►
From YouTube: Public Works, Finance, & Safety - 10-19-2020
Description
Public Works, Finance, & Safety - 10-19-2020
A
B
B
C
C
A
C
A
B
E
B
B
B
C
B
B
B
C
A
A
B
A
B
B
B
C
B
C
F
C
A
Carey
all
right,
thank
you
item
six
is
the
regular
agenda
and
a
is
approval
of
construction
change.
Order.
Number
one
final:
with
deutsche
excavating
inc
for
the
eastwood's
drainway
project
number
1523
for
an
increase
of
hundred
13
dollars,
thirty
cents
bringing
the
total
contract
cost
to
eighty
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars.
Twenty
five
cents.
E
G
G
G
You
know
I
wanted
to
be
fully
transparent
with
council
and
with
the
homeowners
along
here
that
you
know
it
is
very
likely
we're
going
to
see
some
continuing
standing
water
conditions
in
here
now.
This
finished
product
does
give
us
a
good
positive
grade
from
this
culvert
right
behind
us
in
this
picture.
Is
cherry
drive
where
it
curves
and
goes
from
east
to
west
and
curves
southward,
but
a
lot
of
water
from
the
prairie
view?
G
Subdivision
comes
out
of
this
culvert
here
or
the
storm
sewer,
pipe
and
flows
westerly
and
then
southerly
through
here
we've
gotten
a
red
of
that
trough
effect.
But
this
grade
is
so
flat
through
here.
As
you
can
see
in
this
picture,
it
is
likely
we're
going
to
still
see
some
standing
water
in
some
seasons
and
some
certain
times
of
year,
more
than
others.
G
But
the
project
at
hand.
We
were
able
to
accomplish
our
goal
of
creating
a
uniformly
graded
channel
and
realigning
it
out
further
north
here
this
this
alignment's
a
little
further
to
the
right
than
what
it
used
to
be
by
probably,
I
think,
maybe
40
feet.
So
we
were
able
to
push
it
a
little
bit
further
north
and
out
away
from
the
the
back
lots
of
these
residents,
and
this
is
the
finished
product.
Now
the
change
order
before
the
council
tonight
there
was
some
overruns
on
the
contract.
G
H
There,
the
first
one
was
there's
a
group
of
six
or
seven
trees,
kind
of
right
around
the
bend.
You
can't
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
see
them
from
this
picture,
but
there's
a
handful
of
trees
over
there
that
that
either
be
removed,
as
we
graded
the
channel
around
that
bend
and
then
to
get
a
nice
there's
some
additional
material
that
was
removed
as
well
and
to
get
a
nice
grade
so
that
matches
really
well
with
the
adjacent
property
owners.
H
G
B
This
is
for
heath.
I
just
always
have
a
question
when
these
overrides
come
in
like
this
or
you
know,
change
orders
that
we've
beaten
somebody
out
of
a
job
because
they
bid
the
job
and
then
all
of
a
sudden.
Now
we've
come
in
with
you
know,
on
a
relatively
small
project
like
this,
you
know
74
000
job
and
now
all
of
a
sudden,
it's
88,
but
did
somebody
bid
85
with
these
changes
in
it,
or
are
these
strictly
our
changes
that
you
know
what
I'm
saying
that
it
we
have
so
many
change
orders.
B
Every
time
we
have
meetings,
I
mean
we
have
one
tonight
which
is
of
course
going
to
go
the
other
way,
but
I
always
wonder
that
if,
if
we're
beating
somebody
out
of
a
chance
to
get
a
job
because
the
job
comes
in
at
74,
but
really
it's
an
88
000
job,
you
know
what
I
mean
yeah.
Would
you
just
comment
on
that?
For
me,
please.
G
G
It's,
it
can
be
difficult
to
get
that
exact
to
a
t
as
far
as
the
estimate
goes,
and
so,
which
is
exactly
what
we
experienced
out
here
in
the
field.
Once
the
contractor
started
grading
down
the
alignment
that
we
wanted
and
realized,
you
know
there
was
room
for
improvement
in
the
project,
some
value-added
engineering,
if
you
will
so
that
things
tie
in
a
little
bit
better
to
the
back.
G
You
know,
you'll,
see
here
in
the
next
meeting
or
two
we'll
have
some
change
orders
on
some
asphalt
overruns
and
that's
one
where
asphalt's
another
material
based
quantity
that
you
can
estimate
it,
but
to
get
the
contractor
put
down
the
exact
amount,
you're
estimating
is
oftentimes
difficult.
It's
something!
G
But
we
do
we
to
the
point
of
your
concern.
We
are
doing
exactly
what
you're
describing
and
trying
to
prevent
these
from
happening
from
a
staffing
level
and
then,
as
far
as
a
bid
concern
it
that
this
one
in
particular,
wouldn't
have
that
concern
because
of
the
way
that
the
the
bids
came
in
and
justin.
You
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
that,
but
I
don't
believe
this
would
have
changed
the
results
of
any
bid
with
this
change
order.
Is
that
true,
justin.
G
F
If
maybe
there's
like
take
what
we
come
up
with
and
add
10
grand
to
it,
we
might
be
a
little
closer
because
it
always
feels
like,
and
maybe
we
just
notice
the
ones
that
we
have
to
go
up
on
and
we
don't
notice
the
ones
we
get
the
kick
back
on.
But
just
it's
almost
easier
to
be
like,
oh,
by
the
way
we
had
a
bunch
of
extra
funds
left
over
from
this,
then
we
need
twenty
thousand
dollars
to
fix
this
yeah.
G
It
definitely
is
when
it
comes
to
putting
together
plans
and
specs
for
the
next
project,
we're
when
we're
creating
an
engineer's
estimate
in-house
or
even
through
our
consultants,
we're
using
averages
of
of
costs
and
when
it
comes
to
quantities.
You
know
that,
of
course,
is
a
project
specific
item,
but
you're
right.
If
you
have
a
milling
overlay
project
and
you're
consistently
running
10
percent
over,
it
makes
sense
to
build
that
into
the
next
year's
project.
So
you
have
that
contingency
in
there.
G
G
You
will
have
change
orders
on
most
projects,
just
because
you're,
balancing
out
those
final
quantities
and
when
you're
dealing
with
materials
on
a
large
scope,
there's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
of
a
correction
to
make
at
the
end
of
the
project,
but
obviously
the
most.
You
can
keep
those
in
check
the
better
off.
We
are
when
we've
got
budget
constraints
to
work
within
so.
E
Heath
or
justin,
I
got
a
couple
of
questions
on
this
project.
Okay,
you
admitted,
there's
probably,
could
still
be
some
standing
water
in
there,
depending
upon
weather
conditions,
etc.
How
will
we
know
that
this
is
working?
I
mean
if
we
get
a
inch
and
a
half
two
inch
rain,
this
fall
or
next
spring.
How
will
we
know
that
we're
accomplishing
what
we
set
out
to
do.
G
Well,
I
think
that
that
proof
is
in
the
pudding
with
the
grading
that
we
see
on
site
now
today
this
grade
is
a
is
a
true
grade
line
from
a
to
b.
If
you
will
that
that's
a
one
continuous
grade,
we
didn't
have
that
before
it
varied
throughout
that
alignment,
where
it
would
dip
lower
and
then
the
elevation
would
increase
and,
of
course,
that
causes
ponding
and
blockage
of
water.
E
G
E
Then
another
question
is:
I
drove
drove
through
there
this
weekend,
I
noticed:
there's
a
fair
amount
of
dirt
piled
up
in
the
development
immediately
to
the
north
and
east
of
that.
Do
we
have
any
concerns
if
we
get
a
3
4
inch
rain
that'll
that
some
of
that
dirt
or
a
lot
of
that
dirt,
could
potentially
wash
into
this
and
undo
what
we've
done.
G
A
A
So
this
will
likely
always
be
wet
and
never
dry
out
and
there
will
be
cattails,
it'll
be
mushy,
but
hopefully
we've
narrowed
down
the
locations
of
where
the
water
is
and
it's
you
know
if
it
were
very
steep,
it
might
travel
quickly.
But
this
isn't
it's
pretty
flat.
So
it's
it's
going
to
be
mushy
hard
to
mow
and-
and
that's
not
going
to
be
an
indication
of
failure.
A
B
A
B
A
A
H
A
C
E
C
A
Thank
you
item
b
is
approval
of
construction
change
order
number
one
final,
with
dunnick
inc
for
the
2020
parks
and
recreation
improvements,
mount
hope,
cemetery
project
2018
for
a
decrease
of
nine
thousand
fifty-five
dollars,
three
cents,
bringing
the
total
contract
price
to
forty
six
thousand
six
hundred
sixteen
dollars.
Ninety
seven
cents.
F
A
G
But
what
we're
bringing
forth
is
a
change
order
for
reduction
in
the
overall
contract
for
some
work
that
we
did
on
the
roadways,
the
internal
street
network,
if
you
will
for
the
cemetery-
and
this
came
in
a
little
bit
under
the
contract
amount
which
in
effect
ended
up
bringing
the
total
contract
under
and
within
the
original
budget
amounts.
Original
original
budget
amount
was
fifty
thousand.
G
I
Really,
this
is
an
ongoing
ongoing
plan.
We
have,
we
got
a
five-year
plan
to
continually
redo,
separate
roadways
out
there.
This
is
phase
two
of
our
five-year
plan
and
this
year's
scope
and
justin
can
jump
in.
He
was
the
project
manager,
but
we
basically
did
from
the
front
gate
to
the
south
along
that
that
main
roadway
last
year
we
did
a
little
more
internal
work,
so
we
identify
each
season
what's
in
need
and
we
we
stretch
what
basically
50
000
will
accomplish
with
within
the
pricing
that
that
heath
and
his
staff
get
so.
E
E
I
E
I
E
Okay,
great
and
also,
I
know
it's
an
ongoing
project
out
there,
but
just
the
observation
driving
through
there
as
you
take
the
road
to
the
as
a
road
branches
to
the
forks
to
the
left
around
the
the
shop
and
and
office
out
there
that
that
stretch
right
in
there
is
breaking
up
pretty
bad.
So
I
guess
hopefully
that
would
be
a
high
on
the
list
of
the
next
next
stretch.
That's
done
out
there.
I
Yeah-
and
I
know
marcy
marcy
and
I
discussed
too
the
the
very
entrance
in
that
road
you
speak
of,
is
definitely
going
to
be
coming
up,
and
you
know
we
do
have
50
000
continuing
for
for
fiscal
year
2021,
but
it
may
come
to
a
fact
that
we're
not
keeping
up
with
that
50
and
in
future
years
may
need
to
expand
that
that
dollar
amount
to
truly
get
caught
up
so
but
you're
right
that
stretch
is
is
definitely
on
the
radar
for
for
the
next
section.
Okay,
thanks.
E
I
G
And
I
I
could
comment
to
councilman
vilhar
to
your
concern
on
the
economy
of
scale
here,
as
far
as
the
quantity
of
work
that
we're
getting
done.
That's
something
to
we'll
probably
touch
on
briefly
here
later
on
the
meeting
with
the
long
cip
discussion
that
kristen
will
be
presenting
when
we
talk
about
the
212
fund
and
the
street
improvements
and
how
our
dollars
simply
just
aren't
going
as
far
as
they
as
they
used
to
even
in
the
recent
past.
G
So
I
I
think
it's
a
little
bit.
You
know
it's
obviously
market
driven
and
it's
some
of
that
supply
and
demand
coming
into
play.
Where
we're
doing
what
we
can
with
conversations
with
contractors
and
trying
to
make
them
aware
of
the
sensitivities
we're
having
with
it
because
it
does,
it
does
tie
our
hands
as
far
as
the
work
we
can
get
done
and
we're
trying
to
make
that
go
all
the
further
every
year.
So.
A
C
B
B
C
B
B
A
C
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
before
the
council
is
a
long-term
capital
plan.
This
will
be
for
2022
through
2026.,
I'm
just
gonna.
Instead
of
going
through
each
department,
the
council
and
the
public
has
had
an
opportunity
to
see
the
plan.
So
if
there's
specific
questions
that
I
don't
touch
on
necessarily
council
feel
free
to
bring
them
up,
but
otherwise
I'm
just
going
to
roll
through
some
of
the
the
bigger
items.
Stop
me
ask
questions.
We
can
always
go
back.
C
C
I
want
to
point
out
that
what
we
did
is
we
actually
pulled
out.
Some
of
the
bigger
items
so
that
the
council
has
an
opportunity
to
see
what
some
of
the
bigger
ticket
items
are,
and
those
will
come
up
later
in
the
discussion
on
page
five
that
table
at
the
very
top
shows
where
we're
going
to
be
getting
our
revenue,
whether
that's
from
the
general
fund,
capital
improvement
park
and
rec
or
any
of
the
enterprise
funds,
as
well
as
grant
funding
that
potentially
is
going
to
offset
the
cost
of
the
projects.
C
E
C
E
E
Is
it
inevitable
that
we
are
going
to
be
looking
at
having
to
do
some
kind
of
bonding
at
some
first
at
some
sort?
Was
a
geo
bond
or
a
sales
tax
revenue
bond?
I
mean
just
to
get
that
that
thought
out
there
in
the
public's
eye
that
the
timing
does
not
lend
itself
to
for
immediate
payment
on
all
these
projects.
C
Yeah
as
we
get
into,
I
was
gonna
just
jump
into
that
as
we
get
into
some
of
these
bigger
items.
I've
actually
added
in
a
little
bit,
instead
of
just
identifying
it
as
a
capital
improvement
fund,
I've
actually
identified
issued
issuance
of
debt.
So,
yes,
there
is
a
number
of
projects
that,
as
we
go
through
the
plan,
I
will
point
out
that
they
will
need
to
have
debt
discussed
and
potential
bonding
to
cover
the
cost.
Okay,
thanks.
E
C
Yep,
so
if
we
do
go
to
the
next
page
page,
seven,
the
very
first
one
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
is
the
city
hall.
This
one's
been
in
the
plan
for
quite
a
while
and
as
glenn
just
stated,
this
would
be
one
of
those
that
if
it
does
come
to
fruition,
we
would
need
to
issue
debt.
We
would
not
have
this
cash
available
to
construct
a
new
administrative
building,
so
this
sits
in
the
plan
as
it
is
we'll
keep.
There's
no
change.
C
The
other
thing
that
I
will
point
out
before
I
keep
going
at
the
very
bottom
of
each
one
of
the
pages.
If
there
are
changes
from
the
previous
year,
it
will
let
you
know
whether
that
is
that
a
price
went
up
or
it
got
moved
from
one
year
to
the
next
year.
So
if
there
isn't
any
changes
like
this,
one
didn't
change
it
just
move
forward
as
it
should
in
the
plan.
It'll
state
that
at
the
bottom
of
each
page.
C
So
if
there's
no
questions
on
that,
the
next
one
we'll
go
to
is
I'll,
actually
skip
a
couple
pages
and
I'll
actually
go
to
page
10..
This
is
the
fire
department,
another
big
item
that
potentially,
if
we
do
at
the
very
bottom,
there's
the
east
fire
station.
This
one
too
has
moved
forward
from
previous
years.
It
has
increased
a
little
bit
in
the
cost,
just
because
we
know
that
the
cost
of
construction
has
went
up.
C
J
We
we
had
to
raise
the
price
of
that
station
up,
because,
just
as
chris
and
I
mentioned,
the
costs
are
going
up,
we
did
it.
We
did
look
into
some
substations
built
around
the
area.
There's
one
being
built
this
year
in
sioux
falls
and
that
had
a
construction
cost
of
pretty
close
to
three
million
dollars.
So
that's
what
we're
looking
at
square
footage-wise
would
be
eight
to
ten
thousand
square
feet.
J
We
we
haven't,
got
a
complete
design
or
nothing
right
now,
and
actually
we
don't
have
land
technically
set
aside
the
on
for
building
and
things
like
that.
We
do
have
one
spot
that
we're
looking
at,
but
still
looking
at
that
parts
of
it.
We've
also
looked
into
what
it
would
look
like
for
o
m
cost
before
the
for
the
building.
J
We
are
looking
at
two
different
options
on
this.
Obviously,
ems
is
very
much
needed
somewhere
near
that
year
of
2023
right
now,
as
as
we've
demonstrated
in
the
past.
A
lot
of
our
our
response
times
from
station,
one
which
are
currently
coming
from
out
in
by
the
interstate
is,
is
somewhere
around
that
eight
to
13
minutes
for
fire
and
ems.
J
J
Call
lines
going
up.
Ems,
obviously,
as
most
you
know
there
are,
is
our
most
need.
That's
where
calls
are
are
going
going
up
more
dramatically
than
fire,
so
one
option
we
would
have
on
this
building
is
build
a
fire
station.
Just
like
you
would
if
it
was
a
full,
fully
fledged
fire
station,
but
then
just
started
out
somewhere
after
it's
built.
One
option
would
be
to
just
have
an
ems
operating
out
of
there.
J
24
7,
but
just
would
have
an
ambulance
with
staffing,
and
we
believe
that
it
at
this
point
it's
an
estimated
that
it
would
take
us
about
four
staff
to
run
a
two-and-uh
24-hour
shift
crew
over
there.
So
using
the
numbers
of
roughly
about
75
000
staff
with
benefit,
and
things
like
that,
just
as
a
rough
figure
that
would
that
would
put
us
in
that
with
operating
costs
somewhere
around
that
375
to
400
000
for
ems.
J
Only
and
then,
if
we
ended
up,
ended
up
going
for
a
fire
ems
station,
it
would
cost
us
about.
Seven
staff
is
what
we're
estimating
and
that
would
run
in
with
with
operating
costs
around
600
to
625
thousand
dollars
annually.
So
that's
kind
of
where
we're
sitting
for
an
overview
of
what
we
believe.
We
need
rough
estimates
and
you
know
we
are
willing
to
really
research,
his
heart
and
stuff.
J
A
C
See
any
okay,
I
will
keep
going
then
the
next
one
we're
going
to
do
is
page
12..
Here's
where
we're
at
the
street
department,
the
street
department
facility,
is
set
for
2022.
This
one
is
at
a
budget
of
just
a
little
about
four
and
a
half
million.
I
do
know
that
heath
and
rob
would
both
like
to
speak
on
this.
This
one
is
a
a
project
that
kind
of
keeps
going
a
little
bit
up
and
down
in
the
the
need.
G
G
This
number
is
looking
closer
to
be
a
realistic
number
of
close
to
about
six
million
dollars,
and
I
I
did
also
want
to
note
that,
due
to
necessity
and
being
the
sharing
team
member,
that
rob
is-
we
did
take
this.
This
was
your
mark
for
2021
and,
of
course,
had
to
take
that
cash
on
hand
to
distribute
towards
our
airport
terminal
funding
needs
in
order
to
get
the
airport
terminal
to
complete
and
use
our,
and
I
don't
know
if
that
was
a
straight
transfer
it.
G
Chris
can
speak
more
intelligently
than
I
can
to
that,
but
I
do
know
that
rob
has
had
this
programmed
in
the
long
range
cip
for
four
years.
I
think
it
was
correct
me
from
wrong
rob
but
was
targeted
to
go
next
year
in
21
and
of
course
we
put
that
off
now
because
of
the
the
obvious
need
and
the
that
we're
in
complete
agreements
with
that
had
to
be
done
to
take
this
money
that
we
had
on
and
put
it
towards
that
airport
terminal.
H
H
H
H
G
H
G
Our
size
are
able
to
do
to
get
the
snow
removal
efforts
rolling
in
those
winter
months.
So
you
know
to
in
looking
ahead.
I
think
that
those
would
be
the
two
big
needs,
rob's
looking
at
meaning
material
storage
and
then
appropriate
facilities
for
the
equipment
to
house
our
equipment
in
and
and
we'll
we'll
we'll
be
glad
to
stay
tuned
with
kristin
and
the
council,
as
we
make
further
decisions
on
any
bonding
or
anything
like
that.
C
Okay,
so
we
will
continue
on
to
page
17..
This
is
the
golf
course
department.
This
is
one
change.
That
kind
of
the
reason
I'm
pointing
it
out
is
it
kind
of
came
up
here
in
the
last
little
bed.
I
know
it's
been
discussed,
it's
just.
It's
never
really
been
placed
anywhere,
so
I
probably
have
terry
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
it,
but
it
is
the
clubhouse
replacement
was
added
and
that's
added
into
2024
for
a
little
over
1.2
million
dollars.
I
Okay,
thank
you
kristin,
as
the
council
probably
awares.
Kristin
alluded
to
is
the
fact
that
this
has
been
a
top
conversation
for
for
years,
I'm
going
to
say
looking
back
in
files
10
to
15
years
ago,
we
had
plans
and
drawings
and
hopes
and
dreams
on
on
the
clubhouse
replacement.
So
when
I
met
with
chris-
and
you
know,
we
had
the
conversation
of
you
know-
we've
never
really
placed
it
in
the
long
term.
I
I
Would
probably
take
that
whole
campus
area,
so
you'll
see
in
23,
150
000
for
that
road
closure
and
then
in
24
the
1.25
million
for
a
new
clubhouse,
and
we
don't
know
you
know
honestly
what
that
looks
like
at
this
point.
That
would
be
part
of
the
2022
50
000
remodel
plan,
and-
and
this
is
ongoing,
we
are
seeing
the
clubhouse.
Currently,
I
won't
call
it
complete
disrepair,
but
we
are
seeing
the
electrical
plumbing
hvac.
I
The
roofing
is
definitely
showing
its
age,
and
on
top
of
that,
it's
really
square
footage
for
the
amount
of
patrons
members
daily
green
players.
We
have
it's
just
really
undersized
for
a
27-hole
course.
So
utilization
is,
is
a
big
factor
of
me
pursuing
to
increase
the
square
footage
and
look
at
replacing
that
so
I'll
open
that
up
to
questions,
whether
it's
finance
through
kristin
or
overall
questions.
D
Thank
you
mayor.
Do
we
have
any
way
to
raise
funds,
for
that
I
mean
the
street
department.
Obviously,
that
is
something
that
takes
care
of
the
entire
community
and
I
would
say
that
there's
many
certain
members
of
this
of
the
public
that
are
going
to
say
well.
The
golf
course
only
really
helps
the
people
that
are
you
know,
members
and
or
golf
there,
which
I
don't.
I
You
know
we,
we
do
have
a
little
bit
of
a
better
opportunity
than
say
a
street
building,
because
we
are,
we
are
fund-based.
You
know
we
do
charge
fees.
You
know,
we've
got
the
sponsorship
aspect,
we
can
look
at
adam,
you
know,
we
don't
know
where
that
would
go.
You
know
I
would
reach
out
for,
for
you
know,
consultants
to
tell
me
those
answers,
but
we
do
have
potential.
I
What
that
amount
is.
I
couldn't
tell
you,
but
you
know
sponsorships
naming
rights
different
things
like
that,
we're
in
a
better
position
than
say
heath
and
rob
are
in
in
kind
of
a
a
different.
You
know
a
different
type
of
facility.
Definitely
in
and
I'll
look
it
up
back
to
you
know
no
different
than
softball
fields.
C
I
Arenas
things
like
that,
you
know
everything
we
do
is
a
specific
group.
So
that's
always
a
tough
argument,
but
you
know
if
we're
gonna
provide
that
product.
There
are
certain
things
that
that
we
gotta
look
forward
and
move
on
to
to
still
have
the
quality
that
we
do
so.
But
yes,
ultimately,
I
don't
know
what
those
dollars
are
councilman,
but
there
is
potential
for
us.
Yes,
okay,
thank
you.
I
It
would
be
diverted
you
know
back
around
the
back
side
where
that
current
service
road
is
but
it
would.
You
know
the
notes
I
found
it
does
provide
substantial
expansion
of
the
width.
That'd
be
something
I
start
with
heath
to
look
at,
so
we
don't
inhibit
the
area
of
the
the
current
land
owners
there
now
or
we'd
bring
that
road,
probably
closer
to
where
the
cart
sheds
are,
but
it
would
be
bypassed
around
to
the
rear
of
the
the
car
sheds
along
to
the
wastewater,
the
old
white
wastewater
plant.
There.
C
Okay,
I'm
gonna.
Actually,
it
looks
like
I'm
skipping
really
far
ahead
and
I
am
we're
actually
gonna
go
to
page
25
and
that
is
the
capital
improvement
sales
tax
fund.
I'm
not
going
to
go
necessarily
into
depth
into
each
one
of
the
street
kind
of
categories,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
to
the
council:
it's
important
to
see
the
projected
spending
for
each
year
is
right,
a
little
over
three
million
just
for
the
street
and
then
between
storm
steward
and
the
industrial
park.
C
So
just
what
I
want
the
council
to
be
aware
of
is
as
we
look
at,
that
three
million
dollars
anytime.
We
issue
debt
that
potentially
lowers
what
we
can
do
annually
for
those
street
maintenance
and
new
streets
and
items
like
that.
So
it's
just
kind
of
more
be
aware
that
if
we
issue
too
much
more
debt,
those
numbers
may
have
to
go
down.
E
I'm
gonna
direct
this
to
heath
heath.
I
remember
a
presentation
that
you
made
probably
about
a
year
ago,
thereabouts
looking
at
our
our
street
maintenance
needs,
and
I
remember
a
figure
I
mean
like
we
were.
I
thought
you
said
like
we
could
be
easily
spending
a
million
dollars
a
year
or
more
or
we
should
be
spending
a
million
dollars
a
year
more
than
what
we
currently
are.
Is
this.
I
guess
I'd
like
your
thoughts
as
far
as
is
this
adequate
or
are
we
still
shortchanging
our
sales
compared
what
we
should
be
spending.
G
Yes,
great
question:
councilman
bill,
howard,
I'd
love
to
talk
through
some
thoughts
we
have
in
the
engineering
office
in
relation
to
these
numbers
and
how
we're
sitting
on
the
needs.
As
far
as
the
pavement
management
program
that
the
city
engineering
office
administers,
if
you
recall
in
2017
we
we
did
construct
a
pavement
management
analysis
of
our
entire
street
network
and
that
we
got
a
very
valuable
and
useful
report.
Out
of
that
ims.
G
G
G
But
of
course
the
dilemma
comes,
you
know.
Where
do
we
get
that
extra
million
bucks
from,
and
those
are
some
discussions
too,
that
I
know
we've
had
preliminary
discussions
on
options
on
where
to
find
additional
revenues
and,
of
course
something
that
we'll
continue
to
look
at
and
help
wade
through
and
try
to
find
some
solutions.
D
Thank
you,
mayor
kristen.
I
know
that
the
event
center
is
coming
off
here
in
the
next
couple
years.
If
we
were
to
bond
that,
that
would
be
if
we
were
to
use
as
a
property
tax
type
of
bond
versus
a
sales
tax
bond.
Would
that
help
our
cause
and
the
overall,
you
know
just
to
try
to
get
some
of
these.
You
know
large
ticket
community
community
projects
that
really
don't
have
they
don't
have
a
sales
aspect
to
them
or
anything
along
those
lines.
D
C
The
the
thing
that,
if
we
go
down
the
general
obligation
bond
that
goes
on
to
the
property
tax
and
what
that
does
is
that
takes
off
that
burden
of
our
sales
tax
to
facilitate
not
only
our
annual
improvements
but
to
also
pay
the
debt
anytime.
We
issue
sales
tax
revenue
bond.
We
are
held
to
maintain
a
certain
amount
of
debt
coverage
so
that
anytime,
we
issue
those
sales
tax
revenue.
Then,
yes,
our
annual
amount
that
we
can
provide
between
street
park
and
rec.
C
Also,
you
don't
see
it
on
here,
but
some
of
the
things
we
talk
about
in
park
and
rack
the
industrial
park
improvements.
All
of
those
things
go
against
the
sales
tax.
So
yes,
the
thing
when
the
community
considers
a
general
obligation
bond
is
what
that
does.
Is
it
puts
it
on
the
property
tax,
but
removes
that
burden
from
sales
tax
having
to
cover
the
cost
of
the
debt.
A
C
This
is
something
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
have
too
much
conversation
on
it,
but
I
do
want
to
point
it
out
and
it's
the
fast
first
removal
facility
now
I
do
know
and
roger
or
heath
can
correct
me,
but
I
do
think
that
this
is
the
year.
I
believe
it
was
2020,
maybe
2021
that
will
actually
be
doing
a
study
to
see
the
feasibility
of
that
phosphorus
removal
facility.
G
J
B
B
C
C
I
can't
speak
yet
as
to
what
it'll
look
like
there
is
the
potential
that
we
would
seek
out
either
alone
or
try
to
cover
these
with
the
revenue
made
at
the
landfill,
but
that
will
kind
of,
as
we
continue
to
watch
what
our
cash
flow
looks
like
at
the
landfill.
Those
discussions
will
come
further,
the
very
next
one
that
we
are
going
to
look
at,
and
this
will
be
the
kind
of
the
last
one
is
the
airport
fund
page
33..
C
Now
I
know,
what's
tough
is,
as
stated
earlier,
the
terminal
project
kind
of
bounced
forward
and
what
kind
of
gets
a
little
tricky
at
the
airport
is
a
lot
of
times.
Our
projects
are
driven
a
little
bit
by
the
faa
and
the
the
grants
that
we
can
get.
The
only
thing
that
I
will
say
that
came
to
our
attention
here.
C
Recently
is
that
the
snow
removal
equipment
building
may
have
the
potential
to
move
forward,
but
other
than
that
this,
this
breakdown
was
provided
by
helms
as
kind
of
the
plan
for
those
next
five
years
at
the
airport.
If
there's
any
questions,
we
can,
I
think,
between
myself
and
heath,
maybe
try
to
answer.
G
G
G
So
again,
very
preliminary
information.
Now
that's
great
news
to
the
fa
telling
us
hey.
We
want
to
give
you
money
sooner.
You
get
stuff
done
quicker.
That's
all
great
news!
Of
course,
the
only
hiccup
is
is
what
do
we
have
in
our
coffers
to
cover
our
our
share
of
that
expense,
and
that's
something
that
kristen
and
I
and
todd
the
mayor
will
continue
to
monitor
and
keep
tabs
on.
D
C
Are
you
referring
to
more
than
a
million
dollars
when
we
get
our
ten
thousand
employment,
yeah
employment
yeah?
So
my
understanding-
and
I
that
is
all
a
little
bit
confusing
to
me,
but
that
is
what
kind
of
moves
us
up
in
the
grant.
It's
not
necessarily
that
it
offsets
any
of
our
amount
that
we
have
to
reimburse.
We
would
still
be
responsible
for
our
portion,
which
is
now
at,
I
believe,
it's
6.5
percent
of
whatever
the
project
is,
and
I
don't
know
if
heath
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
that.
One.
G
A
C
A
E
I
guess
I
want
to
make
sure
I
understand
this
so
heath.
You
said
this
might
be
moved
up
quicker
than
2023.
So
is
that
is
that
really
to
our
benefit?
To
do
that?
Necessarily
because
aren't
we
going
to
be
taking
dollars
away
from
what's
already
been
allocated,
or
I
mean
if
we
stay
where
it
is,
I
mean
it
looked
like
me.
93
and
a
half
percent
would
be
paid
for
by
state
and
feds.
I
mean
we're
not
shooting
ourselves
in
the
foot
by
moving
it
up
earlier.
Are
we.
G
That's
my
understanding
of
it
is
if,
if
they
were
to
want
a
request
or
recommend
that
we
do
this
sooner
it's
because
of
taking
advantage
of
the
money
they
have
in
front
of
us
at
that
point
in
time
now
as
to
the
cost.
Here,
those
are
some
details.
I'd
have
to
iron
out
with
todd
to
figure
out
what
kind
of
difference
there
would
be
in
the
cost
share
between
21
versus
23.
A
Right,
the
faa
has
apparently
and
brought
it
up
and
they
they'd
like
to
see
it
move
forward.
Another
thing
to
consider
is
that
our
terminal
construction
interrupts
our
maintenance
building
function,
and
so
we
will
be
without
a
maintenance
building
when
we
get
the
new
terminal,
and
so
that's
that's
happening
soon.
A
C
Okay,
so
the
only
thing
that
kind
of
covers
the
long-term
capital
plan.
Now
I
didn't
state
it
at
the
beginning,
but
I
will
put
it
out
there
if
there
is
any
items
that
we
covered
or
that
the
council
was
able
to
look
at
in
the
plan
that
they
maybe
want
to
make
a
change
to.
They
want
to
place
it
in
a
different
year.
Change
the
amount
anything
like
that,
it's
a
simple
motion
and
second
and
all
that
approval
to
do
that.
A
A
A
E
E
In
general,
I
think
you
know
I've
gone
through
this
a
number
of
years
now
and
the
this
is
at
this
point.
Still,
yes,
it
it's
an
our
best
guess
at
this
point,
but
it
still
only
is
an
estimate
at
this
at
this
time
that
is
subject
to
change
based
upon
council
makeup.
Other
city
needs
city
manager
versus
mayor.
It
said
any
number
of
things
that
could
impact
this,
but
it
is
a
you
know
our
best
shot
at
this
point
as
an
estimate
of
what
our
needs
are
for
next
five
years.
A
B
F
F
C
F
C
B
B
C
A
B
E
B
B
B
A
F
I'll
just
try
and
keep
it
quick,
two
things
one
I
was
down
in
nelson
park
recently.
I
don't
know
if
we
like
have
people
check
by
parks
periodically.
I
assume
we
do
but
there's
just
some
blatantly
broken
playground
equipment
at
this
point,
one
of
the
like
bouncy
things
that
you
rock
forward
and
back
on
just
snapped
in
half,
so
that's
just
laying
there,
but
it
might
be
something
to
look
at
that
park's
getting
a
little
run
down
at
this
point
and
then
the
only
other
thing
was.
F
I
know
we'd
kind
of
briefly
talked
about
it,
it's
kind
of
appropriate
with
the
new
business
that's
coming
up
just
because
it
was
part
of
the
discussion
and
I've
heard
from
a
few
people
on
this.
But
have
we
started
a
sidewalk
committee
or
anything
or
what's
our
plan
there
for
discussing
policy
on
our
sidewalk
ordinance.
F
A
A
We
have
a
sidewalk
accessibility,
improvement
project
and
other
than
that,
if
we
have
someone
that
requests
a
route,
a
sidewalk
route,
where
none
exists,
we
can,
as
as
a
community
the
council,
can
order
sidewalks
in
so
that
there
is
a
complete
route
from
point
a
to
point
b
and
that's
how
we've
been
operating
for
many
years.
We
have
had
numerous
sidewalks
ordered
in
that
way,
and
you
know
when,
when
it
comes
to
our
attention
is,
is
when
it
happens.
A
So
it
isn't
like
we're
not
paying
attention
when
we
get
a
complaint
about
a
problem.
The
engineering
department
goes
out
and
assesses
it,
and
if
it
we
find
that
it
doesn't
meet
the
ada
requirements,
the
sidewalk
repairs
get
ordered
in
it's
the
responsibility
of
the
property
owner
to
make
those,
but
that's
also
why
we
have
the
bucket
of
money
available
to
assist
people,
so
we
do
reimburse
when
the
sidewalk
is
in
disrepair
or
old
neighborhoods,
where
someone's
putting
phil
in
sidewalk.
A
We
have
money
available
and
we
just
increase
that
at
the
last
council
meeting
the
cost
share
that
the
city
provides.
Otherwise
anybody
in
a
newer
neighborhood,
where
sidewalks
were
a
requirement
passed
on
to
the
property
owners.
Those
are
the
complete
100
percent
responsibility
of
the
property
owner
and
usually
the
council
will
hear
pretty
loudly
from
the
property
owners
if
they're
ordered
to
put
it
in.
Without
someone
saying
hey,
I
walk
here,
I
would
like
a
sidewalk,
so
that's
why
it
hasn't
been
done
unless
there's
actually
someone
requesting
that
sidewalk.
A
F
Yeah,
I
think
for
me,
it's
more
so
just
taking
a
hard
look
at
it,
because
I
know
that
the
folks
that
are
on
14th,
some
of
them
feel
a
little
and
we
heard
it
a
little
bit
in
the
discussion
about
it
like
does
it?
Take
a
project
happening
to
force
me
to
do
this,
and
why
does
it
have
to
be
me
that
gets
this
now,
but
nobody
else
has
to
do
it,
which
isn't
really
what
it
is
yeah
10th.
F
A
F
F
I
know
that
down
in,
like
my
ward,
for
instance,
or
just
being
in
one
of
the
older
wards
in
town,
that
you'll
find
some
really
strange
design
decisions
and
I've
walked
quite
a
bit
even
in
other
areas,
but
I
mean
it's
looking
at
the
sidewalk
issue.
It's
looking
at.
We
have
streets
in
town,
and
I
know
this
is
gravel
roads
committee,
but
we
have
that,
but
there's
no
curb
and
gutter
in
neighborhoods
over
by
the
high
school.
F
So
it's
just
I
don't
know
it
seems
like
there's
some
things
that
we
might
want
to
take
a
hard
look
at,
and
maybe
we
do
that
in
a
more
organized
fashion,
especially
when
it
comes
to
sidewalks.
Just
because
the
I
don't
know
it's
the
idea
that
we
have
some
near
schools
that
it's
still
kids
walking
in
the
street
when
it's
winter,
because
there's
in
a
sidewalk
in
their
neighborhood
and
they're,
just
going
to
choose
to
do
that,
because
no
one's
policing
them
to
keep
them
up
out
of
the
street.
A
Yes,
thank
you.
I
appreciate
that
it's
been
controversial
throughout
our
history,
any
other
old
business,
okay,
new
business.
We
do
have
an
item
on
the
agenda.
14Th
street
southeast
right
of
way,
vacate
discussion
for
the
south,
dakota
department
of
transportation,
highway,
212,
phase,
two
reconstruction
project
and
I'll
ask
heath
to
talk
about
this.
You
don't
need
action,
do
you
or
or
are
you
looking
for
action.
G
G
Here's
a
configuration
of
that
intersection
as
newly
proposed
through
the
dot's
design
to
the
right
here
is
north
on
this
diagram
and
that's
14th
street
to
the
left
here.
Of
course,
the
south
that
leads
down
to
hyvee
and
highway
212
is
running
east
and
west
up
and
down
the
page
here.
So
the
current
tie-in
of
the
north
leg
of
this
intersection
is
offset
from
the
south
leg
of
the
intersection,
and
what
we're
wanting
to
do-
and
the
d.o.t
is
agreeable
with-
is
realigning
14th.
G
G
There
are
some
utilities
in
there
that
we
would
want
to
retain
a
utility
easement
for
if,
if
they're,
not
otherwise
relocated
out
into
the
right
of
way,
but
what
the
d.o.t
is
just
wanting
is
a
check
off
from
the
city
that
they
can
move
forward
and
plan
on
a
right-of-way
vacate,
which
they've
already
prepared
a
an
exhibit
for
for
this
portion
of
right
away.
That
would
no
longer
be
needed,
and
it's
this
kind
of
purple
hatched
pink
hashed
area
here.
G
That
would
no
longer
be
needed
and
we
would
vacate
formally
months
down
the
road
once
construction
is
complete
and
we're
looking
at
having
the
ability
to
vacate
it
at
that
point
in
time.
So
this
is
a
preliminary
head
nod
check
off
that.
Yes,
we
would
be.
The
city
would
be
agreeable
to
do
that
that
the
formal
action
wouldn't
come
for
some
time.
G
A
All
right,
thank
you,
and
this
is
a
a
good
change.
The
212
is
a
section
line,
it's
a
correction
line
where
the
streets
don't
intersect
and
it
was
it's
an
unfortunate
place
to
have
a
state
highway
on
a
correction
line
because
the
south
and
the
north
don't
meet,
and
so
then
we
have
to
make
these
changes
to
the
alignment
and
that
costs
money.
D
D
A
C
B
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
I
just
state
something
for
the
record
there
on
that:
the
action
that
was
just
taken
just
as
a
kind
of
reminder
that
formal
action
will
still
be
forthcoming
and
then
and
then
nothing
that
the
council
just
did
binds
the
city
in
any
way.
That'll
be
a
separate
vote.
That'll
have
to
be
taken
at
some
point.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that's
clear.