►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-11-02]
Description
00:04 Welcome
01:00 Mainnet
32:00 Gnosis Chain
44:13 Discussion: Restructuring and Refocus
B
So,
as
always,
we'll
start
with
a
proposal-
Roundup
I'm
gonna
put
that
back
up
here.
So
we
have
mainnet
and
gnosis
chain
to
go
over
a
bunch
of
different
proposals.
There's
a
couple
different
proposals
in
there
I
think
that
will
will
require
some
additional
discussion
and
maybe
not
just
sitting
on
them.
So
we'll
chat
through
that
bear.
C
B
Then
yeah
we
have
another
big
point
of
discussing
in
terms
of
the
restructuring
and
refocus
phase,
two
accountability,
access
and
Anatomy
structure,
as
opposed
from
Keenan.
That
I
think
was
last
Thursday,
and
then
we
had
a
discussion
on
Friday
and
so
some
polls
in
there.
So
following
up
from
that,
there
yeah.
But
let's
start
with
the
proposal
Roundup
and
starting
with
mainnet,
we
have
D
Labs
contributor
bonus.
So
this
is
off
of
a
discussion
on
it's.
D
B
In
the
Forum,
I
think
one
of
the
most
active
discussions
lately
on
the
exploit
disclosure
from
Deep
South
governance,
and
so
this
is
a
request
for
150k
usdc
as
a
compensation
for
the
disclosure
on
this
feature
so
Dave.
Maybe
you
can
kind
of
give
the
synopsis
of
of
what
other
people
may
have
a
little
bit
of
understanding
of
what
the
problem
of
what
the
vulnerability
was
but
kind
of.
Where
does
this
proposal
fit
into
that.
E
Sure
so
I
mean
this
is
well
a
brief
overview
about
the
vulnerability
is
that
essentially,
the
dial
stack
contributor
scheme,
which
is
a
global
scheme
used
among
all
the
dial
stack
dials
and
which
the
X
style
uses
for
any
font
trances
had
a
periods
variable
which
essentially
was
simply
a
multiplier
and
I
guess.
The
main
issue
is
that
this
was
not
reflected
in
either
of
the
uis,
so
any
proposal
could
have
a
hidden
multiplier.
E
It
was
actually
like
a
unsigned
integer
of
256
bits,
which
means
like
you
can
set
like
up
to
over
a
trillion
multipliers.
So,
even
if
you
request,
like
one
die,
you
could
set
a
multiplier.
Of
course
my
doorbell
has
a
ring
right
now
of
up
to
a
million,
and
it
would
actually
like
pay
out
at
that
multiple
of
both
rep
and
the
erc20
token
you
request,
or
ether
and
yeah
I
guess
to
avoid
this
we've
both
added
some
monitoring
to
dxgov.
E
So
if
you
actually
look,
I
submitted
one
proposal
which
had
like
multiple
periods
back
in
June
when
I
actually
found
out
about
it.
It'll
actually
have
a
little
warning
sign.
I
don't
know
if
you'll
find
it
now
live
on
the
call
and
then,
if
you
click
into
it,
they'll
actually
be
like
a
sign,
I
think
it's
like
d-labs
expenses
or
something
it
was
called
but
yeah
anyway,
and
then
there
was
some
discussion
in
the
Forum
around
you
know
paying
out
the
Bounty
Etc.
E
B
E
F
B
C
B
And
kind
of
a
discussion
on
how
exactly
to
resolve
it
first
is
that
we
didn't
have
a
established
bug
body
program
for
the
treasury
or
for
the
deaked
out
core
contracts.
We
have
hats
that
we've
used
for
some
of
the
other
contracts,
but
there
wasn't
something
that
was
set
up
for
this
specific
one
and
then.
Secondly,
the
fact
that
Dave
was
you
know
as
a
full-time
contributor
was
like
already
looking
at
the
contracts
and
was
kind
of
monitoring
where
it's
like
a
lot
of
bug.
B
B
B
G
E
It
could
be
that
the
ipfs
Texas
corrupted
or
something
that's
why?
But
if
you
were
to
submit
a
new
proposal
which
has
multiple
periods,
it
would
be
flagged
as
a
warning
and
I
mean
maybe
Augusto
or
Ross
can
specify
more
but
like
that's
pushed
to
it's
in
develop
on
GitHub
and
I.
Believe
it's
also
pushed
to
production
right,
foreign.
B
B
E
E
B
A
B
E
B
Pretty
easy
way
to
to
check
this,
so
this
is,
let's
do
Dave's
proposal
right
here.
This
is
what
it
looks
like
when
it's
been
you
go
down
here,
you
go
to
decode
input
data
as
an
avatar.
That's
the
stat
description,
hash,
that's
the
ipfs
hash
and
then
rewards.
So
this
is
150
plus
six
zeros
for
usdc
and
then
right
here
is
how
many
times
it
can
be
reward.
I
think
this
is
like
the
number
of
periods
or
whatever.
So
that's.
B
A
G
E
G
I
G
B
I
B
I
B
G
Yeah
so
this
raises
this
raises
a
topic
of
like,
and
we
haven't
had
many
scenarios
where
DX
Dow
governance
can
get
stalled.
It's
not
it
doesn't
get
shut
down,
but
it
can
get
stalled
by
holographic
consensus
with
a
token
that
is
not
worth
very
much
money
and
is
not
liquid
and
actually
yeah
I.
Don't
it's
hard
to
even
tell
who
holds
this
gen
token,
that
is,
that
is
the
holographic
element
of
our
system.
G
So,
as
you
can
see
like,
if
people
want
to,
they
can
clearly
shut
down
the
governance
systems
of
DX,
Dao
or
at
least
delay
them
right.
You
can
keep
making
new
proposals
and
new
proposals,
and
but
people
can
keep
staking
and
down
staking
and
upstaking
on
proposals.
That's
why
reaching
consensus
before
doing
proposals
so
that
yeah,
probably
there
is
no
adverse
Staker,
is
often
yeah
part
of
a
key
part
of
the
governance,
but
whether
if
this
was
DxD
token
instead
of
gen,
would
it
like
change
the
thing?
G
I
Yeah
1.5
is
going
to
use
DXE
and
it
will
be
a
stronger
and
safer
staking
because
you
won't
be
able
to
attack
it
in
this
way,
because
what
this
is
attack,
but
is
mainly
like
yeah,
taking
an
advantage
of
a
very
often
a
very
weak
token
that
we
are
using
for
the
staking
so
yeah
I'm
going
to
go
and
stay
on
this,
because
this
is
I
think
we
should.
We
should
have
the
right
to
vote
here
and
to
see
you
know
to
be
able
to
make
a
decision.
B
Mean
aggressive,
no
amount
of
money.
You
can
speak
on
this
gen.
There's
like
this.
Is
this
the
same
rules
that
Gauss
holographic
princesses
had
from
the
beginning?
I
wish
there
was
more
of
a
financial
incentive
to
do
that,
but
I
would
honestly
implore
all
detail
stakeholders
to
like
get
gen
like
you
should
have
again
in
order
to
like
push
things
through.
That's
the
whole
way.
The
system
has
worked
kind
of
from
the
beginning.
I
definitely
prefer
DxD,
but
I.
Don't
really
see
this
as
any
different
than
just
like
normal.
How
holographic
consensus
should
work?
B
I
Yeah
I
I
know
it
is
I
know
it
is
part
of
the
game
and
and
I
respect
it,
but
yeah
I
think
it.
It
is,
will
be
good
to
acknowledge
like
how
weak
we
are
right
now
on
the
holographic
consensus
class
I
mean
it's
something:
that's
quite
cool,
it's
very
cool
and
it's
great
to
have,
but
if
you
have
a
weak
token
for
the
choreography
concerns,
you
know
this
thing
can
happen
so
yeah
I'm
going
to
buy
Jen
and
a
steak.
This.
C
This
could
have
happened
before
too
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
something
like
bad
like
this
will
happen.
I'm
just
saying
if
someone
from
Dao
stack
with
a
bunch
of
Jen,
because
I
checked
the
wallets
and
some
of
them
are
like
old
double
stack
people
if
some
of
them
just
want
to
mess
around,
they
could
have
just
done
this
with
one
million
gen
right
and
what
will
like
the
only
way
we
could
do
something
about
it
is
voting
with
51
percent
but
yeah.
C
It
is
a
little
bit
worrying
because
style
stack
is
I,
I,
don't
know
if
they
are
like,
if
they're
active
or
not,
but
if
someone
is
willing
to
buy
one
million
gen
of
the
of
the
market
from
one
of
the
old
Tao
stack
people.
That's
that's
pretty
worrisome
right,
especially
if
you
actually
have
a
division
between
the
dial
we
do.
We
do
see
some
patterns
of
how
people
are
voting
and
and
why
this
is
happening.
I'm
not
gonna
speculate,
but
just
saying
there
is
yeah
I'm
a
little
bit
I'm,
not
worried,
but
I.
C
B
C
H
C
J
I
was
going
to
say
that
I
caught
up
with
Adam,
who
was
a
douse
deck
just
today,
it
just
randomly
someone
and
yeah,
just
like
one
of
the
things
that
he
said
about
this
whole
thing
is
that
they
knew
that
this
exists.
They
knew
that
you
know
the
contracts
are
not
fully
reflected
in
the
front
end,
and
it
can
happen
for
various
reasons,
and
then
you
know
back.
J
G
Yeah
so
one
of
the
things
I
wrote
in
the
in
the
Forum
Thread
about
this,
which
we
we
don't
like
to
like
look
back
and
learn,
which
is
my
questions
were
related
to
that.
But
if
we
made
a
new
system,
we
made
a
whole
new
front
end
and
we
actually,
we
when
you
make
a
front
end,
you
bake
a
front
end
based
on
a
back
end.
I
I'm,
wondering
I
want
I
would
like
to
know
I'm,
not
blaming
anyone
but
like
how
can
you
make
a
whole
new
front
end?
G
G
It's
kind
of
simple
there's,
there's
more
variables
and
not
all
the
variables
are
showing
in
the
front
end
but
like
if
we,
if
we
never
discovered
that,
because
Dow
stack
didn't
do
that,
that's
one
thing,
but
we
actually
built
an
entire
new
front
end,
but
we
never
matched
up
the
number
of
variables.
Why?
How
does
that
slip
through
the
cracks
foreign.
J
G
J
J
So
you
cannot
write
the
front
end
that
will,
you
know,
have
all
of
these
cases
in
mind.
You
just
can't
and
so
like.
There
are
always
trade-offs
in
these
things
and
so
like
what
that
was
like
did
like
the
trade-off
today
like
this
is
from
you
know
the
conversation
with
Adam.
What
dubstep
did
is
that
they
just
created
like
many
different
yeah,
like
reporting
mechanisms.
Every
time
the
contract
is
interacted
with,
which
is
like
the
ultimate
truth
right.
J
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
see
like
what's
the
date
that
people
have
interacted
with
the
contract.
You
wouldn't
be
able
to
translate
that
into
UI,
but
you
will
see
that
someone
has
interacted
and
try
to
do
something,
and
then
that
would
be
mapped
out
and
monitored.
Very
heavily
I
think
like
this
is
I.
Remember
back
in
the
day,
Nico
and
myself
and
a
few
others
like
we
yeah
I,
don't
know
if
it's
live
yeah.
It's
not
live.
B
So
yeah
this
that
I
promise
is
actually
a
good
transition
to
the
next
part,
which
is
actually
continuation
of
this
discussion
with
another
proposal
on
mainnet.
That
is
boosted
right
now,
and
so
this
is,
we
talk
about
the
front
end
element
to
this
in
terms
of
tracking
and
that's
kind
of
implemented.
Now
and
again
any
proposal,
maybe
a
proposal
that
is
submitted.
B
The
DX
controller
contract-
let
me
close
some
of
these
other
things
and
then
we
want
to
input
the
current.
We
want
to
get
scheme
parameters
and
to
do
this
we
need
the
scheme
address
and
the
Avatar
address,
so
the
scheme
address.
This
is
for
the
current
contribution
reward,
because
what
we
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
the
current
contribution
reward
is
the
same
as
the
new
one.
B
So
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
put
the
scheme
address
here
and
then
we
get
the
Avatar
address
here
and
then
this
is
where
we
get
this
0x
60a149,
and
then
we
actually
need
to
get
the
hash
of
this
in
order
to
be
able
to
get
this
back,
and
so
we
actually
need
to
go
and
get
this
on
the
contribution
reward
scheme.
I
know
this
is.
B
If
we
take
the
parameters
that
we
got
here,
if
we
take
that
and
input
it
on,
the
contribution
rewards
it's
going
to
go
and
we
can
see
that
this
is
the
one
that
we
all
use
here,
because
we
see
all
these
great
ens
names
here.
So
it's
a
good
way
of
kind
of
checking
with
that
there
and
then
once
we
get
this
we're
taking.
B
B
Yeah
we've
got
the
parameters
hash
remember.
They
said
this
is
a
global
scheme,
so
these
parameters
can
be
used.
Actually,
this
contribution
reward
scheme
can
be
used
by
anyone
yeah,
and
then
we
see
right
here.
This
is
the
same
things
that
we
have
here
just
in
a
little
bit
more
confusing
way
to
read.
So
this
is
the
old
contribution
reward
scheme,
and
then
we
want
to
look
at
the
new
contribution
reward
scheme
and
make
sure
that
it
has
these
same
parameters
and
so
right
here.
B
This
is
the
proposal
that
registered
this
contribution
reward
speed
using
0x9
90c
here,
so
you
can
see
that
here
register
the
scheme
and
then
when
we
go
in
and
look
at
the
scheme,
the
second
transaction
here
is
a
set
parameters,
transaction
and
so
in
the
set
parameters
transaction.
Here
you
can
see
that
the
parameters
that
were
set
are
they
can
see
that
they're
the
same
ones
as
the
previous
ones.
We
can
actually
double
check
that
again
here
by
looking
at
Genesis
protocol
and
then
yeah
inputting
this
here
and
yeah.
B
We
confirm
that
this
is
the
same
parameters
there.
Just
with
that
small
adjustment
and
you
notice
it
actually
is
still
the
same
hash
to
be
able
to
do
that,
because
the
hash
is
actually
of
these
parameters
that
here
not
over
the
redeemability
part.
So
this
is
a
big
change
in
a
time.
You're
changing
any
scheme
is,
is
definitely
important,
so
it
actually
has
a
48
hour
boost
time
and
then,
after
that,
it
has
14
days
until
it
is,
it
can
be
up
for
vote.
B
So
this
is
just
the
beginning
of
being
able
to
see
it,
and
then
there
is
also
a
separate
proposal
on
gnosis
chain
to
make
the
same
change
there.
It's
much
more
difficult
to
verify
that
on
noses
chain,
because
the
Genesis
protocol
on
noses
chain
is
not
verified,
so
you
can't
do
that
there,
but
Augusta
kind
of
walked
Walked
through
it,
I
think
in
a
Dev
call,
and
then
also
yesterday,
but
again
it's
the
exact
same
kind
of
changes
there
just
on
Justice
chain.
I
I
The
the
important
thing
to
know
is
that
the
we
are
resisting
a.
We
are
registering
a
contribution
reward
with
the
same
parameters
with
this
with
the
same
boarding
parameters
that
we
have
on
the
controller
and
the
same
permissions.
So
once
it
happens,
the
only
way
to
use
this
contribution
reward
is
by
again
by
creating
a
proportion
and
executing
a
proposal.
So
I
think
the
next
step
was.
This
is.
I
We
should
create
a
proposal
to
test
that
the
transfer
is
working
and
test
that
we
cannot.
You
cannot
submit
The
Proposal
with
more
than
one
period.
We
already
have
tests
for
this
on
the
on
GitHub
repository.
But
again
we
are
going
to
try
to.
We
are
going
to
try
to
attack
it
on
mainnet
and
it
should
fail.
B
B
Anything
else
on
this,
this
is
actually
might
be
it
for
the
exploit
disclosure
discussion
and
just
to
know
that
there
is
an
update.
Real-Time
updates
here
on
the
governance
call
that
now
there
are
two
pre-boosted
proposals
in
the
contributor
reward
scheme
both
are
or
one
is,
the
labs
white
hat
reward
and
the
other
is
d-labs
contributor.
Bonus,
I
think
they
are.
The
text
is
basically
the
same,
the
difference
being
one
is
200k
usdc
and
the
other
is
for
150k
usdc
yeah
I
mean.
B
B
B
B
That's
like
potential
both
in
potential
attack
Vector
but
like
maybe
that
scheme
isn't
showing
up
in
DX,
Vote
or
kind
of
isn't
being
tracked
or
something.
So
that's
why,
a
couple
months
ago
we
did
so
or
it
was
in
spring,
because
we
did
a
bunch
of
deregistering
of
some
schemes
that
we
don't
use
and
then
I
think
this
is
probably
Q
for
Ross.
To
maybe
say
all
of
this
scheme
talk
will
change
in
governance
1.5,
because
it's
a
kind
of
different
structure.
B
B
C
B
B
And
then
we
have
yeah
Leonardo
contributor
proposal
here,
who's
been
doing
some
great
work
on
on
swapper
here
and
also
was
at
in
Columbia
at
The
Retreat.
Here
I
think
we
have
three
different:
multi
cow
swap
orders
actually
two
right
right
now,
so
those
have
kind
of
been
going
on
there
and
kind
of
executing
I
think
pretty
pretty
well
with
a
lot
less
overhead
and
to
recall.
B
B
And
then
yeah
we
have
a
dive
out
for
boozy
Foss.
This
is
actually
one
that
was
for
mostly
April,
but
I've
done
a
lot
of
the
both
swapper
stuff
and
then
also
carrot
here,
foreign
and
then
we
have
yeah
a
couple
different
contributor
proposals.
We
have
Melanie's
contributor
proposal,
we
have
Ross.
Has
it
three
proposals
here,
yeah
one
there's
the
retrospective
of
them
in
the
past?
B
There's
one
going
forward
and
then
that
is
separate
from
the
actual
payment
proposal
that
is
to
Dev
X,
but
that
is
live
there
and
then
yeah.
As
I
said
before,
there
is
a
new
contribution,
reward
scheme
that
is
being
registered
here.
It's
the
the
same
thing
as
the
last
one,
but
because
the
Deep's
controller
contract
is
not
verified.
That
is.
We
can't
really
do
that
on
on
gnosis
scan
and
then
yeah.
We
have
yeah
there's
a
good.
Maybe
we
can
talk,
maybe
Ross!
B
K
Yeah,
so
the
proposal
kind
of
goes
through
the
stats
of
this.
We
had
a
farm
post,
discussing
a
dxt
guild
as
like
a
short-term
solution
to
not
having
governance
2.0
immediately,
but
still
wanting
to
give
dxt
holders
a
voice,
a
meaningful
voice
in
governance,
and
so
now
we
have
guilds.
We
can
make
a
DxD
Guild,
which
is
able
to
vote
and
and
just
normal
data
governance
the
the
phase
one
of
the
restructuring
also
highlighted.
This
is
one
of
the
actions.
K
K
K
So
yeah
also
there'll
be
more
some
more
stuff
coming
on.
That's
not
verified.
This
is
something
we
need
to
do
as
well
as
verifying
our
own
is
verifying
unable
to
scandals.
The
scanners
irritating
but
there'll
also
be
some
more
stuff
coming
around
project
that'll
be
going
into
public
data
this
week.
We're
just
getting
the
communication
started
on
that,
but
everything's
going
pretty
smoothly
having
guilds
and
production
networks.
B
K
Yeah,
that's
correct.
We
got
the
preliminary
report
back
from
them
just
before
Defcon,
since
it's
just
payments,
The
adversional
Proposal,
there
was
10K
and
then
in
this
Midway
Point
another
10K
in
the
final
payments.
Once
we
have
the
full
audit
back.
Obviously
you
can
go
and
read
the
proposals.
If
you
want
more
background
done
all
of
this
or
to
even
read
the
agreement
that
we
did
with
Omega
omega's
also
done
for
us
in
the
past,
I
guess
everything
I
had
a
very
busy
day
making
proposals.
K
B
B
J
C
I
mean
I,
guess
I
could
give
some
background.
Why
John
wanted
some
clarification
on
some
details
for
for
my
period,
I
am
I
felt
that
I
didn't
I
didn't
need
to
do
some
clarification
and
and
basically
told
John,
to
leave
me
alone,
and
he
said
he
will
not
vote
for
my
proposal,
and
here
we
go.
He
did
a
vote
down
my
proposal
and,
if
I
remember
correctly
in
a
couple
of
hours
before
the
proposal
should
have
gone
through
or
something
like
that.
C
B
H
B
B
B
But
then
you
had
votes
coming
in
four
and
there
were
several
votes
that
came
in
this
morning
before
and
so
that
has
now
switched
the
proposal
to
it
will
now
pass.
But,
interestingly,
it
did
not
actually
reset
the
quiet
ending
period
And.
So
this
quiet
ending
period
is
now
at
one
day
away
from
passing,
even
though
it's
full
instead
of
It
kind
of
resetting
to
two,
which
is
I,
guess
how
I
thought
it
maybe
worked,
but.
K
I
B
I
H
I
I
B
B
C
B
F
Great
to
hear
your
voice,
I
hope,
I,
sound,
wonderful,
because
I
feel
awful
yeah
I'm
coming
down
with
some
kind
of
illness.
I
did
a
covet
test,
not
covered,
thankfully,
but
don't
really
know
what
it
is:
super
weak
kind
of
stomach
illness
feeling,
but
on
the
topic
of
this
I'm,
probably
not
going
to
speak
much
I'm
getting
the
ASMR
things,
I
always
get
when
I'm
sick
in
the
chat.
F
F
F
F
Excuse
me
yeah,
so
I
think
everything
is
feeling
pretty
good.
There's
some
questions
as
we
had
in
Phase
One,
alongside
kind
of
the
the
more
not
respected
but
kind
of
expected
to
be
going.
This
way
points,
but
there
is
I
guess
two
that
are
are
still
a
little
bit
of
question
marks
with
some
questions
that
need
to
be
answered
and
Chris
I
was
hoping.
You
could
maybe
lead
the
discussion
about
the
accountability,
councils
and
kind
of
take
that
discussion
to
where
it
might
need
to
go.
B
B
Okay,
yeah
I
think
there
were
a
bunch
of
things
in
here
and
like
as
I've
presented
on
the
the
at
The
Retreat
and
have
talked
a
little
bit.
There's
kind
of
like
three
different
things.
I
had
seen
as
like
pillars
for
how
we
can
kind
of
come
to
these.
Better
coordination
and
governance
decisions.
That's
a
six-month
budgetary
cycle
for
all
squads,
these
Squad
accountability,
councils
or
advisory
councils
and
then
a
priorities
board
and
so
just
a
way
that
we're
like
kind
of
publicly
coordinating.
K
B
Polls
in
here
there
I
think
the
overwhelming
majority
of
them
are
pretty
I.
Guess
you
can
see
here,
they're
budgetary
cycle
80
for
20
against.
You
can
see
the
the
the
squad.
Accountability
councils
are
clearly
the
closest
vote
and
I
think
there
was
maybe
just
a
vote
recently,
because
I
saw
it
was
50
50
when
I
started
the
call
here
and
so
I
think
this
was
like
kind
of
an
idea
of
having
this
really
like
layer
between
execution
and
governance.
B
B
So
I
kind
of
see
it
fitting
into
that,
and
so,
like
you
know,
we'll
see
how
I
guess.
Keenan
is
kind
of
leading
how
the
proposal
end
up
being
written
here,
but
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
should
like
move
forward
to
going
like
long
term
is
like
how
can
we
have
just
another
group
that
is
like
providing
some
insight
and
Analysis?
That
is
like
separate
from
the
squad
itself,
but.
C
I
B
F
Foreign
yeah,
thank
you,
Chris,
particularly
interested
in
it.
If
anybody
that
has
a
strong,
no
vote,
I
would
like
to
speak
up
and
and
share
their
thoughts,
just
kind
of
to
help
guide.
The
signal
proposal
over
the
coming
days
here,
yeah,
if
I
should
have
discuss
more
I,
think
is
the
the
common
Point
that
I've
heard
personally.
F
Maybe
if
there
is
a
vocal
pushback
against
the
idea
of
cementing
a
vision
before
kind
of
understanding
the
vision
statement
which
I
personally
do
not
see
as
a
problem
instead
as
a
positive,
but
if
that
is
the
case,
we
can
instead
kind
of
indicate
a
delegation
of
you
know.
Should
the
Excel
explore
this
kind
of
package
of
vision
and
whatnot
yeah
Open
Stage
to
anyone
who
has
any
pushback
or
ideas
or
thoughts
on
kind
of
the
the
vision
idea
of
you
know
enabling
Community
Freedom?
Does
it
resonate
with
you?
F
D
Yeah
I
mean
I,
think
I
spoke
already,
The
Wiz
Dev
call.
The
only
concern
for
me
is
is
what
is
the
value
that
we
will
deliver
if
we
achieve
this
Vision?
If
you're?
If
you're
able
to
answer
this
and
then
if
you
are
able
to
answer
this
in
unison
like
everybody
in
the
Dow
understands
what
this
enabled
Community
Freedom
will
deliver
as
a
value,
then
then
I'm
good?
It's
it's
not
like
it's
just
that.
D
I
I
I
I
think
this
when
we
came
to
the
definition
of
of
the
purpose
of
a
vision
or
actually,
this
is
more
like
a
purpose
that
set
us
on
a
on
a
on
a
direction
and
we
try
to
evolve
together
on
this
line
right
like
what
it
does.
Some
of
us
will
have
a
different
understanding
of
us
in
every
Community.
Freedom
is,
but
we
all
we
are
all
going
to
work
toward
the
towards
the
same
directions.
Close
you
right.
So
this
is
the.
This
is
the
main
idea.
This
is
I.
I
Think
for
me,
the
main
need
for
for
DSL
is
to
have
a
a
clear
Direction,
a
clear
path
and
okay.
Now
we
want
to
go
there.
How
do
we
go
there?
What
resources
we
need,
how
what
up,
whatever?
Whatever?
What
are
our
objectives
right?
What
are
we
pursuing?
So
this
is
what
we
are
pursuing
right:
one
two
enable
communities
to
gain
freedom;
okay,
what
type
of
you
know:
Financial
Freedom,
Democratic
freedom,
freedom
of
speech.
What
is
enabled
it's
just
it's
just
build
this
document,
it
is
educate
and
what
are
communities?
I
I
Okay,
what
enabled
and
which,
which
Community
we
want
to
work
on
on
which
type
of
Freon,
but
the
purpose
to
have
something
that
is
very
hard
very
impossible
to
reach,
and
it
will
be
always
there,
so
we
all,
we
will
always
have
in
North
Star
right,
so
we
want
that
we
can
work
into
that
direction.
So
I
think
that's.
That
was
very
important
and
I
like
that
ellipse
room,
for
how
do
we
interpret
it
right?
How
do
we?
I
How
do
we
became
closer
to
that
purpose?
To
the
to
that
goal?
How
do
we
make
more
com
communities?
How
to
increase
your
freedom
on
communities?
I
mean
not
just
okay.
Now,
you're
free,
like
increase
your
freedom
or
okay.
Now
this,
let's
say
this
community
or
this
group
of
people
have
been
using
this
platform
to
communicate
or
to
as
a
forum.
Okay,
you
can
use
this,
the
a
censorship
assistant
or
you
can
do-
or
you
can
use
this,
this
application
to
make
decisions.
B
F
B
C
B
Eastern
New
York
time,
but
that
will
be
interesting
and
definitely
please
do
attend.
And
then
there
are
a
couple
different
Columbia
reflection
posts
here,
I
think
it's
sky
I
believe
this
is
Wayne
and
then
Keenan
right
here
and
then
also
kind
of
an
interesting
from
the
DS
referral
reward
for
violence.
Some
interesting
things
in
terms
of.
G
Davi,
so
Davi
is
in
a
state
where
it
can
be
used
and
it's
got
It's.
It's
got
stuff
on
gnosis
chain,
mainnet
Gourley,
but
we
we
don't
have
many
people
using
it
and
if
you
actually
use
it
you'll
see,
there's
lots
of
things
that
are
missing
or
things
that
might
be
confusing
and
we
actually
need
massive
amounts
of
feedback.
So
we
actually
need
everyone
here:
well,
DX
dial
contributors,
but
then
also
DX
style,
community
members.
G
Maybe
we
can
come
up
with
some
dials
that
can
get
more
people
involved,
the
wider
audience
and
there's
things
like
quorums
and
all
these.
These
settings
that
are
new
to
experiences
of
governance,
and
we
actually
need
a
lot
of
people
internally
using
it
to
see
how
it
works
and
what
it
can
be
done
and
we
can
squads.
Can
you
know
instead
of
using
multi-states
and
start
using
guilds,
and
then
we
have
some
new
guilds
that
can
start
doing
things
and
some
will
be
with
10
people.
G
K
Yeah
thanks
for
asking
yeah,
hopefully
I
think
tomorrow,
we'll
have
some
communication
going
about
the
public
beta
and
yeah,
just
as
important
that
you
all
participate
and
we'll
find
some
cool
stuff
to
do
with
it
as
well.
Obviously,
up
until
now
it
hasn't
had
any
use,
but
now
there
is
actual
use
and
like
fun
stuff,
we
can
do
with
it.
I
B
G
And
just
yeah
go
ahead
all
right!
Yeah,
a
bunch
of
us
had
given
some
feedback
in
the
past
that
was
Consolidated
into
I,
think
a
notion
organization
or
an
organized
notion
which
is
lets
this.
The
Davi
team
take
that
feedback
and
work
on
those
things
and
issue
re
issue,
issues
on
GitHub,
I,
guess
and
so
yeah
people
can
just
come
up
with
their
own
feedback
record
it
somewhere
and
share
it
in
a
doc
like
I
guess,
once
we
could
have
a
place,
that's
very
easy.
K
Yeah
I'm
going
to
write
up
some
documentation
of
how
you
can
share
feedback.
If
it's
larger
feature
stuff,
we
have
we're
using
canny,
which
is
a
solution
for
this.
That
does
it
all
for
us
and
is
really
good
for
tracking.
If
it's
like
just
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
or
like
General
feedback,
it
will
also
have
a
place
for
that
in
the
notion.
But
yeah
that'll
be
detailed
in
tomorrow's
post.