►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 6-15-2020
Description
City Council Meeting - 6-15-2020
C
C
B
D
D
B
D
A
E
B
E
C
B
C
C
B
A
All
right
next
item
now
is
public
comment,
and
this
is
a
time
reserved
for
anyone
who
would
like
to
make
a
public
comment
to
step
forward
and
do
so.
Please
state
your
name
into
the
microphone
for
the
record
before
making
your
comment
and
if
your
comment
is
related
to
an
agenda
item.
Please
wait
until
that
agenda
item
is
taken
up
by
the
City
Council
and
if
you
are
on
by
phone
or
remotely,
please
state
your
name
and
then
say
request
permission
to
speak
there.
Anyone
here
who
would
like
to
speak.
A
Hearing,
no
one
will
move
on
item
six
is
approval
of
the
agenda
and
before
we
can
do
that,
I
would
like
to
remove
item
a
and
with
that.
Is
there
a
motion
for
approval
motion
by
vill
Hauer
and
a
second
by
wholly
in
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
roll
call
vote.
Please
Kristen.
C
C
D
A
You
carry
all
right
item:
B
is
Valley
View.
Second,
addition:
annexation
and
Zoning
and
item
one
is
approval
of
resolution
number
20,
27,
annexation
of
a
tract
of
land
contiguous
to
the
city
of
Watertown,
South
Dakota,
to
be
known
as
Valley
View.
Second
edition
of
emotion,
my
whole
lien
and
a
second
by
Radomski
I,
see
our
urban
planner
brandy.
Hannon
is
here
brandy.
Will
you
please
tell
us
about
this?
One?
Yes,.
F
Okay,
can
everyone
see
that,
yes,
okay?
So
as
the
mayor
mentioned,
this
is
the
efficient
and
zoning
of
Valley
View
second
edition,
and
there
will
be
two
actions
on
here,
but
I
can
just
explain
them
together
on
what
they're
accomplishing
with
this.
So
this
is
the
the
second
edition
in
the
Bellevue
subdivision
that
is
converted
with
their
preliminary
plan.
F
They
are
doing
our
one
single-family
residential
zoning,
our
two
single-family
attached
in
our
our
three
multi-family
residential
district,
the
our
two
was
an
addition
from
the
preliminary
plan,
but
that
was
rezone
previously
in
the
first
edition,
so
it
is
conforming
with
what
was
rezone.
This
will
be
11.5
acres
of
land
there
along
2nd,
Street,
northeast
and
I.
A
F
A
C
C
B
C
B
A
Thank
you
part
two
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-19
establishing
the
zoning
designation
of
our
one
single-family
residential
district
are
two
single-family
attached
residential
district
and
our
three
multi-family
residential
district
for
the
area
of
land
to
be
known
as
the
Valley
View.
Second,
addition
upon
annexation
and
Brandi
has
already
kind
of
described
the
area,
but
this
is
the
zoning
part
of
it.
So
I'm
look
for
a
motion
motion
my
whole
Lane.
A
F
A
C
C
C
B
C
A
Carry
all
right!
Thank
you
items.
C
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20-20
amending
the
zoning
map
of
the
city
of
Watertown
South
Dakota
for
a
portion
of
lot,
a
campus
key
dunes,
second
subdivision
from
r1
single-family
residential
district
to
r3
multifamily
residential
district
I've
motion.
My
hélène
and
a
second
buyer
demske
and
I
would
like
Brandi
to
tell
us
about
this.
Yes,.
F
Thank
You
mayor,
so
it
was
stated,
this
is
a
rezone
from
there.
Currently
it's
currently
zoned
r1
single-family
residential
and
they
are
proposing
to
rezone
it
to
our
three
multi-family
residential
district.
This
area
was
preliminary
planned
that
was
approved
by
the
planning
commission
on
April
23rd.
We
would
expect
that
after
if
this
is
rezone
that
we
will
see
a
plat
and
development
agreement
come
forth
and
but
that'll
be
after
we
get
construction
plans
to
review,
so
council
can
look
forward
to
seeing
that
and
then
that
will
also
memorialize
the
zoning
distinct
earth.
A
G
F
We've
already
approved
the
preliminary
plan,
and
that
shows
the
layout
and
I
actually
have
that
pulled
up.
So
you
guys
have
an
idea.
The
prelim
plan
only
gets
approved
by
the
plan
commission
and
then
the
plat
and
development
agreement
comes
to
council
of
they're
different
phases.
So
this
is
this
is
what
he's
rezoning
right
now.
So
then,
if
this
impacts
public
infrastructure,
then
that
plat
will
come
to
Council,
but
this
is
what
was
approved
by
the
Plan
Commission
for
the.
G
H
You
mayor
I
recall:
we
discussed
this
at
last
meeting.
This
is
a
rezone
only
they're
going
to
get
access
from
existing
roads.
The
question
that
comes
up,
though,
and
I'll
be
interested
to
see
when
the
final
plan
and
the
plan
get
put
together
is
how
they
going
to
handle
water.
There's
no
new
roads
going
in
on
this,
but
it's
it
that
whole
area.
This
I
get
a
lot
of
questions
about
this.
H
B
C
C
C
B
C
A
Carrie
all
right,
thank
you
item
D
is
approval
of
resolution
number
20
29
approving
the
plat
of
River
Ridge
Estates,
7th
addition
to
the
municipality
of
Watertown
in
the
county
of
Coddington,
South,
Dakota
and
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
development
agreement
for
the
plat
of
River
Ridge
Estates,
7th
edition
promotion,
my
Helene
second
buyer
demske
and
brandy.
Will
you
please
tell
us
about
this.
F
F
F
F
So
the
language
that
we
put
in
the
development
agreement
states
that
a
street
would
come
at
a
later
date,
either
with
the
next
phase
or
when
the
park
is
developed
that
if
we
would
see
it
necessary
to
go
in,
but
he,
but
that
it
would
happen
in
conjunction
with
that
and
then
the
sidewalk
discussion
that
happens
with
the
street
when
the
streets
installed.
The
sidewalk
is
as
well.
F
The
plan
Commission
stated
that
they
would
like
to
see
if
the
streets
not
going
in
right
now,
at
least
the
sidewalk
be
extended,
and
so
that's
where
we
left
it
in
the
development
agreement.
Obviously
council's
decision,
but
then
it's
important
to
I
think
Jerry
Kelly's
on
the
line,
the
the
Parks
and
Rec
Department
has
decided
or
is
hoping
to
develop,
River
Ridge
Park
in
2021.
F
So
this
part,
if
the
park
wasn't
going
to
be
developed
for
a
long
time,
you
know
it.
Maybe
it
wouldn't
be
necessary
for
a
street
and
sidewalk,
but
since
it's
going
to
hopefully
be
developed
next
year,
a
sidewalk
may
be
nice
to
include
and
then
the
street,
to
leave
the
language
in
there
that
that
could
come
with
the
next
phase
when
it's
warranted,
but
that's
kind
of
where
it
opens
up
completely
council
decision,
but
that's
just
the
language
that's
presented
them
in
development
agreement
today.
A
G
You
mayor
yeah
I
had
mr.
Roth
Peter
to
reach
out
to
me
on
that
I
had
a
lengthy
discussion
about
it.
They
were
not
at
the
they
didn't
realize
they
were
supposed
to
be
at
that
meeting
then
realize
it
was
on
the
agenda
and
stated
that
they
would
prefer
not
to
put
that
Sidewalk
in
until
that
part
goes
in.
You
know,
and
I
I
guess
I'm
in
favor
of
that
set
up
on
a
sidewalk
in
and
hoping
the
park
gets
done.
G
Maybe
we
could
have
that
when
the
park
is
in
the
process
of
being
done,
that
we
do
sidewalk
at
that
time.
Otherwise,
who
maintains
it?
If
people
drive
across
it,
we
bring
heavy
equipment,
you
know
I,
don't
I,
don't
need
to
be
replacing
sidewalk
two
years
or
a
year
after
it
gets
put
in.
So
those
are.
G
Those
are
the
discussions
I
had
it
didn't,
go
up
and
look
at
the
property
as
to
where
its
gonna
lay
out,
and
things
of
that
nature
didn't
make
a
lot
of
sense
to
complete
that
road
going
farther
north
and
I
guess
it's
more
of
a
northeast
type
Road
until
they
were
ready
to
develop
more
of
that
and
I
think
the
sidewalk
is
one
of
those.
If
we're
gonna
put
the
park
in,
let's
do
the
sidewalk
at
that
time.
G
A
A
And
the
Planning
Commission
was
feeling
like
if
they're
you
know,
this
property
is
coming
off
the
tax
roll
and
will
be
owned
by
the
city,
but
there's
no
access
to
it.
There's
no
Road
adjacent
to
it
because
the
developer
is
postponing
until
they
put
playground
equipment,
it's
still
parkland,
but
there's
no
way
for
anybody
to
get
to
it,
and
so
that
was
the
reason
that
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
at
least
putting
the
sidewalk
in
some
of
them.
A
A
C
A
There
was
supposed
to
be
a
park,
it
was
right
away
in
that
first
phase
and
it
was
all
approved,
and
then
the
developer
came
back
to
the
city
and
said
I'd
really
rather
put
Lots
here
where
the
park
was
going
to
be
I'll,
do
a
park
later
and
they
just
kept
I
mean
we're
on
phase
7
and
there's
still
no
park.
This
is
a
7th
edition
and
finally,
the
park
is
coming,
but
the
neighborhood
has
been
without.
E
A
E
Yeah
well
I'm
gonna,
I,
I'm,
not
sure
what
you
just
stated
is
is
accurate
because
it
I
don't
understand
how
someone
thinks
it
was
our
responsibility
to
bring
this
park
to
a
head.
Every
time
we
brought
a
phase
forward,
I
would
have
thought
that
would
have
fell
on
the
city
to
say.
We
won't
approve
this
much
like
you're
doing
now
without
some
sort
of
a
park
agreement
that
how
how
would
that
fall
on
us
I.
Don't
remember
ever
going
back
and
saying
I'd
like
to
put
Lots
where
this
Park
is
that
also
what
I
the.
E
A
A
20Th
Avenue
North,
the
very
first
addition
had
a
park
right
there,
and
there
I
found
this
in
the
record
that
those
first
lots
right
down
there,
where
the
cursor
is
the
very
most
southeastern
portion
of
the
subdivision,
was
approved
for
a
park
in
its
first
phase,
and
then
it
was
approved
by
the
city
and
I'm,
not
blaming
the
developer
at
all.
For
this,
the
city
did
say
it's
okay
for
the
park
not
to
be
here,
we'll
put
it
somewhere
else
later
and
I'm,
not
blaming
the
developer
at
all.
For
this,
it's
just
been
kicked
down.
C
A
E
You
made
it
I
mean
you
know.
My
perception
of
what
you
had
just
said
was
that
we
kept
putting
it
off
and
kicking
it
down
the
road
if
the
city
kicked
it
down
the
road,
because
if
it
were
as
simple
as
saying
I'd
like
to
put
Lots
there
in
the
city,
goes:
oh
okay,
let's
do
it
later
then
I'd
say
the
same
thing
here
and
we'd
be
done
with
this
I
mean
I
just
I
want.
E
E
The
the
public
has
access
the
right
but
who's
who
wants
to
walk
out
into
a
bean
field,
and
when
you
go
to
develop
that
park
an
eight
point,
six
acre
park
I'm
not
sure
how
many
people
realize
how
big
that
is,
but
you
aren't
going
to
go
out
there
with
the
lawn
tractor
and
develop
that
Park
and
turn
it
from
beans
and
alfalfa
into
grass
for
a
park.
That's
gonna
take
more
than
just
a
month
or
so
to
develop.
You're
gonna
have
to
go
in
there
and
spray
it
with
Roundup.
E
E
A
Mr.
Hoff
teaser
I
apologize
if
I
seem
to
be
blaming
you
that
wasn't
my
intention
at
all.
I
was
kind
of
advocating
for
the
neighborhood
needing
a
park
and
that
it's
the
city
is
fully
responsible
for
approving
plats.
The
developer
doesn't
do
that.
The
city
approves
the
plats
and
they've
come.
This
is
a
seventh
one,
and
this
is
finally
getting
a
park
for
the
people.
Who've
lived
out
there
for
so
many
years
and
I'm
sure
some
children
are
now
adults
but
and
they
never
did
have
a
park
there.
A
The
normal
agreement
gives
a
developer
two
years
to
do
a
subdivision
and
that's
what
this
development
agreement
says.
So
what
I
would
hate
to
see
is
for
the
neighborhood
to
not
be
able
to
put
the
park
in
because
there's
no
access
to
get
the
equipment
in
to
put
the
park
in
because
the
road
isn't
there
so
well.
E
There's
there's
you
know,
there's
actually
I
mean
you're
I
mean
it
you're,
making
it
sound
like
they're
gonna
go
stick
equipment
in
there
in
April,
I
mean
I,
I
mean
it.
Common
sense
tells
you
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
before
they're
ready
to
put
swings
and
slides
or
playground
equipment.
E
There,
I
mean
and
they've
got
to
get
some
heavy
equipment
in
there
to
disc
that
up
and
to
spray
it
and
de-seed
it
I
mean
I,
would
guess
and
I'm
not
I,
don't
put
parks
and
that's
not
what
I
do,
but
I
would
guess.
You're
gonna
be
lucky
to
be
able
to
put
park
equipment
on
grass,
not
mud.
You
know
that
has
been
seeded
or
disc
because
you
got
to
hope.
E
The
grass
comes
up
and
there's
all
kinds
of
weed
control
got
to
be
done
for
the
spring
and
summer
until
the
grass
is
mowed
three
or
four
times
I'm
gonna.
Guess
the
playground
equipments
going
to
go
in
you
know
maybe
next
September
and
that
grasses,
that
you
certainly
don't
want
to
put
playground
equipment
in
the
middle
of
a
bean
field
and
it's
gonna
take
a
year
to
establish
grass
enough
so
that
you
want
people
out
there
and
join
it,
not
in
the
mud
but
in
in
grass.
That's
been
mowed
several
times.
E
I
mean
it
takes
time
to
do
that.
It's
not
like
they're
gonna,
take
playground,
equipment
and
plunk
it
in
there
in
April,
and
we
need
access
to
that.
So
the
kids
can
go
play
in
the
park.
I'm
willing
to
put
the
sidewalk
in
when
that's
developed,
but
to
put
it
in
ahead
of
time
I'm
trying
to
save
you,
it's
going
to
be
easier
for
the
city
to
develop
that
park.
E
A
E
Unfortunately,
we
weren't
told
there
was
a
meeting
or
we
could
have
been
there
to
have
this
discussion
and
it
might
be
a
moot
point
tonight,
but
we
weren't
told
there
was
a
meeting
and
we
didn't
get
a
chance
to
go
there
and
talk
to
them
about
it
and
explain
the
things
I'm
explaining
now.
Unfortunately,.
E
And
that
that
we
missed
an
opportunity
to
attend
that
meeting
and
and
I,
don't
think
we'd
even
be
discussing
this
now,
if
people,
if
anybody
that
had
made
that
suggestion
had
gone
out
and
looked
at
it
and
seen
that
it
was
a
bean
field
and
and
a
hay
field
to
extend
a
sidewalk
254
feet
and
then
to
drive
your
equipment
around
it.
When
you
develop
the
park,
it
just
makes
no
sense,
but
it.
A
Was
something
thrown
up
by
one
of
the
plan,
commissioners
as
an
option
when
another
plant
commissioner
had
said
you
know
the
standard?
Is
the
roads
go
in
at
the
time
of
the
plat
and
this
one's
different?
The
road
is
delayed
by
the
park.
So
this
is
not
a
standard
process,
and
that
was
just
meant
to
mitigate
that
a
little
bit,
but
you
make
a
valid
point
and
I
think
it's.
A
A
E
Then
the
the
the
problem
I
have
with
this
again
is
not
being
able
to
attend
that
Planning
Commission
meeting,
because
I
would
I
would
like
to
have
asked
them
if
any
single
one
of
them
went
out
and
looked
at
the
site,
because
when
you
look
at
it
on
paper
and
if
you
tell
the
layperson
off
the
street,
we
have
a
park
here,
shouldn't
there
be
a
sidewalk.
It
sounds
like
a
great
idea.
E
I
would
agree
with
it
myself
on
paper,
but
if
they
went
out
and
looked
at
it
and
said
this
doesn't
really
make
sense
here,
because
it's
a
bean
field
and
why
would
you
lay
a
sidewalk
into
a
bean
field
for
the
public
to
access
a
bean
field?
And
then,
when
we
develop
it,
I
mean
it.
We
didn't
have
a
chance
to
defend
ourselves
or
to
actually
save
your
cell
from
the
planning
committee.
E
I,
don't
think
any
of
them
and
I'm
not
faulting
them,
but
I
think
before
they
make
decisions
they
should
get
as
much
information
as
possible
and
I.
Don't
think
we
were
able
to
a.
We
were
able
to
provide
it
and
B
I,
wonder
if
any
of
them
went
out
and
drove
out
to
the
site,
like
Adam
did
and
looked
at
it
and
went
this
doesn't
make
it
makes
sense.
But
you
look
at
this.
This
doesn't
make
sense
and
then
to
remove
snow
from
254
feet
of
sidewalk,
all
winter.
F
I
might
just
add
to
this
brandy
with
the
plan
Commission.
If
council
decides
to
change
the
development
agreement,
that's
presented,
that's
not
necessarily
going
against
them,
because
plant
emission
never
recommend
development
agreement.
They
they
only
recommended
the
approval
of
the
plat.
We
bring
the
development
agreement
to
them
as
a
courtesy
just
because
they're
all
that
the
preliminary
plan.
So
if
council
did
deviate
from
what
is
presented
here
tonight,
you
wouldn't
be
necessarily
going
against
the
plan
commission
recommendation
because
they
didn't
make
one
okay.
G
You
on
this
particular
one:
what
I,
what
I
would
look
at
is
Greg
and
if
you're,
okay,
with
that,
you
know
once
that
part
gets
in
place,
putting
that
sidewalk
in
after
so
that
we
are
not
having
to
run
equipment
of
any
kind
across
it.
I
don't
want
to
be
having
to
replace,
especially
at
the
city's
expense,
additional
concrete,
simply
because
we
we
put
the
concrete
in
three
months
later,
six
months
later,
a
year
later,
we
went
into
the
park.
Are
you,
okay,
with
that
Greg
I
have.
E
No
problem
if
they
were
developing
the
Park
Park
as
we
speak,
I'd
have
no
problem
laying
it
this
year.
But
again,
if
it's
gonna
be
a
year-
and
you
say
it's,
it's
proposed
I
mean
you
know.
Maybe
it
goes
in
the
budget,
maybe
a
dozen,
but
until
the
park
is
in
and
again
it's
gonna
take
a
while
to
establish
that
as
a
park.
It
just
isn't
going
to
happen
in
April
or
May
of
next
year.
G
I
guess
I
I'm
not
gonna,
make
it
yet
because
there's
other
hands
that
want
to
be
raised,
but
I
mean
my
recommendation
is
and
I'm
I'm
one
of
those
that
let's
get
ourself
ducks
in
a
row.
Let's
make
sure
that
we
have
it
done.
You
know
but
looks
you
know,
do
it
smartly
and
not
have
to
replace
it,
but
all
that
I'll.
Let
people
talk
first
and
then
we
need
to
make
more.
You
can
make
that
motion.
Okay,.
E
H
H
F
H
And
just
this
is
how
old
I
am
I
was
involved
with
planning
of
this
property
in
97
and
I.
Do
recall
that
that
we
did
make
some
drastic
change,
especially
when
we
we're
looking
at
the
bypass
extension
from
from
the
interstate
over
to
highway
20.
And
so
we,
you
know,
the
idea
was
to
start
developing
from
the
south
to
the
north,
and
you
know.
C
H
We
it
was
at
the
request
of
the
Planning
Commission
at
that
time
to
you
know,
to
kind
of
make
a
lot
of
changes
and
yeah
it's.
This
has
been
drug
through
the
mud
quite
a
bit,
no
doubt
over
the
years,
but
anyway
that
was
my
question.
I
just
thought
it
might
make
sense
to
make
sure
we've
got
property
available
that
we
could,
if
we
could
have
an
access,
maybe
that
Lucas
circle
area.
If
that
would
make
sense,
I
don't
know,
but
it
would
be
something
certainly
for
the
for
you.
Yes,.
H
E
E
A
F
F
We
did
we
did
change
the
language
after
that
meeting
I'd
have
to
see
how
it
ended
up
being
presented
to
Planning
Commission,
but
right
now
the
what's
presented
to
council
is
all
properties
intended
to
be
dedicated
dedicated
to
the
public
or
for
the
part
for
public
use,
such
as
parks
and
storm.
Water
detention
lock
shall
have
a
sidewalk
installed
by
the
developer.
Sidewalk
should
be
installed
within
the
ingress
and
egress
easement
adjacent
to
River,
Ridge
Park
contemporaneous
to
park
development.
F
F
A
C
F
Wanted
they
want
plan
commission,
but
they
expected
that
they
didn't
know.
We
didn't
know
at
that
time
when
the
park
was
going
to
be
developed.
So
now
that
we
know
from
the
from
Terry
Kelly
that
they're
hoping
for
2021,
then
it
still
would
really
fall
in
within
this
development
agreement
when
the
sidewalk
was
the
land.
But
it's
ultimately
it'll
be
this.
This
can
change,
but
the
plan
Commission
doesn't
doesn't
recommend
the
development
agreement.
So
this
would
read
to
what
Greg
is
proposing.
H
Sounds
to
me
like
we're
all
pretty
much
in
agreement,
we
agree,
there's
gonna
be
a
park
or
we
agree.
There's
gonna
be
a
sidewalk
to
the
park.
It's
not
a
matter
of
if
it's
just
a
timing
issue.
Is
that
what
we're,
after
all,
right
so
Brandi,
if
you
allow
me
to
pose
a
question
to
you,
first
of
all,
I
take
great
weight
in
what
the
Planning
Commission
says,
but
Brandon.
F
So
they
they
were
wondering
when
the
park
was
going
to
be
developed.
We
weren't
clear
on
that.
We
had
initially
thought
2022,
but
then,
in
talking
with
TK
that
they
were
hoping
to
move
it
up
to
2021.
So
then
they,
but
they
just
thought
Bert
since
we're
not
doing
the
street
that
just
a
sidewalk,
but
they
they
really
and
obviously
Greg-
didn't,
have
the
opportunity
to
to
discuss
this
with
them.
C
G
You
Mary
I,
guess
I'd
make
the
recommendation
that
you
know
once
the
park
is
under
construction
and
and
basically
to
the
point,
where
they're
ready
to
simply
plant
grass
and
do
the
you
know
whether
it's
playground,
equipment
or
whatever,
maybe
that
they
they'd
be
allowed
to
put
that
that
driver
driveway.
What
side
walking
after
that.
So
I
don't
know.
If
that
needs
to
be
in
a
motion,
no
I,
don't.
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
B
C
C
C
A
All
right,
thank
you
and
I
have
been
getting
lots
of
questions
about
when
the
park
is
coming
for
this
neighborhood
I
think
they'll
be
very
happy
to
hear
that
it's
coming
soon
item
E
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
20
21
to
supplement
the
2020
budget
for
various
departments
and
projects
motion
by
Helene
second
by
Ville,
Hauer
Kristen.
We
please
explain
this
for
us.
B
Thank
you
Mary
before
you
is
actually
the
second
reading.
I
did
go
over
each
of
the
items
during
the
first
reading,
but
I
can
run
through
them.
All
of
these
have
actually
been
approved
prior
to
the
budget
supplement,
except
for
the
urban
renewal
supplement.
Otherwise,
everything
kind
of
was
approved
prior.
If
there's
any
specific
questions,
I
can
try
to
answer
those
questions.
All.
A
Right,
thank
you.
Any
questions,
councilman
Albertsons
ham
is
up.
Do
you
have
question
now
the
hand
is
down?
Sorry,
that's
all
right.
Anyone
else,
no
questions
all
right,
we'll
look
for
action,
then
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion,
Kristen
roll
call
vote.
Please.
Okay,
algorithm.
B
C
B
C
C
C
B
A
B
You
mayor,
as
the
mayor
stated,
this
is
actually
the
first
reading
of
another
budget
supplement
it's
a
little
bit
different.
What
this
is
is
this
budget
supplement
is
to
account
for
the
remaining
sales
tax
revenue
bond
dollars
that
were
going
to
spend
in
2019
and
reimbursed
fun
to
12
and
2020.
This
does
allow
the
state
to
meet
the
requirement
of
spending
all
bond
proceeds,
and
it
also
will
help
when
we
begin
our
refunding
process.
I
think
that's
been
talked
about
where
we
had
some
remaining
bond
dollars
that
needed
to
be
spent.
B
D
B
D
Thank
You
Kristin
now
the
comment
just
to
clarify
that
this
in
no
way
takes
those
dollars
away
from
the
Ice
Arena
project
and
we
haven't
given
up
on
that
project
just
put
on
on
hold
for
the
time
being.
This
does
not
take
dollars
away
from
that,
because
when
that's,
when
that
time
does
come,
we
would
make
a
transfer
back
the
other
way
to
restore
those
dollars
correct
that.
B
Is
correct
what
this
does
is
this
allows
for
us
to
meet
that
requirement
with
the
current
situation
of
kovat
and
having
that
2028
timeline,
this
allows
us
to
meet
the
requirement
that
was
set
for
it
to
spend
the
dollars
in
a
certain
time
frame,
and
it
also
will
help
earlier
this
year.
I
had
also
came
before
the
council
to
with
permission
to
refund
some
of
these,
and
the
requirements
also
is
that
the
bond
dollars
have
already
been
spent
before
you
can
refund.
B
G
B
They
were
pushing
I,
don't
think
that
cutoff
was
late,
October
of
2020,
but
that
was
my
comfort
level
and
with
the
refunding
we
pretend
to
we'll
be
refunding
in
September
of
2020
so
and
COBIT
kind
of
happened
and
it
didn't
look
like
we
were
gonna,
have
any
more
expenditures
here
in
2020
that
we
could
offset
with.
So
this
was
kind
of
the
decision
that
I
made
to
meet
that
requirement
and
still
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
refunding
now.
A
Finance
officer
speak
any
other
questions,
Kristen
all
right,
I,
don't
see
any
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
G,
which
is
the
review
of
the
continued
necessity
of
resolution
number
20-15
declaring
an
emergency
concerning
the
pandemic
outbreak
of
the
novel,
coronavirus,
Cova,
19
and
providing
for
responsive
measures
related
to
the
operations
of
the
city
and
the
protection
of
public
health,
and
there
isn't
necessarily
action
unless
the
council
would
want
to
take
action.
This
is
the
resolution
which
closes
the
city
buildings
and
we've
been
gradually
opening
them
up
little
by
little
as
it
stands.
A
A
The
City
Hall
is
doing
everything
that
City
Hall
does
when
it's
open,
even
though
it's
technically
closed
to
the
public.
So
there
there
wouldn't
be
a
change
in
the
level
of
service
to
open
City
Hall.
The
library,
on
the
other
hand,
is
closed
to
the
public.
They
do
curbside
delivery
of
books,
but
they
aren't
allowing
browsing
at
this
time
and
that
that's
a
little
bit
a
different
situation
and
so
I
mean
the
library
board
hasn't
made
a
recommendation
to
open
yet,
but
they
are
looking
at
a
reopening
plan.
A
The
fire
station
doesn't
get
a
lot
of
public
access
to
it
and
the
street
the
same
thing.
This
Street
Division
they're
not
technically
open,
but
there's
really
not
a
problem
and
people
are
able
to
get
in
if
they
need
to.
So
it's
really
no
functional
reason
to
change
the
way,
we're
doing
things
we
could.
A
You
know,
have
to
move
backwards
if
we
open
too
soon
and
then
we're
wanting
to
close
back
down
but
really
we're
not
I'm,
not
getting
any
complaints
whatsoever
about
City
Hall
being
closed,
I
have
received
some
complaints
about
people
wanting
to
get
into
the
library
and
browse
around
like
normal,
but
council,
yes,
go
ahead.
Just.
D
A
comment
I
agree
completely
as
far
as
City
Hall
business
being
done
through
all
this,
with
the
way
things
are
currently
by
the
same
token,
I
am
concerned
about
the
public
perception
out
there
of
the
City
Hall
being
closed
down,
as
it
is
I
realize
a
court
at
the
County
Courthouse
does
totally
different
business
than
we
do,
but
they've
been
open
for
a
couple
of
weeks
now
so
I
would
like
to
see
us
get
a
you.
You
would
present
it
to
us
a
phase
of
phased
in
a
phasing
in
plan
for
reopening
the
facilities.
D
C
A
D
I
really
don't
think
that
would
be
necessary
because
again
we
do
such
different
operations.
We
know
that
from
the
public,
but
the
public
is
not
where
public's,
not
aware
of
that,
but
I,
don't
think,
would
be
necessary
for
us
to
be
counting
heads
as
closely
as
a
county
would
need
to
be,
but
I
would
definitely
like
to
see
us
have
a
timetable
for
reopening.
C
C
G
I
do
to
the
Glens
point.
I
think
we're
in
the
same
we're
in
the
same
boat
I
mean
you,
you
had
sent
out
I.
Think
the
library
had
you
guys
had
kind
of
same
plan
as
far
as
a
implementation
of
a
you
know
in
phases
type
deal,
I
took
Glen's
point
I'd
like
to
see
that
move
forward.
Here,
maybe
around
the
first
of
the
of
July.
You
know
and
leave
that
kind
in
in
your
hands
and
maybe
to
the
part
or
not
the
park,
the
library
board's
hands.
C
G
I,
don't
know
if
you're
willing
to
do
that
yet
or
not.
You
know,
that's
I
think
you,
as
the
CEO
of
the
community
I,
think
you
have
that
right
to
say
this
is
what
we're
thinking
of
doing
and
right-
and
you
know
you
know
the
people
in
the
in
City
Hall.
You
know
probably
better
than
any
of
us
to
you
know
as
far
as
what
the
well
I
know,
they're
doing
their
job
and
I
have
no
concern
about
that.
But
you
know,
let's
see
if
we
can
get
stuff
opening
as
well
right.
A
And
we
can't
stay
closed
forever,
definitely
realize
that,
but
we
functionally
we'd
only
be
doing
this
for
the
image.
There
won't
be
any
change
in
the
function.
We're
already
performing
every
function.
There
isn't
any
function,
we're
not
performing.
We
do
have
limited
staff.
So
if
one
of
our
employees
contracts
kovat
as
a
result
of
a
customer
coming
in
I
mean
that
could
wipe
out
a
department
pretty
quickly
just
because
we
are
a
pretty
small
staff
and
you
know
I've
talked
about
how
that
would.
What
would
we
do
it?
A
A
A
We
probably
wouldn't
change,
he
might
sit
in
his
office
and
be
on
teams
rather
than
sitting
at
his
home
and
being
on
teams
there,
just
a
few
people
that
are
doing
that
it
isn't
most
or
all
you
know
we're
in
the
construction
season
now
so
folks
are
out
on
jobs
and
I.
Think
it's
a
we're
still
accommodating.
A
G
Mir,
if
I
could
come
along,
thank
you
yeah,
one
of
the
things
I'd
recommend
if
we
do
open
that
is
we
take
someone
from
a
department
and
have
them
like
for
a
week
at
a
time
they're
working
from
home
so
that
we
do
have.
You
know
essentially
a
contingency
of
someone.
What
happened
to
get
it
in
that
department
you
know
and
that
they
could
rotate
through
and
know
the
county
did
that
in
some
of
their
offices,
that
they
don't.
G
C
A
D
D
Let's
say
that
we
don't
take
any
definitive
action
tonight
relative
to
City
Hall
in
the
library.
Does
a
mayor
have
the
authority
to
my
concern?
Is
we
don't
meet
for
three
weeks
now,
barring
a
special
meeting?
My
concern
is
we
don't
do
anything
for
three
weeks,
three
weeks
from
now
we
sit
down
with
the
same
conversation.
All
of
a
sudden
we
decide.
Okay
through
booked
put
off
two
three
more
weeks,
all
of
a
sudden
we're
you
know
mid
to
late
July,
I,
guess
I
like
to
see
us
get
some
timetable
and
motion.
D
I
Well,
no,
because
we
put
this
in
this
resolution
that
the
council's
been
approving
as
we've
gone
on
here,
there
would
need
to
be
an
amendment
to
the
resolution
to
give
that
authority.
You
know
in
other
instances,
we've
basically
accepted
certain
buildings,
giving
the
authority
to
the
respective
departments
that
control
those
buildings.
So,
for
example,
when
we,
when
we
took
the
park
buildings
out
of
the
ordinance
that
basically
gave
the
authority
to
the
park
board
to
make
the
decisions
on
those
buildings.
I
I
You
know
this
is
one
of
those.
This
is
such
an
odd.
You
know
such
a
kind
of
a
surreal
time.
There's
no
rule
that
says
who
could
who
had
the
authority
to
lock
the
front
door
at
City
Hall.
You
know
we
don't
have
an
ordinance
that
says
that
City
Hall's
at
City,
Council's
collar-
that's
the
mayor's
call
I
think
is
the
executive
of
the
city
without
any
other
rule
affecting
it.
It's
probably
the
mayor's
call
as
to
whether
or
not
the
front
door
is
unlocked
or
locked
I.
D
Guess
I
would
like
I
mean
you've
heard
Adams
and
my
comments
about
our
thoughts
about
this
I
guess
I,
look
a
little
more
feedback
from
some
our
other
colleagues
up
here.
As
far
as
you
know,
are
we
good
to
go
as
is
and
just
let
it
ride
for
a
while
or
I
guess,
I'd
like
to
know
what
some
other
thoughts
are
about,
this
councilor.
H
Mayor
you're
on
the
response
team
that
meets
all
the
time
on
this
and
a
unified
command
team,
I
guess
I
should
say
at
this
point,
I
think
no,
we
there's
been
an
abundance
of
caution.
I
actually
am
okay.
If
the
mayor
decides
in
two
weeks,
she
wants
to
open
the
city
hall
to
a
certain
extent,
at
this
point,
I'm.
Ok
with
that
so
I.
A
Think
you
know
I've
been
asking
the
department
heads
how
they
feel
and
I
personally
I
have
been
out
and
about
I've
been
I've.
Had
a
coffee
with
the
mayor
gathering
invited
people
to
come,
people
came
I
wore
a
mask.
They
were
masks.
I
am
encouraged
hearing
that
the
hairdresser's
that
came
to
work,
sick
with
kovat
wore
masks
and
all
of
their
clients
wore
masks,
even
though
they
were
publicly
shamed
across
the
nation
and
150
people
were
identified
as
exposed.
Not
a
single
one
after
three
weeks
came
down
with
Kovan.
A
So
there
are
the
masks
work
but
asking
the
employees
to
wear
a
mask
all
day
well
and
interact
face-to-face
with
the
public.
I'll
be
honest
it.
It
causes
quite
a
bit
of
trepidation
with
with
people
who
are
still
pretty
worried
about
it.
People
who
have
health
situations,
I
personally
told
several
people
I
didn't
want
them
coming
even
to
work
with
their
co-workers
because
of
health
conditions.
A
That
I
was
aware
of
I
want
to
protect
the
employees
as
well
and
if
they're,
not
comfortable,
that
makes
me
feel
uncomfortable
I'm,
not
getting
the
sense
that
they're
ready
and
that's
that's.
My
only
concern
I'm
ready
myself
personally
but
I'm.
You
know
if
someone
were
to
become
sick
and
have
an
issue
with
it.
That's
on
me,
councilman
Roby,.
H
Glen
makes
a
good
point:
we
don't
meet
for
three
more
weeks
so
again,
if
you're
working
with
the
department
heads
getting
their
input,
but
there's
an
office
or
two
or
all
of
them
or
city
hall
that
you
guys
have
decided
well
we're
pretty
comfortable,
then
I'd
say
open
up.
I,
wouldn't
wait
for
the
council
meeting,
it's
my
opinion.
Okay,.
D
Just
weigh
in
as
well
sorry
I
didn't
make
it
off
Reed,
but
I
mean
you're
our
CEO
and
you're
in
a
better
position
than
any
of
us
to
know
the
situation
with
your
staff.
I
mean.
Are
you
okay?
If
we
were
to
give
you
the
authority
to
use
your
discretion
as
far
as
when
to
open
up,
or
do
you
want
more
guidance
from
us?
No.
A
We've
installed
the
screens
and
we've
we've
got
thermometers
and
we've
got
forms
for
people
to
fill
out
every
day
when
they
come
to
work,
that
they've
checked
their
temperature
and
they've.
You
know
they're,
not
feeling
sick,
I
feel
pretty
comfortable
about
all
of
that.
It's
just
the
really.
The
thing
that
makes
me
hesitate
is
the
fear
I
see
in
the
employees
who
have
fragile
loved
ones,
people
that
they
live
with
people
that
they
associate
with.
You
know
there
are
we
putting
them
at
risk,
but
it's
you
know.
I
could
see
it's.
A
C
C
Personally,
if
I
were,
if
it
were,
my
decision
I
would
open
City
Hall
on
a
limited
basis,
so
that
the
public
can
come
in
and
visit,
but
also
allowing
you
some
flexibility
to
work
with
department
heads
to
not
necessarily
have
every
city
employee
here
all
the
time
allow
some
flexibility
for
those
with
fragile
loved
ones
or
situations
to
work
from
home
as
long
as
they're
still
doing
the
work.
Yes,.
A
C
C
H
A
H
A
Tell
you
this:
the
hospital
isn't
open
you.
You
are
now
they're
talking
about,
maybe
letting
one
visitor
per
patient
in
you
have
to
say
bye
to
your
child
when
they're
in
the
hospital
and
those
that's
the
medical
community
feeling
like
they're
at
risk
of
course,
they're
dealing
with
sick
people.
So
it
is
different,
but
sick
people
do
come
to
come
to
do
their
business,
sometimes
councilman.
H
A
G
D
C
C
It's
been,
we've
spent
some
time
with
that
with
Dede
and
I'm
sure
this
next
meeting.
If
they
have
an
open,
she
will
probably
be
ready
to
open
at
that
point,
because
she's
talked
about
the
three
steps
of
the
how
you
would
do
that
the
three
different
phases,
and
so
I
she's,
put
some
time
into
a
and
you
know
they're
all
nervous,
because
large
numbers,
but
if
they
use
the
CDC
stuff
I,
think
they'll
be
okay
too
right.
G
A
I
It
relates
to
the
resolution.
You
know
it
sounds
like
the
four
buildings
that
come
to
mind
here
are
City
all
the
library,
the
police
and
fire
department.
You
know
one
option
the
council
could
entertain
is
just
striking
the
entire
city
closure
clause
from
the
resolution
and
therefore
it
would
fall
on
to
the
mayor
working
with
the
park
board
or
excuse
me,
the
Mara
working
with
the
library
board
and
the
police
and
fire
department
and
the
city
hall
staff
as
to
the
appropriateness
of
opening
the
buildings
and
the
timing
of
that.
I
A
D
A
D
A
D
A
I
Correct
so
if
you
struck
the
building
clause
in
the
resolution,
then
buildings
are
just
by
default:
open
normal
operating
hours,
but
because
of
your
powers
in
the
resolution
to
take
actions
under
this
emergency
situation,
you
could
leave
City
Hall
closed
as
you
deem
appropriate
or
the
part
you
work
with
the
library
board.
As
far
as
how
that's
going
to
work
with
the
reopening
the
library
and
then
I
think
police
and
fire
I
think
they
took
action
independently
of
us
prior
to
us
even
enacting
the
resolution,
if
I
recall,
but
you'd.
A
Right
and
I
didn't
participate
in
another
mayor's
conference
call
today,
and
it's
really
mixed
across
the
state.
What
the
various
cities
are
doing.
Some
libraries
are
open,
but
they're
City
Hall
is
closed.
Some
have
the
opposite.
Some
are
just
like
us.
Some
never
closed
anything.
It's
really
mixed.
There's,
it's
not
uniforms
case-by-case
I,
guess
so
we're
not
weird
or
acting
and
way
differently
than
anyone
else.
A
I
It
is
now
I
would
just
add.
As
the
motion
originally
stands,
I
would
add.
I
would
add
a
clause.
The
resolution
that
specifically
just
gives
you
authority
to
make
the
decision
on
City
Hall
and
leave
everything
else
the
same,
and
that
would
be
what
I
would
do
as
it
as
it
is
right
now.
If
the
motion
as
it
stands
passes
but
I
guess,
I
was
just
trying
to
offer
up
a
way
to
potentially
simplify
the
situation
and
just
strike
the
built-in
clause,
but
you
wouldn't
have
to
okay.
E
H
A
C
B
I
B
C
C
C
A
A
C
C
A
A
H
C
We
just
need
to
remind
the
folks
out
there
that
water
ordinances
for
how
long
your
grass
can
be
before
you
might
be
cited
from
the
code
enforcement
officer
and
then
also
was
brought
to
my
attention
that
there's
some
Yards
in
town
that
people
have
built
new
houses
and
it's
going
on
two
or
three
years
that
do
not
have
lawns
put
in.
Yet.
If
we
could
send
those
folks
a
letter
and
remind
them,
they
need
to
get
their
lawns
put
in.
You.
A
D
Wouldn't
call
it
a
new
business,
but
I
know
we
received
some
complaints
from
some
some
residents
or
constituents
concerning
the
the
ban
that
was
downtown
here
recently.
You
know
it's
been
an
ongoing
discussion
of
with
this
group.
We
gave
that
authority
to
the
police
department
and
building
services,
but
there
were
some
complaints
again.
So
it's
something
to
continue
to
monitor
going
forward,
especially
this
one
person
particularly,
is
a
good
point
that,
with
downtown
development
and
more
residents
living
downtown,
that's
only
gonna
make
that
issue,
probably
worse,
going
forward.
I.
D
A
A
Discussion
about
this
at
coffee
with
the
mayor,
some
pro
some
con,
so
people
always
say
there's
nothing
to
do
here.
I
would
disagree
with
that.
We
have
lots
of
things
to
do
here,
so
yeah
I
think
it's
a
something
that
should
be
discussed,
though,
and
one
of
the
comments
that
I
got
was
I
think
something
we
should
try
turn
the
show
mobile
so
that
the
band
plays
into
shooters
not
into
the
open
air
and
then
maybe
those
sound
waves
won't
travel
so
far,
councilman
Roby
I
also.