►
From YouTube: City Council Meeting - 06-21-21
Description
City Council Meeting - 06-21-21
A
A
B
Oh
god,
creator
of
all
things
and
source
of
wisdom
and
knowledge
send
your
holy
spirit
to
guide
our
thoughts,
words
and
actions
so
that
everything
we
do
will
begin
with
your
inspiration
and
continue
with
your
guidance
and
blessing
help
us
to
speak
and
act
with
integrity.
So
we
may
uphold
the
values
of
the
city
of
watertown.
B
A
D
C
D
E
B
C
A
B
A
H
A
C
Okay,
thank
you.
Mayor
attached
to
the
agenda
is
actually
the
canvas
of
the
election.
The
first
thing.
What
I'll
do
is
I'll
just
kind
of
go
over
each
one
of
the
items
with
the
number
of
votes
and
that
will
certify
the
votes
so
for
charter
amendment
number
five,
yes,
votes
were
2697,
no
votes
were
1055.,
so
charter.
Amendment
5
passed
then
for
the
official
canvas
of
the
votes
for
the
mayor
and
council
helene.
E
A
Thank
you
I'll,
second,
that
anyone
else
all
right.
Thank
you
all.
Those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
aye,
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
b.
Is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-23
to
supplement
the
2021
budget
for
various
departments
and
projects
and
line
item
transfers,
have
a
motion
by
albertson
and
a
sac
by
roby,
and
I
will
ask
the
finance
officer
kristen
to
tell
us
about
this
one
as
well.
C
Okay,
thank
you
mayor.
This
is
the
second
reading
of
the
budget
supplement
and
also
the
line
item
transfers.
I
did
go
over
it
with
the
first
reading
I'll
run
through
it
really
fast.
If
there's
any
questions,
I
can
answer
them
so
for
the
general
fund,
the
supplement
is
95
000
and
that's
going
to
cover,
go
to
icap.
That's
for
the
kitchen
equipment,
the
fire
department
and
ambulance
department
as
a
joint
one.
That
was
for
the
increase
for
the
temporary
salary
to
extend
the
part-time
position
to
the
end
of
the
year.
C
Then,
when
we
jumped
to
the
bbb
that
was
when
julie
had
came
and
asked
to
have
the
original
budget
that
was
asked
for
in
2021,
which
was
kind
of
held
back
due
to
not
knowing
how
the
taxes
were
going
to
come
in.
So
that's
for
55
000
and
the
capital
improvement
fund,
the
land
purchase
of
80
000,
that
is,
to
purchase
that
land
off
of
81
and
I
believe,
it's
kind
of
north
of
10.
C
A
portion
of
that
is
to
increase
the
downtown
park
budget
and
the
remainder
is
to
supplement
the
budget
for
the
ada
park
that
that
the
parks
department
is
doing
on
the
budget
line.
Item
transfers
we'll
be
transferring
thousand
seven
hundred
from
the
street
department.
Dub
dump
truck
line
to
the
pickup
line
item
rob
had
spoke
about
the
ability
to
get
another
truck
that
is,
is
needed,
a
pickup
for
the
department
and
then
the
other
portion.
C
A
C
Okay,
thank
you
mayor
before
you
is
a
transfer
from
the
contingency
account.
The
city
does
budget
a
300
000
contingency
we've.
I
think
this
is
the
second
one
that
we've
kind
of
tapped
into
so
terry
kelly
with
parks
approached
me.
They
were
having
trouble
with
the
bucket
truck
and
it
kind
of
came
up
faster
than
anticipated,
so
he
asked
that
we
use
the
contingency
transfer
process.
So
that's
what
we
have
forty
nine
thousand
five
hundred
that
does
leave
the
balance
in
that
account
of
one
forty
three
hundred
forty
three
thousand
five
hundred.
B
I
I
We've
been
battling
with
really
only
one
for
about
the
last
year
because
it
did
not
meet
dot
inspection
that
was
about
eighteen
thousand
to
bring
basically
a
ten
thousand
dollar
unit
to
usable,
so
we've
been
holding
off
with
one
unit.
That
was
a
hand-me-down
from
the
utilities.
From
about
eight
years
ago,
we
did
blow
the
motor
on
that
one.
About
two
weeks
ago,
two
rods
and
the
crank
crankshaft
went
out.
The
quote
was
eight
thousand
and
then,
when
we
researched
it,
the
trade-in
value
on
that
would
have
been
about
7
000
value.
I
So
it
made
sense
to
talk
to
kristin
just
to
kind
of
look
forward
in
the
process.
We
did
have
one
budgeted
in
long-term
cip,
but
unfortunately
this
happened
a
lot
quicker
than
we
than
we
thought
it
would.
So
that's
where
we're
at
where
we're
at
right
now
is
actually
on
a
daily
basis,
we're
sharing
a
unit
with
the
street
department.
I
I
It
is
a
2014
dodge
5500,
with
a
45
foot
reach
telescopic
boom
and
we
would
normally
go
larger
to
a
55
or
60.
But
again
I
the
question
may
come
up
we're
really
close
on
getting
the
grapple
saw
to
bid
which
will
be
a
90
foot
reach.
So
we
feel
this
will
actually
be
a
more
of
a
benefit
to
the
department
for
even
little
things
like
the
uptown
banners,
the
212
banners
is
sort
of
more
maneuverable
than
than
our
bigger,
larger
bucket
trucks.
I
I
D
A
Thank
you.
Item
d
is
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-25,
an
ordinance
amending
section,
10.0105
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown,
replacing
references
to
mayor
with
city
manager
relating
to
the
duties
and
powers
of
the
fire
chief,
a
motion
by
will
howard
second
by.
Why,
and
I
will
ask
the
city
attorney
matt
roby,
to
explain
this.
Please.
F
Thank
you,
mayor
ordinance
in
ordinance,
there's
a
section
that,
regarding
the
powers
of
the
fire
chief
in
the
event
of
of
a
fire,
to
order
the
the
removal
of
an
existing
building
to
prevent
the
spread
of
fire
or
to
order
the
tear
down
of
the
remaining
portion
of
a
structure.
Currently
in
ordinance.
It
spells
out
that
the
mayor
or
two
members
of
the
council
need
to
get
the
the
fire
chief
needs
to
get
their
check
off
or
to
make
those
calls.
A
See
none
will
look
for
action.
All
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion,
carries
item
e
is
the
second
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-26,
an
ordinance
amending
chapter
7.18
of
the
revised
ordinances
of
the
city
of
watertown
regarding
the
composition,
election
and
terms
of
the
council,
members
have
a
motion
by
lawlum
and
a
second
by
albertson
and
I'll.
Ask
the
city
attorney
matt
roby,
to
tell
us
about
this.
Please.
F
Thank
you
mayor.
This
ordinance
change
again
comes
along
with
our
changing
form
of
government.
That
we're
going
through
at
the
moment
reflects
the
new
composition
of
the
council,
as
well
as
the
replacement
of
a
council
president
and
vice
president
with
a
deputy
mayor,
which
will
be
elected
at
the
first
meeting
in
july.
E
F
F
You
know
we
we've
crafted
this
form
of
government
that
isn't
specifically
provided
for
under
statute
and
we're
allowed
to
do
that
under
charter.
But
with
that
ability
we
have
to
implement
just
a
generic
administrative
appeal
process.
The
city
of
brookings
has
one
essentially
anybody,
that's
aggrieved
by
any
decision
of
any
actor
on
behalf
of
the
city
has
a
mechanism
whereby
they
can
appeal
that
decision
and
so
that'll
be
probably
coming
here
in
the
near
near
future.
A
Any
other
questions
right
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye,
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying
nay
motion-
carries
item
f-
is
the
first
reading
of
ordinance
number
21-29,
establishing
a
zoning
designation
of
a1
agricultural
district
for
the
area
of
land
to
be
known
upon
annexation
as
harmony
hill
third
edition,
and
this
is
just
a
first
reading.
So
no
action
and
I'll
ask
the
public
works
director,
heath
von
I
to
tell
us
about
it.
G
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
an
application
by
the
benedictine
sisters
of
watertown
mother
of
god.
Monastery
they've
submitted
a
petition
for
annexation
and
zoning
for
a
portion
of
their
property
located
generally
along
south
highway
81
south
of
the
roundabout.
This
portion
of
their
property
contains
a
little
over
18
acres.
It
is
surrounded
by
city
limits
and
they're,
proposing
to
temporarily
zone
this
particular
piece
of
land
as
a1
agricultural
district.
G
So
again,
here's
the
roundabout
on
the
map
and
you
go
south
on
81,
and
this
is
the
parcel
being
petitioned
for
annexation
and
zoning.
This
being
the
first
reading.
The
second
reading
would
be
coincided
with
would
coincide
with
the
annexation
approval
as
well
at
the
next
council.
Meeting
planning
staff,
stacy
and
brandy
are
both
online
with
us
and
we'll
stand
by
for
any
questions.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Any
questions,
council
yeah,
I'm
glad
to
see
there's
a
couple
of
the
newly
elected
council
members
here.
This
is
a
first
reading
and
so
it'll
be
a
different
council
that
takes
action
on
it.
So
you've
been
here
and
so
now,
you're
aware
that
the
first
reading
has
occurred
takes
a
little
bit
of
the
grief
away
from
from
that.
G
G
G
A
C
B
A
Anyone
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item.
I
is
approval
of
resolution
number
21-26,
the
plot
of
the
lakes
of
willow
creek.
First
addition
to
the
municipality
of
watertown
in
the
county
of
coddington,
south
dakota
and
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
development
agreement
and
the
plot
as
a
proprietor,
a
motion
by
lollum
and
second
by
holleen
and
I'll,
ask
the
public
works
director,
heath
von.
I
to
tell
us
about
it.
G
Thank
you
mayor.
This
is
a
proposed
plat
for
an
area
to
be
known
as
the
lakes
willow
creek
first
edition
within
the
city
of
watertown,
and
it
includes
numerous
lots
for
development
within
the
subdivision.
I
will
again
pull
up
a
map
of
this
plat
and
we
can
talk
through
some
of
the
details
and
logistics
here.
You'll
note
in
the
title
of
the
action
item.
G
The
city
is
a
proprietor
on
this
plat
due
to
a
portion
of
the
right-of-way
running
through
some
city
property,
and
that
is
identified
with
28th
street
northeast
and
the
of
way
some
of
the
extents
of
that
right
away
does
come
through
city
property.
So
we
we
have
to
be
a
party
to
the
plat
in
order
for
that
to
be
filed
appropriately.
G
This
is
the
the
front
page
of
the
plat
and
then
each
of
these
sections
of
the
platter
broken
down
in
more
detail
in
the
subsequent
pages.
I'd
note
that
this
plat
is,
in
conformance
with
the
preliminary
plan,
that's
been
vetted
through
the
the
staff
review
and
the
planning
commission
review
processes.
G
G
This
is
shy
of
our
collector
route.
80
foot
requirement,
the
reason
being
that
it's
progressed
to
this
point
is
in
part
due
to
the
fact
that
the
preliminary
plan
was
approved
just
prior
to
us
adopting
our
new
engineering
design
standards,
and
so
we
went
ahead
and
carried
through
the
prior
approved
66
foot
right
away
through
the
rest
of
the
preliminary
plan
approvals
and
then
subsequent
to
that
approval,
the
engineering
design
standards
came
out
were
formally
adopted
which
require
an
80
foot
right
away
for
a
collector
route.
G
The
other
thing
I
would
note
specific
to
this.
We
have
28th
street
identified
as
a
collector
route,
but
we
also
have
the
future
use
of
the
known
31st
street,
which
will
also
be
a
collector
route
due
to
factors
with
physical
constraints
of
the
development.
We
missed
extending
a
collector
on
the
quarter
line
like
we'd
hoped
to,
and
we've
talked
through
that
in
detail
again
through
the
preliminary
plan
phases,
but
28th
street
is
identified
as
a
collector.
G
that
language
from
this
the
prior
owners
development
agreement
was
copied
over
into
this
development
agreement,
with
the
added
stipulation
that
they
would
maintain
that
until
the
point
in
time,
31st
street
is
constructed
to
meet
the
city's
engineering
design
standards
and
proposed
for
acceptance
by
the
city.
Engineer.
G
Another
unique
factor
here
that
we've
been
working
closely
with
the
developer
on
are
the
check
offs
from
the
corps
of
engineer
and
the
game,
fish
and
parks
as
we're
required
to
do
with
state
and
federal
agency
involvement.
We
have
received
jurisdictional
determination
as
far
as
wetlands
are
concerned.
Within
the
subdivision,
the
corps
of
engineers
has
made
those
determinations
the
only
area
of
impacts
that
they've
determined
are
the
the
actual
channels
of
themselves
of
willow,
creek
and
then
the
tributary
to
willow,
creek,
otherwise
informally
known
as
cherry
creek.
G
Aside
from
that,
I
know
the
developers
here
this
evening.
We
also
have
a
brandy,
han
online,
a
city
planner.
That's
worked
at
great
extents,
with
drafting
the
development
agreement
and
coordination
with
the
platt
and
then
also
stacy
bungard.
The
community
development
manager
is
online
with
us
as
well
and
we'll
stand
by
for
questions.
A
G
G
J
J
I
can
pull
up
the
language
actually
so
that
we
have
that
straight,
but
we
also
did
check
because
of
our
community
rating
system.
We
checked
off
with
fema
when
we
were
updating
title
24
so
that
we
were
not
out
of
compliance
necessarily
or
not
getting
points
for
the
activities
that
we're
doing
with
what
we're
showing
on
the
plats.
A
A
J
G
And
I
believe
mayor,
if
I
could
chime
in
briefly
part
of
the
concept
or
logic
behind
the
the
note
in
lieu
of
the
boundary,
was
because
of
the
two
steering
guidelines
that
we
have.
We
have
the
the
fema
firm,
the
zone,
a
the
approximate
zone,
but
then
we
also
have
the
willow
creek
study,
which
essentially
have
two
differing
outlines
or
boundaries
of
floodplain
extents,
and
we
felt
that
that
could
be
all
the
more
confusing
to
the
platte
by
identifying
both
of
them
or
asking
the
developer
to
identify
both
of
them
on
the
plant.
G
J
So
here
in
chapter
2406,
16
for
the
plot
requirements,
we
on
number
12
here
for
properties
within
the
special
flood
hazard
area,
reference,
the
effective
flood
insurance
rate
map
date
and
then
the
community
and
panel
number.
So
as
far
as
our
plot
requirements,
we
are
meeting
ordinance.
The
section
that
the
mayor
is
referencing
is
actually
in
the
chapter
prior
sorry,
so
in
chapter
2405,
19
area
is
subject
to
periodic
inundation
and
then
so
here
is
where
it
states.
J
J
The
only
thing
is
that
this
is
referencing
a
plot,
and
it's
really
not
in
the
plot
requirements
section
and
then
it
is
inconsistent
with
what
we
require
for
platts
and
it
does
state
it
here,
and
I
think
that
as
far
as
boundaries,
it
doesn't
state
boundaries.
Necessarily
it
just
says
that
the
floodplain
shall
be
shown
on
the
plat
and
elevations
must
be
shown
and
elevations
make
it
tough
too,
and
your
floodplain
is
it
it's
always.
J
It's
potentially
always
changing,
because
we
know
with
the
approved
preliminary
plan
for
this
area,
that
they
will
be
bringing
in
phil
and
changing
the
grades
and
then
requesting
a
lomar
f,
which
is
a
letter
of
map
revision
based
on
phil,
and
then
that
does
change
the
floodplain
too.
So
by
showing
the
boundaries
it
really,
it
doesn't
stay
current
with
how
the
map
is
constantly
changing.
A
A
So
not
that
we'd
be
so
concerned
about
this
development,
but
downstream
of
it.
There
could
be
impacts
that
we
don't
know
about,
because
the
analysis
hasn't
been
done
just
for
the
council's
information.
Another
thing
that
you
didn't
mention
was
that
this
developer
is
proposing
to
use
the
city-owned
property
to
meet
the
federally
mandated
water
quality
control
requirements
and,
to
my
knowledge,
we've
never
allowed
that
in
the
past.
So
this
could
be
setting
a
precedence.
A
It's
city
owned
property
and
they're
using
it
so
that
they
don't
have
to
do
the
water
quality
facility
on
their
own
property.
They
don't
have
to
give
up
their
own
land.
They
can
use
the
city
property
for
that
and
the
I
discussed
this
with
the
staff
and
I
think
that
they
addressed
when,
when
you're
using
the
lake
as
the
water
quality
facility,
it's
to
trap
the
pollutants
and
they
should
periodically
be
removed.
A
G
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
for
reminding
me
that
that
was
another
one
of
the
anomalies
here
that
I
know
we
wanted
to
touch
on
the
the
feedback
or
the
discussion
with
staff
and
with
the
developer
in
relation
to
that.
Are
there?
Yes,
there's
city
property
here
with
a
large
body
of
water,
the
developers
designed
in
their
development
to
utilize
that
body
of
water,
for
both
water
quality
and
water
quantity,
detention
means,
and
that
would
then
function
and
serve
all
these
lots
that
are
being
planted
here
being
proposed
to
be
platted
before
the
council
this
evening.
G
When
looking
into
that
further,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that,
if
that
were
approved,
that
the
development
agreement
addressed
the
maintenance
of
that
pond.
Accordingly,
we
do
have
to
still
execute
a
bmp
maintenance
agreement,
best
management
practices,
maintenance
agreement
with
the
developer
and
in
that
agreement,
what
we
would
hope
to
do
is
stipulate
the
developers,
requirements
per
city,
ordinance
language
when
contemplating
regional
detention
ponds.
G
And
when
you
look
at
this,
essentially
that's
what
this
would
be
functioning
at.
So
in
chapter
23
we
we
researched
this
in
our
drainage
ordinances
and
we
do
have
the
option
as
a
city
to
allow
the
use
of
regional
detention
ponds
and
it
talks
in
that
ordinance
about
the
city,
procuring
the
property,
that's
going
to
be
a
regional
pond
and
then
having
stipulations
in
place
for
monetary
contributions
for
the
developers
use
of
that
now,
city
property.
Now,
in
this
case,
we
don't
have
to
buy
anything.
G
We
don't
have
to
have
the
the
developer
dedicate
anything
to
us.
We
already
own
this
property,
but
we
would
still
like
to
follow
that
ordinance
for
regional
detention
requirements
as
far
as
the
monetary
contribution
from
the
developer
to
maintain
that
pond
or
place
those
maintenance
responsibilities
strictly
on
them
in
perpetuity
and
that's
what
we
would
weigh
out
when
we
finalized
the
b
p
maintenance
agreement.
A
A
But
now
we
are
and
the
reason
that
we
don't
in
the
willow
creek
watershed
is
that
detention
in
this
location
exacerbates
the
peak
for
the
basin.
So
it
makes
it
worse.
But
now
we're
saying
we
are
requiring
detention
here,
or
is
that
just
to
call
it
a
regional
pond,
because
we
don't
normally
do
regional
water
quality
facilities?
A
G
G
Correct
that,
as
you
get
further
north-
and
I
believe
it's
just
as
further
north
outside
of
this
plat-
that
basin,
that
sub
basin
drains
to
the
north
pond
and
then
down
through
the
creek
and
and
through
this
area,
okay,
but
it'll-
be
detained
in
that
northerly
pond.
That's
on
that
northerly!
Half
of
this
subdivision.
A
G
A
G
The
as
far
as
the
the
quality
of
the
water
itself,
you
know
that
can
be
addressed
in
the
b
p
maintenance
agreement
or
at
least
acknowledge
that
the
city
wouldn't
have
any
responsibility
in
that,
for
instance,
if
there's
condos
built
next
to
this
pond
area
and
we
get
complaints
from
the
residents
because
there's
a
film
of
green
moss
over
the
pond.
We
obviously
wouldn't
want
to
be
responsible
for
that.
We
wouldn't
want
the
city
forces
to
have
to
pay
to
clean
that
up
or
address
that
issue.
G
J
And
so,
typically,
in
the
december
council
meeting
the
second
meeting
in
december,
the
council
did
state
that
they
were
okay
with
engineering
being
authorized
to
enter
into
those
agreements,
because
they
are
standard
this
one
with
not
being
so
standard
except
it
does.
It
will
comply
with
the
language
in
the
ordinance
of
either
like
the
taxpayers,
won't
be
paying
for
the
maintenance
it'll
either
be
the
developer
or
it'll,
be
assessed
back
to
the
property
owners
that
are
benefiting
from
utilizing
this
property.
A
Okay,
the
township
has
requested
they
expressed
frustration
with
the
city
over
this
development
in
the
past
for
the
extra
traffic
that's
generated
on
the
township
road,
which
is
31st
street
outside
the
city
limits
who's
responsible
for
maintaining
that
township
road
between
this
development
and
highway
212.
Right
now,.
G
According
I
don't
know
in
practice
what's
happening,
but
according
to
the
old
development
agreement
with
the
prior
owner
of
this
land,
they
were
responsible
for
maintaining
31st
street
from
the
extents
of
of
this,
this
area
all
the
way
south
to
highway
212.,
and
that
is
the
information
that
is
the
language
that
we
rolled
into
the
development
agreement.
That's
on
tonight
for
approval.
A
So
the
the
old
language
says
the
developer
agrees
to
maintain
all
public
streets,
including
31st
street,
to
the
highway
212
frontage
road
until
such
time
as
they
are
paved
and
all
required.
Improvements
are
completed
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
city
engineer
and
the
current
language
that
you've
proposed.
Could
you
read
that.
B
Madam
mayor,
if
I
could,
can
the
council
ask
some
questions
on
this
or
thank
you
the
developers
are
here.
How
close
are
you
guys
to
coming
up
with
a
best
practice
agreement?
Have
you
guys
looked
into
that
at
all?
Yet
typically
the
city
writes
it.
So
he
writes
it
okay.
So
if
we're
going
to
look
at
this
and
looking
at
you
know,
we
gave
that
authority
to
the
engineering
staff
here
in
december
I
mean
what
we're
talking
about.
B
Is
them
using
their
judgment
professionally
and
coming
up
with
a
practice
that
is
going
to
do
that?
I
don't
think
it's
up
to
the
city
to
maintain
that
I
would
assume
the
developers
are
in
that
same
agreement
as
well
as
far
as
31st
if
anyone's
drove
31st
recently,
I
don't
know
that
anyone
maintains
it
like
it
should
be.
B
B
D
C
D
E
B
A
D
So
brandi,
could
you
be
kind
enough
just
to
pull
it
up,
so
we
can
compare
those
two
floodplains.
The
concern
I
have
here
is
just
when
we
did
our
core
sample.
We
found
some
and
that's
just
in
one
location,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
ground's
like
here
guys.
It's
it's
nothing
like
beyond
that.
It's
just
I
want
to
know
if
we're
going
to
re
pull
it
out
like
we
are
on
that
other
site
and
then
we're
going
to
put
engineered
fill
in
then
that
you
know
is
reassuring.
G
If
I
could
briefly
just
to
respond
to
the
previous
question
regarding
the
maintenance
of
31st,
this
is
how
it
reads
in
the
proposed
development
agreement,
as
I
have
shared
in
my
screen.
Developer
agrees
to
maintain
31st
street
northeast
to
the
highway
212
frontage
road.
Until
such
a
time,
it
has
improved
to
meet
the
city
standards,
the
satisfaction
of
the
city
engineer-
and
I
believe,
that's
similar
to
what
the
other
one
read
with
exception,
to
a
reference
to
the
city's
standards
that
are
now
adopted.
A
A
Maintaining
until
31st
street
is
improved
to
meet
the
city
standards
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
city
engineer.
I
just
wanted
that
to
be
perfectly
clear
that
that's
what
the
developer
is
signing
the
developer
and
that
runs
with
the
land.
So
whoever
owns
that
land,
the
people
that
buy
the
lots,
including
the
city,
will
have
some
responsibility.
If,
if
we
put
our
ice
arena
up
there
and
we
own
a
portion
of
the
land,
that
would
run
with
those
lots
and
the
condos
and
everybody
else.
J
Add
to
that
sure,
so
I
just
wanted
to
state
that,
as
the
mayor
had
said,
with
that
strong
side
or
strum
south
east
side
edition,
the
sole
access
came
from
31st
street
northeast,
and
so
that's
why.
I
think
it
was
probably
really
important
to
the
township
that
the
maintenance
responsibilities
were
spelled
out
and
because
that
was
the.
If
you
can
trace
that
heath.
Do
you
have
your
screen
shared,
so
they
only
were
utilizing
31st
and
then
alban
avenue
and
nothing
was
improved
to
city
standards.
J
Now
at
least
28th
street
will
be
extended
from
willow
creek
drive,
so
there
will
be
paved
access
to
city
standards
as
the
hopefully
primary
route,
and
then
that
31st
would
end
up
being
secondary
and
that.
But
we
did
just
keep
that
language
that
was
in
that
previous
development
agreement
so
that
it
was
covered.
But
I'm
assuming
that's
why
the
language
was
added
at
that
time.
When
that
first
plat
of
strum
set
the
set
addition
came
through.
A
G
G
I
have
not
gotten
to
review
that
in
great
detail
myself.
I
passed
it
on
the
assistant
city
engineer
and
the
geotech
engineer
that
did
the
report
also
provided
paving
recommendations
and
to
my
knowledge
I
haven't
heard
of
any
red
flags.
Yet
maybe
jamie
or
colin
could
speak
to
this
tonight.
But
to
my
knowledge,
there
weren't
any
huge
red
flags
or
anything
that
they
couldn't
address
through
the
construction
of
the
roadway
and
the
installation
of
the.
H
Utilities
with
you
know
in
detail
with
it
and
we're
definitely
everything's
in
our
comfort
zone.
What
we
can
do
in
you
know
back
to
31st.
We
do
maintain
it
occasionally,
but
you
got
donek
that
shares
that
too,
and
and
utilizes
it
real
heavily.
You
know,
with
their
mining
and
and
asphalt
operations
on
31st.
A
No,
the
whole
thing
and
the
reason
for
that
the
the
township
didn't
have
the
resources
to
maintain
it
when
this
was
originally
planted,
so
they
they
knew.
This
would
generate
traffic.
They
didn't
have
the
resources
to
maintain
it,
and
so
that
was
the
deal
that
was
struck.
He
got
four
building
rights
in
that
property.
That
was
it.
Everybody
had
to
have
sealed
holding
tanks
because
there's
no
sewer
anywhere
near.
A
I
think
there
is
water
out
there,
but
the
township
has
been
very
unhappy
with
the
level
of
maintenance
and
they've
contacted
the
city,
various
different
individuals
numerous
times
throughout
the
years
since
this
was
originally
planted-
and
I
don't
remember
the
year,
but
I'm
thinking
2010ish
2011.
when
the
original
plot
was
recorded.
E
A
So
it's
been
about
eight
to
ten
years,
and
the
township
has
recently
contacted
me
and
told
me
they're
they're,
getting
an
attorney
because
they
feel,
like
the
city,
is
encouraging
development
in
this
area,
with
even
with
an
extra
road
to
get
to
these
properties.
There
still
will
be
people
taking
that
township
road
and
the
level
of
maintenance
on
it
hasn't
been
satisfactory,
they're
responsible
ultimately,
but
they
don't
have
the
resources
there's
two
or
three
culverts,
maybe
even
four,
where
willow
creek
is
and
the
road's
failing
there
a
little
bit.
H
H
Oh,
the
culverts
are
possibly
installing
them
they're
in
pretty
tough
condition
there
right
at
willow,
creek
and
and
we're
willing
to
step
up
and-
and
you
know,
fulfill
our
obligation
as
far
as
what
we
sign
the
developers
agreement
to
maintain
that
and
I'll
have
to
obviously
maybe
pin
a
little
that
on
donek
but
that'll
be
my
own
doings
when
it
comes
to
that
due
to
their
usage
of
it.
Also.
H
J
J
So
they
did
show
the
same
connection
that
now
the
lace
of
willow
creek
is
showing
with
28th.
So
it's
strong
seth
drive,
but
they
were
not
required
to
improve
that
at
the
time
this
plaque
and
development
agreement
were
recorded.
They
were
allowed
four
building
permits
for
these
lots,
but
they
were
using
gravel
streets
like
the
mayor
had
742
the
seal
holding
tanks.
They
do
have
water
up
the
up
here,
but
this
31st
was
their
only
access.
E
G
B
J
Can
you
you
guys
can
see
that
now?
Okay,
perfect?
So
these
are
the
four
lots
that
were
being
planted.
They
showed
the
right-of-way
connection
to
willow
creek
drive,
but
they
were
not
required
to
improve
it.
They
only
were
improving
albin
avenue
to
lot
four
as
a
gravel
street
section,
which
is
definitely
not
to
our
engineering
design
standards.
Today
we
wouldn't
allow
a
plaque
to
come
through,
like
that.
So
then
they
were
having
to
solely
access
31st
street
east.
J
Now
today,
in
the
lakes
of
willow,
creek
28th
street
will
be
improved
to
city
standards
and
we'll
have
the
connection
to
the
city
street
network.
So
hopefully
that
is
the
primary
access
and
that
people
would
not
necessarily
utilize
it.
It's
inevitable
that
they
will,
but
it
won't
be
their
only
access
anymore
off
of
31st
street.
A
A
But
we
do
have
the
boring
logs
for
the
road
that
we
will
be
asked
to
own
and
maintain
correct
and
there's
so
there
are
boring
location,
101
had
seven
feet
of
fill,
boring,
102
had
11
feet
of
fill,
boring,
103
had
11
feet
of
fill,
boring,
104
had
11
and
a
half
feet
of
fill
number
105
had
seven
feet
of
fill
that
that's
pretty
significant
and
I
I'm
getting
a
blank.
I
don't
see
what
106
was,
but
the
I'd
assuming
there's
some
recommendation
of
that.
G
One
thing
to
note,
with
the
depths
they're
they're
going
to
be
installing
some
pretty
significantly
deep
utilities,
which
is
going
to
create
some
pretty
excessive
trench
excavation.
So
the
contractor
will
inherently
be
rebuilding
the
road
from
the
utilities
up
essentially
for
a
good
portion
of
the
roadways.
G
So
if
they
do
run
into
some
questionable
fill
in
those
areas
that
were
cited,
as
you
know,
of
a
significant
depth.
A
lot
of
that
should
be
clearly
identified
and
inherently
addressed
because
of
the
amount
of
trenching
excavation
they're
going
to
need
to
perform
for
the
depths
of
utilities.
That
will
be
installed.
G
Typically,
you
know
you'll
see
your
water
below
frost
line,
so
anything
six
to
eight
feet.
Deep
is
pretty
common
and
then
sanitary.
You
typically
want
to
see
that
just
so
you
can
account
for
an
eight
foot
to
nine
foot
basement.
So
you
see
those
nine
to
ten
feet
deep
now
in
this
area,
we're
up
to
depths
of,
I
guess,
I'd
have
to
have
connor
jamie.
H
H
H
I
mean
we
spent
several
thousands
of
dollars
to
have
these
borings
done
and
and
in
engineering
to
this
point,
so
I
mean
it's,
this
definitely
isn't
a
fly
by
the
seat
of
our
pants
and-
and
we
have
several
hundred
thousand
dollars
invested
this
so
far
to
date.
So
we're
definitely
all
about
doing
it
right.
D
E
A
All
those
opposed
signify
by
saying,
nay
motion
carries
item
j.
Is
approval
of
resolution
number
21-28,
the
platt
of
valley,
view
third
edition
to
the
municipality
of
watertown
in
the
county
of
coddington,
south
dakota
and
authorization
for
the
mayor
to
sign
the
development
agreement
motion
by
manti
second,
by
bueller
and
I'll
ask
keith
bonai
the
public
works
director
to
tell
us
about
this.
Please.
G
G
J
A
No
all
right
I'll
look
for
action,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye
and
you
want
to
post
signify
by
saying,
nay,
motion
carries
for
the
record.
Councilman
roby
was
absent
from
the
vote
item
k
is
approval
of
resolution
number
21-29,
a
resolution
of
intent
to
enter
into
a
two-year
airline
transportation
system,
lease
agreement
with
key
lime,
air
corporation,
doing
business
as
denver
air
connection
who
got
a
motion
by
holine
and
a
second
by
albertson
and
I'll.
Ask
the
city
attorney
matt
roby,
to
explain
this
one.
Please.
F
F
There
will
also
be
a
public
hearing
prior
to
that
action
at
the
july
6
council
meeting,
I
did
just
I
received
an
email
earlier
today
with
a
kind
of
revised
layout,
looks
like
the
actual
number
of
shared
square
feet
of
shared
space
in
the
terminal
will
be
three
3555
rather
than
the
3253
listed
in
the
resolution.
So
I
would
ask
that
you
amend
the
motion
to
include
3555
square
feet
rather
than
3
253
square
feet.
E
A
B
B
F
F
A
D
So
I
brought
it
up
at
the
last
meeting,
but
just
mentioning
the
housing
issue
and
then
going
into
the
potential
of
an
rfp.
So
I
did
some
follow-up
research
on
that,
not
just
for
the
rfp
but
kind
of
for
where
folks
are
at
in
our
community.
I
just
talked
to
some
local
lenders
essentially,
but
what
it
came
down
to-
and
I
ran
a
scenario
essentially
where
it
looks
at
somebody
who's
working
in
like
one
of
our
manufacturers,
so
someone
who's
making,
probably
about
thirty
thousand
a
piece.
D
D
D
If
you're
like
a
lot
of
people
when
you
own
a
vehicle,
then
you're
looking
at
somebody
having
potentially
two
vehicles,
they
own
seven
hundred
dollars
there,
maybe
two
hundred
dollars
in
credit
card
debt.
The
best
you
could
do
is
about
120
000.
So
I'm
just
putting
out
that
information
for
you
guys
as
you
go
forward.
Thinking
about
that
issue
that
we
face
in
our
community
like
many
issues
and
many
communities
face
this,
but
that's
kind
of
your
pocket
demographic.
Looking
at
it.
D
I
learned
that
a
lot
of
people
struggle
just
to
have
the
high
enough
credit
score
these
days,
which
was
a
surprise
to
me.
I
I
didn't
realize
that
that
was
such
an
issue,
but
640
is
what
they
look
for,
and
a
lot
of
people
aren't
hitting
that
for
various
reasons,
but
it's
the
secondary
debt
that
gets
them
and
yeah.
If
you
don't
have
secondary
debt,
you
can
do
200,
but
you're
going
to
be
having
like
a
1700
house
payment
every
month.
D
F
You
just
a
quick
update
on
the
ice.
We
had,
of
course,
a
big
update
a
couple
weeks
ago,
but
we
have
got
dexter
rosberg
working
on
a
number
of
things
for
us
and
he's
been
doing.
Some
research
he's
been
a
very
valuable
resource
because
he
can
do
that
stuff
so
effectively.
So
we're
waiting
to
hear
back
from
him
on
a
couple
of
those
things,
and
also
we
are
he's,
been
doing
some
work
and
we're
going
to
have
some
visits
with
him
about
the
architects
we're
talking
to
so
we're
angling
towards
getting
an
architect
identified.
E
Can
just
comment,
I
think,
we'll
reach
that
when
we
reach
that
point
and
we're
getting
close
to
it,
that
we
do
recommend
an
architectural
firm
to
work,
but
that's
a
that's
a
huge
step
in
this
whole
process.
So
we
are
getting
close
to
that.
But
again,
like
don
said,
dick's
assistance
has
been
invaluable
working
through
this
of
late.
A
A
A
A
A
Correct
right,
that's
people
that
would
take
buy
their
own
whatever's
legal
and
are
and
there's
a
list-
and
I
know
they
know
what
that
is
at
the
places
where
you
buy
fireworks.
They
know
what
our
regulations
are,
and
this
is
really
a
tremendous
service
by
lou's
fireworks
to
offer
this
for
the
city
residents.
Anyone
else
councilman.
B
A
17Th
avenue
southeast
by
premier
softball
complex
the
anza
soccer
complex,
and
there
is
a
public
parking
lot
there.
They'll
have
metal
garbage
cans.
You
don't
want
to
put
hot
stuff
in
plastic,
garbage
cans.
It
doesn't
always
work
out
real
well
and
actually,
I
think
that
lou's
just
had
people
pile
it.
Did
anybody
go
there
last
year
they
pile
it
outside,
I
think,
and
then
they
take
care
of
it.
A
A
E
A
couple
things
in
the
utility
or
a
few
things
in
the
utility
board
new
board
member
rich
thomas
new
president
lisa
carrico,
very
concerned
they're
having
it
they're
having.
I
think
they
have
one
a
couple
years
ago,
another
cyber
security
audit.
That
is
something
that
is
really
a
huge
issue
relative
to
utility
companies
around
the
country
and
ours
is
not
exempt
from
those
problems,
so
they
are
having
a
cyber
security
audit
taking
place
for
their
operations
out
there.
E
Also
they
are
having
a
consultant
work
with
them
and
hopefully,
we'll
have
a
result
back
to
us
by
the
time
we
do
our
budget
later
on
this
summer,
summer
fall
now
concerning
the
transfer
amount,
that's
been
a
you
know.
Every
year
we
we
kind
of
go
back
and
forth
the
utility
department
on
that,
and
they
have
a
consultant
that
has
worked
through
that
for
any
number
of
other
utility
companies
around
the
country
and
they're
engaging
them
to
give
them
some
recommendations
relative
to
arriving
at
a
transfer
amount
to
the
city.
B
B
Hopefully
we
have
served
the
community
as
well
as
they
have
served
us,
because
I
do
believe
that
our
community
is
fantastic
when
it
comes
to
that.
So
I
I
don't
really
have
too
much
else
to
say
besides,
I
just
want
to
thank
each
and
every
one
of
you.
I
become
friends
with
everyone
here
and
respect
everyone
in
this
room,
so
I
thank
you
all
for
all
your
dedication
and
the
people
that
are
continuing
to
go
forward.
B
D
A
I
actually
do
have
a
quorum
of
folks,
okay,
that
will
be
able
to
attend
a
special
council
meeting
at
noon.
On
july
1st,
which
is
a
week
from
thursday,
there
were
two
items
that
didn't
get
published,
and
so
we
couldn't
do
it
on
this
agenda.
I
told
you
all.
It
was
one
item,
but
it's
actually
two
sorry
about
that
sales
should
be
relatively
quick.
I
think
it's
another
finance
thing.
Anyone
else,
councilman
vilhauer.
E
E
There's
there's
eight
people,
including
you
mayor,
getting
off
this
this
diocese
and
that
combines
for
40
adds
up
to
40
years
of
experience
council's
experience
that
we
are
losing
with
those
of
you
that
are
already
partying.
So
as
a
as
a
stay
on
member.
I
I
thank
you
for
your
service
and
I
hope
we
can
do
our
our
justice
going
forward.
F
B
G
B
It's
in
my
ward,
which
is
why
I'm
bringing
it
up-
and
you
know
it's
something-
we
started
way
back
when
we
worked
with
the
downtown
business
owners
to
take
some
of
their
funding
from
the
tax
and
put
it
towards
the
park
and
in
that
period
of
time
from
then
to
now,
we've
done
a
series
of
small
but
significant
steps:
vacations
of
property
transfers
of
property.
Things
like
that
to
get
to
where
we
are
today
and
it's
not
a
swing,
set
and
slide
park.
B
It's
a
park
where
we'll
have
a
city
center,
we'll
be
able
to
put
festivals
concerts.
It's
a
four
season
park,
which
is
amazing
for
me
personally,
I
grew
up
with
really
not
a
lot
of
anything.
We
didn't
have
a
second
car.
We
had
a
house
because
my
grandparents
gave
us
one,
but
my
childhood
is
from
going
to
parks
where
I
could
access
all
of
the
amenities
for
free
and
this
park
is
going
to
be
that
for
us,
the
ice
skating
rink
will
be
there.
B
B
I
worry
about
potholes,
but
when
I
was
a
kid
I
didn't
couldn't
tell
you
if
we
had
potholes
or
not
in
our
community,
but
I
do
remember
going
with
my
mom
and
my
brothers
to
the
parks
and
to
the
you
know
the
amenities
that
we
had
that
were
free.
So
from
near
and
dear
to
my
heart
and
plus,
I
know
that
a
thriving
downtown
also
means
a
thriving
community.
G
I'll
jump
on
the
bandwagon
here,
I
just
want
to
say
it's
been
an
honor
working
with
all
you
folks,
obviously,
the
folks
that
are
staying,
but
certainly
the
ones
that
are
leaving
us
and
I
just
want
to.
I
want
to
say
I
appreciate
all
your
contributions
and
look
forward
to
seeing
some
of
you
on
committees.
I
hope
that
can
help
us
out
with
some
of
these
things,
with
all
of
your
experience
and
you'll
be
missed.
B
Thank
you
mayor.
I
would
just
like
to
thank
the
people.
It's
been
a
great
four
years.
I've
enjoyed
it
very,
very
much.
It's
been
an
enjoy
to
it's
been
a
joy
to
work
with
the
city,
the
mayor,
the
rest
of
the
council,
so
yeah.
It
definitely
should
be
something
everybody
has
to
do,
but
definitely
in
I've
enjoyed
it,
and
I
wish
the
new
council
the
very
best.
D
D
I
always
encourage
people
to
get
out
there
vote
be
involved,
but
you
can
continue
to
do
great
things
even
not
sitting
up
here.
You
can
organize
events.
You
can
come
up
with
charities
that
take
care
of
so
many
people
and
make
such
a
big
impact
in
our
community
and
we'll
continue
to
grow
as
long
as
we
want
to,
and
as
long
as
we
want
to
put
the
work
in
so.
A
Thank
you
and
I'll,
just
reiterate
everything
everybody
said
and
just
add
that
serving
as
mayor
has
really
been
a
highlight
in
my
life.
I've
treasured
every
moment
I
the
memories,
are
going
to
be
fantastic.
It's
it's
a
a
wonderful
thing
for
me
in
my
life
to
have
had
that
experience,
and
I
think
we've
had
just
fantastic
counsel.
A
This
council,
that
I've
worked
with
in
the
last
four
years,
I
think,
is
some
of
the
best
councils
I've
ever
worked
with,
and
I've
been
in
public
administration
for
35
years.
So
this
was
really
great
council
experience
for
me
as
well,
and
I
thank
everybody
and
I
wish
the
new
folks
all
the
best
and
hope
that
it's
also
a
great
experience
for
you.
So
thank
you,
everyone,
and
with
that
we
have
no
reason
to
go
into
executive
session
pursuant
to
sdcl
1-25-2
and
there
being
no
further
business.
I
declare
the
meeting
adjourned.