►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2023-01-04]
Description
00:02 Welcome and Agenda
00:42 Mainnet roundup
13:59 Gnosis Chain roundup
15:57 DXdao Governance Stewards
23:20 DXD Redemption Implementation
B
C
A
B
Proposals
here
that
we
can
go
through
here,
yeah,
so
starting
with
mainnet
here,
so
you
can
see,
we
have
I,
think
nine
different
Cal
swap
orders
in.
So
this
is
really
Big
Ups
to
Dave
for
doing
a
lot
of
this
over
a
Christmas
break
because
of
this,
since
it
takes
16
days.
You
basically
he's
been
like
submitting
these
proposals
a
lot,
and
so
we
have
those
nine.
A
B
There
and
I
think
most
interestingly,
is
that
we
have
started
increasing
the
amounts
of
these,
which
I
think
in
this
one
yeah,
it's
15
000
LUSD,
and
this
is
basically
this
price
is
now
going
forward-
will
be
busy
set
at
the
70
treasury.
Nav
Target
price
in
stable
coins
and
I'll
still
take
16
days
to
go
through,
but
that'll
also
be
a
because
of
the
way
Cal
swap
works.
If
the
prices
change,
where
it's
gone
in
a
different
direction,
then
it
will
basically
turn
into
a
limit
order.
B
Yeah,
so
that's
the
the
Cal
swap
orders
as
I
said:
there's
nine
all
in
the
multi-call
there
we
have
candy
Fork
worker
proposal
for
December
2022,
so
this
is
just
for
December
previously
been
doing
two
month
proposals
but
to
align
these
with
the
Guild
budgets
on
this
is
just
for
December.
So
I
posted
this
at
the
beginning,.
A
B
C
B
B
Initial
time
to
realize
you're
moving
between
the
years
so
for
anyone
watching
at
home,
anyone
that
is
question
this
2022
throughout
this
should
be
2023.
Of
course,
this
is
not
a
proposal
to
go
back
in
time
and
fund
geek
style
through
this.
This
is
a
proposal
for
going
forward.
So
having
established
that
this,
as
a
reminder,
is
part
of
the
new
structure
of
the
phase,
two
restructuring
refocus
proposal
to
use
to
a
budget
budgetary
based
system
here.
B
So
in
going
through
that
process,
there
were
five
different
guilds
that
submitted
six-month
budgets
that
were
improved.
We
have
the
operations
Guild
voice,
Guild
DX,
gov,
swapper
and
Carrick
Guild,
so
they
were
approved
for
six
months
of
regular
cost.
That
cost
for
the
six
month
is
918
000
for
the
the
six
six
months
there,
and
then
in
this
proposal,
funds
are
being
sent
for
three
months
of
the
operations
of
these
different
guilds,
so
for
I.
Think.
A
A
B
Lot
over
the
last
month
or
two
is
not
just
the
process
for
funding
how
we
come
to
consensus
on
what
should
be
funded,
but
the
actual
infrastructure
that
we're
using
using
the
guild
stuff
that
on
the
guild
infrastructure
that
the
DX
government
team
has
built.
So
while
we
are
kind
of
transitioning
to
that,
what
we
have
here
is
actually
the
funding
address
for
the
multi-sync
to
receive
the
funding
and
then
that
multi-sig
can
then
pass
it
along
to
the
guild
as
it
sees
fit
here.
B
B
B
One
other
note
you
can
see
here,
I
guess
two
of
the
notes,
one
other.
First,
one
is
there.
If
you
add
up
all
these
I
think
it's
just
400
and
70
000,
but
wanted
to
send,
but
the
proposal
itself
is
actually
for
629
000.
You
can
see
this
number,
and
so
this
is
actually
susd,
but
the
reason
we
wanted
to
send
all
more
than
the
amounts
to
the
guilds
is
is,
is
because
the
rest
of
it
will
actually
be
deposited
into
notes
this
chain
base.
C
B
C
B
B
There
the
reason
using
susd-
and
this
number
here
is
this-
is
actually
the
entire
amount
of
susd
that
is
available
in
the
who's
in
the
treasury.
So
I
think,
if
you
had
looked,
we
got
a
yeah.
So
this
is
the
the
that's
just
the
token
here
and
so
I
think
we
got
this
in
the
initial
treasury
diversification
round,
because
it
is
one
of
the
ones
that
you
can
say
is
decentralized,
because
it's
actually
only
based
on
the
synthetics
token
and
does
it
have
any
centralized
collateral.
B
So
it's
in
a
usdc
in
it,
although
I'm
not
sure,
if
just
being
basing
on
the
synthetics
token
is
actually
a
a
strong
Defender
against
Central
centralization.
So
that's
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
have
not
increased
the
use
of
it,
but
here
decided
to
basically
just
use
all
of
the
susd,
so
we
can
clear
out
of
the
so
we
could
clear
it
out
of
the
treasury,
and
so
that's
the
629
there,
and
just
for
people
that
are
maybe.
D
B
A
B
B
Calculation
will
be
very
important
so
through
this
process
kind
of
moderate,
being
clear,
being
clear
on
what
counts
to
the
treasury
and
what
does
not
so
for
this
purposes.
Basically
I
think
the
definition
is
any
funds
that
is
in
a
multi-seeker
guilds.
That
is
through
this,
whether
it's
these
ssds
multi,
these
safe
multi-sigs
or
the
guilds
themselves,
funds
in
those
will
be
counted
towards
the
Excel
treasury
until
it
is
in
the
sole
possession
of
the
individual
stakeholder
and
contributor.
B
Going
once
I
guess,
we
will
say
goodbye
to
the
susd
and
before
that,
we'll,
as
this
kind
of
says
in
here,
the
susd
will
need
to
be
converted
to
dying
and
then
also
bridged
across
now.
The
nice
thing
about
each
of
these
saves
is
when
Sky
created
them,
they're
actually
multi-chain.
So
this
is
the
same
address
on
gnosis
chain
as
well
as
mainnet,
so
the.
B
B
Okay,
next
up
is
yeah
the
Great
governance,
gas
refunds
enter
gas
refunds
yeah,
so
those
of
you
that
are
not
familiar
with
geek
style
has
been
subsidizing
greatly
subsidizing
the
cost
of
doing
governance
on
Main
net
census
Inception
here.
So
this
is
the
Q3
and
Q4
gas
refunds
here.
So
anyone
that
is
interactive.
You
can
see
the
35
addresses
that
have
interacted
with
the
style
governance
over
that
time
period
have
spent
various
amounts
of
ease.
That's
whether
you're.
B
Submitting
proposals
moving
proposals
from
the
state
phase
of
the
boosted
phase
you'll
have
that
and
though
we're
looking
at
the
if
you're
looking
at
the
rankings
for
who
has
spent
the
most
gas,
you
can
see
here,
d-labs
here
at
just
under
one
eth
in
that
time
and
then
candy
Fork
here
at
point
four
six.
So
those
are
the
big
gas
vendors
of
this
time
and
then
Augusto
is
I'm,
not
sure
where
you
gusto
seven
yeah.
B
B
B
B
The
proposals
that
will
program
the
deposit
will
need
to
take
separate,
take
place,
separate
and
I
actually
think
we
should
suggest
doing
those
in
smaller
amounts.
Just
because
the
pool
itself
is
not
that
big
right
now,
I
think
it's
on
about
56
eth
right
now,
so
you
want
to
kind
of
gradually
do
that
so
yeah
be
on
the
lookout
for
like
the
first
proposal
of
this,
probably
to
go
in
hopefully
by
the
end
of
today.
Here.
B
This
is
actually
voted
down
by
Candy
Fork
here,
and
this
is
because,
if
you
look
at
this
order
first
and
each
order
we've
actually
now
since
we've
hit
the
70,
we
no
longer
need
to
have
that
additional
slippage
tolerance,
and
so
this
order
itself
is
actually
at
0.553.
West
for
DxD
Which
is
higher
than
the
70,
so
voted
that
down
there
and.
B
B
B
B
Cool,
so
the
first
thing
I
want
to
bring
up.
This
is
something
I
posted
just
before
Christmas.
Was
this
idea
of
this
governance
stewards
and
wanted
to
present
this
just
because
I
was
hoping
to
maybe
try
to
move
this
forward
into
a
proposal
in
the
next
few
weeks
to
kind
of
get
some
feedback
and
a
way
to
launch
this
program.
B
So
just
for
recap:
this
is
a
program
trying
to
engage
rep
holders
who
are
not
active
contributors
to
engage
in
governance,
more
active,
and
so
this
would
be
a
program
that
would
actually
incentivize
that
behavior
by
paying
them
directly
and
they
would
get
paid
for
that
evaluated.
Based
on
some
of
their
governance
performance,
the.
B
Is
attending
the
calls
and
then
voting
on
The
Proposal
once
a
month
and
so
yeah
this
would
be
potentially
a
cost
because
it
would
be
paying
people
for
this,
but
I
think
it's
a
way
of
kind
of
starting
to
introduce
this
idea
of
paying
for
governance
and
some
different
discussions
about
maybe
way
to
implement
this
and
element.
Finance
you
can
see,
has
done
that
and
I'm
not
sure
that
this
would
be
something
that
would
be
like
wildly
popular
in
the
initial
phase.
B
B
So
yeah
I
wanted
to
kind
of
call
to
attention
here
to
see
if
there
are
any
kind
of
thoughts,
comments,
disagreements
or
questions
about,
maybe
like
what
this
program
could
look
like
and
again,
if
no
one's
interested
it
doesn't
work,
the
cost
isn't
really
there.
There
is
some
overhead
cost,
I
guess
in
terms
of
setting
it
up
and
doing
that,
but
yeah
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
the
deaked
out
governance,
stewards.
B
A
B
I
mean
is
the
guy
being
anyone
who
is
as
above
0.5
rep,
and
this
number
could
could
change
right.
Anyone
that
has
Above
This,
that
is
not
an
active
contributor,
could
apply
to
get
funding
to
get
paid
to
participate
in
DX,
dial
governance,
and
so
the
way
that
that
participation
will
be
judged
would
be.
They
would
need
to
attend.
A
B
Yeah
I
mean
I
think
that
this
is
very
easily
gamable
and
that's
kind
of
this
is,
and
so
this
would
not
be
say
a
permissionless
program
Open
to
everyone
and
because
then
you
would
have
a
lot
of
potential
like
malicious
activity.
What
you're
really
trying
to
do
is
filter
to
a
good
group
of
governance
participants
and
that's
what
I
think
is
actually
valuable
in
the
rep
holder
base.
Is
we
actually
know
that
this
group
of
addresses
has
engaged
in
governance
in
the
past,
and
so
they
are?
B
B
A
B
Soup,
I'm
just
and
I
mean
I'm
thinking
about
you
know
everyone.
You
know
a
lot
of
people
on
this
call.
I
think
guys
are
mostly
a
lot
of
people
are
active
contributors,
some
people,
maybe
in
the
future.
You
want
to
like
go
and
do
something
else
against
d-style,
but
somehow,
like
stay
engaged
a
little
bit,
so
it
could
kind
of
be
for,
for
that,
I
think.
There's
also
a
way
that
we
could
maybe
encourage
other
rep
issuance.
B
C
B
B
B
A
rep
issuance
on
mainnet
for
a
lot
of
the
contributions
you
guys
did
not
just
for
like
DC
token
important
group,
but
it
cops
you
a
bunch
of
different
things
there,
but
I
think
you
guys
are
kind
of
exactly
the
type
of
people
that
it's
like.
If
we
can
provide
a
little
bit
more
incentive
for
you
to
participate
in
governance
than
that,
like
is
beneficial
to
to
all.
B
B
Cool
and
then
yeah
the
next
time
on
the
discussion
list
that
I
wanted
to
call
out
was
we
have
discussion
on
the
txt
Redemption
implementation,
so
there
was
just
a
a
question
from
Molotov
both
here
on
in
the
Dow
talk
and
then
there's
also
some
question
the
Discord,
so
I
think
we
discussed
this
yesterday.
Also
in
the
developer
call
and
it's
kind
of
being
worked
on
just
kind
of
a
final
steps.
Maybe
Dave
you
could
give
a
little
bit
of
an
update
on
what
the
current
status
is.
D
D
D
I
think
we
need
like
a
green
light
from
dxta
I
think
this
would
be
coming
in
a
form
of
a
multiple
proposal
that
is
going
to
approve
the
three
tokens
that
we
are
trying
to
Target
so
that
we
die
unless
lusdc
and
then
usdc
for
width
I.
Think
we
need
to
I
think
we
need
to
wrap
it
using
like
probably
different
correctly,
but
something
called.
C
D
False
to
get
back
the
web
into
the
contract
again
and
then
we
want
the
community
to
actually
be
part
of
this,
so
we're
waiting
from
other
contributors
who
are
technical
enough
to
run
a
verifier
node.
We
need
those
addresses
to
put
them
on
the
contract.
Finally,
we
also
want
to
get
a
consensus
or
a
temperature
check.
Whether
a3c
should
be
running
the
aggregator
note
or
just
delegate,
that
to
one
of
the
rep
holders
or
ones
that
actually
bothered
with
the
server
cost
with
the
setup
and
everything
make
sure
they
have
like
a
reliable
infrastructure.
B
C
B
D
Then
we
would
also
ask
them
to
start
running
a
server
giving
us
their
endpoints,
so
we
can
put
that
in
the
database.
Obviously
everything's
automated.
The
verify
have
to
do
this
themselves,
but
the
idea
is
we
want
to
get
those
people
we
want
to.
Let
them
know
that
these
are
the
things
we
also
need
to
know
the
threshold
of
how
many
so
it's
this
threshold
is
like
I,
believe
I
explained.
This
is
It's
a
basis
point
right
now.
It's
set
to
a
minimum
of
50
percent.
D
A
D
B
And
I'm,
just
looking
at
this
line
here,
I
would
actually
say
that
I
think
this
could
either
be
rep
holders
or
DxD
holders,
but
probably
just
a
rep
holder,
because
then
you'd
be
able
to
like
slash
in
any
case,
malicious
and
so
and
then
I
guess.
The
other
question
is
this:
is
this
something
that
should
be
incentivized?
If
people
aren't
doing
it,
is
there
I
guess?
Is
there
a
cost
to
running
it
in
the
first
place
and
then
yeah?
Should
we
incentivize
the
addresses
that
that
run,
because.
B
A
B
B
Cool
and
that
was
it
for
the
discussion
items
I
know,
there's
been
some
discussion
on
the
proposal
for
reimbursement
of
stone
funds,
but
I
think
that
was
maybe
yeah.
We
could
chat
about
here,
but
that
was
better
for
the
The
Forum,
while
that's
still
being
in
discussion,
but
I
wasn't
sure.
If
there
was
anyone
want
to
talk
about
that
or
anything
else
on
the
mind.
B
Would
set
in
that
initial
approval
period
yeah
that
would
be
like
the
last
backstop
there
and
that
would
be
a
proposal
that
needs
to
come
through
there.
So
that's
like
the
I'd
say
like
the
only
big
decision
is:
what
is
that
initial?
Like
approval
period,
yeah
I
mean
you
can
stagger
those
it
would
only
like,
so
you
could
submit
a
proposal
and
then
again
it's
like
16
days
and
you
could
submit
the
next
one
whenever
you
wanted
to
do
those
initial
authorizations.
B
B
B
A
fine
discussion,
I
guess
the
other
thing
is
kind
of
talking
about
OTC
develop
like
kind
of
two
is
like.
Is
this
something
that
couldn't
be
better
coordinated
just
through
like
direct
sales
and
I?
Think
either
either
is
fine?
I
mean
I?
Think
we
were
using
this
one
as
a
way
of
like
a
more
scalable
version,
but
I
think
like
Mesa
proposals
would
also
be
fine.
I
mean
it
is
like
you
can
kind
of
think
that
anyone
can
submit
the
Mesa
proposal
right
now.
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
Yeah
from
my
understanding,
the
issue
is,
if
you
don't
feel
within,
like
like
the
initial
amount
of
time
or
like
your
order,
becomes
the
limit
order
because
it
can't
match
in
the
future
it
won't
actually
route
through
any
other
decks.
It'll
only
match
if
someone
is
actually
placing
an
order
of
the
exact
same
size
on
car
itself
here.
So
it's
like
not
it's
a
bit
sub-optimal
if
it
doesn't
match
you.
C
C
Well,
you're
in
Wisconsin:
well,
the
the
way
cow
swap
works.
It's
an
approval
right,
so
you
never
the
the
funds
only
get
withdrawn
when
an
order
is
matched.
So
you
never.
The
funds
are
never
even
withdrawn
in
in
the
first
place,
but
you
can
also
cancel
the
order
anytime
to
or
any
time
is
a
good
statement.
It
takes
16
days
for
us
to
cancel
an
order
of
course,
but
if
you
would
want
to
cancel
an
order
you
you
can
just
the
same
way.
You
sign
it.
B
D
B
B
B
B
Awesome
and
then
just
as
a
like,
we
I
have
not
kind
of
tried
to
put
a
schedule
out
at
the
end
of
the
week,
but
we
are
trying
to
hopefully
have
the
first
DxD
monetary
policy
committee
meeting
in
a
couple
weeks.
I
think
three
weeks,
maybe
from
tomorrow
or
the
20.
Sorry,
no
four
weeks
from
tomorrow,
yeah
but
I
will
send
that
out
at
the
end
of
the
month,
January
26th
yeah
four
weeks
three
weeks
from
tomorrow
there
which
we'll
discuss
this
and
then
also
some
of
the
things
in
the
inverse
bonds.