►
From YouTube: CNB Sub-Team Sync: Learning - 18 Feb 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Are
on
the
sub
team?
Sync:
there
are
no
new
faces,
so
I'm
not
gonna
worry
about
that.
A
There
shouldn't
be
too
many
stale
issues,
but
if
I
filter
by
learning
team
it
turns
out
there
are
there's
more
than
I
thought.
B
B
B
A
Well,
it's
either
that
or
we
decide
to
have
a
a
stale
issue
party
which.
C
Of
these
another
option,
if,
if
I
may
throw
one
out
there,
I
know
in
the
pack
repository
specifically
we're
we're
thinking
about
employing
a
stale
bot
and
we
have
three
tiers,
essentially
no
orders,
one
where
it
would
poke
the
maintainers
after
one
week.
I
think
after
a
few
more
weeks,
maybe
four
it
asks
whether
the
issue
is
still
you
know
relevant,
so
that
that'll
go
both
to
the
author
and
maintainers
and
then,
if
there's
no
response
after
that,
then
it'll
just
basically
close
it
automatically.
C
Two
weeks
later.
So
that's
six
weeks.
C
But
yes,
they
are
tweakable
yeah
yeah,
but
it's
more
or
less
the
idea
of
whether
we
want
to
employ
something
here,
whether
some
of
these
things
do
become
stale
or
at
least
drive
them
to
completion
but
open
to
that.
C
C
C
Yeah,
I
think
we're
gonna
like
respond
to
the
stillbot.
Most
of
them
with,
like
yes,
shut
up
right.
B
C
You
know
people,
individual
organizations
and
very
loosely
defined
from
a
project
perspective,
because
we're
doing
the
same
thing
here
right
and
I
think
it
comes
down
to
the
idea
of
do
people
want
it
or
do
we
want
to
provide
it
right
so
like
for
pack,
the
stillbot
makes
sense,
because
people
are
reporting
something
they're
they're,
the
ones
providing
something
that
says.
Okay,
this
is
a
word
blah
blah
blah
right,
and
then
we
ask
if
it's
irrelevant,
if
they
really
care,
they
would
implement
it
in
in
some
cases
right
on
this
one.
C
C
I
think
the
they're
not
you
know
it's
not
the
same
sort
of
issue
they're
running
across
and
I
don't
know
prioritizing
it
solves
a
pack
issue.
That's
for
sure
right,
but
for
this
one
not
sure
either.
B
A
Okay,
so
we
know,
we've
got
a
problem,
we're
not
getting
through
docs
tasks,
quick
enough,
I'm
gonna
just
try
and
take
one
or
two
over
the
next
week
or
so,
and
and
just
get
them
done.
So
if
you
want
to
just
ping
me
on
slack
with
your
preferred,
I
I
don't
really
mind
I
personally.
A
What
do
you
want
to
tackle
documenting
life
cycle
a
bit
better,
but
that
I
don't
think
is
one
of
the
tasks
here
and
I
don't
want
to
put
another
issue
in
without
having
anything
behind
us.
C
C
So
our
strategy-
I
don't
know
if
we
talked
about
this,
but
as
the
learning
team-
it's
really
just
to
facilitate
other
teams
for
them,
providing
their
documentation
for
the
components
that
they
facilitate
and
and
for
us
it's
really
more
about
just
the
general
like
overarching
items
right
so
like
any
sort
of.
Let's
see
adopters
right,
so
maybe
marketing
is
what
we're
really
focused
on
right,
so
anything
that
has
to
do
with
marketing.
We
would
definitely
do
that.
A
C
C
A
A
A
Well,
that
would
be
interesting
because
we'll
figure
that
out
right
we've
got
an
issue,
there's
a
bunch
of
ways
that
that
we
could
solve
it.
B
Did
we
wait,
have
we
did?
Is
there
a
google
docs
thing
happening
happens
around
now
right?
Do
you
remember.
C
We
have
to
do
it
through
the
cncf
so
I'll
reach
out
to
your
and
see
whether
or
not
they
partake
in
that
yeah
I'll.
Take
that
as
an
action
item.
A
Thank
you
very
much,
so
I
can
put
that
under
here
and
just
say.
A
Yeah
and
if
you
need
somebody
to
help
mentor
that
I
can
I
can,
I
can
help
as
well,
which
is.
C
Good
yeah
I'll
get
more
info
and
then
I'll
relay
the
information
here
and
to
other
teams.
Sweet.
A
There's
an
anonymous
nine
cat,
that's
cool!
Is
that
me
yeah,
I
think
that's
probably,
but
in
terms
of
the
outstanding
issue
about
studying
polls,
this
doesn't
seem.
A
Okay,
let
me
read
this
after
we
get
off
the
call
and
I'll
I'll
just
run
it
to
a
test
and
make
sure
that
it
works
with
the
last
agenda
item,
which
is
the
o7
docs
bump,
because
we've
now
bumped
things
to
supporting
o7
api
on
the
the
the
build
pack
author's
guide
and
the
catacota
stuff.
B
A
Okay
yeah,
given
that
I've
I've
made
a
bunch
of
suggestions
to
it.
Maybe
I'll
just
is
anthony
unable
to
finish
this.
Is
that
it
yes
correct?
Yes,
okay,
cool
I'll
I'll
I'll.
Do
that?
That's
four
five!
Seven.
A
I'll
get
that
one
done
and
I'll
probably
end
up
changing
it
to
software
build
materials.
I
I
know
the
structured
build
materials
was
what
we
preferred,
but.
B
A
Cool
okay,
I'll
sort
that
out
that's
in
anthony's
fork,
so
I'll
I'll
I'll
fork
his
fork
into
a
branch
and
we'll
sort
it
all
out.
You.
B
B
A
Will
do
so
that
leaves
us
with
one
last
lpr,
which
is
the
update
teams.
That's
been
approved.
B
A
So
probably
have
them
alphabetical.
This
looks
like
it
puts
them
alphabetical.
A
Yeah,
thank
you
yeah.
If
you
want
to
push
that
change,
then
I'll
I'll
merge
it
and
that
will
be
the
third
of
our
stale,
pure
actually
dealt
with,
which
is
good
okay.
So
we
we've
got
ways.
A
A
Yeah,
then,
other
than
that
it's
we
did
bump
the
docks
to
matching
0.7
release.
So
the
docks
now
actually
create
an
s-bomb
at
the
end
and
allow
you
to
download
the
s-bomb
correctly
to
your
device
of
choice,
which
is
kind
of
nice,
and
that
just
means
that
we're
actually
demoing.
I
think
one
of
the
kind
of
fairly
serious
features
that
you
get
for
free
with
buildbacks,
which
is
kind
of
cool.
C
A
Cool
yeah
anything
else
that
needs
to
be
discussed,
not.
B
One
agenda
item
which
was
called
craigly:
badges,
credly
badges.
Yes,
so
I've
seen
other
cncf
projects
do
this.
They
issue
a
badge
to
their
contributors
and
maintainers.
B
It's
just
like
something
nice
for
them
to
share
it's
more
of
a
marketing
thing
than
anything
cool,
but
it's
it's
always
nice
and
so
cradley
requires,
like
some
paid
account
to
create
badges
and
issue
them.
But
cncf
will
do
that
for
us,
so
we
can.
We
can
create
back
contributor
and
build
back,
maintain
your
badges
and
issue
them
to
people.
If
you
want
the
contributor
one,
I
think
would
be
more
useful
than
to
maintain
the
one
because
to
at
least
help
get
people
into
the
project.
B
First
and
I,
as
I've
seen.
Contributors
are
more
excited
about
this.
C
Could
I
ask
a
question:
can
you
point
me
to
a
project
or
some
idea
on
how
these
are
used
like?
Where
are
they.
B
A
C
A
B
C
So
they
have
what's
this
called
the
kyverno,
they
have
another
badge
for
fundamentals:
yeah
is
earned
like
it
has
the
earning
criteria.
B
Yeah,
so
you
can,
you
can
do
a
couple
of
things
you
can.
One
like
craigly
is
just
a
simple
badge
profile,
verification
thing
where,
if
you
complete
a
course
for
example,
you
can
get
a
badge
or
you
get
an
achievement.
You
gave
a
talk
at
a
conference
like
kubecon
hands
or
friendly
badges.
If
you've,
given
a
talk
at
cubecon,
for
example,
or.
B
You
can
ask
for
one,
but
you
can
you
can
get
badges
for
speaking
at
conferences.
You
can
get
badges
for
completing
a
course.
You
can
get
badges
for
making
a
contribution
to
an
open
source
project.
Wow.
B
No
idea
what
it
uses
it's,
a
it's,
a
it's
a
company
rightly
is
a
company
that
a
bunch
of
open
source,
orgs
use,
so
cncf
has
an
enterprise
account
with
them,
which
allows
them
to
issue
badges
and,
like
you
know
how
you
have
those
cka
trainings
like
cpi,
cks
and
so
on.
They
also
issue
a
credly
badge
and
certificate
for
that.
Okay,
so
we
can
also
create
like
a
training
course,
for
example,
for
buildbacks,
and
if
you
pass
that
you
can
get
a
batch,
but
I
thought
this
would
be
easier.
B
C
A
Okay,
can
we
one
of
the
older
holy
grails
of
online
learning
was
to
be
able
to
hand
out
badges
at
the
end
of
courses?
Could
we
can
we
help
catacota
into
it?.
B
Yeah
so
like
they
need
stronger
guarantees
for
that,
like
if
most
of
the
cncf
projects
that
hand
out
badges
for
examinations
needed
to
be
certified
in
a
certain
way
to
make
sure
you're,
not
cheating
or
anything.
So
like
that,
kibo
no
batch
that
you
just
saw
for
like
fundamentals.
That's
like
a
course
that
you
have
to
take
and
it
gives
you
a
certificate
in
the
badge
for
kubernetes.
B
C
B
C
Code,
the
linux
foundation
mentorship
basically
any
leadership
program
and
contributor
status
yeah
and
maintain
it.
Yes,
those
would
be
good
and
they're.
I
assume
they're
low
hanging
through
right,
because
at
that
point,
there's
a
way
to
verify
that
that's
very
strict
and
the
only
other
thing
would
be
the
design.
How
do
we
go
about
the
designing
of
the
badges.
B
So
I
think
so
once
we
have
that
what
we'll
get
as
a
maintainer
is
the
ability
to
issue
badges
given
an
email
address,
so
whoever
the
contributor
is,
we
can
ask
them
if
they'd
like
a
badge
and
give
us
their
email
address,
we'll
send
it
to
them.
They
can
then
choose
to
accept
it
or
not.
If
they
choose
to
accept
it,
then
they
can
add
it
whatever
they
want,
like
conflict
or
linkedin
or
their
credly
page.
A
Cool,
so
do
you
want
to
talk
to
cncf
about
that
or.
B
C
B
C
Like
to
give
some
to
some
of
our
devex
people
and
other
people
like
cora,
he's
done
a
lot
of
talks
for
us
yeah.
I
would
definitely
want
to
give
her
a
badge.
B
A
Well,
that's
cool
nice
idea
and
it's
cheap
as
java
says
it's
a
low
hanging
fruit.
So
why
not
cool
it
sounds
like
we've.
We've
made
some
progress
on
things
whilst
still
remarking
that
there's
a
bunch
of
stale
issues.
A
A
Fantastic,
so
I
don't
think
we
need
to
stay
around
for
much
longer
unless
you
want
to
just
chat
and
turn
off
the
stream,
and
we
are
done.
Thank
you
very
much.
Everyone.