►
From YouTube: CNB Sub-Team Sync: Learning - 4 March 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
There
are
a
few
things:
we've
got
our
standing
items,
but
I
might
just
move
to
those
after
we
go
through
and
just
catch
up
on
the
things
that
we're
talking
about
last
time,
just
for
fun,
javier
any
updates
on
the
season
of
doc
stuff
from
the
cncf.
B
Yeah,
basically,
they
just
gave
us
a
standby.
I
haven't
heard
back
from
that.
I
think
steven
also
cut
wind
of
it.
So
we're
definitely
it's
in
our
crosshairs,
but
I
don't
think
we
have
anything
officially
to
get
started.
Am
I
wrong
son.
C
We
got
an
email
yesterday
from
cncf.
Are
you
subscribed
to
the
cncf
maintainers
list.
B
I
should
be
yes
yesterday
is
that
my
time
zone
or
yours,
yours
as
well,
I
think.
C
But
cncf,
so
it
was
sort
of
weird
they.
They
said
please
reply
back
if
you're
interested
in
participating
under
the
cncf
umbrella
or
just
like,
fill
out
the
form
as
an
individual
project,
and
I
replied
back
to
them
and
they
just
said,
go
and
fill
out
the
form
I
was.
I
was
hoping
a
bit
more
details
and
go
and
fill
out
the
form
I
was
like
if
there's
anything
specific.
C
If
you
want
to
do
this
under
the
cncf
umbrella,
rather
than
proposing
billbacks
as
its
own
top-level
project,
but
yeah
the
if
we
propose
build
packs
as
the
top
level
like
project
that
our
technical
writers
will
apply
to,
then
we
have
to
fill
out
like
the
project
proposal
plan.
B
B
So
that's
interesting,
but
I
do
wonder
if
maybe
they're
just
trying
to
minimize
the
work
on
their
side.
Yeah.
C
Actually
so
this
that
I
guess
we
I
I
wanted
to
discuss
it
in
the
meeting
today
whether
we
want
to
apply
as
a
project
or
should
I
just
bug
cncf
folks
again
if
we
can
apply
under
their
umbrella,
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
preference,
we
have.
B
B
Okay,
so
I
definitely
don't
mind,
at
least
I
guess
that's.
The
other
thing
too
is
like.
Are
we
talking
like
per
project
as
a
build
pack
project
as
a
whole,
or
is
it
a
project
like
the
gsoc
project,
where
it's
like
a
small
unit
of
work?
B
I
would
maybe
assume
the
letter
so
that
we
could
have
like.
I
think
that
would
be
a
preference
right
if
we
could
have
multiple
small
units
of
work
that
we
could
propose
as
projects
more
or
less.
C
C
So
there
are
a
few
example
project
ideas
that
google
has
put
in
here,
so
they
create
a
contribution
guide
or
write
tutorials
for
a
library
or
reorganized
documentation
like
similar
to
do
you
remember
that
the
organization
guy
that
natalie
shared
a
while
level,
which
was
like
four
corners
like
tutorials
reference
and
forgetting
the
exact
name
of
that
guide,
but
yeah.
I
want
to
organize
our
tutorials
in
that
fashion.
C
We
can
have
someone
do
like
an
audit
of
things
that
are
incorrect
or
out
of
date
and
fix
those
the
I
think
the
only
restriction
is
that
it
has
to
be
documentation
related.
It
cannot
be
a
tool
that
you
create
right,
more
documentation
as
far
as
I
understand
so
it
can't
be
like
a
lost
like
it
can't
be
like
implement
that
katakuri
order,
generator
thing
that
we
did
like.
That's
not
yeah.
That
won't
be
a
part
of
this,
but
we
can
be
like
write
more
cards
of
color
tutorials.
C
B
Yeah,
it
definitely
seems
interesting
and
I
guess
what
is
the?
What
is
the
current
ask?
Is
it
like
hey?
Do
we
want
to
take
or
leverage
this
and
if
so,
how
do
we
strategize
or
is
it
just
more
like
announcing
hey?
This
thing
exists?
B
Yeah,
no,
I
was
thinking
more
on
our
side
like
on
the
build
pack
side
right
like
what
do
we
want
to
do
internally?
Do
we
have
like
a
single
point
of
contact
that
sort
of
manages
everything
similar
to
how
the
cncf
works
right,
like
eor
typically,
would
be
the
point
of
contact
for
anything
g-shock
related?
B
Do
you
want
to
kind
of
do
that
internally,
so
that
anything
season
of
docs
related
goes
to
either
myself
or
or
you,
sam
or
whoever
wants
to
volunteer
for
that
right,
they're
kind
of
more
or
less
helping
the
people,
like
other
people
that
might
actually
have
project
ideas,
but
not
be
burdened
by
the
whole
process.
C
C
B
C
It
can
help
facilitate,
if,
like
someone
else
wants
to,
if
it's
just
like
the
the
form,
links
and
everything
else
will
be
public,
so
if
it's
just
making
sure
that
they
can
communicate
with
cncf
folks,
if
you
want
to
go
to
cncf
road,
we
can
do
that.
If
we're
just
directly
applying,
then
we
can
cut
out
the
middle
one.
In
that
case,
anyone
can
fill
that
form.
B
Yeah,
I
guess
I
was
wondering
if,
if
maybe
I'll
do
these
this
for
a
set
of
individuals,
I'm
thinking
more
specifically
the
team
at
vmware,
I
could
be
the
point
person
and
organize,
be
like
oh
hey.
What
are
your
doc
ideas
kind
of
again
do
the
same
thing
that
ncf
does
for
us
for
gsoc,
where
it's
like,
hey,
just
literally
put
this
information
in
this
format,
I'll
go
and
and
I'll
apply
for
us
and
then
I'll
give
you
the
access
when
what
to
what's
necessary,
you
still
do
all
the
candidate.
B
C
B
And
I
don't
think
anybody
on
our
team
right
now
is
focused
on
that
right,
and
so
just
I
don't
know
how
transparent
we've
been,
but
on
our
my
on
the
team
I'm
on
it
would
be
myself.
Natalie,
juan
mikey
and
yellow
just
came
back
right,
so
emily's,
not
part
of
it
and
the
k-pac
group
is,
you
know
a
separate
team
altogether.
B
A
Cool
okay,
so
you're
going
to
ask
for
ideas
in
internally
in
in
your
house
about
ideas
for
the
for
documentation
projects
and
we're
going
to
ask
in
our
house
for
ideas
on
documentation
projects
as
well
and
we'll
we'll
talk
and
on.
A
That
that
that
sounds
good,
some
above
credly
badges.
C
There
there
was
a
period
of
time
in
the
last
week
or
so
where
the
services
tickets
were
a
bit
like
inactive.
I
think
they
found
appropriate
replacements
now.
So
that's
fine.
A
A
Cool
sounds
good.
Blue,
I
think,
is
good
as
a
design,
input,
purple
or
pink.
A
Then
I
put
this
last
one
on
I've
been
playing
around
with
taking
the
shell
script,
ruby
build
pack
and
rewriting
it
in
libcnb,
because
we've
had
requests
for
that
and
I've
written
some
of
the
documentation
I
haven't
pushed
to
pr
yet
because
I
don't
want
to
push
a
pr
with
my
personal
github
module
name,
my
name
in
the
github
modules
and
stuff
like
that.
So
is
there
somewhere.
I
should
plonk
this
code
or.
C
B
C
I
think
what
we
discussed
this
in
one
of
the
past
back
meetings.
The
idea
was,
if
you
are
creating
an
end-to-end
buildback,
you
should
go
into
samples
positively
if
you're
creating
examples
of
how
to
do
one
thing.
So
you
remember
how.
Last
time
we
talked
about
the
app
developer
gate,
having
like
individual
things
like
just
do
this?
Do
this
do
this?
B
Okay,
yeah
so
I'll,
throw
in
my
little
tidbit
of
what
I
recently
ran
into
is.
I
did
want
to
create
a
build
pack
myself
for
some
some
something
and
I
really
wanted
to
use
go,
but
I
really
couldn't
get
any
like
idea.
C
B
How
to
use
lip
cmd
and
so
for
me
right
as
the
very
simple-minded
person
being
able
to
go
like
the
samples,
repo
and
just
being
able
to
take
that
as
kind
of
like
scaffolding
and
then
make
modifications
to
what
I
needed
to
do.
I
think
would
have
eased
a
lot
of
that
workflow
workflow.
A
C
C
But
if,
let's
say
the
potato
folks
want
a
potato
specific
scaffolding
tool
and
yeah
repository
impact
or
like
the
google
folks,
want
something
for
the
google
buildbacks
or
the
heroku
folks
point
one
for
rust,
like
we
don't
want
to
be
maintaining
all
of
those
no
impact,
but
we
we
still
want
to
be.
We
still
want
to
allow
back
to
be
able
to
scaffold
buildbacks
somehow.
A
Okay,
I
will
look
into
that
because
it
would
seem
to
make
sense
that
whatever
we
have
in
the
hello
world,
documentation
should
align
whatever
intending
to
put
into
a
scaffolding.
In
impact
and
yeah
I
mean
it
seems
like
the
picketto
project
structure
without
the
use
of
libpack.
It
is
a
reasonable
project
structure.
A
I
know
the
only
differences
that,
in
turn
that
another
build
packs
that
I've
worked
on.
We
don't
use
the
the
biketo
build
system,
because
that
just
is
a
little
bit
crazy,
yeah
and
yeah.
If
we
just
for,
for
example,
code
in
a
tutorial,
we
we
only
need
to
be
able
to
go,
build
and
go
run
test
or
just
go
build
frankly.
We've,
because
if
we
remove
the
test
problem
from
it,
because
I
know
there's
no
agreement
yet
over
what
test
framework
should
be
pushed.
B
Yeah
and
and
then
yeah
to
sam's
point
right
being
able
to
select
from
any
sort
of
scaffolding
source.
That
would
be.
A
That
just
removes
the
the
the
appearance
of
bias
from
pack.
Okay,
that
sounds
good.
A
Okay,
I'll
have
a
look
into
that
and
we'll
yeah
that
that
that's
a
better
approach,
fantastic,
some.
B
B
B
C
A
Interesting,
yes,
I
I
have
not
yet
found
a
project
management
strategy
that
works.
A
B
C
A
It
should
be
a
discussion-
it's
just
probably
not
a
discussion
for
today,
because
we've
got
two
minutes
and
at
least
we
need
to
periodically
revisit
them.
I
would
think
because
otherwise,
stale
pures
will
get
even
more
stale
than
one
another.
A
B
B
April
first
week
or
something
oh
wow,
okay,
we've
got
more
accident
time.
The
I'm
going
to
california
one
week
disneyland,
so
I'm
gonna
try
to
make
the
best
out
of
it.
I
don't
know
that
I'll
be
as
happy
you're.
A
True,
true,
okay,
cool
well
have
a
good
fun
in
in
disneyland
in
india.
What
california?
You
said,
I
thought
it
was
in
florida.
B
A
Yeah
all
right
well
I'll,
see
you
in
two
weeks
then
have
you
and
have
fun
and
I'll
see
samba
in
about
30
minutes
all
right.