►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-06-01]
Description
00:04 DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-06-01]
00:24 Mainnet Proposals
20:00 Gnosis Chain
37:23 State of Auditing
A
First
proposal:
that's
set
to
pass
soon
is
the
exile
commitment
to
the
ministry
position
at
the
taoist.
So
that's
something
we've
chatted
about
for
quite
some
time.
There
was
already
a
signal
proposal
to
gauge
interest
in
that,
and
this
is
the
proposal
which
actually
transfers
the
funds
over
to
the
taoist.
A
So
for
anyone
who's
not
familiar,
perhaps
with
the
proposal
it's
so.
The
daoist
has
been
organizing
events
around
dallas
and
the
whole
web3
governance
sphere
for
a
year
or
two
perhaps
a
year
I
would
say,
and
dxdau
has
been
an
enthusiastic
supporter
of
the
taoist.
We
sponsored
a
number
of
their
events
starting
with
paris,
which
I
believe
was
the
first
one,
and
this
new
military
ministry
position
grants
a
couple
of
privileges
so
to
speak,
early
access
to
tickets,
but
also
kind
of
supports
the
taoist
on
their
mission.
B
Yeah
we-
I
was
just
discussing
this
because
we're
doing
some
reorgs
with
like
dx
voice
squad
multi-sig,
and
you
know
budgeting
and
things
like
that,
and
so
this
was
a
little
bit
unique
because
we
did
you
know
we
did
a
lot
of
discussion.
We
did
a
signal
proposal
on
gnosis
chain
which
basically
passed
with
you,
know
a
lot
of
support
and
then
we're
doing
a
mainnet
proposal
to
actually
move
the
money
and
so
yeah.
There
are
different
ways
to
do
this
this
they
they
wanted
the
money
on
maintenance.
B
We
need
a
mainnet
proposal
if
we
want
the
money
to
move
from
the
dow
and
there's
always
something
to
be
said
by
you
know
a
dow
to
dow
actual
movement
of
funds
which
is
like
you
know
it's
on
the
blockchain
forever.
So
it's
cool
to
do
it
that
way.
Theoretically,
like
if
we
had
you
know
some
squad,
multi-sig
that
had
funding
already
allocated
for
things
like
sponsorships
of
different
things.
B
Once
the
signal
proposal
passed
like
theoretically
that
that
money
could
move
in
another
mechanism,
there
could
be
a
multisig
that
executes
the
the
signal
proposal.
So
just
something
to
keep
in
mind.
I
think
it's
fine
to
do
it
the
way
we
did
it,
but
that
there
are
other
ways
to
do.
It
then
also
shared
a
video
that
they
created.
You
know
they've
made
yeah.
They
are
good
at
making
content.
B
They
made
a
video
about
this
opportunity,
but
as
part
of
as
being
part
of
dawn
and
yeah
being
a
ministry
position,
I
think
you
know
it
would
be
cool
to
think
about
from
a
marketing
and
dx
voice
perspective.
Any
videos
and
ideas
that
we
have
like
these
aren't
like
graphic
videos
of
our
products
right.
These
are
videos
more
of
like
people
and
the
contributors
talking
about
certain
ideas,
and
maybe
it
could
be
around
an
event
that
we
have
or
something
we
participate
in,
or
it
could
be
a
a
like.
B
A
educational
thing
that
we
want
to
communicate,
but
maybe
try
doing
some
stuff
with
their
content
team
is
is,
is
included,
is
a
idea
we
can
explore.
So
there's
lots
of
things
that
we
can
do
and
once
we
are
part
of
this
and
have
access
to
the
meta,
heaven
stuff,
the
yeah.
We
can
start
thinking
about
ideas
and
even
anyone.
B
So
it's
a
great
way
for
those,
especially
in
lisbon,
to
connect
more
with
all
of
the
other
parties
and
all
that
kind
of
one
place,
maybe
there's
a
certain
day
every
week
or
two
where
you
guys
all
gather
there
and
can
work
in
person.
I
would
if
I
was
in
lisbon,
I
would
love
to
do
that,
but
yeah,
maybe
maybe,
if
we
visit
or
something
so
keep
that
in
mind.
A
C
A
D
So
that
yeah
kind
of
returning
what
you
were
just
saying
a
minute
ago
about
like
where
the
payment
is
coming
from,
I
do
always
like
a
coming
from.
I
think
it's
nice
when
it
comes
from
d
style
on
the
blockchain,
and
I
just
kind
of
was
looking
at
this-
the
address
that
this
proposal
is
being
sent.
This
is
requesting
25
000
usdc,
and
this
is
actually,
I
think,
the
third
time
that,
if
you
just
look
on
ether
scan
there,
you
can
see.
Dx
style
has
already
sent
usdc
to
this
address.
D
So
I
think
I
just
sent
a
transaction
for
one
that
was
done
almost
a
year
ago
or
two
thousand
dollars.
So
I
guess
that
was
the
first
paris
one.
So
I
think
it
is
cool
to
have
that
track
record
and
like
be
able
to
like
point
to
that
and
everyone
kind
of
see
that
it
really
builds
up
legitimacy,
and
I
think
that's
something
to
consider
when
we're
thinking
about
how,
like
the
the
payments
and
things
flow.
A
E
Yeah
happy
too,
and
apologies
a
bit
under
the
weather
here,
but
that
proposal
requests
the
final
amount
for
the
remaining
epochs
of
arbitrary
gnosis
chain
to
the
multi-sig
multi-chain
multisig,
to
be
distributed
to
gnosis
chain
and
to
arbitrarium,
so
not
really
much
to
add
beyond.
What's
in
the
proposal
text
but
moving
the
swapper
funds,
we
need
to
get
moving
on
farming
this
coming
week
for
the
june
9th
period.
A
I
I
will
start
from
now
on.
Thank
you
wayne
for
the
thanks
in
the
chat
moving
on
to
a
more
controversial
proposal,
so
to
speak,
given
that
it
has
both
upwards
and
downwards
is
augusto
l,
dxd
bulk,
vesting
withdrawal.
I
think
perhaps
this
is
a
good
occasion
to
maybe
give
a
bit
of
an
overview
of
why
these
proposals
are
happening
so
tammy
already
requested
one
previously
augusto
now
requested
his.
A
There
is
a
proposal
on
gnosis
chain
as
well
from
paul
machina,
to
request
some
dxd
vesting
and
I
think
overall,
to
keep
it
concise.
It's
that
we
haven't
been
deploying
the
dxd
vesting
contracts
when
an
individual
actually
submits
the
proposal.
So
that's
something
we
will
be
doing
with
the
new
contributor
payment
schemes
we'll
have
on
gnosis
chain,
but
as
of
now
that
hasn't
been
happening.
A
So
it's
mostly
been
somewhat
of
a
back
office,
job
keeping
track
of
the
various
dxd
that
contributors
are
owed
and
given
that
a
lot
of
these
are
reaching
the
first
year
of
maturity,
contributors
are
able
to
claim
partially
some
of
those
funds
and
that's
kind
of
where
contributors
are
submitting
their
own
proposals
and
kind
of
trying
to
keep
track
of
dxd
outstanding
et
cetera.
I
think
in
also
specific
proposal.
There
was
some
confusion
around
txd
prices.
A
Of
course,
we've
changed
that
a
couple
of
times
in
the
past,
at
what
amount
contributors
are
vesting
at
it
used
to
be
all-time
high,
and
now
it's
market
price
for
the
floor
price
of
the
all-time
high
that
was
purchased
of
the
bonding
curve.
So
I
think
there
was
just
some
small
error
around
that,
and
I
assumed
the
proposal
will
be
resubmitted
shortly.
C
D
Yeah
and
just
to
clarify
it's
an
error
on
the
calculations
for
the
proposal
that
was
submitted
not
really
on
augusta.
He
was
following
the
ones
in
the
proposal,
but
going
over
and
looking
at
the
numbers,
they
were
a
little
different,
so
gusto,
yeah,
we're
working
through
that
now
and
yeah
should
be
a
pretty
simple
fix
but
yeah
as
as
david
said,
there's
tammy's
out
there
on
my
to-do
list
to
do
one
for
caney
fork
that,
hopefully,
will
be
another
model
for
this
too,
but
yeah.
D
That's
something
that
I
know
people
should
be
interested
in
doing
and
we
can
kind
of
crank
these
out
and
but
I
think
it
does
require
some
double
checking
right,
and
this
is
like
a
verification
thing,
so
it
takes
like
more.
Eyeballs
is
good.
Looking
at
different
numbers,
saying
you
know
pointing
out
from
something
looks,
looks
off
there
and
so
yeah
for
the
proposals
that
are
coming
in
now
right.
There
was
actually
just
one
submitted
by
machina.
D
So
that's
the
best
way
to
verify
it
for
for
voters
who
want
to
check
and
then
like
the
next
level
right
is
to
go
back
into
the
original
worker
proposal
when
that
dxd
was
earned
and
like
double
check
and
make
sure
that
cross
references
with
the
right
price
and
that's
what
actually
in
doing
that,
ally
caught
it
for
augusta's
most
recent
one.
So
yeah
we'll
be
trying
to
be
more
vigilant
to
make
sure
we're
double
checking
here.
A
Fabulous
then,
moving
on,
we
have
a
proposal
which
is
actually
mirrored
both
on
mainnet
and
agnosis
chain,
which
is
a
call
for
payment
facilitation
service
providers.
In
brief,
the
I
think
a
lot
of
contributors
have
been
struggling
receiving
their
contributor
payments.
It
can
be
a
very
tedious
thing
to
do
depending
on
jurisdiction,
given
that
the
dow,
of
course
is
not
legally
incorporated
anywhere-
something
we're,
of
course
very
proud
of,
but
that
can
also
create
some
issues
for
contributors,
claiming
payments
etc.
A
So
a
lot
of
contributors
so
far
have
been
setting
up
limited
liability
companies,
but
also
banking,
etc,
can
be
an
issue.
So
this
proposal
really
lies
out
a
framework
of
what
the
dao
kind
of
requires
and
a
framework
for
eventual
special
purpose
companies
to
apply
to
facilitate
these
payments
on
behalf
of
the
dow,
so
I
think
the
motivation
here
for
the
dow
is
to
have
a
a
couple
of
options.
Probably
it
would
be
good
to
have
these
geographically
distributed
so,
of
course,
regulation,
etc.
Also,
changes
in
the
future.
A
A
And
so,
when
you
submit
your
contributor
proposal,
you're
actually
using
the
contributor
payment
scheme,
I
believe
it's
called
funding
proposal
on
mainnet
and
then
there
are
also
different
schemes,
for
example,
multicalls,
which
on
mainnet,
for
example,
have
some
whitelisted
contracts
they're
able
to
call.
We
also
have
generic
multi
cools
both
on
mainnet
and
gnosis
chain.
C
No,
that
is
correct
and
well.
I
went
forward
with
what
we
discussed
on
doubt
and
I
created
the
proposal's
own
genocide
and
maintenance
to
remove
the
schemes
that
we
discussed.
The
only
change
that
we
did
when
we
were
discussing
the
proposal
on
the
forum
is
to
keep
the
ens
registrar.
I
think
we
have
a
bunch
of
vns
schemes,
but
we
are
using
one
to
assign
the
ens
domains
with
a
with
four
days,
boosted
time
period,
so
that's
it
one.
After
the.
C
After
all,
this
proposal
passes
we
are
going
to
have
in
on
maintenance
contribution
reward
scheme.
This.
This
is
the
main
one
that
we
are
using.
Three
multi
calls
and
the
one
for
the
ens
assignment
and
on
renault
we
are
going
to
have
the
contribution,
reward
them
and
I
think
only
the
multi-core.
These
are
going
to
be
the
the
only
two
schemes
that
we
are
going
to
have
available
on
genocide,
which
is
even
better
because
the
lesser
scheme
that
we
have
it's
less
there
is
access
that
you
have
to
the
avatar
funds.
C
So
the
idea
is
to
remove
a
scheme
that
we
are
not
using.
Like
you
said
the
I
don't
know
if
the
proposals
have
been
boosted-
I
I
I
talked
with
john,
but
also
yeah.
If
it's
up
to
chris
you,
they,
anyone
who
wants
who
can
goes
and
double
check,
just
double
check
the
address
that
we
talked
on
the
form
of
the
schemes
to
be
removed,
and
I
just
created
a
proposal.
I
want
someone
else
to
boost
it,
so
we
make
sure
that
we
have
more
eyes
on
the
proposals
and
then
they
are
going
to.
F
I
intend
to
review
these
to
like
run
them
through
tenderly
and
kind
of
confirm
that
they
are
doing
what
they
should
be
doing,
and
I
encourage
folks
who
know
how
to
do
that.
To
also
do
it
as
well,
and
I
think
maybe
it
would
be
good
actually
to
talk
about
verifying
it
in
some
of
the
public
channels
like
whether
that's
the
governance,
channel
and
key
base,
or
maybe
even
discord
so
yeah,
chris
or
dave.
F
If
you
guys
beat
me
to
that,
I
would
say
like
kind
of
show
people
how
you're
verifying
it
so
other
people
can
can
see
it
and
understand,
because
obviously
the
plug-in
scheme
is
a
very
sensitive
and
important
scheme
that
has
a
lot
of
power.
So
it's
it's
good
that
we
kind
of
demonstrate
the
proper
kind
of
way
to
verify
by
this
stuff.
D
Yeah,
I
agree.
I
was
just
kind
of
okay,
so
I
hadn't
did
not
immediately
think
of
how
to
verify
it.
It's
like
just
like
looking
through
the
tenderly
thing,
but
it's
like
removing.
It
is
a
little
bit
different,
so
I
guess
verifying
that
it's
the
right
scheme,
I
guess,
is
the
big
thing
and
then
I
haven't
looked
at
it
on
dx
vote.
Yet
actually,
but
unlike
alchemy,
it
doesn't
say
much
besides
like
remove
scheme,
but
I
will
look
at
yeah
I'll
look
at
this
too
and
yeah.
D
D
Yeah-
and
actually
this
is
I'm
just
looking
dx
vote-
does
have
the
more
specific
functions
in
it
because
in
alchemy
it
just
kind
of
says
what
it's,
what
it's
doing
there,
but
yeah
I'm
also
like
somewhat.
This
is
somewhat
exciting,
because
these
are
like
kind
of
like
spring
cleaning.
These
are
like
the
things
that
are
like
very
cool
to
seeks
out
governance,
and
it's
like
you
know,
interesting
and
to
go
through
this
process,
because
yeah.
D
A
Awesome
and
that
wraps
up
the
current
mainnet
proposals
moving
on
to
gnosis
chain.
We
have
two
proposals
from
van
grim.
One
of
them
is
actually
reclaiming
the
rep,
so
he
made
a
mistake
in
his
original
proposals,
and
this
is
just
reclaiming
the
correct
amount
of
rep.
The
second
one
is
claiming
the
entity
formation
and
maintenance
contributor
stipend,
which
we
passed
earlier
this
year.
A
Then
we
have
our
second
columbia,
stipend
request
by
dave,
which
is
live
as
well,
and
if
you
do
vote
for
it,
I
will
also
personally
thank
you
and
we
have
a
number
of
buyback
orders
as
well.
We
have
203
four
and
five.
If
you
check
the
forum
you
saw,
there
are
also
the
updated
trading
volume
data
about
txd,
so
the
trading
volume
has
decreased
slightly
more
again,
but
I
think
that's
pretty
much
expected
in
the
current
market
situation.
A
A
A
A
C
Hola,
yes,
yes,
I
can
well.
We
have
been
talking
a
lot
with
lateral,
which
is
a
company
that
we
hire
in
order
to
help
us
organize
the
hackathon
and
retreat,
and
while,
during
the
past
week,
they
have
been
looking
for
possible
venues
that
met
our
requirements
in
order
to
make
this
three-day
hackathon,
we
found
one
and
we
already
talking
with
them.
We
are.
We
are
talking
internally
about
if
we
want
to.
If
we
want
to
put.
G
C
And
effort
there
in
order
to
make
the
hackathon
happen,
the
idea
would
be
to
book
the
venue
to
have
something
in
place
already
a
set
in
stone
that
we
can
start
showing
to
co-organizers
to
possible
colonizers,
I'm
talking
personally
with
kharkat
I'm
going
to
meet
with
separating
tomorrow
and
yeah.
We
are
starting
meeting
with
future
possible
colonizers,
the
the
person
that
I
share
the
idea
of
what
we,
what
of
what
we
want
to
do
in
volta?
C
C
C
G
C
And
yeah
share
the
ideas
of
what
we
are
going
to
do
share
our
plans
in
order
not
to
compete
directly
with
them,
but
maybe
to
organize
ourselves
where
both
of
us
can
make
a
good
hackathon
right
and
that's
it.
I
don't
know
if
I'm
missing
something
john
and
melanie
has
been
with
me,
organizing
and
helping
make
this
happen.
G
Awesome
yeah,
and
I
think
you
summarized
it
really
great.
I
think
that
this
would
be
a
really
cool
opportunity
for
dx
style
to
have
like
a
technical,
focused
hackathon
in
bogota,
obviously
they're
like
challenges
that
you
know
we're
facing,
because
a
lot
of
us
don't
live
in
colombia,
but
lateral
has
been
super
helpful
and
we'll
have
more
updates
coming
in
the
upcoming
days
after
we
talk
to
zeppelin
or
after
a
gusto
does
and
we'll
update
the
community.
C
G
D
D
Which
is
cross
the
river
by
feeling
the
stones,
which
is
like,
I
think,
an
important
way
to
think
about
any
big
endeavor
that
you're
doing
it's
hard
to
know
what
the
destination
is
and
be
able
to
kind
of
build
all
that
at
first,
especially
something
that's
new
like
this,
that
you
kind
of
have
to
be
able
to
sell
something,
that's
real
to
the
co-organizers
before
you
actually
have
that
thing.
That's
real
there!
It's
okay,
like
the
approach
we
should
be.
D
Having
with
this
is,
you
know,
different
things
come
up
is
right,
like
figuring
out
how
we
can
move
things
forward
without
like
over
committing
ourselves
to
something
so
that
we
can
be
nimble
and
cross
the
river
by
feeling
the
stones,
and
so
I
think,
actually
what
john
said
in
the
dx.
Her
chat
was
kind
of
summed
up
as
like
the
way
I
was
considering.
This
is
like
this.
It
is
a
the
like.
D
The
downside
here
is,
if
they
commit,
if
we
commit
fifteen
thousand
dollars
to
this,
that
there
would
be
ten
thousand
dollars
for
that.
That
would
be
committed
to
the
pot
in
the
event
that
things
didn't
work
out,
and
I
think
that
is
not
a
huge.
I'm.
Obviously
that's
a
you
know
a
chunk
of
change,
but
that's
not
a
incredibly
large
commitment
to
be
able
to
move
things
forward
and
explore
this,
and
especially
to
try
to
get
the
co-organizers
on
board.
D
A
C
G
But
I
think
that
what
we
have
to
remember
is
that
you
know
east
global
is
you
know,
their
focus
is
on
so
many
other
things
and
and
we're
focusing
mainly
on
defy
and
endows,
and
so
I
think
that
our
the
goals
we're
looking
to
achieve
are
different
than
than
east
global.
So
I
don't
think
that
it's
like
direct
competition
with
us
per
se.
C
C
That's
going
to
that's
going
to
help
us
a
lot
and
we
actually
want
the
one
good
technical
coordinators
to
have
a
good
technical
quality
event,
but
yeah
first
we're
going
to
walk
the
first
one
into
the
place.
Make
something
real
do
this
first
step
feeling
the
stones
and
the
stones
feel
solid.
So
far,
so
let's
continue
walking
crossing
the
river.
A
A
So,
for
example,
whenever
you
do
your
own
contributor
proposal
and
that
passes
successfully
on
the
funding
scheme
on
mainnet,
you're
rewarded,
500
rep
for
doing
so
on
gnosis
chain,
it's
lower,
it's
a
hundred
rep!
So
theoretically,
and
I
well,
I
actually
believe
this
rep
is
should
not
be
synced.
I
think
that's
a
discussion
we
previously
had.
I
can't
actually
point
to
somewhere
where
it
says
this,
but
theoretically,
if
that
is
the
case,
then
just
taking
your
balance
of
rep
on
gnosis
chain
and
syncing.
That
would
add
up
to
an
incorrect
amount.
A
Now,
if
you're,
a
person
that
doesn't
really
submit
many
proposals
other
than
your
worker
proposals,
the
amount
of
rep
that's
going
to
be
off
is
probably
going
to
be
very
low
because
on
gnosis
chain,
first
of
all,
you
only
get
100
rep
proposal,
and
on
top
of
that,
if
you
really
only
submit
your
contributor
proposals,
it
likely
won't
be
that
many
but
yeah.
Perhaps
it's
just
worth
briefly
chatting
about
that.
Yeah.
F
I
don't
have
the
references
ready
myself,
but
I
suspect
it's
in
the
signal
proposal
on
mainnet
that
kind
of
like
designated
the
xdi
base
now
gnosis
chain
base,
but
yeah.
I
believe
that
it
only
like
called
for
worker
proposal
rep
to
be
sinkable
across
chains,
so
other
rep
that
you
maybe
get
for
un
kind
of
specified
reasons
on
either
base
would
not
necessarily
like
cross.
E
D
And
I
think
the
requested
amount
is
actually
the
amounts
that
you
like
put
in
your
proposal
for
main
net
rep
when,
like
really
what
is
I
mean
so
the
background
for
all
this
right
is
for
the
funding
and
voting
power
schemes.
Every
proposal
that
gets
successfully
passed
the
proposer.
The
issuer
of
that
proposal
gets
a
small
rep
award
on
top
of
whatever
they
request
for
their
rep
award,
so
on
gnosis
chain,
the
funding
of
voting
power
issues,
100
rep
for
each
proposal
and
then
on
mainnet.
D
A
A
F
So
but
the
the
first
thing
is:
there's
a
couple
of
audits
underway
right,
one
was
the
tx
vote
contract,
so
this
is
like
the
new
wallet
schemes,
plus
existing
stack
contracts
that
omega
team
had
audited
earlier
in
the
year
they've.
Given
us
feedback,
tx
gov
team
had
responded
to
the
feedback
and
they
are
currently
reviewing
that
they
ask.
F
They
are
asking
for
a
little
additional
scope
there,
which
I
think
is
fair,
because
we
took
a
little
bit
longer
than
they
kind
of
call
for
in
their
contracts,
which
is
they
usually
want
the
feedback
address
within
a
couple
weeks
because
we
were
working
on
kills.
It
like
took
a
couple
couple
months
and
there's
like
some
additional
scope
in
there.
So
they're
asking
for.
I
think
it's
four
thousand
dollars
to
complete
that
acceptance
of
the
dx
vote
contracts.
I'm
going
to
put
that
into
a
proposal.
F
F
Here
and
again,
that's
I
think,
four
thousand
dollars,
so
I'm
going
to
be
combining
those
two
things
and
just
going
straight
to
a
proposal
since
it's
a
relatively
small
amount
of
money
and
they're
tied
to
like
active
efforts
just
so
that
we
can
get
that
going.
But
for
the
other
stuff
that's
coming
up,
where
we
have
this
kind
of
opportunity
to
accelerate
the
timeline
because
of
cancellations
for
omega
and
super
prime
I'm
gonna
be
making
a
forum
post
today
and
so
like
yeah.
F
I
think
omega's
got
an
opening
starting
next
week
and
then
sigma
prime
has
one
starting
next
month
and
the
things
that
we
have
on
the
docket
are.
You
know,
additional
audits
for
guilds
and
the
expo
stuff
that's
being
worked
on
and
then
carrot.
V1
is
kind
of
the
big
thing.
That's
ready
right
now,
there's
other
there's
also
some
other
contracts
in
the
works
that
aren't
quite
ready
yet,
but
so
looking
at
carefully
one
and
kills
is
kind
of
like
the
top
priorities
here.
F
Sigma
prime
is
actively
doing
an
audit
right
now
on
guilds
that
they're
they
should
be
giving
us
a
report
for
shortly.
I
think
there's
gonna
need
to
be
some
time
to
like
respond
to
that.
So
I
don't
want
to
rush
into
scheduling
anything
for
guilds
and
therefore
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
slot
carrot
in
next.
So
what
I
would
suggest
here-
and
this
is
for
after
you
know,
talking
with
the
gov
teams
in
federico
as
well-
is
that
we
slot
carrot
v1
in
with
omega
teams,
starting,
I
think
they
can
said.
F
F
We
we
would
be
able
to
accomplish
this
relatively
quickly
here,
going
with
omega
this
month
and
then
sigma
prime
in
the
following
month,
and
I
also
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
these
audits
done.
Sequentially
because,
like
you,
could
actually
do
it
in
parallel
right.
We
could
actually
get
sigma,
prime
actually
had
an
even
earlier
opening,
and
we
could
potentially
have
omega
and
sigma
both
audit
and
carrot.
F
F
Today,
one
is
going
to
be
a
proposal
to
pay
omega
team,
basically
an
incremental
amount
of
money
to
for
the
additional
scope
from
dxgov
and
then
also
for
the
curve
wrapper
on
swapper,
and
then
we'll
have
a
forum
post
to
kind
of
get
discussion
going
on
carat,
v1
audits
from
omega
team
and
sigma
prime,
so
yeah.
If
there's
any
questions
on
I'm
that
happy
to
take
them
now,.
D
G
F
It
we
don't
have
federico
on
the
call.
He
would
probably
be
best
to
address
this,
but
careful
does
not
require
the
the
contracts
that
we
have
ready
to
be
audited
does
not
require
jolt.
They
are.
They
are
written
in
such
a
way
that
you
could
later
put
in
a
system
like
jolt,
so
so
kind
of
like
being
ready
for
doing
that
something
yeah
on
joel,
where
I
was
actually
just
having
a
conversation
with
federico
about
about
jolt
and
what
the
plans
are
there
like.
F
I
mentioned
this
on
the
dev
call,
but
you
know
I
think
we
need
to
be
very
mindful
of
you
know
how
we're
spending
resources
and
like
what
we're
doing
it
on
obviously
like
you're,
seeing
with
the
sigma
prime
audits
like
auditing,
is
quite
expensive
right
so
and
federico
actually
brought
this
up.
He
was
saying,
like
hey,
you
know,
I
think
we
should
look
a
little
bit
more
closely
at
gelato
or
maybe
the
other
things
that
are
out
there
and
just
make
sure
that,
like
jolt
is
like
the
right
choice
and
the
right
strategy.
F
But
we
should
have
our
eyes
open
in
terms
of
like
what
the
costs
are
going
to
be,
what
the
bandwidth
will
be
required
and
like
whether
it's
like
the
kind
of
product
that
we
want
to
go
and
compete
in
the
market
with
right
with
there
being
like
gelato,
brink
keeper
and
other
things
out
there
as
well.
I
think
it
could
be
a
great
opportunity,
but
I
mean
I
think
we
should
just
do
a
little
bit
of
thinking
before
we
rush
into
it.