►
From YouTube: CDF SIG Events - June 5, 2023
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
B
A
The
operator,
it
seems
something
some
automation
that
that's.
C
A
A
A
E
A
Because
it
might
be
suitable
for
him
to
join
this,
this
time,
stop
Maybe
yeah,
let's
see
I,
guess
we
get
started
to
power
them.
I
can
share
this
time.
A
C
A
A
Looking
at
some
action
items,
I
have
an
old
action
item
on
me
to
prepare
information
for
the
TOC
updates
on
the
Sig
events,
project
or
group,
and
the
City
events
project
have
not
done
that.
Unfortunately,
additional
to
that
I
would
not
be
able
to
join
the
TOC
tomorrow,
because
I'm
on
a
Swedish
holiday
national
day,
so
I
will
be
off
tomorrow,
but
maybe
for
the
next
location.
I
can
do
it
then
Andrea.
You
said
last
time
you
would
like
to
talk
to
Michael
from
Margo
about
the
collaboration.
There
has
anything
happened
there.
B
So
we
had
a
shot,
but
then
remember
if
this
was
before
last
time
or
after,
but
anyway
I
had
a
child
with
with
Michael
and
he
he
created
an
RSC
for
Argo
CD.
E
B
A
Guess,
there's
nothing
more
to
say
about
that
then
from
other
groups.
I
guess
I'll
do
this
again
about
the
produce
Representatives,
which
are
now
denomination
period,
ends
today
and
I'm
nominated
to
to
represent
City
events
and
their
own
temporary
weeks,
starting
from
next
Monday
anything
else
from
other
groups.
We
should
bring
to
the
needs.
You
think.
D
So
on
the
topic
of
well
I'll,
wait
till
we
get
to
the
next
section,
collaboration
with
other
communities.
A
D
I'm
trying
to
get
us
a
call
with
the
no
I'll
just
wait
all
the
apology.
E
A
A
D
Two
areas:
there's
there's
actually
some
really
important
areas
that
we
should
be
involved
in
and
I'm
hoping
I
can
recruit.
Ml
would
be
great
if
you
could
join
or
Andrea
either
one
of
you
so
the
open,
ssf
started
a
new
working
group
called
The.
It's
called
the
Sterling
tool
chain.
A
D
Yeah,
it's
not
going
to
be
permanently
named
that
nobody
likes
that
name.
They
don't
really
know
exactly
what
it
is
they
want
to
do,
but
this
came
as
a
an
idea
that
Brian
bellendorf
is
very
close
to
his
idea.
Being
that
we
need
a
set
of
tools
that
we
can
recommend
to
people
for
security.
D
You
know
the
openssf
folks
are
great.
They
really
are.
They
have
really
deep
knowledge
on
on
cyber
security
and
hacks
and
tooling.
That
needs
to
be
done
to
prevent
that,
but
I
wouldn't
say
that
they're
experts
in
devops
or
cicd
pipeline
some
of
them
have
some
understanding,
but
not
necessarily
understanding
some
of
the
problems
I
pointed
out
to
them
at
that
meeting
that
from
if
we
stood
back
and
said
what
are
we
really
trying
to
solve
we're
trying
to
solve
security
for
not
just
some
open
source
projects,
but
for
every
Enterprise?
D
D
Let
them
know
that
they're,
the
ones
who
should
be
building
City
events
around
security
yep
that
got
a
lot
of
interest,
there's
also
a
lot
of
money
in
Alpha
Omega
and
if
you
know
anything
about
Alpha
Omega
alpha
alpha
has
selected
a
handful
of
Open
Source
tools
that
they're
going
to
build
out
solutions
to,
and
then
they
want
to
do
the
Omega
side,
which
is
to
bring
those
solutions
to
a
larger.
You
know
group
of
Open
Source
communities.
D
We
should
be
looking
at
participating
in
the
Sterling
tool
chain
and
the
alpha
omega
groups,
and
we
should
be
trying
to
get
some
funds
out
of
that
when
I
first
brought
it
up
to
the
open
ssf
for
us
to
to
collaborate,
I,
don't
know
if
I
read
Brian's
email
correctly,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
if
he
was
gung-ho
about
it
or
just
cautious
about
the
open,
ssf
and
CDF
working
together
he's
now
the
CTO
they
have
a
new
general
manager,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
when
I
brought
up
CD
events
and
the
idea
of
truly
sort
of
disrupting
the
CI
CD
Pipeline
with
an
event
based
process
that
would
solve
the
problem
where
we
could
actually
build
out
this
Sterling
tool
chain
in
an
automated
way.
D
There
were
a
lot
of
folks
on
that
call
that
got
excited
about
it.
So
I
feel
like
we
have
a
opportunity
here
to
bring
CD
events
up
to
the
open
ssf
in
that
Sterling
tool.
Chain
group
and
potentially
the
alpha
omega
group,
is
where
we
could
be
able
to
get
some
funds
to
to
potentially
have
some
money
to
do.
Do
something
bigger
than
what
we
already
could
afford
can
do
with
the
the
team
that
we
have.
D
So
what
I
want
you
guys
to
think
about
how
we
can
work
with
that
group
and,
if
there's
any
chance,
I
can
get
you
get
one
of
you
on
the
Sterling
tool
chain
or
I've
asked
a
crow
to
introduce
me
to
the
alpha
omega
folks,
because
I,
it's
kind
of
been
even
though
I
was
on
the
board
there.
It's
kind
of
been
a
close
Community.
I
have
not
been
able
to
open
the
door
there,
but
we
need
to.
We
need
to
bring
it
down
and
let
them
know
what
we're
doing.
A
Yeah
yeah.
Well,
of
course
you
shouldn't
miss
that
opportunity,
I
think
and
it's
it's
a
good
opportunity
to
educate
them
about
cicd,
of
course,
and.
D
D
Some
of
them
are
still
in
that
thinking
that
you
can't
ask
somebody
to
change
the
way
they
do
CI
CD.
D
D
There
are
so
many
new
new
types
of
tools
out
there
that
nobody
can
actually
adopt
because
it
takes
too
much
time
to
update
every
all
these
static
workflows
and
they
didn't
under.
They
didn't
realize
that
that
was
a
problem,
so
it's
and
and
they
don't
they
don't
have
to
realize
that's
a
problem
because
that's
not
their
space.
Their
space
is
knowing
that
they
want.
D
Everybody
to
you,
know,
do
signing
or
or
generate
an
s-bomb,
and
they
don't
understand
why
they're
they're
Enterprise
companies
and
they
one
of
the
members
basically
said
I-
don't
understand
why
my
developers
are
still
generating
s-bombs
manually
when
we
ask
for
it
they'll
then
they'll
generate
one.
Why
don't
they
just
do
it
and
it
was
like?
Well,
it's
a
broader
story.
That's
a
broader
problem.
C
D
C
D
D
So
it's
9
00
a.m.
Pacific
time
and
there
is
the
zoo
meeting
you
can
just
go
and
sign
up
and
you'll
get
in
invitations.
I
think
maybe
I
got
an
invitation.
Let
me
see
if
that
is
out
there.
Yet
as
a
working
group
and
and
probe
who's,
part
of
the
CDF
is
actually
managing
this
group.
D
The
Sterling
tool
chain
and
he's
the
chairperson
for
this
for
their
tack
so
he's
their
new
chairperson,
which
is
great.
D
While
we
continue
I'll
look
to
see
if
I
can
find
where
that
mailing
list
is
and
how
I
got
on
it,
I
probably
just
got
audit
because
I'm
on
a
broader
list,
I'm
still
getting
governing
board
meetings
out
of
attend
them,
because
I
didn't
get
reelected
but
I'm
still
getting
all
those.
Those
meetings
invites.
A
D
D
Yeah
Alpha
Omega
does
now
I,
don't
know
anybody
from
the
alpha
omega
team.
What
I'm
hoping
that
we
can
do
is
we
can
get
the
because
what
the
Omega
project
of
Alpha
Omega
really
want
needs
to
do
is
Implement
some
kind
of
a
common
process
for
all
the
open
source
teams.
But
what's
going
to
happen
just
like
in
any
Enterprise
company,
not
everybody
writes
the
same
language.
D
Not
everybody
has
the
same
tools
so
they're
going
to
run
into
the
they're,
going
to
start
learning
about
some
of
the
challenges
around
building
a
devops
pipeline
or
a
devsecops
pipeline
or
their
Sterling
tool
chain,
whatever
they're
calling
it
they're
going
to
learn
that
everything
there
is
no
such
thing
as
one
perfect
pipeline,
because
it's
different
based
on
your
platform
and
your
language,
so
they're
going
to
learn
that
and
it's
the
Omega
team
that
will
be
facing
it
first
I
believe.
But
it's
the
Sterling
tool
chain
that
we
I
think
that
we
need
to.
D
A
D
E
A
D
D
A
D
A
A
A
D
Another
there's
another
one
called
the
security
tooling
working
group
I,
don't
know
what
how
they
are
any,
how
they're
different
from
the
Sterling
tool
chain
and
they
they
also
have
a
supply
chain.
Integrity
group
now
so
they're
getting
a
lot
of
splintering
groups
but
I
believe
the
one
that
will
get
the
most
attention
internally
from
Linux
foundation
will
be
the
Sterling
tool
chain,
because
it's
Brian,
bellendorf's
kind
of
dream
and
project,
and
now
he's
the
CTO
so
he'll
be
pushing
it
internally.
A
So,
where
does
that
money
come
from
for
the
alpha
omega?
Is
that
some.
D
D
Their
open,
ssf
members,
but
it's
not
a
project,
they
don't
have
projects
like
we
have
projects
they're,
not
like
an
artillius
project.
I
can't
remember
what
they
call
them.
They
kind
of
have
their
own
they're,
they're
kind
of
splendored
off
and
they're
they're
doing
their
own
thing
basically,
and
they
are
supposed
to
answer
to
the
board.
D
C
A
D
Yeah
and
that's
the
other
thing
that
just
is
happening
at
the
cncf
level,
they
do
now
have
and
I'm
attending
it
because
of
emporis.
That's
the
red
hat
project
that
ortilius
is
has
brought
in
as
a
sub
project,
and
it's
an
artifact
group.
It's
really
looking
at
how
artifacts
should
be
managed.
D
C
E
B
Emil
says
I
mean
we.
We
have
been
planning
of
having
security
features
for
City
events
for
sure,
but
yeah
and
and
that's
how
we
started
also.
You
started
the
the
email
thread
with
openness
to
set
up,
because
we
we
need
to
get
the
kind
of
the
expert
involved
too,
to
design
that
in
a
way
that
is
useful.
So,
yes,.
D
And
I
really
do
believe
that
that
Sterling
tool
chain
there's
there's
a
lot
of
selling
to
be
done
still,
but
I
really
do
believe
that
that
the
concept
around
the
Sterling
tool
chain,
they
really
should
be
thinking
of
it
in
terms
of
vocabulary
and
events
they,
but
they
didn't
even
know
that
existed.
D
A
Okay,
shooting
on
them
so
next
on
this
list
is
the
target
delivery
and
we
said
when
we
met
last
time
that
we
should
reach
out
to
them
see
if
we
should
meet
them
in
on
Wednesday.
D
A
E
E
D
Addressing
common
problems
across
any
type
of
artifact
and
what
a
standard,
what
a
you
know,
we
call
it
an
oci
repository
and
what
the
standards
are,
but
that
relates
to
Containers
they're
trying
to
do
it
with
any
type
of
artifact.
E
C
D
Oh
and
then
finally,
I
am
working
on
a
white
paper.
B
D
Not
test
Cube,
let
me
see
where
is
Ole
from
so
it
was
two
two
things
that
I'm
I'm
working
on,
but
he
asked
me
to
reach
out
to
create
a
white
paper
on
CD
test
events.
I,
don't
have
the
the
knowledge
to
create
a
white
paper,
so
I
suggest
that
we
start
with
a
Blog
and
then,
if
we
can
formulate
some
of
that,
maybe
we
can
turn
it
into
a
white
paper
and
I'm
working
with
Ole
lensmar.
D
Him
to
get
a
white,
a
Blog
started
and
then
the
folks
from
test
Cube
are
going
to
be
doing
a
CDF
online.
Meetup
I,
don't
know
how
much
the
person
who
is
doing
that
knows
about
test
events,
but
I'll
I
was
going
to
reach
out
and
ask
them
if
he
could
talk
about
test
events
as
part
of
his
PR.
His
his
presentation.
C
D
D
All
right
so
I'm
gonna,
his
name
is
Abdullah
abedrava
I'm,
going
to
reach
out
and
ask
him
if
he
can
include
some
information
on
CD
events
in
his
talk.
E
A
C
E
B
Release
right
so
yeah
when
I
asked
owner
I
got
the
feeling
that
so
he
said
that
tests
show
just
about
that
say.
He
said
this
open
source
project,
accelerator,
yeah.
A
B
It
was
under
the
impression
that
then,
the
the
different
project
there
actually
also
companies
how.
A
But
it
looks
like
this
is
more
of
a
project
to
me.
C
A
C
B
Yeah
he
told
me
that
he
has
a
role
in
I
mean
in
Cube
shop
and
as
well
as
in
desk
Cube
directly,
so
I
think
he
has
a
leadership
role
in
test
Cube
and
then
well.
He
specifically
personally
involved
in
test
Cube
but
yeah,
so
he
will
refer
to
other
projects
as
well.
B
A
A
Should
we
do
it
the
way
we
did
last
time
to
go
into
each
of
these,
starting
with
the
Spectrum
repository
then.
A
This
is
probably
that
is
so.
Let's
see
we
skipped,
we
skipped
the
skip
comment
for
now
explosion
aspects.
We
said
it
should
be
in
the
Roblox,
didn't
we.
B
Yeah
yeah,
we
marked
it
as
zero
four,
so
it
does
not.
E
B
A
So
now
it
should
be
there.
Oh,
it's
a
zero
towards,
but
fine
schema
store.
We
talked
about,
we
don't
do
it
at
this
time
in
Texas,
in
markdown,
Docs
or.
A
B
B
A
B
Full
request
for
these
I
mean
it's
it's
only
available
in
PDF
into
the
repo,
so
I
don't
think,
that's
something
that
can
be
fixed
through
pull
request.
A
A
C
A
B
Okay,
the
thing
is
the
CD
events
white
paper.
A
Okay,
so
where
is
it
then?
The
latest
one
is
that
on
the
City
Foundation
somewhere.
B
Doesn't
let
me
open
the
links
either
that,
yes,
so
yes
I
think
we
had
a
blog
post,
but
we
should.
A
This
because
this
is
updated,
May
2023,
so
this
is
the
latest.
C
B
E
E
B
A
C
B
I
mean
I.
Remember
we
fixed
the
links,
we
had
a
discussion
about
those,
but
it
seems
that
what
is
what
I
find
a
bit
frustrating
that
there's
a
there.
A
Google
Docs
documents,
but
maybe
if
that
was
for
the
first
iteration
of
the
new,
otherwise
back,
but
not
the
last
one.
But.
B
A
B
E
A
Should
we
yeah
it's
not
related
to
zeros4
and
away
so
we
can
help
with
a
separate
issue.
Yeah
I,
think
yeah.
So,
let's
go
on
the
content
of
the
outcome
field
is
not
declared
as
enums
all
right.
Yes,
so
this
is
just
a
string.
A
B
A
A
C
A
I
guess
that's
the
is
that
the
parameter
that
is
the
same
account
events.
A
B
A
E
B
A
A
B
B
B
B
They
recommend,
including
a
version
in
there,
so
when
considering
the
value
of
type
attribute,
even
event
producer
may
choose,
any
version
is
going
to
wish
such
a
version
number
or
date
as
part
of
the
value.
Then
we
also
use
the
attribute
time
to
convey
that
a
particular
version
is
not
yet
stable
and
make
good
for
breaking
changes.
C
A
C
E
B
E
A
What
is
it
called?
The
version
under.
E
A
Yeah
this
version
here,
yes,
computers,
this
one
thing.
A
Yeah,
the
question
is:
if
we
need
to
do
that
now
before
we
are
have
reached
1.0,
so
I
have
deprecations
I
mean
it
will
require
some
more
effort
on
on
our
end
to
handle
applications,
but
at
the
same
time
it
will
be
hard
for
the
sdks
and
other
others
to
manage
it.
If
not.
A
B
We
don't
really
have
to
I
think
according
to
the
policy,
but
because
we
are
in
a
0.x
release
still
so
we
could
just
do
it
if
you
wanted
to.
A
B
B
A
A
B
A
It's
maybe
implicit
in
the
term,
but
a
bill
could
actually
mean
two
things.
Of
course,.
A
E
A
B
A
B
Think
we
we
can
try,
we
can
put
it
I
mean
these
are
kind
of
small
small
things
to
do
as
well.
So,
if
you're
someone
who's
looking
for
helping
out,
this
is
a
kind
of
small
task
that
maybe
can
be
given
to
to
get
started
like
adding
the
queue
to
task
one,
for
instance,
yeah.
E
A
Okay,
it's
already
up
time.
Do
we
have
okay,
two
more
things
to
look
into
here:
POC
dependence
updates
through
okay,
but
this
should
be
moved
to
the
Community
report.
I
think,
probably,
oh,
maybe
not.
C
A
Show
up,
but
it's
not
in
this
report:
oh
okay,
yeah,
let's
create
one.
A
B
A
B
A
Okay,
okay,
so
we
got
through
this
list
at
least,
but
now
time's
up,
yes,
very
good
collaboration
and
then
I
will
be
off
tomorrow,
but
we'll
meet
next
week,
I'm
off
as
well,
actually
on
the
eighth
of
summit
with
an
April
Summit
next
week
in
person.
Oh
okay,
so
I
will
not
be
able
to
join
the
work
group
next
week,
either
so
we'll
meet
in
the
City
events
meeting
in
two
weeks
time.