►
Description
00:00 Meeting Commences, Attendance/Apologies, Leave of Absence, Confirmation of Minutes,
01:20 Conflict of Interest Declarations 4.1, Committee Forward Planning Schedule, Reports and Presentations
04:25 Report 6.1
09:40 Report 6.2
43:00 Report 6.3
55:55 Report 6.4
1:11:15 Report 6.5
1:24:38 Closed Session Reports and Presentations, General Business
A
C
A
D
Eight
two
and
six
point:
one
thanks:
chairman
in
2011,
I
received
675
dollars
from
RPS
planning,
I
presume
they're
associated
with
RPS
Australia
mentioned
in
the
body
of
the
report,
but
I'm
seeking
to
remain
in
the
room,
because
I've
had
no
contact
with
the
consultant
for
many
years
and
I
personally
believe
that
donation
is
minor
and
remote.
Such
that
a
reasonable
person
will
trust
that
a
final
decision
would
be
made
in
the
public
interest.
E
A
D
B
A
A
A
E
I'm
happy
to
move
the
the
change
recommendation.
Yeah
so
so
presently
read
set
the
leap
petition
and
be
advised
that
fairy
lights
will
not
being
sold
on
the
treason,
Varsity
parade
and
Lake
Street
at
this
time,
but
will
be
considered
for
future
installation
as
the
nighttime
economy
in
Varsity.
Lakes
grows
full
stop
if
we
could
add
a
second.
E
Yeah
look
thanks:
Mr
chairman,
first
and
foremost,
I
just
want
to
flag
with
City
officers
and
I
have
made
declarations
which
Council
have
supported
and
allowed
me
to
participate
in
this
debate.
Just
want
to
flag
again
of
a
friend
an
electoral
donor
operates
the
business
in
the
precinct.
My
brother
owns
I
had
an
office
suite
I've
previously
made
those
declarations,
so
I
don't
need
to
make
them
again.
E
Here,
I
was
contacted
by
local
business,
who
requested
the
installation
of
fairy
lights
down
Varsity
parade,
because
in
their
view,
that
was
required
to
bring
this
the
center
up
to
the
same
standard
as
say:
Chevron,
Island
and
other
precincts
across
the
Gold
Coast
City
officers
considered
the
installation
of
fairy
lights
and
they
were
not
simply
not
value
for
money.
Fairy
lights
were
installed
in
this
area.
E
Prior
to
my
election,
I
think
fifteen
thousand
dollars
were
spent
in
the
fairy
lights,
didn't
last
very
long
because
they
were
strapped
to
branches
which
grew
and
everything
kind
of
snapped
in
order
to
protect
the
rate
pay
a
dollar
in
order
to
light
up
these
trees.
What
really
would
be
required
is
some
under
Road
civil
work,
which
would
blow
the
cost
out
astronomically.
E
Also,
the
retail
mix
on
that
strip
really
doesn't
demand
the
installation
of
ornamental
lighting
because
there
isn't
presently
much
of
a
nighttime
economy
in
place.
What
we
do
have,
though,
is
an
opportunity
to
better
activate,
what's
called
Varsity
Promenade,
which
forms
part
of
the
key
of
Varsity
Lakes,
and
in
order
to
support
that
activation,
the
members
of
our
city
place,
making
team
have
put
together
a
plan
of
new
embellishments
and
soft
upgrades,
and
that
plan
will
form
part
of
my
division.
E
11
local
area
Works
program,
which
is
proposed
for
next
financial
year
and
councilors,
will
have
an
opportunity
to
support
that
or
otherwise,
when
we
adopt
the
budget.
The
purpose
of
adding
this
second
part
to
the
changed
recommendation
is
simply
to
signal
to
the
lead
petitioner
that,
although
they
have
not
had
their
particular
suggestion
progressed,
we
are
actually
investing
quite
heavily
or
proposed
to
in
the
precinct
to
support
the
same
objectives
as
they
hold
so
different
solution
to
the
same
problem.
Thanks
Mr
chairman.
A
A
B
B
A
J
It
is
in
close
proximity
to
local
transport
routes
and
the
character
of
the
area
is
a
mixture
of
large
two-story
dwellings
and
single
story.
Dwellings
with
some
houses
having
built
boundary,
carports
awesome.
The
subject.
Side
itself
is
a
square
corner
lot
with
a
side
that
is
a
size
of
755
meters.
Squared
it
benefits
the
two
frontages
and
at
the
moment,
is
currently
improved
by
a
single
story.
Dwelling
house.
J
So
the
ground
floor
of
the
proposal
has
AO
compliance
setbacks
to
the
adjoining
neighboring
dwellings,
with
a
small
encroachment
to
the
front
boundary
setback
of
King
card
and
drive.
Both
dwellings
propose
built-to-bounded
carports.
These
achieve
the
appropriate
amenity
outcome
of
50
transparency,
as
well
as
the
front
fence.
Landscaping
is
included
outside
the
front
fence,
but
also
inside
of
the
site,
boundaries
that
softens
the
built
form
along
Roderick,
Court
and
King
carton
Drive.
The
dwellings
are
separated
and
are
viewed
from
the
street
as
individual
dwelling
houses.
J
J
The
key
considerations
for
this
proposal
was
the
residential
density
being
one
dwelling
per
377
meters
squared
not
as
it
doesn't
comply
with
the
1
per
400
meter.
Squared
the
Strategic
framework
identifies
that
jaw
occupancies
are
contemplated
within
the
low
density
residential
Zone,
where
they
allocated
on
Dual
Frontage,
have
occur
in
low
concentrations
and
achieve
a
low
intensity.
Low
rise
outcome.
J
An
analysis
of
the
surrounding
area
in
the
site
has
found
that
the
proposal
can
achieve
these
benchmarks,
as
it
is
located
on
a
dual
Frontage
corner
lot.
The
Dual
occupancy
there's
only
one
average
occupancy
in
the
area
and
it's
located
130
meters,
west
of
the
subject
site.
Therefore
achieving
a
gentle
scattering
effect.
The
character
of
the
area
is
currently
of
large
dwelling
houses
that
have
some
existing
bulk
in
the
area.
J
The
resulting
built,
form,
setbacks
and
site
cover
represents
something
that
is
already
existing
in
the
area
with
those
large
dwelling
houses,
therefore
achieving
the
desired
outcome
of
the
low
density
residential
Zone.
In
this
context,
public
notification
we
received
74
properly
made
submissions.
One
petition
containing
29
signatures
and
18
of
those
submissions
were
in
support
of
the
development.
J
This.
This
slide
shows
the
submissions
in
a
broader
context
of
the
Gold
Coast
and
in
conclusion,
The
Proposal.
The
proposed
development
complies
with
the
Strategic
framework
to
provide
to
provide
housing
options
in
the
Suburban
neighborhoods
officers.
Recommend
office
recommendation
is
approval
for
the
development
info
with
conditions.
J
So
I've
done
multiple
site
visits.
I've
got
a
couple
of
sites
here.
The
top
slide
is
the
adjacent
neighboring,
drawing
yeah
the
two
enabling
dwellings.
They
both
have
carports
I'm,
not
sure
if
they
had
garages
as
well
as
the
carport
and
then
the
second
image
is
the
two
properties
directly
across
the
road,
so
they
both
have
carports
as
well.
I
am
not
I
didn't
look
inside
to
see
if
they
had
other
garages
as
well
as
carports.
E
I'm
generally
reluctant
to
say
that
I,
you
know,
the
proposed
outcome
is
consistent
with
the
balance
of
the
area
if
the
rest
of
the
dwellings
provide
for
garage
car
parking
as
well
as
a
carport,
because
I
think
a
dwelling
with
only
a
car
park.
That's
our
only
a
carport
is
very
different
to
a
garage
and
a
carport.
Sorry.
D
E
From
the
street,
you
know
no
I
totally
get
that
I'm,
just
saying
how,
if
we
are
relying
on
a
comparison
of
how
this
development
looks
and
functions
compared
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood.
For
me,
what
one
lenses
I
cast
on
is
the
where
the
homes
have
got
sort
of
closed
garages
that
are
safe
and
secure
I.
J
E
What
I'm
interested
in
is
whether
those
other
properties
with
carports
also
have
gout-like
closed,
enclosed
garages
right
and
I
just
wondered
whether
When
They
carried
out
their
neighborhood
analysis,
whether
they
broke
down
those
figures,
it
doesn't
sound
like
it,
which
is
fine.
It's
it's
something
that
I'll
pick
the
brains
of
the
local
counselor
can
I
just
ask
in
terms
of
site
coverage.
How
did
we
land
and
I
want
to
ask
a
follow-up
question
about
the
site
coverage
and
those
carports.
J
E
E
E
K
E
C
J
As
part
of
the
site
analysis
I
went
to
this
a
number
of
times.
A
lot
of
the
existing
homes
I
feel
are
built
forward
because
of
the
canal
frontages
and
the
they
have
like
built,
then
from
an
aerial
image,
extended
the
pergolas
and
everything
so
yeah.
That
was
taken
into
consideration
that
the
area
has
an
existing
high
side
cover
of
those
things
specifically.
I
C
C
L
Just
a
I
guess
just
a
comment,
something
not.
That
would
be
really
handy
in
the
report
because
obviously,
you've
been
out
and
you've
had
a
really
good
look
at
the
area
because
when
you
say
100
odd,
carports
within
that
distance-
and
we
all
know
and
there's
not
a
person
in
this
room.
That
could
admit
it
that
if
you
went
and
asked
those
people
who
have
built
carports
at
the
front
of
their
renovated
properties
to
lift
up
their
garage
doors
they're
either
an
unapproved
room
or
they're
full
of
all
of
their.
L
We
actually
know
what's
going
to
be
on
that
site
unless
they
actually
start
closing
in
garages
and
that
so
I
think
that
more
than
that
slide
more
than
anything
else
goes
to
show
the
character
and
that
of
the
area
and
that
the
this
property
here
actually
doesn't
sit
outside
and
if
you
said
all
single
level,
Little,
Beach,
fibro
dwellings
or
something
I
don't
understand,
but
a
presentation
like
that
just
goes
to
show
that
this
has
been
carefully
thought
out
and
it's
is
a
good
urban
renewal
in
that
area.
That's.
L
A
A
F
The
department
that
would
be
very
much
appreciated
if
I
could
thank
you
Mr
chair.
Firstly,
I,
don't
have
any
issue
at
all
with
what
the
council
officers
have
done
here.
As
far
as
the
the
extent
of
the
investigations
they've
undertaken,
I.
Think
John
has
you
know,
as
he
said,
he's
been
out
on
side
he's
looked
very,
very
carefully.
He's
answered
everything
and
I
can
understand
why
the
committee
is
sort
of
saying
well
yeah.
You
know
because
it
is
a
very
thorough
presentation.
My
issue
is
not
with
the
officer's
interpretation
of
this.
F
F
Then
then,
basically,
you
can
you
can
subdivide
and
do
that,
but
it
makes
it
quite
clear
that
it's
800
square
meters,
this
block,
is
755
square
meters
and
the
dwellings
are
going
to
be
sitting
so
we're
looking
at
377
square
meters.
My
concern
and
rhetorical
question:
I
guess
is:
where
does
it
stop?
It
always
seems
to
be
well
yeah.
You
know
it's
about
50
square
meters
under,
but
you
know
we
can.
We
can
still
make
make
this
work.
Is
it
800
square
meters?
Is
it
750?
Is
it
seven?
F
F
We
might
as
well
just
throw
that
out
the
window,
the
800
square
meters,
because
no
matter
how
and
I
think
in
places
like
Varsity
we've
even
got
blocks,
we've
actually
got
dual
locking
sitting
on,
so
each
one
will
be
sitting
on
around
what
300
to
270
300,
which
to
me
is
is
absolutely
insane
so
I
can
understand.
As
I
say
from
an
officer
point
of
view,
why
they've
come
up
with
this
and
so
I
can't
afford
what
what
John
has
done
and
what
the
other
officers
done
here.
F
As
far
as
saying
this
is
how
it
meets
the
requirements
with
the
acceptable
outcomes,
but
the
fact
is
it's
not
an
acceptable
outcome
for
the
local
community
and
yes,
we
can
actually
look
and
John's
absolutely
right.
I've
been
on
site,
I
I
know
the
the
area.
Well,
even
though
I
only
inherited
this
area
at
the
last
election,
but
yes,
within
a
hundred
120
square.
Well,
meters,
radius,
120
meter
radius.
F
Yes,
there's
one
at
number,
eight
I
think
it
is
and
I
think
you
actually
had
it
on
the
on
the
screen
but
yeah,
which
is
a
you
know,
just
opposite,
but
in
the
immediate
vicinity
there
isn't
anything
else.
Roderick
called,
of
course,
that's
a
little
cul-de-sac.
Everything
is
low
rise
there.
So
for
the
immediate
neighbors,
yes,
Edinburgh,
Road,
benowa
Road.
When
you
get
onto
those
larger
those
larger
streets,
there
are
a
lot
of
bigger
properties.
F
These
blocks.
Some
of
these
blocks
are
a
lot
smaller
than
those
blocks
and
whatever
you
say
this,
this
building
and
let's
face
it.
Architectural
Merit
is
a
bit
like
Arts,
you
know,
and
and
Beauty
it's
in
the
eye
of
the
beholder.
What
what
I
might
think
looks
attractive
in
a
building.
Someone
else
might
think
looks
you
know
butt
ugly
and
vice
versa,
but
and
vice
versa,
but
the
the
thing
here
is
architecturally.
Yes,
it's
whether
you
like
that
or
not.
F
You
can
see
that
it's
going
to
be
a
quality
home,
but
the
site
coverage
is
over
the
acceptable
site
coverage
and
the
overall
appearance
of
this
is
something
that's
quite
bulky.
It
just
looks
bulky
I
know
it's
10
on
the
top
I
know
it's
30
on
the
middle
level
and
I
know
it's
50
53
54
on
the
bottom
level,
but
the
overall
effects
when
you
drive
in,
is
you're
just
going
to
get
this
this
bulk,
and
it
is
going
to
look
out
of
character
with
the
immediate
with
the
immediate
area
and
the
partial
third
story.
F
Again.
Yes,
it's
just
under
that
nine
meters,
but
again
that
just
makes
it
a
game,
look
quite
imposing
an
outer
character.
So,
from
my
point
of
view,
there's
no
way
in
the
world
that
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
support
this
when
it
comes
to
full
Council
and
I
can
fully
understand
why
there
were
50.
Six
submissions
objecting
to
this
and
I
can
understand
why
there
was
the
petition
with
another
29
names.
F
I
always
look
at
any
any
situation
like
this
was
how
would
I
feel
if
I
was
living
next
door
to
it
or
within
close
proximity
to
it,
and
I
certainly
wouldn't
want
it
next
door
to
me.
So
obviously,
there's
a
move
at
this
second
to
here,
we'll
see
how
that
goes.
But
to
me
the
development
doesn't
fit,
even
though
I
can
understand
why
the
officers
have
said
it
has
I
can't
fault
as
I
say
what
what
the
officers
have
done.
F
L
I
just
wanted
that
on
the
record,
because
it's
not
that
everybody
within
the
local
area
is
objecting
because
there
are
people
in
the
area
that
would
or
who
don't
live
in
the
area.
Who
would
possibly
like
the
opportunity
to
live
in
that
area
but
unable
to
buy
a
site
big
enough
for
a
house
big
enough
to
suit
their
needs.
So
I
think
I
just
wanted
that
on
the
record
that
there
was
actually
one.
J
C
I
just
wanted
to
get
clarification
because
councilor
Castro
brought
up
acceptable
outcomes,
but
just
clarification
that,
while
it
doesn't
meet
a
couple
of
the
AO
outcomes
that,
when
reviewed
under
the
Strategic
and
performance
outcomes,
it
does
meet
requirements,
I
feel
like
it
was
very
selective
to
only
bring
up
the
acceptable
outcomes
and
not
refer
to
the
other.
Two
parts
of
the
planning
scheme.
K
Through
you,
Mr
chair,
that
is
correct,
an
alternative
outcome
is
only
one
way
of
meeting
compliance
with
the
city
plan.
Officers
always
go
to
the
PO.
The
performance
outcome
for
the
actual
assessment
and
in
this
case
officers
are
convinced
that
the
application
meets
all
relevant
performance
outcomes.
A
D
D
I
won't
go
into
detail,
but
the
fact
is
when
the
performance
outcomes
can
be
met
and
the
officers
provide
us
with
a
recommendation
having
given
thorough
consideration
to
all
of
those
performance
outcomes,
and
they
tell
us
that
it
complies
with
the
Strategic
framework,
which
is
the
level
above
our
General
scheme.
When
impact
assessment
is
undertaken,
it's
foolish
not
to
accept
the
officer's
recommendation,
because
any
resulting
appeal
in
my
view
would
see
us
go
down
the
gurgler.
So
this
is
a
fine
looking
development
I
can
appreciate.
D
Councilor
Le
Castro
is
doing
his
best
to
represent
his
community,
but
in
my
view,
looking
at
the
the
perspectives
on
page
179,
what
you
see
is
two
amazing
looking
developments
that
will
provide
uplift
to
that
area,
and
we
know
that
these
can
only
be
delivered
on
Corner
blocks.
I'm,
not
sure
if
this
is
the
first
of
its
kind
in
that
area,
Council,
Le,
castra,
or
how
many
opportunities
exist
for
something
more,
but
they
do
look
like
individual
dwellings
and
I
I.
B
You
chair
so
just
a
couple
of
observations.
Firstly,
it's
it's
not
a
subdivision,
it's
a
dual
occupancy
and
that's
the
scheme
allows
for
that
and
clearly
allows
for
it
to
be
salt
and
peppered
through
this
zoning.
In
the
context
of
corner
Lots,
the
400
meter
Benchmark
is
effectively
elevated
to
a
higher
level
of
assessment,
which
is
what
has
happened
here
today
through
the
impact
assessment,
as
opposed
to
being
code
assessable
counselor
Le
Castro
will
be
aware
that
we
have
a
we
don't
have
a
prescriptive
scheme.
F
Saying
I
wasn't
saying
that
I
wasn't
calling
you
about
ugly
sorry,
I
was
saying:
I
wasn't
saying
that
this
architectural
design
for
this
building
was
but
I
was
talking
in
general
terms
of
when
we
look
at
architectural
design,
some
people
might
think
it's
beautiful.
Some
people
might
think
it's
about
ugly
as
I
say,
I.
Think
architecturally
as
I
say.
I
think
this
is
as
I
say.
It
looks
really
good,
but
it
looks
bulky
so
I
wasn't
referring
to
this
product.
Okay,.
B
Thank
you,
I
apologize
if
I've
misunderstood
your
reference
and
yeah
and
ultimately
in
this
benowa
areas
as
we're
going
to
see
in
part
two
of
today's
substantial
papers
for
the
planning
we've
got
growth
in
the
city
and
in
the
benowa
area.
The
estimated
population
over
the
next
20
years
is
is
destined
to
be
another
500
people
living
in
the
area.
B
So
it's
going
to
go
from
seven
thousand
to
seven
and
a
half
thousand,
and
it's
going
to
do
that
through
the
gentle
change
in
the
in
the
landscape
that
is
allowed
for
by
the
planning
scheme.
So,
in
that
regards
it's
under
the
height
it
was
triggered
to
a
high
level
of
assessment
because
it
was
less
than
the
400
square
meters.
There
is
no
black
and
white
as
to
what
too
small
enough
is,
but
councilor
Castro
you'll
recall
when
a
similar
dual
occupancy
came
through
recently
at
helensvale.
B
A
So
I
just
referred
back
to
some
of
my
notes,
which
are
the
refer
to
publicly
available
documentation
on
the
Court's
website,
for
example,
in
relation
to
our
number
of
pills,
received
and
resolution
right,
and
that's
to
say
that
at
the
moment
we
have
54
appeals
open
in
the
system.
The
equivalent
number
to
that
when
I
was
first
elected
in
2012,
was
in
excess
of
120..
A
A
So
I'm
very
happy
to
take
any
questions
on
those
matters.
But
our
position
on
appeals
has
been
that
we
have
been
receiving
somewhere
between
about
45
and
70
appeals
annually,
and
we
have
an
in
excess
of
100
resolution
rate
per
annum,
which
is
the
rate
that
which
they
come
in
the
door
and
go
out
the
door
during
any
given
12
months.
So
I
think
for
anyone
watching
at
home.
They
should
have
a
great
deal
of
comfort
that
we
are
not
spending
any
more
money
on
appeals
than
is
absolutely
necessary.
A
A
A
B
M
M
M
Sure
so,
good
morning,
councilors
chair,
my
name's
Anne
McKenzie
I'm,
the
coordinator
for
culture,
Heritage
and
I'll
present
on
behalf
of
the
office
of
architecture
and
Heritage.
Today,
purpose
of
the
presentation
really
will
be
twofold:
I
guess,
firstly,
to
provide
a
summary
report
of
the
streets
of
remembrance
project
and,
secondly,
to
present
the
four
options
for
Council
consideration.
M
M
There
have
been
some
challenges
through
that
process,
for
example
this
year,
despite
significant
research
over
60
percent
of
the
leads
could
not
be
validated
either
because
there
were
a
lack
of
Records
or
because
that
lead
was
shown
to
be
incorrect.
Nonetheless,
we've
had
great
Community
feedback
and
I
believe
it's.
It's
engendered,
Community
Pride
in
a
collective
sense
of
Gold
Coast
identity,
as
we
can
see
in
the
photo.
We've
got
Mrs
penins
who
participated
in
this
year's
media
event.
She
was
there
commemorating
her
late
husband
among
others,
sorry,
her
late
husband's
father,
Among,
Us.
M
So
the
project
is
scheduled
to
conclude
on
the
30th
of
June
of
this
year,
but
City
officers
have
presented
four
options
for
council's
consideration.
Should
you
wish
to
continue
if
we
do
continue,
the
office
of
architecture
and
Heritage
can
deliver
the
project
in
time
for
alignment
with
Anzac
Day
2024.,
so
I'll
just
present
the
four
options
now
for
you
so
option
A
is
effectively
a
continuation
of
the
commemorative
badging
program.
M
M
Option
C
is
to
focus
on
the
Gold
Coast
Wharf
Homefront
War
narrative,
to
increase
the
community's
understanding
of
the
experience
on
the
Gold
Coast.
This
has
been
estimated
to
cost
between
five
and
ten
thousand
dollars
and
also
has
a
high
likelihood
of
success
because
of
redrawing
on
existing
information.
M
M
B
On
Jones
see
if
I
could
just
ask
a
couple
of
questions
to
you
Mr
chair.
Firstly,
in
regards
to
the
research
that
identified
some
of
the
streets
that
had
been
misspelled.
What
was
our
final?
Where,
where
do
you
think
we
should
finally
rest
with
that,
leaving
the
streets
as
they
are
currently
identified?.
H
B
Yeah,
unfortunately,
it
can
be
a
bit
complicated
when
there
are
so
it's
everybody's
mailing
addresses
it's
all
of
their
legal
documentation
around
mortgages
Etc.
So
so
I'm
I'm
pleased
to
hear
that
they're
identified
on
the
web
page
but
I
don't
know
whether
or
not
we
need
to
pursue
the
change
of
the
blades
or
the
streets
formally.
B
When
we
had
a
briefing
a
couple
of
weeks
ago,
we
mentioned
whether
or
not
there
should
be
a
process
that
could
be
created
so
rather
than
option
A
where
we
pursue
research
over
22
possible
leads,
but
maybe
a
a
process
that
could
be
created
wherever
counselor
was
aware
or
was
made
aware
of
a
street
that
might
have
been
named
after
a
deceased
service
person,
whether
or
not
that
could
be
brought
forward
to
city
offices
for
consideration.
Did
you
give
any
consideration
to
that.
H
B
So
so
it
clearly,
it
would
come
at
a
cost
to
research
to
make
sure
that
the
thought
was
right
and
likewise,
during
the
briefing
we
had
that
discussion,
I
think
there
was
a.
There
was
a
clutch
of
streets
in
Southport
where
they
had
been
named
after
both
service
Personnel,
who
had
been
killed
in
action,
but
also
service
Personnel,
who
had
served
and
I
think
that
we
we
saw
this
program
being
very
much
a
program
to
recognize
those
that
have
been
killed
in
action,
rather
than
necessarily
those
that
had
served.
I
M
B
M
Through
the
chair,
it's
in
it
was
intended
that
it
would
be
all
women
memorials
across
the
city,
regardless
of
the
nature
of
the
tenure.
So
we
actually
have
a
huge
number
of
War
memorials
across
the
city
that
come
in
all
shapes
and
forms.
Some
of
them
are
actually,
for
example,
you
know
cenotaphs
with
the
names
of
service
Personnel.
Some
of
them
are
figurative
representations,
and
some
of
them
are
actually
buildings
that
we
have
yeah.
B
So
so,
and
I
I
suppose
I
ask
because
I
know
of
at
least
four
examples.
So
the
oxenford
state
school
have
a
have
a
a
display
as
such,
which
was
funded
by
the
federal
government.
Sea
change
have
Arundel,
have
an
area.
The
The
Sanctuary
Cove
have
a
designated
area
now
as
well
and
they're
at
maudsland,
the
kumara
CWA
on
their
land
have
a
memorial
which
is
used
for
Dawn
services.
So
so
that's
just
four
examples
and
I'm,
assuming
that
throughout
the
city,
it'll
be
a
lot
more
like
that.
M
Through
the
chair,
yes,
there
are
many,
and
actually
all
that
information
is
readily
available.
We
did
a
bit
of
reconnaissance,
just
an
anticipation
of
putting
together
the
report
and
I
was
confirmed.
There
are
well
over
45
across
the
city
and
in
addition
to
that,
a
number
of
additional
plaques,
for
example,
and
all
of
that
information
could
be
included
onto
a
web
page
for
the
community's
interest
and
also
as
a
resource,
because
that
currently
doesn't
exist.
It's
all
kind
of
spread
across
multiple
platforms,
currently.
G
You
chairman,
you've
already
mentioned
cenotype
so
I
I
did
have
a
question
specific
to
that
through
your
chair,
because
the
document
talks
about
War
memorials
but
I
know,
for
example,
at
nerang
that
there's
not
a
memorial
in
the
sense
that
we
have
it
upper
cooma.
But
there
is
a
senator
for
the
outside
the
memorial
Club.
So
would
that
be
included.
M
G
You
and
if
I,
might
just
use
this
opportunity
to
draw
your
attention.
The
RSL
sub
Branch
at
nerang
has
a
on
a
board
which
is
just
in
their
room.
It's
it's
very
old
and
it's
the
original
I
mean,
and
it
would
be
good
for
that
to
be
included
as
a
piece
that
gets
reviewed
with
the
proposal.
That's
before
us,
there
is
still
scope.
I
need
to
be
sure
for
people
to
nominate
streets,
even
though
we're
not
specifically
preferring
option
A.
That's.
M
A
B
To
speak
to
that
councilman,
yeah
I
think
it's
been
a
great
program
and
and
I
think
it.
It
clearly
reflects
the
city's
commitment
to
those
that
have
served
for
Australia
and
I.
Think
it's
been
incredibly
well
received
by
our
residents
and
it's
a
it's
a
touching
tribute
and
a
digital.
The
the
ability
to
have
information,
easily
displayed
digitally
will
be
I,
think
well
received
by
the
Gold
Coast
population
as
well.
G
N
N
You
may
recall
that
Council
reviewed
the
lgp
around
November
late
November
early
December,
and
it
was
resolved
to
essentially
approve
that
version
to
send
to
the
minister
for
approval
for
Council
to
adopt.
So
this
report
is
essentially
closing
out
the
last
stage
of
the
process,
and
it
also
includes
some
consequential
changes
to
the
Land
Development
guidelines
to
ensure
that
the
actual
City
plan,
if
it's
adopted
today,
has
consistent
embellishment
standards
for
parks.
N
The
consequential
minor
amendments
I
mentioned,
relate
to
the
city
plan
policy,
Land,
Development
development
guidelines,
the
section
dealing
with
public
park,
recreation
and
sport
parks.
As
I
said,
it's
really
to
ensure
that
there
is
alignment,
because
the
LG
includes
updated
standards,
so
the
standards
that
were
in
the
ldgs
or
the
Land
Development
guidelines
would
be
superseded
by
those
standards
in
part,
four
being
LG
yeah.
N
A
D
D
There's
a
multi-million
dollar
figure
for
an
inaccessible
park
within
this
report
at
kumara
and
I
I
missed
it
to
be
honest,
going
through
so
I
I,
don't
understand
it.
I'll
seek
some
information
from
Parks
officers
because
we
are
I,
believe
Moving
Straight
to
LGB
3
and,
if
indeed,
I
find
otherwise
we'll
change
it
for
algebra
3.
N
A
E
We're
not
going
to
be
able
to
deliver
the
infrastructure
we
need
to
meet
the
population
challenges
that
we
have
I
mean
I
sit
to
be
corrected,
but
as
far
as
understand
the
amount
that
we
can
levy
on
developers
per
lot
is
fixed
has
never
been
indexed
since
the
commencement
of
the
infrastructure
Arrangements.
What
it
has
been
indexed.
E
Okay,
but
but
I'd
be
interested
I
mean
my
understanding
is
that
the
indexing
has
not
actually
reflected
the
underlying
cost
of
delivering
the
infrastructure
and
is
more
or
less
picked
to
CPI,
and
we
know
looking
at
our
own
Capital
Works
program.
Some
projects
to
deliver
a
footpath,
for
example
in
a
park,
is
now
35
more
than
it
was
just
a
few
years
ago.
E
So,
while
I'm
happy
to
see
a
revised
LGB
which
will
allow
us
to
guide
development
contributions
to
population
driven
infrastructure,
I
worry
that
we're
actually
not
keeping
Pace
with
growth
and
that's
no
fault
of
the
offices
we're
working
within
the
constraints
of
the
state
government.
One
of
the
things
that
I'd
like
to
see
when
we
look
at
the
next
version
of
LGB
is
the
definition
of
what
constitutes
trunk
infrastructure
and
in
part,
we
need
to
work
with
the
state
government
on
that.
E
But
I
think
there
are
some
internal
standards
that
we
can
be
setting
to
try
and
unlock
better
outcomes
in
the
community,
and
that's
not
work
that
we
could
have
achieved
in
Algebra
2,
but
I
think
that
has
to
be
formed.
Part
of
algebra
3
and
lastly,
this
one
underscore
that
I've
got
some
deep
reservations
around
the
timing
of
some
of
the
trunk
projects
in
and
around
Robina,
in
particular,
the
intersection
of
Robina
Parkway
and
labor
Drive,
that's
earmarked
for
commencement
or
Construction
in
2031.
A
N
G
Okay,
so
to
speak
briefly
to
it,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
Echo,
Council
of
horses,
sentiments
in
regard
to
the
cap
on
infrastructure
charges,
it's
a
significant
limitation
to
us
as
a
council,
and
certainly
a
burden
on
the
community.
It's
an
unfair
burden.
The
great
thing
about
well
I
think
LG
generally,
is
a
great
thing.
The
fact
that
all
councils
are
required
to
look
into
the
future
and
anticipate
the
demands
for
infrastructure
born
out
of
growth.
G
A
D
D
In
2027
we
have
the
potential
development
of
4
000
dwellings
on
the
land
north
of
Westfield
kumara,
since
the
property
has
just
exchanged
hands
and
we
have
the
kumara
connector
dumping
on
to
foxworld,
and
it's
a
major
concern
that
we
don't
anticipate
our
road
upgrades
until
about
2031,
which
is
some
five
years
after
we're
going
to
be
at
gridlock.
Because
of
all
these
things
that
are
happening
and
I
know
that
the
officers
are
doing
some
planning
work,
but
I
don't
believe.
We
can
wait
that
long.
There's
a
road
called
Road
G.
D
That
would
relieve
a
lot
of
the
pressure
and
just
yesterday,
I
had
the
opportunity
at
a
disaster
and
Emergency
Management
unit
meeting
to
take
it
up
with
a
representative
from
Queensland
health,
because
the
hospital
construction
borders
on
the
the
land
that
will
be
home
to
4,
000,
odd
dwellings
and
they
need
a
secondary
access
from
that
hospital.
That
goes
over
the
railway
line,
so
if
we
can
encourage
that
to
be
developed
during
the
state
government's
work
as
a
contribution,
it
would
be
a
major
step
forward.
D
So
I've
I've
arranged
to
have
a
meeting
in
that
regard,
but
the
things
I've
mentioned,
the
four
things
like
Costco
will
bring
people
from
the
tweet.
It
will
bring
people
from
Ipswich
it'll
bring
people
from
Logan.
There
is
a
Costco
at
Ipswich,
I
apologize,
I
meant
to
say
Logan,
but
from
all
over
our
boundaries,
people
will
come
to
use
that
Costco,
and
that
alone
has
you
know
two
minor
Road
entries
and
access
only
through
either
49
or
54..
C
Mr
I'll
start
by
endorsing
the
work
like
others
have,
but
I
think
there's
another
important
point
that
we
need
to
acknowledge
in
this
and
that
while
I
agree
about
the
review
of
what
we
get
from
developers,
the
other
side
of
the
equation
is
what
we
set
service
standards
at
in
terms
of
what's
live
in
the
community
and
what
we,
as
a
council,
set
as
priorities.
We
have
some
very
expensive,
Big
Shiny
projects
proposed
in
the
next
decade
that
there
may
have
to
be
some
serious
discussions
about
what
is
a
priority
for
our
community.
C
If
it's
bringing
forward
Road
upgrades
intersection
upgrades
or
if
it's
other
park
or
similar
projects
that
there's
going
to
be
some
tough
decisions
as
Council
to
make
on
priorities
to
meet
Community
expectations
that
it's
not
all
just
about
the
funding.
It's
about
what
we
set
as
priorities.
Moving
forward.
B
E
B
What
I
was
going
to
go
on
to
say,
yeah
yeah,
so
so,
like
I
mean
and
it's
the
challenge,
it's
the
challenge
we
all
face,
because
when
people
suggest
to
us
as
a
council,
we
need
to
deliver
the
infrastructure
networks.
We
explain
hopefully
to
them
that
we've
got
a
local
government
infrastructure
plan
that
deals
with
the
five
infrastructure
networks
that
we're
responsible
for
that
actually
has
the
costs
and
how
it's
going
to
be
funded,
whether
or
not
it's
through
infrastructure
charges
or
through
the
general
rate
or
borrowings
which
has
to
be
repaid
anyway.
B
B
That's
all
that
we
can
look
after,
but
the
the
things
that
people
would
like
to
complain
about
the
most,
be
it
main
road
or
public
transport
or
hospitals
or
policing
all
rest
with
our
friends
in
the
state
government
who,
if
I,
could
wish
for
anything.
It
would
be
a
state
government
that
would
like
to
plan
for
the
future
and
lay
out
a
good
infrastructure
plan
for
the
next
20
years
that
marries
up
with
what
they
require
local
governments
in
Queensland,
Southeast
Queensland,
to
do
well.
B
O
The
outstanding
items
from
the
major
update
two
and
three
known
as
the
MU
two
and
three,
in
addition
to
formalizing
the
outcomes
of
the
councilor
Workshop,
we
are
looking
to
have
Council
endorse
the
preparation
of
the
related
amendments
within
the
package
and
also
to
allow
Council
officers
to
repair
present
the
tailored
notice
and
the
communication
strategy,
which
supports
the
tailored
Amendment,
which
is
the
first
amendment,
a
just
to
recap:
The
Minister's
decision
on
mu
and
t
two
and
three
had
34
policy
items.
13
of
those
were
unable
to
be
approved.
O
O
During
the
10-year
planning
scheme
review,
we've
also
looked
at
the
complex
changes
that
would
otherwise
require
significant
changes
to
the
scheme.
Again,
those
have
been
considered
to
be
appropriate
to
be
considered
as
part
of
the
10-year
planning
scheme
review.
We've
also
taken
account
of
the
changes
that
are
recommended
to
be
included
in
the
strategy
and
for
those
to
be
brought
forward
in
the
early
stages
of
the
amendment.
O
A
Just
want
to
go
back
a
slide.
Could
you
just
flush
out
what
you
just
said
about
the
light
rail?
Yes,
how
that
will
operate
in
effect.
Is
that
that's
to
make
a
clear
statement
that
we're
not
going
to
sort
of
just
allow
speculative
development
and
and
unless
there's
a
distinct
body
of
planning
work,
then
that
is
ultimately
brought
into
City
plan.
Then
we're
not
just
going
to
let
it
run
three.
O
Three
Mr
chair,
that's
correct.
That's
the
current
version
of
the
CD
plan
has
a
I
guess
a
broad
policy
position
on
investigations
for
the
light
rail,
rural
residential
areas
that
may
transition
a
number
of
things.
There
were
a
number
of
changes
to
address
those
that
position
as
part
of
mu
two
and
three.
We
are
looking
to
reintroduce
that
in
a
more
distinct
and
narrow
form
to
to
reaffirm
exactly
what
you've
described.
That's
great.
Thank
you.
O
O
In
addition
to
the
principle
support
provided
by
state
officers
during
the
counselor
Workshop,
we've
met
with
the
state
officers
a
number
of
times
to
speak
about
the
content
for
Amendment
a
as
part
of
those
discussions.
We've
been
able
to
engage
on
them
with
the
tailored
notice
and
also
they've
confirmed
that
the
items
within
Amendment
a
are
suitable
to
be
progressed
through
the
tailored
process.
O
O
It's
important
to
note
that
the
the
some
of
the
state
comments
through
the
process
of
mut
two
and
three
identified
that
where
there
are
potential
changes
in
zoning,
Heights
and
densities
through
successive
amendments,
it
might
be
best
to
look
at
having
a
process
in
place
to
address
those
matters.
So
you'll
see
it
on
the
screen
there.
That
Amendment
B
is
when
we'll
introduce
the
changes
for
the
identified
growth
areas
that
were
formed,
Target
growth
areas
and
also
the
first
sequence
of
the
urban
station
neighborhoods
in
through
the
stage
3.
D
O
Mr
chair,
the
the
exception
to
that
conversion
is,
is
the
targeted
and
identified
growth
areas
and
also
the
enabled
framework
those
particular
locations
have
different
settings
to
what
currently
occur
and
to
bring
forward
all
those
changes
to
those
settings
in
those
locations
would
change
and
might
have
unintended
consequences
for
the
operation
of
the
scheme.
So
what
we're
looking
to
do
is
to
bring
forward
those
conversion
changes
as
part
of
introducing
Associated
changes
to
support
the
development
effectively,
which.
D
O
O
Changes
for
the
neighborhood
Frameworks,
and
particularly
the
draft
Nobby
Beach
and
Miami
North
Station,
enabled
concept
plan
and
the
draft
Christine
Avenue
and
Second
Ave
station
enabled
concept,
plans
and
I
guess
specifically
as
I
identified
on
the
screen.
It's
intended
that
this
increase
in
plan
development
and
increasing
dwelling
Supply
in
these
locations
comes
forward
in
the
Second
Amendment
to
allow
us
to
introduce
those
alongside
new
improved
built
form
and
Urban
Design
Provisions.
So
we
can
identify
the
outcomes
that
we'd
like
to
achieve
in
those
locations.
O
Provisions
in
the
overlay
might
be
best
dealt
with
through
the
zones
and
the
development
codes
to
provide
a
bit
more
clarity
in
this
game,
foreign
as
you'll,
see
on
the
slide
in
front
of
you.
We've
got
an
indicative
timing
for
progressing
these
amendments,
as
you'll
see
today
is
where
we're
seeking
council's
endorsement
for
the
amendment
strategy
and
we're
also
looking
to
as
part
of
the
subject,
the
canceled
endorsement
will
actually
submit
the
tailored
notice
and
the
communication
strategy
to
the
director
General
to
allow
us
to
progress.
O
Amendment
a
and
the
content,
the
city
plan,
content
from
Amendment
a
is
intended
to
be
brought
back
in
June
so
subject
to
receiving
council's
endorsement
for
the
content
in
Amendment
a
and
the
notice
issued
by
the
minister
or
the
director
General.
We
can
proceed
that
the
First
Amendment
to
State
interest
review.
Also.
The
process
that,
as
I
mentioned,
will
allow
us
to
progress.
The
changes
for
the
housing,
Supply
Amendment
and
the
light
rail
changes.
O
And
is
the
animal
presentation,
with
the
exception
of
a
notable
need
for
a
changed
recommendation
for
two
of
the
items?
One?
The
change
identifies
that
it's
for
Section
20
of
that,
but
we
need
to
cite
both
provisional
sections
of
the
ACT
to
give
header
power
for
both
the
tailored
Amendment
and
the
major
amendments
under
the
MGR.
So
I
believe,
there's
been
an
update
to
those
to
reflect
which
portion
of
the
ACT
give
a
header
power
to
which
of
the
particular
amendments
that
we'll
be
progressing.
A
Okay,
so
council
is
just
a
couple
of
technical
changes
there,
any
other
questions
for
Gavin,
someone
like
to
move
the
motion
moved
by
Council
Hamill
second,
by
councilman
Neil,
you
want
to
speak
to
it
against
him
cancer.
Any
of
you
right,
I
just
want
to
say
briefly
that,
as
we
know,
this
has
been
a
long
and
arduous
process
with
a
number
of
hurdles
placed
in
front
of
us,
but
the
team
are
doing
an
incredible
job
of
progressing
this
work.
So
a
big
thank
you
to
them.