►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Gathering [2021-12-13]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Making
up
like
hello
and
welcome
to
the
dxdow
biz
dev
call
for
monday
december
13th
2021.
A
on
the
agenda
today
we
have,
we
don't
have
any
member
introductions
and
we
don't
have
anyone
presenting
we'll
be
talking
about
carrot,
sort
of
like
wrapping
up
all
the
ideas
that
we've
been
talking
about
so
far
initiative.
Doubt
the
proposal
is
live
and
I
mean
I've
already
made
like
a
sort
of
like
a
proposal
for
the
dow
to
spend
some
money.
A
B
Yeah,
so
there's
still
so
I
guess
for
for
processes.
I
think
last
week
we
were,
I
mean
I
wasn't
following
it
in
detail,
but
we're
like
still
figuring
out
like
processes
for
how
to
create
these
things
and
stuff,
and
so
it
would
be.
B
I
guess
helpful
to
know
if,
if
there's
projects
that
want
to
like
do
little,
experiments
and
things
even
if
they're,
like
small
or
kind
of
fun
is,
are
those
things
that
we
can
like
easily
implement,
because
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
making
sure
the
front
end
shows
the
actual
campaign
and
then
creating
and
stuff,
and
so
do
we
want
to
have
like
a
measured
approach
or
if
we
have
projects
that
are
thinking
about
doing
a
like
unique
interesting
test
of
it.
B
B
At
first
and
like
what
kind
of
measure
what
kind
of
approach
we'd
we
I
did
from
a
technical
perspective,
we'd
want
to
like
take
with
carrot,
I
guess-
and
so
I
you
know
federico
is
not
here.
I
don't
know
if
he's
back
this
week,
but
if
someone
has
some
perspective
on
on
like
what
how
how
much
of
a
flow
we
would
want
to
do
in
creating
new
carry
campaigns.
C
It
would
be
good
to
ask
federico,
I
would
say:
maybe
we
should
shoot
for
like
less
than
a
handful
to
as
a
goal
like
three
to
five.
D
Yeah
last
I
heard
from
federico
over
the
weekend
he's
actively
working
on
carrot,
v2,
incorporating
the
decentralized
fork
of
the
keeper
network,
he's
thinking
of
strategies
for
combining
conditions
and
execution
of
those
thinking
of
nfts
and
stuff,
but
yeah
before
we
go
on
to
the
next
version,
the
next
iteration
of
the
protocol.
We
need
to
think
of
what
do
we
do
with
what
we've
got
it,
and
first
and
yeah.
B
Yeah,
so
it's
yeah,
like
the
next
version,
sounds
awesome.
I
guess
one
of
the
weak.
It's
like
the
weakest
link
in
the
chain.
Like
I,
my
understanding
was
like
federico's,
the
only
one
that
can
create
cat.
I
mean
actually
luigi
lemon
created
one,
but
to
like
get
it
fully
to
show
up
in
the
in
the
ui
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
like
people
could
create
some
cards
from
the
smart
contracts.
B
C
Like
right,
we
gotta
add
it
manually
to
the
front
end
right
now,
and
at
least
with
like
trying
to
show
data,
there's
a
little
bit
of
work
there
right.
We
got
to
get
the
data
source
from
some
subgraph
or
something
and
plug
that
in
and
federico
has
been
doing
that
so
yeah.
That's
something
I
think,
as
we
onboard
projects,
it's
just
important
to
remember
that
that
will
take
a
little
bit
of
time
and
then
that
we'll
need
to
update
the
the
ui
as
well
like
so.
B
C
Yeah,
it's
not
really
necessary,
I
suppose,
like
I
mean
I
think,
that's
one
of
the
questions
we
should
try
to
figure
out
like
do.
We
really
need
it.
Is
that
because
that
might
be
one
of
the
easiest
ways
to
start
introducing
kind
of
like
the
do-it-yourself
element
into
the
ui
right
like
allow
people
to
create
carrots
from
the
ui,
but
maybe
there's
no
data
right.
If
you
want
like
a
a
graph
or
something,
then
that's
gonna
require
the
custom
part
like.
Maybe
that's
a.
B
C
B
B
So
if
you
say
because
and
we're
using
averages
in
carrot
to
it,
make
it
less
gameable
right
and
then
the
minute
you
say
the
average
of
december
versus
like
the
price
of
something
at
the
end
of
the
year,
like
that's
how
oman's
always
been
at
the
end
of
2021,
which
is
like
the
last
minute
of
the
last
day
of
utc
time.
2021,
like
people
look
at
what
the
price
of
something
is
and
like
then
reality
solves
that,
and
you
can
look
at
a
graph
right.
B
The
minute
we
start
saying,
like
the
average
of
december
2021,
it's
very
hard
for
people
to
know
where
to
look
for
that.
So
that's
in
that
case,
that's
why
we
created
these
data
graphs,
which
and
then
like
actually
says,
like
oh
look
at
the
actual
carat
data
average.
That's
shown
on
the
ui
to
settle
the
condition
basically,
and
so
I
think
that's
what's
caused
the
extra
work
around
showing
data
and
what
data
to
look
at
is
this
average
thing
and
I
think,
we're
gonna
in
carrot.
We
we're
probably
going
to
be
using
averages
a
lot.
B
B
So
we
could
do
the
same
approach.
We
do
with
omen
and
just
like
trust
the
system
without
showing
graphical
data.
I
think.
C
Yeah,
that's
a,
I
think,
a
really
good
summary.
I
would
add
just
that.
I
think,
with
the
data
where
we
could
potentially
go
into
like
a
more
permissionless
creation.
Kind
of
do-it-yourself
model
is
maybe
with
the
data
you
can
support
data
from
specific
platforms
right
so
like
maybe
eventually
the
current
ui
will
support
like
the
swapper
sub
graph,
or
you
know
other
particular
platforms
where
you
might
want
to,
but
I
don't
know
how
that
interesting.
B
If
you
have
subgraphs
like
linked,
would
you
have
to
like
show
a
list
like
a
drop
down
of
here?
Are
all
the
pieces
of
data
you
could
choose
from
that
feed
in
from
the
sub
graph,
because
yeah,
like
you,
just
said
that,
like
most
projects
have
a
custom
thing,
they
want
to
want
to
ask
against
a
condition
and
even
subgraph
like
might
or
might
not
have
that
so,
like?
B
I
guess,
if
you,
if
you
had
a
drop
down
of
all
the
data
you
could
show
from
a
subgraph,
then
it
could
be
permissionless,
because
your
permissions,
within
the
bounds
of
the
data
of
those
subgraphs,
but
that's
very
different
than
any
project
that
wants
to
do
another
condition
and
if
you
don't
show
the
data
you
just
kind
of
trust.
B
That,
like
I
mean,
if
you
say
average,
you
wanted
to
clarify
what
kind
of
average
it
is,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
like
people
have
to
go
figure
out
what
that
average
was
or
what
the
condition
settlement
is
and
then
propose
that
to
reality,
and
it
could
lead
to
some
contention
if
some
people
think
it's
one
thing
and
other
people
think
it's
one
thing,
but
then
that's
where
the
reality
that
eath
thing,
if
the
two
things
are
close
enough,
then
at
some
point
someone's
like
okay.
That's
that's!
Basically
what
my
answer
was.
B
I
don't
want
to
stake
more
money
like
let's
just
settle
it
on
that
one.
Basically
right
and
it
seems
to
have
always
worked
for
omen.
I
mean
we've
had
a
couple
contentious
markets
which
were
not
really
anything
to
do
with
data
they're
more
like
opinion
of
how
to
interpret
a
a
market,
and
so
I
think
we
can
just
make
it
as
simple
as
possible.
C
So
if
it's
like
a
close
call,
I
don't
think
projects
are
going
to
be
like
I
don't
know
I
mean
it
depends.
I
think
the
other
question
too
is
like
what's
more
popular.
Is
it
like
scalar
type
ranges,
or
is
it
binary?
Because
if
it's
a
range,
I
can
see
it
being
less
of
a
contentious
thing
too,
because
it's
more
just
it's
less
at
stake,
if
you're
slightly
off
right
but
but
yeah.
C
C
A
C
Is
that
the
call
so
there's
two?
The
subgraph
only
comes
into
play
with
displaying
data
on
the
front
end.
That
is
important
in
resolving
the
question
at
the
end,
so
the
actual,
like
carrot
tokens,
it's
a
pretty
simple
contract
that
is
deployed
on
xdi,
where
anybody
can
deposit
their
collateral
token.
That
is
the
ultimate
reward
and
create
the
the
carrot,
tokens
the
carrot,
kpi
tokens
so
yeah.
We
should
have
more
documentation
as
well,
but
it's
still
pretty
like.
C
B
If
you
could
like
take
screenshots
and
like
write
down
the
steps
of
what
a
person
has
to
do,
that,
documentation
should
be
in
our
documentation
and
someone
should
be
able
to
look
at
that
or
google
how
to
create,
carry,
and
that
should
be
the
first
pop-up
and
then
they
should
be
able
to
follow
those
steps
and
create
a
carrot
using
you
know,
ether
scanner
or
yet,
since
there's
no
like
ui
to
do
it,
you
do
it
in
ether,
scan
right,
but
that
should
be
written
down
somewhere,
so
that
people
have
something
to
reference.
I
think.
D
Yeah
as
long
as
it's
controlled
by
the
dow,
I
don't
think
we
could
do
with
a
walk-through
at
the
moment.
It's
still
permissioned
in
the
future
iteration.
When
it's
permission
less
more
like
the
diy
liquidity
mining
setup
on
swapper,
then
we
could
have
a
walkthrough
like
this
and
internally
we
could
definitely,
you
know,
have
a
meeting
so
we're
all
familiarized
with
the
process.
B
D
B
That
makes
sense
like
you
would
never
have
the
front
end
where
people
could
like
add
stuff
to
the
front
end,
so
it
either.
There
has
to
feed
automatically
at
time
of
creation,
but
people
can
still
use
carrots
and
create
carrots,
even
if
it
doesn't
like
immediately
show
the
front
end
like
luigi
did.
Basically.
B
C
I
think
you're
both
right
right,
like
I
think
we
we'll
do
the
meeting
and
we'll
get
that
better
documented.
So
we
have
more
people
able
to
to
do
it
understand
it.
It
should
eventually
be
on
dx
docs,
so
yeah
we'll
definitely
do
that
and
then
I
think
nathan's
also
right,
though,
that
like
we
still,
we
don't
want
to
just
like
throw
people
the
documentation.
C
We
still
need
to
be
hand-holding,
I
think
for
the
time
being
and
yes
like
anybody,
could
create
carrots
and
like
give
them
out
and
like
use
them,
but
I
think
the
trick
there
with
the
ui
is
that
when
it
comes
to
actually
redeeming
them,
like
presumably
they're
giving
carrots
to
somebody
to
you,
know
some
group
of
parties
or
something
and
those
people
should
have
somewhere
to
go
to
redeem
them.
I
mean
I
don't
know.
Maybe
people
are
want
to
get
handle
it
all
themselves
and
that
they
could
do
that.
C
A
A
I
guess
we
need
like
this
interim
solution
for
now
with
like
likely
detailed
documentation.
This
documentation
could
be
used
later.
If
someone
wants
to
build
like
a
different
front
end
that
uses
the
same
protocol.
A
C
Don't
know
john,
do
you
want,
did
you
want
to
say
something
yeah?
I
think
I
think
that's
right
and
just
wanted
to
comment
that
I
think
the
people
using
it
now
that's
going
to
hopefully
help
us
build
that
ui
right,
like
that's,
going
to
inform
how
we
how
we
build
it
like
what
do
these
people
want?
The
first
people
using
it?
What
kind
of
feedback
do
we
get
from
them
and
yeah.
A
Yeah-
and
I
think
yeah
nathan
said
earlier
that
we
should
have
like
a
carrot
team
meeting
so
like
I
think
maybe
this
should
also
be
public
and
yeah.
We
should
just
like
talk
about
characters
like
a
public
product
and
invite
people
who
are
using
it
to
hear
like
what
are
we
doing
carrot
and
what
are
the
updates
and
get
their
feedback
as
well,
so
yeah
yeah.
I
guess
there
should
be
like
an
internal
meeting
and
then
an
external
meeting
as
well.
So
I
don't
know
how
to
structure
that.
D
A
D
Yeah
and
I
think
if
we
invite
you
know
someone
like
luigi
the
guys
from
agave,
they
will
have
good
input
so
yeah,
but
you
know.
After
all,
we
even
though
we
were
a
dow,
you
know
we
kind
of
the
the
process
of
product.
Ideation
is
still
somewhat
internal
in
the
early
stages
before
you
present
it.
So
you
know.
C
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
having
some
public
stuff.
Some
feedback,
like
I
don't
know-
if
everybody
here
even
knows
but
like
the
agave-
is
using
it
right.
So
it's
live
on
next
time.
If
you
go
to
their
platform
and
you
deposit
into
their
platform,
you're
actually
earning
carrot,
tokens
and-
and
it
shows
a
little
carrot-
logo
in
the
rewards,
which
is
pretty
cool
and
so
yeah
it'd
be
great
to
get
some
kind
of
a
public
meeting.
I
think
going
to
get
some
feedback
from
the
users
using
this
stuff.
A
Yeah,
okay,
should
we
move
on
to
the
next
topic
or
anyone?
Any
other
mentions
of
carrot.
D
I
mean
just
to,
as
most
of
us
are
also
part
of
the
gx
voice
squad,
also
that
this
kind
of
conversation
would
also
help
tremendously
with
marketing
the
product.
A
B
B
This
proposal
has
had
some
issues
where
I
don't
know
it's
it's
it's
broken
in
the
x
voter.
It
broke
the
x
vote
and
you
can't
see,
I
don't
know
you
can't
see
the
ipfs.
You
can't
see
anything,
so
it's
a
little
risky.
That
is
the
proposal.
You
can
see
the
money's
going
to
at
least
the
multi-sig
that
was
created
for
initiative
dial,
which
is
like
a
temporary
or
a
first
type
of
multi-sig.
It
was
kind
of
based
on
a
dx
voice.
B
Multi-Sig,
with
an
adjustment
like
nathan
is
also
included,
but
tammy's,
not
since
she's,
just
kind
of
moving
away
and
she's
still
on
dx
voice,
but
maybe
she
maybe
she
would
be
taking
off
that
as
well,
but
it's
just
like
yeah
and
I
don't
know
if
nylon
you
want
to
be
on
it
too,
but
it's
just
a
place
to
put
this
funds
allocated
aside
on
it
on
x,
die
and
then
yeah
people.
B
Maybe
we
want
to
create
a
thread.
The
question
is:
if
you
have
an
idea,
I
don't
know
nylon.
Where
did
you
post?
Your
idea
that
you
had
was
it
on
the
forum?
Is
it
is
its
own
thread?
No,
this
is
just
in
the
in
the
chat
right.
The
key
based
chat,
yeah
yeah,
so
we
should,
I
think,
a
cool
would
be
like
initiative
dao
thread
for
like
then
that
would
be
where
anyone
would
post
a
new
idea.
Yeah.
B
Be
like
the
best
way
to
intro
it
to
the
to
the
initiative
dial
just
so
it
have
like,
and
maybe
the
three
things
you
want
to
communicate,
which
is
about
the
idea
to
get
the
amount
of
funds
you
want
and,
and
then
that
would
be
could
be
processed
rather
quickly,
given
like
it
fits
the
criteria
laid
out,
but
I
guess
the
problem
is
the
criteria.
B
I
can't
remember
if
I
put
it
in
the
forum
also,
but
the
criteria
which
is
like
the
details
is
actually
in
the
in
the
proposal,
and
the
proposal
is
what
no
one
can
see.
So
that's
a
problem.
You
can't
see
the
the
different
criteria,
so
I
guess
we
need
to
put
that
in
the
form
as
well
yeah.
This
is
a
this
is
a.
This
is
a
this.
Is
a
governance,
technical
issue?
That's
pretty
bad!
B
I
mean
I
don't
know
why
that
one
data,
why
the
one
the
text
data
for
ipfs
is
not
showing
for
this
one
proposal,
but
it's
yeah.
When
that
passes,
those
funds
will
be
there
and
then
people.
B
Yeah
people
asked
about
the
proposal
chris
yeah
chris
asked
over
the
weekend.
If
that
was
my
worker
proposal,
which
wasn't
my
worker
proposal,
but
it
was
yeah,
it
was
initiative,
dow
funding,
and
so
I
guess
it
would
have
been
down
staked
or
down
voted.
I
guess
down
voted.
If
people
didn't
know
what
it
was.
B
But
the
other
thing
this
is
a
governance
thing,
I'm
I
was
a
little
concerned
so
dave
and
I
both
ran
into
a
problem
around.
We
I
mean
around
this
not
showing
but
then
like
trying
to
redeem
jen
from
like
a
past
proposal
and
then
augusto
said
he's
like
he
was
working
on
the
cash
and
all
this
kind
of
stuff,
and
that's
why
dx
vote
was
down,
but
I
didn't
understand
why
doing
a
transaction
wouldn't
actually
release
gen
like
redeemed
gen,
even
if
the
front
end
was
being
worked
on,
is
that
yeah.
B
B
B
C
B
Yeah
I
mean
we
put
the
yeah,
we
have
the
like
when
it
was
happening
and
stuff
and
maybe
the
the
transactions
are
in,
I
guess
in
the
dx
vote
channel,
so
we
can
continue
it
there,
but
to
say
it's
totally
unrelated.
I
would
I
wouldn't
necessarily
100
say
that,
because
it
happened
all
at
the
exact
same
time,
so
it
could
be
related,
but
yeah.
B
I
guess
we
can
move
move
on
from
initiative
now
so
we'll
create
that
thread
where
people
can
post
and
then
the
next
thing
you
guys
were
talking
about
a
little
bit
in
the
beginning
is
like
the
gno
swapping
and
then
gno
gnosis
auction
is
live,
and
I
guess
this
is
this
yeah.
This
whole
thing
is
happening
and
at
the
same
time
is
this
like
x,
x,
x,
die
ecosystem,
dao
is
is
still
in
the
works
of
being
formed.
B
Yeah
and
one
interesting
topic
which
I
have
just
raised
here
is
so
this
dow
effectively
becomes
a
dao
of
different
projects
in
the
xda
ecosystem.
So
you
could
argue
it's
a
dao
of
taos,
but
there's
a
representative
for
each
dao
who
have
showed
up
to
these.
Like
conversations.
So
far
and
most
projects,
just
like
there's
one
person
there
like
talking
on
behalf
of
the
dao
but
there's
never
been
like
a
formal
yeah.
B
You
know
a
bunch
of
us
have
been
attending
the
calls
and
things
and
have
organized
some
of
it
as
well
and
just
like,
not
by
any
like
direct
choice
like
I
like,
I
was
put
on
the
or
I
was
offered
to
be
included
on
the
original
multisig,
which
is
like
the
stepping
stone
before
we
have
an
actual
dow
for
this
dow,
and
so
theoretically,
I'm
representing,
I
mean
at
least
for
voting
power,
I'm
representing
a
vote
on
the
multi-sig
right
now
for
for
dx
dao
and
then
could
be
a
representative
in
this
dao
representing
dx
dao
and
just
wanted
to
make
sure
someone
asked
like
how
do
we
prove
that
each
community
has
said
this?
B
I
don't
know
leader-like
taos
in
the
ecosystem,
but
I
guess
it's
a
long-winded
saying
of
does.
Does
dx
dao
want
to
do
a
vote
to
say
who
should
be
a
representative
on
behalf
of
dx
dao
in
each
community
that
we
exist
or
is
it
by
default
kind
of
like
dx,
biz
people
like
myself
or
nylon
or
nathan,
unless
otherwise
challenged?
B
And
so
it's
an
open
question
and
open
discussion
that
all
of
these
communities
are
trying
to
or
will
have
to
figure
out
and
you
you
could
just
like
go
with
it,
as
is
until
something
bad
happens
and
then
address
it
or
you
could
actually
try
to
do
a
more
formal
proof
ahead
of
time
and
say
like
oh,
we
did
a,
we
did
a
rep
vote.
We
did
a
signal
proposal
and
we
decided
that
this
person
is
going
to
represent
the
dao
or
the
thoughts
of
the
dao
into
this
ecosystem.
Dao.
F
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
a
good
example
of
like
where
the
best
strategy
is
maybe
something
like
optimistic
governance,
which
is
like
assume
that
you
know
things
are
or
are
going
ahead
and
like
move
forward,
but
then,
like
geeks
dao
has
the
ability
to
kind
of
like
revoke
that
or
be
able
to
do
something
at
a
later
stage,
because
I
think,
like
what
you
guys
are
doing
is
great.
F
I
think
we
want
to
like
empower
ambassadors
or
like
the
dxbiz
people
to
be,
or
you
know
anyone
a
lot
of
trainers
to
be
like
members
of
different
community.
It
is
important,
though,
like
if
they
are
entering
those
communities,
as
like
representatives
of
the
style,
like
the
reason
that
you're
on
the
multisig
is
not
just
because
your
sky
is
because
it's
like
kind
of
dx
taos
position
on
that
multi-sig.
F
But
I
think
it's
easier
to
put
like
structure
around
it
or
even
like
ask
those
questions
once
it's
already
set
up,
and
so
we
should
kind
of
like
optimistically
move
forward
with
these
things,
with
the
ability
for
like
governance,
to
like
call,
you
know,
kind
of
move
at
a
later
stage,
or
something
and
kind
of
maybe
claw
back
or
take
back
or
really
just
further
enable.
B
Yeah,
so
the
key
with
optimistic,
rollups
or
optimistic
governance
is
that
it's
really
important
to
have
other
people
also
watching,
because
if
there's
no,
like
you
know,
quote
unquote
watchdogs,
there's
no
one
to
like
call
out
what
could
be
a
malicious
voice
or
a
malicious
action
right.
So
you
can
have
one
representative,
but
it's
really
important,
to
have
multiple
people
there
to
like
yeah
to
do
to
to
basically
call
a
discrepancy
of
the
optimistic
governance.
B
If
there
was
one
right
versus
the
opposite
is
like
zk
proof:
governance,
where,
like
you,
prove
up
front
that
you
already
have
this
decision
from
the
dow,
but
you
need
to
have
the
watchdogs.
Otherwise,
like
optimistic
roll-ups,
don't
work
if
there's
no
one
like
watching
whether
or
not
everything
is
correct.
B
F
A
great
phrase-
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
have
like
governance
watchdog,
that's
kind
of
like
the
next
layer
of
that
we
can
figure
out
how
that
would
work.
Maybe
that's,
like
a
you
know,
monthly
report
back
on
things
and
those
people
are
kind
of
aware,
but
I
think
that
is
a
key
part
of
that
accountability
to
like
take
style
or
governance.
Rep
holders.
A
Yeah
in
genesis
now
there
was
something
that
came
up
that
was
called
like
the
accountability
task
force,
which
essentially,
you
had
like.
You
know
a
few
people
that
was
like
a
part
of
their
role
to
actually
see
that
certain
initiatives
are
like
executed
on
or,
like
you
know,
review
them
for
the
rest
and
yeah.
Make
sure
that
I
don't
know
someone's
not
are
not
doing
what
they're
supposed
to
this.
D
B
B
Currently
for
this
situation
and
and
then
yeah
participate
as
much
as
you
can
everyone
and
then
and
then,
if
we
have
a
new
situation
yeah,
we
can
try
that
again
or
try
a
different
version,
but
unless
anyone
has
a
problem
with
it,
I
get
that's
how
it's
going
so
far.
B
Yeah
this
I
mean
this
it
highly.
It
also
connects
him
with
governance
as
a
service,
so
like
theoretically,
if
you
know
d5
money
market,
if
dao
was
actually
ever
was
a
dow
and
then
like
we
were.
We
have
a
lot
of
you
know
we
had
a
lot
of
dmg
and
we
still
do.
I
guess
right.
We
gotta
figure
out
what
to
do
with
that
still.
B
But
if
we
were
gonna
like
we
were
going
to
have
an
ambassador
like,
I
was
trying
to
do
it
at
one
point,
but
there
wasn't
much
to
do
and
there
was
no
way
to
vote
with
our
with
our
with
our
holdings,
and
so
we
already
have
that
issue.
You
know
we
we're
holding
work.
Token,
for
example,
there's
not
really
that
many
votes
today,
but
eventually
there
will
be
votes
and
stuff,
and
so
there's
there's
voting
with
tokens
that
dxdow
holds
right
and
then
there's
representing
dx
dow
in
those
in
those
governance
discussions.
B
So
it's
really
it's
heavily
tied
with
governance,
but
it's
also
dx
dxbiz,
because
it's
yeah,
I
would
guess
doubt
a
dao
kind
of
communication
and
relations.
So
it
ties
in
with
both
but
yeah.
B
We
can
do
updates
on
this
call
and
then
also
maybe
mention
it
if
it
was
highly
related
to
like
governance
or
there
had
to
be
a
vote
or
something
because
at
some
point
I
think
we
might
do
a
an
internal
signal
vote
or
a
dx
dow
vote
in
order
to
make
a
decision
on
a
representation
into
another
dow
right
this
is
on
is
we
could
do
soft
consensus,
but
sometimes
we
may
have.
B
If
we
can
do
it
fast
enough,
we
could
have
quick
signal
proposals
that
may
be
need
a
new
scheme
in
dx
vote,
but
you
might
have
like
a
one
or
two
day
signal
vote,
and
this
is
something
we
can
never
really
do
with
alchemy
and
now
we'll
be
able
to
do
it
with
the
ex
vote.
Oh
there's
an
upcoming
proposal.
We
need
the
voice
of
dx
dow's
decision
to
go
vote
using
that
voice
in
this
other
dao's
proposal,
like
let's
do
a
quick
signal.
B
Dx
vote
signal
proposal
to
figure
out
how
we're
gonna
vote
on
this
other
proposal
in
in
the
other
dow,
so
yeah
we'll
we'll
try
to
keep
everyone
updated
on
that.
F
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
really
cool
stuff,
and
you
see
this
kind
of
growing
a
lot
and
just
to
point
out
like
this
is
also
the
benefit
of
reputation
as
a
like
as
part
of
the
excel,
because
people
can
represent
dxtal,
but
there's
still
some
like
recourse
if
they
like
act
maliciously,
because
reputation
can
still
be
slashed.
So
I
think
it's
a
really
like
advantage.
I
think
a
dick
style
has
in
terms
of
like
being
able
to
extend
into
other
communities
and
still
like
having
some
control
or
like
a
recourse
over
it.
D
Yeah
I
mean
the
whole
thing
just
shows
how
early
we
are
in
the
space,
as
this
kind
of
situation
hasn't
even
occurred
yet
and
people
haven't
thought
it
out.
I
I
do
agree
with
the
optimistic
type
of
in
a
way
looking
at
it.
You
know
if
any
community
comes
up
to
the
ecosystem
down
and
says
we
no
longer
agree
with
this
person
representing
us,
then
that
will
be
the
beginning
of
a
process
to
off-board
that
person
from
the
ecosystem.
D
Now,
but
overall,
the
due
diligence
should
be
on
the
ecosystem,
dial
to
make
sure
that
anyone
who
approaches
the
multisig
and
and
wants
to
be
a
part
of
it
and
says
that
they
represent
certain
community
is
double
checked
whether
that
person
really
represents
that
said
community,
because
if
I
look
at
the
ecosystem
now
and
see
that
there's
a
dap
in
on
next
slide
chain.
That
is
underrepresented
like
that
there
isn't
anyone
in
the
discord
channel
and
I
implant
myself
and
and
say
that
I
represent
them.
D
But
no
one
really
knows
me
or
has
ever
checked
whether
I'm
I'm
really
part
of
that
team.
Or
you
know,
and-
and
I
could
be
a
part
of
the
multi-sig
without
the
the
doubt
doing
due
diligence,
so
there
should
really
be
some
ask
for
proof
whether
signing
a
message
on
chain
or
some
kind
of
a
signal
vote
from
each
dow
and
also
the
off-boarding.
D
How
does
that
happen?
Like
is
the
multi-sig
of
ecosystem?
They
are
able
to
boot
someone
if
their
community
no
longer
wants
them
to
to
represent
them,
and
also
it
is
not
a
security
issue
for
ecosystem
now
like
if,
like
imagine,
if
the
jury,
they
have
one
person,
who's
hung
up
on
a
vote
and
they
boot
him
just
so
that
they
could
pass
a
proposal.
D
Is
that
okay,
should
the
ecosystem
down
multisig
always
maintain
a
certain
number
of
minimum
votes?
So
if
they
decide
to
boot
someone,
they
should
only
do
it
when
they
also
at
the
same
time,
on
board
someone
new
so
that
they
remain
like
the
number
of
voters
like
whether
it's
5
out
of
7
or
whatever,
remains
intact
that
you
know
the
space
is
still
early
so
that
it
it's
nice
that
we're
kind
of
innovating
doing
this
type
stuff.
B
Maybe
we
should,
I
guess,
just
10
minutes.
We
should
probably
move
move
along.
A
Yeah,
okay,
do
you
want
to
talk
quickly
about
the
denver
or
about
like
some
of
the
expansions
opportunities?
I
don't
think
tammy.
B
Eat
denver
first,
like
we're
still
figuring
out
how
we
can,
if
we
can
do
the
sponsorship
as
a
proposal,
but
they
got
eat
denver
got
flack
with
their
like
whole
privacy,
things
and
like
why
they
need
liability.
I
don't
know
they
they're
going
to
try
to
get
someone
to
sign
it,
but
I
don't
know
who's
supposed
to
sign
it.
I
don't
know
so
we're
trying
to
figure
that
out,
but
I
think
the
immediate
thing
would
be.
B
We
need
to
figure
out
if
dx
dao
wants
to
have
an
event
or
some
type
of
drinks
thing
and
what
day
and
and
start
organizing
that.
I
believe
that
would
be
something
that
we
just
yeah
just
to
chill
drinks
would
work,
but
we
need
to
then
you
know
I
agree,
inviting
people
like
not
just
open
eventbrite.
We
would
just
like
hand,
we
would
have
a
code
and
we
would
hand
invite
ex,
like
any
of
the
people
that
we
would
want
to
come
there.
Basically,
so
we
need.
B
Just
no
so
carrot
in
general
is
not
good
for
individual
people.
Things
right.
E
B
Crowds,
it
works
if
the
individuals
make
up
a
crowd,
but
we
should
actually
use
kickback.
If
we
want
to
do
like
a
staked
event,
where
people
stake
money,
we
should
actually
use
kickback.
C
Yeah
kickback's
good
for
enforcing
people
getting
people
to
commit
and
follow
through
right,
but
I
do
think
you
could
use
carry
for
invent
events
to
like
incentivize
or
like
promote
attendance,
because
you
could
have
something
like
you
know:
will
the
event
sell
out,
or
will
it
be
at
capacity
right?
You
could
like
give
those
carrots
out
ahead
of
time.
C
Yeah
that
everybody
with
the
carrot
could
redeem
yeah.
You
need
like
a
single
because
it's
like
the
oracle
needs
to
be
answered
right
so
like
something
like
kickback
you're,
actually
like
per
person
somebody's
like
checking
that
off
right,
like
oh,
they
were
actually
here.
They
get
their
money
back
with.
E
B
The
best
way
would
actually
be
like
use
kickback
with
carrot,
because
the
problem
with
carrot
is
we
don't
have
everyone's
wallet
addresses
right,
so
you'd
either
have
to
ask
for
them
some
way.
But
if
you
use
kickback
people
could
like
stake,
ten
die
10x
die,
you
get.
You
have
all
their
wallet
addresses
right,
they
all
are
on
kickback.
B
C
I
could
see
it
as
like.
Carrot
would
be
a
way
to
like
basically
delegate
some
number
of
people
as
promoters
right
like
if
you
gave
like
a
dozen
people,
carrots
ahead
of
like
the
event
that
had
like
a
500
person
capacity
or
something
it
would
like.
Incentivize
them
to
promote
the
event.
C
And
then
kickback
is
like.
It
gets
people
to
commit
ahead
of
time
and
then
actually
show
up
right.
C
B
How
so,
how
big
of
a
event
and
and
chilled
drinks
sounds
good
at
like
a
bar
in
the
in
the
area
or
or
a
brewery,
which
is
a
lot
of
breweries
and
figuring
out
like
what
day,
and
these
things
can't
really
be
during
the
main
they're
not
supposed
to
be
like
events
during
the
main
eve,
denver
hackathon,
which
is
friday,
night
or
friday
afternoon,
till
till
sunday
night.
So
it
has
to
be
like
prior
to
that
sometime.
B
A
I
think
those
are
the
best
events
to
be
honest,
like
right
after
the
conference
right
after
the
conference,
like
I
mean
like
right
after
the
day
of
like
lectures
and
stuff
like
4
or
5
p.m,.
C
B
Yeah
monday's
the
taoist,
so
yeah
probably
have
to
be
tuesday
or
wednesday.
B
E
B
Well,
this
is
the
thing
announcing
it
so
the
way
we
did
the
omen
one
in
in
lisbon.
I
feel
it's
not
ideal.
I
don't
know
I
didn't
go
to
the
gnosis
drinks
that,
like
john
you
guys,
some
of
you
guys
went
to,
but
that
was
like
seemed,
like
they
hand,
invited
a
whole
bunch
of
people,
and
then
there
was
drinks
and
like
some
food
or
whatever,
but
they
it
was
like
people
showed
up
because
they
got
like
a
special
invite
to
those
things.
B
So
we
would,
I
think,
want
to
like
special
invite,
like
only
send
it
to
like
people
that
we
want
to
show
up.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
publicly
announce
it
and
then
yeah
eventbrite
or
anything.
I.
E
B
E
E
C
C
I
was
like
yeah,
so
the
gnosis
dinner
was
like
a
list
right
like
that
they
had,
it
was
sort
of
like
they
did
invited
they
like
who
they
wanted.
I
don't
know
if
we
wanted
to
to
do
that
and
that
maybe
made
a
little
more
sense
for
gnosis
in
lisbon
because
they
have
like
offices
in
lisbon
and
stuff,
but
but
do
we
want
that
where
it's
like
kind
of
an
exclusive
thing
like
you
have
to
be
on
on
the
list
or
do
we
want
something
more.
A
A
A
A
A
Email
addresses
I'm
saying
like
I
would
rather
have
like
people
log
in
with
their
web3
and
then
we
could
notify
them
somehow.
But
how
do
we
yeah?
How
yeah,
I
think,
that's
why
we
should
use
kickback.
So
there's
a
I
mean,
there's
a
protocol
called
inbox
right
like
parallel
down.
I
just
saw
it:
I'm
not
paladino
I'll,
send
it
later.
E
But
I
think
it
all
could
also
be
cool.
What
like
john,
was
saying
what
gnosis
did
right?
I
mean
we
could
even
do
both
right.
It
could
also
be
like
a
separate
dinner
with
people
we're
in
talks
with
like
if
we
want
to
talk
with
the
agave
people
and
stuff
invite
like
some
of
their
people
to
like
a
more
close
dinner
or
something
like
that.
You
know
we
could
all,
and
I
mean
we
could
do
both
right.
B
Cool
and
then
just
check
this
out,
if
you
want
to
just
quickly
before
we
finish,
tammy,
had
shared
a
draft
in
our
in
our
dx
ventures
group.
B
I
think
there's
gonna
be
a
propose
if
it's
not
already
live,
there's
going
to
be
a
proposal
live
for
the
grant
to
atlantis
world,
and
one
idea
which
we
had
mentioned
a
while
ago
is
to
include
some
extra
incentive
using
carrots
so
like
and
like
it's
like
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
grant
and
there
was
like
a
ten
or
twenty
thousand
dollar
like
additional
grant
wrote
award
if,
like
certain
a
few
different
conditions
were
met
in
terms
of
like
integrations
of
dx
styles
products
and
stuff
into
the
into
atlantis
world.
B
So
there's
some
kind
of
I
don't
know
blurriness
or
whatever,
where
like
the
base
grant
is,
is
for
x,
y
and
z
and
then
there's
like
some
stretch,
goals
which
weren't
part
of
the
plan.
But
if
they
were
accomplished,
there's
like
they
hold
these
carrots
which
become
worth
more
money,
and
it's
doing
it
as
a
grant.
It's
like
a
pretty
cool
idea.
I
mean
it's
extra
money
spent
and
stuff,
and
we
don't
know
like
how
valuable
this
money
spent
in
general
is.
B
But
it's
an
interesting
thing:
it's
the
metaverse,
the
xtiles
not
there
yet,
and
so,
if
we're
gonna
do
something,
it's
it's
a
cool
idea
to
embed
carrot
into
that
like
type
of
grant,
I
think
so,
if,
if
people
agree
with
that,
I
think
that's
gonna
be
included.