![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lUbc4CE0-W8/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 04-20-2020
Description
City Council Meeting - 04-20-2020
C
A
E
A
F
B
B
B
B
A
Alright,
thank
you
item.
5
is
the
public
comment
period
and
this
is
the
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so.
Please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone
and
just
say
your
last
name,
permission
to
speak
and
I'll
call
on
you
if
it's
related
to
an
agenda
item.
Please
wait
until
that
agenda
item
is
taken
up
by
the
council
and
be
a
better
time
for
it
is
there
anyone
who
would
care
to
speak.
H
B
B
I
C
C
B
C
B
A
Motion
carries
thank
you
item.
Seven
is
the
regular
agenda
item
a
is
tracked,
one
of
Carter
trail
addition
annexation
and
zoning
and
item
one
is
annexation.
Resolution
number
20-20
their
motion,
a
motion
by
lane
and
second
by
and
there
is
I'm
going
to
ask
the
public
works
director
city
engineer
to
give
an
introduction
to
this,
but
this
does
not
have
a
public
hearing,
but
if
anybody
wants
to
speak
regarding
the
annexation
I,
you
just
have
to
let
me
know.
Otherwise
we
will
have
a
public
hearing
for
the
zoning
portion
of
this,
so
he
thought
I.
J
So
we
have
before
you
tonight,
resolution
for
the
annexation,
the
Carter
trail
portion
of
land
out
near
Lake
campus.
This
is
in
relation
to
the
recreational
trail
that
we're
trying
to
accomplish
a
full
loop
eventually
around
the
whole
lake,
and
this
is
kind
of
a
southeasterly
portion
of
that
loop.
This
property
has
been
donated
to
the
city
by
the
Carters
and
it's
currently
outside
city
limits
and
so
needs
to
be
annexed
and
then
subsequently
zoned
for
our
use
of
it
as
a
recreational
trail.
So
we've
glad
to
help
answer
your
questions.
J
G
J
So
you'll
see
we're
out
here
on
near
the
intersection
of
several
roads,
actually
you're
off
the
end
of
Hidden
Valley
Drive,
just
for
context
of
where
we're
at
at
the
south
end
of
Palm
Pesce
Drive,
and
that's
also
where
South
Lake
Drive
curves
around
and
continues
southerly
along
the
west
side
of
this
Carter
property.
This
parcel
here's,
the
Carter
property,
and
this
component,
that
is
hatched,
is
what's
being
proposed.
The
annex
is
owned
as
a
dedication
from
them
to
the
city.
A
B
B
Aye
all
right
man
see
I.
C
B
C
B
C
A
J
I'll
just
specify
that
the
proposed
zoning
for
this
area
that
we're
annexing
is
our
one
single-family
residential
district,
which
is,
of
course
very
accommodating
to
the
area.
That's
what
we
have
to
the
immediate
west
and
the
rest
of
the
area
to
the
east,
of
course
remains
in
the
county.
So
this
was
also
proposed
to
the
Planning
Commission
I
forgot
to
note
that
in
the
last
case,
but
both
were
recommended
unanimously
for
approval
to
the
City
Council,
okay,.
A
J
However,
I
can't
tell
you
two
that
this
is
one
of
the
projects.
That's
in
the
hopper
pending
bids
that
the
mayor
and
myself,
the
finance
officer
would
like
to
communicate
to
the
council
on.
You
know
how
we're
going
to
prioritize
the
continuation
of
some
of
these
projects
and
which
bids
we
do
want
to
continue
with
and
don't
want
to
continue
it,
but
as
of
now,
yes,
this
is
earmark
to
be
bid
and
constructed
yet
in
2020.
Okay,
thank.
A
B
B
C
A
Carried
thank
you
item.
B
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-12
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota
for
a
portion
of
River
Ridge
Estates
from
a1
agricultural
district
to
r1,
single-family
residential
district.
Have
a
motion
by
Helene
and
a
second
by
Radomski
and
I
will
ask
heath
on
I
to
explain
this
one
to.
J
J
This
is
up
in
the
River
Ridge
subdivision
and
in
a
discussion
last
meeting
on
the
first
reading
of
this
rezone,
but
we
talked
about
the
parkland
dedication.
Our
urban
planner
brandy
Anton
was
able
to
confirm
that
the
parkland
dedication
acres
that
are
provided
are
met.
What
was
out
needing
the
detention
pond
area?
I
know
that
was
one
of
the
questions
that
came
up
was
whether
the
detention
pond
area
was
required
as
part
of
the
park
area
and
they
are
able
to
meet
the
park.
Clan
dedication
require
without
the
detention
area.
J
Maximize
that
so
this
is
the
Porsche
and
the
hatch
portion
is
what's
being
rezone
to
r1
from
a1
and
there's
a
series
of
watts
at
they'll
include
upon
Platt
a
subsequent
planning,
this
portion
right
here,
Cheyenne
Lane.
We
talked
about
the
last
reading
on
the
potential
extension
of
that
as
it's
adjacent
to
the
designated
park
area
and
in
discussions
with
the
developer,
it's
been
made
known
to
them
that
we
would
have
interest
in
seeing
this
built.
J
We,
we
staff,
recommend
that
we
address
that
during
the
planning
process
and
the
subsequent
development
agreement
that
would
have
to
accommodate
that
plat
I
can
tell
you
already
there's
been
discussion
on.
You
know
whether
it's
appropriate
to
extend
this
ahead
of
any
park
improvements
being
made,
whether
there
should
be
something
the
development
agreement
that
allows
for
the
extension
of
Cheyenne
Lane
when
or
upon
the
improvement
of
the
park
area
and
things
of
that
nature.
That
I
think
are
good.
J
Talking
points
that
we
need
to
work
through
with
the
developer
and
will
it
be
ironed
out
and
subsequently
approved
by
the
council
at
the
time
of
the
development
agreement,
and
so
I
think
that
we've
got
time
and
and
methods
and
our
procedures
to
account
for
that
extension
of
that
roadway
in
the
future.
Here,
aside
from
that,
I
think
that
helps
address
some
of
the
questions
that
came
up
for
the
first
reading
and
we'd
be
glad
to
help
answer
any
from
tonight.
A
J
Okay,
it's
a
good
question.
The
green
is
actually
just
eggs
owned
land
not
to
be
confused
with
parkland
that
the
actual
parkland
will
be
in
this
red
patch
boundary
here.
So
what
would
happen
is
if
the
council
required
that
an
extension
or
included
in
the
subsequent
clap
they
would
have
to
play
off
this
right
away,
extend
this
roadway.
That
can
all
happen
with
this
being
zoned
egg,
and
it
really
doesn't
affect
anything
at
all,
because
we
can
allow
for
a
street
and
ride
away
in
an
eggs
on
land
adjacent
to
that
residential.
Thank.
C
J
J
C
J
So
that's
not
a
good
question
that
I've
counseled
Bueller
what
what
we
would
want
to
require
a
minimum
for
emergency
response
vehicles
and
just
because
in
a
lot
of
cases,
are
garbage
trucks
and
things
of
that
nature.
We
have
some
dead-end
streets
out
there.
What
we
should
be
requiring
here,
for
it
is
at
least
put
a
temporary
turnaround
in
for
emergency
response
vehicles,
garbage
trucks,
things
of
that
nature
and
the
general
public
that
drives
down
a
dead-end
street
doesn't
have
anywhere
to
turn
around.
J
J
A
A
B
A
B
H
C
A
B
Okay,
Thank
You
mayor:
this
is
the
process
that
we
do
each
year
based
off
of
our
Home
Rule
Charter.
We're
allowed
to
carry
over
certain
capital
expenditures
that
haven't
either
been
completely
built
out
or
started
for
a
three
year
time
frame,
so
I've
listed
each
of
them
by
their
fund.
I
can
go
into
specifics.
B
I
will
say
that
some
of
them
have
already
either
been
purchased
and
delivered,
and
it
was
more
of
a
timing
and
that's
why
we're
carrying
it
over
or
the
project
has
been
bid
in
the
general
fund,
the
ambulance
equipment
and
the
snow
removal.
Removal
equipment
has
all
been
purchased
and
delivered
the
Parks
and
Rec
the
two
roof
repairs
were
part
of
our
old
insurance
claim
and
the
repairs
were
pushed
back.
Just
I
think
due
to
some
timing,
whether,
but
those
are
slated
to
happen
this
year
in
regards
to
the
capital,
improvement
fund,
I.
B
B
B
So
if
there's
any
specific
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
them
during
the
conversations
with
the
departments
if
the
purchase
had
not
been
made
or
the
contract
had
not
started,
and
they
were
waiting
to
do
it
in
2020,
we
did
ask
that
they
have
a
further
conversation
with
the
mayor
and
myself
just
to
kind
of
see
where
we're
at
with
the
2020
budget.
So
thank
you.
G
B
G
B
A
F
H
C
B
A
H
B
K
So
what
you
have
in
front
of
you
here
is
a
resolution
like
the
title
says:
to
transfer
the
urban
renewal
revolving
loan
funds
to
the
WDC
for
administration.
Continuance
of
that
program.
We
were
approached
by
bikers
from
the
WDC
a
while
back.
He
had
been
approached
by
various
folks
in
the
downtown
area
with
their
work
in
the
district
and
asking
about
the
status
of
the
loan
program
and
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
know
the
WDC
has
the
the
capacity
they
have.
This
initiative
focused
on
the
downtown
area.
K
What
so
we
thought
it
would,
it
seems
to
make
sense,
with
the
council's
blessing,
that
the
WDC
be
given
these
funds
to
continue
administering
those
those
loans.
I
think
the
intention,
my
understanding,
listening
Chris
might
be
on
this
call,
so
I
would
ask
him
to
chime
in,
but
I
think.
The
intention
originally
is
to
continue
the
program,
as
is
but
I
I
will
note
that
there
is
language
in
there
that,
basically,
you
know
once
this
money's
gone
and
it's
being
put
under
the
purview
of
the
WDC
Board
of
Directors.
K
A
C
G
K
Well,
I
guess
I'll
chime
in
and
maybe
ask
cristen
to
chime
in
as
well.
I
should
have
mentioned
that
my
overview,
these.
The
current
balance,
is
a
hundred
and
thirty
three
thousand
dollars,
there's
also
a
six
thousand
three
hundred
and
five
dollars
roughly
outstanding.
Okay
and
Kristen
Kristen
and
I
were
discussing
that,
whether
or
not
we
would
just
transfer
their
balance
of
that
once
those
accounts
receivable
are
paid
by
the
end
of
the
year.
K
I
think
that
Kristen
would
prefer
I
think
just
to
clear
out
that
those
dollars
but
I
believe
and
Kristen
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
I
believe
there's
also
some
restricted
funds
like
for
$14,000
or
some
other
amount.
That
also
is
designated
for
renewal
funds
that
would
not
be
affected
by
this
Kristen
yeah.
B
So
the
133,000
192
34
is
the
restricted
cash
that's
been
set
aside
for
the
revolving
urban
renewal
loan.
There's
a
$6,300
balance.
As
Matt
stated,
the
urban
renewal
fund
has
about
fourteen
thousand
dollars
and
other
cash.
We
would
maintain
that
that's
part
of
that
assessment
revenue
that
has
come
in
over
the
past
years,
so
this
really
has
nothing
to
do
with
that.
This
is
only
the
loan
portion
of
the
cash
okay.
G
B
G
So
it
would
be
the
restricted
cash,
as
well
as
the
loan
balance
that
we're
looking
at
moving
over
okay
yeah.
Now
what
about
it?
At
the
last
council
meeting
two
weeks,
oh,
we
talked
about
going
to
interest
only
on
those
loans
for
the
time
being
so
who
was
going
to
administer
that
at
this
after
this
juncture,
I'm
a
development
company
gonna
step
in
now,
and
or
will
that
still
be
our
responsibility
to
pursue
collection
of
the
interest
and
eventually
the
loan
balance
the.
B
I
Thank
You
mayor
question
for
Matt,
just
looking
at
my
definitions
here,
the
urban
renewal
used
in
the
resolution
I'm
wondering
is
that
will
that
coincide
well
with
state
law
I'm,
looking
at
the
definition
of
urban
renewal
in
South,
Dakota,
codified
law,
11,
8,
4
or
11
8?
Where,
specifically
it
says,
urban
renewal
is
used
to
renovate
a
slum
or
a
blighted
area
and
that's
specific
and
state
law
and
I
I.
Don't
think
that
we'd
be
in
any
trouble
doing
our
own
definition
with
this,
but
I.
K
So
thanks
councilman
helene,
the
to
the
little
history
the
urban
renewal
fund
was
the
of
renewal
district
was
set
up
under
state
law
that
you're
referencing
there
and
so
we've
been
operating
under
that
framework.
For,
however
long
the
urban
rural
district
has
been
around,
I
believe
it
was
the
the
80s,
the
the
funds
that
we're
actually
transferring
right.
Now
we
were
a
community
development
block
grant
from
the
federal
government
via
the
states
many
many
years
ago
as
well,
and
so
the
so
that's
the
source
of
those
funds.
I
guess
to
answer
your
question.
K
You
know
once
these
once
were
transfer
these
funds
out
there
they're
no
longer
under
the
purview
of
that
framework,
you're
referencing
in
state
law,
debate
they're
just
being
administered
privately,
but
for
now
at
least
it's
going
to
be
administered
identically
to
what
we
had
been
doing
that
doesn't
have
more
confusing
or
that
in.
Hopefully,
I
shed
some
light
on
your
question.
No.
I
K
K
C
K
Was
hypothetical
I
mean
the
idea?
Is
the
increase
I'll
invite
Krista
jump
in,
but
I
think
the
plan
in
the
short
term
is
to
continue
administering
those
loans
that
there
might
come
a
time
or
if
there's
no
interest
in
those
loans
any
more
from
people,
they
could
decide
that
the
money
could
be
better
spent,
helping
the
downtown
district
in
some
other
way.
Yeah
Chris
here
I
mean.
C
I
could
do
some
reports
to
to
the
council
if
you'd
like
on
applicants
and
different
things,
you
know
really
the
only
thing
that
we
talked
about
and
I
know:
Slater's
been
used
in
the
past,
as
some
people
have
their
storefront
fixed
up,
but
then
asking
to
be
used
for
the
inside
to
redo,
something
so
I
think
just
the
need
of
that
program.
I
don't
see
it.
C
C
It's
like
you
said
it's
not
that
we
don't
I,
don't
trust
you
I
just
thousand
dollars
that
currently
the
city
controls
and
we
transfer
up
to
an
opportunity,
whether
it
be
you
or
someone
else,
I'd
like
to
know
what
happens
of
it.
Yep
and
I
couldn't
report,
as
as
you
wish,
that's,
not
a
problem.
That's.
F
C
I'll
add
one
thing
too
just
to
clarify
on
Dan's
point
too
is
there?
Is
a
subcommittee
set
up
of
downtown
business
owners
that
would
review
applications
and
then
those
would
be
forwarded
on
to
our
forward
board
for
review?
Much
like
we
do
with
the
workforce
development
council.
Now
where
we
have
the
attractive
enhanced
program,
that's
sub
committee
of
different
HR
personnel
throughout
the
city,
and
then
they
make
recommendations
for
that
program.
So
we
do
get
outside
involvement
outside
of
our
board
to
overview.
K
B
F
H
B
C
A
K
K
There
has
been
some
discussion
about
what
that
would
look
like
from
an
enforcement
standpoint
on
the
local
level
and
the
council
were
to
take
the
approach
of
adopting
an
ordinance
that
would
basically
put
into
effect
the
governor's
executive
order
you
could
on
the
local
level
at
some
nuisance
like
language.
That
would
give
us
the
ability
to
to
enforce
that
on
a
local
level.
K
So
if,
for
example,
an
establishment
were
we're
violating
some
sort
of
social,
distancing
or
number
of
patrons
in
an
area
directive
that
the
police
department
could
a
base
a
nuisance,
essentially
where
they
could
go
in
and
and
require
folks
to
disperse.
So
just
some
food
for
thought
there
and
stand
by
for
questions.
Thank.
G
I've
got
a
question:
okay,
you!
You
explained
what
what
would
happen
if
we
were
to
repeal
that
now
we
we
could
do
that
tonight
correct
at
this
bread.
Okay,
let's
say
that
rather
than
let's
say
we
want
to
repeal,
but
we
also
want
to
put
something
else
in
place:
okay,
if
we
repeal
it
the
governor's
Proclamation
automatically
kicks
in.
Let's
say
we
want
to
repeal
it,
but
also
want
to
do
something
else.
What
what
can
we
do
tonight
from
a
administrative
or
from
a
mechanical.
G
K
Yeah
again,
this
kind
of
goes
back
to
what
we
did
at
the
beginning.
Here
we
have
language
in
our
charter
that
allows
implementation
and
adoption
and
effectiveness
essentially
simultaneously
for
emergencies,
but
state
law
also
calls
for
a
second
reading
five
days
between
the
first
and
second
reading,
and
then
it
can
be
effective.
So
I
guess
my
recommendation
would
be
that
that
the
council,
if
they
were
to
choose
to
put
a
new
ordinance
in
effect,
that
they
would
set
a
meeting
another
meeting
in
the
next
day
or
two,
and
we
can
have
that
on
the
agenda.
K
K
A
And
I
was
just
getting
ready
to
look
at
that,
so
a
motion
to
approve
would
be
essentially
approving
what
we
already
have
and
just
basically
reiterating
that's
what
we
think
is
right
and
so
I
think
we
can
have
more
discussion.
We
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
we'll
take
input,
but
so
that
we
have
a
means
to
discuss
this.
We'll
get
a
motion
on
the
floor.
I.
K
I
was
gonna,
think
yeah
I
was
just
gonna
say
that
councilman
and
he
that's
it.
That's
another
I
mean,
of
course,
in
an
ideal,
world
I
could
come
up
with
a
nice,
a
nice
piece
of
paper
or
four
corners,
and
he
could
have
a
present
something
in
the
next
day
or
two,
but
you
could
also
just
take
it
upon
yourselves
at
this
meeting
and
make
motions
to
amend
the
current
ordinance.
That
would
be,
in
effect
immediately.
K
I
A
I
G
I
A
L
I'm
aired
this
is
Liv
Christensen,
requesting
permission
to
speak,
representing
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club.
Okay,
go
ahead,
Liz
hi!
Thank
you
for
your
time,
I'm
representing
a
coalition
of
community
members,
we're
working
together
to
put
some
childcare
options
into
place
to
help
our
emergency
or
our
essential
workers
in
Watertown,
we've
had
a
few
different
meetings
and
most
recently
surveyed
all
of
the
health
care
workers
in
Watertown,
and
there
is
some
need
for
folks.
You
know
to
have
some
help
who
work
in
those
areas.
L
So
my
question
is
with
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
being
one
of
those
locations.
We
are,
you
know,
city-owned
building
and
in
or
close
to
the
public.
Perhaps
I
guess
I
wanted
to
open
it
for
discussion.
If
you
know
there
was
an
option
for
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
to
open
our
facility
for
some
childcare
during
this
co-ed
time.
Even
with
the
current
resolution,
Thank.
A
You
Liz
and
the
it
was
the
resolution
that
closed
the
city,
businesses
and
that's
the
next
item
on
the
agenda,
but
that
oh
okay,
that's
fine
I
mean
you
use
made
a
very
compelling
case
for
that.
But
the
ordinance
isn't
effect
doesn't
affect
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
operation.
Okay,
and
am
I
right
Matt.
M
Thank
you,
Mary
Karen.
We
had
our
unified
command
meeting
this
noon
or
excuse
me
or
one
o'clock,
and
this
was
discussed,
councilman
ville.
How
I
asked
if
I
would
be
willing
to
make
some
comments
on
behalf
of
the
healthcare
community,
and
it
was
discussed
by
all
the
participants
and
asking
for
input
from
the
healthcare
community.
The
healthcare
unified
command,
which
has
representatives
from
prairie,
Lakes,
Hospital,
Brown,
Clinic
and
Sanford
clinic
I,
am
clinic
director
for
Sanford
clinic.
M
But
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
healthcare
community,
there
was
total
agreement
that
it's
too
early
to
open
or
relaxed
restrictions
on
certain
activities
that
are
contrary
to
social
distancing
guidelines
and
how
you
interpret
that
to
each
individual
business
line
is
up
to
you,
but
not
only
is
what
we're
doing
working
as
far
as
social
distancing,
but
we
don't
yet
know
the
implications
of
several
moving
parts.
For
instance,
Easter
was
just
over
a
week
ago.
M
Having
said
that,
I
don't
think
it's
a
bad
idea
to
start
talking
about
what
preventive
practices
need
to
be
in
place
for
limiting
for
a
limited
reopening
of
certain
businesses.
Very
obviously,
you
guys
to
decide
and
those
businesses
could
present
their
own
proposed
precautions
or
conditions
for
operation.
M
You
know
I'm,
certainly
supportive
of
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
for
childcare
for
healthcare
workers
with
precautions,
health
care
workers,
kind
of
have
been
somewhat
discriminated
against
and
I
understand
it.
There's
a
lot
of
fear
and
concerned.
So
there's
been
a
lot
of
health
care
workers
who
have
had
their
children
hate
to
use
the
word
but
kicked
out
of
their
regular
daycare
because
of
fear
and
I
get
that,
but
we
probably
are
closest
to
it
and
being
very
cautious,
so
I'm
supportive
of
that.
But
there
probably
needs
to
be
precautions
with
that.
Also,
but
dr.
A
D
Just
wanted
to
piggyback
on
both
of
these
topics.
Childcare
has
been
something
that's
been
on
my
mind
and
I
was
reviewing
the
ordinance
and
I,
don't
see
any
specific
reference
to
it
unless
I'm
missing
it
Matt,
so
is
that
something
I
know
with
kids.
You
know:
I
have
some
friends
that
have
been
put
in
kind
of
a
real,
tough
spot,
with
the
kids
being
homeschooled
and
some
of
those
type
of
things
or
like
lists,
or
was
it
anyway?
D
What
have
you
said
that
you
know
people
are
getting
kicked
out
of
their
health,
their
daycare
or
whatever,
and
that
was
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
bring
up
tonight.
Is
there
are
other
cities
and
other
states
even
Minnesota,
that
has
a
travel
ban?
That's
allowing
some
of
their
daycares
to
stay
open
for
that
purpose.
So
I
just
guess,
that's
bringing
it
up
now,
because
it
seemed
like
a
good
segue,
with
the
comments
that
we
just
had.
A
C
Dad,
on
the
permission
to
speak,
could.
C
C
Obviously
there
isn't
a
health
emergency
in
connington,
County
I
mean
we
have
one
active
case,
maybe
that
too,
over
the
four-week
period,
it
seems
somewhat
arbitrary
to
declare
a
health
emergency
and
close
businesses.
When
there
isn't
any
cases
to
indicate
you
have
a
health
emergency,
it
would
be
somewhat
more
responsible
to
have
some
metric
in
the
ordinance.
That
would
provide
some
guidance
to
the
members
to
say
if
you're
more
than
10
or
less
than
20,
something
in
there.
That
would
define
what
you
are
declaring
as
an
emergency,
but
because
currently
we
don't
have
an
emergency.
C
A
M
Cindy
Midland
requesting
to
speak
again
go
ahead.
Cindy
I
just
wanted
to
tag
on
to
those
comments.
It's
it's
not
arbitrary
and
to
say
we
have.
No
cases
doesn't
mean
that
we
don't
have
any
cases
for
several
reasons,
one
being
that
people
can
be
contagious
and
still
be
asymptomatic,
meaning
they
don't
have
any
symptoms
and
give
it
to
somebody
who
has
a
high
risk
factor
and
could
become
very
ill.
M
Second
of
all,
we
found
very
quickly
that
cases
like
Sioux,
Falls,
Worthington,
Minnesota,
etc
and
and
beatle,
County
and
Huron
that
it
can
take
off
like
wildfire
pretty
quickly
and
just
because
we
don't
have
any
now
doesn't
mean
that
we
rip
off
the
band-aid
and
and
not
cover
the
wound,
so
to
speak,
pardon
the
pun,
but
by
the
time
you
have
five
cases.
Ten
cases,
twelve
cases
all
of
a
sudden
within
a
week.
M
You've
got
it
out
of
hand,
because
two
weeks
later,
you're
going
to
have
each
person
is
going
to
expect
two
to
three
more
people,
and
so
you
always
have
to
stay
ahead
of
it
and
I
know.
This
is
painful.
It's
painful
to
certain
members
of
my
family
as
well.
I
totally
get
that
that
are
in
business,
but
it
isn't
that
just
because
we
don't
have
any
today
we're
safe
and
we
can
just
go
back
to
the
way
as
business
as
usual,
because
that's
not
the
case.
A
C
Again,
the
council
has
to
make
a
determination
what
is
considered
a
health
emergency.
We
can't
continue
for
months
with
one
active
case
or
worried
about
one
or
two
active
cases
and
keep
everybody
shut
down
for
that
it.
Just
it
is
not
feasible
and
it's
not
it's
not
recognizable
as
a
way
to
function
so
I'm.
Just
that's
still
the
suggestion
I'm.
A
E
Mac
Android
permission
to
speak,
go
ahead,
Cathy,
okay,
I
am
a
business
owner,
a
fitness
business
owner
a
property
owner
and
a
citizen
taxpayer
and
I
do
understand.
There
is
a
health
threat
due
to
the
cove,
environs
and
I
do
understand.
We
do
need
essential
businesses
to
be
open
for
essential
needs.
E
We
were
a
threat
and
the
city
rushed
to
essentially
seize
our
business
to
close
us
and
you
allowed
other
non-essential
businesses
to
be
open
with
no
restrictions,
while
others
were
quickly
passed
through
as
being
able
to
comply
with
the
CDC
restrictions
and
allowed
to
self-regulate,
even
the
essential
businesses
that
are
currently
operating,
such
as
Menards
not
to
take
on
them.
But
I
was
there
Saturday
they're
operating
with
large
gathering
places
of
hundreds
of
people
in
a
building
at
one
time
and
they're
touching
items
and
breathing
in
doors
and
for
some
reason
this
is
considered
safe.
E
As
a
matter
of
fact,
we
never
have
hundreds
of
people
in
our
facility
at
one
time,
but
we
are
being
judged
as
unsafe.
In
addition,
we
sent
a
letter
of
our
concerns
to
each
and
every
one
of
the
council,
members
and
the
mayor
and
have
not
had
any
response
or
no
acknowledgement
whatsoever.
The
United
States
president
states
that
gyms
can
now
open
and
the
South
Dakota
governor
has
repeatedly
stated
that
South
Dakota
is
not
forcing
businesses
to
close.
Therefore,
water
towns
ordinance
is
going
above
and
beyond
higher
governmental
authority
with
this
law.
E
Presently,
our
local
economy
is
being
negatively
affected
directly
by
this
law.
Were
you
aware
that
this
ordinance
has
already
eliminated
two
gyms
in
town?
One
gym
has
already
permanently
closed
in
the
last
three
weeks
and
they
will
not
be
reopening
and
one
one
gym
has
packed
up
and
left
the
city.
I
would
ask
that
the
City
Council
act
to
repeal
this.
An
equally
applied
ordinance
immediately.
Thank
you.
Thank.
I
Thank
You
mayor
I
just
wanted
to
make
one
comment
before
we
get
into
the
actual
discussion
of
it,
and
this
is
for
Kathy,
with
your
with
your
statement
that
you
sent
an
email
or
you
sent
something
to
every
council
member
and
you
did
not
get
a
single
response.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I,
don't
think
every
council
member
got
an
email
directly
from
you.
I
have
read
your
concerns,
but
they
were
forwarded
from
another
email
address,
so
the
ability
to
reply
directly
to
you
was
not
necessarily
there.
So
I,
don't
I.
I
Don't
want
you
to
think
that
none
of
us
have
cared
or
have
read
it,
because
we
have
and
I
just
wanted
to
defend
my
colleagues
on
the
council.
We
are
aware
of
your
concerns.
They
have
not
gone
on
heated.
Sometimes
it's
not
just
as
easy
as
I
mean
we
heard
your
concerns,
let's
just
put
it
that
way.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
G
I've
got
a
number
a
number
of
comments,
but
I
was
waiting
for
a
few
more
of
my
colleagues
to
weigh
in
first
because
I
I
feel
like
probably
in
closest
to
this
being
part
of
the
unified
command
structure.
So
I
guess,
if
somebody
else
wants
to
jump
in
I,
would
yield
the
floor
at
this
point
before
I.
Make
any
comments.
I
I
guess
just
for
the
sake
of
argument,
so
that
we
all
are
on
the
same
grounds.
I
would
like
to
hear
from
yourself
mayor
and
Glen
and
anyone
else
who,
from
the
unified
team
I,
am
curious.
Looking
at
the
guidelines
sent
to
us
from
the
president's
administration,
the
gating
criteria
are
pretty
clear
as
to
what
you
have
to
satisfy
to
move
into
phase
one
of
reopening
the
economy
and
I
was
just
wondering.
Could
someone
give
us
an
overview
of
where
we
are
at,
particularly?
They
have
three
different
criterias
for
those
who
haven't
seen
it.
I
They
have
symptoms,
which
means
you
have
to
have
a
downward
trajectory
of
influenza-like
illness,
'as
or
stable
same
thing
with
cases,
and
then
also
there
are
hospital
requirements
for
the
care
of
our
healthcare
workers
and
for
the
patients.
So
I
was
just
wondering
if
someone
could
give
us
an
overview
on
where
we
are
at
meeting
those
beating
criteria.
Well,.
A
I
can
start
out
by
saying
even
phase
one.
The
very
first
phase
says
you
don't
move
here
until
you
have
ADD
quit
testing,
that's
a
basic
understood
premise
for
moving
anywhere.
You
start
with
adequate
testing
and
the
big
problem
is,
we
don't
have
adequate
testing,
we
are
still
severely
limited
and
it's
the
we
can't
test
everybody
that
seems
to
show
symptoms.
So
that's
a
problem
right
now.
So
do
you
want
to
add
to
that
cost
'mobile
that.
G
That's
right.
That
was
one
of
the
very
first
comment
that
came
out
of
I.
Think
with
dr.
dan
reef
and
burgers
mouth
on,
Thursday
or
Friday
I
think
was
Friday.
When
that
same
question
or
topic
came
up,
read
is
that
we
Astana
have
adequate
testing
materials
available
to
us
yet
in
Watertown.
Otherwise,.
A
A
You
know,
for
us
to
jump
forward
with
the
presidents
and
just
disregarding
that
first
basic
promise
that
you
have
to
have
adequate
testing
and
ignore
that
we
can't
move
forward
with
his
until
we
reach
that
goal.
Point
and
I
don't
know
what
the
governor
is
going
to
say
on
hers,
but
she's
assembled
a
panel
of
medical
experts.
Our
community
has
a
panel
of
medical
experts
and
they
have
weighed
in
on
this.
H
That's
an
I
mean
it's.
It's
a
right
on
concern.
Some
of
the
struggle
right
now,
I'm
sure
that
a
lot
of
folks
have
in
the
state
is
that
the
governor
has
already
said
we're
at
phase
1,
and
you
know
we
don't
have
adequate
testing.
We
really
don't
I
would
put
to
it
like
any
large
business
we
have.
If
you
went
out
there
and
started
testing
you
may
find
people
testing
positive
I
mean
many
people
carry
at
a
symptomatically.
H
They
never
went
end
the
symptoms,
weren't
strong
enough
for
people
to
think
to
get
an
active
test,
or
maybe
they
couldn't
just
get
the
active
test,
because
it's
kind
of
difficult
to
get
tested,
as
you've
mentioned
some
of
the
struggle
that
I
know
that
I
get
contacted
about
and
that
even
I
see
is
that
we've
buckled
down
as
long
as
we
have
and
I'm
already
starting
to
see
some
of
our
larger
businesses
in
town
easing
their
restrictions,
I
mean
and
again
not
to
pick
on
certain
groups.
But
you
drive
down
to
twelve.
H
She
went
down
there
this
weekend,
it
looked
like
it
was
Black.
Friday
Watertown
has
not
been
adhering
perfectly
to
social
distancing,
there's
many
folks
that
are
still
out
and
about
it's
a
little
bit
ironic
that
we
have
some
that
limit
sixteen
year
old
and
under
going
into
businesses,
but
they
don't
do
65
and
up
who
are
the
most
vulnerable.
H
Sorry,
but
there's
just
got
to
be
some
creative
solutions
that
we
can
come
up
with
to
find.
Some
paths
and
I
really
do
understand
the
argument
for
putting
some
metrics
on
our
phases
and
our
triggers
because
it
is
kind
of
tough
when
we
only
have
one
listed
active
case
and
yes,
I
mean
the
public
might
not
realize
too
that,
if
you're
from
a
different
County
and
you
test
positive
in
our
County
and
you
work
in
our
County
you're
still
only
going
to
be
counted
in
the
county
that
you
live
in.
H
So
the
numbers
aren't
always
so
clear
for
us
what's
actually
going
on
locally
and
again
without
testing,
we
don't
really
know
either
but
I
understand
where
the
frustrations
come
forward,
that
it's
difficult
to
see.
Treatment
of
the
situation.
When
we
have
you
know
hundreds
of
people
in
open
businesses,
but
then
we
can't
do
a
socially
distance,
ten
or
less
and
some
of
the
other
establishments
or
I
don't
know
for
the
sake
of
discussion,
even
having
somebody
posted
at
the
front
door.
H
What
the
thermometer
ready
to
go,
that's
not
a
perfect
way
of
testing,
but
it's
better
than
nothing
and
just
common
sense
of.
If
you
see
someone
displaying
any
symptoms,
even
if
their
allergy
light,
you
have
the
right
to
ask
them
to
leave
the
establishment
for
the
protection
of
others.
So
I
don't
know.
If
we
start
looking
at
is
there
a
step
we
can
take
that
can
open
up
a
little
bit
of
leeway.
It's
still
really
restrictive
and
really
protective
towards
things.
H
A
Yes,
excuse
me
just
a
minute
whoever's
at
the
phone
number.
Eight
eight,
two,
six:
two:
zero
zero.
Would
you
please?
Oh
that's
you
if
there's
some
feedback
or
something
going
on
if
you
are
on
and
your
microphone
is
not
muted,
please
mute
your
mic
Cosman
Radomski.
We
have
any
idea
when
we
might
have
adequate
testing.
A
No
and
actually
I
was
on
a
conference
call
with
the
governor
today
and
she
was
talking
to
all
of
the
mayor's
first
and
second
class
cities
in
South
Dakota,
and
she
told
us
that
in
her
conference
the
the
governor's
conference
with
the
president,
the
states,
including
South
Dakota,
are
begging
for
adequate
tests.
They've,
given
us
this
nice
equipment
for
testing
quickly
with
no
test
kits.
A
So
we
have
the
machine,
but
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
use
it
and
until
we
can
get
the
testing
where
we're
kind
of
in
the
dark
and
we
are
set
up.
So
this
will
be
great
once
the
test
kits
become
available,
things
will
change
and
we'll
be
able
to
be
able
to
pinpoint
where
cases
are
coming
from
once
that
happens.
But
even
the
president
acknowledges
that
you,
you
can't
move
on.
You
can't
move
up
to
the
next
stage
without
adequate
testing
and
well
we
didn't.
C
A
That
you're,
absolutely
right-
and
the
governor
has
stated
this
over
and
over
and
over
that
we
need
people
to
take
personal
responsibility
and
particularly
those
who
are
vulnerable.
Those
are
the
ones
that
were
most
concerned
about,
so
that
has
to
be
a
an
important
part
of
whatever
we
do
is
that
people
take
responsibility
to
protect
themselves.
F
Think
that
this
discussion
is
great
I
think
the
idea
of
moving
it
down
the
road
for
two
more
weeks
is
great.
I
also
think
that
we're
going
to
have
to
and
I'm
hearing
what
people
are
saying
we
can't
deal
with
this
testing
situation,
but
you
know
if
we
continue
to
the
community,
continues
to
do
a
great
job
and
we
don't
have
a
spike
of
any
kind.
F
But
if
we
don't
get
the
testing
in
two
weeks,
will
we
not
have
it
until
July
or
will
we
not
ever
get
it?
You
know,
because
Watertown
is
not
a
high
priority
when
Sioux
Falls
has
hundreds
of
cases
every
day,
so
we
may
not
get
testing,
and
so
we
may
never
be
able
to
reach
that
and
I
think
we
should
open
it
look
very
carefully
at
doing
some
opening
really
soon
and
but
we
want
to
do
it
in
connection
with
the
doctors.
That's
for
sure,
right.
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
that
down
and
the
incubation
period
takes
a
couple
of
weeks,
so
people
who
got
together
with
Easter
with
family
and
friends
from
outside
the
area
may
have
been
infected
and
might
not
even
show
their
symptoms
for
another
week
to
come,
and
then
they
might
not
be
severe
enough
to
go
to
the
doctor
for
another
week
after
that.
So
there's
a
time
lag
involved.
A
That
I
think
that
the
medical
community
wants
to
give
this
a
little
more
time
to
see
if
we
have
a
bomb-
and
we
also
have
the
construction
season
starting
right
now,
we've
got
crews
coming
from
other
parts
of
the
country
to
our
community
and
that
too,
could
cause
a
bump.
So
there
it's
not
that
people
aren't
paying
attention
that
the
ordinance
was
passed
and
the
the
council
has
gone
to
sleep
there.
People
are
watching
this
intently
day
by
day,
Councilman
Hoyer
right.
H
A
The
construction
companies
have
a
vested
interest
in
keeping
their
crews
healthy
and
so
what
we're
finding
and
we
do
have
in
the
incident
command.
There
are
numerous
branches
in
that
group,
and
one
of
those
branches
is
communicating
with
all
the
construction
crews
that
we
can
find.
Information
for
and
they've
been
pleasantly
surprised
to
see.
They
do
have,
for
the
most
part,
a
pretty
good
plan
for
monitoring
their
employees
and
making
sure
that
they're
healthy
and
plans
for
quarantine
if
they
become
six
so
we'll
see
if
they
actually
carry
through
with
it.
A
But
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
if
these
people
come
from
outside
our
area,
it
may
not
show
up
as
a
Cottington
County
case.
So
it
might
look
like
we're
not
having
a
bump
right
away
if
we
start
having
people
from
outside
our
area
getting
sick
until
they
start
infecting
the
people
who
live
here
and
then
it
by
that
time,
it
could
could
be
pretty
bad,
but
we're
watching
and
we're
prepared.
So
that's
good
yeah.
C
C
Got
drops
I
missed
some
of
the
public
testimony,
but
I
just
wanted
to
weigh
in
with
the
following
the
people
I've
heard
from
it's
about
5050,
pretty
impatient
on
both
sides.
Our
health
care
professionals
are
telling
us
just
wait
at
least
a
little
bit
longer.
That
sways
me
quite
a
bit,
but
I
also
think
that
we
need
to
move
forward
with
the
architect
that
plan,
at
least
at
a
high
level.
How
do
we
step
in
to
unwinding
this
I
think
that
we
should
not
waste
any
time
and
getting
that
planet
in
place?
C
H
Other
point
that's
becoming
increasingly
difficult
to
address
with
people.
Is
that
yes,
we're
at
one
active
case
right
now
the
rules
applied
before
two,
but
when
we
had
zero
cases
in
the
county,
it
didn't
stop
the
city
from
allowing
our
st.
Patrick's
Day
celebration
to
still
go
on
with
a
public
parade
with
people
still
going
around
it's
just.
We
have
to
be
able
to
look
at
that
too
and
come
up
with
something
it
just.
It
seems
a
little
arbitrary
discussion
comes
in.
H
What
are
we
basing
our
stuff
on
I
understand
the
mites
and
I
understand
that
we
should
use
plenty
of
caution
when
doing
anything,
but
there
just
has
to
be
a
level
of
assessing
risk,
knowing
where
our
capabilities
are
as
of
right.
Now,
according
to
the
South
Dakota
website,
I
mean
we've
had
two
hospitalizations
here:
I,
don't
believe
they're
still
hospitalized
at
the
moment.
But
you
know
if
we're
sitting
with
empty
medical
facilities.
H
I
would
like
to
think
that
we're
in
a
relatively
good
position
to
be
able
to
manage
any
sort
of,
even
if
it's
just
small,
incremental
opening
I'm
again
don't
open
the
floodgates
but
being
willing
to
take
a
step
in
one
direction,
ease
it
up
and
if
we
see
an
uptick
one,
we
know
that
we've
taken
the
time
to
prepare,
so
we
can
handle
a
little
influx.
But
if
we
don't
see
it,
then
it
can
continue
for
a
little
bit,
but
until
we
start
seeing
those
numbers
coming
in,
it's
really
difficult
to
continue
forward.
H
G
Just
a
weigh-in
now
probably
repeating
some
of
the
same
points
that
have
already
been
said,
but
first
of
all,
I
want
to
thank
Cindy
Midland
for
for
calling
in
because
I
I
kind
of
put
somebody
on
the
spot
today.
I
just
you
know,
while
you're
talking
to
governor
I
was
leading
the
unified
command
meeting
today
and
when
the
health
care
profession
came
out
loud
and
clear.
That
said,
it's
too
soon
to
act.
I
said
well.
I
said
somebody
from
your
group
needs
to
speak
to
that
tonight
and
so
I
appreciate
Cindy
volunteering.
To
do
that.
G
I
also
want
to
explain
what
the
unified
command
team
is
or
is
it
I
got
the
utmost
respect
for
everybody
that
serves
on
that
that
group,
but
please
don't
let
them
become
a
political
body
whereby
people
start
to
lobby
them
one
way
or
the
other
as
far
as
swaying
their
decision.
As
far
as
what
to
do
with
this,
because
that's
now
what
they're
there
for
I'm
part
of
that
and
but
I
also
made
it
clear
to
the
group
today
that
we're
between
a
rock
and
a
hard
place
as
a
council
and
I
said.
G
There's
no
there's
no
doubt
about
that
and
the
longer
we
we
continue
in
place
with
what
we've
got,
we
will
kill
more
I,
hear
completely
the
concerns
about
the
unfairness
aspect
of
it
that
there's
businesses
out
there
that
can
operate
under
CDC
guidelines
perfectly
great
but
yeah
we
shut
them
down
by
the
flipside.
Like
you
said,
the
consulate
hoyer
we've
got
other
places
that
are
just
I
mean
they're,
jam-packed,
practically
and
yet
they're
allowed
to
operate
that
there
is
definitely
a
fairness
aspect
there
that
concerns
me.
G
G
They've
got
a
vested
interest
to
to
do
things.
The
way
it
should
be
done
so
I
I
trust
our
business
community,
something
else
that
we
have
not
talked
by
a
conversation
with
liquor
store
owner
the
other
day
their
businesses
go
on
gangbusters.
Do
we
we're
diluting
ourselves
if
we
think
that
people
still
aren't
still
aren't
gathering
at
different
places,
whether
it
were
they're
not
supposed
to
or
if
it
comes
to,
for
example,
consuming
alcohol?
This
is
great
for
the
liquor
store.
G
So,
having
said
that,
I
guess
I've
I've
spoken
my
my
piece
for
tonight:
Sarah
I,
guess
I'd,
like
you
as
mayor
I,
think
you've
probably
already
indicated
where
you're
leaning
towards
on
this,
but
I
guess
I
would
like
to
know
as
our
because
you
are
the
head
of
that
of
that
command
structure.
Where
you
shake
out
in
this
exactly
okay.
A
I'm
happy
to
say
it:
I
am
taking
my
cues
from
the
medical
community
and
I'm
not
seeing
them
budge
at
all,
and
it's
a
timing
issue
and
actually
Casey
DeBoer.
The
CEO
of
the
hospital
just
now
sent
me
a
link
to
an
article
in
Reuters,
North,
Dakota,
coronavirus
cases
spiked
with
outbreak
at
GE
wind
power
plant.
We
have
wind
power
plants
under
construction
all
around
us
and
the
workers
are
just
now
starting
to
arrive
and
it
we
are
aware
of
that.
We
were
paused
and
ready
for
it,
but
we
haven't
seen
the
impact
of
it.
A
Yet
it's
just
too
soon,
but
I
have
no
problem
whatsoever
with
coming
up
with.
What's
going
to
be
our
next
step
with
or
without
testing,
and
if
the
council
wants
to
do
that,
I
think
you
need
to
think
it
through
carefully
the
we
in
this
state
took
early
measures
by
closing
down
our
schools
and
our
athletic
activities
and
I.
Think
that
gave
us
a
big
head
start.
We
were
closed
before
New
York
and
look
what
happened
to
them.
A
Of
course,
we're
a
completely
different
state,
but
Sioux
Falls
didn't
take
the
action
that
we
did
and
they're
in
a
different
situation
than
we
are.
We
were
a
lot
more
conservative
and
we
we
took
action
to
close
down
businesses,
Sioux
Falls
did
not,
and
so
now
the
Sioux
Falls
residents
are
coming
to
Watertown
to
shop
because
we're
clean,
but
so
I
do
think.
Yes,
we
need
to
make
a
step
forward,
and
people
need
to
be
reassured
that
this
isn't
forever
and
I.
Don't
want
this
to
be
forever.
A
H
It's
hard
to
okay,
so
our
large
large
businesses,
large
gatherings,
are
still
happening
right.
We
haven't
seen
the
uptick
that
I
would
expect
to
see.
With
that
I
mean
we
have
hundreds
of
people
in
some
of
these
buildings
at
some
points
and
like
I
still
go
to
grocery
stores.
I,
don't
see
anyone
wearing
PPE
as
a
cashier,
sometimes
how
many
people
do
they
interact
with
every
day
when
we
look
at
Sioux
Falls,
that
was
a
manufacturing
plant
that
had
a
massive
outbreak,
because
there
were
a
lot
of
steps
not
being
taken.
H
There
was
a
lot
of
irresponsibility
on
that
company's
behalf
with
their
employees,
not
looking
out
for
their
employees.
I
would
hope
that
our
manufacturing
locally
is
looking
out
for
people
and
that
they're
encouraging
them
to
take
sick
time
if
they're
feeling
under
the
weather
and
not
doing
things
like
responsibility,
pay
trying
to
bring
people
in.
H
H
How
I
mean
I'd
still
say
like
yeah,
we
shouldn't
do
like
public
sports.
We
shouldn't
do
parades,
we
shouldn't.
Do
you
know
a
4th
of
July,
a
gathering
with
a
large-scale
group
of
people,
but
if
you're,
limiting
numbers,
I
I,
don't
see
how
that's
different
than
the
people
go
into
gas
stations
right
now,
right.
A
And
and
I
think
that
the
the
medical
community
was
expecting
to
see
a
bump
after
Easter
because
that's
a
traditional
time
to
get
together
with
family.
And
it's
also
the
beginning
of
the
construction
season
and
just
wanting
just
to
see
where
we
are
before.
We
start
backing
up.
And
that's
maybe
a
week
or
two
and
not
months.
So.
But.
H
H
H
A
H
A
A
C
Like
to
give
a
shout
out
to
the
factories
and
tell
them
that
have
taken
this
seriously
in
the
measures
that
they've
put
in
place
to
protect
their
employees,
a
lot
of
these
factories
in
town,
employee,
hundreds
of
people
and
all
these
people
in
each
of
these
factories
I'm
sure,
don't
always
work
six
feet
apart
from
each
other
and
all
these
factories.
Once
these
people
leave
work,
you
know
they're
going
to
Menards
they're
going
to
buy
groceries.
So
then
they
intermingle
I
mean
that's
no
different
than
these
same
people.
C
That
would
be
eating
at
the
same
restaurant,
together,
they're
sitting
in
the
same
casino
together,
you
know
things
of
that
nature.
I
think
we
also
need
to
be
very
mindful
the
businesses
that
have
lost
business,
the
businesses
that
have
closed
and
I'm
sure
there's
going
to
be
more.
That
probably
will
not
reopen
and
I'm.
Also
in
favor
of
taking
some
quick
swift
action
to
open
up
some
of
these
businesses
again,
all.
F
Okay,
just
to
re-emphasize
reiterate
what
I
said,
at
least
that
I
would
like
to
see
us.
Have
your
group,
the
you
meet
with
every
day,
come
up
with
some
suggestions.
I
get
the
feeling
the
flavor
of
doing
something
soon
is
on
our
minds
and
if
you
came
with
with
some
recommendations
for
us,
because
you
probably
will
include
the
Kathy
McEnroe's
of
the
world
and
not
saying
Kathy,
but
somebody
like
that
or
several
that
would
say
here's
what
we
could
do.
F
If
you
would
let
us
get
back
into
business
again
and
in
two
weeks,
if
you
told
your
command
group,
we're
going
to
probably
do
something
in
two
weeks,
and
we
want
to
do
it
correctly.
I
have
a
feeling
that
they
would
come
up
with
something
I've
got
so
much
confidence
in
our
community.
That
I
think
that
if
we
say
guys
we're
going
on
we're
going
out
on
the
edge
of
the
tree
here,
because
they
say
we
have
to
have
testing,
we
don't
think
we're
going
to
get
it.
A
You
I
think
you're
right,
dan
and
I
think
the
community
would
take
great
care
if
given
guidelines
and
and
I
am
in
favor
of
doing
that,
and
taking
that
to
the
incident
commanders
and
and
let
them
take
a
look
but
I,
you
know
we.
We
talked
about
setting
up
those
guidelines
ahead
and
they
they
were
just
thinking.
It
was
too
soon
and
every
day
that
goes
by
is
another
day
that
someone's
hurting
and
so
I
hear
it
I
hear
at
both
sides.
Councilmen
l'olam
did
you
want
to
speak
yeah.
C
I
just
had
a
couple
of
questions.
I
mean
one
of
our
capabilities
currently
with
our
healthcare
system.
Let
me
know
have
we
talked
about
that?
What's
that,
what's
the
bed
comes
that
are
available?
What
are
we
looking
at?
Not
that
I
want
to.
You
know,
look
doomsday
scenario,
but
you
know
what
what
can
we
handle?
Yeah.
A
We're
we're
set
up
for
what
we
need
and
we
have
the
beds
identified
and
the
surge
capacity
locations
identified
and
a
planning
that's
ready
to
be
implemented.
If
we
need
it.
So
I
I
think
that
you
know
we
have
different
phases
like
we've
got
hospital
beds,
but
then
we've
got
surge
capacity
beds
that
aren't
actually
necessarily
in
the
hospital,
but
would
be
areas
cleared
out
for
expanded
hospital
if
we
should
need
it
so
we're
in
good
shape
to
handle
the
surge
when
it
comes
and
the
the
surge
is
not
expected
to
be
here
until
June.
A
C
C
You
know
and
I
think
that
what
we
did
right
away
was
probably
the
right
thing
to
do
to
get
that
to
give
them
the
time
to
be
able
to
handle
what
they
needed
to
on
their
end.
They
ought
to
you
know,
Cindy's
point
yeah.
We
have
one,
you
know
in
one
frankly
too
many,
but
we're
going
to
have
that,
no
matter
what
we're
gonna
have
people
that
are
going
to
get
this.
C
C
Taking
the
social
distancing
pretty
pretty
far
on
that
I
think
the
people
that
go
out-
and
you
know
I-
want
to
go
to
these
establishments
and
the
owners
I
think
the
owners
will
do
their
best
to
diligence
to
try
to
keep
everything
in
clean.
They
don't
want
anyone
getting
sick
either.
You
know
it's,
it
is
a
tough
situation.
I
don't
have
any
idea
as
to
you
know
what
kind
of
time
frame
we're
looking
frankly,
I,
don't
think
we
can
go
till
June,
you
know,
is
it?
Is
it
Monday
I,
don't
know
I
mean?
C
C
You
know
also
I
mean
it's
coming
up
sooner
rather
than
later.
Anyway,
you
know
I
mean
maybe
we
set
parameters
in
there
to
Michael's
point.
Is
you
know?
Maybe
if
we
get
too
ten
cases
within
a
certain
time
frame,
we
have
to
relook
at
that.
You
know.
I
know
that
ten
cases
usually
doesn't
mean
just
ten
cases
either.
That's
kind
of
one
of
those
you
know
the
numbers
typically
higher
than
what
the
number
is,
because
you
got
people
that
will
not
frankly
go
on
and
get
tested.
So
those
are
something
like
my
questions.
C
I,
have
it's
not
an
easy
decision,
whether
we
reopen
or
now
we
got
to
give
some
of
these
businesses
at
least
time
that
maybe
have
furloughed
employees
or
you
know,
frankly,
put
their
employees
on
the
only
they've.
Let
them
go
kind
of
give
them
a
little
bit
of
time
to
bring
on
their
employees
back
on,
if
that's
the
case.
So
those
are
a
couple
of
my
comments,
just
kind
of
want
to
hear
what
you
guys
thought
after
that
Madame.
D
Just
a
couple
comments,
listening
to
what
everybody's
been
saying,
you
know:
I,
guess
that
I
don't
want
to
repeat
what
everybody's
already
been
saying,
because
they
all
have
points
I
want
to
make.
When
we
talk
about
the
potential
Easter
surge
and
some
of
these
other
things
and
the
expiration
of
our
current
ordinance,
the
governor's
guidelines
I,
would
suggest
that
we
don't
go
more
than
a
week.
That
would
give
us
the
two
weeks
or
whatever.
It
is
the
14
days
that
we're
looking
at
for
the
potential
Easter
bump.
D
We
will
have
a
lot
more
information
as
to
what's
going
on
on
a
statewide
level
as
well
as
here
and
then
I.
Think,
moving
to
the
governor's
guidelines
and
I
do
agree
with
everybody
who
said
that
I
don't
think
our
businesses
want
people
to
get
sick,
I,
think
our
businesses
will
be
responsible.
The
ones
who
can't
make
the
accommodations
are
going
to
say,
hey
I
can't
make
those
accommodations
the
ones
who
can
convey
what
you're
talking
about
what
are.
D
Somebody
else
has
got
their
microphone
on
so
they're
stepping
over
me,
so
whoever's
not
microphones
on
not
you
guys.
Please
turn
off
anyway,
so
go
to
that
one
week
period
our
ordinance
sunsets
on
Friday,
we
call
special
council
meeting
or
whatever
we
need
to
do.
I
think
that
we
go
to
the
CDC
guidelines
that
the
governor
set
pardon
me
of
her
Orden
of
her
resolution.
Then
we
create
you
know
we
can
be
thinking
about
this.
Your
team
can
be
thinking
about
this.
What
do
we
do
together?
D
You
know
this
is
what
we
have
to
see
for
us
to
go
back
again
and
I.
Think
people
would
be
very
willing
to
do
that
to
keep
the
community
safe,
but
I
just
I.
Just
really
think
that
we
need
to
give
people
a
little
bit
of
hope.
A
little
bit
of
glimmer
I
think,
like
Adam
said
they
need
to
know
when
to
start
bringing
their
people
back
online
when
to
start
putting
inventories
back
in
place.
D
Some
of
those
things,
but
you
know
I,
can
hold
on
for
a
week
but
I'm
not
gonna,
hold
on
for
two
weeks
or
longer,
I'm,
not
gonna.
Wait
till
June
I'm
taking
this
personally
as
a
council
person
without
getting
pretty
firm
about
what
I
feel
about
this.
So
that's
my
suggestion
is
to
wait
the
week.
Look
at
our
ordinance.
What
do
we
want
to
do?
We
want
to
reinstate
it?
Do
we
want
to
change
it?
D
A
D
I
would
think
April
20
I
meant
another
week
so
that
we've
had
the
Easter
two
weeks.
Yeah
I'm
talking
about
week,
not
the
sunset
of
our
ordinance
talking
about
the
we
store
to
week,
but
we
can
certainly
do
something
before
the
ordinance
sunsets
or
we
can
modify
it
or
we
can
choose
to.
You
know,
throw
it
out.
D
Do
the
governors
guidelines
but
I
think
that
that
people
would
be
very
happy
if
they
could
at
least
see
some
light
at
the
end
of
the
tunnel
or
be
preparing
for
us
to
open,
and
then
we
can
do
it
quite
quickly,
but
I
think
as
fast
as
we
shut
down.
We
could
do
it
again.
If
we
had
to
I
mean
we've
proven
it.
We've
proven
that
we
can
say
yep.
D
A
H
C
C
You
just
to
just
a
few
comments,
just
just
want
to
kind
of
go
over
a
few
things
of
that
that
I
have
ascertained
from
this
discussion
and
you
know:
I
have
tremendous
empathy
for
those
businesses
in
town
that
are
hurting
and
I.
Think
it's
important
for
us,
combined
with
unified
command
I,
think
we
need
to
work
together
to
put
together
some
sort
of
a
contingency
plan
on
how
we're
going
to
roll
this
out
for
different
types
of
businesses
that
are
shut
down.
C
C
So
again,
a
lot
of
folks
can
be
walking
around
with
this
virus,
and
can
it
doesn't
take
a
whole
lot
to
get
a
whole
lot
of
people
infected,
I,
don't
believe,
and
so
I
do
think
it's
important
for
us
to
to
plan
and
I
mean
right
now.
I
think
it's
important
right
now
that
we
start
planning
on
how
we're
going
to
move
forward
with
the
businesses
in
our
community
so
that
they
can
can
start
back
up.
I
really
feel
for
these
folks
that
are
out
of
work
and.
J
K
H
Kind
of
the
last
thing
for
me,
but
just
to
two
fears:
one:
if
we
create
a
prohibition,
it
just
goes
underground.
If
you
stop
them
from
doing
things
that
they're
gonna
do
anyway,
they're
just
gonna,
do
it
in
a
more
dangerous
way.
You
see
that
with
people
that
are
underage,
you
see
that
with
multiple
things
and
and
I,
don't
want
to
think
that
our
citizens
do
that
stuff,
but
I
know:
there's
been
people
that
have
gathered
for
parties.
H
But
that's
that's
kind
of
my
last
piece
on
it.
I
agree
with
that.
I
think
a
week
out
is
a
good
amount
of
time
to
see
if
we
see
the
bump
and
if
we
don't
working
I
I,
like
councilman
duelers
point
that
we
work
together
and
see
if
we
can
find
a
path
that
meets
in
the
middle
because
we're
gonna
see
people
go
under
and
when
people
start
going
under
we're
gonna
see
mental
health
issues
start
to
happen
and
when
we
see
desperation
it
can
spiral,
and
we
don't
want
that.
H
I
I
I
think
that's
fantastic
and
I
also
want
to
thank
all
of
the
people,
because
we've
always
kept
it
civil
as
well
in
this
discussion
tonight
over
the
last
couple
weeks,
what
we've
heard
from
people
by
and
large
everyone
has
been
very
civil.
Even
if
we
disagree,
because
we
can
understand
the
arguments
on
both
sides
and
I
wanted
to
thank
everyone.
The
unified
command
team
has
been
fantastic.
I
I've
watched
your
briefings,
I,
really
liked
what
Mike
Carney
said
today,
where
he
said,
he's
praying
for
the
decision-makers,
because
we
are
going
through
unprecedented
waters
and
we're
just
trying
to
find
a
way.
We
all
know
what's
at
stake.
It's
it's
grave
concerns
on
both
sides,
so
we're
just
trying
to
find
a
way
and
I
would
just
ask
for
a
continued
respect
for
all
of
the
decision
makers.
With
that
said,
I
will
also
come
out
in
favor
of
repealing
this
going
back
to
the
governors
guidelines.
I
I
would
say
if
we
want
to
give
it
a
week,
I'm,
okay
with
a
week,
I,
would
be
okay
with
even
being
a
little
bit
more
aggressive
in
falling
back
to
the
governors
guidelines.
I
also,
would
it
urged
the
unified
command
team
to
look
at
water
tone,
specific
businesses,
I'm
thinking
like
the
beauty,
salons,
hair,
barbers,
and
things
like
that?
I
As
long
as
the
barber
has
the
mask
on
and
they're
the
only
ones
touching
their
tools
and
they
disinfect
between
clients
and
things
like
that,
and
you
limit,
you
know,
like
one
person,
social
distancing,
still
I
think
that
there's
a
way
for
business
owners
to
work
with
the
city
of
Watertown
and
for
all
of
their
patrons
it's
an
everyone's
best
interest
to
keep
everyone
healthy
and
I.
Think
that
we've
got
to
trust
people's
personal
responsibility.
For
that.
I
Unfortunately,
you
can't
trust
to
everyone's
personal
responsibility,
because
people
will
violate
it.
Even
otherwise
intelligent
people
will
go
underground,
as
councilman
Hoyer
just
said,
and
then
there
are
people
who,
even
if
you
passed
a
law
and
made
it
illegal
and
you'd,
throw
them
in
prison.
They'd
still
go
out
and
do
this
so
at
a
certain
point
for
all
the
law-abiding,
intelligent,
socially
distancing
people
in
Watertown
I
think
that
we've
need.
We
need
to
get
this
city
going
again
so
respectfully
and
understand
the
concerns
of
the
medical
community.
I
I
Then
it's
the
fourth
of
July
bump,
how
many
more
bumps
of
people
getting
together
are
we
going
to
have
to
go
through
I
mean
we
could
seriously
shut
down
the
economy
for
two
years
before
we
100%
feel
that
we're
safe
to
go
back
to
work
at
a
certain
point
you
have
to
just
vote
and
I
will
vote
to
repeal
this
I'll
say
a
week
and
fall
back
to
the
governor's
guidelines
and
hope
and
pray.
We've
made
the
right
decision
with
the
ability
to
come
back
fast
and
reimpose
some
regulations.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
C
C
C
A
question
you
know
we're
voting
on
whether
to
appeal
or
repeal
this.
If
we
wanted
to
make
an
amendment
I
think
either
either
way
to
Reed's
point.
We
want
to
make
an
amendment
to
next.
You
know
so
it
goes
till
next
Monday,
first
day
as
a
week
out
like
we
talked
about,
do
we
have
to
actually
amend
our
original
Morse
motion
and
then
to
Don's
point.
C
If
we
want
to
make
some
guidelines
and
or
would
we
make
an
amendment
to
the
the
ordinance
or
to
the
this,
how
do
we
get
this
into
effect,
or
you
know
some
of
those
I'm
just
kind
of
hoarse
from
clerical?
What
are
we
going
for
on
this
and
then
how
do
we
move
forward
with
it?
Maybe
that's
more
format
merit
Don.
Another
quick
point:
go.
A
C
We're
going
to
vote
on
it
right
now,
just
obvious
what
the
medical
profession
tell
us
I'm
going
to
vote.
No,
in
other
words,
we
continue
as
we
are,
but
I'm
willing
to
look
at
it
get
another
week.
In
other
words,
I.
Don't
think
this
is
something
that
we're
just
gonna.
It's
got
to
be
kept
in
front
of
us.
C
I
think
I'm
willing
to
go
another
week,
just
because
the
magic
professional
recommendations
but
I'm
not
saying
we
won't
yeah
I,
think
we
need
to
think
about
this
to
the
week
and
we
underway
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
unwind
or
back
these
things
off
and
then
be
ready
to
consider
it
another
way.
I
think
this
is
a
real
time
thing
we're
going
to
keep
looking
at.
K
K
So
the
emotion
was
to
continue
just
for
the
clarification
there,
but
what
I
would
suggest
if
you
want
to
revisit
it
in
a
week
you
could
amend
the
ordinance
expiration
date
to
a
week
from
today's
date,
thereby
forcing
you
to
reconsider
it
again
at
that
time
and
at
that
meeting
I
can
have
something
drafted.
That
would
be
a
framework
that
the
council
could
consider
at
that
time.
Now
at
that
meeting
they
could
the
council
could
say
no.
K
We
saw
a
spike
over
the
week,
we're
going
to
keep
the
current
ordinance
in
place
and
extend
it,
we're
gonna
table
or
postpone
action
on
the
proposed
alternative,
or
you
could
say
you
know
what
we're
gonna
go
ahead
and
repeal
the
current
ordinance
and
put
in
place
this
alternative,
and
the
alternative
is
really
going
to
look
like
a
lot
of
what
the
governor's
executive
order
looks
like
with
the
exception.
It'll
give
us
the
ability
to
enforce
some
of
those
directives.
D
D
You
know
like
I,
said
before
we
know
we
can
back
it
up
fast
if
we
see
people
grossly
abusing
it,
but
I
I
think
that's
where
I'm
at
I
didn't
make
the
original
motion,
but
I
think
that
a
week
seems
to
fit
everybody's
comfort
level.
I
know
everybody
is
looking
to
move
the
economy
along,
but
yet
respect
what
the
medical
community
is
saying
and
I
think
an
amendment
and
a
week
revisiting
in
a
week
works
for
all
of
those
things.
That's
just
my
opinion.
F
A
K
Just
was
going
to
say
that
I
would
absolutely
anything
that
I
put
put
together
would
be
vetted
through
the
medical
professional,
but
I
will
say
that
what
what
I'm
envisioning
at
the
moment,
they
basically
is
going
to
be
very,
very
similar
to
what
the
governor's
executive
order
is.
So
if
anybody
wanted
to
get
a
head
start
and
looking
at
that,
they
they
could
do
so
today
and
I
will
say
that
the
governor,
the
governor,
of
course,
is
advised
by
a
slew
of
medical
professionals
as
well.
G
C
C
I
sense:
a
lot
of
indecision,
I'm
part
of
that
indecision
on
this
one,
but
I'm,
okay,
planning
on
for
accessible
council
meeting
a
week
from
now.
This
is
extraordinary
circumstances.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we
get
our
head
around
it
and
I
think
the
fact
that
we
have
something
coming
up
in
7
days,
an
impending
event,
if
you
will
I,
think
we're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
discussion.
We
good
discussion
on
the
next
few
days
and
really
really
try
and
figure
out
how
we
want
to
do
this.
G
C
C
I
You
I
just
want
to
do.
This
is
read
for
those
of
you
are
seeing
me,
but
I
made
the
original
motion
and
I
would
have
made
this
motion,
but
Adam
beat
me
to
it.
I
will
support
this
motion
to
have
its
sunset
in
a
week.
I
think
that's
the
right
thing
so
that
people
can
start
planning
and
I
also
really
think
that
councilman
Roby
had
a
great
point,
which
is
to
know
that
this
is
coming
up,
will
spur
some
Watertown
specific
debate.
I
I
do
want
to
hear
from
some
of
these
people
like
Kathy,
who
spoke
about
her
Jim
I,
want
to
I,
want
to
hear
what
some
of
her
ideas
are,
and
maybe
some
of
the
other
workout
facilities.
How
are
they
going
to
protect
their
their
people
and
the
city
of
Watertown
I
think
they
can
bring
that
forward.
I
think
other
businesses
can
as
well
give
business
nor
give
business
owners
and
the
people
of
Watertown
a
chance
to
come
up
with
a
good
plan.
So
I
am
in
support
of
this
and
I
hope
it
works
out.
Thank.
A
I
B
C
C
B
C
A
F
A
A
F
C
C
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Item
F
is
review
of
the
continued
necessity
of
resolution
number
20-15
declaring
an
emergency
concerning
the
pandemic
outbreak
of
the
novel
coronavirus,
kovat,
19
and
providing
for
responsive
measures
related
to
the
operations
of
the
city
and
the
protection
of
public
health,
and
we've
already
had
one
person
weigh
in
on
this
there's.
Not
a
public
hearing,
but
I
would
invite
anybody
that
wants
to
speak
on
this
and
is
on
the
line
that
I
would
give
them
the
opportunity.
A
Look
for
a
motion,
so
we
can
discuss
it
so
councilman
Helene!
Is
there
a
second
second
by
councilman,
ville,
Hauer
and,
as
I
said,
we've
already
had
Liz
Christensen
of
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
asked
us
to
revisit
the
idea
of
all
city
buildings
being
closed
because
they
would
like
to
use
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club,
which
is
a
building.
A
The
city
owns
to
be
available
for
some
child
care
purposes
that
are
beneficial
to
our
community
in
our
fight
against
Cove
at
19,
and
there
might
be
others
who
would
like
us
to
change
provision
in
our
ordinance,
which
closes
all
city
buildings
and
I
would
say
there
are
several
so
the
the
museum
is
closed.
We
we
don't
manage
that
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club,
which
we
already
spoke
about
the
Senior
Center,
which
is
a
city
building
that
we
do
not
manage.
A
H
A
part
of
me
that
really
feels
like
this
needs
to
be
looked
at
case
by
case
I
would
understand
that
many
of
these
organizations
will
likely,
like
Senior
Center,
for
instance,
would
likely
continue
to
not
be
open
off
their
own
choice
just
for
the
safety
of
their
patrons,
but
it
just
seems
like,
as
people
come
towards
us,
this
might
be
something
that
we
discuss.
I,
absolutely
think
that
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
proposition
makes
100%
sense,
I
think
that's
only
a
positive
thing
that
can
come
of
it.
Meals.
H
G
I
I
think
definitely
with
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
situation.
I
would
be
in
favor
of
that
for
a
practical
standpoint
would
would
we
not
be
reviewing
this
at
the
same
time
next
Monday
next
Monday
at
our
special
council
meeting.
As
far
as
this
resolution,
as
well
as
far
I
mean
whether
or
not
we
want
to
strengthen
it
or
loosen
it,
so
I
guess
I'd
be
encouraged.
A
K
This
resolution
was
intended
to
be
merely
a
housekeeping
resolution
to
formalize
the
closure
of
city
buildings
to
the
public,
which
the
mayor
really
did
the
night
before
the
council,
a
she
took
action
and
so
I
would
I
guess.
I
would
suggest
a
amendment
to
the
resolution
language
that
we
basically
just
changed.
Instead
of
city
buildings,
we
just
add
city,
operate
the
buildings
or
something
to
that
effect,
because
you
know
if,
if
Leah
that
just
it
just
cleans
it
up
a
little
bit.
K
A
C
K
C
K
So
the
original
resolution
just
basically
said
that
city
buildings
are
closed.
It
was
I
think
the
intention
was
when
we
passed
that
we
had
in
mind
buildings
like
City,
Hall
and
the
like,
but
unintentionally
we
also
owned
other
buildings
that
have
been
mentioned
here
tonight,
the
event
center,
the
Senior
Center,
the
kinda
County
Heritage
Museum.
K
That
could
could
be
interpreted
that
they
were
affected
by
that,
even
though
I'm
not
sure
if
it
was
the
intention
or
not,
and
so
the
the
suggestion
would
be
to
make
it
clear
that
it's
city
operated
buildings
and
then
the
folks
that
operate
out
of
our
buildings
that
aren't
city
employees
aren't
City
business.
They
would
have
to
make
their
own
determination
as
far
as
opening
and
closing
unless
they
were
subject
to
the
other
ordinance.
So.
A
L
K
L
Lot
of
safety
and
security
measures,
including
screening
before
the
children
and
parents,
would
come
in
the
building,
personal
protective
gear,
sanitation
and
cleaning
processes.
You
know
all
of
our
staffing
operations
that
we
lead
out
with
will,
of
course,
have
safety
and
security
knowing
and
our
first
priority,
so
we'll
take
guidance.
You
know
from
a
lot
of
the
agencies,
certain.
B
L
L
M
C
A
C
A
And
you
can.
This
was
just
a
resolution,
so
there's
no
second
reading
or
anything
and
I
think
that
it
by
changing
the
one
word
it
does
change
the
meaning
and
if
there's
anything
else
that
the
council
wanted
to
change
on
that,
you
could
add
that
in
but
right
now
that's
all
I'm
hearing
it's
the
one
word
I.
A
A
I
K
Councilman
Helene
are
the
one
that
comes
to
mind
the
fifth
one
that
also
comes
to
mind
is
the
golf
course
building
Levi's
who
operates
that
facility
is
an
independent
contractor.
He
is
not
an
employee
of
the
city,
so
that
would
that
would
apply
to
that
building
as
well.
But,
of
course
that
building
is
you,
they
are
a
restaurant.
Therefore
they
would
still
have
to
comply
with
our
ordinance
similar
to
the
event
center
in
Minerva.
They
just
don't
supply
with
our
ordinance.
I
I
guess
I'd
kind
of
like
what
councilman
Roby
said
in
the
previous
discussion.
I
would
like
to
provide
the
unified
team,
some
flexibility
for
dealing
with
this
on
a
case
by
case
basis,
because
there
I
mean
the
transit
is
going
to
be
a
completely
different
business
unit
than
some
of
these
other
than
like
the
museum,
and
things
like
that.
So
I,
don't
think.
I
would
like
to
give
you
mayor
just
as
I
trust
business
owners
to
look
after
the
health
of
their
patrons
I
trust.
I
A
K
Can
I
say
something
real,
quick,
though
sure
the
only
issue
with
that
is
that
if
next
week
we
say
restaurants
are
open
for
business
and
but
the
nervous
still
has
to
come
to
us
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
Every
time
they
want
to
have
somebody
come
in
their
business
that
doesn't
make
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
I
saw
this,
throwing
it
out
there.
I
I
guess
I
I
see
a
little
bit
of
a
distinction,
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt.
If
anyone
wanted
to
say
something
which
is
I
understand
that
distinction,
but
they're
still
operating
out
of
a
building
that
someone
else
owns,
it
would
be
the
case
of
a
restaurant.
Let's
say
if
someone
was
operating
a
restaurant
out
of
a
building
someone
else
owned.
It
would
still
be
that
biz
that
the
person
who
owns
the
building
could
go
to
the
restaurant
and
say:
look
I,
don't
want
this,
so
I,
you
know
have
to
consider
this
on
a
case-by-case
basis.
I
K
K
And
so
you
know
in
a
sense
we're
kind
of
controlling
their
business,
even
though
our
ordinance
and,
on
the
other
hand,
says
that
they
can
be
open
and
operating
at
random,
for
example,
there's
nothing
that
prevents
them
from
having
the
public
in
and
out
of
the
building
all
day
long
in
our
ordinance,
but
now
by
resolution,
because
we
haven't
known
the
building,
we're
but
essentially
amending
the
terms
of
the
lease,
so
that
I
just
would
throw
that
out
there
as
a
cautionary
tale.
Here.
G
D
Think
that
I
understand
but
Reid
saying
but
I
sorry
this
is
Beth
but
I,
think
to
Matt's
point
and
I
think
we
need
to
be
aware
that
when
he
gave
the
transit
example,
that's
when
it
the
light
bulb,
went
off
for
me
and
I
think
we
go
back
to
amending
it
with
our
word
of
operated
versus
owned
and
operated
I.
A
K
C
G
C
Right,
I'm
not
for
the
case-by-case
deal,
I
think
it's
cleaner.
If
it's
an
operating,
if
it's
not
operated
by
the
city,
I
think
that's
got
a
clear
delineation.
I,
don't
see
the
scenario
where
case-by-case
I
don't
know,
I
would
be
in
favor
of
the
operating
or
the
city,
not
operating
the
building.
That's
clear
and
by
the
way
that
was
the
original
motion.
There
was
their
original
motion
that.
K
A
A
A
B
H
B
C
A
A
C
B
C
C
A
M
H
B
H
A
A
G
I
guess
I'd
like
what
we
opened
the
door
and
I
think
maybe
council
and
Elvis,
and
maybe
you
want
to
jump
in
you're
kind
of
one-
that's
been
driving
this
I
guess
I'd
like
to
update
as
far
we
where
we
stand
with
the
abatement
refund.
Whatever
the
case
may
be
on
the
urban
renewal
district
tax
assessment.
A
B
B
There's
only
certain
ways
that
you
can
amend
a
tax
once
it's
been
certified
to
the
county,
a
couple
examples
of
that
or
is,
if
all
the
sudden
the
building
on
the
property
was
removed,
was
no
longer
there
or
if
it
was
an
elderly
freeze
situation
or
the
property
owner
was
tax
exempt,
but
the
council,
essentially
just
wanting
to
remove
the
tack,
is
not
allowed
by
state
law.
So
that
is
what
I
found
out
from
the
county.
B
G
B
G
G
C
J
Yes,
councilman
Roby
still
staying.
Of
course,
the
pandemic
has
shifted
plans
a
little
bit
for
the
developer
they're
in
a
hold
and
wait
period
here
as
well
as
or
in
regards
to
whether
they
would
proceed
with
any
work
on
their
development.
My
recommendation
would
be:
is
we
kind
of
wait,
wait
through
some
amount
of
time
here,
whether
it
be
a
month
or
maybe
a
little
more
with
the
developer,
to
still
try
to
coordinate
this
grading
with
their
project
that
timeline
I?
Don't
thank
hurts
our
project.
J
G
J
J
That
class,
that
we've
presented
is
being
represented
to
the
FAA,
with
easements
instead
of
rights,
away
to
make
a
long
story
short
we're
able
to
accomplish
the
same
effect
of
cleaning
up
the
airport
property
plat
without
having
to
go
through
the
the
land
land
release
processes
for
airport
property.
Had
we
planted
that
as
right
away
like
we
originally
proposed,
we'd
have
to
go
through
the
formal
and
release
process
for
airport
property.
J
So
we've
come
up
with
an
alternative
plan
to
place
easements
on
that
plat
to
help
clean
up
their
property
and
the
the
roads
and
things
that
encroach
onto
it
and
that
that
so
far
has
been
verbally
approved
by
the
FAA
as
an
acceptable
alternative.
So
where
we're
at
is
we
briefed
submitted
that
plat
to
the
FAA
for
formal
approval
and
we
hope
to
hear
back
soon?
It's
they.
G
J
F
Got
two
things:
I'm,
not
sure,
they're
old
business,
I'm,
not
sure
if
they're
new
business
but
I
do
have
questions
on
a
couple
of
things.
One
you
did
explain
to
me
that
the
city
clean
up
is
only
postponed,
I.
Think
in
Watertown.
That's
a
pretty
major
item
and
honestly
that
you
know
it's
always
said
that
nobody
is
to
go
out
and
pick
the
bowl
and
so
to
have
people
coming
in
from
out
of
town.
If
they're
not
supposed
to
do
that,
you
know
I'm,
not
sure
where
that
would
ever
end.
C
A
B
J
Excuse
me
so
those
points
councilman
Albertson,
the
yard,
cracked,
the
city
way
cleanup.
We
had
decided
through
conversations
with
the
mayor,
given
formal
proof.
We
decided
to
send
out
a
announcement
that
we
would
postpone
the
citywide
cleanup.
Some
of
the
concerns
there,
like
you
cited,
were
you
know
whether
that
draw
people
into
town
too
I
kind
of
treat
it
as
a
citywide
rummage
sale
source,
which
kind
of
happens,
and
then
you
have
people
going
door-to-door
looking
for
one
man's
trash
potentially
being
their
treasure.
J
We
wanted
to
avoid
that,
but
the
other
component
to
that
is,
we
didn't
want
to
expose
not
only
our
city
staff
but
all
sort
contractors
to
all
the
hands-on
labor
that
is
involved
in
that
project.
I
know
that
a
good
brunt
of
the
material
that
gets
put
out
is
picked
up
by
whether
it
be
a
pale,
odor
or
skid
steer
by
mechanical
means.
But
there
is
an
awful
lot
of
hands-on
removal
to
ask
to
occur
like
the
electronics,
for
example.
J
On
a
citywide
basis
for
everybody's
stuff,
that
gets
put
out
to
the
curb,
so
those
are
a
couple
of
reasons
is
what
I
would
thought
that
wouldn't
be
a
good
idea
to
continue
that
right
now
at
this
point,
but
we
are
hopeful,
we
can
maybe
do
a
late
summer
event
or
something
of
that
nature
where
it
doesn't
bump
up
so
late
in
the
year
that
we
might
as
well
as
wait
till
next
spring.
That's
our
hope.
J
J
So
that
want
to
count
on
level
with.
If
the
council
beam
that
we
wanted
to
proceed
with
that
or
any
of
these
things.
For
that
matter,
I
mean.
Obviously,
we
could
proceed
with
them,
but
these
are
some
of
the
talking
points
that
Mike
and
I
have
come
up
with
together
and
wanted
to
share
with
you
one
last
final
note:
I'll
make
the
the
free
landfill
use
for
city
residents,
Mike
and
I
were
converting
with
the
mayor
on
this.
J
Just
today
and
Mike
has
already
sent
out
a
public
service
announcement
allowing
for
the
public's
free
use
of
the
landfill,
with
a
copy
of
their
utility
bill
with
them.
The
reason,
one
of
the
reasons
being
that
we
opened
that
one
up
is
because
we
are
seeing
a
huge
spike
at
the
landfill,
as
of
last
Saturday
for
people
just
doing
spring,
cleanup
efforts,
and
so
that's
already
occurring
by
the
demand
for
them,
and
they
want
to
come
and
get
rid
of
their
stuff.
J
People
generally
take
turns
they're
in
and
out
of
their
cars,
one
or
two
at
a
time
and
there's
a
little
more
different,
seeing
effect
than
what
we
might
see
in
other
situations,
Mike
I,
don't
the
anything
you
wanted
to
add
to
that
or
if
we
could
just
hold
for
further
discussion
and
answer
any
other
questions
you
guys
might
have.
Otherwise,
no.
A
That's
a
yard
waste
site.
If
the
council's-
and
you
know
not
opposed
to
that
I'll,
just
direct
them
to
do
that.
I
think
that's
a
service
that
the
public
relies
on
every
year
and
and
I
did
hear
from
numerous
people
that
were
shocked
at
the
thought
that
it
might
not
be
available.
So
all
right,
any
other
new
or
old
business
councilman
bill,
Haller,
I'm.
G
Not
sure
who
all
got
this
I
guess
I'm
a
Chamber
member
but
I
just
like
to
point
out
I
got
an
email
from
Tim.
She
at
the
Chamber
this
afternoon
that
there
are
some
grants
available
from
the
save
small
business
fund
for
businesses
that
had
between
3
and
20
employees
up
to
$5,000
one
time,
Supplemental
cash
grants
that
are
available
out.
There
apparently
I'm,
not
sure
if
it's
first-come,
first-serve
I,
but
if
people
want
more
information
on
this,
the
website
that
is
cited
is
w.
C
C
G
G
G
C
A
C
To
point
that
out,
the
other
thing
I
would
say
to
Heath
as
well.
You
know
with
all
the
people
that
are
at
home
and
that
you
know
they're
going
through
items
myself
included
at
their
house.
You
know,
cy
clean
up
would
be
a
big
deal.
That
sometimes
is
here.
You
know
just
with
people
trying
to
get
through
and
clean
out
stuff
that
they
haven't
had
time
to
do
in
the
past.
C
That
would
be
something
that
we
should
definitely
look
at
moving
forward,
whether
that
be
you
know
and
I'm
two
months,
a
mom,
you
know
end
of
the
summer
type
deal,
but
just
as
a
way
to
get
people
to
clean
out
and
get
rid
of
stuff
out
of
their
homes
that
they're
probably
going
through,
as
they
have
time
now.
Good.
C
That
we
don't
want
to
get
too
late
in
the
year,
because
we
don't
have
the
staff
to
accommodate
all
the
electronic
waste
and
all
of
the
yard.
The
fall
yard
waste
drop-off
last
night
and
as
well
as
well,
that
the
e-waste-
and
we
would
love
to
we'll-
have
two
drivers
on
a
hard
way.
Chocolate
leaf
season
comes
so
if
it
gets
into
a
fall,
it
becomes
it.
We
don't
have
a
staff,
so
we
would
be
sooner
than
better
than
I.
Think
yep
good.
I
A
A
I
You
for
that
I
would
like
to
commend
Todd
Syre.
All
of
the
personnel
at
the
airport.
I
want
to
tell
all
the
business
owners,
families,
everyone
in
town
I
know
everyone's
just
trying
to
figure
out
a
way
to
make
it
through
this
and
here
at
the
city,
we're
doing
the
same
thing
on
all
levels.
I
know
that
we
could
apply
this
to
all
of
the
city
personnel
we're
just
trying
to
find
a
way
at
the
airport,
while
there's
lots
of
businesses
that
are
down
the
latest
numbers.
I
Our
Airport
Travel
are
down
98
percent,
that's
nationwide
and
it's
dismal
and
with
air
service
being
such
a
vital
part
of
growing
this
community
Todd
and
everyone
at
the
airport
board
and
all
the
personnel
we're
trying
really
hard
to
figure
out
a
way
to
just
keep
this
alive
and
keep
it
going.
We
are
working
with
Sky
West.
We
are
working
with
the
FAA
and
we're
trying
a
lot
of
different
things
to
just
we.
I
We
need
to
try
to
keep
this
going
as
best
as
we
can,
because
the
airline
industry
is
not
one
that
you
can
just
start
back
up
again.
There
are
so
many
rules
about
flying
into
airports,
gassing
up
terminals,
gate
fees
bidding
on
your
tracks,
and
things
like
that
on
when
you
fly
and
where
you
fly,
there's
a
lot
of
restrictions.
I
So
it's
not
just
you're
going
to
wave
a
magic
wand
and
it's
going
to
come
back
so
as
a
result,
the
FAA
is
trying
to
keep
it
as
normal
as
it
could
possibly
be,
knowing
that
we
are
in
the
most
abnormal
time
as
you
could
possibly
be
in
so
I
just
want
to
tell
the
city
of
all
of
the
people
we're
trying
very
hard
to
keep
airline
a
very
viable
product
going
forward
in
Watertown,
and
we
just
thank
everyone
for
that.
I
would
just
wanted
to
commend
everyone
at
the
airport,
Thank.
A
All
right,
any
announcements
seen
any
we
do
have
a
need
to
go
into
executive
session
this
evening
in
order
to
discuss
and
consult
with
legal
counsel
on
contractual
matter
and
personnel
matters,
and
we
do
not
expect
to
take
action
upon
coming
out.
So
look
for
motion
motion
my
whole
een.
Second,
by
behar
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
chrysten
signify
by
saying
aye
roll
call
vote.
Please.