►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting 2 18 2020
Description
Agenda items include the second reading of Ordinance No. 20-06 and the first reading of Ordinance No. 20-07.
A
C
B
D
F
F
A
The
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda,
a
motion
by
l'olam
and
a
second
by
man.
T.
Is
there
any
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye?
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item
is
public
comment.
This
is
the
time
for
anyone
to
come
forward.
If
they'd
like
to
speak
about
something
particularly
not
on
the
agenda,
see
no
one
will
move
to
item
F
approval
of
the
agenda
of
a
motion
by
vill
Hauer
and
a
second
by
Roby
any
discussion.
A
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
as
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay,
motion,
carries
first.
Item
on
the
regular
agenda
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
2
0
6
zoning
text,
amendment
to
chapter
21,
point
7,
6,
campgrounds
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
Watertown
for
emotional
second,
by
Mantee
and
before
I
open
the
public
hearing
I
asked
the
public
works
director
to
give
us
a
brief
summary.
G
G
Some
of
the
talking
points
that
we've
worked
through
with
the
plan
commission
and
some
of
which
were
shared
during
the
first
reading,
but
miss
Hanna
is
here
again
this
evening.
If
we
have
any
detailed
questions
that
need
answered,
I'd
lean
into
her
to
help
talk
through
that
and
help
with
any
of
the
discussion.
All.
A
B
Kondeh
williams,
I
had
a
friend
called
this
morning
and
we
were
visiting
and
he
said
this
project
is
beyond
my
backyard.
I
have
to
say
that
also
this
project
is
beyond
my
backyard.
He'll,
be
a
lesson
learned
what
is
best
for
the
lake
present
and
future
Lake
residents?
Lake
quality-
we
are
not
in
the
game
of
entertainment.
At
stake
shouldn't
be
how
much
developers
or
city
taxes
make
at
stake
is
what
are
you
and
I
doing
for
God's
gift
to
us?
This
is
beyond
us.
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
My
Clarence,
we
I
work
with
Bob
Drake
and
we
are
working
on
coming
up
with
a
a
campground
that
has
been
approved
on
the
West
I.
Guess
it'd
be
the
north
north
part
of
the
lake
I
guess,
and
we
kind
of
want
to
do
more
of
a
long
term
campground
where
people
can
come
out
there
season
long
move,
move
their
camper
in
place
kind
of
more
of
like
a
park
model.
They
have
them
in
Madison.
They
have
three
at
Detroit
Lakes.
They
have
them.
I
mean
they're,
fairly
common,
actually
up
by
I.
F
Think
it's
Ortonville
has
one,
and,
and
these
types
of
things
have
club
houses
they
have
pools,
they
have
amenities,
they
have
parks
and
it
kind
of
gaps.
The
ownership
of
Lake
home
versus
you
know
a
300
to
get
on
the
lake
and
pesco
there's
a
there's,
a
huge
barrier.
It's
a
350
thousand
dollar
barrier
which
which
knocks
a
lot
of
families
out.
What
we're
looking
to
do
is
bring
that
barrier
down
and
give
them
somewhere
where
they
can
go
for
the
season
and
still
have
that
same
accessibility
through
public
landings.
F
F
You
know
that
that's
the
difference,
if
you
drive
by
the
ones
in
Madison
you
drive
by
the
ones
up
by
Ortonville,
the
big
stone
I
mean
they're,
nice
and
people
take
pride
in
that
they're
out
there
you
you,
you
tend
to
have
better
people
coming
in
that
you
know
the
people
you
start
talking
to
them
on
the
bike
path.
The
neighborhood
kind
of
embraces
these
things
rather
than
you
know,
somebody
like
City
Park,
where
you
come
in
for
three
days
and
then
you
leave
and
you
never
see
those
people
ever
again
or
they're.
F
Coming
for
a
short
period
of
time,
I
mean
the
the
camp
problem
we
have.
The
most
issues
with
is
a
short-term
non-reservation,
campground
and
the
other
ones.
We
have
a
lot
less
issues,
so
that's
that's
kind
of
what
we're
doing
and
that's
kind
of
how
I
got
involved
and
brought
this
up
is-
and
there
is
campgrounds
now
on
the
lake
that
do
have
season
long
things
so
just
trying
to
make
it
a
level
playing
field.
B
A
G
Not
America
dad
rs.1
Up
mr.
Lawrence's
comments.
There
there's
really
two
primary
changes
in
this.
In
this
section
of
the
ordinance.
One
of
our
pertains
to
the
length
of
stay
like
Mike
spoke
to
the
the
current
ordinance
reads
that
no
campground
may
be
occupied
by
the
same
person
or
persons
for
more
than
30
days
in
one
calendar
year.
The
proposed
amendment
that's
before
the
council
tonight,
should
they
approve.
G
This
will
state
that
campsites
shall
only
be
occupied
by
any
one
individual
for
temporary
seasonal
stays
and
no
individuals
occupancy
at
a
campground
shall
exceed
180
days
in
any
one
calendar
year.
So
that's
one
of
the
primary
changes
we're
making
this
proposed
to
be
made.
Here's
we're
going
from
a
30-day
maximum
stay
to
180
day
maximum
stay
and
then
the
other
one
is
part.
Eight
of
this
code
is
being
struck
completely
because
we
felt
was
a
little
bit
repetitive.
G
We've
conferred
with
the
city
attorney
on
its
it's
more
or
less,
stating
that
all
special
permits
issued
under
this
section
are
temporarily
invalid.
Only
during
the
period
of
the
campground
and
associated
facilities
comply
with
the
provisions.
We
all
felt
that
that
goes
without
saying,
with
any
of
our
city
ordinances,
that,
if
they're
non-conformities
or
not
compliance
is
there's
measures
in
place
to
address
those
issues.
So
those
are
the
two
main
changes
that
are
forward
before
you
tonight.
I
thought
it
just
touched
on
those
briefly.
Thank.
D
First
of
all,
we're
not
voting
on
a
particular
campground
we're
voting
on
an
ordinance
change.
That's
point
number
one
point
number
two
is:
how
does
this
affect
current
campgrounds?
You
know
city
park,
Memorial,
Park,
I
know,
there's
they
have
restrictions,
do
they
are
they
going
to
keep
their
restrictions?
How
is
that
going
to
affect
existing
campgrounds?
Yet.
G
To
that
point,
councilman
Roby,
that's
a
great
question.
We
have
discussed
this
with
the
city
park.
Campground
managers,
Terry
Kelly,
the
acting
Park
and
Rec
director
spoke
with
us,
and
Brandi
can
correct
me
for
wrong
here,
but
I
believe
they
plan
to
administrative
Lee
still
implement
the
30-day
limits
on
the
city,
campground
and
I.
G
Think
some
of
the
logic
that
was
discussed
at
the
Planning
Commission
level
and
with
staff
was
that,
because
it
is
a
public
campground,
we
felt
it
was
justified
and
trying
to
limit
that
space
to
see
some
turnover
to
allow
others
other
community
members
to
utilize
that
campsite
that
campground
facility
so
I
believe
they
internally
through
the
park
board
and
the
city
staff
we're
going
to
still
administer
that
30-day
limit
and
the
others
then,
of
course,
would
be
able
to
adjust
their
their
rules
and
regulations.
Up
to
that
180
days,
like
the
ordinance
would
say
all.
H
Just
toss
out
as
someone
who
grew
up
in
a
camping
family
a
lot
of
times
when,
because
many
campgrounds
have
that
30-day
limit
the
way
people
get
around
it,
you
just
hop
to
another
campsite
and
then
you're
good
to
go
because
as
long
as
you
change
sites
you're
within
compliance
with
that,
so
that's
usually
how
people
get
around
it.
But
I,
don't
think
180
days
thing
is
an
issue,
a
lot
of
grandparents
utilize
like
summer
long
spots,
so
they'll
come
back
for
the
summer.
They
park
their
camper
and
then
they
stay
long-term.
H
So
they
can
spend
time
with
their
families,
but
they
don't
want
to
be
up
here
in
the
winter.
So
then
they
take
back
off,
go
back
to
Arizona
or
Florida
or
where
have
you
the
warm
places
and
yeah
I?
Don't
think
you're
gonna
see
a
lot
of
hurt
from
this
and
it's
it's
a
good
measure.
The
city
taken
upon
themselves
with
a
30-day
at
City
Park.
But
again
just
so
folks
understand
like
there
are
people
that
still
stay
180
days
during
those
seasons.
H
E
As
far
as
infrastructure
goes,
you
know
the
this
hundred
eighty
days
if
they
would
decide
to
like,
as
Mike
has
alluded
as
like
a
perk
model
style,
are
we
gonna
require
them
to
put
in
sewer
or
septic
course
I'm
along
those
lines,
so
electricity
to
each
individual
spot
I
mean
no
one's
gonna
want
to
move
there.
You
know,
leave
it
there
480
days
and
then
decide
to
go,
get
rid
of
their
waste
yeah.
G
There
might
be
certain
limited
camping
pads
in
the
campground
that
could
utilize
those
types
of
full
connection,
services
and
others
that
may
not
be
able
to,
but
we
will
definitely
be
looking
at
that
when
that
campground
comes
in
as
a
sim
it'll
for
review
and
making
sure
that
everything
is
covered
in
those
respects.
Yeah.
E
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
get
in
too
much
of
someone's
business
model,
but
I
mean
that
would
be
something
if
I
was
looking
to
put
a
part-time
model.
There
I
mean
that
obviously,
would
have
to
be
a
one
to
check
in
the
box
for
me,
but
you
know
how
do
we?
How
do
we
take
care
of
that?
As
far
as
the
you
know,
the
cost
of
that
are
we
gonna
do
by
individual
spots.
Are
we
gonna
use
it
gonna
be
like
a
holding
septic
somewhere
I'm?
Oh
so
maybe.
A
E
G
Really
is
it
comes
down
to
that
design
phase
and
there
is
a
holding
tank
or
a
dump
station
requirement
as
well
for
every
campground.
Now,
if
they
have
full
service
connections,
is
that
still
a
requirement?
I'd
have
to
look
back
in
the
regulations
but
I
believe
we're
covered
there
either
way
that
there
would
be
some
level
of
service
required
for
the
campground
to
provide
as
far
as
disposing
of
the
waste,
but.
H
H
Just
toss
out
I
mean
if,
whenever
you
choose
a
place,
that
you're
gonna
stay
these
periods,
those
campgrounds
have
those
hookups,
that's
just
common
sense
business
model
for
themselves.
So
I
can
just
speak
from
the
many
campgrounds
we've
gone
to
that
they
have
full
hookup
service
at
most
places
that
actually
offer
that
so
yeah
I
I,
don't
think
anyone's
gonna
open
a
campground
that
doesn't
have
that
kind
of
hookup.
C
Think
just
to
point
out
I
mean
the
water
supply,
sewage,
etc.
That's
already
addressed
in
our
current
ordinance
I.
So
we're
not
we're
not
changing
or
addressing
that.
So
we've
already
got
some
restrictions
in
place.
You
know
that
that
hit
on
some
of
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
here
so
and
I
guess
I
just
like
to
point
out
that
this
did
come
through
the
Planning
Commission,
with
a
unanimous
recommendation
on
their
part
at
their
meeting
here
recently.
H
C
C
A
I
Mayor,
thank
you.
This
relates
back
to
the
discussion
that
was
originally
had
at
last,
the
last
council
meeting,
the
Commission
or
the
committee
meeting
prior
to
the
council
meeting.
What
this
ordinance
change
would
do
essentially
is
eliminate
the
requirement
for
a
runoff
vote
in
the
camp
in
the
elections
for
mayor
and
city
council
and
the
method
that
the
council
had
given
me.
The
feedback
to
pursue
was
essentially
just
repeal
the
ordinance,
so
we
would
rely
on
state
law.
I
D
I
That's
absolutely
right,
yeah.
If
you
have
10
10
folks
in
a
race,
the
winner
could
in
theory,
receive
10.1%
or
11%,
or
something
like
that,
and
and
clearly
not
be
the
representative
of
their
their
district
or
the
at-large
depending
on
which
seat
it
is.
You
know
one
of
the,
since
the
last
meeting
I
did
I
saw.
I
Somebody
comment
to
absent
happens
to
be
a
judge
that
the
city
should
consider
Instant
Runoff
voting,
which
is
done
throughout
the
country
in
different
places,
but
my
interpretation
of
the
statute
that
that's
not
currently
allowed,
but
in
the
event
in
the
future
that
the
statue
were
to
change
to,
allow
that
that
might
be
something
to
consider
where,
essentially,
you
drank
your
your
choices
and
in
the
event
somebody
doesn't
get
a
fifty
percent
majority.
You
instantly
go
to
that
second
choice
of
those
who,
whose
vote
didn't
count
in
the
first
round
anyway
long
story
short?
J
Yes
well,
and
that
is
a
concern
whether
I
mean,
if
you're
getting
like
a
lot
of
people
in
a
race
and
you're
concerned.
Does
that
person
then,
if
they
win
with
eleven
percent?
Are
they
actually
representing
the
district?
That
argument
could
be
made,
but
I
could
I
would
suggest
that
argument
could
be
made
now
in
a
runoff
election.
We
have
so
few
voters
turnout
for
city
elections
anyway,
if
there
was
a
runoff
election
and
there's
only
a
hundred
and
fifty
people
who
show
up.
Is
that
really
indicative
of
the
disc
of
that
award
as
well?
J
A
I
E
G
That
contract
last
year
was
executed
for
a
six-month
duration
which
expired
here.
The
end
of
January,
so
arc
Starr
has,
of
course,
wants
to
continue
their
services
to
the
city.
That's
been
contemplated
internally
by
staff
and
then
subsequently,
at
the
airport
board
level,
all
of
which
have
recommended
continuing
these
services
with
arts
star
arc
stars
fees
for
this
next
year.
G
Should
we
choose
to
approve
this
contract
our
$3,500
per
month,
and
it
be
for
a
12-month
contract,
I
thought
I'd
note
some
of
the
general
services
that
art
stars
provided
the
city
and
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport.
This
far,
one
of
the
things
they've
done
is
they've
lobbied
for
schedule,
adjustments
on
our
flights
and
and
how
that
best
interacts
with
our
flight
availability
and
connecting
flights
and
the
airports
that
we
connect
to
which
I
think
has
been
a
great
benefit
for
the
Watertown
users.
G
Hover
Airport
they've
also
negotiated
corporate
discounts
with
United
Airlines
and
then
went
a
step
further
with
that
and
signed
up
several
new
companies
to
those
United
loyalty
programs
and
have
done
a
lot
of
marketing
in
those
respects.
As
far
as
drawing
new
businesses
to
utilize
our
Regional
Airport
on
a
regular
basis,
rather
than
driving
to
Sioux,
Falls
or
other
competitive
airports
in
the
region,
so
I
think
that
some
of
those
measures
added
up
and
then
those
are
just
a
few
of
them.
G
G
Contract,
like
I
mentioned,
is
for
12
months,
and
it
is,
we
are
able
to
terminate
it
upon
a
proper,
no
1s
provided
I
believe
that
disclosures
in
most
of
our
contracts,
like
this
nature,
mr.
Gary
Foss
wasn't
able
to
be
here
tonight
and
Todd.
The
airport
manager,
Todd
Saira,
is
also
out
on
vacation,
so
I
will
certainly
help
answer
any
questions
you
might
have
and
you'll
have
to
forgive
me
in
advance.
If
I
don't
know
the
exact
answer.
Okay,.
G
A
Because
it
says
direct
sales
calls
and
sales
follow
will
be
billed
at
$40
per
hour.
I
also
says:
other
expenses
related.
This
agreement
will
be
billed
at
cost.
These
include
airfare
hotel
meal,
rental,
car
and
incidentals,
so
those
aren't
figured
into
the
monthly
I.
Would
that's
how
I
would
interpret
it
correct.
E
A
couple
things
it
actually
does
say
in
the
contract
that
they
would
be
approved
by
the
airport
in
advance.
They
would
not
be
back
data
and
hey
we're
gonna,
send
you
a
bill.
Heath
and
I
know
you're
not
on
the
airport.
Obviously,
but
do
you
feel
that
this
company
has
helped
increase
our
traffic?
That's
coming
through
the
Regional
Airport?
Thank.
G
You
for
asking
that,
because
it
reminds
me
of
a
note
that
Todd
asked
me
to
pass
on
it
was
last
I
forget
the
exact
day
late
last
week.
The
airport
parking
lot
was
full.
There
wasn't
a
free
parking
space
out
there
and
that's
happened.
They
said
two
or
three
times
now,
since
everything's
evolved
over
the
past
months
out
at
the
airport.
A
C
B
B
C
B
H
H
Just
means
that
it
was
a
past
somebody
screen
it's
pretty
easy
to
get
four
hundred
thousand
impressions
speaking
as
like
a
social
media
marketer,
but
when
they
talk
about
their
click-through
rates
far
exceeding
industry
standards,
that's
something
you
should
be
interested
in
and
that's
the
kind
of
data
that
we
should
maybe
seek
to
see
in
the
future,
because
that
means
they
actually
click
on
the
ad
and
they
utilize
it.
So
that's
that's
good
hard
data
to
get
I
know
they
always
talk
about
the
nice
connections.
H
J
You
I
just
feel
like
I
should
chime
in
yeah
I
was
at
that
meeting
at
the
airport
board
a
couple
months
ago,
and
this
contract
with
arc
star
was
not
just
a
thing
that
they
wanted.
This
was
the
number
one
that
they
felt
was
important
for
the
continuing
growth
and
viability
of
the
airport,
especially
with
the
other
things
that
were
discussing
the
it
really
is.
Travel
really
is
consumer
driven
market
people
will
go
elsewhere
if
it's
cheaper,
and
that
is
their
number
one
concern.
J
So
getting
those
fares
negotiated
that
arc
star
does
and
making
sure
that
we
are
competitive
is
the
number
one
thing
that
will
that
people
will
notice,
and
it's
purely
anecdotal
now
in
my
own
situation,
but
I've
flown
out
of
the
Watertown
airport
several
times
and
last
two
flights,
I
didn't
recognize
a
single
person
and
I
can
guarantee
you
I
know
a
lot
of
people
in
Watertown,
so
I
started
talking
with
people
and
there
are
people
coming
from
Sioux
Falls
Fargo.
That
is
purely
anecdotal.
J
D
H
Just
tie
back
into
to
actually
echo
you
a
little
bit
Reed
but
I've
even
had
people
at
our
business
that
aren't
from
Watertown
that
something
happens
with
the
weather
and
the
flight
stops
or
they're
there
before
a
flight,
and
you
know
they're
shopping
locally
too.
So
it
does
a
lot
economically
for
the
entire
community
and
tons
of
you
tons
of
people
Aberdeen,
especially
like
to
come
down
and
use
the
Watertown
Airport.
So.
J
A
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
4
is
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
and
future
documents
related
to
the
professional
services
agreement
associated
with
the
Watertown
Regional
Airport,
new
terminal
building,
design
bidding
and
construction
administration
city
project
number
1927
with
Mead
and
hunt
Inc
in
the
amount
of
three
million
one
hundred
eighty-five
thousand
two
hundred
eighty
seven
dollars
a
motion
might
allow
them
in
a
second
Mayville
Hauer
and
I
will
ask
works
director,
Heath
Vaughn
I,
to
give
us
a
rundown
on
this.
Please
Thank.
G
You
mayor,
this
is
a
one
of
the
first
formalities.
I
guess
we
could
call
it
in
bringing
forth
into
fruition
the
new
airport
terminal,
building
the
site,
design
and
subsequently,
of
course,
the
construction
of
not
just
the
building,
but
all
the
civil
site
work
that
needs
to
occur
as
well.
This
contract
is
with
Medan
Hantz.
They
were
a
design
architect,
an
engineering
company
that
was
selected
some
months
some
several
months
back
in
preparation
for
what
has
now
evolved
into
the
FAA
year,
marking
nine
million
dollar
grant
towards
the
city
of
Watertown
for
a
Regional
Airport.
G
Generally
speaking,
this
has
been
reviewed
by
staff
taht,
sorry,
airport
manager
and
myself.
We've
had
some
in-depth
conversations
with
consultants
and
some
of
their
sub
consultants,
such
as
Helms
and
associates,
who
is
a
civil
engineer
for
meet
and
hunt
on
this
project
and
is
also
our
contracted
civil
engineer
for
a
lot
of
the
airport
responsibilities.
G
I've
also
communicated
in
depth
with
Matt
Roby
city
attorneys,
given
review
this
christen,
Bobbsey
and
finance
officer
on
the
funding
aspects
of
this
and
how
we
cashflow
these
expenses
until
we
get
the
grant
money
and
at
this
point
we're
at
a
level
of
comfort
to
recommend
approval
of
this
contract
and
move
forward
accordingly
with
meeting
Hunt
Mitch
Walker
from
Eden
Hunt
is
here
this
evening
as
well.
If
you
have
any
questions,
him
or
I
could
certainly
help
answer.
K
Absolutely
first
off,
thank
you
again
for
the
opportunity
to
be
a
part
of
this
release.
Setting
project
the
airport's
been
growing
significantly
over
the
course
of
last
year,
and
we
we
know
that
the
existing
terminal
building
is
ready
for
an
upgrade
the
we
have
been
a
part
of
this
community.
For
now
about
a
year
and
a
half,
we
were
selected
as
to
put
together
a
terminal
area
study
for
the
opportunity
to
seek
federal
funds
in
a
supplemental
grant
to
provide
a
new
terminal
building
for
the
city
of
Watertown.
K
We
completed
that
that
study
about
a
year
ago,
and
we
were
notified
just
late
last
year,
right
around
November
of
2019,
that
the
supplemental
funding
was
provided
in
the
amount
of
right
around
that
nine
million
dollars
that
was
discussed
so
quick.
We
reassembled
the
design
team
and
started
in
on
the
actual
design
of
a
terminal
facility
for
the
for
the
city
in
the
community.
Right
now,
we
are
just
early
in
the
schematic.
K
Design
phase
are
finishing
out
the
schematic
design
phase,
because
the
the
nature
of
the
schedule
of
this
project,
the
grant
funds
will
be
available
by
the
end
of
this
summer,
and
so
it's
imperative
that
we
that
we
move
forward
quickly
in
order
to
meet
the
FAS
required
timeframes.
A
lot
of
a
lot
of
this
is
based
on
FA
schedule,
FA
requirements
and
and
how
we
access
grant
funds,
so
the
process
will
be
moving
through
schematic
design
this
month.
We
will
then
start
into
design
development
with
the
city
as
well
and
then
construction
documents.
K
K
Absolutely
mayor,
so
the
terminal
building
itself
is
roughly
half
of
the
overall
contract
amount
for
for
the
terminal
area
program
that
is
in
the
concept
budget
report
was
right
around
the
twenty.
Twenty-One
million
dollar
number
we're
still
right
around
that
general
area,
although
some
increases
due
to
FA
required
relocations
of
nav
aids
weather
services,
things
of
that
nature
have
increased
that
a
little
bit
right
now
we
are
in
the
process
of
going
back
and
forth
with
the
federal
government.
K
A
K
K
What
we
sought
was
funding
to
provide
terminal
construction,
and
so
the
FAA
needs
to
see
actual
bid
numbers
from
a
competitive
bid
process
in
order
to
actually
release
those
grant
funds.
Right
now
we
are
appropriated
to
the
amount
we're
in
the
spreadsheet,
so
to
speak,
to
the
amount
of
right
around
nine
million
dollars,
and
so
that
grant
would
be
issued
once
competitive
bids
are
in
hand.
Thank.
E
K
Question
we
so
the
FAA
is
as
set
that
nine
million
dollars
for
the
terminal
project
itself.
We
will
need
to
seek
additional
grant
dollars
next
year,
discretionary
grant
dollars.
You
know
the
good
news.
Is
the
fa
largely
never
completes
a
project
like
this
and
does
not.
You
know
fully
complete
the
necessary
projects
to
make
it
operable?
That's
just
not
something
that
that
they
would
do
so.
K
A
K
As
the
architect
it
hurts,
it
pains
me
to
say
that
largely
all
of
the
flat
work
is
all
eligible
and
only
when
it
gets
into
the
building
is
when
we
have
to
fight
for
eligibility.
So
the
entry
drive
the
taxi
lane
the
apron
parking
lot,
because
that
parking
lot
is
non
revenue
generating
we're
not
offering
pay
parking
for
that
parking
lot.
Then
the
federal
government
will
pay
for
that
at
a
hundred
percent
or
basically
ninety
percent
covered
by
the
FAA
and
then
five
percent
covered
by
the
state
and
5%
by
local.
But.
A
K
K
For
vertical
projects,
again
the
state
taps
out
at
two
hundred
thousand
I
believe
for
for
their.
You
know
for
their
part
for
their
contribution.
We
have
maxed
out
all
state
funding
for
this
and
we
receive
state
approval
for
the
maximum
dollar
amount
that
they
can
once
eligibility
determinations
are,
are
made
sometime
next
month,
so
that
was
done
at
the
state-
a
VA
ssin
conference
last
year,
right
here
in
Watertown.
In
fact,.
C
B
D
C
G
Councilman
ville,
how
are
the
airport
board?
Their
interactions
have
been
varying
depth
from
the
beginning.
Back
to
a
year
and
a
half
ago,
when
we
selected
meet
and
hunt
on
this
preliminary
phase,
they
have
seen
and
are
knowledgeable
with
the
concept
budget
report
and
in
there
are
the
anticipated
dollars
that
would
it
take
that
it
would
take
for
us
to
pay
meet
and
hunt.
So
they
have
been
on
board
with
those
numbers
and
in
approval
with
those
from
the
concept
budget
report
level.
K
This
is
the
FA
actually
requested
and
Heath
alluded
to
this
earlier.
We,
this
is
a
little
bit
different
than
normal,
in
that
the
FAA
is
actually
stated
that
they
want
to
include
all
the
design
and
the
construction
administration
or
from
the
civil
side
resident
engineering
as
a
part
of
this
contract.
So
there
does
not
need
to
be
any
sort
of
leg
where
we
determine
go
through
contracting
again
with
the
FAA
or
the
city.
This
will
take
us
from
start
to
finish
and,
and
so
once
we
get
bids
in
hand,
you
know.
K
F
A
All
right
next
item
on
the
agenda
is
old,
business
and
I
know
people
want
to
know
about
the
Ice
Arena
I
have
no
new
information
to
disclose
at
this
time.
However,
several
of
these
council
members
have
been
meeting
meeting
meeting
I
think
they
had
four
meetings
last
week
and
they're
working
really
hard.
So
hopefully
soon
we'll
have
something
to
talk
about.
Is
there
any
other
old
business,
councilman
Hoyer
mayor.
H
I
was
just
wondering
I,
don't
think
Brandis
here
anymore.
Have
we
heard
any
more
development
on
the
lake
campus
commercial
zoning,
because
I
know
we
brought
it
up?
Had
a
previous
meeting
didn't
go
forward
with
it
because
we
were
still
in
the
works
on
that
just
didn't
know
if
it's
actually
been
moving
forward
at
all.
That's.
G
G
Yes,
you're
correct:
it's
amendment
of
the
zoning
ordinance
to
create
a
commercial
ciel,
we're
calling
a
commercial
lake
district
and
in
there
we
would
outline
and
have
been
drafting
an
outline
for
what
commercial
activities
will
be
appropriate
within
a
certain
proximity
to
the
lakeshore.
And
if
I
recall
correctly,
that
is
up
for
discussion
again
at
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting,
not
quite
for
action
yet,
but
soon
we're
getting
close
to
having
a
draft
that
will
go
through
the
Planning
Commission
for
action.
Okay,.
A
G
Our
work
has
proposed
on
our
plans
as
far
as
the
regrading
in
that
channel,
they
tucked
us
in
under
what
they
call
their
nationwide
permit.
It's
kind
of
like
a
general
permit
for
construction
activities
as
state
and
federal
agencies
have
authority
to
do
so.
The
next
steps
for
us
are
to
get
with
our
consultant
that
helped
some
of
the
design
work
and
get
with
the
developer
to
coordinate
this,
creating
with
their
grading
project.
G
As
you
recall,
the
developer
to
the
north
had
to
do
some
off-site
grading
off
of
their
property
on
to
the
city's
property,
and
we
wanted
to
coordinate
these
two
efforts
so
that
we
weren't
redundantly
grading
work
out
there
and
performing
the
same
thing
twice
effectively.
So
there's
a
little
bit
of
coordination,
work
left
on
that
end
and
pending
the
developers
schedule.
That's
something
I
want
to
lean
into
next.
If
that
seems
reasonable
and
we
can
proceed
with
them
and
through
a
development
agreement.
B
A
We're
at
a
point
where
we're
ready
to
start
the
process
of
approving
our
comprehensive
plan,
and
it's
been
a
long
time
since
we
did
a
complete
rewrite.
This
isn't
just
another
amendment
to
our
comp
plan.
It's
kind
of
a
big
deal
and
both
a
Planning
Commission
and
the
council
need
to
approve
this
document,
and
so
there
will
be
one
combined
council
plan
commission
meeting
where
we
have
a
public
hearing
and
the
public
is
invited
to
comment
and
the
council's
invited
a
comment
and
plan
commission.
A
So
we
can
get
it
all
done
in
one
fell
swoop,
but
prior
to
that
there
will
be
you'll,
be
invited
to
come
to
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
to
see
the
presentation
and
at
this
time,
they're
planning
to
first
district
will
be
making
the
presentation
first
meeting
in
March,
so
just
be
looking
for
those
notices
to
come
out
and
it's
possible
that
those
dates
could
change.
But
I
just
want
that
to
be
on
your
read
radar.
It's
a
pretty
big
deal
to
adopt
a
new
comp
plan.
Is
there
any
other
new
business?
D
D
A
C
Update
as
those
are
the
main
following
where
the
legislative
session
again
is
taking
up
a
task
of
looking
at
the
the
Rural
Electric
Cooperative-
and
you
know
territorial
issue
that
does
impact
Watertown,
there
is
a
House
bill.
That's
that
has
been
introduced
that,
in
the
opinion
of
our
utility,
people
is
skewed
very
heavily
in
favor
of
the
of
the
reas,
and
there
was
a
hearing
scheduled
for
tomorrow
morning,
but
we
found
out
just
today
that
it
has
been
cancelled
and
needs
to
be
rescheduled,
I'm,
not
sure
what
that
means.