►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-01-05]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
geeksdale
governance
discussion,
the
first
one
of
2022.,
it's
wednesday
january
5th,
1600
utc.
We
will
start
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
and
hopefully
I've
pre-loaded,
the
dxfo
pages,
so
they
work
dave
but
yeah.
Let's
start
with
mainnet.
Here,
oh
no.
A
A
couple
big
proposals,
even
on
mainnet
during
this
this
time
I
think
yeah.
So
this
is
one
I
mentioned
actually
a
couple
weeks
ago.
I
think
it's
just
about
to
pass
and
the
next
day
it's
a
red
boost
for
saso.
It's
an
old
rep
boost
there,
but
she
submitted
it
at
the
beginning
of
december.
I
think
it's
good
to
encourage
the
the
rep
boost
there
and
then
we
have
ross
nielsen's
worker
proposal.
A
I
would
give
a
shout
out
to
this
one
for
worth
or
read:
there's
a
lot
of
good
information
in
it.
Ross
talks
a
lot
about
what
he's
working
on,
but
also
kind
of
some
things
where
dx
gov
is
going
there
so
definitely
worth
a
worth
of
read
and
I
guess
is
set
to
pass
in
four
days
there,
and
then
we
have
the
proposal
for
grand
investment
from
geek
style
to
d2
labs
inc,
aka
double
so
this
is
also
mirrored
on
xdi
from
sky,
but
this
proposal
is
actually
from.
C
A
Wallet
of
d2
labs
has
been
submitted
by
by
them,
I
believe
actually
through
dx
vote
two,
so
this
would
be
100k
grant
investment.
I
think
this
is
based
primarily
off
of
the
grant
investment
that
was
done
for
for
opolis,
so
skye.
You
were
kind
of
leading
this,
and
this
has
been
people
talking
about
this
for
the
last
a
couple
months,
but
maybe
you
would
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
this
proposal.
C
D
Yeah
in
general
yeah,
you
know,
there's
a
lot
happening
in
the
d5
space.
I
even
though
there's
like
other
things
that
are
like
trying
to
solve
like
projects
that
need
liquidity
and
things,
there's
like
balancer
pools
and
and
ondo,
and
whatever
I
still
think
like
this
type
of
product
and-
and
I
think
henry
and
his
team
are
really
good,
and
I
think
that
if
they
are
able
to
execute
this,
it
ties
in
really
well
with
dx
dao's
suite
of
products,
especially
once
we
had
like
project
launching
things.
D
So
I
think
in
general
it's
a
really
it's
a
very
unique,
it's
very
specific
at
first,
but
it
could
expand
and
it's
very
unique
to
defy
space
in
terms
of
like
the
structure
of
this.
Yes,
it
was
based
kind
of
off
of
opolis.
D
The
difference
was
opolis
had
and
had
a
live
work
token
that
they
kind
of
distributed
as
a
get
almost
as
a
gift
to
participants
in
the
opera
system
that
are
using
opolis
and
also
people
that
gave
grants
and
investments,
and
so
it
was
kind
of
a
yeah.
The
token
was
already
live.
D
This
structure
has
similar
language,
but
it's
it's
very
unique
because
it
includes,
if
you
scroll
down
a
little
bit
chris
like
to
the
details
of
yeah,
can
you
just?
Can
you
scroll
down
yeah
as
the
investor?
D
Sorry,
the
the
no
further
up
it's
the
structure
of
that
this
part,
so
the
grantors
shall
will
basically
get
the
same
rights
as
an
investor.
So,
even
though
this
is
a
grand
investment
which
is
what
we,
how
we
structure
it
and
like
theoretically,
they
can
walk
away.
D
Henry
actually
proposed
this,
and
this
is
very
unique.
To
put
this
is
the
actual
same
details
as
like
that
are
in
a
safe,
like
this
is
a
y
combinator
safe.
That
is
how
they
are
raising
money
from
other
investors
and
seed
investors
and
individuals,
and
maybe
there's
a
couple
funds
but
like
having
those.
D
This
is
effectively
the
same
as
like
signing
a
safe
contract.
Now
we
don't
have
the
legal
recourse,
but
that
we're
using
that
logic
behind
the
investment
grant.
So
that's
because
there's
no
token
that
exists
right.
So
this
is
like
you.
D
We
could
have
equity
in
this
thing
and
then,
if
there
is
a
token,
we
then
could
get
like
tokens
as
like
through
like
the
warrant
process
or
whatever,
and
so
that
having
that
speci,
I
had
it
very
like
way
more
generic
in
the
beginning,
because
that's
kind
of
you
know
we
don't
have
legal
legal
contracts,
henry
actually
offered
to
put
this
exact
language
into
this
proposal
and
so
effectively
by
him
doing
this
and
us
if
we
pass
it.
That
is
effectively
like
an
enchanting
contract,
and
so
that's
that's
pretty
cool.
D
I
haven't
really
seen
yeah
a
dao.
Do
a
investment
grant
proposal
that
gets
you
the
basically
the
same
terms
as
a
investor
in
a
like
y
combinator,
safe
agreement.
So
that's
pretty
unique.
I
think
most
things
have
been
like
four
tokens
and
things
like
that.
So
we'll
see
how
yeah
this
has
never
been
done.
So
I
don't
we'll
see
how
this
ends
up,
but
and
then
this
kind
of
partnership
alignment
piece
we
added
also
basically
to
solidify
in
this
agreement
between
this
on-chain
agreement
that
we
like
it's
not
just
an
investment
like.
D
We
also
want
to
benefit
each
other
and
use
our
skills
that
we
both
have
to
benefit
the
other
community
and
project,
and
so
putting
that
language
in
there,
I
think,
was
a
good
addition
and
yeah,
and
so
I
yeah,
I
think,
they're
he
they're
planning
to.
Like
close.
D
I
bet
I
guess
closed
the
whole
fundraising
things
that
they're
doing
in
like
this
month
and
then
they
you
know,
I
still,
I
think,
have
to
get
auditor
they're
in
the
process
and
then
they
would
like
have
a
launch
at
some
point
in
the
in
the
next
few
months.
Probably,
but
they
you
know,
the
cool
thing.
D
Is
it's
d5,
so
they,
you
know
the
as
the
things
change
like
the
project
can
also
change
and
improve
and
update
as
well
and
so
anything
that
we
think
that
we
can
help
them
with
yeah
and
that
that
includes
feedback
that
includes
trying
to
use
it.
D
You
know
incorporating
it
where
we
can
introducing
them
to
people
on
projects
that
might
get
value
of
it
out
of
it,
so
anything
that
we
can
contribute
to
the
to
their
team,
which
would
help
you
know
the
overall
thing
and
then
they
can
yeah
and
then,
if
we
have
questions
or
needs
or
ask
from
them,
we
can
also
ask
them
so
yeah,
it's
part
of
a
bigger
relationship.
D
So
that's
kind
of
the
summary
which
is
pretty
exciting
and
the
cool
thing
in
general
is
we
have
like
this
and
we
have
probably
a
handful
of
other.
You
know
things
that
are
all
gonna
kind
of
pass
in
maybe
january,
which
is
a
great,
I
think,
a
great
way
to
start
off.
2022
with,
like
all
these,
you
know,
on-chain
big
partnership,
actions
and
investments
and
things
which
is
yeah
great
great
start
to
2022..
E
I
agree
this
is
pretty
cool
and
just
echoing
what
I
wrote
in
the
chat,
which
is
good
to
see
that
the
valuation,
I
think
that
should
be
something
we're
always
like,
mindful
of
with
any
investment
and
yeah.
It's
exciting.
Thanks
for
leading
this
guy
yep.
A
Yeah
and
just
to
echo
something
scott,
I
think
you
said
earlier:
it's
like
a
unique
product
in
a
very
like
familiar
space
like
there's
lots
of
people
trying
to
solve
this
problem,
but
no
one
has
really
figured
out
how
to
do
it,
and
so
it's
good
to
kind
of
back
a
horse.
I
think
in
in
that
race
and
also,
hopefully
that'll
kind
of
help
the
product
suite
too
and
then
the
second
thing
is
yeah.
A
It's
very
cool
to
see
this
kind
of
the
structure
of
this,
the
the
yc
save
component,
the
valuation
of
that
and
the
way
that
these
things
work.
I
guess
going
forward.
Of
course,
there's
no
like
recourse,
but
if
we're
building
in
this
world
that's
on
chain
and
there's
all
of
these
different
ways
of
like
social
checking,
I
actually
think
we
have
you
know
pretty
good
recourse,
because
we
can
go
back
and
point
to
this
proposal
itself
for
any
type
of
kind
of
discussion
for
going
forward.
A
D
Yeah
and
then
just
you
mentioned
the
beginning,
this
was
submitted
on
dx
vote
so
ross.
This
was
this
would
be
kind
of
cool
to
hear
so
henry
you
know
had
never
used
the
expo
before
and
he
was
able
to
yeah
with
very
little
help
do
this.
He,
the
ipfs
loading
thing,
is
very
confusing
to
someone
who's
never
seen
this
before.
He
saw
like
the
text
upload
to
ipfs,
but
then
he
didn't
see
the
field
entry
details
upload
and
he
was
very,
he
was
kind
of.
D
He
thought
that
that
might
have
been
a
mistake
or
something
that
the
actual
number
details
of
the
of
the
proposal,
which
is
like,
I
guess
the
on-chain
part
right
that
that
doesn't
go
to
ipfs,
which
kind
of
makes
sense,
if
you
think
about
it,
but
yeah
for
someone
who
is
using
dxo
for
the
first
time
and
has
never
seen
it
before
was
able
to
do
the
proposal
with
yeah
with
very
little
help
just
checking
yeah.
A
D
D
This
is
not
john
pauler
who
has
done
one
before
this
is
like
part,
people
that
work
with
him.
When
we
asked
them
to
do
this
proposal,
we
basically
told
them
the
proposal
that
they
should
make
to
dx
dow
for
eth
denver
sponsorship,
which
is
a
little
unique
because
we
are
the
ones
that
want
to
sponsor,
but
we're
asking
them
to
do
it
so
that
it
was
more
of
a
contract.
D
D
D
It's
not
it's
less
of
a
contract,
then,
in
the
meantime,
like
we
kind
of
complained
that
they
were
being
lazy
and
so
john
pollard
eventually
like
said,
he
could
have
done
it
because
he's
done
it
before
and
he's
familiar
at
least
with
alchemy
is
where
he
did
it,
even
though,
when
he
did
alchemy
or
acropolis,
he
like
he
got
messed
up
twice
two
times,
but
that's
yeah
that
that's
not
a
good
sign
of
like
people
that
are
like
less
sophisticated,
like
henry's
sophisticated.
D
A
Okay,
moving
along
to
the
last
proposal
on
mainnet
also
a
mirror
proposal.
This
one
also
a
hundred
thousand
usdc
this
one
a
little
bit
different.
This
is
a
proposal
to
sponsor
the
copenhagen
flames,
which
is
a
esport
team,
so
this
was
submitted
by
d
labs
and
so
dave.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
give
a
few
comments
and
explain
this.
C
Sure
I
mean
we
talked
about
it,
a
bit
already
on
the
strategy
and
biz
school,
but
happy
to
give
a
brief
overview.
I
think
there
are
really
well.
The
summary
chris
said,
of
course,
is
correct:
it's
like
a
one-year
sponsorship
with
copenhagen
flames,
which
is
an
esports
organization
based
out
of
denmark
in
copenhagen.
Of
course,
the
name
kind
of
gives
it
away,
and
I
think
there
are
three
main
kind
of
goals
for
the
dx
style
in
doing
this
or
moving
forward
with
this.
C
If
we
decide
to
do
so,
the
first
is
from
the
marketing
angle.
So
overall
awareness
and
of
course
we
you
know
they
would
print
a
jigsaw
logo
on
their
yearly
jersey,
which
goes
into
production
soon
and,
of
course,
their
fan
base
is
very
tech.
Native
already,
it's
mostly
you
know.
Young
people
who
are
you
know
already
use
discord.
So
there's
somewhat
of
an
overlap
of
communities
there
and
a
lot
of
esports
organizations
are
already
sponsored
by
other
crypto
projects
as
well
exchanges.
They
do
nft
launches.
C
So
there
is
already
a
significant
overlap
there
in
terms
of
target
audience.
I
guess
the
second
one
would
be
I'm
just
reading
john's
comments.
Apologies,
the
second
one
would
be
general
onboarding
of
new
people
into
web3
and
educational
content,
so
copenhagen
flames
would
be
down
to
like
prepare
educational
content
about
what
a
dow
is
and
how
teams
can
use
dials
in
esports
to
kind
of
govern
themselves
and
the
third
and
ultimate
one,
which
would
be
kind
of
more
like
the
long-term
goal.
C
C
C
So
I
spoke
with
them
and
we
would
get
the
t-shirts
at
production
cost
and
a
quick
funny.
Little
thing
is
that
they're
actually
also
sponsored
by
hp
omen,
which
is
like
the
gaming
umbrella
of
hp,
and
so
it
would
have
both
dx
dow
and
then
it
would
have
holmen
on
the
shirt
as
well.
If
we
go
ahead
of
it,
so
it
would
kind
of
look
like
it's
both
our
logos
but
yeah.
That's
a
brief
sponsorship
and
so
daniel.
Actually,
the
guy
you
see
at
the
bottom
here
is
the
guy.
C
We've
been
in
touch
with
the
coach
of
the
counter-strike
team,
he's
the
owner,
one
of
the
owners
of
the
the
team
and
also
the
esports
director,
and
he
actually
also
posted
a
comment
in
our
forums.
So
yeah
definitely
worth
checking
out
the
forum
post
and
voicing
your
opinion
by
voting
on
the
proposals
and
that's
a
brief
overview
from
my
side.
E
And
I
think
this
is
super
exciting,
not
just
because
it's
a
cool
marketing
opportunity,
but
because
I
think,
if
you
think,
take
a
step
back
and
look
at
what
we're
doing
in
crypto
here
like
all
of
d5s
and
everything,
it's
very
like
prototyped
and
reflexive,
and
all
about
speculation
and
not
a
lot
of
actual
real-world
use
case.
And
I
think
this
represents
an
opportunity
that
we're
chasing
to
actually
venture
into
the
real
world
where
people
might
find
like
actual
usage
for
the
products
that
we're
working
on
like
on
on
chain
governance,
decentralized,
finance.
E
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
look
for
communities
that
are
already
online.
That
may
be
looking
for
new
ways
to
organize
and
to
capitalize
and
and
so
forth.
And
so
I
think
this
is
super
awesome
and
big
props
to
dave
for
kind
of
coming
up
with
this
and
pursuing
the
idea.
C
Yeah
and
copenhagen
flame,
one
also
cool
thing.
Actually,
thanks.
John
of
course,
is
that
copenhagen
flames
also
has
their
own
production
studio.
So
if
you
go
on
their
youtube,
they
also
do
very
good
content,
so
that's
also
something
that
would
fall
under
this
deal
where
we
would
try
to
do
some
educational
content
around.
What
is
a
dao,
you
know
educating
some
of
their
audience
and
they
actually
also
organize
events.
C
You
know
so
something
we
could
also
do
in
the
future,
for,
like
a
marketing
purpose,
would
be
like
some
web
three
counter-strike
tournaments
or
something
like
this.
You
know
like
they
have
experience
and
run
large
tournaments
as
well.
So
I
think,
there's
you
know
a
lot
of
opportunities
that
might
also
arise,
which
we
might
not
even
be
thinking
about
right
now,.
A
Yeah,
just
to
echo,
I
think
what
keenan
said
in
here
like
this
is
definitely
a
like
a
dao
sponsors
esports
article,
and
I
think
we
probably
wait
until
now,
if
the
sponsors
like
officially
launch
and
kind
of
do
something
with
them,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
would
probably
be
like
the
closest
we
could
get
or
like
the
maybe
the
best
bet
at
getting
some
like
mainstream
crypto
coverage
in
the
coming
like
months
here.
A
And
then
moving
to
x-star,
we
have
register
quick
wallet
scheme
v,
1.1,
which
I
think
is
actually
passed
but
has
not
been
executed
now
gusto
if
you're
on.
Maybe
you
could
chat
briefly
about
this.
F
The
quick
quality
scheme
1.1
fixed
an
issue
where
we
weren't
able
to
change
the
voting
parameters
of
the
existing
quick
quality
scheme,
which
is
going
to
be
the
now
that
we
have
that
we
have
been
using
the
1.0
so
yeah
it
fixed
this
issue,
and
the
next
thing
that
we
should
be
doing
is
setting
the
permissions
for
the.
F
For
the
quick
word
scheme
like
we
should
set
the
same
permission
that
we
have
for
the
1.0
and
to
the
1.1
and
then
prompt
for
the
funds,
and
we
should
be
able
to
to
start
using
it.
Now.
When
I
execute
or
someone
execute
the
function,
we
should
see
register
and
we
will
see
that
the
boosted
time
period
is
different
to
the
other
one
because
it
will
be
using
the
right
voting
configuration.
F
You
can
see
that
everything
is
the
same
like
it
use
the
same
boat
in
parameter
hash,
the
world.
The
scheme
the
scheme
address
is
the
same
that
we
are
using
in
also
in
arabic,
roon
one
in
rinkavy,
because
this
was
created
using
the
create
two.
So
we
have
the
yeah.
We
have
the
same
address
for
the
quick
quality
scheme
in
x-I
alberto
one
ring
kaby.
I
think
arabic
from
testnet.
A
F
A
F
F
F
F
F
A
Go
to
that
I
heard
it
was
an
interesting
demo.
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
see
it.
What
exactly
is
the
the
signed
vote?
This
sign
votes
test
proposal.
F
Well,
actually,
I
don't
know
because
it
took
like
50
minutes
to
go
through
all
the
demo
and
all
the
questions
that
everyone
has
so
it
consumed
the
entire
developer
call.
But
basically,
the
idea
is
to
if
to
share,
is
to
sign
a
vote
and
share
the
signature
on
anywhere
right
on
any
public
network.
So
what
is
very
similar
to
what
the
snapshot
does,
but
snapshot
have
control
of
their
over
the
signature
that
that
they
share
right.
F
There
was
some.
There
was
a
long
discussion
that
about
how
the
balls
are
going
to
be
passing
from
off
chain
to
unchained.
How
can
we
automate
that?
How
can
we
incentivize
that
a
lot
of
questions?
This
is
an
experimental
feature,
but
once
we
have
it,
I'm
pretty
sure
that
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
find
a
right
solution
and
make
a
very
good
implementation
to
have
cheap
voting
where
we
are
going
to
see
more
people
involved
in
the
governance.
F
F
The
hardest
part,
is
to
get
the
signature,
because
once
you
have
it,
we
can
find
a
way
to
incentivize
the
moon
from
modes
off
chain
to
the
on
chain
or
to
execute
it
ourselves
in
an
automated
way
anyway.
F
So
very
much
in
progress
like
I
said,
and
hopefully
we
are
going
to
have
it
soon
this
month
on
on
the
expo
and
is
going
to
be
only
used
on
the
schemes
that
use
the
exe
boring
machine,
which
are
the
word
schemes.
A
Cool
and
for
those
interested
in
this
spicy
discussion,
I
plan
on
watching
it
later
too
there's
some
discussion
on
the
dev
video
dev
call
from
yesterday.
So
if
you're
interested
make
sure
to
watch
that,
so
we
can
dive
into
this,
because
it's
something
we've
obviously
talked
about
for
a
long
time.
So
I
think
explore
exploring
experimenting
with
different
ways
of
solving
this
code.
A
Okay,
moving
to
xdi.
Oh
sorry,
continue
my
next
die.
There's
a
proposal
convert
state
tokens
to
gno,
so
this
is
actually
just
a
simple
proposal
to
send
the
stake.
That's
in
the
treasury,
I
think
it's
seven
thousand
one:
seven
thousand
eight
hundred
stake
to
the
multisig
on
xdi
to
be
able
to
transfer
or
convert
it
to
gno
through
the
state
to
gno
converter
there.
A
A
E
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
good,
a
good
question.
I
think
the
easiest
thing
I
mean
the
reason
it's
going
to
the
multi-stake
and
this
proposal
is
to
just
kind
of
avoid
the
complication
of
having
to
do
it
with
the
ui,
because,
with
the
proxy
tokens
on
stake,
the
current
uis
aren't
supporting
that
with
the
deadline
coming
up
january
9th
it
was.
E
I
think
that
the
idea
was
that
the
multisig
would
just
be
the
safer
option,
and
I
think
it
may
also
make
sense
similarly
to
try
to
leave
the
gno
in
the
multisig
for
the
on
the
ninth
or
you
know,
maybe
a
couple
days
around,
the
ninth
just
to
be
safe,
so
that
when
the
cow
swap
airdrop
happens
and
whatever
else
is
entailed
by
that
airdrop,
it
could
be
handled
by
the
safe.
I
think
there
might
be.
E
E
Maybe
you
want
to
think
about
this
a
little
bit
more
actually,
and
I
think,
there's
also
like
an
options
airdrop,
so
that
gno
holders
have
the
ability
to
actually
participate
in
investing
in
cow
swap
and
the
same
terms
as
some
other
investors
that
they
had
lined
up,
but
I'm
not
sure
the
exact
mechanics,
and
so
the
thing
that
I
I
just
realized
as
we're
talking
is,
is
that
that
vested
portion
like
how
to
get
it.
I
guess
it's
me
yeah,
I'm
not
sure
there,
but
might
need
to
do
some
more
research.
A
Yeah,
I
would
imagine
or
hope,
maybe
not
true,
but
if
the
gno
is
in
the
xd
style
treasury,
I
would
hope
that,
like
gnosis
would
figure
out
a
way
to
make
that
air
drop
like
go
through.
Considering
it
would
be
one
of
the
larger
brony
air
drops
on
xdi
and
our
hypnosis
chain
and
yeah.
Maybe
it
doesn't
go
through
the
official
channels,
but
I
feel
like
it
would
be
good
if
they
figured
out
a
way
to
make
it
work
through
the
dow.
E
I
think
the
dow
would
be
eligible
just
fine.
I
think
that
I
guess
the
other
question
would
be.
Are
there
some
additional
actions
that
we'd
either
need
to
take
or
or
would
want
to
take
and
yeah?
Is
that
going
to
be
difficult
to
do
with
the
multi
call
scheme?
Like
I
mean
anything
is
possible,
but,
like
the
I
may
not
support
it
right.
I
think.
A
E
Of
the
airdrop
to
gno
is
going
to
be
liquid,
I
think
at
the
beginning
or
early
on,
and
then
the
other
half
is
going
to
be
vesting
over
some
other
period
and
then
that
third
component
is
the
options
that
they're
air
dropping
as
well.
I'm
not
sure
we,
I
guess
we
haven't
even
talked
about
that,
would
dx
now
want
to
exercise
those
options.
Should
we
talk
about
that
now.
A
A
little
bit
this
is
the
you
allowed
gnosis
token
holders
to
buy
in
to
what
cow
swap,
I
think,
raised
money
at
yeah.
So
they
say
that
originally
go
ahead.
C
C
E
And
they
lined
up
some.
You
know
normal
vcs
that
have
already,
I
think,
made
their
investments
and
the
idea
was
to
give
the
community
access
to
the
same
terms
as
the
vcs
and
the
way
they're
doing,
that
is
by
air,
dropping
options
to
gno
holders,
and
so
the
gno
holders,
when
they
receive
those
options,
they'll
have
the
ability
to
exercise
the
option
to
purchase
cow,
swap
tokens
under
the
same
terms
that
the
vcs
did,
and
so
that
would
come
with
a
vesting
schedule
and
it
would
be
the
same
price
that
the
vc
said.
E
I
was
actually
just
having
a
conversation
with
ken
this
morning
and
he
was
saying
it's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
complicated.
Actually,
in
that
you
know,
I
think
the
original
investments
by
the
vcs
are
made
in
dollars
like
usdc
or
such,
but
that
they
are
going
to
want
like
the
options
I
think
are
going
to
be
denominated
in
other
things
like
gno
and
eth.
Maybe.
A
G
E
E
Yeah-
I
guess
gnosis
isn't
really
in
this,
but
you
know
a
lot
of
projects
when
they're
raising
venture
capital,
like
that's
their
first
money,
they're
raising
and
they
kind
of
need
to
make.
You
know
they
maybe
don't
have
a
lot
of
leverage
in
those
deals.
Gnosis
doesn't
even
really
need
the
money
right
so
like
if
they
want
to
do
it
this
way
they
can.
They
can
do
it
this
way,
and
so
I
do
think
that
is
pretty
cool.
It's
probably
going
to
be
a
little
bit
complex.
E
Oh
and
the
other
thing
is,
I
mentioned
that
it
would
be
like
a
couple
of
weeks
or
there's
going
to
be
a
limited
time
period
in
which
to
exercise
the
options,
but
the
airdrop
redemption
will
be
like
open,
I
think,
for
a
longer
period
of
time,
but
yeah
I'm
not
clear
on
the
exact
mechanics.
It
was
also
mentioned
that
they're
going
to
do
like
the
tornado
style
with
the
non-transferable
tokens
at
first.
I
don't
even
know
why
exactly
but
yeah.
E
E
D
Yeah
yeah,
it's
I
mean
it's
a
small
enough
amount
like
if
this
was
five
million
dollars
like
that
different
story.
If
it's
a
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars
and
then
we
get
some
cow
and
then
maybe
the
cow
gets
invested
over
time
and
we
like
send
it
as
we
get
invested,
we
send
it
to
the
dao
or
whatever,
like
that.
That
seems
fine
to
use
the
multi-sig
for
that
right.
E
I
think
that
would
be
okay,
but
I
also
thought
it
might
be
neat
to
provide
liquidity
on
swapper
using
the
which
actually
was
what
we
wanted
to
do
initially,
with
the
stake
in
it.
I
think
there
was
some
issue
with
the
proposals
and
then
we
didn't
do
it,
but
it
might
be
nice
to
actually
provide
liquidity
on
swapper
with
the.
J
J
I
have
an
idea,
so
I
skim
through
the
contract
when
you're
claiming
the
airdrop
or
the
vesting
option.
There
is
an
option
to
determine
the
claimant.
So
basically
it's
the
address
that
the
tokens
are
vested
to
after
the
vesting
period,
so
that
could
be
one
option
to
eliminate
the
risk
of
the
goodness
safe
option.
E
Yes,
because
there
will
be
a
time
limit
on
that,
I
think
we
maybe
will
only
have
a
couple
weeks,
so
I
mean
they
said.
The
snapshot
is
the
ninth,
which
is
in
like
four
days.
So,
if
you,
you
know,
I
think
it's
likely
that
the
airdrop
may
come
fairly
soon
after
that
right.
So
we
might
not
have
that
much
time,
even
from
now
to
figure
that
out.
A
Yeah,
I
think
it
would
be
good.
I
mean
I'm
leaning
towards
something
I
mean
think
about
the
other
dx
ventures,
investments
we've
made
and
kind
of
where
they've
been
along.
So
almost
like,
comparing
cow
swaps
to
that,
and
it
probably
I'm
not
sure
what
the
parameters
of
the
discount
are.
But
if
it's
something
that
would
make
it
a
venture
type
investment,
then
I
think
it
makes
sense,
but
I
think
it'd
be
good
to
have
like
if
they
do
have
like.
A
This
is
what
the
deal
is
just
like
putting
that
in
the
forum
and
then
like
making
a
vote
on
it.
I
think,
would
be
a
good
signal.
C
D
E
A
E
E
I
do
think
it
would
be
good
to
do
it's
probably
not
nearly
as
much
as
the
typical
venture
investment
either
since
the
stake
is
only
worth
like
120k,
I
imagine
the
options
are
not
going
to
be
worth.
You
know.
I
imagine
they're
going
to
be
worth
like
a
fraction
of
that
right,
so
it
might
be
something
more
like
10
and
20k.
D
E
A
Cool,
I
guess
finding
out
that
the
multi-stick,
maybe
in
the
short
term,
I
agree
that
we
are
talking
about
actually
pretty
smaller
amounts
here.
Considering
it'll
be
an
airdrop
of
that
130k
and
then
yeah,
I
think,
would
be
cool
to
even
just
signal
that
we
are
interested
in
supporting
it,
even
if
it
is
like
a
obvious
move
from
a
treasury
perspective,
but
it's
kind
of
like
guess,
who's
a
like
what
should
dxdow
be
doing
with
the
treasury
opening
up
that
discussion
to
the
community.
E
Yeah,
you
know
I'll
ping
him
now
and
just
ask
you
know
tell
him
that
we're
trying
to
figure
this
out
and
see
if
he
can
help
at
all.
I
don't
think
I
don't
know
of
any
public
post
that
like
details
this
other
than
that,
like
you
know
they,
they
gave
the
distribution
intent
in
their
next.
C
A
Cool
and
we've
been
along.
A
Then
there
are
the
two
mirror:
proposals
on
x
die
for
the
copenhagen
flames,
which
we
already
discussed
and
then
also
the
double
laps
interesting.
It's
not
double
on
the
x
die,
I'm
just
seeing
that
here,
and
so
those
are
good
for
supporting
and
kind
of
vote
with
the
no
gas
environment
there,
and
I
think
we
have
three
buybacks
that
are
live
or
boosted
right
now
and
then
there
is
this
swap
50k
wx
out
of
usdc
on
curve.
Dave's
talked
about
this
before
so
we
we
test
this
out.
A
I
think
two
weeks
ago,
using
curve
for
a
wx
died,
a
usd
swap.
This
is
needed
for
the
treasury,
because
some
of
the
contractors
like
spacex
team,
omega
request
usdc,
but
we're
primarily
in
in
xdi.
So
this
is
actually
a
way
that
we
can
get
usdc
in
the
xdx
dow,
while
without
without
going
through
the
main
net.
So
this
is
a
pretty
good
proposal.
There.
A
And
then
there
is
two
proposals:
worker
proposals,
one
for
leather
tiate-
that
was
just
submitted
in
boosting
earlier,
and
then
there
is
another
one
for
boris
block
here
and
then
I
literally
just
submitted
it
like
two
minutes
ago,
and
I
haven't
even
boosted
it
yet
because
it
is
yep
here
we
go
because
I
couldn't
get
enough
build
at
ipfs,
but
I
cleared
the
cache
like
dave
and
ross
tell
me
to-
and
it
actually
worked
here
so
just
I'll
boost
this,
probably
in
a
little
bit,
but
just
a
little
background.
A
This
is
actually
the
november
payout.
The
second
second
one
for
me
and
then
also
the
retrospective
bonus
and
then
also
one
thing
to
note
here:
I'm
actually
just
claiming
12
1
214
main
net
rep,
which
would
actually
be
the
limit
for
the
four
percent
main
net
rep
on
mainnet.
I
think
some
of
the
the
main
rep.
Obviously
we
have
the
numbers
going
up
and
down
as
people
mint
new
reputation,
but
some
of
us
are
now
coming
up
to
that
that
four
percent
mark
there.
A
So
maybe
something
to
note
for
that
proposal
there,
but
yeah
that
was
it
for
xdi.
Any
other
anything
we
missed
any
questions
on
the
outstanding
proposals.
A
Cool
and
then
just
the
I
have
read
it,
and
I
I
didn't
have
read
the
initial
response,
but
I'm
not
a
chance
to
see
your
response
nathan,
but
there
was
a
post
from
hen
also
from
and
about
thinking
about
what
to
do
with
the
130
uk
usdc.
That's
in
the
bonding
curve,
smart
contract.
I
think
something
we
need
to
think
about
and
come
up
with,
like
a
multi-maybe
prong
approach
about
how
we're
upgrading
the
contract,
but
then,
specifically,
I
guess,
to
to
hen
to
me.
C
A
Giving
it
to
the
same
address
that
sent
the
130k
to
the
bonding
curve
and
then
just
at
a
later
date,
when
we
upgrade
the
bonding
curve,
we
get
the
130k.
A
That
assumes
that
we
can
upgrade
the
contract
and
get
the
130k,
and
I
think
that
we
are
pretty
confident
of
that.
But
that's
just
the
risk.
I
think
the
dx
dow
would
be
that
we
wouldn't
actually
be
able
to
access
that
130k
usdc,
but
yeah.
This
is
just
in
the
forum,
so
nothing
there
to
to
kind
of
do
right
now,
but
maybe
something
to
think
about
going
forward.
H
Yeah,
it's
good
that
you
picked
on
it.
I
almost
forgot
about
it.
Augusto
and
john
are
probably
more
knowledgeable
on
the
scope
of
work
for
the
update
of
the
contract.
I'm
wondering
could
we
perhaps
incentivize
if
he
could
find
deaths
that
could
do
that
and
speed
up
the
process
of
the
updates?
If
I'm,
I'm
not
sure
whether
we
need
to
do
some
brainstorming
on
the
parameters
of
the
update
or
that's
already
fixed,
and
it's
just
the
implementation
that's
pending.
E
Yeah,
so
can
has
actually
already
did
something
like
that,
where
he
somebody
from
gnosis
actually
helped
him.
You
know,
do
a
pr
that
adds
the
function
that
would
be
required
to
remove
the
funds
in
an
upgrade.
So
I
think,
on
his
part
he
has
made
that
effort.
E
I
I
would
not
want
to
put
any,
I
mean
I
think,
there's
more
than
enough
kind
of
pressure
to
get
government
2.0,
implemented
and
stuff,
but
I
wouldn't
want
to
rush
anything
like
for
the
sake
of
you
know
the
100k
or
whatever
that's
in
the
upgrade.
I
think
we
we
are
planning
to
upgrade
the
bonding
curve
at
some
point
just
in
in
210,
because
there's
the
2500
eth
but
yeah
I
wouldn't
want
to
adjust
timelines.
It
simply
doesn't
seem
worth
it
for
something
like
this.
E
So
personally,
if
people
are
okay
with
it
and
this
kind
of
helps
hand
out,
he
has
been
a
community
member
and
he's,
you
know
been
involved
and
done
stuff
for
for
years
since
pretty
early
on,
so
I
mean
I
think
it's
probably
the
most
expedient
thing
is
to
kind
of
front
him
the
money
here
and
and
then
take
care
of
it
on
our
own
schedule.
E
Well,
he
has
already
waited
some
some
number
of
months
here,
but
yeah.
D
Is
there
some
other
like
like
yeah,
you
was
like.
What's
the
word
like
interesting
way
to
handle
this?
I'm
sure
this
has
happened
a
bunch
before
I'm
wondering
if
there's
some
some
something
that
dx
dow
can
get
out
of
it
right
and
it
almost
used
it
as
leverage.
E
A
A
A
E
D
E
J
D
Because
there
could
be,
you
know
like
if
there's
like
a
bug
in
the
bonding
curve
like
we,
we
thought
we
had
paused
it,
and
then
someone
sends
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
like
gets,
you
know,
1500
dxd,
and
they
like
make
money
because
they
hack
the
bonding
curve.
Like
that
happens,
all
the
time
people
try
to
hack
systems
and
they
like
try
to
do
things
by
sending
money
to
places
to
hack
the
system
like
if
it
worked,
and
he
and
he
got
1500
dxd
from
the
bonding
curve.
D
E
I
don't
think
so
I
mean
for
one.
I
don't
see
any
way
that
an
augusta
could
maybe
also
chime
in
here,
but
I
don't,
I
don't
think
sending
usdc
is
going
to
do
anything
in
the
bonding
curve
because
it
has
yeah.
It's
all
denominated
in
eth
and
also
we
know
him
like
he's.
He
is
agree,
has
rep.
He
was
around
early
on
and
he
works
for
gnosis.
So
I
mean
there
is
some.
I
I
really
don't
think
he
was
trying
to
hack
the
bodyguard,
but.
D
I
mean
the
other
argument
is
like.
Sometimes
you
win.
Sometimes
you
lose
basically
like.
So
we
did,
we
made
a
mistake
and
we
lost
75,
000
usdc
and
then
someone
else
made
a
mistake
and
we
got
a
hundred
thousand
usdc
it
like
basically
balances
out.
So
maybe
we
give
back
25
or
something
karma
is
that
the.
A
E
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
I
think
it's
like
the
right
thing
to
do
to
eventually
give
it
back.
You
know
if,
when
we
do
upgrade,
the
bonding
curve,
like
I
think
the
right
thing
to
do
would
be
to
send
the
usdc
back
if
we
don't
front
it
to
them
right
and,
and
we've
done
kind
of
similar
things
on
a
much
smaller
scale.
E
On
a
couple
of
occasions,
when
people
have
accidentally
sent
dxd
to
the
bonding
curve,
we've
allowed
them
to
make
proposals,
and
they,
I
think
the
I
forget
now,
if
they
actually
did-
and
I
believe
they
passed
proposals
like
this,
where
people
would
send
the
dxd
back
to
the
address
that
accidentally
sent
to
the
curve.
A
D
E
A
A
E
One
thing
another
thing
I
actually
just
painted
and
about
is
getting
swapper
integrated
to
cow
swap
on
on
gnosis
chain,
which
I
think
is
sort
of
a
reasonable
ask,
considering
that
it's
one
of
the
bigger
v2
forks
like
one
of
the
bigger
exchanges
on
a
gnosis,
but
but
I
guess
relatively,
it's
maybe
small,
compared
to
mainnet.
But
you
know
now
that
they
have
gnosis,
it
is
gnosis
chain.
You
would
think
it
kind
of
makes
sense.
D
E
Them
to
pursue
like
the
major
protocols,
but
it
sort
of
feels
bad
that
they
well.
I
don't
know
what
what
is
the
deal
with
those
the
the
stakeholder
words
that
have
been
approved
by
xday.