►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2023-02-01]
Description
00:03 Welcome and Agenda
01:20 Mainnet Roundup
18:17 Gnosis Chain Roundup
22:45 SWPR & ENS Liquidity Discount Multiplier CTA
28:37 ENS DAO CTA
46:00 ESP Priorities Board CTA
A
A
A
Yeah
so
a
bunch
of
mainnet
proposals
and
then
also
a
couple
on
nurses
chain
and
then
yeah
a
bunch
of
these
are
redemptor
ones.
We
can
kind
of
go
through
and
then
yeah.
We
had
maybe
two
two
points,
discussion
items
here.
First,
one
is
from
the
DST
monetary
policy
committee
is
adjusting
the
liquidity
discount
multiplier
for
swapper
and
ens
tokens,
and
then
there
are
actually
two
big
ens
on
chain
proposals
right
now,
one
is
just
funding
the
working
groups
for
q1
and
Q2.
A
A
That's
a
ledger:
Nerf
yeah,
so
we're
okay,
we're
on
this
page
cool.
So
we'll
start
first
with,
as
I
said,
the
proposal
Roundup
on
on
mainnet.
So
we
have
these
two
different
schemes
right
now,
we'll
get
to
proposal
to
de-register
this
game
in
in
a
little
bit,
but
we
have
on
the
old
funding
and
voting
power
scheme.
We
have
two
boosted
proposals
right
now:
Milan
V
there
and
then
also
a
proposal
from
leviate.
B
A
Wants
mom,
so
that's
the
thing
yeah.
So
there
is
one
proposal:
I
just
want
to
quickly
say
this,
because
I
did
actually
vote
against
it.
There
is
the
level
sync.
You
can
kind
of
see
what
my
thought
process
is
there.
If
you
look
at
this,
it
actually
takes
the
percentage
of
rep
on
nose
to
space,
and
then
it
applies
it
to
to
mainnet,
but
the
way
that
we've
done
all
these
rep
syncs
in
the
past
and
the
way
I
think
it
should
be
done.
A
A
I
I
sent
him
a
message
and
told
him
that
if
he
did
a
24,
000
or
the
actual
amount
he
had
it
on,
this
has
changed
that
that
would
be,
would
vote
for
that
and
then
there
just
to
go
through
the
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
here
there
are
four
different
ones
that
are
currently
boosted
right
here:
two
from
dxgov
Guild,
2023,
q1,
funding,
I,
don't
know
if
Ross
is
on
here.
Maybe
he
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
that
and
give
give
everyone
a
break
from
the
child.
C
Yeah
sure
so
these
are
both
just
contingency
costs
from
our
H1
funding
budget
the
past,
so
that
is
a
new
smart
contract
developer
Federico
Nani,
this
kind
of
breaks
down
where
the
costs
from
that
are
coming
from
and
they're
just
getting
transferred
to
the
same
multi-sig
and
then
over
to
Dave's
Guild.
So
this
is
to
pay
for
him
for
January,
February
and
March
I
believe
Jeff
he's
doing
a
great
job
on
Smart
contracts
for
governance,
2.0.
C
B
Exactly
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say.
This
is
first
contributor,
stipend,
contingency
cost,
request
and
great
job
by
the
gov,
Guild
and
Ross
for
putting
this
proposal
together,
and
this
should
probably
be
an
example
for
the
other
guilds
for
they
for
when
they
do
request
their
contributor
event.
Stipends
perfectly
done
just
you
know,
writing
contribute
name
laying
out
like
the
amount
and
then
the
total
at
the
bottom.
B
B
D
C
C
C
There
another
thing
we
can
maybe
do
in
the
future
that
we
just
haven't
experimented
with,
is
actually
just
bridging
with
the
with
the
guilds
again,
nothing
technically
challenging.
Just
a
ux
thing
of
actually
withdrawing
from
the
other
side
is
a
bit
of
a
penis
which
are
swapper
knows,
but
we
have
a
couple
of
solutions
to
that.
We
may
explore
so.
A
D
A
C
A
Kind
of
see,
like
you
know,
I,
think
how
this
will
work
with.
You
know
we
had
the
approved
costs.
These
are
the
ones
that
are
sent
to
the
guild,
and
then
we
have
the
contingency
costs
that
end
up
like
basically
getting
approved
later,
and
it's
I
think
this
is
a
good,
maybe
the
the
Federico
one
is
a
good
example
of
that,
because
I
don't
think
that
any
it
wasn't
that
anyone
would
get
that.
But
looking
at
the
the.
B
A
A
A
six
DxD,
so
I
think
this
is
yeah
for
fourteen
thousand
die
and
for
20
each
there,
and
you
can
see
this
was
confirmed
on
the
Dow
talk
the
same
thing
for
zag
zagu's,
dxt,
Redemption,
bouncer
number,
three,
just
you
can
see
the
ether's
hand
length
there
and
and
confirm
all
of
those
and
molotov's
Redemption
balancer
number
two
is
is
the
same
thing.
I
think
I've
voted
for
all
of
these
because
I
confirmed
them
just
to
get
a
note.
That's
interesting
is
I
noticed.
A
Molotov
and
Zach
Zach
are
doing
more
than
one
Redemption
balancer
and
that's
because
they're
buying
DxD,
when
it
is
trading
below
the
70
nav
on
the
open
market
and
then
submitting
it
through
a
member
Redemption
bouncer,
which
is
you
know,
a
trustless
way
of
really
deexed
out
enforcing
the
price
floor,
guarantee
foreign
but
incentivizing
those
to
do
it
because
I'm
not
sure
the
exact
profit.
But
you
know
if
you're
buying
DxD
at
650
dollars
and
then
putting.
B
A
Okay,
oh
yeah,
and
then
there's
seps
and
duties
who
I've
not
had
a
chance
to
verify.
Yet
the
ceft
one
is
is
a
not
a
large
one,
but
the
do
D1
is
actually
a
pretty
large
one.
I
think
it's
four
yeah
458
DxD,
though
it's
to
the
Avatar
that
he
sent
it
to
because
we
do
not
have
a
multi-sig
here,
but
you
can
see
that
there
and
then
yeah,
so
all
are
welcome
to
confirm
that
there,
the
proposal
actually
just
be
boosted
a
little
while
ago.
A
E
E
I
would
say,
like
the
main
thing
why
people
were
dming
me
is
that
they
placed
limit
orders
at
the
exact
same
amount
or
just
below
what
DX.
That
was
like
setting
the
liquidity
order
at
which
didn't
allow
the
solvers
to
actually
take
sufficient
enough
of
a
fee
to
match
them.
So,
like
a
lot
of
orders
initially
were
not
being
matched,
then
there
was
also
then
like
I
just
tried
to
sell
one
DxD
through,
like
the
swap
interface
and
now.
E
E
The
UI
won't
actually
show
you
the
amount
and
that
also
actually
didn't
match
into
the
liquidity
order,
and
apparently
that
was
because
the
amount
was
too
little
and
then
eventually,
people
started
figuring
out
that
you
just
had
to
set
the
limit
order,
which
was
like
somewhat
below
the
price
of
the
liquidity
order,
and
they
did
start
matching
and
then
yeah.
What
Chris
is
pulling
up
right
now
as
well,
is
like
the
first
two.
E
There
were
two.
While
all
of
this
was
happening.
We
started
noticing
that
the
proposal
did
start
filling
partially,
but
we
didn't
really
understand
who
was
filling
it
and
like
I,
think
if
you
start
looking
into
the
proposal,
it
appears
as
if
a
solver
itself
actually
saw
the
price
difference
between
the
DX,
Dow
liquidity
order,
place
and
the
price
of
swapper
of
the
Xeon
swapper
and
actually
bought
the
XT
on
swapper
and
then
sold
it
into
the
own
liquidity
order.
E
A
Yeah
and
so
like,
whenever
you're
looking
at
these
an
ether
scan,
it's
always
like.
Okay,
where
did
the
dxt
come
from
right?
So
if
you
have
a
400
West
order
right
that
dxt?
Presumably
someone
has
that
not
on
in
a
liquidity
pool,
but
they
will
send
that
vxd
and
it's
like
who
is
sending
that?
How
are
they
doing
that
and
so
Dave
is
saying
like
basically,
no
one
could
sell
into
the
order,
except
for
if
you
look
at
these
first
two
orders,
the
source
of
the
DxD.
A
A
Look
like
anyone
was
selling
into
it
was
just
the
the
the
solver
was
recognizing
that
there
was
an
order
to
buy
DxD
at
0.46
and
that
they
could
access
a
bunch
of
that
on
chain
at
much
lower,
I
think
like
0.4
eth,
and
so
it
just
like
gobble
that
up,
but
it's
it
was
not
actually
geek
style
did
not
get
the
price
at
0.4
that
you
know
to
bring
it
up
to
point
four
six.
It
actually
just
got
everything
executed
at
0.46,
yeah.
E
And-
and
the
main
issue
here
is
that
currently
liquidity
orders
don't
pick
up
Surplus
right
right
if
liquidity
orders
were
able
to
pick
up
Surplus,
it's
probably
likely
would
have
also
happened
and
dxr
would
have
gotten
the
Surplus.
But
unfortunately
it's
not
something
calslops
reports
right
now
and
yeah
also
like
having
to
place
orders
16
days
out
kind
of
like
complicates
all
of
this
stuff
a
bit.
E
A
And
then
so,
these
first
two
were
basically
on
chain
liquidity
pools.
When
you
see
these
happened
like
right
after
the
proposal
passed,
I
think
it
was
like
1105
or
executed
and
then
I
guess
no
one
could
figure
out
so
into
it.
And
then
you
see
about
like
50
minutes
later.
You
see
the
first
like
people's
accessing
and
selling
this
directly.
So
you
have
this
yeah
100
DxD
and
then
someone
did
I,
think
42
DxD
here
and
so
that's
people
actually
coming.
B
A
But
yeah
and
then
just
as
you
said
before,
so
this
is
another
four
and
wet
order.
This
is
that
I
think
0.55
the
wet
price
changes
based
upon
the
price
of
ease.
Because
deep
has
you
know
a
third
of
stable
coins.
So
a
lot
of
that
that
that
changes
from
that.
But
in
order
for
this
proposal
to
go
through,
there
will
need
to
be
another
proposal
that
wraps
the
weft
and
that
can
go
through
in
eight
days.
A
So
that
should
be
fine.
We
just
need
to
do
that.
Yeah
in
the
next
day
and
a
half
there
and
we'd
already
use
the
mimic
fall,
a
bunch
of
times
actually
very,
very
helpful
and
as
a
side
note
we're
trying
to
get
them
to
build.
An
X
die
wrapper
for
the
Excel
on
gnosis
chain
so
that
we
can
trustlessly
wrap
x,
dot.
A
A
That
was,
oh,
just
two
other
ones:
I
missed
before
the
return
of
DxD
sent
by
geek
style.
Mistake
big,
shout
out
to
Wayne
for
coordinating
this
and
yeah.
So
this
guy
didn't
get
sent
it's
like
a
year,
yeah
almost
a
year
and
a
half
ago
to
the
dxt
contract
address,
and
so
it's
just
requesting
that
and
that
DxD
is
recoverable
there
and
then
the
other
one
is
a
claim
for
Nathan
on
his
February.
A
A
So
this
would
basically
get
rid
of
this
scheme
here,
and
this
scheme,
of
course,
is
the
one
that
allows
proposals
to
be
submitted
with
multiple
Redemption
periods,
whereas
a
new
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
is
exact
same
except
for
it
doesn't
allow
that
and
so
need
to
do.
The
same
thing
on
no
such
chain,
I
haven't
looked
at
I
assume
that
I
can
do
that.
It's
not
that
complicated
there,
but
yeah
12
more
days
for
that
to
go
through
so
we'll
be
looking
at
it
for
a
little
while,
okay.
A
A
A
It's
the
payment
for
the
end
of
the
work
there
also
contributor,
stipend
from
contributor
X
has
looked
at
this
and
and
confirmed
that,
and
then
we
have
I
think
fun
proposal,
one
that
I
would
encourage
everyone
to
vote
for.
That's
a
proposal
to
establish
the
governor
stewards
program,
so
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
this
one.
A
We
had
talked
about
this
a
lot
I
think
two
weeks
ago,
but
didn't
get
a
chance
to
submit
it
on
chain
at
the
time,
but
this
proposal
has
been
to
incentivize
good
governance
and
to
be
a
way
of
encouraging
existing
rep
holders.
Anyone
larger
than
that
holds
0.1
percent
of
rep
to
get
paid
for
participating
in
in
governance
there.
A
A
Anyone
that
is
interested
in
participating.
The
first
thing
I
would
do,
is
vote
on
this
proposal.
It's
a
really
great
way
of
getting
your
getting
your
participation
rate
up
and
then
you'll
have
to
post
on
the
dial
talk
thread
with
the
following
information
so
that
the
operations
Guild
can
can
manage
this,
and
this
does
not
this
proposal.
This
is
the
gnosis
chain
one,
but
there
will
be
in
later
this
afternoon.
A
A
Finally,
seeing
that
this
is
the
one
that
she
has
now
reposted
there
and
I
think
it's
for
the
right
amount,
which
is
2500
die
there,
but
you
can
look
through
the
proposal
and
double
check
everything
there
and
then
there
is
number
eight
Milton
contributor
proposal,
I
love
that
Milton
puts
the
numbers
at
the
beginning.
I
really
like
it
I
feel
like
I'm,
following
along
with
them
there,
but
yeah
it
just
boosted
today
and
Milton.
Also
does
a
good
job,
I
think
with
his
proposals
and
writing
a
reflection.
B
A
Kind
of
talking
about
where
he's
at
and
then
the
last
one
of
those
chain
is
International
blue
proposal.
December
creative
director
yeah.
This
is
I,
think
the
end
of
December.
So
this
would
be
the
last
proposal
that
would
go
through
the
Dow
itself
and
then
going
forward
that
is
claimed
through
the
guild
itself.
So
there
is
still
some
proposals
going
on
on
gnosis
chains,
so
yeah
make
sure
you're
checking
that
that
base
there
and
I
think
that's
it
for
gnosis
chain.
A
Maybe
that's
a
I,
don't
know,
probably
a
a
phrase
that
could
be
shortened
in
some
way.
But
basically
it
means
all
the
core
assets
and
D
Styles
treasury
contribution
to
nav
is
a
hundred
percent
right.
So
East
West
usdc
all
of
these
contribute
that,
because
those
tokens
people
will
literally
take
those
out
of
the
treasury
than
themselves
they'll
accept
those
any
of
those
any
of
the
other
ones
like
the
steak
eth.
That
could,
of
course
be
easily
converted
into
each
or
dollars
that
they're
very,
very
liquid.
A
A
So
swapper,
of
course,
digs
down
like
78
of
that,
and
it's
not
very,
very
liquid
ens
is
actually
pretty
pretty
liquid,
but
that
was
gifted
kind
of
to
eat,
to
geek
style,
to
govern,
and
not
necessarily
just
as
a
treasury
asset
and
the
same
thing
for
for
gno
that
there
is
some
strategic
alignment
there
I
think
specifically
when
you
think
about
maybe
supporting
gnosis
chain
there.
So
this
proposal
here
would
do
two
things:
it
would
actually
lower
the
swapper
discount
liquidity
discount
multiplier
to
ten
percent.
A
So
therefore
it
would
its
contributions
would
be
much
it
would
be
lower
than
I
could
change
it
here
right.
You
could
see
how
that
would
affect
nav
and
then
the
other
thing
it
would
do
is
it
would
raise
the
ens
amount
to
50
and
I
think
that
is
in
line
with
the
reality
of
these
assets.
I
think
swapper
itself,
I
think
as
I
said
here,
if
you
can,
a
250
purchase
of
swapper
token
incurs
five
percent
slippage.
A
This
is
on
gnosis
chain,
so
I
don't
think
it's
very
liquid
and
so
I
don't
think.
It's
necessarily
a
good
idea
to
have
that
as
a
such,
a
large
contribution
to
the
treasury
nav,
particularly
because
I
think
it
can
be
easily
manipulated
and
I.
You
know
there
has
been
some
activity
on
the
swapper
token
price,
the
last
couple
weeks
and
I'm,
not
sure
if
that
is
related
to
people
trying
to
inflate
the
treachery
nav.
But
this
is
a
good
way,
I.
Think
of
getting
ahead
of
that.
A
So
I
think
this
will
probably
just
take
the
form
of
a
signal
proposal
through
gnosis
chain
that
kind
of
lays
out
this
here
and
this
would
be
yeah
the
first
one
from
the
DxD
monetary
policy
committee
meeting
and
maybe
we'll
have
some
proposal
like
this.
Every
month
to
adjust
some
of
the
levers
there,
you
can
see
Hedgehog
got
to
20
characters
and
endorsed
this,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
anyone
else
had
any
thoughts.
Comments.
Disagreements
on
on
this.
A
Going
and
I
think
I
actually
missed
it,
but
this
morning
actually
wonder
what
they
did.
The
U.S
fed
had
their
or
so
they're
just
meeting
they
haven't,
they
haven't
released
it,
but
just
in
a
little
bit
the
the
U.S
fed
will
release
their
policy
recommendations
basically
for
this
month
and
that
will
presumably
be
a
interest
rate
increase,
but
not
as
big
as
the
one
that
they've
had
in
the
past
and
I.
Think.
A
If
you
look
at
how
the
FED
has
one
the
reason
this
was
named,
the
monetary
policy
committee
is
because
I
do
think
you're
trying
to
mimic
a
lot
of
the
goals
of
a
monetary
policy
for
an
economy
but
for
Geek
style
itself,
and
for
that
it
is
about
like
the
direction
where
things
are
going
much
more.
It
is
about
getting
like
the
precise
amount
here.
So
it's
not
that
the
FED
hiked
rates
four
percent
in
in
last
June.
It
was
they
hiked.
A
You
know
75
basis
points
every
month
or
two
for
six
months
and
that
kind
of
signals
to
the
market
market
like
the
direction
it's
going
and
then
even
now,
if
they
only
hike
by
25
basis
points,
that's
almost
like
a
it's
still
a
hype,
but
because
it's
a
decrease
in
the
acceleration.
It
almost
is
like
a
market
positive
move
there.
So
again,
I'm
not
opposed
to
going
to
yeah
those,
and
maybe
we
can
get
there
going
further.
But
I
think
there
is
a
benefit
to
moving
things.
A
A
Cool
and
then
the
other
two
discussion
items
I
wanted
to
briefly
touch
on
is
one
the
there's
two
on-chain
proposals
right
now
for
ens,
so
ens
is
basically
they
have
a
compound
Bravo
Fork,
but
the
the
like
front
end
port
is
actually
just
through
tally
itself.
So
they
have
these
two
one
is
a
the
working
group
funding.
So
this
would
fund
the
three
main
working
groups.
A
You
can
see
the
amounts
there
I
posted
this
in
the
in
the
governance,
chat
a
few
weeks
back
and
there's
some
good
discussion
there.
This
also
passed
on
a
snapshot
vote
last
week
here,
and
but
this
is
actually
you
can
see.
This
is
like
the
funding
proposal
itself,
and
so
you
could
see
it
actually
includes
some
people
have
on
here.
Yeah.
B
A
Kind
of
you
know,
I
think
it's
one
of
the
things
I've
enjoyed
about
ens
is
like
seeing
how
other
dowels
operate
and
what
they're
kind
of
using
here.
So
you
can
see.
This
is
what
Tally
is
showing
is
showing
here,
and
so
these
are
like
the
seven
transfers
here.
So
there's
some
Heath
each
one
of
those
and
then
they
do
have
the
actual
executable
code.
So
it
says,
function
one,
but
that
doesn't
really
tell
you
exactly
what
it
is,
but
then
they
do
have
I'm
assuming
this
is
the
tenderly.
A
A
Oh,
that
didn't
really
work,
but
maybe
they're
looking
to
have
the
tenderly
simulation
right
in
right
in
here
so
anyway,
this
is
the
the
first
one
there,
which
I
think
should
be
is
not
as
controversial.
It
does
look
like
there's
some
people
that
had
voted
against
it,
Brantley
and
Gary
Palmer,
so
I
wasn't
sure
if
there's
any
thoughts
on
that
candy
4,
of
course,
has
the
46
000
geeked
out
ens
tokens
as
a
delegate
and
so
right
now.
A
A
No,
so
it's
actually
the
way
that
it's
a
yeah,
the
way
that
this
works
I
think
all
of
there's
three
stewards
for
each
of
these
working
groups
that
are
paid,
but
all
of
that
payment
is
actually
included,
I
believe
in
The,
Meta
governance,
working
group,
and
if
you
look
at
most
of
this
funding,
like
you
know,
a
lot
of
it
is
grants
for
small
grants.
Grants
for
each
limo
is
80k
in
one
of
these
I
can't
remember
what
year
you
go,
get
coin
grants
so
small
grants.
A
That's
an
eth,
get
coin
grants
rapid
grants,
large
grants
so
like
most
of
this
one
is
the
public
goods
working
group
is
like
just
funding
these
different
things,
not
actually
funding
individuals,
The,
Meta
governance,
one
is
the
one
that
does
include
the
steward
and
secretary
compensation.
So
that's
this
line
here,
so
it's
184k
for
the
six
months
for
nine
people,
so
I
think
that
comes
out
to
like
a
couple
thousand
dollars
a
month.
There
yeah
and
then
I
think
this
one
is
the
the
ecosystem.
A
Working
group
is
actually
the
the
biggest
one
you
could
see
here:
935
K
and
250
for
ease
there.
And
so
again
you
can
see
like
a
huge
amount
on
hackathons
huge
amount
on
the
support
and
grants,
and
then
where's
limo,
for
instance,
is
getting
85k
and
10
eth
here
for
running
continuing
to
run
that
the
ens
Ferry
has
got
some
attention
lately
there,
but
a
lot
of
it
is
yeah,
the
only
one
that
actually
includes
the
individuals
is
in
this
meta
governance
working
group.
D
Do
you
know,
if
do
you
know
if
karpaki,
who
is
now
in
charge
of
well,
is
not
in
charge,
but
it's
looking
after
the
treasury
was
is
involved
in
the
is
also
like.
Is
this
a
what
percentage
of
their
total
treasury?
Is
this
they're
allocating
towards
these
two
quarters,
and
is
that
factor?
Is
that
a
Target
that
they're
factoring
in
for
their
for
their
treasury
management?
Do
you
know.
D
A
Is
so
in
addition
to
these,
and
so
let
me
go
back
to
is
this
the
so
right,
so
this
one
is
what's
passing
now
like,
so
it
is
total
I
think,
like
four
million
dollars
a
little
bit
less
than
that,
I
think
three
points.
Something
like
that.
Oh
actually,
no!
It's
two
point
because
over
the
year,
if
you
annualize
this
over
the
year,
it's
like
four
million
dollars
right.
This
is
where
the
Dow
is
spending.
On
top
of
that,
ens
is
funding
ens.
No,
what
do
they
call
it?
A
Ens
Labs
I,
think
used
to
be
true
names
limited
for
four
million
dollars,
I
think
also
so
there's
like
an
eight
million
dollar
total
spend
and
then
the
total
treasury
I
think
is
around
40
million
right
now.
But
the
other
thing
about
DNS
DNS
is
like
making
a
lot
of
money,
so
it
makes
about
a
million
dollars
a
month
in
renewal
fees.
D
A
A
A
This
is
a
proposal
led
by
fireeyes
Dows
to
basically
sell
25
of
that
into
usdc
yeah,
so
I
guess
it's
like
they
have
about
a
little
more
than
55
million
dollar
total
total
Treasury,
and
this
is
meant
to
ensure
that
they
can
cover
operations
for
the
next
18
to
24
months.
This
is
separate
than
the
that's
getting
confusing
separate
than
the
endowment
in
initiative.
A
That
karpaki
is
doing
so
what
could
park
key
would
be
doing,
is
actually
managing
basically
the
rest
of
this
75
percent
and
then
actually
another
thing,
but
it
would
even
manage
some.
It
would
manage
this
too.
It
just
would
be
in
usdc
as
it's
going
and
just
to
kind
of
give
some
background.
I
think
this
is
a
little
bit
of
a
maybe
a
power
struggle.
A
The
fact
that
there
is
this,
where
is
it
the
endowment
initiation
that
has
been
going
through
right
now,
that
is
basically
I-
think
capraki
posted
about
a
week
or
two
ago
was
basically
how
they
plan
to
to
do
everything
through
the
Zodiac
module
through
the
different
yeah.
You
can
kind
of
see
the
the
size
of
things
right
now
yeah.
A
So
this
is
their
current
one,
67
million
2.5
million
in
usdc,
and
then
this
is
the
amount
that
just
basically
comes
into
the
treasury
through
referral
fees
itself,
and
so
they
have
a
plan
basically
for
executing
on
this
endowment
initiation.
You
can
kind
of
see
it
see
it
there
and
I
would
say
that
the
one
to
sell
ten
thousand
dollars
ten
thousand
each
into
usdc
is
I,
wouldn't
I,
don't
know
called
a
rival
plan,
but
it
is,
is
not
being
led
by
Kirk
Franklin.
A
E
They
want
to
use
well
right
now,
I
think
the
last
I
read
the
James
guy.
The
fire
guy
was
proposing
to
do
one
cell
with
Milkman
on.
Well,
he
initially
yeah
I,
don't
know
it
changed
a
lot,
but
the
what
that
he
wanted
to
submit
from
what
I
understood
was
like
one
big
sale
using
milk
and
cow
swap,
which
is
places
in
order
at
the
time
of
The.
Proposal
passing
and
I
mean
also
commented
that
there's
not
too
much
slippage.
E
No,
no,
no
so
Milkman
they
want
to
place
like
one
order.
Milkman
is
actually
really
cool
it
like
we
could
have
used
it
for
our
BuyBacks,
because
the
way
we
did
BuyBacks
is
we
created
a
cow
swap
order
at
the
time
like
16
days
before
the
proposal
passes.
What
Milkman
does
is
it
actually
creates
the
order
when
the
proposal
passes?
E
So
it's
a
bit
confusing
to
be
honest,
because
karpaki
was
expected
to
do
this
based
on
the
signals,
not
snapshot
that
passed
a
while
ago,
but
on
the
execution
method
it
looks
like
it
will
be.
Milkman
and
I
think
the
only
outstanding
question
is
whether
it
will
be
dca'd
or
just
done
in
one
transaction
and
a
lot
of
people
in
The.
Carpati
Proposal
are
actually
asking
them
to
buy
to
sell.
If
when,
if
is
high,
which
I
found
very
amusing.
A
Yeah,
as
I
said
before,
the
other,
the
q1
Q2
funding
proposal
planning
to
vote
for
that
and
I'm
actually
right
now,
leaning
to
voting
against
this
one
for
most
of
the
reasons
that
that
Dave
laid
out
there
because
I
think
it's
kind
of
confusing
in
in
general
and
then
I
also
think.
The
big
reason
is
like
I,
think
you
know
doing
something:
dollar
cost
averaging
over
a
longer
period
of
time.
A
I
think
is
definitely
the
move
and
if
the
way
that
I'm
reading
this
right
now
is
that
it
does
not
dollar
cost
average
over
that
time
it
basically
just
it's
almost
like
a
or
just
like
the
twap
use,
the
time
weighted
average
price
so
you're
just
not
because
if
you
mean
10
000
is
a
lot
of
these
right.
So
if
you
sell
that
right
now
on
the
uniswap
one,
that's
going
to
lead
to
not
just
not
just
some
slippage
but
you're
going
to
get
front,
I
mean
you're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
Mev.
A
Out
of
that,
so
I
think
the
Milkman
one
I
think
just
splits
up
that
order,
but
not
over
like
a
long
period
of
time.
I.
Don't
think
and
I
don't
see
that
in
this
proposal
here-
and
this
is
like
an
on-chain
proposal,
so
you
should
be
able
to
see
that
it
is
yeah
that
it
would
be
over
that
that
time
period
but
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
people
have
thoughts,
because
if
you
look
right
now
this
seems
to
be
a
lot
of
people
voting
for
it
very
few
people
kind
of
voting.
D
D
D
This
was
one
of
the
open
questions
that
we
kind
of
had
when
when
people
were
competing
for
ens's
endowment
there's.
Obviously
the
vote
was
all
signal,
proposals
right
and
then
there's
a
proposal
that
there's
going
to
karpat
keys
in
charge
right,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
because
things
needed
to
happen
on
chain
and
the
money's
sitting
in
the
NS
Treasury.
D
This
is
an
example
of
your
everything
is
going
to
need
further
additional
on-chain
proposals
and
people
can
vote
different
than
they
did
that
than
they
did
in
a
signal
proposals
and
that's
going
to
happen
continuously
over
and
over
and
over.
Unless
you
actually
give
the
power
delegation
power
to
the
person
that
you
actually
signaled
to
be
in
charge
right,
yeah,
well,
I
think.
A
If
you,
this
is
why
I
think
this
the
fire
is
down
like
went
with
this
proposal
quickly,
because
there
is
currently
one.
This
is
like
two
weeks
ago.
That
is
the
execution
of
that
proposal
that
they
got
awarded
right.
So
this
one
would
actually
be
the
transfer
of
funds
and
then
kaparki
would
be
in
charge
with
executing
it.
You
know,
does
use
like
a
zodiac
modifier
role,
so
it's
not
that
caparky
actually
custodies
the
funds.
A
Yeah
the
proposal
is
up
for
another
five
or
six
more
days.
Is
that
I
think
I'll
vote
for
the
q11,
but
I
think
leaning
towards
voting
against
this
one,
primarily
because
the
dollar
cost
average
component
I,
don't
really
see
any
benefit
into
not
splitting
this
up
over
a
couple
months
and
I
think
it's
a
much
more
responsible
way
of
doing.
A
B
D
D
Yeah
I
mean
the
unique
thing
is
if
the
next
quarter,
they
get
another
same
amount
of
Ethan
and
they
get
that
every
quarter
and
that's
ongoing.
Maybe
ens
activity
goes
lower
and
higher
and
stuff,
but
you
could
get
in
a
rolling
basis
of
that
that
it's
kind
of
is
because
if
they
do
the
same
thing,
next
quarter
with
new
Heath
and
he
eats
a
lot
higher
like
it
is
already
kind
of
an
averaging
system
like
if
you
just
do
a
sum
every
quarter
and
you
get
a
new
eat.
Every
quarter
right,
yeah.
A
And
I
think
there's
lots
of
ways
the
ens
could
fund
itself.
Ens
makes
money
on
chain
right
now,
it's
just
like
a
million
dollars
a
month,
so
I
think
it
would
be.
You
know,
because
it
basically,
that
the
the
impetus
for
this
proposal
is
that
we
want
to
secure
Runway
worst
case
scenario.
What
happens?
How
do
we
make
sure
EMS
can
like
function
and
I
think
there
are
a
lot
of
other
options
with
that
that
you
could
incorporate
into
this
that
could
be
considered.
A
Anything
else,
yeah
I,
guess
the
two
just
calls
to
attention.
The
no
I
guess
ESP.
What
is
that
camera
Electronics
signaling
something,
but
this
is
the
priorities
board.
The
app
that's
running
priorities
board
is
really
really
cool,
I
think
in
terms
of
how
it
got
set
up
and
big
shout
out
to
Louis
for
that,
and
so
any
rep
holder
can
go
and
and
allocate
to
whatever
priorities
they
think
are
necessary
both
for
Geek
style
and
then
also
the
guild
itself
and
then
yeah
we
had
if
you're
interested.
A
B
D
20
Care
on
on
the
ESP
tool.
So
far
there
hasn't
been
any
DxD
holding
wallet
that
has
expressed
interest
to
participate.
If
anyone
here
has
DxD
in
another
wallet,
they
can
do
that
any
DxD
holder.
If
you're
listening,
you
can
just
submit
your
wallet
on
that
the
form
in
the
in
the
Forum,
post
and
you'll
get
your
voting
points
and
then
you
can
participate.
There's
a
couple.
There's
one
wallet.