►
From YouTube: City of Gold Coast Governance, Administration & Finance Committee Meeting - 20 July 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
And
second,
by
councillor
pauline
young,
we
will
maybe
wait
to
see
whether
or
not
councillor
hamill
is
able
to
join
us,
but
for
the
time
being
went
still
with
councillor
mcdonald,
it's
all
in
favor
carrie.
Thank
you.
So
we've
got
confirmation
of
minutes
is
starred.
I
don't
have
any
conflict
of
interest
declarations.
A
The
forward
planning
schedule
is
starred,
I'd
like
to
and
the
monthly
financial
return
is
starred,
and
so
too
is
the
order
and
risk
committee.
Did
anybody
want
to
unstar
any
of
those
things
question
about
6.2
yeah
sure
so
we'll
unstar
that
for
you
councillor,
tozer
so
councillor
gates?
How
would
you
would
you
be
excited
about
moving
the
start?
Items
moved
seconded
by
counselor
taylor?
Well
done
so
all
in
favor.
A
Thank
you
so
we'll
go
to
6.2
the
monthly
financial
report
and
counselor
tozer.
You
had
a
question.
We
might
give
jordan
two
moments
to
get
in.
A
So
before
we
get
a
question
councillor
taiser
we
might
cross
to
paul,
did
you
want
to.
B
I
thank
you,
chair,
I'd
just
like
to
introduce
jackie
and
you
see
a
photo
of
the
city
who
started
monday.
Welcome.
A
Anyway,
so
the
council
meeting
is
on
monday,
okay,
so
counselor
taser.
D
31,
where
it
talks
about
the
proportion
of
capital
expenditure
of
actual
verse,
budgeted
and
normally
my
recollection,
is
that
transport
and
lifestyle
tend
to
sit
around
that,
I
don't
know
80
plus
percent,
maybe
a
bit
more
and
in
both
of
these
instances,
they're
at
58
and
I
think
69,
which
is
a
bit
less
than
normal.
The
question
kind
of
has
two
parts.
The
first
is
have
we
now
adjusted
in
the
coming
budget?
D
Have
we
adjusted
our
spend
such
that
the
proportion
giving
having
regard
for
the
supply
chain
issues
is
going
to
re-set
back
to
that
80-plus
percent?
Or
is
this
kind
of
practice
until
those
supply
chain
issues
are
kind
of
sorted
out?
We
should
kind
of
expect
that
58
to
69
from
now
on,
it
is
a
bit
of
an
ideological
question,
but
I'm
trying
to
work
out
what
should
I
expect
in
the
future.
E
Through
the
chair
thanks
councillor
toaster,
the
yeah,
we're
hoping
that's
the
case
so
you'll
remember
through
the
budget
preparation
that
we've
we've
been
knocked
out.
We've
got
a
lower
capital
program
next
year
around
just
over
400
million
about
415
million
dollars.
Yes,
whereas
year
two
of
the
previous
budget
had
that
set
at
about
six
hundred
million
dollars.
E
Yes,
so
there's
in
transport
in
lifestyle
community
they've
tried
to
make
adjustments
in
the
2223
budget,
which
will
help
get
that
spend
back
to
normal
levels
or
even
hopefully,
a
little
higher,
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
issues
with
supply
chain
pressures
and
that
kind
of
thing
which
it
remains
a
lot
of
uncertainty,
but
in
preparing
the
2223
budget
they've
taken
into
account
that
there
was
a
large
underspend
in
2122,
given
that
a
lot
of
those
projects
are
running
behind,
so
water
transport
pulled
out
about
close
to
50
million
dollars
of
projects
from
the
2223
budget.
E
Yes,
to
take
into
account
the
carry
forward
from
21
22.
D
So
follow-up
question
then:
so,
as
we
come
towards
september,
perhaps
this
year
september
october
this
year
we
should
actually
because
the
the
capital
budget
has
reduced
significantly.
We
should
actually
see
that
proportion
of
spent
closer
to
that
80
to
85
and
particularly
as
we
draw
to
the
you
know
this
kind
of
april
may
time
in
2023.
We
should
expect
us
to
be
backed
at
that
point.
There's
nothing
that
we're
anticipating
that's
going
to
keep
it
at
that
low
58
percent
level.
E
Yeah
through,
hopefully
that
will
be
the
case,
as
I
said,
there's
still
a
lot
of
uncertainties
with
with
the
delivery
of
capital
programs
at
the
moment,
but
with
that,
the
setting
of
a
22-23
budget
will
hopefully
then
rebalance
that,
and-
and
hopefully
this
trend
will
continue,
because
our
the
the
carryover
of
capital
has
been
increasing
over
the
last
five
years
right,
so
we're
hoping
that
we
can
get
on
top
of
that
and
reset
that
you
know
get
back
to
that
higher
nice
higher
percentage
spends
the
indication
the
capitalization
process
is
still
being
completed
at
year
end,
but
the
indication
is
we're
sitting
about
65
across
the
board
for
capital
against
budget
capital.
E
F
F
Is
there
any
signs
of
it
improving
or
it's
just
something
over
the
next
couple
of
quarters?
We
need
to
see
where
it
lands
so
as
much
as
we're
talking
about
it
moving.
E
Yeah
through
the
chair,
they're-
probably
not
the
expert
on
that.
It's
probably
more
procurement
issues
that
they'd
be
looking
at
those
trends,
but
definitely
the
briefings
that
we've
had
in
the
past
and
the
director
may
be
able
to
add
something
to
it.
E
But
a
lot
of
the
economists
predictions
that
we've,
the
briefings
that
we've
had
are
that
they,
the
supply
chain
issue,
should
ease
moving
into
2023,
but
definitely
for
the
remainder
of
this
year.
Those
pressures
will
remain
high.
E
B
Other
council
yeah,
I
was
just
going
to
say
yeah
through
your
chair
counsellor,
so
that
the
materials
labor
and
time
delays
are
still
being
experienced.
They
haven't
necessarily
increased
in
the
areas
that
we're
looking
at,
but
they
certainly
not
reduced.
So
I
think,
as
jordan
said,
you
know
for
the
course
of
the
next
six
to
12
months
over
22
23.
We
can
certainly
expect
that
to
be
present.
A
I
tell
you
what
I'll
move
it
and
then,
if
I
can
get
a
second
to
there,
counsellor
pauline
young
all
in
favor.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
that
wasn't
too
painful
at
all.
Was
it.
C
Thanks
chair,
I
just
had
a
question.
I
I've
had
a
run
through
all
of
the
items
and
I
wonder,
do
we
still
have
a
design
section
in
city
infrastructure?
Does
anyone
know
because
I
I
noted
that
the
design
of
footpaths
and
curb
ramps
is
part
of
the
contracting
plan?
I
thought
we
had
a
design
section
that
could
do
those
minor
type
designs.
G
Yes,
there
is
still
a
design
section.
A
lot
of
this
is
supplementary
to
to
what
council's
only
got
so
many
resources
that
they
can
get
the
designs
done
with
so
there's
still
a
lot,
they'll
be
outsourced
as
well,
so
they
usually
work
in
conjunction.
A
No
that's
too
nice,
so
you
know
joe
mccabe
phoned
me
yesterday
to
say
that
he
had
intentions
of
changing
the
way
that
this
was
maybe
presented
to
councillors
in
future
quarters
so
that
it
was
a
little
bit
more
relevant.
A
So
if
you
just
maybe
take
that
on
note
in
regards
to
moving
forward
council
gates.
C
You
this
question:
when
we
saw
the
contracting
plan
attachment
whether
there
had
been
any
changes
to
it,
and
I
think
you
suggested
there
haven't
been
any
changes.
It
was
just
a
yes.
H
So
through
the
chair,
no,
the
the
policy
itself
is
under
review
and
we'll
be
coming
to
council,
probably
on
the
next
round.
This
is
the
contracting
plan,
which
is
another
requirement
under
the
regulation,
in
line
with
the
strategic
contracting
procedures
that
we
follow.
So
this
the
actual
the
plan
and
then
the
list
of
contracts
is
the
forward
contracting
schedule
right.
So
the
change
that
we're
proposing
is
the
the
current
schedule
that
has
come
to
you
today
is
off
the
back
of
achievability
and
budget
approval.
H
It's
been
vetted
by
the
directors,
and
everyone
is
in
agreement
in
that
full
contracting
schedule.
In
future,
we
are
not
going
to
bring
the
quarterly
acquittal
that
we've
brought
to
you
unless
it's
a
strategic
contract.
So
what
we
will
be
bringing
to
you
instead
is
more
information
to
counsel
on
identified
risks
and
categories
of
spend
activity,
changes
in
the
market,
things
that
are
more
relevant
to
you
to
make
decisions
as
a
council
rather
than
a
whole
list
of
contract
activities.
C
H
Round
to
the
directors
for
a
final
approval,
so
it
came
out
of
achievability
and
budget
and
then
any
activities
that
weren't
delivered
last
year
have
been
rolled
over
to
this
year.
With
their
budget
approval,
we
sent
the
list
out
to
all
directors
for
commentary
and
feedback.
We
had
two
comments
from
two
directors
and
we
tied
it
up
the
list
in
accordance
with
their
wishes,
and
this
is
the
final
list.
Okay,
thank
you.