►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-05-25]
Description
00:00 DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-05-25]
00:25 Agenda
00:34 Mainnet Proposals
11:25 Gnosis Chain Proposals
12:00 The DAOist DAWN proposal
15:56 Alchemy and DXvote discussion
21:51 Visual demo: security and access to DXgov
41:43 Removing Old Schemes
46:55 Forum Management and Organisation
49:44 DXDToken Working Group - Call to Action
51:30 Important posts in Forum: Check
A
B
A
Let's
start
first
with
the
proposal
roundup,
we
have
well
actually,
let's
first
just
take
here's
the
agenda
for
today,
a
couple
maintenance
things
gnosis
chain
and
then
a
couple,
different
discussion
items
and
also
some
hopping
times
in
the
forum
too.
If
you're
looking
to
check
out
some
things
going
on,
but
starting
first
with
mainnet
there's
been
a
couple
of
different
rep
syncs
here
I
think
this
one's
actually
already
passed
and
then
medusa's
is
gonna
pass
in
the
next
day
here.
A
So
I
think
we
went
over
the
importance
of
tiny
rep
last
week
and
a
nice
post
by
sky
about
doing
this,
and
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
and
so
yeah.
It's
good
to
see
some
of
the
main
proposals,
and
I
know
what
some
other
people
are
out
there
looking
doing
that
too,
and
then
there
is
a
proposal
to
update
swapper.edcontenthash
to
swapper
v
1.0.0
beta
number
12.
So
a
lot
of
good
features
in
this.
I
believe
there
is
both
cow
swap
integration,
and
maybe
some
bridge
integrations
in
this.
B
C
C
B
I
mean
just
so
we
know
here
if
you
see
what's
changed,
that
it's
a
huge
list
of
changes
and
we
actually
added
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
stuff,
but
the
like.
The
major
things
are
yeah,
basically,
the
swap
box
and
adding
polygon.
But
inside
of
here
you
could,
you
could
read
more
details
and
this
update
is
basically
like
two
months
of
work
and
we
we
still
have
more
stuff,
that's
not
merged,
but
yeah.
It's
it's
a
pretty
big
update.
A
Yeah,
the
next
step
is
payout
to
sigma
prime
for
auditing
services.
So
this
is
a
big
contract.
It's
a
150
000
60,
000
transfer
of
usdc,
and
so
this
is
sigma
prime
one
of
the
big
auditing
firms
out
there
big
three
one
of
the
the
primary
ones.
So,
john,
maybe
you
can
give
us
a
kind
of
brief
overview
of
what
the
audit
is
covering.
D
Yeah
exactly
it's
it's
covering
the
guild's
governance
contracts
that
are
going
to
be
used
for
swapper
and
beyond,
and
this
is
our
first
yeah,
our
first
audit
of
those
kind
of
contracts
in
their
current
state
in
the
top
there.
It
links
to
the
signal
proposal
that
we
passed
a
couple
months
ago,
kind
of
outlining
what
was
involved
here.
D
Sigma
prime
takes
the
payment
up
front,
so
we
actually
don't
have
anything
to
show
yet,
but
they
should
be
done
in
the
next
like
couple
weeks
and
I
will
be
sharing
their
audit
report
as
soon
as
it's
ready
to
be
shared.
Typically,
we
share
the
audit
reports
with
the
development
team.
First,
you
know
make
sure
that
they
get
a
chance
to
review
it
like
feel
good
about
about
sharing
it
more
widely
and
then
then
we
can
share
it
further
and
and
probably
before
we
publish
it.
D
There's
like
you
know
a
round
of
acceptance
for
any
changes.
So
they're
gonna
like
come
back
with
a
report
and
a
lot
of
findings,
and
then
you
know
the
the
gov
team's
gonna
have
to
respond
to
those
and
like
hand
it
back,
and
then
they
need
to
like
accept
it.
Sigma,
prime,
as
chris
mentioned,
is
like
one
of
the
better
known
like
brand
name
firms
they're
also
the
company
behind
lighthouse,
which
is
one
of
the
eth2
clients.
I
think
it's
actually
like
the
second
most
used
client.
D
Now
after
a
prismatic
but
yeah
they've
been
doing
auditing
for
a
long
time
kind
of
based
out
of
australia
and
yeah,
I
would
probably
put
them
up
there
with
open
zeppelin
trailer
bits,
the
very
best
probably
so.
I
have
very
high
expectations,
obviously
we're
paying
a
lot
here.
I
think
it's
a
good
thing
to
note
that,
like
we're,
gonna
have
to
I
think,
project
and
budget
out
what
our
auditing
costs
will
be
into
the
future.
Like
historically,
we've
been
kind
of
sparing
on
our
budget
for
auditing.
D
Then
you
know
people
will
expect.
You
know
good
audit
reports
from
good
recognizable
firms
and
it's
sort
of
respect
best
practice.
So
I
mean
I
think
this
makes
sense,
but
I
think
we
probably
need
to
have
a
good
discussion
about
what
the
budget
like
going
forward
is
like.
This
is
our
like
first
time
working
with
sigma
prime,
and
so
I
think
it's
great
to
have
this
relationship
with
one
of
the
best
firms.
D
You
know
billion
dollar
funds
lined
up
in
recent
months,
and
so
those
guys
got
to
deploy
all
their
capital
to
companies
and
projects
that
are
going
to
continue
to
build.
Of
course,
you
have
all
the
other
existing
projects
continuing
to
build.
So
I
would
say,
like
you
know,
private
fundraising
lags
the
public
markets
a
little
bit
and
auditing
lags
the
private
fundraising
even
more
right.
So
I
think
auditing
demand
will
stay.
E
Maybe
I'll
say
something
about,
I
think
you
know
kind
of
like
builders
are
not
going
to
be
not
going
to
stop
building,
and
I
I
s
no
reason
for
like
auditing
to
slow
down
or
like
auditing
prices
to
slow
down
like
any
any
of
the
rest
of
the
market,
because
it's
kind
of
like
a
necessity-
and
this
is
always
a
bottleneck
and
yeah.
I
don't
think
like
auditing
prices
are
going
to
go
down
even
through.
I
don't
know
like
a
year
of
bear
market.
D
Yeah
yeah,
exactly
not
I'd,
say
yeah,
it
would
probably
take.
My
guess
would
be
it
would
take
like
maybe
two
years
before
we'd
like
start
to
see
it
really
drop
level.
Okay,
we
were
doing
auditing
back
in
like
2018
2019
and
we
did
like
you
did
see
things
soften
up
in
2019,
but,
like
you
know,
the
peak
was
like
january
2018
and
like
auditing
demand
was
like
growing
through
2018
and,
like
still.
A
A
Won't
dry
up
as
much
in
the
last
downturn
and
like
I
don't
I
mean
I
think
people
stuck
around
and
built
during
the
last
one,
and
there
was
a
lot
of
things
going
on.
I
think
there
was
a
lack
of
funding,
but
I
think
now,
given
the
yeah,
given
the
money,
that's
already
kind
of
flowed
into
the
space
plus.
How
much
has
already
been
raised.
I
feel
like
the
funding
will
not
drop
off
like
last
time.
D
E
B
A
A
A
A
H
Just
just
that,
for
I
guess,
a
signal
proposal
that
we're
yeah.
This
is
not
moving
money.
This
is,
I
mean
this
is
on
gnosis
chain
only
for
a
reason,
I
think,
eventually
the
payment
would
be
main
made
using
mainnet
dow
on
mainnet,
but
this
signal
proposal,
if
yeah,
if,
if
a
few
people
vote
on
it-
and
it
you
know,
passes
that
theoretically
is
the
voice
of
dx
dao.
H
H
There
wasn't
much
feedback
from
community
in
the
forum
post
about
it
so
yeah,
if
which
is
always
a
good
place,
to
get
signal
in
the
forum
post,
but
since
this
is
a
vote
yeah,
if
you,
if
you
do
support
this,
go
ahead
and
vote
for
it.
If
you
you
know,
are
super
against
it,
you
can
also
vote
against
it
and
then,
if
you
are
indifferent,
you
always
have
the
option
to
not
vote,
or
you
know
vote
with
some
smaller
percent
of
rep,
which
is
what
dx
vote
is
cool.
H
Unless
you
do
that,
if
you
want
so
but
having
more
signal
from
more
people
that
hold
rep
for
something
for
any
of
these
signal,
proposals
is
always
better
than
just
a
few
people
like
you
know.
Obviously
this
can
pass
with
one
person
voting,
and
that
means
that
the
dao
did
not
vote
against
it,
but
it
doesn't
show
like
massive
support,
either
so
always
better
to
have
participation
in
signal
proposals,
if
possible.
A
Definitely-
and
I
think
that
gets
to
like
legitimacy-
we've
talked
about
talked
about
before
how
to
how
things
gain
legitimacy
and
I
vote.
The
reason
kind
of
you
saw
katie
fork's
name.
Is
I've
been
impressed
by
the
content
generated
by
the
dallas
and
there's
not
very
much?
I
think
high
quality
content
out
there
and
crypto
in
general
specifically
endows
in
having
relationships
with
media
and
content
producers
in
the
space,
I
think,
is
a
good
way
to
build
a
brand
going
forward,
yeah
and
then
just
a
couple.
A
Other
contributors
proposals
and
stipends
there's
wayne's,
dexter,
amsterdam
proposal,
there's
candy
forks
proposal
for
april
and
may
this
is
actually
the
first
half
of
the
one
that
I
just
submitted.
There's
dino
chris
benny
contributor
proposal,
there's
two
from
van
grimm.
I
believe
this
is
van
grime's
first
proposals.
I
know
that
he
had
kind
of
said
was
working
on
some
entity
setting
up
there
and
then
yeah
a
couple
different
buybacks
and
then
a
dx
columbia,
stipend
from
nathan.
A
This
is
after
the
dx
columbia,
stipend
proposal
passed
last
week
from
melanie
and
then
as
part
of
that,
you're
able
to
pre-claim
that,
if
you're
going
just
to
in
order
to
pay
for
flights
ahead
of
schedule,
so
those
were
all
of
the
main
items
on
actually
yeah
on
gnosis
chain.
I
wasn't
sure
if
there's
any
questions
comments
about
any
of
the
proposals
outstanding.
A
Cool
and
then
nothing
in
arbitrary
one
and
then
just
moving
on
to
some
of
the
discussion
items,
actually
a
couple
different
things
to
touch
on
briefly
here.
I
think
first
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
alchemy
and
diex
vote.
I
know
people
probably
been
seeing
in
the
last
week
and
a
half
there
were
a
little
some
downtime
on
both
of
them.
A
I
I
I
guess
like
the
responsibility,
so
there's
actually
there's
a
diagram
in
here
that
might
help
if
you
can
scroll
down
a
little
bit
yeah
just
there
yeah.
So
like
we're
splitting
this,
let
the
export
legacy
now,
instead
of
when
originally,
we
sort
of
intended
this
to
be
the
the
governance
application
to
get
everyone
to
use
it.
Now,
it's
more
focused
on
like
as
much
stability
as
we
can
so
keeping
the
thing
in
theory.
Dx4
should
be.
I
It's
good
that
we
still
have
that
there,
although
obviously
we
don't
actually
fully
control
the
ui
and
then
we're
now
splitting
off
into
a
new
application,
which
we've
already
done
a
lot
of
the
code
for
it's.
Basically,
what
we've
been
talking
about
with
guilds,
but
now
that
will
be
a
unified
application,
a
unified
application
only
focusing
on
the
new
parts
of
governance,
so
yeah.
That
kind
of,
I
think,
summarizes
most
of
the
stuff,
and
you
can
read
the
article
for
a
bit
more
detail.
A
I
No
yeah,
just
a
public
call
for
any
codename
ideas,
yeah
for
so
we're
working
with
dark
to
have
proper
branding.
But
for
the
initial
stuff
like
we
need
a
code
name
because
it's
getting
too
confusing,
referring
to
it
as
a
new
application
or
like
dx4,
initially
we're
using
dx4
1.1.
But
now
it's
more
a
separate
thing,
having
dx4
plus
skills.
I
I
No
dave
no
but
yeah
yeah.
Any
suggestions
are
more
than
welcome.
Currently
we
only
really
have
one
good
suggestion
from
kenny,
which
I
actually
need
to
double
check.
I
can't
remember
what
it
was.
We
had
cooper
now
k-u-b-r-n-a-o,
which
apparently
means
governance
in
greek,
but
yeah,
just
any
any
names
this
week
will
probably
be
choosing
one
and
forking
off
the
project
and
in
the
long
term,
of
course,
we'll
have
an
actual
name
that
we'll
deliberate
on
a
bit
more,
but
yeah
project
name
would
be
nice.
A
I
A
B
A
We're
at
in
terms
of
like
alchemy
and
dx
vote,
and
so
yeah,
we'll
kind
of
be
both
using
those
to
manage
things
but,
as
it
said,
like
dieg
style
being
so
unchained,
even
relying
even
have
two
different
applications
that
you're
relying
on
for
governance
that
could
still
fail
at
certain
times,
so
we
do
need
to
be
able
to
like
govern
without
those.
So
like
one
of
the
ways
you
can
do,
this
is
actually
interacting
with
them
on
ether
scans.
I
don't
know
if
john,
if
you
want
to
yes.
D
D
What's
happening
right,
so
I'm
just
going
to
share
my
screen
and
go
through
a
few
things
now,
but
I'll
put
up
the
the
bonding
curve,
which
we
were
talking
about
a
little
bit
before
the
recording
kind
of
just
to
start
here
so
like
a
little
bit
of
historical
context
for
those
who
maybe
weren't
around
in
2020,
but
bonding
curve
is
how
dxd
raised
capital
so
like
starting
in
may
about
two
years
ago,
this
curve
was
launched
by
the
dow.
There
was
actually
a
proposal
to
set
the
content
hash
to
this.
D
A
similar
ui
to
this
it's
been
updated
a
little
bit
since
about
very
similar.
To
this
you
know,
credit
to
geronimo
who
actually
was
working
on
designs
for
this
ui
as
early
as
like
summer
of
2019
and
yeah,
so,
like
eth,
was
sent
into
the
bonding
curve
that
minted
txd,
so
we
had
a
hundred
thousand
txt
pre-mint
that
was
put
into
a
locking
a
lock-up
contract.
D
That's
usually
somebody
calling
the
public
function
on
that
on
the
curve,
so
that
they
can
so
that
it
releases
some
none
of
the
curve
rather,
but
on
that
lockup
contract,
so
that
releases,
the
extend
of
the
treasury,
90
percent
of
the
eth
that
went
into
this
curve
was
sent
to
the
deak
stock
treasury.
10
percent
was
left
in
the
curve,
so
you
can
actually
see
the
reserve
still
now
is
almost
2500
eath
on
the
bonding
curve
contract
itself.
D
Another
thing
to
note
is
that
the
bonding
curve
contract
is
the
dxd
contract.
Those
are
one
in
the
same.
So
if
you
like,
go
and
find
dxd
on
ether
scan,
that
address
is
the
same
address.
It
is
like
the
contract
address
for
the
bonding
curve
itself,
so
you'll
notice,
like
the
dxdd
token
contract,
has
this
amount
of
eth
on
it
and
yeah.
So
you
know
price
of
dxd
peaked
at
one
eath
in
fall
of
2012.
D
I
think
it
was
in
september,
obviously
came
down
a
bit
since
then,
but
yeah
just
some
context
here
on
how
dx
style
raised
its
capital
and
I
think,
as
rep
holders,
we
all
have
a
lot
of
responsibility
right.
We
have
responsibility
to
build
and
you
know
execute
on
our
job
responsibilities,
but
we
also
have
responsibilities
as
governors
for
dx
dao,
and
that
means
like
being
stewards
of
this.
D
You
know
treasury,
which
we
were
very
fortunate
to
see
appreciate
with
the
price
of
eth,
and
you
know
also
with
everything
else
that,
like
dx
dow,
is
doing
right,
like
we're
responsible
for
making
sure
that
it
continues
to
work
and
continues
to
exist
and,
as
we
all
know
like
the
governance
is
on
chain
right.
So
next,
like
bit
of
context
in
history
here,
is
we'll
switch
over
to
alchemy.
So
I
think
most
people
know
that
dxl
was
launched
on
dowstack's
platform
right.
So
you
know,
downstack
was
a
project
or
it's.
D
I
think
it
still
exists,
but
they've
shifted
their
focus
a
bit,
but
initially
you
know
they
had
raised
an
ico
in
2017
and
we're
working
on
these
governance
contracts
called
arc,
and
this
governance
interface
called
alchemy,
and
it
actually
supports
many
dows
and
dxdow
was
just
one
of
many.
Does
that
like
launched
on
the
dow
stack
platform,
so
you
know
initially,
the
the
goal
of
dxtel
was
not
to
really
like
work
on
governance.
D
It
was
just
to
use
the
you
know
to
to
defy
stuff
or
whatever,
on
and
use
the
does
tech
platform
to
handle
the
governance
right.
So
in
2019,
that's
when
gnosis
and
devstack
launched
dxdow
it
just
had
rep
and
some
gen
at
that
point.
No,
no
dxd,
no
really
significant
amount
of
capital,
but
there
were
400
addresses
that
had
this
reputation
voting
power,
the
bonding
curve
came
later
like
it
was
sort
of
like
this
organic
thing.
You
know
after
gnosis
and
doubt
stacks
stepped
back
and
weren't
involved
anymore.
D
Things
got
a
bit
quiet,
it
was
also
the
bear
market,
but
there
were
some
community
members
that
got
together
and
worked
on
the
bonding
curve
and
launching
some
products.
So
that
kind
of
you
know
first
came
reputation
later
come
came
txt
and
eth
and
that's
where
the
treasury
comes
from
and
that's
how
we
all
get
nice,
not
salaries.
D
So,
like
you
know,
on
monday
or
sunday
or
whatever,
when
you
came
to
the
ui,
there
were
like
proposals
that
weren't
yet
displaying
that
had
already
been
made,
and
that
is
as
gusto
would
say.
No
bueno
right,
like
it's
very,
very
bad
if
dx
style
cannot
access
its
proposals
and,
and
that
relates
to
holographic
consensus
right.
So
holographic
consensus
is
this
powerful
tool
which
really
enables
like
scalability
and
operational
flexibility
for
dx
style
right.
D
So
any
proposal
can
get
boosted
if
enough
gen
token
is
staked
on
the
proposal,
and
once
it's
boosted,
all
that
it
takes
to
pass,
is
over
a
certain
period
of
time.
More
rep
has
to
vote
for
it
than
against,
and
that
could
be
any
amount
of
rep
right
like
it
could
be
a
very
small
amount
of
rep
and
so
that's
very
powerful.
D
I
think
actually,
but
it's
also
very
dangerous
right
and
it's
a
bit
stressful,
if
you
think
about
it
from
the
point
of
view
that
we
have
this
responsibility
for
the
treasury,
because
all
it
takes
is
like
one
malicious
proposal
to
sneak
through
and
that
proposal
could
drain
the
treasury.
It
could
mint
a
lot
of
rep
and
then
control.
D
The
dow
right,
like
so
literally
like,
are
it's
a
huge
existential
threat
and
I
really
mean
existential
right
like
if
that
something
like
that
were
to
happen
like
it's
over
like
we're
done,
we
can't
pay
any
peop,
I
mean.
Maybe
it's
not
completely
done,
but
you
can
no
longer
pay
people
right
like
wouldn't,
have
control
of
the
product
enses.
It
would
be
a
calamitous
disaster
for
dx
dow
right.
So
it's
very,
very
important
that
that's
prevented
from
happening
and
so
back
to
like.
D
How
do
we,
actually,
you
know,
maintain
control
over
governance
because
of
holographic
consensus.
It's
very
important
that
people
always
have
access
to
the
proposals
that
are
always
like
paying
attention
to
what's
happening
so
that,
in
the
event
that
there
were
a
malicious
proposal
made
like
that,
would
just
get
voted
down
right.
It
would
probably
get
down
staked
and
never
even
get
boosted.
But
you
know
if
somehow
that
were
to
happen,
then
people
could
at
least
vote
against
it
right.
D
So
one
attack
vector
could
potentially
be
to
fool
the
ui
into
thinking
that
the
proposal
is
not
there
or
if
the
subgraph
is
just
down
and
like
somebody
taking
advantage
of
this
fact
that,
like
voters
can't
see
the
proposals
right,
so
this
has
always
been
sort
of
an
existential
threat
and
some
graph
was
often
going
down
and
we'd
have
these
stressful
moments
of
like
messaging
desktec
and
being
like
hey?
Can
you
restart
the
subgraph
like?
D
Why
is
some
graph
not
working
blah
blah
blah
right,
and
that
was
like
one
of
the
main
motivations
for
working
on
dx
vote
so
like
this
kind
of,
is
the
backdrop
for
what
ross
was
explaining
right
like
so
dx
vote
is
an
alternative
to
alchemy.
We
want
eventually
for
it
to
be
a
successor
to
alchemy
right,
but
like
one
of
the
things
that
is
interesting
about
dxvote
is
that
it
doesn't
actually
rely
on
the
subgraph.
D
Like
on
ipfs,
it's
like
developed
by
dxtel
contributors,
so
just
like
more
control
here,
right
like
and
hopefully,
more
reliability.
Of
course,
there's
like
a
local
cache.
We've
seen
some
usability
kind
of
setbacks
or
like
downsides
to
right.
Sometimes
it
can
take
a
few
minutes
to
load.
So
you
know
I
mean
just
keep
that
in
mind.
D
We
like
it
when
people
are
using
dxvote
and
can
give
feedback
to
the
developers
and
everything,
but
you
shouldn't
feel
bad
if,
like
it's
taking
a
long
time
to
load-
and
you
want
to
go
use
alchemy
right,
because
you
know
as
long
as
you're
like
trying
to
keep
up
with
the
explode
and
giving
it
a
chance
like
its
purpose.
Right
now
is
really
like
as
a
more
stable
alternative.
D
It's
not
really
at
this
stage,
as
ross
pointed
out
to
like
replace,
alchemy,
but
that's
coming
in
in
the
future,
but
dx
gov
team
has
a
lot
of
responsibilities,
including
guilds,
which
has
been
their
main
focus,
which
we
talked
a
bit
about
with
the
audit
earlier
right.
So,
okay,
so
now
we
have
alchemy.
We
have
dx
vote.
So
good
news
is
over
this
weekend
when
subgraph
was
not
syncing,
I
could
just
go
to
dx
vote.
I
could
see
the
proposals.
D
It's
it's
all
good
right,
but,
as
chris
pointed
out,
sometimes
dick's
vote
has
issues
even
right,
and
you
know,
god
forbid.
What
happens
if,
like
alchemy
and
dx
vote
are
down
right
or
how
do
we
even
like
screen
to
make
sure
that
you
know
somebody
isn't
exploiting
a
problem
with
the
ui
to
sneak
a
proposal
through,
and
this
like
gets
into
this
concept
of
of
monitoring,
but
to
understand
that
and
how
we
can
do
that
better.
Let's
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
genesis
protocol,
which
is
this.
D
I
think
we
call
it
the
voting
machine
right
ross
used
to
feel
free
to
jump
in
guys
if
you
have
anything
to
add
or
that
I'm
missing
here,
but
the
genesis
protocol
is
like
kind
of
what
handles
all
of
the
voting
for
our
schemes,
and
this
is
like
a
dow
stack
contract
right.
So
there's
actually
two
active
genesis
protocols
that
interact
with
different
schemes
on
mainnet
this
one
here
that
I
have
showing
is
the
one
that
con.
That
is
used
by
the
contribution,
reward
and
other
like
significant
schemes
on
mainnet.
D
So
so
now,
if
we
go
back
and
we
look
at
the
funding
and
voting
power
right,
we
have
three
boosted
proposals
here
on
the
screen
and
say
I
want
to
just
like
double
check
that
the
ui
is
doing
what
it's
supposed
to
be
doing.
I
can
go
into
a
proposal.
I
have
to
grab
the
proposal
id.
I
go
back
to
the
genesis
protocol
and
then
you
see
this
org
boosted
proposals
count.
D
This
could
tell
me
the
number
of
boosted
proposals
currently
which
I
could
match
against
the
ui
and
like
get
get
some
confidence
that
there
isn't
an
issue
with
the
ui.
But
what
is
org
here?
It's
it's
not
actually
the
proposal
id
and
it's
not
the
dow
address
it's
actually
something
related
to
the
scheme
and
to
get
the
proposal
organization.
I
have
to
go
up
here,
put
a
proposal
id
from
that
scheme
in
there.
So
this
is
the
contribution
where
I
take
that
organ
d.
I
put
it
into
this,
and
it
tells
me
three.
D
So
everything
is
looking
good
here
right,
because
we
have
three
proposals
boosted
on
alchemy
and
the
you
know,
ether
scan
is
also
telling
me
three,
so
I
feel
pretty
good
that
this
is
showing
the
right
stuff
you'll
notice
that
this
one's
actually
closed,
but
it's
not
executed
and
x.
So
some
people
may
be
familiar
with
this
idea,
like
a
state
machine.
Basically,
like
proposals
always
have
a
different
state,
and
when
you
execute
a
proposal,
it's
actually
like
checking
for
its
state
and
like
updating
it
if
needed.
D
So
if
a
proposal
is
like
voting
is
done
and
you
execute
it,
then
it
will
like
do
whatever
it's
supposed
to
do
and
then
like
take
it
out
of
like
the
boosted
proposal
account
and
so
here
on
the
genesis
protocol.
If
you
go
to
the
right
tab,
you
can
actually
see
all
of
the
voting
actions.
So
so,
not
only
can
we
like
screen
to
make
sure
that
the
ui
is
working
appropriately.
D
If
the
uis
were
ever
down,
you
could
actually
come
to
ether
scan
or
you
know,
block
scout
for
gnosis
chain
and
take
the
actions
that
you
need
to
do
to
like
interact
with
proposals.
Like
you
can
vote
here.
Skye
was
saying
you
know,
dx
vote,
one
of
the
nice
things
you
could
do.
Is
you
actually
set
the
amount?
You
could
actually
do
that
here
in
etherscan
as
well,
but
yeah?
This
is
a
little
tricky
you
have
to
like
put
in.
You
have
to
connect
an
ether
scan.
D
D
That
kind
of
thing,
in
addition
to
just
looking
at
ether
scan-
and
we
want
to
make
this
like
a
more
robust
system
that
actually
like
scales
with
the
dial
right,
like
it's
not
really
great-
that
there's
only
a
couple
of
us
doing
this
monitoring,
and
so
we
want
to
expand
this
into
a
more
reliable,
like
system,
that's
transparent,
that
has
contributors
participating
kind
of
equally
across
the
board,
and
so
our
next
step
is
to
kind
of
form
like
a
small
team.
We'll
probably
you
know
draft
a
couple.
D
C
D
Yes,
let
me
share
again
here
so
go
to
alchemy,
because
they
have
this
like
overall
view
of
the
plugins
and
like
what's
happening
within
each
one
right
so
yeah.
Actually
all
of
these
are
important
to
varying
degrees,
and
so
you
know
with
monitoring.
I
think
we
actually
have
to
be
mindful
of
all
of
them.
I
don't
want
to
get
ahead.
I
think
one
of
the
next
topics
is
actually
about
team,
registering
ones
that
we
don't
need.
D
D
Oh,
what
happened
there
blockchain
disappeared.
Somebody
must
have
called
to
execute
so
yeah.
The
funding
and
voting
power
is
probably
like
the
most
powerful
in
a
way
because
it's
like
access
is
the
treasury
mints
rep,
but
the
multi-calls
are
also
important.
Plug-In
is
also
very
powerful
because
they
can
register
new
schemes.
So
it's
like
equally
as
dangerous
as
the
funding
and
voting
power.
D
It's
powerful,
but
yeah.
The
multi-call
ones
are
also
pretty
powerful
and
the
ens
is
operationally,
like
you
said,
pretty
important,
like
it's
ups,
updating
the
domains
and
you
could
potentially
cause
a
lot
of
trouble.
If
you
know
something
malicious
came
through
here
and
like
set
swapper.edu
like
a
scam,
build
right
that
was
stealing
people's
money
like
we
saw
a
dns
attack
on
honey
swap
like
yeah,
I
mean
similarly
like
the
dow
governance
is
getting
the
product
here
right.
So
it's
it's
the
dow's
responsibility
to
make
sure
something
like
that
does
not
happen
as
well.
D
D
Yeah,
that's
right,
there's
there's
actually
a
few
bots
like
yeah.
I
didn't
want
to
go
too
deep
in
this,
but
there's
a
few
bots
that
people
have
written
for
monitoring.
Yeah
monitoring
has
been
like
it's.
A
very
serious
thing
like
I
said,
like
this
existential
threat
and
monitoring
is
like
one
of
the
things
that
has
been
done
to
kind
of
counter
that
and
like
protect
against
that.
D
We
should
probably
talk
more
about
that.
But
there's
like
a
dow
stack
monitoring
bot
that
operates
on
telegram.
There's,
like
you
know,
one
that
nico
had
written
that
was
operating
on
key
base
that
isn't
currently
active
anymore
and
there's
also
like
one
that
gusto
had
written
that
people
can
kind
of
pull
off
github
and
then
dave
also
has
some
stuff
that
he
has
written
but
yeah.
We
can
talk
more
about
this
in
the
future.
D
E
E
E
B
E
D
E
D
Yeah
I
mean
it
might
be
nice
to
even
like
get
email
like
you
know.
Some
people
may
want
to
sign
up
for
like
an
emailing
service.
That
would
probably
be
pretty
centralized
at
this
point,
but
to
get
notified
of
when
proposals
are
coming
through
or
when
you
should
be
voting
or
like
how
your
proposal
that
you
made
is
doing
like
these
kinds
of
things,
I
think,
could
be
pretty
useful.
A
Yeah
the
email-
I
think
about
that
one
just
mindful
of
time
a
lot
to
keep
chatting
about
this,
but
did
want
to
talk
briefly
about
related
something
that
happened
related
as
we
were
going
through
this
process.
It
was
really
looking
at
our
own
old
schemes
and
all
the
things
that
interact
with
the
mainnet
avatar.
So
augusto
you
made
a
post
yesterday
in
dow
talk.
A
F
F
We
want
to
remove
them,
because
I
mean
if
they
are
there,
you
can
still
use
it
right
and
we
don't
need
to
use
it,
and
some
of
them
have
access
to
funds
that
we
don't
want.
You
know,
because
this
is
attack
vector
right.
You
don't
want
to
have
a
scheme
that
that
you
don't
care
about
that,
can
access
the
funds
so
yeah
I
mean
I
think
the
proposal
is
is
very
simple.
We
just
want
to
remove.
We
just
want
to
remove
the
schemes
that
yeah
spring
schemes
springs
cleaning
schemes.
A
A
Then
we
have
the
contribution
reward
scheme.
This
is
the
one
that
most
people
use
when
you're
just
submitting
a
simple
payment
proposal,
they
can
also
emit
ref,
you
can
rep
and
it
can,
you
know,
transfer
any
proposal
out
transfer
any
funds
out
of
the
treasury.
So
this
is
the
most
widely
used,
and
then
we
have
three
multi-calls
that
have
a
couple
different
functions.
A
Primarily
the
multi-call
3
is
used,
but
the
multi-call,
1
and
3,
as
you
can
see
here,
can
only
interact
with
certain
contracts,
and
so
these
are
like
the
dx
swap
relayer
the
gp
relayer,
the
bonding
curve,
some
of
the
e
s
and
this
multi
one
is
actually
can
call
any
contract,
but
it
has
a
14-day
boosted
period,
which
is
kind
of
to
really
increase
the
security
on
that.
So
those
are
the
ones
we
really
use
on.
A
day-to-day
basis,
I'm
actually
also
seeing
one
here
gusto.
A
A
But
some
of
these,
like
I
mean
the
token
registry,
we're
not
really
using
this
anymore
and
as
he
says,
we
can
call
this
by
multi-call
and
yeah
the
dutch
x
scheme,
not
using
anymore.
That
was
obviously
one
of
the
first
ones
installed
on
geeksdown
or
demand.
Is
the
dutch
x
exchange
not
using
that
anymore
and
then
on
gnosis
chain
kind
of
the
same
thing
here,
of
course,
the
scheme
registrar
and
then
the
two
schemes
that
we
use
there
are
the
contribution
reward.
This
is
the
one
again
that
everyone
uses.
A
They
really
payment
proposal
and
then
the
multi-call
one,
which
is
used
for
buyback
proposals,
swapper
liquidity,
provisioning,
stablecoin
trades
and
the
farming
campaigns.
And
then
these
are
all
the
ones
to
kind
of
get
rid
of
here.
The
dow
deployer
schemes
and
the
dow
deployer
two
schemes.
I
guess
the
competition
scheme
has
been
used
in
the
past,
but
I
don't
think
it's
been
used
for
a
while.
A
Awesome
and
then
mindful
of
time,
I
just
wanted
to
make
kind
of
a
couple
different,
quick
points
here.
First,
I
made
a
post
in
the
forum
just
talking
a
little
about
the
the
management
and
organization,
mostly
because
now
I
I
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
the
forum
and
reading
things
and
it
is
getting
a
little
cluttered
just
because
I
think
we
have
more
and
more
activity
and
really
it's
a
lot
of
the
worker
proposals.
A
So
I'm
gonna
try
to
do
a
better
job
of
tagging.
These
and
keeping
it
a
little
bit
clean
and
you
can
kind
of
see
like
the
three
different
ta
like
the
three
different
ways
to
look
at
it
going
forward
you
can
have.
This
is
probably
the
traditional
way
that
everyone
has
looked
at
it,
which
is
just
looking
at
deep
stout
everything
in
the
d
style
category
and
everything
kind
of
comes
that
way.
A
Alternatively,
if
you
only
want
to
look
at
worker
proposals,
you
can
do
that
here.
So
these
are
all
the
different
worker
proposals
and
then
I
came
up
with
this
tag
myself.
Maybe
dave
could
come
up
with
a
better
one,
but
nwp
stands
for
not
worker
proposal
and
you
guessed
it.
These
are
not
worker
proposals
which
I
mean
you
know.
Worker
pros
are
interesting,
but
this
tends
to
be
like
some
of
the
more
interesting
discussions
here
right.
So
I
mean
you
know
the
dx
gov,
this
swap
robotrom.
A
A
lot
of
these
are
like
interesting
things
to
look
at
and
so
yeah.
I'm
gonna
try
to
keep
that,
and
maybe,
if
you
can
try
to
tag
your
proposals,
if
it's
a
worker
proposal
with
the
worker
proposal,
people
are
doing
proposal
worker,
which
is
fine,
but
I
think
separate
went
out
to
work
a
proposal
and
then
yeah
and
then
also
if
it's
not
order
proposal
just
do
nwp.
A
I
do
now
have
admin
status
and
it's
pretty
pretty
easy
to
actually
go
through
and
add
these.
So
I
can
do
that
if
you
miss
it,
but
of
course
it
makes
my
life
a
lot
easier.
If
you
do
that,
but
anyway,
I
think
this
is
also
something
we
should
start
thinking
about
a
little
bit
more.
We
talked,
and
I
think,
there's
like
a
whole.
You
know
how
do
we
build
the
tech
stack
of
a
decentralized
forum?
It's
just
a
huge
problem.
A
You
know
that
we
can
kind
of
tackle
on
the
product
side,
but
I
think
there
is
something
about
like
what
is
the:
how
does
the
forum
function
in
terms
of
organization
in
terms
of
people
going
there
in
terms
of
things?
People
posting
things
there,
like?
I
don't
know,
for
instance,
just
thinking
of
some
of
these
posts
that
are
like
also
worth
checking
out
like
these
are
really
great
things
that
are
like
different
discussions
and
maybe
should
be
a
little
bit
more
categorized.
A
We
maybe
we
should
think
about
how
to
do
that
and
there's
even
one
I
didn't
have
on
here,
which
is
from
nathan,
which
is
about
like
provisioning
liquidity
on
swapper.
I
think
like
a
guide
there
so
anyway,
if
you
have
any
other
thoughts
on
the
on
the
forum
manager
organization,
not
just
this,
but
anything
suggestions
feel
free
to
leave
it
on
this
post
here
and
then.
A
This,
I
think
it
takes
in
the
form
of
maybe
like
a
working
group,
something
that
we
did
for
governance
2.0.
It
was
like
a
problem.
We
said:
okay,
we're
going
to
have
we're
going
to
set
aside
time
out
of
our
normal
calls
out
of
our
normal
kind
of
like
governance
structure.
There
are
normal
decision
making
things
to
try
to
engage
and
come
to
a
solution.
For
that.
I
think
a
key
part
of
that
and
I
think,
a
key
reason.
A
Actually,
the
governance
2.0
working
group
was,
like
I
thought
worked
out
in
the
end-
was
because
we
had
outside
people
giving
input
and
ideas,
and
some
of
it
wasn't
used,
but
just
like
having
those
different
ideas
involved
in
the
process,
I
think
would
be
really
important.
So,
as
we
think
of
like
doing
this
dc
token
working
group,
which
we're
gonna
we'll
start
with
a
post
about
it
and
kind
of
give
some
discussion
on
how
that
will
work.
But
it
would
be
really
helpful
if
anyone
had
any
ideas
from
other
people.
A
You
know
in
other
communities
that
want
to
contribute
or
would
want
to
sit
on
a
call
every
two,
two
or
three
weeks,
or
something
and
kind
of
give
input.
It's
kind
of
a
fun
idea.
So
yeah,
if
you
know
of
anyone,
maybe
even
some
influencers
yeah
try
to
try
to
get
them
involved
I'll,
be
working
on
a
post
about
this
in
the
next
week
or
so.
A
Yeah
and
then,
as
I
said,
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
in
the
forum.
There's
a
swapper,
arbitrary,
gnosis
chain,
final
admissions
funding
proposal
from
kenan
there's
a
call
for
payment
facilitation,
service
providers
from
dave
and
then
yeah,
there's
some
deep
sea
tracking,
22,
22
updates
from
ali
and
also
a
mainnet
rep
sync
guide
from
alley
there.
So
lots
of
things
in
the
forum.
If
you're
interested,
please
check
them
out.