►
From YouTube: DevoWorm (2022, Meeting 1): Looking forward, lab preprints, 3-D microscopy, and soft biomaterials.
Description
Looking forward into 2022. Lab preprint review on Game Theory in Development and the DevoLearn platform. Google Summer of Code 2022 projects. Papers on 3-D microscopy techniques (PIV and OCM) and the biophysics of soft material thermodynamics. Attendees: Susan Crawford-Young, Richard Gordon, Karan Lohaan, and Bradly Alicea.
A
C
So
why
don't
I
get
the
meeting
started?
Other
people
come
in
we'll
catch
them
up
on
what
we've
been
talking
about.
So
how
have
you
been
doing
over
the
last
few.
B
Weeks,
yeah
things
have
been
okay,
just
finished
with
my.
A
B
C
B
C
Well,
thanks
for
showing
up
yeah
yeah,
welcome
to
the
meeting
and
we're
gonna
talk
about
something
a
couple
things
this
week.
This
is
the
first
week
of
2022
or
first
meeting
with
2022
so
welcome
to
the
new
year.
We'll
talk.
C
Yeah,
so
let's
see
first
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
I
can
launch
right
into
g
or
google
summer
of
code
news
or
what
we
want
to
do
this
year.
B
C
So,
as
you
as
people
know,
here,
we
are
affiliated
with
incf.
That's
our
managing.
D
C
And
that
you
know
that's
the
they're,
the
ones
who
interface
with
the
google
summer
code
program,
so
they
manage
everything
and
and
sponsor
us.
So
this
year
it's
gonna
be
the
program
is
gonna,
be
quite
a
bit
different.
They're
gonna
have
two
different
lengths
of
program,
like
I
think,
a
10-week
in
a
22-week
program.
E
C
About
the
details
of
what
they,
I
just
got
an
email
this
morning
about
what
they
want
exactly
in
the
calls
for
involvement
like
when
your
your
group
puts
forward
a
proposal
to
the
sponsoring
org
and
they
advertise
it
and
get
people
so
that
that's
that,
and
then
we
also
thought
about
having
our
own
organization
hi.
Dick.
C
And
so
our
own
organization
is
the
idea
there
is
that
I've
got
some
other
people
who
are
interested
in
participating,
but
they
don't
have
an
sponsoring
organization.
So
this
year,
male
1
and
incf
suggested.
You
know
that
if
people
want
more
slots
and
if
they
want
to
do
so,
they
can,
they
can
fill
out
their
own
mentoring
organization,
app
application
and
then
incf
would
sponsor
it,
and
it
would
be
a
better
chance.
C
It
was
getting
accepted
that
way,
the
benefit
there
would
be
we'd
have
more
slots
and
we
could
do
more
things,
but
it's
it's
up
in
the
air
and
we
probably
will
do
both
and
then
we'll
see
which
one
works
out.
So
I
have
a
let's
see
so
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen.
C
That
I've
come
up
with
where
we've
come
up
with
and
I
put
together
and
so
this
is.
We
have
two
and
I
think,
that's
probably
enough.
In
the
last
year
we
had
three,
but
this
one
is.
I
don't
need
that
one
for
this
document.
C
You
want
to
connect,
so
this
is
the
first
one
is
gnns
as
developmental
networks.
So
this
is
a
graph
neural
networks
and.
C
C
I
don't
know
exactly
how
this
would
be
pulled
off,
but
that's
one
of
the
things
I
like
to
do
is
like
to
get
people
a
chance
to
sort
of
propose
their
own
solution
and
then
once
they
do,
that
you
have
say
like
10
applicants,
you
can
find
the
best
one
and
then
the
people
who
don't
get
selected
would
can
you
know,
follow
up
on
that
on
their
own
or
depending
on
how
many
slots
we
get.
We
can
accept
more
people,
but
this
is
so.
C
This
is
just
kind
of
using
these
kind
of
graph
embeddings
to
sort
of
characterize
biological
rules.
Look
at
the
differentiation
of
nodes
in
a
network.
So
once
we
have
these
graph
embeddings,
we
can
do
a
lot
of
things
with
them
potentially,
but
we
need
to
get
that
those
that
work
done
first.
So
that's
why
I
propose
that
we
start
here.
E
C
Data
that
we've
been
using
for
our
deep
learning
work.
We
can
just
simply
use
those
data
sets
and
maybe
find
a
few
more,
and
that
would
be
that,
and
so
you
know
we
do
this,
we
kind
of
tell
them
what
they
can
do
before
the
program
starts.
C
It's
the
same
as
every
year
and
I'm
not
sure
about
the
skills
and
requirements.
I
may
have
to
update
that,
but
I
think
pie
torch
and
tensorflow.
You
know
if
you
want
to
use
one
or
the
other,
then
that's
that's
a
good
basis
for
it.
C
So
that's
that's
the
first
project
and
I'm
not
sure
about
the
gui.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
do
that.
So
I'll.
Do
that
and
then
the
second
one
is
digital
microsphere,
and
that
is
a
project
that
is
the
one
we
proposed
last
year.
This
is
with
susan's
data,
so
this
is
the
one
where
you
have
her
ball
microscope
that
can
take
pictures
from
all
these
different
angles
and
you
can
also
use
this
flipping
microscope
technique.
C
So
you
have
all
these
data
that
basically
show
an
embryo,
the
surface
of
an
embryo
with
different
perspectives
and
then
we'd
build
a
spherical
atlas
of
this,
so
it
would
be,
like
you
know,
you'd,
be
able
to
tile
the
surface
of
a
sphere
and
explore
those.
You
know
that
surface
and
you
know
so
this
is
basically
I
know
we
had
a
couple
people
produce
artifacts
on
this
last
year.
I
don't
know
I'll,
probably
send
it
out,
hopefully
they'll
reapply,
but
this
is
enough.
C
You
know
this
is
again
one
of
these
things
where
you
have
to
come
up
with
your
own
solution.
You,
you
know
just
basically
say
I'm
going
to
use
this
technique.
This
will
work
good
with
this
project.
C
You
know,
there's
a
lot
of
kind
of
like
figuring
out
how
to
do
these
tilings
of
space,
so
you
take
like
flat
images
and
you're
tiling
them
onto
a
sphere,
so
there's
some
mathematical
transformation
that
has
to
happen,
and
then
you
have
to
have
a
base
sphere
that
you
can
tile
these
things
onto
that
you
can
navigate.
So
there's
a
you
know
a
bit
of
work
that
goes
into
that
part.
So
it's
a
little
bit
different
than
the
first
one,
because
you're
not
just
throwing
an
algorithm
set
of
algorithms
at
it.
C
It's
going
to
be
more
heterogeneous,
I
guess
so,
and
then
the
skills,
I
think,
are
higher
handling
higher
dimensional
microscopy
data
building,
an
intuitive,
a
gui
feature
extraction,
so
yeah
these
are
base
the
basic
skills,
and
so
these
are
all
the
ideas.
Are
there
any
ideas
about?
You
know
if
we
want
to
add
another
project
or
if
we
want
to.
C
The
account
differentiation
tree
and
phylogenetic
trees
as
networks
yeah.
Actually
we
do.
We
can
count
those
as
networks
and
that's
something
you
know
when
I
guess
we
can.
In
parallel
with
that
project,
we
can
kind
of
characterize
different
things
that
are
networks
and
kind
of
put
together
a
short
list
of
those
things
that
you
know
what
how
we
might
work
with
them
in
in
terms
of
not
only
as
networks
but
like
in
these
kind
of
graph
neural
networks.
So
that's
a
good
question.
B
Something
more
basic
because
I
remember
like
alpha
fold,
was
using
something
similar
to.
C
Well,
I
guess
you
could
you
know
there
are
a
couple
things
that
we
could
do.
We
could
characterize
networks
just
in
general,
so
you
know
we
could
build
the
embeddings
and
then
the
idea
would
be
you'd,
be
able
to
train
different
types
of
data
and
get
analyses.
So
you
know
with
the
deep
learning
stuff
it
was
just
like
taking
microscopy
images
of
an
embryo
and
segmenting
those
images
and
then
using
the
segmentation.
Information
to
you
know
build
these
classifications.
D
C
C
B
C
E
C
Cited
one
in
the
list
here
to
read
so
yeah
this
one
here,
so
this
is
the
the
google
embryo
for
building
quantitative
understanding
of
an
embryo
as
it
builds
itself
and
yeah.
I
usually
give
people
these
two
papers
to
read
if
they're
interested
in
the
project.
So
it's
a
good
starting
point.
C
Just
making
some
notes
here
on
this
so
yeah,
I
think
that's
good.
Yes,
I
think
you
know
the
benef
only
benefit
of
having
another
project
here
would
be
that
if
we
don't
get
any
applicants
for
these
we'd
still
have
another
one,
but
I
think
these
two
will
probably
this
one
will
probably
get
a
lot
of
applicants.
C
This
all
starts
like
we
have
to
have
these
projects
into
incf
by
the
end
of
the
month
and
then,
if
we
apply
for
or
we
will
be
applying
as
an
organization
and
that'll
be
another
month
after
that,
so
by
march
1st,
we
it
should
be
the
beginning
of
the
application
period
and
that's
when
people
come
and
start
asking
about
the
projects
and
then
applying-
and
you
know
we
work
with-
I
work
with
them,
mainly
to
develop
the
proposal,
and
then
you
know
we
get
some
pretty
good,
pretty
good
solutions
to
some
of
these
things.
C
So
that's
good
any
other
comments
or
questions
before
we
move
on.
C
All
right,
let's
see,
oh,
we
got
one
here,
yeah
scent.
Thank
you.
So
speaking
of
this
diva
learn
this.
This
is
the
print
link
to
a
preprint
here,
and
I
think
I
showed
this
last
couple
meetings
ago
last
year,
and
this
is
now
I've
got
this
up
on
the
research
gate
is
a
stub.
So
this
is
the
diva
learn
paper,
so
I've
had
it
on
github
and
I'm
not
really
sure
it's
long
enough
to
really
publish
it
or
even
make
it
into
something
like
an
archive
preprint.
C
But
it's
oh,
we
got
11
reads
on
it.
I
just
yesterday,
when
I
looked,
we
had
three.
So
that's
good,
but
this
is
the
pre-print
for
evil
learn.
So
we
were
working
on
this
all
last
year
and
I
had
the
I've
turned
it
into.
What
I
did
was
I
created.
C
We
actually
was.
I
think
it
was
myself
and
my
yook,
but
it
were.
You
know
we
created
this
document
in
markdown,
which
is
the
language
that
we
use
on
github
you
you
know
make
commits
to
github
in
this
language.
It
puts
together
this
document
and
then
I
converted
this
to
a
pdf
using
atom.io,
which
is
a
nice
tool
for
conversion,
converting
things
from,
like
you
know,
mark
down
to
pdf
or
html
to
markdown,
or
you
can
work
with
latak
in
it
as
well.
C
So
that's
a
nice
document
tool
and
I
created
this
pdf,
so
my
my
knock
bradley
and
usual
are
all
the
authors
and
then
the
abstract
is
pretty
short.
C
We
have
a
summary
of
the
software
here
and
then
there's
a
little
gap
here
and
view
the
file
like
this
there's
a
little
gap
here,
because
the
image
is
actually
this
image
is
actually
it's
animated
in
the
markdown
version.
But
it's
it's
static
here,
that's
the
only
disadvantage,
but
and
then
you
know,
headings
about
accessibility,
statement
of
need,
technical
details
and
then
walking
through
like
segmenting
a
c
elegans
embryo
again,
these
figures
are
animated
in
the
markdown
file.
So
it's
it's
with
the
pdf.
C
It's
like
limited
utility,
but
it
you
know,
that's
just
something
that
is
the
disadvantage
of
a
pdf
file,
and
you
know
we
have
our
data
sources
generating
synthetic
images
using
gans,
hyper
parameter.
Optimization
lineage
prediction,
which
is
something
so
this
basically
goes
through
all
of
the
different
features
of
diva
learn,
and
I
was
surprised
when
I
went
through
this
to
put
this
together.
C
How
many
things
there
were-
and
this
is
from
mayak
and
minox
projects,
as
well
as
some
other
documentation
that
we
wrote
up
on
it
so
and
then
the
diva
learned
platform,
which
is
this
github
organization
that
has
the
different.
So
we
have
diva
warm
ai.
We
have
evil,
learn
and
then.
C
Devo
zoo,
which
is
something
we
haven't
talked
about
in
a
while,
but
this
is
the
collection
of
data
sets
that
we
have
for
different
species,
and
it's
something
that
I'd
like
to
get
back
to
at
some
point.
But
it's
you
know.
Maybe
it
needs
to
be
upgraded
a
little
bit
more,
but
I
think
there's
a
role,
there's
a
solid
interest.
I
think
in
people
talking
about
different
model
organisms.
C
C
Those
are
all
relevant
to
develop
to
understanding
development
at
a
broader
scale.
So
this
devozu
is
actually
a
nice
resource
and
it
needs
to
be
developed
more.
But
it's
all
under
this
umbrella-
and
the
idea
here
is
to
kind
of
in
in
this.
The
thing
nice
thing
about
a
preprint
is
that
we
can
add
in.
If
we
decide
the
devozu
needs
to
be
highlighted
a
little
bit
more
in
here
and
highlight
it
a
little
bit
more
and
describe
what
it
is.
In
fact
I
think
that'll
be.
C
The
next
version
is
going
through
evo,
zoo
and
even
diva
warm
ai,
which
wasn't
really
mentioned
here
too
much.
But
so
that's
that's
that
and
I
think
that's
a
nice
way
to
like
kind
of
cap
off
some
of
the
work
that
we've
done
on
diva
learn
and
I
don't
know
what
the
next
steps
are
for.
Diva
learn.
I
guess
it's
just
you
know
when,
as
we
get
people
coming
in,
they
can,
you
know,
maybe
add
on
their
own
functionality
or
you
know.
C
A
C
It
or
build
you
know
any
sort
of
more
work
if
we're
just
okay,
people
are
just
kind
of
using
it
and
thinking
about
next
steps.
C
So
my
knock
and
my
hook,
I
haven't
really
been
involved
with
it
much
lately
by
lately
I
mean
the
past
two
or
three
months,
so
they
might
come
back
and
work
on
it,
some
more
or
we
might
get
some
new
people
who
might
want
to
do
some
more
work
on
this.
So
that's
very
good.
That's
I
mean
this
is
something
I
want
to
keep
sort
of
sustained
and
I
want
to
keep
bringing
it
up
and
coming
back
to
it.
C
C
Okay
and
then
yeah,
I
think,
that's
a
good.
I
know
there
have
been
some
interesting
reviews
of
model
organisms
of
late.
I
think
we've
reviewed
a
couple
in
the
group
and
then
they're
others
that
I've
seen
that
I
need
to
go
back
and
grab
hold
of,
because
I
think
that's
an
interesting
kind
of
topic
to
build
on,
and
so
you
know,
work
on
model
organisms
is
two-fold.
C
So
look
I'll
think
about
the
people
who
you
know,
maybe
I'll
contact
some
people
and
see
what
they're
thinking.
C
Okay.
The
next
thing
I
want
to
cover
is
this
game
theory
in
of
developmental
processes.
So
this
is
a
paper
that
I
I
just
put
this
preprint
out.
This
is
something
that
I
think
it
presented
last
year
a
couple
months
ago
in
the
group
this
is
this
was
something
that
was
submitted
to
the
dynamics
days
conference,
which
just
happened
this
last
weekend,
so
it
was
a
pretty
decent
conference.
I
was
hosted
by
georgia,
tech
and
they
were
hit.
C
You
know
virtual
because
they,
you
know,
couldn't
meet
in
person,
and
so
they
had,
they
had
the
whole
thing
set
up
in
talks
posters.
We
got
in
as
a
poster,
so
this
is
like
a
two
minute
thing
and
that
video
of
that
presentation
is
on
youtube
on
the
youtube
channel.
So
if
you
want
to
see
that
poster
it
was
a
very
short
two
minute
summary
of
the
poster.
So
then,
and
then
this
preprint
is
meant
to
be
a
supplement
to
that
poster.
C
So
you
know
it's
like
you
want
to
find
out
more
read
the
preprints.
So
that's
why
this
is
here.
Actually
I
just
wanted
to
write
up
a
preprint
for
it
to
keep
moving
the
idea
moving
forward,
but
there's
a
longer
30-minute
talk
on
also
on
the
youtube
channel
for
this
basic
idea
that
I
presented
at
another
dynamics
days
in
europe
last
year
so
and
it
was
also
virtual.
So
this
is
the
preprint
and
it
actually
goes
into
a
lot
more
depth
in
the
different
presentations.
C
So
this
is
a
paper
that
takes
developmental
processes
and
applies
game
theory
models
to
it.
So
the
idea
is
that
you
can
use
this
class
of
model
to
model
developmental
processes
in
different
ways,
and
you
know
there
are
different
types
of
games
and
they're
different,
a
lot
of
different
types
of
developmental
processes.
So
there's
a
lot
of
variation
there
that
you,
you
know,
but
the
general
idea
is,
is
what
I
just
said,
and
that
also
requires
looking
at
game
theory
a
little
bit
differently.
C
So
people
have
thought
game.
Theory
started
back
in
the
40s
and
50s
with
john
nash
and
von
neumann
and
some
other
people,
and
they
came
up
with
these
basic
models
of
game
theory.
It
was
basically
you
know,
games
of
strategy
so
like
something
like
like
they
call
the
tit
for
tat
game,
which
is
a
game
where
you
have
one
player,
plays
a
strategy
and
another
player
tries
to
one-up
that
strategy
and
then
the
other
player
responds
by
one-upping
that
strategy,
and
so
so
on
and
so
forth.
C
They're
they're
strategic
games
like
chess
and
poker
and
those
are
all
you
can
model
those
as
games.
So
you
can
basically
use
a
computational
model
to
model
those
things
as
games,
and
you
know
this
is.
This
was
something
when
you,
if
you
take
the
chess
example,
this
was
something
that
was
used
in
early
ai
to
sort
of
serve
as
a
model
for
intelligent
behavior.
C
C
It
was
usually
some
combinatorial
game,
because
computers
are
good
at
combinatorics
and
you
know
eventually,
this
became
something
that
was
able
to
beat
humans,
so
in
the
90s
ibm's
deep
blue
was
able
to
beat
a
chess
master
chess
grandmaster
and
so
that
so
that
wasn't
a
long
time
that
was
like
40
years
but
anyways.
That
was
the
idea.
C
So
we
can
use
these
for
developmental
processes
and
they're
different
types
of
games,
but
before
we
get
to
that,
we
have
to
talk
about
different
types
of
things
that
the
agent
or
the
player
has
to
embody
as
a
developmental
agent
versus
like
a
strategic
human
player,
or
something
like
that,
I
mean
the
idea
of
rational
strategic
player
is
a
little
misleading
because
although
it's
been
applied,
a
lot
to
humans,
they've
also
used
this
to
analyze,
animal
behavior,
so
you've
had
games
that
can
model
like
birds
and
their
visual
behaviors
and
their
different
decisions
that
they
make,
but
still
even
in
birds.
C
C
Agent,
which
is
this
type
of
agent
that
doesn't
have
this-
it
doesn't
explicitly,
have
cognition
and
it
doesn't
behave
in
this
rational
manner.
It
behaves
sort
of
in
a
natural
manner,
and
so
what
that
means
is
that
you
have
these.
It
basically
operates
on
the
principle
fitness.
C
C
Equilibrium
or
some
other
result
that
is
able
to
maximize
fitness
for
each
player
in
the
game,
so
the
other
benefit
about
taking
cues
from
evolutionary
game
theory
is
that
you
have
this
dynamical
trajectory
so
in
development.
Of
course,
that's
very
important
where
you
have
this
trajectory
of
what
goes
on
in
development,
and
there
are
actually
two
ways
to
view
this.
One
is
through
an
evolutionary
game,
three
lens
which
is
maximizing
fitness,
but
there
are
also
these
iterative
games
which
are
forms
of
games
that
get
played
over
and
over.
C
In
the
prisoner's
dilemma,
where
there's
a
form
of
the
prisoner's
dilemma,
which
is
the
iterative
prisoner's
dilemma,
and
so
you
have
this
single
game
that
you
can
characterize
and
then
you
have
the
iterative
game
which
can
just
be
played
over
and
over
and
the
payoffs
change
based
on
the
you
know,
few
past
states,
the
past
state
informs
the
present
state
which
informs
the
future
state
I'm
trying
to
find
that
table.
C
Maybe
I
don't
even
have
it
in
here,
but
there's
a
table
that
kind
of
goes
over
the
prisoner's
dilemma,
and
it's
payoffs.
I
don't
have
it
in
here.
I
don't
think
I
put
that
one
in
anyways.
C
For
the
prisoners,
they
both
cannot
say
anything
that
would
incriminate
each
other,
but
oftentimes
they'll,
incriminate,
one
or
the
other,
and
so
that's
where
there's
a
sub-optimality
there.
So
that's
the
prisoner's
dilemma
without
going
into
too
much
detail.
But
the
idea,
then,
would
be
you
know
with
the
presenter's
dilemma:
the
iterative
version
do
both
prisoners.
Are
they
able
to
coordinate
the
information
that
they
have
over
a
long
period
of
time
or
do
they
just
do
it
once
and
then
it
breaks
down?
And
so
you
know
these
are.
C
There
are
all
sorts
of
games
that
I
feature
in
here:
they're
dif,
there's
a
zero
order
or
zero
player
game,
which
is
a
set
of
games
that
involve
like
different
point
processes
and
the
game
of
life
is
actually
considered
a
zero
player
game.
C
Then
you
have
single
player
games
which
are
games
against
nature,
and
this
is
where
you
have
some
natural
process,
a
stochastic
process,
or
it
could
be
deterministic
which
isn't
very
fun
but
like
the
stochastic
process,
and
then
you
have
an
agent
that's
playing
against
that
stochastic
process.
C
C
Actually,
if
there's
a,
I
think
if
they
came
out
how
this
works,
but
there's
a
payoff
that
they
get
for
some
sort
of
correct
choice
and
then
for
a
neutral
choice
which
would
be
like
something:
that's
not
correct,
but
something
that
doesn't
hurt
the
agent
it's
a
zero
and
then,
if
it's
something
wrong,
it
hurts
the
agent
it's
a
negative
one.
So
then
you
can
add
this
payoff
of
over
time.
So
this
collective
payoff
is,
you
know,
there's
an
average
payoff,
a
cumulative
payoff.
C
You
can
calculate
it
in
different
ways
and
then
you
can
say
I
see
where
that
process
unfolds
it
the
way
it
did
because
that
payoff
is,
you
know,
there's
a
maybe
there's
some
mechanism
in
the
agent,
that's
able
to
predict
something
in
nature,
and
but
it
only
is
able
to
do
it
sporadically.
C
Quite
valuable
at
the
molecular
scale
where
there's
a
lot
of
there
are
a
lot
of
processes
that
involve
like
recognition,
but
you
know
like
say,
for
example,
cells
when
you
look
at
like
things
like
translation
or
binding
sites.
Things
like
that,
it's
a
processor
there's
a
lot
of
this
going
on
and
not
all
of
it
actually
unfolds
in
the
same
way.
Sometimes
you
know
there's
just
a
lot
of
stuff
in
the
cell.
That
needs
to
be
bound,
and
if
enough
of
it
is
bound
you
get
this
activation.
C
So
not
every
agent
is
going
to
have
a
fair
payoff,
and
so
that's
that's
the
idea
behind
this,
and
then
there
are
these
two.
You
know
the
end
player
games,
which
are
like
two
or
greater
number
of
players,
and
there
are
a
number
of
examples
from
behavioral
biology
and
other.
You
know
other
types
of
rational
agent
behaviors
that
we
can
use
and
apply
to
this
developmental
context.
C
So
in
this
case
there
were
two
examples:
the
prisoner's
dilemma,
iterated
prisoner's
dilemma
which
I've
described
previously,
then
there's
this
knots
and
crosses,
which
are
the
first
mover
games,
and
this
is
something
we
published
a
couple
papers
on.
We've
published
a
paper
on
this
in
embryos
which
is
in
this
paper,
origin
of
the
embryo.
That
was
done
a
couple
years
ago,
where
I
like
one
of
my
contributions
to
that
was
to
put
in
one
of
these
first
player
games.
C
So
the
idea
is
that
you
have
these
different
cell
lineages
that
they
differentiate
and
then
they
divide
and
the
idea
is
there
in
this
confined
space
and
the
lineage
that
divides
first
is
the
first
mover
and
then
the
one
that
divides.
Second,
is
the
second
mover
and
the
first
mover
in
general
constrains
the
second
mover's
behavior.
So
if
the
first
mover
divides,
they
have
more
space
to
expand.
The
second
mover
then,
can
divide
and
expand
and
then
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
this
might
explain
timing
in
a
lineage
tree.
C
You
could
also
apply
this
to
the
connectome,
and
so
how
does
the
connectome
get
assembled?
And
I
actually
use
some
data
from
c
elegans,
both
cell
differentiation
data
and
synaptic
data,
to
show
how
this
connectome
assembles
taking
this
principle
of
first
mover
dynamics
and
deriving
some
rules
or
some
scenarios
where
the
data
fit
in.
So
the
data
get
classified
by
these
different
rules
and
they
fit
these
strategies.
C
So
then
there
are
other
types
of
things
like
systems,
equilibrium,
complexity,
so
they're
different
types
of
combinatorial
games,
evolutionary
more
explicit
evolutionary
games
and
what
we
call
spatial
games,
which
are
things
that
look
at
space
as
a
set
of
potential
strategies.
So
you
know
agents
will
obtain
a
specific
spatial
structure
as
a
collective
strategy
to
defend
against
invaders.
C
There
are
other
things
like
that,
and
then
there
are
the
system,
broader
systems,
level
phenomena
which
I
go
through.
So
that's
that
paper
and
I
I
like
the
idea,
particularly
of
natural
agents,
but
some
of
the
games.
I
mean
this
is
like
a
pre-print,
so
we
can
expand
out.
We
can
come
up
with
new
games
or
kind
of
discuss
more
about
some
of
these
things.
C
I
was
thinking
even
of
what
we
might
call
an
evo
divo
game,
which
is
where
we
apply
evolutionary
game
theory
more
explicitly
to
the
developmental
context
and
look
at
how
that
maybe
explains
some
things
we
see
in
the
evolution
of
development,
a
couple
of
okay,
so
a
suggestion
right,
people
look
at
only
932
papers
in
web
of
science
was
that
for,
oh,
that
was
for
model
organisms
or
yes,
okay,
thank
you.
Yeah
could
extract
email
addresses,
so
maybe
yeah
look.
E
C
C
Yeah
I
mean
it's
this
part
here,
the
part
about,
like
you,
know,
purpose
and
natural
agents.
It's
an
interesting
topic
of
stone
papers
yeah.
So
you
have
to
look
at
that
a
little
bit
more.
I
can't
remember
exactly
even
the
paper,
the
origin
of
the
embryo
that
I
was
involved
in.
I
can't
remember
if
you
get
to
a
point
where
you
can't
remember,
you
remember
kind
of
what
every
paper
is
about,
but
like
kind
of
bernie.
C
Anyways,
so
that's
good
any
comments
or
questions
at
this
point.
C
Okay,
so
next
thing
I
wanted
to
move
on
to
is
a
couple
things
for
2022.
C
We
had
a
couple
things
that
kind
of
ended.
At
the
end
of
the
year
we
had
the
submissions
document
and
the
major
tasks
which
haven't
been
updated.
You
know
as
regularly
as
I
would
like,
but
that's
okay,
so
this
is
our
like
last
year.
This
is
our
submissions
list.
So
at
the
beginning
of
2021
we
started
this
list
and
we
had
34
things
in
it
from
last
year,
and
this
is
like
things
that
were
proposed
or
that
we
did
for
different
venues.
C
Some
things
were
rejected,
and
so
you
know
there
are
all
these
possibilities,
but
we
wanted
to
assemble
them
in
this
document,
so
this
was
for
2021
and
maybe
in
he
had
a
comment
on
this
once
it
was
headed
open
and
someone
said,
is
that
something
you're
going
to
go
through,
because
this
looks
pretty
illegible?
Jim
I
mean
it
is.
If,
if
you
look
at
it
like
this,
we
usually
zoom
in
on
a
couple
lines,
but
but
anyways
maybe
doing
this
for
2022
and
starting
off
with
some
of
the
new
submissions.
C
So
let's
go
to
2021
here,
okay,
so
we
had
a
lot
of
things
and
a
lot.
Some
of
these
things
will
carry
over
to
2022,
and
so
that's
something
that
so
the
neuro
ips
was
something
that
was.
I
think
people
didn't.
I
don't
think
anyone
here
sent
anything
to
them,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
a
couple
people,
especially
my
other
group,
participated
in,
and
so
there
and
same
with
neuromatch
we
had
a
narrow
match.
C
They
had
some
participation
in
neuromatch
as
well,
so
that's
good
and
then
this
dynamic
stage
2022,
which
was
green-
that
was
presented.
So
that's
pretty
good
all
right.
So
we
have
some
things
here.
Some
of
these
items
that
never
we
didn't
really
do
as
much
within
2021
as
we
would
have
liked.
Maybe
we'll
get
some
of
these
and
pull
these
over.
C
These
submissions-
these
are
the
ones
on
the
test
of
williamson's.
Here's
this
one
williamson's
symbiosis.
This
is
the
idea
of.
C
E
Anyways,
maybe.
C
We'll
do
this
later,
oh
now
there
we
go
okay,
so
let
me
get
this
so
we
have
that
one.
We
have
a
couple,
others
that
involve
diatom
movement,
and
this
is
something
I
know
we
were.
I
presented
some
stuff
a
few
weeks
ago
on
that,
so
that
that
might
go
somewhere
this
year.
This
steve
mcgrew's
book
eye
of
nature.
We
still
need
to
go
through
that
and
see
what
we
can
do
with
it.
C
We
talked
about
publishing
it
or
you
know,
building
upon
it
in
some
way,
and
then
this
quantitative
comparison
of
archaea
and
shape
droplets,
which
is
still
you
know.
I
haven't
heard
from
my
knock
on
that.
I
still
wanted
to
get
in
touch
with
him
about
the
presenting
on
it,
but
I
haven't
heard
back
so
we'll
see
you
know
present
in
the
main
meeting
here
I
know
susan
presented.
I
think
it
was
last
meeting
that
we
had
of
2021,
and
that
was
a
very
good
talk
and
that
was
on
some
of
her
work
on.
E
C
C
I
don't
know
this
one
yeah
smoother
jerky,
so
that's
already
in
the
list.
So
we
have
that
in
the
list
2022
list
we
have
some
yeah.
So
this
is
the
different
diatom
things
and
then
the
one
dimensionalizing
is
wolfram
pattern.
Generator
yeah,
there's
some
interesting
things
going
on
with
pattern
generation
like
you
know,
in
terms
of
both
like
kind
of
thinking,
about
how
it's
generated
and
then
looking
at
some
of
the
outputs
of
that
visualization
so
again
like
this
is
something
that
you
know.
This
list
is
like
just
very
basic
ideas.
C
C
Let's
see!
No,
I
don't
want
to
do
that.
C
Okay,
I'll
fix
that
later.
The
other
thing
is
major
tasks
for
2020
2021,
which
I
guess
now
is
20
20
to
2022.
So
I'll
change
that
later-
and
so
we
have
all
these
cards
here
and
I
didn't
want
to
have
to
go
through
them
point
by
point,
but
I
just
wanted
people
to
be
aware
that
these
are
still
here,
and
so
some
of
these
things
are
finished.
C
I
don't
I'm
not
logged
in
in
the
so
that's
okay
we'll
do
that
later.
But
some
of
these
are
finished.
Some
of
the
these
two
are
finished,
for
example,
or
at
least
partially
finished.
You
know
I
don't
want
to
say
they're
not
going
to
revisit
that
again.
It's
just
that.
You
know
that
for
now
it's
finished
a
lot
of
things
here
to
do
to
possible
things.
C
So
this
kind
of
ties
into
this
submissions
document,
where
we
kind
of
plan
things
out,
so,
if
you're
looking
for
something
to
do
a
way
to
contribute,
these
are
things
that
we
can
revisit
and
kind
of
make
up.
You
know
kind
of
find
something
to
do.
We
have
a
lot
of
things
that
we've
talked
about.
This
is
the
way
to
carry
over
some
of
those
ideas
and
align
them
with
people,
people's
interests.
C
C
Okay,
so
last
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
today
is
get
into
some
papers,
and
I
know
I
talked
about
some
things
already,
but
let's
see
I
had
some
interesting
things
to
come
up.
I
know
dick
has
sent
me
some
papers
in
the
pet
over
the
break.
So
thank
you
for
that,
and
so
one
of
the
first
thing
I
want
to
talk
about
is
this
microscopy
folder.
I
have
a
couple
interesting
papers
in
here
to
go
over
and
following
up
on
our
microscopy
interest
in
the
group.
C
The
first
paper
is
from
bmc
bioinformatics.
This
is
quick,
piv
the
technique
name,
and
so
this
is
efficient.
3D
particle
image,
veloci
velocimetry
software
applied
to
quantifying
cellular
migration
during
embryogenesis.
So
this
is
velocimetry
software.
This
is
on,
I
guess,
on
a
data
set
and
they're
actually
developing
the
software
around
it
and
trying
to
get
to
sort
of
quantify
cellular
migration.
So
in
this
case
you're
not
just
extracting
you
know
segmenting
parts
of
cells,
you're
tracking
them
as
they
move
in
in
movies.
C
So
the
background
here
is
a
technical
development
of
imaging
techniques,
and
life
sciences
has
enabled
the
three-dimensional
recording
of
living
samplers
at
increasingly
temporal
resolutions,
meaning
that
you
can
not
only
capture
the
movement
in
as
like
a
movie.
But
you
can
capture
that
movie
in
smaller
and
smaller
time
or.
C
Okay,
it
was
muted,
yeah,
okay,
no
sound,
okay
yeah.
So
let
me
go
back
to
this,
so
this
is
the
yeah.
So
this
is
the
technical
development
of
imaging
techniques.
So
the
idea
is
that
you
have
these
videos,
but
they
also
have
a
higher
sampling
rate
that
you
know
you
can
have-
and
we've
talked
about
this
before,
and
so
there
are
some
machine
learning
techniques
that
allow
us
to
take
like
series
of
images,
time,
series
of
images
that
are
sampled
at
a
fairly
low
sampling
rate
and
increase
those
increase,
the
sampling
rate.
C
Basically
there
you
know
the
idea
is
that
the
algorithm
will
take
the
images
in
sequence
and
then
infer
the
images
in
between
and
so
in
a
normal
time
series
analysis.
C
Unless
you
really
kind
of
you
know,
work
at
it,
and
I
I
don't
know
but
anyways
this
paper
is
a
dynamic
3d
data
sets
of
developing
organisms.
So
they
have.
These
they've
collected
the
data,
especially
for
this.
They
call
it
dynamic.
3D
allow
for
time
resolve
quantitative
analysis,
morphogenetic
changes
in
three
dimensions,
so
they
have
three
like.
I
guess
they
have
a
three-dimensional
data
set
where
they
collect
data
from
like
three
spatial
dimensions
and
then
integrate
that
and
then
do
the
analysis
on
that.
C
So
this
generates
terabytes
of
image
data.
So
it's
a
lot
of
data,
a
particle
image,
veloce
velocimetry.
I
I'm
having
trouble
with
that
word
today,
piv
as
a
robust
and
segmentation
free
technique.
So
this
does
not
involve
segmentation.
This
particular
technique
suitable
for
quantifying
collective
cellular
migration
on
data
sets
with
differing
labeling
schemes.
This
paper
presents
the
implementation
of
an
efficient,
3d
piv
package
using
julia,
which
is
a
nice
scientific
programming
language
that
we've
in
my
other
group,
we've
talked
about
about
it
around
the
edges,
but
it's
a
very
nice
language.
C
It's
not
python,
but
it's
something.
That's
really
enables
a
lot
of
scientific
computing,
and
so
this
package
is
called
quick
piv.
Our
software
is
focused
on
optimizing,
cpu
performance
and
ensuring
the
robustness
of
the
analysis.
So
this
this
quick
piv
is
three
times
faster
than
the
python
implementation
host
in
an
open
piv.
So
this
quick
viv
uses
julia,
and
so
our
software
is
also
faster
than
the
fastest
2d
pv
piv
package
in
open
piv
written
in
c
plus.
C
Embryos,
so
they
have
again
a
lot
of
the
cell
tracking
that
we
do
ultimately
involves
cells
that
have
something
labeled
in
the
cell.
So
it
could
be
the
nucleus,
it
could
be
actin.
It
could
be
something
in
the
cell
that
you
can
use
as
a
marker
and
you
can
hook
onto
that
to
segment
them,
but
in
this
case
they're
just
using
these
labels
as
a
way
to
sort
of
orient
their
analysis.
C
D
C
I
say
label
I
mean
like
they
do
this
in
a
molecular
way:
they
they
use
some
sort
of
fluorescent
protein
or
some
sort
of
antibody
stain
that
binds
to
something
and
makes
it
fluoresce.
So
it's
like
this
nice
fluorescent
contrast
in
the
image
and
so
they're
able
to
detect
translations
and
non-segmentable
biological
image
data.
So
there
are
some
of
our
images
we've
chosen.
C
I
hope
that
here
we
go
so
this
is
pictures
of
the
embryo,
so
this
is
piv.
Analysis
was
were
performed
on
the
actin
signal
of
a
double
hemizygous
transgenic
embryo
before
and
during
so
before.
The
top
during
is
the
bottom
of
gastrulation,
so
this
is
a
and
this
is
before-
and
this
is
during
gastrulation.
C
So,
as
you
can
see,
there's
this
gastrulation
process
where
you
get
this
sort
of
folding
of
the
tissue,
and
you
can
see
it's
picking
it
out
in
this
area
here.
So
this
is
the
image,
that's
being
analyzed.
That's
kind
of
you
know
giving
us
differences
in
this.
We
have
the
arrows
here.
So
it's
showing
the
movement
of
cells
and
these
arrows
are,
you
know
you
can
see
a
difference
here
between
the
two
samples.
C
So
that's
what
it's
doing.
It's
picking
up
these
labels
and
seeing
how
they
move
in
the
image
in
the
video
images
and
then
it's
creating
these
arrows
that
show
the
direction
and
the
extent
of
the
movement.
So
you
can
see
that
it
has
this
there's
a
difference
here
in
the
different
samples
and
then
you,
of
course
you
can
create
numbers
out
of
this
and
actually
do
some
more
analysis
on
it
and
then
pi
view
is
also
performed
for
the
same
time.
C
Points
on
the
nuclear
signal
when
b
and
then
the
similarity
selective
average
vector
fields
are
shown
next
to
the
actin
vector
fields
which
I'm
not
sure
what
the
difference
is
here,
but
you
can
see
that
you
have
differences
again
in
the
embryo
and
then
these
vector
fields
that
result
so,
okay.
So
that's
good,
so
yeah!
This
looks
pretty
good.
This
is
a
nice
and
then
they
show
this
graph
here
and
see
the
orientation
similarity
between
each
pair
of
vectors
and
the
two
channels
is
computed
through
their
normalized
dot
product.
C
So
this
is
the
euclidean
error
here,
the
normalized
dot
product-
and
it
kind
of
shows
you
this
in
the
plot
and
then
three
patterns
of
cell
migration
can
be
distinguished
in
this
data
set.
So
the
first
is
segmentable
and
trackable,
okay
and
then
the
second
is
segmental,
segmentable
and
non-trackable,
which
is
this
one
snt
and
then
non-segmentable
and
non-trackable
nuclei.
So.
C
So
you
have
a
segmentable
and
trackable
nucleis,
meaning
you
could
both
track
and
segment
these
these
nuclei,
meaning
that
they're
pretty
obvious
to
the
algorithm
and
they're
pretty
easy
to
sort
of
segment
and
and
understand
as
a
little
dot.
C
Do
neither
in
every
as
you
can
see,
they're
pretty.
You
know
you
can't
really
make
them
out.
You
can
make
them
out
with
the
eye,
maybe
but
not
with
an
algorithm.
So
that's
that's
what
we
have
when
we're.
You
know
dealing
with
this
kind
of
data,
so
I
think
this
is
an
interesting
paper.
The
other
one
I
want
to
talk
about
is
this
label-free
three-dimensional
imaging
of
c
elegans
with
visible
optical
coherence
microscopy.
C
So
I
think
susan
talked
about
this
technique
in
her
talk
last
year,
optical
coherence,
microscopy
is
this
ocm
method
and
so
fast,
label-free
high-resolution
three-dimensional.
Imaging
platforms
are
crucial
for
high
throughput
in
vivo
time-lapse
studies.
C
So
this
means
that
we
want
to
look
at
these
things
live
and
they
want
to
look
at
a
lot
of
data
and
we
want
to
look
at
them
over
time
as
a
time
lapse,
and
so
this
is
the
kind
of
thing
you
want
to
do
for
c
elegans,
because
c
elegans
has
a
nice
mode
of
development
where
you
can
do
this
and
it's
easy
to
analyze
and
easy
to
understand
what
you're
getting
so,
despite
the
needs
methods
combining
all
these
characteristics
have
been
lacking
in
this
case,
they're
presenting
this
label-free
imaging
technique
for
three-dimensional
data
sets
sub-micrometer
spatial
resolution
and
it's
something
they
call
visible
optical
coherence,
microscopy
or
vissocia.
C
So
vis-ocm
is
a
versatile
optical,
imaging
method
which
we
introduced
recently
for
tomography
of
cell
cultures
and
tissue
samples.
So
susan
mentioned
it
as
oct
or
optical
coherence,
tomography,
there's,
of
course,
a
larger
class,
which
is
just
the
general
microscopy,
but
it's
the
same
thing
more
or
less.
E
C
Yeah,
so
this
is
yeah
that
so
our
method
is
based
on
fourier
domain
optical
coherence,
tomography
and
then
this
kind
of
tells
you
what
that
is
by
operating
in
the
invisible
wavelength
range
and
using
a
high
and
a
objective.
Bizocm
attains
a
lateral
and
axial
resolutions
below
one
micrometer.
C
C
C
Then
this
is
the
sample
mounted
on
a
plate,
so
they
have
these
cell
cultures
that
they
look
at,
and
then
this
is
the
setup
here,
the
illumination
detection,
and
then
this
is
the
spectrometer
that
they
use
for
this.
These
sort
of
recorded
spectrum
with
a
subtracted
background,
and
then
you
get
this
profile
there.
Anything
you
want
to
say
about
this.
Susan.
E
No,
I
haven't
gotten
into
optical
clearance
tomography
like
I
want
to
it's
just
that
it's
a
well,
it's
a
tomography.
You
do
depth
images
and
it
can
go
to
two
to
three
millimeters,
depending
on
how
you
set
it
up.
Usually
they
say
two
millimeters
depth,
so
this
is
a
little
shallower.
E
Like
yeah
there's
one,
that's
spectrometry,
which
you
use
a
broadband
light
source
and
then
there's
a
swept
source
where
you
break
out
the
different
frequencies
and
you
more
or
less
get
the
same
type
of
image
or
you
it's
more
or
less
the
same
technique,
except
that
one's
a
broadband
light
source
and
one
is
sort
of
incremental,
so
you're
separating
out
the
the
bats.
E
And
then
you
do
similar
processing
with
the
different
frequencies.
Okay,
post-processing
yeah,
yeah.
E
Oh
definitely
need
the
40
transforms
to
work
with
this
and
some
interesting
tenser
math
that
does
sparse
sets,
which
I
haven't
looked
into
either
very
advanced
linear,
algebra.
C
Yeah,
that's
that's
good.
I
think
dick
had
to
leave
and
I
had
a
comment
from
him
in
the
in
the
chat.
We
were
talking
about
pi
the
piv
method.
Before
is
it
a
problem?
Real
pi
via
flow
run,
a
moving
diatom.
C
So
piv
was
this
other
technique
where
I
know
susan
missed
it,
but
it's
this
technique
where
you
can
look
at
different
things
like
different
markers
in
the
in
the
you
know,.
C
Or
a
cell
culture,
and
you
can
basically
track
them
over
time
and
get
a
flow
map
which
is
like
a
map
of
arrows,
and
what
dick
is
saying
here
in
the
chat
is
that
you
could
create
a
pivot
floor
on
a
moving
diatom.
C
You
could
use
like
you
know
some
sort
of
track,
maybe
a
tracking
die,
or
maybe
some
sort
of
fluorescent
tracking
technique
to
look
at
the
flows
around
the
diatom
itself.
So,
instead
of
using
something
in
the
cell
and
making
it
fluorescent
for
us,
you
could
use
something
around
it.
I
think
that's
an
interesting
point,
because
this
piv
technique
looks
kind
of
interesting
and,
of
course
we
have
the
computational
tools
to
to
complement.
E
C
E
Readily
so
finding
a
dye
that
works
at
those
frequencies
is
difficult,
they're,
more
or
less
water
windows.
C
C
Yeah
yeah,
that's
that's
fine,
yeah
yeah!
It's!
So
that's
the
image
there
and
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
other
images
they
have.
Sometimes
they
have
an
image
of
the
okay.
Here
we
go.
3D
volume
rendered
images
of
cut
sections
of
a
young
adult
wild
type
c
elegans.
So
this
is
our
adult
c
elegans.
This
is
where
it's
not
a
mutant,
it's
a
wild
type
and
you
can
see
that
they've,
characterized
the
entire
worm
from
head
to
tail.
This
is
the
this
is
what
a
worm
looks
like
under
a
microscope.
C
You
get
the
it's
it's
a
model,
so
it's
not
like
doesn't
show
a
lot
of
the
features
on
the
outside
here,
but
it
basically
looks
like
this,
and
you
have
a
cross
section
here,
so
you're
able
to
walk
through
the
cellular
structure
in
d
and
e,
so
you
can
see
that
there's
this
cross
section
with
sort
of
cell
bodies
all
along
this
axis.
C
You
have
difference.
This
f
is
a
transverse
section,
which
is
where
you
cut
it
from
top
to
bottom
dorsal
to
ventral,
and
you
can
see
this
sort
of
section
where
you
have
cells
are
organized.
You
know
cut
in
that
way
and
so
b
and
c
are
what
b
and
c
are
sections
along
the
x-axis.
C
So
those
are
just
sections
along
this
way
from
head
to
tail
and
you
can
see
the
structure
in
there.
So
this
is
this
technique.
Will
slice
up
this
c
elegans
in
a
number
of
ways
that
allow
you
to
see
the
different
anatomical
views
and
walk
through
them?
As
you
know,
if
you've
done
microscopy
or
even
fmri,
which
is
a
technique
for
looking
at
anatomy,
you
get
these
slices,
it
walks
through
the
slices
you
can
explore
through
the
slices
and
it
looks
like
you
know,
you're
moving
through
some
organ
or
some
organism.
C
C
So,
along
the
surface
of
a
c
elegans,
you
know
it
might
be
like
a
couple
of
millimeters
long
and
then
the
width
is
not
even
110
microns
and
then
the
height
is
about
60
microns
you
ever
take,
and
so
that's
the
spatial
scale
we're
looking
at.
So
it's
pretty
fine
grained
and
you
can
see
that
it's
coming
up
with
some
pretty
nice
images.
E
Major
advantage
of
this
technique
is
that
you
can
do
histological
imaging
without
harming
the
animal
like
they're,
live
and
already
said
that,
but
it
also
doesn't
harm
tend
to
harm
things.
I've
done
axolotl
eggs
at
early
stage
and
the
actual
legs
have
hatched,
and
in
the
case
of
the
female
that
hatch,
she
had
her
own
eggs
and
hatched
babies
that
were
normal
yeah.
I've
already
tried
this
or
my
friend
elizabeth
has.
C
Yeah
so
like
the
one
of
the
alternatives
for
c
elegans
is
something
called
cryo-em,
which
is
where
they
freeze
the
sample
and
then
they
go
through
and
they
get
these
really
nice
images
problem,
of
course,
is
you
have
to
kill
c
elegans
to
do
that?
You
freeze
it.
You
know
in
liquid
nitrogen,
I
believe
so.
This
is
a
probably
an
advantage
here
as
well,
and
so
this
is
the
pharynx
the
intestine.
C
So
these
are
just
like.
You
know
different
parts
of
the
worm.
You
can
see
it's
pretty
high
resolution
where
you
get
like
you
can
make
out
the
vulva
and
oocytes
germ
cells.
I
mean
these
are
things
you
would
see
like
you
know
under
maybe
like
a
more
a
normal
microscope,
but
getting
this.
This
is
a
little
bit
higher
resolution
I
think
than
normally.
C
You
would
normally
get
in
some
cases,
so
yeah
they're
able
to
do
a
3d
model
of
this,
so
they're
able
to
pull
this
together
and
build
it
and
so
yeah.
So
this
is
just
a
benchmark.
I
guess
this
isn't
like
anything
like
where
they're
trying
to
discover
something,
but
this
is
something
that
they're
able
to
build
a
3d
model
of
c
elegans,
using
high
contrast
down
to
the
subcellular
level,
where
you
can
actually
identify
things
inside
the
cells
and
yeah.
C
I
think
that's
good,
so
that's
that's
our
microscopy
and
then
I
wanted
to
talk
about
one
more
thing
before
we
go.
I
don't
know
if
I
brought
it
up
here
today,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
get
into
it.
C
Well,
I
don't
think
I
included
it
today,
but
I
think
I
might
talk
about
maybe
a
physics
paper
here
before
we
go
so
this
is
an
interesting
paper
scale,
dependent
irreversibility
in
living
matter,
so
that
we
talked
about
active
matter
last
time,
and
this
is
about
living
matter.
So,
let's
get
in
a
little
bit
into
this.
I
just
wanted
to
go
over
a
little
bit
before
we
go
so
the
abstracts
is
a
defining
feature
of
living
matter.
Is
the
ability
to
harness
energy
to
self-organize
multi-scale
structures.
C
C
So
here
we
unravel
a
fundamentally
thermodynamic
connection
between
the
physical
energy,
dissipation,
sustaining
non-equal
non-equilibrium
system
and
a
measure
of
statistical
irreversibility
or
the
arrow
of
time
can
provide
quantitative
insight
into
the
mechanisms
of
non-equilibrium
activity
across
scales.
So
a
non-equilibrium
system
might
be
an
organism.
This
statistical
irreversibility
is
the
arrow
of
time.
So
the
idea
is
that
you
know
you
have
this
organism
or
this
embryo
that's
developing
or
this
organism
that's
living
and
time
is
basically
entropy
acting
upon
the
system.
C
It's
either
you
know
developing
and
growing
or
it's
you
know
sustaining
itself
where
it's
dying
and
falling
apart,
and
this
involves
energy
flows.
So
you
need
a
lot
of
energy
when
you're
growing
or
sustaining-
and
you
know
energy
is
dissipated
when
you're
dying
and
you
don't
have
any
incoming
energy.
It's
a
very
you
know
abstract
way
to
look
at
it,
but
so
they
want
to
understand
this
mechanism
across
scales
and
so
in
an
organism
it
would
be
like
the
cells
or
it
could
be
the
dna
or
it
could
be
like
other
organelles
in
the
cells.
C
Specifically,
we
introduce
a
multi-scale
irreversibility
metric
demonstrate
how
it
could
be
used
to
extract
model
independent
estimates
of
dissipative
time
scales,
so
they
use
this
metric
of
looking
at
things
that
are
irreversible.
With
respect
to
this,
the
flow
of
time
demonstrate
how
it
could
be
used
to
extract
these
estimates
of
dissipative
time
scales
like
so.
You
know
what
is
dissipative
just
means
like
it's.
You
know,
there's
an
energy
flow
there
using
this
metric.
We
measure
the
dissipation
time
scale
of
a
multicellular
structure,
the
active
meiosin
cortex,
which
is
a
thing
with
muscle.
C
It's
a
muscle
thing
that
involves
muscle
building
and
things
like
that
and.
C
That
the
irreversibility
metric
maintains
a
monotonic
relationship
with
the
underlying
biological
non-equilibrium
activity.
Additionally,
the
irreversibility
metric
can
detect
shifts
in
the
dissipative's
time
scales
when
we
introduce
spatiotemporal
patterns
of
biochemical,
signaling
proteins
upstream
of
ectomyosin
activation.
Our
experimental
measurements
are
complemented
by
a
theoretical
analysis
of
a
generic
class
of
non-equilibrium
dynamics,
which
is
this
these.
You
know
the
problem.
We
use
something
like
differential
equations
to
look
at
the
behavior
of
this
over
time,
eliciting
how
dissipative
time
scales
manifest
in
multi-skill
or
reversibility.
C
C
Yeah
yeah,
so
you
know,
I
don't
know
how
they.
This
is
interesting,
like
some
of
these
models
of
like
entropy,
they
don't
really
consider
like
things
like
biomechanics
or
other
types
of
things.
So
I
don't
know
how
they're
looking
at
this.
I
don't
think
they're
considering
gravity
but
or
a
tree.
I
don't
know
how
they
treat
gravity
in
it.
C
E
C
C
Like
especially
like
we've
talked
about
like
active
materials-
and
you
know
I
don't
know
like
what
the
state
of
that
is.
If
people
really
consider
things
like
gravity
in
those
models
or
not
but
or
a
differential
behavior
of
gravity,
usually
I
think
maybe
they
just
assume
a
specific
gravity.
C
E
A
C
Especially
if
you're
considering
differences
in
gravity,
I
mean
people
probably
just
assume
like
one
g,
which
is
you
know
what
you
have
on
earth
and
that's
that
and
it's
like
a
vacuum.
You
know
it's
like
the
whole
joke
about
the
spherical
cone
of
vacuum
or
spherical,
something
in
a
vacuum.
That's
like
the
physics
standard
physics
model,
yeah
yeah,
so
I
mean
a
lot
of
this
is,
like
you
know:
they're
modeling,
these
type
of
biological
molecular
biological
systems.
C
So,
looking
at
the
energetic
efficiency
of
molecular
motors,
for
example,
you
know-
and
it's
just
kind
of
looking
at
the
different
forces
but
again,
like
you,
know,
they're
not
considering
gravity
necessarily.
E
Yeah
but
they're
the
motors,
the
molecular
motors
will
operate
differently
in
microgravity
microtubules,
don't
form
in
the
same
way
there's
no
convection
in
microgravity.
So
that
complicates
a
microtubule's
life.
Shall
we
say
it?
Doesn't
they
don't
get
convection
to
help
with
the
replenishing
of
the
plastic.
C
C
So
a
lot
of
times
they
consider
like
with
these
models.
They
also
consider
like
just
a
closed
system.
So,
like
you
know,
it's
like
you
kind
of
fix
the
parameters
and
you
see
what
it
behaves
like
under
a
closed
system,
but
a
lot
of
life
is
actually
an
open
system
which
is
kind
of
an
interesting
apparel.
You
know
interesting
thing.
I
don't
know
how
you
model
equilibrium
as
an
or
model
thermodynamics
is
an
open
system,
but
you
know
it
does
make.
C
So
any
non-equilibrium
process
is
accompanied
by
the
irrever
irrevocable
loss
of
energy
to
its
environment,
often
in
the
form
of
heat
which
commensurally
commensuratively
produces
entropy
in
the
environment.
So
again,
this
is
in
a
closed
system.
Now,
when
you
have,
you
know,
obviously
you're
losing
you
know,
you're
generating
entropy
as
you
sort
of
as
an
organism
behaves
or
as
it
doesn't
replenish
it
well,
it
can
replenish
its
energy,
but
you're
still
losing
this
entropy.
So
it's
an
inconvenient
way
to
think
about.
C
C
You
know
that
sort
of
you
know
there's
an
entropy
loss,
but
there's
also
a
lot
of
energy
coming
in.
So
it's
that
you
know
it's
one
thing
I
don't.
I
don't
really
know
how
they're
I
know
they're,
probably
thinking
about
it
as
a
closed
system
and
kind
of
like
isolating
the
mechanism,
but
there's
a
lot
more
going
on
there
that
we
can
consider-
and
so
again
we
have
our
equations
here
for
thermodynamics
and
so
active
meiosis
and
cortex
is
a
multi-scale
dissipative
structure.
C
That's
their
main
argument
here,
and
so
this
is
something
they
were
able
to
measure,
and
this
is
the
ectomyosin
cortex.
This
is
these
little
meiosis
molecules
here
so
and
you
can
see
that
they've
got
different
positional
fluctuations
and
position.
Increment
autocorrelation
functions
of
these
endogenous
cortical,
granules
and
they're
able
to
probe
this
for
force
fluctuations
in
the
cortex.
So
this
is
the
ectomyosin
cortex.
C
C
E
C
Yeah
yeah,
it's
good!
You
have
to
dig
into
the
paper
for
this,
but.
E
Okay,
yeah
well,
like
I
can
look
at
it.
I
captured
it
all
the
time
good.
C
Yeah,
so
this
is,
and
then
this
is
time
irreversibility
reveals
the
dissipative
time,
skills
and
levels
of
non-equilibrium
activity
and
pattern
cortex.
So
you
can
see
that
they're
looking
at
these
dissipative
time
scales,
they're
looking
at
the
fluctuations
and
the
intensity
here,
looking
at
frequency
analysis
and
then
lag
time,
which
is
d,
which
is
this
estimated
irreversibility
of
this
parameter
for
five
different
stages
as
a
function
of
lag
time.
C
So
this
is
something
that
they've
derived
out
of
this
graph,
and
this
is
the
oscillation
period
s
irreversibility
time
scale.
It
goes
up
as
the
row
oscillation
period
increases.
So
that's
an
interesting
paper.
I
don't
want
to
get
too
much.
You
know
I
probably.
C
Hour
on
it,
it's
not,
but
it's
an
interesting
way
to
look
at
the
different
problems,
and
I
was
looking
for
another
thing
that
I
was
going
to
show.
But
I
was
I
couldn't
find
it,
but
next
week
I'll
probably
show
that
anyways.
C
It
was
that
imaging
paper
was
the
I
can
send
them
along.
It
was
this
piv
technique,
which
is
like
a
technique
for
imaging
different
way.
You
image
different
fluorescent
markers
and
you
don't
segment
the
cells.
You
just
track
the
fluorescent
markers
in
a
cell
over
time,
so
you
have
these
movies
and
then
you
can
track
them.
You
can
create
vector
fields
which
allow
you
to
get
a
handle
on
movement
and
in
collective
movement
and
like
they
looked
at
an
embryo
actually,
so
that
was
a
nice
way
to
do
it.
C
Yeah,
okay!
Well,
everyone
thanks
for
attending
our
first
meeting
of
the
year,
I
think,
was
pretty
successful.
If
you
have
any
papers,
you
want
us
to
present
in
the
meeting.
You
can
do
that
and
present
it
yourself.
If
you
want,
you
can
also
present
on
different
topics.
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
we
talk
about
every
week,
but
you
know
one
of
the
things
about
this
is
we'd
like
to
see
people
present,
maybe
a
short
thing
that
you
know.
If
they're
have
a
topic,
they
want
to
really
kind
of
explore.
C
You
know,
besides
just
kind
of
presenting
papers
like
the
way
we
do.
We
can
kind
of
lay
them
out
a
little
bit
more.
So.