►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-06-30]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
There's
the
there's
been
two
main
buyback
proposals
so
far
and
the
third
one
the
multi-call
proposal
is
set
to
pass
in,
I
think
about
five
hours
and
the
funding
proposals
it
passed
last
night
and
in
addition
to
that
one,
there
are
four
other
dxd
buyback
proposals
on
mainnet,
both
of
which
have
a
funding
proposal
and
a
multi-call
proposal
associated
with
them,
and
then
there
was
also
ln
lhb
inc
worker
proposal,
which
is
the
rep
portion.
So
this
is
kermit
crispy,
claiming
his
main
net
rep.
A
A
A
A
C
C
D
A
C
B
A
Yeah,
I'm
only
saying
that,
because
dave-
actually
just
this-
is
actually
not
in
target
x
type
proposals,
the
this
is
not
in
the
one
because
it
just
happened
about
an
hour
ago,
but
dave
submitted
xdxd
buyback,
number
13
the
funding
proposal
and
boosted
it
and
and
also
the
multi-call
proposal.
So
I
think
it's
like
good
to
do
these
in
tandem.
The
reason
that
there
weren't
any
of
the
last
couple
days
is
because
there
was
actually
no
more
weft
left
in
extincts
out.
A
A
You
know
it'd
be
great
to
talk
with
as
many
other
people
about
like
figuring
out
how
to
submit
these
proposals
themselves,
because
that
you
know
it
is
a
little
complicated,
but
part
of
it
is
just
kind
of
running
through
and
being
able
to
double
check
the
right
things.
So
dave
has
been
doing
this
one
and
it'd
be
great
to
talk
to
anyone
else
for
it.
You
do
need
to
coordinate
a
little
bit
because
there
is
like
the
one
day.
A
Try
not
to
have
it
on
the
within
one
day
is
to
abide
by
the
buy-back
program
signal
proposal,
so
actually,
for
this
one,
there
are
two
main
net
proposals
that
will
pass
after
this
xdi
proposal
was
submitted,
even
though
those
mainnet
proposals
were
submitted
before
the
xdi
proposal,
because
I
mean
that
it
takes
a
day
on
the
next
night
takes
five
days.
So,
like
I
mean,
I
think
we
should
be
thinking
about
how
to
continue
buyback
program
and
kind
of
do
it
as
as
much
as
it
falls
with
the
parameters.
A
So
I
think,
like
kind
of
coordinating
this
on
both
xdi
and
and
mainnet
is
a
is
a
good
strategy,
especially
as
liquidity
builds
on
both
xti
and
maynet,
for
the
for
dxd
for
through
the
swapper
farming,
and
also
all
of
these
proposals.
I
think
starting
after
this.
Third,
one
are
five
percent
slippage:
tolerance
up
from
the
2.5
and
that
first
one
will
go,
and
I
think
it's
tomorrow
evening
is
the
first
five
percent
sluggish
tolerance,
trade
on
on
mainnet.
A
A
Yeah
so
the
x
dive
bass,
as
dave
just
said,
actually
there's
another
not
in
the
agenda
here.
There's
another
buyback
proposal
that
just
went
up,
but
in
addition
to
that
there
is
named
dxdow's
token,
offering
platform
to
aqua.
That's
a
signal
proposal.
I
think
there's
another
day
for
for
that
to
be
open.
There's
proposal
to
set
the
swap
fee
on
house
wealth
pair
to
0.5
percent
and
then
there's
a
rep
boost
for
colt,
bold,
move
and
then
there's
a
reimbursement
of
weth
sent
to
dx
dow.
A
This
was
from
the
address
that
had
sent
funds
to
be
used
for
the
house
wet
farming
proposal
because
there
wasn't
any
west
indies
style.
This
address,
fronted
the
west
and
is
requesting
a
reimbursement.
This
proposal
will
come
in
after
the
x-side
transfer
and
then
there
is
the
dx-dow
hats
collaboration
proposal
that
I
think
is
boost
now,
boosted
and
yeah.
Those
are
the
ones
on
next.
I
wasn't
sure
if
there
were
any
comments,
thoughts,
context.
A
E
Yeah
there
is
a
proposal
live
to
adjust
the
fee
to
point
five
percent.
There
is
some
debate
going
on
in
the
house
community
on
like
what
that
fee.
What
like
a
good
fee
would
be
for
that
pool
so
yeah
that
that's
like.
So
it
will
be
interesting
like
how
like
house
holders
as
they
like,
do
this
farming
and
and
enter
this
pool
it
become.
It
will
become
their
main
pool
right
and
they
will
likely
organize
and
try
to
decide
and
separately
they.
A
Cool
and
then
the
hats,
geek
style
collaboration
just
want
to
open
it
up,
because
I
guess
this
will
now
boost
in
14
hours,
and
this
is
just
a
signal
proposal,
but
they'd
come
on
into
the
biz
dev
call
on
monday
and
just
for
the
timing
of
this
proposal.
This
would
voting
would
close.
That's
five
days
from
now,
so
it'd
be
closing
kind
of
beginning
of
next
week
so
wanted
to
see
if
anyone
had
any
thoughts
on
this
signal
proposal.
F
And
I
would
and
there's
like
a
smaller
group
of
some
of
the
technical
contributors
meeting
with
the
hats
team
later
today
to
go
over
how
the
you
know,
mechanics
of
this
collaboration
would
actually
work
so,
hopefully
we'll
you
know
we
can
report
back,
hopefully
soon
from
that
as
well.
Just
to
kind
of
like
give,
you
know
some
of
the
contribute
style
contributor
perspective
on
how
this
is
going
to
work
and
how
we
feel
about.
A
A
Cool
and
there's
a
yeah
there's
been
some
form
discussion
on
this
too,
and
the
signal
proposal
is
just
kind
of
laying
out
the
parameters
of
a
possible
collaboration.
There's
there's
not,
I
think
the
biggest
ask
is
that
there
would
be
a
committee
that
would
need
to
look
through
the
disclosure
reports,
so
that
would
be
an
ass
from
geeks
dow
and
then
it
looks
like
there's,
maybe
an
ass
to
deposit
some
dxd,
but
that
amount
is
tbd.
So
maybe
it's
like
once
it
doesn't
require
that
much
but
yeah
no.
A
H
H
I
guess
we
talked
about
this
in
in
the
business
called,
but
you
know
there's
like
you,
you
don't
want
this
to
be
to
be
completely
centralized,
but
you
can't
have
it
open
either.
So
yeah,
I'm
not
sure.
If
there's
a
better
way
than
right
now,
like
a
multisig,
perhaps
the
the
dev
multisig
of
dxdo
to
start
and
then
you
know
that,
could
that
could
change
yeah?
I
guess
we
could
call
it.
I
guess
nsa
and
be
like
just
weird
about
it.
H
D
A
G
A
A
Cold
has
been
really
kind
of
providing
cool
insight
and
perspective
to
the
contributor
ux
squad
and
has
kind
of
been
lurking
around
the
key
base
for
a
long
time,
and
I
think
I'm
excited
to
see
how
he
can
kind
of
bring
some
of
his
ideas
around
performance
review
and
elsewhere
to
the
to
the
community,
and
then
I
think
there
was
another
one
for
cabello
who
has
been
doing
some
great
work
for
for
omen
squad.
Just
kind
of
you
know,
nuts,
the
bolts
there
and
then
yeah.
A
A
Next
is
the
locked
75k
in
the
marketing
and
coms
multisig
postmortem.
So
for
those
unaware
there's
a
post.
This
morning
I
made
a
post
this
morning
kind
of
reflecting
and
outlining
some
of
the
events
on
what
kind
of
led
this.
The
tl,
dr,
is:
there's
75
000
usdc
locked
in
a
relayer
contract
that
cannot
relay
usdc
or
any
erc20
token.
This
was
sent
a
proposal
passed
through
on
mainnet
through
dxdow
governance
and
sent
the
and
executed
and
sent
the
funds
there.
A
This
was
discovered-
I
guess
yesterday
the
day
before
and
kind
of
confirmed
yesterday,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
discussion
on
what
led
to
this,
and
I
think
kind
of
that.
The
two
takeaways
for
me,
of
course,
is
first
and
foremost
it's
a
failure
of
like
vigilance,
scrutiny
and
verification
of
proposals
and
that
kind
of
falls
on
all
rep
holders
right
that
are
managing
dx
dow.
A
You
know
there
was
an
opportunity
in
the
boosting
phase
and
also
the
seven
day
voting
period
to
verify
the
proposal
and
recognize
the
era
and
like
we
didn't,
we
didn't
do
it
and
then
I
think.
Secondly,
there
was,
you
know,
a
series
of
incorrect
assumptions.
You
know
I
think
john
was
talking
about
once
it
was
like
contributor,
a
thought
this,
but
contributor
b
thought
this,
and
so
it
was
like
clearly
it
was
almost
like.
A
No
one
made
the
single
assumption,
but
it
was
like
a
string
of
these
together
and,
I
think,
that's
just
kind
of
like
miscommunication.
You
know
within
the
community
kind
of
lack
of
understanding
on
that.
So
I
think
those
are
those
are
kind
of
really
really
important.
I
think
there's
some
things
that
should
be
do.
We
should
be
doing
next
time,
obviously,
first
and
foremost
like
everyone,
everyone
should
be
looking
at
dxf
proposals
on
alchemy,
like
following
the
address
copying
it.
A
Looking
what
it's
doing
you
know
we
should
be
doing
more
guides
on
this
kind
of
like
walkthroughs
on
this.
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
can
kind
of
verify
these,
and
this
is
what
everyone
can
do-
who's
a
rep
holder.
Secondly,
we
should
be
testing
contracts
we're
using
for
the
first
time
if
we're
sending
something
to
a
contract.
We
should
do
a
test
proposal
of
you,
know
50,
100
or
something
and
then
send
that
one
behind
this
is
trouble.
A
This
is
difficult
on
mainnet,
obviously,
because
there's
some
gas
concerns,
but
I
think
maybe
that's
just
something:
we're
gonna
have
to
build
into
the
cost
structure.
When
we
wanna
like
launch
something
new
that
that's
gonna,
that's
gonna
have
to
be
done.
I
think
we
should
be
more
specific
about
the
proposal.
Execution
like
what's
exactly
happening
right.
I
think
that
was
something
that
wasn't.
You
know
it
wasn't
clear
exactly
that
there
was.
F
F
You
know
the
address
was
in
fact
in
fact
like
a
relayer,
but
I
failed
to
like
make
the
connection,
which
was
that
we
shouldn't
be
sending
usdc
to
what
was
really
just
an
e3
layer
and
like.
I
also
want
to
give
like
a
little
bit
of
background
as
to
why
we
are
even
doing
this
in
the
first
place
right.
So
we
we've
used
both
these
things
for
different
kind
of
expenses
and
moving
money
around
where
we
needed
to
do
it
quickly
and
have
been
sending
ethan.
F
Such
we've
been
sending
ethan
and
molly,
mostly
eth,
we've
been
sending
to
multi-states
for
a
while
now
with
the
berlin
hard
fork,
we
ran
into
an
issue,
so
this
is
a
couple
months
ago
that
you
know
the
dow
stack
dao
that
were
built
on
couldn't
send
eth
to
gnosis
multisigs
and
not
to
get
too
technical,
but
it
has
to
do
with
what
you
send.
It
calls
this
fallback
function
and
the
old
transfer
function,
which
dow
stack
code
from
you
know.
F
This
was
written
a
couple
years
ago
uses
specifies
like
a
fixed
limit
to
gas,
and
so,
if
that
fallback
function
wants
to
do
anything
more
than
that,
fixed
limit
would
support
it.
It
failed
so
we
weren't
able
to
send
eth
directly
to
multi-stakes.
So
this
led
to
like
the
solution
to
that
the
fix
there
was
we
had
to
deploy
a
relayer
and
so
yeah
like
there
was
a
you
know.
F
We
didn't
understand
well
and
communicate
well
that
this
relayer
was
really
just
needed
only
for
eth,
because
when
he
said
that's
when
the
fallback
function
gets
called,
erc20
transfers
are
called
on
the
erc20
contract.
So
I
mean
it
like
you
know.
I
agree
with
chris
that
we
do
need
to
do
a
better
job,
absolutely
like
scrutinizing
proposals
and
stuff,
but
this
would
have
been
tough,
I
think
for
most
people,
if
anybody
was
going
to
catch,
you
probably
should
have
been
me
or
some
of
the
technical
folks,
and
I
I
failed
to
do
that.
F
I
feel
bad
about
that.
So
you
know
we
were
in
this.
Like
you
know,
it's
it's
one
of
those
things
there's
like
a
string
of
things
where
people
didn't
like
understand
the
full
picture,
and
you
know
you
see
that
and
it's
just
kind
of
like
dope,
but
you
know
stuff
like
this.
You
know,
unfortunately,
this
blockchain,
like
things,
can
get
tricky
and
stuff
like
this
can
happen
and
so
yeah.
I
think
we
just
need
to
take
these
lessons.
It
does
not
feel
good
to
lose
money.
F
We
need
to
you
know
just
remember,
try
to
do
the
best
when
you're
communicating
be
as
clear
about
what
the
problem
is
and-
and
I
think
chris's
point
about
testing
stuff.
You
know
we
had
used
the
israel
movie
layer
before
so
you
know
there
was
some
comfort
with
that,
but
you
know
anytime
we're
doing
a
new
deployment
and
moving
money
like
maybe
we
should
be
a
little
bit
more
stringent
about
that
and
do
smaller
tests
up
front.
I
think
that
could
be
a
good
approach
as
well.
E
E
E
So
if
we
had
like,
if
there
was
a
when
we
create
a
workaround,
if
there
was
like
a
documented
forum
post
about
why
we're
creating
the
workaround
and
exactly
what
it's
for
then
like,
hopefully,
everyone
here
would
know
that
knowledge
and
then
then
anyone
could
have
stopped
it
really.
But
if
you
didn't
know,
then
you
can't
really
stop
it
and
and
the
thing
with
it
like
there's
always
going
to
be
like
we
have
lots
of
proposals
that
are
wrong
right.
So
people
make
correct
proposals,
people
make
incorrect
proposals
and
then
hackers
can
make
malicious
proposals.
E
So
anyone
in
the
world
can
actually
put
his
proposal
into
dx
dao.
The
only
thing
that
can
stop
incorrect
and
malicious
proposals
is
the
governance
process,
and
the
governance
process
basically
failed
to
identify
this
problem.
Even
though
yeah
it
would
have
been
better
not
to
have
the
incorrect
proposal,
but
yeah.
J
F
I
mean,
and
I
don't
think
a
malicious
like
if
this
had
been
a
malicious
proposal.
I
think
it
would
have
been
stopped
because,
like
that's
was
my
mindset
when
I
was
looking
at
it
was
like
you
know.
I
think
I
know
what
this
is
about.
Like
I
know
about
the
market,
marketing
multisig,
I'm
just
verifying
that
who
said
they're
doing
it
is
who
they
are,
and
it's
going
where
it
says
it's
going
and
like
that
part
I
did
verify,
but
I
like
wasn't
thinking
like.
Oh,
is
this
actually
technically
correct,
like
is
like?
A
F
So
we
didn't
even
like
ask
the
right
question
right,
which
is:
do
we
need
a
relayer
for
ustc
and
the
answer
is
no
right,
but
if
we
had
asked
that
we
would
have
been
okay,
but
we
didn't,
because
you
get
in
these
habits,
you
have
certain
momentum
and-
and
you
just
you
know,
we're
always
operating
on
assumptions
right
and
it's
like
you
make
the
wrong
assumptions
you
get
set
up
to
make
the
wrong
assumptions
and
stuff
like
this
can
happen
and
yeah.
I
think
we
can
do
a
better
job
documenting.
F
A
G
E
F
So
when
you
say
the
owner,
I
think
what
you
you
might
be
actually
meaning
is
like
the
ability
to
recover
funds
or
upgrade
the
contract
right,
like
that's
like
more
functionality.
Right
so
I
mean
when
we
were
deploying
the
e3
real
error.
It's
it
was
really
like.
You
know
it
had
one
task:
it
does
that
task
right.
A
But
just
thinking
of
the
word
relay,
or
even
there
too,
because
like
we,
you
know,
we've
got
the
there's.
This
protocol
relay
or
we've
got
the
liquidity
mining
relay.
We've
got
the
swapper
relayer
and
those
like
are
actually
pretty
different
than
this
very,
very
simple,
like
e3
layer
and
like
so
yeah
you
could
see
maybe
a
little
bit
how
we
could
like
conflate
those
two
things
and
using
the
same
terminology.
So
I'd
anyway.
Just
like
another
area
where
there's
like
some
opportunity
for
confusion.
E
I
A
I
Yeah,
exactly
the
the
reason
why
it
appeared.
Is
it
really
what
we
needed?
So
I
I
think
I
call
it
like.
I
know
in
a
day
like
it
wasn't
minutes,
maybe
because
it's
only
like
few
lines
of
code,
you
just
receive
ether
and
it
sends
either
to
other
address.
When
you
call
the
when
you
call
the
relay
function
so
ideas,
I
I
never
thought
of
adding
any
ownership,
because
I
said
there
was
a
whole
reason
for
this
contract
to
exist,
receive
scissors
and
send
ether.
I
I
never
thought
that
it
was
going
to
receive
erc20
tokens.
In
fact
it
wasn't
designed
for
that,
but
yeah.
It
was
not
communicated
correctly,
because
other
users
thought
that
it
was
able
to
receive
tokens
where
that
wasn't
the
purpose.
So
so
there
was
a
there
was
a
lot.
I
don't
know
we
all
of
a
comment
committed
mistakes
in
the
whole
process.
I
I
E
Even
even
the
simple
like
action
of
instead
of
in
like
the
forum
post,
because
we
were
talking
about
75
000
with
like
a
dollar
sign,
if
we
just
if
it
was
written,
75,
000,
75,
000
usdc,
like
augusta,
you
were
in
those
conversations
you
you
would
then
think
of
it
as
usdc
rather
than
as
dollars,
and
so
like
a
small
little
detail
like
that,
then,
and
then
everyone
have
been
like
well.
Of
course
you
don't
need
a
real
error.
E
I
Yeah
yeah.
Actually
I
never
thought
that
we
were
going
to
that.
We
were
going
to
use
it
for
that
when
you,
when
you
asked
me
for
something
hey,
we
need
a
relayer
yeah.
I
created
and
instantly
to
you
guys,
and
I
assume
that
that
you
know
how
how
we
are
going
to
use
it,
but
it
was
not
clear.
So
maybe
it
was
I
mean
it
was,
of
course,
in
part,
my
fault,
because
I
didn't
communicate
correctly
and
other
use
of
the
psychology,
so
yeah
a
lot
of
things
that
cause.
F
Yeah
and
I
think
something
that
we
try
to
do
in
engineering
as
well
as,
like
you
know,
state
the
requirements
without
trying
to
get
into
the
solution
right.
So
if
you
kind
of
you
know
in
this
case
to
use
this
as
an
example,
the
requirement
is,
you
know
the
marketing
team
wants
to
send
75
000
usdc
to
a
multi-sync,
and
then
you
kind
of
like
could
hand
that
to
engineering
and
then
make
sure
that
engineering
is
actually
responsible
for,
like
the
whole
thing
right
as
a
like.
F
You
know,
because
I
think
we
started
you
know.
Different
people
are
taking
different
pieces
and
that's
how
you
kind
of
we
got
the
miscommunication
right,
and
I
think
so.
Another
way
to
think
about.
Maybe
avoiding
this
kind
of
thing
in
the
future
is
to
make
sure
that,
like
somebody
is
responsible
like
more
of
an
end-to-end
situation,
like
that's
another
thing
that
could
maybe
have
helped,
I
mean
the
other
thing
is
yeah
right
yeah,
I
just
say:
like
I
mean
it
sucks,
I
feel
bad
about
it.
I
mean
really
the
governance.
F
Should
support
this
right
like
if
we
were
on
a
newer
version
of
you
know,
governance
framework,
it
would
have
a
transfer
function
that
just
worked
right
like
it
shouldn't
be
this
hard
to
send
funds
from
a
governance,
family
right-
and
I
mean
and
so
like.
We
need
to
address
this
at
like
a
more
fundamental
level
by
getting
the
software
we're
operating
on
like
up
to
date
and
like
making
it
functional
right
so
like
we
can
improve.
F
A
Think,
objectively,
objectively,
like
we
would
probably
even
say
this
is
a
collective
mistake
in
general,
but
like
objectively,
it
is
pretty
impressive,
like
how
many
like
different
components
were
a
part
of
this
and
how
many
people
I
mean
people.
Voters
had
the
opportunity
to
do
it
and
even,
as
you
said
like
going
upstream
from
that
right,
like
the
whole
like
framework,
the
framework
we're
operating
on
is
there
so
like
yeah.
E
F
K
We've
also
had
quite
a
few
calls
and
interviews
with
marketing
lead
candidates.
Over
the
past
week,
we've
taken
next
steps
with
a
few
people
that
could
be
a
fit
for
the
for
the
position
and
are
hoping
to
present
some
candidates
to
the
community
soon
and
then.
Finally,
I
just
wanted
to
walk
you
through
next
steps
for
dx
events.
K
So,
as
a
proposal
states,
each
contributor
in
attendance
is
eligible
for
reimbursement
up
to
about
1200
us
dollars
or
about
a
thousand
euros
covering
all
but
not
limited
to
cova,
testing,
transportation
and
accommodations,
and
then,
in
addition
to
that,
your
conference
ticket
will
be
covered
so
you're,
each
individually
responsible
for
claiming
your
reimbursement
for
these
costs.
That
means
you'll
need
to
submit
a
proposal
for
this,
whether
it's
a
standalone
proposal
or
it's
in
your
next
contributor
proposal.
C
Yeah
thanks
melanie,
you
guys
can
hear
me
great
see
throughout
our
kind
of
process
of
making
this
overhaul.
I've
had
some
notes
on
paper,
but
nothing
kind
of
visually
to
look
at
that
could
be
shared
and
understand
understood
by
others.
I
just
dropped
a
link
in
the
chat
and
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
here.
C
If
it
will,
let
me
we
go
yeah,
so
I
threw
this
this
sheet
together
on
a
whim
basically
took
aggregated
our
current
levels
of
all
contributors
and
and
the
time
commitments
and
kind
of
roughly.
This
obviously
isn't
going
to
be
perfect,
but
roughly
translated
what
the
actual
cost
will
be
based
on
our
current
standpoint.
This
might
be
a
little
less
or
a
little
more.
C
Obviously,
as
we
kind
of
discuss,
the
new
level
system
will
be
a
kind
of
select
your
own
based
on
the
information,
so
it's
not
a
direct
translation
but
based
on
what
we
have
currently,
this
is
roughly
the
burn
rate.
I
then
also
accounted
for
the
price
of
eth
and
dxd
so
like
the
lower
band
of
0.05,
each
per
dxd
is
half
of
roughly
half
of
the
current
all-time
low
and
0.4.
C
If
I
remember
correctly,
is
the
target
for
the
dxd
buyback
and
subsequent
buyback,
so
the
idea
is
basically
to
get
a
snapshot
of
what
the
burn
rate
is.
You
know,
percent
of
dxd
in
the
current
form
is
roughly
six
percent
annually,
and
it's
also
worth
noting
that
that
six
percent
release
is
over
three
years,
so
it
isn't
supply-wise
being
released
six
percent
a
year,
but
rather
six
percent
of
the
supply
is
locked
into
the
contract
and
then
released
over
three
years
yeah.
C
I
guess
that's
kind
of
the
overarching
point
the
the
kind
of
what
I
the
conclusion
that
came
to,
I
suppose,
is
that
this
is
actually.
I
was
a
bit
worried
at
one
point
just
putting
pen
to
paper,
but
I
think
these
numbers
are
pretty
healthy
and
you
know
dx
style
contributors
are
who
we
want
to
be
distributing
dxd2
right,
and
this
kind
of
you
know
five
percent
range,
presumably
going
to
be
getting
better.
C
Alongside
this
dxd
buyback
is,
I
think,
a
very
good
number
to
be
working
with,
and
just
one
last
little
point.
I
did
also
do
some
calculations
for
the
stable
increase,
but
obviously
that's
not
as
sizable
compared
to
the
or
as
much
of
the
talking
point,
I
suppose
so
yeah
take
a
look
at
those
numbers.
Let
me
know
if
there's
any
anything
missing
any
information
you
might
want
to
see
that
I
didn't
account
for.
A
F
Yeah,
I
think
this
is
super
helpful
keenan,
thanks
for
putting
that
together
and
yeah,
I
would
agree,
I
think
five
percent
seems
reasonable.
Another
way
I
don't
know,
I
think
I'd
like
to
tend
to
think
about
is
you
know
we
should
be
setting
ourselves
up
and
preparing
ourselves
up
for
different.
You
know
potential
market
circumstances
right
and
I
mean
if
we.
F
Extended
or
deeper
bear
market,
you
know
we
might
end
up
facing,
you
know,
lower
east
prices
and
that
may
affect
the
xd
price
and
bring
that
down.
So
I
mean
obviously,
we
could
adjust
the
compensation
guidelines
again
in
the
future
to
respond
to
market
conditions,
but
I
wonder
if
it
makes
sense
to
kind
of
stipulate
something
up
front
that,
like
you
know,
if
you
know
like
there's.
G
A
I
think
it
would
be
difficult
for
contributors
to
vote
for
that
in
that
position,
because
it
would
be
you
know,
it'd
be
against
their
self
interest
and
so
yeah.
I
guess
that's
like
the
big
concern
is
like
one
what
the
downside
if
gxd
like
goes
down
right.
This
does
put
the
dow,
like
just
on
the
hook
for
like
a
lot
of
dxd,
and
so
how
do
we
yeah?
I
guess
we
could
put
a
floor
a
number
or
you
know
keenan.
Do
you
have
an
idea.
C
C
I
suppose,
but
in
that
kind
of
doomsday
scenario
at
point
for
dxd
evaluation,
we're
still
in
that
healthy
range,
that's
about
a
seven
percent
burn
rate,
and
obviously
I
would
hope
by
the
time
that
we
reach
a
five
hundred
dollar
each,
that
the
ecstatic
is
doing
considerably
better.
So
I
think,
even
in
that
doomsday
scenario
provided
the
the
goal
of
the
buyback
is
succeeded.
We
actually
shouldn't
have
a
problem.
C
That
being
said,
I
think
that
we
should
have
some
kind
of
contingency
alongside
this,
like
john
said,
maybe
a
floor,
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what
that
looks
like,
but
that
should
be
in
this
kind
of
compensation
overhaul.
As
you
know,
you
know
on
chain
like
this
should
exist
when
it
goes
live
in
that
event.
So
maybe
that's
something
we
can
chat
about
today
on
on
contributor
ux.
A
Because
I
think
it
scales
the
other
direction
right
like
if
dxd
price
goes
up
like
that's
kind
of
good
and
then
the
people
are
getting
paid.
Now,
like
that's
good,
because
you're,
you
know
contributing
in
an
early
stage
when
you
know
geek
style
is
not
as
well
established,
so
it
definitely
scales
up.
The
question
is
yet
on
the.
B
A
A
This
is,
I
think,
true,
I
don't
know
I
mean
to
a
certain
extent
right.
It's
not
a
super
strong
incentive.
I
am
more
ambivalent
on
how
to
achieve
what
is
like
the
quote-unquote
current
dxd
price
to
be
used
for
for
worker
proposals.
I
don't
really
know
exactly
the
best
way
to
insulate
it
from
being
gamified,
and
I
don't
know,
maybe,
if
there's
something
we
could
think
about
here
or
if
there's
something
we
could
put
into
the
guidelines.
A
But,
broadly
speaking,
I
think
that's
the
range
we
want
to
go
to.
I
think
it's
important
to
like
be
honest
with
people
how
that
works.
I
think
the
bigger
concern
is
like
how
we
calculate
this
and
coming
up
with
some
like
official
way
in
how
someone
like
goes,
and
do
it
just
get
the
medium
price.
I
think
that's
a
great
one.
He
said
we're
like.
A
Medium,
how
to
get
the
median
price
of
dxd
over
the
last
month,
and
so
we
would
make
sure
that
we
would
have
to
like
track
that
and
put
that
up
in
a
central
location
or
something
that
people
could
check
but
curious
to
know
what
people
think
is
like
the
best
way
to
avoid
like
the
the
incentive
to
gamify.
It.
J
I
think
a
median
price
is
a
good
idea.
I
was
also
thinking
like
if
there
may
be,
there
could
be
some
sort
of
correlation
to
ethereum,
because
you
know
the
price
is
so
correlated
to
ethereum.
So
you
know
if
ethereum
goes
down,
it's
not
our
fault,
you
know
it's
not
our
fault.
That
ethereum
is
going
down
and
then
also
dxd
is
going
down
so
like
then.
If
so
the
price
of
ethereum
went
down,
then
it
would
be
like
greater
in
terms
of
dxd
but
the
same
amount
of
dollar.
J
A
A
Awesome
just
like
three
final
points
here
and
I'm
just
going
to
so
we
get
a
chance.
The
first
one
is
just
to
claim
your
main
rep
I
saw
chris
pearson
did
this.
I
know
people
were
looking
at
single
gwey
prices.
It's
important
to
decentralization.
It's
important
that
we're
all
following
these.
These
proposals
on
mainnet
so
make
sure,
and
do
that,
so
any
there's
instructions
on
how
to
do
it.
A
It's
much
easier
for
any,
very
easy
for
any
worker
proposal
that
you've
already
been
approved
for
and
receive
payment
on
exci.
You
would
simply
batch
those.
The
rep
amounts
in
each
of
those
proposals
and
submit
it
on
mainnet
and
then,
secondly,
is
dxvote
needs
testing.
I
put
a
link
in
the
in
there
I'll
put
another
link
here
and
then
lastly,
is
the
geeks
yield
talks?
I
don't
know
if
dave.
B
Yeah
sorry:
well,
there
there
was
a
blog
post,
a
while
back
about
the
x
yield,
which
was
also
approved
in
the
treasury
diversification
proposal
number
two
of
putting
some
stable
coins
and
some
ether
to
yield.
I
guess
the
main
concern,
or
the
main
thing
that
changed
in
the
meantime,
is
that
the
yielding
rates
have
obviously
dropped
quite
a
bit.
So
the
question
is,
you
know
at
what
type
of
rate
do
we
think
it's
worth
putting
some
stable
coins
into
yielding
protocols?
B
Perhaps
it's
easier
to
have
a
more
flexible
approach
and
something
that
had
a
good
yield
right
now
is
actually
like
staking
some
eath
on
like
a
little
platform
or
something
like
this,
which
returns
like,
I
believe,
five
percent
I
saw
earlier,
and
we
also
have
like
a
thousand
ether
authorized
to
for
the
yielding
program.
So
maybe
that's
somewhere
we
could
start,
and
then
I
don't
know
it
would
be
great,
of
course,
to
also
he'll
hear
other
people's
opinion.
B
E
I
I
think
we
should
do
it
and
move
forward
to
learn
how
to
seek
yield,
even
if
the
yield's
small,
so
we
just
do
it
with
small
amount.
To
start
and-
and
I
expect
yields
at
some
point-
will
pick
back
up
and
then
you'll
be
ready
to
just
continue
that
program
and
put
more
stable
coins
into
yield,
seeking
pro
assets,
and
so
doing
some
like
more
than
zero
is
a
good
first
step.
F
F
You
do
comes
with
some
risk
in
blockchain
and
we
should
be
very
protective
of
the
stable
coins
and
so
like
personally,
I
would
think
like
one
or
two
percent
is
just
simply
not
worth
the
the
risk
that
comes
with
the
smart
contracts,
but
to
do
it
at
scale,
but
I
still
think
it
would
be
really
cool
to
to
demo
to
do
it
like
kind
of
pilot.
It.
F
B
F
A
A
Yeah,
I
think
I
agree
that
the
yields
aren't
what
they
used
to
1.2
on
usdc
on
compound
right
now,
and
you
guys
may
have
seen
that
coinbase
release
their
four
percent
guaranteed.
Apy,
that's
going
to
be
like
a
little
c5
to
d5
thing,
so
there
will
presumably
be
a
very
heavy
supply
of
stable
coins
into
compound,
and
I
actually
don't
think
rates
are
gonna.
Go
up
that
much
or
like
we
may
have.
We
may
not
see
the
fifteen
percent
that
data
yeah.
F
A
Dollars
that
are
like
willing
to
take
risk
on
to
lend
out
it
like
eight
to
nine
percent
on
compound
right,
like
that's
that's
kind
of
there,
but
I
think
for
from
my
respect
to
that
kind
of
two
points
or
one
d
style,
I
think,
needs
to
develop
the
capabilities
to
like
interact
with
the
defy
ecosystem
and
so
like
thinking
about
that
more
as
like
a
long-term
infrastructure
thing
we're
doing
rather
than
this
you're
like.
Oh,
we
need
to
do
this
to
get
yield
right
now.
A
I
think
that's
the
impetus
for
that,
and
I
think.
Secondly,
I
think
we
should
consider
the
staking
eth
option
a
lot
and
I
think
that's
something
that
we
could
do.
I
think
we've
had
lido
lido
on
the
call
and
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
products
that
are
doing
that
and
we
could
presumably
just
literally
acquire
s
key
eth,
and
so
this
would
be
like
another,
obviously
another
risk,
but
I
just
think
in
terms
of
like
kind
of
moving
the
treasury
forward
moving
diversification
forward.
A
I
think
the
staking
eth
option
is
one
that
maybe
we
should
consider
more
so
than
the
stable
coin
yield
one.
I
also
think
that
actually
fits
in
line
better
with,
like
some
of
the
other
things
that
other
treasury
dow
treasuries
are
doing,
and
we
dekes
dao
has
a
lot
of
beef,
so
it
would
be
good
to
get
some
some
some
yield
on
that
anyway.
F
A
I
love
the
like
the
new
or
like
doing
it's
like
emoji.
You
know,
people
like
you,
stop
doing
emoji,
so
they
don't
pierce
the
image.
You
just
do
the
actual
text
and
now
it's
the
same
thing
where
you
just
like
type
out
the
name
of
the
emoji
you're
trying
to
do
rather
than
actually
send
the
the
emoji.
Oh
look
at
keenan
anyway,
just
to
close
things
off,
I
think
dx
vote
because
you're
looking
for
people
testing,
I
think
I
sent
the
link
earlier.
A
I
think
the
cool
thing
would
be
for
everyone.
That's
submitting
any
proposal.
Xdi
mainnet
you've
got
your
things
copied
out
just
open
up
another
window
on
duke's,
vote
on
rink
b
and
then
submit
your
proposal
there.
Just
so
we
can
test
it
and
do
everything
like
that
augusto.
Do
you
have
any
other
things
to
add
and
encourage
people
testing
or
things
to
look
out
for.
I
No,
not
really
I
just
it
would
be
good
to
hear
what
do
we
think
that
is
super.
That
is
super
priority
in
the
expo
like,
for
example,
because
for
me
right
now,
I
think
it's
a
priority
that
I
fix.
How
is
playing
the
time
on
the
schemes
like
on
the
schemes
on
the
proposal
when
it's
going
to
be
executed
and
when
it's
going
to
estimate
how?
L
F
A
So
like,
how
would
we
do
like
a
multi
co
like
I'm
saying
what
are
the
proposals
to
lead
to
liquidity
and
swapper,
and
it's
like
there's
funding
proposals
for
each
of
the
assets
so
like?
How
would
we
get
west,
you
know
maybe
wptc
die
usdc.
How
do
we
get
those
into
the
swapper
liquidity
relayer
and
then
how
do
we
control
the
locality
relay
or
presumably
through
the
multi
call
scheme,
and
I
think
this
is
something
we've
probably
all
done,
or
that
we've
done
on
extend
mainnet
but
like
how?
I
Okay,
okay,
so
it
will
be
adding,
for.
I
can
add
the
recommended
function
that
we
want
to
execute
on
swapper
on
the
export
like
right
now
we
have,
for
example,
if
you
select
the
controller
you
it
recommend
you
to.
It
recommends
you
to
use
the
mean
reputation
and
burn
reputation
functions,
so
you
can
actually
die
at
least
of
course
or
things
you
want
to
execute
the
same
for
erc20
transfers,
where
the
addresses
that
we
are
getting
right
now
they
are
hard
coded
from
a
from
a
json
file.
I
So
I
guess
it
will
be
getting
the
addresses
of
the
tokens
dynamically,
the
one
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
in
swapper
the
balance,
the
balances
of
the
tokens
that
the
dao
has
there
is
a.
There
is
something
here
that
later
we,
what
I'm
going
to
be
showing
in
the
excel
in
india's
world,
that
an
avatar
can
have
balance
and
a
quality
scheme
can
have
balance.
I
We
have
a
quick
wallet
scheme
that
can
execute
functions
way
faster,
so
we
should
be
able
to
execute
also
functions
to
swapper
from
the
quick
quality
scheme,
but
it's
going
to
be
acting
as
an
owner.
Instead
of
the
avatar,
so
it
will
be
that
right,
like
adding
the
recommended
function
on
swapper,
that
they're
going
to
be
add
and
remove
liquidity
and
what
else.
A
I
Okay,
okay!
Well,
I'm
going
to
work
on
that.
Then
I'm
going
to
put
priority
on
that
on
add
the
functions
to
swapper,
where,
for
example,
right
now,
if
you
go
to
cal
to
odd
to
other
call,
you
have
a
set
of
contracts
that
you
can
use,
we
can
add
swapper
and
we
can
add
the
functions
that
we
want
to
execute,
and
that's
it
later.
Another
thing
that
I
think
it's
going
to
be
super
cool
to
add.
We
have
templates
the
template
that
melanie
search
for
me.
B
Tag,
no,
no,
it's
a
serious
thing
man!
Well,
you
are
you
starting
like
that
straight
away.
Man
like
on
alchemy,
you
can
put
a
tag
on
your
proposal
right,
but
then,
when
I
actually
want
to
retrieve
it,
it's
almost
impossible
to
retrieve
these.
So
it
would
be
nice
if,
like
someone,
submits
a
worker
proposal
and
tags
it
with,
for
example,
the
product
they're
working
on,
and
if
I
then
just
had
an
api
where
I
can
just
pull
all
this
stuff
from.
That
would
be
wonderful.
I
A
About
this
maybe
a
priority,
but
you're,
probably
building
this
in,
like
just
on
alchemy,
like
there's
a
problem
when,
if
we
want
to
give
a
reward
or
send
funds
with
with
a
asset
that
is
not
in
the
drop
down
menu,
it's
like
really
hard,
and
so
we,
I
think,
like
john,
has
to
crank
up
a
local
version
of
alchemy.
So
it'd
be
great
just
if
we
can
like
send
funds
with
just
the
token
address
and
not
needing
that
from
the
ui.
But
I
assume
assume
that
it's
probably
possible.
I
No,
that
that
can
be
done
too.
It
will
take
some
time
but
yeah
that
can
be
another
feature
I
mean
yeah.
We
should
create
all
these
features
in
in
issues
or
proposals
and
if
I
think
that
they're
going
to
take
a
lot
of
time,
I'm
going
to
be
done,
bolting
them
yeah.
I
think
like
that
include
that
once
if
you
create
a
proposal
asking
for
that,
I
actually
wanted
to
vote
down
skye's
proposal,
but
I
didn't
I
wasn't
fast
enough,
so
it
got
executed
because
arbitrary,
so
fast.
E
Man
just
too
quick
yeah,
the
other,
the
other,
really
cool
thing.
The
and
chris
you
had
mentioned
this
augusto
added
like
a
thing,
a
process
at
the
bottom
to
like,
submit
a
feature
suggestion
or
a
bug
that
process
that
would
like
the
form
and
it
feeds
into
github
as
an
issue
and
all
that
that
is
exists
for
dick's
vote
now.
E
I
think
that
that
exact
same
thing
should
be
on
every
single
one
of
our
products.
Now,
okay,
maybe
you
maybe
you
don't
want
to
be
overwhelmed,
but
they
go
into
some
side
place,
but
it's
an
amazing
way
to
get
feedback
from
users
and
so
that
exact
process
that
he
that's
on
the
expo
should
be
on
all
of
our
products.
I
think.
I
I
A
We're
involved
yeah,
I
think
what
john
said.
I
think
it's
good
to
try
to
think
what
john
said
about
like
what
we
need
to
govern
swapper
like
if
that's
kind
of
the
guiding
lineup
we
can
think
of
those
are
like
definitely
the
high
priority
items,
anything
that
we
definitely
need
to
be
able
to
to
do
that
better.