►
From YouTube: Board of Adjustment - 05-06-2021
Description
Board of Adjustment - 05-06-2021
B
A
B
A
C
C
B
C
A
B
C
D
A
A
B
Yes,
thank
you
jeff.
Let
me
pull
up
the
gis
here,
so
we're
looking
at
700,
709th
avenue
southeast
for
the
request
of
a
bar
or
tavern
on
this
property
you'll
be
familiar
with
it,
that
it
was
the
previous
shopco
location
and
it
is
zoned,
c3,
highway,
commercial
and
there
is
sufficient
parking,
and
so
they
are
asking
for
the
bar
tavern
conditional
use
with
that
I'll
open
up
for
questions.
A
B
A
A
E
E
E
D
E
C
E
E
At
that
we've
never
talked
about
doing
a
full-time
venue
there
I
mean
it's
kind
of
wide
open
as
to
where
this
thing
could
go,
because
the
three
events
we've
had,
I
kind
of
went
over
really
well,
so
we
we
don't
even
know
quite
what
this
thing's
capable
of,
but
I
don't
see
that
happening.
That's
not
something!
I'm
wanting
to
do.
A
E
A
B
B
So
basically,
today
there
is
a
5.5
by
20
uncovered
deck
on
the
the
residence
and
right
now
they
have
a
22
foot,
front
yard
setback
in
the
r2a.
You
typically
have
to
have
25,
but
because
these
other
two
properties
exist,
they
actually
we
use
inline
provision.
That's
allowed
through
ordinance
that
you
would
take
the
average
of
the
existing
structures.
So
the
house
itself
could
have
a
19
foot
front
yard
setback.
B
So
what
they're
asking
for
is
to
they
want
to
redo
the
deck
that
that
is
there
today
and
then
they
want
to
expand
it
by
two
feet
into
the
front
yard
and
then
cover
the
entire
thing.
So
that
would
create
it.
You
know
a
deck
is
looked
at
as
especially
when
it's
covered,
it
is
looked
at
as
the
same
as
the
primary
structure.
They
have
the
same
setbacks,
so
that
would
create
a
14.5
front
yard
setback,
and
that
is
ultimately
what
they're
asking
for.
B
So
the
neighbor
to
the
north
is,
I
want
to,
I
want
to
say,
22
and
then
the
neighbor
to
the
south
is
16
and
I
think
is
that
provided
no.
We
might
we
took
that
out.
We
went
through
a
couple
of
renditions
of
the
staff
report,
so
I'll
just
take
a
quick
measure
here
and
it
is
tough
with
gis
2
because
you
get
there
could
be
overhangs
and
whatnot.
B
B
Potentially,
I
have
that's
coming
next,
I'm
sorry!
So
then
yeah
you
can
see
here,
then
that
would
make
for
a
14.5
front
yard
setback
when
19
is
required
and
then
so.
This
is
what
they
could
do
and
actually
I
wish
that
I
would
have
included
a
support
structure
here,
so
they
could
have.
They
could
expand
and
have
a
covered
porch
three
foot,
a
three
foot
covered
porch,
but
then
the
additional
4.5
would
have
to
be
uncovered.
D
B
B
Yeah
close
porridge,
that's
why,
with
my
rent
with
my
illustration
there,
I
wish
that
I
would
have
put
a
w.
I
should
have
put
a
beam
here
or
something
a
post,
because
then
that
could
be
covered,
but
then
you
and
you
and
you
can
actually
have
a
three
foot
overhang
as
well
as
long
as
there's,
not
a
structural
support,
so
they
could
even
extend
you
know,
have
this
have
a
post
here
and
even
extend
this
three
feet
as
well,
so
you're
getting
a
lot
of
it
would
be
covered.
B
B
D
Quick
go
back
to
the
over
the
aerial
photography,
okay.
Theoretically,
I'm
going
to
guess
that
most
of
the
traffic
that
drives
on
the
road
in
front
of
them
is
local
traffic.
Most
people
take
compes,
take
the
boulevard
as
far
as
the
through
traffic
in
that
area.
I
would
almost
consider
this
to
be.
There
is
something
unique
about
this
property
because
you
have
a
secondary
road
right
next
to
the
other
one
yeah,
and
this
is
more
or
less
of
a
private
drive
that
accesses
those
four
properties.
B
A
C
B
D
Hi
ma'am
quick
question:
if,
if
the
board
was
to
entertain
the
variants
and
grant
it
to
do
what
you
want
to
do
as
far
as
covering
the
the
deck
portion
of
the
approach,
with
a
condition
that
you
would
never
be
able
to
enclose,
that,
would
that
be
objectionable
to
you?
Or
would
you
be
okay
with
that?
I.
A
B
And
just
for
full
disclosure
too,
that
wanda
and
ronald
henricks
are
the
owners,
so
they
would
sign
off
on
the
applicant
their
relations
so
that
they
they'll
they
will
sign
off
on
the
on
the
building
permit
itself,
but
they
were
they
signed
off
on
this.
So
just
to
just
if
anyone
was
confused,
why
the
names
didn't
match.
A
A
D
Discussion
on
the
motion,
I'm
just
making
the
motion
and
supporting
the
motion
based
upon
the
uniqueness
of
this
lot,
having
an
extraordinary
wide
right
of
way
encroaching
upon
the
lot
as
well
as
a
road
that
would
is
not
really
what
I
would
call
a
functional
street
from
the
perspective
that
people
drive
on
that
they
use
compesco
boulevard,
and
this
is
more
of
a
private
drive
that
accesses
this
property
and,
I
think,
just
the
amount
of
traffic.
The
encroachment
is
not
going
to
bother
the
traffic.
A
Thank
you,
and
I
also
think
you
know
this-
the
property
right
next
to
it
has
16
feet
so
I
mean
I
know
we
use
the
average,
but
the
one
that's
closest
to
it
is
closer
than
the
one
that's
separated
by
an
alley.
So
I
think
that's
even
more
reason
that
we
should
use
the
number
closer
to
what's
to
the
south
yeah
any
other
comments
from
the
board
hearing.
None
I'll
ask
for
a
roll
call
vote.