►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment Meeting - 09-10-2020
Description
Board of Adjustment Meeting - 09-10-2020
A
A
B
A
C
B
C
B
A
C
B
A
Yes,
so
this
is
board
consideration
of
a
variance
request
to
the
zoning
ordinance
requirements
related
to
the
proposed
improvements
on
the
property
located
at
572
south
lake
drive.
So
what
we're
asking
for
here
is
the
current
is
to
build
a
new
residence
with
the
current
setback
of
the
house.
That
is
there
of
that
foundation,
which
is
18
feet
from
the
property
line,
and
so
he's
just
asking
for
the
to
remain
or
to
keep
that
18
foot
setback
instead
of
the
25.
C
A
C
A
Okay,
so
here's
where
the
the
current
residence
sits
and
then
you
can
see,
there's
18
feet,
but
then
also
south
lake
drive
doesn't
have
sidewalk
or
anything.
So
people
can
utilize
that
right-of-way
or
they
they
do
utilize
the
right-of-way
area
for
parking.
So
he
still
has
30
feet,
which
is
definitely
sufficient
for
a
cars
to
park
there
or
any
vehicle
really.
B
E
A
C
A
B
F
Thank
you
first
of
all
for
hearing
me
out
what
we're
trying
to
do.
What
I'm
trying
to
do
here
is
I
don't?
Oh,
I'm
don
roby,
I'm
the
landowner
at
572,
south
lake
drive.
You
think
I
would
do
with
that
one.
What
we're
trying
to
do
is
we're
going
to
build
a
bigger
house
on
the
lot
we're
moving
the
house.
That's
currently
there
to
another
lot.
However,
I
do
have
a
picture
of
the
house
I'll
hold
it
up,
so
you
all
can
see
it
here.
F
F
Okay,
okay,
I
just
want
to
point
you
I'll
point:
the
fence
out,
if
you
look
at
my
where
I'm
tapping
on
the
paper
there's
a
privacy
fence
on
the
east
side
and
there's
also
privacy
fence
on
the
west
side.
Those
are
my
fences,
those
are
put
in
after
concurrence
with
the
neighbors.
I
didn't
want
to
block
any
views
and
it's
it's
again.
I'm
fortunate.
I
have
good
rapport
with
my
neighbors.
F
If
I,
if
I
move
the
house
close
the
lake,
it's
going
to
start
encroaching
in
their
viewpoints
more
so
the
guy
in
the
east
and
the
guy
in
the
west,
the
house
we're
going
to
put
up
is
going
to
be.
I've
got
about
sixteen
hundred
and
thirty
square
feet
of
living
space,
plus
the
garage
on
the
current
structure.
F
What
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
doing.
This
is
not
the
exact
house,
and
these
are
not
to
scale
but
the
style
of
house
we're
trying
to
get
it
to
fit.
The
lot.
If
you
look
at
what's
been
going
on
at
the
lake,
is
they're
building
on
every
square
inch,
that's
possible
and
they're
running
the
walls
up
really
high.
So
what
it's
been
doing
is
it's:
it's
just
basically
encroaching
on
the
air
space
and
it's
blocking
sunlight.
What
have
you
the
way
this
house
is
designed?
F
This
lot
has
a
rip,
wrap
and
stone
on
the
shoreline.
I
bet
at
least
20
feet
of
my
lot
is
beyond
the
grass.
The
the
previous
owner
did
a
real
nice
job
with
it,
but
he
ate
up
a
lot
of
the
property
there.
So
my
point
is
this:
I
don't
want
to
take
up
any
more
grass
than
I
have
to,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
encroach
on
the
neighbor's
viewpoint.
F
Our
views
and
I've
talked
with
both
neighbors
and
they,
you
know
they're
all
on
board,
with
the
design,
okay
and
and
and
I've
told
them
the
type
of
house
we're
going
to
build.
So
if
you
look
at
this
type
of
design,
that's
what
it'll
look
like
versus
what
you
see
a
lot
of
more
they're,
just
going
walls
straight
up
two
stories,
and
I
think
it
encroaches
on
the
view
and
the
airspace
there
so
we're
trying
to
fit
the
house
to
the
lot.
E
F
F
30
feet,
I
I
should
have
enough
room
to
do
that,
but
that's
when
others
I
don't
want
to
go
too
far.
I'm
going
to
add
you
know,
roughly
I
don't
know
20
or
30
percent,
to
the
square
footage
on
the
ground
floor,
where
I'm
going
to
pick
up
space
is
the
half
story
up
top.
I
pick
up
two
small
bedrooms
up
there,
so
I
don't
want
to
move
it
any
closer
to
the
lake
and
I
have
to
for
my
own
benefit,
but
for
the
benefit
of
the
neighbors
too.
A
A
E
E
E
F
F
A
B
Is
the
right
of
way
and
the
lack
of
of
boulevard
and
the
closeness
that
predates
a
lot
of
the
the
rules
at
the
lake
is
something
to
consider
in
relation
to
this.
This
one
does
have,
though,
18
feet
to
the
property
line,
and
then
it
looks
like
an
additional
amount.
Is
a
total
of
32
feet
to
the
roadway.
F
B
C
A
G
G
G
Okay,
so
this
my
comment
is
that
I
will
be
supporting
this
request
for
the
same
reasons
that
I
supported
the
request
that
the
krause
is
made
in
august.
I
think
the
right-of-way
is
is
excessive
for
the
amount
of
traffic
and
what
we're
going
to
be
needing
down
the
road.
The
purpose
the
parking
of
vehicles
would
still
be
off
of
the
road
surface,
with
several
feet
to
spare,
and
I'm
just
being
consistent
with
previous
decisions.
I've
made
before
in
this
regard
at
the
lake.
D
B
A
A
We,
what
is
being
requested
is
to
construct
an
addition
onto
an
existing
shop
building
that
is
conforming
to
the
required
setbacks
for
the
c3
highway
commercial
district.
The
proposed
edition
will
encroach
in
the
required
20
foot
yard
setback,
side,
yard
setback.
The
applicant
is
asking
for
a
variance
to
allow
for
the
sideyard
setback
for
the
proposed
edition
to
be
14.3
feet.
A
A
B
B
A
D
G
C
G
C
B
A
A
So
for
the
for
outdoor
storage
of
off-street
parking,
maybe
in
the
side
yard
next
to
a
garage
provided
any
items
stored,
does
not
protrude
beyond
the
front
of
the
adjacent
structure.
If
the
side
yard
is
adjacent
to
an
alley,
there,
then
at
any
item,
stored
or
parked
must
be
set
back,
not
less
than
four
feet
from
the
alley.
If
the
property
does
not
have
a
garage,
the
owner
occupant
may
choose
a
side
yard
for
permanent
outdoor
storage
off
street
parking
and
then
so
that
reference
that
stacy
had
made.
That
is,
for
an
actual
parking
lot.
A
A
C
B
B
B
A
E
C
A
B
A
A
G
C
A
B
C
B
C
A
A
The
owner
is
seeking
the
conditional
use
to
construct
a
caretaker's
residence.
An
existing
shop
pharmaceuticals
are
delivered
to
the
shop
regularly
and
caretakers,
and
a
caretaker
would
assist
with
providing
security
for
the
contents
of
the
building,
and
this
is
also
in
an
area
where
we
just
recently
granted
this
same
request.
C
A
A
This
is
more
so
just
to
make
sure
that
life
safety
is
being
protected
and
that
we
know
that
somebody
is
living
there
if
you
know
for
them
for
most
situations
where,
if
a
fire
were
to
happen,
that
the
fire
department
would
be
aware
of
it,
so
they
were
looking
for
somebody
they
because
you
typically,
they
probably
wouldn't
expect
to
find
somebody
in
a
shop
like
that.
So
then
they
would
weigh
out
their
op.
You
know.
C
C
Is
he
looking
at
one
caretaker's
residence
in
there
or
two
primarily
just
one
right
now,
the
one
on
the
south
end?
It's
two
levels.
The
bottom
bottom
main
floor
is
office.
Upstairs
we've
got
kind
of
a
break
room
for
my
drivers,
but
then,
on
the
other
side,
I
have
basically
the
same
dimensions,
same
setup
on
the
other
side,
that's
just
kind
of
wasted
space
and
I've
got
an
assistant
manager
kind
of
looking
for
a
place
to
live,
and
this
would
help
me
having
someone
overnight
when
pharmaceuticals
are
present.
C
F
C
C
E
E
C
G
A
G
E
A
B
A
D
I
have
one
typically
when
we
do
conditional
uses
in
areas
where
there
isn't
sidewalks
or
other
infrastructure.
We
either
require
them,
or
we
request
the
the
applicant
to
sign
a
waiver,
the
right
to
protest.
If
sidewalks
ever
to
go
in
they'll
pay
their
portion.
Do
you
have
any
issues
with
that?
No,
no.
I
got
no
problem
with
that.
G
B
I
guess
just
a
just
a
comment
from
my
perspective
on
the
sidewalk
issue.
You
know,
while
it
is
something
that
has
traditionally
been
optional
in
an
industrial
area
and
something
that
we
haven't
firmly
approached
as
we
talk
about
mixed-use
districts
and
caretakers
and
residential
use,
that's
ancillary
to
some
of
these
developments,
not
just
this
one
here,
that's
something
that
we
should
probably
consider
at
a
holistic
level
of
whether
or
not
sidewalks
and
walkability
becomes
a
more
stringent
factor.
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
E
D
A
D
A
A
Yes,
thank
you
blake.
This
is
board
consideration
of
a
conditional
use
request
in
the
a1
and
our
force.
A1
is
the
agricultural
and
r4
is
the
manufactured
homes
district
on
property
generally
located
south
of
12th
avenue,
southwest
on
block
2,
strom,
seth
3rd
edition
and
in
the
northwest
corridor
section
1,
1,
116
north
range,
53,
west
and
the
owner
is
reagan.
A
In
this
area,
so
the
site
plan
that
he
provided.
It
fits
in
this
kind
of
mode
area
where
the
wetlands
are
not,
and
it
will
be,
the
the
access
will
come
off
of
12th
avenue,
and
I
believe
that
utilities
are
already
in
place.
That
and
bert,
with
utilities
had
mentioned
that
it
was
it's
been
in
for
quite
a
while
that
it
was
set
up
for
a
mobile
home
park
in
the
past
and
then
now
he's
asking
for
to
do
a
campground.
Instead,.
B
A
A
C
H
We
were
planning
on
stripping
black
dirt
and
putting
a
good
measure
of
crushed
concrete
in
initially
and
seeking
good
compaction
and
then
we'll
be
doing
a
chip
coat
likely
over
the
top,
we're
still
in
the
formative
stages
as
to
that.
But
a
lot
of
that
has
to
do
with
austin
engineering's
recommendation
as
to
how
to
build
the
road
so.
G
A
G
G
H
Yeah,
our
intention
is
to
make
this
a.
I
mean
our
parks
are
done
well,
and
this
is
not
going
to
be
done
on
the
cheap
there's
going
to
have
to
be
lamp
posts.
It's
all
going
to
be
under
some
one
owner
utilities
for
water
sewer
electrical,
so
we'll
we'll
be
in
charge
of
paying
the
bills
so
to
speak,
and
we
want
it
to
be
safe
and
it
to
be
very
attractive.
B
C
G
G
H
No
we've
I
had
to
do
one
in
thief:
river
falls
through
the
state
of
minnesota
one
time
25
years
ago,
and
they
didn't
tell
us
how
big
to
build
it
or
the
design
standards,
and
eventually
I
just
put
a
culvert
above
ground,
a
square
culvert
above
ground
with
caps
on
each
end.
But
even
today
they
don't
have
design
standards
and
they
don't
have
square
footage
requirements.
So
it's
really.
F
D
H
It's
just
a
difficult,
it's
a
difficult
thing
to
size,
because
as
soon
as
we
build
one,
it
won't
be
big
enough,
it
won't
be
accessible,
kids
will
get
into
it
and
make
a
mess,
and
it
just
becomes
so
problematic.
Now,
if
it's
required,
we'll,
certainly
entertain
it,
but
we
we're
not
going
to
just
do
it
because
we've
I've
worked
through
this
before
and
it
it
ends
up
opening
up.
So
many
other
issues
that
people
a
lot
of
times.
Don't
think
about
is
what
design
standards
wind
loads.
Who
has
the
master
key?
F
H
We
have
a
full-time
manager
that
works
for
us
and
has
for
years
we
run
a
tight
ship.
We
have,
we
adhered
very
strictly
to
the
the
crime
free
zone
and
I
think
your
police
department
would
probably
attest
to
the
fact
that
the
fewest
calls.
I
I'm
hedging
here,
because
I
don't
know
that
for
certain,
but
I
know
by
the
number
of
calls
and
the
good
rapport
we
have
with
the
police
we're
not
going
to
let
a
bunch
of
anything
happen
here
that
isn't
reflecting
us
personally.
H
B
G
H
D
A
A
B
A
B
E
This
is
mayor,
sarah,
karen,
I
just
wanted
to
share
my
screen
here
and
just
to
point
out
their
private
streets
in
this
neighborhood
12th
avenue,
which
is
paved
with
curb
and
gutter
and
19th
street.
Those
are
both
private
streets
and
actually
at
some
point
we
knew
about
that
potential
for
a
road
there,
because
we're
showing
it
as
a
private
street.
E
I
I
don't
think
it
exists,
but
this
is
our
just
an
excerpt
from
our
private
street
map
that
we
have-
and
I
don't
know
if
I
didn't
even
know
if
brandy
knew
we
had
this
map,
but
just
because
it
shows
on
there
as
a
street,
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that
that's
a
public
street,
so
a
12th
avenue
is
actually
a
private
street
and
that's
the
one
that's
along
here.
This
is
a
private
street
and
then
they'd
be
extending
another
private
street.
E
H
Campground
yeah,
the
intention
is
not
to
have
a
revolving
door,
we
we
seek
to
have
simplicity,
and
so
we're
actually
going
to
have
a
a
minimum
stay
requirement
so
that
we
don't
have
people
just
coming
in
from
a
koa
campground
situation.
So
because
we
want
minimal
and
long-term
stays.
We
want
simplicity
and
we
can.
We
can
enforce
that
by
saying
you
have
to
be
here
for
at
least
two
weeks
or,
and
we
haven't
determined
what
the
optimal
point
is
on
that.
But
we
don't
want
an
overnight
situation.
H
This
all
this
all
started
just
for
because
there
was
this
was
designed
to
be
a
mobile
home
park
and
the
infrastructure
is
put
in,
but
the
after
we
purchased
it.
The
the
lines
were
changed
as
to
the
100-year
line,
100-year
flood,
and
so
you
know
we
basically
have
invested
the
infrastructure,
but
then
the
lines
were
changed
and
it
just
happens,
but
because
we
can't
build
something
permanent
on
it.
I
was
visiting
with
a
couple
of
the
other
park
owners,
one
of
them
who
has
a
rv
park,
and
he
said
he
turns
down.
H
I
think
if
we,
because
it's
really
beautiful
it's
a
beautiful
area
and
it's
quiet
and
it'll
stay
that
way.
So
it
was
trying
to
tear
lemons
out
of
lemon
or
eliminate
our
lemons,
because
it's
we're
paying
taxes
on
it.
We
have
the
infrastructure,
but
we
can't
do
anything
with
it
and
this
would
serve
that
purpose.
C
Yeah
and
I
I
totally
understand
the
vision
of
it-
I
I
think
mike
the
only
concern
just
to
voice
it
for
record
is
just
western
north
dakota
I've
been
out
there
for
business
and
I've
seen
what
some
of
those
seasonal
rv
parks
look
like,
and
they
can
get
rough
at
times
if
they're
not
maintained
well.
So,
if
there's
on
tight
management,
that
obviously
helps,
but
just
for
the
record
just
know
from
experience
what
they
can
turn.
B
H
Well,
if
you
have
a
moment,
pull
up
country
view
and
mallard
cove
mobile
home
park
and
click
on
the
website
and
do
the
virtual
tour
of
our
parks.
I
think
you'll
understand
quickly
that
we
don't
put
up
with
anything
that's
going
to
be
disrespectful
to
our
neighborhood
or
the
value
of
our
property.
So
we
are
not
going
to
make
this
in
anything
other
than
something
to
be
proud
of.
C
B
H
Like
yeah,
yep
and
again,
rod
was
out
this
afternoon.
He
left
a
little
early.
I
know
he's
got
some
of
the
drawings
done.
I
was
hoping
to
bring
them
today,
but
I
guess
it
was.
I
didn't
want
to
spend
an
inordinate
amount
of
money
with
rod
until
I
knew
that
we
were
able
to
move
forward
with
this,
but
he
has
done
some
conceptuals
and
he
was
identifying
the
utilities
because
they
did
originally
the
design
work
and
that's
the
beginning
of
it.
G
H
You
know
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to,
and
again
this
comes
back
to
austin
engineering's
design.
What
is
fits
within
you
know,
what's
tasteful,
what's
what
makes
sense,
but
I
would
we're
estimating
around
30
units
at
max,
but
it
might
be
35.
I
haven't
seen
his
final.
Some
of
the
shapes
of
the
lots,
don't
really
allow
for
two
into
one.
B
G
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
request
for
a
campground,
with
the
one
caveat
that,
while
they
do
own
both
properties
right
now
and
the
the
can,
and
then
the
manufacturer
home
court
to
the
north
is
is,
is
done
in
immaculate
condition.
The
existing
double
wide.
That's
going
to
be
immediately
a
budding
lot,
one!
H
We
we've
built
a
couple
of
nice
long
fences,
but
I
personally
have
built
them
in
spots
where,
frankly,
we
were
shielding
them
from
scrap
yards
on
the
north
and
in
places
that
just
you
know
the
neighbors
were
not
very
clean.
They
just
had
junk
piled
everywhere,
so
we've
built
those
in
the
past.
I
see
exactly
the
same.
What
you're
seeing
and
I,
when
you
when
we
get
down
to
it?
H
I
don't
think
there's
any
problem
with
that,
because
we
want
this,
these
homeowners
to
be
happy,
and
so
I
I
don't
see
that
not
not
only
a
problem.
I
think
it
would
probably
be
something
we
would
end
up
doing
regardless
because
it
just
we
want
this
to
be.
You
know
these
people
have
invested
a
lot
of
money
and
they've
been
there
for
years.
Last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
put
them
next
to
something
that
they
think
is
not
right.
H
So
we
would,
we
will
likely
do
something,
but
I
would
guess
it
will
be
like
the
offense
and
it's
they're
not
cheap,
but
it's
the
only
solution
that
planting
trees,
I
mean,
although
we
we're
going
to
plant
another
130
trees.
Next,
next
spring,
with
the
help
of
the
city,
we
plant
trees
all
the
time
I
did
48
this
year,
but
I
think
in
this
case
it's
probably
gonna
have
to
be
offense,
and
I
agree
with
you.