►
Description
00:00 Meeting Commences, Attendance/Apologies, Leave of Absence, Confirmation of Minutes 3.1,
03:00 Conflict of Interest Declarations 4.1, Committee Forward Planning Schedule 5.1
05:07 Reports and Presentations 6.1
15:00 Report 6.2
1:06:00 Report 6.3
1:12:00 General Business 8.1
1:15:48 Closed Session Reports 7.1, 7.2
1:47:48 Open Session, Report 7.1, Report 7.2, General Business 8.2
A
A
A
A
B
B
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
chair,
so
my
declarable
conflict
of
interest
relates
to
item
6.1.
The
nature
of
the
declarable
conflict
of
interest
is
as
follows:
a
reasonable
person
may
form
the
view.
I
have
a
personal
interest
in
this
matter.
This
is
because
I
understand
the
lead.
Petitioner
is
a
close
friend
of
my
son
and
a
member
of
my
son's
rugby
team
I've
spoken
with
the
family
about
the
petition
when
they
raised
it.
B
So
the
name
of
the
related
party
here
is
Herman
vorster.
My
relationship
to
him
is:
is
my
son?
I've
got
capitalized
s
at
some
point.
That'd
be
great.
The
nature
of
the
interest
is
Herman's
friend
is
the
lead
petitioner
I'm,
however,
seeking
permission
to
participate
in
making
a
decision
about
the
matter.
That
is
because
the
interest
is
extremely
mind
and
remote
on
that
basis,
there's
no
material
conflict
between
the
interests
of
the
public
and
those
of
my
son.
A
Would
yeah
you're
fine,
welcome
councilor
young,
so
there's
no
questions
from
the
floor
at
all.
Look
I
I
would
say
that
it
would
be
so
remote
I
wouldn't
have
any
concerns
with
you
participating
in
this
Council
of
Austin
did
anyone
else
have
concerns
at
all?
No
okay,
we're
just
happy
to
leave
it
at
that.
C
A
A
A
D
So
the
the
team
chair
are
just
coming
up.
Obviously
this
petition
is
it's
not
new.
There's
been
a
significant
amount
of
work
previously
done
in
terms
of
koala
Park.
Looking
at
traffic
studies
as
well
as
active
transport
links,
the
petition
outlines,
whilst
there
is
some
need.
Ultimately,
when
considering
our
active
transport
links,
we
look
at
the
entire
city
of
Gold
Coast
and
as
a
priority.
It's
not
necessarily
highest
on
the
list.
So
what
the
team
are
probably
comfortable
to
go
straight
to
questions.
Unless
anyone
wants
further
information.
B
I
had
a
question
through
you
to
the
director
of
the
team
concerning
how
the
recommendations
of
this
report
may
or
may
not
have
been
informed
by
the
parallel
petition
that
we
presently
have
concerning
rat
running
and
traffic
treatments,
yeah,
so
I
I
guess
the
point
I'm
making
is
that
we
seem
to
be
settling
on
a
way
forward.
As
far
as
pedestrians
are
concerned,
while
we
have
another
Road
Safety
orientated
petition
for
this
part
of
the
world
in
motion.
D
D
Fund,
so
certainly
the
petition
petition
still
provided
back
relating
to
the
the
rat
running
as
you
as
you
call
it
counselor
as
I
understand,
is
one
of
multiple
and
we
will
be
responding
to
such
in
terms
of
the
previous
reviews
that
we
have
done
in
this
area.
So
it's
probably
not
what
I'd
say
a
new
situation
that
has
now
just
got
to
go
through
investigation.
We
have
done
multiple
investigations
in
both
traffic
and
pedestrian
in
this
area
previously,
but
the
team
can
probably
elaborate
on
that
for
you.
E
Through
the
chair,
so
technically
both
we've
had
three
petitions.
The
first
petition
was,
as
you
referred
to,
was
a
petition
to
close
Reserve
Street
to
through
traffic.
We
took
that
to
council
last
year.
This
is
the
second
petition.
This
one
focuses
on
active
transport
links
and
we've
recently
received
a
third
petition
which
revisits
the
first
petition.
So
the
first
and
third
petition
really
more
relate
to
traffic
management
outcomes.
This
one
has
a
focus
on
active
transport
links.
In
particular,
this
one
has
a
focus
on
Ocean
parade.
E
B
B
Do
you
have
a
sense
that,
if
were
if
the
fourth
stage
of
the
light
rail
were
to
progress,
Beyond
Burley
to
connect
to
the
airport?
Would
there
be
a
sort
of
a
a
more
pressing
need,
a
better
case
for
investment
in
the
sort
of
pedestrian
infrastructure?
Or
is
it
so
such
a
sort
of
such
a
low
priority
that
it
wouldn't
be
swept
up
by
that
fourth
stage
project
right.
F
So
through
you,
madam
chair
I,
think
it
is
a
lower
priority
that
one
through
koala
Park
we've
investigated
them
a
number
of
times
over
the
last
few
years.
The
work
that
has
been
done
has
shown
it
is
quite
a
low
priority.
We
have
other
active
transport
links
that
we
are
would
look
looking
at
as
part
of
a
flight
rail
stage.
Four
does
get
up,
but
I
doubt
if
it'll
really
be
impacted
this
one
for
the
next,
certainly
for
the
next
sort
of
five
to
ten
years
and.
B
E
E
B
Madam
Michelle
I
just
think
what
it's
a
pretty
robust
report
and
I
think
that
there
would
be
a
community
interest
in
the
exhaustive
investigation
that
City
officers
conducted
and
of
without
providing
a
direction
or
presuming
to
amend
the
recommendation.
I
just
think
it
would
be
useful
if,
along
with
the
letter,
a
copy
of
this
report,
which
is
a
public
document,
is
included,
perhaps
also
with
a
copy
of
our
active
travel
plan
or
active
transport
plan.
B
It's
one
of
the
subordinate
pieces
of
work
that
we
have
in
our
transport
strategy
just
to
provide
a
little
bit
of
context
for
those
who
have
supported
the
petition
around
those
projects
that
we
do
tend
to
prioritize
on
the
basis
that
spending
is
fixed.
So
they
know
that
there
are
other
footpaths
that
are
being
constructed.
Thank
you.
G
So
I
think
we
all
have
areas
in
our
various
divisions
where
there
are
missing
sections
of
footpaths.
Some
of
the
councilors
are
very
active
in
plugging
those
missing
gaps,
but
we
can
do
that
through
our
local
area
works
as
well.
So
there's
nothing
in
this
report
that
necessarily
prevents
the
low-hanging
fruit
from
being
activated
through
our
area
works.
So
so
I
looked
in
regards
to
Ocean
parade,
which
is
125
meters,
which
did
clearly
look
to
link
to
existing
footpaths.
G
H
I
I
The
roads
are
very
narrow
and
I
understand
that
the
any
pathways
through
here
would
be
quite
expensive
to
construct
because
of
how
it's
situated
up
there
and
I
do
understand
too,
that
any
Pathways
in
this
particular
location
it
would
be
either
pathway
or
parking.
So
there'd
have
to
be
much
public
consultation
because
parkings
at
a
very
limited
around
there
and
I
know
that
there's
safety,
but
the
officers
did
do
research
on
the
number
of
vehicles
that
use
the
area.
However,
you
know-
and
this
has
been
discussed-
thank
you.
Councilor
Ryan,
Jones.
A
So
it's
and
it's
not
unfortunate,
but
it's
when
you
measure
it
against
the
demands
on
the
whole
of
the
city.
Then
the
whole
of
the
city
is
there's
a
lot
of
other
gaps
there
that
we
needed
to
deliver
so
appreciate
your
time
on
that
thanks,
councilman,
no,
more
questions,
counselors
I
will
put
that
to
the
vote.
All
in
favor
that's
carried
unanimously.
Thank
you.
Councilors,
move
on
to
6.3,
oh
no
6.2
traffic
area
and
parking
permits
in
the
tap
stage.
Four.
D
D
Through
you,
madam
chair,
so
just
coming
out,
it
is
done
from
the
traffic
and
transport
team.
He
looks
after
our
Partnerships,
and
this
is
also
in
his
area.
So
from
a
traffic
area
permit
perspective.
This
is
obviously
stage
four
and
stages,
one
to
three
have
obviously
been
through
Council,
previously
there's
a
couple
of
different
areas
that
are
impacted
this
time,
similar
to
similar
to
other
stages.
D
We've
obviously
looked
at
that
for
those
around
the
light
rail
stage
three,
but
obviously
there
are
also
some
improvements
in
other
areas
of
the
city
which
we
ever
considered.
As
this
I
will
also
know,
it
will
probably
not
be
the
last
I
think,
obviously,
as
the
city
evolves,
we
will
continue
to
use
this
scheme
successfully
for
the
way
that
people
park
across
and
use
it.
J
J
No
I
don't
think
so,
unless
it's
just
on
here,
I'll
get
that
one
cool
awesome.
Thank
you
councilors.
As
you
may
be
aware,
Council
offices
review
our
traffic
areas
every
two
years.
So
this
is
the
fourth
review
that
we've
undertaken
since
2017
and
as
part
of
this
most
recent
review,
we've
identified
the
need
to
introduce
two
new
traffic
areas,
as
well
as
make
an
expansion
to
one
of
our
existing
traffic
areas.
J
So
through
our
investigations,
it
was
identified
that,
with
the
opening
of
fly
rail
stage,
three
there'll
be
a
significant
increase
in
parking
Demand
on
the
streets
surrounding
the
stage
three
Corridor,
which
will
result
in
adverse
impacts
to
existing
residents
in
that
area,
largely
as
a
result
of
commuters
traveling
from
outside
the
corridor
and
parking
in
the
surrounding
streets,
which
will
obviously
lead
to
substantial
impacts
on
local
residents
and
businesses.
So
in
response
to
that
issue
identified
we're
proposing
to
introduce
a
traffic
area,
as
shown
on
the
slides
before
you
in
the
within
the
orange
boundary.
J
So
this
is
generally
based
on
a
400
meter,
walking
distance
from
the
specific
Corridor
itself,
which
is
consistent
with
the
traffic
areas,
the
Central
Traffic
area,
which
encompasses
the
light
rail
stages
within
surface
paradise
and
broadbeach,
and
similarly
we're
proposing
this
traffic
area
would
operate
in
the
same
fashion.
So
it
would
include
a
three
hour
time
limit
nine
a.m
to
5
P.M
Monday
to
Friday
and
residents
would
be
eligible
to
apply
for
parking
permits,
subject
to
meeting
certain
criteria.
J
So
what
we've
identified
is
that
they're,
during
large-scale
events
at
the
show
grounds
we're
seeing
significant
parking
demand
in
the
surrounding
streets,
which
is
resulting
in
adverse
impact
on
local
residents
and
also
causing
road
safety
issues
as
well.
So,
in
response
to
that,
we're
proposing
to
introduce
our
new
traffic
area
an
event
based
traffic
area,
specifically
for
large-scale
events
occurring
at
the
showgrounds
so
generally,
in
accordance
with
the
locations
shown
on
your
screen
there.
J
The
third
and
final
change
relates
to
expanding
the
existing
bundle,
Chevron
Island
traffic
area
boundary.
So
on
the
screen
before
you,
the
the
yellow
area,
is
where
we're
proposing
to
expand
to.
So
that's
part
of
our
investigations.
It
was
identified
that
they're
staff
that
work
in
the
surrounding
area
parking
long
term
during
the
day
in
the
area
shown
in
yellow,
which
is
resulting
in
amenity
impacts
on
the
local
residents.
J
9
A.M
to
5,
P.M
Monday
to
Friday
and
once
again,
residents
would
be
eligible
for
permits
subject
to
criteria,
so
in
closing,
Council
officers
are
proposing
to
introduce
two
new
traffic
areas,
one
for
the
Gold
Coast
Light
Rail
stage
three
Corridor
and
then
also
for
the
modular
bar
showgrounds
for
event-based
purposes,
as
well
as
include
a
minor
extension
to
the
bundle,
Chevron
Island
traffic
area.
If
our
recommendations
are
supported,
the
next
steps
from
here
would
be
to
commence
making
amendments
to
subordinate
local
law
number
two
regulated
parking.
J
H
Thank
you
chair.
My
concern
is
about
the
mudra
bar
showground
Precinct
I
accept
that
they're
during
show
times
it
is
pretty
chaotic
around
there
and
there
are
cars
parked
everywhere
and
some
of
them
unsafely
but
I'm
a
bit
concerned
about
the
comparison
of
that
area
with
existing
areas
that
are
serviced
by
lots
of
car
parking
and
car
parking
facilities
expressly
around
Robina
and
and
Carrara
show
of.
H
Stadiums.
Yes,
that's
the
word
sorry!
So,
whereas
in
those
areas
we've
got
stadiums
and
car
parking
and
the
provision
adequately
to
accommodate
cars
off
the
road
safely
in
madrabah,
there
is
no
such
provision
and
I
wonder
about
the
economic
impact
that
might
arise.
You
know.
If
we
can't
allow
people
to
park,
then
they
can't
go
to
the
show
because
there's
nowhere
to
park,
and
so
there's
another
consideration
here,
rather
than
just
the
parking
and
and
the
traffic
chaos
and
I
wonder
if
the
so.
K
A
K
H
K
L
Thank
you
through
you,
chair
regarding
the
bundle,
Chevron
Island
traffic
area
expansion.
Thank
you
for
considering
the
consistent
complaints
that
the
residents
provide
us
about
parking
in
the
area.
I
realize
it
is
a
frustration
in
that
highlighted,
yellow
area
that
parking
happens
from
people
who
are
working
so
not
in
a
residential
space.
My
concern
is
that
we
bring
in
a
new
change
which
causes
another
lot
of
issues.
We
have
had
the
temporary
run
in
there
of
the
the
parking
arrangement
with
the
parking
permit
and
it
has
caused
issues.
L
L
This
particular
area
is
low
rise,
a
lot
of
large
homes
where
there
are
Generations
living
in
there,
so
they've
created
a
home
so
that
there
will
be
a
large
family,
maybe
grandmother
or
adult
children
living
in
the
property,
and
they
have
arranged
to
have
off-street
parking.
The
issue
with
the
current
parking
permits,
though,
is
it,
isn't
equal
in
that
each
house
gets
equal
access
to
a
parking
permit.
If
you
have
made
the
effort
to
go
and
create
off-street
parking
for
yourself,
then
you
may
be
doing
yourself
out
of
a
parking
permit.
L
It
is
already
causing
frustration
in
that
area.
It's
causing
much
stress
and
I
I.
Think
if
we
add
this
without
looking
at
that
other
element
of
the
parking
permit,
we're
going
to
add
some
more
problems,
so
I
know
we've.
You
know,
we've
had
this
discussion,
we've
looked
at
it
and
I'm
just
wondering
about
the
ability
to
align
the
review
of
those
two
local
laws.
At
the
same
time,.
J
J
That
then
dictates
how
many
permits
you
are
eligible
for.
So
so
that's
based
on
the
fact
say.
If
someone
doesn't
have
any
off-straight
car
parking,
we
then
are
a
bit
more
considerate
and
we
allow
those
people
to
park
on
Street
to
take
away
those
Provisions
all
together
and
and
allow
everyone
the
ability
to
access
a
permit,
regardless
of
how
many
off-street
car
Parks
they
have
would
lead
to
issues
around
whether
or
not
we
actually
have
enough
row
space
allocation
to
accommodate
that.
L
So
through
the
chair,
this
is
my
issue
with
a
kind
of
and
I
appreciate.
We
need
like
a
whole
of
city
law,
but
when
we
create
one
plan
for
everywhere
it
doesn't
fit.
So
if
you
drove
down
any
one
of
those
streets
today,
you
would
be
lucky
to
spot
a
car
in
in
the
areas
that
we've
already
arranged
a
parking
permit.
There
is
well
and
truly
enough
space
once
you've
defined
that
it's
for
residents
only
because
there's
absolutely
no
issue
in
that
area.
If
it's
only
residence
parking
there.
L
If
every
resident
parked
three
cars
there
on
the
street,
it
still
wouldn't
be
an
issue
because
they're
large
homes
there.
The
problem
is,
though,
we're
saying
parking
permits
a
lot
of
people,
not
getting
one
parking
permit,
whilst
they've
got
completely
empty
streets
and
they
find
that
very
confusing
I,
don't
see
any
point
in
bringing
local
law
changing
laws
for
an
area
where
we're
just
going
to
create
another
problem,
and
unless
we
address
that
I
think
we
may
be
creating
another
problem
here.
M
Thank
you,
and
through
the
chair
to
Dan
thanks
very
much
look.
I
find
this
works
really
well,
but
I'm,
taking
what
councilman
Patterson
said
on
board
that
we
do
need
to
be
flexible
in
relation
to
how
the
permits
work
I
find
in
our
division.
It
works
really
well,
but
there's
my
concern
is
looking
at
a
couple
of
the
other
areas
is
one
where
you
do
have
a
higher
residential
Tower
block.
M
The
other
bit
I
just
want
to
take
note,
is
Cronin
Island
for
myself,
which
is
not
part
of
the
part
of
this
study,
but
we
are
having
high
development
in
the
in
that
particular
area
and
there's
starting
to
be
a
bit
of
concerns
about
trades
parking
around
through
the
streets
there.
So
my
question
to
you,
Dan
is:
have
we
got
other
tools
or
levers
to
have
timed
parking
in
that
area
if
we
feel
it's
becoming
a
problem
with
trades
in
the
area
moving
forward,
considering
this
as
a
two-year
yeah.
B
Thanks
Madam
chair
a
few
questions,
but
I
am
really
interested
in
Crown
and
Ireland
I'm,
not
because
I
can
afford
to
live
there,
but
I
can't
seem
to
reconcile
why
it
would
be
that
there's
a
case
to
expand
the
traffic
area
into
the
yellow
section
and
not
onto
Cronin
Island.
If,
as
I
read
it,
this
push
is
being
driven
by
the
traffic
and
the
number
of
vehicles
we're
inducing
into
Chevron
because
of
construction
and
infield
development.
J
Through
the
chair,
it
was
based
on
feedback
received
from
the
community
as
well
as
investigations
that
we
undertook
in
the
area
to
support
that
feedback
which
identified
that
there's
significant
parking.
Well,
there
are
parking
issues
occurring
in
that
location
as
a
result
of
staff
that
work
in
the
surrounding
Precinct
parking.
J
In
that
location,
long
term
we
haven't
received
similar
feedback
around
staff
parking
on
Cronen
Island
for
long-term
periods
during
the
day
that
the
issue
at
Cronin
Island
as
I
understand,
it
relates
more
to
people
parking
at
parking
there,
trailers,
boats
and
Caravans
in
that
area,
which
is
something
that
we've
discussed
to
investigate
as
part
of
a
future
Taps
review.
So.
B
I
mean
that's
interesting:
why?
Why
wouldn't
we
I
I'm
still
not
quite
clear
here?
Why
wouldn't
we
have
expanded
the
three-hour
parking
onto
Cronen
Island,
because
if
the
issues
are
to
do
with
trailers
and
boats,
the
only
way
that
we
have
to
deal
with
this
is
actually
to
introduce
a
regulated
parking
area,
because
those
Vehicles
do
not
qualify
for
permits
at
all,
so
wouldn't
the
most
straightforward
and
only
real
option
be
to
expand
the
footprint
of
the
traffic
area.
I
mean
I,
guess.
My
question
is:
why
delay
the
inevitable.
J
Through
the
chair,
the
work
that
we've
done
on
the
Taps
for
review
that
we've
that
we're
here
for
today
has
been
undertaken
over
the
last
12
months,
we've
had
Consultants
on
board.
We've
undertaken
a
lot
of
Investigations
over
many
months.
This
Cronen
Island
issue
has
come
up
quite
recently
after
that
work
was
completed
and
after
the
report
was
submitted
through
to
council
today.
So
this
is
a
recent
emerging
issue,
so
we
have
suggested
it's
something
that
we
can
investigate
moving
forward,
but
it
has
occurred
outside
of
this
process.
B
All
right
so,
let's
say,
for
example,
we
will
be
moving
to
community
consultation
right.
So
if
city
offices
collectively
have
no
appetite
to
support
a
change
to
the
boundaries
on
the
floor,
which
I
wouldn't
say
is
without
precedent,
because
I
think
we
did
it
with
the
harbor
Keys
stuff
years
and
years
and
years
ago.
But
if,
through
the
formal,
Community
consultation,
there
were
a
couple
of
people
on
Cronin
Island
who
wanted
a
permanent
solution
to
their
problem.
E
B
E
The
chair,
when
we
go
out
to
the
public
it
we're
actually
going
out
to
the
public
about
the
local
law,
an
amendment
to
the
local
law
or
subordinate
local
law.
So
it's
not
really
targeted
in
that
sense
that
you
think
what
we're
saying
is
there's
a
part
due
process.
We
need
to
follow
to
amend
a
local
law.
B
B
Then,
when
we
go
to
community
consultation,
we
will
be
soliciting
Community
feedback
about
some
changes
to
words
that
appear
in
our
local
law,
but
we
will
not
be
granting
the
community
a
direct
opportunity
to
choose
two
hours
over
three
three
over
four
Monday
through
Wednesday
over
Monday
through
Sunday,
for
example,
or
to
include
or
exclude
little
pockets
on
the
street
that
won't
be
captured
in
the
consultation
process.
No.
E
E
B
So
if
this
microphone
starts
probably
turn
it
down,
I
would
have
hoped
that
we
could
have
acted
on
some
of
the
feedback
that
they
might
have
had
through
that
consultation.
But
if
this
process
doesn't
afford
them
the
opportunity
to
temper
the
city
officer
decision
or
recommendation
and
the
council
decision,
I
think
we're
going
to
run
into
some
grief
and
the
reason
why
I'm
stressing
this
consultation
bit
is
a
few
rounds
ago.
Madam
chair,
you
might
recall.
B
D
So
we
we
have
a
number
of
different
ways
when
we
start
to
look
at
every
two
years
that
we
review
this,
we
take
into
it
any
complaints
that
we
receive
from
the
community
and
that
to
council
patterns
and
points
also
includes
things
such
as
permit
times.
We
also
look
at
the
area
areas.
We
look
at
the
safety,
we
look
at
volumes
and
there's
a
significant
piece
of
work
that
aligns
to
the
best
practice
and
the
lessons
we've
learned
with
previous
ones,
which
is
why
we
engage
with
an
external
party
to
come
with
these
recommendations.
D
So
there
certainly
is
an
opportunity
for
the
community
to
provide
feedback
throughout
some
of
the
other
process.
But
ultimately,
what
the
team
are
presenting
today
had
to
have
a
finite
Line
in
the
Sand
based
on
some
of
those
decisions,
and
this
is
absolutely
the
recommendation
of
the
experts
in
this
field
about
how
to
best
resolve
those
competing
tensions
that
we
know
that
we
are
going
to
have
and
that
we
have
seen
previously
absolutely
we
will
have
other
opportunities
for
those
in
different
areas:
Cronin
Islands.
If
we
continue
to
receive
complaints,
that's
an
emerging
one.
D
That'll
come
through
in
other
ones,
in
terms
of
the
community
consultation
for
those
around
the
light
rail.
We
obviously
will
give
those
residents
the
opportunity
they
can
provide
feedback
residents
can
provide
feedback
and
any
of
our
decisions
at
any
point
in
time,
and
that
will
always
go
through
some
kind
of
mechanism,
so
I
think,
whilst
it's
not
fair
to
say
and
and
to
the
next
point
that
it
will
be
about
the
local
law.
B
B
There
would
be
hundreds
and
hundreds
and
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
cars
parked
dangerously
across
people's
nature
strips
around
intersections
and
on
sporting
infrastructure,
On
Any,
Given
game
day
and
I.
Think
last
time,
I
made
an
inquiry
about
the
number
of
fines
that
we
issued
was
in
the
order
of
fifteen
thousand
dollars
in
the
one
night.
B
Something
about
this.
The
way
we
manage
Stadium
traffic
is
not
working
despite
the
fact
that
we've
got
this
traffic
area
and
I
worry
that
we're
going
to
end
up
recreating
the
issues
around
verbena
Stadium,
around
mudra
bar,
where
people
have
no
contemplation
that
this
traffic
area
exists
because
maybe
they're
not
a
frequent
visitor
to
the
mudra
bar
show
grounds,
but
they
might
go
during
the
mudra
bar
show,
for
example,
or
there
may
be
some
music
concert
or
whatever
so
they're
hopping
their
car.
B
And
then
they
approach
this
Precinct
they're,
paying
no
mind
to
the
signage
and
they're
walking
away
with
a
extremely
high
fine,
potentially
putting
our
reputation
as
an
events
destination
at
risk.
And
this
that
and
the
other
now
to
be
clear,
I'm,
very
supportive
of
the
regulations
around
our
stadiums,
but
I'm,
seeing
more
and
more
and
more
infringements
and
I'd
be
really
interested
from
a
city
officer
perspective.
Or
perhaps,
if
you've
got
a
perspective
yourself
Madam
chair.
A
And
I
just
to
to
weigh
in
on
that
I
think
it
all
comes
back
to
resident
Behavior.
You
can
make
people
aware
of
it.
We
have
speeding
signs
or
not
speeding,
signs,
travel
signs
all
over
the
city
recommending
the
speed
limit.
We
go
time,
time
and
time
again,
people
are
taking
the
fines.
I've
had
residents
come
out
to
me
and
so
happy
to
pay
the
fine,
but
this
is
where
I'm
parking
so
other
than
and
taking
on
some
sort
of
vigilante
type
approach
to
it.
A
I
think
the
city
is
confined
under
the
act
as
to
what
we
can
actually
do
when
it
comes
into
this
space
and
we
can
give
them
as
much
information
as
we
can
as
much
education
as
we
can
and
how
many
times
I'm
sure,
we've
all
heard
it
where
we
can
say
if
they
get
a
fine,
they
won't
do
it
again,
but
they
do
so.
We
can't
control
the
human
behavior.
A
The
police
is
not
in
the
police,
aren't
in
the
position
that
they
can
actually
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
that
type
of
thing,
because
there's
so
many
other
things
happening
in
the
city
with
you
know:
domestic
violence
and
anything
else.
It
takes
priority
over
it
so
and
with
our
hooning
and
with
our
our
youth
crime.
So,
unfortunately,
I
think
we
are,
we
can
do
the
best
we
possibly
can
with
the
tools
that
we've
got,
but
we
cannot
lead
them
to
water
and
then
make
them
drink.
B
I
thought
I
totally
agree
with
you,
I
suppose.
I
was
turning
my
mind
to
the
role
that
city
offices
have
when
they
work
with
event
organizers,
including
the
stadium
on
approving
traffic
management
plans
on
on
game
day.
So
it
might
be
that
there's
a
role
for
the
stadiums
to
include
advisory
signage
at
trouble
spots,
which
say
that
you
know
this
area
is
not
for
parking.
Heavy
fines
apply.
D
Sorry
quickly,
just
sorry
chair,
just
just
to
probably
alleviate
some
of
cancer
forces
concerns
we
we
do
absolutely
do
that.
We
will
continue
to
Advocate
and
certainly
Dale
and
the
team
have
been,
for
example,
heavily
involved
in
ensuring
people
understand
how
to
get
to
the
Pacific
air
show
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
D
You
know
there
are
key
things
that
we
will
do
with
event
organizers.
We
will
obviously
support
experience,
Gold
Coast
as
well,
when
they
take
over
the
big
ones
to
make
sure
that
we're
working
closely.
We
use
the
city
channels
as
well
to
to
supplement
the
messages
that
event
organizers,
give
with
the
how
to
get
there
and
make
sure
that
they're
using
appropriate
transport
options.
So
we
will
absolutely
continue
to
do
that
in
these
instances,
yeah.
I
Look
I'd
like
to
thank
the
officers.
They've
put
a
lot
of
work
time
and
effort
into
this
just
for
an
example
along
the
Esplanade
at
Burley
we're
having
problems
with
people
camping
there
permanently.
We
brought
in
the
three-hour
car
park
and
had
a
trial
period
because
you
know
we
wanted
to
get
feedback
from
the
residents
along
there
since
that's
been
put
in
place.
I
F
Foreign
chair:
yes,
we
do,
however,
they
are
being
still
worked
through
with
the
design.
With
the
with
the
contractor.
For
the
light
rail,
there
will
be
more
than
500
spots
lost.
However,
there
are
other
spots
that
are
being
looked
at
and
and
I
think,
there's
a
few
examples
in
third
and
fourth
Avenue
in
in
Burley,
where
we're
trying
to
gain
some
more
spots
on
the
on
the
side
streets
and
that's
probably
one
of
the
one
of
the
real
important
reasons.
F
The
demand
for
parking
in
that
in
that
zone
is
going
to
be
higher
and
we
need
to
make
sure
that
we
manage
it
effectively
and
we
have
the
turnover
of
spots
and
we
don't
have.
We
encourage
as
many
people
as
possible
to
use
Light
Rail
and
we
encourage
long-term
Parkers
not
to
park
in
that
area,
clogging
up
the
the
streets
for
the
local
residents
and
businesses
and
and
other
other
users
of
the
of
the
of
the
road.
I
Well,
with
the
lesson
500
car
Parks,
that's
pretty
Mass
Ive.
That
certainly
will
encourage
any
people
for
future
development
wanting
to
put
in
at
least
two
car
Parks
per
unit,
and
the
only
other
thing
that
I
would
like
to
ask
when
the
officers
did
speak
to
me
about
this,
I
did
ask
for
a
bigger
map
of
on
page
28.
I
just
wanted
to
see
the
boundary
streets
and
I.
Don't
think
that
I've
received
that.
So,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
sending
that
through,
so
it's
a
little
bit
clearer.
I
That
would
be
appreciated.
But
again
you
know
thank
you
for
the
work
and
I'm
sure
that
we're
going
to
get
some
very
interesting
feedback,
because
I
know
some
streets
I've
already
been
to
and
that's
been
offered
to
them
about
that
through
our
car
parking
and
they've
certainly
knocked
it
back.
So
it'll
be
interesting
just
to
see
what
the
feedback
comes
from
those
people
in
that
Community.
Thank
you.
G
You
thank
you
so,
just
in
regards
to
the
area
that
yellow
area
around
Regatta
parade,
my
understanding
is
the
pressure
was
coming
not
from
Cronin
Island
but
from
Grand
Motors
Marble
Bar
area.
Is
that
correct
through
the
chair?
Yes,
yeah,
okay
and
in
regards
to
the
Cronin
Island
residence,
if
the
local
representative
wanted
to
write
to
them
during
their
public
advertising
period
does
and
if
there
was
a
overwhelming
support
for
it
to
be
extended.
Is
that
an
opportunity.
D
G
J
G
G
To
the
to
the
rough
timing
of
that,
maybe
20
26
27
is
that
right,
25,
26,
yeah
so
and
I've
raised
with
officers
pretty
previously.
But
at
some
point
in
time
the
state
government
is
going
to
finish
or
well,
it's
going
to
start
and
then
finish
a
heavy
rail
station
at
Hope
Island,
which
will
have
an
impact
on
riverlinks
and
Montreal
keys.
So
I'd
want
to
make
sure
that
both
of
those
areas
are
front
and
center
and
I
don't
know
whether
or
not
there
are
going
to
be
similar
impacts
for
the
other.
G
Two
new
heavy
Railway
stations,
I
think
there's
one
at
pimpama.
Isn't
there
markets
on
stage
and
wherever
the
other
one
might
be,
and
then
there's
also
been
a
change
in
density
and
usage
on
and
on
Hope
Island
as
well,
which
I
think
is
probably
another
area
that
deserves
a
good
look
at
in
regards
to
Future
Taps
five.
A
M
Thank
you
and
I'm
just
so
curious
about
that
yellow
section
and
and
moving
forward
Harry
review
it,
because
chronoam
is
very
important
in
that
space
and
I.
Think
the
the
whole
program
works
fantastic
through
the
city.
But
that's
why
I
asked
the
question:
is
there
other
mechanisms
to
manage
that
situation
in
a
certain
area
outside
this
scheme,
because
I'd
be
very
concerns?
Seeing
us
continually
create
these
zones
and
all
we
are
is
putting
a
sign
up
at
an
entrance
point
and
I
know
the
residents
soon
work
it
out.
M
M
But
I
think
we're
just
got
to
be
mindful
that
as
we
expand
them,
we're
really
conscious
of
the
other
residents
and
have
we
got
other
tools
that
we
can
use
to
ensure
we
can
manage
a
smaller
area,
not
knowing
the
yellow
bit,
but
for
me
there
could
be
an
impact
that
we
could
use
other
tools
to.
Instead
of
actually
putting
them
into
a
complete
area,
so
just
your
thoughts
in
that
space,
yep.
D
Through
you,
madam
chair,
absolutely
that
is
correct,
counselor
and
I
think
it's
an
important
thing
similar
to
what
Dan
mentioned
earlier.
Sometimes
there
are
local
problems
with
different
interventions
that
we
can
look
at
so
certainly
this
is
not
the
only
way
to
potentially
fix
issues
in
local
areas.
It
is
a
big
part
of
the
local
law.
It's
a
long
process,
it's
quite
an
arduous
process.
So
obviously
that's
why
we
have
to
draw
the
land
line
in
the
sand
each
time
we
do
it
and
then
we'll
move
on
to
that.
D
But
certainly
we
will
absolutely
look
at
Community
issues
regularly
and
look
for
ways
that
we
may
be
able
to
resolve
those
in
an
interim
process
potentially
moving
into
into
a
longer
term
one
or
it
might
be
an
alternative.
But
certainly
we
are
more
than
happy
to
take
those
on
board
and
Dan,
and
the
team
will
work
through
those
individually.
D
A
Thanks
Darren
and
just
to
Dan
and
your
team.
Thank
you
very
much
for
all
your
work
on
this.
So
to
reiterate
what
council
McDonald
said,
you've
actually
really
looked
at
it.
We
know
that
mid-2025
we're
going
to
have
the
light
rail
going
all
the
way
through
to
Burley
and
to
see
that
here
we
are
mid-2023
that
you're
ensuring
that
this
investigation,
consultation
and
feedback
is
well
ahead
of
its
the
the
opening
of
the
next
stage
of
the
light
rail.
B
C
B
To
the
point
I
was
making,
and
you
can
certainly
speak
for
it
in
a
moment,
but
but
Mike's.
My
fear
is
that
the
community
aren't
alert
to
the
fact
that
there
will
be
500
fewer
spaces
in
the
area
and
speaking
with
Council
McDonald
before
certainly
a
figure.
That
is
news
to
her
and
I.
Just
worry
that,
because
the
community
don't
know
how
much
Supply
will
ultimately
be
available,
that's
a
little
bit
disingenuous
for
us
to
ask
them
to
make
somewhat
binding
decisions
concerning
the
way
parking
is
managed
in
this
Precinct
I.
B
Much
would
have
preferred
a
very
general
Community
consultation
through
GC
have
your
say
to
have
surfaced
some
of
these
issues
and
for
that
to
have
informed
our
proposed
boundaries
and
Regulatory
approach.
So
perhaps
we've
nailed
it.
Perhaps
my
my
concerns
won't
be
born
out
in
practice,
but
I
think
we
would
have
ended
up
with
a
much
more
defensible
outcome.
L
And
the
director
mentioned
that
the
point
of
this
was
to
fix
issues
and
I've
come
to
the
realization
that
what
we're
doing
in
this
area
is
we're
fixing
an
issue,
but
it's
not
actually
the
issue
that
the
residents
want
fixed.
So,
yes,
you've
taken
the
consultation
from
residents
when
residents
say
there's
too
many
people
from
businesses
parking
in
front
of
my
house
they're,
not
okay,
they
don't
like
it,
but
that's
not
the
underlying
concern.
L
The
underlying
concern
is
I
can't
park
outside
my
house
now
what
you're
presenting
and
what
you're
proposing
just
brings
another
reason
why
they
can't
park
outside
their
house
it.
Does
you
I'm
afraid
that
we
are
addressing
the
wrong
problem?
We
need
to
go
back
to
the
question.
The
question:
isn't?
How
do
we
move
business
people
out?
L
J
Through
the
chair,
so
if
they're
eligible
they're
able
to
park
on
the
street
with
their
permit
so,
for
example,
in
this
location
here,
if
a
person
lives
in
a
house
and
they
have
one
space
off
Street,
they
can
potentially
apply
for
two
permits
to
park
on
street.
If
they
have
three
or
more
spaces,
then
they
are
not
eligible
to
apply
for
a
permit.
A
A
If
they're
parked
outside
the
house
at
9am
in
the
morning,
they
can
be
there
at
9am
tomorrow
morning
because
they
have
a
permit
and
it's
outside
their
house,
so
the
3p
as
long
as
they're
eligible
for
that
and
they
can
secure
a
car
park
because,
as
that
Council
McDonald
said,
you
can
issue
a
thousand
permits
for
Burley
Esplanade,
but
there's
not
a
thousand
car
Parks.
So
it's
you
can
have
a.
If
you
are
eligible,
you
can
have
it.
A
You
can
park
outside
your
place
and
you
don't
need
to
walk
out
there
after
two
just
a
moment.
Please
counselor
Patterson,
while
I
speak
waving.
All
the
time
distracts,
so
they
can
actually
leave
their
cars
packed
there.
So
that's!
Basically
the
thing
is
that
they
can
stay
for
more
than
three
hours
if
they're
permitted.
L
So
I
appreciate
that
the
issue
with
this
and
I
realize
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
is,
because
you've
got
one
local
law
for
the
city,
but
the
issue
is
for
an
exam
for
an
area
like
this.
There
isn't
that
issue.
If
every
single
person
there
had
access
to
a
residential
permit,
they
would
there
would
not
be
a
parking
issue.
The
parking
issue
is
because
of
people
coming
from
outside.
L
So
it's
a
different
issue
to
the
other
ones
and
we're
doing
a
One-Stop
fixes
everything
and
it
doesn't.
We
are
going
to
get
exactly
the
same
amount
of
complaints
since
we
put
those
those
fixed
areas
in
here
I'm
getting
just
as
many
complaints
about
the
fact
they
can't
get
a
permit
and
they
still
have
the
same
problem.
They
can't
park
outside
their
home.
L
A
L
Are
all
empty
if
you
drive
there
today
they
are
all
empty.
There
is
no
one
parking
there
because
they
don't
have
a
right.
They
can't
get
a
parking
permit
and
also
the
business
people
are
not
parking
there.
So
they
are
empty
long
streets,
Regatta
parade!
You
can
walk,
you
can
go,
you
know
what
is
it
800
meters,
one
side
of
the
street?
You
will
not
see
a
car
there.
L
It
is
right,
I
promise
you
there's
a
lot
of
large
homes
there
who
have
adult
children
and
cannot
get
parking
permits
they
have
invested
into
their
into
their
property
so
that
they
have
garages
and
the
like,
and
if
they
use
that
for
a
different
purpose.
As
so
many
people
do
in
this
city,
they
can't
park
on
the
the
streets
that
are
vacant
currently
vacant.
So
I
appreciate
the
intention
here,
but
you
are
just
causing
another
world
of
problems.
A
Correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
you're,
just
saying
if
they've
got
garages
there,
but
they
use
those
for
other
purposes.
The
reality
of
it
is
if
they're
approval
for
their
D.A
conditions,
and
they
have
three
off-street
car
parkings
in
their
establishment
and
they're.
Using
that
for
other
purposes,
is
that
the
city's
problem?
No.
A
L
I
L
So
after
consultation
and
complaints
by
residents
about
three
years
ago,
we
brought
in
a
temporary
measure
of
this
3p
parking
permits.
So
this
this
exists
in
many
of
those
streets
in
that
yellow
highlighted
area
already,
it's
just
not
part
of
this
local
law.
So,
and
what
has
happened
is
we've
just
had
a
transfer
of
complaints,
a
transfer
from
there's
business
people
holding
it
up
to
now.
The
streets
are
vacant,
but
I'm
not
allowed
to
park
in
it
still.
So
that's
the
problem.
L
This
thing
that
we're
looking
at
bringing
in
Monday
to
Friday
3p
is
currently
in
place
in
a
lot
of
those
streets,
and
it
was
the
solution
we
saw
for
an
issue,
but
it
is
causing
another
problem.
So
until
this
policy
is
aligned
with
our
parking
permits,
it
isn't
solving
the
problem.
It's
solving
a
different
problem.
A
D
Correct
so
through
you,
madam
chair,
this
I
think
is
his
first
time
presenting
at
committee,
so
Liam,
De
Luca,
is
our
executive
coordinator
of
our
ocean
beaches
and
Waterway.
I
won't
call
him
the
new
Shannon
because
he's
an
amazing
Coastal
engineer
in
his
own
right
and
you
will
also
be
hearing
from
him
at
a
couple
of
other
committees.
Given
the
ocean
beaches
work,
that's
coming
to
the
end
of
life
from
the
strategy
perspective.
N
Can
I
just
say
that
the
team's
done
a
great
job
of
the
report
and
I
think
you've
covered
off
quite
well
and
extensively
all
the
questions
that
were
put
to
you
with
this
petition,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify
a
few
items,
and
this
is
on
behalf
of
the
lead,
petitioner
and
I.
Think
you're
quite
well
aware
that
the
lead
petitioner
had
a
lot
of
questions
about
whether
rainbow
Bay
in
particular
is
still
a
safe
swimming
beach.
N
He
does
not
believe
it
is
he's
a
swimmer
he's,
not
a
I,
don't
think
he's
a
recreational
swimmer.
He
does
like
to
swim,
and
that
means
he
has
to
go
out
where
it's
deeper
to
start.
His
swimming
he's
also
heard
on
several
occasions.
Lifeguards
comments
surf
Surf
Club
comments,
saying
that
the
the
beach
is
not
safe
and
at
several
times
of
course,
flags
have
to
come
down
to
science.
Go
up,
saying
it's
unsafe
to
swim.
N
O
And
then
on
the
beach
profile,
the
wave
of
water
level,
conditions
and
other
people
that
are
using
the
space
like
any
of
our
beaches,
it
can
be
safe
and
it
can
be
unsafe.
So
I'd
encourage
anybody
going
to
any
of
our
beaches
to
assess
the
conditions
themselves
and,
of
course,
look
at
the
signage
and
swim
between
the
flags
But.
Ultimately,
the
the
tweets
and
bypasses
return,
the
beach
to
the
condition
it
was
before
the
extension
of
the
break
quarters
in
in
the
60s,
and
it
hasn't
contributed
negatively
to
amenity
or
safety
in
that
location.
N
Ken
Madam
chair:
do
you
think
that
the
placement
of
sand
in
and
around
rainbow
Bay
has
has
the
effect?
It
certainly
has
the
effect
that
it
widens
the
beach,
but
sometimes
it
doesn't
actually
end
up
on
Rainbow
Bay.
Anyway,
it
does
drift
drift
North
anyway,
and
that's
just
Mother
Nature
taking
its
course
I
mean
I
sit
on
the
advisory
committee,
so
I'm
well
aware
of
where
the
placement
of
sand
is
why
it's
placed
in
the
in
the
in
the
boxes
that
it
is
placed.
N
But
in
your
opinion,
is
that
placement
of
then
could
it
be
placed
better?
Could
we
look
at
something
else
to
maybe
not
get
so
much
sand
at
Rainbow
Bay
and
maybe
make
it
safer,
because
when
it
is
unsafe,
when
their
surf
conditions
that
are
unsafe
and
there's
a
lot
of
board
riders
in
that
area
too,
and
and
bodyboarders,
they
often
close
the
beach,
not
just
smooth
the
flags.
O
So
through
the
chair,
I
suppose
we're
balancing
a
number
of
things
in
that
location
if
we
were
to
not
Place
sand
in
that
location,
we'd
obviously
increase
the
the
risk
of
erosion
and
would
also
reduce
the
amount
of
space
available
for
people
to
lie
on
and
would
also
potentially
negatively
impact
surf
amenity.
So
there's
a
number
of
factors
that
need
to
be
balanced
there
and,
and
we
believe
that
the
bypass
has
got
the
balance
right
at
the
moment
in
terms
of
supporting
all
of
the
uses
in
that
location.
Thank.
N
O
O
N
A
A
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
don't
know
about
other
councilors,
but
I'm,
getting
quite
a
number
of
complaints
about
the
lime
bikes,
how
they're
being
left
around
the
city
and
every
day
I
would
have
complaints
driving
around
you
see,
Bunches
of
maybe
a
dozen
they're
so
heavy
to
move
their
people
just
leave
them
where
they
are
they're
left
on
the
roads.
They're
left
on
the
footpath
they're
left
in
Parks
I've
seen
photos
whether
up
in
trees,
they're
up
on
our
toilet
blocks
and
I'm,
just
wondering
what
we
can
do
to
solve.
The
problem.
D
The
team
did
provide
a
response,
I
think
through
to
the
media
team,
but
I,
don't
think
that's
gone
quite
through
yet
so
we
will
be
coming
to
committee
to
talk
about
line
bikes.
There's
a
renewal
coming
up
in
terms
of
the
the
contract.
What
I
can
tell
you
is
that
they
have
increased
their
Fleet.
That
is
why
people
are
seeing
more
line.
D
Bikes
is
because
there
are
more
bikes
around
and
certainly
there
there
are
contractual
commitments
that
they
are
required
to
make
in
terms
of
the
pickup
and
particularly
if
they
are
left
in
places
that
are
not
appropriate.
But
absolutely
there
is
a
committed
report
forthcoming
relating
to
the
bikes
and
the
ongoing
contractual
arrangements
with
those
that
we
can
discuss.
Then.
N
Thanks
Madam
chair
just
through
due
to
the
director
will
that
report
have
some
information
on
maybe
some
more
docking
stations
further
south,
because
I,
probably
the
further
south
I've
seen
one
is,
is
at
Palm,
Beach
and
I.
Think
that
may
be
part
of
the
problem
that
special
I'm
getting
a
lot
of
complaints
too
and
they're
being
left,
Here,
There
and
Everywhere,
but
we've
as
far
as
I
know,
we've
got
no
docking
stations
as
such
in
my
in
my
area.
D
That
that
is
correct
for
you,
ma'am
chair.
We,
we
will
absolutely
work
on
some
of
those
components,
there's
obviously
things
that
are
within
the
current
contract
and
there's
things
that
we
would
maybe
like
to
discuss
with
lime,
lime,
bikes
that
will
we
can
enter
into.
So
we
will
absolutely
have
that
conversation
as
as
part
of
that
report,
thanks.
A
Cancer
cell
I'm
going
to
leave
it
there.
Okay,
all
right,
so
we're
going
to
move
into
close
negotiations
relating
to
commercial
matter
involving
the
local
government,
for
which
a
public
discussion
would
likely
print
you,
the
centers
of
the
local
government.
So
if
I
could
have
somebody
move
us
into
closed,
which
is
councilor
Patterson.
Second,
at
councilor
Hamel,
all
those
in
favor
that's
carried.
A
A
A
A
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
K
A
A
A
A
A
All
right
and
welcome
back
to
all
of
those
hundreds
of
viewers
out
there
who
are
who
have
watching
our
transport
and
infrastructure
committee.
We
have
been
in
closed
session
for
two
two
items
for
negotiations
relating
to
the
commercial
matters.
So
item
7.1,
significant
contract
plan
for
peachy
Road
upgrade
our
mover.
There
was
councilor,
Hamill
and
seconded
was
councilor
Taylor.
A
A
A
A
Cancer
does
we
have
a
gbi
up
there
moved
by
councilor,
Owen
Jones,
second
and
by
myself,
all
those
in
favor
carried
unanimously.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
councilor
Alan
Jones
for
that.
If
there's
no
other
business
items
today,
I
declare
the
meeting
closed
at
2
55
pm.
Thank
you.
Everyone
for
your
input.