►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
An
apology
from
councillor
pauline
young.
If
someone
would
like
to
move
that
moved
by
councillor,
o'neill
secretary
councillor,
peter
young,
all
in
favor
against
is
carried.
I
think
we
otherwise
have
a
full
complement
of
member
counsellors.
We
welcome
councillor
belden
lumsden
yeah
here
and
councillor
mcdonald
yeah.
B
A
Might
have
to
do
it
all
the
time
yeah
once
the
light
rail
comes
up
and
then
there'll
be
a
spur
across
chevron,
island
and
boom
across
the
fourth.
A
A
Okay,
so
councillors
we
have
a
number
of
start
items
actually
we'll
start
with
no
leave
of
absence.
Was
there
someone
like
to
confirm
the
minutes
of
the
last
meeting
councillor
gates
seconded
by
councillor.
A
Peter
young,
all
in
favor,
against
carried
conflict
of
interest
declarations
there
any
on
this
meeting,
no.
A
Okay,
moving
to
section
six
of
the
agenda,
we've
got
a
number
of
start
items
there,
6.1
6.2
and
six
point
three.
Would
anyone
like
to
unstar
any
of
those
counsellor?
Oh,
I.
A
Yes,
we
can
start
six
point
four,
I'm
happy
with
that.
Unless
there's
any
opposition,
I
would
like.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions:
sorry
on
6.4,
yep,
okay,
sorry,
cancer
and
jones.
We
tried
which
right,
council
macdonald.
A
Did
you
did
you
have
a
presentation
or
yeah
counselors?
Would
you
like
a
short
presentation
on
this
one
or
council
mcdonough
just
had
a
couple
of
questions.
Yeah,
let's
just
have
a
fly
through.
E
E
The
place
making
plan
provides
a
snapshot
of
the
precinct
at
a
point
in
time
discovering
its
strengths
and
weaknesses
and
exploring
opportunities
on
what
interventions
are
recommended
in
the
short,
medium
and
long
term
to
enhance
the
quality
of
the
precinct
as
a
trading
environment.
This
place
making
plan
is
a
post
light.
Rail
future
for
burley
heads
community
consultation.
E
E
The
engagement
period
ran
from
the
6th
to
the
9th
of
may
2021,
a
total
of
1
372
survey.
Responses
were
received.
A
consultative
survey
asked
for
feedback
on
specific
aspects
of
the
placemaking
plan
and
an
ideas
tool
opened
up
the
discussion
asking
what
other
opportunities
do
you
see
for
the
improvement
in
the
billy
heads
precinct.
E
This
is
the
top
three
reasons
for
visiting
burley
the
beach
and
surfing
was
the
top
one.
As
you
can
see
in
the
graph
there,
and
that
was
72
percent
of
respondents,
then
there
was
dining
which
was
58
and
being
in
nature
52,
and
it
goes
down
from
there.
E
Roads
and
traffic
was
second
and
with
this,
and
and
as
such.
Also
it's
it's
both.
They
both
had
positive
and
negative
sentiment,
followed
by
pedestrian
walkways
and
crossings.
E
Then
the
area
needs
upgrading
and
updating,
and
then
local
atmosphere
and
identity.
In
some
instances,
respondents
use
the
free
text
field
to
provide
conditions
or
exceptions
to
the
overall
level
of
support,
rather
than
the
reasons
for
their
selection
example.
Respondents
selected
strongly
support
have
indicated
that
issues
of
parking
needs
to
be
addressed.
E
E
There
was
a
notable,
no
taxi
shown
up
and
also
these
scooters
were
very
low,
but
we've
been
noticing
that
there
seems
to
be
more
and
more
people
on
these
scooters
places
to
be
sorry
preferred
place
to
park.
The
esplanade
was
definitely
number
one
and
then
goodman
terrace
and
then
james
street.
It
goes
from
there.
E
Which
five
proposed
improvements
is
most
important
to?
You
was
the
next
question.
This
was
very
interesting.
This
is
where
we
could
find
out
what
was
really
happening
behind
the
scenes
of
parking.
Even
though
parking's
there
number
two
there
we
broke
it
down
into
different
sections,
looking
at
who
strongly
supported,
who
supported
it
neutral
and
somewhat
or
strongly
opposed,
and
what
we
found
was
these
little
comments
here.
I've
got
here
shade,
trees
and
planting
is
consistently
the
most
important
proposed
improvement,
counting
towards
16.9
of
total
responses.
E
Parking
is
consistently
the
second
priority
at
14,
except
for
those
who
strongly
support
the
plan
who
place
pedestrian
connections.
Example,
crossings,
ramps
and
their
sec.
Second,
priority
parks,
amenity
and
recreation
is
generally
placed.
Third
public
safety,
street
lighting
and
cct
is
consistently
placed
forth
except
fifth
for
those
who
support
the
plan
whose
place
who
plays
pedestrian
connections
and
crossings
ramps
higher
public
amenities
example.
Seating
and
features
is
sixth,
wider,
footpath,
seventh,
except
11
for
those
who
strongly
oppose
the
plan.
Local
identity,
visual
branding
and
celebrating
burley's
history
is
eighth,
increased
bike,
racks
and
cycling
facilities.
E
Ninth
public
art,
murals,
pavement,
art,
furniture
and
decorative
lighting
is
related
higher
by
those
who
support
the
plan
than
and
others
rate
it.
Third
last
slower.
Traffic
speeds
for
road
safety
is
slightly
more
supported
by
those
who
strongly
support,
and
mobility
and
inclusion
is
slightly
more
supported
by
those
who
oppose
the
plan,
which
is
interesting.
E
D
Through
you
to
the
offices,
did
you
get
a
sense
that
there
had
been
any
deliberate
campaign
to
provide
a
set
of
answers,
in
particular
around
the
the
car
parking?
Or
do
you
think
that
there
were?
It
was
a
a
genuine
response
from
the
broader
community.
E
I
think
overall,
it
was
a
general,
a
genuine
response.
There
were
some
issues
in
certain
places
that
we
spotted
where
there
was
a
little
bit
of
gathering
of
of
the
responses
like
in
front
of
a
the
regis
on
the
esplanade.
They
didn't
want
trees
out
the
front
because
they
didn't
want
to
lose
their
view.
Things
like
that
and
they
related
that
to
parking
problem
problems
in
the
future.
The
other
one
was
the
rad
park
issue
of
putting
parking
in
there.
E
I
would
have
been
liaised
with
parks
all
through
that
and
they're
look
they're.
Looking
at
that
closely.
We
had
a
workshop
last
week
with
the
burleigh
heads
business
community
and
they
went
through
all
that.
So
there's
certain
aspects
that
had
some
groupings,
but
generally
overall,
I
would
say
it
was
just
a
general
response
to
parking.
F
Now,
I'd
just
like
to
thank
the
officers,
we
did
have
what
was
it
three
meetings
with
the
business
and
residents
within
that
area
and
they
did
a
very
thorough
public
consultation
process,
which
was
very
good.
There
was
quite
a
deal
of
public
talk
about
it
through
the
media,
so
people
had
a
really
good
opportunity
to
have
an
input.
As
we
know,
burley
is
very
loved
and
we
just
want
to
make
whatever
changes
are
made
there
or
or
upgrades
that
we
just
want
to
get
it
right.
F
G
Thanks
very
much
chairman
sorry,
I
was
just
following
up
on
the
question
that
councillor
owen
jones
asked
and
I
wanted
to
be
sure
from
what
I
read.
I
understood
that
there's
a
net
increase
in
parking
that
would
be
proposed
if
we
followed
the
feedback,
which
I'm
sure
we
will
so
we
would
actually
have
an
increase
in
parking
spaces.
E
They've
known
that
loss
of
parking,
that's
what
we're
aiming
at
there's
there's.
For
instance,
in
james
street,
we
proposed
a
centre
crossing
for
people
in
wheelchairs,
so
there's
a
couple
of
parking
spaces,
for
instance
there,
which
will
come
out,
but
in
that
meeting
we
have
with
the
business
groups.
They
all
agreed
that
that
is
a
a
fair
and
reasonable
thing
to
do
so.
We
we
aim
for
a
no
net
loss
of.
A
So
I
think,
just
to
flush
that
out
a
little
bit
further,
there
was
the
concept
of
changing
the
the
car
park
at
the
top
of
the
headland
and
those
car
parks
being
removed,
which
is
obviously
more
than
two
and
then
and
some
additional
car
parking
being
put
into
rudd
park.
A
E
That's
the
parks,
initiative
and
they've
told
me
that
their
intention
is
to
have
no
net
loss
of
parking.
Okay,.
G
I
was
informed
that
there's
a
net
increase
in
parking
and
I
think
that
would
satisfy
the
community
and
I
think
it's
worth
bearing
in
mind
in
response
to
their
participation
in
this
process.
A
Working
through
that
great
and
then
just
to
clarify
what
the
community
support
for
that,
the
conversion
of
the
car
park
at
the
top
of
the
headland
to
park.
Can
you
just
clarify
what
the
level
of
support
or
descent
was
for
that
particular
concept?
If
you
can
identify
that,
yes,.
E
There
was
20
of
people
were,
19,
people
were
against
the
blood
park,
19
19
were
against
them,
but
I'll
just
pull
the
figures
out
so
yeah.
Thank
you.
G
Just
just
while
you're
looking
my
understanding
to
chairman
was
that
there
will
most
definitely
be
a
drop-off
point
at
the
top
for
people
who
perhaps
are
not
able
to
walk
to
the
top.
So
whilst
there
might
be
parking
removed
and
more
parking
provided
at
the
lower
level,
there
would
most
definitely
be
the
option
of
a
drop-off
poi
point,
which
was
supported
by
the
community.
E
Yes
through
the
chair,
but
john
lewis
parks
or
the
the
highest
opposition.
That's
that's
what
I'm
saying
19
and.
A
A
E
John
lawrence
had
about
60
percent
agreement.
Okay.
A
C
You
very
much,
mr
chairman,
I'm
just
trying
to
find
the
page
here,
but
there
was
a
breakdown
of
responses
by
suburb.
Someone
can
perhaps
point
me
to
the
41..
C
So
when
I
have
a
look
at
page
40,
there
is
just
this
really
awesome
breakdown
of
ages
right
to
see
so
many
people
between
the
ages
of
35
and
44,
then
45
and
54,
and
55
and
64,
and
so
on.
I
mean
that's
really
pleasing
to
me
because
I
think
it's
a
great
representative
set
of
data.
C
You
know
it's
a
character
area,
it's
got
a
fairly
unique
atmosphere
and
offering,
and
I
would
have
expected
that
all
gold
coasters
would
have
had
an
interest
in
either
retaining
improving
or
reshaping
that
precinct.
And
yet
it
seems
that
the
responses
have
largely
come
from
those
who
live
on
the
doorstep
of
the
suburb.
C
E
But
chad,
yes,
I
I
feel
like
we
are
confident
that
we
got
a
good
overall
response.
I
know
you
generally
do
get
more
people,
obviously
from
the
area
with
these
surveys,
but
we've
got
people
coming
in
from
all
different
parts
of
the
gold
coast
and
further
afield.
E
C
C
If
not,
then
it
highlights
to
me
at
least
that
there
are
things
that
of
particular
importance
to
to
locals
and
I'd
like
to
know
what's
particularly
important
to
those
locals,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
at
all
possible,
but
it'd
be
great
just
to
get
that
little
breakdown
and
just
two
other
things.
Mr
chairman,
on
the
issue
of
car
parking.
C
C
C
Yeah,
because
you
know
it
could
be
that
the
line
marking
regime
in
those
car
parks
are
actually
not
optimized
to
provide
the
greatest
number
of
car
parks,
and
you
know
for
the
cost
of
a
lick
of
paint.
Perhaps
we've
got
the
ability
to
accommodate
30
or
40
more
more
vehicles.
It'd
be
interesting
to
know
that
and
lastly,
maybe
this
one's
for
parks,
I'm
not
sure,
but
the
gordon
and
jean
something
or
other
car
park
right
in
burley,
there's
a
misspelling
of
carpark
on
that
sign.
C
F
Thanks
chair,
my
question
was
about
alex
black
car
park
as
well,
because
I
mean
it
is
full
most
of
the
time.
So
I'm
just
wondering
why
it's
sort
of
figured
so
low
on
the
on
the
survey,
but
I
think
is
it
because
a
lot
of
workers
parked
there
because
you
can
park
there
all
day
for
five
dollars.
Whatever?
E
During
the
week
for
the
chance
during
the
weekend,
we
definitely
find
that's
the
situation,
but
during
the
week
we're
finding
that
it's
still
got
capacity.
Okay,
yes
and
we've
heard
that
people
don't
even
like
spending
five
dollars
on
parking
for
for
a
day.
So.
E
E
F
H
Mr
chairman,
a
more
broader
question.
I
was
just
interested
in
that
if
officers
thought
the
amount
of
engagement
versus
the
amount
of
residents
that
not
I
just
in
burley
heads
by
that
immediate
catchment,
which
I'm
guessing
would
be
around
100
000
resident
mark,
if
they
thought
the
level
of
engagement
was
good
or
if
it
could
have
been
better
or
if
it's
kind
of
on
par
with
what
we'd
normally
expect.
With
this
kind
of
work,.
E
We
were
told
this
was
a
really
a
good
engagement
result
through
the
chair.
Sorry,
with
this
this
project,
we
we
had
great
results,
like
we've,
been
told
by
comms
that
this
was
a
good
survey
and
could
result
so.
I
Thanks
chair
just
to
help
clarify
councillor
voice,
to
aired
a
concern,
legitimate
concern
about
the
geographic
spread
of
the
respondents
and
on
page
42,
there's
actually
a
listing.
That
indicates
this.
The
suburbs
from
which
people
have
identified
their
residence,
and
that
is
obviously
a
very
broad
representation
of
people
from
suburbs
across
the
entire
city
and
in
indeed
interstate.
C
C
So
what
I'd
like
city
offices
to
do
is
you
know,
pull
those
suburbs
together
to
the
point
where
we
might
have
a
statistically
sound
representative
sample
of
areas
outside
of
the
catchment.
So
I
did
see
that
breakdown.
I
really
appreciate
you
drawing
attention
to
that
table
for
everyone
tuning
in,
but
I'd
like
to
see
all
of
that
aggregated
together
as
a
different
sample
to
those
within
the
precinct.
So
we
can
have
a
bit
of
a
contrast.
F
Thanks
chair,
I
had
a
question
about
the
engagement
as
well.
The
responses,
I'd
actually
thought
were
quite
high
compared
to
some
other
feedback
things.
I've
had
interest
in
were
the
responses
only
through
gc
have
your
say
or
the
pop-ups
were
there
pen
and
paper
kind
of
feedback
options
as
well.
F
Yes,
there
was
pen
and
paper
feedback,
okay,
so
it
wasn't
exclusively
online.
Okay,
thank
you
and
in
terms
of
the
survey,
was
it
a
standard,
just
tick
and
flick
kind
of
survey.
E
F
E
I
believe
we
have
those
figures,
but
I
top
my
head.
I
don't
know
what
they
are,
but
they
analyze
corp
comps
analyze-
that
to
that
that
level,
so
that
a
lot
of
there's
a
lot
of
information
in
the
beginning
of
the
report
that
the
state
states
those
facts.
E
A
A
Was
13
72
responses,
yeah,
that's
also
on
page
19,
but
the
numbers,
the
numbers
that
have
broken
down
below
that
seem
to
be
a
little
bit
different
so,
but
we
can
get
that
thanks,
yeah
just
chris
any
other
questions
all
right.
Someone
like
to
move
that
move
by
councillor
on
jones,
second
by
council,
vorster,
cancer
and
jones.
You
want
to
speak
to
that.
D
No,
I
think
the
officers
have
done
a
pretty
good
job
and
clearly
everybody
loves
burley,
and
it's
no
surprise
that
there
actually
was
a
fairly
wide
range
of
commentary
outside
of
the
that
burley
area.
Even
though
that's
where
the
focus
of
all
the
postcards
and
the
contacts
had
actually
gone.
But
I
think
it
just
it's
a
logical
report
for
moving
forward
in
regards
to
the
future
of
burley.
A
G
G
Thank
you
very
much.
I
understand
that
one
of
the
changes
being
proposed
with
the
pda
was
to
allow
a
boutique
brewery
in
in
southport
and,
as
a
result,
it
seems
to
me
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
that
the
prohibition
on
medium
impact
industry
is
to
be
removed
from
the
actual
pda
area
and
I'm
interested
to
know
why
it
would
be
considered
that
that
entire
suite
of
businesses
that
medium
industry
impact
might
be
removed
and
the
consequences
of
that
in
a
24
7
area
with
no
appeal
right.
G
So
we
all
know
that
in
the
pda
area,
there
are
no
appeal
rights
for
development
applications
and
having
represented
an
area
where
there
was
conflict
between
residences
and
industry.
I
I
want
to
have
an
understanding
of
what
is
possible
and
if
it,
if
the
medium
impact
industry
zone
being
removed
from
a
prohibitive
activity,
would
allow
all
the
sorts
of
medium
indus
impact
industry
that
exist
in
the
definitions.
So
you
know
spray,
painting
and
all
car
repairs,
and
all
of
that
I'm
sure
you
understand
what
I'm
driving
at
and
I'd
like
to
know.
B
B
There
could
be
other
like
food
and
beverage
related
type
activities,
coffee
roaster
little
other
activities.
We
didn't
want
to
narrow
it
down
specifically,
but
we
do
believe
there's
enough
provisions
in
there
too.
G
G
To
ensure
and-
and
I
also
have
a
question
around
what
else
is
being
introduced
in
terms
of
construction
to
protect
potential
residents
from
the
amenity,
because
I
feel
that
that
responsibility
should
rest
with
the
people
who
are
going
to
be
introducing
the
live
music
or
the
medium
impact
industry
to
that
region,
that
they
should
be
responsible
for
ensuring
that
the
sound
and
amenity
of
the
area
is
protected
rather
than
new
developers
coming
into
the
area
and
building
residential
dwellings.
So
how?
How
does
that
work
as
well.
D
I'm
going
to
answer
the
land
use
one
and
then,
if
you
want
to
talk
to
the
amenity
requirements
so
with
with
the
appeal
right
side
of
things,
it
goes
both
ways.
So
developers
also
don't
have
appeal
rights
so
as
much
as
a
resident
who's
upset
about
an
approval.
At
the
same
time,
also,
a
developer,
who
gets
a
refusal,
also
doesn't
have
an
appeal
right.
The
next.
D
It
cuts
both
ways
and
the
key
thing
there
is
by
taking
out
the
prohibition
of
medium
industry.
There
are
additional
words
included
in
the
in
the
development
scheme
which
talk
to
the
type
of
medium
industry
that
would
be
accepted,
which
is
what
justin
highlighted
around
production-based
activities,
where
it's
food
or
beverages,
that
sort
of
thing,
so
that
narrows
down
the.
A
B
B
B
All
right,
so
we
do
talk
about
accommodate
medium
impact
industry
where
for
a
micro,
brewery
and
co-located
with
a
bar
or
a
hotel,
so
we
kind
of
really
emphasize
that's
the
sort
of
medium
impact
industry.
We're
looking
at
any
others
is
most
likely
going
to
be
incompatible
with
the
expectations
for
residential
amenity
in
the
area
and
where
I
said,
food
and
beverage
other
food
and
beverage
that
might
be
associated
with
entertainment
like
coffee,
roasting
business,
that
that
would
be
the
exception
that
I
was
thinking
of.
But
it's
still
it's
it's
just
not
prohibited.
G
And
in
terms
of
the
construction,
is
it
intended
that
new
developments
will
have
a
higher
bar
in
regard
to
protecting
the
amenity
of
their
potential
residents?
Or
is
it
intended
that
the
businesses
that
are
developing
that
are
going
to
cause
the
impacts,
because
it's
24
7
that
the
impulse
will
be
on
those
businesses.
B
Through
the
chair
within
the
special
entertainment
precinct
and
the
buffers
associated
with
that,
there
is
the
additional
criteria
for
the
residential
development,
so
that
that
works
for
any
type
of
it's
specifically
targeted
towards
attenuating
against
the
intent
for
amplified
music
venues
in
that
core
areas.
B
We've
also
included
with
the
pda
amendments,
some
strengthening
of
the
amenity
criteria
in
the
is
it
345
parking,
servicing
amenity
and
operation,
and
we're
just
strengthening
the
provisions
around
preventing
loss
of
amenity
and
threats
to
health
and
safety
on
surrounding
activities
and
we've
clearly
specified,
including
expected
future
residential
amenities.
So
we
know
that
part
of
that
area
in
the
emerging
corps
doesn't
have
residential
right
now,
so
the
intent
is
development.
I
B
I
A
Yep
councillor
on
jones
and
council
of
also.
D
So
I
think
the
history
of
that
is
that,
in
the
dim
past
officers
had
provided
a
a
forward
from
the
mayor
in
a
draft
version
of
something
which
he
hadn't
seen
and
that
had
caused
some
grief.
So
I
think
that
it
was.
The
process
was
changed
that
as
part
of
the
consultation
about
how
it
would
be,
the
narrative
would
be
built
for
public
communication
that
the
mayor's
commentary
would
actually
be
from
the
mayor's
office,
as
opposed
from
offices
generated
for
the
mayor.
D
That
makes
sense
so
that
does
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
fundamentally
the
reason
why
that
that
happened.
So.
A
So
the
mayor's
office
alarm
bell
just
went
off
so
luke's
just
arrived.
Luke
have
you
got
a
sec
just.
A
As
soon
as
you
use
the
word
mayor's
office,
the
alarm
goes
off.
The
red
light
starts
swirling
and
luke
flies
down.
I
actually
thought
it
was
something
thank
god
you're
here
just
to
clarify-
and
I
don't
know
if
you've
read
this
agenda
item
like
but
point
question
question
from
councillor
peter
young
in
relation
to
0.2
about
the
community
engagement
and
marketing
plan
approved
by
the
mayor's
office.
Can
you
just-
and
this
relates
to
the
cbd,
change.
A
Yeah,
possibly
so,
do
you
know
in
practical
terms?
What
does
that
mean?
Do
you
have
you
done
these
in
your
time
as
the
chief
of
staff.
A
C
So
so
maybe,
mr
chairman,
maybe
we
should
merely
say
that
the
be
undertaken
in
accordance
with
the
community
consultation
policy,
because
if
it's
yeah,
if
it's
a
matter
of
process,
then
it
should
suit
the
mayor,
because
nothing's
really
changed
and
it
doesn't
feel
to
the
public
at
least
like
a
special
case,
because
I've
never
seen
the
phrase
before
and
I
don't
mean
to
get
in
the
way
of
the
mayor's
oversight
on
this
because
he's
the
official
spokesperson
in
the
first
instance
on
all
city
issues-
and
I
know
the
southport
pdas
of
intense
interest
to
him.
A
F
Yeah,
it
sounds
good
through
you,
mr
chair
councillors.
We
could
also
put
a
full
stop
as
another
option
just
after
plan,
because
the
internal
process
is
that
it
does
go
through
the
mayor's
office.
That
happens
with
all
of
our
plans,
and
that
I
mean
that's
on
richard
and
I
and
us
to
follow
that
process.
So.
C
So
there
are
two,
mr
chairman:
we've
got
a
community
engagement
policy
and
we
also
have
an
external
communication
policy.
I'd
just
say,
in
accordance
with
the
relevant
policies
and
consultation
with
the
office
of
the
mayor,
all
right.
G
G
A
A
Okay,
well
done
so
moved
by
council
of
also
taken
by
council
gates.
Were
there
any
other
questions
about
this?
The
item
before
we
move
to
debate
okay,
council
of
also
general
respect
to.
C
That
thank
you
very
much,
mr
chairman,
mrs
german,
as
we've
heard
during
the
debate,
any
changes
to
the
well
during
the
line
of
questioning
any
changes
to
the
planning
scheme
need
to
be
very
careful.
They
need
to
be
deliberate
and
they
need
to
be
grounded
in
community
consultation.
C
What
I'm
particularly
encouraged
by
is
that
city
offices
have
gathered
up
a
lot
of
the
commentary
that
we've
provided
over
an
extended
period
of
time
concerning
the
cbd
and
also
policy
positions
that
we've
taken
through
other
earlier
agenda
items
to
present
to
the
community
an
opportunity
to
fine
tune.
Our
vision
for
the
area,
I'm
sure
councillor
patterson,
will
provide
further
insight
from
a
local
perspective
at
full
council,
but
I'm
very
comfortable
in
the
process.
C
Today
and
hopefully,
once
the
office
of
the
mayor
has
an
opportunity
to
review
that
marketing
plan
and
it's
sort
of
put
through
the
rigor
of
our
community
consultation
process.
We
can
give
the
community
an
opportunity
to
begin
weighing
in
as
soon
as
possible.
C
G
Mr
chairman,
I'm
sorry
to
do
this,
but
I've
just
found
what
gave
me
pause
about
this
and
it's
on
page
142
and
it's
the
summary
of
proposed
amendments
and
relationship
with
regulatory
tools
and
it's
the
one
under
the
economic
development
act
on
the
bottom
level
of
the
page
and
it's
dot.
Point
two
which
says:
provide
additional
criteria
for
residential
development
within
the
sep
and
buffer
areas
to
ensure
compatibility
with
the
intent
for
ampli
amplified
music
venues.
G
I
would
have
liked
an
additional
piece
put
in
there,
which
said,
provide
additional
criteria
for
noise,
generating
venues
and
for
residential
development,
because
I
I
firmly
believe
that
there
should
be
an
onus
on
the
operations
that
are
going
to
establish
in
this
precinct,
as
well
as
any
future
development,
because
I
don't
think
that
the
owners
should
be
entirely
on
the
new
development
of
residential
dwelling.
So
I
just
before
I
we
move
on,
would
would
you
mind
addressing
that
and
telling
me
whether
that
is
a
possibility.
F
Sorry,
mr
chair,
if
I
could
just
interject,
if
you
actually
refer
to
page
176
of
the
agenda
item
counselor
gates,
there's
provisions
there.
It's
the
last
stop
point
on
the
third
column
that
talk
about
for
all
new
development,
to
incorporate
design,
manage
measures
to
attenuate
eight
against
noise
associated
with
the
operation
of
other
businesses
and
activities
associated
with
a
24-hour
activity.
F
So
the
provisions
we're
proposing
to
put
in
place
for
the
step
actually
further
strengthen
that
to
do
with
the
amplified
music
venues.
The
report
we
bought
back
to
council
november
last
year,
where
we
actually
discussed
the
findings
before
we
started
to
draft
the
sept,
talked
about
the
likely
development
costs
on
residential
buildings.
F
G
Okay,
I
accept
that
I
just
want
to
be
sure
that
the
words
that
are
used
in
the
final
amendment
actually
make
it
clear
that
it's
not
just
that
the
onus
is
spread
across
all
development,
okay
and
with
that
I'll
be
quiet
and
happily,
second,
the
motion
and
I
think,
councillor
borsta's
spoken
significantly
enough.
A
Would
you
like
to
close
cancel
so
since,
since
there
was
an
interjection
that
sorry,
we
lost
the
wonderful,
the
wonderful.
C
Opening
and
I
have
to
get
back
to
the
rhythm
look,
mr
chairman,
just
to
support
what
councillor
gates
says.
I
think
we
need
to
treat
all
developers
as
even-handedly
as
possible,
but
I
think
it's
also
important
to
note
that,
in
the
case
of
a
cbd
we're
not
seeking
to
create
a
purely
residential
outcome,
we
want
a
variety
of
mixed
uses
and
we
want
to
attempt
to
encourage
commercial
development
wherever
possible.
C
So
even
if
there
is
a
little
tiny
amount
of
back
pressure
on
residential
outcomes,
it's
not
necessarily
a
terrible
thing
because
it
may
foster
more
commercial
mixed
use
outcomes
that
we're
presently
missing
out
in
the
development
that's
currently
unfolding.
I
also
want
to
support
city
offices
taking
the
position
that
they
have
with
that
dot
point,
because
I
think
it
reflects
the
policy
position
we've
taken
before
on
reverse
amenity
right.
C
So,
if
there's
an
establishment
that
is
generating
noise
and
hopefully
that
we
encourage
that
because
of
the
scp,
if
new
development
unfolds,
it
needs
to
provide
some
consideration.
The
fact
that
they're
coming
in
after
the
fact
because
the
last
thing
we
want
is
a
successful
venue
jeopardized
because
all
of
a
sudden
we've
got
sensitive
noise
receptors
moving
into
an
area
generating
complaint
that
jeopardizes
licenses.
C
A
All
right,
great
closing,
we'll
take
the
vote
all
in
favor
against
carriage
all
right.
I
think
that's
the
last
of
our
agenda
items
so
councillors
we've
got
one
item
of
general
business,
which
is
the
development
activity
report.
H
Just
on
the
back
of
the
point
just
raised
mr
chair,
but
interested
I'm
just
looking
at
the
average
days
by
development
type
at
the
moment
and
just
a
bit
of
feedback
from
offices
of
a
few
developments.
My
area
at
the
moment
that
times
are
starting
to
stretch
out
a
little
bit.
So
just
if
the
director
had
some
comment
on
or
if
mick
had
some
comment
on,
how
we're
kind
of
looking
and
maintaining
time
frames
into
the
future
with
more
applications
and
a
few
staff
shortages.
J
Yeah
through
you,
mr
chair,
that
you,
you
correct,
council
hamill,
those
time
frames
are
sort
of
increasing,
has
been
a
creep
in
that
which
has
sort
of
matched
the
the
volume
of
applications
coming
in
we've.
I
guess
a
couple
of
things:
one
we've
tried
to
ramp
up
the
eda
and
there's
some
stats
in
there,
and
that
looks
positive
in
the
sense
that
it's
we're
getting
more
applications
coming
in,
which
is
hopefully
less
of
a
burden
on
officers,
because
we
can
turn
them
out
quickly
to
deal
with
the
volumes
we.
J
H
Mr
just
on
the
back
of
that,
so
thank
you
to
mick
for
that
bit
of
commentary,
but
just
to
say
that
in
my
area,
with
especially
with
yatla
at
the
moment,
which
is
going
silly
with
applications
and
quite
large
and
significant
and
intense
applications
for
officers
to
deal
with
just
to
thank
them
for
their
efforts
in
the
last
six
months,
they've
done
some
pretty
extraordinary
work
and
pumping
applications
out
and
meeting
time
frames.
And
hopefully
with
the
positive
outcome
of
this
afternoon's
committee
and
a
few
more
staff.
H
We
can
get
those
time
frames
pulled
back
in
a
little
bit
and
get
the
support
to
the
some
of
the
more
senior
members
who
are
doing
a
hell
of
a
lot
of
work.
At
the
moment.
I'm
getting
some
emails
after
midnight
on
some
things
at
the
moment,
so
they're
putting
in
big
hours.