►
From YouTube: DXbiz Weekly Gathering [2021-06-14]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Hello
and
welcome
to
dxp's
weekly
gathering
of
14th
of
june
2021
we're
going
to
start
with
some
new
member
introductions.
If
you
have
any,
I'm
gonna
go
through
yeah
I'll
go
through
the
engine,
and
then
we
can
start
with
that.
We
have
a
few
dxps
squad
opportunities
that
we
can
talk
about.
B
Dxp's
discussions,
sorry
among
them
like
the
stock
that
we
just
kind
of
came
up,
incubator
discussion,
how
like,
if
and
how
you
might
want
to
incubate
sort
of
crypto
startups
within
dxdow
and
then
some
technical
discussions.
I
think
this
is
a
critical
one
around
alchemy
and
the
latest
outages
and
effective,
like
lack
of
support
events,
talk
about
ecc
and
yeah.
We
do
have
like
product
ideas
for
omen
as
well
yeah.
I
think
we
can
start
off
with
that
yeah.
C
Yeah
sure
thanks,
hey
everyone.
Yes,
we
do
have
a
few
new
member
introductions
today,
I
would
like
to
first
welcome
madisha
madisha.
If
you're
here
go
ahead
and
introduce
yourself,
it
would
be
great
if
you
could
just
tell
us
a
few
things
about
yourself.
Like
your
area
of
expertise,
any
past
work
experience
and
how
you
found
out
about
dx
dao.
D
Oh
sure
so,
hi
everyone
I've
been
working
as
a
full-stacker
developer
for
the
past
four
years,
so
I've
been
working
at
psn
education
and
so
for
the
past
couple
of
years,
I've
been
looking
into
crypto
on
and
off,
but
this
is
the
first
time
I've
been
involved
in
a
script
project
as
a
developer.
D
So
I
found
dxd
when
I
was
looking
to
project
building
on
pmi
2,
so
why
I'm
here
is
because
I
want
to
gain
more
experience
in
crypt
and
possibly
move
into
a
full-time
sort
of
a
career
in
crypto
yeah.
So
that's
about
me
yeah,
so
I'll
be
working
on
me,
so
I've
been
working
on
mesa
for
a
while.
So
that's
my
plan
so
far
and
I
work
on
isd
time
zones.
If
you
want
to
reach
out
yeah,
that's
about
me.
C
Awesome
welcome
and
like
he
was
saying
he
will
be
developing
with
mesa
and
working
with
the
mesa
team,
we're
working
on
his
first
worker
proposal
now
so
looking
forward
to
having
him
join
the
team
and
then
start
contributing
with
us.
E
Yeah
well
welcome.
Medusa
yeah
he's
already
been
an
active
member
of
the
team
for
at
least
a
week
now
he's
been
joining
our
calls
and
he's
been
active
on
key
base
contributing
to
the
team's
effort
at
this
point
he's
dedicating
20
hours
a
week,
which
is
quite
impressive
and
yeah.
We
welcome
any
help
thanks
for
joining
addition.
C
Great
to
have
you
and
we
have
another
new
member
introduction
today,
I'd
like
to
welcome
kyle
kyle,
if
you're
here,
you
can
introduce
yourself
now,
just
like
medusa
did
just
tell
the
community
a
couple
things
about
yourself,
your
area
of
expertise,
how
you
found
out
about
dxtau.
F
Absolutely
hey
everyone:
I'm
kyle,
I'm
a
senior
at
texas
state
university
in
san
marcos,
texas,
I'm
majoring
in
marketing
with
minor
and
creative
writing.
I'm
also
a
radio
dj,
videographer,
editor
and
podcaster
at
a
local
radio
station,
as
well
as
a
published
poet.
So
if
we
need
any
poetry,
I'm
on
that,
but
I've
got
experience
in
social
media
management
and
community
outreach
through
various
organizations.
I've
been
a
part
of,
and
I'm
super
passionate
about,
web
content,
curation
and
creation,
and
I'm
even
more
excited
to
apply
that
with
dxdow.
F
I've
been
following
crypto
for
about
two
years
now,
and
I've
been
keeping
up
with
the
company
for
the
last
four
or
five
months
thanks
to
keenan-
and
I
think
I'd
be,
I
think,
I'd
be
a
great
fit
with
the
current
marketing
team.
So
you
can
expect
my
contributor
proposal
in
the
coming
days.
Yeah
it's
nice
to
meet
everyone.
B
Awesome
nice
welcome.
Welcome,
yeah.
I
think
I
think
we
would.
We
could
use
some
portrait.
We
could
use
some
art
yeah.
F
Art
and
crypto,
that's
what
I
was
that's
what
I
was
thinking
I
I
had
to
I
had
to
you
know,
fill
that
hole
for
you,
guys,
yeah.
B
Welcome
anyone
else,
molly.
B
Awesome
so
I
guess
the
first
kind
of
item
on
the
agenda
is
the
the
expiz
opportunities
sky.
Do
you
want
to
start
with
a
work
awareness
strategy.
G
Yeah,
so
some
are
kind
of
recaps
and
updates
from
ongoing
discussions
that
we've
been
mentioning
the
last
a
handful
of
weeks,
but
with
the
with
the
swapper
farming
campaign
going
live
like
coming
soon.
Dx
tao,
like
our
first
campaign,
is
really
on
a
couple
of
our
own
pairs
and,
as
that
goes
live.
That
will
likely
be
followed.
G
With
this,
what
we've
been
calling
a
showcase
pair,
which
in
this
case
we've
talked
about
using
a
work
token
pool
one
of
the
things
with
that,
I
think,
is
important
to
like
come
up
with
a
strategy.
Well
we're
going
to
have
our
own
strategy
for
like
when
we
announce
farming
and
it's
like
there
could
be
lots
of
different
announcements,
but
as
we
do
it
in
like
and
include
a
third
party
community
like
the
work
opolis
community
or
in
the
future,
potentially
other
communities,
we
need
to
figure
out.
G
We
want
to
make
sure
that
those
communities
get
are
very
aware
of
of
like
the
campaign,
for
example.
So
we
might
want
to
think
specifically
about
the
strategy
on
how
to
once
that
campaign
is
live,
as
it
follows
just
making
sure
anyone
that
it
could
be
relevant
to
is
aware
of
it.
G
With
the
with
conditional
token
kpi
tokens
that
federico's
been
working
on,
we
did
have
a
call,
a
follow-up
call
with
the
chain
link
team
and
there's.
I
guess
we
came
away
from
that
call
with
a
couple
dif,
a
different
strategy
where
we
likely
will
have
like
a
very
basic
version
of
the
platform.
G
But
we
can
follow
that
as
as
we
we
communicated
the
type
of
oracle
data
price
feeds
that
that
we
would
need,
for
certain
types
of
example,
sample
conditions,
and
so
it's
a
little
bit
more
complex
but
we're
seeing
if
the
chain
link
team
has
the
ability
to
like
custom
build
those
those
actual
feeds
that
dxtown
needs,
and
they
haven't
done
it
in
the
past
and
a
lot
of
it
revolves
around
settling
against
an
average
of
something
and
in
our
case
average
like
tvl
over
time.
And
so
that's
like
a
unique
scenario.
H
You
know
a
partnership
chain
link
and
we
were
asking
them
for
basically
tvl
and
averages,
and
if
they
could
do
that,
and
it's
not
something
that
I
don't
think
they've
done
yet.
It
was
interesting,
too,
that
they
reacted
kind
of
saying
because
we're
looking
for,
like
basically
aggregated
on-chain
data
right,
like
we
want
to
know,
what's
total
value
locked
in
a
protocol.
H
H
Tr
we're
just
trying
to
see
if
they
can
even
provide
the
data
we
would
need
and
and
they're
looking
at
xdi
right
now,
so
we're
giving
them
ad
like
we're.
Giving
them
swapper
addresses.
I
And
being
like
hey,
can
you
give
us
tbl
for
this
pair
got
it?
What
about
using.
A
Reality
as
a
oracle,
it's
required
plan
to
use
right
yeah
on
arbitrary.
H
A
Reason
we
couldn't
use
it.
No,
no,
I
think
what
we
should
do
is
reach
out
to
the
main
developer
and
like
basically
get
to
know
what
his
plans
are
for
deploying
a
reality.
You
know,
like
I
think,
if
he
has
plans,
then
we
should
probably
like
be
in
sync
with
his
deployment,
because
I'm
not
sure
if
we
want
to
have
our
custom
reality
deployment
yeah.
So
so
that's
that.
A
G
A
Like
if
chaining
is
like
not
able
to
to
provide
what
we
need,
maybe
we
should
also
like
reach
out
to
api.
A
G
E
G
We
we,
you
know,
we
have
had
discussions
with
api
3
in
the
past
and-
and
there
was
a
like
there
was
a
a
use
case
that
they
were
looking
into
and
we
actually
did
some
like
soft
agreement
with
them.
I
think
to
like
see
if
we
could
use
it
in
omen
right,
but
I
think
the
work
the
necessary
work
to
link
the
two
things
together
has
hadn't
been
done
yet,
maybe
I'm
not
sure
we
need
to
recheck
with
them.
What
happened
post
that,
like
soft
agreement.
A
Yeah
I
mean
it's
all
about
like
who's
gonna,
deliver
it
as
soon
as
possible
for
us
right
like.
If,
if
api
three
sees
it
as
like
an
opportunity
to
beat
chain
link,
then
we
will
like
benefit
and
they
will
benefit
right.
I
mean
cheney
can
still
provide
their
stuff
and
we
will
do
the
announcement,
but
having
two
oracle
providers
on
our
products
also
like
it
will
win
for
us.
E
A
Exactly
like,
I,
I
think
if,
if
the
main
developer
is
not
like
keen
to
deploy,
then
we
should
just
like
go
with
it
and
deploy
our
own
reality
contract
until
he's
actually
doing
it
right
and
diesel
can
always
be
like
the
the
court
system.
G
Cool,
so
yes,
we'll
follow
up
with
those
three
additional
or
those
two
additional
leads.
The
next.
The
next
topic
is
back
related
to,
as
omen
is
rolling
out
omen
token
and
oh
my
guild,
and
there
was
a
separate
proposal
from
the
claros
team
for
like
gnosis,
backing
conditional
token
ideas
and
products
with
additional
gno
rewards.
G
We
have
like
a
working
group
that
had
been
crafting
and
putting
together
a
proposal
to
see
how
we
could
tie
any
type
of
gno
reward
into
the
system.
The
omen
reward
system
that
is
is
going
to
be
coming
and
our
our
approach
is
really
kind
of
speaking
to
the
gno
holders
and
seeing
if
how
that
group
in
general
thinks
about
products
like
omen
that
run
on
conditional
token
framework,
and
at
this
point
the
pro
the
proposal
that
we
put
together
was
like.
G
G
G
But
so
we
can
either
move
ahead
and
like
post
something
to
their
forum
and
even
without
the
team
support
like
their
team
support
and
see
and
like
raise
the
discussion
and
make
it
a
like
open
community
discussion
between
all
stakeholders
to
see
what,
like
all
gno
holders,
think
about
this,
or
we
can
put
it
on
hold
move
ahead
with
omen.
G
You
know
using
omen,
token
and
rewards,
and
we
could
always
then,
if
that's
up
and
running
and
working,
then
other
projects,
whether
it's
claros
or
gnosis,
community
or
other
projects,
could
have
the
ability
to
put
like
add,
rewards
into
the
system
at
like
a
future
date
and
time.
It's
a
little.
It's
probably
a
little
easier
for
like
the
community
to
see
to
understand
it
once
it's
live
and
working.
G
But
I
didn't
know
if
what
people
thought
about
like
the
state
of
this
conversation
and
if
we
should
move
ahead,
even
if
the
gnosis
team
like
is
not
supporting
their
product,
their
noses
conditional
token
protocol
at
this
point
in
time.
A
Yeah,
I
think
the
chances
are
like
lower
than
one
percent
that
we
that
we
are
successful,
primarily
because
dignity
star
was
like
very
badly
distributed
in
terms
of
power.
It's
it's
mainly
like
gnosis
teams,
doing
whatever
they
want,
so
the
chances
are
very
low,
but
I
think
we
should
practice
like
public
governance
activities
outside
of
the
league
still,
and
that
is
like.
I
think
you
guys
could
put
in
work
and
it
would
be
wasteful
if
we,
if
we
let
it
pass
and
like
not
publish
it,
actually
try
to
achieve
our
goals.
A
G
A
Think
actually,
no,
I
think
there
should
be
one
place
where
we
where
we
discuss,
and
I
think
that
should
be
like
the
gnosis
downfall.
H
Is
is
there
any
like
just
to
kind
of
look
at
it
from
the
other
perspective?
Now
I
think
it
makes
tons
of
sense
like
gno
was
issued
like
launched
to
build
prediction
markets
right,
so
it
makes
sense
that
the
community
should
support
something
like
this,
to
the
extent
that
there
is
a
community,
but
what
is
in
it
for
the
gno
holders?
I
guess
like
what
like,
how
do
they
benefit
so
the.
G
Markets
should
be
interested
in
omen
to
to
give
get
omen
token
in
the
hands
of
those
interested
parties,
so
that
they
can
participate
in
like
the
future
of
omen
and
the
main
production
market
platform
running
on
the
gnosis
conditional
token
framework.
In
my
mind
it
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
for
gno
holders
to
give
it
a
shot
if
they
don't.
You
basically
are
saying.
Oh,
let's
just
let
auger
like
take
over
prediction
markets
forget
about
gnosis
token,
conditional
tokens
and
products
built
on
gnosis
framework.
I
don't
know.
A
Yeah
the
way
we
like
what
we
propose
is
basically
a
more
complex
like
token
swap
with
the
gene
holders,
not
with
the
gnosis
tower
gnosis
dao,
aka,
gnosis
limited
liable
company
so
like
the
g,
inner
holders
will
receive
omen
tokens
and
that's,
like
I
think,
that's
like
a
very
clear
incentive
for
geno
holders
like
to
actually
be
positive
about
it
because
they
will
just
like
receive
a
valuable
token.
A
In
exchange
for,
like
some
portion
of
gene,
geno
rewards
some
portion
of
gno
tokens
from
the
gnosis
dow
treasury,
and
the
question
is
like:
do
they
think?
That's
that's
something
they
own
right
right
now,
I
would
say,
probably
not
because
they
don't
have
anything
to
say
anyway.
J
But
one
other
thing.
J
I
think
we
should
post
something
on
our
forum,
even
if
it's
just
a
reference
to
the
art
like
say,
hey
everyone
like
if
you're
not
aware
this
has
been
a
discussion,
that's
going
on
and
you
know
to
give
feedback
if
you're
a
juno
holder
go
here
or
if
you
have
any
specific
attachments
or
anything.
Regarding
this
plan
comment,
I
I
don't
see
why
it
would
hurt
to
not
have
it
in
our
form
as
well.
K
G
So
so
claros
in
general,
like
would
love
to
see
way
more
collaboration.
They,
their
team,
has
tried
to
help
communicate
to
us
how
they
thought
gnosis
would
interpret
those.
This
community
would
interpret
something
like
our
proposal
and
they
you
know
they
were
pushing
for
like
like
more
of
a
even
ownership
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff,
because
they
didn't
think
that
that
gnosis
people
would
be
excited
about
anything
less
than
that.
G
J
Yeah
for
for
basically
the
references
regarding
ownership
and
then
also
just
the
amounts
that
we
would
be
doing
for
the
liquidity
program,
just
yeah
various,
like
factors,
I
think
it's
mostly
like
whether
or
not
genosis
as
a
team
is
interested,
and
you
know
whether
there's
substantial
amounts
of
gnl
holders
that
would
separately
be
interested.
Claro's
already
had
like
a
similar
proposal
like
with
a
wider,
like
range
of
ideas
for
like
what
kind
of
products
could
fall
for
under
this
like
scope,
including
omen,
and
there
were
some
juno
holders
that
had
interest.
J
K
J
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
it's
there's,
you
know
it
was
just
like
kind
of
getting
like
constructive
feedback
on
the
proposal
and
just
seeing
where
there
could
be
some
sort
of
like
you
know,
productive.
You
know
small
partnerships
regarding
the
tokens
and
the
governance
systems
yeah.
I
think
the
door
is
open
for,
like
future
conversations.
H
J
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
we
like
we
think
of
like
the
way
like
we
can
like
put
the
link
again
in
to
the
proposal
and
even
maybe
share
the
proposal
on
our
forum,
regardless
just
to
see
what
people
think
about
it,
because
it's
also
kind
of
an
interesting
exploration
of
like
omen,
the
product
and
like
where
it
is
and
like
what
we're
thinking
about.
Like
prediction.
Markets
is
kind
of
this
burgeoning
area,
but
there's
been
growth,
but
there's
still
lots
of
strides
and
like
progress.
J
That
needs
to
be
made
and,
like
collaboration,
is
kind
of
key
for
that.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
you
know
we
thought
it
was
interesting
that
claros
first
bridged
this
idea,
considering
that
we're
moving
towards
the
omen
guild
and
that
it
would
be
good
to
do
some
sort
of
small
partnerships
to
kind
of
reinvigorate
the
relationship
with
genosis.
But
I
think
it's
good
to
like
look
at
the
product
and
like
where
we
see
like
points
of
weakness
or
points
that
we
need
to
like
continue
to
improve
on
collectively.
J
We
should
talk
about
that
and
consider
what
we
can
do.
H
Yeah
totally,
I
just
had
another
comment
that,
like
obviously
gnosis,
has
been
around
a
long
time
well
capitalized
and
they
have
a
very
capable
and
large
engineering
team.
But
if
you
actually
like
look
in
to
the
conditional
token
framework,
it
was
essentially
written
by
one
developer,
who
has
since
left
gnosis.
So
I
do
feel
like
there's,
maybe
actually
like
sort
of
a
lack
of
understanding
of
their
own
framework
with
from
within
the
the
company,
the
the
conditional
token
framework's,
a
quite
a
dense
piece
of
of
code.
That's
not
easy
to
understand,
but
yeah.
J
Well,
yeah,
I
think
I
think
their
interests
and
their
interests
are
elsewhere
right
now
they
have
other
products
they're
focusing
on
and,
like
you
said,
the
one
develop
the
main
developer
or
one
developer
that
was
working
on
that
particular
piece
of
code
is
not
there
anymore
and
hasn't
been
for
a
while
right,
so
yeah.
I
just
don't
even
think
it's
like
high
on
the
priorities
list
with
you
know
other
stuff
they
have
going
on
with
genesis,
safe
and
moo.
Swap
right,
I
think
that's
the
name.
I
can't
remember
the
name
anyways
yeah
house
house.
A
J
Yeah,
that's
like
so
maybe
we
can
just
make
it
very
clear.
Like
you
know,
if
it's
a
comment
on
like
the
partnership
or
like
something,
you
know
please
go
here,
but
just
just
so
it's
you
know,
people
just
check
our
forum,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
they're
aware
of
it
and
they
know
where
to
go
if
they
want
to
like
make
a
comment.
Maybe
something
like
that.
Yeah.
A
G
First
one
is:
we've
continued
to
be
in
touch
with
the
x
type
team,
xdi
community
less
so,
but
there
are
there
well,
we've
had
a
number
of
discussions
on
how
dx,
dao
and
xdi
community
could
kind
of
do
something
together
with
farming,
and
so
we've
been
waiting
for
farming,
we're
not
sure
like
if
we
could
do
a
co-reward
thing
at
this
point.
That
would
make
more
sense
for
when
we
have
swapper
token,
but
then
on
the
side
like
there's.
G
A
number
of
I
think,
just
do-it-yourself
farming
in
general
is
something
that's
exciting,
we'll
be
doing
it
ourselves,
and
other
teams
and
projects
have
use
cases
and
and
and
there's
lots
of
things
that
can
be
done
with
it.
So
I
think,
like
there's
a
bunch
of
different
ideas
floating
around,
for
how
it
can
be
used,
even
if
we
don't
necessarily
like
go
in
and
create
a
stake,
pull
with
them
or
a
token
or
a
some
other
token
in
their
in
their
ecosystem.
G
But
we
want
like
once
we
have
do-it-yourself
farming
live
and
we've
used
it
like
ourselves,
and
people
can
see
that
it
works.
We
can
share
that
with
way
more
communities
and
see
what
opportunities
that
brings
it's
something
that
hasn't
existed
really
in
this
manner
across
other
dex
platforms.
G
So
they're
like
there
are
teams
that
are
excited
about
it,
so
we
want
to
get
it,
get
it
in
front
of
them
as
soon
as
as
soon
as
we
can
and
then
the
last
thing
is
this
mesa
idea
for
mvp,
which
is
quite
mesa
specific,
but
nathan
or
martin.
I
don't
know
if
one
of
you
wanted
to
just
run
run
over
the
idea
at
high
level,
so
people
are
aware
of
it
and
we
can
get
ready
for
something
for
like
early
mesa,
mvp
ideas
and.
L
Stuff
yeah
hi,
I
can
add
a
few
words
we
discussed
this
on
friday
already
so
because
you
have
not
been
present
this
guy,
but
I
can
yeah
neither
directly
talked
today
again
about
this.
So
there's
like
a
basic
idea
that
we
can
get
some
feedback
from
the
community,
mostly
and
with
community
I
mean
we
have
to
see
how
how
far
we
spread
it,
but
that
is
that
we
sell
like
a
basic.
L
We
make
a
token
a
normal
token
sale,
and
then
this
token
can
redeem
be
redeemed
again
for
a
pull-up,
and
maybe
we
had
an
idea
today
that
only
people
who
then
after
the
sale
happen
is
happening
happened.
We
maybe
make
like
an
open
discussion.
I
don't
know
where,
on
the
community
call
or
on
a
special
call
on
discord,
and
then
we
try
to
collect
feedback
about
the
sale
to
get
like
an
impression
how
people
feel
about
using
the
platform,
and
then
they
get
the
ball
up
as
a.
L
If
then,
if
they
have
the
coin,
they
can
redeem
it
against
the
poor.
So
this
is
the
basic
testing
we
can
do
even
without.
I
think
we
can
do
with
this.
Even
if
the
contacts
not
have
been
fully
audited
because
there's
almost
no
downside
risk,
it's
not
real
money
involved,
but
we
will
make
a
better,
we'll
write
this
up
and
then
yeah
ask
for
feedback.
G
B
The
big
one
is,
and
I
think
it's
like
from
fairly
recent-
is
the
dx
talk
creation,
we're
currently
using
this
course
that's
kind
of
owned
by
daostack
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
like
I've
been
saying
this
for
years
to
tao
stack,
you
know
to
integrate
the
the
you
know,
the
form
aspect
or
the
communications
aspect
into
the
actually
that
to
the
actual
dao
and
yeah
lately,
like
we
realized
like
a
couple
hours
ago,
that
people
can
edit
other
people's
posts,
and
then
it
turns
out
that
this
was
a
feature,
not
a
bug
and
nothing
was
hacked.
B
But
you
know
that
just
came
up
and
then
this
whole
idea
of
you
know
what
is
the
style
using
for
most
of
our
communications,
what
we
should
be
using
in
the
future
and
yeah.
I
think
this
is
like
my
opinion
is
that
we
could
probably
create.
I
don't
know
a
big
bounty
for
something
like
this,
and
you
know
this
is
either
because
this
course
is
like
fully
open
source.
B
I
don't
know
if
you
know
that
could
be
implemented.
I
don't
know
deployed
onto
like
ipfs
or
or
something
like
that,
but
yeah.
This
is
something
interesting
to
explore
and
I
don't
know
from
boosters
on
the
call.
A
Yeah
I
have
in
general
no
issue
with
dow
talk
as
long
as
it
provides
like
a
stable
service
to
us.
I
think
it's
it.
I
I
think
it
seemed
more
like
more
pros
and
cons
to
actually
like
use
other
infrastructure
for
the
d
stone
to
be
just
like
more
resilient
against.
Like
one
big
attack,
I
think
the
more
the
current
full-time
developers
get
control
the
the
worse
for
the
dxo,
so
I
think
the
more
we
like
use
infrastructure
where
it
can't
be
captured,
was
like
neutrally
neutrally
owned,
not
by
the
dx.
B
A
B
Yeah
and
I've
created,
like
I
think,
someone's
saying
that
it's
not
backed
up.
I
created
like
backup
files,
so
yeah,
maybe
I
can
share
it.
Maybe
we
can
upload
this
to
ips.
I
don't
know
yeah.
J
Yeah,
I
think
it's
it's,
I'm
not
I'm
not
sure
how
or
who
fixed
everything
with
alchemy,
but
thank
you
for
whoever
took
care
of
that.
Maybe
it
was
like
a
third
party,
but
really
really
thank
you.
It
seems
like
it's
working
again,
but
that
definitely
showed
like,
even
if
we're
relying
on
dow
stack
for
better
for
worse.
J
Like
I
mean
we
all
have
our
own
bandwidth,
so
I
think
it
is
good
to
somehow
you
know
when
we're
able
to
work
with
like
active
developers
who
are
like
you
know,
things
are
like
up
and
working
well.
Why
not-
and
you
know
it's
not
super
broken
or
anything
like
that.
So
why
focus
on
that
at
this
time,
unless,
like
there's
like
some
real
problem,
like
obviously
we
saw
with
like
alchemy
there's
been
real
issues,
so
dx
vote
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
J
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
but
if
someone
comes
like,
if
there's
some
sort
of
someone
comes
with
a
great
idea
and
we
just
put
a
proposal
out
there
for
a
bounty
sure,
but
I
don't
think
we
should
spend
too
much
resources
or
time
on
like
seeking
this
out.
If
it
comes
to
us
great,
but
if
not.
B
B
I
don't
think
any
of
them
have
caught
on
and
I
think
ibuffz
inherently
has
problems
with
like
storing
data,
so
I
don't
know
like
if
that
will
work,
but
that
I
would
like
to
see,
though,
like
if
we're
using
the
ex
vote.
I
would
like
to
see
I
don't
know.
Maybe
there
could
be
like
an
embedded
tab
of
the
dx
style
category
inside
the
depth.
A
L
I
did
visit
this
page
like
two
days
ago,
but
it's
just
invitation
still
and
it
looks
like
there's
not
a
lot
of
ongoing
development
there.
Somehow
it
looks
like
because
last
information
is
like
last
block
entries.
I
think,
a
year
old
yeah,
something.
L
D
L
I
think
they're
in
switzerland
still,
I
know
yeah,
I
think
he's
in
suk.
The
guy
has
been
lately
somehow.
I.
L
A
A
Around
with
it
like
in
terms
of
like
it's
on
wrinkle
by,
but
my
I
think
my
overall
point
is,
there
might
be
some
like
bigger
team,
actually
delivering,
hopefully
a
communication
platform
where
it's
like
completely
ethereum
native,
and
that
would
be
very
interesting
class
right.
Because
then
we
can
just
like
build
like
governance
modules
inside
the
interface.
H
L
J
No
different
guy
but
super
smart
and
is
working
on
like
related,
like
decentralized
social
media
concepts
but
and
goal
to
move
to
web
3..
We
can.
We
should
plan
another
talk
with
him.
He
like
we
gave
him
some
feedback
that
I
put
in
the
dx
ventures
chat
just
describing
some
of
our
needs,
and
we
can
now
that
we've
had
this
like
conversation,
we
can
mention
even
like
forum
and
voting
interface,
specific
requests
and,
if
that's
something
he's
even
interested
in
doing
and
maybe
there's
some
some
room
for
collaboration
there.
J
E
K
Discourse
is
great,
I
think,
like
discourse
as
like,
a
way
of
mediating
or
like
story
even
storing
like
online
discussion
for
dao's,
I
think,
is
great.
Just
like
how
do
you
get
that
with
the
voting
aspect,
I
think
yeah?
Actually,
it
would
be
like
the
the
boardrooms
and
the
tallies
of
the
world
that
probably
end
up
doing
that
integration
that
are
more
serving
the
all
of
the
voters,
rather
than
maybe
individual
governance
interfaces
doing
that.
A
Yeah
there
is
one
polkadot
project,
edgeware
and
I
think
they're
kind
of
connected
to
to
a
different
product,
which
is
also
like
very
focused
on
governance,
and
I
know
they
have
like
an
ethereum
integration
and
and
that's
actually
like
pretty
legit.
As
far
as
I
like
check,
it
check
that
out,
like
a
full-fledged
forum
with
like
on-chain
components,
for
like
a
variety
of
blockchains.
L
L
Yes,
exactly
right,
they
use
it.
As
I
looked
into
the
discussion,
they
had
like
discussion
how
they
should
move
forward
and
how
to
pay
people
and
now
they're
straight
that
yeah
they're
changing
their
structure
somehow,
and
but
I
don't
know
what
they
are
building
because
you
know
other
polka
dot
projects
have
like
huge
teams
and
move
forward
very
quickly,
and
I
think
edgeware
has
very
close-
has
been
very
close
connected
to
to
that
three
foundation
because
they
did
the
lock
drop
like
very
early
and
the
free
foundation.
L
A
Right,
it
looks
awesome
by
the
way
like
like
simplified
reddits.
A
The
question
is
like:
can
we
actually
like
join
the
game
and
actually
like
contribute
to
that
and
potentially
build
out
like
the
holographic
consensus
model?
I
don't
think
we
should
build
things
like
out
of
scratch.
Maybe
like
dx
vote
is
absolutely
necessary,
but
if
we
want
to
tackle
this
like
community
communication
platform
plus
governance
module
built
in,
we
might
be
smart
in
like
contributing
to
existing
dashboards
right.
B
Yeah
is
anyone
connected
to
any
of
these
next
to
akasha
or.
K
I
know
the
I
think
we've
had
a
call
with
the
boardroom
guys
and
then
I
know
ruff
from
tally.
Pretty
well
actually
saw
him
in
miami
they're.
Like
a
bit
hyper.
I
mean
they're
pretty
focused
on
the
government,
the
compound
like
forks,
so
all
of
the
stuff
they
support
now
is
compound
governor
alpha
contracts,
but
yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
they're
definitely
interested
in
building
lots
of
functionality
like
that.
G
That
might
work
for
compound,
but
like
we're
already
doing
a
lot
of
our
stuff
on
x-tie
right,
so
they
didn't
have
any
way
to
tie
that
in
they
when
they
like
at
that
point,
weren't
even
thinking
about
it,
so
they
like,
like
their
solution,
was
like
kind
of
irrelevant
for
our
organization
when
we
talked
to
them
six
six
months
ago.
So
you
can
see
if
they've
updated,
that.
B
B
All
right
should
we
have
like,
I
know,
maybe
a
specific
group
to
talk
about
these
things
and
we
can
follow
up
on
this
next
week
as
well.
Any
connections
we
have
and
yeah
see
basically
how
we
we
move
forward
on
this.
A
Yeah,
that
sounds
sounds
great.
I
think
we
should
move
forward
like.
I
think
we
should.
Besides
the
explode
like
try
to
actually
fix
this
forum,
plus
governance
building
right.
B
I
mean
I
can
talk
to
augusta,
but
I
feel
like
it's
possible
to
have
basically
to
create
like
a
tab
or
I
don't
know
something
doesn't
look
terrible
from
a
ux
perspective
and
you
can
embed
the
entire
page
of
like
the
style
from
the
out
like
you
can
do
that.
There's
like
plugins
for
that.
So.
H
E
B
Sorry,
I'm
dying,
we
don't
have
much
time.
Does
anyone
have
like
any
any
other
thing?
They
want
to
discuss
real,
quick.
G
Maybe
just
an
update
on
alchemy,
so
alchemy
now
is
working
again,
mostly
right,
so
there's
still
main
net
is
missing,
but
x
thai
alchemy
is
like
functioning
and
ready
to
use.
I
understand
and
maybe
mainnet
is
like,
which
we
use
less,
but
there's
some
proposals
and
things
that
are
not
showing
still
is
that.
H
Is
that
the
current
scenario
right?
So
the
issue
was
with
ipfs
hashes
being
read
from
the
sub
graph,
so
which
is
the
dependency
of
alchemy,
and
we
ended
up.
You
know
we
have
now
a
discord
channel
with
the
subgraph
team.
They
their
initial
fix,
didn't
work.
Their
second
fix
got
us
to
where
we
are
today,
which
seems
like
x
day
is
pretty
much
working
main
net,
like
new
proposals
seem
to
be
working,
but
historical
stuff
is
not
showing.
H
So
you
know
I've
just
pinged
the
graph
team
and
doused
stack
again
this
morning
about
that,
but
I
mean,
I
think,
for
all
intents
and
purposes,
people
should
kind
of
do
what
they
need
to
do
like.
There's,
no
reason
I'll
hold
back
anything.
K
And
then
just
one
other
announcement
or
call
the
expand,
geek
style
to
arbitram.
One
signal
proposal
is
up
for
another.
Eight
hours
on
x
die
so
it'd
be
great
for
everyone
to
vote.
I
think
for
things
like
this
that
are
signaling
the
dow's
intentions,
it's
great
to
have
as
many
people
vote
as
possible,
especially
when
it
will
be
referenced
in
marketing
material.
B
Well,
I've
just
thought
about
like
deploying
the
dao
in
orbit.
That's
going
to
be
complicated.
H
We're
not
using
we're
using
dx
vote,
it's
already
been
deployed.