►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-12-22]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Hello
and
welcome
to
the
dx
style
governance
discussion
today
is
the
22nd
of
december
and
we're
all
in
very
festive
spirits.
Let's
jump
in
right
to
the
proposal.
Roundup,
not
a
lot
on
the
agenda
today,
but
we
do
have
a
couple
of
proposals
live
so
on
mainnet.
There's
a
proposal
for
reimbursements
for
augusto
who
has
been
deploying
some
smart
contracts.
So
that's
passing
soon
and
we
also
have
a
proposal
which
is
mirrored
on
both
mainnet
and
xi,
which
is
to
approve
the
dxd
investing
distribution
to
contributors.
B
Following
on,
we
have
a
lisbon
expenses,
e3
embarrassment
and
a
rap
sync
from
caney
fork.
So
that's
a
very
efficient
proposal,
doing
a
lot
of
transfers
and
minting
in
one
single
transaction.
That's
how
we
like
it,
then
we
also
have
the
keenan's
rap
mint
and
burn
proposal
still
up
in
live
passing
in
a
couple
of
days.
I
believe,
then
again,
we
have
a
mirrored
proposal,
both
on
main
connect,
which
is
the
txt
pay
structure
update.
B
So
I
know
this
is
something
which
has
been
live
on
the
forum
as
well
for
a
while,
so
I
believe
you're
all
up
to
date
with
it,
but
it's
somewhat
of
a
slight
increase
in
pace,
but
not
only
that
also
an
increase
in
the
number
of
contributor
levels.
B
We
have
both
to
kind
of
to
adapt
to
market
rates
and
just
a
bit
for
inflation,
but
most
importantly,
also
give
like
a
longer
powerful,
like
you
know,
a
way
to
increase
your
level
at
the
exile
by
extending
the
number
of
levels
and
on
the
lower
rank,
also
to
try
and
attract
more
people
who
perhaps
do
not
have
that
much
experience
and
give
them
an
opportunity
to
onboard
to
the
external.
So
that's
very
exciting
make
sure
to
go
check
that
out
and
cast
your
vote
and
moving
on
again.
B
We
have
another
mirror
proposal,
which
is
the
east
denver
sponsorship,
so
this
is
for
the
upcoming
east
denver
event
where
a
lot
of
the
excel
members
will
actually
attending
in
person-
and
I
know
this
has
been
talked
about
a
lot.
I
don't
know
if
sky
or
melanie,
you
guys
wanted
to
say
anything
just
on
the
record
for
the
call
about
it,
maybe
give
a
brief
overview
of
it.
C
Yeah,
just
that
this
is
a
example
of
an
on-chain
agreement,
eat
denver
kind
of
operates
well.
Spork
dao
is
a
dow
that,
like
eat,
denver
as
part
of
that,
but
obviously
denver
also
has
a
legal
entity,
and
so
they
normally
when
you
do
sponsorships
and
things
you
have
kind
of
a
written
legal
contract.
We've
communicated
a
number
of
times
that
dx
dao
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
sign
like
paper
legal
contracts.
C
C
There
are
parts
of
the
sponsorship
that
are
public,
you
know,
or
some
that
are
less
public,
so
we
kind
of
structured
in
a
way
that,
if
like
exact
details
were
wanted
to
be
known
like
you
could
reach
out
to
like
the
core
team-
and
you
could
probably
reference
those
but
putting
everything
on
into
like
the
public
proposals,
not
necessarily
the
the
way
it's
done,
but
yeah
so
yeah.
So
it's
like.
C
Basically,
a
sponsorship
of
denver,
which
is
happening
in
february,
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
things
that
come
with
that,
including
having
like
a
table
presence
and
being
able
to
participate
and
give
prizes
in
the
hackathon.
So
we
should
really
start
to
think
about
what
types
of
things
we
would
ask
hackers
in
the
hackathon
to
hack
on
in
the
dx
style
ecosystem.
C
C
We're
gonna
have
mentors
there
and
we
could
really,
you
know,
recruit
and
attract
people
to
build
or
try
things
out
with
some
of
the
x
styles
products,
maybe
whether
it's
carrot,
new
ideas,
around
carrot
or
potentially
dxgov
type,
newton
ideas,
yeah
and
then
really
get
dix,
dao's
name
out
into
the
east
denver
community
and
that
event
typically
has
always
been
like
a
pretty
strong
like
three
or
four
day
weekend
event
this
year.
C
C
That's
the
the
money,
the
money,
the
payment
of
the
proposal
is
actually
going
to
move
on
mainnet,
but
we
mirrored
it
on
x,
dies
just
to
have
signal
and
the
money
is
moving
yeah
in
die
straight
to
like
the
multi-sig
of
the
actual
eth
denver
entity.
So
yeah,
that's
that's
a
summary.
There's
a
still
a
handful
of
things.
C
We
need
to
sort
out
like
around
the
event
like
potentially
dx
dow
having
some
of
its
own,
its
own
little
drinks
or
something
or
supplying
drinks
to
the
to
the
to
the
to
the
hackathon
and
then
also
merch,
and
having
a
table
that
was
a
base
and
being
able
to
hand
out
different
types
of
merch
and
things
to
people
but
yeah.
That's
the
summary
and
awesome
anything
else.
No.
B
Corona
permitting
will
most
of
us
will
be
there
sweet
and
then
the
last
proposal
live
on
made.
It
is
actually
the
staking
of
the
second
proposal,
so
I
know
this
is
something
we've
talked
about
a
lot
as
well,
so
we
already
staked
500,
eats
right
on
lido,
which
is
already
back
in
the
treasury
and
re-basing
daily,
so
already
yielding
somewhat
on
our
initial
amount
of
stake
eve,
and
this
second
proposal
just
kind
of
closes
up
the
proposal
by
staking
a
further
500
eve.
B
This
time
spread
around
stake,
wise
and
rocket
pool,
then
moving
on
to
gnosis
chain
or
x-tie.
I
I
I
believe
knows
chain
is
the
correct
terminology.
Now
we
have
a
number
of
worker
proposals,
including
violet
worker
proposal,
melanie
contributor
proposal,
ross
milton
and
lou
troops
as
well,
and
then
we
also
have
the
buybacks
going
on
so
buyback
number
95
should
be
passing
imminently
and
96
and
97
are
also
lined
up,
so
we're
keeping
that
going.
B
We
also
it's
very
easy
to
keep
track
of
the
buyback
now
and
due
to
funds
such
as
ether
or
west,
being
bridged
being
allocated
and
put
directly
into
the
gnosis
protocol
relays.
So
you
know
it's
easy
to
just
look
at
the
gnosis
protocol
relay
and
see
kind
of
where
we're
standing
there,
but
that's
moving
ahead,
good
and
well,
and
then
you
know.
Of
course
we
have
the
mirrored
proposals
here.
So
we
have
the
dxtel
pay
structure
proposal
and
the
if
sponsorship
proposal
other
than
that
we
have
the
audit
of
the
dx
governance.
D
E
Yeah
john
can
maybe
go
into
a
bit
more
detail
since
he
sort
of
organized
the
audit,
but
the
scope
of
it
is
kind
of
going
over
the
wallet
scheme,
which
is
the
new
parts
and
has
already
been
audited.
But
it's
kind
of
taking
in
a
larger
scope,
and
that
was
kind
of
spurred
on
by
the
bug
we
found
in
the
wallets
came
just
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
F
Yeah
russ
covered
it
and
the
dow
stack
contracts
had
previously
been
audited
by
dao
stack
and
then
there
had
been
an
audit
for
the
initial
wallet
schemes,
but
this
is
to
encompass
kind
of
all
of
it
and
yeah
just.
I
think
it
generally
a
good
idea
to
take
a
deeper
look
at
the
governance
stuff
as
we're
moving
towards
governance
2.0
and
using
this
with
more
and
more
funds.
G
And
maybe
this
is
kind
of
jumping
to
dave's
favorite
proposals
coming
up,
but
it
was
it'd
be
interesting
to
like
in
this
process
to
understand
things
like.
Oh,
we
can
trade
with
multi-call
scheme
on
xdi
or,
like
kind
of
understand
these
different
things.
So
there's
still
a
lot
that
we
maybe
take
for
granted.
F
Yeah
exactly
we
should
be
doing
a
better
job,
it's
kind
of
on
my
plate
too,
and
I
can
work
with
ross
and
and
getting
some
of
the
documentation
a
little
clearer
and
and
kind
of
describing
what
the
system
is
and
the
approach
to
like
security,
basically
where
the
different
restrictions
are.
Why
and
and
like
what
the
plan
is
kind
of
moving
forward
to
try
to
make
more
things
more
flexible.
B
So
chris
already
spoiled
spoiled
this,
but
the
latest
and
greatest
proposal,
of
course,
is
on
gnosis
chain,
which
is
the
test
proposal
to
swap
10
rap
excite
to
usdc
on
curve
3
pool.
B
So
there
are
actually
two
separate
proposals
for
this,
and
this
is
actually
using
the
generic
multi-core
schemes
on
x-style
organizer
chain
whatever,
and
so
this
currently
would
be
much
more
difficult
to
do
on
mainnet.
But
essentially
one
transaction
actually
just
approves
the
three
curve
three
pool
on
curve
to
spend
ten
rap
xli
from
the
dow
treasury
and
the
second
one
places
in
order
to
swap
rap
excited
for
usdc.
B
So
one
of
them
is
currently
already
boosted
and
the
other
one
is
pre-boosted.
So
these
should
be
passed
tonight
towards
the
end
of
the
week.
But
if
this
works
correctly,
it
would
actually
be
quite
interesting
and
nice
because
it
means
that
in
the
future
we'll
be
able
to
simply
whenever
we
bridge
from
funds
from
mainnet
to
gnosis
chain
to
do
that
in
wrapped
ecsty.
B
And
then
the
treasury
anyway
has
the
ability
to
unwrap
exercise
which
we've
already
seen,
and
it's
just
the
habit
that,
as
of
now,
how
you
know
we
do
work
proposals,
people
just
request
x
died
just
because
it's
easier
and
the
ui
guides
you
to
do
that,
and-
and
it's
totally
fine,
but
just
having
these
abilities
to
do
stuff
directly
with
the
treasury
is
already
a
nice
step,
which
you
know
we're
able
to
take
thanks
to
the
explode
and
yeah,
it's
very
exciting
and
I
don't
see
why
it
wouldn't
go
through
but
yeah.
B
So,
given
that
we
can
do
multiple
calls
in
one
multicall,
we
can
actually
do
the
authorization
and
the
trade
in
one
single
proposal
which
doesn't
change
much
technically
other
than
they
happen
in
one
transaction.
So
it's
just
one
proposal
less
of
course,
as
well
on
on
our
governance
platform
and
less
gas
fees.
Well,
although
I'm
not
sure
about
that
but
yeah
and
that's
pretty
much
already
wrapping
up
everything.
So
no
proposals
currently
live
on
arbitrary
and
the
other
discussion
item
is
just
merry
christmas
to
everyone.
Dave.
G
Before
we
get
to
the
mirror
on
your
very
very
cool
proposal,
I
guess
would
that
fail
if
the
funds
were
going
someplace
else
is
that
kind
of,
like
the
way
that
I
guess
the
multi-call
scheme
would
work,
that
it
allows
you
to
like
move
things
in
the
treasury,
but,
like
you,
can't
send
those
funds
someplace
else.
That
can
only
happen
through
the
contribution
reward.
B
Yeah,
so
if
you
I
mean,
if
you
look
at
the
proposal,
there's
actually
no
funds
being
transferred.
That's
that's
why
we
need
two
proposals
right,
so
the
first
one
is
an
authorization
and
then,
if
you
look
at
the
contract,
that's
authorized
to
withdraw
these
10
rap
x
ty.
You
can
look
it
up
on
block
scout,
it's
actually
the
contract
of
the
three
pool
on
curve,
and
then
the
trade
also
doesn't
actually
move
any
funds.
B
It
just
requests
the
trade
and,
given
that
that
contract
has
now
been
granted,
the
ability
to
withdraw
10
wrapped
x
die.
It
would
be
able
to
withdraw
those
rap
x
dies
and
transform
them
in
usdc
and
curve
curve.
Also
doesn't
have
the
ability
to
send
the
exchange
tokens
to
a
different
address.
They're
always
returned
to
the
source.
B
So
in
this
case
you
know
whoever's
doing
the
call,
which
is
the
agnosis
chain
treasury,
so
yeah
there's
no,
not
really
a
way,
we're
not
really
sending
funds
and
there's
not
really
a
way
on
the
curved
side
either
to
redirect
them
like
you
might
be
able
to
do
on
a
on
a
bridge.
For
example.
Right
does
that
make
sense.
G
B
Yeah
and
I
mean
in
the
future,
if
we
also
have
like
some-
you
know,
wallet
schemes
deployed,
maybe
we'll
even
have
some
wallet
schemes
for
the
treasury.
You
know
where
a
subpar
of
the
treasury
is
and
where
you
know
you
know
this
can
be
managed
more
easily
in
a
way.
We
could
even
think
about
doing
like
an
infinite
approval.
You
know,
so
we
would
not
even
have
to
do
the
approval,
but
you
know
I
mean
for
now
it's
just
a
test
transaction,
so
you
know
I
definitely
wouldn't
want
to
move
there
directly
and
anyway.
B
B
E
B
Yeah
and
just
to
clarify
the
reason
why
I
said
that
is
that
wallet
schemes
actually
have
their
own
treasury
right,
so
we
wouldn't
be
authorizing
the
whole
funds
in
the
treasury,
but
just
those
that
are
actually
in
that
wallet
scheme.
So
that's
actually
why
I
why
I
said
that
in
case
someone
was
confused.
Yeah.
F
Yeah,
I
think
I
think
you
did
a
good
job
there
david,
I
do
think
like
approving
and
calling
something
is
effectively
ends
up
being
the
same
transfer
as
if
you
were
to
like.
Well,
it's
not
the
same
thing,
but
it's
still
a
transfer
of
funds,
even
if
you're
not
using
like
the
send.
So
in
some
ways.
It's
kind
of
this
same
idea
and,
generally
speaking,
the
the
ex-die
has
this
flexibility,
but
it's
been
restricted
on
on
main
net
out
of
like
concerns
for
security,
so
that's
sort
of
like
just
the
general,
so
yeah.
G
I
think
that
was
like
kind
of
my
question
is
like.
Could
you
do
two
proposals
to
like
transfer
funds
through
the
multi-call
scheme
and
not
through
the
contribution
reward
on
mainnet?
But
I
guess
because
there's
a
whitelist
on
mainnet
there's,
probably
much
more.
F
Yeah
mainnet
has
more
for
so,
and
I
think
this
was
actually
maybe
not
exactly
the
intent
where
we
set
up
the
multi-column
except
or
the
x-time
multi-cal
can,
I
think,
can
do
like
the
they
can
do
the
approves-
and
I
think,
maybe
even
send
funds,
but
that's
locked
down
on
mainnet
like
there's
no
approvals
and
no
sending
of
funds
through
multi
calls
so
yeah,
so
you'd
have
to
use
the
contribution
reward
first
and
then,
in
addition
to
that
on
mainnet,
there
is
the
whitelist
so
so
on
mainnet
the
multicalls
can
only
interact
with
the
whitelisted
ones
in
any
way
like
so
so
that's
why
we
end
up
using
relayers
like
like
the
gnosis
protocol
relayer
on
mainnet
and
yeah.
F
I
think.
Ideally,
we
get
to
a
newer
system
where
the
proposal
process
is
a
little
more
flexible
and
elegant,
but
we
can
still
be
confident
in
the
security,
and
you
know
we
have
some
ideas
about
that,
but
I
think
it
still
needs
some
thought
and
like
this
you
know
these
audits
and
stuff
are
par
part
of
us
getting
to
where
we
need
to
be
kind
of
moving
into
the
future.
B
And
yeah,
I
I
don't
know
if
anyone
else
wants
to
discuss
anything
governance,
related,
etc,
feel
free
to
speak
online.
C
Just
the
one
thing
with
initiative
doubt
proposal
that
had
passed
on
xdi.
I
believe
that
that
proposal
still
like
it
doesn't
show
up.
You
basically
can't
find
it
and
you
can't
reference
it
and
you
can't
see
it.
So
I
think
it
moved
money
in
the
scenario
like
that.
Is
it
there's
nothing
to
reference
when
we
like
talk
about
initiative
dao?
C
So
I
was
either
going
to
take
the
text
or
try
to
get
the
text
from
it
and
put
it
onto
the
forum
and
use
that
as
the
reference
point
and
like
link
the
things
together
there
or
potentially
do
another
proposal
that
like
actually
shows
the
text
and
like
also
references
the
thing
that
passed.
Is
there
a
recommendation?
C
C
F
You
can't
search
via
the
even
the
title
is,
is
not
showing
right.
So
it's
like,
I
think
the
the
proposal
is
there
and
if
you
knew
when
and
and
like
you
could
probably
find
it
with
a
little
trouble,
but
but
yeah
I
mean
especially
since
it's
well,
so
did
it.
It
transferred
the
funds
for
the
initiative
now
right
to
the
initiative
down
multi-city
yeah
yeah.
F
C
You
know
yeah,
but
I
guess
so.
My
point
is
like
there
were
some
details
around
like
some
guidelines
around
the
initiative.
Doubt
they
were
in
that
proposal
and
now
right
and
they're,
not
no
one
can
find
them
anywhere.
So
where
should
where
I
want
to
put
them
up
somewhere,
should
I
just
put
them
in
the
forum
post
or
should
I
do
another
signal
proposal
that
like
puts
it
on
chain.
G
Yeah,
I
think
keenan-
and
I
were
talking
about
this
because
he
had
the
same
thing
for
his
mainnet
rep
sync
proposals
that
he
had
put
the
information
in
the
proposal
itself,
but
it
didn't
get
uploaded
ipfs
and
I
think
he
had
then
created
a
dow
talk
post
and
then
linked
to
the
specific
proposal
in
the
dow
talk
post.
So
that
was
like
the
connection
to
there,
so
you
can
see
the
actual
on-chain
actions
in
the
proposal
through
dx
vote
or
alchemy
or
whatever,
and
then
see
in
dow
talk
like
what
the
contents
were.
G
I
think,
like
just
from
a
like
meta
governance
perspective.
I
think
what
we
could
like
you
can
see
now,
which
is
like
on
the
blockchain.
This
happened
is
like
sky
skymine
labs.
Who
has
you
know,
I
guess
four
percent
rep
on
xdi
or
something
submit
a
proposal,
and
then
I
kanye
fork
voted
for
it.
G
So,
like
we're
kind
of,
I
guess
the
responsible
parties
in
a
way
like
in
terms
of
like
governance
being
able,
so
we
would
probably
be
the
ones
that
would
be
held
accountable
or
questioned
for
that,
and
I
think,
like
I
have
a
reason.
I
had
a
reason
to
vote,
for
it
actually
asked
you
about
it
specifically
like
what
it
was
and
it
kind
of
we
had
talked
about
it.
So
I
felt
comfortable
voting
for
it.
G
So
there
is
like
context
there
that,
like
governance
would
be
able
to
like
check
up
on
even
the
on-chain
actions
itself,
but
I
think,
as
you're
saying
in
terms
of
referencing
things
going
forward,
it's
really
nice
to
have
like
a
permanent
reference
for
things
and
yeah.
If
that's
in
the
forum,
when
the
proposal
isn't
there,
then
I
guess
that's
what
we
need
to
do,
but
I
think
hopefully
going
forward.
This
isn't
an
issue
that
we
have
because
of
people,
we're
kind
of
increasing
ipfs
stuff.
C
So
forum
was
forum
was
one
option,
but
I
was
just
thinking
like
actually
doing
a
new.
I
don't
know
what
you
would
call
this.
It's
like
a
signal
proposal
that,
like
actually
says-
and
it's
gonna
say
like
this-
is
linking
to
this
proposal,
which
passed
here's.
What
here
was
the
text
that
was
in
this
proposal
like
let's
just
pass
this
to
show
that
this
was
verified,
and
here
is
the
actual
text.
You
can
reference
right
and
it
really
links
it
on
chain.
B
F
So
we
know
that
this
is
a
mint
and
a
burn,
and
you
can
kind
of
infer
that
even
from
the
two
proposals
for
single
proposals
without
the
actual
text,
it's
it's
sort
of
not
achieving
the
purpose
right
because
there's
nothing.
The
whole
point
is
to
establish
a
reference
that
can
guide
us
and
be
referred
back
to
in
the
future.
H
Yeah,
it's
almost
it's
like
a
new
dow,
and
this
is
like
its
manifesto
and
and
with
the
title
and
description
completely
missing
is
just
a
transaction
hash.
So
it's
a
dao
that
was
established
for
a
certain
purpose
with
a
certain
manifesto
and
it's
now
missing
and
you
could
basically
do
whatever
you
want
with
it
which
isn't
appropriate.
So
it
would
probably
need
to
do
something.
C
Cool
okay,
so
I'll
do
a
new
proposal
in
this
case,
it's
not
like
a
huge
deal.
This
is
just
like
a
little
thing
but
like
if
this
ever
happens
again
on
something
really
important.
Obviously
it
would
be
good
to
have
like
a
process
that
we've
kind
of
used
before
and,
as
this
is
almost
like,
a
test
right
like
in
this,
maybe
we'll
see
if
this
works
well,
but
this
is.
C
E
Yes,
I
am
in
the
new
version
of
dx
vote.
This
should
be
at
least
partially
resolved
where
we're
actually
just
waiting
before
the
user
can
even
continue.
So
if
it's
not
uploading
properly
type
ipfs,
it
won't.
Let
you
go
through
with
the
entire
thing
sweet.
It
should
be.
Instant
brothers,
like
ipfs,
sometimes
has
issues.
Gateways
can
have
issues.
Uploading
can
have
issues
yeah,
we
need
to
add
more
redundancy
there.
That's
kind
of
the
longer
term
solution,
but
yeah.
G
I
don't
know
if
we
should
have
passed
this
proposal,
because
it
like
wasn't
that
important
for
it
to
for
the
funds
to
get
transferred
really
what
was
important
to
like,
convey
and
establish
this
right,
and
so,
if
it
didn't
get
a
load
of
ipfs
then
like.
Well,
then
that
proposal
wasn't
good.
We
need
to
do
it
like
again.
C
I
E
B
E
I
E
F
We
have
there's
a
structural
issue
with
ipfs,
where
there's
a
reliance
on
the
pinning
servers
that
are
not
actually
being
like
we're,
not
paying
them
or
there's
no
like
proper
incentive,
like
crypto
economic
incentive,
for
them
to
keep
it.
I
mean
the
way
it
works
is
like
pinata
is
the
service
right
and
kind
of
relying
on
them?
F
We
should
probably
be
like
looking
at
other
ways
to
make
it
more
redundant
in
terms
of
using
ipfs.
I
think
you
know
individual
members
could
be
running
our
own
nodes
and
pinning
services
that
might
be
a
good
redundancy
and
then
I
think
the
gov
team
ross.
Maybe
you
could
say
something
about
too,
like
it's
looked
a
little
bit
into
file
coin?
Is
it
web3
storage
is
what
they're
calling
it
yeah.
E
Web3
storage
is
like
the
easiest
way.
Currently,
I
think,
to
use
filecoin.
It's
like
a
combination
of
filecoin
and
pinata,
and
so
it's
like
using
that
alone
doesn't
resolve
it,
but
we
had
that
as
well
as
pinata
as
well
as
the
like,
just
local
ipfs
uploading,
then
that
kind
of
resolves
it.
The
other
thing
I
was
talking
to
it
was
sky
or
is
it
nathan?
E
I
can't
remember
that
sent
me
the
skynet
telegram
grip
and
I
was
chatting
with
them,
and
so
it
would
require
a
smart
contract
change
because
we
need
an
extra
field
for
the
hash
there,
but
we
could
use
skynet
for
this
as
another
redundancy
yeah.
F
And
I'm
a
little
fuzzy
on
the
difference
between
skynet
and
sia
cya
coin
and
file
like
yeah
and
filecoin,
and
what?
But
I
know
with
like
saya
the
the
original
network
there,
but
its
own
blockchain,
so
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
difficulty
paying
for
that
from
a
dow
and
ethereum
like
they
it's
it's
a
paid
storage
and
it's
distributed
on
their
decentralized
network.
F
So
it's
as
long
as
the
network
is
functioning,
it's
sort
of
like
the
blockchain
effectively
where
it
you
can't
really
take
something
down
like
it
or
it's,
it's
very
hard
for
something
to
be
removed.
Unintentionally
like
through
you
know,
if
multiple
nodes
could
go
down
and
the
documents
on
saya
network
would
still
be
intact.
C
Yeah,
like
the
bittorrent
protocol
yeah.
So
what
is
the
text
because
there's
already
nft
projects
that
do
this?
What
if
the
text
of
the
proposal
when
you
say
upload,
we
upload
it
to
like
ipfs,
plus
our
weave
plus
skynet,
and
then
we
only
use
ipfs
in
the
expo,
but
you
have
in
the
hash
of
the
proposal
or
something
you
have
like
the
actual
hashes
of
the
of
the
other
two
as
well.
That
way,
if
ipfs
goes
down,
we
can
always
go
manually.
Look
at
it
on
our
weave
or
something.
E
Yeah,
no,
I
mean
we
could
even
automate
it,
but
that's
what
I
was
saying
with.
If
we
were
going
to
use
skynet.
The
issue
is
that
they
have
different
hashes,
so
we
need
a
new
contract.
Another
thing
we're
doing
with
the
wallet
schemes
is
we
actually
have
a
field
for
title
titles,
obviously,
quite
short,
usually
so
it's
not
an
issue
to
store
that
on
chain
and
so
restoring
titles
on
chain
with
the
new
wallet
schemes.
E
So
that's
kind
of
a
partially
addressing
it.
We
could
look
at
even
adding
a
description,
but
obviously
the
issue
there
is
you're
going
to
be
looking
at
higher
gas
and
stuff.
F
F
E
D
Like
I,
I
think
in
general,
we
will
need
to
have
keepers
anyway,
like
keepers
who
are
doing
something
on
some
network
for
the
geek
store
off
chain
work,
and
I
think
we
should
start
as
soon
as
possible
with
it
pushing
the
proposal
data
on
now.
If
make
sense,
I
mean
in,
I
don't
think
I
will
like
once
it's
put
on
rv.
D
But
having
like
yeah,
I
I
think
yeah
pushing
that
stuff
on
our
weave
and
sign
and
skynet
makes
sense,
and
we
should
like
invest
in
like
community
keepers.
Who
are.
I
think
that
there
is
a
way
to,
like,
I
don't
know,
put
like
an
rv
address
on
ens,
and
then
we
can
actually
verify
that
some
community
member
is
actually
like
doing
the
keeper
work
on
our
weave
and
then
we
just
pay
them
for
their
work.
D
And
I
think
like
we
can
start
like
john
already
said,
like
maybe
we
do
like
a
working
group
with
like
core
contributors
and
like
everyone,
who's
interested
in
running
keepers
should,
and
I
think
we
should
actually
call
out
like
the
community,
because
it
would
be
better
if,
if
the
developers
are
actually
not
running
it.
G
Yeah,
I
completely
agree,
and-
and
just
hearing
us
talk
about
this-
it
is
really
exciting.
If
we
like
have
this
capability,
because
then
we
really
are,
like
you
know
in
you,
know
sovereign
redundant
like
independent,
like
these
are
the
types
of
things
we
need
like
long
term,
and
I
don't
really
know
if
anyone
else
is
thinking
of
it.
C
In
announcing
like
dx
dao,
like
let's
say,
let's
say
anyone
that
that
runs
these
things
right
on
behalf
of
supporting,
like
decentralization
of
things
related
to
the
exile,
you
know
you
get
like
100
100
x
die
a
month
or
50
x
that
a
month
whatever
it
is
like
dx
dao
has
a
budget
of
five
thousand
dollars
a
month
or
three
thousand
dollars
a
month
to
like
pay
a
handful
of
people
that
are
running
this
so
actually
incentivize
them
and
and
like
dow,
paying
paying
open
community
to
make
sure
its
products
are
decentralized.
Basically,
right.
D
Also,
like
very
important,
I,
like
I
consider
this
like
new
group
of
contributors
as
like
a
new
type
like
we
have
core
contributors
who
are
like
doing
work,
I
mean
infrastructure.
Work
is,
is
part
of
it
right,
but
they
could
be
like
our
infrastructure
providers,
and
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
give
them
rep
to
keep
them
in
in,
like
the.
H
For
for
are
we
in
particular,
I
I
don't
believe
we
need
to
have
this
like
middle
service
and
it's
basically
what
we
are
we
does.
We,
we
just
need
to
integrate
it
in
dx
vote
and
just
the
way
we
upload
to
ipfs.
We
will
just
be
uploading
to
r
weave
and
the
difference
between
the
two
is
with
ipfs.
You
need
pinning
with
r
weave
every
node
has
to
have
each
and
every
file
and-
and
they
don't
go
obsolete
over
time.
So.
H
H
With
cs
guy
in
particular,
ross-
and
I
asked
ask
them
whether
we'd
need
to
be
running
nodes
and
they
said
that
it's
not
necessary
for
us
to
run
nodes
or
anyone
to
run
nodes.
We
we
just
interact
with
their
network.
D
Yeah,
that's
true,
like
you,
don't
need
to
run
notes,
but
someone
needs
to
like
if
someone
is
creating
a
proposal
who
puts
who
puts
the
data
on?
Are
we.
G
D
G
And
I
think
geronimo's
bigger
point
is
like
this
is
not
just
about
our
weave
and
ipfs
and
uploading,
like
geek
style,
has
lots
of
dependencies
on
infrastructure,
and
so,
like
figuring
out
a
incentive
system
for
that,
and
I
like
the
idea
of
carving
out
like
a
new
contributor
like
an
element
to
it,
I
think,
is
what
we
need
to
be
doing.
Regardless
of
the
are
we
even
ipfs
stuff.
D
D
If
they
provide
a
good
service
and
they
receive
like
they
earned
a
specific
amount
of
rep,
then
they
could
even
like
brand
themselves
as
dxr
right
potentially,
because
if
they,
if
they
own,
like
some
part
of
the
exam
with
rap
they
they
can
what
they
should
potentially
like
do
as
like.
Dx
doll.
H
And
also
how
about
the
current
proposals
from
the
past
period
say?
You
know
we
we've
used
pinata,
but
what?
If
in
like
three
or
four
months
time
from
now,
there
is
some
proposal
that
no
one
ever
visited
and
used
the
ipfs
hash
to
to
read
it
like
it
would
literally
disappear,
and-
and
so
does
that
mean
that
hypothetically
in
half
a
year,
half
of
the
proposals
on
gx
vote
would
be
irreversibly
gone
and
inaccessible.
D
Yeah,
so
this
is
again
like
a
nice
example
for
having
infrastructure
providers
like
we
could
literally
write
up
like
a
specification
of
what
those
people
need
to
do
or
those
companies
need
to
do,
and
one
of
this
would
be
like
to
scrap
all
the
existing
data
on
ipfs
and
actually
put
the
whole
package
like
each
quarter
on
our
weave.
So
it
will
always
exist
right.
F
E
D
E
Of
what
they're
aiming
to
fix,
with
having
the
not
so
pretty
centralized,
I
don't
think
the
way
they're
doing
it,
but
they
have
it's
still
served
in
ipfs
and
it's
pinned
on
ipfs,
but
there's
still
file
coin
backups.
I
believe
with
contracts
and
filecoin.
Just
now
has
like
excess
storage,
which
is
why
it's
you
get
like
a
terabyte
for
free
with
web3
storage.
D
Yeah,
exactly
like
fights
ficon
is
another
data
bucket.
We
could
reuse
right
like
the
third
one
skynet,
even
ipfs,
our
weave
and
fightcoin,
like
having
those
four
like.
I
don't
think
our
data
will
ever.
E
E
I
C
I
E
H
All
this
for
us,
but
it's
nice,
that
we're
going
through
these
pains
ourselves
building
dx
votes
so
that
if
we
nail
it
right,
we
we
have
something
to
offer
to
future
dows.
You
know
we're
solving
problems
because,
as
chris
said,
as
an
answer
to
alan,
like
all
the
other
dowels
quote,
unquote,
they
they
they
don't
use
any
decentralized
infrastructure
they're.
Just
using
you
know,
snapshots
and
whatnot.
I
Yeah,
I
wonder
if
just
like
documenting
our
process,
just
kind
of
like
our
you
know
our
like,
whatever
ip
ipfs
content,
hash
update
process
and
all
these
things
like
very
soon,
I
mean
it's
already
happening
a
little
bit,
but
very
soon,
like
more
and
more
sort
of
quote-unquote
taos
are
going
to
come.
Looking
for
processes
to
actually
do
things
in
a
decentralized
way.
E
Yeah,
so
I
mean
the
important
thing
about
the
idea
of
us
running
our
own,
like
keepers
or
whatever,
and
like
our
own
internal
infrastructure,
for
this
is
that
it
doesn't
scale
to
when
we
offer
governance
to
other
dials,
we
can't
tell
them
to
go
run
their
own
things.
You
know
we
need
a.
There
could
be
a
good
option
for
us
as
like
a
last
line
of
defense.
H
Geronimo
was
actually
alluding
to
something
that
federico
is
building.
We
actually
have
that
you
know
the
keepers,
so
it's
it's
something
that
federico
will
be
presenting
to
the
dell
soon
and.
E
A
H
I
H
F
H
Yeah,
that
was
daniel,
but
yeah
david.
We
have
a
telegram
group
and,
and
david
was
helping
us
with
you,
know,
figuring
out
how
we
could
you
know,
find
a
belt
alternative
to
the
ipfs
panetta
problems,
we're
having.
D
Two
interesting
things
right,
like
the
off-chain
keeper
work
for
like
reproducing
our
data
on
like
decentralized
networks
and
then
like
a
lutsy's
keeper
project,
which
serves
like
the
dxdaw
for
like
ethereum
off-chain
transaction
off-chain,
work,
which
needs
to
be
done
so
like
they're,
two
great
initiatives
there
and
I
think,
with
lucy's
project.
I
think
the
dxo
could
even
pay
out
dxd
for
like
keeper
work
on
the
ethereum
network.
H
Yeah,
possibly
he
is
banging
his
head
with
the
tokenomics
it
it
could
be
any
it's
yet
to
be
determined.
It's
it's
difficult.
H
It's
my
fan,
my
my
laptop
just
had
its
fan
turned
on.
J
H
Yeah
well,
we
would
pass
the
signal
proposal
and
I
reached
out
to
them
and
they
said
that
they
will
prepare
some
end
points
for
us
they're,
just
struggling
with
figuring
out
the
amount
of
requests
that
would
be
sending
their
way
and
because
currently
it's
mostly
you
know,
swapper
that
has
the
most
activity.
E
C
Ross
is
there
a
way
to
put
to
share
that
amount
in
the
number
or
like.
E
I
just
took
them
from
geronimo's
once
they
used
norman.
D
C
Sweet
because
yeah
like
the
whole
idea,
was
like
we
need
to
well.
C
The
goal
is
to
ramp
up,
you
know,
usage
of
our
products
and
then
in
turn,
that
would
also
ramp
up
usage
of
request
to
pocket
and
then,
like
the
more
we're
using
it,
the
more
then
we
can
take
the
next
step
and
the
next
step
is
like
yeah
gets
buy
some
of
their
tokens
and
I
think
we
want
to
buy
some
of
their
tokens
at
their
otc
price
like
sooner
than
later,
if
possible
and
then
and
then
eventually
like
they're
running
the
nodes
for
us
and
then
eventually,
according
to
the
conversation
we
just
had,
then
people
in
the
dxdow
community
can
run
the
nodes
too
or
something
but
yeah
by
buy
the
tokens
soon.
D
Yeah,
I
would
like,
I
think,
that's
several
times
I
sing
a
like
positive
about.
We
should
do
a
talk
as
soon
as
possible,
but
I
think
we
already
missed
out
a
little
bit
on
like
price
appreciation.
I,
like
I'm,
very
bullish
on
pocket.
C
C
E
C
Is
there,
is
there
any
reason,
or
is
it
possible
to
let
other
projects,
let's
say
other
gnosis
chain
projects
or
something
that
are
getting
a
bunch
of
traffic
like
come
through
us
through
our
pocket,
our
pocket
rails?
Is
that
something
that
makes
sense
or
not
to
like
build
the
volume
that's
being
coming
through
dx
thousands.
E
D
E
J
D
E
We
could
also
like
currently,
if
you
connect
your
metamask
in
the
exports
and
load
it
that
way,
we're
just
using
the
whatever
rpcs
set
up
in
your
meta
mask.
We
could
skip
that
as
well
force.
H
Yeah
I
mean
their
comment
on
like
having
us
especially
send
them.
Many
requests
was
if
we
wanted
to
additionally
buy
an
extra
amount
of
tokens,
you
know
through
dx
ventures,
but
as
dx
dao,
they
are
more
than
happy
to
create
the
end
points
for
us
to
start
using
them,
even
without
even
purchasing
any
tokens.
You
know
that
they
will
cover
us
until
they
get
their
tokens
wrapped
and
sent
to
ethereum
maintenance.
D
Like
rece
previously,
I
I
I
thought,
like
I
had
a
call
with
them
with
a
few
other
dxo
members.
They
had
actually
no
issues
with
a
token
swap
proposal,
but
it
seems
like
it
changed.
H
Well,
the
issue
was
mainly
on
our
end
because
we
had
nowhere
to
store
the
pop
tokens
because
they
only
lived
on
their
network
and
and
we
wanted
proper
custody
of
those,
and
the
only
offer
at
hand
was
for
us
to
form
a
multi-sig
on
their
own
network.
But
now
that
they
will
have
the
tokens
bridged
to
mainnet.
It
will
be
a
whole
different
thing,
so
yeah,
but
we
don't
even
need
to
do
a
swap.
We
could
just
purchase
them
with
eth
or
stable
coins.
C
D
Got
it
and
there's
no
way
like
nathan?
Do
you
know
the
status
of
like
the
east
bridge.
H
Not
as
of
late
here,
I
I
just
realized
for
some
reason,
I'm
no
longer
in
the
discord
and
something
weird
happened
yesterday
with
curve.
I
was
kickband
and
I'm
wondering
if
it
could
be
related,
because
I
I
was
in
pog
discord
recently
just
like
a
few
days
ago
and
I
wonder
how
that
could
have
happened.
I'm
still
in
a
ton
of
other
discord
servers
that
I
never
visit
and
and
I'm
suddenly
like
no
longer
in
the
pocket,
discord
and
I'm
as
we
speak
now,
I'm
trying
to
join
it
and
I
cannot
even
join
it.