►
From YouTube: CNCF SIG Contributor Strategy 2021-02-25
Description
CNCF SIG Contributor Strategy 2021-02-25
A
A
A
Okay,
now
I
hope
it's
better
how's
that
sound
yeah.
Now
I
don't
know
it
happens,
the
third
time
it's
happening.
It's
like
this
metallic
kind
of
voice,
and
first
I
thought
it
was
the
other
person's
connection
yeah
and
then
everyone
said
no.
I
hear
everyone
fine
and
then
I
just
log
in
and
out
again
and
it's
fine.
A
B
Yeah
we
didn't
get
so
much
where
I
live.
There
we
go.
We
got
a
little
bit
which
to
be
fair,
is
kind
of
a
big
snowstorm
for
the
uk
because
we
just
don't
we
don't
get
much
snow.
So
it's
super
exciting,
so
we
got
any
snow
at
all
and
it
actually
stuck
around
for
a
couple
of
days,
which
is
super
unusual,
but
it's
it's
actually
a
little
better
right.
Now
it's
been
like
it's
been,
like,
I
don't
know
like
eleven
twelve
degrees.
So
what
so.
A
C
A
A
D
D
B
D
E
D
E
D
D
B
D
B
B
D
F
G
D
A
I
I
definitely
am
aware,
I
believe,
of
most
of
you
just
from
having
seen
your
activities
with
the
cncf.
My
name
is
anita.
I
work
for
a
small
company
called
rxm,
we're
a
cloud
native
training
and
consulting
firm,
and
we
usually
like
to
try
to
hop
in
as
many
cncf
meetings
as
possible
just
to
keep
up
with
the
cloud
native
space
and
check
out
what's
going
on,
so
I'm
really
here
more
of
as
an
observer
just
to
see
you
know
the
work
that
you
guys
are
doing
and
trying
to
inform
my
team.
D
B
F
C
C
A
A
D
C
C
C
Oh,
my
gosh,
I
am
100
with
you
on
that
I'd.
Much
rather
merge
it
and
then
have
other
people
who
have
ideas
and
edits
submit
their
own
pr
on
top
and
having
one
person
try
to
coordinate
and
synthesize
a
bunch
of
feedback
into
text.
Yeah,
it's
not
fun.
Let's
not
ask
people
to
do
that,
so
I
definitely
like
to
merge
stuff
sooner.
F
C
No,
it's
the
other
way
around
cncf
contribute
needs
to
get
merged
first,
and
then
we
can
merge
the
other
one.
Okay,
because
it
it
references
it.
The
main
website
that
actually
does
the
build
is
in
our
repository
and
just
some
content
is
in
cncf
contribute,
but
the
content
needs
to
be
in
the
right
directory
structure.
That's
why
we
need
that
first,
gotcha,
cool
cool.
D
D
D
D
D
Yeah
so
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
going
to
be
the
way
to
go,
is
just
go
ahead
and
put
a
meeting
on
this
calendar
and
call
it
merging
new
contributor
site,
because
because
the
problem
is,
you
can't
really
do
this
asynchronously,
because
if
you
merge
the
stuff
in
the
contribute
repo
and
then
don't
merge
the
other
stuff
for
24
hours,
I
mean
mind
you.
Nobody
really
uses
the
current
contribute
site.
So,
even
if
it
was
down
for
24
hours,
I'm
not
convinced
anyone
would
notice.
C
D
F
D
And
the
yeah
and
and
then
we'll
be
good,
and
then
we
can
start
adding
more
things,
because
sad
already
gave
a
thumbs
up
on
subprojects
template,
although
I
still
have
pending
edits
from
dawn
on
that,
so
the
and
so
won't
be
merging
that
quite
yet.
But
it's
it's
technically
approved
because
the
edits
are
small
wording
things.
It's
not
anything
that
needs
reapproval
by
our
liaison,
speaking
of
which
we
should
do
some
kind
of
meeting
with
the
liaisons,
because
we
have
a
new
liaison.
D
D
D
G
D
D
C
C
F
C
D
H
B
H
G
D
H
F
There
is
a
language,
workstream,
marketing,
comms
pr
work
stream
and
a
community
and
tooling
community
and
tooling
work
stream,
which
is
somewhat
analogous
to
like
kubernetes,
sig,
contributor
experience
or
or
us
right.
The
contributor
strategy
so
intake
discussing
different
tools.
The
reason
I
mention
these
work
streams
is
the
the
oss
work
stream
is
kicking
off
next
week
and
if
anyone
is
interested,
I
felt
it
would
be
a
be
a
good
meeting
to
talk
about.
If
y'all
are
interested
in
hanging
out.
F
I
sent
a
note
out
to
the
the
mailing
list,
as
well
as
the
slack
channels.
So
if
you
want
to
come,
hang
out
with
us
the
there's
a
link
in
the
meeting
notes
that
will
lead
you
to
a
mailing
list
thread
which
will
lead
you
to
a
doodle
poll
that
you
can
vote
on
and
choose
your
time
and
I'll
send
out
invites
for
that
going
into
the
next
week
and
don.
I
know
you
had
a
comment
about
the
times
it's
hard
times.
Those
are
hard
times.
D
B
E
B
E
B
F
The
difference
between
the
two
since
this
has
come
up
before
is
that
community
and
tooling
is
kind
of
intended
as
the
intake,
whether
it
be
bringing
in
new
contributors
to
the
initiative
or
discussing
tools
that
people
have
made
and
they
may
want
to
donate
or
they
may
want
us
to
integrate
into
the
overall
initiative,
whereas
the
oss
side
is
more
about
think
governance
working
group
right
so
think,
like
I
want
to
execute
this
within
my
open
source
project.
I
don't
know
how
to
get
started.
F
F
Fill
out
the
doodle
absolutely
fill
out
the
doodle.
There
is
no
attendance
requirement
really.
Whenever
I
do
doodles,
I
you
know
it's.
The
people
that
have
to
be
in
the
room
are
get
priority
choice
and
then
everything
else
is
like
it's.
It's
like
for
the
most
part,
I'm
going
to
try
to
get
as
many
people
in
the
room
as
possible,
but
yeah,
hopefully,
hopefully
they'll,
be
a
convenient
time
for
you.
Thanks
that
helps
I'll
show
up
there.
F
F
I
think
it's
brow
based
proud,
plus
slack
equals
fun
and
then
from
the
at
least
from
the
red
hat
side.
I
know
that
I
know
that
jason
jason
brooks
is
one
of
the
the
leaders
here
and
then
there's
also,
I
know
carson
is
getting
involved
too.
So
carson's
going
to
be
hanging
out
both
on
the
the
oss
and
probably
the
language
work.
H
Yes,
so
the
march
11th
event
will
be
focused
on
values
and
principles,
development
again,
sarah's
speaking,
I
work
at
microsoft,
so
I
don't
know.
I
guess
I
need
some
help.
Looking
for
another
seeker,
I'm
not
totally
sure
what
her
exact
topic
will
be
within
that
theme,
but
I
will
check
in
with
sarah
just
to
make
sure
we
don't
overlap
with
anything.
But
if
anyone
has
any
leads
for
speakers
on
this
topic,
please
let
me
know
you
say
we
need
two
speakers
for
this
topic.
C
H
D
Okay,
so
there's
a
couple
other
items
on
the
agenda
and
I
don't
know
who
added
them
so
whoever
it
is,
if
you
can
speak
up
and
and
take
this
is
meta
group
and
take
control
of
that.
If
paris
added
those,
then
we'll
just
wait
for
paris
to
join
in
about
four
or
five
minutes
the
and
for
me
to
leave
so
I'll
find
out
what
they
are
later
so
otherwise.
C
E
D
D
D
D
F
F
H
I
I
did
put
like
a
bullet
point
for
project
manager
because
originally
when
I
was
doing
this,
I
had
a
maintainer
section
and
then
I
broke
it
down
into
like
other
suggestions
of
like
community
meeting
or
project
maintainer
release
manager,
docs
manager.
So
there
is
a
section
you
could
tuck
under.
If
you
wanted
to
specifically
call
out
project
manager
under
maintainer,
does
that
make
sense
drop
josh
yeah?
Can
you
hear
the
link
and
then
we'll
take
a
look.
F
We
just
become
like
the
the
like
the
funnel
of
last
resort
kind
of
thing,
so
I
think
that
you
know
I
think
that
definitely
kubernetes
we're
seeing
some
of
this
strain,
whether
it
be
across
like
having
to
review
technical
prs,
but
also
doing
you
know
also
like
building
a
roadmap
for
a
sig
right,
and
these
are
not
necessarily
tasks
that
need
to
be
done
by
just
one
set
of
people.
I
think
the
program
manager
role
has
been
super
useful
to
me.
F
Definitely
to
have
a
little
bit
more
clarity
on
thinking
about
technical
strategy,
as
opposed
to
you
know,
maybe
maybe
like
setting
up
project
words,
which
is
still
a
thing
I
I
do
and
it's
not
necessarily
like
supposed
to
be
relegated
to
to
any
one
role,
but
there
are
some
things
that
there
are.
There
are
some
extra
things
that
we
we
have
while
we're
holding
the
hat
like
while
we're
wearing
the
hat.
It's
like
do
all
these
things
and
then
it
definitely.
F
F
Yes,
we
need
more,
so
I
mean
the
the
big
thing
about
it
too.
Is
that
you
know,
while
we
had
while
we
had
sig
pm,
you
know,
sing
pm
was
definitely
a
thing
that
you
know
was
towards
the
end.
It
was
just
kind
of
dragging
it
by
its
feet.
Come
on
we're
gonna
do
we're
gonna
do
pxm
type
stuff,
but
I
am
not
I'm
not
a
trained
p
anything
and
the
the
people
who
are
interested
in
this
like
it
did
not
have
enough
of
a
framework.
F
It
was
not
listed
as
a
role
that
you
could
do
so
I
think
just
the
fact
that
it
is
on
paper
somewhere
for
a
project.
Has
the
potential
to
drive
drive
new
contributions
right?
We
have.
We
have
a
bunch
of
product
program,
project
managers
in
kubernetes
that
don't
know
where
to
jump
in,
because
it
is
it's
not
a
named
role
right.
So.
F
C
C
C
A
A
C
C
I
Yeah
I
put
a
lot
of
stuff
on
here.
Sorry,
I
was
in
another
meeting.
The
meta
group
stuff
was
that
I
need
to
or
we
need
to
update
the
charter
with
a
new
roadmap
and
the
graduation
requirements
for
the
guidance,
and
I
think
maybe
what
you
all
were
just
talking
about.
I'm
not
sure
I
just
came
in
and
the
guidance
would
be
what
we
discussed
in
the
last
couple
of
meetings
where
saad
needs
to
approve
and
then
and
then
the
toc
needs
to
approve.
I
So
that
needs
to
go
in.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
has
comments
on
that,
but
let's
collect
some
new
road
map
items
as
well,
since
we've
completed
a
lot
of
what's
on
the
roadmap
currently,
so
it
would
be
good
if
the
working
group
leads
for
each
one
kind
of
gave,
maybe
like
a
little
ambiguous
blurb
about
you,
know
what
we're
gonna
do
in
2021
and
kind
of
like
what
we
have
in
there
now.
I
I
F
I
I
mean
I
think
he
left
com.
I
saw
some
comments
come
through,
so
I
think
there's
comments
like
around
town,
so
we
just
need
to
figure
out
at
this
point
a
way
to
get
better
with
tracking.
What's
approved
versus.
Not
I
don't
know
if
that's
just
like
an
issue
or
a
spreadsheet
or
or
what
because
like
right
now
we're
just
doing
we're
actually
doing
back
approvals
on
stuff,
that's
already
been
merged.
F
I
F
F
F
F
Nope,
cool
cool,
cool
paris
for
you,
we
had
talked
about
the
maintainer
circle
stuff
and
I
think
for
the
group
we're
so
yeah
karen's
question
was,
you
know,
do
we
need
another
speaker
and
I
think
a
few
of
us
are
like
sarah's-
probably
enough
for
for
the
session
and
we
usually
go
over
anyway.
So
I
think
we're
should
we
add
that
to
guidance
or
does
the
guidance
explicitly
state
that.
I
The
guidance,
no,
the
guidance
says
that
it
should
be
too
but
well.
The
idea
is
that
it's
supposed
to
be
science
and
then
relatable
so
like
that's
why
it
was
supposed
to
be
two,
but
in
the
case
where
sarah
has
been
a
maintainer,
you
know
I.
I
would
say
that
that's
fine,
but
the
guidance
just
says
to
try
for
two
in
that
case,
where
it's
the
science
and
then
the
relatable
but
yeah
it's
just.
It
just
says
that
as
guidance,
it
doesn't
say
required.
So
that's
totally
fine.