►
From YouTube: Plan Commission 5-20-21
Description
Plan Commission 5-20-21
A
D
A
A
C
A
C
A
D
C
A
A
C
Yes,
thank
you
blake.
So
this
is
the
plot
of
river
ridge
estates.
Eighth
edition
the
owner
here
is
greg.
Hafteeser
he's
the
acting
agent
for
high
plains
development
corporation
and
I'll
pull
up
this
agenda
here
and
just
for
proximity
for
those
of
you
who
do
not
know
where
river
ridge
is
it's
the
northeast
side
of
town,
2nd
street
northwest,
and
then
this
is
14th
avenue.
It
is
in
the
to
the
north
of
there.
So
then,
and
then
you
have
the
valley
view
edition.
C
C
A
C
A
A
C
No,
I
think
I'll
just
note
too
that
in
the
development
agreement
we
did
have
conversation
and
we
were
specific
that
there
would
be
services
stubbed
to
the
park
land,
because
the
the
park
and
rec
would
like
to
develop
that
with
a
bathroom.
So
that
will
be
pertinent
to
have
utilities
stubbed
in
there
before
the
road
is
paved.
A
C
C
A
A
A
C
C
Okay,
so
here's
another
development
that
we're
pretty
familiar
with
this
is
the
lakes
of
willow,
creek
right
there,
north
of
willow,
creek,
drive
and
then
west
of
31st
street
northeast,
which
actually
resides
in
the
county
and
is
the
gravel
street
there
I'll
point
that
out,
31st
and
then
willow,
creek,
drive
and
then
on.
The
north
side
is
third
avenue
northeast,
so
we
are
looking
at
planning.
The
first
edition
today
pull
up
the
plot
here.
C
C
As
far
as
we
do
not
have
a
development
agreement
attached
with
this
one,
I
do
have
one
that
I
can
pull
up,
though,
to
share
with
the
board
as
the
draft.
We
are
ironing
out
some
details
with
the
construction
plans
and
then
before
it
would
go
to
city
council.
We
will
have
those
final
details
resolved
and
included
in
the
development
agreement.
C
Really
the
only
thing.
It's
all
very
standard
everything
will
meet
the
engineering,
design,
standards
and
ordinance
for
the
infrastructure
improvements
we
just
added,
because
previously
this
this
subdivision
was
known
as
the
strom
south
east
side
edition,
and
so
then
this
plot
will
be
vacating
portions
of
that.
C
So
if
there's
I
mean
questions
there,
but
they
would.
They
would
maintain
that
we
just
added
the
language
back
in
there
that
they
would
maintain
31st
to
the
highway
212
fronted
street
and
that's
kind
of
in
collaboration
with
the
street
department.
I
did
verify
with
rob
bainen
that
they
act,
they
do
maintain
it
and
then
jamie
just
makes
make
sure
that
he
just
goes
above
and
beyond.
So
we
added
that
language
into
the
development
agreement
so
that
we
were
not
losing
that
as
we
vacate
the
plot
of
the
strom
seth
eastside
edition.
C
I
think
with
that.
Let
me
see
if
there's
any
other
good
details,
so
this
plaque
contains
64.48
acres
and
then
it
will
create
33,
c3,
highway,
commercial
lots
and
we
will
enter
the
development
agreement
where
they
will
be
installing
all
of
the
streets
within
the
two
year
time
frame
the
typical
and
then
these
lots
here.
If
anybody
was
wondering
there
will
be
a
private
street
that
will
provide
frontage
and
access
there.
That
will
also
be
in
compliance
with
our
standards.
A
A
A
C
And
then
the
other
proprietor
that
will
be
signing
off
on
the
plat
are
the
levatics.
They
own
lot
three
of
strom
south
east
side
edition.
So
that's
the
only
portion
of
strom
southeast
side
edition
that
will
not
be
vacated,
but
then
because
there
is
their
frontage
road
though
they
need
access.
So
that's
why
they
are
also
signing
off
and
then
again
jamie
will
be
installing
that
street,
so
they
won't
have
obligations.
There.
D
C
So
they,
actually,
I
think
it's
just
the
hundred
year
and
I
can
maybe
colin
can
confirm
too,
but
so
the
the
gray
is
just
the
plaid
itself.
But
then
the
darker
shading
is
the
hundred
year,
but
this
area
is
actually
unique
because
currently
it's
only
an
approximate
a
zone,
so
the
city
did
a
independent
study,
so
we
do
have
best
available
data
that
we
are
able
to
use,
but
fema
had
never
put
elevations
to
this
area.
C
Now
we're
going
through
a
map
update
with
fema,
and
so
they
do
have
they've
done
a
detailed
study
here,
and
so
we
do
have
new
information,
and
I
believe
this
is
what
it's
reflecting
and
then,
but
also
we
kind
of
went
back
and
forth
with
floodplain
showing
floodplain
boundaries
on
the
maps.
I
think
actually
should
have
caught
this
earlier,
probably,
but
I
think
if
we
just
have
a
note,
instead
of
actually
showing
the
boundaries
so
that
somebody
looking
at
the
plot
would
know
that
it
is
involved
with
the
floodplain
but
the
bound.
C
C
D
C
Yeah
and
they
can
they
actually,
they
will
be
constructing
so
that
everything
is
above
the
hundred
year.
Structures
have
to
be,
and
then
as
well
there's
in
the
engineering
design
standards,
there's
right
requirements
for
the
street
construction
as
well,
so
that
in
the
100
year,
event
you're,
not
it's
not
inundated
and
people
can't
get
out.
E
As
far
as
the
design
standards
go
like
brandy
indicated,
the
the
roads
would
be
constructed
to
an
appropriate
elevation
so
that
there
isn't
there's
only
a
certain
degree
of
inundation
allowed
over
this
over
the
roadways,
roadways
and
both
a
minor
and
major
storm
event.
That's
the
five-year
and
100-year
storm
event,
so
those
criteria
are
looked
at
when
we
review
and
approve
the
construction
plans.
E
Those
soil
borings
from
the
geotechnical
engineer
will
also
lead
the
geotech
engineer
to
provide
design
recommendations
for
the
subgrade
and
and
the
the
build
up
of
that
roadway,
including
the
the
base
course
and
the
pavement
section
as
well.
So
once
we
get
that
report,
you
know
shy
of
the
geotech
finding
any
surprises
of
things
that
look
unbuildable
or
troublesome
that
need
to
be
addressed
with
engineering
fill
or
soil
correction
measures.
We
would,
of
course,
abide
by
any
recommendations
that
they
would
they
would
provide
in
their
report,
but.
D
But
what
about
downstream
impacts?
That's
what
I'm
talking
about,
because
I
mean
if
and
I'm
not
trying
to
try
to
make
this
difficult.
I
just
it
looks
to
me
like
a
fair
amount
of
this
100
year.
Floodplain
we
fill
all
that
in
aren't
we
losing
that
retention,
then
I
mean
what
happens
down
by
tractor
supply
or
that
the
new
ender
stuff
that
we're
doing
I
mean.
Does
that
now
become
flood
plain
or
we
have
flooding
issues
down
I
mean:
are
we
playing
a
game?
E
C
Yep,
so
with
it
being
a
hundred
year,
flood
plan
you
can
fill
and
there
is
adequate
storage
that
it
can
be
dispersed.
Still
if,
within
the
floodway,
you
cannot
fill
in
a
floodway,
then
you
would
need
a
no
rise
certificate
and
typically
a
clomar
and
then
a
lomar,
which
is
a
conditional
letter
of
map
revision
based
on
fill
so.
C
Yes,
and
they
do,
we
have
those
stormwater
detention,
pond
requirements
and
then,
in
this
watershed,
actually
it
is,
you
do
not
hold
back
the
you,
don't
hold
back
the
100
year
because
of
what
the
down
the
downstream
impacts.
So
it's
to
mitigate
the
the
peak
event.
You
want
to
push
the
water
through.
Otherwise
it
would
all
compound
during
the
peak.
D
C
D
D
I
can
think
of
is
when
you
drive
by
on
212
and
to
the
north.
You
can
see
and
it
seems
really
steep
and
narrow,
right
and
then
to
the
south.
You've
got
menards
is
built
up
right,
I'm
just
curious.
I
mean
we
feel
comfortable
that
this.
If
we
fill
in
a
bunch
of
stuff-
and
we
have
an
event
that
there's
going
to
be
proper
drainage
and
or
retention
such.
C
Yes,
because
they
will
still
have
to
route
that
water
to
a
pond
and
then
release
it
at
the
pre-developed
rate.
So
even
though
you're
filling
and
then
they
are
required
to
fill
when
they're
in
the
flood
plain,
I
mean
well,
not
necessarily,
but
they
can
do
wet
flood
proofing
or
whatnot.
But
the
structure
has
to
be
elevated
or
wet
flood
proofed
because
it's
commercial
to
a
foot
above
the
base.
Flood
elevation.
C
Yeah
and
they
would
still
have
to
route
that
and
valid
concerns,
and
thank
you
for
bringing
those
up,
but
they
would
still
have
to
route
it
to
a
pond
and,
like
I
said
it's
the
two-year
event
so
in
the
100-year
storm,
though
that
is,
that
is
recommended
because
to
get
the
water
out
of
there.
But
it's
really
the
same
amount.
E
A
There
was
no
adverse
facts
that
was
noted
in
the
drainage
report.
It's
routed
to
that
that
pond
kind
of
on
the
west
side,
the
existing
pond
there
and
then
it's
close
to
the
south
and
into
the
wild
creek,
and
what
brandy
was
explaining,
is
what
what
their
report
says:
they're
allowing
the
100
unit
flow
at
the
pre-development
rate
or
less.
D
And
again
I
apologize
because
I'm
out
of
my
element
here,
I'm
not
an
engineer,
I
don't
understand
hydrology.
I
just
understand
that
if
you
take
a
bunch,
you
know
if
you
you
fill
a
bunch
of
stuff
in
and
you
put
a
bunch
of
impervious
services,
you're
going
to
have
more
runoff
right
and
you're
going
to
have
more
water
and
it's
got
to
go
somewhere.
B
I
just
wanted
to
mention
one
other
thing
if
I
could,
at
the
building
permit
level
should
this
get
to
that
point
we
could.
We
will
be
looking
at
those
that
geotech
report
and
then
based
on
what
we
find
there.
We
could
require
individual
borings
on
the
lots,
if
necessary,
that
sometimes
comes
up
when
you
have
an
area
like
this,
where
there's
been
a
lot
of
fill,
so
we
may
look
at
those
lots
on
an
individual
basis
as
well
just
for
protection
of
the
structures,
and
that
would
also
give
recommendations
as
to
the
the.
B
D
A
A
C
B
None
that
I
have
I
do
have
something
I
just
wanted
to:
let
the
board
know
and
see
if
you
felt
it
appropriate
to
bring
forth
an
amendment
to
the
zoning
ordinance
that
would
look
at
where
churches
are
allowed
and
just
making
sure
that
they
have
equal
opportunity
with
like
businesses
and
such
on
just
to
to
meet
the
reluca
act
and
and
also
for
those
opportunities.
So
if
the
board
feels
that
appropriate,
we
will
start
working
on
that
amendment.