►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-12-07]
Description
00:02 Welcome & Agenda
01:00 Mainnet roundup
07:20 Gnosis Chain
34:08 Voice Guild Budget Presentation
01:04:25 Additional Budget Commentary
A
A
Geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
Wednesday,
December,
7th,
1600
UTC
a
date
that
will
live
in
infamy.
Let's
start,
let's
look
at
first
at
the
agenda
for
today,
as
always,
we'll
start
with
the
proposal
Roundup
a
bunch
of
different
ones
on
mainnet
and
nurses
chain,
actually
here
and
then
for
discussion
items.
Here
we
have
a
deep
dive
into
the
voice.
Guild
H1
2023
budget
proposal
draft
there
and
then
I
want
to
touch
on
the
ones
that
were
presented
last
week,
the
dxgov
ones
and
the
operations
Guild.
C
A
Are
just
going
to
give
an
overall
status
update
on
where
we
are
there
and
then
they're
actually
doing
the
same
thing
for
the
priorities
board
and
Guild
Council
update
to
just
giving
kind
of
a
status
update
on
where
things
are
there
so
yeah?
Let's
go
first
to
the
proposal.
Roundup
on
mainnet,
we
have
our
first
die.
Dxd
order
is
finally
going
through
all
this
goes
through
the
multiples
game
which
takes
16
days
to
go
through.
So
this
was
the
first
one
we
tried
to
do
to
do.
A
There's
a
couple
others
that
are
in
the
queue
already
for
that.
Interestingly
enough,
this
we
actually
set
this
I
think
at
a
pretty
high
I,
can't
remember
what
the
percentage
was
above
when
we
set
this,
but
there's
a
chance.
It
might
not
clear
because
the
limit
price
of
545,
which
I
think
was
like
15
percent
more
than
the
market
price
at
that
time,
with
DHD,
has
now
risen
to
that
market
price.
A
Yeah
so
there's
another
orders
doing
the
same
thing
there
yeah
and
then
next
up
we
have
approved
new
DxD
token
model.
So
this
is
a
big
proposal.
It's
proposal,
that's
also
a
gnosis
chain.
It's
also
on
DxD
snapshot
Bears.
We
have
all
of
our
governance
bases
covered
here.
So
I
think
we've
talked
about
this
a
lot
over
the
last
couple
months
and
also
talked
about
it
last
week
on
this
call
before
making
this
final
submission
here.
So
yeah
have
a
have
a
read
through.
A
A
And
then
yeah
we
have
this
one
registered
new
contribution
reward
from
Arc
recall.
This
has
been
in
the
queue
the
last
two
weeks
as
well,
because
it's
a
scheme,
registrar
proposal.
So
it's
a
16
days
there.
This
is
submitted
Republic
of
Adam
here,
and
this
is
the
existing
contribution
reward
scheme.
That
only
has
the
the
changes
of
preventing
multiple
period
proposals
from
being
submitted,
so
that
is
set
to
go
through
in
four
days.
D
A
Worker
proposal,
you
could
always
do
like
program.
You
can
combine
that
with
a
repsync
on
mainnet,
otherwise
encourage
others
in
these
times
of
low
low
gas.
To
do
your
your
reps
anyway,
and
then
yeah
the
two
proposals
that
have
been
staked
on
on
our
in
the
pre-boasted
stage.
First,
is
the
DX
Voice
multi-sig
final
top
out
and
new
wallet
authorization,
so
this
is
from
Keenan
to
Keenan.
Maybe
if
you
wanna
chat
a
little
bit
about
this
there's
two
different
things
going
on
here.
G
Yeah,
so
actually
pretty
simple:
when
you
boil
it
down,
there's
two
payments:
we
need
to
make
and
I've
run
out
of
funds
since
the
initial
authorization
I
think
a
little
over
a
year
ago.
Now
that
was
an
initial
I,
think
75k,
and
that
is
now
empty.
So
we
need
to
facilitate
those
payments
or
requesting
those
and
we're
also
authorizing
a
new
multi-sig.
This
is
updated,
safe
and
also
multi-chain
safe.
The
last
one
was
only
ethereum.
G
Everyone
is
signing.
The
signs
are
shaking
up
as
well.
Everyone
deciding
is
one
percent
I
think
you
can
see
their
wallets
when
you
go
directly
into
if
you
check
the
enses
and
yeah,
not
a
Christmas
happening
here
and
worth
noting
that
the
guild
structure
will
effectively
supersede
the
multi-sig
I
expect
in
a
lot
of
scenarios,
but
authorizing
it.
So
we
do
have
access
to
that
tool
in
case
it's
needed.
A
A
And
then
the
last
proposal,
what
was
this
yeah
test
mimic
weft
wall?
So
we've
done
the
test
event.
Two
weeks
ago
there
was
not
enough
cameras
on
an
East
or
the
gas
limit
was
too
low,
but
a
small
issue
with
that,
and
so
this
is
just
another
test
of
the
weft
wrapper
contract,
which
would
be
a
trustless
way
of
of
wrapping
each.
A
A
What's
the
plan
with
calculating
70
NAD
again
will
be
weekly,
bi-weekly,
so
kind
of
just
the
proposal
itself
commits
to
bi-weekly,
and
so
that's
kind
of
like
the
Baseline,
and
this
is
what
we
do
a
lot
of
times
with
proposals
we
get
to
a
baseline,
but
we're.
Actually,
it
was
just
Dave
and
I
were
actually
just
chatting
about
like
a
a
different
way.
That
would
almost
allow
like
instant
calculation
of
nav
that
we
could
ultimately
use
to
to
manage
this
like
long
term.
A
Awesome
and
then
on
to
nurses
chain.
We
have
a
couple
different
contributor
proposals.
Melanie
contributor
proposal
is
just
going
to
pass
here
in
51
minutes
and
then
we
have
yeah.
This
has
not
been
voted
on,
but
we
have
a
signal
proposal
deaked
out
in
Denver
2023
test
from
sky
here,
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
anything
to
say
about
this
proposal.
H
Yeah
Augusto
mentioned
this
briefly
on
the
dev
call
yesterday,
but
this
is
actually
a
test
proposal
of
the
critical
vulnerability
that
was
found
and
then
and
then
patched
as
you
see
here
in
in
the
DX
governance.github.io
version
and
the
develop
version.
I
believe
that
it
still
doesn't
show
correctly.
But
this
proposal
looks
like
it's
sending
xdi
and
it's
actually
minting
rep.
H
H
A
Yeah
and
one
of
the
things
I
guess:
there's
just
on
DX:
go
dot
GitHub
now
yeah
one
of
the
things
I
guess
we're
already
doing
David's
setup,
we
sort
of
the
security
bot
you
can
see
in
the
key
base
channel.
So
that's
just
for
mainnet
proposals,
but
that
would
you
know,
be
a
separate
way
of
monitoring
or
gathering
that
data
from
the
blockchain.
A
F
D
A
Going
to
Black
Scout
I
want
to
go
to
notes
to
scan
so
I
like
copied
this
hash
here,
and
then
this
is
now
where
we're
here
but
what's
guided
was
it
was
like
a
multi-back
multi-transaction
execution,
so
you
can't
just
go
through
and
see
what
the
proposal
is
through
unnosis
scan
there.
So
we
have
to
go
through
the
logs
here.
A
Yeah
right
here,
so
this
is
the
proposal
idea
here
right.
This
is
the
same
one
we
have
here
and
then
I
guess-
and
this
is
like
you-
can
see-
not
new
contribution
reward,
these
all
the
different
things,
but
yeah
I
can
say
reputation,
change,
one
I
think
that's
18
zeros,
but
here
it
only
says
0.01
next
time.
A
F
F
A
Yeah
yeah
yeah
no
need
to
vote
on
this
proposal,
but
I
guess
at
least
we
kind
of
explain
what
the
kind
of
issue
was
and
what
the
kind
of
other
fix
is
and
then
also
again
like
key
part
offices.
Monitoring
is
having
an
effective
monitoring
part
about
this
yeah
Elsewhere
on
gnosis
chain
approved
new
DHD
token
model
are
already
discussed
this
on
on
mainnet,
but
go
and
vote
there.
If
you're
worried
about
gas
costs,
space
development
work
for
October
2022,
so
this
one
is
a
reduced
one.
A
C
A
Sorry
not
the
last
proposal,
yeah,
there's
Ali
Q,
contributor
proposals
that
are
just
been
staked
on
this
morning
and
then
yeah
the
last
proposal,
maybe
to
chat
a
little
bit
about
it
here,
was
submitted
by
Melanie.
This
is
a
detail,
contributor,
stipend
and
event
budget,
and
so
this
is
involved
in
the
whole
restructuring
and
refocus
process
of
Melody.
Can
you
kind
of
walk
us
through
this
here?
Yeah.
C
It
is
yeah
so
quickly
about
the
contributors
type
in
an
event
budget,
and
a
little
bit
of
background
is
that,
after
the
refocus
and
refrigerator
phase,
one
past
DX
out
committed
to
creating
more
guidelines
around
like
our
event
budget
and
limiting
the
overall
budget
to
150
000.
So
this
proposal
aims
to
provide
some
exact
allocation
numbers
of
that
150
000
in
The,
Proposal
I've
broken
down
the
distribution
nation
of
these
funds
into
three
separate
categories.
C
Lastly,
twenty
thousand
dollars
towards
DX
style,
conference
or
event
sponsorships
and,
like
our
off-site
more
details,
will
be
provided
in
a
standalone
proposal
likely
from
someone
from
Dick's
Voice
or
the
DX
Biz
Squad,
and
there
was
also
mentioned
in
the
Forum,
proposing
a
technical
off-site
which
I'm
definitely
not
opposed
to
I.
Think
that
if
others
see
a
lot
of
value
in
a
technical
off-site,
that
idea
should
be
explored.
C
However,
I
do
think
it
is
important
to
stay
within
the
current
budget
and
not
any
add
any
additional
costs
at
this
point.
But
I'm
opening
open
to
evaluating
where
costs
are
at
mid-year
and
see
if
it
is
something
that's
feasible.
I
did
discuss
this
one-on-one
with
Augusto
as
well,
and
he
agreed
that
this
would
be
like
the
best
approach
to
kind
of
exploring
a
technical
offsite
at
a
later
date.
C
A
I'm,
like
all
of
this,
like
I,
do
a
lot
of
like
quarterly
and
halves,
accounting
now
with
all
his
budget
stuff.
So
it's
kind
of
funny
but
cool
thoughts,
comments,
I,
know,
Sky.
You
had
had
some
kind
of
thoughts
on
on
this
proposal.
I
wasn't
sure
if
there
was
anyone
else
that
wanted
to
talk
about
it.
H
No
my
only
comment
which
I
think
Melanie
included
was
the
language
of
yeah.
If
DX
Dow
has
a
limited
budget
and
that's
very
tight,
compare
it
right,
like
two
scenarios,
would
be
every
contributor
like
evenly
split
and
you
get
that
annually
and
then
you
use
that
to
go
to
events
and
travel
versus
DXL
has
a
known
budget,
and
it
has
to
be
very
strategic
on
where
it
spends
that
budget
and
the
like
bang
for
it.
Buck
bang,
bang
for
the
buck.
H
H
We
don't
just
split
up
the
audit
budget
between
the
products
evenly
we're
going
to
have
to
be
very
strategic
on
how
the
audit
budget
gets
spent
on
Audits,
and
so
the
idea
would
be
to
also
Factor
some
of
that
into
how
you
spend
the
the
dxtile
travel
budget,
yeah
and
off
site
for
30k
like
if
it's
in
Colombia
might
work
again.
If
it's
in
Amsterdam,
it
probably
wouldn't
work,
but
we
can
figure
that
out
and
monitor
and
change
as
we
go.
C
A
A
Like
I
guess
here
it's
kind
of
hard
because
you
don't
have
the
specifics
of
an
off-site
in
mind
but
like
and
then
I
guess
the
question
is
well.
If
people
spend
their
events
type
and
budget
in
the
first
half
of
2023,
then
they
don't
have
the
stipend
budget
to
go
to
the
off
site
at
the
second
half
of
2023.
A
D
H
Yeah
and
planning
it
is
difficult
like
if
assuming
this
would
be
maybe
around
Devcon.
If
Devcon
happens
next
year,
no
one
knows
where
it
is.
It
could
be
anywhere
like
it's
hard
to
come
up
with
the
details,
rather
than
these
buckets
kind
of
make
sense
for
sure,
but
keep
keep
that
in
mind
and
there's
likely
going
to
be
a
Devcon
and
I
would
say
that
there's
a
high
chance
that
the
an
offside
would
be
around
the
Defcon
I'm
guessing
so
keep
that
in.
A
Mind
and
I
imagine
like
to
give
Scott
an
example:
I
mentioned
Scott
you're
gonna
go
to
lots
of
different
conferences
next
year,
and
not
all
of
them
are
going
to
be
paid
by
Duke
style.
Some
will
because
we
want
to
encourage
that.
But
some
of
this
is
kind
of
like
on
the
individual
contributor,
if
they're,
if
they
want
to
do
things,
and
that's
like
fine
to
make
it
kind
of
encourage
in
here
but
I
think
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
subsidize.
C
H
Yeah
I
mean
so
DX
Dao
in
had
in
in
general,
hasn't
already
hasn't
paid
for
everyone's
travel
to
all
events
and
things
right.
It's
it's
only
selected,
maybe
I
think
there
were
three
and
three
official
Gatherings
stipend
events
for
the
DX
Dao
included,
but
there's
yeah
tens
of
it.
You
know,
there's
50
events
that
you
could
go
to
and
and.
B
A
E
C
A
A
And
then
I
think
there
was
camera
what
else
there
there
was
or
something
there.
Lisbon
was
a
bit
higher,
but
this
all
this
is
50
000.
This
is
everything
we
spent.
This
also
includes
The
Retreat
itself,
so
you
can
see
here.
Let
me
go
to
where's
the
list.
Button.
Well,
I
didn't
break
down
this
bin.
Oh
here
it
is
yeah,
as
you
can
see
here.
A
You
know
2
000
less
than
2
000
there
here
and
then
you
go
to
Denver
it's
a
little
bit
like
more
right,
so
you
can
see
I
guess
the
stipend
per
person
is
like
yeah
3500,
so
that
was
maybe
a
little
bit
more
than
we
had
I
think
it
took
some
time
you
can
see
kind
of
here:
2400
2300
2500.
This
is
for
Denver
here
Dave
up
here
with
4
800
I
think
he
was
in
the
Hilton
and
Amsterdam
was
more
expensive.
D
D
A
A
A
cut
a
rush,
that's
kind
of
the
point,
is
I
think
we're
in
a
different
place.
We
need
to
kind
of
run
that,
and
it's
not
like
also
just
like
the
level
of
support
they
need
to
be
given
now.
Maybe
things
are
really
different
in
six
months,
maybe
they're
opportunities
that
are
just
like
wait.
Carrot
is
here
we
got
to
get
everyone
out
there
or
Dobby
is
doing
this.
E
A
A
G
G
So
this
is
the
h1223
voice,
Guild
budget.
This
encompasses
both
the
current
DX
Biz
and
DX
voice
squads
under
one
kind
of
services
bucket.
If
you
attended
the
I
guess
product
strategy
maybe
call
last
week
on
Friday,
there's
a
good
presentation
that
kind
of
ran
over
the
reasons
for
why
it
makes
sense
to
put
this
under
one
bucket
for
accountability
purposes
and
kind
of
guide
towards
a
more
cohesive,
I.
Guess
better
delegation
of
attention
for
the
squads.
G
G
The
key
supports
at
15,
that's
Wayne,
Watford,
International,
blue
for
DX
voice
and
metronome
or
nylon
for
the
expizz
and
Boris
block
and
Caney
Fork,
as
key
supports
with
lower
time
allocations
to
both
squads,
and
this
kind
of
makes
up
the
the
soul,
bound
governance
structure,
of
course,
same
governance
rules
as
the
currently
passed
operations
and
I
assume
most
other
guilds
to
come,
which
is
no
power.
Past
25
and
2.5
percent
earned
over
full-time
contribution
so
for
the
overarching
bucket
of
voice
The
Voice
Guild
is
the
voice.
G
The
Voice
skill
will
initiate
doubt
priorities
that
expand
the
external
name,
share
brand
cohesiveness
and
reach
in
order
to
accomplish
its
goals
so
really
encompassing
the
non-technical
bucket
of
content,
branding
marketing,
Biz,
Dev
and
making
sure,
of
course,
initiating
keyword.
It
wasn't
necessarily
communicated
correctly
in
the
first
rendition.
There's
been
some
changes
that
can
help
visualize
that
a
bit
better,
hopefully
that
the
voice
code
will
be
stepping
in
to
do
these
priorities
and
a
little
bit
more
on
that
for
DX
voice,
specifically
DX
voice.
G
Cloud
provides
a
voice
to
the
expound,
its
products
through
a
strong
Baseline
of
marketing,
branding
and
other
content
related
talent
that
can
facilitate
and
grow
the
extent
in
accordance
with
his
priorities.
Skye.
Maybe
if
you're
here
I'll
run
through
the
DX
voice
stuff,
and
then
you
can
step
in
and
chat
the
expizz
again
leading
me
to
the
overall
kind
of
Guild
Milestones.
This
is
just
the
total
bucket.
G
My
perspective
of
this
bucket
is
that
DX,
Biz
and
DX
voice
will
still
have
lots
of
Independence
and
key
Milestones
independently
of
the
total
bucket,
but
there
will
be
a
lot
of
collaboration
between
the
two
parties
so
coordinate
on
a
mission
and
vision
statements
in
accordance
with
phase
three
of
the
structuring
could
better
communication
flows
surrounding
the
community,
both
internal
and
external?
Of
course,
this
has
been
discussed
a
few
times
chats.
G
You
know
the
form
Etc.
How
can
we
be
more
transparent
with
the
community
provide
services
and
support
to
the
external
product,
deals
to
facilitate
growth
of
both
brand
and
user
base
and
broaden
the
range
of
non-technical
roles
integrated
within
Dow
culture
and
by
part
DXL,
and
a
quick
pass
through
the
budget
zoomed
in
here
it's
a
little
blurry.
G
The
key
thing
to
kind
of
note
if
you're
unfamiliar
with
the
squad
would
be
the
comparison
which
is
actually
wrong.
Chris
brought
to
my
attention
last
night
and
I
haven't
updated
this
quite
yet,
but
the
2022
average
is
actually
higher
than
I
indicated
here.
This
is
actually
10
months,
not
12
months
averaged.
So
it's
missing
two
months
of
spend.
The
actual
number
is
I
believe
69
500
average.
A
G
Reduction
Phoenix
voice
sucks
on
metrics
I
can
have
a
sub
note
here,
we'll
be
focusing
on
Baseline
growth
and
unification
of
branding
throughout
the
first
half
of
the
year.
Of
course,
the
Excel
is
in
a
bit
of
a
confusing
spot
right
now,
working
towards
what
it
wants
to
do
and
understanding
where
it
stands,
and
it
doesn't
necessarily
make
sense
to
us
to
give
some
raw
numbers
and
say,
let's
reach
this,
when
we
need
to
figure
out
what
we're
doing
and
how
we
can
build
towards
that.
G
So
I
say,
as
a
path
forward
becomes
more
clear
how
deep
soils
will
adjust
its
focus
to
Brand
awareness
and,
of
course,
these
more
measurable
social
targets
likely
in
H2,
so
kind
of
starting
with
the
chemosphones
and
goals
deliver
an
operable
demo,
mock-up
and
viability.
Statement
of
the
recently
classed
Flagship
focus
and
collaboration
with
the
excavent
other
product
teams.
G
So
of
course,
phase
two
adjusted
the
focus
of
the
extent
product
towards
a
flagship.
Of
course,
that
doesn't
mean
anything
until
we've
explored
it
and
kind
of
start
executing
upon
it.
So
the
idea
of
this,
which
was
discussed
at
The
Retreat,
is
to
kind
of
dive
a
little
bit
deeper
into
what
that
looks
like
how
it
would
operate.
G
Of
course,
this
will
depend
on
focuses,
I
had
to
talk
in
the
retreat
this
year
of
wanting
to
kind
of
reprioritize
some
of
the
things
that
we
have
left
behind.
That
would
be
minimal
effort,
especially
ones
that
we
have
spent
considerable
time,
thinking
about
and
executing
upon
branding
Omen
Rings
the
largest
bill.
G
So
it's
difficult
to
say
the
specif
specificity
of
each
product
in
my
eyes,
but
this
does
cover
as
the
priorities
kind
of
emerge.
Where
we'll
be
targeting
I
imagine
this
will
be
for
carrot
and
Davi.
In
my
perspective,
as
for
the
responsibilities
facility,
execution
of
the
accessor
channels
maintain
further
developed
content
strategy,
including
regular
written
pieces.
G
So,
to
kind
of
finish,
this
off
there's
some
fun
blurbs
here
for
each
of
the
members,
but
this
also
includes
the
time
commitments
levels.
There
are
no
changes
relative
to
the
current
on-chain
proposals.
All
levels
are
the
same,
I
believe
there's
some
slight
time.
Adjustments
from
Boris
skymine
and
maybe
candy
Fork
I
believe
there's,
maybe
a
five
percent
adjustment
on
your
side.
This
was
a
contextual
piece.
H
But
yeah
there's
a
commitment
to
basically
work
like
on
a
very
close
basis
to
work
with
the
product
guilds
to
through
the
conveying
of
knowledge
and
ideas
and
like
opportunities
that
are
discovered
in
the
that
we
are
either
aware
of
or
could
be
opportunities
in
the
future.
All
things
that
are
really
important
for
a
product
choosing
a
path
and.
H
I
know
Chris
has
done
a
lot
of
of
working
on
I've
started
looking
at
it
there's
the
priorities
board
is
key
to
this
entire
setup
of
the
extile
moving
forward.
Currently,
a
lot
of
the
priorities
that
the
guilds
are
coming
up
with
will
be
asked
will
be
things
that
exist
on
the
priority
board,
and
then
we
also
need
the
ability
to
add
any
new
ideas
that
don't
sit
within
a
current
Guild.
H
New
teams,
new
investment
opportunities
that
get
brought
into
DX
Dao
and
those
have
to
be
there'll,
be
an
opportunity
for
DX
Dow
as
a
as
a
community
to
to
vote
and
prioritize
any
of
those
ideas
into
the
existing
ideas
as
well,
but
yeah,
that's
a
that's
an
overview.
I
think
that
should
cover
most
of
it.
G
G
My
perception,
based
on
the
the
Friday
called
last
week,
is
that
the
party
board
is
key
in
the
facilitation
of
this,
because,
prior
to
this,
there
was
an
unclear
delegation
of
attention
for
DX
voice.
It
effectively
was
in
a
state
where
anyone
could
come
to
us
and
request
and
push
through
initiatives
which
worked
in
some
cases,
and
others
resulted
in
massive
inefficiencies,
as
we've
seen
with
Omen,
for
example,
and
so
this
separate
way
of
focusing
on
the
priority
board.
G
It
isn't,
and
this
is
why
we
don't
like
Services,
it
isn't
really
the
product
squads
or
the
relevant
squads
of
incubated
squads
coming
to
us.
It
will
be
DX
voice
reaching
out
specifically
to
the
people
in
the
in
the
priority
board
in
that
order.
So,
of
course
those
squads
can
deny
those
services
or
deny
help
if
they
wish,
but
the
plan
is
to
in
order
priority,
create
a
plan
relative
to
the
the
priority
in
DX
style.
G
G
E
Yeah
I
mean
like
I,
said
yesterday
and
I,
don't
like
the
word
servicing,
because
I
mean
we,
you
are
the
best
team
and
the
marketing
team
heads
that
would
be
driving
initiatives
that
would
be
creating
initiatives
for
what
needs
to
be
done.
I
think
it's!
It's
not
it's
not
a
fair
sense
in
terms
of
product
squads.
Coming
to
you
guys
and
then
asking
for.
E
E
G
At
least
from
my
perspective,
at
The,
X,
voice,
I'm,
not
sure
Sky,
if
you're
thinking
differently,
but
that
is
100
what
direction
we
want
to
move
in
at
The,
X
voice
and
and
not
having
a
system
where
we
have
agency
to
say
what
should
or
shouldn't
be
done
respective
to
our
bucket
of
expertise.
I
think
has
resulted
in
a
lot
of
those
inefficiencies,
so
yeah
I.
G
Think
I
will
be
editing
this
today,
a
second
time
to
to
introduce
that
kind
of
detail,
but
it
is
DX
voice
having
agency
over
the
kind
of
marketing
and,
of
course,
broadly
I,
think
the
voice
Market.
Should
this
guy's
able
to
handle
the
dxp
size
as
you
wish,
but
it's
coming
to
you
guys
and
then,
if
you
guys
say,
for
example,
don't
think
it's
a
good
plan
or
don't
want
to
fall
through
that
plan
or
want
your
own
internal
side
of
things.
You're
always
open
to
deny
that
support.
H
H
Concern
is
valid,
I
I
think
we
can.
We
can
figure
out
how
to
make
it
work.
The
way
that
would
be
best
in
general,
when
you
have,
we
had
dxdo
working
as
one
giant
Collective
the
this
plan,
the
this
idea
of
of
fractalizing
it
into
guilds
you
know
had
had
defined
squads,
which
were
all
just
soft
squads.
Everyone
was
part
was
one,
was
one
together
and
now
you're
fractalizing
it
into
actual
separate
budgeted
guilds
based
around
ideas
and
products
and
services
and
operations
that
the
fact
that
you
are
that
we
are
doing.
H
A
I
think
venkies
point
is
less
about
priorities
and
more
about
ownership,
so
I
think
like
it's
more
of
who
is
driving
these
initiatives,
or
these
things
right
and
I
think
you
know,
is
kind
of
saying
voices
and
then
the
priorities,
maybe
is
not
so
much
who's
owning
them.
It's
like
how
do
you
decide
amongst
those
things
that
you
own,
so
you
can
imagine
here
like
to
me
it's
pretty
clear.
I
think
voice
phones,
the
go-to
market
strategy
for
swapper,
Davi
and
carrot.
A
Those
are
like
how
you
prioritize,
which
one
you
work
on
First
and
how
you
like
actually
Implement
them.
That
is
like
a
tough
thing
that
we
need
to
have
like
that.
You
kind
of
the
priorities
board,
because
that's
what
dick
style
is
there,
but
on
the
question
of
like
who
owns
it
or
who
is
responsible
for
it,
I
think
that
is
actually
clear
and
just
kind
of
looking
at
looking
at
some
of
the
kind
of
a
couple
comments
on
the
The
Proposal
in
general.
A
A
lot
of
the
words
I
think
are
a
little
bit
more
about
support
here,
rather
than
than
ownership,
and
really
what
I
think
we're
trying
to
do
these
guilds
things
is
like
what
do
these
guilds
own?
What
are
they
responsible
for?
What
are
they
going
to
deliver?
Not
so
much
like?
What
are
they
going
to
just
support?
I.
Think
support
is
part
of
that.
A
But
support
to
me
would
be
a
responsibility
like
you
have
a
you,
have
a
responsibility
to
support
kind
of
things
and
I
guess
the
question
for
like
the
milestones
and
goals
is
like
what
are
is
kind
of
being
driven
here.
So
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
little
bit
more
specificity
in
the
dxbiz,
Milestones
and
Golds
here,
and
rather
than
being
a
little
bit
more
generic
on
that
in.
A
D
A
I
think
it's.
This
is
why
it
does
get
tricky
to
write
these
right
and
so
I
think
I
kind
of
said
this
yesterday,
like
I,
think
a
commitment
to
do
a
go
to
market
strategy.
Is
you
know,
good
commitment,
I.
Think
a
commitment
to
have
like
one
partnership
for
each
of
the
products
is
like
a
good
one
right,
like
that's,
probably
like
a
base
level
that
you
can
kind
of
like
measure
and
commit,
and
maybe
that
partnership
works
out.
A
It
doesn't
work
out
but,
like
I
think
at
least
stage
we
have
like
at
least
we
want
to
be
doing
that
now.
Maybe
there's
one
of
those
we
want
to
go
like
much
more
in
and
the
product
kind
of
changes
in
terms
of
what
what
you're
looking
for,
but
I,
think
there
can
be
a
little
bit
more
like
base
level
measurables.
A
On
both
I
think
that
should
be
a
thrill.
I
mean
That's,
a
classic
example
that
is
kind
of
like
on
both,
because
it's
going
to
dependent
on
that.
So
I
think
that
would
be
one.
That's
that
that's
on
on
both
of
those
and
That's
a
classic
one.
That
may
be
the
priorities
board
is
there
that
needs
to
like
help
that
prior
to
get
over
the
line
or.
A
To
get
over
the
line
there,
yeah
I,
don't
think
it's
bad
to
duplicate
these
things
any
other
time
there.
This
is
when
you
do
want
to
be
like.
Sometimes
you
want
to
be
creative
with
when
you
say,
lead
or
direct
or
create,
as
opposed
to
help,
support
or
other
verbs.
That
kind
of
imply
that
there's
not
as
much
that
you're
kind
of
providing
the
support,
I
think
there's
the
language
on
that
is
is
important.
G
E
And
also
about
I
mean
now
we
talk
a
lot
about
these
priorities.
Board
I
mean
who,
how
what
we
will
do
to
add
items
to
this
priorities
board
like?
Is
it
going
to
be
like
product
squads
that
needs
to
add
say,
for
instance,
like
okay,
decide
on
the
next
Network
that
swapper
wants
to
launch
or
yeah
yeah
I
mean
I'm
succulents
with
business
marketing.
G
A
For
governance
right,
it
is
so,
governance
can
figure
out
a
way
to
convey
what
it's
thinking
about
and
what
it
values
for
the
guilds
to
execute
on
now
we
can
do.
Governance
is
able
to
do
teach
that
governance
is
able
to
do
this
right
now
as
we're
approving
these
budgets
right
that
proving
what
is
the
words
that
go
into
them.
A
The
amounts
that
go
into
those
are
all
ways
that
DXL
governance
is
having
effect
on
how
the
guilds
are
executing
on
its
priorities,
and
the
priorities
board
is
meant
to
be
there
as
another
tool
to
give
detail
influence
over
how
they're
executing
that
is
not
just
like
a
financial
purse
right
and
that's
having
like
a
ranking
and
I
think
really
being
able
to
adjudicate
or
mediate
between
conflicting
priorities
and
so
that
guilds.
Maybe
when
they've
got
some
confusion,
they
can
point
to
that.
A
A
A
The
key
is
like
how
do
you
kind
of
get
out
of
the
list?
And
how
do
you
actually
do
that
voting
for
it,
but
it
will
likely
be
like
a
monthly
meeting.
We
have
I,
don't
know
if
it's
gonna
be
hosted
on
this
call
or
something
but
we'll
go
over
them
and
there'll
be
opportunity
to
kind
of
like
reset
them
and
I
will
yeah
I'll
get
something
up
in
the
Forum
next
week
and
then
I
think
this
is
something
we
can
start
toying
around
with
in
the
middle
of
January
or
so.
G
A
Here,
I
just
want
to
kind
of
talk
a
little
bit
about
this
and
budget,
the
budgets
kind
of
in
general.
So
you
know
voices
out
here.
Last
Wednesday
we
presented
the
operations
Guild
budget
made
some
changes
to
that
at
the
end
of
last
week,
and
then
the
DX
gov
group
presented
theirs
and
I've
been
seeing
a
swapper
guild.
A
One
around
that
looks
to
be
ready
to
be
presented
posted
in
the
Forum
and
I
assume
we
can
chat
about
it
on
Friday
and
then
I
also
think
we're
gonna
get
a
carrot.
Guild
of
some
sorts
maybe
set
up
too,
and
we
can
kind
of
figure
that
out,
but
in
terms
of
like
where
we
are
and
the
overall
process,
the
original
schedule
had
basically
said
the
earliest
you
can
submit
the
proposal
to
approve
the
budget
is
at
least
a
week
after
it's
been
in
the
Forum.
A
What
I'm
seeing
here,
though,
is
that
there
is
an
awful
lot
of
overlap
between
the
different
guilds
right,
so
I
think
a
classic
example.
I
saw
Boris
on
The,
Voice
Guild,
but
I
think
he's
also
kind
of
working
for
geeks
gov.
There's
some
questions
about
kind
of
how
QA
fits
into
this
swapper
and
carrot
are
kind
of
using
some
of
those
things
so
I
think
there
is
it's
almost
helpful
to
have
everything
out
there.
All
of
these
budget
drafts
out
there
before
we
move
forward
with
specific
proposals.
A
So
what
I'm
hoping
is
that
we
can
get
all
of
the
draft
proposals
out
this
week
and
then
start
moving
forward
with
the
proposal.
Submissions
on
the
early
ones,
like
the
operations
government,
these
governments
early
to
middle
of
next
week
and
just
kind
of
mindful
of
voting
over
the
weekend
and
kind
of
things
like
that.
A
But
I
think
we
still
should
be
on
on
schedule
to
get
all
of
this
approved
before
a
couple
days
before
Christmas
having
the
proposals
all
go
through
there,
but
I
think
we
probably
won't
submit
the
operations
Guild
one
until
early
next
week,
and
actually
what
I'm
hoping
to
do
is
put
a
comprehensive,
geek
style
budget
together
of
the
draft
ones.
So
we
can
have
like
a
whole
idea.
Okay,
this
is
what
we're
all
proposing
for
detail
budget
for
one
half
23
2023,
and
then
that
will
help
I.
G
Yeah,
it
sounds
perfect
and
just
to
to
remove
myself
from
your
your
site,
Crystal
I'm,
still
on
the
stage,
thanks
for
listening
to
our
little
ramble
here
on
voice.
Any
questions
comments
very
welcomed
in
the
Forum
there's
a
lot
of
good
stuff
yesterday
on
some
today,
as
well,
so
great
to
have
that
in
the
Forum
ahead
of
any
kind
of
large
decision
making
a
proposal
and
yeah.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
To
jump
on
that,
I
really
really
encourage
people
to
put
in
stuff
in
the
Forum
like
even
mean
stuff
or
even
things
that
may
not
end
up
changing
the
proposal
itself
right
now.
Maybe
you
disagree.
Maybe
you
think
they
should
go
in
this
direction,
because
it's
so
valuable
to
have
that
feed
feedback
now,
not
just
for
this
proposal,
but
in
four
five
six
months
when
we're
doing
the
second
half
of
the
2023
budget,
it
will
be
so
helpful
to
look
at
the
discussion
that
happened
during
this
time
be
like.
A
Okay
could
were
there
anything
that
we
could
have
seen
at
that
time
to
make
a
better
decision,
and
maybe
you've
got
something
that
you
wish
a
guild
would
change,
but
you
know
they're
not
going
to
change
right
now.
Put
it
in
a
reply
to
the
guild
now
see.
I
think
this
is
a
good
direction
to
go
to,
even
if
they
don't
want
to
go
into
that
direction.
As
we
move
forward,
it's
something
you
can
kind
of
point
back
to
for
good
discussion,
so
yeah
I
think
it's
a
great
opportunity
for
lots
of
suggestions.