►
From YouTube: WG Platforms Project Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
B
Well,
I
do
have
questions
about
plans
for
kubecon,
so
in
particular
the
like
I
guess
they
were
more
the
tag
tag
plans,
but
we're
obviously
underneath
the
tag
I
signed
up
to
help
out
of
the
booth
a
bit
wanna
just
confirmed
that
stuff
and
and
also
put
in
an
idea
for
a
lightning
talk
at
both
the
tag
meeting
on
the
Tuesday
and
in
the
session
and
see
how
that,
basically,
how
that's
going
so
those
are
my
only
questions
other
than
that,
whatever
I
can
do
to
help.
But
yeah.
A
Yeah,
just
thinking
should
we
go
through
this
stuff
for
people
that
watch
the
video
I'm
just
briefly
looking
at
definitely
cubecon
is
on
here,
but
yeah
I.
Guess
if
that's
yeah,
let's,
let's
start
with
that,
then
hey
abhinav,
how
you
feeling.
C
B
C
A
A
But
let's
just
go
briefly
over
this,
so
Abby
was
just
asking
about
kubecon
we're
meeting
today
at
12
I,
don't
know
who's
gonna
come
at
12.,
but
yes,
we
have
right
now
11
submissions,
two
of
them
are
from
you.
Abby
three
of
them
are
from
me,
but
I
think
I
think
we're
gonna.
You
know
we
will
we'll
have.
We
have
we're.
Gonna
have
eight
to
ten
for
for
Tuesday
afternoon,
I
think
which
is
more
than
plenty
and
then
we'll
have.
We
have
like
two
or
three
at
this
point
for
for
Wednesday.
C
Well,
yeah
and
I'll
submit
it
like
probably
two
to
three,
probably
today,
sorry
for
not
getting
those
earlier.
It's
just
yeah.
B
C
A
Probably
Tuesday
or
Tuesday
or
Wednesday
right
now
it's
we'll
have
much
on
Thursday,
so
yeah,
so
they've
been
back
into
the
you
know.
We
put
the
binaries
all
in
as
close
as
they
can
go,
yeah,
so
I'll
respond
like
after
we
meet
today
at
12.
If
anyone
comes
I'll
reply
to
the
folks
and
tell
them
you
know
exactly
when,
so
we
can
kind
of
lock
that
down
yeah.
A
Yeah,
that's
what
I
did
too
I
put
one
on
Wednesday,
which
I
thought
might
be
more
more
broad.
You
know
or
something
yeah
cool
and
then
I
guess
same
thing.
If
people
want
to
volunteer
for
the
meat
for
the
booth,
thank
you
for
Abby
and
to
others
who
have
it's
that
that
Google
doc
has
a
sign
up
sheet,
so
folks
can
sign
up
there.
I
should
put
the
link
in
the
in
the
notes
here.
Let's
just
see,
if
I
can
find
it.
A
A
Have
the
here's
the
tag
activity
sheet
we'll
have
the
meet
up
at
it's
on
the
the
schedule?
I'll
put
it
into
the
stock
here
too,
but
it's
on
the
schedule
for
or
kubecon
yeah.
A
So
yeah
I
gotta
I'll
put
that
in
here
and
then
yeah
I
was
gonna.
Put
a
link
to
this
in
here.
C
Okay,
yeah
I
know
right
now:
I'm
tagged
for
raphae
Booth's
Duty
like
across
the
board,
but
like
if
there's
any
times
in
between
I'll
just
double
check
and
if
I'll
try
I'll
try
to
see
if
I
can
make
sure
I
can
squeeze
some
time
in.
For
this.
A
Yeah
I'll
come
over
and
yeah
say
hello,
yeah.
A
That's
kind
of
half
the
purposes
just
facilitate
great
body.
Yeah
I
also
have
to
go
to
Red
Hat.
Some
too.
The
other
thing
I
was
going
to
mention.
If
you
guys
saw
the
the
brochure
that
Leanne
is
proposing,
it's
pretty
cool
I
think
the
only
logistic
blocker
at
this
point.
B
And
we
yeah
just
ping
to
ask
what
the
general
budget
required
was
I,
think
we
can
it
shouldn't
I
can't
imagine
it
would
be
very
high,
so
I
think
we
can
definitely
find
a
sponsor
there.
So,
okay.
A
Yeah,
let's
see
what
else
here,
oh
so
the
paper
is
live,
I
shared
it
on
the
thread
there
like
it's
yeah
and
I,
really
want
to
start
like
blasting
it
around,
but
there
have
been
all
there
have
been
a
few
little
things.
A
So
there
was
yesterday
I
needed
to
fix
the
picture,
and
today
they
wanted
to
switch
the
the
URL
and
it
is
going
to
get
changed
to
tag
Dash
app
dash
delivery,
but
they
said
they'll
keep
this
one
in
so
we
can
and
they
said
it
could
be
another
24
to
48
hours
before
that
happen.
So
I
wanted
to
go
ahead
and
start
sharing.
So
please
share
I
mean
I'll
start,
but
yeah
share.
Broadly,
let's
do
this.
A
Yeah
related
the
survey
I
I've,
been
I've,
been
kind
of
supporting.
I
haven't
worked
on
a
little
bit,
but
Michael
luskin
has
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
here.
It's
so
we've
got
actually
the
content
was
finalized.
He
worked
with
Josh
Burkes
from
the
contributor
strategy
group,
but
we
have
to
get
into
a
form.
We
asked
the
ncf
and
they
said
SurveyMonkey
can't
do
forks
with
what
we
have.
A
So
we
suggest
we're
gonna,
put
it
into
Google
forms,
which
is
okay,
I,
guess
minimum
viable
and
we
just
haven't
done
it
yet
are.
B
A
We
can
talk
about
that,
there's
room
to
maybe
reduce
yeah.
C
B
C
B
C
A
B
That's
a
good
question.
That's
a
good
point,
though,
that
they
were
saying
30
something
I
hadn't
looked
at
it
at
all,
and
I
was
like.
That
is
a
lot
of
questions,
but
they
must
have
been
looking
at
the
total
questions,
yeah,
not
paying
attention
to
the
fork
which
definitely
reduces
the
risk
significantly.
So
that's
cool
yeah
Fair.
Thanks
for
pointing
that
out.
A
A
yeah,
they
I
feel
like
the
volume.
Maybe
in
these
capabilities
we
have
two
adoption
too,
but
the
it's
too
roadmap.
B
I
think
one
of
the
big
things
is
how
many
required
this
as
well
right.
It's
like
the.
If,
yes
like,
add
detail
here,
needs
to
be
an
optional,
because
we
just
need
to
allow
people
to
just
like
select.
Yes,
no,
multiple
choice
and
move
on.
If
that's
how
they
want
to
be,
you
know,
I,
think
you're
more
likely
to
get
completion
rate.
If
that's
the
case,.
A
So
yeah,
my
thinking
on
this
is
like
yeah.
If
somebody
wants
to
go
ahead,
that
that
form
is
open,
I
think
to
all,
if,
if
somebody
is
motivated
to
go
ahead
and
put
all
that
in
there,
I
might
get
to
it
by
Friday
I
think
we
ideally
I
would
like
to
finish
this
by
Friday,
so
we
can
share
it
around
next
week,
Michael
if
you're
listening
you're
more
than
welcome
to
do
it.
He
knows
if
not
yeah
I'll
see
what
I
can
do
in
abhinab
or
Abby.
If
you
want
to
no
pressure.
A
So
that's
that
the
next
topic
I
was
going
to
mention
to
you
all
capabilities
that
we
do
have
an
effort,
a
nascent
effort
to
get
a
Ouija
artifacts
working
group
going.
A
Basically
they
came
to
us,
the
oras
group,
which
is
Oracle
register
oci
registry
as
a
service
which
they
are
like
the
ones
advancing
oci
for
other
use
cases
like
Helm
and
stuff,
but
there's
a
bunch
of
them.
They
came
to
us.
They
wanted
to
do
some
some
conventions
around
the
metadata,
so
it
could
be
more
easily
searched
and
things
like
some
things
like
that.
I
know
that
they're
concerned
about
like
searching
for
s-bombs
and
attestations,
and
things
like
that.
A
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
and
they
basically
had
no
place
to
do
it
and
I
was
like
that
app
delivery
is
a
is
a
great
place,
plus
I'm
motivated
because
platforms.
The
last
capability
there,
but
artifact
storage
is
one
of
them
and
plus
it's
the
tag
after
Liberty's
kind
of
remit.
So
I
I've
been
talking
with
them
a
lot
and
they
opened
that
issue.
But
there's
been
a
lot
there's
also
a
channel.
If
anyone
is
interested
in
joining.
A
So
it
looks
like
we
have
a
little
momentum
there
I
mean
it's
probably
you
know
hard
to
build
on
this
week
and
next,
but
but
we'll
talk
like
that's
actually
one
of
the
ones
that
I
submitted
I,
don't
know
if
we'll
talk
about
it,
if
it's
a
lightning
talk
or
just
in
a
general
discussion,
but
we'll
talk
Tuesday
about
it,
so
just
letting
people
know
and
I
Linked
In,
the
other
ones
there.
A
If
anyone
is
passionate
about
Secrets
or
something
like
that
and
pick
them
up,
yeah,
that's
that's
all
maturity
model,
I,
think
Abby.
You
must
have
added
that.
B
Right
yeah
I,
just
added
in
just
to
say
that
we
we've
got
sort
of
a
a
starter
for
ten
that
we've
gotten
some
buy-in
from
some
really
great
people
around
sent
it
around
to
some
people
in
this
group,
as
well
as
just
people
that
we
know
around
the
industry
in
different
organizations
and
different
kind
of
backgrounds.
And
so
I
don't
think
it's
a
complete
joke
or
mess.
B
Yeah
exactly
I
just
wanted
to
start
socializing
it
on
this
call
and
then
I'll
socialize.
It
keep
going
and
then,
with
the
issue,
be
able
to
socialize
and
a
lot
more
on
the
different
catch-up
calls
that
we
have
but
I
don't.
My
intention
is
not
to
rush
this
through
in
some
way
to
publication,
so
definitely
want
to
get
people
I,
think
it
being
out
there.
Even
in
draft
form
is
a
big
step
and
that
then
we
can
make
sure
we
refine
it
to
the
right
level.
So
yeah.
A
B
I
will
have
one
for
next
week,
so
we're
trying
to
get
some
some
final.
Basically,
when
I
first
shared
it
with
people,
we
didn't
get
their
approval
to
to
list
their
names
as
reviewers
and
I
don't
want.
We
want
to
credit
them,
but
we
also
don't
want
them
to
be
credited
in
a
way
that
they
don't
expect.
B
So
we've
got
an
ask
out
right
now
to
people
we're
giving
them
a
week
to
let
us
know
if
they
don't
want
their
name
listed,
and
so
once
that's
done,
I'll
be
able
to
share
the
the
draft
with
with
the
reviewers
and
stuff
on
it
and
yeah
I.
Just
don't
want
to
be
sharing
people's
names
that
they
would
prefer
not
be
sure.
B
To
be
fair
ours,
this
was
the
the
one
for
the
white
paper
was
quite
an
open
process.
This
one
was
more
like
pinging
people,
we
know
by
email,
so
there
was
no
expectation
of
this
being
an
open
review,
which
is
why
we
want
to
just
do
the
do
the
right
thing
and
confirm
with
people
that
they're,
okay
with
it
and
I
suspect
everyone
will
be,
but
it's
just
one
of
those
extra
cautious
things
so,
but
yes,
link
link
to
be
added
by
next
session.
So.