►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2023-01-11]
Description
00:02 Welcome and Agenda
01:20 Mainnet roundup - DXD discussion too.
29:45 Gnosis Chain roundup
33:56 Budgets and Guilds check-in
34:44 Governance Stewards
38:25 Mission Wardens
A
A
A
At
the
end,
the
governance,
stewards,
which
would
be
a
way
of
encouraging
non-contributors
to
rep
holders
that
are
non-contributors
to
participate
in
governance
and
get
paid
for
it.
And
then
the
mission
wardens-
or
this
idea
of
we
think
we
just
call
it
Guild,
Council
or
something
that
would
provide
some.
A
And
accountability
for
the
guilds
themselves,
so
we
will
start
with
the
yeah,
as
I
said,
the
proposal
Roundup
here
and
so
just
a
couple
different
ones.
Again.
We
have
seven
hours,
always
some
of
my
favorite
proposals.
Here
we
have
the
update,
swapper.edu
content
hash.
So,
of
course
this
is
I
think
this
has
been
a
18
here.
A
D
A
A
A
So
this
is
the
first
one
and
that
this
would
deposit
40,
sorry,
61,
dxt
or
n25v,
so
it's
actually
either
or
because
that's
what
it'll
program
it
and
then
it
will
use
the
on-chain
price
when
it's
executed
to
then
deposit
at
that
same
amount
and
I
believe
it
comes
with
a
five
percent
slippage
there
too.
So
this
is
61
DxD
and
25b.
I
think
the
current
pool
is
like
55,
each
and
140
dxt.
So
this
is
a
pretty
sizable
increase
and
yeah.
A
E
A
A
A
And
yeah
we
have
the
then
we
have
another
request
for
Q2
gas
governance
refund.
So
this
was
a
I
believe
this
is
a
sky
did
not
claim
his
gas
refunds
in
the
previous
one.
So
this
is
him
claiming
it
here
and
the
way
that
this,
the
gas
refunds
work
and
also
just
a
kind
of
call
to
attention
if
the
Q3
gas
refunds
already
to
be
claimed
now
Q3
and
Q4.
A
So
if
you're,
if
you're
looking
to
get
those
for
participating
in
governance
head
to
this
site,
there
and
you'll
be
able
to
figure
out
how
to
get
that
eth,
but
the
way
that
the
contract
works
is
if
no
one
claims
it
after
a
certain
amount
of
time.
There
is
a
way
to
basically:
where
is
it
yeah
you
can
like
kill
the
contract?
Oh,
you
can
kill
the
contract
and
it
basically
sends
the
remaining
eth
back
to
DX
down.
A
And
then
we
have
another
worker
proposal
just
trying
to
get
through
all
the
worker
proposals
and
other
ones
before
we
get
to
the
DxD
ones.
So
this
is
from
Philip
vadakovich.
This
is
yeah.
We
had
a
couple
different
proposals
for
this
month.
The
first
one
was
submitted
was
like
5.6
billion
usdc,
which
is
clearly
one
of
many
times
that
the
usdc
decimal
problem
has
sprouted
up.
But
this
one
looks
to
be
the
the
right.
One
is
just
actually
gone
into
the
boosted
phase.
A
A
A
Of
the
DX
vote,
though,
was
so
that
you
didn't
have
to
rely
on
the
graph
because
it
was,
it
was
tough,
so
yeah
I
think
that's
all
of
the.
Let
me
just
look
quickly,
I
think
that's
all
of
the
Regular
proposals,
not
PhD
ones
and
so
yeah,
just
to
kind
of
look
at
all
of
the
bunch
of
anyway.
Maybe
someone
could
mute
someone
not
for
who
this
is?
They
have
a
mechanical
keyboard.
A
Thank
you,
Keenan
yeah,
so
the
proposals
that
you
know
are
live
in
terms
of
DxD.
You
know,
as
I
said,
we
have
the
dxt
liquidity
one,
so
that
would
make
sure
that
there
is
Unchained
liquidity
in
swapper
for
those
that
would
increase
it
there,
and
then
we
have
about
I
think
there
are
eight
orders
right
now
that
are
purchases
through
Cal
swap,
and
so
these
you
can
see.
We
actually
you
know,
because
it
takes
so
long.
A
We
can
see
we
submitted
these
data
submitted
these
December
27th
and
it
takes
16
days
to
go
through
this.
One
is
just
for
five
thousand,
but
if
you
see
I
think
starting
with
this
one,
the
orders
increased
to
15
000
here
and
that's
kind
of
been
going
through
it
there.
So
these
just
get
executed
on
chain
and
if
they
cannot
be
filled,
then
they
are
kind
of
turned
into
a
limit
order
there,
as
as
it
says
in
the
proposal
here.
A
So
those
are
that's
the
LUSD
one
and
then
we
did
just
have
like
this
new
proposal
here,
which
is
pretty
big,
and
this
is
different
than
the
other
ones,
because
it
is
a
liquidity
order
and
yeah.
Maybe
Dave
you
could
so
so.
This
is
a
big
one,
because
it's
liquidity
order
and
then
the
big
thing
is.
This
would
be
a
500
000
dxt
purchase
through
Castle,
which
of
course
be
the
largest
one
to.
E
Sure
so
I
mean
the
main
limitation
there
is.
Is
that
Cal
swap
does
not
allow
partial
fills
of
orders.
Yet
that
means
if
we
submitted
it,
if
we
submitted
a
half
a
million
dollar
order
under
the
previous
method
and
it
wouldn't
have
matched
once
we
sign
it,
the
order
then
becomes
the
limit
order,
but
it's
fill
or
kill.
So
there's
no
partial
matching.
So
you
know
until
until
the
order
duration
is
live.
E
If
someone
can
entirely
fill
that
in
one
go
by
trading
through
Cal
swap
it
would
fill,
but
it
would
not
allow
for
any
partial
filling
and
the
difference
between
the
liquidity
order.
It's
like
a
special
set
of
water.
They
kind
of
set
up
for
market
makers
mostly
is
allowing
to
set
larger
order,
amounts
that
also
allow
a
partial
fill
and
to
even
be
able
to
set
these
orders.
You
kind
of
have
to
be
whitelisted
by
Cal
flop
and
yeah.
These
these
allow
partial
filling
so
also
still.
E
There
is
a
limitation
that
this
is
only
for
orders
that
go
directly
through
calsop,
so
these
liquidity
orders
will
not
pick
up
available
liquidity
on
the
market
kind
of
when
the
order
is
signed,
but
you'll
only
be
able
to
sell
into
this
liquidity
order
by
going
directly
through
Cal
Swap,
and
then
assuming
this
were
the
best
price
available
on
the
market.
You
would
fill
this
order,
so
it
still
would
work.
You
know,
Council
would
still
always
give
you
the
best
rate
and
yeah
that's
kind
of
like
the
main
difference
and
the
idea
behind
these.
E
Of
course,
you
know
we
have
this
16
day
limitation.
Well,
all
60-day
duration,
which
is
kind
of
like
a
limitation
on
like
placing
accurate
orders
in
terms
of
price
and
circulating
Supply,
but
kind
of
like
how
we
set
it
up.
For
now.
You
know
at
least
there's
some
temporary
liquidity
on
the
market
is
that
we
submit
proposals
with
a
23-day
duration.
So
if
you
account
for
the
16
days,
it
actually
takes
for
the
order
to
pass
because
the
order
starts
when
you
actually
create
the
order
through
their
API.
E
So
the
16
days
kind
of
are
part
of
the
order,
and
then
you
have
an
additional
seven
days
of
where
the
order
is
actually
signed
and
people
can
sell
into
it.
And
so,
like
you
know,
if
you
submit
a
proposal
every
seven
days,
you
can
kind
of
update
the
price
it
is
still
lacking
behind
significantly,
which
is
also
why
we're
looking
into
potentially
installing
a
new
multi
scheme.
E
So
we
can
like
at
least
reduce
that
time
frame
a
lot
but
yeah
that's
how
it's
currently
set
up,
and
this
will
be
our
first
one
going
through
and
I
think.
It
also
makes
sense
to
kind
of
like
now
that
we
have
the
mimic
Vault
wrap
some
of
the
if
we
have
and
also
start
placing
some
of
these
orders
in
Eve
as
well
as
that
should
also
like
be
able
to
reflect
at
least
Market
volatility
a
bit
better
as
ether's
more
correlated
to
txt.
Of
course,.
A
A
Ones
but
I
think
they've
enjoyed
kind
of
seeing
how
to
work
on
those
so
yeah.
This
is
I,
think
is
the
exciting
one.
Dave
and
I
were
just
talking
about
being
able
to
submit
another
one
of
these
today
and
figuring
out
the
specific
price
for
that
and
again,
this
is
like
16
days
to
go
through
I
think
we're
talking.
A
We
were
just
talking
I
think
yesterday
about
trying
to
create
a
new
multi-call
scheme
that
would
white
list
the
cow
swap
contract
so
that
it
could
pass
through
eight
days
like
the
previous
Mesa
order,
orders
and
then
for
that
I
think.
That's
a
pretty
effective
way
of
doing
lots
of
different
open
market
operations
for
dxt
for
DxD
and
other
and
other
tokens
Because
deep
stalking.
A
You
know
submit
any
of
those
over
eight
days
and
they're
not
fill
or
kill,
and
they
can
provide
a
lot
of
liquidity,
but
we're
still
kind
of
figuring
that
out
there
so
yeah,
that's
the
that's
the
kind
of
exist.
Those
cow
swap
proposals
there,
and
then
we
have
a
big
proposal
here.
The
member
balance
proposal
underneath
new
T
token
model.
This
is
from
ponzilonger.eath
AKA
zagu
AKA
Connor,
and
we
can.
A
This
is
a
lot
of
discussion
in
in
the
Forum,
and
you
can
see
kind
of
that
discussion
here
and
I.
Think
the
key
thing
to
highlight
is
you
can
see
this
address
that
submitted
the
proposal
sent
5634
dxt
to
DX
Dao
at
this
time,
and
so
that
dxt
is
now
in
geek,
Style's
Treasury,
and
then
this
is
a
member
balancer
to
claim
the
the
I
guess:
proceeds
makeup
of
that
are
kind
of
passed
with
the
new
DxD
token
model
being
70.
A
B
A
I
think
from
Geeks
Dallas
perspective,
it
saves
a
rebalancing
effort
because
this
basically
keeps
the
treasury
at
the
exact
same
makeup
in
terms
of
eth
and
stable
coins,
and
so
it
doesn't
require
any
extra,
like
kind
of
work
from
from
Geek
style
to
be
able
to
rebalance
that
there.
So
this
is
a
big,
a
lot
of
money.
A
lot
of
funds
come
into
the
extent
a
lot
of
dxt
that's
kind
of
gone
in.
Obviously,
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion,
so
I
wasn't
sure
if
anyone
want.
E
A
D
A
A
You
know
it's
difficult,
because
if
you
look
at
the
snapshot
right
now,
the
treasury
right
when
you
would
be
sending
that
in
I,
think
that
snapshot
would
not
be
representative
of
where
the
treasury
and
the
70
would
be
in
six
days
or
seven
days
when
this
proposal
would
pass,
because,
presumably
if
Connor's
proposal
does
pass
that
has
like
a
big
effect
on
these
numbers,
so
I
think
anyone
is
more
than
capable
of
submitting
those,
but
it
does
run
the
risk
of.
Does
this
actually
live
up
to
the
70
number?
There.
A
A
A
Yeah
and
I
think
so
Molotov
it's
like,
and
this
is
I'm
speaking
for
candy
Fork
right,
so
candy
Fork
I've
not
fully
kind
of
run
the
numbers
on
this,
but
and
since
this
one
is
here,
I
think
it's
another
member
balance
or
proposal
would
be
submitted
right.
It
would
take.
It
could
only
be
like
I
guess
20.
It
would
take
eight
days,
but
about
a
day
and
a
half
behind
this
one,
Candy
Fork
would
wait
until
this
proposal
would
go
through
and
then
recalculate.
A
What
is
the
70
nav
and
there's
also
maybe
some
other
changes
in
terms
of
the
assets
and
then,
if
that
70
number
matched
up
what
was
in
the
proposal
for
the
other
memory
bouncer,
then
it
would
vote
for
that.
But
if
it
didn't
it
would
vote
it
down
and
of
course,
the
only
way
you
can
submit
that
proposal
is
if
the
the
DxD
is
in
is
already
is
there
in
the
treasury
right
now?
A
A
I
mean,
as
I
said,
anyone's
free
to
submit
DxD
member
balancers
member
bouncers
are
right
and
just
from
what
at
least
candy
Fork
will
vote
for
it's
only
going
to
be
ones
that
fulfill
the
70
nav
and
that
calculation
will
depend
on
what
it
is
at
that
moment
when
the
proposal
passes
and
I.
Think,
since
you
have
a
very
big
proposal
going
through
here,
that
will
affect
all
of
this,
and
so
I
wouldn't
vote
for
and
I
don't
know.
A
A
A
A
A
So
that's
just
it's
kind
of
tough,
because
we
can
only
get
that
on-chain
confirmation
through
a
past
proposal
and
then
second,
every
decision
from
DX
Dao
takes
at
least
eight
days
to
be
decided
right,
and
this
is
unavoidable.
Reality
of
the
first
point
that
the
only
way
to
have
a
Dao
that
speaks
for
a
large
number
of
stakeholders
is
to
have
ample
time
for
all
of
them
to
review
and
discuss
any
proposal.
A
It
possible
so
I
think
the
one
good
kind
of,
if
you
think
about
this
in
DC
older
perspective,
the
important
incentive
here
is
there
is
actually
not
an
incentive
to
like
Run
for
the
exits,
so
I
think
the
exits
that
you're
looking
for
here
for
anyone
that
wants
to
exit
because
they
want
liquidity
outside
of
DHD.
So
they
want
USD
they're
going
to
do
that
with
something
else.
A
But
the
way
the
70
nav
works
that
if
you
are
anyone,
one
that
does
a
member
balancer
after
Conor
will
get
a
higher
price
for
their
DxD
than
Connor
did
right.
So
Conor
is
actually
getting
like
one
of
the
lower
prices
for
gxd
than
others.
That
would
come
after
him,
because
every
time
you
do
a
DxD
purchase
from
Deek
style
that
increases
the
price
of
of
dxt
for
the
next
person
right
and
so
like.
There
is
actually
an
incentive
to
basically
wait
for
everyone
else
to
exit,
thereby
like
increasing
your
dxt
price.
A
I
think
there
could
be
like
you
know.
Well
once
Conor's
passes,
is
there
going
to
be
someone
that
wants
to
jump
in
like
immediately
and
again,
like
I,
think
anyone
can
do
that?
I,
don't
think
it's
a
very
like
if
people
are
racing
to
submit
member
balancers,
then
it
kind
of
to
me
makes
sense
to
wait
for
those
to
go
through
and
get
I
or
DHD
price.
A
And
then
like
is
it
I
know
this
is
kind
of
confusing.
You
know
this
is
a
kind
of
a
big
transition,
we're
trying
to
figure
out
this
new
token
model
and
how
it
kind
of
applies
to
lots
of
things,
and
that's
why
I
just
say
like
separate
from
that
outside
of
some
of
these,
like
larger
ones,
I
think
it's
incredibly
important
to
have
like
a
liquid
market
for
DxD.
That
is
not
just
through
these
member
bouncers,
because
that
can
have
that
can
just
be
kind
of
confusing.
A
And
then
maybe
we
could
talk
a
little
I,
don't
know
if
there
are
any
questions,
but
I
was
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
redemptor
contract
and
how
that
kind
of
like
fits
in
to
all
these
different
tools
that
we're
we're
talking
about,
and
so
this
has
been
worked
on.
We're
kind
of
still
testing
out.
But
again,
this
is
something
like
like
brand.
C
A
I
think,
if
you
look
at
Connor's
original
post,
it
was
you
know
he
wanted
to
speed
things
up,
because
he
didn't
want
to
wait
on
the
redemptor
contract,
even
though
that
was
probably
maybe
the
best.
What
he
was
thinking
is
a
long-term
solution
there,
so
yeah,
Dave,
I,
don't
know
if
Dave
or
Adam
want
to
kind
of
touch
on
this
a
little
bit
in
some
of
the
different
things
going
on
with
the
redemptor
contract.
C
A
A
A
But
the
good
news
is
like,
unlike
the
other
ones,
we
have
the
16
days
right,
the
big
problem
with
the
16
days.
There
is
not
just
the
weight,
it's
that
when
you're
submitting
that
proposal
you're
putting
a
price
in
that
proposal-
or
this
is
the
same
through
with
the
eight
days
even
the
member
balancer,
one
you're,
putting
that
price
in
at
the
proposal
submission.
A
E
D
A
A
Cool
one
is
just
any
other
parting
thoughts
on
this
The
Proposal
will
be
up
for
another
six
days,
so
Conor
will
I,
don't
know,
be
sleeping
or
not
sleeping
over
those
those
six
days
there
and
then
I
think
that'll
be
clearly
a
signal
from
from
Deep
style
that
it's
kind
of
committed
to
this,
and
we
can
kind
of
talk
about
the
other
paths
going
forward.
But
at
least
to
me
I
think
this
is
yeah.
A
A
A
We
have
dinos
and
benzix
AKA
brown
backpack
guy
in
the
new
contribution
reward,
and
then
we
have
Guerra
P
contributor
proposals
is
doing
some
great
work
on
swapper
and
stats,
so
I
take
stats,
but
those
are
the
only
proposals
there
and
yeah
and
just
kind
of
Shifting
to
the
yeah
I'm
gonna,
just
kind
of
find
a
point
by
multi
read
out
loud
just
about
the
redemptor.
Can
we
get
details
on
the
tokens
that
will
be
redeemed
in
What
proportion
will
use
the
same
proportion
as
the
member
balancer
proposals.
A
Maybe
this
question
can
be
addressed
on
the
implementation
topic.
I
think
yeah.
This
is
probably
something
to
require
more
discussion,
but
I
think,
at
least
from
my
perspective,
I
think
at
least
using
the
same
trying
to
maintain
the
same
makeup
of
the
treasury.
Maybe
a
little
bit
more
stablecoin
than
eth
is
the
preference
there,
but.
A
B
A
We
shouldn't
see
any
contributor
proposal
coming
into
gnosis
chain
or
or
even
mainnet.
Those
contributor
proposals
should
go
directly
to
the
guilds
themselves
and
then
anytime,
any
additional
funding
requests
would
need
to
come.
That
would
need
to
come
from
DX
Dao.
That
would
need
to
go
to
geek
style,
but
actually
come
from
The
Guild
itself,
rather
than
an
individual
as
like
kind
of
a
general
rule
of
thumb.
Here
there
will
obviously
maybe
the
other
expenses
or
other
costs
that
are
going
to
be
paid
out
through
through
GX
Dow.
A
So
there
is
about
I,
think
like
100,
000,
die
of
or
they'll
be
about
100
000
die
of
in
in
nurses
chain.
After
these
proposals,
and
so
like
I
guess,
the
general
rule
of
thumb
is,
if
you
have
less
than
five
thousand
dollars
in
your
pay
request
or
whatever,
that
is,
for
contract
work
or
whatever,
or
maybe
it's
for
someone
else
for
someone
that
you're
facilitating
that
probably
best
to
go
through
nurses
chain,
but
above
five
thousand
dollars,
probably
best
to
go
through
magnet.
A
Yeah
and
then
just
wanted
to
maybe
open
up
for
us
any
discussion
on
kind
of
the
current
status
of
the
the
budgets
and
the
guilds.
I
think
we've
gotten
some
worker
proposals
that
have
gotten
up
on
Davi
that
these
are
again
worker
proposals
to
the
guild,
not
to
DXL.
But
those
work
proposals
are
up
and
then
I
think,
hopefully,
in
the
next
day
or
two,
we
will
start
the
streaming
payments
for
contributors
from
those
guilds
or
the
lump
sum
payments
there.
A
Cool
next
topic
is
the
Deek
style
governance
Stewarts.
This
is
a
program
meant
to
engage
others
into
governance.
So
we
discussed
this
posting
this
before
about
a
month
ago,
and
then
we
discussed
it
last
week
on
this
call
and
so
I
actually
want
to
move
forward
to
a
proposal
here.
So
just
wanted
to
kind
of
highlight
it
here.
A
The
big
change
made
after
a
kind
of
discussion
was
lowering
it
to
0.1
percent,
and
this
is
on
gnosis
chain
or
mainnet
you'd
be
able
to
like
participate
in
that
and
then
so
that's
0.1
percent
there
and
actually
a
clarification.
I
want
to
make
geez
look
at
how
many
likes
Kaden
got
I
got
one
like
here,
and
he
got
six
likes
for
this
comment
and
he
liked
my
comment
so
I
guess
by
like
deduction
you
guys
all
liked.
A
It's
kind
of
the
the
way
to
align
incentives,
I
think
if
you're
just
paying
people
in
stable
coins,
then
you
know
maybe
not
necessarily
have
that
long-term
alignment
but
up
for
discussion
and
then
this
one,
as
he
said,
maybe
this
already
implied
but
clarify
that
active
contributors
at
50
of
time
or
more
can
also
be
governed.
Stewards.
Yes,
I
meant
to
kind
of
put
that
in
there
this.
C
A
A
program
to
have
people
pay
for
with
existing
contributors.
You
know
for
participating
governance
as
a
way
kind
of
engaging
those
that
are
not
working
kind
of
full-time
there.
So
I
will
definitely
make
sure
and
clarify
that,
but
I
wasn't
sure
if
there
were
any
other
thoughts,
maybe
specifically
about
this
DxD
portion.
B
A
A
Has
kind
of
been
interesting,
I've
been
working
a
little
bit,
you
know
with
ens
dowity
and
the
delegation
from
from
Geek
style,
and
you
do
see
how
like
these,
these
stewards
or
whatever
that
are
like
small
amount
of
payments.
Sometimes
they
are
not
as
active
as
they
want
and
again
that's.
Why
I
like
the
vested
DxD
point
and
then
soup
makes
a
interesting
point
about
pricing
it
at
nav,
not
a
post.
A
The
only
reason
is
it's
very
hard
to
look
back
at
the
the
treasury
NAB
because,
like
we
don't
have
the
retrospective,
but
it
is
very
easy
to
do
that
with
a
txt
price,
so
you
could
actually
even
change
that
change
that,
so
you
could
do
as
you
could.
Just
if
you
wanted
to
do
that,
I
think
in
general
I
think
you
pay
out
nav
at
dxt.
That
should
be
whenever
dxt
is
like
being
paid
out
right
now.
I
think
it
changes
the
calculation
a
little
bit
when
you
are
vesting
something.
A
E
A
To
discuss
is
he
probably
got
more
like?
No?
He
didn't.
He
got
four
likes
this
time,
but
so
this
is
another
post,
T,
stat,
Mission
wardens
you
can
see.
This
is
actually
from
Candy
Forks
style
talk
name
because
I've
been
working
on
this
with
with
Ross
G
for
a
lot.
He
did
a
lot
of
the
great
work
on
this
and
so
Deeks
down
Mission
wardens
I
encourage
everyone
to
read
this
post
before
I
give
a
brief
overview
of
it
now.
A
With
all
of
you
know
the
day-to-day
minutia
of
what's
going
on
with
the
guilds.
So
the
goal
of
this
is
to
kind
of
create
an
in-between
I
think
it's
called
a
layer
in
between
execution
and
governance
right.
So
the
execution
is
the
guilds
that
is
going
on
in
a
kind
of
they're
executing
on
the
vision
and
the
priors
of
DX
style
and
then
for
governance.
They
are
you
know,
voting
on
that
and
and
on
chain,
but
really
they
need
a
lot
more
information
and
a
lot
more
coordination.
A
So
this
extra
layer
of
governance,
I
think,
is
what
the
the
mission
wardens
can
accomplish
here
there
so
yeah
as
I
said
kind
of
read
the
read
it
for
more
information,
there's
kind
of
two
clear
responsibilities
that
these
Mission
wardens
would
have.
The
first
is
to
attend
and
provide
feedback
on
a
halfway
check-in
provided
by
The
Guild
team
in
March
or
April.
So
this
would
not
be
a
written
report,
but
it's
just
making
sure
that
there
is
a
presentation
both
from
The
Guild
and
the
the
wardens
themselves
and
the
second.
A
This
is
kind
of
the
key
thing
is
a
mission
assessment
one
month
prior
to
conclusion
of
the
six-month
budgetary
term,
and
so
we
can
maybe
go
into.
We
created
a
little
bit
of
a
template
of
what
this.
Oh,
we
need
to
change
that
I.
Guess
someone
clicked
on
us
I
didn't
realize
that,
but
anyway,
there's
a
yeah.
We
have
this
sample
Mission
assessment
for
what
kind
of
mission
wardens
potentially
fill
out
there,
and
then
we
also
have
laid
out
what
a
potential
like
nomination
and
election
process
would
be.
A
A
Include
a
like
the
compensation,
I
think
this
is
really
important.
If
you're
asking
people
to
do
work,
you
need
to
make
sure
that
they
are
paid
for
that
work,
and
so
here
the
mix
we
had
is
1K
and
stable
coins
and
4K
in
DHT
vested
for
one
year
and
so
for
this
yeah.
You
can
see
here,
I
think
this
kind
of
goes
back
to
the
same
discussion,
we're
just
having
I
think
you
know
having
someone
that
is
judging
Guild
performance.
A
The
key
incentive
that
I
want
to
have
is
I
want
them
to
be
a
want
DHD
to
grow
in
value.
I
want
them
to
want
the
treasury
to
go
in
value,
and
that
is
aligning
them
on
the
4K
DHT.
They
are
vested
over
over
one
year
and
then
the
1K
at
in
stable
coins
there
just
as
another
payment
there.
So
that
was
we're
doing
the
compensation
and
then
still
some
discussion
on
thinking
about
how
many
wardens
you
have.
A
A
But
we
could
do
that.
We
also
don't
necessarily
need
to
have
a
defined
number
of
of
wardens,
because
they're
not
really
going
to
be
like
a
board
who's
voting
on
on
things
or
not
they're,
more
likely
going
to
be
a
more
like
yeah
again
providing
feedback
and
assessment.
So
you
actually
don't
need
to
have
a
specific
number
of
them
and
so
I
think
we
can
kind
of
figure
that
out.
You
can
see.
B
A
Kaden
I
think
what
we
were
saying
is:
if
the
proposal
passes,
then
we
will
need
to
denomination
process.
This
is
just
the
first
instance
of
it,
but
of
course
Caden
is
already
nominated
himself
for
a
warden
there,
I
think
in
terms
of
timeline.
As
I
said,
we
just
kind
of
presenting
this
information
here
and
so
would
want
to
have
a
lot
of
feedback
on
kind
of
what
this
this
program
would
look.
A
So
if
someone
is
anonymous
that
may
enable
them
to
provide
that
feedback
more
effectively,
but
it
may
be
very
difficult
for
deaked
out
governance
to
judge
the
effectiveness
of
this
Warden
if
they
are
Anonymous.
So
maybe
if
there
was
like
a
I
mean
pseudonymous
would
be
another
way,
but
there's
a
way
of
kind
of
evaluating
the
effectiveness
of
the
individual
as
a
warden.
While
they
are
Anonymous
I
think
would
be
really
effective
way
to
do.
A
D
B
Yeah,
you
want
good
wardens,
you
want
to
be
able
to
pick
which
wardens
you
have
to
make
sure
that
you're
gonna
get.
You
know
good
quality
stuff
from
them
and
you
can
hold
them
accountable.
But
once
you
have
the
group
of
Wardens
you
know,
maybe
they
are
anonymized
within
that
group
so
that
you
know
you
don't
necessarily
get
targeting
against
any
particular
person
and
the
the
reviews
could
be
anonymized
and.
B
E
A
So
cool
I
won't
yeah
the
labor
too
much
longer,
because
I
think
this
is
kind
of
actually
pretty
big
would
be
a
pretty
big
program
and
kind
of
involve
a
lot
of
different
things
and
we
just
got
the
first
one
out.
Just
yesterday's
would
love
some
feedback,
these
kind
of
feedback
here
and
we'll
yeah
keep
working
on
this,
as
I
said,
probably
looking
for
like
a
proposal
on
the
maybe
the
end
of
the
the
week.
A
A
A
A
So
that
actually
would
not
be
that
accurate
of
a
snapshot-
and
it
would
kind
of
you
know,
require
a
lot
of
different
things,
but
the
real
benefit
of
member
balancer
in
the
original,
so
just
to
give
some
Predator
sky's
the
original
I
guess
inventor
of
member
balancer,
and
it
was
really
about
diversifying
the
treasury
early
on
when
the
extent
out
all
this
eth
and
or
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
how
to
diversify
it.
And
we
didn't
want
to
use
multi-cigs.
A
It's
the
same
thing
it's
true
even
like
two
years
ago,
so
the
member
balancer
was
used
there
and
basically
people
would
send
stable
coins
to
the
treasury
and
then
immediately
create
a
proposal
asking
for
those
to
return.
I
think
we
did
have
like
a
one
percent
fee
or
return
to
try
to
encourage
people
to
do
that,
but
it's
just
like
very
clear
cut
right.
A
It's
like
this
address,
sent
this
amount
and
at
this
time-
and
you
can
kind
of
vote
and
calculate
on
that,
and
so
I
actually
think
that
those
questions
become
a
lot
more
complicated
when
you
get
into
using
the
multi-sig
itself,
because
there
are
lots
of
kind
of
changes
with
that
which,
with
the
member
balancer,
there
really
isn't
and
the
same
thing
with
the
liquidity
or
or
so
the
the
Cal
swap
purchases
like
for
their.
That
calculation
is
happening
at
the
proposal
submission
that's
like
boom
70
and
then
those
proposals
are
voted
down.
A
I
guess
by
governance
and
Dave
and
I
are
watching
this.
If,
at
the
time
of
passing
that
70,
it
would
be
higher
than
70
there
and
that's
a
way
of
making
it
clear-cut
there
and
there's
aim
that
the
redemptor,
like
it's
very
clear-cut
there.
So
it
is
just
very
helpful
to
have
this
very
clear.
So
there's
not
all
of
this
discussion
and
debate,
but
that's
also.
Why
we're
why
we're
here.
A
Yeah
and
to
Connor's
further
point
he's
not
going
to
use
the
DSD
BuyBacks
to
happen
between
now
and
when
his
member
balancers
passed
I
think
there
was
just
like
nine
DxD
purchased
through
the
Cal
spot
border
like
a
couple
hours
ago,
and
so
that
would
affect
that
and
there's
a
couple
that
are
over
the
next
couple
days.
That
would
end
up
affecting
that
but
hit
memory.
Balancer
is
at
the
time
of
this
submission
or
the
the
transaction.
That's
sending
the
funds
to
the
treasury.
A
Everything
cool
what
else
anything
else
on
the
mind,
maybe
just
some
also
worth
checking
out
as
I
said
before
the
governance
gas
refunds
are
up
now,
so
those
are
always
fun
to
get
your.
If
you've
worked
on
on
governance,
you
can
kind
of
see
there
and
then
yeah
just
a
call
to
attention
just
scheduling
the
first
priorities
board
monthly
check-in.
So
the
priorities
board
is
also
after
the
phase
two
and
restructuring
Focus
proposal.
A
This
is
going
to
be
a
week
and
a
half
from
now
on,
Monday
January
23rd
at
11,
A.M,
so
yeah
you
can
check
out
the
existing
comments
there.
We
also
have
Ross,
who
did
not
get
as
many
likes
as
I
did
and
giving
some
good
feedback
there.
So
yeah
anyone
else
make
sure
and
give
some
feedback
there
and
would
love
to
have
anyone
on
this
call.
The
next
next
Monday.