►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2023-03-29]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
That's
a
different
one
yeah.
So
as
always
proposal,
Roundup
discussion
items
and
also
worth
checking
out
but
I
think
yeah.
There's
a
lot
of
folks
here
to
be
chatting
about
a
couple
things
in
particular,
so
we'll
get
to
that
yeah.
So
I
guess
just
looking
over
the
current
live
proposals
here
on
Alchemy
we
have
the
operations
Guild,
H1
2023,
onboarding,
the
funding
proposal.
We
had
discussed
this
last
week
and.
A
It
was
actually
then
a
couple
votes.
Last
night
you
can
see
here
that
moved
it
into
the
negative
or
failing
one
and
as
with
the
governance
system,
that
means
it
restarts
the
clock
for
The
Quiet
ending
period,
so
that
was
two
days
ago.
So
this
proposal
will
extend
or
is
open
voting
for
another
one
day
and
nine
hours
here.
A
Cool
and
then
we
have
dlabs
DxD
vesting
for
April
I
haven't
done
the
math
actually
I
think
maybe
it
will
be
done
here
in
terms
of
DX
vote
for
April.
One
actually
must
be
hopefully
UTC
time
there,
but
Dave
running
up
right
to
the
hour
here
in
terms
of
the
the
vesting
there
so
that
that's
set
to
pass
in
one
day
19
hours,
and
then
we
have
a
rep
claim
from
I
believe
this
is
Adam
here
as
well.
A
So
these
are
all
things
that
were
earned
on
or
all
approved
on,
gnosis
chain
thing
is
is
20.
Is
this
spot
language
I
thought
that
that
was
like
some
some
date
or
something
but
anyway,
so
this
is
Adams
there
and
it
also
I.
Think
as
it
concludes,
here
includes
8
000
rep
from
the
January
and
February
2023
worker
period
yeah,
and
then
we
have
a
vanky
rep
claim
as
well
for
these.
So
this
is
the
last
year,
but
then
also
for
January,
February
and
March
as
well.
A
Cool
and
then
we
have
the
yeah
I,
guess
just
to
point
out
this
one
that
is
boosting
here:
Robert
txt,
Redemption
balance
number
one.
This
is
a
pretty
big
one.
We
can
talk
about
this
if
we
want
to,
but
I
think
there's
been
some
discussion
in
Discord
on
on
this
one.
So
this
is
a
pretty
big
one.
It
is
the
right
calculations
if
anyone
is
going-
and
this
has
just
been
boosted
12
hours
ago-
so
that
will
have
another.
A
Cool
and
then
I
guess
maybe
the
the
main
event.
This
proposal
that
was
submitted
on.
C
A
From
an
address
does
not
have
any
rep
in
it,
but
this
was
submitted
on
Monday
after
some
discussion
over
the
weekend
in
the
Forum.
It
was
staked
on
on
Monday
afternoon
and
or
this
is
U.S
time
Monday
afternoon
and
there's
been
some
additional
discussion-
candy
Fork
to
downstake
it
on
Tuesday,
and
then
it
has
been
Upstate
on
Tuesday
afterwards
and
now
has
been
boosting
I
guess
for
yeah
about
20
hours
here
yeah,
so
there's
already
been
six
votes
on
them.
A
Candy
Fork
has
already
voted
against
him
and
going
to
the
kind
of
reasons,
maybe
for
that
but
I
guess,
because
this
is
the
the
call
that
maybe
the
the
person
could
join
jitsi
but
I
don't
know
if
either
the
submitter
of
this
proposal
or
anyone
else
wants
to
kind
of
set
the
set.
The
stage
here
for
what
this
proposal
specifically
calls
for.
A
Okay,
I
guess
no
kill
switch
so
I
guess
then
there
is
10.57
rep
that
has
voted
for
and
so
yeah
there's.
A
couple
addresses
here:
I
think
this
is
Geronimo.
This
is
Dave
and
yeah.
Some
other
dresses
here
that
have
long-standing
reputation
from
before
worker
proposals
for
Geek
style.
So
I
don't
know.
If
maybe
they
wanted
to
set
the
stage
or
someone
wants
to
advocate
for
this
proposal.
B
C
A
And
that's
fine
yeah,
so
I'm
not
going
to
read.
The
text
of
this
proposal
includes
discontinuing
DxD
redemptions
discontinuing
DxD
issuance
discontinuing
rep
issuance,
accelerate
vesting
DxD,
implementing
a
fixed
DxD
claim
process
against
80
of
the
treasury,
excluding
DxD
swapper
ens
and
are
Distributing
eight
percent
of
the
treasury,
excluding
DxD
swapper,
ens
and
ARB
to
rep
holders
that
would
have
received
the
8000
dxt
under
the
governance
2.0
proposal,
Distributing
ens
tokens.
Didn't
you
meet
treasury
Distributing,
swapper
tokens
to
swapper
treasury
Distributing.
D
A
Tokens
to
swap
our
treasury
Distributing,
six
percent
of
Treasury,
excluding
DxD,
swapper,
ens
and
arm
to
swapper
treasury
Distributing,
six
percent
of
Treasury,
excluding
DxD,
swapper,
ens
and
ARB
to
carrot
treasury,
so
I
think
those
are
the
bullet
points
there
and
then
there
is
maybe
some
explanation
and
justification
of
that.
But
I
think
that's
kind
of
it's
not
too
long
of
a
proposal.
So.
B
Yeah
so
I
I
think
that
looks
pretty
clear
to
me
and
there's
a
few
reasons.
I
I,
like
this
proposal
and
I'll
just
start
I
think
by
talking
about
the
problems
that
I
see
that
I
think
need
to
be
generally
addressed.
I
think
the
first
is
the
fact
that
this
DxD
Redemption
program
that's
been
implemented
like
spirals
out
of
control
and
then
leaves
the
treasury
with.
You
know
much
less
than
30
percent
of
where
it
started.
I
think
that's
just
an
unsustainable
system.
B
I
think
also,
you
know,
there's
been
several
restructuring
efforts,
but
they
don't
seem
to
have
brought
spending
under
control
like
I
still
think.
Just
fundamentally
DXL
lacks
the
ability
to
do
something
as
simple
as
layoffs
and
I
think
that
gives
rise
to
a.
E
B
Problem
which
is
a
lack
of
kind
of
motivation
and
kind
of
like
morale
being
low
and
I
kind
of
get
that
impression
from
talking
to
several
contributors
that
people
feel
like
kind
of
motivation
is
gone.
You
know
people
look
over
their
shoulders,
other
people
maybe
aren't
working
hard
or
they
just
don't
feel
aligned
and
so
I
like
this
proposal,
because
I
think
it
actually
addresses
all
of
those
problems.
So
that's
why
I
when
I
you.
F
B
G
Have
a
drop
in
yeah,
yeah,
hola
John
nice
to
have
you
here
something
that
well
I,
think
the
proposal
brings
quality
concerns
and
very,
very,
very
valid
concerns.
I
think
it
is
a
very
harsh
how
it
was
submitted
and
and
Lead,
because
we
are
seeing
here.
We
are
seeing
here
a
lot
of
actions
that
are
proposed
to
be
implemented,
and
this
is
first
of
all.
This
is
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time
and
Technical
capability
to
to
implement
this
I.
Think
if
we
want
to.
G
If
we
want
to
go
this
way,
it
might
be
able
to
analyze,
maybe
split
this
in
different
ETMC.
We
really
want
to
execute
all
these
actions
or,
if
we
want
to
add
new
ones.
For
example,
what
happens
to
the
other
commentary
to
the
other
squats
like
that
they
have
a
working
product,
for
example,
dscope
and
Davi.
So
it
is
clear
here
that
it's
going
to
be
left
out,
but
maybe
there
is
we,
it
courts
having
a
discussion
where
layoff
during
the
chat
yeah
some
people
making
fun.
G
We
are
taking
this
seriously
Adam.
Maybe
it's
I
think
again.
This
proposal
again
bring
balance
concerns,
but
if
we
want
to
go
this
road,
it
will
be
great
to
take
the
take
this
as
a
start
of
the
discussion
of
if
we
wanna
really
execute
it,
how
it's
been
to
execute
and
if
this
going
to
be
there,
the
final
terms
of
the
Exile
termination
I
bought
it
against
this
proposal,
just
because
of
the
resource.
G
G
Regarding
the
DXE
spiral
of
death,
that
that
is
being
that
is
being
presented,
I
know
that
there
is
a
lot
of
concerts
here.
So
maybe
this
is
something
that
can
also
be
addressed.
I
mean
it
should
also,
it
should
be
addressed
if
we
want
to
continue
DXL,
so
I
know
Chris,
you
also
body
against
this
proposal.
What
are
your
concerns
about?
G
B
A
Cool
yeah
I
mean
I,
guess,
I
did
I,
think
Gusto
and
I
are
the
only
votes
for
or
against
this,
so
maybe
I
can
go
next.
I
did
write
something
up
when
I
did
vote
and
kind
of
explain
yes,
because
I.
F
H
A
Kind
of
John's
concerns
and
the
different
kind
of
questions
that
have
emerged
both
in
the
the
Discord
and
and
elsewhere.
Yeah
I
think
it's
an
interesting
conversation
in
terms
of
of
where
things
are
at
and
I
take
a
lot
of
the
the
input
on
that.
A
It's
this
proposal
is
in
front
of
us
here,
and
this
proposal,
and
like
kind
of
the
specifics
of
it,
are
I
think
what
we're
really
focusing
on
debating
and
I
understand.
This
proposal
is
meant
to
address
like
all
of
those
problems
and
issues
that
we've
been
been
talking
about
and
I
think
those
are
important
to
address.
But
in
terms
of
like
the
specifics
of
this
proposal,
the
things
I
guess
I
kind
of
disagree
with
here.
A
You
know,
as
a
rep
holder
I,
just
think
it's
a
very
uneven
distribution
of
dhstyle's
resources
right
so
I
think,
as
as
a
Gusto
said,
this
is
a
proposal
to
dissolve
the
Excel
and
first
of
its
assets,
and
so,
if
that
is
the
method
going
forward,
then
the
distribution
and
how
that
goes
about
is
very,
very
important
and
I.
A
Think
this
proposal
just
does
not
do
a
good
job
of
Distributing
that,
because
it
just
it
leaves
out,
you
know,
geeked
out
right
now
as
three
functioning
products
swap
or
carrot
and
and
Davi,
and
it
just
leaves
out
one
of
them
completely
without
really
a
justification
for
a
while.
So
if
we
want
to
go
through
this
route
in
terms
of
enabling
the
products
giving
them
more
autonomy,
all
of
that
kind
of
driven
from
there
I
think
that's
fine.
A
It
just
seems
like
pretty
clear
that
the
three
products
should
be
treated
there
and
maybe
there's
a
difference
of
those,
but
some
discussion
around
those
rather
than
what's
in
here.
Similarly
I,
don't
really
understand
the
justification
for
paying
the
rep
holders
from
the
I
guess
would
have
been
September.
2021
snapshot
for
rep,
so
Kenny
Fork
was
was
a
reputation
holder
there
so
would
presumably
get
some
get
some
of
the
DxD
from
that.
But
the
point
of
that
allocation
was
to
deliver
on
governance,
2.0
and
so
I
know.
A
There's
been
you
know,
governance
2.0
is
this
like
I,
don't
know
white
whale,
if
that's
the
right
metaphor,
but
is
this
this
this
thing
that
of
course,
we've
chased
for
a
while
have
not
delivered
and
so
I
I?
A
Don't
really
understand
that
Distributing
to
that
portion
specifically
because
because
of
that,
because
that
was
contingent
on
that
and
then
as
a
DxD
holder,
you
know,
as
I
said
here:
candy
Fork
has
about
350
liquid
DHD,
in
addition
to
whatever
is
getting
in
addition
to
vesting,
which
is
about
200
there.
A
So
I'm,
you
know
looking
after
candy
Forks
financial
interest
here
and
obviously
like
I
think
there's
a
reason
that
candy
Fork
has
a
lot
of
DxD,
because
I
think
that
is
something
that
I
I
believe
very
strongly
in
and
I
believe
it
has
strong
value
and
that
is
partially
because
of
the
treasury
back
I
mean
how
we
do
that,
but
really
what
I
think
the
DxD
model-
and
this
was
what's
kind
of
coming
out
of
the
the
token
model-
was
being
able
to
have
a
an
on-chain
crypto
treasury
right,
something
that
is
governed
on
chain
that
is
simultaneously
incubating
and
taking
bets
on
projects
in
the
space
right,
and
so
it's
funding
them.
A
It's
incubating
them,
it's
developing
them.
Obviously
this
is
one
we've
done
with.
You
know,
swapper
care
and
with
Dobby.
Now,
obviously,
there's
been
Omen
in
the
past.
That
we've
also
done
this
with
so
this
is,
you
know
this
idea
of
an
on-chin
Treasury,
and
then
you
get
the
upside
potential
of
the
products
right
that
to
me
was
the
DxD
cell
and
this
proposal
just
doesn't
really
it
just
forfeits.
All
of
those.
You
know
things
I
think
Mimi
specifically
like
you
know.
A
That
was
a
proposal
that
passed
in
August
to
give
nimi
10
100
000
from
the
treasury
plus
six
months
of
40
for
I,
think
it
was
four
or
five
contributors,
so
that
turned
out
to
be
about
75
000
dollars,
so
about
175
000
was
invested
into
nimi
and
and
this
proposal,
like
so
DHD
holders
right
in
in
terms
of
funding
that
dxt
holders
funded
the
treasury.
So
therefore
they
funded
the
you
know
the
the
invest,
the
investment
Grant
to
to
nimi.
A
That
is
just
kind
of
evaporated
in
this
and
there's
no
really
kind
of
precursor.
For
that,
the
same
for
swapper
itself,
like
DxD
holders,
we're
we're
integral
to
that,
but
instead
all
the
like
they
don't
get
any
kind
of
say
in
terms
of
how
swapper
is
distributed.
The
ones
in
the
Treasure
just
kind
of
all
goes
there.
A
So
I
think
that
thinking
about
how
that
plays
out,
I
think
is,
is
really
important
and
yeah
just
to
kind
of
reiterate
what
Augusto
had
said
right
that
this
is
I
guess
so
I
think
it
was
posted
on
Thursday
was
the
initial
discussion,
and
then
there
was
kind
of
some
on
the
Forum,
and
so
it's
been
almost
a
week
of
this
right,
and
if
this
is
where
the
Dow
wants
to
head
like,
if
there's
consensus
in
terms
of
the
dissolution
of
of
Deeks
doubt,
then
there
should
be
serious
thought
and
consideration
into
the
terms
of
that
dissolution,
and
this
proposal
does
not
do
that
at
all
right,
and
this
proposal
is
what
we're
kind
of
voting
on
right
now.
A
So
I
think
voting
on
this
now
without
kind
of
fixing
these
problems
or
having
this
kind
of
conversation
doesn't
make
a
lot
a
lot
of
sense
there.
So
that's
why
candy
Fork
voted
knowing
this
proposal
and
that's
why
yeah
I
think
we
can
take
this
as
signal
in
an
important
conversation
about
how
things
need
to
get
changed
or
things
need
to
get
upended
or
about
this
proposal
and
dissolution.
But
to
me
this
proposal
is
not
the
answer.
D
Yeah
I
mean
I
voted
for
it.
I
I
I,
explained
myself
in
the
Forum
I
think
I
think
like
right
now,
if
you
look
at
it
right
now,
if
you
want
to
keep
the
six
percent
spending
on
products
based
on
Treasury
nav
in
July,
probably
like
a
third
of
the
workforce,
has
to
be
cut
and
even
more
if
more
redemptions
go
through
in
that
time.
Right
and
even
if
you
talk
about
incubating
other
products,
where
does
that
money
come
from?
You
know?
D
D
You
know
and
I
don't
think
people
will
necessarily
vote
to
not
pass
their
own
budget,
so
I
think
it'll
be
pretty
much
of
a
bloodbath
when
those
proposals
do
go,
live
and
people
try
to
download
different,
builds
and
so
I
think
this
proposal
is
actually
much
fairer
because
here
it's
kind
of
like
yeah.
It's
shutting
down
everything,
but
everyone
gets
to
vest
their
dxt
immediately,
which,
if
you
get
fired
in
June,
good
luck,
that
DxD
has
any
value
in
three
years.
D
You
know
like
I'm,
unfortunately,
with
the
current
system,
I
have
very
little
faith
in
that
you
know.
So,
if
you're
part
of
the
one-third
or
maybe
even
more
that's
out
in
June
or
July,
you,
you
you're
pretty
much.
You
know
this.
One
is
very
fair
because
it's
just
based
on
you
know
your
dxt
you've
got
pending
investing.
Everyone
gets
the
same
amount
based
on
what
they've
vested
like
everyone
gets
the
full
100
and,
of
course,
yeah
I
mean
for
me
personally.
Of
course,
I
have
a
lot
of
DxD.
D
That's
vesting
I'm,
actually
not
a
full-time
contributor,
anemia
anymore,
but
of
course,
I'm
still
involved
in
nimi,
so
I
would
have
a
big
upside.
Who
would
be
happy
for
the
nimi
team
to
receive
those
tokens
but
yeah
that's
pretty
much
my
thoughts
and
and
then
also
because
Ross
G
called
me
fat.
B
Not
exactly
professional
there,
but
I
I
also,
don't
think
it's
a
dissolution
of
dxt
for
sure,
but
it's
not
a
full
dissolution
of
the
doubt
because
of
the
funds
that
are
directed
at
the
products.
B
So
DxD
is,
you
know
getting
80
of
the
remaining
Treasury
and-
and
that's
like
the
market.
I
think
has
also
spoken
for
a
long
time
that
it
doesn't
really
value
the
products
at
anything
right,
because
THD
has
long
traded
well
below
the
net
asset
value
of
the
treasury,
which
is
sort
of
like
if
the
Market's
speaking
saying
that
it
expects
DX
down
to
waste
its
money
and
not
generate
upside
right.
So
I.
E
Mean
this
gives:
why
would
you
not
just
give
away
all
of
the
treasury
and
let
each
product
stand
on
its
own
to
raise
its
own
money
instead
of
giving,
instead
of
getting
12
away
to
two
projects
that
whoever
whoever
this
kill
switch
is
and
clearly,
you
agree
with
this,
and
the
other
guys
agree
with
this-
that
these
two
projects
are
worthy
of
getting
12
of
the
treasury.
These
other
projects
aren't
yeah.
Look
all
these
projects
have
been
wrong
and
failed
to
get
traction
for
the
same
amount
of
time
like
why?
How
do
we
get
to?
E
Why
do
we
get
to
play
big
this
and
those
projects
don't
get
this?
If
they
can
all
raise
money
and
people
don't
believe
in
them,
it's
fully
or
equally
supported,
they
all
need
to
spin
out.
They
all
need
to
spin
out,
but
this
is
just
like
hypocritical
and
totally
nonsensical
as
to
why
one
deserves
this
money,
and
the
other
doesn't
deserve
this
money
and
there's
no
argument
for
why
or
what
makes
one
reason
better
than
another.
G
Yeah,
maybe
this
one
bro,
the
easiest
seemed
like
the.
We
have
three
projects
right
where
we
have
to
tabi.
G
Swapper
and
carrot
here,
we
are
taking
two
in
count
and
there
are
some
things
like
the
eight
percent
of
DXE
Distribution
on
a
snapshot
on
Governor
2.0.
So
there
are
some
changes
that
can
be
done
to
split
to
give
each
project
the
same
right,
an
equal
amount
and
have
equal
exit
opportunities
right
of
of
the
Exile.
That
might
be
the
first
one.
That
is
what
is
what
I'm
hearing
and
what
address.
G
If
something
like
this,
if
a
proposal
closing
it
out
will
will
happen,
I
think
that
will
be
the
first
one
because
we
are
living
one
outside
and
yeah
I
think
that
would
be
the
the
fair
the
first
option.
If
we
want
to
execute
and
closure
like
like
this
like
so
like,
like
Chris
mentioned,
these
robots
I
think
needs
a
bit
more
discussion.
I
know
every
time
someone
said
I
say:
oh
now
we
are
going
again
on
the
dxr
bureaucracy
and
we
talk,
we
talk,
we
talk
and
we
get
nothing
done.
G
The
idea
would
be
to
change
a
bit.
This
proportion,
maybe
to
create
an
amendment
or
something
that
that
can
be
proposed,
where
we
can
find
more
amicable
and
equal
terms
for
everyone
involving
DXL.
If
this
is
if
this
is
going
to
happen,
this
is
what
I
meant
I,
don't
I
don't
want
to
delay
it
on
put
rocks
on
the
way
my
chance
saying
like.
G
Maybe
we
should
I
think
we
should
put
a
lot
more
thought
into
it.
It
is
being
quite
clear
that
maybe
this
is
the
the
direction
that
the
community
wanna
take,
which
it
is
sad
for
me,
but
if
it
is
the
direction
that
we
really
want
to
take
well,
Banky
was
very,
very
experi.
I
think
that
was
it
for
me
was
a
turning
point
on
the
discussion
when
I
saw
that
all
with
and
with
entire
respect
right.
G
G
So
the
squad
I
belong,
which
is
dscope
and
and
operations
and
I,
can
speak
for
the
for
the
rest
of
the
x-scope.
We
just
had
a.
We
just
had
a
call
where
people
contributors
are
motivated.
They
still
want
to
continue
working
on
the
on
the
product
if,
if
DXL
ends
and
I
think
it
will
be,
it
would
be
very
good
if
we
can
find
equal
channel
for
every
product
in
DXL
that
have
that.
Having
have
been
created
here
in
in
this
organization
since
the
beginning.
B
B
What
has
happened
with
the
x-style
is
that
it's
sort
of
become
this
bureaucratic
kind
of
like
stagnation.
That's
exactly
the
type
of
thing
that
I
hated
about!
You
know
previous
companies
that
I've
worked
for
and
what
was
my
original
motivation
for
even
working
on
governance
and
digs
down
in
the
first
place.
So
it's
like
really
painful
to
see
how
kind
of
bureaucratic
and
like
how
low
the
morale
is,
and
so
what
I
like
about
this
is.
It
does
send
money
to
the
products
that
are
live
and
have
users
and
I
mean
I.
B
Do
hear
the
arguments,
though,
that
you
know
why
not
takes
come
or
like
other
efforts,
I
mean
that
makes
sense
as
well.
A
I
think
Omen
is
still
like
I
like
I.
Don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
I
don't
know,
Omen
is,
like
still
has
I
think
a
lot
of
potential
when
the
world
eventually
figures
out
prediction
records.
B
Yeah
I
mean
omen's
old,
old
Tech
and
now
you've
got
a
zero
and
thales
and
some
other
efforts
coming
but
yeah.
It's.
A
Okay,
well,
we've
had
a
couple
different
thoughts
and
opinions.
They
all
happen
to
be
at
the
top
of
my
screen.
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
has
like
happened
with
everybody
else,
but
they're
the
people
at
the
top
of
my
screen.
I,
don't
know
if
other
people
in
the
call
have
anything
they'd
like
to
share
about
this
proposal.
B
F
I
It's
it's
of
me
I'm.
It's
listening
to
all
the
discussions,
I
kind
of
read
this
proposal,
and
just
so
that
everybody
knows
I'm
quite
happy
to
leave
the
Dow.
If
that's,
what
would
make
the
people
happy
in
terms
of
keeping
expenditure
low
when
I
joined
the
Dao
I
joined
it
because
of
what
you
John
and
Chris
and
Augusto
had
said
on
that
podcast,
where
you
basically
all
three
were
proponents
of
fairness
and
equality,
and
you
know
basically
like
this
measured
approach
to
getting
things
done
and
dealing
with
people
and
dealing
with
situations.
I
So
it's
interesting
to
me
that
this
proposal
is
not
measured
or
balanced,
so
I
mean
I.
Also,
like
I
said,
I'd
be
happy
to
leave,
but
there
was
never
every
any
kind
of
like
real.
Like
discussion
like
hey,
you
know
what
let's
break
up
the
Dow
or
father
you've
got
to
leave,
put
up
your
hand,
who'd
be
willing
to
I
mean
I.
I
I
would
think
that
whenever
major
decisions
have
to
be
made,
they
would
let's
say
you
could
put
this
proposal
in
the
discussion
forum
and
then
there
would
have
to
be
some
kind
of
discussion
like
we're.
Having
now
before,
there's
an
actual
vote
on
the
on
the
proposal,
because
I
was
saying
to
Dave
today
that
you
know
just
to
vote
yes
or
no
on
something
like
this.
I
It's
kind
of
difficult,
because
it's
not
really
completely
black
and
white
there's
so
many
issues
to
address
here
that
had
I
mean
how
do
you
vote
yes
and
no
on
on
a
proposal
that
it
has
got
like
one,
two,
three,
four,
five,
eleven
distinct
highly
important
points.
So
it's
it's
quite
a
difficult
thing
to
do
so.
I
I
would
just
like
to
know
how
it
is
that
it's
not
so
it
wears
like
the
where's
it
where's.
The
common
sense
is
kind
of
what
the
thing
that
I'm
missing
here:
I
understand
the
cutting
cost,
and
that's
why
I
say
I'll
put
up
my
hand
I
mean.
Obviously,
if
this
proposal
passes,
it
makes
no
difference
whether
I'm,
willing
to
leave
or-
or
you
know,
basically
saying
that
I
will,
but
even
if
it
doesn't
I'd
still
be
willing
to
put
to
pack
my
bags
and
leave.
If
that
means.
I
Basically,
you
know
things
continue
going
forward,
but
each
one
of
you
I
heard
Chris
and
you
guys
talking
even
you,
John
agreed
with
it
that
basically
saying
that
you
know
to
give
swapper
tokens
to
give
carrot
tokens
but
to
ignore
anemic
tokens,
but
to
ignore
DX
gov.
It's
it's
strange.
It
seems
personal
seems
personal
to
me
more
than
what
it
seems
as
a
drive
to
kind
of
save
the
doubt
or
save
DxD.
I
All
this
and
I
am
concerned
about
that
as
well,
because
I
obviously
have
DxD
that
hopefully
in
the
future,
is
worth
something
or
whenever
this
time
comes,
but
no
I'm
not
really.
Personally.
Attached
to
this
proposal,
I
I
do
like
working
for
the
Dow
I've
enjoyed
this
whole
experience,
but
I
don't
really
have
like
a
personal
opinion
in
terms
of
like
an
emotional
opinion
like
I,
don't
feel
like
somebody's
gone
and
attacked
me
because
you
know
this
thing
says
voice
people
need
to
be
fired,
I
mean
I've
worked
in
many
companies.
I
A
Thanks
Wayne,
others
I
think
this
is
a
pretty
the
most
popular
one
call
we've
had
in
definitely.
C
C
A
Keen
to
be
others
I'd
be
happy
to
read
something
I
wanted
I
thought
about,
calling
it
randomly,
but
I,
don't
know
if
that's
fair,
I'm
happy
to
read
things
in
the
chat
as
well.
B
B
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussions
around
that,
starting
from
like
summer
of
last
year,
through
you
know,
end
of
end
of
last
year,
and
so
like
it,
I
mean
personally
I've
been
disappointed
with,
like
the
lack
of
sort
of
outcomes
from
those
efforts,
so
I
mean
I
kind
of
get
the
sentiment
that
this
isn't
like
perfect
or
isn't
fair,
but
on
the
flip
side,
I'm
also
like
I,
would
like
kind
of
respond
with
something
that
I
think
I'm.
I'm
personally
frustrated
with
the
lack
of
you
know
like
functioning
of
the
Dow.
Basically.
D
A
I
Maybe
I'm,
maybe
like
saying
fair,
is
not
100,
correct,
I,
suppose
being
in
a
dow
you,
you
kind
of
look
for
this
fairness
the
whole
time,
but
I
would
also
think
that
it's
got
to
be
from
a
logical
perspective.
More
than
from
a
fairness
perspective,
I
mean
Davi
has
now
been
built
around.
Basically,
if
you
look
at,
if
you
look
at
what's,
Ross
was
proposed,
saying
that
Davi
can
do
so.
I
Davi
also
does
have
the
same
potential
as
let's
say:
swapper
carrot
or
or
nimidas
and
I've
also
seen
a
lot
of
the
work
that
Dirk
has
done
in
terms
of
preparing
for
going
to
Market,
as
in
terms
of
preparing
a
user
interface
for
a
product
that
could
basically
Steward
governance
into
other
into
other
areas
and
other
Downs
of
so
that
would
be.
I
I
can't
see
that
if,
if
this
is
based
on
logic,
then
it
should
be
that,
like
you
say,
yeah
split,
the
split
the
treasury
get
rid
of
the
Dead
weight
and
I
I'll
I,
put
myself
in
the
dead
weight
category,
so
I'm
not
advocating
for
my
job
here
we
can
even
say
I
will
even
say
on
this
call
that
I
will
leave
right.
So
that
way,
I'm
not
advocating
for
my
job
here.
I
But
if
this
was
my
business,
I
wouldn't
just
be
like
tossing
one
product
for,
and
you
know
for
for
without
a
reason
and
not
the
others.
I
would
give
each
one
of
them
an
opportunity
to
basically
be
able
to
carry
themselves
which
DX
gov
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
from
what
I've
seen
the
guys
are
doing
and
stuff
like
that.
There
is
as
much
possibility,
and
you
know
future
for
them
is
what
they
is
for
swap
or
for
carrot
or
for
nimi.
I
So
you
know
my
opinion
is
that
this
situation
has
been.
Basically
it's
it's
backwards.
It's
like.
First,
we
have
the
proposal
that
creates
the
chaos
and
then
we
start
to
discuss
it.
We
should
have
discussed
it.
First
came
to
some
kind
of
like
agreement
or
not
agreement,
but
basically
you
know
they're
in
businesses.
There's
nobody
wins
right.
Everybody
has
to
have
some.
There
has
to
be
like
this
constant
negotiation
until
there's
a
consensus
amongst
everybody.
I
What
what
everybody
is
willing
to
give
and
what
they
are
willing
to
take
in
return
for
what
they're
willing
to
give
and
that's
basically,
what
we
should
have
done
here.
We
should
have
all
sat
down
and
said:
hey,
you
know
what
this
is
going
like
and
we're
getting
pissed
off,
and
you
guys
don't
seem
to
be
listening,
so
we
either
sit
down
or
we're
going
to
make
a
proposal
like
this
in
the
Forum,
which
is
the
way
that
it
seems
to
me
is
this
is
what's
happened?
I
People
got
pissed
off
because
they
felt
they
weren't
being
listened
to
and
weren't
being
heard.
As
you've
said,
and
now
they
basically
have
made
this
proposal,
which
is
like
this
massive
like
thing
that
needs
to
be
sorted
out
and
it
creates
even
more
animosity,
because
now
you
have
this
this
side
against
that
side,
with
a
simple
yes
or
no
in
between
makes
it
difficult.
You
know.
A
We've
had
some
hand
raised
and
some
comments
too
so
I
don't
know
in
the
I
guess
Adam
says:
can't
Dobby
raise
funds,
Ross
Jesus,
can't
carrot
and
can't
swapper
Adam
says
swapper
and
Garrett
can
fund
Davi
if
they
think
Dobby
will
serve
them
in
governing
the
protocol
product
and
then
Connor.
You
raise
your
hand,
I,
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
say
something:
I
could
read
with
you
said
here.
A
Conor
says
no
there's
no
vested
interest
here,
but
if
people
want
Fair
could
total
up
total
spend
to
date
on
each
project,
add
the
12
treasury
in
Split
three
four
ways
whatever
it
is,
then
pay
balance
of.
What's
do.
C
A
Care
gets
more
to
balance
out
funding
today,
John
says
Connor
with
the
logic
Connor
says,
or
pay
80
to
DxD
orders
and
then
reserve
the
rest
to
match
what
the
four
products
can
make
can
raise
independently.
So
they
have
to
prove
they
are
able
to
independently
raise
lots
of
options
that
are
fair
but
also
meritocratic
yeah
and
then
yeah
I
think
Eric
also
raised
his
hands.
I,
don't
know
if
you
wanted
to
yes.
C
Yes,
yes,
well
to
basically
one
that
you
know
when
they
when
they
read
this
proposal.
It
just
looked
to
me
that
obviously
the
proposal
is
it's
obvious.
That
proposal
is
made
by
the
by
person
that
that
does
not
like
believe
in
in
text
now
anymore.
C
So
and
the
other
thing
was
that
you
know
I
was
surprised
to
see
all
those
like
bullet
points
put
into
one
proposal.
So
that's
a
lot
to
digest
and,
to
be
honest,
I,
don't
I,
don't
understand.
You
know
why
why
all
those
points
are
put
into
one
single
proposal.
C
You
know
whether
there
was
some
thought
into
all
those
bullet
points
or
not,
but
you
know
and
I'm
not
sure
you
know
whether
whether
it
makes
sense
to
even
to
like
to
discuss
all
those
separate
points
if,
like
the
result
for
me,
is
like
the
not
the
restructuring,
but
rather
if
it
is
like
as
a
as
a
digs
down
like
shutdown,
so
I
was
I
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
missed
you
know
any
any
of
these
kind
of
discussions.
C
I,
remember
yeah
some
the
opinions
of
several
of
you
like
even
a
couple
months
ago
and
so
I
I
may
see.
You
know
your
your
point
but
yeah
to
me.
It
looks
like
a
as
a
as
a
proposal
just
to
Simply
shut
the
eggs
down,
so
it
might
be
even
fair
just
to
call
it
that
that
that's
indeed
the
shadow
of
the
of
the
Dao
and
the
the
end
of
the
Dao,
because
not
sure
you
know
what
kind
of
restriction
like
results
from
this.
To
be
honest,
yeah.
B
B
Got
involved
in
DXL
in
2019
I
actually
think
that
you
can't
really
get
rid
of
the
rep
distribution
that,
like
that's
just
Unchained
right
and
so
like
a
lot
of
us
were
active.
I
mean
it's
not
a
lot
of
the
people
present,
but
there
was
people
kind
of
before
dxt
existed
before
Capital
was
raised,
that
sort
of
saw
the
vision
or
some
Vision,
maybe
their
own
vision
of
dxdo
and
like
were
involved
so.
B
G
Maybe
it
makes
sense
to
to
split
this
proposal
into.
G
Maybe
they
can
be
submit
this
this
week,
one
to
Signal
the
intention
of
shut
down
the
treasury
right
and
another
one
to
propose
a
like
a
shutdown
strategy,
how
the
how
the
funds
are
are
going
to
be
distributed.
G
So
in
case
the
shutdown
proposal
passes,
we
can
start
discussing
okay,
how
this
is
going
to
be
implemented
following
a
starting
with
the
with
the
points
present
here
above
cause.
Key
switch
was
the
one
who
started
the
discussion
who
presented
the
the
who
did
the
first
iteration
of
of
The
Proposal.
Some
things
can
be
changed
or
maybe
not,
let's
see,
but
I
think
this
is
set
up
a
lot,
not
a
lot
more
discussion
but
more
discussion,
and
it
will
be
good
to
Signal
first.
G
If
we
really
want
to
stop
the
active
reactions,
start
DXE
invested
instantly
and
then
propose
how
the
treasury
is
going
to
be
claimed
and
distributed
cost
again.
It's
going
to
also
take
a
lot
of
I
think
a
maturity
of
the
pose
as
a
shock
until
yeah
I
didn't
I
can
speak
for
myself.
I
need
to
get
very
very
silly
because
it
wasn't.
It
was
someone
Anonymous
who,
who
posted
so
yeah
I
can
I
can
speak
for
that,
but
this
is
a
thing
it
was
like.
G
A
grenade
was
thrown
next
to
a
dynamite
case
and
everything
from
blown
away,
and
it
sparked
a
lot
of
heightened
desires
and
that
other
contributors
had
that.
Maybe
didn't
DNS
press,
and
this
is
what
happens
when
you
you,
you
put
a
spark
there
so
again,
a
big
explosion.
We
I
think
we.
We
should
have
a
in
our
discussion
like
maybe
take
another
week
to
to
discuss
another
iteration
of
the
proposals.
If
it
is
that
we
really
want
to
to
close
the
treasury
and
yeah.
G
This
is
what
I
will
propose
to
actually
what
I
propose
on
the
on
on
the
post
was
to
wait
till
we
can
execute
the
restructure
that
I
took
so
much
time
to
to
decide
to
to
design
to
implement.
We
are
the
first
three
months
of
this
Guild
Squad
structure,
which
this
can
be
an
effect.
This
can
happen.
I
think
this
happened
also
because
of
what
we
did,
because
we
separate
into
different
gears
squads.
We
increase
the
individual,
the
we
separate
even
more
as
an
organization
and
I
mentioned
that
this
could
happen
on
on
the
retina.
G
When
we
were
talking
about
this
about
this
new
structure,
I
didn't
like
it
that
is
going
to
make
the
squad
separate
even
more,
instead
of
working
to
it
as
a
as
a
soul
and
unique
Dao.
So
this
is
what
happened
now
we
are
even
more
separated.
G
Everyone
feel
like
okay,
they
are
ready
to
go
on
their
own
and
if
it
is
what
every
Squad
wants
the
signal
this
and
let's
try
to
distribute
the
funds
we
have
in
the
in
the
first
wave
possible,
which
there
is
always
going
to
be
person
that
is
going
to
be
against
it,
that
you.
We
cannot
make
everyone
happy,
thus
that
that's
impossible
to
make
everyone
happy
so
yeah.
Ideally,
this
is
what
I
propose
but
seems
like
the
seem
like
most
of
the
products
and
projects
want
to
go
on
their
own.
B
B
To
have
some
levity
here
too,
that
like
this,
is
still
an
experiment
right
and
we're
like
actually
learning
about
how
governance
works,
but
engaging
in
this
obviously
there's
some
serious
stuff
on
the
line.
But
but
for
me,
yeah
I
feel
like
I've.
One
of
the
lessons
I've
learned
is
that,
like
you
know
individual
squads,
individual
people,
they
all
have
their
own
incentives
right
and
if
those
aren't
kind
of
set
correctly
early
on
or
at
the
beginning,
it
becomes
very
difficult
to
like
coordinate.
G
A
F
Oh
man,
there's
no
more
eyes
to
break
Ross.
Thank
you.
No
I
I
just
voted
actually
on
the
proposal.
I
know
a
lot
of
people
will
be
very
disappointed
on
that.
I
have
my
own
reasons,
but
one
big
reason
why
I
think
I
I
I
think
there's
urgency
on
this
proposal
is
because
this
incentive
for
current
workers
to
not
vote
on
this
right.
F
You
you,
stop
getting
paid
right,
that
that
is
an
incentive
to
keep
getting
paid
and
I'm,
not
saying
all
of
us
think
or
all
of
us
think
this
way,
but
but
it
is
an
incentive
to
keep
the
Dao
alive
as
it
is
today,
and
the
second
thing
is:
if
we
keep
the
Dao
lab
as
it
is
today
we
lose
more
and
more
rep
to
the
current
workers.
That's
how
the
balance
looks
like
and
I
think.
If
anything
like
this
can
be
achieved.
F
It
is
through
through
doing
this,
and-
and
it
is
a
hard
thing
to
do-
but
if,
if
we
do
this
in
six
months,
then
majority
of
the
rep
will
not
be
held
by
non-contributors,
right
and
I.
Think,
being
a
contributor
is
too
powerful
today
and
and
I.
Don't
trust
that
contributors
will
do
the
right
thing
for
everyone?
B
I
very
much
agree
with
that.
Is
that,
like
I,
think
you
know
it
wasn't
really.
The
intention
with
the
governor's
2.0
proposal
was
to
have
txt
have
an
equal
say,
but
because
of
the
amount
of
time
it's
been,
you
know
with
the
rep
and
placement
rep
inflation
to
worker
proposals,
just
in
effect,
DXL
is
like
an
employer
or
employee
Collective.
A
F
A
A
B
A
A
Yeah
and
I
guess
I'll
just
say
kind
of
the
same
thing.
I
I
said
here
that
I
still
don't
think
really
anyone's
addressed
is
the
the
two
concerns
for
me
in
this
specific
proposal.
The
reason
I
voted
down
was
because
I
don't
think
it's
a
fair
distribution
to
the
three
products
and
that
just
you
know,
there's
kind
of
no
thought
in
terms
of
how
that's
going
and
then
second
is
physique
steel
holders
losing
kind
of
claim
on
the
other,
the
other
products
I
think.
That's
the
reason
that.
A
B
F
B
A
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
just
con
the
ideas
that
Connor,
you
know
said
there
I
think
are
also
worth
considering
I'm
happy
to
put
together
a
counter
proposal.
I
think
the
people
voting
on
it
maybe
could
have
waited
for
that
to
develop
if
they're,
if
their
option
was
to
have
a
counter
proposal
for
something
I
think
some
time
and
consideration
on
what
that
is,
would
have
been
considered.
A
But
obviously,
given
the
gravity
of
the
moment,
there
probably
needs
to
be
something
that
people
can
can
get
in
tangible
on
that
so
yeah
and
so
I
think.
Just
in
terms
of
of
that
tomorrow,
there
was
the
previously
scheduled
Dixie
monetary
policy
committee
meeting,
so
I
think
I
will
run
through
some
ideas
and
happy
to
present
any
ideas
from
people
about
how
to
have
a
counter
proposal
that
is
similar
to
achieving
the
aims
of
this,
but
does
so
in
a
way
that
is
more
fair
and
equitable.
J
I'll
I'll
address
Conor's
latest
question
in
the
in
the
chat
about
the
raise
matching.
I.
Also
think
that
is
a
really
interesting
idea
and
you
know
swapper
carrot
little
swapper
for
three
over
three
years.
Carry
it
for
two
years,
like
there's,
been
people
working
on
these
things
and
they're
not
complete
products.
Yet
so
it
takes
it's
taking
a
long
time.
J
I
think
DXL
can
learn
from
gnosis
like
when
you
spit
when
we
tried
to
spin
out
swapper
kind
of
by
launching
a
token,
but
we
didn't
have
any
governance.
There
was
no
way
to
actually
launch
it
to
the
world,
and
so
it
like
launched
a
token,
but
that
didn't
actually
turn
it
over
to
anyone.
And
now
it's
just
been
funding
the
slow
building
of
it
for
a
while
now
well
for
a
few
years,
and
so
if
products
are
gonna
be
able
to
survive
on
their
own,
they
yeah
like
like
gnosis.
J
Did
they
incubated
them
and
then
they
they
raised
money
on
their
own
and
then
gnosis
gave
them
some
money
and
they
spun
them
off
and
they
turned
over
full
control
to
a
new
to
the
team
and
to
a
new
governance
system
and
like
gnosis
gno
token,
does
not
control
cow
at
all
anymore
and
gno.
Does
not
control
does
not
control
safe
at
all
like
they,
they
launched
them
into
the
world
as
part
of
that
they
had
to
raise
money.
J
They
luckily
did
it
in
a
more
attractive
Market.
It's
harder
right
now,
but
I
like
I
I.
Agree
like
carrot
is
a
really
interesting
product.
I
think
it
can
I
think
it
can
become
its
own
product,
but
just
giving
money
to
swapper
and
carrot
and
like
saying
here,
just
burn
the
rest
of
this
and
like
I,
mean
Cara,
doesn't
even
have
a
governance
token
or
anything
swapper
could
become
a
governance
token,
but
they
really.
J
We
you
you
you
without
some
outside
justification,
that
it's
a
valuable
product
and
people
want
to
be
a
part
of
it
and
invest
in
it.
Dx
dial,
giving
it
money
is
probably
also
not
a
smart
investment
like
if
no
one
else
wants
to
invest
in
it.
Why
should
DXL
invest
in
it,
so
DX
out
just
giving
money
to
the
few
people
that
are
building
the
products
right
now,
like
I,
don't
think
that's
going
to
help
the
product
in
any
way
like
we
want
the
product
to
have
success,
so
I
think
carrot.
J
Should
you
know
if
Cara
wants
to
become
its
own
thing,
it
should
go
out.
It
can
and
I'm
happy
to
help,
but
it
can
go
out
and
raise
try
to
raise
money
and
and
become
its
own
entity,
and
then
dxdyle
could
you
know
also
invest
in
it
and
give
it
some
launch
money,
but
if
it
can't
raise
any
money
on
its
own
and
it's
not
interesting
to
anyone
else
in
the
world,
why
would
DxD
holders
and
DX
dial
want
to
just
give
it
a
bunch
of
money?
J
And
so
you
could
say
the
same
about
all
the
products,
so
I
I
really
like
the
idea
of
a
product
having
to
prove
itself
in
the
wild
with
a
certain
amount
of
people
in
order
for
DxD
out
to
give
it.
Maybe
any
funding
at
all
and
like
and
like
money
is
not
a
money,
is
not
the
reason
why
carrot
is
not
an
existing
product
right
now
like
like
if
care
like,
if
we
could
throw
a
million
dollars
at
carrot
and
then
it
would
be
live
today.
J
It's
gonna,
you
know
so
like
if,
if
Cara,
if,
if
any
product
needs
money
to
re
to
go,
build
faster,
it
can
already
get
that
money
from
DX
dial.
So
it's
not
a
matter
of
getting
it
money
so
far,
but
we
can
yeah
I.
Think
if
we're
gonna
spin
out
products,
we
should
do
it
so
that
the
product's
sustainable
and
has
like
a
long-term
model
to
exist.
H
I
mean
I
just
wanted
to
bounce
of
sky
here
that
I
mean
I.
Don't
think.
Dxr
is
a
good
place
for
us
to
build
products,
not
in
the
way
that
it
is
set
up,
because
RND
X
dial
has
set
of
priorities,
but
then,
as
products
that
you
want
to
move
faster,
you
don't
have
the
support
of
marketing.
You
don't
have
the
support
of
growth
team.
You
don't
have
the
support
of
the
business
when
you
when
you
actually
need
it.
H
It
has
to
be
like
a
constant
evolvement
of
these,
but
it's
it's
yeah,
it's
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
dxdo
in
its
current
shape
would
be
able
to
spin
out
any
successful
product
app
that
that's
the
bottom
line.
We
are
great
at
governance,
but
then
we
build
and
support.
We
are
great
at
governance
in
terms
of
non-token-based
governance,
but
then,
when
it
comes
to
funding
and
supporting
Davi,
we
then
move
ourselves
and
support
token
based
governance.
So
I
don't
understand
what
dxdav
wants
it's.
A
Thanks,
thank
you.
I'm
just
yeah,
some
other
things
in
the
chat.
Swapper
token
already
exists
and
how
swapper
can
spin
out
and
how
that
will
affect
with
swapper
token
John
says,
can.
A
A
token
and
airdrop
to
swapper
token
holders
Bob
Ross,
says,
lets
the
product.
C
A
Themselves,
that's
it
playing
favorites,
Ross
Nielsen,
says
I.
Guess
the
question
is:
how
does
dxdot.
C
A
A
A
A
Yeah
people
saying
constructive
discussion:
the
dream
is
over
I
guess
this
passes.
What
happens
next?
This
proposal
passes.
That's
next.
This
guy
says
IRL,
so
some
chats
there
but
yeah
I
think
we
can
leave
it
here.
A
As
I
said,
we're
still
going
to
do
the
dxt
monetary
policy
committee
meeting
tomorrow.
Presumably
there
will
be
yes
some
thoughts
on
this
and
maybe
continuing
the
conversation,
so
that
is
actually
at
1400
UTC
and
then
also
just
because
I
did
it
and
I'm.
You
know
it's
like
when
you
do
something
you
want
to
tell
people
about
it,
but
there's
a
G1
operation
skills
update
in
the
Forum
I'm,
not
sure.
If
anyone
cares
there,
as
well
as
one
from
dxgov
here.
A
Okay
thanks:
everyone
for
joining
and
yeah
have
a
great
Wednesday
thanks.