►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-05-18]
Description
00:00 DXgov Call 2022-05-18
00:19 Game Face
00:24 Agenda
00:35 Mainnet proposals
15:03 Importance of Tidy REP - REP Sync Discussion
40:35 Gnosis Chain proposals
41:20 DXD Buybacks
44:07 DXColumbia Contributor Stipend
47:14 TheDAOist Dawn
A
Regarding
is
that
welcome
to
deep
style
governance
discussion
for
wednesday
may
18th
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
I'm
gonna
share
my
screening
first,
so
we
don't
have
to
stare
at
chris's
game
face
the
the
whole
time
yeah.
So
here's
the
agenda
for
today,
looking
at
the
proposal,
roundup
of
actually
does
not
say,
propose
a
round
up
here,
but
it
usually
does,
but
looking
first
at
mainnet
we
actually
have
an
active
mainnet.
A
A
couple
active
proposals
on
mainnet
right
now.
First
is
a
transfer
of
funds
to
gc
baits
500k.
This
is
a
a
proposal
that
would
transfer
500
000
susd.
That
would
be
converted
a
half
into
die
and
half
into
usfdc
and
bridged
over
to
the
gnosis
chain
base.
This
will
pass.
This
is
set
to
pass,
I
think,
on
monday
or
tuesday
of
next
week
and
what
will
require
some
some
execution,
and
I
want
to
talk
about
that
in
in
just
I
mean.
A
B
Sure
so
well,
one
of
the
main
reasons
is
we've
kind
of
taken.
A
look
at
the
current
like
stable
coins,
we
hold
on
main
net
and,
of
course,
die.
Usdc
tend
to
be
the
ones
most
requested
for
contributor
payments,
and
I
guess
overall,
there's
also
somewhat
of
a
re-evaluation
going
on
around
stable
coins
in
the
whole
crypto
market.
B
There
is
some
conversion
taking
place,
and
I
think
it
just
makes
sense
to
you
know:
go
you
know,
use
our,
perhaps
the
s
usd
first
then
perhaps
usdt
next
and
we
have
like
roughly
2.1
million
of
both
of
them,
so
that
should
keep
the
gnosis
chain
base
well
funded
until
end
of
the
year
at
least,
and
yeah
people
still
submit
proposal
mainnet
as
well.
So
we
also
don't
want
to
deplete
our
die
and
usdc
reserves
on
mainnet
as
those
are
also
used
and
yeah.
B
B
You
actually
most
likely
won't
be
able
to
redeem
your
proposal
as
the
funds
won't
be
there
to
pay
out
the
proposal,
but
the
way
it
actually
works
is
that
the
proposal
will
still
be
claimable
on
monday
or
at
any
point
in
time
where
the
funds
are
replenished.
So
you
don't
need
to
resubmit
your
proposal
or
anything
like
that.
There
you'll
you'll,
most
likely
just
have
to
wait
a
day
or
two
before
you're.
B
Actually
able
to
claim
the
funds,
and
I
think
it's
the
first
time
it
actually
happens
with
so
many
proposals
queued
up,
but
that's
mostly
due
to
just
the
number
of
proposals
we've
had
over
the
past
week
or
two
as
well
as
the
air
contributors
I've
been
for
amsterdam,
so
yeah
nothing
to
be
worried
about
and
monday.
We
should
be
back
in
shape
on
connor's
chain.
C
A
So,
tomorrow
evening
everyone
should
be
able
to
that
will
and
then
this
mainnet
proposal
is
to
fund
kind
of
operations
going
forward,
and
so
they'll
be
you
know
replenished
in
there,
but
I
believe,
there's
yeah,
that
the
65k
should
cover
that
initial
one.
There
also
has
been,
as
people
notice
that
there
is.
There
was
like
some
limits
on
usdc
withdrawals
from
gnosis
chain
kind
of
over
over
the
past
a
week
or
two.
It
was
a
couple
weeks
ago
there
just
to
kind
of
another
reminder
of
thinking
about
liquidity
across
chain.
D
I
was
just
wondering
about
the
susd,
I'm
kind
of
like
not
super
intimate
with
how
synthetics
works,
but
it's
it's
a
collateralized,
stable
coin
right
with
snx
being
the
collateral.
Is
that
right?
Yes,
okay!
So
in
a
way
it's
like
it
bears
some
resemblance
to
luna
and
ust,
which
I
guess
is
part
of
the
thinking
for
why
we
should
be
off
boarding
it
right.
B
A
A
A
Ratios
yeah,
that's
the
same
so
when
you're,
liquidating
like
that's
like
it
kind
of,
is
a
slightly
different
way
of
the
death
spiral.
It
still
is
like
a
death
spiral
in
in
like
certain
ways,
but
it
has,
I
guess,
like
different
properties,
but
I
think,
broadly
speaking,
they
have
been
less
conservative.
I
mean
sorry
more
conservative
in
their
approach,
like
I
mean
susd,
is,
I
think,
it's
115
million
dollar
market
cap.
The
total
market
gap
for
the
stable
coin,
which
is
like
very
small
snx,
is
not
that
big.
A
So
it's
only,
I
think,
like
a
six
seven
hundred
million
dollar
market
cap,
but
yeah
they've
they've,
I
think
been
more
conservative
but
in
terms
of
to
I
think,
to
deex
dao.
It's
it's
really
like
that
means.
Geeks
now
is
like
right
now,
like
one
percent
of
all
susd
and
I
think
that's
a
kind
of
unnecessary
risk
really
and
not
really
yeah.
A
A
liquid
market
to
be
able
to
use
right,
yeah
right,
it
is
impressive,
as
dave
said
that
they
still
like,
we
still
have
good
liquidity
on
it
like
you
can
get
one
to
one
right
now
for
500k
on
curve,
but
I
guess
also
take
a
step
back
and
think
like
well.
Why
does
the
treasury
have
susd
and
I
believe
it
was
the
first
three?
A
A
Even
though
they're
you
know
the
team,
the
snx
team
is
like
pretty
centralized.
So
that's
really
like
the
justification
for
the
original,
the
original
like
allocation,
but
since
that
time
l
usd
has
launched
right,
which
is
a
pure
east
as
collateral
stable
coin.
Of
course,
rye
is
launched.
Cintiq
style
is
like
three
million
dollars
of
that.
So
I
think
they're,
just
like
other
options
that
the
extent
was
getting
in
terms
of
reaching
its
decentralized
goals
in
terms
of
the
stable
coins
in
its
treasury.
A
D
D
It
makes
sense
to
have
more
right
like
to
have
some
variety,
because
even
usdc
could
like
fail
or,
like
you
know,
decide
to
start
censoring
people
or
something
right
so
yeah
and
then
like
on
the
collateralization
model
yeah.
I
guess
like
even
if
snx
were
to
fall
like
with
the.
If
with
you,
if
you
have
a
healthy
liquidation
system,
it
should
be
able
to
unwind
relatively
gracefully
right
without,
like
hurting
the
value
of
sust
too
badly
versus
like
the
luna
ust
model.
D
You
literally
have
this
sort
of
like
accelerating
downfall
like
potential
where,
as
people
wanted
to
get
out
at
ust,
they
were
like
minting,
luna
and
then
dumping
luna
right.
Whereas
I
mean
I
guess
that
you
have
a
potentially
similar
effect,
though,
with
the
with
the
smx
price
right.
If
it's
falling,
people
have
to
liquidate,
sell
their
smx,
then
it
falls
more,
but
yeah.
A
D
D
A
Yeah,
I
was
gonna
say
of
course,
there
is
a
possibility
that
even
with
that
collateral,
like
maker
dot
die,
could
death
spiral
because
eath
is
death.
Spiraling,
like
this
is
kind
of
what
you
saw
a
little
bit
with
black
thursday,
where
like
markets
in
free
fall-
and
that
is
but
that's
you
know
a
another
completely.
You
know
separate
type
of
risk.
There.
D
A
This
is
why
it
drops
like
10
15
when
it
drops
a
little
bit,
because
you
have
these
liquidation
cascades,
where,
like
it
goes
down
a
little
bit
and
then
people
get
liquidated
and
then
you
need
to
sell
more
collateral
and
then
it
ends
up
going
like
down
more.
So
I
do,
I
think,
just
like
part
of
it
is
built
in
like
crypto,
because
people
are
using
so
much
leverage.
A
But
you
can
see
this
now,
where,
like
market
participants,
now
know
that
bitcoin
and
eth,
like
will
debt
spiral,
so
you
have
different
investors
coming
in
and
filling
like
those
bids.
When
you
see
you
know,
seed
markets
go
down
a
little
bit
liquidations
happen,
and
then
you
have
like
a
different
set
of
investors.
That
is
now
coming
in
to
see
that
because,
like
that,
they
know
that
that's
what
the
the
bitcoin
and
eth
like
market
structure
happens
when
prices
move.
D
A
You
need
a
robust
system
like
that's
what
this
all
is
right,
it's
like
how
do
you
build
a
robust
system
right
and,
like
you
know,
that's
why
ethan's
collateral
like
well
ethereum
is
like
a
pretty
pretty
effing,
robust
asset
right
and
so
there's
a
risk
in
these
things
always
but
like.
How
do
you
build
that
robust
system?
Anyway,
we
are
drifting
further
and
further
away
from
the.
A
A
I
believe
this
is
for
the
last
six
months
from
reducing,
I
think
it's
almost
nine
or
ten
months
from
from
venky
skye,
also
just
posted
a
proposal
in
the
forum,
the
importance
of
tidy
rep
that
I
think
is
kind
of
relevant
to
this
discussion,
so
maybe
sky.
If
we
can
like
kick
off
the
discussion
and
then
we
can
chat
about
any
of
these
specific
ropes
proposals.
E
Sure
yeah
for
the
last
year
or
more
we've
been
doing
most
of
our
governance
on
on
gnosis
chain
and
we've
been
using
mainnet
rep
as
the
reference,
because
we
thought
that
that
was
the
smart
thing
to
do,
because
that's
where
you
know
the
rep
started
and
that's
where
the
main
treasury
is
and
things
like
that.
But
what
we
were
doing
is.
We
also
have
a
goal
to
increase
decentralization
of
dx,
dow
and
one
of
those
one
of
the
ways
to
do
that
is
to
decrease
the
just
increase,
the
distribution
of
of
rep.
E
E
Eight
almost
20
percent
discrepancy
from
what
it
should
be,
and
so
the
question
is:
why
does
that
matter?
And
if
you
just
go
back
up
the
the
reason
that
matters
is
because
there's
there's
a
handful
of
main
ways
that
this
is
affecting
people
and
so
the
the
core
contributors
that
are
earning
you
know,
regular
contributors
that
are
earning
you
know.
E
0.166
each
month,
they've
been
they've
been
earning
that
off
of
this
like
lower
incorrect
rep
base,
and
so
the
people
that
this
is
probably
affecting
the
most
would
be
new
contributors
that
don't
currently
have
rep
that
are
that
are
trying
to
get
kind
of
up
the
curve
to
earn
some
voice
in
dxdow
and
they've
been
working
every
month
and
they've
actually
been
getting
less
than
what
you
know.
Contributors
in
the
past
have
been
getting
for
the
same.
What
was
supposed
to
be
the
same
like
standard
amount
and
we
use
0.166
percent
for
a
reason.
E
E
But
we
yeah
we've
been
calculating
the
four
percent
cap
off
of
a
fully
incorrect,
mainnet
rep,
and
so
it's
yeah
there's
a
few
different
factors
that
it's
actually
affecting,
and
it
makes
a
quite
a
big
difference,
because
you
can
see
this
massive
discrepancy
and
one
one
question
would
be
like.
Does
it
matter
that
much
because
if
it's
affecting
everyone
like
if
it's
affecting
everyone
currently
equally
kind
of
everyone's,
just
learning
earning
less
rep
together?
E
But
this
also
causes
the
factor
of
it's
it's.
It's
not
doing
what
the
dao
has
set
out
to
do,
and
it's
also
the
people
it's
helping.
The
most
is
it's
helping
the
oldest
rep
holders,
who
have
not
contributed
to
dxdown
a
very
long
time,
so
those
rep
holders
that
really
you
know,
should
theoretically
be
losing
more
governance
power
over
time
because
of
of
the
inflation
of
rep
and
so
yeah
that
it's
like
this.
This
mismatch
of
rep
on
mainnet,
this
incorrect
repo
net
is
really
like.
E
E
E
E
We,
the
the
community,
hasn't
really
done
these
rep
syncs
during
since
that
point,
even
though
it
was
supposed
to
be
happening,
and
so
we
can
either
sorry
we
this
proposed
solutions,
are
we
we
start
doing
these
and
requiring
rep.
Syncs
is
a
little
it's
a
little
hard
to
do
anything
that's
required
in
the
decentralized
world
we
can
incentivize
rep
syncs
better
to
to
cause
like
you
know,
people
to
do
this
more
often
and
more
regularly.
E
Theoretically,
other
people
or
other
a
squad
in
the
in
the
team
could
in
the
in
the
dow
could
could
actually
do
these
without
the
permission
of
a
person
right,
but
dxdot
does
not
usually
do
has
not
usually
done
stuff
like
that,
where
it
just
does
something
without
the
without,
like
speaking
to
or
having
the
backing
of
the
person.
That's
receiving
that
rep
or
that
money
right.
We
don't.
We
don't
normally
do
that.
E
So
that's
that's
a
little
weird
yeah,
but
so
there's
not
a
exact
there's
a
few
options
and
we
should
talk
about
it
and
then
decide
if
we
want
to
like
try
to
get
everyone
get
things
up
to
speed
of
where
they
should
be,
and
then
we
should
put
a
process
in
place
to
make
this
more
accurate
going
forward.
So
that's
like
kind
of
the
summary.
D
Thanks
skye
yeah,
I
think,
like
this
is
sort
of
a
product
of
well
one
that
we
are
out
of
sync,
but
also
the
percentage
approach
right,
because
the
percentage
approach
is
always
relative
to
whatever.
The
number
is
so,
therefore,
is
all
of
a
sudden
like
chronologically
dependent
right
like
if
you
and
10
other
people
sink
before.
I
sync
now
my
number's
different
than
if
I
had
gone
first
right,
and
so
you
sort
of
have
that
and
that's
like
where
you
can
get
into
this.
D
Like
you
know
an
aggregate,
this
can
actually
make
a
pretty
big
difference,
based
on
like
when
you're
searching
so
like.
If
venky
is
the
first
one
to
get
up
to
date,
but
then,
like
10
other
contributors
now,
do
it
right,
like
there's
gonna,
be
you
know
a
whole
other
10
of
like
inflation
on
the
rep,
and
you
know,
venky's
number
is
basically
10
lower
than
maybe
it
should
have
been
right
or
like
something.
You
know
just
rough
numbers.
So
I
guess
like
what
I'm
asking
myself
here
and
now
asking
you
all
is
like
well.
E
D
E
Okay,
but
you're
still
number
so
it's
just
displaying
that,
but
we've
always
been
using
numbers
for
rep,
because
we
just.
I
would
think
that
we
reason
use
percentages
because
it's
easier
to
because
it's
an
inflating
supply,
it's
easier
to
talk
about
like
a
quantity
related
to
the
overall
supply.
When
you
talk
about
percentages,
otherwise,
you'd
be
talking
about
like
2108
rep
versus
two
thousand
two
hundred
yeah.
D
E
A
In
there,
because
that
should
not
affect
people's
main
net
sites,
that
should
only
affect
their
future
contributor
proposals
that
are
using
the
size
of
the
main
net
rep
when
you're
doing
a
mainnet
rep.
Sync,
that's
only
coming
from
rep
that
has
already
been
earned
from
proposals
that
you've
already
gotten
approved
with
specific
amounts.
E
A
E
Yeah
but,
but
even
even
like,
because
there
is
a
scenario
where
people
that
do
it
first
use
a
lower
base
than
people
that
do
it
later,
like
in
general.
That
is
a
phenomenon,
but
if
you
have
a
little
bit
of
volatility
along
the
way
on
average,
that
should
kind
of
average
out
the
problem.
Is
these
massive
discrepancies
of
time
that
cause
cliffs
in
rep,
rather
than
just
like
a
little
bit
of
volatility
here
and
there
yeah.
G
The
only
way
where
you
get
rep
inflation
is
because
rep
is
being
generated
when
rep
is
being
generated
is
because
someone
is
committing
to
the
exile
and
someone
is
doing
something
useful
for
the
exam.
So
if
rep
increases,
we
all
should
be
happy
right,
because
something
good
is
happening
for
the
doubt
and
the
doubt
is
giving
reputation
to
a
member
or
or
somewhere
right.
So
if
I
see
rep
increases,
I
should
be
happy.
G
If
I
see
my
rep
being
diminished
e
percentage,
then
I
should
be
happy
because
more
the
the
organization
is
growing.
Now
we
have
more
members
and
more
repetition
being
being
distributed.
What
what
I
think
we
are
doing
wrong
is
we
are
thinking
on
percentage
and
saying
hey,
my
rep
is
being
diminished,
so
now
I'm
worth
less.
For
now.
It's
not
it's
not
how
it
works.
If
you
have
a
reputation
you
are
already.
G
You
are
an
important
member.
So
the
only
thing
that
you
should
be
that
the
only
thing
that
we
should
try
to
care
about
is
to
have
a
standardized
way
of
issuing
rep,
which
I
think
we
started
doing
in
in
reputation
in
percentages
and
again
this
is
this
is
wrong.
Rep
is
a
is
a
token
where
you
can
you
mean
by
by
number,
by
an
absolute
amount.
So
if
may
you
can,
maybe
we
can
start
thinking
and
saying?
G
H
G
Yeah
yeah
and
this-
and
this
is
the
other
issue
where
another
thing
that
I
wanted
to
talk
about-
is
how
hard
is
to
maintain
right
maintenance,
for
example,
like
say
synchronize,
with
with
exercise,
I
mean
for
each
of
us
creating
a
sync
and
a
sync
proposal.
No,
no!
No!
No!
That's
not
when
that's
not
practical,
that's
not
that's
not
efficient.
G
So
this
is
a
big
constraint
that
we
had
on
the
operations
level
where
we
are
using
all
the
legacy.
Smart
contracts,
that
again
they
work
the
contribution
reward,
the
multi-call
all
the
things
works,
but
we
have
a
lot
of
concerns
of
things
that
we
can
do.
We
need
to.
We
need
to
synchronize
a
lot
of
reputational
amounts
in
one
proportion,
and
we
cannot
do
it.
We
will
be
able
to
do
it
in
the
future.
G
Yeah.
I
think
that's.
That
is
our
constraint
because,
again
having
four
proposals
from
four
different
from
four
different
members
synchronizing
their
reputation
and
they
spend
that
you
know
like
five
or
ten
or
ten
minutes
or
the
energy
that
I
put
there.
I
couldn't
do
it
myself
with
my
reputation
and
the
four
of
you
guys
and
that's
it.
So
that
is
how
I
think
it
should
work
in
the
future.
Yeah.
D
In
the
future,
it
can
be
better
by
design
with
the
governance
system,
but
it
is
timely
now
because
I
was
doing
some
stuff
on
chain
last
night
with
13,
15,
gwei
and
yeah.
I
think
the
main
reason
that
this
sort
of
became
a
backlog
was
not
out
of
like
laziness.
It
was
because
it
was
like
costing
a
small
car
to
pass
proposals
on
mainnet
for
a
little
bit
there
and
that's
changed
right.
D
So
I
think
now,
especially
if
we're
like
batching
multiple
periods
like
six
months
a
year
at
a
time
or
something
like
that,
I
don't
see
any
reason
why
people
shouldn't
be
able
to
go
and
sink
their
rep.
At
this
point
you
know
with
like
20
gray
gas
prices.
You
know
they
get
reimbursed
it's
it's
not
yeah
yeah.
G
D
E
There's
a
map
that
that's
one
of
the
riskiest
things
that
the
dow
can
face
if,
if
that
gets
into
the,
if
that
is
like
incorrectly
done
like
that,
could
very
highly
disturb
the
what
proper
rep
should
be
right.
So,
like
it's,
it's
powerful,
it's
it's
efficient,
but
it's
also
really
risky
right
yeah.
We
don't
want
to
rush.
D
They
also
are
the
creators
of
lighthouse
client
for
eth2,
and
they
have
an
interesting
approach
where
they
actually
are
building
the
tests
like
themselves
as
they
audit
things
so
yeah
I
mean
for
those,
I
think,
a
lot
of
people.
You
know
just
use
crypto,
whatever
you're
kind
of
aware
that
hacks
happen
and
stuff-
and
maybe
you
haven't-
had
the
opportunity
to
like
really
like
kind
of
dig
in
and
like
see
what
is
involved
in
like
shipping
a
system.
D
But
you
know
I
think
this
is
going
to
be
a
great
report,
because
they
create
great
reports
and
they're
very
detailed,
and
so
you
know
in
a
matter
of
weeks.
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
share
that
with
everybody
and
I
think
that'll
be
a
good
opportunity
for
everyone
to
kind
of
get
a
taste
of
what
I'm
looking
at
quite
frequently.
And
I
think
that
may
calibrate
some
of
your
thinking
around
like
what
we're
handling
and
what
we're
dealing
with.
D
C
Yeah
we
can
as
if
we're
doing
it
regularly
at
once
every
month,
then
what
should
the
maximum
be?
It
would
be
like
one.
Two
percent
is
not
going
to
be
a
huge
amount
of
rep,
not
saying
we
shouldn't
not
be
careful
with
that,
just
that
it's
still
feasible.
It's
not
like
we're
doing
tens
of
percentage
changes
each
time.
D
C
E
C
A
A
A
You
can
also
even
request
that
all
in
one
proposal
and
that's
exactly
what
I
was
going
to
say
ross,
you
could
argue
for,
depending
on
your
off
ramp
method,
this
could
be
a
cheaper
way
actually
to
get
your
funds,
especially
because
all
of
your
transactions,
through
through
dick's
out
governance,
are
reimbursed
through
that
way.
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
do
that
and
also
you
know.
John
was
strolling
down
ethereum
last
night
with
thirteen
way
well.
A
Shotgun
man,
I'm
telling
you
that's
it's
it's
a
good
feeling
yeah,
so
that
was
actually
just
technically
mainnet
for
the
proposal
roundup
been
a
while
since
maynet
took
took
so
long
of
that
on
to
gnosis
chain
quickly.
We
talked
several
about
these,
but
you
can
see.
There's
you
know
a
bunch
of
worker
proposals
here
from
sky
mine
labs.
A
This
is
actually
a
stipend
reimbursement
d
labs
dave
zett
with
the
amsterdam
stipend,
leonardo
bertiati,
who
also
just
made
a
nice
call
to
arms
in
the
swapper
channel
about
voting
for
that.
Another
skyline
labs,
melanie
adam
wayne
who's,
been
doing
some
great
work
on
dx
voice.
I
believe
this
is
wayne's
first
worker
proposal
so
great
to
see
that
up
there
and
then
carl
b
and
medusa
from
the
dxgov
team
and
also
diogo.
A
And
then
there
are
three
buyback
proposals
currently
in
the
queue
a
couple.
I
guess
two
things
to
note
on
the
buyback
proposals:
one
is
erroneously
labeled
197
in
the
title,
but
that's
actually
198
and
then
you'll
notice,
the
the
decline
in
the
amount
of
wealth
spent
in
on
these.
That's
from
the
decline
of
the
ghd
trade
volume
which,
as
we
talked
about
last
week,
has
gone
down
a
lot
over
the
past
month,
broadly
in
line
with
the
market
as
a
whole.
A
But
so
this
is,
I
believe,
an
average
buy
of
like
23
000
dollars
per
per
buy,
which
lowers
the
amount
of
heat.
That's
been
on
the
buyback,
so
that
will
actually,
I
think,
have
a
have
a
positive
effect
in
terms
of
prolonging
the
amount
of
time
before
the
buyback
reserve
is
depleted
and
then
the
other
proposals
on
gnosis
chain
yeah.
I
guess
starting
just
jumping
around
a
little
bit.
We
mentioned
this
unwrapped
65k
wx
die
to
die,
so
this
is
there's.
A
C
A
To
get
so
after
that
proposal
passes,
and
then
there
is
the
cross
chain,
member
balance
which
supply
x6
dow,
with
thirty
five
thousand
exchange
for
continued
governance
operations
from
skymind
labs
who
yeah
has
executed
or
executed.
The
deposit
is
asking
for
the
reimbursement
there.
This
was
for
a
previous
proposal
that
was
slightly
faulty,
but
but
no
no
harm
done
and
then
yeah.
The
two
proposals
may
be
open
for
discussion.
A
Here
are
one
looking
at
the
stake:
255
gno
signal
proposal,
so
this
was
part
of
stakewise's
effort
to
move
some
of
the
treasury
into
yielding
assets.
So
there
was
a
corresponding
signal
proposal
on
mainnet
to
do
to
stake
2000
eth
into
stakewise,
and
then
this
is
the
gnosis
chain,
one
that
would
255
gno
and
then,
presumably,
if
these
proposals
pass-
and
there
will
be
kind
of
like
an
execution
plan
on
how
we
get
that
eth
and
gno
into
staking.
A
J
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
I'm
on
the
call,
so
we
have
been
talking
about
this
for
a
few
weeks
now.
But
finally,
the
proposal
is
on
chain,
but
this
columbia,
dx
columbia,
contributor
stipend,
outlines
the
cost
that
will
be
covered
for
devcon
and
the
dx
retreat.
That's
happening
this
coming
october,
so
the
stipend
outlines
the
daily
to
stipend,
the
transportation
actually
from
your
country
of
origin,
to
bogota
transportation,
to
the
retreat
in
cartagena,
from
bogota
accommodations
wall
at
devcon,
just
any
testing
and
then
the
potential
devcon
ticket.
J
And
then,
if
there
are
any
visa
costs
that
you
know
are
incurred
before
traveling
as
well.
I
did
make
some
slight
adjustments
to
the
on-chain
proposal.
Originally,
we
had
made
the
transportation
to
cartagena
a
hundred
dollars
100
us
dollars,
but
upon
further
investigation
from
dave,
we
realized
that
the
flight
that
flight
or
that
transportation
might
be
a
little
bit
more
expensive.
J
D
A
Awesome-
the
last
item-
I
don't
know
if
we
really
have
much
time
to
chat
about
it,
but
I
just
wanted
to
call
it
attention
a
conversation
that
was
going
on.
I
think,
on
monday's
business,
biz
dev
call
about
becoming
a
geek
style
becoming
a
key
member
of
the
taoist
dawn
and
so
sky
gets
another
proposal
from
you
or,
I
guess
sorry,
another
forum
post
from
you
here.
Maybe
you
can
speak
to
this.
E
One
question
that
was
raised
on
monday
was
kind
of
about
the
the
the
core
team
that
helped
that
helped
build
this
from
the
start,
and
you
know
almost
on
a
on
a
volunteer
basis,
part
of
the
and
and
how
those
f,
what
their
commitment
was
going
to
be
and
and
how
the
funds
were
going
to
be
used,
and
so
a
portion
of
the
total
funds
raised
in
this
is
actually
going.
It
says
on
their
core
team,
but
it's
actually
core
team,
plus
all
of
the
new
contributors
that
are
that
have
started
contributing.
E
And
so,
if
you
have
a
team
focusing
on
this,
like
there's
unlimited
possibilities
for
new
events
and
ideas
and
things
that
come
out
of
it,
there's
this
idea
of
the
meta
hub
in
in
lisbon
and
that
could
actually
expand
to
other
regions
as
well,
and
then
they
they
do.
And
so
I
and
then
I
also
asked
like
if
the
core
team
yeah,
how
much
of
the
future
of
this
will
come
from
the
dow.
How
much
will
come
from
the
core
team?
Do
they
or
the
the
core
workers?
Do
they
have
their
own
ideas?
E
And
their
answer
was
that
yeah
there
there's
a
few
different
tracks
of
tech,
art,
culture
and
governance,
and
they
their
team
has
a
whole
bunch
of
different
ideas
that
they
can
and
will
propose
to
the
dao
for
the
dao
deciding
but
they're
like
if
yeah
the
da,
it's
not
dependent
on
the
dao
to
start
coming
up
with
their
own
ideas.
From
the
start,
it
will
be
a
mesh
of
the
team.
E
That's
already
been
doing
this
plus
all
of
the
new
people
involved
in
the
dow
and
there's
some
there's
a
there's,
a
like
six
big
sponsorship
opportunities,
support
opportunities.
I
think
one's
being
done
by
prime
doubt
one's
being
done
by
giveth
one.
Those
are
all
I
think,
locked
in
there's
a
there's,
a
handful
of
them
and
so
the
ministry
support
ones.
I
think
there's
18
of
them.
That
would
be
one
of
the
ones
that
we
that
dx
dao
has
the
opportunity
to
join
on
and
so
yeah.
E
So
I
guess
what
we
need
is
yeah
once
everyone
dives
into
all
this
information,
any
questions,
discussions,
support
negatives,
put
in
the
forum,
open
public
discussion-
you
know
other!
You
know.
Community
members
may
have
questions
about
this,
but
it's
it's
all
yeah
fully
open
and
then
there's
some
immediacy,
because
these
ministry
spots
are
limited
at
this
price
and
it
would
be
better
for
dx
dow
to
to
make
a
decision.
Sooner
than
later
I
think
yeah
and
if
they
have
public
calls
you
can
join,
you
can
join.
F
E
H
No,
if
you
read
through
this
information,
a
little
bit
truths,
you
would
see
that
they
were.
They
basically
are
planning
on
being
almost
like.
You
know,
ambassadors
for
daos
against
other
corporations,
and
this
type
of
thing
to
basically
be
a
voice
for
the
in
the
dark
space
to
advocate
for
dows
and
this
type
of
thing,
and
I
think
that's
what
they
mean
by
that
the
way
they've
written
it
in
their
paperwork.
H
E
If
we
wanted
to
we,
we
could
see
if
that
one
ambassador
spot
is
still
open,
but
yeah
the
reason
yeah
same
reason:
we've
been
invited
and
have
been
close.
A
big
participant
in
their
events
is,
you
know
they.
They
they
want
dx
dao's
perspective
to
be
involved,
especially
if
yeah,
if
this
is
representing
dows
in
front
of
you,
know
governmental
organizations,
and
things
too
like
they
want
the
perspective
of
dx
dao
and
the
and
the
participation,
because
maybe
they
recognize
some
of
the
some
of
the
unique
parts
of
the
exile.