►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-08-24]
Description
00:03 Welcome
00:40 Mainnet
13:05 Gnosis Chain
16:08 Restructuring and Refocus
B
Let's
check
the
agenda
out
first
yeah,
and
we
have
the
proposal
roundup
that
we'll
go
through
for
mainnet
and
gnosis
chain,
and
then
we
have
a
discussion
topic
on
a
big
post
in
the
forum,
restructuring
in
focus
and
then
there's
some
additional
links
here.
If
you
guys
are
interested
in
checking
some
things
out
interesting
in
the
forum,
but
starting
first
with
the
proposal
roundup
here
we'll
go
to
maine
a
bunch
of
proposals
on
mainnet
here,
a
lot
of
different
activity
last
couple
weeks
have
been.
B
B
This
was
discussed
in
the
call
last
week
because
it
had
just
been
boosted,
but
this
would
adjust
the
fees
on
swapper
through
the
multi-call
scheme.
So
there's
actually
a
nice
11
vote
here,
and
I
think
this
is
a
good
experiment
in
terms
of
figuring
out
how
to
use
the
fee
adjustments
on
swapper
better,
and
I
think
this
also
could
make
or
should
make
being
an
lp
for
dxd
on
swapper
much
more
appealing,
because
the
higher
fee
will
hopefully
lead
to
more,
I
mean
so.
B
I
believe
this
is
the
first
we
tested
this
through.
Earlier
of.
I
think
this
is
the
first
one
in
over
a
year
to
adjust
the
the
fee
yeah
and
then
we
have
the
neemi
incubation
grant
dx
ventures.
This
is
a
big
big
proposal
that
has
been
discussed
a
lot
over
the
last
month
or
two,
so
there
is
a
mirror
proposal
on
gnosis
chain,
but
this
is
actually
the
mainnet
proposal
itself
and
it
sends
a
hundred
thousand
usdc
to
the
nemi
multisig
there,
and
these
are
kind
of
the
details
of
it.
B
So
nimi
team
can
allocate
forty
percent
of
their
time
to
neemi
for
up
to
six
months.
Geeksdale
funds,
the
anemia
ms
with
the
100k.
This
is
the
100k
usdc
and
then
d
style
receives
a
10
stake
in
mimi,
so
yeah.
This
is.
This
has
been
discussed
a
lot
of
the
last
month
or
two.
I
don't
know
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
or
comments.
B
Cool
moving
on,
we
have
the
first
unauthorized
500k
of
dxd
buybacks
with
new
parameters.
So
last
week
the
last
buyback
extension
that
took
from
the
buyback
reserve
was
passed,
so
it
was
107
each
that
was
transferred
over
to
the
gp
relayer
earlier
this
week,
and
you
can
see
the
buybacks
are
going
a
little
bit
more
frequent
now.
So
that's
means
there's
about
120
eth
in
the
gp
relayer
and
given
actually
this
the
decline
in
dxd
volume.
B
B
A
couple
key
things
that
we've
discussed
before
right
is
it
make
some
changes
to
the
circulating
market
cap
and
saying
that
only
txt
that
is
outside
of
dx
dao
is
counting
towards
circulating
marketing
capitals.
This
does
not
include
unvested
dxd.
It
also
makes
two
big
changes
to
how
the
nav
is
calculated.
B
Well,
the
first
thing
is:
it
only
takes
up
to
70
percent
of
geek
style
nav,
as
opposed
to
the
previous
buyback,
which
is
just
whenever
dxd
is
trading
below
nav,
and
the
second
thing
is
does:
is
it
adjust
what
we
calculate
when
we
say
to
calculate
the
treasury
nav
and
the
big
change
there?
Is
we
subtract
future
liabilities,
which
is
2.5
k,
2.5
years
of
g
styles,
burn
rate
estimate,
290,
k
or
8.7
million,
so
that
would
give
us
basically,
the
treasury
value
is
net
this
here
when
determining
the
nav
and
nav
ratio.
B
B
B
Either
so
that
would
need
to
be
another
one
but,
as
I
said,
I
think
it'll
be
like
another
30
days,
and
also
some
of
that
could
actually
come
from
nurse's
chain
base
itself,
because
there's
some
meets
there
yeah
and
then
the
next
one
which
we've
talked
about.
I
think
in
the
last
two
calls
we
don't
really
need
to
do
anymore.
Is
this
trade
1000
die
the
usdc?
C
B
2.0
working
group
we're
carving
out
specific
time
to
work
on
these
things
in
a
public,
transparent
way,
gathering
ideas
from
the
community
and
then
presenting
those
to
rep
holders
is
a
good
way
of
coming
of
making
broad
decisions,
important
decisions
as
a
dao.
So
this
would
start
actually
next
thursday
if
this
passes,
and
then
it
would
lay
out
kind
of
a
schedule
here
and
I
think,
like
a
big
important
thing,
is
getting
some
ideas
flowing
and
things
fleshed
out
so
that
in
the
retreat
in
october,
we
can
really
move
forward
on
that.
B
C
Yeah,
I
think
it
will
be
great
sorry.
Can
you
kill
me
guys
yep
yeah,
awesome,
yeah.
I
think
it
would
be
great
also.
You
only
say
that
it
would
require
an
approval
of
rep
holders,
but
this
is
the
dxe
talking
group.
So
I
think
we
should
include
the
dfc
token
holders
as
a
as
part
of
the
process
right,
a
part
of
the
approval,
maybe
as
a
requirement
it
is
I
mean
we.
C
We
cannot
continue
making
decisions
on
our
own
on
behalf
of
the
dxe
token
hoarders,
that
is
creating
a
lot
of
electro
fiction,
and
maybe
this
can
be
something
where
we
can
start
reconciliating
the
reptile.
Can
holders
are
the
dxe
token
holders
right?
So
I
think
I
I
will
add
later
later.
I
have
to
see
if
I
going
to
finally
vote
in
favor
or
against
it.
C
I
would
like
to
see
a
requirement
of
the
dxz
token
holders,
having
some
way
to
express
approval
and
chain
of
the
steps
that
we
are
going
to
want,
that
we
want
to
take
forward
both
of
us
rep
holders,
which
is
the
community
that
is
behind,
building
the
exam
right
now
right
and
the
dxd
doctor
with
the
ones
who
did
the
initial
investment
on
us.
So
I
think
this
can
be
a
great
place
where
we
can
start
building
up
our
relationship
with
on-chain
confirmation
right.
C
We
know,
of
course,
with
additional
discuss
on
the
forums
and
in
the
poly
talks,
but
have
they
have
a
final
loan
chain?
Confirmation
where
there
is
going
to
be
no
doubts
about
what
the
dfz
token
holders
want
and
what
the
rep
holders
want
and
trying
to
find
a
middle
ground
here
where
we
can
continue
working
together,
because
this
is
what
we
have
to
do.
C
B
So,
just
to
kind
of
look
at
what
is
in
this
republic
here.
So
I
completely
agree
with
you
and
in
terms
of
like
the
people
participating
in
the
voices.
You're
said
like
this
does
specifically
call
out
dxd
holders
as
being
an
active
participant
there,
and
actually
the
way
it's
worded
here
is
mixed
out
governance
and
not
rep
holders
and
like
in
a
lot
of
ways.
B
I
consider
dxt
holders
a
part
of
the
style
governance,
and
so
I
think
the
specifics
of
how
this
like
single
agreed
upon
plan
would
be
voted
on,
is
not
he's
more
like
little
left
up
to
is
a
little
ambiguous
here
and
it
says
dx
down
governance,
but
I
think
it'd
be
a
great
opportunity
either
dave
is
saying
snapshot
or
also
to
use
the
maybe
a
dxd
guild,
or
something
involved
with
that.
So
I
think
that's
definitely
something
that
you
know.
I
think
this
is
all
about
kind
of,
including
that
voice
in
it.
A
C
No,
I
mean
we
can
create
the
exit
guild
whenever
we
want.
We
just
need
to
finish
the
the
audience
of
the
erc20
that
we
are
currently
on
the
process.
We
shall
receive
the
review
and
we
have
two
issues
left
to
fix,
and
then
we
can
deploy
the
dxe
guild
that
can
be
used
as
a
as
a
starting
point
where
you
wouldn't
need.
Just
to
you
won't
even
need
to
stake
the
exe
guild.
C
You
will
just
use
your
balance
or
snapshot
your
balance
and
that's
it
where
you
can
express
your
opinion
there
with
off
chain
voting
signature
or
something
like
that.
So
I
think
that
we
should
have
a
requirement
of.
We
should
require
a
on-chain
approval
of
exe
folders,
using
something
at
the
example
like
the
executes
right,
in
addition
to
the
approval
of
the
or
the
rep
holders.
Here,.
C
Or
we
can
even
use
that
option,
but
again
if
we
created
the
elc
20
gig
for
shot,
it's
purpose,
I
mean
we
want
to
start
using
our
path.
We
want
to
get
traction,
we
want
to
use
it.
What
where?
What?
Where
that
to
have
the
dxe
holders,
use
the
stuff
that
we
built
with
the
money
that
they,
you
know
that
they
that
they
invested
in
the
excel,
and
this
way
we
can
start
getting
some
validation
from
their
site
and
they
can
tell
us
hey.
C
C
Exactly
and
we
can
re-deploy
it
later,
if
we
want,
we
can
just,
we
can
deploy
a
very
minimal
version
of
the
key
that
just
it's
just
going
to.
This
is
going
to
snapshot
the
balance
of
the
dxd
holders
and
they
are
going
to
make
and
they
are
going
to
use
it
as
a
initial
version
of
the
of
the
dx
guild,
and
they
can
use
it
on
the
on
on
davi
or
on
the
pros
that
we
have
been
working
to
use
this
erc20,
gills
and
yeah
get
their
feel
back
on
it.
B
B
B
Then
we
have
some
worker
proposals.
We
have
level
k
worker
proposal
payout
for
march
2022
and
april
202
late
submission.
There
was
also
another
level
k
worker
proposal
of
the
lead
that
has
just
been
boosted
or
is
about
to
be
boosted
pending
boost
here,
and
then
we
have
the
same
signal
proposal
on
gnosis
chain
to
establish
the
dxd
token
working
group
here,
and
there
are
some
stipend
proposals.
B
We
have
dave
wayne
and
I
believe
another
dino
down
there
or
that's
a
contributor
prize,
excuse
me
and
then
we
actually
have
a
pretty
cool
or
like
an
interesting
proposal
here
on
the
multi-call
here
to
update
the
swapper
fee
receiver
contract.
I
don't
know
if
adam
I
believe,
submitted
this
proposal
wants
to
to
say
anything
on
what
exactly
this
proposal
does.
A
All
right,
so,
basically,
we
redeployed
the
free
receiver
contract
with
the
fix
and
this
proposal
updates
the
the
fee
receiver
contract
address
on
the
swapper
factory.
So
it
goes
through.
I
believe,
two
contracts,
one
is
the
fee
receiver
server
and
then
the
few
receiver
server
calls
the
factory
which
updates
the
free
receiver
contract.
B
Okay
and
then
that
yeah,
as
I
said,
there's
wayne
and
dino's
worker
proposal
and
then
ross's
worker
proposals,
which
I
believe
are
actually
just
rep
minting
here
and
there
are
for
august
to
october,
but
I
believe
yeah
they're,
just
rep,
I
think
he's
going
through
devex
for
that.
I
think
that
was
it.
Do
we
get
all
of
the
and
then
there's
that
boris
block,
geeks
columbia,
contributor,
stipend,
good
to
see
him
and
we'll
be
working
through
that
yeah.
So
that's
it
for
gnosis
chain.
B
Cool
and
then
moving
on
to
the
discussion
items,
so
we
have
a
big
one
for
today,
restructuring
and
refocus.
So
this
is
a
post
yesterday
by
corkus,
and
so
I
think,
there's
been
discussion.
I
guess
before
this
call,
but
I
don't
know
if
geronimo
or
one
of
the
signers
of
this
post
want
to
like
set
the
stage
for
what
this
is
and
what
it's
proposing.
D
Toronto
more
either
he
was
having
some
connection
issues,
so
he
might
be
disconnected
at
the
moment.
I'm
here,
though,
ross
is
here
in
federico
as
well
yeah
I
mean
there's
two
high-level
points.
I
think
one
is
looking
at
the
forward-looking
budget
and
suggesting
a
reduction
in
that,
and
this
second
point
is
how
to
like
move
product
development,
to
give
us
a
chance
to
have
success
on
that
front.
B
A
In
a
sentence
we
may
have
overreacted
to
the
post,
but
that
could
be
the
fault
of
the
delivery
of
the
polls.
Geronimo
is
not
a
writer,
so
it
looks
like
the
team
that
gathered
to
do
the
post
have
the
idea
of
the
dao
working
together
on
a
product
strategy,
roadmap
and
yeah.
It
will
be
a
team
effort
of
everyone,
so
we
we
may
have
overreacted
a
little,
but
it
it's
not
a
problem
of
the
people
who
overreacted.
Maybe
the
delivery
is
a
bit
ambiguous.
C
We
never
discuss
any
of
this
publicly
and
we
are
talking
about
restructuring
the
entire
now,
like
I
mean
we
have
been
years
working
on
this
and
suddenly
we
see
a
post
by
members
who
have
no
active
worker
proposal
that
they
are,
they
are
their
contributions
to
the
exile
are
being
evaluated
right
now,
in
the
case,
in
the
case
of
john,
where
he
has
been
receiving
dumbbells
on
his
working
proposal,
heron,
who
has
no
worker
proportion,
hasn't
been
active
in
the
forum.
You
see
it
for
nine
months.
C
C
No,
they
just
structure,
let's
just
cut
a
lot
of
expenses
and
save
a
lot
of
money,
because
we
because
we
have
to,
I
know,
cut
expenses
or
we
are
spending
money
where
we
shouldn't
be
need
to,
and
this
came
again
from
people
who
is
involved
in
the
community,
but
they
are
doing
and
taking
the
responsibility
for
for
granted,
and
they
have
no
respect
in
the
governance
process,
because
you
are
seeing
a
post
like
this,
proposing
that
they
are
going
to
be
firing
and
removing
people
and
who
is
going
to
be
making
the
decision.
On
that.
C
I
mean
this
goes
completely
against
what
we
are
trying
to
build.
I
mean
the
work
culture
that
they
are
proposing
here
is
completely
different
to
what
I
think
we
are
creating
and
what
we
are
doing
so.
This
is
why
I
was
extremely
surprised,
sad
disappointed
to
see
my
fellow
co-workers
and
genesis
members
going
entire
entirely
against
the
other,
the
other
direction,
and
they
can
say
that
they
don't
want
to,
but
I
know
they
want.
C
I
mean
it
is
clear,
and
maybe
they
don't
know
it,
but
they
are
going
to
go
toward
this
direction
where
they
are
going
to
have
a
pedometer
structure
and
they
are
going
to
be
few
members
making
decisions
and
who
is
going
to
continue
working
on
the
exhaust
note
and
who
is
going
to
be
working?
What
and
what
we
are
going
to
be
doing,
and
maybe
just
maybe
that's
the
reason
why
we
don't
have
any
what
why
we
don't
have
any
traction
on
our
products.
C
C
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
points
that
conor
makes
I
just
trying
to
do
both
things.
It
would
be
great
to
start
getting
like
real
real
profit
from
the
exile,
like
being
the
first
out
to
start
making
huge
profit
building
products,
forking
stuff,
creating
an
awesome
community,
but
I
think
this
is
yeah.
This
is
not
the
way
different.
Definitely
I
think
this
is
another
way,
I'm
entirely
against
this,
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
always
speak
in
behalf
of
the
the
exact
holders.
C
In
fact
I
was,
I
think
it
was
the
only
one
for
everyone
we
shut
down
the
the
bonding
here
who
wanted
to
keep
it
active.
We
wanted
to
figure
out
the
parameters,
so
we
can
really
use
it
and
they
can
have
on
chain
say
on
on
the
price
on
the
price.
For
that
the
dxe
token
it
was
going
to
have
on
the
bonding
kill.
C
We
didn't
trust
that
we
didn't
follow
the
process
of
the
abandoning
cure
and
what
it
was
designed
for,
and
now
we
are
going
to.
We
want
to
figure
out
again
right.
So
now
the
dxd
token
working
group,
I
think,
is
going
to
be
a
great
opportunity
to
start
building
up
this
relation
again.
That
is,
I
think,
it's
been
damaged,
it's
been
damaged
and
we
are
creating
a
lot
of
friction
by
some
members.
That
again
I
not.
C
C
I
mean
you
have
been
working
for
dxo
now
for
months,
doing
stuff
being
part
of
the
internal
group
chats
having
access
to
sensitive
information,
and
you
are
known
on
chain
member
of
the
dow.
So
that
sets
an
example
who,
what
about
the
other
people
who
is
taking
care
of
doing
their
work
proportion,
for
example,
and
also
I
mean
by
posting
this-
I'm
mentioning
people.
F
F
This
is
first,
let
me
speak
and
additionally,
I
worked
for
a
couple
of
months
for
free.
I
have
a
lot
of
rap
and
there's
no
consensus
about
who
can
be
part
of
key
based
groups.
I'm
still
admin
of
the
key
base
group
right,
there's
no
discussion
about
how
we're
going
to
deal
with
those
groups.
To
that
point,
I
guess
I
think
that
is
wrong,
that
we
violated
the
governance
process,
because
this
is
the
governance
process.
F
D
C
Yeah,
I
think
that
such
a
such
a
powerful
proposal
like
this
should
be
discussed
beforehand,
not
just
share
it
around
like
publish
it
there
we
sign
messages
from
prep
holders.
Where
you
can,
you
can
follow
up
the
rep
amount
that
you
have
and
you
have
like,
20
or
plus
20
percent
of
rep.
Just
on
that
proposal,
it's
like
saying
hey.
We
think
we
should
do
this
and
we
have
20
percent
of
rep.
This
is
kasi.
C
F
B
I
guess
so
drama,
I
think
you're
right.
We
could
talk
about
how
this
proposal
is
brought
up
and
I
think
there's
been
some
things
said
about
the
people
of
feelings.
So
I
guess
like,
if
there's
any
other
thoughts
on
that,
but
we
could
surely
go
into
the
details
of
this
proposal
and
what
it
says
and
what
it
suggests.
So
I
guess:
are
there
any
other
comments
or
thoughts
on
like
how
this
was
presented
or
brought
up.
D
Yeah,
so
I
mean
in
terms
of
like
the
signature
thing
just
I
post,
I
put
something
in
the
chat
here.
This
is
what
a
very
similar
topic
looks
like
when
it's
just
posted
right.
This
is
month
old.
It
doesn't
really
have
any
attention
right,
so
I
mean
this
is
how
tx
now
works.
You
have
to
build
consensus
and
demonstrate
when
things
are
important.
Signatures
are
just
a
way
to
like
clearly
demonstrate
that
everybody
read
the
final
text.
D
It
wasn't
just
the
poster
the
signatures
have
been
used
before,
and
it's
really
just
a
way
of
showing
that
all
of
these
people
are
like
all
the
same
group
of
posters
right,
because
otherwise
you
really
can't
do
that
on
dow
talk,
there's
no
way
to
like
sign
something
on
doubt
talk.
So
that's
just
what
yeah.
D
Well,
ross
can
have
his
turn
to
speak.
Certainly,
but
like
one
other
thing
I
want
to
say
before
handing
it
over.
Is
that
another
thing
that
I
think
is
kind
of
clearly
wrong
about?
What
augusto
is
saying?
Is
this
section
or
bullet
point
on
the
grab
of
power
and
the
change
to
a
pyramid
structure?
Nothing
in
this
post
it
which
is
essentially
maybe
a
draft
proposal,
meant
to
like
start
discussions.
D
Nothing
about
this
changes,
the
way
that
the
governance
power
works
right.
There's,
there's
no
change
in
governance
structure,
really
like
the
only
change
in
in
how
the
governance
work
that
we're
working
on
is
governance
2.0.
Until
then,
things
are
actually
shifting
away
from
dxd
holders
and
from
people
who
may
have
had
more
rep
at
the
beginning
like
myself,
so
I
think
that's
just
fundamentally
a
false
accusation.
I
understand
maybe
there's
a
a
bit
of
a
response
here
because
of
the
signatures
or
whatnot,
but
I
think
we
should
clear
that
up.
F
B
B
D
B
B
Okay
and
then
so
I
guess
anything
else
I
mean,
I
guess
I
think
the
conversation
of
like
how
this
is
talking
about
and
getting
the
governance
things
is
like.
You
know
that
that's
important
one,
but
I
think
there's
probably
lots
of
strong
feelings
about
this,
and
so
I
think
it's
good
to
maybe
turn
the
conversation
over
to
the
content
of
this,
and
so
I
made
a
post
last
night.
I
just
thought
kind
of
a
couple
questions
I
have
here
yeah.
B
So
I
think,
as
john
said,
there's
really
two
things
here
going
on
there's
this
renewed
focus
on
product
development
and
gov
2.0,
and
then
this
proposed
budget
cut
to
non-product
expenses
and
honestly,
I
agree
with
a
lot
of
geronimo's
assessment
of
the
state
of
deek
style
product
development.
What
I
was
not
really
getting
is
how
this
renewed
focus
on
products
of
builder
culture
or
whatever
focus
on
resources
on
government.
Whatever
is
the
proposed
change
is
going
to
be
any
different
from
the
status
quo.
B
B
D
B
D
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
very
important
to
talk
about
right
and
so,
and
I
think
the
point
to
kind
of
go
back
to
the
context
of
the
at
least.
My
understanding
is
clear.
The
point
is
that
dx
tao
doesn't
have
much
traction
right
like
I
think
we
can
probably
all
agree
that
you
know.
We
know
that
we
have
some
revenue
coming
in
from
swapper
it's
a
fraction
of
what
we're
spending
on
development.
D
We
don't
have
a
ton
of
users
there.
We
haven't
shipped
some
of
the
governance
stuff
that
we're
working
on,
but
there's
a
lot
going
on
in
terms
of
the
work
you
know,
past
products
that
have
had
some
traction
like
omen
and
mesa
have
essentially
been
sunset
or
are
on
ice.
We've
had
rails
that
didn't
really
go
anywhere.
Aqua
was
sort
of
a
failed,
failed
start
right.
I
think
the
main
point
of
this
post
is
that
we
lack
traction
with
our
currents.
D
B
D
Okay,
so
I
think
if
we
look
at
the
last
year,
we've
made
a
lot
of
strides
in
for
in
terms
of
forming
teams
right
like
if
you
go
back
a
year,
there
was
no
dx
gov
team.
We
didn't
have
like,
like
even
structure
around
teams
like
we
had
zett
and
federico
working
on
swapper.
So
I
think
a
lot
has
been
done,
and
this
should
be
acknowledged
that
we've
actually
had
success
in
forming
these
teams
and
they're
operating
quite
well.
D
Now,
I
would
say,
like
I'm
actually
quite
proud
of
where
we've
come
with
swapper
and
with
dxgov,
I
think
like
ross
has
really
stepped
up
to
the
plate.
I
think
adam
has
really
stepped
up
to
the
plate.
I
think
zed
has
done
a
great
job.
The
product
like
venky,
is
just
like
relentless,
like
we
have
great
structures
in
place,
and
I
think
we've
actually
done
a
pretty
good
job
of
establishing
front-end
development
capabilities
like
dap
development
capabilities.
I
think
that
shows
in
swapper.
D
I
think
it's
going
to
show
soon
when
we
ship
guilds
and
and
so
that
that's
good
right
but
there's
a
severe
bottleneck
that
we
have
not
given
enough
attention-
and
this
is,
I
think,
what's
holding
us
back
most
of
all
from
shipping
innovative
stuff
that
will
give
us
a
legitimate
chance
to
get
traction
crypto's
competitive.
It's
hard,
we're
in
a
bear
market.
D
I
can't
say
even
with
all
the
best
people
that
we
could
definitely
like
make
revenue
right,
but
that's
the
goal,
and
and
to
do
that
we
need
to
be
able
to
ship
and
we
have
a
severe
bottleneck
around
smart
contract
development.
We
basically
have
federico
and
a
gusto.
We
have
some
others
that
are
trying
to
learn
and
are
are
making
some
progress,
but
it's
really
just
federico
and
agusta
that
have
shipped
smart
contracts
augusto's
at
two-thirds
time
right
now
right.
D
So
so
that's
the
main
problem
that
I
think
we
need
to
focus
on
and
we
could
certainly,
I
think,
add
more
substance
to
a
plan
like
this
to
address
that,
and
I
mean
I
actually
think
it's
important
to
hear
from
you
know.
I
think
augustus
talked
to
bit
already
but,
like
you
know,
lucy
is
on
this
call
federico.
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
hear
from
him
his
perspective
as
like
a
smart
contract
developer
and
like.
B
D
I
think
there's
three
things
I
would
say,
and
I
would
like
to
hear
federico
speak.
I
think
you
should
give
him
a
chance
to
talk,
because
he
is
the
prototype
of
what
we
need
and
he's
done,
an
amazing
job,
shipping
stuff
for
dxtau.
So
I
mean
we
have
33
people
and
the
three
four
people
and
you
know
federico
augusto-
writing
smart
contract
code.
It's
not
the
proper
kind
of
distribution.
So
I
think
we
can
all
agree
on
that
right.
D
C
D
G
Yeah
yeah,
I
know
I
mean
I
think
I
think
john
is
right
on
this
in
the
sense
that
what
I
would
like
is
for
you
know.
I've
heard
like
before
this
call
we
had
another
call.
We
talked
a
bit
about
how.
Basically
it
came
out
that
the
dao
was
not
really
able
to
ship
products,
and
I
think,
historically
speaking,
that's
you
know
a
half
truth.
Let's
say
because
we
we
have
shipped
some
products,
but
we
could
have
done
better.
G
G
Obviously,
I'm
not
saying
like
this
is
easy
or
anything,
but
obviously
having
more
smart
contract
developers
would
be
great,
but
I
think,
in
order
to
do
that,
we
need
to
first
kind
of
try
to
build
this.
This
builder
culture-
and
I
don't
like
the
term
but
kind
of
a
dev
first
kind
of
culture.
You
know
to
drive
kind
of
initiatives
and
products
from
from
people
that
that
have
experience
in
in
building
so
yeah.
I
mean
that's
that's
kind
of
my
my
view.
C
No,
no,
I
mean.
Let
me
let
me
finish,
I
mean
we
are.
We
are
building
a
building
culture
in
dx
globe,
with
madusa,
with
kenny
with
milton
and
dino,
who
have
been
contributing
on
solidity,
smart
contracts
for
months
now,
and
they
are
going
to
be
solidity
developers
and
there
you
have
four
solidity
developers.
So
it's
not
just
me
and
lucy
who
are
contributing
solidity.
C
They
are
the
standing
on
the
decentralized
application
development,
the
thing
that
they
have
proposed,
the
issues
that
they
have
fixed,
that
they
actually
very
hard.
They
just
did
a
refactor
of
our
entire
dxo
smart
contracts
that
we
are
going
to
use
in
a
few
months
from
now
on,
and
they
did
everything
themselves
and
they
are
doing
a
great
job
and
they
are
four
and
they
are
going
to
be
ready.
C
So
this
issue
that
you
are
presenting
now
is
going
to
be
fixed.
We
just
need
to
make
sure
that
they
feel
comfortable
that
they
are
going
to.
They
feel
comfortable
on
this
building
culture,
though
I'm
creating
the
club,
and
I
will
be
glad
to
continue
it
on
swapper
or
in
other
another
projects
in
other
processes
and
products
that
we
that
we
want
to
work
on.
But
what
I'm
seeing
here
and
we
can
go,
can
you
scroll
to
the
point
where
they
propose
how
the
restriction
is
going
to
work
on
chris
here
on
the
screen?
C
C
C
I
haven't
been
talking
with
with
medusa
and
kenny
lately
after
this
has
been
proposed,
but
I
met
with
milton
and
dino
and
I'm
following
up
on
them
and
they
and
I
wanted
to
be
successful
developers
who
are
going
to
continue
contributing
on
dxo
when
I'm
not
here,
and
I
have
full
confidence
that
this
is
what
is
going
to
happen,
and
I
can
replicate
this
on
more
developers.
This
is
idea
of
also
what
I
want
to
the
hackathon.
F
So
the
main
issue
you
see
is
that,
like
it's
amazing
that
you
like
bootstrap,
all
those
like
so
many
developers-
and
I
would
like
to
hear
from
from
them
how
they
like
how
the
experiences
this
is.
This
is
exactly
the
the
developer
culture
we
want
to
see,
but
they
are
mainly
working
on
like
on
the
governance
side
of
things
and
I'm
pretty
sure
they
might
want
to
continue
on
that,
because
they're
like
experiencing
like
there's
no
experience
with
like
d5
protocols
right
so
it's
nice
that
we
like
bootstrap.
F
Absolutely
that's
on,
like
the
government
side
of
things
which
we
need
to
do
because
gap
2.0
needs
to
happen
right
and
they
are
like
if,
if
they're
like,
let
by
you
and
yeah,
I
think
like
this
is
like
the
team,
which
will
probably
like
kill
it.
But
then
the
whole
other
side
on
like
products
right
is,
is
another
big
question
like
graph
2.0
needs
to
happen,
and
then
we
need
to
compete
on
like
pro
like
revenue
streams,
which
requires
products
who
is
working
on
products
besides
lutzy
on
solidity,.
D
C
D
C
I
I
still
don't
support
kero
and
john
bunny
in
any
brother
squad,
seeing
what
everything
that
has
happened
on
the
last
few
months,
how
it
has
been
communicated,
how
this
is
still
not
clear,
because
now
it
has
only
one
squad
when,
when
you
just
when
you
read
it,
the
first
thing
that
you
feel
that
it's
essentially
a,
I
think
it
take
cover
of
the
entire
restructure
of
the
now
right.
So
now,
suddenly
it's
just
one
squad
anyway.
I
just
personally
but
personally
like
seeing
everything
that
had
happened
lately
on
these
months
and
everything
yeah.
E
The
federico
geronimo
john
and
I
guess
ross
have
been
four
of
the
of
the
people
that
have
largely
been
leading
the
product
strategy
for
the
last
two
years
and
I
could
get
into
details
about
each
one.
But
if
you
were
going
to
do
that,
dx
dow
would
say
all
right.
Let's
change
things
up
and
let's
actually
try
some
new
people,
and
this
is
the
chris's
like
status
quo
point.
E
D
E
John
well,
two
yeah
two
are
not
even
official
contributors
right
now
and
I
don't
think
you
and
geronimo
do
smart
contract
development
federico,
I'm
not
saying
federico,
shouldn't
work
on
smart
contract
development,
but
if
there's
going
to
be
people
in
charge
of
determining
that
path
with
that,
delegating
that
responsibility
to
that,
I
don't
see
you
you
would
a
normal
company,
wouldn't
actually
keep
it
with
the
same
people.
No,
I'm
not
saying
it's
my
opinion,
I'm
just
saying
this
is
how
companies
would
do
it.
E
C
C
D
D
D
B
And
I
guess
this
is
what
I
mean
john
by
like
responsibility:
accountability
like
when
governance,
2.0
passed
like
in
march
2021,
like
I
assumed
that
you
as
the
technical
lead,
would
take
responsibility
for
like
driving
that
technical
development
and
like
a
year
and
a
half
later
like
it's
just
it's
just
like
not
there,
and
so
I
think.
If
we're
going
to
move
forward,
we
need
to
like
kind
of
reflect
on
like
okay,
why,
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
did
a
product
technical
team
that
you
were
leading
kind
of
the
overall
resources
allocation?
D
Augusto
is
leading
the
governance
squad.
I
helped
coordinate
this
stuff
right,
so
I've
had
a
lot
of
responsibilities
beyond
just
the
technical
ones
as
well.
Over
this
time
frame
and
in
terms
of
taking
responsibility,
there's
been
a
lot
of
distractions
for
me
that
I
think
we
could
talk
about
where
there
isn't
leadership
and
responsibility
taken
from
other
functions
within
the
dao,
and
that
has
been
personally
a
big
distraction
for
me
and
a
reason
that
I
have
not
been
able
to
give
my
full
attention
to
some
of
these
issues.
D
But
of
course
I
cannot
do
any
of
this
or
all
of
this
by
myself,
anyways
right,
like
and
and
part
of
what
my
effort
over
the
last
year
has
been
to
set
up
teams
that
are
functioning
and
and
do
do
this,
and
that's
for
governance,
augusto
and
ross.
Now
the
tech
spec
like
I,
you
know
they
could
do
it
themselves,
but
I
think
it
would
be
good
to
have
other
folks
like
myself
and
federico
and
general.
C
Why,
if
we
can
do
it
ourselves,
and
we
have
already
a
technical
roadmap-
I
mean
roach-
has
shared.
It
was
just
here
a
week
ago,
a
very
detailed
plan
of
what
or
what
we
are
going
to
do
where
we
are
going,
and
we
are
good
on
that
on
times.
I
think
we
have
more
people
working
on
that
like.
Why
do
we
need
you.
B
Yeah,
I
just
I
kind
of
agree
with
you,
so
I
think
there
needs
to
be
a
lot
more
reflection
from,
like
john
in
the
leadership
on
what's
happened
over
the
last
year,
right
thinking
about
guilds
and
kind
of
like
how
much
we
devoted
resources
to
a
lot
of
these
things
that
have
taken
away
from
governance,
2.0
and
technical
product
development,
and,
like
john,
like
if
you're
gonna.
This
is
a.
D
B
D
D
F
Setting
budgets
john
had
never
the
chance
to
be
a
development
lead,
and,
to
be
honest,
if
you,
if
you
ask
any
developer
john
at
the
end
of
the
day,
did
did
a
great
job
making
sure
developers
like
get
what
they
what
they
need,
and
so
like
so
far
the
developers
are
actually
happy.
Even
though
he's
like
his
performance
has
been
degraded
since
for
a
long
time,
because
he
was
spread
out
on
like
all
fronts,
to
make
sure
other
things
are
actually
happening.
B
A
B
D
But
this
is
the
problem.
If
you
want
to
talk
about
this,
this
is
the
problem
right.
You
want
me
to
be
focused
on
on
product
development.
Yeah.
What
have
you
actually
taken
ownership
of
where's,
the
guy?
Why
is
everybody
still
late
on
worker
proposals?
Why
are
you
like
throwing
it
up
in
my
face
after
you're.
D
Why
what
did
the
contributor
guidelines
take
me
and
geronimo
getting
involved
in
dxd
holders
to
like
get
it
fixed?
Why
is
there
no
off-boarding
process?
Why
have
you
never
been
involved
in
off-boarding
process?
Why
don't
we
have
any
forward-looking
budget?
Why
do
you
continue
to
recruit
people
and
bring
on
people
when
spending
increases
and
the
runway
gets
smaller
and
smaller?
Why
do
you
like
blow
up
this
process
about
the
dxd
buyback
when
it's
clearly
failing
like
where's
your
ownership
of
the
big
issues.
B
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think,
I've
owned
all
of
them,
and
I've
talked
about
all
of
those
in
the
forum
and
have
been
trying
to
push
forward
everything.
I'm
public,
I'm
transparent
about
this.
I
leave
this
call
every
day
and
everything
you
mentioned.
I've
been
working
on
and
developing
it's
hard
to
get
things
done,
but
I'm
working-
and
I
don't
know
what
this
has
to
do
with
the
proposal
guys.
This
is
really
important.
I
want
to
stop
this
just
because
we're
way
off
course.
Here
we've
got
like
we're
way
past
the
hour.
You.