►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-11-17]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
november
17th,
1600
utc,
I'm
going
to
start
with
the
governance.
Sorry
with
the
proposal,
roundup,
let
me
show
you
my
screen
here.
So
a
bunch
of
proposals,
it's
a
really
kind
of
busy
day
across
kind
of
a
busy
week,
sorry
across
mainnet
and
xdi,
so
just
starting
with
mainnet.
Here
we
have
the
dx
lisbon
contributor,
stipend
and
funds
amendment.
This
is
the
main
net
proposal.
B
There
was
also
the
corresponding
excite
proposal,
and
this
makes
a
small
adjustment
for
the
two
hundred
dollars
in
code,
testing,
related
fees
and
then
also
some
for
the
stipend
for
travel
there,
and
so
that's
set
to
pass.
I
think
in
the
next
two
days
and
other
people
have
already
been
claiming
their
stipends
for
that
next
up
is
the
send
three
million
dollars
swapper
to
the
multi-chain
multi-sig
for
x,
dye
and
arbor
trim
farming,
air
drops
and
single-sided
staking.
B
So
this
is
kind
of
both
a
simple
proposal
that
does
a
couple
of
things,
so
you
can
see,
there's
really
six
different
places
that
the
swapper
would
go
so,
first
and
foremost,
this
is
being
sent
to
the
multi-chain
multi-sig.
So
this
is
a
one
that
has
been
deployed
and
used
a
little
bit
on
xdi,
but
the
big
advantage
here
is
that
you
can.
We
have
the
same
address
across
chains
there,
and
so
you
can
see
here
the
the
the
six
different
places.
B
So
the
first
is
sending
swapper
to
xdi
and
that'll
actually
be
sent
to
the
farming
relayer
itself
and
that
will
go
across.
I
believe
the
next
seven
epochs
there
on
x
die
and
then
there's
a
1.3
million
swapper
to
refund
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
on
arbitrary
one,
and
so
that's
just
for
these
epochs
there,
but
that
actually
ends
up
matching
up
with
the
x-die
epochs
and
I
believe
these
would
refill
it.
B
I
think,
until
the
end
of
february,
so
we'd
have
to
do
another
re-up
sometime
in
january
or
early
february,
for
the
scheduled
farming
campaigns
that
have
been
going
going
on
and
then
yeah,
and
then
we
have
244
000
swapper
to
fund
the
distribution
to
smart
contracts
on
mainnet
and
then
292
000
to
fund
the
swapper
airdrop
correction
on
arbitrom,
and
so
just
a
recap
of
these
two.
B
The
smart
contract
wallets
were
missed
out
on
the
initial
swapper
airdrop
because
they
couldn't
be
on
arbitrom,
so
this
swapper
is
to
airdrop
what
two
smart
contract
wallets,
that
held
dxd
the
the
swapper
that
they
were
due
to
get
into
the
initial
airdrop,
and
so
this
will
be
distributed
on
mainnet
and
then
separately.
There
is
additional
swapper
for
the
airdrop
correction
and
I
believe
this
has
to
do
with
some
of
the
how
yeah
some
of
the
wallets
did
not
get
the
same
amount.
B
I
think
if
they
were
lping
in
a
certain
place,
so
this
re
gives
the
swapper
again
to
refund
those
and
then
the
last
two
which
we
can
get
to
a
little
bit
later
are
a
potential
and
extra
swapper
to
be
sent
for
single-sided
staking
on
x-die
and
arbor
term
one.
B
B
I
should
say
we're
trying
to
figure
out
bridging
two
arbitrary
one,
maybe
maybe
tricky
through
the
the
multisig,
but
we're
exploring
that.
B
Cool
and
then
next
up
is
a
maintenance
on
the
mainnet
base.
Is
a
transfer
of
158
to
x
side
for
the
dxd
buyback
dave?
Do
you
want
to
kind
of
outline
what
cine's
proposal
and
what
makes
it
a
little
unique
or
different
than
past.
A
Sure
so,
well,
I
guess
this
proposal
is
a
bit
different
than
previous
proposals
in
that
it
actually
deposits
the
wef
directly
into
the
gp
relayer,
so
just
to
give
a
very
brief
overview
to
post
orders
on
gpv
one.
We
need
a
gp
relayer
and
on
mainnet,
of
course,
to
post
orders.
We
have
to
fund
it
and
then
actually
pass
an
order
which
posts
the
order
on
gpv1.
A
Obviously,
given
that
on
mainnet,
we
have
all
the
funds
in
the
treasury.
We
always
posted
a
funding
proposal
and
then
a
proposal
that
actually
post
the
order
and
when
we
moved
to
xti,
we
pretty
much
just
adopted
the
same
system,
because
it's
how
we
always
did
it
right.
But
given
that
the
ether
is
already
moving,
it's
probably
or
at
least,
I
believe
so
much
more
pragmatic
to
deposit
that
ether
directly
in
the
gp
relayer.
And
that
means
that
the
dow
actually
only
has
to
pass
a
proposal
posting
the
order.
A
So
given
that
the
funds
are
already
authorized
for
buyback
and
they're
meant
exclusively
for
that,
it
actually
makes
sense
because
it
clogs,
I
mean
I
think,
clogging
is
maybe
not
the
correct
terminology
here.
But
you
have
a
lot
less
proposals
in
the
given
scheme
right
so,
if
we're
doing
daily
buybacks-
and
they
take
four
days
to
pass
or
five
if
you're
taking
the
boosting
time,
you
always
kind
of
have
five
contributor
proposals.
I
believe
they're
called
on
xstyle
live
right,
which
also
increases
the
amount
of
gen.
A
You
need
to
stake
or
dxd
in
the
future.
So
it
removes
all
of
that
by
just
depositing
it
directly
in
the
relayer
and
other
than
that.
Nothing
really
changes
we'll
just
be
posting
the
orders
which
are
posted
on
the
the
multicall
scheme
on
xsi,
which
is
rarely
used
anyway.
A
So
I
guess
it
just
makes
it
much
more
efficient,
given
that
the
funds
already
allocated
to
that
rather
than
always
having
to
post
proposals,
and
it
makes
the
posting
of
proposals
a
lot
easier
as
well
as
you
just
have
to
post
one
proposal
and
then
boost
it,
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
has
any
questions.
I
know
it's
not
the
most
exciting
topic
in
the
world,
but
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
bit
of
an
overview,
as
there
is
a
something
in
the
process
changing.
I
guess
it's
a
good
way
to
put
it.
B
And,
of
course,
xd
style
can
at
any
time
withdraw
the
eat
from
the
gp
relayer
through
proposals
itself,
so
that
you
know
it
isn't
directly
in
the
treasury,
but
it
is
still
in
control.
Control
of
xdx
data.
B
Cool
and
then
back
to
dave
or
fluid
drop
for
decentral
labs,
so
dave.
This
is
a
little
bit
different
proposal.
So
maybe
you
wanted
to
give
a
little
background
on
on
this.
A
Sure
so
well,
I
believe
my
first
proposal
already
passed
on
exercise,
so
some
of
you
might
have
already
heard
the
alpha,
but
really
I've
just
come
around
to
forming
a
legal
entity,
and
so
my
future
worker
proposal
will
be
submitted
by
decentral
labs,
not
really
much
more
to
it
than
that.
So
I
like
chris,
going
right
into
the
ipfs
link,
but
yeah:
that's
that's
pretty
much
it,
so
you
just
expect
to
see
fewer
or
rather
no
proposals
from
fluid
drop
anymore.
B
A
B
Cool
and
then
the
last
proposal
on
mainnet
is
a
rep
sync
from
sky,
not
loading
right
now,
but
you
can
see
here
on
the
ipfs
link.
These
are
three
proposals
that
passed
on
xdi
and
he's
thinking
on
maybach.
It
looks
actually
like
we
need
to
get
a
boost
from
there.
I
can
do
that
after
this.
C
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
you
know
I
was
trying
to
go
by
example
of
of
doing
this,
but
it
is,
you
know
it's
gonna
cost.
I
was
calculating
it
like
total.
C
I
mean
he's
lower
now,
so
maybe
and
I
was
doing
it
with
low
gas
prices,
but
it's
still
like
you
know,
800
or
something
total
by
the
time
you
get
done
with
this
kind
of
rap
thing,
but
I
think
I
think
mainnet
is
is
so
is
becoming
far
off
of
what
it
should
be
and
what
yeah
is
not
tied
closely
with
like
what
mainnet
rep
should
be
just
how
it
should
be
distributed,
and
so
by,
if
you're
not
doing
this
every
quarter
or
maybe
every
six
months
or
something
it's
hard
to
do
like
analysis
on
distribution
of
rep
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff
too.
C
So
I
think
it's
important
to
do,
even
though
it's
a
little
expensive.
So
I
don't
know
yeah.
B
And
I
think
it's
it's
well,
I'm
just
gonna
say
I
think
what
dave
did
was
also
interesting.
I
think,
is
like
combining
proposals
in
the
sector,
what
I'm
planning
to
do
not
just
combining
months
and
proposals,
but
like
I,
I
need
to
get
a
refund
for
launching
the
or
for
deploying
the
swapper
east
pool
on
mainnet,
and
so
in
that
proposal
I
can
also
like
get
other
reimbursements
for
other
things.
In
addition
to
doing
the
rep
sync,
so
sometimes
combining
proposals
can
be
good
there,
but
yeah
and.
B
Refunded
on
on
mainnet-
and
this
is
an
important
thing
so
yeah-
I
think
people
should
be
encouraged,
but.
C
Like
in
general,
when
we're
asking
for
refunds
in
general,
you
probably
ask
for
most
refunds
or
reimbursements
or
things
on
xdi
right
normally,.
B
Right
but
I
mean
that's
typically,
I
mean
the
expense
itself
was
incurred
on
main
net
right,
it's
kind
of
like
gas
refunds
and
it
was
like
so
I
mean
I
think
that
was
the
reason
I
was
gonna.
Do
that
one
there,
but
maybe
it's
also
like
I
mean
again,
it's
just
like
kind
of
combining
proposals
in
a
way
like
what
can
we
do
that
combine
different
things
and
you
can.
C
That's
an
interesting
idea
is
if
it's
a
little
tricky,
but
given
that
we
do
like
gas
maintenance,
gas
refunds
once
a
quarter,
I
think
it
is
right
is
that
right,
dave
like
there
could
be
a
two-week
submission
period
where
all
contributors
like
propose
reimbursements
to
like
a
collection
area,
and
then
dave
includes
those
in
the
the
overall
refund,
because
the
the
refund,
the
governance
refund
method
is
like
the
cheapest
most
efficient
way
to
get
money
from
mainnet,
because
the
maine
is
one
proposal
that
goes
to
like
this
contract
and
then
you
can
then
go
claim
for
pretty
cheap
from
that
contract
right.
C
B
Yeah
and
maybe
a
bigger
discussion,
but
it
does
make
me
think
about
when
we
are
doing
literally
reimbursements,
where
that
it
means
there
is
like
an
off-ramp
and
then
a
lot
of
people
are
getting
those
bridging
costs
themselves
or
how
are
people
doing
it?
So
I
think
it
is
because
this
is
something
that
everyone
deals
with.
You
know
this
contributor
or
like
dude
style,
is
dealing
with
as
it's
like
doing
reimbursements.
We
should
be
thinking
about
like
how
this
really
like
transaction
cost.
A
A
I
go
to
the
rep
contract
and
I
see
total
issued
rep,
but
this
also
excludes
all
the
rep
that
has
been
issued
on
xdy,
which,
if
people
haven't
synced
it
up
right,
it's
not
going
to
show
there
so
actually
if
everyone
else
is
also
using
that
same
method,
we're
also
technically
getting
a
lot
less
rep
right,
because
once
people
sync
up
they're
actually
inflated
by
a
lot
which
was
not
taken
into
account
when
you
actually
calculate
how
much
rep
you'll
get
in
your
proposal,
which
I
mean
it's
not
that
it's
not
not
like.
E
So
I
guess
like
I
think
we
might.
I
might
explain
this
a
bit
more
later
as
well,
but
with
the
new
contributor
proposal
thing
on
dx
vote
like
the
new
ui
for
getting
funds
from
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
it's
actually
taking
x,
direct
and
calculating
it
automatically.
E
I
don't
know
what
our
thoughts
around
that
are.
I'd
assumed
that
it'd
be
best
to
calculate
from
x
time,
since
that's
kind
of
where
we're
issuing
the
new
skin
cells.
It
solves
a
lot
of
things
yeah
I
don't
know
I
mean
we
can
make
it.
We
can
take
it
from
mainnet.
Also
it'll
just
be
a
change,
but
I
don't
know
if
it
makes
more
sense
for
us.
Since
we
know,
xda
is
always
going
to
be
more
up-to-date
to
take
the
issuing
rep
from
there
and
don't
know
what
thoughts
on
that
are.
A
F
Yeah
I
mean
like
so
the
the
issue
with
that
is
that
we
were
treating
like
mainnet
as
the
main
kind
of
like,
like
the
main
focus
of
the
doubt,
which
makes
sense.
I
think,
because
that's
where
it
started
and
most
the
capital
is
and
like
certain
things
you
do
on
next,
I
are
eligible
to
like
get
rep
on.
They
saw
like
all
the
worker
proposals,
but
I
think
in
theory
we
were
leaving
the
possibility
open
that
you
could
do
things
that
are
local
to
ex-die.
F
That
would
earn
you
ex-die
rep,
but
not
be
like
redeemable
for
mainnet
rep.
I
think
in
practice
that
probably
hasn't
really
happened
yet.
E
F
C
Yeah,
but
because
next
diet,
total
rep,
is
a
lot
less
than
main
net
ross
you're
using
x,
die.
Rep
is
actually
is
x
times
lower.
Yes,
even
worse,
it's
much
lower
than
if
you
used
an
uninflated,
an
incorrect
maintenance,
rep.
A
F
But,
of
course,
like,
as
people
earn
more
rep
right,
like
that's
inflating
the
total
rep
so
like.
If
people
are
only
redeeming
that
on
next
time,
not
on
midnight
because
of
the
costs
now
like
exercise
is
on
a
trajectory
to
get
bigger
than
main
net.
Even
though
yeah.
F
E
We
actually
just
implemented
it's
not
available,
yet
it
should
be
once
we
released
today,
a
new
feature
in
the
export,
where,
if
you
hover
over
the
minting
rep
amount,
it
shows
you
the
rep
percentage.
As
of
the
time
the
proposal
was
created
and
I
was
going
through
some
of
the
like
recent,
because
I
had
a
huge
batch
of
people
doing
their
proposals
and
it
I
think
I
mentioned
double
checks.
E
I
didn't
look
at
it
in
great
detail,
but
I
think
most
of
them
are
actually
above
0.1667
percent,
going
off
of
main,
going
off
of
ex
diet
right.
B
Because
that's
kind
of
the
art,
because,
basically
not
to
like,
say
like
I
mean
what
has
value
like
xdi,
has
some
funds,
and
so
that
is
valuable
but
like
the
real
value
of
the
style,
comes
from
the
things
that
are
on
mainnet
and
so
that's
kind
of
what
people
and
contributors
really
are
earning.
Is
that
mainnet
rep?
B
G
There's
a
protocol
that
supports
arbitrary
x-tie
chain
and
ethereum
mainnet
and
it
offers
guestless
transactions.
They
do
it
one
use
cases
when
you
airdrop
in
a
token,
and
if
you
want
people
to
claim
it
and
not
you
know,
postpone
it
if
they
think
gas
will
be
too
expensive.
G
You
know,
put
proposals
on
mainnet
and
not
incur
any
gas
and
not
wait
to
be
reimbursed
later
on.
They
just
don't
pay
at
all.
B
Yeah
something
yeah
a
lot
of
things
to
kind
of
explore
here,
so
maybe
we'd
be
good
to
follow
up
but
yeah.
Maybe
let's
keep
going
because
make
sure
you
do
have
a
bunch
of
stuff
on
next
die.
C
Ross
does
this
mean?
Does
this
mean
that
your
your
rep
asks
in
your
proposals
are
incorrect?
Potentially,
yes,
they're
just
a
little
too
low,
so
we've
had
that
before
and
you
can
top
it
up
later,
but
okay,
cool
yeah.
E
B
Cool
then,
on
xdi,
a
bunch
of
proposals,
so
first
up
is
this
is
about
to
pass
in
three
hours.
This
is
the
audit
of
the
staking
contracts
of
u2,
so
this
is
by
the
omega
team,
which
is
some
former
downstock
folks,
since
I
think
we're
fortunate
to
get
them
on
the
auditing
front
there
and
so
yeah.
This
is
set
to
pass
with
a
pretty
healthy
percentage
there
in
the
next
couple
hours.
F
It's
obviously
like
a
big
need
auditing
and
we
were
it
was
it's
still
a
bottleneck
even
with
them
so
great
to
have
them
working
with
us-
and
I
mentioned
this
on
the
dev
call
yesterday,
but
it's
on
my
to-do
list
to
put
up
a
post
in
dow
talk
to
kind
of
like
estimate,
basically
what
I
think
the
budget
will
need
to
be
for
auditing
costs
over
the
next
year
and
like
one
of
the
things
I'm
doing
now,
is
trying
to
line
up
a
time
with
some
of
the
bigger
firms,
because
they're
all
very
booked
out
like
consensus.
F
Diligence
is
saying
like
now
that,
if
you
talk
to
them
today,
you
won't
be
able
to
get
anything
until
august
of
next
year.
So
I
mean
I,
I
talked
to
them
a
little
bit
earlier,
so
I'm
hoping
we'll
be
able
to
book
some
time
in
q2,
but
yeah
I
mean
that's
how
crazy
auditing
demand
is
right
now,
and
I
don't
see
it
going
away
any
time
soon,
even
if
we
were
to
like
go
into
a
bear
market.
F
So
I
think
the
approach
needs
to
be
booking
way
ahead
of
time
and
I'll
yeah
look
for
a
post
with
more
details
on
that.
B
Cool
and
then
there
are
two
current
buyback
proposals.
I
think
a
third
one
is
expected
in
the
in
the
next
couple
hours,
and
so
these
will
be
the
last
ones
that
have
the
three
that
have
the
the
multi-proposal
approach
that
has
a
separate
funding
one
and
so
starting,
I
think,
on
friday
or
thursday,
when
we
submit
those
proposals
by
the
time
those
pass.
B
The
weft
from
the
mainnet
transfer
proposal
should
be
in
that
we'll
be
in
the
gp
relayer,
and
so
we
can
go
from
there,
but
yeah
there's,
there's
a
two
live
and
one
one
coming
today
and
then
yeah.
I
think,
there's
a
couple
different
proposals
regarding
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
So
I
think
we
can
talk
with
with
with
ross
and
gusto
about
this,
but
kind
of.
First
and
foremost,
the
qual
scheme
is
actually
only
on
dx
vote,
so
you
actually
can't
see
proposals
through
the
quick
wallet
scheme
yet
on
on
alchemy.
B
So
I
know
a
lot
of
people
are
checking
out
to
me,
so
this
is
really
important
that
we
are
kind
of
checking
dx
vote
now,
as
things
are
happening
there,
and
so
I
think
there
are
four
proposals
in
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
B
I
can
sort
this
here,
two
from
ross
and
two
from
a
gusto,
and
so
these
are
both
of
their
worker
proposals
and
then
there
is
a
separate
proposal
to
move
funds
to
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
basically
to
be
able
to
execute
those
proposals,
and
so
I
think
it's
25
000
wrapped
x,
die
and
25
dxd,
because
the
exciting
thing
about
the
quick
quality
scheme
and
the
work
being
done
there
is
it
has
the
dxd
vesting
contracts
with.
D
B
Xdi,
as
well
as
having
dxd
investing
so
ross,
agusto
kind
of
thoughts
about
the
current
proposals
or
things
with
a
quick
wallet
scheme.
You've
been
thinking
and
want
to
share.
E
Yeah
sure
so
this
is
kind
of
we've
already
tested
with
small
funds,
but
this
is
kind
of
the
first
time
actually
using
this.
So
I
think
I
mean
my
proposals
are
pretty
out
of
date
and
just
because
I
stubbornly
was
waiting
for
the
quick
wallet
scheme
to
be
ready
and
didn't
think
about
how
long
it
would
actually
take.
E
E
So
it's
doing
four
things.
There's.
First
of
all,
it's
mintingrep,
which
is
currently
pulled
off.
The
total
for
for
x
die,
which
I
now
know
is
maybe
not
correct,
but
so
we
can
fix
that
we
can
actually
just
pull
it
from
mainnet
using
an
rpc.
We
don't
do
that
anywhere
currently,
but
it
shouldn't
be
too
difficult.
If,
in
future,
we
want
to
do
that,
we
can
talk
about
that
in
the
future
and
then
transfers
or
transfers
stable
coins.
E
Just
usual,
wrap
text
die,
it
then
approves
dxd
and
then
the
call
after
that
is
creating
the
vesting
contract
which
isn't
showing
up
properly
right
now.
E
But
these
are
this
is
everything
that's
happening
in
the
new
and
then
your
contributor
proposals,
so
you'll
actually
get
your
dxt
vested
and
so
that's
kind
of
exciting,
and
we
don't
need
to
go
back
and
back
to
everything,
obviously
for
the
ones
that
haven't
been
done
yet,
but
once
this
passes
we
can
get
some
more
funds
into
the
quick
wallet
scheme
and
get
everyone
using
it,
and
that
should
be
should
be
good.
C
E
Yeah
the
way
we
another
contract
that
we
that
wasn't
supported
the
usual
way
we
do
things.
We
were
relying
on
essentially
block
scouts
api
and
it
stopped
working
on
the
expo.ether.link
we're
getting
cars
errors
where
we
didn't
previously.
So
there's
effects
for
that.
I
just
did
this
afternoon
just
adding
it
manually,
essentially.
E
G
About
the
parameters,
can
we
have
the
name
of
the
field
show
as
well,
because
sometimes,
if
it's
a
proposal
that
has
several
addresses
involved,
they
may
be
the
correct
addresses.
But
we
are
not
able
to
confirm
whether
we've
added
them
in
the
correct
order.
They,
you
know
you
could
have
pasted
the
right
address,
but
in
the
wrong
field
and
misplaced
to
two
different
addresses
and
when
you
look.
E
I
mean
the
issue
is
that
you
don't
actually
know
what
the
parameters
are.
Even
if
you
have
the
api,
it
just
shows
you
like
what
the
the
order
of
them
are
like
in
the
code.
It
doesn't.
E
It
shows
up
as
just
the
parameters
in
the
order
of
them,
so
we
can
manually
have
that
and
like
create
a
sentence
that
explains
what
it's
doing
and
the
and
sort
of
decoding
it
manually
that
way,
but
it's
not
quite
as
simple
as
that,
because
the
code
we
get
from
the
apis
doesn't
include
the
name
of
what
it's
actually
doing.
E
Yeah,
it's
something
we
could
look
at
doing
ronaldo.
I
don't
want
to
run
away
here,
but
the
the
new
guilds
ui
and
what
we'll
eventually
use
for
dx4
actually
displays
it
in
a
lot
nicer
way
as
well.
It's
just
a
lot
simpler
to
read,
so
that
might
not
be
such
an
issue.
There
there's
some
color
coordinated
things
going
on.
It's
very
nice.
B
Keenan
is
asking
about.
I
guess
whether
this
creates
an
accounting
nightmare.
I
guess
would
this:
what
would
would
we
be
able
to
use
this?
In
other
words,
in
any
way
to
like
do
the
dxd
investing
for
the
past
ones.
E
And
we
can't
use
the
exact
thing
we're
using
here
like
the
ui
for
it,
but
we
now
can
create
best
in
contracts
through
dx4,
so
yeah
in
theory.
We
can
do
that
yeah.
It
might
be
a
slight
invest,
accounting
issue
and
that
you'll
have
to
manually
check,
but
I
guess
it
kind
of
just
pushes
us
to
do
the
the
sink
sooner
rather
than
later.
So
we
get
caught
up.
E
Nope,
well,
it's
it's
hard
coded
in
the
like
current
ui,
but
then
I
mean
we
can
change
that
if
we
need
to
apparently
all
the
all
the
contracts
are
the
same,
and
so
it
just
starts
from
the
start
date.
But
if
we're
creating
them,
we
can
create
custom
ones.
We
could
even
put
an
override
in
in
future
in
the
your
current
ui.
C
Keenan,
do
you
ask,
do
you
actually
request
or
get
your
dxt.
H
No,
the
new
the
new
system,
you
input
the
dxc,
it
creates
the
vesting
contract,
requested
yeah
yeah.
It
did
like
a
one-month
period
automatically
autofilled
and
I
would
normally
I
would
expect
that
the
dxd
investing
would
start
at
the
end
of
the
two-month
period
rather
than
monthly,
because
I
requested
the
start
of
the
first
month.
The
end
of
the
second,
for
example,.
E
I'd
kind
of
assumed
that
it
was
working
the
same
way
as
as
just
any
other
payment
was
like
right.
If
you
get
half
up
front,
half
at
the
end
same
thing
with
stable
coins,
I
kind
of
assume
that
the
dxd
would
be
paid,
half
and
half
and
since
reaching
x
I,
the
cost,
isn't
exactly
an
issue
with
creating
two
contracts.
E
I
don't
know
if
it
is,
we
can
change
it.
Obviously
if
it
needs
to
be
just
one
at
the
end.
A
A
How
I
mean
that's
just
how
I've
been
doing
it?
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
official
statement
about
it.
H
C
We
have
lots
of
vests
and
contracts
in
the
past
and
they
yeah.
They
usually
start
at
the
start
of
the
period.
And
if
you
look
at
the
details
of
the
proposals,
but
you
don't
ask
for
it
until
you
do
the
work,
so
you
you
ask
for
it
once
you
complete
the
period.
But
you
start
the
vesting
at
the
beginning
of
the
period.
E
We
can
actually
make
things
a
bit
a
bit
simpler
in
a
way
yeah.
So
currently
I
don't
actually
end
this
ui,
it's
not
been
updated
yet,
but
we
have
an
input
for
the
start
date
of
the
proposal,
so
we
can
just
have
all
contracts
starting
from
then,
but
it
will
still
create
two
proposals,
presumably
a
two
contract,
rather
for
vesting
one
that
gets
created
immediately
and
then
one
at
the
end.
When
it's
been
complete.
B
B
Yeah,
I
think
the
sheet
is
updated
through,
like
october
there's
some
proposals
that
I've
gone
through,
but
I
do
agree
that
we
need
to
get
the
the
txt
the
past
dxd
vesting
set.
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
kind
of
come.
We
do
have
this
spreadsheet
here.
That
is,
I
think,
a
pretty
good
base
and
we
can
kind
of
get
a
full
approval
on
what
this.
B
What
this
issued
unissued
dxd
is,
but
I
think
it
would
be
great
to
have
like
an
outline
of
what
the
process
will
be
for
people
to
claim
their
their
gxd
and
so
not
something
we
need
to
do
now,
but
maybe
something
we
can
do
over
the
next
couple
weeks
or
a
month
here.
E
Yes,
I
think
it
was
something
that
we
talked
about
previously.
There's
the
option
of
everyone
doing
it
manually
or
the
just
batching
option,
which
I
think
is
more
in
favor
of,
and
I
guess
does
make
more
sense.
We'll
just
have
to
have
everyone
check
it
because
there's
going
to
be
hundreds
of
calls
in
one
proposal
and
if
one
of
them
is
wrong,
then
that's
an
issue
and
obviously
there's
a
lot
of
dxd
state
yeah
we'll
need.
E
Yeah
they'll
also
be
moving
up
in
the
process,
and
so
I
guess
we'll
we
can
have
a
more
faith
in
it
once
it's
transferred
to
me
and
I
just
stole
our
monies,
but
it
should
be
fine,
but
we
can
validate
that
just
an
extra
validation
before
we
maybe
move
over
how
many
hundreds
of
dxt
it
is.
C
What's
the
main
issue,
why,
like
so
chris's
proposals,
are
feeding
in
I'm
get
I
get?
I
get
ipfs
like
getting
proposal
description
and
often
won't
feed.
What
is
the
solution
to
that?
What
is
and
it
becomes
unusable
if
you
can't
see
the
text
right,
do
you
know.
B
D
You
have
to
go
into
the
link
to
see
I'd,
say,
create
a
create
issue
photo
and
we'll
fix
it.
E
Yeah,
maybe
just
need
like
a
refresh
button
there
or
to
try
a
few
more
times,
but
make
an
issue
for
it
and
fix
it.
B
Cool
and
then
just
on
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
there
is
a
proposal.
This
is
to
send
the
funds
to
the
quick
blog
scheme.
So
this
is
past.
This
is
in
the
regular
contributor
or
the
funding
and
voting
power
scheme
there.
I
did
have
a
question.
B
On
the
timing
of
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
I
think
there
was
this
proposal
that
passed
that
set
the
boosted
proposed
proposal
period
to
three
days.
But
then
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
was
true
for
yours
and
a
gusto's
proposal,
because
it
still.
E
Looked
yeah
they
were
made
after
that
one
executed,
so
that's
it
should
have
been
three
days.
I
think
it
was
four
completely
so
one
twist
and
then
the
three
when
it's
boosted,
okay,
yeah
before
I
mean
so
the
yeah.
The
other
important
thing
is:
we
need
to
execute
the
transfer
of
dxd
things
if
it's
a
few
hours
ahead
of
me
against
those
anyways.
So
that's,
okay.
E
B
B
B
Things
in
the
the
quick
wallet
scheme
here,
even
yeah-
this
is
good.
I
Yeah,
sorry
that,
even
if
the
worker,
if
this
proposal
failed
it
cost
like
a
month,
you
know
to
be
executed.
So
let's
say
that
pros
and
my
propos
proposals
are
mine
passes
and
there
is
no
funds
and
there's
not
enough
funds
right
to
execute
them.
They're
going
to
have
a
there
are
going
to
be
a
month
there
to
be
executed
successfully
once
that
month
passes.
I
I
A
I
B
Cool
anything
else
on
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
I
guess
ross
and
augusto
proposals.
B
And
then
next
one
just
a
funny
proposal.
This
is
the
final
answer.
This
is
something
to
do
with
carrot.
It's
a
test
as
using
dx
dow
as
an
arbitrator,
and
so
I'm
not.
I
think
the
final
answer
is
yes,
but
this
will
pass
and
we'll
be
testing
the
deek's
thousand
arbitrator.
B
And
then
yeah
there's
a
couple
other
proposals:
the
next
die:
there's
the
member
balancer
to
sky
for
the
x-gen
that
he
bridged
over.
I
think
it
was
35
000
x-gen,
so
anyone
that
has
xgen
unclaimed.
You
can
now
claim
that
from
from
xdx
dow,
you
should
be
able
to
do
that
in
the
in
your
top
right
on
mdx
vote.
I
think
there's
also
a
way
to
do
it
through
block
scout
in
a
batched
way,
but
yeah
that's
boosted
and
the
reimbursement
was
set
to
pass
in
three
days.
B
Yeah
then
there's
a
rep
boost,
I
think
that's
finally
getting
cleared
after
there's
been
some
proposals
through
and
then
there
is
a
reimbursement
for
zett
that
I
think
had
the
the
title
a
little
bit
left
over
from
the
dummy
text.
But
this
is
the
merchant
stipends
for
hats.
I
mean
for
shirts
hats,
all
of
the
good
stuff
we
had
in
lisbon
and
then
yeah.
I
think
there
are
and
then
there's
the
space
inch
development
work
in
october.
B
So
this
proposal
is
actually
a
little
bit
different
than
the
past
ones,
because
it
was
actually
submitted
by
space
inch
themselves.
I
actually
tried
to
get
them
to
use
dx
vote
and
they
got
all
the
way
until
they
found
out
that
a
trezor.
They
can't
submit
a
proposal
with
a
with
a
treasure.
They
got
a
eip,
50
1559
error,
but
anyway
they
submitted
this
themselves
on
alchemy,
and
then
I
staked
on
it
to
this.
B
So
this
is
the
third
month
that
they've
been
doing
work
on
swapper
finishing
the
bridging
stuff
and
said
this
is
a
payout
to
them.
For
the
month
of
october,.
B
And
then
I
think
the
last
one
is
a
proposal
from
keenan
and
then
a
proposal
that
I
assume
is
from
the
keys
from
kenan
because
it's
from
keenan's
address,
but
these
are
keenan's
record
proposals
that
he
submitted.
I
think
last
night
and
are
slated
to
boost
today.
H
Yeah,
I
have
a
quick
comment.
I
left
in
the
governance
chat
the
I
think
my
chrome
did
it.
I
don't
think
dx
vote
did
it,
but
my
second
proposal
auto
filled
when
I
was
typing
it
out
and
I
just
missed
it.
So
my
second
proposal
has
the
same
proposal,
how
you
say
title
as
the
other.
They
both
say
two
out
of
two,
but
the
calls
and
proposal
texts
are
accurate,
so
I
boosted
them.
B
D
E
I
think
that
might
happen
when
there's
no
title.
That
was
oh,
so
this
was
actually
causing
an
issue
in
the
cache
building.
The
cache
doesn't
like
it
and
keeps
goes
into
an
infinite
loop
of
trying
to
get
something
from
ipfs
that
doesn't
exist.
B
E
E
B
B
B
Awesome
and
then
just
like
the
the
discussion
items,
one
skye
posted
a
signal
proposal
for
eth
denver
sponsorship
opportunity
and
I
think
we're
looking
to
move
quickly
on
this.
I
don't
believe
sky
that
this
actually
includes
the
payment
in
the
proposal,
but
it,
I
guess,
signals
the
the
level
of
payment
there
but
yeah
anything
to
add
to
this
and
before
you
move
it
to
on
chain
proposal.
C
Well,
yes,
we
don't
have.
We
don't
have
the
details
of
where
and
when
we're
sending
funds,
but
we
could
send
the
funds
like
directly
from
a
proposal
to
pay,
which
is
better
than
like,
using,
for
example,
the
ex-voice
would
be
as
long
as
the
timing
as
long
as
we
they're,
okay
with
the
timing
but
yeah.
If
this
signal
proposal,
pat
if
this
is
supported
in
the
forum
depending
on
when
we
do
the
unchained
proposal
yeah,
we
could
send
the
funds
actually
from
on
xdi,
probably
directly.
B
C
C
C
So
if
we
can't
get
that,
I
think
it
would
be
slightly
cheaper,
which
they're
called
a
metal
light
like
like
2500
off,
and
if
we
can
get
the
table,
I
think
it's
the
20k,
so
it's
one
or
the
other,
but
either
way
yeah
we're
seeing
which
one
we
can
get.
I
think
the
desire
was
that
we
want
the
sponsorship
table
if
we
can
get
it,
which
is
then
the
the
the
full
price
that's
in
there,
the
20k
and
if,
for
some
reason
we
can't
get
it
it's
slightly
cheaper
yeah.
B
C
This
this
is
one
more
example
of
like
some
of
the
information
is
private,
like
they
don't
want
the
entire,
like
menu
of
sponsorship
stuff
like
fully
public,
so
we
can't
make
that
fully
public.
If
you
have
questions
you
can
ask-
and
we
can,
you
know,
show
privately.
C
Ideally
things
like
this:
there
are
other
scenarios
where
we
want
to
pay
from
the
dx
voice
multisig
once
we
know,
but
there
is
this.
Like
general,
we
don't
really
know
how
to
deal
with
this,
because
if
we
we
have
support
in
this
on
the
forum
like
do,
we
actually
need
an
unchained
proposal
like
it's
cool
to
do
it
on
chain
proposal
and
pay
was
with
some
of
the
details
and
we've
done
that
with
the
opolis
crew
and
the
etheropolis
crew
before
so
they're.
C
Familiar
with
that,
but
theoretically,
like
expenses
like
this,
could
also
come
out
of
the
dx
voice,
multisig,
but
a
big
expense
like
that.
It's
good
to
know
that
there
is
general
support,
but
it's
it's
like
comes
down
to
like.
Do
you
pay
this
out
of
a
delegated
like
thing
that
was
already
approved
for
things
like
like
conferences,
or
do
you
do
a
new
proposal
with
money
leaving
the
treasury,
so
I
think
whenever
possible,
it's
okay
and,
and
we
can
put
the
public
information.
C
B
Yeah
definitely,
and
it
will
be
depend
on
the
situation
and
the
size,
obviously
yeah.
I
know
we're
running
at
the
top
of
the
hour,
so
I
just
wanted
a
one
more
kind
of
item
to
to
touch
on
here.
Finky,
I
think,
is
on
the
call,
but
can't
speak.
He
has
posted
a
forum
in
the
forum
last
week
about
swapper
single
sided
staking.
So
I
think
this
is
something
we've
been
talking
about
for
a
bit
in.
B
You
know
the
discord
and
on
on
calls
and
there's
good
consensus
on
this
and
he's
ready
to
move
forward
to
his
signal
proposal,
and
the
discussion
was
where
to
do
the
signal
proposal,
because,
obviously,
with
swapper
and
swapper
emissions
were,
you
know
also
trying
to
build
up
swapper
governance
capabilities,
so
wondering
whether
this
proposal
should
go
on
xdx
tao,
on
xdi
or
through
the
swapper
snapshot
or
both,
and
I
think
he
was
hoping
to
try
to
get
this
up
in
the
next
day
so
curious
to
know.
B
G
Yeah,
I
personally
think
that
both
are
fine
if
we
do
unchain
with
rep
holders
and
snapshots
if
we
are
to
go
for
just
one,
I
I'd
be
for
snapshots
so
either
way.
Yeah.