
►
From YouTube: Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting 03-02-2020
Description
Public Works, Finance & Safety Meeting 03-02-2020
A
B
C
Do
role
at
this
meeting
good
afternoon,
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
the
public
works,
Finance
and
Safety
Committee
meeting
of
Monday
March,
2nd
2020.
First
item
on
the
agenda?
Is
approval
of
the
consent
agenda,
a
motion
by
man
T
and
a
second
by
Helene
any
discussion
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
C
D
E
Thank
you
all
for
hearing
us
on
this.
Struggled
with
a
cold
just
got
a
Saturday,
so
apologize
for
that
in
advance.
I
do
have
captain
horse
with
me
who's
gonna
kind
of
explain
the
grant
process
and
I've
also
got
an
assistant
chief
to
me
with
me,
who's
going
to
help
kind
of
identify
and
explain
to
you
all
about
the
justification
for
why
we
think
we
need
these
three.
So
back
in
about
2017,
we
decided
we
needed
to
have
a
few
more
officers,
so
we
met
with
aye.
E
Think
Shellie
would
have
been
the
finance
then
and
a
different
mayor
Thorsen.
So
if
we
met
with
them,
we
talked
about
a
process
for
going
forward
to
hire
officers.
My
plan
was
at
that
time
is
to
try
and
hire
two
in
eighteen
and
two
and
nine
or
twenty
and
be
done.
We
kind
of
talked
about
it.
We
decided,
maybe
to
go
more
of
a
one
per
year,
type
deal
to
get
there.
So
what
we
did
is
in
2017
we've
in
the
budget
process.
E
We
did
the
paperwork
and
went
through
the
justification
to
hire
an
officer
in
2018,
which
we
did.
We
added
one
officer
in
2018
and-
and
we
went
in
last
year
to
hire
another
officer
this
year
which
didn't
get
through
because
of
the
budget
constraints
and
the
fact
that
I
think
we
kind
of
the
city
said
is
a
kind
of
as
a
whole,
no
new,
no
new
employees,
that
year
this
year,
so
what
I
did
is
we've
kind
of
been
watching
these
cops
grants.
They
don't
come
out
very
often
I.
E
Think
the
last
one
was
five
six,
maybe
seven
years
ago,
I
don't
have
the
exact
date,
but
it's
been
a
while
these
cop
grants
come
and
go
sometimes
they're
a
hundred
percent,
sometimes
they're
75
percent.
This.
This
year's
grant
happens
to
be
a
75
percent.
They'll
pay,
75
percent
of
an
officer
and
the
city
is
required
to
pay
the
other
25
percent
for
three
years
and
then
the
fourth
year
the
city
takes
on
the
full
responsibility
and
they're
required
to
keep
that
officer
on
for
that
fourth
year.
E
This
is
a
good
decision
and
a
good
move
for
an
apartment
to
get
these
three
more
officers
on
what
that'll
allow
us
to
do
is
have
seven
officers
on
each
of
the
four
squads
and
they'll
be
working
right
now,
they're
working
with
six,
and
so
if
we
could
get
three
more
because
we
got
the
one
last
year
2018
and
so
by
getting
these
three
cops
grant
officers
it
allow
us
to
get
to
that
full
strength.
Now,
nothing's
guaranteed
with
the
grant
we
have
to
fill
out
the
paperwork.
E
We
have
to
jump
through
all
the
federal
hoops
there's,
some
certain
areas
that
they
do
award
grants
to
which
Steve
will
touch
on
here
in
a
minute
and
if
we're
successful
enough
to
be
awarded
the
opportunity
to
put
on
the
three
officers.
Of
course,
we'd
have
to
come
back
before
council
and
get
the
authorization
to
go
ahead
and
accept
that
grant.
So
today,
what
we're
really
looking
for
is
to
answer
any
questions
you
might
have.
Hopefully
we
can
get
your
support
to
at
least
apply
for
this
position
to
hire
an
ad
three.
E
What
we
would
do,
then,
is
complete.
The
paperwork
submit
it
and
if
we're
approved
for
three,
we
come
back
before
you
and
ask
for
your
approval
to
go
ahead.
Accept
the
grant
the
grant
could
come
back
and
say
that
we're
only
an
authorized
one
officer,
they
could
say
two
or
possibly
they'll
say
all
three.
E
So
whatever
the
outcome
is,
if
they
come
back
and
say
that
they'll
allow
us
to
add
one
officer
in
front
in
future
years,
we'll
probably
still
come
back
before
you
to
try
to
get
to
that
four
that
we
would
like
to
have
we
added
one.
So
we
want
to
add
the
three
more
to
get
to
the
seven
per
squad,
we'll
be
able
to
show
you
that
there's
some
justification
for
us,
not
just
because
we
want
it
or
feel
like
we
need
it.
We
do
feel
like
we
need
it.
E
We
can
show
it
through
some
of
the
numbers
and
some
of
the
call
volumes
and
those
type
of
things,
but
what
I
hope
is
that
you
at
least
open
up
and
have
a
chance
for
us
to
tell
you
kind
of
what
we're
looking
at
and
why
we
want
to
add
these
three
and
this
grants.
Opportunity,
like
I
said,
doesn't
come
around
that
often,
if
we
don't
do
it
this
time
we
may
be
seven
years
before
there's
another
grant.
E
It's
a
25%
match
so
basically
it'll
be
like
adding
one
additional
officer
each
of
the
three
years,
instead
of
adding
the
three
at
one
time,
if
that
makes
sense,
so
I'll
turn
it
over
to
Steve,
he's
gonna
kind
of
go
through
the
grant
process
and
what
it
all
looks
like
some
of
the
things
they're
looking
for
and
then
I'm
gonna
have
Tim
come
forward
and
give
you
some
of
the
justification
that
he
came
up
with
so
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
Thanks
all.
F
Right
so,
ahead
of
time,
I
dropped
off
some
forms
in
front
of
you.
Look
like
this
they're
a
spreadsheet,
and
that
explains
the
dollar
amounts
which
I'm
sure
everyone's
interested
in
there's
the
top
one.
This
is
what
it
would
cost
for
one
full-time
officer
and
then
two
and
then
three
as
it
looks
to
the
grant
there
there's
two
because
the
top
one,
if
you
see
where
it
says
health
insurance,
the
city's
contribution,
that's
for
the
individual
health
insurance
and
the
the
next
one
underneath
is
for
a
family
health
plan.
If
they
opted
to
take
that.
F
As
far
as
a
new
officer,
I
gave
you
two
typically
I
looked
at
about
our
last
ten
officers
that
we've
hired
and
about
eight
out
of
ten
of
it
with
the
individual
health
insurance
plan
instead
of
the
family.
Just
to
kind
of
give
you
a
an
idea
on
that.
So
how
this
grant
works
like
it's
are
kind
of
already
been
said,
and
I
did
talk
with
Kristin
to
ensure
that
the
the
numbers
on
here
are
in
line
with
what
what
we
feel
would
be
accurate
to
represent
what
the
cost
would
be.
F
It
is
a
three-year
grant.
The
maximum
that
the
government
would
cover
will
be
one
hundred
and
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
officer
over
that
three
year
period
of
125,000.
They
require
the
city
to
at
least
a
minimum
match
of
twenty
five
percent,
which,
if
you
see
on
there,
that
would
be
forty
one
thousand
six
hundred
and
sixty
seven
dollars
would
be
the
twenty
five
percent
match.
F
They
do
require
a
fourth
year
beyond
the
grant,
once
that's
done
after
the
third
year,
the
cop's
office,
which
is
the
community
orientated
policing
services,
they
do
require
that
you
maintain
those
three
positions
for
a
period
of
twelve
twelve
months
after
that
which
the
city
would
have
to
pay
the
full
salary.
So
when
you
look
in
2024,
you
can
see
that
we're.
Actually,
we
would
be
paying
the
full
salaries
for
the
officers.
That's
why
that's
included
in
there
beyond
that?
There
are
no
requirements
as
far
as
retaining
those
positions
that
would
be
hired.
F
F
They
do
have
a
thing
where,
if
we
drop
below
the
numbers,
where
we've
hired
as
long
as
we're
actively
hiring
people,
it's
called
a
non
supplanting
policy
in
there.
As
long
as
we're
actively
hiring
someone
to
fill
that
vacancy,
they
will
continue
to
reimburse
us
for
the
officers
they're.
Like
chief
said,
this
is
a
very
unique
opportunity
for
us.
F
We
see
grants
all
the
time
for
equipment
and
things
of
that
nature,
but
to
see
a
grant
of
this,
this
level
where
they're
gonna
pay
one
hundred
twenty-five
thousand
dollars
per
officer
over
that
period
is,
is
pretty
unique
for
us
to
see
and
with
the
cops
cops
initiative
here.
It's
not
just
us
looking
to
grab
three
officers
and
throw
them
on
the
street
and
hope
that
things
get
better
or
that
we
can
do
better
things.
F
And
what
areas
can
we
best
attack
how
to
prevent,
solve
and
deter
crime
from
happening
in
the
future,
and
so
we're
really
kind
of
embracing
that
community
orientated
policing
philosophy
and
so
the
three
areas
that
we've
looked
at,
including
in
this
grant
with
his
officers
that
we
would
hire
one
would
be
a
school
driven
position.
Assistant
Chief
Tim.
F
You
spoke
with
the
superintendent
and
the
assistant,
superintendent
and
they're
supportive
of
us
seeking
this
Avenue
and
one
of
the
officers
and
what
we
look
at
doing
is
having
an
officer
specifically
working
with
the
Intermediate
School
in
the
elementary
schools,
so
that
we
can
have
that
early
interaction
with
youth,
because
they
show
that
the
earlier
we
interact
with
them
and
develop
that
rapport.
We
can
have
a
long-lasting
impact
on
crime
down
in
the
future.
I
can
speak
on
behalf
of
the
DARE
program
as
well.
F
We've
had
a
lot
of
disclosures
and
things
that
have
brought
to
the
officers
just
in
the
dare
class
alone.
So
that's
one
one
area
we
identified
as
an
officer
we
if
this
is
approved
and
we
we
are
granted
the
grant
one
of
the
areas
will
be
working
in
the
schools.
Like
that,
the
other
one
is.
We
would
have
a
mental
health
officer
that
would
focus
on
mental
health
issues
in
the
community.
F
Our
2019
stats
show
that
we
had
two
out
of
every
three
days
or
responded
either
to
a
completed
suicide,
a
suicide
threat
or
a
suicide
attempt.
So
we
see
that
as
a
major
area
where
we
can
serve
the
community
to
help
those
individuals
so
that
we
can
do
some
preventative
items
there
as
well,
so
we
had
I'm
an
officer
and
they
would
primarily
work
on
addressing
issues
of
people
having
mental
health
crisis
and,
following
up
with
him
working
closely
with
the
Human
Service
Agency.
F
The
third
piece
that
we'd
be
looking
at
would
be
crimes
against
crimes
against
people
and
with
those
we
looked
at
that
and
last
year
we
had
296
arrests
for
things
such
as
assaults,
rapes,
child
abuse,
false
imprisonment,
basically,
crimes
against
persons.
We
had
296
arrests
that
fell
into
those
crimes
against
persons
categories.
F
So
that's
kind
of
the
the
route
we're
going
with
a
three
that
would
be
looking
at
we're,
not
simply
just
going
to
hey,
give
us
three
officers
and
we're
just
gonna
put
them
in
the
car
and
let
them
go
to
work
or
actually
give
them
some
directive
and
what
we're
trying
to
accomplish
with
hiring
these
positions
and
those
goals
that
were
looking
at
with
those
officers
would
last
for
a
minimum
of
the
four
years.
So
it's
not,
we
would
just
do
the
school,
for
you
know
one
year
and
then
move
on
to
something
else.
F
F
Something
we've
discussed
and
we've
looked
at,
and
we
feel
that
with
what
we
have
currently
we're,
gonna
be
able
to
accommodate
those
positions.
As
far
as
you
know,
you
look
at
things
such
as
Tasers
and
firearms
and
vehicles,
and
we
do
have
those
things
and
we
feel
that
we'll
be
able
to
successfully
make
it
work
within
the
budget
that
we
currently
have.
I
guess.
G
A
We
went
through
all
the
wage
negotiations
here
recently.
I
know
one
of
the
things
I
think
we
heard
pretty
loud
and
clear
was
it
was
difficult
to
hire
new
employees
because
their
starting
wages
are
so
or
so
low
I'm
hopeful,
I'm
gonna
get
the
answer
I
want,
but
those
were
raised
that
how
does
that
affect
this?
Well,
it
means
I
gonna.
It
wasn't
enough
to
affect
it.
You
know
really
meaningfully
affect
I
really
to
hire.
H
With
the
starti
higher
starting
sours
I
think
it's
going
to
be
huge.
It's
a
it's
a
huge
jump
forward
for
our
department,
we're
excited
about
it.
Obviously
we
haven't
had
the
opportunity
to
hire
anybody
yet,
since
the
wages
went
up
but
we're
gonna
attract
talent
from
all
over
the
country,
I
believe,
because
now
we're
competitive,
we.
H
I
So
you
guys
know
that
every
year,
except
this
year,
I've
asked
you
how
many
more
officers
you
need
and
you've
been
really
good
about,
saying
we're:
okay,
one
thing
that
I
think
is
important
to
know:
where
do
we
stand
in
terms
of
officer
per
resident
versus
another
city?
Our
size,
I
think
I
think
that
that
would
be
important
to
understand
it.
H
Where
is
it
Steve?
The
FBI
recommends
2.4
per
1000
and
I
a
CP
recommends
2
parts
per
thousand.
So
as
we
compare
to
other
agencies
in
the
state
right
now,
we
sit
at
1.7.
If
we
brought
on
the
three
additional
officers
that
would
get
us
or
do
we
sit
at
1.6
right
now.
That
would
get
us
at
1.8.
Workings
has
hired
since
I
did
the
study,
but
they
were
at
1.5,
but
other
than
that
were
the
lowest
compared
to
the
people.
We
compared
to
Aberdeen
sits
at
1.7
with
47
officers.
H
I
C
I
D
Again,
if
somebody
let's
say
we
go
through
with
this,
you
get
the
three
the
three
new
positions
in
the
meantime,
though,
during
that
three
year
period
or
four
year
period,
again
I
you
what
you
explained
it,
but
it
go
through
it
again.
Let's
say
you
also
lose
just
a
Tricia
retirement,
whatever
explain
rate
are
we
required
to
bring
the
force
back
up
to
where
it
was
at
the
grant
point
or
explain
that
again
so.
F
Right
now,
excuse
me
will
be
starting
at
37
officers.
So
if
we
added
the
three
we'd
be
at
40.
So
if
we
drop
down
to
say
39
as
long
as
we're
actively
working
to
hire
again
to
fill,
that
grant
position
will
be
reimbursed
Evan
on
supplanting
what
it's
called.
So
basically,
if
we,
if
we
got
the
grant
and
we
got
we're
getting
paid
and
reimbursed
for
these
positions,
we
drop
down
to
39
and
it
was
to
decide
we're
not
going
to
hire
they're
gonna
quit
giving
us
the
money.
Does
that
answer?
Okay
through.
F
C
F
Yes,
the
the
grant
will
receive
money
will
the
hundred
twenty-five
thousand.
If
you
see
and
there's
split
evenly
between
the
three
years,
the
fourth
year,
we
would
not
receive
any
money
from
the
government.
It
would
be
their
requirement
for
twelve
months
that
we
pay
the
full
salaries
of
those
three
officers.
H
A
The
scenario
is:
if
this
were
to
go
forward
and
you're
you
get
you
put
the
apply,
you
get
the
grant.
You
get
the
three
officers
where
it's
three
years
were
required
to
forth.
Here.
You
know.
Budget
goes
to
heck
at
the
end
of
the
fourth
year.
They
there's
cutbacks
whatever
there's
there's
no
penalty
after
the
fourth
year,
so
correct.
I
J
First
year
would
be
eighty
thousand.
Our
second
year
would
be
eighty
nine,
ninety
seven
and
then
our
fourth
year
would
be
two
hundred
and
thirty
one
thousand
which
in
times
when
we
continue
all
of
our
meetings.
Talking
about
how
difficult
it
is,
it's
gonna
cost
us
a
half,
a
million
dollars
to
add
three
people.
No,
that's
not
talking
about
need
or
want,
or
anything
else.
That's
just
real
world
that
you
know.
We've
been
kicking
around
a
hockey
rink
and
we're
talking
about.
J
H
H
Can
we
get
by
absolutely,
but
just
some
of
the
numbers
it's
even
going
to
reduce
our
overtime
last
year
was
our
highest
request
for
overtime
and
that's
working
with
bare
minimums
we're
seeing
some
employee
burnout,
those
types
of
things
so
to
maintain
a
high,
highly
motivated,
engaged
Department.
It's
something!
H
That's
needed
these
mental
health,
the
mental
health
officer
that
we're
looking
for
I
think
that's
extremely
important,
especially
for
quality
life
here
in
Watertown,
I
could
go
on
and
on,
and
you
guys
know
that
we
need
that,
but
just
to
be
I
mean
we
have
the
wages.
Now
we
have
a
great
opportunity
here.
I
think
it
needs
to
be
seriously
considered
because,
like
the
chief
said
that
it's
going
to
go
away
and
it's
politically
driven
so
right
now
there's
cop
grants,
but
who
knows
what's
going
to
happen
in
the
next
few
years?
G
H
K
K
G
H
Yeah
great
question:
we
as
an
administration
monitor
that
very
closely,
not
only
for
burnout
for
use
of
sick
time
and
use
of
a
comp
earning
comp
and
all
those
things
so
yeah.
We
do
monitor
that
we're
doing
we're
doing
well.
The
12-hour
shifts
are
working
really
well
for
us
right
now.
The
only
problem
we
have
is
our
officers
are
building
up
a
lot
of
comp
time
and
that
they
can't
can't
use
because
we
don't
have
the
manpower
you
know
between
training
training
is
hugely
important
for
any
Police
Department.
It's
a
big
liability
protection
shield.
H
If
we
don't
trail
you,
if
you
fail
the
Train,
it's
one
of
the
biggest
liabilities
for
for
a
city
as
far
as
the
police
department,
so
we
provide
these
guys
with
a
lot
of
training,
but
we've
not
given
them
the
time
off,
because
we're
so
short-handed.
We
have
an
unofficial
minimum
of
four
people
on
a
shift.
We
just
started
that
last
year
and
it's
working
well,
but
that's
not
enough
right.
So
right.
F
And
one
just
two:
if
I
can
throw
one
thing
in
there,
one
thing
we've
seen
too
is
the
amount
of
time
it
takes
to
train
a
new
officer.
Last
year
we
had
had
four
retirements
and
to
train
a
new
officer.
It
takes
I,
would
say,
probably
about
fifteen
to
eighteen
weeks
and
our
in-house
training,
and
then
on
top
of
that,
if
they're
not
certified,
they
have
to
go
to
appear
for
another
13
weeks,
so
you're,
looking
at
almost
30
weeks
before
they
can
even
go
on
their
own
and
do
anything.
F
So
you
know
when
we
do
run
short,
it's
not
where
we
just
hire
someone
and
put
them
in
the
position.
That's
where,
when
we're
short
people
for
retirements,
what
have
you
or,
if
they're,
all
that
training
or,
if
there's
sick
time
or
they're
on
vacation?
This
is
more.
It
allows
us
to
to
better
serve
the
community
by
having
that
that
higher
staffing
level.
A
H
H
G
G
H
F
H
You
know-
and
you
know,
we're
all
wanting
to
cure
this
drug
problem
and
I-
think
that
additional
officer
that
we
got
for
that
problem
has
been
effective.
We've
seen
the
first
decrease
in
it
in
drug
arrests
for
the
first
time
and
as
long
as
I
can
remember,
but
is
still
a
big
problem
other
than
two
thousand
something
adult
arrests.
800
of
them
were
for
drug
arrests.
H
So
by
getting
these
additional,
you
know
we
have
to
canines
that
we
spent
a
lot
of
money
on
in
training,
but
they're
they're
responding
to
calls
there
are
patrol
officers,
so
their
effectiveness
is
hurt
too,
because
of
we're
short-handed,
so
I
think
I
see
across
the
board.
I
mean
community
partnerships
is
another
big
one.
There
you
take
an
officer
off
the
street
to
teach
there
that
leave
street
on
the
street.
You
know
so
we're
below
our
for
minimum,
but
we
all
know.
H
D
A
comment
and
then
a
question
I
had
opportunity.
Excuse
me
to
see
there's
about
half
a
year
strategic
plan
session
this
afternoon
and
I
was
one
of
a
few
civilians
that
that
were
there,
but
it
was
really
exciting.
Hearing
your
department
and
the
camaraderie
and
the
morale
I
mean
you.
That
comment
came
through
loud
and
clear,
so
it
was
really
exciting
to
hear
that
from
from
you
guys
today,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
do
anything
that
would
jeopardize
that
and,
if
possible,
make
it
stronger.
D
Now,
by
the
same
token,
I
don't
know
as
I'm
ready
to
commit
our
city
dollars
to
the
three
positions.
So
now
my
question
is
okay.
This
is
only
an
approval
to
apply
for
the
grant
correct
I
mean.
Is
there
anything
I
mean?
Do
you
need
to
give
any
indication
on
that
grant
that
you've
got
a
commitment
from
us
or
is
a
totally
open-ended
at
this
point
in
the
application
process?
D
F
It's
open
at
this
point
and
once
I
get
further
into
it
once
I
the
approval
is
given
to
move
forward.
That's
something
I
can
discuss
with
them
and
I
can
see
what
the
options
are.
If
that
is
an
issue,
I
can
definitely
look
into
that
depending
on
what's
either
approved
or
not
approved.
So
one
other
thing
that
we
talked
about
I,
think
in
the
system.
F
Chief
Jimmy
alluded
to
it
as
well
as
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
do,
that
you
know
the
public
maybe
doesn't
see
you
know
such
as
we're
out
at
the
airport
for
anywhere
from
two
to
you
know
six
eight
hours
a
day
depending
if
there's
a
delay
or
something
you
know
and
we're
gonna
we
went
to.
Last
year
we
went
to
70
community
events,
20-some
business
events,
we
taught
154
day
or
lessons.
F
H
And
this
will
set
us
up
for
the
future,
there's
no
doubt
about.
If
we
do
take
advantage
of
it,
it
will
definitely
set
us
up
we're
not
going
to
come
here
next
year
and
ask
for
three
more
officers
and
the
volunteer
for
three
more
officers.
This
sets
us
up
for
unless
we
have
a
huge
population
explosion-
and
you
know
we
get
a
bunch
of
factories
in
town
or
something
I
think
we're
gonna
be
set,
but
we
do
understand
it's
a
huge
task
and
we
appreciate
our
relationship
and
your
support
anyway.
H
F
I'd
spoke
with
the
cop's
office
the
other
day
and
verify
that
we
could
do
January
1st
as
a
starting
date.
So
it
would
be
some
time
between
now
and
then
it's
hard
to
tell
when,
though,
when
they
officially
announce
that
I
asked
them.
If
they
had
any
thoughts
on
how
many
there
award-
and
they
said
it
simply
depends
on
how
many
they
get
and
the
dollar
amounts
the
millions
that
are
made
available
and
what
they
can
afford.
So
it's
really
hard
to
determine
what
what
will
happen
there.
So
it's.
H
B
Really
have
a
question
more
of
a
comment
on
this.
If
that's
allowed
sure
what
I
would
say
is
given
the
deadline,
March,
11th
I
say
we
give
you
the
approval
to
go
ahead
with
it,
because
it
doesn't
hurt
to
see
what
we're
what
we
get
back.
If
we
get
one
too,
you
know,
maybe
we
can
handle
that
better
and
Councilman
Albertson
is
right.
B
We
do
have
some
big
budget
items
going
on,
but
it
given
a
January
1st
timeframe
or
we
have
several
months,
I-
believe
that
we
will
have
some
clearer
idea
on
what
these
big
big
budget
items
will
actually
cost,
which
ones
we
will
be
doing
and
I
think
that
we
can
make
a
better
decision
in
the
future
based
on
personnel.
Knowing
once
all
these
decisions,
hopefully
get
made
so
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
stop
the
process
before
it
begins.
Let's
keep
it
going
and
then
we
can
deal
with
it.
C
Thank
you.
Anyone
else,
all
right,
don't
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor.
Oh
sorry,
yeah
I
didn't
have
a
motion
from
redemption.
Oh
no,
I
didn't
sorry.
That
was
the
sorry
thank
you
motion
by
Y
and
a
second
by
man
T.
Thank
you.
All.
Those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
D
C
Thank
you.
Okay
item.
C
is
counsel
consideration
of
a
bit
award
for
the
2020
pavement
rehabilitation,
crack
ceiling
and
sealcoating
project
number
2006
asphalt,
surface
Technologies
Corporation
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
fifty
eight
thousand
one
hundred
ninety
two
dollars:
fifty
cents
of
emotion,
my
whole
lien
and
a
second
way
Roby
and
Public
Works
Director
City,
Engineer,
Heath,
Vaughn
I.
Please
tell
us
about
this
one.
Yes,.
L
Thank
you
mayor.
We
are
in
the
bidding
season
and
the
engineering
office
of
Public
Works,
and
these
are
a
few
of
the
first
ones
to
bring
forward
to
you
that
we've
advertised
for
bids
for
this
first,
one
being
in
the
annual
crack
seal
and
sealcoating
project,
similar
to
what
she's
carried
out
last
year,
where
we
combined
a
project
to
perform
the
crack,
sealing
efforts
throughout
the
the
city
streets
and
then
do
the
chip
seal
seal
coat.
The
process
as
well.
L
You
remember
last
year's
process
was
a
little
bit
different
where
we
put
a
layer
of
oil
on
top
of
the
rock
and
when
we
finalized
our
chip
seal,
which
we
felt
made
for
a
better
finished
product
for
the
community.
We
had
really
good
luck
with
that
last
year.
It's
the
same
process.
We
anticipate
using
this
year.
That's
what
was
bid
out
in
this
project
here
and
the
apparent
low
bidder
was
aztec
asphalt.
Surface
technologies
and
engineering
office
recommends
approval
of
this
of
this
project.
L
K
L
Good
question
a
councilman
Hoyer:
this
would
be
a
completely
separate
project
unrelated
to
the
contractor
and
the
work
that
was
had
warranty
issues
in
the
downtown
area.
We
will
be
reanalyzing
that
talking
with
that
contractor
who's,
actually
a
different
contractor,
that's
being
awarded
here
and
following
up
with
him
on
any
additional
remedies
or
credit
or
reduction
and
pay
for
the
work
that
they
did
under
that
contract.
L
C
And
I,
just
looking
at
the
map,
I
noticed
it's
one,
color
is
for
crack
ceiling
and
the
other
color
is
crack
ceiling
with
chip
ceiling.
So
the
ones
we
cracked
sealed
last
year.
We
must
have
chipped
sealed
all
of
those,
so
we
have
to
crack
seal
and
then
chip
seal
for
the
chip
seal
ones.
They
were.
They
aren't
over
areas
that
we,
cracked,
sealed
previously.
No.
L
No,
that's
correct,
it
should
not
be
engineering.
Staff
has
worked
with
the
street
superintendent
to
lay
out
this
map
and
the
plan
of
how
we're
going
about
our
crack
sealing
and
chip
ceiling.
There
are
at
times
where
these
locations
overlap
or
we
will
come
in
and
do
crack
sealing
ahead
of
the
chip
seal
and
they
don't
always
coordinator
that
way.
But
that
is
the
overarching
goal,
but
there
are
other
outlying
areas
that
also
get
cracks.
You
lose
weight.
C
L
G
L
This
particular
contract.
The
quantities
are
pretty
easy
for
staff
to
keep
in
check.
As
far
as
the
original
contract
amount,
it's
pretty
straightforward
as
far
as
the
square
yardage
of
the
fog
seal,
that's
going
down
and
the
the
pounds
of
crack
sealed
material
that
are
getting
applied.
So
when
we
hit
that
point,
it's
also
the
kind
of
project
where
we
can
cut
the
work
off
and
we
know
we're
at
the
budget.
So
this
particular
one
we
tend
to
have
a
little
bit
more
control
over
those
overruns
and
change
orders.
Does
that
help
answer
your
question.
J
D
J
Thought
a
lot
of
change
order
stuff
last
year
and
it
was
because
of
a
variety
of
things,
but
you
know
now
we
do
have
another
bidder.
I
think
we
really
need
to
make
sure
that
we
adhere
to
the
bid
now
because
another
guy
is
sitting
there.
Looking
at
us
saying,
oh
just
had
a
change
order
for
80,000
and
then
we'll
be
okay.
You.
L
Yeah
you're
correct,
councilman
Albertson,
we
did
have
quite
a
few,
and
some
of
those
were
the
neighborhood
projects
that
will
be
coming
forth
yet
in
front
of
you,
where
we're
doing
a
lot
of
asphalt,
paving
it's
the
paving
component
that
really
crept
over
on
us
last
year
that
we've
tried
to
hone
in
on
through
the
bidding
process
this
year.
So
as
we
bring
those
those
projects
forward
to
you,
one
of
which
we
pulled
from
the
agenda
tonight.
The
mill
and
overlay,
which
includes
a
lot
of
asphalt,
paving
I,
waded
research.
L
Those
numbers
a
little
bit
close
more
closely
and
make
sure
we're
moving
into
that
contract,
with
the
expectations
being
the
same
across
the
board
between
ourselves
and
the
contractor.
But
you
bring
up
a
good
point
that
we're
being
very
sensitive
to
this
year.
This
this
contract
and
the
next
one
that
we'll
talk
about
I
do
believe
that,
because
of
the
nature
of
the
work,
we
have
a
lot
more
control
and
the
overruns
and
to
cut
it
off.
L
C
Right
and
I
I
like
how
the
bids
came
in,
we,
we
were
just
a
little
bit
high
on
every
item
on
the
bid
in
our
estimate
compared
to
the
low
bid,
but
we
were
just
a
little
bit
low
on
every
item
for
the
second
bid,
and
luckily
we
had
two
bids,
so
we
did
get
a
good
bid.
Are
there
other
questions
or
comments?
I
do
have
a
motion,
so
I
would
look
for
action
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
I.
G
C
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
item.
D
is
council
consideration
of
a
bid
award
for
the
2020
pavement
rehabilitation,
large
patches
project
number
2005
to
RH
sealcoating
and
asphalt
maintenance
in
the
amount
of
up
to
$100,000
of
emotion,
mahalia
and
second
over
here,
councilman,
Villar
and
Heath.
Please
tell
us
about
this
one.
Yes,.
L
L
That's
where
contracting
this
workout,
we
felt
would
be
a
good,
viable
option
to
help
keep
the
streets
maintained
and
I'm
in
a
fashion
where
this
surface
treatment
is
appropriate,
of
course,
and
so
we
did
so
with
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
budgets,
and
we
put
this
bit
out
there.
This
one
did
come
in
over
budget
and
so
you'll
notice
that
the
recommendation
is
to
approve
this
bid
for
an
up
to
one
hundred
thousand
dollar
amount,
because
this
is
patching
it'll
be
on
a
and
E
on
demand
basis.
L
So,
between
the
streets,
superintendent,
myself,
we
will
have
select
locations
where
they
will
have
this
contract
for
commencing
and
again
this
one's
very
controllable
to
where
we
know
how
much
will
have
been
spent
and
when
we
can
cut
these
services
off
at
that
budgetary
amount.
And
so
that's
why
we're
comfortable
moving
forward
with
the
apparent
low
bidder
we
did
communicate
to
them.
The
budgetary
constraints
that
we've
got
on
this
project
and
RH
sealcoating
was
glad
to
work
with
us
within
those
constraints.
D
I'm
looking
at
the
the
bid
tabulation
sheet,
and
can
you
explain
why
there's
a
huge
disparity
in
the
unit
price
on
the
base
course
from
the
engineer's
estimate
to
our
HCL
coatings,
actual
bid,
I
mean
it's
I
mean
no.
No
comparison.
Twenty
versus
a
hundred
I
mean
I.
Guess
what
that's
telling
me
is
that
that
we're
gonna
get
cut
off
a
lot.
I
mean
a
hundred.
A
hundred
thousand
is
not
going
to
get
us
very
far
based
upon
their
unit
price.
That
they're
using.
Do
you
have
an
explanation
for
that?
L
Do
yes,
that's
a
great
catch.
Councilman
fill
our,
so
this
particular
contractor.
Well,
every
contractor
weighs
their
bids
differently
than
the
next.
Some
will
put
a
lot
of
upfront
costs
and
the
mobilization,
as
you
see
the
difference
between
these
two
bidders
digits,
that
the
opposing
bid
had
a
lot
of
their
costs
absorb
into
that
mobilization.
This
particular
contractor
increased
that
base
course
line-item,
for
whatever
reason
that's
how
they
do
their
math
and
where
they
are
comfortable
and
moving
forward
and
trying
to
secure
a
project
to
do
the
work
now.
L
It's
it's
not
necessarily
a
red
flag
for
us,
because
we're
still
looking
at
the
overall
cost
and
the
amount
of
work
that
they
can
perform
and
the
square
yardage
of
and
tonnage
of,
asphalt,
that'll
be
going
down
as
the
key
driving
decider
on
our
end
that
we're
wanting
to
see
in
here
so
the
quantity
of
asphalt
will
beginning
is
no
less
than
the
competitive
bidder.
I
guess
is
what
I'm
saying
and
still
meets
the
contract
terms.
L
L
Further
talk
to
council
Vilar's
point:
we
did
I
analyzed
these
numbers
kaolin
that
did
this
before
he
left
I'm,
not
sure
of
Mars.
He
was
involved
with
these
number
crunching
or
not,
but
we
did
confirm
that
by
reducing
the
lowest
bidders
RH
steel
coatings
contract
by
40,000,
that
we
didn't
in
fact
create
a
new
little
bitter
because
of
that
that
disparity
or
that
weight
a
difference
in
those
bid
items.
We
did
confirm
that
and
cross
those
numbers
that
they
would
still
be
a
little
bitter
for
up
to
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
work.
K
Things
I
mean
I'll
point
out
between
done
Inc
and
our
each
sealcoating
that
their
asphalt,
concrete
composite
has
just
as
big
of
a
jump
in
it.
So
I'm
kind
of
siding
with
Heath
here
that
I'm,
not
too
spooked
by
it,
because
there's
disparities
everywhere
and
all
that.
But
is
there
anything
new
going
into
this
with
how
they're
constructing
these
patches
are
they
doing
anything
different
than
we've
done
in
the
past?
I
know,
I've
seen
the
woven
geo
textile
fabric
is
that
kind
of
a
newer
thing
for
us
to
do
with
our
road
repair.
L
Don't
councilman
Hoyer,
not
necessarily
new,
just
something
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
was
quantified
in
this
contract.
There
are
certain
locations
where
it's
not
necessarily
needed
to
have
the
geotextile
fabric,
but
given
the
fact
that
we're
opening
up
a
road
doing
a
performing
larger
patch,
it
is
it's,
become
cheap
insurance
over
the
years
to
go
ahead
and
install
that
that
fabric
at
the
and
incorporate
it
into
this
type
of
work.
So
that's
something
that
we've
done
in
the
past
and
we'll
continue
to
look
at
doing
right.
C
D
L
C
Thank
you
any
other
questions
or
comments.
All
right,
I
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Those
opposed
signify
by
saying
nay
motion
carries
item.
E
is
council
consideration
to
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
all
necessary
documents
related
to
the
South
Dakota
game,
fish
and
parks,
range
facility,
expansion
and
construction
grant
application
for
the
gun
range
parking
lot
project
number
2009,
a
motion
by
man
T
and
a
second
by
ho
lien
and
I'll
have
Heath
explain
this
Thank.
L
You
mayor,
so
this
is
an
application
for
a
grant
to
the
South,
Dakota
game,
fish
and
parks
and
I
believe
it's
the
exact
same
grant
program
that
the
gun
range
was
built
under
this.
This
go-round,
though,
we'd
be
applying
for
the
paving
of
the
access
road
and
the
parking
areas
that
are
at
the
gun
range.
C
No
questions
all
right:
it's
a
good
deal
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.
Anyone
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
thanks.
Heath
and
item
F
is
Council
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
2019
annual
municipal,
separate
storm
sewer
systems.
Ms4
report
for
the
Department
of
Environment
and
Natural
Resources
need
a
motion
on
that.
I
have
a
motion
by
Hoyer
and
a
second
by
Y
Heath.
L
Yes,
thank
you,
mayor,
I'll,
just
tee
this
off
and
then
pass
it
off
to
staff
marcy
luna.
Is
there
engineer
one
for
those
of
you
that
have
not
met
her
she's
with
it
been
with
us
for
a
handful
of
months
now
up
in
the
engineering
office?
But,
generally
speaking,
this
ms4
report
is
one
of
our
annual
obligations
and
to
be
in
compliance
with
the
Clean
Water
Act
and
the
stormwater
rule.
L
That's
administered
through
the
state
by
the
DNR
and
part
of
that
annual
report
has
several
components
to
it
that
I'll
let
Marcy
talk
about
and
highlight
some
of
the
components
of
that
report,
and
then
this
action,
of
course
in
front
of
you
tonight,
is
to
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
this
for
its
formal,
some
it'll
to
be
in
our
Marcy.
If
you
could
please.
M
You
don't
know
what
that
means
is
multiple
separate
storm
sewer
systems
and
it
is
in
response
to
the
Clean
Water
Act
regulations.
If
you
aren't
familiar
with
the
Clean
Water
Act,
it's
preventing
erosion,
sediment
controls
from
getting
into
our
local
bodies
of
water,
and
we
prefer
to
keep
them
clean
for
future
generations.
So
they
have
six
control
measures
and
you
can
see
them
on
the
agenda
packet.
M
There's
public
involvement
in
education
and
outreach,
which
we
just
completed
for
this
year
and
that
was
the
2020
home
show,
and
we
completed
it
last
year,
which
was
the
2019,
and
it
was
a
great
great
turnout
as
the
mayor
can
talk
to
as
well.
It
was
a
good
good
day
and
a
half.
The
next
would
be
public
involvement
in
participation.
So
in
the
past,
we've
done
quizzes
and
different
things
to
understand
public
involvement
around
protecting
our
bodies
of
water
and
then
the
next
is
illicit
discharge.
In
detection
and
elimination.
M
We
have
a
reporting
system
through
the
wastewater
treatment
plants
as
well
as
Suites
Department,
on
understanding
the
illicit
discharges
that
happen
throughout
the
city.
The
next
is
construction
site,
stormwater,
runoff
controls.
We
do
this
through
switz.
All
of
our
development
plans
are
required
to
have
a
swept
if
they're
over
an
acre,
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
there,
youth.
M
And
so
any
of
them
that
our
building
they
will
have
their
slip
will
review
it,
approve
it
or
add
changes
to
it.
We
also
have
post-construction
stormwater
management,
so
any
of
our
sites
that
have
either
buildings
putting
up
houses,
we
will
actually
go
through,
make
sure
everything
is
appropriate
and
to
our
recommendations
and
then
the
last
one
is
pollution
and
prevention
and
good
housekeeping.
M
So
we,
along
with
the
education
we
ask,
people
to
you,
know
be
aware
of
where
they're
putting
their
stormwater
their
sump
pumps
everything
throughout
the
year
and
then
just
a
couple
of
comments.
In
with
this
report,
the
Department
of
our
environment,
Natural
Resources,
does
review
it
and
then
they'll
come
back
with
comments
in
18
there
was
no
comments
and
19,
so
that
was
four
reports
from
2017
and
2018,
which
was
great,
and
then
we
didn't
have
any
findings
from
the
audits
that
I
could
find
in
the
last
couple
of
years,
which
are
random
audits.
M
D
L
D
C
It's
doing
March,
six,
that
correct
yeah,
so
there
was
probably
some
water
quality
facility
or
something
that
not
this.
This
is
our
city's
report
and
we
have
our
own
facilities
that
we
have
to
keep
up
and
just
it's
a
part
of
just
making
sure
we're
doing
everything
we're
supposed
to
be
doing
any
questions
other
than
that
all
right,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
I.
G
C
Opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Marcy.
The
home
show
was
awesome.
This
year
we
changed
it
up
a
little
bit.
We
gave
out
flower
seeds
instead
of
microwave
popcorn
packets
and
that
was
very,
very
popular.
They
was
just
being
around
those
seeds
and
all
their
bright
colors
made.
You
feel
good.
C
Alright
number
eight
orgy
is
council
consideration
to
authorize
the
mayor
to
sign
all
documents
related
to
the
agreement
with
the
South
Dakota
Department
of
Transportation
for
their
negotiation
and
procurement
of
land
on
behalf
of
the
city
for
right-of-way
and
utility
easements
required
as
part
of
the
future
highway
212
phase.
Two
do
t
reconstruction
project
have
motion
by
Albertson.
L
L
This
is
documentation
that
we
received
from
South
Dakota,
do
T
there
right
away
office
and
in
preparation
for
the
they're
finalizing
of
the
highway
212
Phase
two
design
there
initiate
the
procurement
process
for
any
additional
right
away
that
they
need,
and
in
that
process
they
acknowledge.
There's
some
local
right-of-way
needs
and
easement
needs
that
were
derived
through
the
design
process.
L
So
this
essentially
allows
the
d-o-t
to
negotiate
on
our
behalf
to
procure
that
additional
right-of-way
and
that
additional
easement
area,
the
right-of-way
specifically
are
on
the
exhibits
and
the
right-of-way
is
related
to
14th
Street
southeast,
where
they'll
be
realigning
the
north
leg
of
that
intersection,
as
it
ties
into
highway
212
to
better
align
with
the
South
portion
of
14th
Street
southeast,
the
easement
component
has
to
do
with
a
hydrant
location
along
highway.
212
and
looks
like
is
between
10th
Street
11th
Street
southeast.
L
A
L
C
C
D
L
Yes,
councilman
feel
our
that
is
still
in
the
works.
Nothing's
been
finalized
yet
but
I
hope
to
bring
something
forth.
The
council
for
formal
consideration,
unless,
through
conversation
with
the
city,
attorney
it's
something
that
the
the
mayor
I
could
move
forward
with
without
council
action.
I
was
good.
Thank
you
all.
C
C
G
C
A
Want
to
talk
about
the
parking
lot,
the
downtown
parking
lots,
I,
told
Rob
Bannon
that
we
weren't
gonna
talk
about
them,
but
and
I
just
noticed
that
I
had
sent
this
to
be
added
to
the
agenda
and
I
know.
Lauri
he's
been
out
with
her
sister,
so
it
doesn't
look
like
it
got
added.
But
maybe
if
you
want
to
just
give
a
brief,
summary
and
kind
of,
let
us
let
the.
E
On
the
books,
we
don't
have
a
specific
ordinance
that
addresses
the
city,
parking,
lots,
uptown
and
I
know
some
of
them
got
kind
of
carried
away
this
winter.
In
fact,
Dan
called
us
one
day
about
a
bunch
over
in
the
old
Elks
parking
lot.
So
we
went
to
work
trying
to
get
something
moved
out
of
there
by
talking
with
people
and
stuff.
E
That
lot,
just
so
happens
to
be
the
only
little
city
lot,
that's
kind
of
identified
as
only
parking
for
24
hours,
money
through
Friday,
the
rest
of
our
city,
Lots,
just
say,
city
parking
and
the
really
no
way
we
can
get
a
card.
A
lot
of
them
at
that
point,
with
legal
justification
as
if
it
becomes
junk
or
abandoned
flat,
tires
license
plates
aren't
up
to
date.
Those
type
of
things
so
I
was
talking
with
Matt
about
possibly
adding
that
to
our
city,
ordinance
where
it
would
be
some
time
frame.
E
I,
don't
know
what
that
time
frame
would
be
24
hours,
maybe
isn't
enough,
but
48
hours,
whatever
we
thought
would
be
comfortable,
and
then
we
could
mark
the
tires,
wait
two
days
48
hours
and
then
we
could
take
the
vehicle
attempt
to
contact
an
owner
if
it's
still
there.
Well,
then
we
tow
it
and
get
rid
of
it.
Some
of
them
were
quite
the
eyesore,
and
some
of
them
are
just
people,
maybe
you're
out
of
left
for
the
winter,
and
they
just
leave
him
there.
Yeah.
K
E
E
Don't
really
have
anything
in
the
ordinance
that
kind
of
maintains
the
parking
in
the
parking
lot
on
the
street.
We
can
take
care
of
some
of
those
issues,
but
in
a
parking
lot,
that's
not
specifically
addressed
in
our
city
ordinance
the
way
we're
catching
the
one
by
the
old
her
by
the
city,
I
terminal,
daleks,
lot
that
one
we
did
put
up
the
signs,
and
so
it
kind
of
fits
into
that
or
it
says
no
parking
regulated
by
signs
and
so
probably
five
years
back.
A
J
It's
a
pretty
good
Segway,
also
by
the
way,
thanks
for
doing
that,
because,
yes,
the
person
that
reminded
me
about
it,
appreciated
it,
and
so
thank
you.
Yeah
I
think
it's
a
great
segue
also
for
the
parking
downtown.
You
know
when
there
wasn't
anybody
in
all
these
buildings
we
backed
off
and
just
said:
let's
will
let
people
park
there,
but
now
that
these
buildings
are
filled
and
filled
with
business
people
I
know,
there's
considerable
talk.
J
I
talked
to
one
person,
Davis
said
two
of
her
neighbors
are
really
concerned,
because
there
are
cars
parked
there
overnight
and
sometimes
from
Thursday
to
Monday
and
and
weekend
being
a
busy
time
for
them.
So
I
think
we
should
consider
even
more
than
the
parking
lots.
Maybe
the
parking
downtown.
Of
course
I
was
one
of
the
ones
who
said,
let's
do
away
with
the
restriction,
but
now
I'm
wondering
if,
because
it's
so
busy,
if
that's
the
right
thing,
yeah.
K
K
There's
kind
of
two
things
a
little
bit
in
that,
like
the
hope,
would
be
that
we're
pushing
people
to
utilize
our
public
parking
lots
a
little
bit
more,
whether
that
be
like
what
Brookings
does
we're
72
hour
parking
in
those
larger
Lots
and
then
no
on
street
at
night.
But
it's
it's
something
that
we
should
probably
take
a
hard
look
at
as
we're
going
forward,
especially
with
all
this
new
development
happening
downtown.
Otherwise
we're
just
asking
for
pain
as
we
get
going.
I
think
all.
G
B
You
I
would
personally
suggest
a
72-hour
frame
because
if
it's
in
a
parking
lot,
let's
say
if
someone
is
living
downtown
and
it's
a
good
weather
weekend
or
a
bad
weather
one
where
they
just
don't
want
to
drive
their
car
for
either
reason.
I
just
think
it
would
be
a
shame
to
ticket
someone
who
is
legitimately
parking
there
for
a
weekend.
So
I
would
just
suggest
that,
but
possibly
you
could
frame
parking
on
the
street
versus
in
the
lot.
B
I
This
is
something
that
I
think
I've
heard
about
for
15
years,
but
anyway,
I
think
everybody's
got
a
bit
of
it.
I
would
like
to
see
a
more
consistent
policy
on
the
parking
lots.
We've
talked
for
a
long
time
about
making
them
more
visible,
better
signage,
so
people
know
where
they
are
and
what
they
can
use
them
and
then
add
the
signage.
For
you
know,
maybe
that
parking
lot
is
for
residents
who
live
in
that
area,
maybe
another
one,
and
so
that's
that's
a
different
thing.
I
We've
also
talked
about
how
easy
it
would
be
to
have
a
permit
a
tag.
You
know,
I
live
downtown
and
I
get
this
from
my
landlord,
and
you
know
we
know
who
lives
downtown
and
now
we
know
that
they
are
attendant.
So
if
something
happens
like
Reid
described,
we
know
you
know
that
person
is
a
downtown.
That's.
C
I
E
I
And
that
that
was
what
I
was
thinking
too,
is
that
it
not
a
hard
thing
to
ask
of
the
landlords,
but
it's
a
great
tool
for
us,
or
for
you
and
able
to
be
able
to
move
those
or
find
out.
It
really
does
live
downtown
and
you
know
I
think
it's.
It
proves
us
tune
up
to
make
sure
we
have
the
conversation
with
the
developers
and
the
people
who
are
putting
in
residences
downtown,
as
you
know,
have
you
thought
about
where
your
people
are
going
to
part
work.
You.
I
C
Really
like
that
idea
of
a
tag-
and
you
could
get
a
permit
to
you
know
if
you
don't
have
a
tag
you
can
park
for
24
hours
in
any
parking
lot,
if
you're
a
resident
downtown,
you
get
a
permit
to
park
downtown
for
longer
than
24
hours,
but
then
we
can
look
the
tag
number
up.
We
need
to
get
a
hold
you
to
move.
Your
vehicle
seems.
G
E
C
A
A
C
G
C
We'll
put
a
police
officer
on
that
committee
as
well,
we'll
have
the
meetings
at
the
police
department,
but
we
need
Cookies
go
ahead
and
voluntary
know
who
it
is
anything
else
before
I
rush
into
adjournment,
all
right,
I'll
look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
I
had
one
from:
why
are
you
still
motioning?
Okay,
second,
by
Roby
any
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye.