►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-11-09]
Description
00:03 Welcome & Agenda
01:05 Mainnet roundup
02:45 Gnosis Chain roundup
07:04 Restructuring and Refocus
26:28 Discussion item: DXD Buyback
36:35 Infinite Hackathon and DXdao Retreat
B
B
Is
maybe
a
brief
discussion
about
I?
Think
the
first
enter
Dow
vote?
We
can
get
to
for
discussion,
items
there
and
then
yeah.
So
we'll
start
with
the
proposal
Roundup.
We
have
just
two
proposals
that
are
boosted
or
pending
boosting
right.
Now
we
have
the
contribution
reward
scheme.
We
have,
of
course,
the.
B
So
this
was
talked
about
last
week
as
well.
This
proposal
specifically
was
actually
already
submitted
and
talked
about
during
this
call
last
week.
I
think
it
was
still
boosting
during
that,
and
then
we
talked
about
the
the
period
before
and
then
this
is
yeah
slated
to
pass
in
the
next
five
and
a
half
hours
there.
B
And
then
we
have
the
registered
new
contribution
reward
scheme
which
still
actually
doesn't
have
any
votes,
but
it's
going
to
be
in
the
queue
for
another
nine
days,
because
this
is
a
really
important
change
to
the
yeah
to
antique
style
governance,
and
so
it's
important
to
kind
of
take
the
time.
So
that's
how
the
governance
system
is
built
for
that.
This
is
in
response.
A
A
B
B
B
On
xdi,
we
have
a
three
different
Cal
swap
orders
that
are
going
through
there,
one
so
needing
some
votes,
and
then
we
have
The
Violet
contributor
proposal,
Violet,
of
course,
two
and
a
half
years
over
two
years
to
de-style
he's
been
doing
things
on
both
swapper
and
nimi.
This
is
the
second
half
of
that
proposal
and
then
also
a.
B
Contributor
reward
proposal,
so
this
is,
as
far
as
the
DX
referral
reward
reward
program
for
basically
bringing
in
new
contributors
to
dstyle
and
we're
rewarding
those.
So
this
is
actually
a
lot
of
work
that
Milan
did
in
terms
of
bringing
in
another
Milan
Diego
and
Leonardo
too.
So
that's
a
cool
initiative
and
yeah.
This
is
boosted
just
boosted
earlier
today,
and
then
there
are
a
couple
pending
boosts.
B
I
should
have
kind
of
done
that
here
we'll
get
to
this
proposal
in
a
second
but
yeah,
there's
a
couple
that
are
still
pending
boosts,
Diego,
contributor
proposal
and
then
Keenan
is
for
the
first
half
and
the
the
second
half
here
of
his
proposals
there
that
are
now
able
to
be
voted
on
once
they
get
boosted
there,
and
then
there
is
yeah.
Maybe
another
proposal
to
highlight.
We
have
two
different
proposals
from
nylon
or
metronome
here.
So
this
is
a
retroactive
contributor
proposal.
B
E
B
And
then
there
is
another
one
on
the
quiet
ending
period.
I
noticed
down
here:
Guerra
p,
contributor
proposal.
This
is
for
doing
a
lot
of
great
work
on
DX
stats
and
is
actually
going
to
start
helping
on
the
carrot
front
end.
But
yeah
DX
stats
has
really
been
really
cool
and
nice
and
I've
actually
been
playing
around
with.
B
F
Yes,
I
want
to
say
that
the
proposal
in
the
contribution
reward
fixing
the
vulnerability
the
submitted
by
Dave
was
was
executed
today,
and
we
are
going
to
submit
a
proposal
to
test
that
it
works
correctly
today.
So
it
is
already
there.
We
have
a
request
in
the
in
in
development
and
yeah.
We
are
going
to
be
testing
that,
but
everything
worked
so.
B
B
Awesome
and
then
yeah
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
restructuring
and
refocus
proposal.
I
guess
I'm
going
to
read
it
correctly:
restructuring
refocus
phase,
two
accountability,
access,
Anatomy
parentheses
structure,
not
comma
structure
here.
So
this
is
yeah
once
again,
Xerox
column
here
so.
B
A
Yeah
100
thanks
Chris
and
I,
always
love
the
difference
between
zero
and
O
between
cultures
when
they
read
my
name
yeah.
So
the
signal
proposal
for
phase
two
is
out
now:
there's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
period,
a
lot
of
time
spent,
of
course,
in
person
as
well,
which
is
a
very
unique
aspect
of
this
phase
in
my
eyes.
So
let
me
quickly
go
over
the
kind
of
finalized
conditions
here,
which
I
think
Chris
has
in
screen
as
well
the
first
one.
A
This
is,
of
course,
all
based
on
the
off
chain
consensus,
including
calls
Forum
discussions,
Etc,
the
Excel
will
Implement
a
six-month
squad-based
budgetary
cycle
and
shift
contributor
poses
to
their
respective
squads
and
then
kind
of
footnote.
An
exact
solution
and
specifications
will
be
explored
in
phase
three.
This
action
ascertain
extent
shift
to
a
squad-based
budgetary
cycle,
so
basically
saying
that
we
want
to
move
in
this
direction,
not
what
the
exact
specific
implementation
and
solution
of
it
is.
But
the
important
thing
is
that
we
will
move
towards
the
system.
A
A
This
actually
ensures
that
the
Excel
will
commit
to
further
exploration
of
the
accountability,
councils
or
other
initiatives
that
could
effectively
fall
within
this
step
during
the
third
phase
of
its
restructuring,
so
accounting
for
the
basis
of
the
the
kind
of
Step
between
execution
governance.
There's
been
a
lot
of
discussion
on
that
topic.
A
Similarly,
to
to
the
above,
this
is
one
with
kind
of
broad
support
and
the
implementation
doesn't
necessarily
matter
from
The
Proposal
aspect.
The
idea
is
to
kind
of
point
in
that
direction,
so
if
this
were
to
pass,
then
there's
an
on-chain
signal
that
ixta
will
implement
the
priorities
board,
which
is
the
most
important
part
number
four
dxtel
formally
establish
its
over
Envision
as
enable
Community
freedom
and
kind
of
footnote
here
as
well.
A
This
operates
as
a
vision
statement,
the
specifics
of
the
mission
statement
and
further
actions
to
be
determined
within
phase
three.
If
these
statements
change
dramatically
during
expiration
they'll
be
reflected
in
the
final
signal
proposal,
this
action
ascertains
a
direction.
I
guess
the
language
is
very
similar
from
most
of
these
points
that
it's
not
saying
the
exact
specifications
that
it
is
the
answer,
but
it's
taking
nothing
moving
to
something,
and
if,
throughout
the
exploration
of
the
next
two
months
into
the
end
of
the
year,
we
kind
of
determined
that
there
is
something
better.
A
Then
we
can
move
to
that.
If
not,
then
we
have
a
direction
that,
at
this
stage,
I
think
a
majority
are
super
happy
with
on
both
the
product
side,
the
vision
side
and
the
structure
side,
and
then
the
last
Point
the
extent
will
formally
establish
its
Direction.
As
a
decentralized
pipeline
for
communities
and
look
to
prioritize
a
flagship
product
that
interconnects
current
and
future
product
initiatives
and
just
a
footnote,
excuse
me
if
during
exploration
and
alternative
emerges,
they'll
be
reflected
in
the
final
signal
proposal.
A
Just
ascertain
the
direction
of
the
subject
is
product
focused
something
into
phase
three
similar
to
the
kind
of
squad
budget
aspect.
This
is
the
other
largest
shift
and
kind
of
dynamic
and
focus
for
the
Dow
and
my
eyes
what
the
specifics
I
mean.
Like
I
mentioned,
it
doesn't
necessarily
matter.
The
point
is
that
it
sets
the
direction
of
the
stage
for
phase
three
where
we
can
dig
into
what
we're
going
to
do
and
how
we're
going
to
execute
upon
it.
A
One
thing
I
did
mention
here
is
DX
voice,
so
this
is
a
quite
a
long
discussion
at
The
Retreat,
but
DX
voice
in
collaboration
with
dxgov
will
look
to
create
an
operable
wireframe
throughout
phase
three
provided
the
proposal
passes,
I
think
Chris.
This
is
your
idea
initially,
if
I
remember
correctly,
but
the
idea
is
just
to
kind
of
mock
out
what
this
would
look
like
and
make
sure
it
makes
sense
to
do
and
would
be
used
before
the
Dow
commits
to
the
actual
product
Direction.
A
A
Yeah,
so
that's
the
oh,
his
idea,
oh
I,
think
I'm
stealing
his
Thunder
here
yeah,
that's
the
the
meat
of
the
of
the
phase.
Two
super
super
important
proposal
in
my
eyes
and
interpretation
of
the
discussion
so
far
and
I
will
once
again
reiterate
that
I'm
super
happy
with
how
we
have
got
here.
The
discussions
have
been.
You
know
much
more
friendly,
less
toxicity
surrounding
these
discussions
specifically
and
I.
Think
that's
generally,
we've
been
moving
steadfast
into
a
direction
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
B
B
G
B
Right
before
this
call
yeah,
so
as
you
can
see
on
the
GX
vote
here,
there
has
been
a
lot
of
support
and
yeah.
One
of
them
was
candy
Fork,
which
I
voted
this
morning
for
this
proposal
and
just
really
want
to
kind
of
explain
a
little
bit.
Why
I
said
you
know
I
think
this
proposal
would
put
DX
down
on
a
path
to
a
more
robust,
accountable
and
decentralized
governance
culture,
while
also
aligning
the
community
and
contributors
around
a
core,
Vision
and
I.
Guess
like
the
key
Point
here
is.
B
If
this
passes
and
we
go
through
with
that,
I
think
there
will
be
a
lot
more
in
terms
of
discussion
and
like
well.
How
do
we
implement
this
and
how
do
we
kind
of
go
through
yeah
and
and
iron
out
a
lot
of
the
fine
details
there
but
yeah?
That's?
Why
Kenny
Fork
voted
for
it?
I
don't
know
if
there
are
any
what
else
that
wants
to
say
anything
or
comment
on
this
proposal.
E
This
is
yeah,
it's
zero
percent,
it's
actually
like
0.005,
I
think
but
yeah.
This
was
the
as
far
as
I
know,
I,
don't
know
a
good
way
of
working
out.
Potentially
the
first
intro
Dao
vote
it'd
be
interesting
to
work
out.
There
was
another
one
but
yeah.
This
was
technically
a
vote
from
DxD
Guild,
although
it
only
really
had
the
authority
of
me
since
I
had
over
50
locked
in
there
since
we're
just
testing
it,
but
it
was
pretty
cool
to
see
a
photo
actually
going
through.
E
So
this
was
a
proposal
made
on
the
dxt
guilds
to
vote
in
in
this
proposal,
so
yeah
DSD
will
yeah
I,
think
I
locked
0.01
at
0.1
or
0.01
txt,
and
right
now
it's
just
me
Sky
and
Wayne
in
there
so
yeah.
This
is
pretty
cool
as
a
proof
of
concept.
It's
nice
to
see
you
all
working!
Well,
if
you
look
in
the
logs,
yeah
I
think
you
can
see
a
broader
proposal
yeah,
which
is
awesome
with
100
reputation,
14
years
so
yeah.
We
have
some
next
steps.
E
No
there's
some
work
still
in
a
PR,
that's
true
to
where
the
next
release
of
daddy,
which
battery
supports
this
there's
it's
still.
It
was
still
in
a
fairly
hacky
way,
just
to
test
that
it
can
actually
work
and
then
beyond
that
we'll
be
advertising
it
to
DxD
holders
to
get
them
into
the
guilds
if
they're
interested
in
voting
and
then
after
that,
all
that's
left
is
minting
the
initial
four
percent,
which
we'll
try
to
do
as
soon
as
possible.
G
F
Yeah
yeah
I
want
to
say
why
I
bought
I.
What
in
favor
of
these
of
this
proposal,
I
am
not
entirely
uncomplete
so
on
some
stuff
regarding
even
more
of
about
the
accountability
councils,
but
yeah
I
just
want
to
reflect
on
what
happened
on
these
past
months
since
July
on
on
the
Exile,
and
this
looks
like
way
different
to
the
state
where
five
four
months
ago
and
where
things
were
for
me
at
least
personally
on
the
contributor
layer
where
quite
frustrating
and
we
lack
I.
F
F
Here,
even
if
you
are
not,
if
you
not
agreeing
to
entirely
with
this,
you
can
still
go
on
both,
maybe
with
half
of
your
rep
or
just
with
yeah,
with
the
part
of
Europe
just
to
Signal
an
approval
or
yeah
or
some
on
this
right,
and
we
are
changing
how
we
work
by
now.
Again,
it
might
not
be
perfect,
it
won't
be
perfect.
F
E
B
C
B
I
B
I
C
Yeah
I
want,
to
maybe
add
that
I
mean
this
is
a.
This
is
a
culture
thing
and
I
think
as
a
part
of
this
through
focus
and
restructuring
like
we're,
gonna
have
to
rebuild
our
culture,
we
have
I,
think
a
vision
or
a
direction
of
a
vision
and
the
cultures
that
we
need
to
build
and
I
think
we
discussed
about
this
before
and
some
of
the
calls.
C
If
anyone
has
seen
the
ray
dalio
Ted
talk
about,
like
radical
transparency,
calls
it
so
I
I
suggest,
like
you
know,
going
through,
and
seeing
that
then
I
think
one
of
the
best
things
that
we
can
do
is
figure
out.
How
do
we
give
feedback
to
each
other?
How
do
we
improve
by
that
and
how?
How
do
we
not
get
offended?
If
someone
tells
you
that
you,
you
know,
you've
done
something
wrong
or
you
didn't
do
something?
Well,
you
don't
need
to
get
offended.
You
need
to
find
a
way.
C
Yeah
I
highly
suggest
to
see
the
you
know
the
Ted
Talk
by
Ray
dalio.
This
is
it
was
my
inspiration
to
originally
to
like
why
Dallas
are
gonna.
You
know
take
over
everything
and
then
you
know
reality
happened
and
it
doesn't
really
work
this
way,
but
but
yeah
definitely
you
know
something
to
look
up
to
and
what
what
in
that
Ted
talk.
You
know
it's
pretty
extreme
the
way
they
work.
We
don't
need
to
go
that
way,
but
I
think
a
part
of
yeah.
D
C
C
Yeah
yeah,
maybe
a
small
anecdote,
I
have
friends
who
work
there
and
you
know
they
said
like
30
percent
of
your
time
is
dedicated
to
feedback.
Every
every
single
thing
is
recorded
and
there's
a
team
who
analyzes
things,
and
you
know
they
will
come
up
to
you
after
a
meeting
and
be
like
you
know
at
that
meeting.
You
were
personal
and
you
know
they
will
give
you
feedback
on
this.
So
it's
it's
a
bit
like
a
cult.
That's
what
she
said
so
yeah.
B
B
C
B
B
So
that
means
we
have
11
536
DxD
to
be
burned
as
part
of
that,
because,
as
part
of
the
agreement,
all
of
the
DxD
acquired
through
the
buyback
Reserve
is
to
be
burned,
whereas
the
DxD
that's
acquired
from
the
general
treasury.
Actually,
oh
sorry,
DC,
that's
acquired
with
Ethan
the
general
treasury.
Just
goes
back
to
the
general
treasury
there
so
that
just
concluded
and
then
what
we
just
started
is
the
first
purchases
under
the
new
authorization,
the
500k
authorization
that
passed
at
the
end
of
August.
B
Now
this
one
was
different
because
it
had
a
little
different
stipulations
in
terms
because
it
was
not
using
it
from
the
buyback
Reserve.
So
that's
where
we
are
there
and
then
the
other
kind
of
changes
that
we've
you've
noticed,
of
course,
is
that
we've
now
switched
over
completely
to
using
Cal
swap
for
buyback
order,
executions
there,
but
yeah,
maybe
just
wanted
to
this
one,
because
I
thought
it
was
kind
of
interesting
that
I
presented
on
the
dxt
token
working
group
last
week,
some
of
the
like
numbers,
you
have
right.
B
So
in
the
beginning
there
was
48
976
DxD.
That
was
minted
from
the
bonding
curve.
There
was
a
hundred
thousand
DxD
that
was
minted
to
vest
to
the
exta
over
three
years,
and
so
that
was
the
whole
Supply
to
start
with,
and
so
where
things
are
right
now,
there's
80
725
DxD
in
the
DX
style,
treasury,
there's
still
19
600
of
this
a
hundred
thousand.
B
That
is
vesting
still
2
vest
to
DxD
to
DX
style,
there's
16.99
DxD
in
the
bonding
curve,
because
of
poor
soul
sent
that
there
he
was
later
refunded,
there's
also
like
130
000
usdc
in
the
bonding
curve
that
was
refunded
there,
but
there's
a
little
bit
of
DxD
there.
And
then
you
look
deeked
out
on
notices.
Chain
has
12
935
DxD,
and
that
is
all
from
these
purchases
that
have
happened
on
gnosis
chain.
Of
course,
they've
gone
back
to
the
the
DX
down
notice,
chain,
Treasury
and
yeah
we'll
get
to
a
second.
B
So
you
can
see
you
know
in
terms
of
what
was
minted
from
the
curve.
You
can
see
that
yeah
about
31
of
of
DxD
minted
from
the
curve
has
been
repurchased
there
and
the
Dixie
to
burn,
as
you
said,
would
be
115,
sorry,
11,
536,
and
so
that
would
lead
to
a
projected
total
Supply
of
137
440
and
then
the
other
commitments
that
we
you
know
have
been
made
is
there's
about.
B
In
DxD
that's
vested
over
three
years,
so
we're
accounting
for
that
here,
but
that's
not
on
the
market
yet
so
it
doesn't
contribute
to
circulating
Supply
and
then,
as
part
of
the
governance
2.0
agreement,
there
was
a
good
chunk
of
DxD
that
was
going
to
be
vest
to
individual
rep
holders.
After
three
years,
once
governance,
2.0
launches
and
then
yeah
in
terms
of
the
I
guess,
the
bonding
curve
itself
I
like
to
say
inhaled
these.
B
It
took
in
about
25
000
eth,
and
it
minted
with
that
48
000
976
txd
remember
it
was
a
linear
increasing
price,
so
it
starts
at
like
0.01
each
and
then
I
think
it
had
all
the
way
up
to
like
1.0
to
each,
but
the
average
price
that
was
minted
from
that
was
0.51
dxt
per
eth.
And
then
the
average
price
that
teached
out
has
acquired
up
here
is
yeah
0.19626.
So
just
under
that
and
then
so
far
there
has
been
one
thousand
100
dxt
issued
by
Deep
style.
B
Some
of
that
is
for
contributors
that
have
already
earned
vest
in
DxD
other.
That
was
for
some
swapper
farming
and
then
a
couple
random,
like
smaller
marketing
things
that
we've
used
DxD
for
that.
So
anyway,
that's
the
kind
of
lay
of
the
land
in
terms
of
where
we
are
on
on
this
and
then
I
guess
like
the
next
thing,
actually
not
as
much
on
here
but
Dave.
B
G
B
D
Yeah
I
mean
a
couple
of
reasons
for
that:
I
guess,
like
dxc,
currently
makes
up
the
large
percentage
part
of
the
knowledge
exchange
treasury.
But,
most
importantly,
if
we
do
plan
to
burn
this
dxt,
we
could
of
course
do
that
on
all
this
chain,
but
then
the
corresponding
DxD
on
mainnet
would
most
likely
still
exist
in
the
actual
Bridge,
so
kind
of
like
bridging
that
back
to
main
net.
D
If
we
want
to
eventually
burn
it
logically
makes
more
sense,
and
it's
also
just
easier
to
be
tracked
from
like
coin
Gecko
and
all
these
sites,
which,
like
simply
query
like
the
dxt
balance
on
mainnet
and
so
yeah,
one
Forum
posts
about
that
up
soon
and
kind
of
also
decide
how
much
dxt
we
want
to
live
in,
ignore
this
chain.
I
think
it
definitely
makes
sense
to
leave
some
there,
especially
with
people
claiming
their
vested
DxD
through
worker
proposals
in
granola's
chain.
D
You
can
actually
do
that
through
just
one
proposal,
because
xdy
is
a
native
token
and
you
can
send
DxD
as
an
erc20
while
a
minute
you
actually
have
to
do
two,
because,
if
you're
requesting
Stables,
that's
two
erc20s.
Of
course,
so
yeah
we'll
follow
up
on
the
Forum
with
this
and
then
hopefully
do
a
proposal
end
of
this
week
or
early
next
and
bridge
over
a
majority
of
the
dxt
yeah.
B
Adam's
saying
there's
a
way
to
like
basically
burn
unnosis
chain
that
automatically
Burns
I
mean
that
but
I
think
we
should
burn
through
the
Curve.
That's
what's
cool
yeah
any
thoughts
on
that
I
guess
the
other,
maybe
just
think
two
things
to
highlight
are
one
the
DxD
trade
volume
the
post
two
days
ago
on
this
is
actually
trade.
B
Actually
going
up
the
last
month
or
so,
and
even
like
the
last
couple
days,
there's
actually
been
a
lot
of
volume
here
in
activity.
I
think
some
of
that
is
Market
General
market
volatility
related,
but
I
think
it's
also
just
maybe
a
little
bit
more
uptick
in
interest
and
volume
there
and
then
the
last
thing
is
working
on
a
proposal
to
you
know
for
all
of
these
BuyBacks
that
we've
been
talking
about
here.
B
All
of
these
were
purchased
with
each
right,
so
we
were
using
East
from
the
treasury
to
buy
DxD
and
I.
Think
when
we
look
at
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
see
the
price
of
eth
or
the
the
general
makeup.
The
treasury
I
think
it
could
make
more
sense
to
do
some
BuyBacks
from
using
dollar
liquidity,
so
using
stable
coins
themselves
and
I.
B
Think
we
could
do
that
on
mainnet,
where
there
is
a
little
bit
more
like
liquid
market
for
for
DxD,
and
so
that
would
be
a
little
bit
more
tricky,
because
when,
if
you're
doing
things
in
dollar
buys,
then
the
price
of
eth
could
change,
which
then
could
affect
like
the
price
of
DHD.
Whereas,
like
typically,
the
the
ethd
price
is
a
little
is
the
stable.
Even
if
the
dollar
price
of
DxD
is
a
little
more
is
a
little
trickier.
B
So
that's
a
little
trickier
and
then,
of
course,
with
Cal
swap
on
mainnet.
We
had
to
have
15
days
to
pass
proposals.
So
in
terms
of
like
how
do
you
set
slippage,
or
you
just
trust
that
the
order
will
be
executed
there,
but
anyway,
just
wanted
to
give
like
a
little
brief
update
on
that
here
and
I'll
yeah
working
on
a
post
to
get
that
up.
Hopefully,
today
on
on,
like
on
how
that
will
work,
and
maybe
how
we
affect
the
accounting
of
that,
because
that.
B
J
J
These
were,
the
dates
were
where
they
occurred
and
the
hackathon
was
organized
by
by
us,
but
colonized.
We
were
actually
like
support
there,
but
the
main
organizers
were
the
ex-stop
hopper,
bring
clearos
and
sworn
having
a
DX
Dao
as
as
lead
organizer,
and
this
was
done
in
in
Bogota
at
the
Hilton
there's
a
big
venue
and
well
it
was
there
three
days
long.
J
This
is
what
happened
mainly
as
I
said
on
on
the
document.
Here
you
can
find
the
complete
schedule,
but
roughly
this
is
it
I
think
it
was
nice.
It
happened
quite
smoothly.
There
were
some
issues
on
the
way,
but
we
we
mostly
solve
them
all
and,
and
one
thing
we
we
noticed
at
the
end,
we
we
have
it
on
the
on
the
report.
Also
is
that
hackers
were
like
really
happy
with
how
this
turned
out.
J
Not
all
of
them
went
to
the
hackathon,
but
one
important
thing
to
to
say
about
this
is
that
there
were
other
hackathons
occurring
at
the
same
time.
So
I
think
it
was
actually
a
good
number,
because
one
of
the
hackathons
was
was
done
by
ET
EDH
and
it
was
a
big
one,
so
so
having
51
hackers
is
actually
a
success
for
me
and
well
16
projects
which,
which
is
also
a
very
interesting
number,
some
of
them.
J
So
the
the
thing
there
is
that
the
the
venue
was
open,
all
all
the
time
continuously
like
24
hours
so
and
there
was
a
continuous
supply
of
food
drinks
and
everything
so
those
who
wanted
to
stay
there
and
sleep
there
actually
with
with
the
big
bean
bags,
they
could
stay
there
and
they
were
being
back
for
all
if,
if
they
would,
if
all
of
them
would
like
to
stay,
they
could
have
stayed
there.
So
that
was
nice.
J
Of
course,
there
are
some
opportunities
to
improve
how
the
hackathon
turned
out,
but
in
general
we
we
think
it
was
a
good
hackathon.
With
with
with
a
nice
outcome
and
and
well,
we
will
probably
need
to
see
how
things
evolve
with
the
economy,
and
so,
but
this
is
probably
a
nice
thing
to
to
keep
doing
over
the
years
well
going
to
the
extra
Retreat
also
organized
by
us,
but
in
this
case
only
for
the
excel
in
in
Tierra
woman
Cartagena
at
the
venue
called
Namaste.
It's.
F
G
F
Yeah
I
just
wanted
to
add
on
on
the
conclusion.
My
personal
conclusion
on
the
hackathon
I
agree
with
everything
that
Tommy
chat
said
that
I
think
it
went
very
good
and
it
was
I
was
actually
surprised
because
I
knew
it
was
going
to
be
tough
to
make
a
good
hackathon
a
good
quality,
even
more,
with
eth
global
running
next
to
us
have
hundreds
or
hundreds
of
hackers
way
more
price,
yeah
way
more
money
on
prices,
I
mean
it
was
everything
bigger.
F
You
know
so
I
I
think
what
we
end
up
when
we
end
up
doing
was
very
good,
very
good
yeah.
It
was
not
very,
it
was
not,
maybe
not
so
what
not
so
well
organized.
Actually,
it
was
not
good
or
organized
before
that
I
had
to
I
could
do
a
lot
of
stuff.
I.
Think
a
lot
of
DXL
people
had
to
do
a
lot
of
stuff,
and
we
saw
very
few
engagement
from
colonizers.
That
is
what
I
that
is
my
conclusion
that
Gordon
and
I
said
were
not
actually
co-organizing.
F
It
was
monthly
DXL,
something
could
change
for
the
future
cost.
It
took
a
lot
of
energy
to
the
Excel.
Luckily
it
was
good
but
yeah.
It
took
a
lot,
a
lot
of
more
energy
and
resources
that
we
planned,
but
maybe
that's
maybe
that's
why
it
went
so
good.
Maybe
if
we
weren't,
maybe
if
we
were
organizing
it
with
other
with
other
people,
it
was
like
in
a
more
collaborative
called
laborative
process,
maybe
wouldn't
turn
up
so
good.
F
I
think
that
we
put
a
lot
of
motivation
and
passion
on
the
organization
and
you
can
see
reflecting
on
the
event
but
on
the
future
I
I
personally,
I
I,
don't
I
I
won't
like
to
go
through
that
again
because
again
it
was.
It
took
a
lot
of
energy,
so
yeah
I
won't
organize
a
hackathon
again.
I
would
like
to
help,
but
for
a
for
me
personally,
I
think
for
other
people
in
the
Exile.
It
took
way
more
energy
that
we
were
expecting
it.
F
J
Also,
maybe
now
that
we
already
did
this
once
and
we
already
kind
of
know
what
needs
to
be
done.
We
can
distribute
tasks
better.
You
know,
maybe,
if,
if
the
next
time
it's
it's
organized
again,
we
can
just
from
the
beginning,
say:
okay,
you,
as
coronizers,
dedicate
and
and
solve
these
issues,
and
we
will
solve
those
other
issues
and
things
could
like
get.
The
load
of
work
could
get
better
distributed.
J
J
H
H
So
far,
we've
done
this
a
handful
of
times
virtually
eat
Denver
our
own
hackathon,
getting
hackers
to
hack
on
DX
style
products
has
continually
been
tricky,
so
organizing
our
own
hackathon
is
like
a
larger
way
to
scale
that
it
got
us.
You
know
it
got
us
community
and
some
interested
people
and
some
good
relationships
with
the
co-organizers
and
some
good
discussions
and
things,
but
like
people
didn't
really
hack
on
DX
style
stuff.
We
also
faced
that
issue
at
in
person
and
and
virtual
eth
Global
hackathons
as
well.
H
J
Yes,
something
in
relation
with
that
sky
is
what
what
we
are.
What
we
wrote
on
it
on
the
report
is
that
maybe
the
hackathon
could
be
like
more
targeted
to
specific
to
solve,
to
solve
specific
things,
so
that
using
the
technology
is
not
not
it's
not
only
a
plus.
Where
that,
if
you
do
it,
you
get
some
some
payment,
but
a
must.
You
must
use
that
technology
to
solve
something,
any
issue
that
maybe
the
Excel
has
and
needs
to
solve.
J
It
will
be
nice
to
hackers
to
actually
hack
and
solve
things
you
already
have,
which
would
make
them
use
the
technology,
and
it
would
be
also
maybe
a
good
place
to
to
pick
up
talents
and
recruit
people
if
needed.
So,
yes,
I,
agree,
there's
there's
a
little
thing
to
be
done
there
around,
focusing
more
on
on
the
profitability
of
of
the
hackathon
back
to
to
DX
down
is
what
one
of
the
things
I
wrote
here,
and
it's
it's
a
little
bit
longer
written
here
on
the
document.
You'll
see
it.
J
H
We
left
it
very
open,
but
the
fact
that
very
like
no
one
there
was
interested.
They
were
in
more
interested
to
hack
on
Hopper
and
Brink
and
Claro's
over
the
things
that
they
could
hack
on
related
to
DX
Dao.
That's
that's
a
that's!
An
underlying
yeah!
That's
a
big
obstacle
right,
like
the
fact
that
no
one
wanted
to
hack
on
governance
products
at
what
was
what
we
wanted
to
be
like
a
dow,
focused
hackathon
seems
a
little
crazy
right.
J
The
technology
and
the
solutions
need
to
be
I,
don't
know
like
better
explained
or
sold,
so
that
people
know
what
they
can
do
with
them
and
and
they
want
to
do
things
with
them.
So
yes,
if
you,
if
you
make
a
hackathon
where
they
can
do
whatever
they
want,
it's
more
open
that
if
you
present
them
with
challenges-
and
you
say:
let's:
okay-
try
to
solve
this
particular
thing,
which
Narrows
a
little
bit,
and
it's
also
a
good
way
to
do
a
hackathon
I've
seen
it
otherwise.
H
Yeah,
so
so
my
I
guess
my
my
original
question
was:
it
is
going
to
cost
to
organizing
and
there's
a
there's
a
time
and
money
cost
and
there's
a
cost
to
joining
other
people's
hackathons
like
youth,
globals
or
eat.
Denver's
are
people
yeah.
Is
the
community
interested
in
participating
in
more
hackathons
over
the
next
six
months
to
12
months.
B
D
B
F
J
Also,
roughly,
this
is
what
happened
again.
If
you
go
to
the
full
report,
you
have
the
complete
schedule
here
and
a
little
bit
more
explained
each
day.
What
what
we
did
but
roughly
this
is
what
happened
in.
In
our
opinion,
it
was
like
really
productive
from
the
maybe
more
personal
and
and
and
team
building
aspect.
J
So
these
are
the
the
outcomes
we
we
have
like.
The
the
tangibles
are
a
solid
purpose,
which
is
the
one
Augusto
said
a
while
ago
and
I
think
it's
the
one
that
probably
will
lead
you
a
few
through
a
couple
of
years.
Hopefully,
and
then
we
have
this
six
concrete
ocrs.
If
you
go
to
the
report,
you
have
this
pictures
where
you
can
also
see
the
the
key
results.
J
But
there
is
a
much
longer
one
here.
So
if
you're
interested
I
think
you
better
read
this
one.
This
is
just
if
you
want
to
present
something
and
what
what
is
very
important
is
next
steps,
and
here
I,
I'm,
glad
I
I
heard
a
while
ago
before
I
started
to
talk
some
of
the
things
you
said,
and
some
of
them
are
a
little
bit
in
line
with
with
what
we
think-
and
this
is
one
of
them,
is
like
strongly
work
on
communication
skills
I.
J
We
actually
saw
that
there
are
some
difficulties
in
in
getting
conversations
and
receiving
what
you
said
a
while
before
receiving
feedback
in
in
having
like
difficult
talks
without
getting
into
a
fight,
and
this
is
something
you
can
develop
like
these
are
skills
people
can
can
develop,
and
our
invitation
is
to
you
to
to
work
on
this,
and
it
requires
time
and
dedication
and
probably
people
that
will
help
you
with
this.
It's
not
not
something
like
that.
You
learn
alone,
it's
like
any
other
thing.
J
You
need
someone
that
helps
you
with
with
this
training,
but
it's
an
important
issue
and
it's
maybe
the
the
most
structural
thing
of
an
organization
is
communication.
So
if
communication
is
not
working,
probably
all
the
rest
won't
work,
also
improve
and
decision
making,
and
this
this
is
also
done
this.
This
has
to
be
done
in
a
in
a
very
explicit
matter.
You
need
to
to
to
create
agreements
so
that
this
decision
making
is
is
context
based.
J
So
in
some
context,
some
decisions
are
made
on
a
way
and
another
constant
go
another
way,
but
this
is
something
you
need
to
build
in
brief
collaboration
between
teams
and
squads.
This
is
actually
something
that
came
up
on
the
OCR,
so
it's
it's
very
in
line.
Also,
the
feedback
issue
maybe
fits
into
this
one.
It's
all,
basically
the
same,
distribute
knowledge
and
a
constant,
transparent
matter.
Also.
This
goes
with
the
collaboration
between
the
teams.
J
We,
we
had
the
feeling
during
the
The
Retreat
that,
even
though
information
is
somewhat
somehow
always
available,
it's
not
always
known
by
everyone
and
some
something
that
surprised
us
a
little
bit
is
to
see
many
faces.
That
were
like
surprised
to
hear
things
that
the
ones
that
were
saying
it
were
like
pretty
sure
that
everybody
knew
about
that
and
and
that
it
was
not
the
case.
So
somehow
you
need
to
improve
in
how
the
knowledge
is
distributed
and
how
how
the
information
gets
to
everyone,
because
that
helps
to
to
make
better
decisions.
J
Also
and
then
there's
other
two
things
which
are
more
a
suggestion
like
regularly
meet
in
person
as
much
as
possible.
Many
of
the
things
that
happened
during
the
retreat
in
three
or
four
days
would
probably
take
many
months.
If
you,
if
you
do
it
online
always
meeting
in
person,
is
much
better.
It's
also
more
expensive
in
this
case,
but
but
well
you
are
a
online
organization,
so
maybe
this
is
an
expense
you
can
afford.
J
I,
don't
know,
that's
something
you
need
to
decide
and
now
that
you
have
okrs
it's
something
that
must
be
dynamic
and
must
work
and
be
like
reviewed
constantly.
Okay,
so
KR
should
be
reviewed
every
three
months
and
the
OCR
should
be
reading
again
every
six
months
because
they
need
to
be
re-evaluated
and
Rewritten
and
that's
it
with
the
short
version.
But
you
have
all
the
information
much
longer
at
the
report.
J
F
F
F
B
It's
like
we
now
actually
have
that
information
I
think
there
were
a
couple
questions
on
the
like
budget
counting
stuff,
but
I
think
that
those
were
like
mostly
answered,
but
that
was
maybe
the
only
other
thing
I
thought
to
like
tie
up
just
so
we
have
like
a
clear
idea
on
what
those
are
and
I
haven't.
I
haven't
looked
all
the
way
through
this,
but
I
think
if
this
is
just
Dave
and
Chris
I
think
is
like
the
other
thing
and
with
the
what
the
conversion
rate
is.