►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-08-18]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
and
welcome
to
the
dxdow
governance
discussion
18th
of
august
2021,
looking
at
first
of
all,
proposals
live
on
mainnet
nxti.
We
have
seven
proposals,
boosted
or
pending
boost
on
mainnet,
first
of
which
is
the
dx
retreat
2021
in
lisbon.
A
So
this
is
something
that's
been
talked
about
for
for
a
while,
with
the
upcoming
blockchain
lisbon
week
happening
in
portugal,
lisbon
to
organize
a
small
dx
retreat
where
the
exile
contributors
fly
out
one
week
before
the
event
to
not
only
meet
in
person,
but
also
do
some
workshops,
some
team
building,
as
well
as
some
co-working
together
and
also
kind
of
get
synced
up
and
organized
about
the
upcoming
eth
lisbon
blockchain
week.
A
So
this
proposal
actually
already
passed
on
xdi,
so
it
was
up
on
main
net
nxti
on
extend.
It
was
solely
a
signal
proposal
on
mainnet.
It's
actually
a
signal
in
funding
proposals,
so
the
mainnet
proposal
actually
also
transfers
some
funds
to
the
multisig
wallet,
which
is
20
000
euro
more
or
less
25
000
us
dollars.
So
these
are
transferred
in
usdc.
A
The
proposal
already
passed
on
exa,
as
I
mentioned,
and
we
have
a
couple
of
days
remaining
on
the
mainnet
one,
which
is
also
the
funding
one
then
moving
on,
we
have
lh
l,
h,
b
worker
proposals,
which
is
kermit's
proposals,
they're
split
through
a
couple,
as
you
request,
die
and
rep
on
different
addresses.
Then
there's
also
a
mainnet
rep
sync
for
nathan,
so
for
anyone
else
who
also
hasn't
done
the
rap
sync.
You
know
it's
always
good
to
have
the
rep
reflected
on
mainnet,
whatever
you
earn
on
xdi.
A
So
even
though
gas
costs
aren't
optimal,
if
you
haven't
done
a
mainnet
rep
sync
for
a
while,
you
know
we
always
encourage
that
you
do
do
some.
Then
we
have
an
update
on
the
omen.
Ethan
xdi
omen
eve
contest,
hash
of
ipfs,
not
sure
geronimo.
If
you
want
to
say
anything
specific
about
that
or.
A
B
Right
that
is,
the
refactoring
release.
Like
someone
from
the
community
proposed
the
new
version,
it
looks
correct
and
it's
like
the
bigger
refactoring
release
which
which
was
announced
on
on
key
face.
Okay,.
A
Awesome
and
then
we
have
actually
one
last
proposal
left
on
mainnet,
which
is
a
member
balancer,
so
sky
actually
did
a
member
balance
for
jen
on
x
die
so
the
treasury.
When
x,
I
was
running
a
bit
low
on
gentles,
just
a
rebalancing
for
him,
covering
the
gen
and
the
transaction
costs
and
then
moving
to
x
die.
We
have
10
proposals
boosted
or
pending
there,
the
majority
of
which
are
actually
just
buybacks.
A
So
we've
started
to
kind
of
increase
the
frequency
of
buybacks
trying
to
do
one
per
day,
particularly
considering
that
we're
not
able
to
do
them
on
mainnet
at
the
moment.
So
we're
trying
to
push
out
one
dede
on
x
die
and
those
also
make
up
the
bulk
of
the
current
proposals
on
extire
other
than
that
we
have.
The
lp
dow
rewards
proposal
live,
so
this
is
to
launch
a
house
westpac
campaign
with
dxd
rewards,
which
we
talked
about
on
last
week's
governance
school
as
well.
A
A
So
I
guess
we
can
start
off
with
the
dx
retreat
in
lisbon,
which
we
really
briefly
spoke
about
before.
So,
as
I
said,
the
proposal
already
passed
on
x-tie,
so
we
have
like
some
signaling
intent
that
this
is
going
to
happen.
Two
days
left
for
the
mainnet
proposal,
which
will
also
transfer
the
funds.
A
This
proposal
right
now
is
more
of
like
a
general
signal
proposal
for
the
dx
retreat
to
happen,
and
the
funds
transferred
in
this
proposal
actually
pretty
much
solely
to
cover
accommodation
for
the
entirety
of
the
dx
retreat,
which
would
be
roughly
from
the
10th
of
october
until
the
17th
so
one
week
and
following
that
from
the
18th
until
24th
or
25th,
is
actually
the
if
lisbon
blockchain
week
or,
however,
that
is
whatever
the
official
name
is,
and
so
this
proposal
actually
covers
accommodation
for
dx
style
contributors
over
this
time
period,
so
we'll
have
a
different
accommodation
for
the
dx
retreat,
which
is
expected
to
take
place
close
to
lisbon.
A
So,
like
20
30
minute
drive
outside
of
lisbon
in
a
bit
more
of
a
rural
area,
so
a
bit
more
relaxed
and
you
know
we're
a
little
bit
hectic
than
being
in
the
capital
and
then,
of
course,
we're
moving
to
lisbon
a
bit
earlier
before
the
blockchain
week
actually
starts.
So
we
also
have
some
time
to
get
settled
down
in
lisbon
and
then
we'll
have
accommodation
until
the
25th
we
haven't.
A
We
have
got
a
couple
of
things
prepared
which
we
are
intending
to
book
on
house
transportation
I'll
get
to
that
in
a
second.
So
we
have
a
couple
of
things
we
already
want
to
book
we're
just
waiting.
We
actually
have
some
reserved
as
well,
so
we're
just
really
waiting
for
the
proposal
on
mainnet
to
go,
live
and,
after
that
we'll
kind
of
have
a
set
accommodation
and
we'll
also
be
able
to
start
planning
a
bit
more
around
the
workshops.
We
want
to
do
any
team
activities.
A
So
the
first
venue,
if
we
do
go
ahead
and
book
that
it's
actually
a
20-minute
ride
from
the
airport,
so
I
would
expect
that
in
a
future
proposal
similar
to
how
we
did
in
ecc,
there
will
be
a
certain
amount
of
budget
allocated
to
everyone
which
is
intended
to
cover
food,
transportation,
etc,
and
I
believe
the
best
way
in
lisbon
to
get
around
is
really
just
uber
or
public
transport.
We're
actually
trying
to
book
a
place
very
central
and
close
to
the
hackathon
for
the
time
in
lisbon.
A
So
I
don't
think
transportation
will
be
a
major
issue,
but
uber
is
relatively
easy
to
use
and
affordable
in
lisbon.
So
even
from
the
airport
to
the
first
venue,
I
would
expect
like
a
maximum
of
10
or
15
euros,
so
it's
really
relatively
affordable
compared
to
other
cities,
uber
and
lisbon
and
yeah.
Then
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
had
anything
to
talk
about.
I
know.
A
Nylon
had
also
proposed
a
set
of
workshops
from
an
external
company
which
kind
of
specializes
in
strategy
workshop
for
startups,
and
they
also
have
a
lot
of
experience
in
the
dao
space.
So
that's
one
of
the
more
I
would
say,
formal
workshops
that
we'll
be
doing
if
if
it
passes,
of
course,
no
I'm
not
sure
if
you
want
to
give
a
quick
overview
of
what
they
do
exactly.
C
C
All
it's
not
you
know
if
it
passes
it's
when
it
passes,
but
yeah
greater
than
they're
a
company
that
I've
known
for
a
while.
I've
actually
worked
with
them
in
daostack
and
yeah
they're,
very
good,
with
like
team
building
and
process
building
and
sort
of
like
strategy
building,
and
I
think
this
is
something
we
need
they're
very
experienced
also
with
you
know,
decentralized
autonomous
organizations
and
have
experience.
We
know
this,
like
you
know,
hierarchy,
less
structures
and
yeah.
I
think
this
is.
C
This
could
be
like
a
very
good
sort
of
like
focused
workshop
on
on
something-
and
I
think
like
this.
These
are
conversations
that
happen
in
paris
and
kind
of
like
in
the
end.
So
in
the
past
couple
of
yeah,
I
don't
know
the
past
couple
of
months
about
yeah,
like
you
know,
sort
of
like
the
core
and
mid-term
like
tactics
or
strategy.
I
don't
know
how
to
call
it.
How
do
we
flush
these
out?
How
do
we
build
the
right
processes?
C
How
do
we,
you
know,
try
to
get
you
know
to
the
right
decisions
so
yeah?
That's
that
you
know
the
proposal
is
up
on
the
dow
doc
forums
and
feel
free
to
like
comment
there
and
yeah.
I
will
put
it
up
onto
xdi
yeah,
probably.
A
E
B
Yeah,
I'm
in
general,
curious
what
those
workshops
entail,
because
we
are
like
completely
remote
via
and
communicating
with,
like
one
chat
finds.
How
do
like
what
kind
of
workshop
do
we
expect
to
improve
our
work
environment,
workflow.
C
C
There's
some
stuff
I'm
reading
here
like
yeah.
It's
like
emergent
strategy,
which
is
you
know
like
essentially
a
process
to
you,
know
realize
I
don't
know
decisions
in
a
decentralized
or
you
know
non-hierarchical
way,
yeah
like
there's
a
session
about
distributed
leadership
and
accountability
like
how
do
you?
How
do
you
I
mean?
I
think
I
don't
I
mean
we
do
have
a
little
bit,
but
I
think,
like
we
could
use
a
bit
more
accountability
and
then
maybe
rewards
for
successful
accountabilities
yeah
I
mean.
Can
you
like
anything
related?
A
F
So
so
the
the
sensor
and
the
gun,
so
when
you
hit
the
gun,
it'll
it'll
make
a
noise
and
there's
a
also
a
life
indicator
on
the
side.
So
you
have
basically
have
four
at
four
life
bars
so
asking.
If
we
could
play
some
like
team
elimination
stuff,
we
could
actually
get
pretty
competitive
with
it.
If
you
wanted
to-
or
we
could
just
you
know,
keep
it
this
casual
laser
tag,
but
either
way
I
think
that'll
be
that'll,
be
a
fun
activity.
F
So
well
so
there
you
have
up
to
four
teams
that
you
can
make.
Usually
you
have
red
and
blue
then
like
if
you're
on
the
red
team,
and
then
you
hit
a
blue
like
the
laser.
Somehow
the
waves
are
nose.
I
don't
know
how
it
works,
but
it
just
it
just
knows
what
team
it's
on.
B
A
B
A
That
should
be
quite
cool.
I
would
just
advise
you
to
maybe
check
requirements
to
bringing
this
into
portugal,
because
an
american
flying
to
europe
with
24
guns
in
a
suitcase
might
raise
flags
yeah.
F
I'll
be
like,
but
they're
just
laser
guns,
it's
like
nah
come
with
us,
but
yeah
I'll
check
those
requirements
for
sure.
A
Yeah,
just
so
you
don't
lose
them
or
anything
but
yeah.
No,
that
sounds
awesome
and
as
well.
You
know
once
we
have
the
accommodation
book,
we'll
also
be
able
to
have
like
some
more
concrete
schedule
and
start
putting
down
an
agenda
so
also
like
the
workshops
of
nylon.
We
can
figure
out
some
dates
for
that,
and
I
know
melanie
is
also
in
touch
with
a
couple
of
people
already
in
lisbon
for
actually
organizing
some
dx
style
workshops
and
talks
as
well.
A
Given
that
there'll
be
a
number
of
events
surrounding
liz
con
and
eats
lisbon
as
well,
so
that's
quite
cool
and
moving
ahead,
and
also
one
last
thing
to
say
about
the
dx
retreat
is
if
any
contributor
is
wanting
to
come-
and
you
haven't
put
your
name
on
this
list-
I'm
sharing
in
the
chat
now
make
sure
to
do
so.
So
we
can
also
get
the
numbers
right
and
start
sorting
out
everything
a
bit
more
concretely
and
not
sure
if
anyone
else
has
any
questions
around
dx
retreat
or
lisbon
blockchain
week.
B
I
have
one
how
many
tickets
does
like
do.
We
need
two
tickets
for
east
lisbon
and
blizzcon.
A
Yeah,
so
listcon
tickets
will
actually
go
on
sale,
so
a
bit
like
ecc,
I
believe,
we'll
have
to
purchase
them.
If
we
do
go
with
the
sponsorship
option,
we
should
have
some
tickets
included
with
that.
We
already
signed
up
for
their
sponsorship
deck,
but
I
believe
it's
not
ready
yet
they're
expecting
to
have
it
this
week.
So
we'll
have
some
more
information
on
that,
hopefully,
by
end
of
the
week
and
for
the
hackathon.
Instead,
it's
a
hackathon
right,
so
you
actually
have
to
apply
to
hack.
They
don't
actually
sell
tickets.
A
Agusa
is
to
actually
apply
to
hack
or
if
you
have
a
sponsorship,
you
get
some
entry
tickets,
so
I
don't
know
if
everyone
has
already
applied
for
if
lisbon,
if
you
haven't
make
sure
to
do
so
now,
you
can
just
go
on
the
website
if
lisbon
and
apply
to
be
a
hacker
or
share
the
link
in
the
chat
so
yeah,
it's
two
separate
tickets
and
then
the
side
events-
I
guess
they'll
mostly
be
free
or
you
know,
have
some
other
way
of
getting
in
so
we're.
A
Actually
also
looking
to
organize
a
dx
style
party,
which
we
could
do
as
an
opening
party
before
the
event
or
something
like
this,
and
we
might
also
want
to
think
about
something
cool
like
some
way
to
get
in
would
be
like.
Oh
show
us
the
wallet
where
you
hold
dx.
Now
when
you
get
in
or
we
could
distribute
rep
at
the
event
or,
but
I
I
think
all
these
things
are
starting
to
be
a
bit
more
concrete
now,
and
if
anybody
has
some
cool
ideas,
please
also
share
them
in
the
chat
or
wherever.
A
Yeah
and
then,
if
no
one
else
has
any
other
questions,
there
was
one
last
item
on
the
agenda.
So
if
you
have
been
on
in
the
forum
you
might
have
seen,
keenan
has
kind
of
posted
an
arbitrary
launch
plan,
keenan,
not
sure
if
you
may
want
to
give
a
quick
overview
of
that.
G
Yeah,
I
can
give
a
give
an
overview
and
then
maybe
john,
if
you
want
to
step
in
with
some
of
the
more
technical
steps
that
would
be
good
but
yeah,
as
you
may
or
may
not
know.
Dx
thou's
been
preparing
for
arbitrary
for
quite
a
while.
Now,
probably
pre-summer
and
arbitrary
had
to
keep
moving
back,
and
we
now
have
a
a
soft
date
of
august,
which
we
are
interpreting
to
be
this
coming
week.
G
G
If
you
haven't
seen
it
there,
it
is
I'll
skip
the
steps
for
now,
but
the
only
thing
that
you
probably
would
need
to
know
if
you're,
not
the
deployer,
is
that
there's
a
reward
for
the
deployer
to
do
the
smart
contracts
and
deploy
the
swapper
token
of
0.5
eth
and
there's
a
large
list
of
of
technical
things
that
they
need
to
handle.
G
I
guess
the
only
other
thing
would
be
included
in
that
the
dx
vote
deployment,
which
would
be
our
first
time
utilizing
dx
vote
on
our
arbitrary
base,
which
we
are.
I
believe
we
are
calling
adx
tau
lowercase
a
and
yeah
we're
also
dealing
with
swapper
liquidity
mining
via
that
base
through
proposals,
and
it
will
be
funded
in
the
coming
weeks
as
well
with
the
signal
proposal
that
passed
about
a
month
ago,
which
authorized
2.25
million
of
capital
2
million
to
swap
for
liquidity
and
about
250
000
to
working
capital.
D
D
It's
a
lot
of
first
right,
first
time
deploying
dx
vote
with
real
funds
and
production
first
time
moving
to
a
layer,
two
just
to
launch
barber
trip
itself
is
really
exciting
and
the
first
time
dxdot
will
be
doing
a
product
token,
so
exciting
stuff
definitely
check
it
out.
It's
fairly
complicated,
but
it's
all
laid
out
there.
So.
D
Yeah
exactly
so,
there's
three
steps:
dx
vote
being
probably
the
first
one,
although
that
could
be
done
in
parallel
with
the
second
step,
which
is
deployment
of
the
swapper
token
itself.
Once
those
are
in
place,
then
the
dev
team
will
let
our
from
one
team
know
to
whitelist
the
proposer
address
so
that
you
know
that
could
be
anybody.
But
then,
at
that
point
after
those
first
two
steps
are
complete.
D
It
clears
the
way
for
the
third
step,
which
is
the
one
that
involves
deploying
all
of
the
swapper
exchange
and
surrounding
smart
contracts
to
arbitrary
one,
and
you
know
making
sure
that
the
initial
swapper
token
required
for
the
airdrop
on
arbitrary
one,
as
well
as
the
initial
liquidity
mining
campaigns
are
all
in
place
on
arbitrary
one
and
then
the
proposal
that
goes
with
that
third
step
is
update
to
swapper.ed.
So
it
would
also
involve
you
know,
deploying
the
latest
release
for
swapper
with
the
correct
environment,
variables
and
yeah.
D
And
one
thing
to
note
there
is
that
you
know
that
for
that
third
step
to
the
release
hasn't
been
done
yet
so
like
there's
still,
you
know
that
piece
needs
to
be
done
from
the
dev
team
before
that.
Third
final
step
can
happen.
B
D
Sort
of
the
same
process
that
we
follow
with
doing
dap
deployments
and
updates
right,
like
the
dev
team,
will
will
do
the
coding
and
make
the
release
and
then
it's
up
to
the
community
to
do
the
deployments,
and
this
is
just
a
little
bit
more
complicated
than
usual
because
it
involves
you
know,
like
I
said,
all
those
pieces
and
the
smart
contracts.
So
exactly
it's
just
a
set
of
instructions
for
the
community
to
follow.
B
So,
are
we
gonna
like
keep
the
community
updated
in
terms
of
like
where
the
basically
the
community
deployment
is
in
terms
of
progress?
I
think.
E
Yeah,
I
also
wanted
to
add
some
features
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
for
the
first
time
in
the
export.
Just
to
summarize,
first
of
all,
we
are
going
to
be
using
the
wallet
schemes
that
we
develop
based
in
our
needs.
So
this
has
a
very
nice
feature
that
is
acts
as
a
security
layer
where
we
can
say
which
contracts
the
schemes
can
call
and
which
cannot.
E
Also,
we
are,
we
are
going
to
be
having
new
new
constraints
for,
for
example,
for
the
execution
of
boosted
proposals.
E
So
now
we
are
going
to
require
a
small
percentage
of
votes
to
be
set
in
boosted
proposals
in
order
to
be
executed,
and
there
is
also
a
check
making
sure
that
the
schemes
are
not
able
to
mint
or
burn
more
than
more
than
a
certain
reputation
percentage,
and
the
best
of
all
is
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
a
dxevori
machine,
which
means
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
dxz
for
staking
in
arabic.
E
So
yeah,
all
those
all
those
security
features
plus
dxz
voting.
So
this
is
the
first
time
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
dxe
and
ether
with
all
our
new
governance.
Our
brand
new
governance
system,
dx
vote
on
arbitro,
I'm
going
to
be
deploying
on
arbitron
and
then
I'm
going
to
give
control
to
the
to
the
dxo
multi
signature
that
I
guess
that
we
are
going
to
have
to
deploy
something
on
on
arbitrary.
E
So
the
idea
is
that
this
multi-signature
owner
that
has
been
taking
actions
on
on
the
exile
on
mainnet
executing
buybacks
and
a
lot
of
transfers.
They
are
going
to
be
able
to
change
the
the
exposure,
configuration
and
update
the
cache
and
some
maintenance
action
that
later
I'm
going
to
kind
of
train.
D
I
said
it's
also
worth
pointing
out
that
the
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
is
set
up
in
such
a
way
that
there's
a
fairly
high
minimum
percentage
vote
required
for
boosted
proposals,
something
we
don't
have
on
midnight
right
so
like
with
the
suggested
parameter
here
in
the
dot
tag.
Post
is
seven
percent,
but
that's
also
paired
with
pretty
quick
turnaround
times
for
the
boosting,
pre-boosting
and
boosted
periods.
D
So
the
idea
there
is
that
this
would
enable
like
the
community
and
governance,
to
move
pretty
quickly
in
the
early
days
on
arbitrary
one,
with
the
liquidity,
mining
campaigns
with
swapper,
and
this
is
the
swapper
wallet
scheme.
So
it's
just
loaded
with
the
like.
You
know,
required
swapper
tokens
that
doesn't
have
access
to
other
dx
style
funds
or
or
other
like
important
privileges
right.
It's
just
gonna
be
able
to
manage
those
swapper
tokens,
but
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
new
approach
to
moving
quickly.
I
think
and
definitely
check
out
those
parameters.
D
We
could
maybe
even
set
out
some
time
in
a
future
governance
call
to
go
through
all
the
parameters
and
stuff,
but
we
will
also
be
able
to
update
parameters
by
voting
right
on
the
registrar
scheme.
E
Yeah,
all
the
conf,
all
the
configuration
only
that
all
the
permissions
configuration
and
cache
of
the
app
they're
going
to
be
able
to
be
updated,
well,
their
permissions
via
proposals.
The
configuration
be
a
change
in
the
configuration
that
the
address
that
is
going
to
be
stored
on
ipfs
and
the
cache.
Also
by
that,
so
there
is
going
to
be
an
address
that
is
going
to
be
maintaining
this
cachet,
this
data
that
is
stored
in
the
application
and
this
com
and
the
configuration
file.
E
So
I
guess
later
next
week
we
should
organize
a
setup,
a
call
where
I
can
explain
the
signature
owners
how
to
use
and
how
to
change
and
how
to
maintain
the
application
themselves,
because
right
now,
I'm
in
complete
control
of
the
application
right.
Everyone
is
using
the
application
on
githubio,
and
that
is
not
the
idea.
So
we
are
going
to
have
it
on
on
a
proper
ens
name
and
is
going
to
be
under
control
of
of
the
exile
people.
D
E
Maintenance
yeah,
it's
practically
maintenance,
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
have
any
it
doesn't
put
any
funds
at
risk,
mainly
the
idea
why
why
do
we
have
to
use
them
with
sig?
For
that
good
question?
Hello,
because
the
app
is
a
very
early
stage,
so
we
need
to
be
able
to
do
change
quickly
right
if
we
find
a
valve
or
if
we
find
an
issue,
we
need
to
be
able
to
change
the
deploy
to
change
the
application
on
this
deploy
quite
quickly.
E
We
cannot
wait
for
now
for
seven
days
so
till
the
application
is
not
in
in
a
stable
state.
We
are,
I
mean
it's
going
to
be
it's
going
to
be
under
control
of
a
of
this
multi-signature
addresses
that
we
have
been
using
for
for
buyback
purposes,.
E
I'm
going
I'm
going,
I'm
talking
about
the
explode
application
swapper.
I
have
no
idea
how
it's
going
to
be
controlled.
I
guess
they
can.
It
can
be
controlled
by
the
the
exile
itself,
but
the
idea
of
the
dxvote
application
is
still
in
early
stage,
so
I'm
I'm
putting
the
responsibility
of
design
when
the
when
the
app
is
ready
on
the
multisignature
owners
and
when
we
think
it
is
ready.
We
transfer
the
ownership
to
the
excel.
B
Yeah,
that
makes
total
sense.
I
I
had
one
question
to
augusto
augustine.
You
mentioned
the
the
usage
of
constraints
and
they
will
like
it
will
require.
E
Yeah
there
is,
there
is
going
to
be
a
required
percentage
on
on
positive
votes
on
boosting
proposals
too,
for
example,
I
think
we
are.
We
are
requiring
like
a
seven
percent
positive
votes
on
on
proposals
that
are
going
to
be
on
the
swapper
quality
scheme
on
the
quick
quality
scheme
we
are
going
to
require.
I
guess
I
think
one
percent
or
something
like
that,
and
then
the
master
word
scheme
five.
So
this
is
a.
This
is
a
check
that
we
added
because
we
were,
we
saw
boosted
proportion
execute
with
very
few
reputation.
E
B
Yeah
make
sense,
so
it's
basically
like
adding
a
quorum
to
dx
volt
proposals
right.
E
To
the
expo
boosted
proposals
exactly
okay,
so.
B
E
Also,
just
to
finish,
I'm
working
on
a
dx
boat
road
map
for
to
version
2.0,
so
I'm
just
getting
the
document
ready
and
I'm
going
to
be
sharing
we
internally
with
the
community
and
then
share
it
on
on
dow
talk
and
yeah.
That
is
going
to
be
also
this
step
on
deploying
to
arbitrage
and
a
few
future
steps
that
we
are
going
to
take
and
in
x.
I
am
mainly
to
because
the
configuration
that
we
are
going
to
use
in
everything
that
is
the
ideal
one.
E
That
is
what
we
once
we
started
using
it
your
you
guys
are
going
to
see
how
awesome
it
is,
and
why
do
we
want
to
use
it
in
excitement
and
I'm
creating
a
roadmap
of
how
we
can
migrate,
how
we
can
migrate
from
x
from
x?
E
I
a
minute
to
a
configuration
that
we
are
going
to
be
using
in
arbitrary
and
also
is
taking
yeah
using
dxe
for
start
using
the
xa
dxe
as
staking
in
x
I
and
and
minute,
and
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
start
staking
with
dxz
on
and
on
x.
D
And
this
was
something
that
confused
me
for
a
bit
but
gusto,
even
though
we're
using
dxd
as
the
staking
token
on
arbitrary
one
on
adx
tao.
The
dow
itself,
like
that
base
is
not
actually
providing
down
stake
in
dxd,
like
like
the
main
net
dow
provides
down
stake
in
gen,
is.
Is
that
right.
E
Yeah,
that
is
something
that
that
many
words
in
the
contribution
reward
where
you
have
a
you,
have
a
reward,
for
I
mean
a
minimum
dow
bounty
that
is
set
to
250
gem
in
contribution
reward.
If
you
create
a
proportion-
and
you
succeed
and
and
you
execute
it
successfully-
you
get
the
250
gen
as
reward,
because
the
because
the
dow,
the
avatar
and
the
and
the
boring
machine,
mainly
the
volume
machine
it
has
gen
that
give
you
a
reward.
So
here
is
there
is
not
going
to
be
no
reward.
E
The
minimum
dial
bounty
that
is
set
that,
for
example,
when
you
create
a
proposal
on
dx
vote,
and
you
say,
and
you
see
that
there
is
one
dxe
take
it
on
on
negative
right,
so
you
have
to
stick
more
than
one
to
to
boost
the
proposal,
this
negative,
the
exit
that
you
see
at
the
beginning.
This
is
it
is
not
like
an
area
like
you
are
not
going
to
get
it
back
like
you
do
with
with
the
chances
protocol
right
now
using
the
contribution
reward.
E
B
The
the
feature
dow
stack
kind
of
introduced
with
this
rewarding
governance
participation
right
at
the
end
of
the
day.
We
want
that
dxd
holders
actually
like
basically
boost
stuff
and
signal
with
their
money
if
something
should
go
through
and
they
should
be
rewarded
with
it.
So
I
like,
I
would
love
to
see
that
feature
getting
back.
E
A
A
E
Can
be
that
can
be
configured
as
well?
I
don't
I
don't
remember.
How
do
we
configure
it
in
the
in
the
dxd
boring
machine?
There
is
an
option
that
dao
that
the
dao
can't
claim
the
the
the
stake
that
one
lost.
We
are
not
using
it
on
on
the
dxe
body
machine.
I
think,
but
in
case
that
us
take
on
a
on
an
outcome
that,
for
example,
proportion
executed
successfully
and
you
take
it
for
no
and
this
proposal,
security
didn't
expire,
it
actually
executed.
E
B
Dave
was:
was
that
also
a
question
for
the
mainnet
like
if
these
dolls
were
actually
winning
a
staking
game
or
like
do
you
know
the
outcome
on
on
mainnet.
A
No,
I
don't
know
the
outcome
on
mainnet.
Actually
you
know
so.
B
D
So
if
the
dow
is
automatically
down
sticking
like
it
is
and
may
not,
250
gen
then
like,
I
think
the
dao
is
getting
all
of
the
up
stake
if
it
fails
right
unless
other
people
also
down
staked,
in
which
case
it's
split,
if
I'm
yeah
I'm
a
little
unclear
or
not
unfamiliar
with
how
this
is
going
to
work
without
the
automatic
downstairs
from
the
dow
it
sounds
like
it
still
requires
the
up
stake,
the
same
amount
of
upstate.
I
just
don't
know
what
happens
to
it.
If
it
fails.
E
Yeah
yeah
the
dxd
body
machine.
I
think
we
don't
use
nothing
like
this.
We
use
a
simple
configuration
that
we
can't
like
there
is.
There
is
no
dxe
going
to
and
from
the
the
the
warrior
machine
itself,
it
is
all
distributed
among
the
people
who
are
stakes
on
it.
E
So
depends
on
the
outcome
on
how
much
you
are
going
to
get
of
your
stake
back,
but
yeah
later
we
show,
we
should
already
need
to
make
sure
that
we
have
a
clear
understanding
of
it
because
the
chinese
protocol
machine
it
has
a
different
configuration
and
I
think
it
use
it's
a
bit
more
complex.
D
Yeah,
maybe
we
can
look
at
that
config
and
we
can
also
just
run
a
test
on
the
test
net
version
of
the
export
where
we,
like,
you
know,
try
to
fail
a
proposal
and
see
what
happens
to
the
upstate.
E
Definitely
yes:
well,
we
have
the
exporting
in
and
ring
cabbie
and
an
aventura
desnet.
We
can
use
it
there.
We
can
test
everything
there
if
we
want-
and
another
thing
is,
that
the
the
reputation
that
we
are
going
to
use
for
dx
vote
on
arbitrarily
is
going
to
be
based
on
the
reputation
that
you
have
mainnet,
plus
the
ones
that
you
that
you
map
in
your
reputation,
mapping
so
from
the
reputation
from
the
reputation
token
or
minute,
plus
the
reputation
mapping.
We
are
going
to
generate
how
much
reputation
has.
E
The
reputation
mapping
is
something
that
we
use
when
we
started
using
the
the
the
reputation
token
on
other
networks
and
we
needed
to
have
we.
We
need
to
have
access
to
reputation
that,
where
that
belongs,
to
a
smart
contract,
what
is
in
maine,
so
the
the
smart
contract
wallet?
We
cannot
resonate
that
address
on
other
networks,
so
we
need
this
smart
contract,
so
maintenance
to
tell
us
which
address
they
wanted
to
use
on
another
network.
That
is
why
we
use
a
reputation,
mapping
tool.
D
D
D
Obviously,
it's
good
to
have
engaged
governance,
but
this
is
also
I
view
like
a
tx
vote
beta,
so
the
feedback
and
input
from
the
people
trying
to
use
it
for
governance
will
be
very
important
for
improving
the
dap
and
getting
it
to
a
point
where
we're
ready
to
use
it
on
midnight
and
and
lastly,
it's
going
to
be
important
in
moving
quickly
with
the
swapper
liquidity,
mining
rewards
and
and
the
things
that
need
to
happen
around
that.
B
Yeah
also
like
when
we,
when
the
clone
of
air.
D
B
G-Star
on
exit
happened.
I
think
there
was
a
mistake
where
we
did
like
the
rep
state
was
actually
reduced
in
terms
of
address
count
because
we
basically
did
not
include
you
know
like
smart
contract
wallets,
which
have
not
been
mapped
on
on
the
contract,
and
I
think
that
mistake
should
should
not
be
done.
The
second
time
when
I
was
wrong.
Basically,
if,
if
there
is
a
smart
contract
wallet
which
didn't
map,
I
think
we
should
just
use
the
smart
contract
wallet.
Ethereum
address
as
a
placeholder.
D
D
That
would
be
a
way
to
hold
it.
In
my
view,
it's
not
necessarily
a
mistake,
though,
because
if
you
know
there's
this
technical
hurdle
and
if
the
the
addresses
are
not
engaged,
you
know
they've.
You
know.
People
have
basically
had
this
entire
time
to
do
the
mapping
right
and
if
your
address
is
not
engaged,
then
they're
not
likely
to
participate
right.
So
in
some
ways
I
think
it's
almost
like
a
beneficial
thing
for
the
doubt
that
we're
losing
some
of
the
unengaged
addresses,
but
but
the
option.
D
So
I
think
in
some
ways
it's
actually
like
beneficial
to
the
dow.
If,
if
we're
missing
the
unengaged
rep.
B
Yeah,
that
makes
sense
that
makes
sense,
especially
if
we
want
to
achieve
majority
votes
on
average
from
right
like
including
non-governance,
but
participants,
just
as
for
a
placeholder,
like
the
main
point
from
my
from
my
point
of
view,
was
that
yeah,
I
think.
B
The
addresses
who
have
mapped
and
who
have
a
lot
of
rep
will
just
have
like
way
more
power
on
on
arbitrary,
so
it
will
not
be
the
same
rep
like.
I
think
we
will
reduce
the
decentralization
of
rep
on
arbitrary,
but
with
a
like
a
good
deal,
because
we
will
have
like
mostly
governance,
participants
on
audit
room,
which
is
beneficial
for
the
beginning.
D
Yeah
and
as
you
see
with
these
reps
things,
I
mean
things
are
getting
more
distributed.
You
know
it's
a
shame
that
we
can't
move
faster
with
some
of
that
rep
syncing
in
terms
of
like
you
know
the
proposals
on
mainnet
and
that
they
cost
money,
but
but
they
are
like
increasing
the
distribution
of
rep
and
and
reducing
the
top
heaviness
like
you
know,
slowly
over
time,
which
I
don't
know
in
my
mind.
I
think
that's
the
right
way
to
do
it
like.
D
B
Yeah,
especially
on
average,
I
think,
for
the
first
month.
It's
basically
like
a
still
a
playground
right,
so
I
expect
that
just
the
core
will
participate.
B
Do
we
know
any
other
like
dao
redeploying?
Everyone
is
talking
about
products
and
mm
protocols,
but.
D
D
Yeah,
I
think
that's
it.
On
the
on
that
dev
talk
post,
encourage
everybody
to
take
a
look.
It
is.
It
is
a
bit
long,
but
some
cool
stuff.
A
Awesome-
and
I
believe
that
also
covers
our
agenda
for
today,
for
the
governance
course.
So
if
anyone
else
has
anything
else,
they
want
to
talk
about,
speak
now
or
forever
remain
in
silence.
A
H
Yeah
I
was
wondering
whether
it's
at
all
possible,
where
dalstack
would
allow
it,
but
augusto
just
left.
H
And
this
brings
up
a
bigger
question
whether
we
could
somehow
allow
a
proposal,
whatever
the
reason
for
it,
not
not
just
rep
on
on
any
chain
to
be
able
to
be
executed
as
an
action
on
some
of
the
other
dow
networks
that
we
have
a
base
on.
D
I
think
the
short
answer
is
we
don't
have
the
ability
to
do
that
at
this
time
like
it,
they
are
kind
of
like
these
separate
instances,
even
though
they
reflect
the
distribution
from
mainnet
at
the
start,
but
yeah.
These
are.
These
are
like
interesting
questions
right
and
like
things
to
think
about
it's
like
the
system.
D
We
had
a
pretty,
I
think,
involved
discussion
when
we
were
launching
the
x-type
base
and
I
believe,
like
what
was
said
was
that
you
know
the
plan
was
basically
to
when
launching
a
new
base
like
take
the
current
rep
mapping
from
mainnet
and
use
that
on
the
new
base,
and
then
that
base,
though,
could
diverge
from
mainnet
in
terms
of
what
the
rep
looks
like
and
what
the
rep
distribution
is.
D
Certain
actions,
like
you
see
on
next
night,
with
worker
proposals
can
be
synced
back
up
to
mainnet,
but
I
could
also
imagine
other
actions
really
being
local
to
that
base.
So
so
it's
an
interesting
thing
because
I
think
what
you
said
here
in
the
chat
like
we're,
not
three
dows
or
one
dow
like
that
is
true.
I
totally
agree
with
that,
but
there
is.
I
think
a
little
bit
of
independence
in
some
way
of
the
bases,
if
that
makes
sense,.
B
Well,
I
actually
expect,
because
we
kind
of
envisioned
that
the
bases
are
kinda
sovereign,
like
I
think,
there's
a
high
chance
that
those
bases
will
have
a
slightly
different
community
right
like
like
depends
on
if
they
are,
if
they
upgra
like,
if
they
update
their
rep
state
on
mainnet.
B
I
think
each
base
is
kind
of
sovereign
and
no
no
base
has
ownership
of
the
other
and,
like
I
think
that
it's
like
that's,
actually
a
good
thing
in
terms
of
security
like
for
nathan's
idea,
it
would
mean
that
the
the
mainnet
base
has
kind
of
ownership
of
updating,
rep
on
other
bases
right
and
that's
a
huge
security
like
attack.
A
D
D
Yeah,
he's
sovereign,
but
perhaps
like
dependent
a
bit
on
a
minute
like
mina,
is
where
the
majority
of
the
funds
are
like
the
control
of
the
ens
names
right
and
you
might
get
into.
If
they
really
did
diverge,
it
could
be
interesting
yeah.
I
don't
know
when
you
start
thinking
about
this
stuff,
it's
quite
a
big
design
space
and
I
actually
like,
like
the
idea
that
nathan
is
describing
here,
but
there's
also
technical
challenges
to
what
you
can
implement
today
right.
So
actually,
I'm
not
really
sure
how
you
could
implement
something
like
that.
D
B
Of
blockchains,
I
think,
the
third
or
fourth
generation
they
will
like
seamlessly
cross
chain
communicate,
and
this
is
something
where
I
think
it
will
possible
like
on
cosmos
or
polka.
Dots
like
installing
in
a
dao
which
has
ownership
of
another
down
on
some
other
relay
chain
or
like
other
zone
on
on
cosmos,
is
possible
already
right
now,
but
not
only
here,
like
the
bridges
are
just
super
like
first
there's
no
bridge
standard
everyone's
building
their
own
bridges.
B
B
I
guess
if
each
2.0
with
like
finality
comes
in,
I
think
this
will
change
and
then
the
bridge
design
space
will
will
be
huge
again,
but
east
1.0.
D
H
A
I
think
I
think
it
sounds
nice,
but
technologically
probably
also
a
bit
of
a
nightmare
for
exploits
and
yeah,
and
also
some
proposals
like
buy
back
funding
proposal
on
x
die.
You
don't
necess,
like
some
proposals,
are
base
specific
right,
they're,
not
necessarily
base
agnostic.
Where
you
would
want
them,
I
don't
know
I
mean
I
think
it
sounds
really
nice,
but
I
think
I
don't
know
john
you
on
muted,
as
well.
D
Yeah-
and
I
mean
I
think
that
does
sound
like
a
bit
of
an
optimization
but
yeah,
I'm
not
technically.
I
think
there
would
be
a
decent
amount
of
work
if
to
do
something
like
that
and
yeah.
I
just
don't
know
of
easy
ways
to
make
that
happen
now,
but
I
mean
I
do
think
in
like
I
said
this
design
space
is
incredibly
large
and
I
think
we
will
see
a
lot
of
innovation
and
work
done
around
these
types
of
things.
B
Yeah
so
like
one,
one
good
example
is
omen
with
the
arbitration
service.
Right
omen
on
x.
Die
is
actually
using
claros
on
mainnet
to
decide
for
like
bigger
markets,
and
it's
doing
that
by
like
using
the
bridge
messaging
protocol.
But
it's
like
super
super
alpha,
shitty
ex
user
experience.
It's
on
xdi,
a
user
actually
needs
to
like
send
a
transaction
on
xdi,
which
is
basically
sending
a
message
to
the
bridge
and
telling
the
bridge
hey
bridge.
B
Can
you
talk
on
mainnet,
please
to
to
some
contract
to
like
please
trigger
like
the
arbitration
service,
and
then
someone
on
mainnet
needs
to
like
waiting
for
the
bridge
to
signal
that,
like
a
keeper
can
actually
trigger
the
transaction
on
mainnet
and
then,
like
some
keeper
needs
to
push
that
transaction
on
mainnet,
to
call
the
clara
system
on
maintenance
to
do
arbitration
and
then
the
same
thing
needs
to
happen
to
send
the
message
from
mainnet.
E
E
B
Bad,
how
bad
bridge
designs
are
right
now
and
it's
it's
a
proof
of
work
chain.
At
the
end
of
the
day,.
H
A
Awesome,
I
think
we
also
running
a
bit
over
time,
so
thank
you,
everyone
for
attending
and
see
you
around
see
you
next.