►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2023-01-25]
Description
00:03 Welcome and Agenda
01:09 Mainnet Roundup
22:22 Gnosis Chain Roundup
24:52 DXD Redemption Check-in.
25:58 Scheme Spring Cleaning
29:30 Restructuring and Refocus Post and Check-in
A
A
A
So
the
way
holographic
consensus
works
is
when
there
are
proposals
that
are
boosted,
meaning
they've,
been
above
a
minimum
threshold
for
at
least
24
hours,
that
that
increases
the
amount
of
proposals
that
I'm
sorry
increases
the
minimum
threshold.
That
proposals
need
to
have
a
positive
stake
on
so
it
starts
out
at
250
and
then
it
goes
against
300
and
then
it
goes
to
420
or
something
like
that,
but
that's
just
affecting
the
required
up
stake
right.
It's
increasing
that
amount
of
Upstate,
the
idea
being.
A
If
there's
lots
of
proposals
in
the
queue,
then
voters
like
the
rep
holders
and
government
need
some
ability
to
kind
of
process
that.
So
if
you
want
to
get
a
proposal
boosted,
it
increasingly
costs
more
and
more
so
that
affects
the
upstate
side.
So
the
interesting
thing
about
this,
though,
is
that
the
down
sync
side
was
increased
kind
of
automatically,
and
that
was
not
due
to
the
number
of
proposals
in
the
queue.
C
A
A
C
A
You
can
see
650
each
and
45
000
die,
so
that's
coming
out
of
the
treasury,
so
I
think
it's
important
that
we
kind
of
take
some
time
to
to
look
at
these
and
yeah.
So
the
first
thing
we
can
see
here
is
the
original
transaction
hash
that
was
sent
to
geek
style,
as
you
can
see,
2100
DxD
and
then
so
you
got
sent
in
this
transaction
and
so
then
he's
trying
to
claim
a
a
Redemption
balancer.
C
A
Seemed
to
be
slightly
broken
in
Alchemy,
yes,
but
you
can
see
here.
This
is
what
he's
the
the
proposal
was
claiming
so
the
2168-
and
this
was
done
through
the
spreadsheet,
the
treasury
spreadsheet
there
and
the
key
thing
about
this
I
think
is,
you
know,
checking
the
eat.
Price
is
the
big
thing
that
really
affects
these.
A
So
you
want
to
look
at
courses
that
the
circulating
supplies
the
circulating,
Supply
29
420
was
what
the
circulating
Supply
was
after
Conor's,
big
Redemption
proposal
for
5400
DxD
went
through
so
that
lowered
it
to
29
420.
So
that's
a
big
number.
You
want
to
be
checking
and
then
the
1582
is
the
eats
price
there.
A
C
A
A
A
Execute
this
proposal,
not
just
the
the
proposer
itself,
but
if
you
think
it's
cool
when
you're
sending
lots
of
fun
and
through
proposals.
This
is
why
it's
also
very
cool
when
you're
doing
lots
of
things
on
chain
like
changing
a
website
right
that
automatically
gets
updated.
That's
what
we
do
through
ens
or
a
lot
of
the
treasury
things
we
do.
A
A
A
Yeah,
so
you
can
see
here,
this
has
actually
been
updated
with
the
eats
price
that
was
like
two
days
ago,
so
you
can
see
why
the
the
prices
are
a
little
bit
higher
and
how
that
would
have
affected
the
different
amounts
that
would
be
sent
through.
Most
importantly,
you
can
see
in
this,
even
though
the
price
of
eth
has
changed,
there
is
not
a
noticeable
difference.
I
guess,
there's
a
little
bit
more
eth
I'm,
not
sure.
A
If
that's
because
of
withdrawals
or
something,
but
you
can
see,
the
each
price
has
not
really
changed
that
much.
But
you
see
a
little
bit
more
on
I
guess
it's
just
changed
the
makeup
of
it
too
really
so
anyway,
this
is
a
big
one.
There,
a
big
shout
out
to
Molotov
for
putting
the
a
lot
of
this
kind
of
process
together.
B
A
Spreadsheet
that
you
can
take
a
screenshot
of
I
think
it
makes
it
much
easier
to
verify
that.
So
this
is
the
first
one
here
and
then
we'll
have
we'll
kind
of
look
at
some
of
the
other
ones.
So
we
have
zag
zag,
who
I
should
come
up
with
a
new
pronunciation
each
time,
but
this
is
member
balancer
number,
two
and
I
think
what
is
kind
of
interesting
about
this
one,
of
course
not
to
give
too
much
of
of
Conor's
approach
away.
A
A
So
that's
one
of
the
ways
I
think
of
enforcing
the
floor.
Price
guarantee
is
having
that
like
flow
of
funds,
obviously
take
a
little
bit
of
risk
in
the
eight
days
and
then
also
a
little
bit
of
risk
of
whether
it
will
be
approved
or
not,
but
based
on
the
number
ones
that
have
been
approved
already.
I
think
it's
pretty
clear,
and
this
is
actually
the
second
one
of
of
zagu
zag
zagu
and
then
there's
another
one
that
I
think
has
just
been
yeah
boosted
here.
A
That
is
a
similar
situation,
and
so
those
are
the
molotov
this
one
and
then
we
have
two
others.
Triangulars
is
great
because
they
had
included
the
actual
sheet
in
the
in
The
Proposal
here,
but
they
didn't
actually
include
the
transaction
Hask,
which
I
always
like
to
see.
We
can
check
out
this
from
here.
A
Yes,
okay,
she
didn't
include
it
here,
and
this
is
kind
of
the
the
right
proposal.
After
a
couple
times,
you
can
yeah
I
mean
really
important
to
check
the
transaction
hash
and
another
thing
I
always
kind
of
checking
is,
is
who
sent
this
funds
in?
Is
that
actually
who
made
the
proposal
I
think
it
was
for
triangular
that
it
was
actually
not
the
same
address
right
and
that's
why
I
think
John
had
said?
We
need
to
have
kind
of
verification
for
that
here,
but.
B
A
Making
sure
kind
of
everything
looks
okay.
What
you
can
do
is
another
way
to
verify,
because
again
the
key
thing
is
really
like:
the
the
eat.
Price
is
a
big
thing
that
could
be
manipulated.
Is
you
know,
looking
at
the
actual
transaction
hash,
and
you
can
see
here
what
the
price
of
eth
was
and
that
one
actually
seems
to
be
a
little
bit
higher
but
interesting.
A
A
B
A
The
same
address:
that's
sending
that
in
there
and
46.26
matches
up
and
31
791
matches
up
with
what
we
see
here
and
the
key
thing
again
we're
looking
at
the
circulating
Supply,
which
is
that
has
stayed
consistent
since
Connors,
because
we
don't
want
to
decrease
the
circulating
supply
for
the
member
balancers
that
have
not
yet
passed
yet
because
we're
also
not
counting
the
funds
that
will
leave
the
treasury
in
those
member
Redemption.
Balancers.
A
Okay,
now
this
is
a
little
confusing,
but
I
think
it's
just
kind
of
good
to
to
go
over
here.
So
we
have
another
one
for
mainnet.
This
is
actually
only
72.48
DxD.
It
is
sometimes
interesting
to
see
where
the
dxt
came
from
so
I
think
it
was
this
one.
No
it's
not
this
one.
One
of
them
was
from
like
the
bonding
curve,
it's
kind
of
interesting
but
yeah.
This
one
posted
here
a
little
bit
smaller,
but
the
same
same
deal
here.
A
You
can
see
the
each
price
right
there
and
then
the
split
up
of
those
as
well
yeah.
It
was
a
bonding
curve.
Okay,
I'll
just
make
this
petrol
yeah.
Well,
there
was
one
I
think
it
was
transferred
from
bonding
curve
to
another
one
or
something.
You
could
like
very
clearly
see
that
it
is
the
bonding
curve
which
is
interesting.
A
B
A
B
A
On
Cal
swap
yes
fun.
This
is
actually
why
David
taken
his
shirt
off
because
it
was
so
much
fun
doing
this
one.
No
so
the
big!
So
we've
done
a
lot
of
these
cow
swap
orders
for
a
lot.
The
last
couple
weeks,
we
had
shifted
to
doing
more
in
stable
coins.
Just
because
of
you
know,
the
price
of
eth
was
down,
and
that
was
an
opportunity
to
acquire
DxD
at
a
low
each
price
at
a
low
price
there,
but
the
problem,
of
course,
being
especially
since
these
are
16
day
proposals.
A
They
get
passed
that,
since
the
price
of
eth,
is
moving
typically
up.
It
was
a
lot
of
these
stablecoin
proposals.
Buyback
purchases
were
falling
out
of
the
the
range
of
the
limit
order
set
in
that
so
I
think
we
had
a
500
000
usdc
order
that
was
for
I,
think
570,
3
yeah,
so
573
usdc,
but
so
it's
still
like
I
think
you
can
actually
access
it
still
now
through
through
Cal
swap,
but
obviously
like
txt
is
not
trading
at
I.
A
B
A
And
since
it'll
be
an
eat,
I
think
it's
placed
at
0.44,
yeah,
0.4642
weft
for
DxD.
So
right
this
is
basically
saying.
Geek
style
is
going
to
buy
860
txt
at
this
this
price
and
yeah.
So
that
the
way
it
is
it's
the
liquidity
orders.
Do
you
think
there's
like
limit
orders
on
calc
there's
three
different
types
of
orders
on
Castle
I
mean
Dave.
A
Correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
here,
because
I'm
once
again,
stealing
the
the
research
that
you
have
done,
but
there
are
three
or
types
of
orders
on
Castle
there's
a
limit
order
that
is
fill
or
kill,
meaning
you
can
place
any
limit
order,
any
price,
and
that
is
that
is
it
can
only
be
filled
or
killed
right.
You
can't
just
have
a
partial
fill
order
to
that.
A
So
it's
really
hard
to
do
large
orders,
because
if
you
have
like
say
this
one
400,
each
maybe
some
people,
maybe
the
people
doing
the
Redemption
bouncers-
would
be
able
to
do
that.
But
for
the
most
part,
it's
hard
to
get
that
entirely
filled
so
and
then
the
second
type
is
Market
orders,
so
you
could
just
say,
buy
as
much
at
Max
at
this
price,
but
basically
kind
of
execute
at
this
execute
at
the
market
price.
Now
the
problem
with
that
is
the
dxt
market.
A
Liquid
Market
on
chain
is
not
that
large,
so
you
can't
really
acquire
that
much
without
really
greatly
increasing
the
slippage,
tolerance
and
kind
of
losing
on
out
that
and
then
the
third
one
is
liquidity
orders,
which
is
basically
like
a
special
position
in
the
Cal
protocol
where
they
can
allow
you
to
do
whether
you
can
allow
you
to
do
the
you.
Basically
I,
don't
know
if
they
have
it
like
you're,
like
a
market
maker
or
something
they
have
like
a
special
ability
to
place.
A
A
Actually.
This
is
interesting.
The
trick
is,
you
have
to
use
the
Cal
swap
UI
to
actually
fetch
that
liquidity,
but
right
now
the
cash
swap
UI
is
actually
not
showing
that
liquidity.
So
it's
a
little
a
little
tricky,
but
it's
basically
like
sitting
on
cow
swaps.
Order
book
after
it
clears
whatever
can
acquire
on
the
open
market.
A
So
I
think
that
was
right,
yeah
and
I.
Guess
I
want
the
two
a
couple
comments
in
the
chat
here:
the
first
one,
this
I'm
going
to
read
it
the
first
one.
This
will
mean
that
the
Dow
is
eating
much
more
of
the
profits
between
cells
and
70,
rather
than
dirty,
Arbors,
Conor,
I,
hope
you're,
not
referring
to
to
yourself
in
terms
of
bargaining,
the
price
up
to
up
to
the
market
price,
and
then
the
next
thing
is
kind
of
well.
A
Maybe
this
would
have
been
better
than
the
current
redemptions
and
execute
faster.
That
is
true,
but
this
proposal
does
take
16
days
to
go
through
and
the
price
of
each
I
mean
the
DHT
eat
price.
Does
change
like
a
good
amount
too,
but
I
think
we
are
kind
of
do
another
I
think
there's
another
one
that
Dave
was
going
to
put
in
today
the
liquidity
order
and
then
yeah
I
think
that's
it,
but
then
the
key
kind
of
for
this
liquidity
order.
One
is
that
this
is
sitting.
A
This
will
first
acquire
ldxt
on
the
market
price
up
to
its
limit
price,
and
then
it
will
basically
sit
on
Cal
protocol's
order
book
and
accessible
through
Cal
swap
UI
accessible
through
Cal
swap
protocol,
but
I
think
actually
right.
Now,
it's
not
it's
not
showing
the
prices
through
the
UI
is
that
correct,
Dave.
B
Yeah,
so
they
just
need
to
like
fix
that
somehow
it's
just
on
the
UI
but
like
you
would
have
a
really
odd
Surplus
if
you
do
do
a
larger
trade,
but
of
course
you're
like
kind
of
trusting,
Cal
swap,
which
is
not
ideal,
so
I
think
they're.
Looking
into
that
and
just
one
correction.
Unfortunately,
this
order
doesn't
tap
into
available
liquidity
on
the
market.
It's
ju,
you
can
just
match
into
it
through
cow
swap,
so
it
is
yeah.
B
It's
still
not
like
an
ideal
solution,
but
it
definitely
does
give
you
know
a
lot
of
liquidity
for
people
to
sell
into
and
yeah.
Hopefully,
the
car
swap
guys
fix
like
the
UI
thing,
so
it
actually
shows
on
the
car
stop
UI.
You
can
right
now
look
at
the
order
and
like
as
long
as
it
says,
open
on
Cal
swap
it
will
match
into
it.
But
of
course,
if
the
UI
just
fetch
these
correctly,
that
would
be
much
simpler
for
everyone.
A
B
B
A
Below
that
cool
and
there's
also
like
another
place
where
things
kind
of
happen,
like
one
inch
limit
orders,
some
things
are
kind
of
going
on
there.
So
there's
some
trades
kind
of
I'm
going
through
there
anyway
yeah.
This
is
kind
of
a
bit
of
a
discussion
about
some
of
the
different
DxD
kind
of
redemption,
and
then
the
cow
swap
orders
in
here
I
wasn't
sure.
If
there's
any
other
kind
of
thoughts
on
this.
A
A
Okay
and
then
the
other
I
think
there's
just
one
other,
there's
two
other
proposals
on
mainnet.
Here
we
have
January
2023
tokens,
claim
Nathan
here
so
Nathan,
of
course,
a
long
time,
Biz
Dev
former
Biz
Dev
worker,
and
so
this
is
just
another
claim
for
DxD.
You
can
see
he
has
a
reference
stock
there,
it's
not
the
same
format,
but
it
does
have
colors
and
then
the
other
one
we
have
is
Milan
V's
contributor
proposal,
which
was
just
boosted
a
little
while
ago
and
so
yeah.
A
B
A
A
Here
again,
this
is
for
mostly
for
December
and
then
also
van
Grimm
has
four
proposals
here.
Basically
I
think
two
months
and
each
proposal
has
an
X
die
and
a
and
a
rep
proposal.
So
that's
why
there's
kind
of
four
different
proposals
then,
and
another
thing
to
note
for
van
Grimm
for
oh
actually,
no,
this
one
is
not
going
through
Dev
X
Maybe.
A
Yes,
there's
the
van
Grim
one.
Then
we
also
have
skylabs
contributor
proposal,
which
was
just
boosted
I,
think
yesterday,
right
now
and
then
there
are
two
currently
boosting,
as
I
said,
the
vancom
one
already
and
then
there's
an
Alchemy
Bounty
payout.
This
is
one
I
just
boosted
a
little
while
ago.
This
is
for
the
3ac
folks
for
creating
this.
What
we're
looking
at
right
now,
creating
I
guess,
setting
up
and
launching
what
we're?
A
A
A
A
So
we
kind
of
just
did
this:
the
DxD
Redemption
check-in,
but
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
there
were
any
other
kind
of
questions
or
things
for
kind
of
going
forward.
I
know
that
this
Molotov
one
will
potentially
go
through
I
think
in
two
days,
so
that
will
likely
maybe
set
off
another
round
of
those,
and
so
we'll
quickly
update
the
sheet
off
of
that.
Of
course,
anyone
can
can
kind
of
update
and
verify
it
there,
but
any
any
questions
from
dxt
holders.
A
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
rep
holders
that
have
been
following
this,
and
maybe
this
is
kind
of
a
lot
to
a
lot
to
follow
in
a
lot
of
proposals
to
process
here
and
so
hoping
to
try
to
make
it
as
easy
to
verify
as
possible.
The
good
news
is,
since
all
these
are
happening
on
mainnet.
We
do
have
eight
days
to
do
all
these,
so
we
will
always
have
to
be
able
to
review
the
any
any
Redemption
balance
or
proposal
at
this
at
this
on
this
call.
A
Yeah
next
time,
I
just
want
to
talk
briefly
about
because
scheme
spring
cleaning.
So
this
is
actually
something
we
did
a
year
ago
before,
but
we
have
I
think
too
many
schemes.
So
Deep's
vote
is
nice
because
it
puts
all
of
the
proposals
in
a
single
flow.
But
if
you
look
at
Alchemy
here,
you
can
see
at
the
top
of
both
the
xdi
and
the
magnet
one.
A
We
basically
have
these
funding
and
voting
power
and
new
contribution
reward
schemes
on
top
of
both
of
them,
and
they
are
basically
the
exact
same
except
for
one
key
difference,
and
that
is
the
new
contribution
reward
scheme
does
not
allow
for
proposals
to
be
suited
to
be
submitted
for
multiple
periods.
So
this
was
revolved
in
the
exploit
that
Dave
discovered
in
the
Summer,
where
you
could
submit
proposals
that
had
multiple
Redemption
periods.
A
So
you
could
just
redeem
those
infinitely,
so
we
fixed
that
we
fixed
that
on
the
front
end,
not
the
the
Alchemy
one,
but
on
the
on
the
DX
vote
front
end.
For
any
time,
you
have
a
proposal
that
has
multiple
periods,
there's
like
a
warning
signal
that
shoots
up,
but
we
also
fixed
it
on
the
smart
contract
level
where
it's
like.
A
Where
is
it
yes
right,
yeah
and
then
I'm
not
sure
if
it
may
be
yeah,
so
we
need
to
deregister
the
scheme
on
gnosis
chain
two,
but
I
guess
those
will
take
longer
on
those
will
take
longer
than
any
of
the
live
proposals.
But
the
key
thing
is
I'm,
not
even
really
sure
how
this
will
will
act,
as
you
submit
a
proposal
for
a
scheme
that
is
being
deregistered
like
that's,
not
I,
don't
really
know,
but
I
guess
what?
If
the
proposal
was
deregistered
before
the
payment
proposal
passes,.
B
I
I
I
believe
there's.
No,
the
only
validation
if
a
scheme
is
installed
happens
upon
the
submission.
So
if
that
scheme
in
the
meantime
does
get
de-registered,
there
is
no
validation
happening
to
check
that
the
scheme
is
still
installed,
but
I,
don't
I
think
something
has
to
break
because
I.
It
would
be
like
really
really
bad
if
that
scheme
still
had
the
ability
to
access
the
extile
funds
if
they
were
installed
right,
even
though
there's
no
validation
happening
at
the
point
of
execution,
yeah
and.
A
Maybe
something
we
should
test
on
nurses
chain
when
we're
de-registering
it
just
like
try
to
send
a
test
proposal
that
does
that
after,
but
the
takeaway
for
anyone
looking
to
submit
proposals
is
make
sure
you're
using
things
that
have
new
in
it
for
right
now
and
that
we
will
de-register
these
schemes.
I'll
boost
this
one
on
mainnet
that
3ac
did
and
then
we'll
look
at
the
the
gnosis
chain.
One.
A
C
C
We
all
know
kind
of
starting
with
project
Davi.
Our
guilds
have
kind
of
pushed
through
budgets
that
have
now
passed,
of
course,
can
be.
Fork
has
a
good
post
on
that
squat
accountability,
Council
councils.
We
have
a
post
also
by
candy
Fork
kind
of
running
through
Mission
wardens
and
an
application
process,
and
what
that
looks
like
so
that
is
being
explored
as
well
priorities.
B
C
B
C
C
C
A
Right
and
DHC
will
approach
its
third
anniversary
in
in
May
there
and
so
I
I.
Think
Duke
style
has
like
a
very
long
future
ahead
of
it
and
I
think
the
history
kind
of
shows
that
there
are
these
times
where
we
have
transition
periods
right,
I,
think
before
the
bonding
curve.
There
was
a
lot
of
people
getting
involved
in
terms
of
making
something
actually
happen
with.