►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-09-07]
Description
00:03 Welcome
00:17 Agenda
00:28 Mainnet
03:40 Gnosis Chain
30:42 DXD Token Working Group
A
I
actually
don't
think
I've
actually
boosted
this
this
one
here,
but
the
first
one
is
to
set
the
swapper
to
factory
fee
receiver
to
xerox
lots
of
zeros,
which
is
submitted,
I
believe
by
adam,
and
that
is
a
fix
that
we've
already
implemented
on
nurses
chain,
and
this
was
regarded
with
some
of
the
problems
with
the
fee
receiver
there,
and
so
this
will
just
set
the
fee
to
zero.
So
I
don't
know
if
adam
or
anyone
wanted
to
say
this
was
sorry
set.
B
A
A
A
A
Okay
and
then
the
second
one
is
just
submit
actually
not
boosted.
We
talked
about
last
week
and
this
would
be
delegate
enos
tokens
to
candy
fork,
so
this
would
have
geek
style
participate
in
ens
governance
through
caney
fork,
my
my
company
as
a
proxy
vote,
and
so
this
has
some
of
the
guiding
tenants
that
would
govern
or
kind
of
guide
the
the
participation
in
the
governance
there
and
then
also
what
to
kind
of
do
to
get
dicks
down
more
involved
and
yeah.
A
So
this
also
uses
the
multi-call
to
scheme
to
basically
cause
the
delegate
function
on
the
ens
token
contract,
and
it
does
that
with
candy
forks
address,
as
you
can
see
here
and
in
the
event
that
geeksad
wanted
to
revoke
that
delegation,
it
would
just
submit
the
same
proposal
through
the
same
scheme
to
delegate
to
someone
else.
Yeah.
C
A
A
Yeah
on
gnosis
chain,
we
have
a
couple
different
worker
proposals.
We
have
thomas
polinta,
who
has
been
doing
some
great
work
with
the
infinite
stuff,
but
is
going
to
be,
I
think,
looking
at
a
lot
of
the
style,
landing
page
and
a
whole
bunch
of
other
stuff
there.
This
will
is
set
it
to
set
to
pass
in
four
and
a
half
hours,
and
then
there
is
a
proposal
for
philip.
A
I
will
not
try
to
pronounce
your
last
name
at
this
point,
but
I
will
try
to
learn
in
colombia,
but
this
is
a
proposal
for
a
lot
of
the
qa
work
that
he's
been
doing
for
swapper
team
and
that's
set
to
pass
in
just
under
a
day,
and
then
we
have
a
couple
different
buyback
orders.
I
think
there's
three
that
are
in
the
queue
right
now
yeah
and
then
we
actually
have
a
somewhat
exciting
gp
v2
wx
die
to
weth
order
that
we're
testing
to
pre-sign
orders.
D
So
this
is
something
I've
been
looking
into
for
a
while.
I
had
a
call
with
the
cal
swap
guys
yesterday
and
yeah.
The
main
idea
is
really
that
the
dow
should
be
able
to
place
orders
on
cow
swap
through
our
like
multi-core
schemes,
which
is
of
course
really
exciting,
because
right
now
most
of
the
trades
we
do,
we
do
rely
on
a
multi-sig
and
you
know
like,
while
of
course
it
does
work
practically.
D
There
is,
of
course,
a
whole
trust
assumption
and
all
of
this,
so
if
we
were
able
to
actually
place
these
through
cow
swap,
that
would
be
really
good.
There
are
still
some
trust
assumptions,
because
the
way
it
works
is
we
have
to
pre-create
an
order.
So
if
you
go,
if
you
see
in
the
proposal,
the
order
actually
already
exists.
D
If,
if
you
look
at
the
price,
it
currently
does
have
like
a
very
high
slippage
amount,
I
think
of
like
20
percent,
and
the
reason
for
that
being
is
that
we
are
setting
the
price
two
weeks
well,
five
days
before
on
gnosis
chain
currently
on
main,
and
it
would
be
like
20
17
days
before.
But
the
way
cow
swap
works,
of
course,
is
that
it
matches
at
the
best
price
right.
So
we
should
be
expecting
to
get
like
a
much
higher
order
surplus
here
and
it
will
match
at
whatever.
D
The
price
is
at
the
current
point,
whatever
kel
swap
finds
the
best
and
the
way
you
actually
kind
of
sign
such
an
order
that
is
created
before
is
by
doing
token
approval
to
the
gpv2
token
vault
for
1500
rap
xtie,
and
then
you
actually
just
do
a
call,
which
is
a
signature.
You
just
pass
the
order
uid
and
the
true
flag.
So
the
first
call
is
the
approval.
The
second
one,
just
kind
of
like
calls
that
order
uid
from
the
dx
tower.
D
Avatar
that
way,
cow
swap
nulls
were
actually
signing
the
order
and
that's
when
the
cow
order
actually
goes
live
and,
as
you
can
see
as
well,
the
order
is
like
live
for
30
days.
So
there's
no
like
issue
in
that
point,
and
one
really
interesting
thing
is
that
we
can
actually
well
there's
a
couple
things.
We
could
use
this
for
buybacks.
So
of
course,
right
now
for
buybacks,
we
have
like
significant
overhead
with,
like
gpd1
having
to
put
our
liquidity
up,
having
to
run
our
own
solver
to
match
the
orders.
D
D
So
I
I'm
pretty
sure
this
will
work,
but
this
is
like
kind
of
like
our
test
transaction
to
make
sure
everything
works,
we're
also
in
touch
with
the
cow
swap
guys
so
they're
helping
us
out,
and
but
I
think
this
is
really
exciting
for
further
down
in
general,
to
be
able
to
do
decentralized
trades
without
relying
on
multi-sigs,
and
you
know
like
even
like,
if
we
managed
to
move
our
buybacks
here.
You
know,
I
think
it's
just
great
in
general
for
everyone.
So
I'm.
B
A
A
Now,
of
course,
we
could
do
this,
where
we
just
have
like
a
straight
limit
order
itself
that
you
could
put
on
cal
swap,
and
that
would
be
fine,
but
then
it
wouldn't
be
using
the
market
price
at
execution,
but
yeah.
Maybe
we
could
think
about
doing
that,
and
then
I
guess
the
one
other
thing
with
this
is
I
mean,
as
you
can
see
here
like
this.
A
A
A
Chatting
a
little
bit
more
mimic
guys
we
chatted
with
them
last
friday
and
they
have
some
really
cool
vaults.
That
can
allow
you
to
do
some
trustless
actions
really
easily
like
such
as
wrapping
wet.
So
you
could
have
a
vault
on
main
net
that
would
could
basically
automatic
wrap,
weft
and
send
it
back
to
dx
down,
which
could
be
pretty
helpful.
Considering
some
of
the
issues
we
have
around
transferring
eth
out
of
the
mainnet
base.
A
A
This
is
just
boosted
yesterday
I'll
be
up
for
another
three
days,
and
then
I
think
that
brings
us
to
up
and
there's
a
couple
other
pre-boosted
proposals
from
ether
labs.
This
is
through
venki's
work
on
on
swapper
and
I
think
yeah
like
the
previous
ones.
This
is
actually
still
being
sent
to
caney
fork
and
who's,
facilitating
that
transaction,
and
then
there
is
a
stipend
or
a
no
sorry
from
wayne.
What
is
it?
A
A
A
Okay-
and
that
brings
us
to-
I
guess-
the
proposal
has
had
a
lot
of
activity
over
the
last
24
hours.
So
this
is
a
gusto
l,
contributor
work
proposal,
number
six
payout
acoustic
posted
a
couple
weeks
ago
for
this
one,
and
then
this
had
been
posted
over
the
weekend
and
then
yeah.
Just
in
the
last
24
hours,
you
can
see
the
number
of
votes
on
it,
which
is
probably
one
of
the
most
voted.
E
E
We
can
say
like
yeah,
some
rules
that
are
going
to
be
happening
at
the
end
of
the
workout
proposal
on
the
contributor
proposal,
where
my
work
is
going
to
be
validated-
and
I
say
here
this
is
how
my
work.
This
is
my
work
validation
rules.
If
I
complete
most
of
all
of
them,
I'm
going
to
be
paid
in
full.
E
This
is,
I
think,
one
of
my
best
contributor
proposal
that
I
did
in
the
past.
This
is
a
number
six
and
I
was
able
to
not
only
finish
most
of
all,
of
the
all
of
the
governors,
all
of
the
governance
issues,
but
even
more,
I
was
able
to
er
to
help
the
dx
gov
developers
by
a
recommendation
of
ros
to
make
them
work
on
on
issues
and
and
work
on
solidity
to
stop
being
the
only
one,
the
only
guy
that
was
working
on
on
study
the
development.
E
So
it
was
involved
in
the
reviewing
of
the
of
the
issues
and
they
when
we
submitted
the
issues
and
the
fix
it
that
we
did.
We
we
got
the
audit
back
and
they
reported
that
two
of
the
vulnerabilities
were
still
open,
but
when
I
checked
the
code,
I
think
they
aren't
so
now
I'm
going
now,
I
now
I'm
going
to
be
talking
with
with
the
sigma
prime
team.
E
Do
it
to
get
the
results
of
the
audit
that
is
going
to
be
complete
and
all
the
fixes
are
going
to
be
are
going
to
be
done.
So
when
I
finish
my
my
my
worker
period,
I
I
published
it
like
my
water
validation.
This
was
done.
This
was
done.
It
was
almost
complete
on
a
personal
evaluation.
I
I
said
that
I
overestimated
a
lot
of
time
that
all
the
time
they
was
going
to
take
me
to
fulfill
these
goals.
I
think
I
am.
E
E
What's
happening
in
the
plata,
where
I
meet
in
my
house,
and
I
moved
to
bariloche
for
the
winter,
but
I
found
a
very
nice
place
here
and
was
able
to
work
a
lot
and
in
a
very
peaceful
space,
and
this
is
where
I
also
met
thomas
that
is
now
onboarding
as
contributor,
and
I
I'm
going
to
be.
I
was
helping
him
to
to
get
started
on
the
exile
and
on
board
with
him.
This
is
the
third
contributor
that
I
help
on
board
in
the
last
year.
E
So
I
asked
don
before
the
call
case.
He
is
not
here.
He
told
me
that
he
wasn't
going
to
to
join
the
call.
I
I
asked
him
why
he
don't
bother
me
and
if
it,
if
it
was
fine
for
me
to
to
read
his
reasons,
here's
publicly
and
what
he
told
me
that
happy
to
explain
you
what
why
I
don't
voted.
I
can
tell
you
here:
half
of
the
half
of
the
the
the
deliverables
are
not
delivered,
and
the
proposal
wasn't
even
formatted
corrected
to
incur
the
rates
yeah.
E
We
don't
have
the
dates,
but
it's
a
payout
of
the
contributor
or
video
number
six,
where
you
can
find
it
there
in
doubt:
okay
and
the
one
that
I'm
referring
to
so
yeah.
I
understand
that
I
missed
the
dates,
but
we
sorry
for
missing
the
dates
for
if
you
have
to
go
to
the
forum
and
take
a
look
at
the
dates
for
that
extra
work,
he
also
said
I
think
you
should
get
paid
for
your
work,
but
with
important
stuff
like
governor
2.0.
I
think
we
should
have
more
discussion.
E
E
Late
proposals,
where
I
don't
bother
some
of
them
not
all
of
them,
not
even
with
my
entire
rep,
so
yeah,
I'm
very
it's
very
it's
very
concerning
to
see
such
a
narrow
minded
and
and-
and
we
can
say
like
targeted
personal
because
there
has
been
some
conflicts,
but
if
you
think
that
someone
should
be
paid
both
for
him
to
be
paid
right.
So
this
is
concerning
to
the
rest
of
the
organization,
because
what
happens
I
mean?
Who
is
going
to
be
next?
E
E
So
for
someone
who
doesn't
have
an
interest
in
joining
a
governor
scoring
getting
consensus
in
finding
a
final
way
to
move
forward,
I
think
it
is
very
concerning
even
more
if
they
were
propositive
restructure
without
imposing
themselves
up
as
leaders
right.
So
this
is
part
of
the
other
bigger
of
a
bigger
issue
drama
whatever
you
want
to
name
it
but
yeah.
E
E
I
have
a
lot
of
time
because
I
have
four
months
started
to
recover
from
injuries
and
there
is
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
in
the
exile
towards
exceed
holders
towards
start
making
pro
products
that
are
going
to
generate
revenue
and
start
building
a
hacker
culture
and
a
more
healthy
culture
to
work
on.
So
this
is
what
I
intend
to
do
on
my
next
contributor
proposal
and
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
first
step,
taking
toward
the
right
direction.
A
C
C
And
yeah,
I
don't
know,
I
think
I
think
we
should
obviously
set
up.
So
this
can't
happen
again.
We
there's
a
lot
of
conspiracies
now
like
this.
This
might
be
only
like
three
people
owning
this
much
of
rep.
I
think
we
should
move
to
to
solve
that
really
fast
and
understand
what
happened
regardless
of
of
this
proposal.
I
think
just
yeah
just
seeing
this
confirms
what
what
we
thought
about
earlier.
C
There
were
rumors
of
a
whale
rep
group
quotation,
and
if,
if
this
is
it
then
yeah
from
my
side,
I
I
don't
like
20
plus
percent
disgusting
stuff
in
private
and
then
moving
into
like,
like
in
in
a
group
going
in
and
just
down
voting
or
up
voting
or
whatever,
I
think
geek
style.
Dixie
should
do
something
about
this.
B
B
Like
reading
federico's
comment,
he
has
solid
arguments.
Logical
augusto
addressed
them,
but
I
just
don't
feel
like
this
is
the
way
that
dialogue
should
be
had
like
if
federico
had
any
of
those
concerns
he
could
have
taken
them
with
augusto
months
ago,
because
he's
bringing
up
issues
from
more
than
a
year
ago,
and
all
that
happening
publicly
on
the
forum
in
factions.
B
E
Well,
let's,
let's
keep
in
mind,
the
organization
is
getting
bigger,
it's
already
like
quite
big,
which
is
awesome.
It
was
always
the
goal
to
grow
and
the
more
you
grow,
the
more
different
opinions
that
you're
going
to
have
right.
I
think
everything
that
is
happening
here
is.
We
can
see
a
good
sigh
in
all
of
this.
E
And
yes,
disagreements
are
going
to
happen.
This
is
not
going
to
be
the
the
first
time
and
this
is
not
going
to
be
the
last
time.
This
is
what
I
wanted
to
say.
We
should
again
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done.
A
lot
of
work,
I'm
seeing
the
messages,
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
in
order
to
start
representing
dxc
holders.
It's
a
it's
a
difficult
task.
E
I
can
say
I
know
the
technicalities
behind
that,
and
this
is
something
that
we
are
going
to
be
hopefully
discussing
next
week
because
to
start
estimating
how
much
energy
is
going
to
take,
how
much
time
it's
going
to
take
to
start
getting
dxe
dx
holders
involved
right
away.
Governor
2.0,
the
exit
guild.
The
yesterday
the
hexagon
squad
and
leave
by
ross
did
a
very
good
demo
of
the
of
the
guilds
of
david,
the
projectile,
where
gears
are
going
to
be
happening.
E
Yep
colombia
is
coming.
That
is
going
to
be
a
very
good
place
to
discuss
a
lot
of
these.
So,
let's
try
to
digest
this
and
make
sure
that
we
are
going
to
come
out
of
this
even
even
stronger
the
27
of
the
down
that
is
voting
on
this.
This
is
this
is
an
alignment
where
we
want
to
go
so,
let's
continue
working
together
and
it
will
be
great
in
the
future
to
see
dlc
holders
involved
in
this
type
of
in
this
type
of
decisions.
This
is
one
of
my
objectives.
E
C
Before
we,
I
don't
know
what
the
next
topic
is,
but
just
maybe
I'm
opening
up
too
widely,
but
I
think
it
is
healthy
that
we
should
should
talk
about
like
the
the
business
of
the
style
and
all
of
that,
and
I
would
love
to
include
our
dxd
holders.
I
think
many
of
our
dc
holders
are
maybe
good
with
making
money.
Some
of
them
may
be
investors
and
some
of
them
just
good
with
money,
right
and
and
yeah.
C
We
need
to
be
better
at
making
money,
but
but
I
don't
think
that
that
we
should
like
start
attacking
each
other
and
starting
like
using
a
microscope
to
look
at
everything
we
did
like
wrong
and
like
that's
not
the
way
to
do
it.
Let's
I
think
we
could.
We
could
do
it
a
different
way,
but
yeah
from
the
dxd
perspective
yeah
we
should.
We
should
definitely
focus
on
the
investment
part
of
the
style
right
and
yeah.
I
don't
know
what
the
next
topic
is.
Chris,
I'm
sorry.
B
A
Token
working
group,
which
I
think
is
an
important
initiative
to
get
that
perspective
of
dxt
holders.
The
first
kickoff
call
was
last
thursday
and
I
thought
that
went
pretty
well
of
kind
of
going
through
the
history
of
dxd
and
how
it
got
here
from
geeksdale
and
also
dxd
and
how
we
kind
of
got
here,
and
I
think
that
history
really
will
end
up
kind
of
dictating
how
things
will
go
going
forward.
A
So
I
think
there's
been
some
really
good
discussion
there,
both
spicy
soup
and
and
connor
were
on
the
call
there.
You
can
see
some
notes
in
the
forum
there,
and
I
also
thought
actually
conor
shared
this
with
me
and
it
was
about
temple
dao,
so
maybe
something
people
could
check
out
a
little
bit
more.
I
think
there's
some
things
that
temple
died.
You
can.
A
You
could
actually
check
out
from
like
a
structural
standpoint,
they're
actually
doing
buybacks,
they
have
like
a
treasury
and
they
have
all
these
things,
but
it
also
seems
that
they
have
been
going
through
a
lot
of
this
similar
discussion
or
kind
of
political
disagreement.
I
guess
on
how
things
move
forward.
I
think
if
you
look
where's
the
line
here.
A
Yeah
so
right
here,
original
double
dial
was
long-term,
intrinsic
value
and
yield
focus
with
all
non-circulating
and
temple
intended
to
eventually
enter
circulation
via
development
partnerships
and
user
incentives.
Earlier
this
year,
traders
bought
temples
seeking
shorter
term
gains
through
price
growth
and
restricting
growth
of
circulating
supply.
The
goal
of
these
auctions,
which
are
these
liquidity
bootstrapping
pools
on
non-balancer,
is
to
strike
a
fair
balance
between
these
two
perspectives.