►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-08-25]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
We
then
have
the
swapper
signal
proposal,
which
has
actually
also
not
been
vaulted
on
yet,
but
I
guess
we'll
get
to
swapper
and
arbitrarium
further
down
the
line
in
this
call,
then
we
also
have
a
member
balancer
from
sky.
I
believe
just
reclaiming
his
gen
that
he
kindly
provided
to
the
x-type
base.
A
We
have
a
couple
of
worker
proposals
live
there,
namely
from
lutsy
foss,
melanie
adam
ross
caucus
medusa,
and
we
also
have.
I
believe
this
is
nissa's
first
contributor
proposal,
so
nissa
will
be
heading
kind
of
the
marketing
efforts
and
her
first
proposal
is
live
so
make
sure
to
go.
Take
a
look
at
that
and
vote
in
favor
of
it.
A
If
you
are
in
favor
of
that,
then
also
another
proposal
we
actually
have
live
on
the
x
diabetes
is
something
melanie
has
been
working
on
for
a
while,
which
is
actually
the
dx
referral
proposal,
so
kind
of
incentivizing
people
to
bring
people
to
dxdow.
If
you
know
someone
awesome
who
is
looking
for
a
job
and
melanie,
maybe
you
wanted
to
briefly
give
an
overview
of
that.
B
Yeah
sure
definitely
well,
let
me
just
say
that
I
think
dxdot
was
long
overdue
for
a
referral
program
and
it's
finally
here.
The
initial
draft
proposal
was
in
the
form
for
about
the
past
few
two
weeks
and
received
positive
feedback.
I
believe
from
the
community,
and
it
is
now
live
on.
Xdi,
like
dave,
was
saying.
B
Dx
referral
is
a
reward
program
specifically
for
those
who
refer
any
new
contributors
to
dx
dao,
I'll,
link,
the
forum
post
and
on
chain
proposal
now
or
maybe
dave
you
can.
The
proposal
outlines
the
specifications
around
this
program
I'll
just
take
a
little
bit
of
time
to
run
through
them
right
now.
So,
essentially,
we
want
to
recognize
those
who
refer
any
new
contributors
to
dick
style
by
giving
them
a
reward
allocated
in
either
stablecoin
or
eth.
However,
there
are
some
guidelines
around
this.
B
You
are
only
eligible
for
the
dx
reward
if
the
referred
contributor
stays
as
a
contributor
and
making
impactful
contributions
to
dxtel
for
at
least
six
and
a
half
months.
In
addition,
there
are
some
specifics
around
the
contributions,
such
as
you
have
to
complete
a
trial
period.
B
All
of
these
requirements
are
outlined
in
the
proposal
in
the
forum
and
as
far
as
the
reward
amount
goes,
the
amount
you'll
be
rewarded
will
be
based
on
the
level
of
the
contributor.
You
refer
at
the
time
of
the
referred
contributors
onboarding.
So,
for
example,
if
you
refer
someone
who's
a
level,
two
you'll
be
rewarded,
two
thousand
dollars
in
stable
coin
or
eth
at
the
end
of
the
six
and
a
half
months,
and
the
reward
will
be
prorated
for
part-time
contributors
as
well.
B
So
you
will
be
responsible
for
contacting
myself
or
anyone
else
in
the
contributor
ux
for
any
referral.
You
have
details
around
what
you'll
need
to
send
over
are
in
the
proposal.
In
addition,
there
are
details
of
how
you'll
claim
your
reward
after
the
six
and
a
half
months
with
an
on-chain
proposal
in
the
post
as
well.
So
let
me
know
if
you
have
any
questions,
otherwise
you
can
go
vote
on
it
on
xdi.
Now,
thanks.
B
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
We
did
go
back
and
forth
a
lot
about
whether
it
would
be
retroactive.
I
think
it
should
be
going
from
starting
now
moving
forward.
If
anybody
has
like
any
additional
suggestions
around
that
I
mean,
I
think
that
it's
you
know
it's
almost
september
and
I
you
know
making
it
retroactive
to
january
of
this
year.
I
don't
it
seems
a
little
unreasonable,
but
any
other
thoughts
around
this
I
mean
you
could
completely
object
to
that.
A
Awesome
well
moving
on
before
we
actually
touch
on
the
arbitrary
swapper
stuff,
which
I
foresee
will
take
over
most
of
the
duration
of
this
call
I'll
just
briefly
touch
on
dx
retreat,
which
is,
of
course,
an
weekly
topic,
but
there
have
been
some
updates,
so
accommodation
has
actually
already
been
booked
from
dxnow
for
all
contributors
attending,
so
just
to
give
a
quick
recap
and
we'll
have
a
dx
retreat
from
the
10th
to
the
15th
of
october.
Accommodation
has
been
booked
for
this.
A
This
is
a
venue
roughly
half
an
hour
outside
of
lisbon,
a
bit
more
country
style
retreat,
I
would
perhaps
say,
but
so
close
to
a
relatively
large
city
for
portuguese
standards,
so
still
within
accessibility
of
everything,
and
then
we've
actually
also
closed
some
places
in
lisbon
from
the
15th
until
the
24th
and
one
of
airbnb
was
actually
also
booked
until
the
25th
for
people
perhaps
partaking
in
the
hackathon.
A
If
lisbon,
as
that
finishes
on
the
24th,
so
for
any
contributors
who
are
attending
feel
free
to
already
arrange
your
travels
and
yeah,
everything
is
sorted
out
on
the
ground
already
in
terms
of
accommodation.
A
I
believe
now
we'll
also
start
looking
into
other
stuff,
as
we
have
the
accommodation
sorted
and
ultimately
because
lisbon
didn't
really
have
a
choice:
a
vast
choice
of
large
properties
with
you
know
which
could
host
20
people.
We
actually
went
ahead
and
booked
four
smaller
airbnbs,
so,
but
the
allocation
of
that
you
know
we
we
can
figure
that
out
at
dx,
retreat,
etc
and
also
still
planning
around.
The
events.
August
is
a
very
slow
month
in
portugal.
A
So
it's
actually
been
quite
difficult
to
hear
back
from
venues
where
we
could
eventually
host
events
or
a
party,
but
that's
still
an
ongoing
offer
effort
and
we're.
Also
looking
at
some
of
the
sponsorship
offers
right
now,
liz
con
was
released
yesterday.
A
I
believe
the
sponsorship
packages
are
a
bit
higher
than
expected
for
me
at
least,
but
there
are
also
other
sponsorship
opportunities,
such
as
taoist
or
well
eat
lisbon,
where
we've
also
had
a
request
in
so
we'll
also
circle
back
on
those
in
the
coming
days
and
see
how
we
want
to
contribute
to
that
and
then
moving
on
to
the
two
hot
topics
of
this
week.
A
We
have
well
dx
style,
arbitrarium
launch
as
well
as
a
swapper
token
launch,
or
at
least
these
two
proposals
are
live
on
mainnet.
None
of
them
have
been
voted
on
yet,
but
I
believe
there's
been
a
lot
of
effort
behind
both
of
them
and
perhaps
we
can
briefly
touch
on
the
swapper
token
first
set.
Perhaps
you
can
give
some
motivating
words
for
people
to
go
ahead
and
vote
in
favor
of
swap
a
token
release.
C
Oh
totally
unprepared
speeches,
let's
go,
I
mean
obviously,
we've
been
preparing
this
for
a
while
we're
preparing
the
product
our
first
product
token,
and
this
is
us
moving
from
being
a
dao
with
products
to
dao
with
with
products
and
product
tokens
and
guilds,
and
I
think
I
think
this
makes
sense
for
at
least
whopper
and
read
it
through
read
through
the
the
dow
talk
post,
the
discussions
we
had
the
changes
we
made
if
it
makes
sense,
for
you
guys,
go
vote
for
it
and
arbitrary
is
launching
any
any
in
a
day
now,
so
we
actually
aligned
the
the
swapper
token
launch,
with
the
arbitrary
launch
and
and
the
goal
is
just
go
all
in
with
the
farming
incentives
with
the
airdrop
trying
to
double
triple
our
community
and
get
new
workers
and
incentivize
workers
with
not
just
being
paid
with
with
the
dxd
and
and
die,
but
also
with
swapper
token,
if
you
believe
in
the
team,
if
you
believe
in
the
product
you
can
get
paid
with
the
with
the
with
the
currency
that
actually
can
yeah,
I
mean,
can
be
a
good
good
thing
for
you
and
yeah.
C
A
Fantastic,
so
people
on
the
call
make
sure
to
make
your
voice
heard
by
voting
on
the
proposal
or
people
listening
to
this
afterwards
in
the
recording,
and
then
I
guess
the
the
big
topic
is
upcoming
arbitrary
launch.
So
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
surrounding
that
and
a
lot
of
things
still
happening,
perhaps
john
or
augusto.
You
can
give
a
recap
also
for
people,
perhaps
listening
to
this
afterwards
of
where
we're
currently
at
there's.
A
Of
course,
the
proposal
live
on
mainnet
as
well,
for
the
anointment
of
the
adx
style
base,
which
is
what
it's
going
to
be
called.
Perhaps
you
guys
can
give
a
brief
update
of
where
we're
at
or
what's
coming
in
the
next
days
and
the
floor
is
yours.
D
D
We
don't
know
who
they
are,
but
they
presumably
saw
the
plan
on
dow
talk
and
deployed
the
swapper
token
sent
most
of
it
to
the
dxtown
treasury
and
made
a
single
proposal
using
the
text
from
the
the
dow
talk
post
that
had
been
prepared
from
the
swapper
squad,
as
well
as
others
in
support
of
that
effort
so
yeah.
So
you
can
check
out
that
swapper
signal
proposal
vote
on
that
it
has.
The
swapper
token
address
it's
important
to
kind
of
verify
that
things
are
being
done.
D
The
the
next
kind
of
proposal
of
interest
is
the
dx
vote
like
anointment
the
arbitrary
base
anointment,
so
that
describes
the
configuration
for
dx
vote
and
agusta
will
tell
us
more
about
that
in
just
a
second
and
the
third,
and
you
know
in
some
ways
most
exciting
proposal
is
the
updated
swapper
dot
eth,
which
deploys
the
latest
release
from
the
swapper
squad,
so
again
a
lot
of
stuff
to
confirm
and
verify
there.
D
If
you
check
out
the
arbitrary
launch
plan,
dow
talk
post,
one
of
the
latest
comments
is
from
federico
who
actually
wrote
a
script
which
helps
confirm
some
of
the
stuff.
That
was
done.
It's
a
little
bit
trickier
than
like
a
normal
situation
on
mainnet,
where
we're
used
to
seeing
everything
on
ether
scan
and
in
all
the
beautiful
detail
that
ether
scan
provides
because
arbitrary
one
is
not
yet
visible
on
ether
scan
and
the
arbitrary
explorer
gives
a
relatively
limited
amount
of
information.
D
But
it's
enough
to
kind
of
see
that
things
have
been
done
correctly
and
then
leveraging
federico's
script,
that
that
can
help
with
the
verification
process.
So
that's
sort
of
like
the
overview.
Those
proposals
are
live.
If
the
you
know,
if
everything
looks
good
and
the
swapper.eth
update
proposal
goes
through
and
that
could
pass
as
early,
I
think
it's
set
to
pass
on
saturday.
If
people
vote
for
it,
then
you
know
swapper.eth.
D
If
you
go
to
it,
it
would
be
live
on
arbitrome.
The
airdrop
would
be
ready
to
go
when
arbitrary,
actually
launches.
Then
the
next
big
piece
for
swapper
is
the
liquidity,
mining
and
also
potentially,
liquidity
from
dxtau
itself,
so
for
the
liquidity
mining.
D
D
However,
there
will
need
to
be
proposals
on
the
arboretum
base
to
kick
off
each
of
these
farming
campaigns
and
even
though
dx
mode
has
been
deployed,
we
do
need
permissions
to
be
set
on
the
swapper
wallet
scheme
or
the
swapper
quick
wallet
scheme
is
what
we're
calling
it.
Basically,
that's
the
voting
module
on
the
arbitrary
base
which
allows
us
to
act
quickly
and
with
the
swapper
farming
campaign
contract
that
the
factory
contract
there
so
I'll.
Let
gusto
talk
more
about
that.
D
There
are
some
steps,
kind
of
underway
which
will
set
us
up
to
do
those
proposals
right.
So
I
don't
it
doesn't.
Look
like
they'll
be
ready
to
go
like
at
the
moment
arbitration
launches,
but
within
like
days
after
I'm
hoping
with
that,
if
all
goes
well,
we
we
should
be
ready
to
kick
off
the
campaigns,
so
yeah
I'll
hand
it
off
to
augusto
and
then
or
if
people
have
questions,
we
feel
free
to
shoot
too.
E
Awesome
awesome:
okay,
well,
yeah,
like
john
said
that
we
submitted
the
proposal
today
to
set
the
permissions
for
the
for
the
dx
vote
addresses
on
arbitral.
Mainly,
the
main
idea
is
to
also
design
set
up
a
flow
of
funds
to
make
it
more
secure,
also
flexible.
So
we
can
so
we
are
able
to
do
everything.
So
the
main
idea
is
that
we
have
four
schemes:
the
registrar.
What
is
the
scheme
that
is
not
going
to
handle
any
amount
of
funds?
E
This
is
why,
when
you
see
the
the
proposal
to
set
the
permission,
you
are
not
going
to
see
the
registrar
wallet
scheme.
The
master
word
scheme
is
from
the.
We
are
executing
the
prop
the
proposal
to
set
the
permission
from
the
master
world
scheme,
because
it
has
the
right
to
set
any
permission
on
the
on
the
on
the
export.
E
We
deploy
the
master
wallet
scheme
with
with
the
same
parameters
as
the
registrar,
but
is
a
is
not
as
expensive
as
a
registered
wallet
as
a
registered
scheme
to
create
and
execute
an
obstacle
proposals,
so
the
permissions
mainly
what
they
do.
They
only
allow
a
transfer
of
funds
of
ether,
dxe,
swapper
and
west.
We
took
in
count
only
those
three
tokens
and
well,
of
course,
either
the
native
token
on
the
network.
E
E
The
quick
wallet
the
scheme
and
they're
going
to
it
can
do
any
it
can
make
any
call
it
can
do
any
traffic,
but
only
with
the
funds
available
on
the
screen.
Let's
say
the
avatar
is
going
to
have
a
south
ameter,
instead
of
risking
the
southeastern
to
be
able
to
do
every
anything
like
we
have
right
now
on
the
contribution
reward
scheme.
Where
on
many,
you
can
create
a
proportion
to
basically
request
the
entire
transfer
of
funds
on
the
dao.
Here
we
are
adding
a
limit.
E
So
if
you
wanna
execute
a
transfer
of
of
ether,
you
send
it
first
to
the
quick
wallet
scheme
and
from
there
you
distribute
the
funds
also
to
the
swapper
world
scheme.
So
if
we
want
to
swap
our
governance
or
financial
action
like
adding
equity
or
creating
a
farming
campaign
with
with
ether
or
or
any
of
these
three
assets
that
I
mentioned
before,
we
send
the
funds
to
the
swap
rewards
key.
But
for
example,
we
want
to
start,
let's
say
paying
workers
using
arbitrary.
E
If
we
think
that
we
are
ready
for
it,
we
can
send
a
bit
of
funds
to
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
let's
say
ten
thousand
dollars
in
ether,
and
then
we
can
do
anything
from
that
quick
wallet
scheme.
We
can
distribute
that
funds
any
way
we
like,
because
the
only
funds
are
going
to
be
at
risk
that
are
fully
transferable,
are
the
ones
that
are
going
to
be
in
this
scheme
one.
E
So
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
distribute
the
funds
in
a
in
a
safer
way,
so
we
can
execute
quicker
and
yeah
faster
actions
on
the
on
the
quick
quality
scheme,
because
we
have
less
funds
at
risk,
so
we
can
be.
We
can
be
more
flexible.
We
can
act
quickly
if
we
see
that
the
quick
qualities
is
running
out
of
funds.
Okay,
we
send
more
funds
from
the
avatar
to
the
quick
wallet
and
the
same
will
be
for
the
swapper
world
scheme.
E
Is
it's
only
one
proposal
away
like
you
that
you're
going
to
see
later
where
we
have
to
resubmit
the
the
permission
setting
proportion,
because
one
permission
actually
like
a
few
permissions?
I
copy
basically
the
wrong
wall,
the
problem
value.
So
in
few
hours
we
are,
we
are
going
to
have
the
final
proposal
to
set
24
permissions
in
one
proposal,
and
this
proposal
is
going
to
yeah
configure
the
dao
just
the
way
I
described,
which
is
very
flexible
and
we
will
be
ready
to
do
anything
we
want
are
the
schemes
that
we
have.
E
If
we
want
to
communicate
that
yeah,
I
mean
it's
a
way
more
complex.
We
are
here
we
just
okay.
If
we
want
to
do
something
new
from
a
from
a
scheme,
send
funds
or
interact
with
a
new
contract.
First,
you
need
to
set
up,
create
the
proposal
to
set
the
permissions
to
allow
that
functions
to
be
called,
and
then
you
call
them.
D
Something
to
note
too,
as
some
people
are
aware,
like
arbitrary
currently,
is
not
open
access
for
all,
even
though
it's
been
launched
right,
they
have
a
white
list,
basically
controlling
all
of
the
addresses
that
can
access
arbitrary
method
at
the
current
time.
D
So
the
proposal
that
augusto
talked
about
that's
coming
from
his
like
whitelisted
address,
which
is
the
only
I
think,
whitelisted
address,
with
reputation
right
now
on
takes
vote
on
arbitral,
so
so
king
of
gusto
on
arbitrary,
for
the
time
being
until
it
opens
up
and
the
rest
of
the
citizens
can
go
over
the
bridge.
D
But
what
that
also
means
is
that
you
know
it
can't
like
possibly
pass
anything
by
absolute
majority
until
it's
it's
fully
launched
so
relying
on
the
kind
of
like
the
boosting
period
and
that
to
get
things
done
initially
here
and
then
once
it
is
open,
though
there
may
be
proposals
that
we
would
want
to
have
absolute
majority
on
to
move
things
quicker.
That's
some
things
that
can
make
things
move
a
lot
quicker,
so
I'd
say
be
ready.
D
The
dow
may
call
upon
its
voters
to
move
things
quickly,
along
with
some
of
these
swapper
campaigns,
and
he
yeah
that
we're
hoping
not
to
have
to
rely
on
that
too
often,
because
the
swapper
module,
the
swapper
quick
wallet
has
the
ability
to
pass
boosted
proposals
within
a
day
and
a
half,
and
the
reason
that
we
think
that's
still
safe
is
because
there
is
a
minimum
threshold
of
rep
that
needs
to
vote.
In
order
for
that
to
pass
so
it's
being
set,
I
think
seven
and
a
half
percent.
D
E
Yes
also,
I
want
to
add
the
on
the
dx
volt
we
had.
We
have
a
governance
view
where
we
are
showing
the
distribution
of
reputation
so
yeah.
We
like
sean,
said
it
would
be
awesome
if
we
can
execute
a
proposal
with
majority
vote.
E
We
have
the
addresses
there
that
have
more
reputation,
so
maybe
let's
try
to
coordinate
internally
on
their
on
their
organization
level.
Who
is
which
ones
are
the
persons
if
they
want
to
identify
themselves
right
inside
the
inside
the
organization
among
us
later
to
coordinate
a
majority,
a
maturity
proposal
execution?
That
would
be
awesome,
though,
without
man
yeah,
I
think
we
are.
We
are
going
to
need
again
the
x
when
arbitrary
launches
they
are
going
to
open
the
gates
and,
let's
see
how
it
works,
but
I
think
yeah.
F
Anna
gusto
dx
vote
on
armatrum
will
also
be
the
the
first
time
using
dxd
as
the
staking
token
in
holographic
consensus.
So
can
you
talk
about
like
what
we're
thinking
about
there
and
like
how
will
that?
How
will
that
work.
E
Oh
man,
yes,
yes!
Well,
today!
Today,
the
idea
is
that
the
proposal
that
we
share
with
the
setting
these
permissions
is
24
permissions.
We
have
to
have
take
it
with
dxe.
I
already
breached
dxe.
I
have
dxe
ready
to
be
used
to
staking
and
we
are
going
to
be
as
taking
the
first,
the
first
proposal
on
a
production
network.
If
we
want
to
call
it
like
that
with
the
xe
so
yeah
I
forgot
about
it,
that's
going
to
be
a
huge
thing.
Well,
we
are
going
to
be
using
dxe
for
staking
yeah.
E
This
is
going
to
be
the
first
proposal
that
they
are
going
to
be
yeah
upstairs
using
their.
E
Okay,
that
now
now
it's
12.
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
know
yeah
we
are
going
to
be
using
dxz
on
arbitro.
You
have
to
bleach
it.
Today
we
are
going
to
upstake,
I'm
going
to
upstate
the
first
proposal
using
dxe
on
a
production
network,
yeah
big
thing.
It's
a
big
thing.
I
think
we
were
talking
about
using
dxe
for
us
taking
talking
for
a
long
time
and
yeah.
It's
going
to
happen.
A
E
Stake
now
the
proportions
start
with
the
negative
state
that
is
called
a
minimum
dawa
bounty.
We
set
the
minimum
dow
bounty
too
high
when
we
made
the
deployment
and
the
the
the
size
effect
from
that
is
that
the
minimum
that
want
is
how
much
the
dow
is
willing
to
pay
to
the
to
the
person
who
is
going
to
be
upset
in
the
the
proportions
to
for
for
having
holographic
consensus
right.
So
the
more
you
pay,
the
more
secure
there
is
going
to
be,
but
the
more
it's
going
to
cost
you.
E
So
the
initial,
the
initial
schemes
that
we
decided
to
use
initial
configuration,
they
use
a
very
high
minimum,
dow
bounty
and
we
are
going
to
be
some
medium
proportion
to
lower
it.
So
the
way
it
works
is
that,
for
example,
on
the
let's
say
on
the
registrar,
what
is
the
scheme
if
you
want
to?
If
you
create
a
proposal
right
now
to
change
skin
parameters,
you
have
to
take
at
least
10
dlc
to
make
them
to
execute
a
proposal
right
to
boost
it.
E
So,
for
example,
let's
say
I
create
a
proposal
on
the
register
quality
scheme
that
actually
I
have
to.
I
have
to
do
it
to
change
these
configurations.
I'm
going
to
be
staking
10
dlc.
This
proposal
is
going
to
change
the
value
that
we
are
going
to
be
using.
We
are
going
to
use
one
dfc
for
actually
not
0.5
dxe
on
resistor
on
the
register
wallet
scheme
in
the
future
and.
E
After
I,
after
I
execute
the
proposal
in
the
in
the
register,
the
mini
mondo
bounty
is
going
to
change
and
I
will
claim
I
I
can
redeem
later
10
dlc
from
the
dao,
because
that
was
the
minimum,
but
I'm
going
to
be
able
to
do
it
once
the
avatar
has
funds
right
me
and
anybody
so
right
now
we
are
not
taking
that
thing
out
in
the
export
we
have
to.
I
didn't
add
that
logic
yet,
but
we
are
going
to
be
claiming
mini
mondale
bounties
from
from
dx
vote
on
mainnet
on
on
xi.
D
Should
we
take
some
time
to
kind
of
go
to
go
over
these
parameter
levels,
because
I
think
maybe
that
was
a
thought
too,
that
we
could
discuss
here
what's
an
appropriate
level
to
set
these
yeah
like
thresholds
to
so
they're
set
there's
like
an
initial
set
and
I
can
share
my
screen.
Actually,
I
think
I
think
augusto
is
not
at
his
computer.
So
I'll
share
my
screen
here.
So
we
can
just
see
the
proposal.
D
Can
everybody
see
this
so
I'll
just
go
over
this
real
quick
and
then
we
can
dive
in
a
little
bit
deeper.
If,
if
that
makes
sense
dave
does
that
yeah?
It
totally
sounds
good.
I
might
take
the
rest
of
that
call
so,
but
I
think
it's
important,
so
we
have
four
schemes
here
that
were
deployed
the
registrar
wallet
scheme,
master
wallet
scheme
and
then
two
what
we
would
call
quick
wallet
schemes,
one
one
is
the
generic
quick,
quick
wallet
scheme
and
one
is
the
swapper
wallet
scheme.
D
So
something
to
kind
of
know.
In
general,
here
registrar
wallet
scheme
is
controlling
permissions
and
installations
of
new
schemes.
So
it's
sort
of
like
the
the
controlling
scheme
for
all
the
other
schemes,
the
master
wallet
scheme
allows
calls
to
be
made
from
the
avatar,
and
so
that
is
basically
accessing
the
avatar's
funds
right.
So
the
main
source
of
funds
on
this
base
and
the
important
thing
that
indicates
that
here's
calls
to
controller
right.
D
So
if
the
scheme
can
call
to
the
controller,
it's
actually
accessing
the
avatar
and
and
doing
things
with
the
avatar
funds,
the
quick
wallet
schemes
don't
have
calls
to
control
or
enabled
so
they
are
just
allowed
to
spend
from
their
own
address
right.
So
they're
sort
of
these
isolated
modules
that
can
do
things
and
basically
we'd,
have
to
load
them
up
with
whatever
funds
are
needed
to
do
the
the
things
with
that
specific
scheme
so,
for
instance,
the
swapper
wallet
scheme.
D
If
the
deployment
did
it
correctly
should
have
the
enough
swapper
token
to
supply
the
planned
liquidity
mining.
For
I
think
it
was
something
like
the
next
three
months
and,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
goal
is
to
have
this
required
percentage
vote
to
execute
boosted
proposals
to
be
seven
percent.
D
So
that
means
here
time
limit
for
pre-boasted
proposals
is
12
hours,
so
you
make
a
proposal
if
somebody
upstates
the
enough
dxd,
it
gets
boosted
in
12
hours
and
then,
if
it
has
enough
votes
in
favor,
it
would
be
passed
within
one
day.
So
one
and
a
half
days
total
here
for
boosting.
D
Otherwise
it's
just
you
know
you
have
to
get
better
than
50
and
it
would
pass
immediately
when
that
threshold
of
50
is
met.
But
if
it
passes
as
a
boosted
proposal,
it
just
needs
to
have
more
rapid
voting
for
it
than
against
and
a
minimum
of
seven
percent
according
to
what's
specified
here
and
yes
so
to
go
through
all
of
these
parameters.
Let's
look
like
at
the
what
master
wallet
scheme
and
just
go
through
each
of
the
parameters
max
seconds
for
calls
to
be
executed
after
approved.
D
So
once
a
vote
is
passed
like
in
a
state
of
passing
or
past
the
boosted
time,
then
there's
one
day
allowed
before
it
expires.
Essentially
you
have
to
actually
execute
it
within
one
day
of
it
passing
maximum
reputation
to
be
changed
in
a
proposal
execution.
So
any
proposal
master
wallace
scheme
can
issue
up
to
five
percent
new
reputation
in
the
arbitrary
base
right,
so
that's
limited.
That's
like
a
safety
measure
that
helps
a
bit
there.
D
The
type
of
controller
permissions
is
generic
call.
So
this
means
that
the
master
wallet
scheme
can
interact
with
basically
any
other
con
like
it
can
do
multiple
calls.
You
can
kind
of
do
any
calls
acoustic
correct
me.
If
I'm
messing
anything
up
here
require
percentage
to
execute
cued
proposal.
So
this
is
basically
what
is
required
to
immediately
pass
a
a
proposal.
It's
50
and
the
way
these
contracts
have
been
written.
You
know
from
daostack.
Originally
it's
hardcoded
like
you
can't
do
anything
less
than
50,
and
so
that's
why
you?
D
One
of
the
reasons
you
see
50
here,
but
it
also,
I
think,
is
logical
that
you
want
it
to
be
50
or
more
for
the
dow
to
be
able
to
kind
of
like
finally
pass
the
proposal,
so
once
it
hits
51
it
passes,
it
doesn't
matter
how
long
it
takes
to
hit
51
once
it's
there.
It's
it's
done
right
that
the
vote
is
passed
and
that
makes
sense
because
it's
an
actual
majority
for
the
whole
doubt
there's
just
no
way
you
could
beat
that
require
percentage
vote
to
execute
boosted
proposals
so
right
now.
D
This
is
intended
to
be
one
percent
time
limit
for
cube
proposals.
This
is
how
long
it
takes
for
a
proposal
to
expire,
so
if
it
doesn't
pass
or
doesn't
get
boosted
after
14
days,
it
expires
time
limit
for
boosted
proposals
is
once
it's
boosted
how
long
the
vote
goes
on.
For
so
remember,
it's
like
a
relative
majority
for
boosted
proposals.
D
So
at
the
end
of
that
five
days,
if
there's
more
for
that
passes,
if
there's
more
against
it
fails
and
then
time
for
pre-boosted,
this
is
how
long
it
takes
from
once
the
up
stake
reaches
a
certain
threshold
for
it
to
go
into
the
boosted
state
the
threshold
limit
to
boost
proposals.
So
this
is
where
you
have
to
do
some
math
right.
D
So
there's
some
weird
math
here
that
sets
the
threshold
for
how
much
up
stake
relative
to
down
stake
is
required
in
order
for
a
proposal
to
boost
and
also
related
to
that
is
this
minimum
down
stake,
except
for
new
proposals.
So
when
you
create
a
proposal,
there's
an
automatic
down
stake
set
by
the
dao
itself.
D
So
if
it's
one
dxd
down
stake
and
the
threshold
limit
here
is
1.5,
the
other
number
that
you
have
to
watch
is
the
number
of
actual
proposals
that
are
are
currently
boosted,
and
you
have
to
raise
this
number
to
the
number
of
currently
boosted
proposals
that
tells
you
the
ratio
of
upstate
to
downstate
that
is
required
in
order
to
boost
so
for
1.5
threshold
constant.
If
nothing
is
boosted,
it's
1.5
raised
to
the
zero,
which
is
one
right.
So,
no
matter
what
the
ratio
constant
is.
D
If
nothing
is
boosted,
it's
always
going
to
be
one
because
it's
raised
to
the
zero,
so
the
ratio
is
one
and
that's
the
upstate
to
downstate.
If
the
minimum
downstate
was
one
dxd,
then
you
only
need
to
get
one
dxd
just
over
one
dxd
in
order
to
boost
it.
If
there's
say
you
know
four
proposals
boosted,
it's
1.5
raised
to
the
four-
I
don't
know
what
that
number
is.
D
If
it's
like
say
it's
like
five:
if
it
was
five,
then
you
would
need
five
dxd
five
to
one
ratio,
so
you'd
need
five
txd
in
order
to
to
boost
that
yep
and
the
minimum
time
for
finance
are
to
not
change
before
execution.
This
is
the
quiet
ending
period.
D
This
is
to
protect
against
a
scenario
where
voters
are
intentionally
waiting
for
the
last
minute
to
make
their
vote
in
hopes
that,
like
they
surprise
or
surprise
people,
and
they
don't-
you
know
other
people
don't
see
it
coming
and
then
they
can
move
the
vote
in
their
favor.
So
this
is
meant
as
a
protection
against
that
happening.
D
So
if
the
vote
switches,
which
way
it's
going
within
one
day
of
passing
it,
it
gets
an
extra
kind
of
like
overtime
of
one
day
in
order
for
other
people
to
be
able
to
see
that
and
also
participate
in
the
vote.
Reps
take
on
cued
and
pre-boasted
proposals
is
the
vote.
Voter
reputation
loss.
D
D
D
So
does
anybody
have
questions
on
that
because
once
we
understand
this,
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
here
to
spend
a
little
bit
of
time
talking
about
what
these
numbers
are.
Currently,
we
have
the
ability,
through
that
registrar
scheme,
to
change
them
right.
So
it's
not
like
these
things
have
to
be.
This
is
a
new
base.
Right
things
are
just
starting.
I
don't
think
it
has
to
be
perfect
on
day
one,
but
these
are
things
that
the
community
should
be
thinking
about,
so
that
we
can
adjust
them
to
the
appropriate
levels.
D
Right
and-
and
I
think
this
is
actually
a
great
learning
experience-
we
have
a
new
base.
You
know
where
the
stakes
are
high,
in
the
sense
that
we
want
to
compete
on
arbitrary,
but,
relatively
speaking,
the
amount
of
capital
is
is
not
the
same
as
it
is
like
on
main
net
right.
So
this
is
a
a
good
opportunity
for
us
in
a
very
serious
environment,
to
do
some
experimenting
and
figure
out
how
some
of
this
should
be
set
so
yeah
any
questions.
G
D
E
Proposal
yeah,
the
reputation
is,
take
its
loss,
it
is
burned
and
also
regarding
the
boosted
required
percentage.
That
is,
there
is
something
that
we
added
on
the
on
on
the
export.
This
is
a
new,
a
new
configuration
like
a
new
voting,
parameter
that
we
added
so,
for
example,
let's
say
that
the
required
percent
is
five
percent
and
the
proposal
finished,
and
it
has
four
percent
on
the
on
on
the
winning
side
to
execute
it's
going
to
show
us
pass.
But
it's
not
going
to
execute
right.
A
A
Transaction
fees
right
so
maybe
not
directly
relevant
to
kind
of
the
parameters
we're
looking
at,
but
do
we
have
an
idea
of
what
fees
will
look
like
on
the
arbitrary
network
in
like
dollar
speaking
in
dollar
amount,
and
if
this,
these
boosted
vote
required
percentage
might
actually
end
up
being
a
bottleneck,
if
feeds
end
up
being
high
or
do
we
have
any
idea
about
that?.
D
E
D
So
yeah
I
mean
to
get
back
to
your
question
dave
like
that
is
something
to
consider
right,
like
you're,
balancing,
essentially
like
quorum,
so
that
things
can't
get
like
snuck
through
essentially
with
low
voter
participation
versus
you
know
the
ability
to
execute
right
because
yeah,
the
two
evils
are
like
something
sneaks
through
without
people,
seeing
it
with
too
low
of
voter
participation
on
one
end
and
then
on.
The
other
end
is
something
important
needs
to
get
done
and
not
enough
people
are
around
to
like
push
it
through.
D
D
One
percent
doesn't
strike
me
as
a
particularly
high
level,
seven
percent,
which
is
what
we
were
going
for
in
the
swapper
wall
scheme.
That
is
a
decently
high
amount
of
of
rap
right,
like
a
lot
of
proposals
pass
on
next
day
with
less
than
that,
but
you
know
I
think
it's.
If
we're
going
to
do
things
really
fast
with
the
swapper
one,
then
that
then
it
makes
sense
to
go
higher.
It's
basically
like
a
compromise
on
the
security
there.
D
F
F
E
Every
time
that
you
want
to,
you
can
register
add,
I
mean
add,
remove
schemes
from
the
registrar
and
also
change
the
configuration.
This
is
actually
something
that
we
are
going
to
be
doing
another
proposal
that
we
have
to
submit
to
change
the
minimum
dow
about.
So
if
we
feel
that
we
also
want
to
change
these
values,
this
will
be
a
chance
to
do
it.
A
D
Yeah,
I
don't
know,
I'm
not
really
sure
like.
I
think
some
systems
punish,
like
they
think
of
it
as
like
an
incentive
to
like
punish
the
losing
side
with
it.
But
yeah.
That's
not
entirely
clear
to
me
right
like
because,
what's
really
like,
you
might
have
contentious
votes
right,
but
what's
really
so
bad
about
being
on
the
losing
side
or
don't
you
want
that
you
want
people
to
engage
it.
You
know.
F
D
Yeah
I
wish
we
had
like
elon
or
something
to
to
grill
them
on
why
this
was
set
up
this
way
because
yeah,
I
don't
know,
but
I
think
that
the
there's
a
few
things
that
we
should
kind
of
discuss
that
might
need
changing.
I
mean
anything.
A
lot
of
these
can
be
changed,
but
I
think
in
particular
yeah
the
voting
loss
ratio.
I
think
the
minimum
down
stake
for
new
proposals
that
costs
the
dow
money
right.
D
So
it's
important
to
keep
that
in
mind
and
as
guso
mentioned
earlier,
I
think
these
are
probably
a
bit
high
right
like
especially
if
you
compare
them
to
what
is
currently
being
done
on
mainnet
like
it's
250
gen.
That's
worth
I
don't
know
something
like
25
these
days
and
you
know:
0.1
dxd
is
like
50
bucks
these
days,
so
even
that's,
maybe
a
little
high,
especially
for
something
that
may
be
meant
to
do
a
lot
of
proposals
on
a
separate
base.
D
E
We
can
take
in
count
how
much,
how
much
is
that
in
in
dollar
in
dollars
and
set
up
values
on
on
on
the
master
world
scheme
quick
word
scheme,
something
like
five
dollars
of
dxe
for
the
quick
quarter
scheme,
maybe
10
or
20,
for
the
master
wallet
a
high
value
in
the
in
the
registered
world
scheme.
That
is
the
most
important
one.
That
is
the
one
that
we
want
to
keep
super
protected.
E
That's
a
that's
a
point
where
you
can
actually
like
attack
without
there
are.
There
are
multiple
ways
to
attack
the
dao.
Oh,
oh
good
way.
I
mean
the
good
thing
is
that,
right
now
on
on
dx
vote,
we
protect
ourselves
against
the
an
attack
that
can
be
maintained,
a
lot
of
reputation
and
burning
a
lot
of
reputation
that
was
fixed
with
the
with
the
max
reputation
change
that
can
be
set
in
the
powering
machine.
E
The
boost
is
required
percentage
that
we
are
adding
making
sure
that
we
are
not
going
to
have
proposals
being
executed
with
zero
one
and
the
register
this
entry
point
of
attacking
now
by
by
using
the
by
using
the
register
the
scheme.
This
is
as
simply
as
creating
assigning
a
an
address
that
can
be
an
ethereum
account
as
a
scheme
that
can
do
anything
and
that's
it.
You
lost
control
of
it.
E
So
right
now,
that's
the
only
way
where,
where
I
can,
where
I
can
see
that
the
dog
can
be
attracted,
that
was
always.
We
always
have
that.
The
that
the
possibility
of
magnitude
it
never
happened,
but
that's
the
only
way
so
far
that
it
remains
that
I
cannot
fix
that.
I
can
I
kind
of
find
a
solution
for
that.
The
solution
they
are
the
the
way
to
protect
ourselves
with
governance.
E
That's
why
we
are
using
these
very
harsh,
boring
parameters
on
the
on
the
registrar
and
then
we
are
safe
because
the
other
scheme
they
cannot
register
any
other
scheme.
We
have
we
protect
ourselves,
for
example,
or
how
much
how
many
or
yeah
how
much
ether
we
are
going
to
transfer
which
functions.
Are
we
going
to
execute
those
two
things
we
protect
ourselves
with
the
permission
registry
and
the
reputation
meeting?
We
protect
ourselves
from
the
voting
machine
with
the
maximum
reputation
change
and
the
booster
required
percentage
on
the
on
the
voting
machine.
E
E
Sorry,
I
think
I
I
think
I
took
too
much
yeah
somebody
else,
something
like
fifty
hundred
dollars
for
the
registered
world
scheme,
ten,
twenty
dollar
for
the
master
wallet
and
then
five
dollars.
Something
like
that
for
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
D
D
Another
yeah,
another
thing
I
think
is
good
to
think
about
is
that
require
percentage
to
execute
the
boosted
proposal,
but
all
of
this
stuff
is
is
interesting
to
think
a
little
bit
about
like
the
time
limit
for
boosted
proposals
and
the
pre-boosting
and
the
quiet
ending
period.
Those
are
important
to
think
about
too,
and
for
like
the
most
sensitive
schemes
that
can
move
a
lot
of
funds
and
stuff.
D
You
know,
I
think,
when
you're
thinking
about
the
time
to
execute-
and
this
fundamentally
is
like-
why
can't
like
one
of
the
reasons
that,
like
consensus,
just
can
can
be
a
little
bit
slow
in
terms
of
the
on-chain
piece
of
it
right
is
that
you
need
to
set
a
certain
amount
of
time
for
people
to
vote,
and
when
you
think
about
that,
I
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
think
about
kind
of
worst
case
scenarios
right
like
what
is
what
happens
like
on
the
holidays
or
like
when
everybody's
at
dx
retreat
or
you
know,
there's
some
big
ethereum
conference
going
on
or
there's
like
an
internet
outage
or
the
or
the
ether
scan
goes
down
or
something
right
like
there's
certain
things
that
could
can
happen
regularly
or
could
happen
kind
of,
hopefully
not
not
regularly.
D
D
But
yeah
I
mean
there's
a
lot
to
talk
about
here,
a
lot
to
unpack.
I
guess
we
were
basically
at
the
end
of
the
call,
but
I
think
yeah,
it's
important
for
everybody
who
has
rep
especially
to
look
at
this
stuff
and
to
understand
it
and-
and
it's
gonna
be
important
for
dxdow
to
to
like
adjust
this
as
we
go
forward.
So
it's
good
the
more
informed
people
we
have
about
this,
the
better.