►
From YouTube: Interoperability SIG - May 4, 2023
Description
For more Continuous Delivery Foundation content, check out our blog: https://cd.foundation/blog/
B
B
Yes,
definitely
like
very
pretty
busy
with
all
the
news
we
will
announce,
which
is
a
good
problem
to
have
to
be
honest
like
because,
like
it's,
oh
I
can't
talk
about
those
things
because
it's
recorded
but
yeah.
We
have
lots
of
needs
to
share
and
we
will
make
two
press
releases
with
project
updates
and
so
on,
and
it
was
like.
B
A
B
A
B
A
A
little
bit
more
background
on
even
just
how
to
start
like.
What's
our
first
step
and
something
I
wanted
to
do,
was
you
know
during
the
event
talk
with
you
know
those
that
started
out
CD
events
and
see
if
we
can
learn
from
that
process
and
do
the
same
thing.
I
want
to
repeat
the
same
thing
and
yeah.
B
B
C
A
B
A
B
B
A
Discussed
it
a
little
bit
last
time
and
I
didn't
have
the
the
link
then,
but
I
did
add
it
to
our
notes
for
our
last
time.
So
here's
the
link
to
the
recording
that
they
did,
but
yes,
I'm,
really
interested
in
bringing
them
back
in
to
have
more
of
a
discussion.
I
think
they'd
have
a
lot
more
input
on.
You
know
anything.
We
do
around
Pipelines
things
like
that.
So
just.
B
C
You
know
any
collaboration
or
any,
especially,
if
they're
looking
to
use
CD
events,
anything
that
we
can
do
to
you
know
extend
those
connections.
I
think
that
would
help
us
a
lot
in
just
trying
to
find
people
who
are
interested,
because
if
the
interoperability
thing
is
just
us
three
right
now,
I
think
that's
the
other
side
of
it.
We're
gonna
need
somebody.
B
Combination
but
I
think
interability
is
broader
than
CD
runs,
but
what
we
discussed,
but
let
me
put
a
link
to
the
chat:
okay,
so
platform
type
of
delivery,
so
this,
like
we've,
been
talking
with
three
people
from
like
app
delivery.
Quite
some
time
now,
but
this,
like
the
collaboration,
hasn't
really
started
just
talking
about
potential
collaboration
opportunities
and
then
during
Europe.
You
know,
Amsterdam
two
weeks
ago,
I
put
the
link
to
chat
me:
Andrea
and
Emil
Brad,
Thomas,
shirts
and
I'll
always
I
think
we
met
with
them.
B
B
Maybe
right
click
open
picture
or
something
so
we
can
open
image
new
tab,
so
we
can
zoom
in
possible
there
we
go
so
what
we
discussed
there
like
if
you
look
at
all
those
big
boxes
like
identify
and
authorized
scanner,
Fox
and
forth
police
automate,
build
test
and
delivery
and
that
automate,
build
and
pass
through
is
like
continuously
delivery,
stuff
and
so
on.
But
what
came
up
during
discussion
is
like.
B
There
is
no
intervals
between
these
large
boxes.
Apart
from
that,
there
is
no
interability
between
what
is
in
the
Box,
and
that
was
the
conversation
starter
and
then
the
idea
was
like
okay.
Maybe
we
should
start
talking
about
how
we
can
find
out
the
way
forward
for
bringing
some
interability
to
this
ecosystem,
because
app
delivery
is
about
app
delivery,
it's
pretty
relevant
what
we
are
doing
and
that's
how
we
end
up
joining
their
meeting
last
yesterday.
B
Actually
their
plan
is
to
look
at
like
what
city
difference
is
doing
and
maybe
make
that
part
of
this
Potato
Head
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember
that
project
potato
at
up
I'm
putting
that
link
as
well,
so
they
can
kind
of
demonstrate.
Cd
runs
and
how
broader
interability
can
be
achieved
through
CD
events,
I,
don't
know
if
I
summarize
it
properly,
but
that
was
I.
Think
the
like
very
short,
summary
of
yesterday's
conversation.
No.
C
I
think
that
is
the
summary
indeed
I
think
part
of
what
I
took
away
from
that
too,
as
they
were,
you
know
sparking
this
interest
in
City
events
is
that
there
is
some
conversation
about
hey.
You
know:
how
are
we
going
to
visualize?
These
events
is
this,
you
know.
Does
this
include
observability
and
did
we
want
to
add
observability
events
to
see
the
events?
I?
Don't
talk
to
me,
I,
don't
think,
that's
something
that
we'd
want
to
do,
but
when
we
start
thinking
about
the
event
broker,
it
should
be
able
to
handle.
C
You
know
many
different
types
of
events,
and
that
was
the
the
feedback
that
I
was
trying
to
communicate
in
that
meeting,
but
I
think
if
we
get
them
to
start
using
CD
events
and
understanding
the
usefulness
of
it,
then
that
becomes
the
the
that
becomes
the
owners
to
have
a
conversation
about
okay.
How
would
a
DSL
now
communicate
with
a
system
that
uses
this,
and
then
you
could
build
your
DSL
around
that
and
they'll
have
some
sort
of
centralized
DSL
I
know
we.
C
Our
goal
is
to
start
with
the
CI
and
just
be
a
CI
DSL,
but
just
having
a
conversation
about
the
broader
schema
in
Spec
and
with
the
backbone
of
that
would
look
like
you
know,
because
it's
about
foundationally
coming
up
with
a
set
of
rules
that
this
is
going
to
be
built
around
in
this
book.
At
least
in
my
mine
before
we
try
to
tackle,
like
all
of
the
small
use
cases
for
a
DSL.
A
B
Mainframe
is
interested
in
working
with
CDF
and
interrupt
and
CD
events,
and
that's
nowhere
to
be
seen
because
we
don't
have
it
in
anywhere.
So
if
you
can
have
that,
like
roadmap,
the
signature
broad
map
kind
of
refreshed,
then
we
can,
you
know,
pass
it
to
others
as
well.
Saying
these
are
the
topics
we
will
start
working
on.
Come
join
us.
A
B
C
Yeah
I
think
what
it
should
be
is
interoperability
is
roadmap
is
about
glue
right.
We
are
the
business
say.
Okay,
this
is
the
next
piece
of
blue
that
we
need
to
bring
these
things
together.
See
the
event
is
one
way
to
do
that
then
the
DSL
would
be
one
way
to
do
that
and
it
might
at
least
in
my
mind,
it
might
not
necessarily
stay
in
the
interoperability
Sig.
C
It
might
be
launched
from
the
unit
operability,
so
we
might
create
the
new
start
to
stack,
but
then
find
the
people
who
actually
are
going
to
carry
it
all
the
way
forward.
And
that
way
we
can
look
at
the
keep.
Looking
at
the
bigger
picture
of
the
CDF
and
gluing
the
things
together
and
also
try
to
find
more
projects
so
join
the
CDF
that
might
be
a
good
fit
and
even
talking
about
more
collaboration
with,
like
the
CNC
app
I.
C
Think
if
we
are
digging
through
the
problem
of
just
being
glue
and
extending
it,
then
that's
the
operation
of
the
interoperability
and
a
really
clear
statement
about
the
separation
of
what
we're
trying
to
do
and
then
what
individual
projects
like
cements
are.
Does
that
make
sense
over
my
overreaching?
You
know
I
think
it
makes
sense.
A
A
A
A
C
Other
than
the
conversation
that
party
and
I
had
I'm
a
little
bit
stacked
right
now,
so
I
have
not
made
move
that
any
further
I
have
a
couple
other
things
to
move
forward
for
Apple,
first
and
then
yes,
I
will
go
back
and
take
the
information
that
we
got.
We
had
a
really
good
conversation
and
we
got
some
great
notes
and
I've
actually
used
some
of
that
for
other
things,
but
no,
it
was
a
I
think
he
helped
me
get
over
some
of
the
issues
that
always
happening
I'm.
A
All
right,
I
meant
to
say
this
at
the
very
beginning
and
I
didn't
I,
actually
need
to
leave
town
here
in
about
45
minutes,
so
I
need
to
end
just
a
little
bit
early,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
to
talk
about
everything
we
want
to
do
this
time.
I
know
it's
just
the
three
of
us
again,
so
anything
new
that
you
want
to
add
to
our
list
or
we
have
enough
to
work
on
between
now
and
between
when
we
meet
again
at
CD
events.
C
I
think
we
do
I
think
you
know
just
Mission
Clarity
and
with
the
roadmap
and
just
a
statement
about
you
know
what
what
the
role
is
of
the
interoperability.
Sig
I'm
gonna
learn
how
to
say
that
one
day
is
awesome
and
the
work
on
the
white
paper
I
have
a
lot
to
do
so.
I
think
this
is
a
good.
This
is
good
for
me.
I
don't
want
to
over
commit
okay.
A
A
Oh
as
far
as
sponsorship,
it
did
come
up
again
in
our
Toc
meeting.
Last
time
we
met
I
did
let
Andrea
know
I'm
willing
to
step
up
and
be
the
sponsor
for
this
sig,
but
between
now
and
the
next
TLC
meeting
I
want
to
be
able
to
gather
enough
info
to
be
able
to
present
to
the
TOC
what
we're
doing
and
what
our
plans
are.
I
think
now
is
a
good
time
to
do
it.