►
From YouTube: GitOpsCon CFP Committee Meeting 20210420
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Before
we
actually
jump
in,
I'm
gonna
hijack
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
to
share.
If,
if
anybody
needs
needed
to
know
that
there
was
a
little
bit
of
an
issue
with
the
form
where
people
who
submitted
their
talks
were
able
to
see
the
submissions
before
them,
which
included
some
personal
information,
I
mean
it's
email
address
name
and
those
kinds
of
things.
So
I
think
leonardo
did
you
send
out
the
communication.
Do
you
want
to
give
the
update
on
that.
B
Yeah
every
every
cfp
submitter,
which
would
have
been
the
ones
that
were
exposed
to
this
exposure,
have
been
notified.
We
have
not
received
any
follow-ups,
so,
yes,
everybody's
been
notified.
The
personal
information
that
may
have
been
seen
by
third
parties
is
email,
pronouns
and
full
name,
and
it.
C
C
A
We,
I
added
an
item
just
to
review
submissions.
Just
in
terms
of
like
how
many
have
we
received.
Are
we
happy
with
the
number
or
do
we
need
to
get
out
and
post
more
that
kind
of
thing?
But
before
we
get
to
that
christian,
you
have
a
hop-in
information
update.
E
Yeah
so
real
quick,
we
had
oh
sorry
by
we
I
mean
chris
short
and
I
had
a
crash,
a
crash
course
with
hop-in,
since
neither
of
us
had
used
the
platform
before
very
trashy,
very
crashy,
very
coursey,
but
so
a
few
things
that
that
came
out
of
that
one.
It
seems
like
simple
right.
It
doesn't
seem.
F
E
Overly
complex,
but
one
of
the
things
that
came
out
of
that
was
that
we,
in
terms
of
the
actual
day
itself,
we
found
that
it
may
be
easier
to
put
all
the
recorded
stuff
at
the
end.
So
if
there
are
basically
do
all
the
live
stuff
up
front
and
then
do
all
the
re
so
like
the
lightning
talks
are
going
to
be
recorded
so
that
that
makes
sense
that
that's
at
the
end.
E
But
if
you
have
any
30
minute
sessions
that
are
recorded
to
put
those
towards
the
end,
so
that
way,
it
just
makes
it
easier
to
hop
in
to
you
know
that,
so
that
way,
there's
no
mistakes
in
in
swapping
in
and
out
it
just
it
just
makes
it
a
lot
easier
in
terms
of
the
the
actual
event
itself.
So
chris,
I
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
else.
I
think
that
that
was
a
big
takeaway.
G
And
the
technical
limitation
here
for
those
that
are
curious
for
that,
like
you,
have
to
have
a
single
source
to
pull
the
videos
from
and
those
sources
could
be
like
youtube
or
vimeo
or
whatever,
and
it's
much
easier
to
kind
of
just
let
a
player
look
play
list
role
than
it
is
to
be
like
just
this
video.
Now
this
person
just
this
video
now
this
person
right
so
that's
kind
of
the
technical
limitation
we're
dealing
with
right,
the
videos
don't
actually
land
and
hop
in
they
land
elsewhere
and
you
stream
them
from
that
service.
E
Anyway,
so
as
as
we're
finalizing
the
agenda,
if
no
matter
which
way
we
go
right,
let's
just
I
think
we
should
keep
in
mind
that
it
just
makes
it
a
lot
easier
for
the
event.
If
we
put,
you
know
shove
everything
in
terms
of
scheduling
towards
all
the
recorded
stuff
at
the
end,
so.
A
A
Great
and
and
christian
chris,
your
our
resources
to
help
manage
that.
E
A
Great
awesome
cool
sounds
good
and
then
you
added
slotting
talks.
A
E
I
added
it
for
him.
He
started
a
conversation
on
on
the
slack
and
I
basically
just
bring
that
conversation
over
here.
So,
okay.
A
Does
that
make
sense
to
shalom?
Do
you
want
to
reiterate
that,
or
should
we
do
a
review
of
what
the
submissions
have
been
just
in
terms
of
volume
and
stuff?
First.
C
We
can
talk
about
that
later.
Just
after
going
through
most
of
the
talks,
that's
the
thoughts
I
had
so
wanted
to
share
it.
C
I
think
we
need
to
go
much
more
into
kind
of
designing
the
conference
in
terms
of
topics
than
I
thought
previously.
A
Okay,
so
let's,
let's
actually.
A
Let's
get
into
that
after
a
quick
status
update,
so
I
don't
know
scott
or
leonardo.
Whoever
has
it
do.
You
have
just
kind
of
an
overview
of
like
how
many
submissions
have
we
received.
Where
are
we
at
how
many
people
have
started
doing
reviews?
I.
B
Can
share
that
right
now
give
me
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen,
real,
quick
so
for
for
those
that
are
not
familiar
put
together
this
additional
sheet,
where
we're
doing
the
the
reviews
so
far,
we've
got
four
people
reviewed
that
have
reviewed
a
bunch
of
them.
Christian
has
commented
that
for
some
of
those
talks
they
cannot
participate
because
they're
co-workers,
because
there's
a
bunch
of
coming
from
redhead
right.
So
I
I
don't
know
if
christian
is
is
done
with
all
the
ones
that
you
can
review.
Can
you
yes,
okay,
so
christian
is.
B
B
It
seemed
it's
in
the
chat,
I'm
gonna
reshare
it
for
anybody
that
did
join
afterwards
unless
I
gotta
drop
it
over
okay,
it's
in
the
chat.
Let
me
know
if
you
need
access,
I
will
be
so
philippe
have
you.
Where
is
your
process
in
terms
of
review.
I
Currently,
I
think
that
I'm
done
I
I
did
it
on
on
sunday
and
basically
because
I'm
I'm
not
working
for
company
from
people
who
submitted,
I
reviewed
every
line.
So
on
on
my
standpoint,
I
am
I
assume
that
I'm
I'm
I'm
done
it's
good
for
me,
okay,
awesome!
Thank
you
for.
B
That
how
about
you,
robert
hold
on
all
done,
okay,
yep,
so
cool
I'll,
be
doing
my
reviews
today.
I
believe
the
deadline
that
we
had
was
for
tomorrow
for
all
of
us
to
have
them
reviewed.
As
far
as
count
there
is
a
total
of
28
talks,
submissions
which
26
are
actually
valid.
The
first
two
were
tests
and
that's
kind
of
like
where
we
are.
I
don't
know
if
anybody
wants
to
add
anything
or
ask
anything.
A
Yeah
we
I
I
guess
I
would
ask
for
the
people
that
have
started
doing
the
reviews,
just
in
terms
of
the
quality
of
the
talks
and
stuff.
Do
you
feel
like
we
have
enough
at
this
point,
or
do
we
need
to
do
like
another
round
of
promoting
to
get
more
talks.
C
I
think
we
definitely
have
enough
talks
because,
after
all,
we
only
need
to
fill
four
slots
with
talks.
Okay
and
I've
seen
enough
for
that,
I
think
actually,
where
we
now
have
a
very
tough
choice
if
we
would
go
for
segmenting.
The
topics
like
one
talk
for
argo,
one
for
flux,
one
for
I
don't
know
whatever
else.
B
And
another
comment
that
I'll
make
is,
I
think,
once
I'm
done
with
my
set
of
reviews
will
basically
hit
the
minimum
three
reviewer
mark
for
all
of
them.
So
I
think
we're
put
there
as
well
I'd
love
to
see
more
reviewers.
We
actually
had
expected
for
eight
total
reviewers
to
participate,
but
since
more
is
a
deadline-
and
I
think
time
is
of
the
essence
here
as
long
as
we
get,
you
need
to
add
that
to
the
data
sheet,
then
so
yeah.
C
B
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
gonna
go
to
the
data
tab,
so
I
guess
it's
important
for
anybody
that
wants
to
add
themselves.
They
have
to
add
themselves
to
this
data
tab
and
that
automatically.
C
D
Okay,
so
I
we
haven't
moved
to
raising
hands,
yet
I
guess
so
I'll
just
jump
in
real
fast.
I
don't
know
if
we
need
to
but
I'll
leave
that
to
you
again
but
I'll
go
home,
okay,
cool!
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
you
know
we
had
discussed
earlier
having
a
panel
with
with
members
of
the
adopts
working
group
in
order
to,
at
the
very
least,
give
some
not
only
announcements
but
just
status
of
the
project.
D
Stat
or
excuse
me
status
of
the
working
group
status
of
the
open,
getups
project
and
anything
else
related
to
contributing
and
becoming
involved,
and
perhaps
perhaps
we
discuss
perhaps
getting
into
the
principles
a
bit
as
well
as
we
when
we
get
to
the
engine.
The
agenda
item
for
the
schedule.
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
we
had
discussed
that
before
and
haven't
really
arrived
at
exactly
what
we're
gonna
do.
B
D
Just
the
fast
follow
response
is
that
I
think
in
a
more
in-depth
conversation
about
principles
could
be,
I
would
vote
for
that
to
be
optional.
Based
on
the
other
talks.
It
would
be
a
shame,
I
think,
to
boot
out
something
that's
super
relevant
so
that
we
could
continue
the
kinds
of
discussions
that
we've
been
having
offline
or
outside
of
that.
D
That
excuse
me
that
venue
anyway,
but
I
do
think
that
the
initial
at
least
initially
introduction
giving
folks
an
update
on
the
group
and
and
the
project
and
and
things
around
that
would
probably
be
really
not
critical
but
important.
So
I
that,
but
that
could
be
short,
probably
that's.
My
vote.
F
Now
the
other
thing
this
is
cornelia
and
I'm
sorry
I
I'm.
I
have
really
bad
bandwidth
here,
so
I'm
on
the
phone
via
audio.
The
other
thing
that
I
want
to
just
remind
everyone
of
is
that
we
do
have
a
set
a
kubecon
session,
where
we
are
going
over
the
the
get
ops
working
group
as
a
as
a
coarse
grain,
inviting
people
to
join,
giving
them
the
history
showing
them
the
context
of
where
everything
fits.
H
F
D
F
It's
virtual
yeah
chris
sanders
and
I
had
a
talk
accepted
on
that
and
we
just
recorded
it
a
couple
of
days
ago
and
it's
we
recorded
a
20-minute
talk
and
there'll
be
15
minutes
for
questions
so.
A
Great
okay,
cool
yeah,
I
mean
just
in
terms
of
like
the
goal
of
get
ops
con.
I
don't
think
it's
necessarily
to
work
on
the
standard.
I
think
it's
to
evangelize
successes
and
introduce
people
to
it.
So
I
don't
think
it's
like
a
maintainers
conference.
You
know
it's
like:
let's
get
the
customers
out
there,
let's
get
the
real
life
use
cases
out
there.
A
Let's
get
people
excited,
engaged
and
interested
in
this
as
a
standard
and
just
to
help
build
the
following
of
the
get
ops
of
open,
get
ops
in
general,
right,
yep,
yep,
cool
cool,
so
that's
a
great
overview
and
I
can
see
I've
like
a
good
picture
of
what's
going
on
now,
so
it
sounds
like
before
tomorrow,
leonardo
myself,
scott
and
chris
short
are
going
to
do
talk,
reviews
and
add
these
in
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
compile
kind
of
it
was
our
plan
basically
to
take
the
average
or
the
cumulative,
or
did
somebody
have
a
specific
plan
for
how
we
would
use
these
scores?
C
F
Yeah,
that's
that's,
probably
a
really
good
idea
to
just
spend
a
10
minute.
You
know
orient
people
in
10
minutes
as
a
part
of
the
keynote
I'd
be
happy
to
do
that.
C
C
Now
to
answer
your
question
about
the
the
the
rating
system.
The
moment
it's,
the
arithmetic
average
pretty
simple
twice
once
for
each
category
and
then
over
all
the
categories.
C
I
strongly
suggest
that
we
take
that
only
as
an
initial
indication
and
that
we
much
more
look
into
the
topics
of
the
talks
and
understand
what
do
we
want
to
present
and
how
to
kind
of
have
one
talk
for
maybe
each
type
of
topic
and
then,
within
each
type
of
topic.
We
should
choose
the
most
appropriate
talk
that
maybe
didn't
get
the
highest
rating,
but
really
fits
the
fits.
The
story
that
we
want
to
tell
as
a
conference.
C
A
Yeah,
so
this
is,
this
is
really
the
slotty
discussion
right
like
what
are
the
topics
we
want
to
cover,
and
I
think
I
think
you
mentioned
we
do
want
to
make
sure
we
have
equal
representation
of
projects
so
making
sure
that
both
flux
and
argo
are
present
was
one
of
the
goals.
A
I
don't
know,
if
there's
any
opposition
to
that
feel
free
to
shout
so,
but
I'll
mark
it
down.
In
the
meantime,.
A
And
then
I
would
say
we
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we
have
some
good.
You
know
customer
stories,
excellent
customer
stories,
I
think,
are
a
priority,
so
those
would
be
my
thoughts.
What
what
does
everybody
else
think
about
kind
of
the
makeup
of
the
talks
and
how
we'd
want
to
do
it.
E
So
I
I
agree
with
in
terms
of
like
we
shouldn't
lean
too
much
on
one
way
or
another.
We
should
have
equal
representation
of
all
the
projects,
but
at
the
same
time
I
think
the
the
guiding
the
group
the
guiding
force
should
be,
I
think,
maybe
user
stories.
I
think
I
find
that
personally
more
compelling.
E
You
know
out
out
kind
of,
like
I
don't
wanna,
say
war
stories,
but
kind
of
like
just
like
battle
stories
or
or
things
that
you
know
that
happened
out
like
in
real
life
right
like
real,
real
use
cases
for
me
like
that
that'll.
You
know
that
I
think
we
should
float
those
to
the
top
like
those.
F
I
would
say
that
probably
half
of
our
agenda
is
experience
reports,
because
that's
really
what
the
community
gets
a
tremendous
amount
out
of
is
a
big
part
of
what
we're
trying
to
do-
and
I
I
like
this,
this
part
of
the
agenda
this
this
goal
from
the
devops
enterprise
summit,
which
is
to
build
community,
and
I
think
that's
what
we're
trying
to
do
here.
So
what
we
want
to
do
is
we
want
to
highlight
those
experience
reports
so
that
others
in
the
audience
can
say.
F
F
So
those
are
those
tend
to
be
more.
The
people
who
are
they
tend
to
maybe
be
with
a
vendor,
but
we're
very,
very
strict
about
not
vendor
pitches,
but
there
are
people
who
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
a
particular
area
like
transforming
fight.
Your
cfo
type
of
a
thing
because
remember
devops
is
not
just
tech
tools
and
technology,
and
so
we
do
have
some
expert
talks.
I
think,
with
our
small
agenda.
F
I
wouldn't
necessarily
want
to
hide,
I
think,
maybe,
between
the
the
keynote,
the
sponsor
you
know
the
red
hat
and
that
that
we
maybe
will
have
enough
of
that
category.
I
would
given
that
we
have
three
or
four
sessions
experience
reports.
If,
if
we
did
all
experience
reports,
that
would
make
me
happy
so.
A
G
A
G
E
A
I'm
trying
to
step
on
your
point
there
cornelia,
but
I
I
agree
completely.
That
sounds
good
and
as
far
as
the
the
length,
what
did
we
decide
on
for
the
length
of
the
like
how
many
sessions
and
like
how
many
slots
we're
trying
to
fill.
E
So
if
you
go
to
the
agenda
tab
on
that
on
that
dock
here
we
we
sort
of
kind
of
high
level
slotted
out
here,
thanks
for
sharing
the
screen
yeah,
so
that's
kind
of
what
we
the
the
agenda.
We
we
have
here
so.
I
Christian
regarding
the
agenda,
I
was
wondering
myself
if
we
do
not
have
a
kind
of
battle
plan
to
to
do,
because,
basically,
the
event
will
happen
from
five
in
the
in
the
afternoon,
up
to
10
on
european
time
time
slot
and
it.
What
I.
What
I
wanted
to
highlight
is
that
at
a
moment.
I
Basically,
I
think
that
we
will
lose
people
from
one
hour,
the
time
to
eat
or
something
like
this,
and
I
was
wondering
if
we
want
to
to
dress
up
a
kind
of
battle
plan,
because
I
really
enjoyed
the
purpose
about
the
end
user
emphasize
in
terms
of
return
of
experience,
and
I
was
wondering
if
there,
if
there,
if
there
isn't
something
to
to
manage
in
terms
of
the
orders
of
what
we
want
to
share
in
depth,
from
the
trenches
and
and
so
on.
I
Regarding
the
the
dura,
the
full
duration,
if
we
map
it
into,
I
would
say
the
european
time
slot.
E
Oh,
I
see
what
you're
saying
have,
though
yeah
so
I
think
having
those
front
loaded.
Is
that
what
you're
saying
having
those
earlier
in
the
in
the
agenda
yeah,
I
know
I
I
hear
what
you're
saying
yeah
no
and
I
agree
yeah
the
lightning
talks
could
always
be
re-watched.
E
I
think-
and
you
know
I
guess
we're.
E
G
E
Hold
on
where
is,
I
don't
know
how
to
view
that?
Oh
and
hang
on?
No,
no!
I'm
sorry
in
in
in
this
spreadsheet
right,
because
I
think,
whoever
created
this
put
it
in
the
time
zone
of.
C
Okay,
the
times
on
the
conference
announcement
are
cesd
central
european
summertime,
summertime.
C
K
C
C
On
the
website,
it
says
time
1700
to
22.00,
on
which
website
I'll
paste
you
the
link.
Thank.
B
C
Chat,
this
is
the
website.
J
J
G
Yeah,
I
wonder
if
I'm
going
to.
E
A
E
Like
if
we
have
three
different
slots,
because
I
was
imagining
that's
11
c
e.
E
That's
what
I
imagined-
oh
thank
you
aubry
for
for
hopping
on
no.
E
L
E
Speaking
of
hop
in
so
we
have
so
we
have
this
scheduled
for
11.
E
I
guess
am
c
e
c
e
s
t
time,
but
on
the
kubecon
website
it
says
1700,
which
is
yeah,
which
is
like
so
those
those
are
two
disconnects.
So
I
wonder
what
do
you
have
on
hop
in?
Do
you
have.
L
What
I
have
on
hop
in
is
what's
in
my
notes,
let
me
just
look
at
my
notes.
Real
quick
or
the
group
notes.
C
L
Was
going
to
say
I
I
would
imagine
we
can.
The
only
reason
that
we
chose
1500
utc
was
that
6
a.m
on
the
west
coast
for
those
of
us
who
need
to
get
up
and
do
a
keynote
or
supporting
mm-hmm.
So
sorry,
what
was
the
requested
time
to
change
to
you
want
to
push
it
out.
A
E
C
F
It
is
virtual,
though
it
is
virtual,
so
it's
not
quite
as
straightforward
as
that,
and
so
I
think
that
that
there
is
most
of
the
conferences
that
I've
seen
go
virtual,
try
to
try
to
do
something
where
it's,
where
the
us-based
people
are
not
presenting
at
three
in
the
morning,
yeah.
A
I
am,
I
am
looking
at
the
times
here
and
I
do
notice
that
many
of
the
times
are
kind
of
afternoon
european
times
and
it's
likely
for
the
same
reason,
but
I
I
I
think
I
think
I
hear
what
you're
saying
and
I
get
it.
I
mean
we
don't
want
to
pick
obviously
incompatible
time
for
the
europeans
so
doing
it
where
it's
scheduled
right
now
from
five
to
ten.
A
J
C
We
have
an
opening,
maybe
even
recorded,
and
then
we
have
the
actual
presentations
by
speakers
in
like
more
gmt
like
time
zones
and
then
towards
the
the
middle
or
actually
towards
the
end.
We
have
the
keynotes
from
the
american
speakers.
J
I
I
think
it's
understandable
in
these
kind
of
scenarios
where,
where
that
the
keynotes
aren't
the
things
that
open
opens
up
the
entire
thing,
just
because
it's
kind
of
hard
to
do
that
with
everyone
sitting
across
the
world
and
as
long
as
long
as
it
doesn't
start
so
late
that
the
conference
will
end.
You
know
in
the
evening
long
until
the.
J
As
long
as
it's
kind
of
like,
if
it
just
shifts
a
little
bit
earlier,
I
think
I
think
that's
at
least
a
good
enough
compromise,
and
if
we
can
change
the
you
know
keynote
to
be
a
little
bit
later.
Okay,
so
can
I
get
best
of
all
words?
I
guess.
A
Either
in
the
middle
or
at
the
end,
any
opposition
to
potentially
having
it
at
the
end,
it's
like
the
roundup,
like
hurrah.
A
E
So,
just
just
to
kind
of
one
one
thing
is
that,
although
we're
not
doing
the
talk,
some
of
us
will
need
to
be
up
to
support
the
platform
as
well,
so.
E
A
C
E
C
Nobody
wait.
There's
nobody
from
europe
doing
all
that.
L
Nope,
this
is
the
platform
that
we
had
available
to
us,
so
it's
it's
being
run
by
the
team
that
can
offer
it.
E
Yeah,
so
we
have
so
then
my
my
I'm
leaning
towards
what
cornelia
was
saying
in
the
beginning.
Can
we
just
like
split
the
difference
having
it
1400
central
european
summer
time?
That's
two
in
the
afternoon
right.
So
that's
not
so
bad
5
a.m.
I
can
I
can
you
know
I
can
do
5
a.m.
You
know
that
that
one
day.
J
Yeah,
but
for
the
hop
in
administrator
thing,
is
it
possible
for
any
of
us
from
europe
to
actually
help?
You
know.
C
F
C
But
I'd
like
to
remind
the
american
platform
managers
that
I
think
you'll
be
you'll
have
to
be
on
the
platform
before
two
o'clock,
like
you
probably
need
half
an
hour
or
even
an
hour
of
prep
time
before
the
event
starts.
E
A
I'm
happy
to
if,
if
it's
a
limitation
of
availability,
I'm
happy
to
take
any
hour.
I
don't
sleep
anyway,
so.
D
I
I
was
going
to
offer
to
pitch
in
too
because
I
also
am
you
know
a
variable
hour
person
as
needed,
but
it
sounds
like.
E
D
C
L
J
A
A
L
So
it
sounds
like
the
only
place
it's
off
right
now
is
we
need
to
align
the
platform
hop
in
and
then
we
need
to
go
back
to
cncf
and
get
that
updated.
Is
that
accurate
sounds
right?
Okay,
I'll
ask
sonia
to
help
with
the
cncf
part.
L
A
Thank
you
aubry
awesome,
okay,
so
that
actually,
that
actually,
I
think,
solves
philippe.
You
brought
up
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we
had
good
accommodations
for
european
time
zone
like
dinners
and
things
like
that
with
the
new
time
change.
Do
you
think
we're
there
or
is
there
more
to
it.
C
Yes,
the
current
schedule
doesn't
have
any
breaks
whatsoever.
Okay,
so
I'm
definitely
not
gonna
sit
six
eight
hours
straight
in
front
of
the
screen.
A
Yeah,
what
if
what
have
people
seen
work
at
virtual
conferences,
because
I
always
worry
during
virtual
conferences
that
if
you
do
a
break,
you
just
lose
half
your
viewers.
So
I've
always
figured
that
if
it's
a
virtual
conference,
people
will
get
up
and
go
to
the
bathroom
and
just
come
back
whenever
they
want
right.
So.
E
Well,
I
said,
and
in
the
way
I
imagined
it
is
that
we
are
not
doing
everything
back-to-back
right,
so
these
times
are
maybe
we
should
change
the
times
here
so
just
to
better
reflect
what
at
least
what
I'm
thinking
is
that,
like
between
the
talks,
there
should
be
like
hey
the
next.
E
You
know,
talk
is
starting
in
five
minutes
or
have
a
bumper
or
whatever
similar
to
what
we
have
chris
in
openshift
yeah
take
a
break
type
in
100
things,
there's
kind
of
like
a
looping
thing,
we'll
be
back
in
five
minutes
or
we're
we're
prepping,
because
we're
gonna
need
time
to
like
have
people
come
to
the
backstage
area?
That's
what
they
call
it
in
hop
in
and
prepare
to
present.
G
Yeah,
the
if
they're
already
in
the
backstage
it's
easy
to
promote
them,
but
like
making
sure
that
transition
happens
smoothly.
I
think
it's
fine.
If
we
I
mean
we
need
a
break
of
some
sort,
but,
like
dan
said,
I
feel
like
the
more
or
the
longer
the
break,
the
more
people
we
lose
and
also
keep
in
mind.
This
is
kubecon
we
might
have
600
people
registered,
but
if
it's
free,
they
probably
registered
for
all
the
free
stuff
and
are
going
to
bounce
you
know
so
we're
not
going
to
have
1600
all
at
once.
A
K
A
Yeah
we
could,
we
could
probably
lose
two
of
them
and
buy
ourselves
10
minutes
to
put
somewhere
else.
If
we
need
to.
J
I
don't
think
we
should
put
on
every
single
lightning
talk.
That's
been
submitted
just
based
on
because.
J
Yeah,
I
think
so,
but
but
that's
not
a
great
idea.
So
so
we
should
probably
lose
one
or
one
or
two.
A
Of
them,
okay,
so
let's,
let's
drop
two
of
them
unless
somebody's
opposed
and
then
we
can
build
in
a
10-minute
break
halfway
through
the
time,
and
we
can
figure
out
during
that
time
either
to
just
have
somebody
like
mc
chat
or
or
just
to
put
up,
but
we'll
be
our
back
or
whatever
it
is.
But
we
can.
We
can
come
up
with
with
some
way
to
maybe
keep
an
engaging
break
so
that
we
don't
have
people
drop
off
like
hey
now's,
your
10
minutes
to
make
a
sandwich.
F
G
F
F
F
C
We
have
one
half
hours,
talk
talk
straight
yep
like
what
do
you
mean.
A
That's
good,
okay!
I
I
barely
pay
attention
in
zoom
meetings,
so
at
a
conference.
E
A
All
right,
that's
that's
great!
So
great
point,
philippe
we've
got
a
couple
of
breaks
built
in
now.
We've
got
the
time
worked
out.
Excellent.
D
Just
one
of
them,
sorry,
before
we've
gone
from
the
lightning
talks,
I
because
I
haven't
finished
the
reviewing
of
all
of
them,
yet
I'm
not
sure
how
many
are
are
good.
Maybe
we
can
just
kind
of
keep
that
in
mind
that
it
could
be
eight
or
less
depending.
A
F
D
F
F
A
So
yeah
I
agree
completely,
so
I
think
at
this
point,
let's,
let's
finish
up
our
reviews
and
then
we
can
kind
of
make
a
decision
based
on
okay.
Well,
we
have
three
lightning
talks.
We
really
love,
we
hate
all
the
rest,
then
let
then
we
can
take
the
decision
at
that
point
to
to
adjust
the
rest,
but
that
sounds
good.
So
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
making
sure
to
have
user
experience,
reports
and
cornelia
brought
expert
sessions.
A
I
think
that's
probably
the
right
framework
in
my
mind
to
go
off
of
now:
that's
essentially
the
agenda.
What
am
I
missing?.
H
Should
we
talk
about
once
we've
all
reviewed,
do
we
need
to
schedule
a
call
like
tomorrow
or
the
next
day,
to
kind
of
like
go
over
the
reviews
and
kind
of
collaboratively
talk
about
what
we
perceive
as
best
quality
or
not
like
how
we're
gonna,
like
once,
we've
all
reviewed?
What's
the
next
step.
A
Yeah
good
good
question,
so
I
would
propose-
and
I'm
happy
to
to
volunteer
for
this
task
if
you'd
prefer.
I
think
one
of
us
should
take
all
the
feedback
and
basically
break
it
down
into
here's
where
everyone
agrees
and
here's
where
everyone
here's,
where
we
have
some
points
of
disagreement
and
discussion
and
then
let's
we
can
either
if
there's
enough
there,
let's
schedule
a
follow-up
and
say:
hey,
there's,
there's
these
five
or
six
talks
where
we
have
really
different
ideas.
Let's
talk
those
ones
out,
but
there's
all
this
set.
That's
like
yeah.
A
We
all
agree
that
this
is
what
it's
gonna
be.
So,
let's
just
move
forward
with
those
ones.
Does
that
sound
like
a
a
potential
plan?
F
I
So
that's
super
helpful.
We
must
be
cautious
because
up
to
now
we
have
only
seven
lightning
talk
before
the
final
cut
and
here
in
the
agenda.
I
think
we
have
something
like,
I
would
say,
nine
or
ten
slots.
So
before
the
final
cut,
we
already
have
more
less
lighting
talks
on
the
the
entry
into
the
agenda.
I
C
Got
more
than
3.5
or
so,
and
maybe
that
got
more
than
three
and
take
this
those
into
consideration
like
throw
away
the
talks,
lightning
talks
that
got
maybe
only
less
than
three
and
then
we'll
know
which
proper
talks
we
can
convert
into
lightning
talk
and
then,
of
course,
people
still
have
to
agree
to
convert
a
light
to
make
a
lightning
talk
and
I'm
sure
we'll
hash
it
out
easily.
I
would
really
talk
about
reducing
or
expanding
the
agenda
at
the
very
last
moment,
not
in
the
beginning,
yeah
agreed.
J
A
Yeah,
there's
there's
an
extra
thoughts
reasoning.
So
if
you,
if
you
see
some
of
those
and
you
that
you
think,
would
make
good
lightning
talks,
go
ahead
and
put
a
note
in
there
after
the
end
of
review
period
tomorrow,
I'll
take
the
action
item
and
do
the
review
and
then
should
we
set
time
for
thursday
to
come
back
and
review
the
areas
of
divergence
and
then
kind
of
finalize
the
agenda.
L
So
if
I
can
ask
you
guys
to
put
a
little
bit
more
urgency
on
that,
we
have
10
days
to
identify
talks,
publish
and
promote
a
schedule,
get
people
to
record
their
sessions,
get
the
sessions
uploaded.
So
I'm,
if
you
guys,
can
do
this
today
or
tomorrow
yeah.
I
really
think
we
need
to
start
pushing
to
do
that.
So.
A
L
A
Okay,
so
folks,
if
you
don't
get
your
feedback
done
by
tonight,
you
ain't
getting
feedback
and
then
for
tomorrow.
A
A
A
Let's
set
the
let's
set
the
hour
tomorrow
at
the
same
time
and
I
think
who
sent
the
who
sent
the
invite
scott.
So
scott,
do
you
mind
sending
a
new
invite
for
tomorrow
at
the
same
time,
but
one
hour.
G
H
J
If
we
have
the
reviews
and
and
and
kind
of
have
a
good
idea
of
the
the
long,
any
long
talks
that
could
be
a
shorter
talk
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
because
at
least
you
know
get
some
some
structure
down
and
and
and
then
we
can
just
you
know,
ask
in
through
our
other
channels
and
ask
if
anyone
else.
E
Yeah,
so
I
I
believe,
I
believe,
the
the
review
it
should
be
kind
of
for
tomorrow.
It
should
be
kind
of
like
a
sanity
check
right
because
all
the
ones
we
voted
for
should
you
know,
float
to
the
top
right,
like
all
the
best
ones
should
float
to
the
top,
and
it
should
be
just
a
matter
of
slotting
them
in
in
a
certain
way.
So.
A
So
what
what
I'll
do
is
for
chris
and
leonardo,
especially
I'll,
get
all
of
the
I'll
I'll
do
the
tabulation
tomorrow
morning,
first
thing
and
I'll
just
send
out
a
status
to
this
group.
So
if
you,
if
you
see
that,
like
your
talk,
is
the
the
talk
that
you
really
wanted
is
the
one
that
is
up
for
discussion,
you
can
at
least
provide
a
comment
or
something
in
there
and
then,
if
it,
you
know,
we
can
play
it.
That
way.
That
way,
we
can
try
to
capture
any
additional
thoughts
or
feedback.
G
G
A
Okay
sounds
good,
so
sounds
like
we've
got
a
path
forward
here,
any
other
things
that
need
to
be
discussed
right
now
or
everything
else
we'll
go
to
tomorrow.
J
Yeah,
I
I
I'll
be
available
at
this
time,
and
so
I
guess
if
we
have
enough
people
to
discuss
things,
we
could
take
a
little
bit
of
discussion
offline,
our
or
asynchronous.
E
Actually,
actually
be
better
for
me
to
be
honest
with
you,
if
we
do
it
earlier,
I
mean
I
I
will
make
it
I'll
make
tomorrow
at
this
time,
if
I
you
know
like,
because
I'm
I'm
committed
to
push
this
course
over
the
line,
but
personally
like
earlier,
actually
would
be
better
for
me.
I
don't
know
what
anyone
else's
schedules
are
like.
A
N
D
So
it
just
it,
looks
like
we
have.
If
we
want
to
do
this
lot.
As
you've
mentioned,
we
have
the
most
votes,
but
we
didn't
give
an
option
for
the
slot
the
hour
before.
So
if,
if
you
want
I'll
just
add
it
and
then
we
can
kind
of
redo
it
not
redo
it
but
update
there.
You
go
yeah.
D
I'll,
let
you
know
when
the
slot
is
at
it,
so
we're
talking
about.
D
Excuse
me,
sorry,
we're
talking
about
wednesday
from
just
one
hour
before
right,
but.
D
I
A
A
I
For
europe
it
will
be
super
late.
If
we,
if
we,
if
we
do
it
one
hour
after
the
session,
we
we
started
today,
I
think
it
it
will
be.
It
will
be
really
late.
I
and-
and
I
I
cannot,
I
don't
know
why
they
cannot
edit
my
my
my
personal
information,
but
the
slot
before
the
hour
we
started
today
is
also
possible
for
me,
but
I'm
not
able
to
change
it
on
the
doodle.