►
From YouTube: Plan Commission - 8-5-2021
Description
Plan Commission - 8-5-2021
A
A
A
C
C
A
All
righty,
thank
you.
Brandi
moving
on
to
item
three
on
the
agenda
today
is
the
invitation
for
public
comment
participant
submittal,
so
I
believe
we
have
a
sign
up
there
in
the
room.
If
anybody
like
to
speak
on
an
agenda
item
or
on
an
item
that
is
not
on
the
agenda
today,
we'll
have
some
time
for
that.
After
the
regular
scheduled
agenda
went
on
to
item
4,
as
the
approval
of
the
agenda
can
I
get
a
motion
for
the
approval.
A
E
A
B
Yes,
thank
you
Blake.
So
what
we're
looking
at
today
is
the
vacation
request
for
a
portion
of
Skyline
Drive,
and
that
is
between
4th
Avenue,
Northwest
and
Third
Avenue
Northwest,
and
to
give
you
a
little
better
proximity
for
this
area.
It
is
a
portion
that
is
unimproved
as
4th.
Avenue
does
dead
end
in
this
location,
and
then
the
Millet
house
is
up
here
to
the
North
and
then
there's
Fifth
Avenue
that
Loops
into
Skyline
Drive
and
then
Lions
Park
here.
B
So
this
portion,
Robert
korth,
is
the
applicant,
and
then
he
owns
three
of
the
adjacent
properties
along
with
youth
electric,
and
so
they
have
all
signed
the
petition
to
vacate
this
portion
of
right-of-way.
It
does
have
utilities
within
it,
so
a
utility
easement
will
be
retained
over
the
entirety
of
it.
But
it
is
not
in
the
street
system
the
major
Street
system
to
connect
this
portion
of
Skyline
Drive.
So
as
far
as
it
ever
being
improved
staff
feels
comfortable
with
it
being
vacated.
B
B
So
what
was
proposed
is
that
the
two
property
corners
within
the
right
of
way
of
Fourth
Avenue,
which
is
an
80
foot
right-of-way
the
applicant,
wanted
to
run
the
vacation
perpendicular
to
this
property
corner
it.
Obviously
you
can
see
it
is
diagonal
and
then
that
it
would
run
taking
up
a
portion
of
the
right
of
way
of
Fourth,
Avenue
Northwest,
and
so,
when
staff
reviewed
this,
it's
staff's
recommendation
that
we
would
look
at
potentially
a
vacation
to
Fourth
Avenue.
That
would
run
parallel,
but
this
would
only
doing
it
this
way.
B
So
there
would
be
48
approximately
48
feet
here.
That
would
go
to
the
adjacent
landowner,
which
typically
we
go
in
half
and
the
right-of-way
is
the
80
feet,
so
that
would
leave
31.2
feet
here.
However,
the
street
department
does
need
access
down
to
this
area,
there's
a
drainage,
Swale
and
then
also
just
for
maintenance
for
snow
removal
and
garbage
pickup
things
of
that
nature,
because
it
is
a
dead
end,
and
so
it
is
a
you
can
do
a
turning
Motion
in
that
area
right
now,
so
the
that
was
expressed
to
the
applicant.
B
He
just
wanted
to
move
forward
with
with
presenting
it
this
way,
and
then
you
guys
and
he's
here,
so
you
guys
can
AF
you
after
when
the
public
hearing
is
open,
then
you
can
ask
questions
there,
but
staff
is
recommending
that
we
would
end
the
vacation
at
the
right-of-way
of
Fourth
Avenue
to
the
South
here.
That
would
run
parallel
to
the
lot
lines.
B
F
D
I'll
ask
a
question
of
staff
so,
a
couple
years
ago,
when
we
were
dealing
with
public
right-of-way
vacations,
I
think
the
one
with
the
church
up
there
on
Second,
Street
or
third,
whatever
street
that
is
Staff
put
together
some
sort
of
a
checklist
to
see
whether
or
not
a
street
should
be
vacated
and
I'm.
Assuming
that
you
applied
that's
those
standards
and
this
vacation
met
all
of
those
standards
that
were
identified,
yeah
a.
D
C
A
And
Brandy,
just
just
to
clarify
access
is
restricted
based
on
that
small
section
that
encroaches
within
the
Fourth
Avenue
existing
right
away.
So
if
that
ended
at
the
the
southern
section
of
Fourth
Avenue
as
proposed,
then
it
would
not
restrict
and
therefore
it
would
be
recommended
to
move
forward.
Yep.
B
Yep
as
I,
it's
stated
that
way
in
the
action
or
in
the
motion
for
recommendation,
and
so
then
access
would
not
be
restricted
to
the
property
that
the
city
property
to
the
west
and
which
is
gosh.
It's
going
to
leave
me
now.
It
is
a
it's.
A
dedicated
Park
starts
with
w
I'm,
not
gonna,
think
of
it
yeah.
Yes,
thank
you.
Diana.
A
C
B
That
so
that
goes
the
right
of
way
split
in
half,
so
it's
a
33
foot
right-of-way!
So
then
half
will
go
to
the
adjacent
Property
Owners
on
the
East
and
half
on
the
west
and
that's
how
every
vacation
is
for
the
most
part
as
long
it
goes
to
the
parent
parcel
and
if
it's,
and
so
that
is
typically
half
and
half
where
the
right-of-way
was
established.
B
C
That's
not
quite
what
I
mean
I
I
understand
that,
but
mostly
when
a
person
adds
property
to
an
adjacent
property,
you
would
pay
for
it.
So
why?
What
what
law
or
what?
What
reference?
Do
we
have?
What
ordinance
that
allows
this
to
happen?
I
just
wanted
I
just
wanted
you
to
flesh
that
out
a
little
bit
without
any
without
purchase
of
this
land,
it's
being
transferred
to
them.
I
understand!
That's
how
it's
what
it's
going
to
happen
just
what's,
what's
the
background
behind
doing
it
in
that
manner,
Matt.
G
There's
an
there's,
a
specific
statute
that
allows
for
vacation
right
away,
and
the
theory
is,
is
you
know
it
goes
back
to
the
parent
Parcels,
because
originally
it
was
taken
from
those
Parcels
as
a
requirement
of
plotting
back
when
it
was
originally
laid
out,
and
so
in
some
sense
it's
actually
being
given
back
to
the
owners
who
you
know
giving
giving
giving
giving
it
back
essentially
to
the
who
gave
it
to
us
in
the
first
place.
I.
D
Think,
just
to
add
on
to
what
Matt
is
saying
is
when
a
piece
of
property
has
dedicated
as
public
right
away.
There
is
some
sort
of
intention
that
a
public,
right-of-way
or
a
street
will
be
constructed
in
that
right
away
or
a
walking
path,
or
something
and
being
that
that
has
not
happened.
I
think
there's
some
other
very
buried
statutes.
That
says
that
you
know
public
right-of-ways
that
haven't
been
utilized
in
the
next
success
of
20
years,
theoretically
lose
some
of
their
public
right-of-way
status
and
I.
H
And
with
this
not,
this
is
Stacy.
If
I
could
Mr
chair
with
this
Skyline
Drive
not
being
shown
as
a
connection
in
our
Major
Street
plan.
I
think
that,
along
with
the
fact
that
it
has
been
unimproved
for
many
years,
I
think
that
that
shows
part
of
like
meets
part
of
the
criteria
for
moving
forward,
except
keeping.
You
know
all
of
Fourth
Street
there
for
Access
purposes,
for
turnaround
for
City
Services.
C
C
I
J
I'm
Robert
korth
I'm,
the
owner
of
the
old
Longworth
Edition
property,
that's
what
they
called
it
Dave
and
his
wife's
don't
remember
her
name.
They
used
to
own
that
and
I
believe
what's
in
question
here.
The
main
concern
is
the
vacation
of
skyline
onto
4th
Avenue.
The
reason
that
I
would
like
to
place.
Why
I,
why
I
would
prefer?
J
If
I
would
have
the
more
room
to
help
alleviate
that
and
make
some
kind
of
a
swell
there
to
get
it
over
that
would
it
would
help
me
immensely
because
right
now
it
all
runs
on
top
of
my
property,
and
then
it
comes
around
on
my
property
into
the
shed
and
I
can't
get
it
over
to
the
to
where
it
belongs.
It
comes
running
in
front
of
the
shed
and
and
there's
all
kinds
of
garbage,
and
and
it's
not
only
the
water
from
Fifth
Avenue.
It's
also
from
all
those
houses.
B
And
I
did
hear
this
concern
from
Robert,
so
I
did
and
and
Rob
Bannon
Street
superintendent
was
a
aware
of
it
too
and
that
they
are
willing
to
help
alleviate
that
issue
and
I
think
that
they
had
created
a
berm.
Last
year
came
out
there.
So
I
think
they
are
willing
to
have
a
continued
effort
to
try
to
help
that,
but
with
putting
but
having
only
that
portion
of
fourth
is
I
mean
probably
not
going
to
help
it.
J
I
understand,
however,
Fourth
Avenue
is
an
80-foot
wide
Street.
Why
doesn't
the
city
reclaim
their
right
away
and
maintain
it
instead
of,
if
you
see
the
Neighbors
on
both
sides,
they
have
already
encroached
25
feet,
that
blacktop
is
33
feet
wide
and
they
have
their
retaining
walls
on
both
sides.
Right
up
to
that
asphalt,
I
mean
they
get
25
feet
already
on
both
sides.
I'm
asking
to
make
my
property
line
square
instead
of
having
a
jog
in
it.
B
J
If
you
go
nursing
and
Shrink
that
down
to
66
feet,
that's
personal
purpose,
all
you're
doing
is
giving
the
adjacent
land
owners
seven
feet
on
both
sides,
and
it
does
nothing
for
the
encroachment
against
the
right-of-way.
Now
they
have
18
feet.
You
know,
what's
there's
still
on
city
property,
with
whatever
they're
doing
there,
with
their
berms
or
walls
or
if
this
can't
work
I
have
another
suggestion,
maybe
you'd,
listen
to
as
it
is
now
leave
Fourth
Avenue.
The
way
it
is
judge
means
lives
in
one
side.
J
Dave
and
Linda
Morris
are
on
the
other
side,
I
think
it
would
be
foolish
to
take
David's
wall
out
and
his
house
would
fail
and
and
Carmen
means
just
put
in
a
really
nice
flower
garden
there
to
me
I'm
not
asking
to
remove
that
I
think
it
looks
great
I
think
that
Fourth
Avenue
should
be
left
at
33
feet,
but,
let's
all
be
able
to
if
they
get
25
feet.
I
also
want
the
city
to
grant
me
to
be
able
to
use
the
right
away.
25
feet
also.
B
And
the
thing
about
those
the
retaining
walls
and
whatnot,
so
they
were
most
likely
put
in
as
landscaping
and
then
they
were
thinking
they
didn't
have
to
get
a
permit,
but
they
not
knowing
they
were
within
the
right-of-way.
So
now
that
we
know
that
we
can
send
notice-
or
we
can
look
at
you
know
reducing
that
right-of-way
to
60.
But
66
feet
is
pretty
typical,
but
it
is
also
a
dead
end
road.
So
we.
B
B
No
because,
as
long
as
we
retain
the
pavement,
because
then
they're
still
able
to
get
to
utilize
this
right-of-way
to
get
to
this
property,
so
I
mean
the
fact
that
it
is
a
dead
end.
Section
could
be
a
unique
situation
that
we
could
look
into,
but
that
would
also
be
a
separate
action.
It
would
be
a
separate
petition,
and
so
we
wouldn't
act
on
that
today.
It's
something
we
could
look
into
if
the
board
that
that
was
favorable.
D
So
if
we
went
with
staff's
recommendation,
granting
the
vacation
up
to
the
South
Boundary
of
Fourth
Avenue
and
then
the
all
of
the
owners
along
4th
Avenue,
as
well
as
Mr
korth,
were
to
come
back
with
a
subsequent
suggestion
to
reduce
the
right-of-way
along
4th
Avenue
and
then
allowing
trade-off
one
way
or
the
other.
That
would
be
we'd.
Take
that
up
as
a
separate
action
down
the
road
we
couldn't
act
on
anything
that
Mr
korthist.
You
know
we
can't
be.
You
know,
trading
horses
at
this
point.
C
J
H
Actually,
a
formal
process:
if
I
could
Mr
chair,
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
this
is
Stacy,
so
there's
actually
a
formal
process
for
that
and
I.
Don't
know
the
history
of
how
those
structures
and
things
went
in,
but
there's
a
formal
process.
If
somebody
wants
to
place
something
in
the
right-of-way,
it's
a
basically
it's
a
request
and
the
council
does
approve
an
encroachment
agreement
within
the
right-of-way.
H
J
J
Know
what
I'm
doing
in
the
future,
because
I'm
trying
to
alleviate
the
water
there
I
think
that
Fourth
Avenue
should
have
two
storm
drains
one
and
one
on
each
side
and
get
it
over
to
the
Culvert
to
all
the
water
and
and
everything
that
comes
down
there.
However,
Skyline
has
got
two
gas
line:
pipes
a
four
inch,
a
six
inch
they're
going
to
be
putting
in
a
30
inch
water,
pipe
I
mean
up
to
the
hospital
and
I
believe.
There's
another
water
pipe
in
there.
B
J
J
I
understand
Skyline
still
is
80
or
4th.
Avenue
still
is
80
feet.
There
would
be
plenty
of
room
there.
What
does
that?
Give
them
33
more
feet,
48
to
80,
to
32
feet
on
the
north
side
of
the
proposed.
What
I
proposed
they
would
move
a
tree
and
they'd
have
33
feet
to
turn
around
on
that
Park,
whatever
you
called
it
and
Skyline.
D
A
K
And
this
is
Bert
Max
with
utilities.
Mr
korth
is
right,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there.
We
have
no
problem
with
the
vacation
of
Skyline.
Drive
just
want
to
emphasize
the
utility
easement
stays
and
he
is
correct.
It's
going
to
be
a
20
inch,
but
it's
still
large
water
main
that's
going
to
go
in
either
in
2022
or
2023.
It's
not
only
going
to
go
in
the
part.
I
I
Would
be
great
access,
since
that
is
City
lands
there
with
that
Park
in
order
to
get
down
to
the
Lions
Park
a
long
third
to
have
a
bike
trailer?
Maybe
it's
just
been
the
best
kept
secret
for
a
while,
because
you
know
nobody
probably
thought
that
that
land
was
hours
to
use,
but
it
before
we
just
discard
that
land
as
useless
I
mean
it.
It
would
make
a
great
Trail
so.
B
B
A
A
A
H
A
E
I
would
emphasize
and
I
Blake
you
were
dead
on
when
you
said
that
we
need.
We
need
to
do
something
about
Third
Avenue
Northwest,
though
I
drive
that
every
single
day
toys
two
to
four
times
a
day
and
there's
young
children
all
day
every
day
coming
and
going
between
Lions
Park
and
the
residential
neighborhood
to
the
east.
On
the
on
the
road.
E
Yeah
I
appreciate
that
Rhonda
and
and
I'm
I'm,
all
for
bike
trails,
love
bikes,
bike
trails,
biking,
Etc,
but
I
I.
Don't
know
that
seems
like
that.
One,
it
kind
of
goes
to
Nowhere.
In
that
instance,
I
understand
the
emphasis
I
think
if
we
focus
and
make
sure
that
we
do
it
right
on
Third
Avenue.
That
should
alleviate
that.
Yes,.
B
And
I
would
say
too
because
we
have
where
the
where
we
have
our
trail
system
and
then
we
have
the
proposed
drill
system
where
it's
not
I
mean
when
we
did
the
master
plan
that
wasn't
considered,
and
it's
also
you
know,
pedestrian
connectivity.
Would
it's
lacking
at
third,
otherwise,
there's
going
to
be
sidewalks
where
pedestrians
will
have
that
we
keep
the
bike
trails
on
the
trail.
That's
there
today
and
then
we
focus
expanding
our
Trail
Network
in
the
proposed
areas
on
our
master
plan.
A
And
there
is
existing
sidewalks
if
you
go
just
just
a
block
to
the
east
of
this
into
Third
Avenue
and
Third
Street
yeah,
and
there
is
a
connection
that
extends
partially
to
the
West
there.
But
it
stops
basically
at
the
the
alleyway
there.
So
just
west
of
305,
3rd
Street,
Northwest,
really
I.
Think
the
primary
concern
from
a
pedestrian
standpoint
is
is
connecting
that
Easter,
easterly
and
Westerly
pedestrian
area.
So
a
sidewalk
Corridor
along
Third
Avenue,
would
tie
you
into
the
existing
bike.
A
B
F
E
C
C
A
B
B
It
so
if
I
pull
up
the
vicinity,
map
on
the
agenda,
you'll
see
that
it
is
a
budding
Golf,
Course,
Road
and
Third
Avenue,
and
then
it
comes
down
to
where
the
existing
Church
property
is
and
approximately
to
this.
This
area-
and
that
is
on
my
vicinity
map
here,
where
you
can
see
the
the
streets
outline.
B
So
this
will
be
Annex
and
zoned
as
A1
agricultural
district
and
the
Egg
District
following
the
County's
guidelines
requires
35
Acres,
so
of
course
we're
at
34.98,
but
it
doesn't
matter
because
it
is
adjacent
to
it's
a
budding
agricultural
zoning
designation.
So
it
does
meet
the
density
requirement
and
then,
as
far
as
minimum
lot
size
would
go
this.
This
property
before
it
would
be
developed
anyway,
would
require
concept,
planning
and
then
rezoning
and
re-platting
or
plating,
because
it
would
not
be
conforming
to
to
develop
so
that
would
be
coming.
B
But
this
is
just
the
first
step
of
bringing
this
property
into
City
Limits.
So
with
that
and
it'll
be
two
action
items
for
the
annexation
and
zoning,
and
so
but
we're
just
going
to
have
the
one
all
presenting
it
once
we
only
have
to
open
the
public
hearing
for
the
zoning
or
for
the
we'll
just
open
the
public
hearing
for
both
at
the
same
time
have
it
at
one:
have
it
at
once
separate
action
items
so
with
that
I
will
open
it
up
for
any
questions.
B
G
D
Don't
I'm
I
have
so
many
ordinances
in
my
head,
but
doesn't
Watertown
require
the
property
to
be
brought
in
as
AG
is
a
holding
piece
just
I
mean
I,
agree,
I!
Think
that's
what
you
should
do
if
you
have
no
intention
to
develop
it,
but
you
want
to
be
in
the
city.
It
should
be
brought
in
as
AG
as
a
holding
District.
Until
we
see
that
comports
with
the
land
use
plan
and
what
their
zoning
ordinances,
zoning.
B
Is
going
to
be
yes
and
a
lot
of
people
do
that
too?
Just
so
with
I
mean
there
they
do
need
to
go
through
the
subdivision
process,
but
first
they
would
need
to
bring
it
into
City
Limits
and
know
that
that
is
good
before
moving
forward.
So
it
is
it's
a
good
placeholder
district
and
then,
before
anything
would
change.
It
would
come
back
to
the
board
in
the
city.
Council.
Public
notice
would
be
out
so.
B
D
I
think
at
this
point
in
time
I
mean
my
my
feelings
and
druthers
are
somebody
wants
to
have
their
property
in
the
city
of
Watertown?
They
want
to
start
paying
taxes
in
the
city
watch
how
we
don't
know
what
we
want
to
do
with
it.
What
is
it
of
our
concern?
That's
it's
just
basically
come
on
in
when
you
get
ready
to
develop,
we'll
we'll
talk
about
it
then.
G
B
That's
the
park.
Dedication
is
at
the
time
of
annexation
or
Master
planning.
So
there's
a
two,
a
two-fold
of
when
to
catch
the
park.
Dedication
because
somebody
could
bring
anytime
there's
a
rezone
and
well
that's
a
bad
example,
so
once
they
would
bring
it
in
they.
If
they
came
in
like
these
guys
as
A1
then
with
when
they
get
their
master
plan
completed,
then
that's
when
we
would
pick
apart.
D
K
I'm
Bill
riefenberger
one
of
the
partners
with
my
kids
on
the
development
that
this
obviously
would
be
brought
back
as
a
and
so
the
plotting
and
working
on
all
that
right
now.
In
fact,
we've
done
a
lot
of
work
on
that
already,
but
the
reason
for
the
35
acres
is
pretty
much
has
to
do
with
the
Rural
Water,
because
that
has
to
be
brought
in
and
if
we
take
it
into
smaller
Parcels
we've
got
to
pay
the
same
fee.
So
so
this
is
pretty
much.
K
We
all
we
own
everything
around
the
church
that
quarter
minus
the
church
and
just
in
case
it
comes
up,
I
don't
want
to
get
into
other
minutia,
but
we
visited
with
the
church,
people
and
they're
all
on
board
with
this
they're
all
excited
about
the
whole
thing.
So
that
was
one
of
my
first
questions.
Would
there
be
any
restrictions
there?
They've?
That's
that's
not
an
issue
at
all.
Of
course
they'll
speak
for
that
when
we
come
back
with
other
things,
but
I
we've
visited
with
all
them
about
that.
So.
G
K
This
this
year,
yet
if
we
can
so
there's
already
been
Austin,
has
already
been
working
on
the
plot
and
stuff,
and
so
we
should
see
that
shortly.
But
this
is
the
first
process
before
we
can
get
anything
going
quite
honestly,
we're
planning
on
being
further
ahead,
but
we
had
to
actually
get
the
land
purchase
and
do
the
annexation
before
we
can
get
anything
else
going
for
the
development
portion.
So.
K
D
E
A
B
A
A
A
B
And
so
at
this
point,
Stacy
is
going
to
take
over
and
give
the
update
on
the
where
the
medical
cannabis
ordinance
is
at
and
then
also
I
am
going
to
have
to
exit.
So
she
will
close
the
meeting
as
well
and
I'll.
Leave
you
guys
with
that
I
I
might
stay
for
a
little
portion,
but
I
do
have
another
engagement
that
I'll
have
to
leave
for
here.
H
All
right,
thank
you,
Freddie.
We
did
talk
about
this
briefly,
I.
Think
at
one
of
our
last
meetings,
attorney
Roby
is
handing
out
the
most
recent
version
of
the
draft.
Again,
it
is
in
draft
form.
We
did
have
our
final
committee
meeting
yesterday,
so
it's
hot
off
the
Preston,
but
there's
still
potentially
a
few
things
to
be
looking
into
and
based
on
some
of
your
feedback
as
well.
H
The
the
time
frame
on
this
is
is
rather
tight.
We
would
like
to
have
something
in
place
by
the
first
of
October
is
our
is
our
guideline
so
and
then
also
we
will
have
a
city
county
meeting
as
well
at
the
plan
commission
level
and
then
at
the
city,
council,
County,
commission
level,
for
the
joint
area
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
City
attorney
Roby
for
an
introduction
before.
G
G
G
There
are
probably
some
typos
in
here.
There
are
probably
some
references
that
now
need
to
be
updated,
based
on
a
few
things
that
have
changed
so
I
just
want
to
emphasize
that
to
to
those
looking
at
this,
that
it
is
in
draft
form
still,
but
we
hope
to
have
it
buttoned
up
as
best
we
can
by
the
time
we
have
the
first
reading
with
the
council
and
the
subsequent
action
by
the
plan
Commission.
G
G
G
In
this,
this
proposal
indicates
that
they
will
be
allowed
in
the
C1
C2
and
C3
zones,
and
at
this
time
the
proposal
is
for
a
maximum
of
three
dispensaries
in
the
city,
and
that
would
Ascend
the
way
we
came
up
with.
That
is
one
per
10,
000
people
or
fraction
thereof,
and
so
I
believe
our
our
population
is
twenty
two
thousand
one.
Forty
eight
at
the
last
census
and
presumably
it'll,
be
a
bit
higher
than
that.
So
it
would
be
a
number
of
three
dispensaries
at
this
time
now.
G
The
way
the
way
this
process
is,
we
expect
the
process
to
work.
The
state
is
the
state's
going
to
issue
a
license
as
well.
The
city's
going
to
issue
a
license,
the
state's
going
to
issue
a
license
we
expected
to
play
out
essentially
in
the
following
manner,
where
somebody
will
be
interested
in
operating.
One
of
these
facilities,
they'll
come
into
the
city.
G
They'll
identify
their
the
location,
they'd
like
to
operate
will
identify
whether
or
not
that
location
is
satisfactory
and
we'll
also
review
their
site
plan
and
their
building
plans,
and
essentially
this
to
the
state's
rule,
is
that
they're
not
going
to
issue
their
license
until
they're
satisfied,
and
so
they
they
receive
Assurance
from
us
that
the
facility
that
meets
all
the
local
requirements.
So
by
the
time
they
get
to
the
state,
they'll
have
proven
to
us
that
they'll
meet
all
the
local
requirements.
G
Then
the
state
will
consider
a
plethora
of
other
issues
that
they're
the
ones
that
will
be.
You
know,
checking
on
character
and
fitness
and
doing
a
background
check
and
that
sort
of
thing
reviewing
business
plans
and
and
then
assuming
all
that
checks
out
and
issuing
the
permit
one
other
piece
to
this.
That
would
be
helpful
and
what
I
see
Stacy
has
pulled
up
here
is.
G
There
is
some
limitations,
some
setbacks
from
certain
types
of
establishments
and
the
map
kind
of
indicates
essentially
the
result
of
those
setbacks
and
maybe
I'll
let
Stacy
chime
in
on
kind
of
the
specifics
of
each
one
of
those
colors
and
the
types
of
establishments.
We
chose
to
have
certain
setbacks
from
sure.
H
These
areas
actually
would
be
allowed
for
the
testing,
the
cultivation
and
the
manufacturing
facilities,
and
then
we
do
have
some
specific
setbacks.
So
all
of
these
other
colors,
you
might
be
wondering
like
for
down
here.
In
this
case
we
do
have
a
thousand
foot
setback
from
a
residence
to
a
manufacturing
facility
due
to
safety
concerns
due
to
odors.
H
Due
to
things
like
that,
so
we
chose
a
thousand
feet
in
the
at
the
committee
level,
and
so
this
would
mean
basically
that
this
area,
you
would
not
be
able
to
have
a
manufacturing
facility,
but
you
could
still
have
a
testing
facility
and
you
could
still
have
a
cultivation
facility
this
next
border
here
it's
kind,
have
the
lighter
blue.
This
basically,
is
a
500
foot.
Setback
from
residential.
You
can
kind
of
see
some
residential
in
here,
so
that
kind
of
gives
you
a
little
idea.
H
So
that
actually
means
that
you
could
have
a
testing
facility,
but
you
wouldn't
be
able
to
have
the
other
two
uses,
either
the
cultivation
or
the
the
manufacturing.
And
then
this
yellow
is
basically
your
300
foot.
Setback
for
your
testing,
so
we'd
have
a
300
foot,
setback
from
residential
for
testing
facilities,
a
500
foot,
setback
for
cultivation
facilities
and
a
thousand
foot
setback
for
the
manufacturing
and
that's
sort
of
based
on
the
level
of
of
the
intensity
of
the
uses.
H
Assuming
that
there
are
cultivation
facility
will
be
a
heavier
use
than
it
than
a
testing
facility,
which
is
basically
a
lab,
and
that
also
assumes
that
our
manual,
the
manufacturing
facility
is
going
to
have
be
heavier
in
as
a
use,
have
more
traffic,
have
more
negative
impacts
to
residential
for
smell,
particularly
odors
and
things,
and
so
that's
why
that's
a
further
step
back.
So
if
we
wanted
to
look
in
in
a
little
bit
more
at
the
dispensaries,
there's
a
bunch
of
setbacks.
H
The
first
one
is
a
thousand
feet
and
that's
actually
written
into
the
state
administrative
rules,
and
so
you
can
see
here
on
the
map
where
these
are
noted.
If
you
kind
of
look
through
the
legend,
so
that's
all
of
these
things,
so
we've
taken
those
out,
remember
we've.
We
said
it
was
allowable
for
a
dispensary
and
a
C1,
a
C2
or
a
C3
District.
H
H
H
F
H
F
D
F
D
Could
answer
this
question
if
you
want
so
staff
from
the
first
planning
district
did
the
analysis,
and
so
the
analysis
was
based
upon
residential
zoning,
commercial
zoning,
and
so
there
may
be
an
incidental
apartment
in
one
of
those
structures
around
that
property.
But
we
didn't
have
the
gis
information
to
determine
that.
So
it's
very
possible
that
in
this
area
in
the
Uptown
area,
downtown
area
that
there
could
be
a
couple
houses.
G
D
H
Yeah
and
the
mapping
too,
is
just
the
best
available
data
that
we
had
so
should
someone
come
in,
we
would
do.
We
would
do
a
double
check
and
verify
as
well,
but
this
kind
of
looks
at
it
comprehensively
and
says.
Well,
where
are
the
areas
in
town
that
we
felt
like
as
a
committee?
It
would
be
appropriate,
and
so
we
said
the
C1,
the
C2
and
C3,
and
that's
typically
also
where
you
know
you'd
find
your
pharmacies
and
things
of
that
nature.
H
So
it's
a
bit
different
than
a
pharmacy,
but
those
that's
how
we
came
up
with
this.
So
if
you
want
to
look
at
it
more
comprehensively,
you
can
see
that
there's.
It
looks
to
be
some
ample
areas
of
where
these
would
be
directed
along
the
212
Corridor
and
there's
also
a
little
bit
up
here
on
Highway
20
and
then
there's
some
of
the
larger
downtown
area.
Here
when.
D
We
applied
the
setbacks.
The
C2
is
basically
wiped
up
because
most
of
our
C2
is
in
close,
close
proximity
to
residential
zoning
and
again,
if
we're
looking
at
dispensaries,
at
least
under
the
model
here,
we're
thinking
three
dispensaries
located
within
municipality
there's
as
Stacy
said,
ample
amount
of
locations
for
the
market
to
drive
where
that
would
go.
D
We
had
a
big
discussion
just
on
that
we
talked
about
that
on
either
leaving
the
let
the
market
completely
decide,
which
is
one
aspect
of
it.
The
other
thing
was
to
start
with
a
number,
and
you
could
always
reduce
that
or
and
get
rid
of
the
number,
because
we
don't
know
what
we're
dealing
with
I
think
was
part
of
it
too
I
know
we
had.
We
both
had
a
lot
of
police
conversation
that
was
brought
into
the
discussion.
We
were
on
both
sides
of
this.
We
went
back
and
forth
on.
I
D
This
metal-
this
is
just
medical
marijuana,
currently
that
you
cannot
have
adult
use.
Recreation
marijuana
in
the
state,
the
medical
marijuana
again,
I
think
it's.
The
market
is
going
to
be
driven
Statewide,
there's,
probably
going
to
be
less
than
8
000
people
that
qualify
from
a
card
perspective
you're
going
to
need
to
be
in
a
physical
location
that
has
close
proximity
to
doctors.
That
can
write
prescriptions
in
the
end.
I
think
the
market
will
take
care
of
it.
D
I
don't
see
two
or
three
of
these
operations
would
probably
be
more
than
whatever
happened
just
to
fill
that
economic
void.
However,
part
of
the
thing
that
could
also
come
out
of
this,
we
had
this
discussion.
If
we
have
15
medical
marijuana
facilities,
there
could
be
a
a
an
Ask
later.
If
adult
Recreation
comes
back,
that
I
am
already
doing
at
the
medical.
Why
can't
I?
Do
it
and
I
know
we
addressed
that
a
little
bit
in
there?
G
Yeah
to
Todd's
Point
commissioner
case
we
kind
of
went
across
the
broad
spectrum
of
opinions.
On
that
you
know.
Originally,
there
was
a
thought
well,
so
so
back
up
a
second
statute
allows
us
to
set
a
number
there's.
No
reason
the
number
can't
be
zero.
We
don't
believe
it
with
the
exception
of
dispensaries,
because
there's
a
second
statute
that
says
that
cities
essentially
can't
prohibit
the
dispensary.
So
they
can
that
you
know
the
the
common
consensus.
Amongst
you
know.
Some
lawyers
across
the
state
is,
is
that
we
could
probably
have
it
be.
H
G
So
that
that's
kind
of
was
this,
the
starting
point
was:
let's
not,
let's
start
small
and
the
flip
side
is
let
the
market
figure
it
out.
There's
been
some
discussions
with
other
states
that
have
expressed
that
when
you
let
the
market
sorted
out
there,
there
tends
to
be
there's
a
risk
of
you
know.
People
are
trying
to
cut
Corners
at
all
costs,
cut
costs
or
competing
against
each
other.
G
G
I
There
is
so
sorry,
oh
I'm,
one
more
question.
Matt,
then
just
along
those
lines,
perhaps
when
these
are,
when
these
licenses
these
three
are
issued
are
the
neighbors.
You
know,
am
I
told
that
the
sensor
is
coming
in
next
door
to
me.
Is
there
any
notification
on
this,
or
does
it
come
in
front
of
the
board,
or
is
it
just
City
staff
that
a
lot
that
gives
those.
H
H
No
okay,
no
okay.
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out.
We
did
have
a
lot
of
discussion
at
the
committee
level
about
the
number,
and
so
we
did
as
City
attorney
Roby
indicated.
We
did
get
some
comments
from
some
other
communities
and
things
that
we
have
to
rely
on,
because
this
is
all
new
in
South
Dakota
and
from
the
law
enforcement
perspective
as
well.
H
Having
said
that,
we
did
a
little
bit
of
research,
and
don't
quote
me
on
this
number,
because
I
can't
remember
off
the
top
of
my
head,
but
we
were
looking
at
pharmacies
and
how
many
pharmacies
per
capita
do.
We
typically
have
that
type
of
thing.
Knowing
that
and
I'm
going
to
ask
commissioner
case
How
many
patients
in
North
Dakota
have
their
medical
card.
H
Eight
thousand
is
all
so:
we
were
kind
of
thinking
based
on
the
number
of
population
or
how
do
I
say
this
pharmacies
per
capita.
We
looked
at
that
and
then
we
also
thought
well
and
I
think
that
number
was
like
one
per
4300
within
the
state.
But
don't
quote
me
on
that,
because
I'd
have
to
get
that
research,
so
we
were
kind
of
thinking.
H
H
H
What
we
would
like
to
prohibit
some
of
this
comes
from
the
from
the
state
administrative
rules
in
terms
of
no
Billboards
and
things
like
that,
but
then
there's
also
just
a
little
bit
more,
because
this
is
something
where
not
everyone
will
be
allowed
to
go
in.
It
will
be
people
of
a
certain
age,
it
will
be
caregivers
and
then
it
will
also
be
those
with
their
medical
cards.
H
I
G
No,
the
thinking
there
is
was
that
the
specifically
cultivation
and
Manufacturing
I
don't
know
about
testing
necessarily,
but
the
the
thinking
there
is
that
the
capital
investment
required
on
the
front
end
is
going
to
probably
naturally
limit
the
you
know
how
many
of
those
in
the
market,
the
General
market
for,
will
naturally
limit
that,
whereas
it,
whereas
the
thinking
on
the
dispensaries,
is
it's
easy.
It'd
be
less
Capital
intensive
to
start
start
a
dispensary,
so
they.
F
G
D
H
Sure
so
we
what
we've
tried
to
do
here
is
we
have
relied
on
the
state's
Draft
rules
as
one
piece
of
this,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
what
we
had
was
related
to
the
time
place
and
manner,
because
that
is
the
authority.
That's
basically
been
specifically
given
to
the
cities,
and
Matt
can
describe
that
more.
H
If
you
would
like,
however,
we
were
looking
at
things.
That
would
be
a
balance.
This
is
all
designed
to
balance
the
interests
of
those
with
medical
cards,
those
wanting
to
or
will
have
medical
cards
those
folks
that
want
to
start
businesses
but
balance
that
with
the
community
interests
and
needs,
and
so,
while
not
prohibiting
that
the
use
of
it
and
then
also
the
business
aspect
of
it
from
the
dispensaries
to
the
testing
facilities,
cultivation
and
Manufacturing.
H
We
have
allowed
for
those
places
in
general
and
and
that's
the
maps
here
in
front
of
you,
but
then
also
looking
at
it
from
a
community
protection
standpoint
that
we
have.
Similarly,
we
have
some
setback
distances
from
bars
to
public
parks,
things
of
that
nature.
So
if
you
look
at
those
protected
uses,
they're
all
like
I
said
before
areas
where
you
may
see
a
high
concentration
of
children
also
putting
out
there
too,
that
this
is
different
from
a
regular
Pharmacy,
because
we
do
have
some
restrictions
at
the
federal
level.
So.
D
I
guess
the
point
I
was
trying
to
make
was
that
this
specific
ordinance
will
not
be
coming
before
the
Planning
Commission.
The
only
thing
that's
coming
before
the
Planning
Commission
will
be
the
amendments
to
title
21
that
says
that
this
types
of
uses
are
going
to
be
allowed
at
this
particular
Zone.
The
information
in
the
setbacks
are
here
are
going
to
be
part
of
a
licensing
type
of
an
ordinance
that
references.
D
G
That's
a
good
question
because
this
I
mean
this
is:
there
are
multiple
pieces
of
this
that
are
time,
placing
manner
related
and
but
you
know,
and
similar
to
the
alcohol,
all
alcohol,
alcoholic
beverage
ordinance.
That's
entitled
to
there's
a
setback
requirement
in
that
ordinance
that
yeah
you're
right
I
mean
technically.
Yes,
it's
not
title
21.
This
would
be
on
title
25.,
but
I
expect
it
will
bring
it
forward
as
a
as
an
exam,
at
least
as
part
of
this,
to
keep
it
part
of
the
discussion.
G
D
Yeah
that
that's
all
I
was
just
wanting
to
get
across
that
we
won't
be
technically
voting
on
this
only
on
the
what's
in
the
districts,
but
the
we
need
to
be
looking
at
from
a
Planning
Commission.
If
we
think
that
those
suggested
setbacks
are
appropriate,
I
do
want
to
Echo
on
my
career
side,
I'm
doing
this
in
50
other
entities
and
we're
dealing
with
the
same
situation
and
the
window
is
closing.
D
We
have
to
have
everything
locked
down
by
the
14th
of
September
at
the
last
date,
and
so
we
are
I
think
what
will
end
up
happening
is
as
we
get
this
down,
depending
on
what
happens
with
the
Supreme
Court
down
the
road.
But
I
think
this
will
be
Revisited
at
a
later
date,
as
we
get
a
better
handle
that
it's
just
something
to
get
our
fingers
in
the
dike.
G
Yeah
we
want
to
get
something
on
the
books.
There
is
there's
going
to
be
a
special
session,
a
special
legislative
session
expected
to
be
in
November
and
they'll,
be
ex
there's
talk
of
some
legislation
related
to
this
there's
Talk
of
legislation
coming
forward
whether
or
not
Amendment
a
is
is
struck
down
or
with
upheld,
I.
Believe,
there's
going
to
be
some
discussion
of
legalizing
I'd
all
use
marijuana
at
this
next
legislative
session.
G
There's
an
open
question
about
whether
municipalities
can
get
into
the
business
if
they,
if
they
so
chose
similar
to
the
there's
a
local
option
for
alcoholic
beverage
sales.
That's
why
Brookings,
for
example,
is
the
only
liquor
sales
in
town,
so
there's
there's
kind
of
there's
a
lot
of
questions
up
in
the
air
right
now,
it's
just
a
matter
of
getting
something
in
place
and
and
then
we'll
probably
have
to
come
back
and
tweak
this
once
or
twice
in
the
future.
I
would
guess
one
other
thing
too.
There's
you
know.
G
H
Yeah
we
wanted
to
have
an
ordinance
that,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
was
relatively
easy
for
the
general
public
to
understand,
and
also
those
that
are
looking
to
start
businesses
or
have
medical
cards
so
kind
of
One-Stop
shopping.
If
you
will,
when
looking
at
this,
so
that
was
kind
of
the
intent
and
to
like
Matt
said,
have
duplicate
things
in
that
mirror
this
date
as
well.
F
D
I
Yeah
I'm
sure,
yeah
and
and
not
to
take
us
down
a
rabbit
hole
off
that
note,
but
I
am
going
to
take
us
down
a
rabbit,
hole,
Todd,
I'm,
just
curious,
okay,
so
the
curve
on
First
Avenue,
where
you
know
Hobby
Lobby,
is,
and
we
have
that
proposed
hockey,
rink
and
then
the
residential
up
there
residential
homes.
Right
now
we
have
purple
and
red
there.
So
if
someone
were
to
come
tomorrow
and
say
you
know,
I
want
to
put
one
there.
The
the
you
know
the
again.
D
D
The
Housing
Development
and
could
happen
the
hockey
rink
could
happen.
They
would
just
be
an
allowable
use,
they'd
be
non-conforming
to
the
ordinance,
but
they
would
have
the
ability
to
continue
on
just
like
any
other
non-conforming
use
would
happen.
Yes,
no
different
than
I'm
raising
a
thousand
cows
out
in
the
county.
D
H
Right
there
is
a
section
in
here
that
does
address
just
that
in
terms
of,
if
you
know,
basically,
if
a
dispensary
goes
in,
for
instance,
and
there
aren't
any
of
the
protected
uses
around
and
in
a
protected
use
comes,
the
dispensary
still
can
stay
there,
that
type
of
use
or
a
protected
use
could
choose
to
locate
closer
to
the
that
dispensary.
So.
C
C
D
H
Absolutely
so
we
wanted
to
bring
this
forth
to
you
all
as
a
draft.
So
you
could
see
it
have
an
opportunity
to
ask
questions,
because
it
will
be
going
to
first
reading
of
ordinance
at
the
city
council
level,
August
16th,
and
then
it
will
be
potentially
then
coming
to
you
all
as
the
plan
commission,
as
well
as
a
joint
meeting
for
the
joint
ordinance
on
August
19th.
D
The
Joint
jurisdiction
ordinance,
as
has
been
drafted
by
Mr
zoning
officer.
Mueller,
basically
is
going
to
restrict
dispensaries,
cultivation,
manufacturing
and
testing
facilities
in
the
joint
jurisdiction
area.
The
the
counties
regulations
as
being
proposed
is
that
cultivation
manufacturing
and
testing
will
not
be
allowed
in
the
rural
unincorporated
areas
of
the
county.
D
Only
one
dispensary
would
be
allowed
in
the
county
in
the
area
outside
of
the
joint
jurisdiction
area
and
that's
going
to
be
again
more
of
a
holding
ordinance
for
the
county,
and
so
they
can
have
some
serious
time
to
to
vet
where
those
manufacturing
and
cultivation
facilities,
because
obviously
you
may
would
maybe
would
see
cultivation
facilities
in
the
AG
area,
but
the
County's
not
ready
for
that.
Yet.
H
F
D
We
don't
have
there's
not
a
lot
of
commercial
or
industrial
zone
property
in
the
county.
There
is
some
commercially
zone,
property,
Outside,
The,
Joint,
jurisdiction
area
on
the
south
side
of
212
out
by
the
rooster,
and
there
there
are
a
couple
other
smaller.
There
are
a
couple
other
spots
within
the
county.
If
somebody
wants
to
find
them,
they
can
look
for
them
and
they
can
decide
whether
or
not
they
can
purchase
them.
But
foreign.
C
H
G
G
Think
by
that
time,
we'll
have
a
you
know,
kind
of
our
formal
proposal,
there'll
be
against
a
little
bit
of
cleanup
here
and
there
in
this
and
I
would
expect
that
we
would
just
circulate
that
to
the
plan
commission
at
the
same
time,
and
so,
if
there's
any
comments
specifically
on
that
draft
prior,
you
know
it'd
be
helpful
if
they
came
before
that
first
council
meeting,
but
there's
still
some
wiggle
room
there
to
make
some
small
changes.
But
you
know
between
meetings
and
that
sort
of
thing
so
but
yeah
by
all
means.
H
H
That'd,
be
terrific,
and
you
know
just
reading
it
from
a
user
standpoint
is
as
clear.
Does
this
make
sense?
What
about
the
direction
of
the
time
place
and
manner
try
to
really
hone
in
on?
That
would
be
my
advice
to
you.
The
zoning
component
of
that.
Does
it
make
sense?
Do
these
setbacks
make
sense
that
type
of
thing
how
this
is
directed
and
does
it
strike
a
balance
between
allowing
those
the
uses
and
then
also
having
some
Community
Protections
in
place?
So
that's
what
I
would
recommend
on
that?
Is
there
any.
H
Map,
yes,
I'd,
be
happy
to
email.
Those
that
we
did
I
wanted
to.
Thank
commissioner
Kays
and
First
District
for
those
Maps
did
a
great
job
with
a
very
limited
amount
of
time.
So
absolutely
we
can
email
this
out
to
everyone
and
then
we'd
be
seeking
your
comments
sooner
rather
than
later
on
that.
So,
with
that,
I
was
going
to
ask
you
privately
Diana
or
any
members.
If
you
would
like
to
proofread,
we
would
be
happy
to
take
that
assistant.
H
K
G
H
D
And
Stacy
and
the
rest
of
the
Planning
Commission
I
mean
once
you
read
this
and
you
look
at
the
maps
and
you
see
the
setbacks.
If
something
is
really
causing
you
some
significant
heartburn
on
a
setback
and
say:
well
what
would
it
look
like
if
you
know
if
I,
if
there's
enough
time,
we
could
do
some
additional
analysis
to
show?
Oh,
this
is
what
a
750
set
book
looks
back
versus
the
yeah
I
mean,
but
I,
don't
I
mean
we
need
about
a
day
turn
around
and
so
I.
D
D
F
H
One
of
the
things
I
did
want
to
point
out
that
assistant
chief,
helped
me
out.
Scott
Youngblood,
pointed
out
to
me
I
believe
assistant
chief,
is
that
yep,
okay,
perfect
I,
want
to
make
sure
I
think
Bonnie.
You
had
had
a
question
about
downtown
and
we
do
have
a
provision
in
this
draft
that
would
preclude
dispensaries
from
being
in
a
building
where
there's
living
units
or
apartments.
So
there
is
that
provision.
H
D
H
Just
wanted
to
ask
and
see
if
a
system
fire
chief,
Scott
Youngblood
or
if
the
building
official
and
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
met
Jason
Spurgeon.
Yet
if
they
had
anything
else
to
add,
they've
really
been
looking
at
this
and
done
a
fantastic
job.
Reviewing
these
types
of
uses
from
a
safety
aspect.
H
C
A
I
did
make
a
note
earlier
during
the
discussion
around
the
vacation
that
I
wanted
to
bring
up
the
sidewalk
around
Third
Avenue,
and
we
had
a
lot
of
this
conversation
at
the
time.
However,
I
did
have
a
couple
of
questions
so
what
we're
doing
for
a
sidewalk
reconstruction
currently
on
Third
Avenue
to
the
west
of
Bramble
Park
in
the
residential
area
and
Stacy
I,
don't
know
if
you'll
know
the
answer,
but
is,
is
the
city
assessing
the
cost
of
that
reconstruction
effort
back
to
those
property
owners.
H
G
A
A
I
I
would
assume
that
it
is
with
the
the
the
cost
that
goes
along
with
that
kind
of
effort,
and
that's
how
we've
you
know
done
some
of
these
things
in
the
past.
Just
generally,
I
have
some
consternation
of
the
city,
doing
a
reconstruction
project
like
that
and
assessing
it
back
to
the
homeowners
having
strict
Landscaping
requirements
for
sidewalk
installation
and
Landscaping
Boulevard
requirements
for
other
developers
and
then
not
following
suit
on
City
owned
property.
So
we're
not
continuing
the
sidewalk
to
the
east,
along
Bramble
Park,
to
tie
into
the
bike
trail.
A
A
E
And
both
and
I
mentioned
to
the
east
to
the
residential
East.
But
there
is
a
lot
of
traffic
from
the
residence
West
on
the
west
side
of
the
river
and
then
there's
a
ton
of
people
crossing
there,
which
is
great.
The
bike
trail
is
being
used
a
lot,
but
but
there's
just
a
lot
of
unsafe
stuff
that
I
see
and
I'm
a
little
bit
attuned
to
that.
Because
I
see
it
in
my
work
all
the
time
but
yeah
that
would
love
to
see
sidewalks
both
on
the
east
and
west
side
and.
A
I
know
some
of
the
feedback
from
the
city
and
the
past
had
been
that
you
know
it
would
be
done
at
the
time
that
the
bridge
was
replaced,
but
that
bridge
has
been
put
off
and
put
off.
That
doesn't
necessarily
need
to
wait
for
the
the
sidewalk
to
gain
benefit
and
pedestrian
safety
up
to
the
point
of
the
bridge
on
either
side
to
the
East
and
the
West,
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
waiting
for
the
bridge
is
is
the
right
solution
to
the
problem.