►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting & Exec Session - 04-06-20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
D
C
A
E
B
A
Yeah
all
right,
thank
you.
I
I
want
to
tell
the
public
that
City
Hall
is
open,
for
we
have
several
public
hearings
and
it's
City
Hall
is
open.
We
might
be
ushering
you
in
one
at
a
time
to
testify,
but
if
you
would
like
to
testify
in
our
public
hearings,
you
still
can
do
that
either
by
coming
in
person
or
by
calling
in,
and
you
can
see
on
our
agenda
the
callin
information
online.
A
A
F
The
first
one
is
I'd
like
to
just
make
it
known
that
the
park
direct
board
on
their
March
thirty
first
meeting
we
had
do
the
official
ban
of
fireworks
at
City
Park.
This
was
strictly
due
out
of
safety.
The
concerns
have
grown
over
the
years.
We've
had
about
three
meetings
on
this
and
the
final
result
was.
Our
determination
was
to
ban
the
fireworks
effective
for
this
season.
Why
worth
2020
that
we
will
not
allow
favorites
as
City
Park?
We
still
will
allow
them
action
and
forsberg.
F
So
that's
that's
one
thing:
I
just
learned
to
make
the
council
aware
of
as
long
as
the
along
with
the
public
that
the
board
a
determined
to
make
that
official
policy,
but
then,
within
the
park,
correct,
Department
number
two
was
within
the
social
media.
We've
had
a
lot
of
questions
we
well
in
my
cutting
out.
Are
you?
Okay?
Okay?
As
far
as
the
Prairie
lakes
Wellness
Center,
we
have
heard
a
lot
of
feedback,
a
lot
of
comments
wondering
what
we
are
doing
moving
forward
with
our
monthly
memberships.
At
that
meeting,
the
board
did
acknowledge
very.
G
F
G
B
I'm
currently
tested
I'm,
currently
testing
I,
see
Facebook
is
live,
it
was
having
a
few
issues
right
away,
just
went
live
and
YouTube
was
working
about
five
minutes
ago
when
I
tested
I
have
not
tried
to
call
in
to
the
meeting
with
the
with
the
public
phone
number,
though
so
I
can
do
that
test
right
now.
Okay,.
F
H
I
A
F
A
F
C
F
B
G
A
C
F
Thank
you,
mayor
Thank,
You,
mayor
members
of
council
and
also
within
public
input
for
members
of
the
community
that
are
watching
and
will
watch
later.
What
I
want
to
do,
for
the
public's
perspective
is
to
reiterate
what
the
Park
Board
took
some
action
on
on
131st
this
year
at
their
March
board
meeting
a
couple
items
that
may
or
may
not
get
traditional
media
coverage
due
to
the
covet
crisis.
What
I
wanted
to
do
is
make
the
public
aware
that
the
Park
direct
board
did
go
ahead
after
lengthy
meetings.
F
I
would
say
we're
about
three
meetings
in,
but
at
the
in
event,
we
did
determine
that
stokes
thomas
lake
city
park,
the
city
park
and
brown
and
adjacent
beach
area
will
be
banning
the
discharge
of
fireworks
effective
this
year,
so
that
will
no
longer
be
an
actor
tunity
for
the
public
to
discharge
them.
We
still
will
allow
Jackson
Park
as
well
as
forsberg
Park
for
those
discharge
of
fireworks
due
to
safety
concerns
and
the
ongoing
I.
F
Just
it's
got
to
a
point
that
out
of
safety
that
the
park
board
did
determine
to
ban
fireworks
at
City
Park
effective
this
season.
So
that's
one
thing:
I
want
to
make
sure
the
council
was
aware
of
as
long
as
well
as
the
public
second
action
that
I
feel
necessary
to
make
the
public
aware,
as
well
as
the
council,
through
social
media
questions.
As
far
as
pretty
Lakes
Wellness
Center,
we
do
charge
a
monthly
payment
for
the
services
of
three
lakes
on
the
center.
F
At
that
March
meeting
again
March
31st,
the
board
did
determined
that,
since
we
are
not
providing
a
product
that
it
was
wrong
for
us
to
be
taking
that
ACH
payment
so
effective,
basically
April
1st,
we
will
withhold
any
kind
of
draws
on
your
account
until
the
time
we
are
open.
In
addition
to
that,
we
will
make
sure
that
the
number
of
days
we
are
closed.
We
will
not
draw
to
that
point,
so
just
letting
the
public
know
that
you
know
we
have
heard
you
have
heard
it.
We
understand
that.
C
F
Kind
of
a
difficult
decision,
but
we
did
not
provide
the
product,
so
we
are
holding
that
on
drying
off
your
memberships
off
the
bank
accounts.
So
if
any
questions
regarding
that
go
ahead
and
call
the
really
so
on
the
center
at
eight
eight,
two
six
two
five
o
or
the
park
erecting
office
at
eight
eight,
two,
six,
two
six.
So
so
those
are
just
a
few
updates
for
our
meaning
that
we
get
on
31st.
Now
let
anybody
and
then
I
know
our
liaison
is
Bruce
Bueller
wind
bill.
Howard
was.
C
F
Perfectly
all
right,
Thank
You
mayor
we
did
as
under
new
business.
Our
board
looked
at
really
the
open
ground
of
our
facilities,
that's
from
Park
systems
to
softball
complexes,
to
skate
parks
to
golf
courses.
What
we
determined
is
if
we
can
do
social
distancing
and
we
can
modify
a
few
rules.
We
want
to
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
that.
We
want
the
public
to
have
an
opportunity
to
get
out
of
the
house
and
do
recreational
activities.
So
we
looked
at
each
and
every
facility
we
looked
at.
Can
we
provide
social
distancing?
F
Can
we
ensure
that
there's
no
communal
contact,
those
that
we
felt
we
couldn't
accomplish
that
we
closed
those
will
be
our
our
playgrounds,
our
basketball
courts?
Our
you
know
our
disc
golf
courses,
things
that
we
know
that
people
will
be
touching
similar
items.
The
board
went
ahead
and
closed,
so
reverting
back
to
the
golf
course.
Our
PGA
professional
Levi,
Pearson
and
myself
work
together
along
with
the
SDG,
a
which
South
Dakota
Golf
Course
Association.
We
do
have
things
in
place
that
prevent
to
ensure
that
we
do
not
have
like
touching
examples.
F
Are
one
person
per
card?
Do
not
touch
the
flag
high
range
balls,
we
put
the
balls
out
there
for
you.
We
disinfect
those
balls
after
every
time.
We
pick
them
up,
so
we
are
doing
everything
we
can
to
ensure
that
people
can
still
enjoy
getting
outside
enjoying
the
game
of
golf
and
we
feel
people
you
follow
what
we've
set
out
as
guidelines.
We
can
keep
the
golf
course
open
and
I
will
reiterate.
You
know
people
do
not
follow
our
protocol.
F
That
may
change,
but
as
of
now
it
is,
it
is
an
outlet
for
people
sitting
at
home
being
something
to
do
so.
The
board
felt
that
if,
if
they
follow
the
protocol
of
one
person
per
cars
not
going
in
the
clubhouse
or
anything
other
than
using
the
restroom
different
things
like
that,
so
the
protocols
are
in
place
and
we
encourage
people
to
get
out.
But
again
they
need
to
follow
the
guidelines
set
forth.
F
So
I
guess
mayor,
that's
that's
kind
of
where
the
board
stands
at
this
point
subject
to
change,
as
everything
else
is:
we've
got
multiple.
You
know
and
I
will
I'll
push
I'll
push
our
trail
system.
I'll
push
our
green
spaces.
I've
gone
go
out
and
enjoy
it,
but
unfortunately
things
that
have
communal
touching.
We
just
had
to
shut
down
Thank.
D
This
is
Glenn
bill.
Haller
I'd
like
to
have
you
point
out,
because
I
asked
a
question
with
the
some
of
the
email
exchanges
going
on
late
last
week.
The
other
court
of
other
courses
around
the
state
as
as
I
understood
that,
with
the
exception
of
I,
think
maybe
here
on
virtually
every
other
bigger
community
in
the
state,
is
going
forward
with
their
golf
courses
being
open.
As
is
Prairie
winds
down.
D
The
road
also
is
planning
to
open
or
has
open,
so
we're
not
we're
not
alone
in
our
decision
to
do
this
again
everybody's
trying
to
follow
the
same
standards
that
you
laid
out,
but
we're
not
alone
in
doing
this,
but
it
is
generating
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
pushback
from
people
in
the
community
that
are
questioning
what
the
wisdom,
keeping
the
golf
course
open.
Yeah.
F
It
is,
and
thank
you
for
that
question
when
it's
you
know
when
we
did
the
research,
we
did
dr.
all
class
one
communities
in
addition
to
our
our
adjacent
courses.
What
we
found
is
the
communities
of
Clark
and
Clear
Lake
were
not
opening,
but
every
other
class
one
community
was
opening
with
the
same
similar
guidelines
we
had
and
the
SDG
eight
followed
by
USGA,
which
is
the
National
Organization
for
golf
courses.
F
You
know,
has
done
the
research,
as
gave
us
the
tools
to
say
here's,
what
makes
it
safe
so
anyway,
and
we
understand
councilman
Bill
Howard
that
there
is
going
to
be
some
feed.
You
know
some
some
comments,
but
if
people
true,
we
adhere
to
those
guidelines,
it
is
a
safe
activity
without
the
risk
of
spread
and
granted
that
people
do
not
follow
that
changes
that
and
we're
gonna,
then
we're
gonna
relook
at
at
keeping
that
facility
open.
So
all
right.
A
E
T
cages
quick
question
with
the
not
touching
the
flag
did
we
get
the
I
know
I
think
I'd
heard
that
the
pga
basically
set
it
up,
so
the
ball
doesn't
go
down
in
the
hole
it
just
basically
taps
the
flag
and
then
goes
away,
and
that
counts
as
in
is
that
what
we're
doing
with
that
to
avoid
touching
the
same
spot?
It.
F
F
Will
remain
closed.
That
was
one
of
the
things
the
board
determined.
Is
that
shared
equipment?
What
it
is
this
we
can
do
social
distancing,
but
if
you're
gonna
play
catch,
you
got
the
same
ball
the
same
glove.
So
you
throw
that
ball
back
and
forth.
You
are
transmitting
anything
on
your
hands
to
the
next
person,
so
that's
an
example
no
different
than
than
our
outdoor
basketball
courts
during
the
same
basketball.
So
at
this
point
we
are
keeping
your
complexes
closed.
I
F
C
F
Best
scenario
would
be
to
identify
those
people
and
have
a
course
of
action.
Like
you
said,
you
know,
nullify
the
membership
or
asked
to
remove
and
and
that's
something
we're
trying
to
do
we're
trying
to
put
people
on
the
course
and
identify
people
that
that
are
just
not
adhering
to
the
rules.
That's
an
option
and
something
I
could
bring
within
a
committee
under
Neath
the
parking
wrap
laws,
but
I'd
rather
see
that
than
ruin
and
ruin
the
opportunity.
Everybody
so
great
question
and
something
that
we
can
pursue
and
talk
about.
I
would.
J
Just
like
to
go
on
the
record
and
urge
you
and
the
golf
committee
to
to
implement
rules
to
that
effect,
because
it
would
only
take
probably
just
two
or
three
violations
for
it
to
be
shut
down,
and
that's
that
would
just
be
a
shame
for
everyone
else
who
is
going
to
adhere
by
the
rules,
and
so
I
would
very
much
like
that
to
put
a
little
bit
of
meat
behind
the
enforcement.
So
as
far
a
golfer
there's,
nothing
that
they
fear
worse
than
to
losing
their
golfing
privileges.
J
F
And
you're
you're
completely
correct
and
that's
our
hope:
it's
not
to
punish
the
whole
community
and-
and
you
know
the
mayor
and
I'll-
give
kudos
to
the
mayor.
I'll
tell
you
what
we've
we've
had
a
lot
of
meetings,
a
lot
of
tough
decisions.
You
know
we
we
our
quality
of
life
and
to
make
these
these
decisions,
such
as
dog
parks
and
and
disc
golf
courses
and
in
public.
But
it's
been
difficult,
but
you
know
we're
doing
everything
we
can
and
again
a
kudos
to
the
mayor.
F
You
know
to
have
the
courage
to
work
with
me
to
make
these
tough
calls
and
are
they
always
popular
no,
but
we're
doing
everything
we
can
to
provide
opportunities
when
we
can
and
and
suspend
them.
When
we
know
it's
that's
right
to
do
that.
I
appreciate
the
support
we
get
from
the
council,
so
alright.
A
D
C
I
A
E
A
K
Yeah
mayor
that'd
be
great
if
I
could
see
this
one
up
for
both
brandy
and
Luke.
The
comprehensive
land
use
plans
been
a
work
in
progress
to
get
an
update
to
it
here
for
2020,
we've
been
partnering
with
the
folks
at
the
first
district,
our
consultants
to
help
us
with
work
along
these
lines.
The
is
a
council
knows
that
the
comp
plan
is
a
strong
steering
document
for
a
community.
It
helps
drive
the
different
types
of
land
use.
As
our
city
expands.
K
It
helps
drive
the
changes
of
land
use
in
the
current
city
limits
and
also
touches
on
other
items
such
as
collector
and
arterial,
Street
extensions
and
things
of
that
nature
that
relates
to
the
expansion,
girls
or
community.
So
Luke
Muller
has
been
doing
a
great
job
working
with
us
going
through
our
comp
plan,
providing
some
updates
to
it
and
gave
a
brief
presentation
at
the
last
Planning
Commission
meeting,
and
it
was
suggested
a
meeting
that
this
be
approved
by
the
council,
Planning,
Commission
and
I
believe
voted
unanimously
for
that.
K
H
C
H
Right,
let's
try
that
again
sure
sure
again
there
we
go
here
comes,
think,
that's
why
I
wanted
to
get
that
set.
So
we
use
that
background
photo
for
the
rest
of
meeting
anytime.
We
bounce
off
of
the
presentation
itself.
That
was
just
a
mute
check,
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
could
see
me
we
have
as
as
Heath
mentioned,
a
lot
of
work
has
gone
into
over
the
last
honestly
six
years,
the
city
of
Watertown
has
been
going
through
the
process
of
updating
the
comprehensive
land-use
plans.
H
You've
made
a
great
introduction
as
to
what
the
plan
is,
what
it's
there
for
and
what
it
lays
out
for
future
growth.
I
have
a
lot
of
slides
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
them
all.
I.
Don't
want
you
to
think
that
that
is
a
to
downplay.
How
important
this
document
is.
I'd
rather
answer
questions,
though,
than
just
talk
at
you,
probably
the
most
important
thing
that
may
not
have
been
mentioned
on
that
front
end.
This
does
provide
a
clear
direction
for
the
future.
That
is
true.
It
is
also
statutory
statutorily
required.
H
If
you
are
going
to
have
this
warning,
your
zoning
ordinance
has
to
reflect
items
that
are
within
a
land-use
plan
that
has
been
prove
by
the
city.
Given
that
the
last
land-use
plan,
the
bulk
plan,
was
adopted
in
2004,
with
some
minor
amendments
in
O,
7
and
2010.
It
was
definitely
time
for
the
update
because,
as
you
make
decisions,
regardless
of
how
small
they
seem
to
be,
you
had
an
amendment
to
it,
loaning
district
or
a
small
permit
being
issued.
Those
are
small
changes
that
you
have
to
update
within
your
plan.
H
I
do
want
to
make
one
point.
This
is,
of
course,
a
policy
document.
It
is
meant
to
be
used
one
to
guide
the
community
through
future
development,
but
too
it
is
expected.
This
thing's,
going
to
change
and
I
know
that
this
has
been
pointed
out
many
times.
If
we
do
have
items
that
are
needed
to
be
changed,
there's
a
process
to
go
through
to
amend
it
and
I
know.
It
sounds
odd
to
be
talking
about
amending
a
document
that
we're
sitting
here
adopting
now,
but
that's
how
a
living
breathing
document
works.
H
K
Luke,
can
I
interject
one
question
off
the
bat
sure
I
know
that
Brandi
and
I
have
been
communication
with
you
and
the
Planning
Commission
made
a
couple
of
housekeeping
item
Corrections
in
a
document
I'm
not
sure
if
those
have
been
100%
completed
yet,
but
if
not
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
that
those
would
be
forthcoming.
Based
on
the
comments
from
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
H
That's
correct
anything
I'm,
sorry,
if
I'm
I'm
on
there
anything
that
was
recommended.
As
far
as
approval
say,
there
was
a
portion
of
a
map
or
something
that
doesn't
show
City
Limits
here
or
or
there.
That
would
be
basically
a
scriveners
error
as
far
as
just
making
sure
that
it
shows
what
is
accurate,
I
know.
I
did
update
a
lot
of
those
Maps.
There
were
a
couple
of
parts
in
there
where
they
were
just
studying
at
shot
in
time.
H
A
H
D
A
couple-
and
I
think
you
may
have
already
amsterdam
loop-
I
guess
I
want
to
kind
of
emphasize
it.
You
said
that
this
does
address
inner
inner
city
as
well
as
a
issues
as
suggestions
as
well
as
growth
on
the
you
know
outside
of
the
city.
Is
that
a
fair
statement?
Again?
I
know
you
said
that
look.
I
guess
I'd
like
to
hear
you
just
answer
that
again.
H
Yes,
I
that's
probably
well
not
probably
that's
what
took
a
lot
of
the
time.
In
all
honesty,
this
update
was
unique
from
probably
about
the
last
three
decades
worth
of
updates
in
that
we've
really
focused
in
the
past
on
growth
outside
the
community,
but,
as
you
pointed
out,
councilman
bill,
how
is
that
this
study
showing
the
map
it's
on
this
screen
attempts
to
provide
some
direction
for
planning
commission
decisions,
perhaps
even
updates
to
zoning
regulations
within
the
existing
part
of
the
city
as
well?
So,
yes,
we
did
look
internally
as
well
and.
D
H
That
is
correct.
That
was
one
of
the
amendments
that
was
recommended
by
the
Planning
Commission
at
the
last
meeting,
and
yet
it
does
there
were
it
turned
out.
There
were
only
there
were
only
neighborhood
of
five
pages
that
really
needed
to
be
updated.
We
needed
to
show
that
map
and
then
otherwise,
for
what
it's
worth
it
for
anyone
that
was
maybe
nervous
about
boy.
The
timing
of
this.
It
really
wasn't
that
far
out
of
line
as
far
as
what
was
already
in
the
land-use
plan
anyway,
it.
H
Really
the
map
to
ratchet
down
where
exactly
that
area
was
so.
Thankfully
it
wasn't
that
far
out
of
line
as
to
what
we
already
had,
because
we
again
we've
been
working
on
this
and
a
lot
of
what
the
Planning
Commission
is
thinking
already
in
this
document.
So
that
district
wasn't
much
of
a
surprise
as
we
went
through
this.
D
H
The
engineering
design
standards
would
stand
alone,
that's
kind
of
like
a
another
9/16
Center
inch
in
that
tool
box.
Remember
the
Land
Use
Plan
is
kind
of
the
idea.
I
always
describe
that
from
a
from
a
larger
level
kind
of
your
policy
document.
We
want
to
develop
in
our
community
in
this
sort
of
use
and
in
an
orderly
fashion,
whereas
that
it
those
design
standards
really.
C
H
D
One
last
question:
I'm
not
sure
who
to
address
this.
To
you
know:
I
followed
this
through
the
Planning
Commission
meetings,
at
least
some.
What
I
know
an
awful
lot
of
time
went
into
this,
but
I
also
know
that
here
month
or
two
ago
there
was
an
email
that
went
out
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
joint
planning.
Commission,
City
Council
meeting
was
being
considered
that
that,
obviously
did
not
did
not
happen.
D
H
A
good
question
I
will
answer
part
of
it
is
yes,
the
staff
wants
to
jump
in
go
ahead,
but
there
are
recommended
road
sections
for
some
of
our
primary
streets,
like
collectors
and
arterioles.
If
I
remember
right
within
within
here,
it
is
not
in
reference
to
say
base
course
thickness
that
sort
of
thing
but
more
about
street
widths
and
where
we'd
want
to
see
how
we'd
want
to
see
our
sidewalks
and
and
that
sort
of
thing
now
keep
in
mind.
These
are
pop.
H
This
is
a
policy
document,
whereas
the
specific
standards
would
come
back
into
the
administrative.
Sorry,
the
design
standards
that
you
have
adopted,
so
specifics
would
go
down
to
their.
What
we
have
is
recommended
or
preferred
design
standard
types
with
regards
to
street,
with
and
kind
of
how
boulevard
the
boulevard
property
line
the
property
line
would
look
so
it's
recommended.
Then
you
get
into
the
yeah,
well
design,
standards,
Luke.
L
K
L
H
It's
alright
I
might
make
one
more
comment
on
just
kind
of
the
forethought
that
went
into
this
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
staff
on
this,
which
I
think
was
a
good
idea,
and
that
is
that
it
was
identified
going
through
the
process
that
that
it
may
have
been
construed
in
our
previous
land-use
plan
that
we're
really
trying
to
steer
people
toward
one
form
of
street
with
how
it
looks.
Boulevard,
2,
Boulevard
and
really
what
this
went
to
was
a
preferred
section
and
as
far
as
what
it
was.
H
So
it
didn't
want
to
be
as
rigid
within
the
Land
Use
Plan
and
went
to
more
of
a
record.
Yet
I
said,
preferred
recommended
Street
section
to
acknowledge
the
fact
that
even
within
our
existing
community
arterials,
for
example,
look
different.
Just
take
highway
212
from
west
to
east
all
the
way
into
end
they're.
Not
all
going
to
look
the
same
wanting
to
have
that
flexibility
within
there
as
long
as
they
serve
their
purpose.
B
D
L
Anyone
else
I
just
wanted
to
make
one
note
just
Luke
and
you
going
through
the
comp
plan
and
I
know:
I
went
through
it
since
you
went
back
and
added
Valley
View.
Specifically,
we
talked
about
that
at
plan.
Commission.
There
are
still
some
of
those
maps
for
the
future
land-use
that
I
noticed
that
you're
showing
the
streets,
but
just
that,
if
you
could
include
that
that
is
annexed
in
and
to
keep
that
consistent.
The
major
street
plan
I
saw
that
it
was
included
as
a
next.
L
A
A
A
I
I
did
not
open
the
public
hearing.
It
I
will
do
that
right
now
and
I'll.
Ask
if
there's
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak
about
this,
it's
hard
when
you're
looking
at
an
empty
room,
we
do
have
a
few
people
that
have
called
in.
Would
anyone
like
to
speak
at
the
public
hearing?
If
so,
please
state
your
name.
A
D
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Item
B
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-10,
a
zoning
text,
amendment
to
title
21
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown,
creating
chapter
twenty
one
point:
two:
nine
Cl
Lake
commercial
district
and
amending
chapters;
21
point:
oh
five
of
districts
chapter!
Twenty-One
point
one:
zero:
summary
of
district
regulations
and
chapter
twenty
one
point:
nine
definitions.
K
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
This
is
the
second
reading
for
this
zoning
amendment,
the
zoning
text
amendment
and
essentially,
what
this
is
doing.
Is
it
creating
a
new
zoning
district
for
the
community?
One
that's
been
somewhat
long-awaited
here.
It's
a
commercial
lake
district
that
is
specific
to
property.
That's
within
a
certain
proximity
to
both
Lake
Camp
Eska
and
Lake
fella
Kimball
there's
been
a
committee
that
has
put
forth
a
strong
effort
and
making
recommendations
to
what
a
zone
and
that's
proximity
to
the
lake
should
include
for
allowable
uses
as
well
as
initial
uses.
K
K
There
are
those
are
pretty
much
the
highlights.
It
really
boiled
down
to
the
fact
that
the
commercial
property
that
is
around
the
lake
or
could
could
be
around
the
lake
in
the
future
I
would
want
to
exercise
the
ability
to
I've
allowed
or
permitted
uses
without
constantly
going
to
the
Board
of
Adjustment
for
conditional
uses
and
I.
Think
that
the
list
that
the
committee's
made
up
in
the
list
of
the
Planning
Commission
has
checked
off
on
is
a
pretty
good
list
of
relateable
uses
to
lake
activities.
K
The
brandy
can
touch
on
how
the
the
boundary
that
we've
created
for
this
district
around
each
lake
and
how
that
was
derived
I
just
would
not
want
to
make
one
more
last
point
here
that
this
is
not
retroactive
to
the
current
commercially
zoned
properties.
This
will
be
we're
creating
a
zone
that
any
land
in
this
zone
can
apply
to
be
zoned
as
we're
not
blanketly
declaring
every
land
property
piece
of
parcel
in
this
zone
as
commercial
lake
property.
K
It
is
something
that
has
to
be
applied
for
and
granted,
and
the
existing
commercial
zones
will
not
be
affected.
They
would
have
to
apply
to
be
rezoned
to
this
lake
commercial
zone,
urban
planner
brandy,
hands
on
the
line
or
in
the
in
the
meeting
room
with
us
here
tonight
and
her
I
could
help
answer
any
questions.
Anybody
might
have
all.
L
A
A
E
L
This
does
so
that's
actually
a
section
within
this
ordinance
and
you'll
see
there
that
there's
design
standards
proposed
for
structures
and
then
specifically,
when
they're
adjacent
to
a
residentially
zoned
property
just
to
ensure
if
there
are
commercial
properties
going
next
door
to
an
existing
house
or
residents
that
it
is
aesthetically
pleasing.
And
it's
not
intruding
on
on
kind
of
the
aesthetics
of
what
the
neighborhood
looks
like
today.
As
the
lake
is
currently
built
out
and
ninety
percent
or
ninety
percent
plus
of
residential.
A
I
L
D
Brandy
or
Heath
guess
what
I
emphasize
that
you
said
if
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
understood
that
this
does
not
automatically
change
the
zoning
of
someone
that
is
currently
within
our
within
city
borders.
It's
a
matter
if
they
wouldn't
need
to
apply
for
that
change
in
zoning
versus
it
being
retroactive
or
automatically
becoming
part
of
the
CL
district,
correct
yep,
secondly,
that
okay.
Secondly,
this
also
includes
areas
outside
of
our
current
city
limits
correct.
D
L
When
we
established
these
boundaries
for
Lake,
Camp,
Asaka
and
Lake
Pelican,
we
did
not
go
through
the
joint
jurisdiction
ordinance
or
have
to
amend
anything
with
that.
This
would
just
be
more
of
a
suggestion
for
if
these
properties
were
annexed,
if
they
were
appropriate
to
be
zoned
as
CL,
so
that
would
just
be
the
process
of
when
they
would
Anna.
Okay.
D
So
we're
not
adding
or
taking
away
anything
as
far
as
the
counties
right
so
what
these
properties
and
then,
as
as
we
may
annex
in
again,
that
does
not
automatically
make
those
annexed
areas.
Part
of
the
CL
dis,
big,
you
know,
would
have
to
go
through
the
the
process
of
applying
to
become
CL
district
yep.
L
A
When
we've
created
new
zones
in
the
past,
the
city
has
initiated
the
change
of
the
zone,
and
so
if
the
City
Council
wished
to
change
the
zoning,
we
can
go
through
that
process
where
so,
it's
like
a
property
owner
petitions,
the
City
Council,
can
do
that
as
well,
so
or
and
I
think
the
Planning
Commission
can
as
well
so
there's
other
options
than
just
the
actual
landowner
requesting
it.
And
if
there
are
no
more
questions,
I'll
ask
for
a
roll
call
vote.
G
B
L
A
E
G
Thank
You
mayor,
as
the
mayor
said,
the
ordinance
you
have
in
front
of
you
is
the
second
reading
of
emergency
ordinance
20-1
for
that
provided
for
the
closure
or
curtailing
of
certain
business
practices
in
the
community
to
slow
or
prevent
the
further
spread
of
kovat
19
in
the
community.
The
teeth
of
the
ordinance,
the
meat
of
the
ordinance
I
guess,
is
identical
to
what
the
council
passed
at
the
special
meeting
on
March
23rd,
but
some
recitals
have
been
added
and
modified
to
reflect
the
current
status.
G
And,
frankly,
it's
not
current,
because
since
I
drafted
this,
there
been
additional
cases
in
our
County
and
surrounding
counties
as
well
as
some
additional
specifics
about
the
nature
of
the
disease.
The
purpose
of
social
distancing
and
the
impetus
and
Authority
for
these
social
distancing
measures
finally
have
added
the
expiration
date,
which
comes
from
our
Home
Rule
Charter.
G
Our
home
world
charter
provides
that
emergency
ordinances
automatically
expires
60
days
after
passage,
and
so
I
did
add
that
expiration
date
and
that
doesn't
limit
the
council's
ability
to
extend
beyond
that
date
or
to
to
a
to
basically
pass
a
resolution.
Ending
the
effectiveness
of
the
ordinance
in
the
interim,
but
I've
also
added
language.
There
you'll
see
that
provides
that
the
council
will
be
taking
this
up
as
a
discussion
item
as
an
agenda
item
at
every
intervening.
A
J
G
J
D
G
Well,
there
can
certainly
be
challenges
to
this
ordinance
and
I.
Think
that's
been
made
pretty
clear,
but
essentially
what
the
council
did
on
March
23rd
was
enact
an
emergency
ordinance
consistent
with
our
our
city
charters.
However,
our
city
charter
is
inconsistent
with
state
law,
which
provides
that
there
must
be
a
first
and
second
reading
of
an
ordinance
prior
to
an
ordinance
as
effectiveness.
D
D
G
Well,
I
haven't
seen
if
she's
actually
released
that
executive
order
yet,
but
the
language
that
sticks
out
in
my
mind,
if
she's,
if
all
that's
being
changes
literally
just,
should
she'll,
be
there
there's
a
particular
clause
that
talks
about
suspension
or
modification
of
business
practices
if
their
business
is
unable
to
meet
the
CDC
guidelines.
So
if
it
still
says
modification,
then
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
day
we
still
be
going
above
and
beyond
what
the
governor
is
calling
for.
G
D
G
E
Just
gonna
defer
back
to
another
statement
that
the
governor
had
made
and
yes
I'm
paraphrasing
a
little
bit
but
she's
pretty
much
put
out
that
she's,
leaving
it
in
the
hands
of
municipalities
to
police
themselves
that
Sioux
Falls
isn't
the
same
as
LinkedIn,
and
it's
different
for
every
community
and
she's
trying
to
allow
those
decisions
to
be
made.
That
way
so
again,
I
think
we're
falling
within
that
to
our
standard,
and
we
continue
to
see
cases
going
up
in
the
county.
So
it
just
makes
sense
that
we
stay
the
course
with
it.
For
now,.
A
Right
and
the
governor
did
say
that
everyone
over
the
age
of
65
and
with
a
list
of
health
issues
that
make
them
vulnerable
in
Lincoln
and
Minnehaha
County
should
stay
home
and
we
haven't
done
that.
That's
a
separate
order,
but
I
do
think
that
that's
a
very
good
idea,
not
that
we're
gonna
slap
anyone
with
a
fine
or
a
ticket
if
they're
over
the
age
of
65
and
they're
out
and
about
or
if
they
have
diabetes
and
they're
out
and
about
but
I
think
it's
a
really
good
idea
to
recognize.
D
I
guess
I'll
add
this
at
this
point.
Is
we're
talking
about
business
closures
mayor's?
You
know,
I
I'm,
part
of
the
unified
command
structure
that
meets
every
day
at
at
one.
With
a
you
know,
a
teams
meeting
and
today
I
specifically
asked
a
question
and
there's
a
in
that
group.
There's
probably
what
half
a
dozen
health
care
professionals
that
are
part
of
that
and
I
specifically
had
specifically
asked
the
question.
D
Specifically
asked
the
question
and
it
because
I
said
we're:
have
a
council
meeting
tonight
it's
going
to
come
to
the
top
of
your
discussion.
I'm
the
one
bring
it
up.
Obviously,
is
that
our
weed
are
we
finding
the
right
balance
between
safety
and
commerce
and
then
I
asked
I
said?
Are
there,
for
example?
Are
there
specifically
businesses
out
there
that
you
would
that
you,
as
health
care
professionals,
would
address
or
recommend
we
closed,
and
there
was
silence?
No
one
weighed
in
that
saying?
Oh,
we
should
definitely
be
closing
this
this
or
this.
D
The
only
comment
that
was
made
by
one
of
the
doctors
on
the
call
is
that
about
the
golf
course
so
to
me:
I
guess,
I'll
just
editorialize
or
make
the
comment
that
I
feel
like
maybe
we've
taken
the
right
step
at
this
time.
You
know:
we've
gotten
some
pushback,
both
ways
that
we've
went
gone
too
far.
Others
think
we
should
go
further,
but
maybe
where
we've
reached
the
right
step
at
this
point,
with
what
we've
done
with
this
ordinance
I
I.
A
Want
to
add,
though,
the
comment
from
the
doctor
about
the
golf
course
wasn't
that
we
should
be
changing
what
we
were
doing
it
was
that
he's
getting
lots
of
comments
about
the
golf
course,
and
so
that's
why
I'm
glad
that
the
park
director
was
able
to
explain
the
reasoning
behind
the
actions
that
the
park
board
took
Don.
Were
you
trying
to
signal?
A
B
F
E
It's
a
difficult
time
for
all
business
owners
facing
these
restrictions.
I
mean
god
bless
all
the
people
that
are
doing
everything
they
can
and
trying
to
keep
the
doors
open.
Thank
goodness,
we
have
a
lot
of
relief.
That's
in
place
for
this
situation,
specifically
because
of
these
frustrations
that
we're
facing,
but
I
would
just
continue
that
we
stay
the
course
with
it.
As
we
see
higher
levels
doing
similar
things,
it's
probably
appropriate
that
we
continue
to
do
that.
There's
no
point
putting
lives
at
risk
for
that
small
to
payoff.
C
A
C
A
B
So
I
think,
with
almost
as
many
cases
in
the
20
to
29
year
old,
as
there
are
in
the
you
know,
50
to
59
60
is
69
is
actually
lower
than
any
of
those
other
groups.
So
my
point
is:
is
that
kids
should
not
be
our
young
people
should
not
be
seeing
this,
as
you
know,
spring
break
on
steroids
or
any
of
those
kind
of
things,
but
to
keep
in
mind
that
we
can
keep
us
at
home.
B
Those
of
us
who
fit
those
categories,
but
if
you
go
out
and
you
can
bring
that
home
to
me
or
to
your
grandparents
or
to
your
parents,
I-
think
that
that
we
really
all
just
need
to
mind
our
own
find
ourselves.
You
don't
take
care
of
our
own
responsibilities
because,
like
I
said,
our
numbers
certainly
don't
show
that
the
elderly
are
the
ones
that
are
getting
the
cases
at
a
higher
rate
than
somebody
who
is
younger.
It's
quite
the
opposite
right.
A
Thank
You,
councilman,
Monty
and
I
would
like
to
add
that
it
it
isn't
the
vulnerable
population
that
has
the
majority
of
the
cases,
but
they
are
the
ones
that
suffer
and
end
up
in
the
hospital
and
well.
Three
of
the
four
deaths
recorded
in
our
state
were
in
that
population.
So
the
serious
complications
from
the
illness
come
in
the
people
in
the
vulnerable
categories
and
and
we
need
to
protect
them.
Everybody
has
a
part
in
that.
Even
the
strong
and
healthy
have
a
part
in
protecting
that
there.
A
Kerry.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
d.
First,
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-12
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota
for
a
portion
of
River
Ridge
Estates
from
a1
agricultural
district
to
r1
single-family
residential
district.
So
this
is
first
reading.
So
there's
no
action,
but
thank
you
I'll,
ask
city
engineer:
he
thought
I
to
introduce
it
and
then
I
know
Brandy's
here
so
go
ahead.
Heath.
K
Thank
You
mayor.
Yes,
this
is
first
reading
and
it's
a
simple
rezone
for
a
continuation
of
development
in
the
River
Ridge
subdivision
up
on
the
north
end
of
town,
great
coffee,
stirrer,
acting
as
the
agents
for
high
plains
development
has
made
this
request
to
rezone
a
portion
of
their
land
from
egg
to
r1f
it
its
subsequent
second
reading.
The
applicable
plat
would
also
be
coming
forth
for
processing
to
create
the
Lots
within
this
area.
They
do
have
a
current,
updated
preliminary
plan
and
from
staffs
review
and
planning
commission
recommendations.
L
If
you
can
see
my
mouse,
that
will
be
the
park
and
so
that
meets
all
of
the
requirements
for
the
five
percent
of
land
for
the
entire
development
of
River,
Ridge
Estates
and
then
so.
The
stipulation
was
that
they
had
to
plat
and
dedicate
this
part
with
their
next
subdivision,
which
is
this
one.
This
will
be
River
Ridge,
7th
edition.
How.
L
No,
but
on
the
preliminary
plan
there's
actually
it
will
Cheyenne
Lane
will
extend
and
that's
something
I
guess
when
we're
looking
when
they're
looking
at
planning
this
that,
if
we
could
have
them,
extend
an
access,
easement
or
or
we
can
look
deeper
into
that-
why
wouldn't
they
just
build
the
road?
Well,
I,
I!
Think
it's
just
because
of
where
they're
at
they
weren't.
Looking
at
extending
it
up
there
at
this
point,
but
yeah
I
mean
good
good
point.
We
can
look
into
that.
Okay,.
L
L
E
E
L
C
L
L
So
you'll
see
that
that
area
all
is
annexed
and
zone
within
the
city
limits
its
eggs.
So
then
they're
rezoning
the
portion
that
they're
looking
at
developing,
so
only
this
portion,
which
will
be
the
detention
pond
area
and
also
part
of
their
park,
dedication
that
will
be
touching
26,
but
no
public,
right-of-way
or
lots
well.
At
this
time,.
B
C
G
L
So
that
northern
area-
that's
where
a
detention
pond
will
be
it
it's
designed,
so
that
it
would
be
dry
within
24
hours,
but
the
then
all
of
this
area
is
just
open
green
space,
so
that
was
a
lot
of
discussion
was
had
with
the
park
board
on.
If
we
would
accept
the
detention
pond
with
the
park
dedication,
it
is
it's
a
minimal
area
we
do
also,
except
in
residential
developments.
We
do
usually
accept
the
detention
ponds
and
the
city
maintains
them
in
residentially
zoned
areas.
Now
commercial
and
industrial
developments
are
different.
K
L
K
C
L
L
L
A
L
I
believe
that
that
was
this
was
the
next
park
that
they
wanted
to
develop
and
I
know
that
I
can't
say
I
know,
I,
believe
they
were
thinking
a
playground
area
for
sure
and
then
I
don't
know
as
far
as
if
they
were
going
to
develop
it
as
ball
fields
or
or
what.
But
that
would
be
a
decision
that
the
park
board
would
have
to
make
in
the
future.
B
A
A
And
so
this
doesn't
have
a
road
next
to
it,
which
would
have
to
be
built
along
with
this
they're,
not
planning
to
build
these
Lots
or
these
Lots
up
here
until
phase
3,
which
is
eight
years
from
now
so
I'm
sure
they'd
rather
not
build
the
road,
but
I
mean
how
are
you
gonna
get
to
the
park?
Councilman
Hoyer.
Did
you
want
to
make
a
comment?
Well.
E
I
guess
it's
kind
of
twofold
one
again
looking
at
the
future
of
this,
it
looks
like
it'd,
be
pretty
simple:
to
eliminate
some
of
these
cul-de-sacs
in
this
plan,
just
by
I
get
that
it
kind
of
limits,
those
three
random
locks
that
are
towards
the
bottom
there,
but
there's
probably
a
creative
solution
there
and
then
just
looking
at
if
you
could
pull
up
the
other
image.
What's
the
floodplain
look
like
on
this.
L
A
K
He's
here
just
to
chime
in
on
counts
monoi
as
concerns
which
are
valid
ones,
that
Brandi
indicated
something
we've
been
keeping
tabs
on
recently
with
some
flats
and
actually
have
them
modified
some
proposed
class
to
get
rid
of
the
cul-de-sac,
but
these
these
physical
constraints
that
were
pulling
out.
These
are
exactly
what
we
look
at,
what
the
developers
and
their
engineers
yep.
If
those
physical
constraints
necessity
to
cul-de-sac.
K
You
know
we're
obviously
a
little
more
amicable
to
bring
those
forward
in
the
preliminary
plans
for
their
approval
and
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
note
too,
that
you
know
this.
These
have
been
vetted
off
in
our
part
of
their
currently
approved
preliminary
plan.
Just
so
that
you
know
that
point
was
clear
to
everybody
as
well,
not
that
we
still
can't
have
these
discussions,
but
this
is
part
of
an
approved
preliminary
plan.
At
this
point
right.
E
L
E
E
K
G
E
K
Part
of
that
I
think
is
due
to
the
parklands
of
configuration
that
they
settled
on
that
Street
would
obviously
cut
through
that
area
and
eliminate
some
of
that
parkland
dedication,
so
I
think
that
it
really
comes
down
to
all
the
ways
that
we
can
lay
these
out
and
enable
developers
consultant
and
lay
these
out,
and
then
our
ability
to
you
know
check
off
these
kind
of
concerns
during
those
preliminary
plan
phases.
Definitely
some
will
keep
tabs
on
sure.
L
And
I
might
add
just
with
the
mayor's
point,
and
it
was
a
that's-
a
good
catch
and
I
apologize
for
not
being
actually
more
well-versed
in
the
plat
that
they'll
eventually
come
with
and
I'd
pull
it
up.
If
I
had
the
access
to
it,
but
they.
When
we
look
at
the
plat,
we
can
still
have
them
dedicate
this
right-of-way
and
they
might
already
be
proposing
that.
But
that
would
be
something
that
we
would
review
at
the
time
of
planning
and
then
the
you
guys
would
have
to
approve
the
plat
as
well
as
the
development
agreement.
A
And
and
with
our
system
the
the
City
Council
does
not
ever
see
the
preliminary
plan
and
I
mean
that
has
come
up
again
and
again,
where
the
plan
Commission
approves
it,
and
then
it
sits
for
a
long
time
and
a
plat
comes
up
and
like
flat,
does
require
council
approval.
The
preliminary
plan
does
not,
and
so
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
you
know,
should
have
the
liaison
watching
these
meetings.
When
we
approve
preliminary
plans,
councilman
Radomski
did
you
want
to
win
yeah.
I
A
C
I
A
I
K
I
Another
question
I
would
have
to
that
would
also
be
how
deep
do
we
anticipate
this
water
getting
a
token
like
ankle,
deep
water,
knee
deep,
how
deep
with
this
water
be,
and,
secondly,
is
there
any
kind
of
a
requirement
with
having
kids
in
that
same
area
that
there
would
have
to
be
a
fence
around
that
retention.
Pond.
K
K
L
The
pond
area
wasn't
necessarily
included
in
the
total
required
dedicated
area
sense,
but
and
I
know
that
that
was
a
huge
discussion
with
the
park
board
and
it
was
something
that
we
didn't
want.
We
didn't
want
to
be
dedicating
the
park
area.
That
was
also
the
detention
pond
where
it
was
unusable
for
people
anyway,
so
or
if
it,
if
it
would
be
unusable.
So
I
will
clarify
that
for
the
second
reading.
A
K
One
more
point
sure
brandy
just
to
note
I
know
it's
been
a
good
ansel
of
months
now,
but
it
seems
the
extension
of
Cheyenne
Lane
or
a
temporary
extension
of
it
may
have
been
discussed
during
the
prelim
plan
phase
that
something
we
might
want
to
go
back
and
look
on
to
to
see
what
notes
were
made
or
comments
were
made.
As
far
as
access
to
that
parkland.
A
There
are
no
other
questions,
we'll
move
on
item
e
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-13,
approving
and
establishing
the
zoning
designation
of
r1
single-family
residential
district,
which,
upon
annexation,
will
be
known
as
tract
one
of
Carter,
Trail
Edition
and
again.
This
is
another
first
reading,
so
no
action,
and
he
would
you
tell
us
about
this.
Please.
K
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
This
is
part
of
an
exciting
project
to
complete
another
segment
of
our
recreational
trail
around
Lake
Camp
Eska.
This
is
off
the
southeasterly
portion
of
the
lake,
where
the
Carters
have
graciously
dedicated
some
land
to
the
city,
donated
some
land
of
the
city
or
the
extension
of
our
bike.
Trail
we've
been
working
with
our
consultant
idg
and
designing
that
bike
path.
K
Through
this
area,
we've
been
working
with
the
Carters
themselves
and
some
adjacent
property
owners
to
the
west
of
their
land
and
have
been
working
pretty
extensively
on
this
project
to
get
it
brought
forward
and
to
finally
get
the
trail
built
on
it.
This
is
the
next
step,
that's
in
the
city's
control,
as
far
as
annexing
and
zoning,
this
property,
and
so
that's
why
we
have
the
first
reading
before
council
here
tonight
as
part
of
establishing
the
zoning
through
what
we
do
an
accident
and
that
would
become
a
zoning
designation
of
r1b.
K
As
far
as
the
pathway
goes,
we're
hopeful
to
bid
that
here
yet
this
spring
and
have
it
constructed
here
through
the
summer.
That's
the
plan
that
we
penally
have
in
place
with
TK
on
the
park
and
rec
department
and
our
consultants
we're
on
board
with
that
plan
and
moving
forward
in
that
manner
and
I
know
mat
rope.
Our
city
attorney
has
been
diligently
helping
us
to
it's
a
lot
of
background
work
with
property
discussions
and
easements,
and
things
of
that
nature
that
are
all
connected
to
this.
C
K
K
Then
here's
the
map
of
the
area
give
you
some
context
of
where
we're
talking
about.
As
you
have
Southlake
drive
that
curves
around
as
westerly
off
of
60th
Street
Northwest
curves
south-
and
this
is
the
area
of
the
Carter
property
that
we're
talking
about
annexing
and
zoning,
that
the
pathway
will
be
extended
through
and
then
connect
out
back
onto
South,
Lake,
Drive
and
run
adjacent
to
south
click,
driving
right
away.
B
K
So
that
would
be
all
part
of
this
same
phase
of
the
construction
project
and
we've
got
that
all
designed
as
well,
along
with
the
segment
on
the
Carters
property.
So
this
whole
run
along
with
everything
in
South
Lake
Drive.
It
will
continue
South
Office
map
I
apologize.
We
didn't
have
the
full
extent
here,
but
that
pathway
will
continued
south
and
then
westerly
to
a
point.
A
D
What's
the
road
like
a
south
wing
driver
or
for
fourth
Avenue
I
guess
by
the
water
tower,
but
that
that
wasn't
in
the
card,
so
we
were
forced
to
cross
over
to
South,
Lake
Drive
and
then
cross
over
again
when
we
get
to
the
water
tower.
So
it
kind
of
added
a
little
few
wrinkles
to
the
project.
Last
summer.
A
A
K
That
is
correct,
Council
bill,
our
that
you
know
we
had
to
work
within
the
constraints
that
the
landowners
would
allow
us
to
there's
a
lot
of
collaboration
here
with
several
different
landowners,
and
that
was
the
not
the
optimal
amount
that
route
that
we
would
have
preferred.
But
it
is
the
optimal
route
that
we
were
able
to
settle
on
with
the
adjacent
landowners.
L
A
A
There
probably
won't
be
a
certified
letter
for
a
product.
That's
not
a
legal
requirement
for
a
project
in
the
right-of-way
to
be
if
the
city
does
not,
as
a
general
rule
issue,
certified
letters
to
all
adjacent
property
owners
for
all
of
our
projects,
so
I
mean,
as
it
would
be
nice
for
the
engineering
department
to
let
the
public
that
are
adjacent
to
it
know
that
the
project
is
happening.
C
A
A
K
Yes,
thank
you.
Muir
I
will
share
my
screen
again
here.
This
is
a
lot
of
a
simple
plat,
but
unfortunately
we
weren't
able
to
do
it.
Administrative
Lee,
it
does
only
include
two
lots
up
in
the
Dakota
commons
area,
we've
been
creating
last
seven
and
last
25.
These
lots
are
in
conformance
with
their
expired
preliminary
plan,
but
given
that
the
circumstances
that
this
these
are
the
last
two
remaining
Lots,
this
development
has
that
they
can
plan
and
it
does
include
a
portion
right
away
that
we
need
to
be
platted
as
well.
K
And
here's
some
math
to
give
you
some
context
where
we're
at
here's
third
Avenue
Northeast,
the
Dakota
Commons
PUD
zoned
subdivision
to
look
out
here
on
the
east
really
extensive
decimal.
This
yellow
line
is
the
currently
annexed
and
zone
property
line.
That's
within
the
city
limits,
and
these
are
the
last
two
lots
that
are
part
of
their
preliminary
plan
that
could
be
plaited.
A
All
right
do
we
have
some
questions.
This
is
a
little
bit
unusual
and
that
all
the
infrastructures
already
built,
and
we
don't
really
know
why
they
didn't
take
all
of
it
when
they
went
forward,
not
really
sure,
but
we
do
know
that
they
aren't
compliant
with
the
stormwater
regs,
and
so
any
more
planning
of
new
rights-of-way
should
be
following
our
ordinance,
and
that
was
really
a
debate
on
this
one.
Should
we
let
them
plant
two
more
lots,
or
should
we
enforce
right
now
so.
A
L
To
add
to
I'll
share
the
GIS,
so
you'll
see
that
the
discovery
map
proposed
by
FEMA
also
is
showing
that
some
of
this
area
within
Dakota
Commons
will
be
within
the
100-year
floodplain,
so
in
zone
AE.
So
it'll
be
very
important
that
when
they
come
forward
with
future
development
that
they
are
going
to
be
re,
looking
at
all
their
hydraulic
analysis
and
then
implementing
the
necessary
measures,
and
so
the
also
they
are
zone.
Dakota
Commons
is
a
PUD,
a
Planned
Unit
development.
E
L
A
Matter
of
fact,
we
get
calls
it
usually
every
spring.
I,
don't
know
if
we
got
any
this
spring,
but
I've
answered
those
calls
many
years
with
folks
that
live
on,
that
little
cul-de-sac
see
the
water
rising
and
coming
close
to
their
house,
and
they
are
nervous
and
if
you
pull
the
map,
so
you
can
see
further
south
Brande.
L
So,
with
this
being
the
discovered
the
initial
discovery
map,
then
we
should
be
getting
updated
Maps
later
this
summer,
and
then
that
will
it
won't,
the
proposed
floodplain
won't
grow,
it
might
lessen,
but
it's
just
this
is
initially
so
now
how
we're
directing
developers
or
property
owners.
Anybody
who
has
questions
about
any
of
these
areas
that
are
potentially
impacted.
L
We're
letting
them
know
that
this
could
be
in
to
effect
it's
just
not
regulatory
right
now,
but
it's
something
that
people
should
be
aware
of,
so
that
they
can
make
whatever
decisions
they
want
going
forward,
that
it
might
be
proactive
to
implement
what
we
require
for
floodplain
management.
If
you
know
if
they
would
build
their
house
up
for
their
lowest
finished,
floor
would
be
higher
than
they
were
initially
planning
for
and.
C
C
A
Right.
Thank
you
item.
G
is
authorization
for
the
Nantz
officer
to
allow
interest-only
payments
to
be
made
on
all
outstanding
urban
renewal
loans
for
six
months,
April
through
September
of
2020
and
proceed
to
notify
loan
holders
and
appropriate
banks
lien
and
a
second
by
our
and
Kristen.
Would
you
please
explain
this
one.
C
Yes,
Thank
You
mayor
I
received
a
request
from
one
of
our
current
urban
renew
her
vow
renewal
loan
holders
asking
basically
asking
for
interest-only
payments
for
the
next
six
months.
It
sounds
like
some
of
the
other
consumer
loans
are
doing
some
similar
thing,
so
it
was
expressed.
It
and
I
said
that
I
would
ask
for
it
to
be
put
on
the
agenda
for
the
council
to
consider
with
council
approval.
I
will
proceed
to
reach
out
to
the
other
loan
holders.
C
A
A
A
A
second
by
Albertson
and
I'll
tell
you
a
little
bit
about
this.
This
came
out
of
the
unified
command
team,
we're
struggling
to
have
enough
gowns
and
we're
able
to
find
these
are
medical
grade
gowns
which
are
difficult
to
acquire.
They
can
be
reused.
The
Raven
Industries
is
able
to
produce
them,
but
we
had
to
act
fast,
a
thousand
of
them
and
actually
tomorrow,
getting
that
check
out
was
kind
of
the
deadline,
and
then
we
miss
our
spot
in
the
queue
and
they're
in
very
high
demand.
A
Right
now,
the
County
Commission
is
considering
splitting
this
cost
with
us,
but
they
haven't
met
yet
to
discuss
it.
So
we
act
on
this.
You
have
to
assume
that
they
vote
no
and
that
we've
shoulder
that
cost
ourselves,
but
it's
really
a
minor
cost.
Considering
what
we're
facing
so
I
entertain
any
questions
there.
D
A
A
Cannot
remember
to
be
honest,
but
I
I
believe
they're
produced
quickly
and
we'll
have
them
in
in
pretty
short
order.
But
if
we
didn't
get
this
done
right
now,
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
line
waiting
and
we'll
go
to
the
back
of
the
line.
So
whatever
their
main.
How
long
does
it
well
sorry
go
ahead,
they're,
making
them
quickly
how.
B
A
And
they
they
are
made
of
a
material
that
can
be
sprayed
down
with
disinfectant
and
hung
dry
and
they're.
It's
it's
not
a
regular
fabric,
but
it's
also
I
mean
they
look
plastic,
I
I,
don't
know!
If
that
picture
got
put
in
the
agenda
packet.
I
don't
see
it,
but
they
they
actually
look
like
a
plastic,
clear
plastic,
gown
I,
don't
think
it's
a
plastic
either
I
think
it's
a
kind
of
a
hybrid
material.
A
True,
we
are
compiling
and
keeping
track
of
all
of
our
expenses
and
we
do
hope
to
get
some
reimbursement
from
the
federal
government
through
the
state
money
that's
being
set
aside
for
the
additional
expenses.
Again,
though,
we
can't
count
on
it
and
we
can
hope
for
it
and
we
will
submit
it
for
reimbursement.
There's
a
really
good
chance.
I
mean
there's
no
way,
we'd
be
doing
this
if
it
weren't
for
the
covet
situation.
A
K
Yeah
Thank
You,
councilman,
Roby
and
I,
don't
Brandy's
still
in
the
room
there,
but
I
have
not
had
any
updates
been
able
to
get
an
update
from
her
in
the
last
two
weeks
on
the
status
of
that
but
I
know,
we've
been
communicating
with
the
developers
engineer
yet
on
their
project
and
I
think
we're
kind
of
waiting
in
the
wings
to
know
for
sure
if
there's
going
to
move
forward
or
not
so
that
we
can
plan
accordingly
for
our
regrading
of
the
cherry
cherry
Creek
drainage
area.
Thank
you.
You're
welcome.
C
A
New
business
I
have
a
couple
of
items.
I
would
like
to
point
out
to
the
public.
There
was
an
emergency
letter
sent
to
the
Federal
Department
of
Transportation
on
behalf
of
Skywest
doing
business
as
United
as
our
essential
air
carrier
and
the
the
individual
park.
Our
excuse
me
Airport
board
members
and
city
council
members
were
shared
with
this
letter
before
I
signed
it,
but
I
did
sign
it
without
direct
authorization
as
an
emergency
measure.
The
the
kovat
situation
is
extremely
hard
on
the
airline
industry,
and
this
is
an
effort.
A
These
are
unprecedented
events
going
on
in
our
nation
right
now
and
and
the
damn
economic
damage
it's
doing
to
companies
is
terrible
and-
and
so
this
is
felt
as
a
something
that
we
would
support
the
Department
of
Transportation,
cutting
them
some
slack
and
paying
them
a
little
bit
more
than
they
were
required
to
by
the
contract.
So
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
that
that
letter
was
mailed
and
another
letter
that
went
out
also
was
shared
with
council
members,
but
it
was
between
meetings,
so
didn't
really
get
on
the
agenda.
A
I
signed
a
letter,
along
with
most
of
the
mayors
of
the
state
of
South
Dakota,
the
various
different
cities
and
all
I
believed
that
all
the
class
one
cities
were
represented,
except
for
Aberdeen
in
urging
the
governor
to
take
some
action
to
declare
make
some
statements
that
would
allow
our
communities
to
take
the
action
that
we
did
and
emergency
ordinance
that
we
passed
in
giving
ourselves
the
ability
to
close
down.
We
have
a
charter
that
enabled
us
to
do
that,
and
a
lot
of
the
other
cities
don't
and
they've.
A
They
feel
like
they
can't
take
action,
but
the
declaration
that
we're
requesting
from
the
governor
would
also
make
us
eligible
as
a
state
for
additional
emergency
funding,
and
so
there's
really
no
harm
and
encouraging
the
governor
to
take
these
actions
and-
and
she
did
mention
that
she
received
a
letter
today
in
her
briefing
and
that
she
had
urged
the
legislature
to
take
some
action
which
they
did
not
on
veto
day.
And
so
she
will
look
into
that.
D
K
K
I,
don't
recall
Tom
ahead,
but
they
are
going
to
be
placing
traffic
head-to-head
on
two
lanes
and
then
they'll
be
shifting
how
those
two
lanes
are
whether
they're
on
the
north
or
the
south
after
the
roadway,
but
they
do
anticipate
to
do
all
the
remaining
work,
which
includes
some
bridge
deck,
sealing
and
then
also
repaving
the
concrete
approaches
to
the
bridge
deck
from
the
permanent
street.
Paving
you
can
tell
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
rough
ride
through
there.
K
It's
because
that
concrete
was
put
in
quickly
in
a
quick
hurry
last
winter
when
they
had
an
open
window
to
do
that,
and
now
some
of
that
they'll
be
going
back
and
taking
out
and
replacing
and
that
ride
will
be
should
be.
It's
smoother
wants
to
get
those
approached
labs
report.
So
you
will.
The
community
will
see
some
shifting
traffic
there,
but
not
to
the
extent
of
the
detour
that
we
had
all
last
summer.
As
of
right
now,
it's
planned
to
keep
the
traffic
head
head.
Think.
D
So
just
heartwarming
as
a
member
of
the
council,
a
member
of
the
community,
is
seeing
people
step
up
when
the
need
is
there
now.
One
comment
I
will
make
on
the
negative
side
is
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
I
mean
we've
got
our
normal
supply
chains
working
by
and
large
for
most
our
retail
stores.
Folks,
there's
no
need
to
be
hoarding
out
there.
You
know
we're
still
seeing
shortages
and
not
able
to
find
various
items.
No
one
need
for
that.
A
E
I'm
just
trying
to
make
sure
yeah
I
know
you
guys
are
crashing
it
and
everything,
but
just
making
sure
we're
looking
ahead
at
all
the
things
that
are
coming
because
I
know
down
south
that's
exactly
what
they're
doing
right
now
is
looking
at.
Where
are
we
gonna
expand?
Where
is
the
National
Guard
potentially
going
to
be
utilized
to
do
just
that,
so
making
sure
we
have
that
contingency
ready
to
go?
If
that
event,
god
forbid
happens
right.
A
H
C
A
Thank
You,
councilman,
Albertson
I
can't
believe
I
didn't
mention
that
what
is
wrong
with
me?
Oh,
my
gosh
for
the
last
couple
of
months,
there's
a
team
of
people
that
have
been
working
very
hard
on
a
contest
to
earn
the
title
of
strongest
town
and
we
actually
won
the
title
and
yes
go
us
it's
we.
We
will
celebrate
later
that
we
will
receive
an
award
at
a
conference
and
also
the
strong
town.
Organizer
will
come
to
Watertown
and
make
a
presentation
and
do
a
little
seminar
here.
So
those
are
exciting
times.
A
A
Watertown
Development
Company
Chris
Chilton,
Julie
Knutson
of
the
Convention
and
Visitors
Bureau
Jan
de
Burgh
from
the
Community
Foundation,
along
with
several
members
in
the
community
foundation,
Greg
Blow,
Kristen,
Henderson,
Liam
:
all
participated,
Matt
Roby
helped
with
it.
Councilman
Hoyer
was
in
the
podcast,
and
you
didn't
see
here
him,
but
Liam
Culhane
was
also
there
with
flashcards
telling
us
what
to
say,
and
we
had
photographs
from
Missy
sinner
lati
folks
supplied
some
photos.
The
it
Patrick
Anderson
provided
some
of
the
photographs
that
were
used
and
my
forgetting
some
people.
The.
A
D
D
E
A
K
Curbs
and
wastewater
division
will
continue
to
follow
up
the
phone
calls
and
they
also
televise
some
of
the
known
video
of
some
of
the
known
problem
areas
to
look
for
suspect
connections.
So
this
one's
community,
mindful
that
we
don't
want
to
be
treating
clean
groundwater
at
the
wastewater
treatment
plant.
We
appreciate
the
client
thank.
A
Okay,
we'd
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
executive
session
pursuant
to
SDC
l1
25
2,
and
we
will
have
an
executive
session
this
evening
in
order
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
contractual
matters,
as
well
as
confidential
financial
information
for
Economic
Development
purposes,
and
we
do
not
expect
to
take
action
when
we
come
out,
but
there
will
likely
be
an
announcement
when
we
come
back
so
I
need
a
got:
a
motion
from
Abilene
to
go
into
executive
session,
a
second
by
Ville
Hauer.
Any
discussion,
roll
call
vote.
Please
Kristen.
A
J
Thank
You
mayor
I
would
just
like
to
inform
the
city
of
Watertown
that
the
ice
committee
met
last
week
and
we
were
asked
on
behalf
of
several
citizens
to
make
a
decision
regarding
the
purchase
of
the
downtown
land
that
has
gone
public
as
the
desired
location
for
ice.
After
much
deliberation,
the
committee
decided
not
to
move
forward
with
the
purchase
at
this
time.
I
want
to
make
it
very
clear
to
the
city
of
Watertown.
This
is
not
a
no
in
regards
to
ice.
We
still
want
ice.
J
We
just
viewed
it
as
in
light
of
today's
economic
situation
and
uncertainty
because
of
the
virus
that
we
did
not
think
it
was
prudent
to
make
such
a
large
expenditure
at
this
time.
I
also
want
to
stress
that
there
is
a
lot
of
good
news
behind
this
there's
still
a
lot
of
movement.
The
committee
has
made
tremendous
progress
when
we
are
ready
to
move
forward
forward
with
ice.
We
are
farther,
along
than
what
we
have
ever
have
been,
and
we
will
be
ready
to
go
faster
once
the
economic
situation
makes
it
possible.