►
From YouTube: SIG Interoperability Meeting - Dec 1, 2022
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
A
For
me
means
stay
home,
so
yeah
I've
been
home,
I'll,
probably
stay
here
through
the
end
of
the
year.
Looking
like
I'll
be
in
Stockholm,
though
in
February
I
will
ping
you
if
see.
B
C
B
A
B
A
Is
it?
Is
it
going
to
be
in
Canada.
C
A
Yep
yep
true
well
I'm
playing
Ketchup
from
being
gone
for
so
long
I
did
start
taking
a
look
at
the
white
paper
that
you
and
Justin
were
looking
at.
B
D
A
B
A
All
right
well
good
deal
I'll
keep
looking
at
it
like
I,
said
I
just
playing
catch
up
this
week,
so
I
just
started
to
look
at
it
today
and
I'll
comment
if
I
see
anything
or
make
it
editions,
suggestions
whatever.
Definitely
would
like
to
help
with
that.
A
So
unfortunately,
I
think
I
messed
up
the
time.
So
I
was
on
here
an
hour
earlier
and
because
I
thought
we'd
changed
all
the
times
and
I
think
maybe
I
changed
my
own
invite
instead
of
the
public
ones,
but
today
is
the
wrong
time,
but
we
made
it
the
three
of
us
made
it.
It's
still.
You
know
it
shows
up
on
the
public
calendar,
so
I
did
edit
in
the
future.
So
everyone
should
be
having
this
meeting
at
3,
P.M
and
I
just.
A
A
And
I
edited
the
wrong
one,
so
I
need
to
edit
both
of
them
so
that
they're,
both
showing
up
as
four
pm
I
will
do
that
with
that
as
a
to
do
on
my
I
think
I'll
do
that
as
soon
as
we
get
off
this
meeting,
all
right
other
than
that,
I
really
don't
have
anything
more
to
share.
Is
there
anything
else
that
has
come
up.
B
I
think
the
goal
ICM,
if
you
remember
I,
didn't
go
SPM
projects
like
the
people
from
that
project.
They
were
interested
and
you'll,
see
I
think
they
are
planning
to
present
the
project
to
Toc
next
year,
they're
doing
Toc
meeting
they
we
put
another
threat
with
Christy
Wilson.
Okay,
like
include
me
and
Andrea
Andrea,
pointed
them
to
the
TOC
meeting
so
like.
If
you
plan
to
join
the
TRC
meeting
next
Tuesday
I
think
the
CDs
project
will
present
their
progress
as
well
as
this
goes.
Stm
might
be
on
the
agenda
as
well.
A
Okay,
hopefully
we
can
get
some
clarification
on
that,
because
I
did
push
a
little
bit
on
that,
but
I
was
told
that
you
know.
Oh,
it
already
is
a
part
of
the
CDF
because
it
was
brought
in
the
fork
of
it
was
brought
in
with
hecton
or
something
so
I,
don't
know
what's
happening
or
why
I
there
was
some
discussion
of
you
know
bringing
that
fork
back
together.
You
know
getting
that
project
better
organized.
But
what
are
the
are
there
advantages
for
getting
that
I?
C
B
Going
back
to
the
first
thing
you
mentioned
is
I,
don't
know
if
you
meant
this
one,
because
there
is
this
taked
on
hand,
chart
and
I,
don't
know.
If
we
have
no,
we
don't
have
anything
to
go
within
CD,
Foundation
I
think
this
oscm
is
like
that.
Discussion
has
been
going
on
for
a
while,
like
maybe
2021
they
reached
out
to
Christy
and
that
conversation
didn't
end
up
anywhere
and
then
they
restart
again
in
September
this
year.
You
were
in
that
threat
and.
C
B
A
Yeah,
let
me
let
me
copy
the
link
of
the
discussion
and
share
it
with
you
and,
and
maybe
there
was
some
clarification
that
happened
after
I'm.
Looking
for
the
chat,
sorry,
okay,
yeah
James
Rawlings
said
that.
D
A
He
thought
that
tecton
uses
the
Jenkins
X
Fork.
It
would,
but
it
would
be
great
to
consolidate
that
so
yeah.
Maybe
we
can
just.
We
can
get
clarification
during
that
meeting
to
see
what
what
exactly
oh.
C
A
Maybe
that's
all
we
need
to
do,
but
and
I'm
not
sure
you
know
if
it
has
been
forked
like.
Are
there
advantages
for
harness
to
get
the
original
project
into
the
CDF
I
wasn't
sure
exactly.
A
B
A
A
C
D
I,
don't
know
I'm
trying
to
think
about
how
we
can
set
ourselves
up
for
success
in
future
meetings.
Yeah
I
think
that
the
15th
is
getting
close
to
the
winter
holiday
season.
D
True
and
I,
don't
know
if
that's
before,
whoever
what
might
come
give
a
presentation
would
rather
skip
until
January,
but
I
think
it's
getting
close
to
that,
and
so
I
I'm
wondering
like.
A
So
in
the
in
the
information
for
this
sig
there
is
a
list
of
potential
presentations
and
a
list
of
past
presentations
and
I.
Don't
we
haven't
been
doing
a
very
good
job
of
keeping
that
up?
That
was
something
I
wanted
to
look
at
this
week
and
get
at
least
the
ones
that
we've
had
recently
get
those
in
there
and
get
the
links
to
the
videos
in
there
and
get
slides.
A
If,
if
we
can
from
the
presenters
just
to
have
a
more
complete
list
and
I
mean
it's
a
lot
of
work
to
present
and
it'd,
be
nice,
one
nice
thing
to
do
for
them
to
get
that
out
and
get
that
a
little
better
advertised
to
folks
who
missed
those
meetings.
A
But
there
were
quite
a
few
names
in
there
and
they,
maybe
they
have
are
still
interested
in
presenting
their
people
we
could
reach
out
to.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
find
it
really
quick.
A
D
A
D
I
used
Firefox,
but
for
some
reason
it
doesn't
play
with
our
corporate
VPN
proxies
very
well
so
I
have
this,
which
is.
B
Yeah
I
think
some
of
some
of
the
presentations
in
the
backlog
was
done,
which
we
forgotten
to
move
them
up
like
with
Piper,
for
example,
it's
and
I
believe
how
presents
tecton
client
plugin
as
well,
but
the
others
like
they
are
not
done.
Some
of
them
are
not
active
anymore,
like
this
cross.
Cloud
CI
is
not
activity
anymore,
but
yeah.
The
rest
seems
to
be
still
valid,
like
Argo
and
the
club
GitHub
presentations,
but
we
don't
have
contacts
there
at
that
point
in
time.
B
Yeah
in
in
white
people
like
there
have
been
some
some
areas
to
look
at,
as
well
as
the
original
Sig
proposal
like
pipeline
standardization
languages.
Maybe
I
can
open
both
of
them.
B
I
can
share
both
of
them
and
we
haven't
touched
those
topics,
because
our
Focus
shifted
on
events
and
then
CD
runs
was
created,
and
then
we
start
putting
our
software
by
Chain,
which
result
in
software's
by
Chain,
so
those
things
kind
of
depart
from
the
signature
ability,
but
the
other
topics
like
this
pipeline
standardization
pipeline
visualization,
which
is
kind
of
partly
driven
under
Sig
events,
as
well
as
best
practice,
I
believe
and
the
other
thing
folk.
Let
me
find
that
original
pull
request,
because
some
people
highlighted
the
brown
things.
B
A
A
Okay:
let's
do
that,
let's
I
think
we
can
agree.
Should
we
just
should
we
cancel
the
next
meeting
for
this
month
since
it's
holiday
time
and
then
just
have
an
action
item
to
add
suggestions
to
a
agenda
for
the
first
meeting
we
have
in
January,
which
let
me
check
the
date
on
that,
though,.
A
B
C
A
B
Generally,
we
like
in
the
past
we
took
like
it,
was
same
for
someone
as
well.
It
was
like
July
was
kind
of
no
on
the
ground
and
last
week
of
December,
like
last
two
weeks
and
first
week
of
January
people
generally
start
slowly
the
new
year.
So
that's
why
like
I
was
saying
January,
maybe
early
okay
get
people's
attention
but
yeah,
if
you
so.
A
January
19th
between
now
and
then
we
want
to
be
pretty
far
on
the
white
paper
right,
because
our
goal
was
to
get
something
in
q1
foreign.
Do
you
see
any
reason
why
we
need
to
meet
sooner?
Just
to
or
you
know
we
can
do
it
offline
and
then
bring
it
up
on
the
19th
for
sure
so
that
we
are
up.
You
know
keeping
up
with
it.
D
A
Okay,
let's
do
this
I'll
I'll
go
ahead
and
send
you
know
notifications
out
or
whatever
that
we're
canceling
the
next
two.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
January
19th
and
the
first
thing
on
the
agenda
will
be
updating
ourselves
on
the
status
of
the
white
paper,
which
we
should
be
pretty
well
Along
by
then
I
would
hope
and
maybe
discuss.
A
You
know
when
to
publish
at
that
point
and
then
between
now
and
then
action
items
for
us
are
to
you
know:
go
through
some
of
the
original
documentation
for
interoperability,
Stig,
some
of
the
stuff
that
was
introduced.
You
know
in
the
as
issues
or
whatever
and
add
to
our
agenda
between
now
and
then.
B
B
If
we
could
push
this
out,
publish
it,
we
can
list
some
future
looking
things
as
well
in
the
document
like
it's,
three
of
them
are
listed
here
like
this
pipeline
standardization
we
can
put
abstractions
and
so
on
to
bring
the
you
know,
participation
back
and
in
addition
to
that
item,
you
are
part
of
this
thread
start
by
garima.
This
VSM
OSS
VSM
interval
technical
committee.
They
want
to
meet
with
us
and
I
called
garima.
Please
include
Justin
Emil,
so
there
may
be
opportunities
there
to
to.
B
D
B
A
B
C
D
Excited
in
who
fatty
can
you
send
me
a
link
to
this
paper?
I?
Have
it
somewhere,
but
I
can't
find
the
link.
D
Yeah
be
go
review.
This
just
never
made
it
to
my
list
of
things
to
do,
and
it
was
it
was
up
here,
but
not
in
the
place
that
I
looked
and
actually
do
things.