![youtube image](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IAHaA5cxLYI/mqdefault.jpg)
►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 05-18-2020
Description
City Council Meeting - 05-18-2020
C
D
A
E
A
A
B
A
B
F
Just
moved
to
the
regular
agenda,
it
wouldn't
necessarily
need
to
be
a
motion.
You,
as
the
chairperson
American,
suggests
that
movement
and
I
would
also
suggest
going
forward,
since
it's
a
pretty
hard
line
about
recusal
as
related
to
alcohol
issues,
not
only
with
the
current
council,
but
going
forward,
there's
more
than
likely
always
going
to
be.
Somebody
with
that
conflict,
so
I
would
suggest
all
alcohol
related
approvals
never
play
put
on
the
consent
agenda.
Okay,.
A
E
G
E
Question
point
again:
I
starting
such
a
hassle
by
the
big
grant
on
the
approval
of
the
consent
agenda
item
4
H
again
just
suggesting
disclosure
I
want
to
deal
with
T
Commission
I'm
involved
with
those
on
a
state
level
I'm
not
going
to
recuse
myself
I'm,
just
disclosing
that
connection.
Thank
you
thank.
A
B
B
B
E
B
A
Item
5
is
the
public
comment
period,
and
this
is
the
time
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so.
If
you'd
like
to
speak,
please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone
for
the
record
and
say
request
permission
to
speak.
If
your
condom
comment
is
related
to
an
agenda
item
I,
prefer
you
wait
until
that
agenda
item
is
taken
up
by
the
council.
Is
there
anyone
who
would
like
to
speak.
A
D
H
E
D
A
Hairy.
Thank
you.
We're
on
item
7,
the
regular
agenda.
A
is
all
of
my
first
addition:
the
annexation
and
zoning,
and
the
first
item
is
approval
of
resolution
number
20-24,
annexation
of
a
tract
of
land
contiguous
to
the
city
of
Watertown,
South
Dakota,
to
be
known
as
the
Ala.
My
first
edition
Heath.
Will
you
please
explain
this
for
us.
I
First
edition
the
owner
of
the
property
currently
located
outside
the
city
limits,
but
is
contiguous
to
the
city
limits
his
petition
to
annex
--an
zone,
approximately
3
acres
of
his
property
that
he
owns.
This
is
the
current
location
of
big
shots.
Fireworks,
as
the
council
recalls.
We've
recently
gone
through
some
zoning
ordinance
amendments
over
the
past
several
months,
and
one
of
those
zoning
amendments
that
we
made
was
the
maid
for
the
allowance.
I
Warehousing
packaging
and
sales
of
fireworks
do
certain
Iwan
properties
within
the
community
that
met
certain
criteria
that
zoning
ordinance
passed
and
is
on
our
books
now
today,
and
in
effect
so
upon
annexation
and
subsequent
rezoning.
If
both
are
approved,
dentistry
alamos
property
would
be
located
in
an
a.1
district
and
the
youth
that
he
currently
has
would
become
approved
under
a
conditional
use.
Permit
application
at
the
POA
at
the
subsequent
Planning
Commission
vo
a
meeting
again.
I
A
H
A
I
Annexation
does
fulfill
mr.
Alma's
agreement
with
the
city
to
annex
he
entered
into
an
annexation
agreement
about
five
years
ago
for
the
purposes
of
receiving
water
service
to
his
facility,
and
that
agreement
was
exercised
between
him
and
his
pool
utilities
in
the
city
and
and
following
through
with
those
requirements
to
be
annexed
within
five
years.
Everything
is
in
line
to
meet
the
deadlines
of
that
agreement.
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out
as
well.
Thank.
A
A
E
B
B
E
E
B
E
A
Thank
you.
Okay
item
7a
to
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-16
establishment
of
the
zoning
designation
of
i1
light
industrial
district
for
the
area
of
land
to
be
known
upon
annexation
as
the
Ala.
My
first
edition,
so
we've
already
had
a
little
discussion
of
that
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion.
Then
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
I
A
A
D
B
I
A
B
A
F
If,
if
folks
aren't
heeding
that
directive
from
the
park
board,
we
also
took
the
opportunity,
since
we
were
addressing
this
ordinance
to
add
in
that
Memorial
Park
is
also
under
you
know.
The
jurisdiction
of
the
County
Commission
and
already
mentioned
was
the
was
sandy
shore
State
Park,
being
under
the
directive
of
the
South
Dakota
game,
fish
and
parks
and
I,
would
you
know
turn
it
over
at
PK?
If
you
add
me,
a
more
input
tour
wanted
to
make
any
comments
on
the
board's
action
there.
Okay,.
G
Thank
you,
math
thinking,
mayor
again
with
this,
as
Matt
alluded
to
the
board,
brought
this
up
but
forth
for
the
council
to
make
it
enforceable,
and
just
just
to
the
council's
awareness.
I
have
received
more
positive
comments
on
this
in
support
of
the
action.
I
I
did
receive
one
one
concern,
and
that
was
a
neighbor
in
the
forsberg
Park
area
that
wasn't
really
a
highly
utilized
fireworks
area
and
their
concern
was
with
city
park.
Closing
if
that'll
become
I,
won't
call
it
the
new
city
park.
But
those
are
the
comments.
G
A
H
A
Jackson
Park
is
another
public
spot
at
the
lake,
the
the
entire
lake
that
was
annexed
at
that
time.
That's
where
you
can
shoot
fireworks
the
only
place
in
town
that
people
can
do
that
in
the
city
limits,
and
so
the
the
public
areas
are
the
public
parks.
You
need
permission
at
the
other
parks
like
the
sandy
shores
requires
state
permission,
Memorial
Park
requires
county
permission,
and
so,
if
someone
were
to
do
a
show
here,
they
could
probably
get
special
permission
from
the
park
board.
Is
that
true
Matt?
F
A
D
E
G
I
do
believe
that
their
state
accesses
they
cannot.
Obviously
Matt
I
will
lean
to
you.
You
know
we
United
to
research
that
but
I
do
believe
if
it's
the
state
access
such
as
sailboat
the
city
access
is,
you
know,
Jackson,
City
or
now
City
with
this,
but
I
do
believe
this,
because
I
D
was
located
by
sailboat
and
I
do
believe.
This
state
didn't
mention
that
that
was
off-limits.
If.
F
K
F
D
That
begs
the
common
I'm
thinking
of
down
by
cuts
having
just
on
the
road
from
you
mayor.
That's
a
public
access
point
and
I
have
received
a
complaint
from
a
citizen
about
that.
The
stuff
that's
stored
at
some
of
those
access
points,
that
is
not
a
storage
spot
for
boat,
docks
and
lifts,
and
you
know
old
vehicles
and
whatnot,
so
especially
the
fourth
coming
up
in
those
spots
probably
wanted
to
be
more
accessible.
People
need
to
get
their
stuff
out
of
those
those
areas,
because
that's
not
a
storage
spot
yeah.
A
I
think
there'd
be
quite
a
few
neighbors
that
would
be
unhappy
about
City
publicising
those
public
accident.
Many
of
them
are
not
improved,
they're,
just
lawn,
that's
mode
by
the
adjacent
property
owners,
and
you
know
it's
there
for
the
public,
but
well
quite
a
few
of
them
are
not
improved,
so
it
would
feel
intrusive,
not
that
it
would
be
illegal
right,
I.
H
A
No,
you
know
this
has
been
brought
up
before
that
we
should
put
signage
there
and
I
think
we're
working
on
that
I
doubt
if
those
points
are
all
signed
at
this
time,
and
so
I
mean
we
can
publicize
a
map
but
the
and
we
have
a
map.
I
can
show
it,
but
it's
hard
to
see
unless
you
zoom
in
and
it's
you
can't
tell
by
looking
at
it
if
it's
improved
or
not
so
I
think
we
could
do
that,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
be
misleading
to
people
and
we.
F
Decide
to
follow
up
on
councilman
Hoyer's
comment
there
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
what
you're
getting
at,
but
I
mean
I,
suppose
that
that's
a
fair
that
Glen
raises
fair
point
here.
I
mean
maybe
it's
a
discussion
that
needs
to
be
had
as
if
we
all
think
that
the
public
can
shoot
fireworks
at
our
large
park.
Should
we
be
condoning
the
public
shooting
fireworks
out
these
little
little
tiny
access
points.
A
Right
now,
it's
not
prohibited
so
you're,
absolutely
right
that
it
would
be
correct
for
someone
to
be
able
to
use
that,
for
that
purpose
and
I
can
put
a
map
out,
but
it
it's
gonna
be
difficult
to
interpret
and
you
will
probably
have
people
going
to
the
wrong
spot
thinking.
It's
a
public
access,
I,
don't
know
well,.
H
A
I'm
not
aware
of
that
going
on
very
often
the
city
has
had
numerous
exercises
of
going
around
the
lake
and
notifying
people
to
remove
their
things
from
the
rights-of-way
like
that
and
I
mean
massive
efforts
years
ago.
It
was
a
huge
problem,
but
lately
I
haven't
seen
that
around
the
ones
that
are
near
me.
I
haven't
seen
that
at
all,
but
it's
possible
that
it's
going
on
on
some
of
them.
Okay,.
H
A
J
You
mayor
question
for
TK
TK
that
went
I
understand
this
was
a
safety
concern
from
the
board.
Was
there
any
other
strategic
alternative
considered
other
than
an
outright
ban
at
City
Park
such
as
maybe
some
enforcement
or
some
safety
guidelines,
or
where
you
could
set
them
off
and
where
you
couldn't,
or
what
I
and
I
will
admit.
I
haven't
been
to
city
park
for
the
fourths
in
20-some
years,
so
I
don't
know
how
bad
it
got
from
a
distance.
It
looks
beautiful,
but
was
there?
G
You
know
there
there
was
councilmen
it.
This
was
not
a
one
meeting
and
done
topic.
This
went
through
facility
committee,
I'm,
gonna,
say
three
to
four
times
before
it
went
to
the
board.
Multiple
options
were
discussed,
you
know
they
discussed
you
know,
should
we
just
change
the
time
and
put
a
parameter
on
8
p.m.
to
midnight
that
way
the
swimmers
were
gone.
That
kind
of
thing
we
talked
about
moving
across
the
road
to
the
east
along
Highway
20,
but
that
area
is
so
damp.
G
Typically
all
the
time
when
it
came
down
to
it
it
it
basically
made
the
most
sense
to
do
an
all-or-none
and
that's
what
the
board
came
up
with
after
it
hearing
all
right.
Looking
at
all
the
safety
issues
it
has,
you
know
you
mentioned
the
20-year
thing
and
it
is
beautiful.
I
mean
it
is
nice
to
sit
and
watch,
but
if
your
shoulders
shoulder
out
there,
if
you're
camping,
it's
not
a
safe,
it's
not
a
safe
environment
and
one
of
the
big
things
is.
We
spend
almost
five
days
picking
up
others
people's
trash.
G
G
Did
not
have
an
official
delegation
that
came
forth.
It
was
discussed
at
our
both
counter
a
committee
level
and
board
level
of
the
potential
implication
of
the
lack
of
fireworks,
error
or
whatever
that
may
be,
but
nobody
did
come
forth
and
in
truth,
Lee
City
Park
around
the
holidays
is
not
typical
you'll.
You
won't
see
a
large
contingency
of
out-of-town
people
just
because
we
don't
offer
reservations
and
to
get
a
spot
at
City,
Park,
typically
you're
pulling
in
almost
ten
days.
Prior
to
that
event,
you.
I
G
If
we
had
a
reservation
system
that
probably
would
look
differently,
but
it
primarily
is
a
local
campground
for
those
holidays.
So
we
may
not
be
losing
on
the
on
the
financial
aspect
on
that
side.
But
as
far
as
the
fireworks,
you
know,
I
can't
say
it's
something
we
don't
do.
It
was
discussed
internally,
but
no
one
officially
came
forward
and
questioned
the
board
on
that
decision.
E
E
G
As
far
as
forsberg,
that's
always
been
on
the
books
as
an
acceptable
location
to
shoot.
You
know
how
much
has
been
used
in
the
past.
I'm,
not
sure
I
didn't
speak
with
a
resident
that
lives
very
close
to
that
location
and
and
they
had
the
concern
and
what
I,
when
I
mentioned,
that
that
we
would
follow
any
type
of
County
burn
bans
as
far
as
the
park
itself.
You
know
it
is
one
large
gravel
parking
lot
if
people
are
not
completely
familiar.
G
That's
where
the
Sun
Dial
o'clock
is
I'm,
gonna,
call
it
real
close
to
across
the
street
from
from
North
Shore.
You
know
a
little
bit
farther
west,
but
that's
the
location
of
that
Park.
It
does
have
a
substantial
gravel
parking
lot,
but
I
won't
argue
with
you
Dan.
As
far
as
you
know,
the
wetlands
is
full
of
cattails.
G
That
type
of
thing,
I,
don't
think
it's
been
strongly
utilized
because
you
know
City
Park
was
always
an
option
and
we
may
see
an
increase
in
usage
moving
forward,
but
I
can't
give
you
specifics
on
how
much
it's
been
used
in
the
past.
What
we'll
see
this
year-
and
it
may
be
one
of
those
things
we
look
at
July,
4th
and
and
if
things
become
an
issue,
we
come
back
before
the
council
for
further
action.
E
Well,
especially
if
it
happens
to
be
a
dry
year,
which
it
might
be,
even
though
we
don't
think
it's
dry
right
now,
but
those
cattails
and
that
whole
thing
and
people
can
get
trapped
in
there
pretty
easily
with
fire
trucks.
Or
you
know
it
doesn't
look
like
a
very
safe
place
to
me
to
have
fireworks
and.
G
I'll
refer
to
our
attorney
Matt
Roby,
on
the
fact
that
I
think
if
we
do
have
a
very
dry
year,
if
there's
burn
bans
in
place
or
if
we
feels
dry
man
I
would
assume
we
could.
We
could
do
some
type
of
Council
action
to
to
amend
this
ordinance
kind
of
I
won't
call
it
last-minute,
but
looking
into
the
future
thinking,
this
may
be
a
problem.
Do
you
want
to
chime
in
on
that
map.
F
L
Just
this
is
suggestion:
I
actually
had
Dan
Ryder
shot
from
lose
called
me
wondering
about.
You
know
they
knew
this
was
going
to
be
on
the
agenda,
one
of
the
things
they
asked
and
then
just
putting
it
out
there
for
discussion.
Is
you
know
the
the
event,
the
fireworks
event
that
was
done
on
a
couple
weeks
ago
by
them
for
their
display?
L
You
know,
was
down
out
at
the
anti
Soccer
Complex
he
wondered
about.
Maybe
they
could
do
something
like
a
public
fireworks
shooting
off
or
for
anyone
that
wants
to
come
out
and
shoot
fireworks
and
he
actually
offered
members
of
his
staff
and
the
Christian
school
to
go
out
and
clean
out
the
day
after
you
know,
maybe
with
a
little
bit
of
assistance.
You
know
by
the
general
public
about
going
out
and
actually
clean
up
after
whoever
the
bad
apples
a
little
tend
to
pick
up
their
stuff
and
or.
L
G
Thought
right
only
liaison
Bueller,
who
is
our
our
council
liaison,
did
didn't
mention
Anza,
as
you
know,
and
I
think
I
can
remember
who
asked
it
was
councilman
read,
skier
or
howleen
did
ask
if
we
looked
at
alternatives
and
in
Mora
Anza
was
considered
as
an
alternative
and
Bruce.
If
you
want
to
touch
on
that
as
well,
but
that
was
considered
and
there's
there's
definitely
options.
You
know
right
now
we're
looking
at
the
unsafe
nasaw
city
park.
E
I,
just
you
know,
I
just
want
to
mention
a
little
bit
I'd
like
to
discuss
a
little
bit
about
our
conversations
regarding
the
safety
issue.
You
know
when
we've
got
the
the
police
department,
that's
come
to
us
and
said
that
it's
a
it's
a
dangerous
situation
for
them,
they're
officers.
You
know
by
the
time
somebody
shot
up,
and
this
happens
frequently
I
guess
they
shoot
fireworks
at
the
policeman
and
by
the
time
it's
it's
over.
They
can't
identify
where
that
came
from.
E
So
that's
been
I
mean
that
was
a
definite
issue
with
the
police
department,
but
as
to
the
point
of
a
different
location,
I
think
I
think
we
really
should
take
a
look
at
that.
That
adds
a
field
I.
Think
that
to
me
that
would
be
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
be
able
to
allow
the
public
to
still
do
that,
and
just
one
other
thing
too,
on
the
safety
end
of
this
thing.
You
know
the
other
part
are
the
campers,
the
folks
in
the
campers,
the
kids.
E
There
were
issues
about
people
swimming
being
in
the
water
fireworks
fire
rockets,
whatever
shooting
out
into
the
water.
All
those
things
had
to
be
considered
when
we
made
the
decision,
because
I
think
we
all
above
to
see
that
continue
there,
but
I
do
think
that
the
city
has
maybe
some
alternate
locations
that
might
work
for
that
and
I.
Think
Anza
would
be
a
real
good
one
for
us
to
take
a
close
look
at.
G
And-
and
we
can
do
that
and
I
think
you
know,
looking
at
the
actual
agenda
item
is
looking
at
the
ban
of
city
park
and
us
as
a
staff,
and
the
board
would
be
happy
to
come
back
to
the
council
with
some
alternatives.
You
know
I,
don't
know
I
think
tonight.
The
focus
is
on
city
park,
but
but
I
have
no
problem
working
with
with
our
board
to
come
through
with
some
alternatives
for
the
community
beyond
what
we
already
have
right.
D
H
We
do
get
that
tossed
onto
the
agenda
for
once'
I.
Think
that's
actually
a
great
idea,
because
I
do
think
we
kind
of
owe
the
public
an
alternative
location
that
doesn't
present
the
same
problems.
We'd
have
anyway
at
the
lake
and
Ahn's
is
such
a
big
wide-open
space
I
mean
it
really
could
work
positively
and
it's
a
good
utilization
of
the
space.
H
If
we
go
down
that
path,
we
may
consider
you
know
putting
in
some
simple
amenities
out
there
if
we're
gonna
do
that,
such
as
like
grilling
space
or
whatever,
just
those
simple
public
ones
stuff
like
that,
just
to
make
it
a
little
more
accessible.
If
we're
serious
about
this,
but
really
looking
at
that
whole
picture,
because
it
could
be
a
really
positive
use
of
it
for
the
summer,
because
you
know
stalkers
during
soccer
season,
so
yep.
E
B
E
The
other
thing
I
just
that
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
and
I
think
the
opportunity
to
use
a
different
location
like
Anza,
perhaps
is
going
to
take
a
little
pressure
off
of
those
locations
that
we
are
going
to
allow
it.
Because
of
the
you
know
the
amount
of
space
that's
left
once
we
take
City
Park
out
in
the
equation,
I
think
you're
gonna
have
people
all
over
each
other
in
those
smaller
areas
that
are
going
to
try
to
cheat
fire.
I
can
tell
you
that
a
little
bit
from
experience
myself
at
Jackson
Park
have.
I
Madam
mayor
he's
here
go
ahead:
he
if
I
could
I'll
quit
pull-ups
map
up
you
referring
to
this
and
then
want
talking
here.
You
know,
like
the
mayor,
pointed
out
this
map
doesn't
without
zooming
in
on.
It
doesn't
clearly
show
you
where
those
public
areas
are,
but
I
just
wanted
to
point
out.
There
are
at
least
back
when
this
map
was
created.
There
were
20
public
access
locations
around
the
lake.
This
is
an
awkward
orientation
of
lakes.
The
North
is
up
here
in
this
direction.
City
park
is
here.
I
Sandy
shores
is
over
here,
one
of
the
things
going
to
point
out:
real,
quick
just
to
councilman
Oilers
and
some
of
the
other
councilman
discussion
here.
The
lakum
Pesce
master
plan
I
believe
generally
touches
on
some
of
these
access
points
as
points
of
potential
improvement
for
public
improvements
and
I
know
that
something
Roger
foot
is
working
on
as
a
big
Sioux,
River
watershed
project
manager
underneath
Public
Works
and
he's
been
communicating
recently
with
me
about
next
year's
budgets
and
projects,
essentially
plug
into
that
just
for
conversation
purposes.
I
wanted
to
make
that
known.
I
That's
a
confess.
Kumasi
plan
generally
talks
about
these
points
of
access
and
I
think
there's
some
guidance.
We
can
take
from
that
plan
to
potentially
improve
some
of
them,
which
lends
to
the
discussion
of
you
know
whether
we
start
signing
all
or
some
some
of
them,
but
something
we've
done
on
a
radar
anyway.
That's
one
of
the
council's
and
all
that
all
right.
Thank.
A
H
If
we
could,
if
we're
gonna
put
that
I
know
it's
probably
accessible
to
the
public,
but
you
could
probably
use
that
same
product
and
then,
if
we
go
ahead
and
just
pull
some
GPS
coordinates
they
can
plug
that
into
any
phone.
And
then
you
can
just
right
there.
That
could
be
an
easy
supplement
to
it,
so
they
don't
have
to
zoom
in
or
think
too
hard
about
it.
But
I
would
imagine
with
our
some
of
our
city
software.
We
can
pull
some
GPS
creds,
pretty
easy.
A
I
A
Each
of
those
access
points
is
shown
on
the
GIS.
Did
you
have
to
look
at
it,
though,
to
see
if
it's
improved,
some
of
them
are
some
of
them.
Aren't
anyone
else,
don't
see
anyone
so
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
roll
call
vote,
Kristen,
okay,.
J
A
Moaning
Harry
all
right.
Thank
you.
So
we're
moving
on
to
item
D,
which
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-18
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota
for
a
portion
of
lot,
1
block
1
of
Isabella
1st
edition
from
I
1
light
industrial
district,
2,
C,
3,
highway
commercial
district,
and
this
is
just
a
first
reading.
So
no
action
is
required.
Iii.
Please
tell
us
about
that.
I
E
I
Is
resumed
that
horse
of
the
platted
lab
will
be
required
to
be
subdivided
replanted
to
distinguish
the
new
zoning
just
boundaries
on
a
distinguish,
lot
line
basis,
and
so
that's
being
first
reading
before
the
council
tonight.
We
could
certainly
help
out
the
Planning
Commission
unanimously
Brack
them
in
approval
after
May
7th
Planning
Commission
meeting
all.
I
Correct
councilman
bill
Haller
and
perfect
segue
into
my
map
was
going
to
share
here.
So
this
is
the
map
of
the
reason
owned
area.
We
have
highway
212
running
through
here
you
have
the
college
property,
that's
C,
3
and
I.
Guess
I'm
not
familiar
with
the
exact
business
right
here,
but
there's
also
C
3
to
the
west,
and
this
hashed
area
is
what
would
become
C
3.
That's
currently,
I
want.
A
B
Thank
You
mayor
so
basically
was
the
second
reading
and
it's
the
section
of
4.01
C
of
the
city,
water,
the
city
of
Watertown
personnel
policy
and
procedure
manual
will
be
deleted
and
it
will
replace
be
replaced
with
the
following
employees.
That
will
require
the
residents
of
15
miles
from
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport.
Those
employees
will
include
all
airport
staff,
Fire,
Rescue
staff,
IT
staff,
police
department,
staff,
Street
division
operators
and
foremen,
and
then
the
wastewater
collection
staff.
A
A
H
B
Yeah,
so
I
believe
that
that's
one
of
the
main
reasons
is
due
to
the
fact
that
they
are
pretty
importance
in
regards
to
if
the
fire
department
were
to
shut
down,
it's
the
police
department,
if
any
of
their
servers
were
shut
down,
they're
going
to
need
to
potentially
go
into
the
fire
department
and
or
the
police
department
to
get
the
server's
back
up
and
running
and
Matt
did
do
some
more
research.
So
if
I
misspoke
Matt
I
would
ask
that
you
comment.
F
A
Main
reason
is
to
enlarge
the
pool
of
applicants
for
the
city
when
we
have
job
openings,
and
this
has
been
requested
numerous
times
through
the
years.
It's
brought
up
and
there's
good
arguments
on
both
sides
of
it,
but
I
just
think
with
with
our
dwindling
applicant
pool
and
the
fact
that
baby
boomers
are
retiring
and
leaving
the
workforce
faster.
Then
people
are
stepping
up
to
take
public
servant
roles.
A
K
What
this
amounts
to
basically,
is
we're
asking
our
taxpaying
citizens
to
pay
use
their
tax
money
to
fund
the
salaries
of
people
who
not
only
will
not
live
in
the
city,
but
will
live
outside
of
Coddington
County.
But
then
we
turn
around
and
ask
them
to
shop
local
and
support
local
businesses.
I,
don't
think
it's
in
the
city's
best
interest
to
promote
people
to
live
outside
the
city
and
draw
taxpaying
citizens
wages
to
fund
their
salaries.
If
the
city
is
good
enough
to
work
in
I
think
the
city's
good
enough
to
live
in
well.
A
Thank
you
for
that.
All
right,
I
appreciate
that
input.
But,
to
be
honest,
for
many
many
years
we
haven't
required
people
to
live
in
the
city
limits.
So
quite
a
few
of
our
employees
already
live
outside
the
city
limits
in
the
county
and
further
away.
This
just
expands
it
a
little
further
and
the
people
who
come
to
work
here
generally
do
shop
here
they
shop
while
they're.
Here
they
pick
up,
groceries,
buy
gas,
stop
at
the
stores.
So
I
would
say.
A
That's
not
true
that
they're
not
spending
money
here,
just
because
it's
not
where
their
house
is
where
their
house
is.
You
know
it's
where
their
body
is
for
eight
hours
a
day.
Five
days
a
week,
year-round
and
they'll
tend
to
spend
money
in
that
location.
So
I,
don't
know
that
anybody's
done
a
study
on
that
to
see
what
it
is,
but
yes,
councilman,
Hoyer.
A
H
A
It
kind
of
does
yes,
that's
true
and
the
departments
are
different,
I
mean
it's
you,
you
look
at
what
has
happened
with
covent
City
Hall
is
closed
to
the
public,
except
by
appointment,
and
virtually
every
department
has
a
lot
of
people
working
remotely
and
every
single
thing
that
we
do
in
City
Hall
is
still
happening.
We
haven't
stopped
any
of
our
services.
We
can.
We
can
conduct
our
services
remotely
now
with
technology,
and
so,
if
someone's
home
in
a
blizzard,
they
can
probably
still
work.
A
A
J
J
This
co
vid
crisis
has
brought
to
light
people
working
remotely,
but
if
this
passes
what's
to
stop
it
from
constantly
being
eroded
to
where
we
just
relaxed
our
rules
so
much
that
we
allow
full
time
city
employees
to
work
remotely
non-stop,
where
are
y
35
miles,
when
will
it
be
stretched
out
to
60
miles
or
90
miles,
I
guess:
I,
don't
know
we
constantly
relax
it
and
where
is
it
going
to
stop?
Have
we
had
that
discussion?
Well,.
A
B
F
Not
at
the
workplace
does
not
count
as
work,
so
maybe
at
some
point
it
might
be
a
discussion
for
the
council
to
have
about
about
work
from
home
and
that
sort
of
thing.
But
currently,
if
somebody
lives
in
Minneapolis
and
they
wanted
a
commuter
every
day,
they
still
have
to
get
here
by
8:00
and
work
a
full
day.
They
couldn't
work
from
Minneapolis
right.
A
D
D
Jason
read
your
concerns,
but
in
this
day
and
age,
I
I
do
not
see
what
what
difference
or
how
critical
the
distance
element
should
be
as
long
as
that
employee
is
getting
their
job
done
satisfactorily,
and
secondly,
I've
also
been
in
this
position
long
enough
to
know
that
we
have
had
an
awfully
hard
time
at
times
filling
a
position,
and
if
we
can
make
this
one
minor
change
that
could
help
a
future
position.
I
I'm
in
favor
of
removing
that
distance
requirement.
E
Thank
you
allotted
two
we've
seen
this
before
it's
kind
of
been
a
moving
target,
which
makes
me
question
the
policy
where
were
changing
on
a
fairly
regular
basis,
I'm
okay,
with
this
change,
I'm
going
to
vote
for
it
because
it's
clear
but
I'm
going
to
also
fall
to
say.
Well,
the
city
management
comes
out
board
I'd
like
to
add
thank.
L
You
know
I
understand
the
points.
I
got
a
couple
of
comments
that
people
have
sent
me
yeah
I'd
love
to
have
everyone.
You
know
that
works
here
live
in
town,
but
you
know
to
your
point:
we
have
people
that
live
in
Florence.
They
live
in
Castle
wood
they
can
live
in.
You
know
acreage,
that's
15
miles
away.
You
know
the
chances
of
someone
not
spending
money
in
order
tone
you
are
here
every
day
is
pretty
low.
L
B
Said
that
it
was
a
game
changer
for
them,
they
have
no
requirement.
He
gave
examples
of
people
who
live
in
Sioux
Falls,
because
one
spouse
or
another
has
a
job
at
the
hospital
or
something
like
that,
and
in
fact
they
even
go
so
far
as
to
have
special
allowances,
for
you
know,
storms
and
things
like
that.
But
what
he
said
was-
and
that
was
echoed
out
here
too-
is
that
the
person
still
had
to
comply
with
all
the
rest
of
the
components
of
their
job
being
on
time,
completing
their
work.
B
They
were
adamant
that
this
was
something
that
they
changed,
that
was
great
and
they're,
not
planning
on
changing
it
back
anytime
soon,
so
I
think
all
the
rest
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
say
were
already
said
about
quality
employees
and
that
type
of
thing,
but
we're
not
alone
in
this
I
guess,
in
fact,
right
now
we
are
probably
one
of
the
few
of
the
cities
our
size
in
South
Dakota.
That
does
have
really
a
very
restrictive
you
know.
Most
of
them
have
dropped
it
all
together.
All.
A
B
Thank
You
mayor
I'm,
just
kind
of
coming
from
my
last
role
to
I,
did
want
to
say
that
in
my
time
with
the
city,
this
policy
has
actually
been
looked
at
and
changed
three
times
it
just
slowly
been
moved
out
further
and
further.
Some
of
it
I
know
a
lot
of
times.
It's
viewed
as
it's
being
changed
because
of
hiring
difficulties.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that,
yes,
sometimes
it
has
something
to
do
with
the
hiring
of
employees.
B
So
we
have
also
lost
very
good
employees
because
of
this
there
again,
you'll
have
a
spouse
that
needs
to
move,
and
the
employee
will
end
up
having
to
quit
because
they
can't
meet
that
residency
requirement.
So
I
understand
sometimes
the
money
aspect
of
the
sales
tax,
but
we
also
tend
to
lose
employees
with
a
lot
of
knowledge
and
a
lot
of
time
with
the
city
because
of
our
residency
issue.
B
The
other
thing
I
do
want
to
point
out
is
that
d'alene
and
Matt
both
requested
all
department
heads
to
look
at
it
and
to
give
their
input,
so
every
department
has
had
the
opportunity
to
look
at
their
size
of
their
department.
It
needs
how
fast
they
need
to
respond,
and
we
all
had
that
opportunity
to
implement
what
we
felt
was
appropriate
for
our
department.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
J
J
They
know
the
people
involved
and
there's
repercussions
to
their
political
and
I
would
even
say
personal
life
based
upon
how
they
vote.
They
are
invested
in
the
community
and
if
we
start
relaxing
these
rules
down
this
slippery
slope
or
someone
who
doesn't
even
live
in
Watertown,
let's
say
considers
themselves
a
resident
of
another
town.
They
would
not
be
what
I
would
call
that
closest
level
of
government.
They
would
not
be
the
most
responsive
to
the
people
that
they
are
trying
to
serve
and
I'm
a
little
reluctant
on
a
philosophical
grounds.
J
A
H
B
Are
you
trying
to
give
l'olam
alright
panty
I,
don't
be
no
OB,
hey
Bill,
Howard
hi
motion
carried.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
and
this
next
item
is
related
item.
Ii.
Is
approval
of
resolution
20-25
amending
the
personnel
policy
and
procedure
manual
to
remove
the
35-mile
residency
requirement
and
clarify
the
categories
of
employees
subject
to
the
15-mile
residency
requirement
and
I'll
look
for
a
motion
then
we'll
have
some
discussion
so.
H
A
B
B
So
the
following
categories
of
employees,
who
will
be
required
to
reside
within
that
15
miles
of
the
Watertown
regional
airports,
do
include
airport
staff,
fire
staff,
IT
staff,
police
staff,
Street
Division
operators
and
foremen
and
wastewater
division,
plant
operators
and
collections
staff
and,
again,
just
to
reiterate
what
Kristin
said.
Matt
did
put
reach
out
to
all
the
department
heads
and
we
got
all
of
their
input
for
this
matter.
B
A
H
Would
just
toss
out
if
we're
gonna
go
ahead,
and
do
this
just
please
make
sure
we
do
have
accountability
for
people
showing
up
to
work
on
time
being
where
they're
supposed
to
be
I
know
that
there's
some
mechanisms
in
place
I
know
each
department
kind
of
handles
it
a
little
bit
different.
But
if
your
voice
isn't
being
heard,
please
make
it
heard
if
there's
issues
that
come
up
from
this
right.
A
Thank
you
was
that
you
Heath
yes,
it
was,
could
I
speak
for
a
minute
sure.
Please
go
ahead.
I
If
it
lets
me
here
to
talk
real
briefly
on
the
public
works
division
for
one
one
reason:
I
want
to
bring
this
up
as
a
point
of
clarity,
I
think
Matt
and
I
and
Elaine
had
a
couple.
Different
renditions
of
us
going
around
the
solid
waste
division
should
be
wastewater
collection,
so
we
didn't.
We
do
not
intend
to
limit
this
to
the
solid
waste
division,
reason
being
and
talking
with
superintendent
Byrd.
The
solid
waste
division
is
not
on
call
or
on
standby,
as
the
wastewater
division
and
wastewater
collection
operators
are
on
standby.
I
There's
a
point
of
clarity
there
that
you
would
want
to
exclude
the
solid
waste
division
and
include
wastewater
collections
and
then
the
other
12-course
division
is
the
airport
staff
and
the
street
division
all
those
the
reason
those
were
selected
on
this
you
put
on
this
list.
The
context
primarily
stems
back
to
what
I
said
a
minute
ago.
If
there's
any
staff
that
are
on-call
or
responsible
to
take
a
take,
an
on
call
phone
home
within
each
night
on
a
rotational
basis
and
they're
on
standby.
I
I
F
F
F
I,
don't
know
I
just
noticed
he
planted
out
there
that
correction.
The
version
that
you
have
in
front
of
you
was
not
the
version
that
was
on
the
last
agenda.
There
must
have
been
a
mix-up
in
our
software
system,
so
the
the
amended
yet
the
aversion
should
be
approved
at
the
version
that
was
on
the
council
meeting
from
last.
The
last
council
meeting
the
agenda
from
the
last
council
meeting.
So
it
does
include
that
correction
that
he
just
pointed
out
so.
A
F
A
A
E
B
D
B
A
D
B
Thank
You,
mayor
and
council,
this
is
a
continue
to
transfer
every
year
during
the
budget
process.
Part
of
our
budget
is
we
implement
$300,000
that
set
aside
as
a
contingency.
What
this
is
meant
for
is
those
unanticipated
expenditures
that
aren't
covered
by
something
that
insurance
would
normally
cover
or
pick
up.
That
is
probably
going
to
be
not
able
to
be
fixed
within
that
department's
budget,
so
the
police
department
had
one
of
the
engines
in
the
patrol
vehicles
go
out
and
it's
estimated
to
be
around
$7,000
to
replace
the
car.
B
Just
came
off
of
warranty,
so
the
police
department
is
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
that
replaced
and
with
that
they
will
be
keeping
this
car
in
the
three
year
cycle
after
the
replacement.
I
do
know
that
curt
is
on
as
well.
So
if
anybody
has
any
more
specific
questions,
he
can
probably
answer
them
to
the
vehicle.
So
essentially
what
this
does
is
it
takes
the
$7,000
from
the
contingency
and
moves
it
to
the
police
department's
budget
so
that
they
would
not
go
over
budget
for
2020.
You
have
any
questions.
A
B
K
B
A
L
B
E
B
A
B
H
B
B
J
A
If
you
carry
thank
you,
the
next
item
is
G
approval
of
resolution
number
20-17,
adopting
the
boundaries
of
tax
increment
district
number
12
within
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota,
and
the
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
a
development
agreement
between
the
city
of
Watertown
and
Parkside
place.
Llc
for
tax
increment
district
number,
12,
hey.
A
F
F
Yet
the
total
amount
of
tax
increment
that
the
city
will
be
paying
out
will
be
1
million
four
hundred
and
sixty
six
thousand
four
hundred
and
seventy
dollars
now
that's
paid
out
over
20
years
or
until
we
hit
that
number.
Whichever
comes
first
so
if
it
gets
assessed
at
a
higher
value,
the
tip
would
end
sooner
if
it
gets
assessed
at
a
lower
value
than
we
anticipate.
F
The
20
years
would
expire
and
the
payments
to
be
made
another
thing
to
note
that
the
payments
here
are
being
assigned
their
payments
owed
to
the
developer,
but
part
of
the
agreement.
That's
part
of
this
resolution
here
is
that
the
payments,
the
city
all
make
will
be
paid
to
the
Watertown
development
company,
because
there's
financing
that
they're
facilitating
local
project
so
hold
all
this
stop
there
and
then
I
would
let
probably
Chris
and
Jessi
if
they're
in
the
room,
maybe
maybe
chime
in
and
go
from
there.
Okay,
we.
A
M
M
A
M
F
There
I
would
add
one
more
item
just
to
point
out
prior
to
discussion
here
this
this
agreement.
The
agreement
part
of
this
action
does
include
an
agreement
by
the
city
to
reimburse
the
developer
for
costs
related
to
site
utility
improvements,
sidewalk
removal
and
replacement
and
alley
removal,
and
specifically,
it's
up
to
not-to-exceed.
Excuse
me:
$18,500
for
site
utility
improvements,
$22,000
for
sidewalk,
sidewalk
removal
and
replacement
in
$23,500
for
alley.
Removal,
if
you
want
to
know
about
that
section,
is
section
2.10
of
the
contract.
A
M
It
will
probably
the
only
thing
that
we
would
change,
possibly
would
be
kind
of
like
we
did
with
the
lost
project
where
we
looked
at
implementing
planters
and
again
that
we
go
through
Heath
and
engineering
and
City
Commission.
Of
course,
if
that
were
worth
worth,
pursuing
we'd
have
to
look
at
the
dimensions
on
that
I.
Don't
know
if
this
sidewalk
over
here
is
quite
as
wide
as
the
one
on
Broadway,
so
it
might
not
work
for
that,
but
I,
also
in
talking
with
Heath
and
with
other
staff
members.
M
Bedrooms
always
rent
two's,
not
always
threes,
not
always,
especially
when
you're
looking
at
downtown
mixed-use
higher
density,
higher
young
professionals,
things
of
that
nature-
and
it
also
comes
back
to
my
management
background
with
two
bedrooms.
You
always
have
inner
fighting
between
tenant
earth
between
roommates
and
things
like
that.
One
bedrooms
just
go
super
simple
super
clean
this
one
is
a
little
tighter
site,
so
we're
also
looking
at
the
ratio
of
parking
spaces
to
bedrooms
and
just
worked
out
a
lot
better
on
this
site
to
have
all
one
bedrooms.
M
D
M
Be
one
thing
to
note:
the
project
decreased
in
cost
from
the
first
go-round
by
a
little
bit,
so
you
know
we
have
approved
us
to
go:
facilitate
financing
to
fund
the
TIF.
That's
been
approved
at
a
higher
dollar
amount.
If
anything
changes
now
we
just
have
to
bring
it
back
since
it'd
be
a
lower
amount,
is
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page
but
as
the
project
lowered
sort
of
the
TIF
amount
but
sort
of
the
TIF
amount
collected.
So
it's
all
in
range
there.
Okay,.
D
M
D
M
So
you
know,
and
I'll
always
reiterate
to
Tiff's
been
a
tool
for
economic
development
for
a
long
time
new
to
Watertown
for
sure,
as
we've
been
getting
projects
going
in
facilitating
downtown
redevelopment,
but
a
pretty
common
tool
used
throughout
the
United
States
I
know:
we've
had
brief.
History
seems
like
who
had
more
lately
in
the
last
two
years,
but
those
are
really
what
it
takes
to
get
development
going.
So
just.
D
M
D
M
Well,
since
it's
all
property
tax,
some
way
shape
or
form,
somebody
would
own
on
the
property.
You
know
we
discuss
at
our
board
level
too.
We
have
some
different
agreements
that
we
have
with
developers
on
that
on
that
protect
us,
but
more
than
likely,
when
it's
up
whether
it's
sold
or
something
happens,
it's
going
to
have
some
tax
assessed
value.
Well.
Well,
it's
in
as
a
reminder
to
you
know
these
really
pay
off
year.
21,
when
you
know
you
take
a
$300,000
property
turn
in
a
5
million
dollar
property.
D
B
A
H
M
K
A
And
this
you
know,
development,
downtown
and
residential,
combined
with
commercial
mixed
use,
is
really
important
for
us.
That's
that's
very,
very
helpful
for
what
we
want
to
go
with
our
town,
developing
it's
one
of
our
main
goals.
So
thanks
for
doing
that,
I'm
gonna
call
for
the
vote.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
roll
call
vote.
Please
Kristen.
E
A
You
alright
item
H
is
review
of
the
continued
necessity
of
resolution
number
20-15
declaring
an
emergency
concerning
the
pandemic
outbreak
of
the
novel
coronavirus,
kovat,
19
and
providing
for
responsive
measures
related
to
the
operations
of
the
city
and
the
protection
of
Public
Health
and
I'm
not
going
to
take
a
motion
right
away,
but
I
will
let
city
attorney
Matt
Roby
talk
about
this?
Go
ahead.
Matt.
F
Thank
You
Mara,
as
the
council
will
recall
this
was
passed
by
by
the
council
a
month
and
a
half
ago,
or
so
two
months
ago,
it's
since
been
amended
twice
once
to
clarify
that
it
does
not
that
the
closure
of
buildings
does
not
apply
to
city-owned
buildings
that
happen
to
be
operated
by
third
parties.
So
it's
just
city
operated
buildings,
and
then
we
also
then
made
an
exception
for
the
zoo
and
the
Wellness
Center,
and
you
know
in
addition
to
that,
it
does
just
just
to
run
through
what
it
does
again.
F
It
declares
a
public
health
emergency
in
the
city
of
Watertown.
It
gives
the
mayor
the
ability
to
a
man.
Excuse
me
temporarily:
suspend
applicable
causes
of
the
personnel
policy
so
specifically,
as
we
referenced
earlier.
Some
of
the
works
from
home
prerogatives
here
that
are
being
that
are
being
facilitated,
are
tied
to
this,
the
building's
policy
arrangements
for
meetings
and
encouraging
folks
to
follow
CDC
guidelines
and
then
giving
the
mayor
some
additional
abilities.
If
there's
a
urgent
matter
that
needs
to
be
addressed.
A
G
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor
I'm,
going
to
kind
of
give
you
a
synopsis
of
the
special
meeting
we
had
one
week
ago
on
May
11th.
Now
we
did
call
a
special
meeting
as
we
were
getting
to
the
point:
we're
ready
to
progress
a
little
further
with
our
openings
within
the
board
did
take
action
on
and
a
few
facilities.
Some
of
these
come
with
recommendations.
Some
do
fall
within
the
the
Park
and
Rec
board
rights
to
open
that
weren't
involved
with
the
resolution.
G
So
we've
got
kind
of
a
combination
here
tonight,
I'm
just
giving
the
council
an
update
on
certain
facilities
and
then
giving
you
a
recommendation
in
hopes
that
you
do
amend
the
current
resolution
in
front
of
you
and
and
I
apologize.
I
truly
do
have
about
10
pieces
of
paper
in
front
of
me.
So
I
don't
miss
anything.
The
first
one,
the
playgrounds
within
the
community.
Those
were
officially
opened
by
the
authority
of
the
the
Park
Board.
They
were
open
the
following
day
on
Tuesday
with
tape
coming
down
and
I'm.
G
In
basically
up
front,
say
everything
we
are
opening
you're
considering
opening
comes
with
personal
responsibility
comes
with
social
distancing.
Comes
with
CDC
guidelines
and
I
say
that
up
front
just
to
not
be
repetitive.
Every
time
I
talk
about
a
facility,
I
I,
don't
feel
I
want
to
repeat
that.
We
are
focused
on
on
those
aspects.
So
again,
just
so
that
councils
aware
we
have
open
playgrounds
to
the
community,
although
CDC
still
recommends
the
closure,
we
have
determined
that
we're.
We
are
not
going
to
play
police
on
that.
G
We're
gonna,
leave
that
up
to
personal
responsibility
again
and
in
hopes
people
follow
that
other
action.
There
was
a
recommendation
to
the
council
to
amend
the
resolution
to
allow
us
to
open
a
few
of
our
brick-and-mortar
rental
facilities,
namely
Derby
Downs
rodeo
arena
and
the
clubhouse,
in
addition
to
fully
shelter
which
is
located
at
the
new
lions
park
on
3rd
Avenue.
G
With
that
we
do
have
restrictions
of
what
the
renter
can
and
can't
do,
but
that
I
did
come
in
with
the
recommendation
of
the
council
to
go
ahead
and
let
us
offer
those
amenities
to
the
public.
We
do
have
some
rentals
actually
beginning
as
early
as
this
Friday
majority
of
those
are
graduations,
we
do
have
a
small
rodeo.
That
will
happen
in
the
arena,
but
that
would
fall
under
the
the
current
resolution
within
the
council.
G
Outdoor
restrooms,
we
have
determined
to
open
the
ones
that
we
actually
have
staff
on-site.
The
two
mainly
would
be
the
outdoor
restroom
at
cattail
crossing
the
restroom.
That's
on
the
course
we
have
the
ability
to
sanitize
that
regularly.
In
addition,
we
did
open
the
restroom
at
the
campground
in
Stokes
Thomas
Lake,
City
Park.
We
do
not
open
the
showers,
but
we
have
opened
those
and
the
rest
of
the
restrooms
that
our
unstaffed
example
McKinley
Park.
G
Park,
we
will
remain
closed
just
to
the
fact
that
we
do
not
have
the
staff
currently
on
board
to
go
in
there
on
a
regular
basis
to
ensure
sanitation
moving
on
athletic
complexes,
the
Board
met
and
we
did
determine
to
recommend
to
open
athletic
complexes.
This
comes
with
no
restrooms,
and
the
opening
of
the
Athletic
Complex
is
strictly
a
practice.
G
That's
different
things
such
as
share
know
shared
equipment.
Everybody
should
have
their
own
helmet,
do
not
use
the
dugouts
for
more
than
four
people.
A
time
use
the
third
baseline
first
baseline
at
the
end
of
every
you
know
if
this
was
but
change
the
softball
out
things
like
that,
so
everybody
came
forth
with
with
great
ideas.
They
did
their
research
and
the
board
felt
very
comfortable
to
open
things
up
for
practice.
G
There
was
a
little
bit
of
confusion
on
this
level
because
there
is
a
brick
and
mortar
restroom
concession
building
within
the
complex.
So
the
question
was
a
rose
of
where
the
authority
lies
to
open
these
up,
and
we
do
feel
you
know
we
can't
open
the
ballfields.
We
do
recommend
to
the
council
to
actually
leave
the
restrooms
closed,
at
least
until
your
next
regular
meeting,
and
that
will
be
about
time.
G
We're
structured
structure,
games
may
begin,
and
then
we
understand
we
do
need
to
come
up
with
something
in
that
situation,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
with
athletic
complexes.
Just
a
quick
recap:
we
do
recommend
to
open
those
up
running
that
through
associations
to
ensure
the
proper
scheduling.
We
don't
get
too
many
teams
at
one
point,
and
they
do
know
that
the
expectations,
the
ins
and
outs
of
what
what
to
have
happen
at
a
practice.
G
When
you
put
it
away,
you
open
a
gate.
The
smaller
pools
have
gates
to
get
into
the
large
amount.
The
concession
area
is,
and
at
this
point
we
are
not
comfortable
moving
forward
with
the
pool
for
opening
and
by
the
time
the
Board
meets
next
and
the
council.
We
are
probably
at
the
point
where
the
financial
obligation
to
openness
probably
does
not
outweigh
the
risk
that
we
have
to
staff
the
users
the
community.
G
So
at
this
point
the
recommendation
is
to
keep
that
facility
closed
and,
while
we're
talking
pools,
we
do
feel
we
can
focus
on
the
indoor
pool
at
the
Wellness
Center,
the
spool
still
operational.
It
does
not
have
us
any
increased
cost.
We
know
we
don't
have
to
open
it,
but
we
do
talk
about
step
two
from
the
Wellness
Center,
which
I'm
gonna
lead
into
that.
G
We
do
plan
on
with
council
authority
to
go
ahead
and
go
into
our
phase
two
opening,
which
should
be
the
gymnasium,
which
would
allow
simply
for
family
cohabitants
to
bring
your
own
equipment
in.
You
know
shoe
baskets
as
a
family.
Do
that
thing
we
will
not
allow
any
type
of
competitive
environment.
No
pickup
games,
no
structured
programs
simply
if
somebody
wants
to
bring
their
your
son
daughter,
spouse
whatever
in
the
shoot
baskets
and
you
bring
your
own
equipment
in.
We
would
allow
for
that
same
thing
with
the
racquetball
courts.
G
If
a
father,
son,
mother
daughter,
any
cohabitants
want
to
play
racquetball,
we
can
allow
for
that.
Moving
on
to
the
group
fitness,
we
think
we
can
move
forward
with
groups
of
less
than
ten,
which
would
include
an
instructor
to
go
ahead
and
have
that
we
do
have
the
space
to
provide
social
distancing.
That
would
be
both
land
and
water
classes.
G
Moving
to
the
indoor
pool,
we
are
ready
to
move
forward
with
lap
swims
to
have
water
exercise
classes,
because
we
we
do
have
the
space
for
social
distancing
with
the
pool.
There
still
will
be
no
locker
rooms.
There
are
no
hot
tubs,
there
will
be
no
Sun.
Is
there
we
no
steam
rooms?
We
do
have
an
expansion
that
people
will
come
in
dressed
in
their
suit
and
leave
in
their
suit.
G
We
are
willing
to
look
at
a
possibility,
used
a
public
restroom
as
a
change
area,
but
our
preference
is
to
just
come
in
in
your
gear
and
leave
in
your
gear.
The
recreation
staff
spent
a
lot
of
time
researching
this.
You
know
they're
the
ones
that
gave
me
this
recommendation.
I've
looked
through.
It
I
think
we
can
accomplish
this.
It
will
come
with
a
few
more
staff
on
board,
but
that's
kind
of
where
we're
at
with
the
pool.
G
So
our
recommendation
would
be
to
allow
us
to
move
on
to
step
two
which
we
to
open
the
gym
at
the
Wellness
Center,
the
racquetball
courts,
the
pool
for
any
nothing
more
than
lap
swim
and
small
group
water
classes,
and
also
group
fitness
classes
that
wouldn't
exceed
ten
people
other
than
that.
That's
kind
of
a
synopsis
of
what
happened
and
I
am
prepared
for
I'm
sure
a
lot
of
questions,
but
some
are
recommendations.
Some
are
board
action,
which
mainly
involves
the
playgrounds,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you,
mayor
or
council,
for
questions.
Okay,.
A
G
A
matter
of
fact
I
think,
especially
when
it
comes
to
the
aquatic
side
of
it,
the
pool
side.
Definitely
you
know,
I
have
spoke
through
some
board
members.
Council
members,
members,
the
community
in
regards
to
the
pool
I,
know
indoor
councilman
Helene
wants
to
jump
in
we've
had
these
conversations
and
we
worked
hard
to
determine
if
it's
safe.
G
When
I
came
to
this
meeting
to
to
have
the
council
ratify
and
give
us
that
that
go
ahead
to
to
make
those
decisions
so
and
the
outdoor
pool,
we
truly
feel
that
there
is
a
lot
to
adhere
to
and
we
do
not
have
the
staff
I,
don't
think
the
experience
would
would
be
worth
the
entrance
and
we
do
have
an
indoor
pool
that
will
probably
start
with
expanded,
open
swims.
If
the
CDC
does
reduce
those
guidelines.
G
F
Similarly,
if
they
were
to
lift
there,
if
they
were
to
lift
the
restriction
on
the
bathrooms
at
the
softball
field,
the
ball
fields,
for
example,
but
the
park
department
wasn't
ready
to
actually
open
them.
Yet
they
could
wait
till
they're,
ready
to
open
them
and
they
wouldn't
have
to
come
back
to
council
to
ask
permission.
Yeah.
A
That
seems
like
that
would
be
expedient.
So
really,
if
we
talk
about
this
in
two
phases
here
how
we
have
to
modify
the
resolution
first
and
then
any
ratifications
that
the
board
is
seeking.
Second,
can
we
do
that
or
do
we
have
to
wrap
this
all
into
the
resolution,
because
that's
what
vid
was
advertised.
F
G
F
C
G
It
when
it
comes
to
the
aquatics,
the
pool
and
the
gymnasium
I
think
I'm
opening
that
up
for
discussion
I
do
believe,
as
we've
talked
since
you've
already
opened
it
up
that
the
board
does
have
the
authority
to
to
slowly
bring
in
those
phased
openings.
But
I
was
looking
for
council.
You
know,
ratification
on.
You
know,
I,
look
at
this
as
droopy
surgeons.
I
really
do-
and
these
are.
These
are
large
decisions
to
make
when
it
comes
to
the
pools,
the
gym.
A
And
campground
right,
thank
you.
So
we
got
Lyons
Park,
Derby
downs,
golf
course
campground
and
ball
complexes.
If
the
council
would
modify
the
resolution
to
open
the
buildings
at
those
locations,
then
the
park
board
can
tell
the
park
employees
when
they're
ready
to
open
certain
elements
within
those
they
have
the
authority
I.
K
A
comment
Terry:
if
we
open
these
ball
fields,
my
concern
is:
is
there
going
to
be
stipulations
that
they
are
only
open
to
say
with
the
softball
association
in
town
lake
city,
slow
pitch
softball?
Are
they
going
to
be
limited
to
local
teams
only
because
I
know
there's
three
teams
that
come
down
from
Sisseton
and
their
covert
situation
up
there
keeps
going
up
or
if
they
have
a
tournament,
is
this
tournament
going
to
be
limited
to
local
teams
only
because
I
don't
want
team,
Brown
County
coming
down
right.
G
Me
let
me
expand,
then,
on
on
the
board
conversation
that,
when
we
put
this
in
the
hands
of
the
association's
8a
team
in
order
to
get
on
the
fields
must
contact
in
the
association
that
directly
represents
their
sport
of
play.
Example,
if
you're
a
Junior,
Olympic
youth,
slowpitch,
softball
team,
you
need
to
get
with
that
association
to
get
a
field
at
time
and
a
field,
and
at
that
point,
that
Association
will
give
you
the
requirements
to
be
able
to
practice.
G
So
if
a
team
from
Roberts
County
wants
to
come
down
and
that's
an
adult
team,
they
would
actually
have
to
contact
the
Lake
City
slowpitch
softball.
At
that
point,
you
know,
and
I
can
talk
to
them,
but
at
that
point
my
hopes
would
be
that
Association
would
say
you
know
you're,
not
part
of
our
Association.
G
This
facility
is
not
available
at
this
time.
This.
This
complete
first
step
is
nothing
to
do
with
structured,
tournaments
or
league
play.
This
is
strictly
practices
with
our
hosts
on
May
26,
the
board
we
can
see.
This
is
a
really.
This
is
a
test
cycle.
Are
the
teams
gonna
adhere
to
what
we
asked?
Are
they
going
to
follow
the
guidelines
if
we
as
a
staff
and
board,
come
back
next
Tuesday
and
feel
that
none
of
this
was
taken
seriously
or
they
weren't
following
the
board?
G
Very
well,
may
not
open
up
structure
league
play
or
tournaments,
so
this
is
really
a
two-week
period
that
we
can
get
a
good
grip
on
what's
happening.
If
people
are
following,
we
have
people
are
respecting.
It
then
we'll
open
up.
You
know
those
those
games-
those
tournaments,
but
with
having
to
go
to
your
local
Association
to
get
even
on
the
field.
B
H
H
I
said
it
last
time
saying
it
again,
but
the
thing
I
kind
of
have
some
concern
about
is
that
if
you're
doing
baseball
and
softball
at
the
complex-
and
you
don't
have
bathrooms
open
or
even
the
parks
for
that
matter,
if
someone
has
to
go
they're
going
to
find
somewhere
to
go,
I
worry
that
it
might
be
better
just
to
open
the
restroom
I,
don't
know
if
we
can
find
a
way
to
have
someone
clean
them,
but
I.
Just
the
concern
is,
if
you
don't
have
them
open,
they'll
just
find
somewhere
to
go.
G
In
regards
that
company
lawyer,
it
was
that
conversation
was
held
and
they're
gonna
hold
practices
to
no
more
than
an
hour
and
fifteen
minutes
with
an
emphasis.
You
know
please
go
before
you
arrived,
but
we
do
understand,
and
you
know
all
jokes
aside:
it's
gonna
happen,
you're
not
going
to
go
around
somebody
having
to
use
the
restroom.
G
You
know
those
are
things
we
just
don't
staff
those
ball
complexes.
If
we
get
to
that
point,
you
know
we
can't
look
at
saying:
hey
each
Association
member,
here's
a
key.
You
know
we're
not
going
to
open
them,
but
if
you
do
have
a
situation,
someone
needs
to
to
use
our
facility.
Here
you
go
and
we
may.
We
may
put
the
sanitation
on
that
Association,
but
that
was
discussed
by
every
Association
and
they
all
agreed
that.
Typically,
we
don't
open
till
about
this
time
of
year.
G
Every
year
and
teams
come
out
there,
April
1
weather,
permitting
practicing.
So
this
isn't
new,
really
there's
been
practices
going
on
with
no
restrooms
for
four
decades
and
everybody
was
on
board
to
accept
the
no
restrooms
and
doesn't
happen.
You
know
we're
both
kidding
ourselves.
We
say
it
does
it,
but
but
but
it
is
a
big
undertaking,
you
know
being
short-staffed.
H
A
L
Thank
you,
hey
CJ,
I
appreciate
that
it
sounds
like
the
board
was
pretty
pretty
open
to
that
opening
up
earlier.
Another
I
got
a
little
feedback
and
on
that,
because
it
did
open
some
like
a
technicality
of
sorts
with
the
bathroom
I
sat
through
the
partner
egg
board.
Meeting
last
Monday
also
went
through
one
through
jail,
softball
I
believe
it
was
on
Thursday
or
Friday
they're,
putting
those
onto
the
coaches
to
clean
their
equipment
as
well
as
give
direction.
I
know.
L
G
You
know
preferably
yeah
I
mean
it's
talking
to
the
staff
we're
to
two
or
three
weeks
to
be
able
to
go
for
the
point,
we're
at
right
now
to
get
it
open,
but
here's
what
we're
not
thinking
of,
because
we
haven't
been
able
to
do
lifeguard
training
classes
right
now
are
we
wouldn't
have
enough
staff
to
surely
open
the
Aquatic
Center
and
that's
30
hour
class?
We
really
are
behind
the
eight-ball.
You
know.
G
Just
today,
city
of
Sioux
Falls
did
wave
the
wave
lake,
you
know
they'd
say
you
know
and
I
know
Don
well
and
he
basically,
when
I
talked
to
him
said
you
know
the
financial
contribution
for
one-tenth
the
facility
we
normal,
provide,
we're
gonna
have
to
cut
down
attendance.
To
almost
you
know,
a
fifth
of
what
we
normally
write
and
what
you
know-
and
this
is
conversation,
but
it
goes
as
far
as
you
know
when
lifeguards
rotate
every
15
minutes
they're
asking
the
lifeguard
before
they
get
off
that
stand
to
sanitize
their
lifeguard
station.
G
You
know
the
handrails
things
like
that,
and
it
just
seems
in
that
outdoor
pool
environment
for
an
aquatic
center.
You
know
what
they're
asking
is
just
astronomical
for
the
return
and
it
would
be
different.
You
know,
on
my
end,
wanting
to
provide
everything
to
community.
If
we
didn't
have
that
indoor
pool
ready
to
go
and
release
a
little
more
guidelines,
I
feel
like.
We
really
need
to
do
everything
you
can
to
open
up
that,
because
kids
need
something
to
do,
but
we
still
do
have
an
indoor
pool.
G
You
know
a
beautiful,
it's
kind
of
waterpark
feature
to
it
and
I
think
that's
what
we
really
need
to
focus
on
is
that
indoor
and
if
and
if
we
can
open
with
some
stipulations
we
can
adhere
to.
You
know
we
can
have
a
lot
more
open
swims
during
the
summer.
You
know
granted,
there's
a
rough
on
it
and
it's
not
the
same.
G
But
when
I
look
at
the
when,
when
I
look
at
the
pool
requirements
to
be
able
to
open
its
just
astronomical
on
the
demands-
and
you
know
it
doesn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
at
this
point,
considering
even
where
random
18th
we're
looking
at
Pride
June
15th
before
we
could
open
those
doors
and
we
closed
May
15th
because
provided
school
does
start,
you
know,
kids
are
going
back
to
college
high
school
fall
sports
by
May
15th,
so
you're
talking
less
than
a
60
meters
of
August,
oh
I'm,
sorry
August,
right
/!
Now.
L
Period
a
couple
questions
I
have
then,
is,
if
they
decided
not
to
do
that,
is
there
a
way
that
people
could
utilize
that
without
having
to
become
members
of
the
Wellness
Center,
you
know
for
someone
that
they
want
their
kids
to
be
able
to
go
to
the
pool
of
things
like
that.
How
can
we
have
a
where
they
go
directly
again,
you
know
maybe
a
separate
access
if
they're,
not
a
wellness,
yeah,
remember.
G
Yep
I,
you
know,
we've
always
not
approached
that,
but
I
think
this
year's
special
in
so
many
ways
that
we
would
probably
create
a
pool.
Pass.
Just
remember
the
community
that
that
didn't
need
that
the
fitness
or
didn't
want
the
fitness
wellness
side
just
have
their
kid,
be
able
to
enjoy
a
pool
things
like
that.
We
would
be
happy
to
go
that
route.
We
do
have
two
different
accesses
to
that
pool
that
we
can
make
that
happen
and
would
be
willing
to
yeah.
L
I
mean
if
it's
me,
I'd
recommend
that
they
don't
open
the
outdoor
pool
just
with
the
guidelines
and
what
you
guys
are
talking
about
as
far
as
the
stipulations
to
get
it
open
at
all.
You
know
you're
at
a
15
minutes
at
a
Guard
Station.
You
got
to
clean
it
down.
It's
going
to
take
you
a
couple
of
minutes.
I
mean
you're
gonna,
literally
be
about
every
five
minutes.
Gonna
be
wiping
down
a
chair
right.
G
G
L
G
G
L
I
got
some
people
from
the
general
public
that
want
to
see
that
open
just
for
lab
swim.
If
nothing
else,
that
would
be
something
you
know.
Maybe
you
can
talk
to
their
board
and
see
if
they'd
be
open
to
listening
to
that,
maybe
just
as
a
right
now
until
you
guys
fully
develop
something
but
relapse
when
be
allowed
by
appointment.
Take
deal
right.
G
And
we're
and
we're
prepared
for
that,
not
only
general
guests
but
swim
team.
Everybody
else
I
would
share
my
screen.
I,
don't
know
if
I'm
as
good
as
Heath
on
sharing
here
I
sure
hope
you
don't
get
the
wrong
thing
that
pops
up
here.
But
you
know
right
here
this
is
you
know
what
the
Wellness,
what
my
Recreation
staff
submitted
to
me.
If
you
look
at
step
two,
that's
kind
of
what
I'm
referring
to
right
now.
G
B
G
A
J
You
Merrick
this
question
will
be
from
Matt
and
then
follow
up
with
TK
Matt
from
legal
counsel
position.
Since
the
Wellness
Center
is
already
open,
we
don't
need
to
make
special.
We
don't
need
to
add
them
in
to
allow
the
Park
and
Rec
board
to
open
it
up
for
lap
swim.
Do
we?
It's
would
be
my
understanding
that
we
do
not
need
council
action,
but
I
just
want
your
verification,
because
TK
specifically
asked
if
council
needed
to
be
needed
to
have
a
voice
on
that
so
Matt.
F
Yes,
that
that's
correct
the
once
the
Wellness
Center
was
opened
up
by
the
council,
I
it's
under
the
authority
of
the
Park
and
Rec
Department
and
the
board,
so
that
decision
does
not
need
to
be
legally
ratified
by
the
council.
Now
I'm
still
a
little
unclear,
though,
if
they
want
some
sort
of
action.
So,
but
no,
it
needs
to
be
nothing
done
by
the
council
as
it
relates
to
opening
the
pool
for
lap
swim
and
then,
like.
A
Notice
that
the
council
did
not
have
the
outdoor
pool
listed
as
a
building
to
open.
So
if
this
motion
passes
the
outdoor
pool
is
closed
still
and
no
action
is
action,
no
action
means
that
pool
does
not
open,
and
so
that's
falling
suit
with
I
was
on
the
phone
with
the
mayor's
across
the
state
and
one
by
one
they're
announcing
they're,
not
opening
their
pools.
Many
of
the
cities
are
not
opening
their
pools.
A
A
Well
that
you
have
to
go
through
a
building
to
get
into
the
pool,
I,
don't
know.
If
there's
you
know
you
go
through
the
the
locker
rooms
and
the
concession,
it's
a
that's
how
you
get
into
the
pool.
So
if
that
building
isn't
open,
I
don't
know,
is
there
a
side
gate
you
could
come
in?
Maybe
there
is
I
guess
there
probably
is
I.
F
Guess
I
mean
for
clarity,
I
mean
if,
if
there
needs
to
be
something
just
because
you
can
just
specifically
lay
out
in
the
in
the
resolution,
we
could
modify
it
to
this
specifically
lay
out
what
is
closed
still
and
it
could
be,
it
could
be,
it
doesn't
have
to
be
buildings,
it
could
be
City
Hall,
it
could
be
the
outdoor
pool,
etc.
It
can
just
be
specifically
the
ones
that
are
closed
and
anything
else
is
not
specifically
referenced
as
open.
A
D
A
B
J
G
J
J
D
A
D
A
B
H
A
D
You
sorta
make
a
comment
because
there
I
think
there
are
four
of
us
from
the
council
that
that
participated
or
listened
to
that
meeting
last
Monday
night
and
I
really
appreciate
what
the
board
and
staff
did
that
night
and
I
think
we
came
away
with
the
understanding
began
and
ice
and
I
spoke
out
in
favor
of
not
feeling
like
the
council
needed
to
weigh
in
on
all
these
decisions.
Now
I
realize
that
after
the
fact
I
think
it
kind
of
came
up
that
hey
when
it
comes
to
buildings.
D
We
do
have
to
weigh
in
on
that.
So
I
think
that's
why
we're
having
the
conversation
we
are
tonight.
Well,
in
the
meantime,
I
know
we
were
reached
out
by
some
people
that
thought
hey.
Are
we
usurping
the
authority
of
the
park
board?
Don't
we
trust
our
staff?
Don't
we
have
any
confidence,
then
that
is
not
the
case.
I
want
to
make
that
clear
that
we're
ratifying
exactly
what
the
board
and
staff
recommended
last
Monday
night.
It
was
a
matter
of.
We
need
to
follow
proper
procedure,
so
I
want
to
clarify
that.
H
H
L
Yeah
mayor,
can
we
just
go
through?
What's
still
gonna
be
closed
if
this
passes.
A
Okay
and
I:
don't
have
a
list
in
in
front
of
me,
but
I
will
say.
The
City
Hall
is
still
closed
to
the
public.
Although
business
can
be
done,
business
is
going
on
and
people
can
make
appointments
to
come
in.
The
library
is
closed
to
the
public.
Although
people
can
still
check
materials
out
there
doing
curbside
delivery.
A
The
buildings,
for
instance
the
police
department
and
the
we'll
just
talk
about
the
police
department,
that
building
is
closed
to
the
public,
but
people
can
make
an
appointment
to
come
in
and
talk
with
a
police
officer.
They
can
arrive
there
into
the
lobby
and
be
allowed
to
enter,
but
they
can't
just
walk
in
the
fire.
Department
is
closed
to
the
public.
The
street
department
is
closed
to
the
public
waste
water,
solid
waste.
Those
buildings
are
closed
to
the
public.
A
G
G
As
far
as
Park
buildings
that
we
still
remain
closed
would
be
the
family
Aquatic
Center,
as
discussed
the
field
house,
which
is
also
our
main
office,
which
we
are
still
as
a
mayor
eluded
to
doing
a
hundred
percent
efficiency
on
serving
the
public.
The
city
auditorium
still
remains
closed,
as
does
the
moth
or
mace
Ice
Arena.
Those
are
the
ones
with
that.
We
are
still
closed
on
as
far
as
public
park,
correct
facilities.
L
E
Thanks
mayor,
we
did
talk
about
it.
Nuts
no
decision
was
bit
was
made
at
that
point
in
time,
so
at
this
point,
they're
still
operated
or
closed
for
the
public,
but
offering
books
and
all
sorts
of
things
to
the
public.
If
it's
a
call
in
and
they
they
meet
the
needs
of
them
at
this
point
in
time.
But
there
was
discussion
about
opening
it
and
when
and
how
to.
C
A
A
E
D
A
G
Thank
you,
yeah
Gausman,
where
we're
at
is
actually
next
week.
We
plan
to
do
a
media
release
full
traditional
media
and
social
media.
The
recreation
division
has
went
through
all
of
our
programs
and
it
determined,
as
we
said
today,
with
guidelines,
what
we
can
offer
certain
programs
have
been
pushed
back
a
little
bit
to
prepare,
but
we
do
plan
on
having
a
sufficient
and
number
of
programs
this
summer
offer
to
the
community.
G
Those
that
we
feel
can
adhere
to
the
current
guidelines,
we're
going
to
offer
and
you
can
expect
to
see
I
believe
that
date
we
shot
for
was
next
Wednesday
a
week
from
Wednesday
to
go
ahead
and
read
you
our
marketing
scheme
to
get
those
out.
So
the
big
one,
that's
kind
of
sitting
in
the
balance
are
our
largest
summer
program,
which
is
our
baseball
softball
program
that
one
we're
kind
of
seeing
how
it
all
works
within
the
complexes
to
see.
If
we
can,
you
know
the
difference,
is
you
know
we're
talking
about
adults
or
teenagers?
G
D
G
I
will,
after
tonight's
meeting
I
will
meet
with
staff
tomorrow,
how
we
can,
as
long
as
we
have
the
staff
and
the
ability
to.
Obviously
one
part
is
you
know,
making
people
aware
of
our
expectations.
My
home
should
be
late
this
week
worst
case,
you
know,
kick
it
off
a
week
from
tonight
worst
case,
good.
L
The
part
of
the
deal
that
parking
records
offer
or
ask
for
is
that
they
wear
their
own
helmets
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
know
that's
going
to
be
tough
for
some
of
those
teams,
especially
the
younger
kids.
So
if
the
general
public
is
listening
and
they
can
you
had
a
couple
helmets
in
around
or
they're
willing
to
donate
a
few
bucks
to
that
to
help
help
a
younger
kid
get
a
helmet,
so
they
can
play
just
more
of
a
call
to
action.
Hopefully
someone
can
take
that
and
go
with
it.
You.
G
F
A
I
Yeah
Thank
You
mayor
so
Scott
Meyer
is
acting
agent
for
Williston,
incorporated
they
own
lot.
Two
and
three
of
the
Williston
addition.
He
has
submitted
a
commercial
site
plan,
application
and
billing
from
an
application
to
construct
some
storage
units,
some
additional
storage
units
on
these
Lots
that
are
south
of
the
already
developed
lot.
One
of
the
subdivision
I'll
pull
up
a
map
here
for
reference,
but
what
they're
proposing
right
now
I'm
in
front
of
the
council
this
evening
as
an
amendment
to
the
prior
development
agreement
when
they
developed
a
lot
one?
I
It
was
agreed
upon
at
that
time
that
an
extension
of
5th
Avenue
Southwest
be
constructed
when
they
developed
lot
to
what
the
developer
is
proposing
is
that
we
either
forego
that
requirement
now
and
required
at
another
future
date
or
future
development
to
the
west.
That
might
trigger
the
need
for
that
Street
extension
and
there's
also
a
couple
other
here
that
we've
talked
about
internally
as
staff
and
with
the
developer
on
what
we
could
look
at
doing.
I
I'll
quickly
name
those
three
options
that
we've
come
up
with,
and
we've
proposed
and
they're
in
the
the
council
summary
notes
here.
The
first,
the
first
step
the
council
could
take
in
our
opinion,
is
to
require
that
5th
Avenue
South
be
installed
during
the
development,
a
lot
to,
as
is
currently
required
for
the
previous
active
development
agreement.
No
amendment
necessary
in
that
scenario.
That
would
be
a
rejection
of
this
permit
tonight.
Second
option
we
feel
would
be
to
amend
the
development
agreement
and
to
remove
that
5th
Street
has
be
installed
upon
the
development.
I
A
lot
too.
There
is
still
language
in
the
development
agreement
that
allows
for
the
city
to
make
assessments
for
local
improvements
to
be
installed
when
it
is
warranted,
as
well
as
it
would
be
required
to
be
installed
upon
development
to
the
west
of
the
Williston
addition.
So
it's
pretty
much
removing
that
requirement
from
this
developer.
At
this
point
in
time
and
making
it
you
know,
you
could
rely
on
the
other
current
development
agreement
language
to
build
that
as
an
assessment
at
a
later
date.
I
The
third
option
is
something
we've
explored
to
is
staffed
at
some
communities.
What
exercise
is
we
could
collect
the
estimated
funds?
It
would
cost
to
build
5th
Avenue
from
the
developer
right
now.
At
this
point
kind
today,
in
order
to
issues
building
permits
and
proceed
with
development,
a
lot
too,
we
will
collect
those
funds.
We
put
them
in
our
coffers
and
save
that
money
for
the
point
in
time
in
the
future,
when
it
was
being
necessary
to
extend
5th
Avenue
and
then
we
would
have
that
money
on
half
for
a
city.
K
I
I
So
we're
out
here
on
the
southwest
corner
of
the
lake
lake
Pesce
and
a
lot
one
you
can
see.
There's
two
existing
storage
units
on
it
that
were
developed,
I
guess,
don't
recall
something
every
year
they
were
not
not
too
long
ago.
At
that
time
the
development
agreement
said:
okay,
you
don't
have
to
build
this
street
extension
of
fifth.
I
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
different
angles
and
thoughts
that
could
go
into
this
as
far
as
whether
this
street
extension
is
necessary.
I
can
tell
you.
We
have
ordinances
in
place
today
that
it's
required
to
add
the
curb
and
gutter
line
established
in
order
to
issue
a
building
permit
on
a
lot.
It's
important
that
any
developed
lot
is
adjacent
to
a
public
street
and
has
access
to
that
public
street.
I
You
know
the
lack
of
traffic
being
generated
for
this
kind
of
a
development
to
substantiate
the
need
for
this
street
extension
is
an
important
factor
to
weigh
into
this
discussion.
There's
not
a
it's
not
like,
there's
a
Walmart
going
in
on
this
lot.
We
need
to
have
this
Street
built
because
of
the
traffic
generation
that
it
would
create
as
an
example
so
I.
I
You
know
the
pros
and
cons
both
ways
when
you
look
at
this,
and
what
we
do
know
is
what
the
development
agreement
says
today
and
the
developers
proposed
that
we
amend
that
to
remove
this
extension
requirement
from
that
agreement.
At
this
point
time,
as
far
as
it
being
constructed
now,
with
lot
to
brandy,
is
online
as
well.
She's
helped
with
the
discussions
with
the
developer
on
this
and
either
I
can
help
answer
any
questions
and
try
to
wade
through
this
decision.
Making
here.
F
I
just
want
to
make
this
point
of
information
Scott's,
actually
not
acting
on
behalf
of
Williston
Inc
he's
acting
on
his
own
behalf,
he's
taking
over
ownership
personally.
A
lot
to
the
development
agreement
still
applies
to
him
because
it
applies
to
successors
and
the
signs
of
Williston,
but
just
want
to
make
that
clarification.
Okay,.
A
B
I
B
B
So
the
the
addendum
that
was
on
the
council
agenda
actually
wasn't
the
most
recent.
So
when
Matt
had
reference
that
Scott
will
be
the
owner,
so
it
won't
be
Williston.
That's
an
agenda
packet
that
was
posted
online
it'll
actually
be
just
got
longer.
So
this
is
the
updated
of
the
most
recent
addendum.
A
Okay,
councilman
Hoyer
well.
H
At
first
with
the
idea
of
this
being
the
same
owner,
I
think
the
fact
that
it
seems
like
this
is
two
different
property
owners.
Now
that
kind
of
makes
this
a
little
bit
different,
whose
responsibility
is
that
for
that
road
down
the
line?
Are
they
going
to
share
costs,
since
it
was
originally
agreed
with
the
first
owner,
or
it.
A
H
I
guess
the
concern
that
I'm
kind
of
having
with
it
is
that
if
we
forego
holding
up
the
original
agreement,
I
worried
that
it's
gonna
create
some
weird
mist
down
the
road.
Just
cuz.
We're
gonna.
Have
this
strange
little
obscure,
cul-de-sac,
V
thing
going
on
which
I
see
the
benefit
of
not
maintaining
that
extra
bit
of
Road
but
I?
H
A
H
A
Wanting
to
get
out
so
the
requirement
as
it
stands
today
is
no
building
permit
on
lot
two
until
that
roads
built
and
that's
what
they
want
to
change.
So
the
two
options
to
that
are
one:
just
don't
make
them
build
the
road
later.
If
the
road
needs
to
be
built
because
someone
to
the
west
needs
it
then
do
an
assessment
project
and
assess
that's
another
option
that
and
the
third
option
is
and
I
may
have
these
out
of
order
from
the
way
they're
listed
would
be
to
collect
the
money
right
now.
A
Don't
build
the
road
right
now
but
collect
the
money
and
keep
it
in
an
account
or
use
it
for
another
purpose.
But
then,
when
development
occurs
to
the
west-
and
you
actually
need
that
road,
then
the
city
builds
the
road
and
we
don't
need
anybody
permission.
We
just
go
in
there
and
we
build
the
road
and
there's
no
assessment
right.
A
B
I
I
We
all
know
how
assessments
can
go
as
property
owners
change
hands
over
the
years
and
they
buy
property,
even
though
they
know
there's
a
development
agreement
attached
to
it
anytime,
Council.
The
next
council
comes
forward
wanting
to
assess
something:
it
becomes
a
difficult
process
and
people
generally
aren't
in
favor
of
assessments,
whether
they
knew
a
bottom
or
not,
and
that's
just
the
reality
we
would
have
to
deal
with
at
that
point
time
in
the
future.
So
what
anything's
off
for
later
is
in
those
contexts
is
never
ideal.
I
Not
speaking
to
this
scenario,
like
I
said
it's
not
a
heavy
traffic
generator
we're
going
to
have
a
stub
of
Street
there
for
us
to
maintain
and
plow
and
take
care
of,
and
asphalt
patch
and
crack
seal
and
all
that
stuff.
That
costs
us
money
for
something.
That's
really
not
going
to
be
serving
a
real
lot
of
traffic
at
all
until
that
development
to
the
West
occurs.
So
on
the
flip
side
of
the
coin,
that's
where
I
could
see
it
being.
You
know
it's
not
a
bad
option
to
maybe
put
this
off
it's
just.
I
D
D
A
follow
up
then
I
mean
I
drove
that
last
week.
That
I
mean
that
literally
right
now
is
a
road
to
nowhere.
If
we
were
to
to
build
that,
but
I
also
understand
their
concern
about
you
know.
If
we
don't
get
it
done
now
or
we
have
to
go
through
the
assessment
process,
that's
gonna
get
messy.
My
fear
is
forgotten,
lost
whatever
you
know,
I
didn't
like
the
idea
of
collecting
the
money
upfront
initially
because
of
you
know,
costs
increase
for
building
a
road
more
than
what
we're
earning
off
that
money.
E
Anyway,
my
question:
he
does
this
not
seem
like
a
good
opportunity
for
right
away.
Verdure
protest.
Could
we
do
that
with
this
road
you
know,
and
if
by
chance
it
were
two
different
developers
that
would
be
1/2
Street,
that
you're
responsible
for
that's
adjacent
to
their
property?
But
to
me
the
way
it
lays
right
now
looks
kind
of
crazy
to
have
to
have
a
Street,
that's
stub
in
there
and
something
that
we've
gotta
maintain
but
I.
Think
if
we
did,
if
that's
possible,
to
do
that
this
as
a
right
away
for
the
protest.
E
A
We
we
always
have
the
right
to
order
improvements
made
the
cot,
we
meaning
the
City
Council,
and
it's
just
that
the
when
it
changes
hands
the
people,
don't
like
it.
When
you
do
that,
and
they
I
mean
we've.
We've
collected
lots
of
waivers
of
right
to
protest
through
the
years.
We
have
never
ever
cashed
in
on
one
that
I'm
aware
of,
and
we've
tried
a
couple
times
and
it
became
you
know
very
uncomfortable
when
people
come
to
the
hearing
resolution
of
necessity
that
you're
passing
for
a
road
improvement
and
yeah
I
know
I
signed
that.
A
Well,
you,
the
council,
doesn't
ever
have
to
do
the
waiver
of
right
to
protest.
The
council
can
insist,
the
improvements
are
made
before
any
building
permits
are
issued,
but
we
didn't
in
this
case
and
the
developer
built
two
structures
in
there
and
the
council
drew
the
line
and
said:
okay,
you're
gonna.
Do
that,
but
that's
it
then
you're
gonna
have
to
do
the
road,
and
now
he
wants
another
building
permit
and
he's
going.
Please
don't
know
made
me
build
a
road
and
it's
the
same.
A
You
know
it
happens
over
and
over
again
it's
a
difficult
thing
to
order,
someone
even
if
they've
signed
like
he
has
an
agreement
to
do
it
later
now
is
later.
He
wants
a
building
permit
on
a
lot
too
and
he's
asking
you
please
don't
make
me
this
is
what
happens
with
waivers
of
right
to
protest.
That's
what
he
signed
when
he
got
permission
to
build
the
first
development
and
the
council
said:
okay,
we
won't
make
you
now,
but
when
you
come
in
for
that
permit
on
lot,
two
we're
gonna
have
to
make
you.
A
Okay,
okay
signs
a
little
waiver
and
you
know
I
again:
it's
I
don't
want
extra
roads
either,
but
there
will
be
development
to
the
West.
Our
comp
plan
says
it's
within
five
years
and
at
that
time,
if,
if
it's
a
waiver
of
right
to
protest,
there's
going
to
be
pressure
on
that
developer,
not
to
develop
at
this
time,
because
it's
going
to
force
somebody
to
have
to
pay
their
share,
they
aren't
wanting
that
right
now
and
there's
you
know,
there's
that
element
in
it.
A
So
it's
not
pleasant
for
the
council
to
cram
it
down
the
throat
of
anybody
at
any
time.
It's
also
not
pleasant
to
do
what
the
ordinance
calls
for,
which
is.
Whenever
you
do
development,
you
build
the
road
now
they
people
don't
want
to
spend
that
money,
because
it's
a
lot
of
money
but
I
mean
those
are
your
choices
and
councilman
Radomski.
K
So
the
lot
to
the
west,
if
that
guy
wants
to
develop
and
this
road
isn't
built
and
then
all
of
a
sudden
a
turn
for
the
worst
I
got
a
lot.
All
of
a
sudden.
Now
can't
afford
to
pay
for
that
road
because
it's
been
put
off
and
put
off
and
his
financial
situation
has
changed
and
he
can't
afford
to
pay
for
that
road
who
pays
for
that
upfront
then,
and
then
it
goes
against
the
tax
roll.
The.
A
K
A
L
Thank
You
mayor
I
would
say
we
really.
You
know
after
going
through
this
with
our
past.
Almost
three
years
of
fixing
problems
of
you
know,
development
agreements
and
things
of
that
nature.
I
think
our
best
or
two
options
are
either
they
built
the
road
or
we
get
the
money
up
front.
We
hold
it.
We
build
the
road
when
they
need
to
do
that.
You
know
I
know
Don
made
that
comment
several
times
see
like
we're,
always
going
back
and
trying
to
fix
something
that
was
done.
L
You
know,
maybe
we
just
didn't
get
all
the
all
the
eyes
died
of
the
t's
crossed
so
I
say
we
either
take.
You
know
take
the
cost
of
the
of
the
road
now
and
hold
that
in
in
there
or
we'll
just
say
you
look,
you're
gonna
need
to,
you
know,
put
the
road
in
there
and
now
it
causes
us
more
headache
for
maintaining,
and
you
know
things
of
that
nature.
L
A
E
E
Somebody
has
the
option
of
coming
telling
me
that
I
have
to
put
sidewalks
in
and
I
understand
that,
on
the
other
hand,
down
the
road,
it
may
never
happen,
and
so
we
may
have
that
road
to
nothing,
and
you
know
we
still
have
to
look
out
for
the
people
that
are
willing
to
do
things
in
the
community
and
I'm
I'm,
not
really
leaning,
one
way
or
the
other
necessarily
but
I
kind
of
like
option.
Two
and
I
know
it's
a
headache
later,
but
it's
also
good
for
our
community
when
we
try
to
work
with
them.
E
E
Americaand
of
keep
me
up
for
this
one,
but
the
problem
we've
had
all
the
years
is
inconsistency.
We've
been
inconsistent
on
this.
We
had
a
gentleman
in
front
of
our
council
three
four
years
ago
on
a
sidewalk
issue.
He
asked
the
right
question.
That
question
was:
why
did
I
get
assessed
and
paid
for
half
I
see
other
people
doing
projects
via
trellis
or
sidewalks?
They
don't.
C
E
E
Whether
it's
for
having
a
table
over
a
gravel
road,
you
took
that
responsibility
when
you
bought
the
property.
What
happens
is
we
get
a
lot
of
complaints?
Nobody
wants
to
pay
for
and
then
what
happens
is
the
rest
of
the
community
pays
for
somebody
else's
street
I.
Think
that's
wrong.
Now
the
request
before
us
is
a
reasonable
one.
The
road
isn't
going
to
get
used,
so
it's
going
to
sit
there
and
it
will
deteriorate
over
time
until
it
does
get
some
activity.
So
I
think
the
request
is
reasonable.
E
But
the
issue
is
this:
whether
it's
me
I'm
a
council
down
the
road
when
this
thing
comes
up,
will
the
council
stick
to
its
own
rules?
That's
the
question
it's
hard
to
do.
They
shouldn't
mean
it's
uncomfortable
at
times,
but
isn't
that
what
was
agreed
upon
when
all
this
was
done?
So
might
they
exist?
It's
a
reasonable
request,
because
the
roads
not
going
to
get
used,
the
suspect
can
carry
with
it.
Will
the
city
following
rules
default.
A
H
For
me,
in
this
kind
of
ties
into
what
Don
was
saying,
there
was
an
agreement
that
was
made
it's
hard
to
hold
people
accountable
when
you
take
on
that
agreement,
just
like
Don
said,
and
you
get
that
property,
you
know
what
the
agreement
was.
You
know
what
strings
come
with
it
and
I.
Believe
me,
I,
understand,
yeah,
we're
gonna
have
a
road,
that's
kind
of
sitting
there
not
really
doing
anything.
Let's
not
act
like
we
don't
have
more
of
those
in
town
anyway,
but
a
lot
of
it
is
the
principle
of
the
thing.
H
It's
the
precedent
that
we
set
passing
the
buck
down
is
a
huge
concern.
Thinking
that
money
I
like
Don's
word
for
it
that
others
are
going
to
have
the
fortitude
to
enforce
something
that
should
have
been
enforced
from
the
start
is
a
concern
because
it's
hard
to
hold
people
accountable,
but
the
agreements
there
and
I.
I
100%
think
that
it
is
a
deterrent,
whoever
develops
to
the
west
of
that.
H
If
that
roads
not
already
in
there,
because
then
they
have
another
timeline,
kickback,
that's
gonna
happen
and
they're
gonna
be
waiting
just
even
longer
to
get
their
property
going.
I
just
I
feel
like
if
we
keep
passing
the
buck-
and
this
is
another
one.
Those
president
thinks
when
we
pass
things
when
we
write
ordinance
unless
there's
a
really
great
reason
not
to
we
should
be
sticking
to
it,
and
we
made
an
agreement.
So
I'd
say
we
stick
to
it.
J
You
mayor
I
will
just
concur
with
my
colleagues
comments.
Just
there
and
just
say,
I'm
a
fan
of
getting
done
today
and
not
passing
off
a
problem
to
a
future
council.
With
that
said,
I
would
support
option,
1
or
option
3
I
would
not
support
option
2,
but
I
will
kind
of
open
it
up.
I
am
okay,
making
a
motion
if
we're
done
talking,
but
I
don't
want
to
cut
anyone
off.
If
anyone
has
comments,
so
I
can't
see
who
has
their
hands
raised?
Okay
and
I
don't
want
to
I
think
alderman
ville.
L
You
know
I'm
good
as
one
or
three
but
I'll
make
the
motion
that
we
take
option
number
three
so
in
my
reasoning,
is
that
we
collect
the
funds
whatever
cost
to
construct
and
that
we
can
put
the
road
in
as
it's
needed
to
download
line,
and
we
don't
have
to
maintain
it
and
we
don't
have
to
you
know,
watch
it
deteriorate
for
potentially
five
to
ten
years
before
we
get
utilized.
So
that
would
be
my
motion.
I
guess.
A
Okay,
we
have
a
motion
by
l'olam
in
a
second
by
ho
lien
and
I'll.
Just
say
this
for
the
record.
When
we
did
this
on
11th
Street,
we
collected
the
money
to
construct
11th
Street
north
of
14th
Avenue
north
the
amount
that
we
collected
even
inflated
per
the
Consumer
Price
Index
was
not
even
20%
of
the
amount
that
we
spent
building
the
road,
so
the
amount
that
we
collect.
A
You
you
might
want
to
be
generous
in
your
estimate
and
then
write
some
sort
of
thing
if
it
doesn't
cost
this
much
we'll
give
back
the
extra
that
sort
of
thing
rather
than
if
it
costs
more
than
this
will
just
have
the
taxpayers
pay
for
it.
You
could
still
assess
the
amount
that
is
not
collected
and
keep
it
in
the
Consumer
Price,
Index
inflation,
and
if
it
still
comes
out
more
than
you
collected,
assess
that
extra
back,
I
guess
I,
don't
know
councilman
hole
well,.
H
H
Outprice
the
inflation
that's
gonna
happen,
I
mean
we
keep
watching
these
projects
that
we
do
where
we
build
roads,
and
then
we
get
a
change
order
in
the
same
year,
because
we
couldn't
guess
the
price
I
worry
that
we're
gonna,
try
and
guess
this
thing.
Now
it's
not
even
gonna
be
close
and
then
we're
just
gonna
end
up
making
the
taxpayer
pay
for
it
down
the
road.
K
A
H
A
We
could
certainly
take
some
data
and
for
our
cost,
which
is
different
from
developer
cost.
If
the
developer
can
do
this
for
50
grand
it's
going
to
cost
us
75,
because
we
have
to
take
the
little
bitter
we
have
to,
you
know
advertise
and
all
that
where
they
have
partnerships
and
agreements-
and
they
don't
have
to
advertise
and
take
the
low
bidder,
that's
only
for
public
projects,
and
we
know
that
that
makes
it
more
expensive
than
a
private
development.
A
A
So
that's
you
know
something.
The
developer
needs
to
keep
in
mind.
Well,
I
can
build
it
for
50.
Why
are
you
making
me
give
you
75
for
you
to
build
it
five
years
from
now?
Well,
because
our
costs
are
going
to
be
higher
than
the
developer
cost
and
we
can
use
real
data,
we
built
a
road
last
year.
We
know
how
much
it
costs
we
built
several
roads.
So
we've
got
these
data
available
for
estimating
purposes.
If
that's
what
you
choose
to
do.
E
A
L
Question
if
they
don't
like
that
option,
can
they
still
put
it
in
the
road?
Then
absolutely
so
I
mean
really
what
we
do
is
we
come
up
with
a
price
that
we
feel
is
adequate
for
the
city's
responsibility.
Putting
that
in
and
if
the
developer
comes
back
says
well,
I
can
do
a
cheaper.
They
have
that
option
to
go
back
in
and
currently
put
the
road
in
as
absolutely
with
the
design
standards
that
we
have
in
place
right.
So
we're
just
we're
saying
this
is
what
our
amount
is.
L
A
F
L
F
L
B
I
L
E
A
We
did
option
two
option:
two
was
done
five
years
ago
and
now
it's
time
to
call
the
call
the
work
to
be
done
and
we're
considering
again
doing
it
again,
so
it
you're
just
moving
it
every
time
it
comes
up
right,
I
mean
we.
Our
ordinance
said
you
do
this
now
five
years
ago,
and
we
said:
okay
well,
we'll
just
get
a
waiver
of
right
to
protest
and
we'll
sign
a
development
agreement.
You'll
do
it
as
soon
as
you
develop
lot
too.
A
Okay,
now
they're
developing
a
lot
too,
and
they
they
want
to
move
it
again.
So
I
mean
I,
know
it's
it's
it's
a
tough
one,
but
building
the
road
now
might
not
be
a
road
to
nowhere.
We,
when
we
do
that,
there's
always
hope
that
development
is
coming
soon,
and
this
is
most
of
our
subdivisions
have
these
little
nubs
of
road
for
the
next
development
that
comes.
A
B
Yeah,
thank
you,
so
I
just
wanted
to
throw
in
there
too
that,
if
you
guys
are
looking
at
option,
three
we'd
have
to
contemplate.
If
that
Street
is
never
as
instructed,
and
then
if
we
would
give
that
to
say
that
say
that
the
development
to
the
north
of
the
West
doesn't
doesn't
need
that
Street
at
all
doesn't
need
that
extension
of
Fifth
Avenue
and
it's
something
completely
different
in
they're
getting
access
from
somewhere
else.
So
then,
if
we
were
collecting
that
money
now
and
then
it's
the
streets
never
is
built
or
never
is
warranted.
B
The
the
nice
thing
about
the
language
with
with
too
is
just
that
you,
you
are
still
you're
still
requiring
that
that
the
street
would
be
extended
if
it's
warranted.
If
development
to
the
north
or
west
happens,
the
only
thing
left
really
changing.
Is
that
you're
saying
that
it's
not?
It's
still
not
warrants
that,
even
though
a
lot
C
was
being
developed,
but
it
would
be
warranted
if
it
were.
If
there
were
development
to
the
north
of
the
West.
B
B
B
So
that
area
is
after
2035,
so
they
don't
anticipate
the
quarter
section
to
develop
until
after
2035,
but
some
of
that
area
to
the
west
of
the
area,
but
that's
not
planted
yet
that
is
anticipated
to
be
before
2025.
So
there
is
a
small
portion
further
to
the
west
of
what
spotted
that
the
comp
plan
is
anticipating
that
it
would
develop
before
2025,
okay,.
H
Thank
you,
mayor,
I,
I
would
ask,
isn't
this
how
we
end
up
with
things
like
modern
day,
gravel
roads
in
our
town,
just
weird
goofy
agreements
where
we
start
kind
of
twisting
things
around
and
then
stuff
just
doesn't
happen
because
I
mean
there's
examples
of
those
roads
that
exist
in
town
where
somebody
was
supposed
to
do
something
and
then
they
didn't.
And
now
we
just
have
this
weird
strange,
gravel
road
now
I
get
it
like
paving
it.
Do
you
have
a
you,
have
a
paved
road
that
goes
to
nowhere,
but.
J
H
Just
and
believe
me
I'm
really
torn
on
it
because
I'm
very
like
strong
towns,
let's
not
build
roads
there,
they're
just
and
you
end
up
having
to
pay
for
it's
just
I
worry
that
I,
don't
know
to
to
almost
looks
desirable
if
we're
thinking
that
that's
just
never
he's
going
to
develop
to
the
west
of
it.
But
if
we
think
it's
going
to
and
we're
taking
that
bet,
then
it
just.
It
seems
like
the
clean
thing
to
do
to
just
do
it,
but
I
I
do
kind
of
like
Adams
point
with.
H
H
H
A
Well,
as
that's
for
the
council
to
decide,
and
then
you
know,
we
did
just
adopt
the
comp
plan
and
acknowledge
that
we
think
that
the
land
to
the
west
will
develop
within
five
years
and
so
having
this
road
constructed
will
probably
precipitate
development
to
the
west.
It
could.
But
nobody
knows
we
aren't
the
owners,
so
we
do
have
a
motion
for
to
move
forward
with
option
three,
which
is
to
collect
the
funds
a.
I
I
If
what
I've
seen
work
well
in
the
past,
is
we
get
an
estimate
from
the
developers
engineer
and
then
the
city
engineering
office
reviews
that
and
will
likely
have
to
inflate
it
based
on
our
prices
that
we
commonly
see
based
on
recent
bids,
but
at
least
it
gives
us
a
fair
starting
point
to
get
that
estimate
from
the
developers
engineer
as
a
starting
point.
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
out
there
for
discussion
purposes
if
you're,
okay
with
us
proceeding
that
way.
If
we
go
with
option
three
so.
A
F
Was
just
gonna
throw
one
other
thought
in
is
that
if,
if
one
way
that
they,
the
developer
might
choose
to
go
at
the
payment
is
if
the
council
were
to
consider
offering
a
payment
plan
stretching
out
what
the
developer
would
all
after
that's
calculated
over
over
a
term
of
years?
If
the
council
wanted
to
explore
that
option
and.
H
A
C
A
F
C
You
guys
are
real
quiet,
I
guess
if
you
guys
can
hear
me
I
guess
let
that
work
so
I
have
no
idea
where
you
guys
are
at
on
this
or
where
you're
at
in
the
meeting
I
just
jumped
on
I'm
out
of
town
right
now,
but
yeah
I
mean
that
the
idea
behind
what
we're
asking
is,
there's
the
the
full
I,
don't
know
what
the
right
word
is,
but
the
road
that's
projected
may
be
distant
years
into
the
future.
To
go
to
the
West.
I
think
you
guys
are
calling
its
fist
there's
something
like
that.
C
We're
asking
that
that
is
placed
on
the
future
owner
of
that
land,
which
is
going
to
be
the
association
of
those
buildings.
I,
think
we're
talking
about
a
200
foot
stretch
that,
if
it
ever
has
to
be
put
in
if
there's
ever
development
to
the
south
or
the
north
or
the
West,
that
we
would
put
it
in
at
that
point
and
not
today,
I
guess
that's
what
we're
talking
about
and
what
we're
asking.
H
I
A
So,
are
we
ready
for
action?
I,
don't
see
anybody
else
with
a
hand
up,
so
we
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
collect
the
estimated
funds
for
Fifth
Avenue,
making
the
city
obligated
to
install
Fifth
Avenue
in
the
future
when
it
is
warranted
due
to
development
to
the
west.
Under
this
option,
the
developer
is
obligated
to
pay
for
all
infrastructure
requirements
that
serve
their
development
and
would
prevent
future
owner
obligations.
A
A
K
C
Ever
had
to
be
done
in
the
future,
it
would
go
back
to
the
landowner
at
that
time
to
be
paid,
for
which
would
be
the
Association
which
we've
got
written
in
our
association.
Dues
and
I've
already
spoke
with
all
the
members
of
that
association,
so
the
owner
of
the
land
for
that
200
feet,
we're
speaking
of
is
the
Association
west
side,
condos,
Association
and
so
I.
K
C
K
C
C
J
I
Well,
mayor
he's
here:
go
ahead:
he
I
don't
want
it.
I,
don't
want
to
speak
for
Scott,
but
I
know
he
is
waiting
to
get
building
permits
on
this
watch
and
get
the
development
going
so
I
defer
to
Scott
if
he
doesn't.
If
the
council
wants
to
wait
and
he's
okay
with
that
I
defer
to
him
for
his
input
as
well.
C
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
very
aware
of
folks.
Oh
I,
get
it
all
right,
100%
I'm,
just
saying
one
way
or
the
other.
What
we're
looking
at
is
Nevers
a
long
time.
I
get
it
okay,
but
if
you
go
out
and
look
at
this
plot
of
land
all
right
and
we're
fine
I'm
one
of
the
owners
I'm
one
of
the
19
owners,
that's
going
to
be
out
in
this
area,
we
all
get
it
that
we're
gonna
pay
for
this
at
some
point
it
if
it
would
ever
happen
all
right.
C
The
problem
is,
is
if
it's
in
nobody's,
if
you
see
where
this
is,
that
I
would
get
it
by
at
City
anywhere
near
me.
This
is
kind
of
a
very
unique
area,
and
it's
a
road
to
nowhere.
Right
now
and
I
think
it
makes
more
sense
to
keep
a
green
space
for
the
next
30
to
40
to
50
years
then,
and
have
the
city
waste
taxpayer
dollars
clean
and
snow
on
a
200-foot
stretch
of
road
that
doesn't
need
to
be
maintained
a
day
but
I'm.
Sorry,
that's
just
where
we're
at
on
it.
B
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
ask
kind
of
follow
up
on
Heath
I'm
I
was
waiting
for
an
yes
or
no,
maybe
from
you
Scott
of.
Are
you
willing
to
wait
until
the
next
council
meeting
for
an
answer
on
this,
or
are
you
looking
for
something
tonight?
I
have
to
admit
you
know
when
councilman
Olien
mentioned.
Does
anybody
else
need
time
to
think
about
this
I've
been
keeping
notes,
but
I
think
I've
lost
track
of
that
conversation.
B
I
really
will
be
honest
about
this
option,
one
two:
three:
what
that
means
collect
the
money
now
not
I,
really
need
some
clarity
on
this
or
additional
clarity
on
this
before
I
want
to
vote,
but
Scott.
If
I
can
ask
you
before
we
even
take
any
action
down
that
road
is
waiting
until
another
council
meeting
acceptable
or
do
you
want
an
answer
tonight?
B
C
I
B
Thank
you
mayor,
so
with
option
three
on
the
table,
I
I
know
it's
been
discussed.
If
we
put
off
the
decision
tonight
he's
did
you
not
say,
though,
that
essentially,
if
the
council
votes
to
proceed
with
option
three
and
Scott
determined
that
he
would
rather
just
proceed
to
do
it
himself,
he
can
still
do
that
regardless.
Is
that
not
correct?
Well,.
I
I
think
that's
the
general
understanding
here
is
that
if
we
think
we're
giving
the
developer
or
some
concessions
by
collecting
the
fee
and
Lua
paint
building
the
road
and
the
developer
says
no
I
just
soon
build
the
road.
If
I'm
going
to
write
a
check,
you
guys
I
might
as
well
build
the
road.
It's
gonna.
Errantly
fall
back
to
the
first
option.
Just
build
the
road
as
the
current
development
agreement
stands
right.
B
A
D
A
K
E
There
come
are
either
a
comment.
The
request
was
reasonable
because
the
fact
that
road
project
won't
get
used
for
a
while
the
concern
I
have
is
we're
going
against
or
not
necessary.
Yes,
we're
modifying
agreement
we
had
in
place
and
we
have
a
habit
of
the
city
of
not
following
our
agreement,
so
this
option
to
which
could
work.
E
I
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question
counsel
in
a
Roby
I
think
that
you
know
that
language
is
in
those
documents
that
go
with
the
land.
So
when
a
property
purchased,
somebody's
property
and
their
title
search
occurs,
and
they
get
all
this
pile
of
information
from
the
title
search
somewhere
in
there
is
going
to
be
the
development
agreement
that
got
filed
at
one
point.
The
past
now
I'll
really
want
to
come
down
to.
Is
you
know
who
that
individual
is?
You
know
how
much
homework
or
thing
to
do
on
their
own
I?
I
Yeah
I
think
there's
just
a
communication
gap
in
there
as
to
whether
these
things
get
pointed
out
at
the
table
when
they're
there
to
sign
the
documents
to
buy
the
land.
Now,
when
you're
talking
something
a
little
higher
level
like
this,
it's
a
commercial
type
use
you're
going
to
have
an
association
involved.
I
the
concern
becomes
less
I
would
say
that
you
know
those
people
are
going
to
be
a
little
more
stooped
to
buying
and
selling
of
land
they're
going
to
be
a
little
more
astute
to
what's.
I
F
No
I
agree
with
everything
you
said
there
think
that
what
it
comes
down
to
is
you
know
when
it
comes
down
to
is
at
this
moment
that
little
stretch
of
road
is
not
needed,
and
so
really,
when
push
comes,
it's
up
to
shove,
for
the
council
sticking
to
their
guns.
It's
gonna
be
at
that
moment
where
that
road
is
needed,
and
somebody
says
well
wait
a
second.
We
don't
want
to
pay
for
that
now.
B
C
I
C
Plate
I
fully
agree
with
Don
Rovi
on
what
he
what
he
stated
there.
The
oversight
on
our
my
part
and
it's
on
me
I
mean
we
put
us
I'm
in
the
process,
I'm
in
the
business
of
building
units
selling
those
units
until
I
went
to
develop
this
piece
and
saw
that
that
chunk
was
going
to
be
placed,
and
it
just
didn't
make
sense
to
put
the
dollar
burden
the
city
at
this
time
to
maintain
a
road.
C
A
There
is
an
item
in
the
development
agreement
regarding
the
trail.
It's
item
2i,
it
says:
sidewalks
are
normally
required
to
be
installed
in
the
public
right-of-way
adjacent
to
all
Lots
in
lieu
of
sidewalks.
It's
proposed
to
have
a
bike
trail
on
the
west
side
of
Old
Highway
139,
that
developers
shall
landscape
and
grade
Lots
so
that
a
trail
can
be
constructed
along
old
highway
139.
A
That
was
something
that
should
have
gone
in
when
it
develops
and
then,
when
they
put
the
trail
in
that's
when
the
typical
five-foot
sidewalk
would
be
assessed,
the
cost
of
a
sidewalk,
not
the
full
cost
of
the
bike
trail,
which
is
going
to
be
more
but
just
limited
to
what
a
five
foot
sidewalk
would
cost.
So
that
part
isn't
proposed
to
be
changed
right.
Brandi.
B
B
A
B
I
Mayor
could
I
interject
one
last
point
sure
go
ahead:
councilman
Beeler's
points
early
on
in
relation
to
option
two
I
would
I
want
to
ask
for
math
input
here.
If
I
could
quick
executing
this
amendment
is
essentially
the
developer
signing
a
waiver
of
right
to
protest
because
of
the
way
the
amendment
would
read
correct.
If
not
what
I
was
going
to
suggest
is
that
we
go
ahead
and
supplement
option
two
with
a
waiver
right
to
protest.
I.
F
Right
well,
this
is
I
mean
it's
a
little
different
I
mean
this
is
this
is
actually
a
contract
to
perform
something
in
the
future.
The
way
of
a
right
to
protest
is
really
what
it
says:
I
mean
it's
a
waiver
of
them
of
them
coming
forward
at
the
time
we're
going
to
choose
to
assess
something
to
the
assessment
process.
This
is
a
contract
that
requires
them
to
put
this
in
and
if
we.
I
F
B
Right
and
when
the
Mayor
was
referencing,
there
is
the
waiver
of
Rights
protest
language
in
the
already
recorded
development
agreement.
So
we
would
everything
would
remain
the
same.
This
would
just
be
amending
those
certain
sections
in
the
addendum
that
would
take
out
that
he
was
required
at
any
time
that
that
the
city
would
assess
a
property
or
access
this
property
that
he
would
have
to
build
this
he
would
have
to,
but
this
was
putting
the
trigger
at
when
lock
2
was
developed.
B
I
B
A
That's
that's
what
I
meant
by
that,
because
there
are
other
requirements
in
there
and
it
says
that
the
developer
acknowledges
that
the
city
has
the
has
is
giving
them
a
building
permit
or
approving.
The
subdivision.
Plat
developer
has
to
immediately
install
the
stuff
and
promises
to
waive
any
objection
to
an
assessed
project.
F
F
A
No,
but
that's
what
the
item
J
says:
developer
acknowledges
the
city.
Has
the
power
to
make
assessments
for
local
improvements
on
property
adjoining
or
benefited,
thereby
to
collect
same
in
the
manner
provided
by
law
and
to
fix,
determine
and
collect
penalties
for
non-payment
of
any
special
assessment.
Developer
agrees
that
anytime
in
the
future
the
city
determines
it
is
necessary
desirous
to
install,
and
then
it
lists
all
the
curb
and
gutter
sanitary
sewer
water
main
through
an
assessed
project
right.
F
E
F
A
F
F
A
Yes,
because
it
might
be
cheaper
for
them
five
years
from
now
or
twenty
five
years
from
now
when
the
road
is
actually
needed
and
the
city
says,
build
it
or
we're
gonna,
build
it
ourselves
and
assess
you
for
the
cost.
They
can
do
it
cheaper,
so
they
might
just
go
ahead
and
build
it.
But
if
they
default
on
that
obligation,
we
can
assess
it
correct.
F
H
I
think
so,
but
I'm
just
gonna
say
this
before
we
hop
into
this.
Unless
we
can
make
this
very
bullet
proof
very
explicit,
meaning
extremely
clear
I
mean
I
think
this
is
just
for
shadowing.
What's
potentially
gonna
be
an
issue
down
the
road,
because
when
there's
gray
area
there's
confusion,
then
there's
a
discussion
and
then
it's
gonna
be
a
pain
in
the
butt
to
solve,
and
then
we're
gonna.
It
just
seems
like
we're.
Gonna
drag
our
feet
on
it.
H
B
H
A
E
B
B
B
E
A
I
think
Harry
all
right.
Thank
you
item
J
is
appointment
of
director
of
Parks
Recreation
and
forestry
department
and
spent
a
long
time
in
coming,
but
the
committee
agreed
to
appoint
the
currently
interim
director
Terry
Kelly
as
the
director
of
Parks
Recreation
and
forestry.
Officially,
so
that's
the
item.
Anita.
E
J
Feel
like
someone
should
step
up
and
say
something
for
TK
he's
done
a
fantastic
job
as
the
interim
director.
He
fully
deserves
this
position.
I
think
he's
been
doing
a
wonderful
job
during
this
situation
with
the
covet
virus.
He's
a
good
man
for
watertown
I
think
we
found
the
right
man
right
at
home,
so
congratulations
TK,
keep
up
the
good
work
and.
D
A
A
Right,
thank
you
item.
K
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
petition
to
vacate
the
alley
adjacent
to
Lots,
15
and
16
block
2
of
the
original
plat
of
Watertown,
and
this
is
the
alley
east
of
the
tiff
plan
that
was
just
approved
tonight.
This
land
lies
between
the
what's
currently
the
County
Fair
banquet
hall
and
the
parking
lot
which
the
city
is
planning
to
reconstruct
into
a
park,
and
so
because
the
city
is
the
owner
of
the
adjacent
land.
That
is
that
the
developer
wants
to
vacate.
A
The
vacation
cannot
be
considered
until
the
petition
is
signed
by
all
of
the
adjacent
owners,
the
city
being
one.
So
this
does
not
authorize
the
vacation.
This
only
authorizes
the
vacation
process
to
be
done,
and
so,
if
it's
approved,
I
will
sign
the
petition
and
the
Planning
Department
will
begin
the
vacation
public
process.
So
look
for
motion
on
that
motion.
G
A
H
A
D
A
A
second
by
Radomski
and
every
year
the
beacon
Center
applies
for
a
grant
and
in
order
to
be
considered
for
this
grant,
the
local
government
has
to
certify
that
this
is
a
good
plan
and
the
plan
is
the
the
grant.
Money
will
help
cover
the
cost
of
operations
case
management
and
services
provided
to
individuals,
while
they're
in
shelter
it
will
fund
security
deposits,
rental
payments,
rental,
arrears,
utility,
but
deposits
payments
in
arrears.
A
The
clients
are
required
to
work
with
the
beacon
Center
toward
goals
that
they've
developed
and
the
grant
can
also
help
offset
costs
for
a
victim
who
is
in
imminent
danger
of
losing
housing,
and
it's
set
up
to
where
they
can
be
on
the
program
for
18
months
purpose
is
to
give
them
tools
to
become
self-sufficient
graduate
from
the
program,
so
their
request
is
$33,000.
This
is
not
coming
from
the
city.
We're
just
certifying
that
this
does
benefit
our
community,
and
this
is
clearly
a
project
that
benefits
our
community.
So
are
there
any
questions
or
comments?
A
C
H
D
A
Kerry,
thank
you.
I'm,
really
grateful
that
the
Beacon
Center
exists
in
our
community.
It's
a
wonderful
benefit
to
us
item.
M
is
approval
of
temporary
general
sidewalk
business
permit
for
year
2020.
So
this
is
a
motion
to
approve
the
general
sidewalk
business
permit
which
I'm
requesting,
but
also
a
motion
to
declare
a
promotion
in
the
city
for
the
period
of
time
when
our
emergency
resolution
is
in
effect
so
and
I'll
tell
you
about
that.
In
a
sec,
you
have
a
motion
by
Helene
and
a
second
by
Radomski.
A
A
Have
business
during
this
time
of
kovat
and
one
thing
that
he
asked
is:
what
couldn't
we
just?
Let
all
of
the
businesses
just
to
have
their
business
outside
on
the
sidewalk
like
the
sidewalk
cafes,
we
have
downtown
and
just
let
them
do
it.
What
would
stop
us
from
doing
that
and
and
I
said?
Well,
we
have
an
ordinance
which
stops
it,
which
says
that
you
can't
display
merchandise
on
the
sidewalk,
except
during
crazy
days
or
another
promotion,
that
the
city
would
call
so
I'm
calling
for
a
promotion.
A
It
will
last
through
the
year
and
at
least
as
long
as
the
resolution
is
in
effect,
and
it
will
allow
all
businesses
to
display
their
merchandise
on
the
sidewalk
as
long
as
they
agree
to
comply
with
a
list
of
conditions,
and
now
these
are
the
general
conditions
that
are
required
for
sidewalk
cafes
there's.
This
doesn't
do
anything
about
the
alcohol
sales.
Our
sidewalk
cafe
permits
are
all
tied
to
alcohol,
and
this
has
nothing
to
do
with
alcohol.
But
it's
the
same
kind
of
requirements
for
putting
things
on
the
sidewalk.
A
You
have
to
leave
enough
room
for
people
to
get
through
and
you
essentially
have
to
agree
to
follow
by
our
rules
and
have
insurance
in
case
something
happens,
so
they
would
just
sign
the
sign
on
the
dotted
line
and
they
can
comply
without
having
to
come
to
the
counsel.
Sidewalk
cafes
require
council
approval
one
by
one.
So
if
there's
an
alcohol
thing
involved,
that's
going
to
require
additional
work,
but
those
businesses
that
don't
serve
alcohol
can
just
sign
this
thing
and
get
approval
if
this
passes
tonight.
So
are
there
any
questions?
H
Just
I
think
it's
a
great
idea,
I'm
just
curious
if
there's
anything
kind
of
in
regard,
just
just
because
South
Dakota
is
a
very
windy
state,
so
anything
regarding
like
littering
at
all
with
it
just
risk
of
refuse
getting
it
on
the
street
I'm
still
totally
Pro
it
I'm
just
making
sure.
Maybe
we
have
a
mechanism
that
same
like
hey,
clean
up
after
yourself
too,
when
you
take
it
all
inside
yeah,.
H
A
D
H
B
H
B
E
E
B
E
B
E
A
Thank
you
and
back
when
we've
approved
the
consent
agenda,
we
moved
item
4d,
renewal
of
alcohol,
alcoholic
beverage
licenses
for
the
period
of
July,
1st
20
22
June,
30th
2021
move
that
onto
this
main
agenda.
So
that's
what
we're
considering
now
take
a
motion
told
motion
my
vill
Hauer
in
a
second
by
whole,
lien
and
Kristen.
Would
you
please
tell
us
about
this
one?
Yes,.
B
A
A
K
K
G
Don't
know
what
you're
talking
about
Jason
I
really
know
it
here.
Hey,
you
know
what
bald
is
beautiful.
I
just
figured
that
out
today,
so.
J
B
G
E
Mayor,
yes,
I
have
a
comment
for
a
new
business
and
since
Terry's
still
on,
I
took
a
little
drive
out
to
the
city
park
area
over
the
weekend,
just
kind
of
look
at
the
North
Park
and
then
just
kind
of
look
at
some
of
the
other
areas
in
the
old
part
of
City.
Park
and
I
talked
to
Doug
taken
for
a
while
in
Terry.
There's
a
few
lots
in
that
new
and
the
older
section,
3
5
and
7
that
it
appears
that
every
time
there's
a
rain.
E
Throughs,
which
are
the
more
premium
sites
and
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
if,
if
we
should
take
a
look
at
and
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
the
year
or
the
time
to
do
it,
but
I
think
we
need
to
take
a
look
at
who's,
trying
to
fix
that,
if
possible,
that
requires
fill
or
some
sort
of
drainage
plan
to
mitigate
that
water
that
tends
to
collect
in
those
areas,
and
it
really
I
mean
these
people
are
campers-
are
in
the
middle
of
a
swamp.
It's
like.
If
you
went,
it
does
flood
the
other
part.
G
And,
and
to
that
Bruce
you
know
that
is
we
all
get
caught
up,
which
we
don't
know
when
that
point
is
going
to
be,
but
I
do
want
to
reach
out
to
Heath
and
his
staff
and
the
engineer
shoot
elevations
and
look
at
a
potential
berming
system
or
or
more
drainage
ways,
because
yeah
I
mean
it's
not
only
the
North
Loop
you're
right,
the
the
original
loop,
especially
in
those
pull
through
's,
gets,
gets
hit
as
bad
that
floods
as
well.
But
you
know
we
do
have
enough.
G
G
You
know
bringing
that
back
up
to
speed
and
if
we
have
a
camp
camper
here
and
there
that's
really
gonna
limit
what
we
can
do,
because
I
do
think
we're
looking
at
a
complete,
bring
it
back
down
to
black
dirt,
because
literally
we
have
cattails
growing
them
there.
That
needs
to
be
done.
We
have
major
water
issues.
We
have
major
electrical,
so
I
would
be
hesitant
to
open
up.
G
You
know
on
the
spot,
despite
that
spot,
because
if
I
can
get
contractors
in
there,
you
know
as
soon
as
he's
and
I
can
work
together
and
get
a
get
an
engineering
plan.
I'd
want
to
move
forward
so
but
yeah
he's
like
I'm
gonna,
definitely
lean
on
him
for
four
elevations
and
his
expertise
and
what
we
can
do
all
right.
Thank
you.
Maybe
you
want
to
chime
in
thanks,
sir.
I
Yeah
absolutely
I'll
be
glad
to
help
out-
and
we've
talked
about
this
briefly
outside
of
this
discussion
through
emails,
it's
one
of
the
biggest
issues
out.
There
is
the
high
water
level,
obviously,
and
when
it
does
rain
and
Ponder's,
nor
it's
hard
to
channel
that
water
somewhere
through
a
drainage
system
because
of
the
high
ground
water
elevation
and
then,
of
course,
the
lake
elevation
right
there
next
to
it.
So,
but
there
could
be
some
ways
to
do.
I
Some
still
we'd
have
to
do
a
floodplain
development,
prevent
things
of
that
nature
that
would
it
could
help
accommodate
that
use.
We
want
to
be
careful
all
we're
not
just
pushing
the
problem
on
to
another
air,
a
property
either,
but
definitely
some
things.
We
need
to
look
at
try
to
improve
the
best.
We
can
all.
A
Councilman
Bueller
your
hand
is
up,
or
is
that
from
what
you
just
said,
I'll
take
that
as
you've
already
spoken,
we
do
have
a
couple
other
new
business
items.
The
discussion
of
the
revocable
curb
space
reservation.
Permit
I
just
wanted
to.
Let
the
council
know
that
we,
the
mayor,
has
the
ability
to
reserve
or
allow
businesses
to
reserve
the
curb
space.
D
Only
comment
about
this
and
I
understand
that
we've
had
this
around
for
a
long
time,
I'm
at
all
in
favor
of
the
concept.
What
concerns
me
a
little
bit
is
that
the
sole
authority
resides
with
your
office.
To
me,
that
seems
like
it
should
be
something
that
should
be
a
collaboration
along
with
the
public
works
director
as
well.
The
Chief
of
Police,
rather
than
just
the
mayor
having
that
authority
well,.
A
And
the
only
other
time
I'm
aware
of
that
a
mayor
has
used
this
was
mayor
Williams
and
he
actually
took
it
to
the
public
works
committee
and
discussed
it
before
he
did
it,
but
the
ordinance
says
it's
revocable
at
any
time.
So
a
new
mayor
could
come
in
and
yank
it.
There's
no
record
is
the
problem
and
that's
why
I
created
the
form
so
that
there's
a
record
and
I
would
put
on
he
I
actually
put
on
here
permit
end
date
and
on
the
one
that
I
issued
together.
A
It's
it
ends
when
the
emergency
resolution
expires,
so
they
don't
have
it
endlessly.
But
if
that's
something
you'd
like
to
change,
I
have
no
problem
whatsoever.
I
most
mayor's
have
not
been
comfortable,
including
me,
and
that's
why
I
brought
it
to
the
council
to
to
just
let
you
guys
know
that
I'm
doing
this
and
why
I'm
doing
it
so
to
change
the
ordinance
so
would
I
mean
if
that's
something
you
want
to
pursue,
we
can
not.
D
A
A
A
See
none
we'll
move
on
to
announcements
and
I
have
an
announcement
to
make
that
this
is
May
17th
through
the
23rd
is
National
Public
Works
week
and
providing
for
the
recognition
of
all
city
of
Watertown,
Public,
Works
employees,
services
and
essential
duties
that
help
sustain
our
community's
development
infrastructure,
health
safety
and
quality
of
life.
I'm,
making
a
proclamation
and
I
will
just
want
to
read
one
little
piece
of
that
here.
A
The
week
is
designated
as
National
Public
Works
week
and
I
urge
all
citizens
to
join
together
with
representatives
of
the
American,
Public,
Works,
Association
and
government
agencies,
to
pay
tribute
to
our
public
works
professionals,
engineers,
managers
and
employees,
and
to
recognize
the
substantial
contributions
they
make
to
protecting
our
national
health
safety
and
quality
of
life
and
I've
been
a
member
of
the
American
Public
Works
Association
since
1984,
and
that
is
an
organization
that
promotes
Public
Works,
which
is
often
forgotten.
Those
are
first
responders
just
like
police
and
fire.
A
If
there's
an
accident,
if
there's
something
going
on
the
public
works,
professionals
are
right.
There,
too,
being
called
out
in
the
middle
of
the
night
in
inclement
conditions
to
do
their
job,
but
I
also
need
to
say
that
this
is
also
EMS
Week.
So
we
need
to
recognize
our
emergency
medical
services
as
well
for
the
good
things
that
they
do
in
protecting
our
community
Public
Safety.
So
those
two
things
are
out
there
and
one
more
announcement.
A
A
D
B
H
A
H
Some
good
news
is
always
great
to
share,
but
so
did
some
private
fundraising
back
in
the
fall
back
when
the
Z
was
going
through
the
accreditation
stuff
that
fundraiser
raised
$545
I
know
that's
not
a
massive
sum,
like
our
huge
donation
that
was
given,
but
you
know,
since
they're,
not
here,
I'll
drop
that
off
to
them
tomorrow,
but
just
on
top
of
that,
thank
you
to
everyone
that
took
the
time
to
donate
and
everyone
that's
been
donating
to
things
in
the
community
as
we
kind
of
go
forward
here,
especially
with
the
zoo
just
like
starting
to
open
back
up
I
know
things
are
a
little
different
there,
but
I
would
encourage
folks
to
you
know,
continue
to
support
organizations
like
that.
H
A
L
Just
a
quick
thing,
I
know
last
week,
I'm
not
sure
if
everyone's
aware
was
essentially
it
was
law
enforcement
week
just
to
thank
you
to
the
police
department
and
the
Sheriff's
Department
in
our
area,
as
well
as
everyone
else.
That's
out
there
in
law
enforcement,
just
all
things
they
do
for
us
just
a
thank
you
to
them.
I,
don't
know.
If
we
talked
about
that
the
last
meeting
or
not,
but
just
just
a
thanks
to
the
boys
and
blue
and
green
I,
guess
it
would
be
or
brown.