►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-12-14]
Description
00:02 Welcome and Agenda
01:39 Mainnet Roundup
06:28 Gnosis Chain Roundup
17:43 ENS DAO Steward elections
25:03 3AC - DXD Redemption Implementation
37:55 DXgov Budget check-in
39:39 DXdao Priorities Board
A
A
A
Items
the
ens,
Dow
Steward
elections
are
ongoing
and
they
actually
close
late
tonight.
So
I've
looked
at
the
opening
statements
and
I
got
some
thoughts
on
who
to
vote
for,
but
just
wanted
to
kind
of
run
it
by
people
here
and
see.
If
there
are
any
kind
of
comments
or
questions
on
that
there
is
the
three
AC
DxD
Redemption
implementation.
My
eyes
there
only
on
having
to
read
three
AC,
but
that's
a
post
about.
A
If
there
are
any
questions
on
those
I
know,
swapper
and
dixgov
both
made
some
edits
this
this
week,
swapper
just
this
morning
and
then
yeah
I
did
a
first
post
of
the
geek
style
priorities
board
on
kind
of
what
that
structure
could
look
like,
and
then
it
also
went
ahead
and
kind
of
created
a
Google
sheet
of
that,
along
with
some
help
there
so
we'll
get
to
those.
But
let's
start
first
with
the
proposal
Roundup
here,
some
at
the
top
that
have
already
passed
or
pending
execution
yeah.
A
Those
are
some
txt,
vesting
ones,
but
you
can
see
here.
There
are
I
think
there
are
three
different
die
or
four
different
die.
Dxd
proposals
going
through
here
so
remember.
This
is
using
this
part
of
doing
DC
BuyBacks
by
using
die
instead
of
eth,
and
this
goes
through
cow
swap,
but
it
takes
16
days.
So
that's
why
you
see
all
of
these
different
Cal
swap
orders
here
over
the
various
time
there.
A
Yes,
I
guess:
there's
actually
five
ongoing
right
there
yeah
and
then
there's
a
test
mimic
weft
wall.
This
was
a
previous
proposal
that
we
had
tried
before
about
an
a
vault
from
mimic
to
basically
automatically
wraps
wef
and
sends
it
back
to
the
Dow,
so
all
of
the
eat,
the
Deep
style
has
is,
is
just
really
in
the
form
of
eth.
But
for
a
lot
of
things
you
need
weth,
which
is
near
C20
token,
and
so.
A
A
For
that
and
is
set
to
go
through
yeah
in
just
under
two
days
yeah,
and
we
have
someone
there,
no
I
will
get
to
the
security
bot
yeah
proposal
for
October
2022.
This
is
a
proposal
that
I
submitted.
So
this
is
the
Second
Avenue
October
November
2022
one
here.
It
also
includes
a
rep
sync
for
proposals
that
previously
had
passed
on
nurses
chain
for
October
and
September.
B
A
Will
soon
be
under
four
percent
again
there,
but
yeah,
if
you
feel
so,
please
vote
on
unmannet
there,
and
then
we
have
the
DX
Voice
multi-sig
final
Top-Up
and
new
wallet
authorizations.
As
you
can
see,
this
is
doing
two
different
things
here.
It's
basically
switching
the
nose
is
safe
to
another
one
I
think
most
of
it,
because
it
can
do
multiple
chains
and
then
it's
also
topping
up
for
some
things
in
the
last
half
of
the
year
here.
So
this
is
the
carrot
landing
page.
C
A
A
A
Proposal
this
is
I,
think
as
you
just
the
rep
link
for
this
is
for
October
here
yeah
and
you
can
see
he's
minting
it
for
the
the
two
months
there
foreign-
that's
it
for.
Oh,
so
maybe
we
can
yeah
in
this
time
they
can
mention,
while
we're
changing
chains
here,
the
security
bot
that
Dave
has
got
up
and
running.
So
obviously
we're
going
here
we're
looking
at
geeked
vote,
which
is
our
way
of
looking
at
DX.
A
Doubt
governance,
but
there's
lots
of
there's
other
ways
to
read
the
blockchain
itself,
so
Dave
is
set
up.
I
think
that
a
bot
that
Nico
maybe
had
originally
set
up,
which
lists
all
of
the
current
proposals
that
are
live
on
both
mainnet
and
noses
chain.
Now,
so
it's
like
the
hashtag
security
bot
there
and
that's
a
way
of
basically
looking
at
the
blockchain
looking
what
the
proposals
are
without
actually
going
to
like
DX,
Vote
or
or
pulling
it
yourself
and
most
excitingly.
A
There
is
now
Emoji
support
on
this
bot.
So
first
it
was
just
emojis
that
had
yes
or
no,
that
was
passing,
but
now
there
is
unnosis
chain,
emoji
and
rumors
of
potentially
more
emojis
in
the
in
the
security
bot
thing.
But
it's
a
really
easy
way.
I
think
great
way
of
like
checking
what
the
proposals
are
more
than
you
want
to
like
investigate
and
read
further
what
they
are,
but
I
think
a
lot
of
us
that
are
looking
at
the
proposals
like
on
a
daily
basis.
That's
a
really
convenient.
B
A
A
We
are
running
low
on
on
West
here,
but
we've
got
a
way
of
kind
of
replenishing
it
there
and
then
we
have
a
couple
different
contributor
proposals.
We
have
Adam's
contributor
proposal
here,
which
is
for
18
000
xdi
for
September
and
October
Adam,
of
course
doing
tons
of
great
work
on
swapper
and
nimi,
and
then
also
you
can
see
here
in
Geeks
down
in
general.
He
had
some
great
ways
of
looking
at
the
ens
proposals
there
and.
A
B
A
Proposal
yet
for
18
000.,
and
then
there
are
two
proposals.
Leonardo
proposal
also
kind
of
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
swapper
here
and
this
one
is
for
3600,
and
this
is
for
the
end
of
this
proposal.
It
ran
through
October
and
November,
and
then
there
are
before
we
get
to
this
proposal
here.
There
are
two
other
contributor
proposals
out
there
or
three
other
con
proposals
for
two
contributors
that
are
just
now
staked
upon
boosted
and
going
so.
We
have
Medusa's
here
working
on
DX
gov.
B
A
A
A
A
small
kind
of
note
here,
if
you
add
up
all
of
the
dye
from
these
proposals,
I
think
it's
about
like
37
000
now,
there's
about
only
I
think
a
1
300
die.
That's
there
right
now,
there's
a
multi-sig
that
has
47k
die
that
we're
going
to
be
transferring
that
will
kind
of
replenish
that.
But
that
means
there's
just
not
that
much
X
style
left
in
nurses
chain
right
now.
We
are
planning
to
do
another
big
funding
proposal
once
all
of
these
budgets
get
approved
and
doing
that.
A
Would
be
great
to
do
that
on
mainnet
right
now,
because
you
will
be
getting
yeah
because
that's
where
the
funds
are
and
then
going
forward,
starting
with
the
new
year,
most
people
actually
will
get
paid
like
right
through
their
Guild,
but
otherwise
there
will
be
like
a
funding
proposal
that
will
replenish
some
of
the
funds
on
on
gnosis
change.
Should
there
be
any
need
for
like
quick
proposals,
quick
payments
going
through
I.
A
We'll
have
like
going
forward,
is
you
know
above
5000,
it
probably
shouldn't
be.
It
probably
should
be
coming
from
DX
down
itself
and,
of
course,
because
most
contributor
payments
are
gonna,
be
coming
through
the
guild
process
itself.
So,
but
outside
of
that,
we
really
shouldn't
be
having
like
large
scale,
payments
I
think
through
the
Notions
chain.
A
A
So
this
is
the
first
Guild
budget
that's
been
submitted,
so
we
have
been
working
on
this
process.
I
think
the
last
couple
of
months,
starting
with
really
like
the
first
restructuring
and
refocus
proposal,
which
you
know
mandated
I,
think
the
geek
style
look
more
closely
at
how
it's
managing
its
budget
and
expenses
and
come
to
a
little
bit
more
forward
planning
than
we
had
phase
two,
which
you
know
committed
to
a
six-month
budgetary
cycle
for
squads.
Then,
and
since
then,
we've
been
working
on.
How
do
we
put
some
process
on
that?
A
B
A
A
I
think
the
exciting
thing
about
this
structure-
and
you
know,
guilds
and
Soul
Bond
governance
in
general
is
this
is
like
a
foundation
for
future
growth
because
you
can
have
additional
people
come
into
the
guild,
earn
reputation,
sorry
earn
earn
governance
power
and
contribute
there.
So
this
is
really
just
like
a
starting.
D
A
For
the
guild
to
go
off
there
and
then
I
won't
get
too
much
into
to
like
the
specifics
on
each
each
squad's,
Mission
and
and
sorry
milestones
and
objectives
and
Milestones
and
goals
and
objectives
and
responsibilities.
But
we
did
put
a
lot
of
thought
into
these.
So
I
think
all
these
are
really
really.
A
And
I
think
it's
important
that
these
are
committed
to
by
The
Guild,
and
so
you
know
all
of
the
the
members
of
this
can
be
held
accountable
for
the
things
that
we've
proposed
to
do
in
getting
paid
for
years.
So,
of
course,
for
the
government
Squad,
the
treasury
Squad,
the
contributor
X
Squad
legal
Squad
and
then
the
devops
and
security
Squad.
A
C
A
Are
having
these
higher
level
discussions
that
are
not
just
about
the
minutia
of
execution?
How
can
we
engage
like
more
rep
holders
in
that
and
really
I
think
create
a
stronger
governance
culture
here.
So
this
is
an
idea
for
that.
Not
it's
included
as
a
contingency
budget
into
this
proposal
here.
So
it's
not
not
be.
A
It
would
need
additional
approval
from
DX
style,
but
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
call
it
out
here
and
yeah
be
on
the
lookout
for
a
separate
post
about
this
going
forward,
which
would
be
when
I
think
paying
for
engaged
governance
there
in
terms
of
the
overall
cost.
You
can
see
here
how
we've
broken
it
down,
so
the
I
guess.
A
Probably
the
key
number
that
we
want
to
see
here
probably
should
have
emphasized
this
one
is
this:
is
the
six
month
regular
cost,
so
this
would
be
170k
for
the
operations
Guild
over
six
months
now.
The
way
that
that
would
be
funded
is.
We
would
only
do
that
in
three
month
increments,
so
the
amount
that
actually
be
sended
at
the
beginning
of
January
or
whenever
that
funding
proposal
would
come
would
be
85
300.
A
A
Yeah-
and
you
can
see
the
breakdown
of
of
the
things
here
so
contributor
cost
that's
contributors
versus
a
monthly
other
regular
costs,
things
that
are
being
spent
instead
of
the
compensation
you
can
see
the
different
squads
and
how
much
the
time
is
being
spent
on
those
here
and
then
for
other
costs.
The
same
way,
you
can
see
that
some
of
the
things
that
are
more
regular,
you
know
we're
nowhere
going
to
be
having
a.
A
Subscription
so
different
things
that
are
regular,
but
things
like
events
stipends
and
then
also
things
like
this
paying
for
governance
stewards.
Those
are
the
contingency
one
there
yeah.
So
that's
like
an
overall
of
80,
sorry
of
170
600
for
the
six
months,
and
then
that
will
be
an
85
300
funding
request.
Should
that
proposal
pass
and
then
just
in
comparison
to
2022
I
think
this
is
helpful.
So
this
2022
number
combines
governance,
treasury
contributor,
X,
also
ecosystem
development
and
security,
which
was
like
the
previous
one
there.
A
A
D
A
Jeff
over
here,
for
me,
that's
that
was
my
job
yeah,
and
so
this
is
the
the
first
one
here
there
are
other
ones.
Are
that
we're
going
to
get
to
in
a
second
and
just
kind
of
check
in
on
them,
but
they're
in
the
Forum,
but
yeah
be
on
the
lookout.
For
those
and
remember
these
are
just
signal
proposals.
What
will
happen
once
these
budget
signal
Pros
approved
there'll,
be
a
separate
funding
proposal
that
actually
funds
the
guilds
themselves
on
noses
chain
where
they're
mostly
be
be
set
up
there.
A
A
And
then
moving
on
to
the
ens
Dow
Steward
elections,
so,
as
many
of
you
know,
geek
style
has
about
46
000
ens
tokens.
Those
are
delegated
to
Candy
Fork.
To
vote
on
its
behalf
and
the
hot
vote
of
right
now,
which
is
17
hours
left,
is
basically
working
group
Steward
elections,
so
for
ens
they
have
these
three-person
bodies
that
kind
of
each
run
their
their
governance
working
groups,
that
is
meta,
governance,
the
ens
ecosystem,
one
and
then
the
public
goods
one
here.
A
So
there's
nine
people
total
and
there's
kind
of
some
elections.
The
elections
are
ongoing,
so
there's
some
kind
of
lobbying
going
on
so
I
just
wanted
to
maybe
talk
through
them.
Right
now
see
if
there
was
any
open
ideas
on
them.
I
do
have,
who
I
think
Candy
Fork
is
going
to
do
to
vote
for,
but
I
wanted
to
see
if
there
were
any
ideas
on
that.
So
this
is
the
public
goods
working
group
one
here
and
you
can
see
the
candidates
there.
A
Some
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
some
of
these
people.
Maybe
you
are
are
not
the
ones
that
candy
Fork
was
planning
to
vote
for
for
this
one
I
think
the
two
were
decided.
It's
actually
the
two
at
the
top
here
so
avsa
dot
eth
is
he's
been
on
the
this
public
good
working
group
already,
and
it's
actually
done
a
lot
of
stuff,
good
stuff,
I.
Think
with
the
ens
small
grants
he's
a
long
time.
Ethereum
I
can't
remember
Alex
Vanda
something
I
can't
remember
exactly
his
full
name,
but
I.
B
A
He's
done
a
pretty
good
job
as
a
public
in
the
public
goods
working
group.
The
same
thing
with
cultron
he's
more
on
the
kind
of
governance
operations
side,
but
he's
been
leading
the
call
for
this
and
been
active,
metaman
and
Colombian
I
think
he's
pretty
good
from
there
pretty
good
there
and
then
for
these
two.
There
was
a
kind
of
discussion
or
I
hadn't
decide
which
one
to
vote
for
here.
So
my
token
is
actually
a
ens,
Labs,
employee
or
I.
A
Think
it
used
to
be
a
tnl
employee
there
and
has
been
involved
in
Indiana.
Some
of
us
actually
I
think
met
met
him
in
in
Colombia
there
and
then
Vega
p
is
not
a
tnl
or
an
ens
Labs
a
member,
but
is
more
of
like
a
Community
member
is
actually
like
a
non-developer
here.
So
I
think
the
question
really
being
is
like:
does
ens
governance
need
more
perspective
from
the
ens
Labs
or
the
the
former
tnl,
or
should
it
be
getting
like
more
perspective,
I
think
from
the
community
there?
A
I
will
talk
to
you
about
because
normally
what's
his
face,
Neiman
from
asteroids
tells
me
to
vote
for
people
that
are,
or
he
has
suggestions
for
that
he
actually
didn't
reach
out
about
this,
but
I
wouldn't
chat
about
that,
but
yeah
so
any
thoughts
on
this
in
the
next
couple
hours.
Let
me
know
I'm
gonna
vote
this
afternoon
on
this
one
and
then
the
ecosystem
working
one
yeah,
so
the
three
I
was
thinking
of
here
are.
B
A
A
Who
yeah
I
think
is
also
done
a
good
job.
They
actually
had
a
pretty
good
Twitter,
a
lot
of
people
that
are
more
involved
in
the
community
from
ens
style,
rather
than
maybe
just
coming
from
coming
from
tnl
members,
the
caps,
oh
yeah,
sorry,
the
cap
is
the
one
who's
the
founder
of
the
namespace.
This
is
a
really
cool
like
portal
for
ens.
It's
basically
trying
to
make
EMS
a
lot
of
cool
things
and
so
I
think
it's
really.
B
B
A
A
I
do
think
it's
interesting
to
look
at
what
other
people
voted,
so
people
who
want
to
know
who
Brantley
is
kind
of
interesting
that
Brantley
did
not
vote
for
nick.eath.
If
you
look
at
some
of
the
other
ones,
it
seems
very
clearly
that
Brantley
is
is
voting
against
some
of
the
people.
That
Nick
is
voting
against
there
and
then
there's
james.e
is
actually
from
the
fireeye's
Dow
here.
So
you
can
see
that's
why
they
had
those
there.
B
A
A
Maybe
he
can
continue
to
involve
the
community
and
kind
of
be
interacting
with
the
community
for
a
lot
of
these
things,
but
I
think
he's
like
a
crucial
person
and
then
Catherine
Wu
is
the
other
one.
That
I
was
planning
before
I've
met
her
several
years
ago.
Very
casually,
but
she's
like
more
of
a
traditional
lawyer
who
works
for
a
VC,
even
though
she's
been
involved
in
this
space
for
a
while
and
I
think
that
type
of
perspective
again
is
healthy
in
the
US
ecosystem.
A
A
So
dalon.eth
is
the
writer
of
the
ens
Dow
newsletter,
which
I
think
is
also
really
great
and
again,
it's
like
I
think
maybe
looking
for
those
type
of
people
as
opposed
to
I,
think
Simona
and
James,
who
are
both
more
of
like
governance,
politicians
across
the
ethereum
ecosystem
right
I
know.
Simone
is
also
very
involved
in
Bitcoin
and
James,
with
fireeye's
thousand
involved
in
a
lot
of
things,
whereas
I
think
dalon
is
much
more
he's
all
in
on
ens
there,
so
yeah
I
was
going
to
do
Nick,
Catherine
and
dalon.
A
C
Or
share
your
doc
sure
yeah.
Let
me
know
we
just
posted
a
brief
overview
of
what,
like
a
solution,
could
look
like
it's
actually
fairly
implemented
already
I
would
say
so.
We
already
have
the
smart
contract
implemented
as
well
as
both
the
aggregator
Oracle
and
the
validating
oracles.
We're
just
actually
fixing
some
like
small
stuff,
like
like
the
nav
calculation
and
DxD
Supply
I
think
we're
still
implementing
them.
C
As
we
interpret
them
to
be
in
The
Proposal,
then
it
would
be
great
to
get
feedback
of
course,
as
well
in
the
Forum,
if,
like
that's
all
correct,
but
right
now,
it
was
only
really
taking
it
through
a
mainnet
treasury.
So
we
added
like
the
lp
positions.
Well
I
hear
what
Adam
is
saying:
the
op
positions
on
swapper
that
the
Exile
holds
both
for
mainnet
and
grenosis
chain.
Those
are
a
bit
more
tricky
to
calculate,
but
adding
those
today
and
then
yeah.
C
The
quote
should
be
working
up
and
running
I
mean
the
calls
already
work.
We
just
need
the
correct
calculation
for
both
the
nav
and
the
circulating
supply,
of
course,
and
I.
Think,
probably
end
of
the
three
group
will
be
able
to
like
open
source
the
we
have
like
a
mono
repo
which
has
all
of
this
stuff.
So
people
can
take
a
look
at
the
Smart
contract
at
the
Oracle
implementations
and
I
think
like
in
an
ideal
world.
It
would
be
nice
for
some
other
people
to
also
run
validating
oracles.
C
C
C
If
we
decide
to
pursue
this
path,
I
think
that
would
likely
be
like
the
largest
time
that
it
would
take
for
you
know
in
the
process,
particularly
considering
that
we
can
only
do
the
approval
once
we
already
deployed
the
contract
right,
because
we
need
to
know
which
contract
to
give
the
approval
to,
but
overall
that's
kind
of
like
where
we're
at
right
now
but
sure.
If
Adam,
you
want
to
add
anything
but
I'm.
Sorry
for
my
voice,
I'm
like
dying
slowly
but
yeah,.
B
C
I
mean
it's
totally
up
to
the
dial.
The
the
like,
the
validation
is
just
individually
check
that
the
quote
the
aggregator
creates
is
correct
right.
So
as
long
as
there's
one
honest
Oracle,
no
order
can
ever
be
placed
so
I
think
like
the
way
it
was
implemented.
Now,
there's
like
a
threshold
of
80
but
a
minimum
of
five.
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
there
is
a
limit
of
how
much
taxi
you
can
redeem,
which
is
like
manage
through
the
approvals
that
dick
style
does
and
yeah.
You
wouldn't
like
Corner,
says
like
if,
if
there's,
if
the
aggregator
does
a
bad
quote,
and
you
have
five
validating
oracles
checking
them,
you
need
all
five
to
be
compromised
to
be
able
to
well
you.
Actually,
you
need
the
aggregator
to
be
compromised
and
the
five
validating
oracles,
because.
C
A
A
If
you
want
to
stagger
that
and
vote
them
down
in
the
case
of
something
is
happening
there,
but
I
think
this
is
yeah
again.
This
is
an
interesting
idea,
I
think,
because
it
is
a
more
like
scalable
solution
that
doesn't
require
that
much
overhead
or
discussion
from
us
and
then
yeah
I'm.
Looking
at
the
I
think
Mall,
who,
from
the
dial,
we
were
sponsored
down
the
energy
calculation
to
confirm
it
with
the
devs
yeah
I
mean
I,
think
the
any
there's
kind
of
two
Dem
two
parts
of
this
there's
the
like.
A
B
Yeah
definitely
this
is
this
is
the
right
way
to
do
it.
This
is
the
right
way
to
do
it.
I
just
I
just
want
us
to
be
careful
about
how
we
are
going
to
be
hope.
I
mean
how
we
are
going
to
be
approving
the
DxD
that
is
going
to
be
sent
to
the
evaluators
and
I
can
imagine
this
as
the
first
solution
that
we
are
going
to
improve
over
time.
B
So
yeah
I
think
this
is
great.
I
think
this
is
great,
but
let's
make
sure
like
I'm
bringing
here
that
we
are
Adam
said
we
invite
everyone
from
the
exile
to
review
the
the
nap
calculation
article.
Well,
we
it
will
be
honestly
if
we
can
like
do
some
approach
on
GitHub
or
or
anything
else
where
we
can
check
that.
Hey
Augusto
took
a
look,
took
a
look
at
it
another
developer
to
go
today
so
yeah.
It
would
be
great
to
get
some
valuation
there
and
and
yeah.
This
is
great.
B
A
A
Okay
for
deep
style,
that's
stronger,
geek
style
because
they're
not
necessarily
bought
into
Division
and
that's
a
way
of
making
sure
that
the
dxt
holders
that
are
there
are
kind
of
more
aligned,
but
like
the
incentives,
especially
if
you
offer
something
with
a
lot
of
liquidity
like
this
right.
If
you
have
liquidity
that
is
going
that
you
feel
confident
you're
going
to
be
able
to
always
have
like
DxD
at
70
of
nav,
then
it
becomes
like
a
question
of
like
well.
A
Do
you
actually
necessarily
need
to
sell
because
you
can
benefit
from
other
people
selling,
and
then
the
value
of
your
DxD
actually
goes
up
from
other
people
doing
that,
because
you
have
that
30
premium,
that's
distributed
to
the
rest
of
dxt
holders,
so
yeah
it'll
be
really
interesting
to
kind
of
see
how
all
this
like
plays
out
and
I
think
that
governance
will
need
to
respond
to
like
the
signals
from
GXT
holders
and
I.
Think,
like
the
budget,
will
need
to
respond
to
all
this.
So
yeah
it'll.
A
A
Maybe
I
mentioned,
is
also
part
of
the
DC
token
model.
There
is
an
approval
for
additional,
deep
style
liquidity
to
be
used
to
provide
DxD
Eve
liquidity
once
it's
above
60,
so
I'm
gonna
hopefully
have
something
in
the
Forum
on
there
about
that
and
I
think
also,
when
you
have
that
that
you
can
also
increase
the
amount
that
you
the
amount
that
the
orders
are
coming
through,
it
may
be
increasing
to
like
20K
or
something
and
yeah
I
think
to
Connor's
Point
like.
B
A
That
have
been
presented,
so
all
these
have
already
been
presented
on
calls
the
dxgov
voice
and
swapper
ones.
I
know
the
dxgov
team
had
updated
this
yesterday
with
some
things
there,
but
if
anyone
that
from
the
guilds
presented
this
or
anyone
has
any
questions
outstanding
questions
on
some
of
these
budgets,
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
open
up
for
discussion
now.
D
Yeah
understood
I,
guess
briefly
mentioned
the
the
changes
I
think
there
were
I
was
just
adding
Boris
under
design
after
talking
with
Dave's
voice
and
working
out
where
that
budget
was
coming
from,
as
well
as
some
gas
costs
under
other
expenses
and
I.
Think
that
was
everything
and
I
think
the
plan
following
the
schedules
to
put
this
up
for
a
signal
proposal
today.
So
if
you
have
any
further
comments
or
questions,
I
want
to
be
sure
to
get
those
in
otherwise
we'll
go
up
on
Nelson's
chain.
A
B
A
Yeah
just
some
thoughts,
it's
good
to
put
those
on
the
Forum
to
be
able
to
look
at
in
the
future
yeah,
so
any
I
don't
know
voice
or
swapper.
If
anything
else
for
those
but
yeah,
we
should
be
probably
look
on
the
lookout,
maybe
for
another
update
from
those
and
then
maybe
a
proposal
sometime
in
the
next
week.
A
A
The
second
element
was
implementing
a
dextao
priorities
board,
which
is
basically
a
way
for
deached
out
governance,
to
convey
its
priorities
to
the
community,
to
guilds
to
its
contributors,
so
that
they
can
kind
of
like
act
on
that,
I
think
in
a
lot
of
ways,
we
have
trouble
of
like
sorting
priorities
and
we
have
people
making
those
decisions,
but
really
there's
a.
We
need
a
mechanism
for
like
geek
style,
to
be
able
to
make
that
so
I
think.
A
A
lot
of
this
is
like
creating
kind
of
a
govern,
both
the
governance,
culture
and
also
like
governance
framework
like
software,
that
can
actually
gather
this
signal
from
the
community
there
so
anyway.
So
this
is
like
the
first
I
implore,
anyone
to
kind
of
take
a
deeper
dive
of
it
in
terms
of
what
this
means
and
how
they
are
decided,
I
think
very
simply
it's
having
like.
Basically,
each
Guild
and
the
Deep
styles
are
all
as
a
whole
has
like
a
list
of
like
top
five
priorities
right.
A
These
are
the
things
we're
kind
of
working
on
and
it's
in
this
order,
and
that
list
is
determined
by
Deep
style,
governance
right
and
so
the
key
thing
is,
you
need
a
way
to
vote
and
Signal
this,
and
it's
actually
a
pretty
cool
tool.
That's
sky
had
shared
that
I
think
we
would
be
able
to
kind
of
use
there,
but
basically,
like
you,
can
signal
your
you
get
like
through
this
one.
It's
like
I've
got
a
thousand
points
available
to
signal
and
you
could
signal
it
to
any
of
the
different
items
that
you
want.
A
I,
don't
know
what
these
really
are:
Dao
sember.
This
is
some
voting
or
something
on
that,
but
you
could
signal
like
all
500
to
the
molar
cloud,
ship
or
all-
or
you
know
100
to
this
and
so
I
think
what
will
happen
is
we'll
have
for
each
of
these
we'll
have
like
a
list
of
like
10
and
be
able
to
allow
votes
on
those,
and
these
points,
whatever
these
points
will
be,
will
be
like
determine
some
basis
on
rep
and
DxD
amount
so
that
we
could
have
Deek.
A
A
This
was
just
like
what
I
thought
was
some
of
the
priorities,
memories
board
and
things
that
I
thought,
and
obviously
that's
just
my
opinion,
and
there
are
other
people
that
have
this
and
I
encourage
those
to
be
able
to
do
that,
but
I
think
figuring
out
how
we
get
that
signal
from
DXL
will
be
important
there
and
yeah.
You
can
kind
of
just
look
at
what
I
think.
Maybe
the
overall
10
priorities
are
and
then
I
had
I
added
other
ones.
A
A
Yeah
so
I
guess
that's
it
and
PSD
also
worth
checking
out
just
a
couple.
Things
Keenan
had
made
a
post
about
geeked
voice,
operational
efficiency.
This
was
on
the
strategy,
call
I
think
two
weeks
ago,
but
yeah
he
made
the
post
out
there
and
then
I
put
the
you
know,
giving
a
sense
of
the
overall
D
stop
budget
I
started
to
kind
of
calculate
that
based
upon
where
the
budget
drafts
are
here
there.