►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-11-16]
Description
00:03 Welcome and Agenda
00:37 Mainnet
08:15 Gnosis Chain
16:52 ENS DAO Discussion
22:30 New Budgetary Process Discussion
A
A
Then
carving
out
a
big
chunk
of
time
to
talk
about
this
phase,
3D
style
budgetary
process,
V1
post
there
so
starting
first
with
the
proposal
Roundup
on
mainnet,
we
have
you
can
see
three
live
proposals
here.
This
first
one
is
the
register
new
contribution
rewards
scheme.
We
talked
about
this
last
week.
We
talked
to
this
two
weeks
ago.
A
Scheme
to
make
sure
it
works
before
voting
for
this
scheme,
I
believe
Violet
had
a
proposal
that
used
that
scheme
that
was
set
to
go
through,
like
I,
think
15
20
30
minutes
ago.
So
maybe
that
as
long
as
that
worked,
we
should
be
able
to
see
some
votes
on
that,
but
yeah
any
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
this
register.
New
contribution
reward
scheme.
A
Sure
you
are
selecting
the
new
scheme
there,
that's
where
all
things
will
be
going
forward
will
be
occur
going
forward,
and
then
we
have
the
infinite
Genesis
hackathon
prizes
proposal
here.
So
this
is
a
proposal
from
Wayne,
so
maybe
Wayne.
You
wanna
chat
a
little
bit
about
this
and
then
maybe
Ross
from
dixgov
can
chime.
In
with
some
of
the
specifics
on
who
this
is.
These
funds
are
actually
being
sent
to.
E
Okay,
that's
basically,
just
after
the
infinite
hackathon
the
prizes
were,
there
was
like
a
certain
percentage
percentage
that
each
organization
would
pay,
but
we
got
together
and
basically
decided
that
it
would
be
better
if
we
just
sent
out
the
browsers
in
one
lump
sum
from
one
place
instead
of
each
organization
sending
out
a
small
percentage
of
each
portion
of
each
prize,
so
the
organizations
will
refund
the
eggs
down
for
this
amount
and
we
will
send
out
the
prizes
individually
to
the
to
the
winners.
There's
one
it
says.
E
F
F
So
me,
Wayne
and
Melanie
were
also
just
on
a
call
setting
up
some
test
transactions
just
to
prove
everything's
working
fine
with
us
before
we
go
ahead,
obviously
with
a
larger
amount
of
money,
so
we've
done
pretty
pretty
thorough
testing
and
most
of
the
test
cases
we've
been
doing.
It's
been
with
transferring
tokens,
be
that
on
localhost
or
in
development
test
networks,
but
yeah.
This
is
on
midnight,
so
this
Guild
we've
previously
used
to
deploy
ens
names
they're.
F
F
This
is
just
an
initial
amount
to
test
it
out.
Oh
and
it's
one.
Other
thing
we
need
to
do
before
the
bunny
arrives
is
increase
the
proposal
time,
because
right
now
it's
set
to
two
hours
just
as
a
test,
but
it
should
be
a
lot
longer
than
that
for
when
we
have
a
bit
of
money
flowing
through
it
and
I.
Think
that's
everything
I,
don't
know.
A
A
F
F
A
F
A
A
Because
he
likes
playing
in
the
big
boy,
land,
yeah,
and
so
that's
it,
for
it's
also
actually
a
good
call
for
people
who've
done
repsyncs
in
a
while.
If
you
haven't
done
a
rep
sync
in
a
while,
it's
always
good.
You
can
combine
that
with
a
proposal
that
you
are
also
doing
that
you're
getting
paid.
You
can
kind
of
hit
two
birds
with
one
stone.
It's
also
good
to
do
the
rep
sinks,
I
think
every
three
months
or
so,
and
you
know,
gas
prices
are
down.
F
A
A
Then
we
have
a
couple:
different
cow
swap
orders
and
then
we
have
what
was
potentially
an
exciting
swap
50k
usdc
to
xdi
treasury
move,
but
Dave
we
discovered
maybe
an
issue
with
this
earlier
and
we're
not
sure
we
don't
think
this
proposal
is
going
to
go
through.
You
want
to
walk
us
through
this
proposal
here.
D
Sure
yeah
so
I
mean
this
proposal.
Essentially
like
approves
5000
usdc
to
the
three
pool
curve,
then,
does
it
trade
to
wrap
the
X
die
and
unwraps
that
X
die?
However,
Space
Inch
withdrew
some
outstanding
usdc
that
they
still
hadn't
withdrawn
from
a
proposal
they
had,
and
so
we
actually
don't
have
50
000
usdc
anymore
in
you
know
this
chain
right
now.
So
for
that
reason,
unfortunately,
the
proposal
will
fail.
D
I
would
like
want
go
through
and
yeah,
given
that
we're
currently
running
a
bit
low
on
funds,
one
proposal
Chris
and
I
had
was
to
perhaps
use
in
the
Omni
chain
multi-sig
rehab,
which
I'll
post
the
address.
Here
we
actually
have
like
207
000
207
000
in
there,
which
we
were
intending
to
buy
LUSD
with
once
it
repegs
to
one.
But
LUSD
is
still
like
four
percent
above
the
peg,
so
I
think
perhaps
it
would
be
a
good
occasion
to
kind
of
use.
D
This
die
return
them
to
the
treasury
just
rather
than
returning
them
to
the
mainnet
treasury.
We
can
just
Bridge
them
over
to
the
ignosis
chain
treasury.
That
way,
we
should
have
enough
funds
until
end
of
the
year
and
we
can
probably
do
like
150k
die
and
then
the
rest
in
usdc.
Just
so,
we
have
some
uscc
Reserve
there
as
well,
but
I
think
that
would
be
the
most
efficient
way
to
do
it,
and
that
way
we
also
managed
to
do
it
immediately.
D
A
F
A
A
Yeah
and
I
guess
I
think
Ross
from
most
of
those
I
think
for
that
we
can
get
to
that
in
a
bit
in
terms
of
likely.
Those
will
be
like
funded
from
mainnet
I
think
that'll
be
cleaner
to
have
those
kind
of
coming
from
there.
We
can
talk
about
the
specifics
of
that.
We
could
have
the
single
proposal
kind
of
gnosis
chain,
but
in
general,
like
one
of
the
reasons
we
ran
out
of,
like
the
the
funds
are,
are.
A
C
A
Different
currency,
so
anyway
yeah
it
is.
It
is
like
a
little
bit
to
balance
all
of
these
things,
but
I
think
yeah
getting
this
from
the
the
multi-sig
and
then
using
that
on
noses
chain.
I
think
is
the
clearest
way
to
get
through
like
the
end
of
the
year,
and
then
we
have
a
little
bit
more
a
better
system
for
managing
it,
going
forward.
I
think
through
the
budget
cycle
process,
foreign
yeah.
D
A
A
A
C
A
C
C
A
F
C
C
A
A
C
A
A
Enos
was
really
and
as
part
of
that,
I
want
to
keep
the
deeked
out
updated
on
the
ens
happenings
and
be
able
to
use
its
ens
tokens
to
be
able
to
express
and
its
interest
in
the
ens
ecosystem,
so
yeah
the
big
thing
kind
of
in
the
in
ens
style
over
the
last
month.
It's
kind
of
from
the
government's
perspective
is
they're,
picking
a
fund
manager,
and
so
they
have
this
selection
of
an
ens
style
endowment.
A
Process
to
follow
in
terms
of
seeing
the
different
groups
that
are
pitching
down
like
ens
on
this
treasury
management
of
it,
and
so
you
know,
ens
actually
has
a
good
amount
of
Revenue
coming
in
from
ens
name
subscription.
So
I
think
they
have
like
a
treasure.
That's
like
40
million,
maybe
30
30
million
dollars.
That's
basically
all
in
eth
right
now,
I'm,
sorry,
mostly
in
youth
right
now,
and
there
will
be
additional
youth
streams
coming
in
there
as
you
have
ens
registrations
going
forward.
So.
A
Maybe
some
of
you
have
been
familiar
with
them.
They've
been
around
a
lot
and
then
llama,
who
is
does
a
lot
of
work
with
Ave
and
they've
done
a
lot
of
different
other
kind
of
Treasury
work.
They
also
actually
had
a
proposal.
It
was
teamed
up
with
alastor
who's
been
on
some
of
these
calls
before
so
anyway,
you
can
see
the
the
different
proposals.
If
you
want
to
go
in,
I
won't
go
into
the
detail
here.
A
A
To
hear
from
like
a
lot
of
the
work
that
we've
been
doing
on
that
that
that's
something
that
like
Dallas
will
manage
in
the
future,
so
avant-garde
itself
is
like
a
whole
protocol
for
Asset
Management,
it's
a
little
old
in
terms
of
when
it
was
designed.
So
it
kind
of
has
this
like
more
like
traditional
fund
manager
model
on
the
blockchain
feel
to
it.
A
A
I
guess
wallet
address
but
yeah,
so
that
one's
good
and
then
kaparki
is,
as
they
talked
with
us,
has
been
working
on
like
a
gnosis,
safe
module
to
be
able
to
manage
this,
and
so,
if
they
have
sorry
a
zodiac
module
on
the
nose
is
safe
to
be
able
to
manage
that.
So
the
vote
will
go.
I,
think
it's
November
18th
at
midnight
I
believe
it's
UTC
time,
I
can't
remember,
which
one
there
and
so
right
now,
leaning
towards
Copart
key
just
because
we
kind
of
has
a
familiarity
with
them.
A
I
know
they're
done
some
good
work
with
gnosis,
but
there
is
a
poll
at
the
bottom
of
this.
If
you're
interested
in
in
that
elsewhere,
they
deploy
there's
a
deployment
of
new
contracts
on
Gurley
was
in
September.
This
is
kind
of
a
long-weighted
update
and
actually
just
something
announced
this
morning.
A
Is
that
they're
actually
going
to
send
the
contracts
back
for
another
audit
there,
and
so
that
I
think
will
start
in
a
week
or
so
there
yeah
and
then
some
other
kind
of
fun
things
here.
There
was
a
great
DNS
Dow
one
year
anniversary
event:
I
tried
to
do
some
of
the
pixel
stuff,
but
I
couldn't
figure
it
out,
but
I
know
Wayne
and
zett
and
others
were
were
in
a
great
pixel
battle
there
for
that
represented
geek
style,
Mimi
and
swapper
in
that.
So
that's
fun.
A
A
A
E
F
C
A
Cool,
so
let's
move
into
yeah
this
post
made
yesterday
on
geeked
out
budgetary
process
V1
that
was
long.
It's
kind
of
got
a
lot
of
dense
things
in
it.
So
maybe
you
thought
we
could
just
kind
of
go
over
here
and
open
up
the
questions
and
kind
of
continue.
This
conversation
yeah
here
so
you
know
just
think
about
where
we
are
in
mid-september.
We
passed
the
proposal
so
we're
going
to
do
these
three
phases.
A
C
A
Two
proposal
which
passed
over
the
weekend
was
basically
we're
agreeing
to
shift
to
this
new
model
and
explore
this
new
model
and
then
the
phase
three
is
basically
implementation
of
that.
So
the
the
I
think
the
five
different
things
in
the
phase
two
restructuring
proposal,
the
first
one
is
six
month,
budgetary
Cycles.
This
second
one
is
implementing
eventually
exploring
the
implementation
of
squad
councils.
A
A
Discussion
in
terms
of
how
this
Vision
kinds
of
variety
of
four
and
five,
but
really
today,
we
want
to
focus
on
this
first,
one
like
number
one,
so
teach
that
will
Implement
a
six-month
Squad,
page
squad-based
budgetary
cycle
and
shift
contributor
proposals
to
their
respective
squads.
So
I
think
if
you
could
just
like
look
at
what
this
governance
call
is
a
lot
of
times.
I
mean
almost
like
half
of
it
is
different
contributor
proposals
that
are
being
are
up
for
vote.
A
So
this
is
kind
of
I.
Think
the
first
step
in
that
process,
so
I'm
trying
to
do
that
here.
I
think
the
the
first
thing
I
wanted
to
propose
and
is
getting
is
Shifting.
The
terminology
I
think
one
of
my
favorite
things
to
do
is
kind
of
to
do.
Mine
shift
is
to
come
up
with
a
new
word
for
something,
and
so
I
think
you
know.
A
Squads-
and
we
have
this
idea
of
squads
or
these
teams
working
on
these
different
projects,
but
I
think
going
forward
when
we
think
about
who
is
going
to
receive
funding
from
DX
Dow,
we
could
think
about
them
in
terms
of
guilds.
Right
and
guilds
are
basically
almost
like
a
little
bit
higher
up,
maybe
from
squads
it
could
kind
of
like
relate
to
those,
but
I.
Think
Guild
really
implies
some
level
of
governance
aspect
to
this
and
I
think
with
with
this.
A
You
could
also
see
that,
with
this
rolls
out
very
nicely
with
all
the
stuff
like
Ross
is
doing
in
terms
of
Ross
and
deeksgov
are
talking
about
in
terms
of
the
the
guilds
work
right
now
that
we
can
really
dog
food
our
own
our
own
product,
by
having
these
guilds
manage,
get
funding
from
Deep
style,
execute
on
priorities
all
through
deep
scov,
backed
infrastructure,
so
yeah.
The
way
that
wanted
to
kind
of
run
this
through
we'll
have
a
couple
steps
to
this.
A
So
it'll
be
a
guild
budget
draft
posted
in
the
Forum
there'll
be
a
Public
Presentation
either
on
the
product
strategy
or
governance
call.
So
that's
either.
On
Wednesday
or
Friday,
then
there
is
a
community
feedback
phase.
There
will
be
a
signal
proposal
on
gnosis
chain,
I.
Think
about
this.
In
terms
of
do
we
want
to
approve
this
and
then
main
a
main
funding
proposal.
A
One
halfway
and
this
kind
of
gets
to
Ross
in
terms
of
where
the
maybe,
where
the
funds
are
coming
from
in
large
part
I,
think
it's
just
easier
because
the
funds
are
on
mainnet
already.
So,
no
matter
where
the
guild
itself
is
managing
and
I
presume,
a
lot
of
the
guild
will
be,
for
instance,
paying
out
contributors,
probably
on
gnosis
chain,
because
it's
it's
cheaper,
I
think
in
the
end
having
the
funds
come
from.
A
A
You
know
in
terms
of
the
I.
Imagine
the
DX
gov
one
will
be
is
an
established
team
as
a
swapper
as
an
established
team,
so
those
will
probably
take
a
little
bit
of
time
there
and
then
yeah.
So
you
can
see
that
the
kind
of
schedule
here
that
we're
proposing
there
yeah
and
then
in
terms
of
six
month,
budgetary
Cycles,
I,
think
what
we
want
to
do
is
this
is
the
maximum
of
the
six
month
budget.
A
Consideration
I,
think
most
of
the
existing
products
will
be
using
a
six
month,
one
but
I
think
the
same
system
could
be
used
to
be
able
to
find
fun
things
on
a
more
on
a
granular
basis
or
a
smaller
time
frame.
I
also
think
it
could
be
used
to
fund
things
that
are
not
necessarily
on
a
time
frame
basis.
A
Will
be
submitting
a
six-month
budget
I
think
some
of
these
will
go
through
more
easily
than
others.
Some
are
like
more
controversial
than
others,
and
it
may
kind
of
take
take
some
time
to
go
through
this
I
want
to
give
some
time
for
that,
but
also
I
think
that
time
will
help
kind
of
make
sure
that
we
have
like
a
solution
to
to
these
here,
yeah
in
terms
of
yeah,
in
terms
of
like
the
the
template,
what
they
all
need
to
do.
A
D
A
I
think
these
are
maybe
some
key
questions
that
we,
the
key
questions
that
we're
going
to
want
everyone
to
be
able
to
answer
and
I.
Think
you
know
having
these
in
a
template
and
a
format
that
is
is
digestible
by
a
lot
of
different
groups.
So
we
can
make
decisions.
I
think
is
visually
important,
not
just
having
this
very
long
list
of
things,
but
having
that
kind
of
clear
idea
of
that.
So
you
can
see
here
Vision.
A
How
does
this
Guild
contribute
to
dxl's
Mission
and
execute
on
deep
Style's
priorities,
Guild
structure?
What
is
the
address
of
the
guild?
How
is
this
Guild
governed?
You
know
I
think
for
most
of
these
we
should
be
looking
into
using
these
the
the
rep
based
guilds,
maybe
for
other
funding
you
could
use
like
a
multi-sigger
or
something,
but
whoever
is
getting
funding
like.
How
exactly
is
that
those
decisions
going
to
be
made
objectives
and
responsibilities?
What
will
be
delivered
by
the
guild
and
what
ongoing
responsibilities?
Does
it
manage
for
DXL,
right,
I?
C
A
I
did
like
want
to
carve
out
both
so
I
can
think
about
the
vested
DxD
amount,
because
right
now,
contributors
get
paid
like
vested
DHD.
So
how
exactly
would
that
vested
DxD
end
up
making
its
way
into
contributors
hands?
Would
it
actually
go
to
the
guild?
Who
would
then
have
a
vesting
contract
that
it
would
then
issue
itself
or
would
that
just
come
from
from
DxD
out
itself,
but
I
think
at
least
putting
that
budget
of
the
invest
in
DC
I
think
is
important
in
this.
A
The
future
that
maybe
guilds
some
guilds
are
more
incentivized
by
Dollar
compensation,
because
they're
providing
Services
certain
Services,
whereas
others
are
more
compensated
by
dxt,
so
I
think
that
will
be
an
important
part.
I
put
the
then
this
regular
and
contingency
costs
so
I
think
the
regular
costs
are
ones
that
this
are
expected.
These
are
the
ones
we
kind
of
have
already
found
the
resources
for,
but
I
do
think.
We
also
want
to
consider
it
being
an
approved
budget
for
things
that
we
don't
yet
have.
A
Then
all
the
funds
already
get
sent
to
swapper
even
before
they
found
that
person
so
I,
think
having
this
like
contingency
cost
element,
would
be
a
good
way
of
finding
a
balance
between
those
two
key
milestones
and
goals.
How
should
the
skills
work
be
judged
and
what
long-term
goals
is
the
Guild
of
trying
to
achieve?
I
think
this
is
really
important
in
terms
of
anyone
asking
funding
from
DXL
will
need
to
you
know
say
this
is
how
you
should
judge
me.
A
These
are
the
key
kind
of
metrics
to
have,
and
I
also
think
there
is
an
element
that
you
want
to
have
a
little
bit
of
the
long-term
objectives
in
there,
because
you
know
swapper
or
DX
gov
are
going
to
be
talking
about.
These
are
the
objectives.
These
are
the
things
you
should
judge
us
on
over
the
next
six
months,
but
you
know
DX,
gov
and
swapper
are
not
building
for
the
next
six
months,
they're
building
things
that
will
be
around
for
several
years
and
they're
building
towards
that
future.
A
So,
keeping
a
little
bit
of
that
like
long-term
element
in
there,
while
also
being
able
to
judge
on
the
actual
like
performance
of
the
six
months
and
then
yeah
key
Guild
Personnel,
who
are
the
primary
contributors
to
the
guild
listing
names
of
people
there
right
right
in
the
beginning
here.
So
I
think
this
would
be
really
important
in
having
to
the
the
actual
dial.
C
A
And
then
you
can
present
it
and
then
it'll
be
a
week
of
feedback
phase
and
then,
after
that
week
of
feedback
phase,
that's
when
you
could
submit
the
that's
when
the
guild
could
submit
the
proposal
for
approval
now.
I
imagine
some
may
take
longer
than
seven
days,
and
so
there
may
be
some
kind
of
feedback.
Of
course,
like
the
proposal
could
get.
A
Obviously,
some
of
those
have
changed,
as
things
have
changed
there,
but
having
that
as
a
basis,
I
think
will
be
good,
and
so
then
yeah
we'll
talk
about
that
on
Friday
and
maybe
I've
got
some
FAQ
here
that
we
could
go
into.
But
I
could
maybe
just
like
pause
here
for
like
questions,
comments
and
I
have
maybe
yeah
and
other
things.
A
Let's
keep
going
do
guilds
need
to
follow
deep,
Style
Guidelines,
so
guilds
are
autonomous,
but
will
still
rely
on
many
DXL
guidelines
for
operation.
This
may
include
compensation
guidelines
on
and
off-boarding
policies.
Guilds
are
also
expected
to
operate
in
the
same
ethos
as
deep
style.
Transparency.
Commitment
to
promote
decentralization
Etc
guilds
will
have
the
ability
to
carve
their
own
way
but
still
be
accountable
to
dstow
governance.
I
think
this
is,
you
know
a
key.
C
A
A
A
You
know
at
start
I
think
contributors
should
still
be
receiving
the
same
amount
of
detail,
reputation
that
they're
getting
0.1667,
but
I
could
imagine
that
maybe
contributors
to
those
guilds
actually
start
earning
reputation
in
the
guilds
themselves
and
then
I,
don't
know
if
it
makes
sense
to
rethink
about
how
D
style
is,
is
Distributing
reputation,
because
maybe
DXL
should
be
Distributing
reputation
to
the
guilds
themselves
right
and
so
then
you
could
have
like
the
da
gov
Guild
has
a
certain
amount
of
reputation
in
DX,
Style
itself.
So
I.
A
Of
keep
things
as
is,
but
that's
something
I
think
we'd
be
really
interesting
possibilities
in
the
future.
Are
there
any
budget
limitations?
The
phase
one
proposal
limited
the
overall
budget
for
Deke
Stout,
sorry,
event:
budgets
out
to
150k
the
overall
audit
budget
to
150k,
so
something
to
think
about
in
terms
of
how
much
will
be
spent
on
events
next
year.
If
you
have
like,
if
you're
putting
that
a
proposal
so
next
year
from
January
to
June,
I
know
that
East
Denver
is
during
that
time.
A
That's
something
that
I'm
thinking
about
wanting
to
to
go
to,
and
and
potentially
like
do
that,
and
so,
if
you're
going
to
do
that,
you
got
to
put
that
in
the
budget.
I
don't
know
if
there
are
other
other
events
that
other
are
people
are
going
to
want
to
go
to,
but
that
150k
is
about
2.3
K
per
contributor
for
the
for
all
of
the
six
months.
A
The
same
thing
with
the
audit
like
we
or
the
the
phase,
one
proposal
limited
it
to
150k
there,
and
so
in
terms
of
what
different
groups
are
proposing
for
audit
audit
needs.
I
guess
this
would
be
the
product
teams.
That's
a
limitation,
even
though
there
is
some
flexibility.
If
there's
a
is
a
big
need
in
terms
of
yeah
a
use
case
for
that
payments
will
still
be
able
to
be
made
outside
the
budgetary
process,
but
I
think
we
should
like
move
away
from
that.
A
So
we
should
discourage
that
there.
As
I
said,
it
could
be
like
a
specific
product
opportunity
to
say
something
like
an
audit
for
governance
2.0
or
like
a
big
thing
that
needs
I
mean
like
the
the
vulnerability
disclosure,
for
instance,
like
that's
something-
that's
probably
not
going
to
be
in
the
budget,
but
I
definitely
think
we
should
be
getting
an
habit
of
like
all
deaked
out.
Expenditures
should
be
going
through
like
a
budgetary
process.
A
C
A
A
Budget
for
this,
do
you
want
to
also
send
the
funds
with
that
or
do
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that
is
only
in
the
event
that
those
resources
have
been
found
then,
like
yeah?
How
many
guilds
need
direct
funding
from
DXL
governance,
so
I
think
some
are
simple.
I
think
this
is
mostly
like
I
think
DX,
gov
and
swapper
are
pretty
simple
that
those
like
are
are.
C
A
A
C
A
These,
like
five
guilds
that
will
receive
funding
and
then
they
are
all
using
like
a
reputation-based
system.
Eventually
we
kind
of
think
about
that
distribution
for
those
initial
squads.
I
think
that
would
be
like
a
good
start
in
terms
of
being
able
to
have
like
these
guilds
function
and
be
able
to
get
funding
and
also
scale
kind
of
with
the
the
squad
system.
A
You
know,
I
actually
saw
this
on
I.
Think
boris's
proposal
here
so
like
Boris,
is
helping
out
on
Project,
Davi
and
carrot
here
so
like
this.
Is
you
know
this
great
work?
Divorce
is
doing
for
that
and
that's
like
something
we
need
to
to
Deeks
down
wants
to
pay
for
then.
The
question
is
just
like:
how
is
that
funded
so
that
either
could
be
funded
where,
like
as
part
of
DX,
Voice's
mandate
or
as
a
part
of
their
sorry,
their
objectives
and
responsibilities?
One
of
them
is
providing
support
to
project
Dobby.
A
Alternatively,
dxgov
could
get,
could
basically
pay
Dick's
voice
to
fulfill
those
Services
themselves
and
then
part
of
DX
gov's
budget
would
be
like
hey.
We
need
to
include
marketing
and
like
design
help
as
part
of
our
budget,
so
I
mean
I.
Think
for
for
it'll
depend
on
the
scenario.
I
think
the
more
like
a
established.
A
A
Yeah,
there's
lots
of
different
ways
that
these
things,
Can,
interlock
and
then
yeah,
just
the
last
thing
I'd
say,
is
like
all
costs
needs
to
live
somewhere.
This
is
you
know
when
people
kind
of
talk
about
a
lot
of
points,
I'm
making
is
like
when
things
leave
the
treasury,
we
want
to
be
able
to
calculate
where
these
costs
go.
We
have
to
assign
them
somewhere,
and
so
just
being
aware
of
like
where
they're
assigned
I
think
is,
is
the
question
that
any
anyone
submitting
any
proposal
for
Deeks
Dow
governance?
C
A
C
C
We
won't
be
constrained
anymore
by
the
one
proposal,
one
transfer
that
we
are
using
right
now,
so
the
the
way
I
I,
see
those
or
as
I
understand
it
or
I
think
will
be
the
easiest.
The
easiest
way
that
every
time
that
a
period
passes
a
six
month
period
pass
it.
Let's
say
here
for
the
for
the
budget
with
the
proporture,
where
we
transfer
all
the
reputation
that
now
we
need
to
transfer
right
to
all
the
contributors
in
in
those
fields.
That
will
be
an
option.
F
C
And
this
is
the
reputation
main
thing
that
we
need
to
do
to
all
these.
Let's
say
six
addresses
we
mean
zero
point.
I
know
two
percent.
Let's
say
we
have
something
right,
two
three
to
each
others,
so
I
think
will
be
great.
If
we
can,
the
more
that
we
can
explain
regarding
reputation
and
DXE
DXE
besting
contracts
and
the
aces
got
the
payment,
the
the
financial
amount,
the
USC
payment
that
can
be
done
directed
from
the
right
so
that
that
won't
be
a
problem
for
the
best
in
contracts.
C
We
might
have
to
do
some
work
to
create
to
do
a
best
in
court
track
that
can
receive
best
that
the
contract
can
be
the
same.
So
each
contributor
has
his
own
basing
contract.
You
have
a
unique
address
and
you
receive
best
in
here,
and
this
is
keeping
track
of
everything
you
receive,
and
it's
have
a
compound
besting
structure
or
something
like
that,
but
we
can
design
it
in
a
way
where
a
contributor
is
going
to
have
a
best
in
address.
C
At
last,
it
can
be
distributed
at
the
end
because
for
the
repetition
we
need
to
create
a
proposal
on
the
dial
level
right,
which
means
on
the
proposal
on
the
scheme.
So
that
can
be
on.
Let's
say
every
three
months:
if
we
want
at
a
like,
like
a
mid
checking
of
the
of
the
six
months
period
or
at
the
end
of
the
six
month
period,.
A
Is
like
what
the
logistics
of
actually
how
that
is
happening
and
like?
How
are
you,
how
is
the
DHT
getting
bested?
How
is
the
rep
getting
distributed?
Yeah
it's.
We
need
to
think
about
kind
of
both
of
those
I
think
kind
of
also
Ross,
Ross
and
I
were
talking
about
some
of
the
like
the
actual
distribution
and
elements
of
this
in
terms
of
like
yeah
people
getting
paid
from
the
guilds
coming
up
with
an
easy
process.
A
C
A
C
Something
that
can
also
be
done
taking
income.com
2.0
is
coming
that
you
can.
The
reputation
is
going
to
work
in
a
different
way
right
about
him.
We
are
not
going
to
have.
You
are
not
going
to
vote
with
reputation
anymore
in
the
future
you're
going
to
vote
with
your
vote
in
power,
and
your
voting
power
is
going
to
be
the
result
of
how
much
reputation
and
DXE
you
have.
C
So
also
is
like
if
this
skill
is
going
to
distribute
this
amount
of
reputation
and
this
amount
of
DXE
on
basing
contract,
we
send
this
to
the
Gear.
This
is
going
to
equal,
boring
power
right
in
in
some
way
it
can.
Maybe
there
are
some
tricky
way
of
how
to
take
in
account
if
you
are,
if
you
are
signing
the
DXE
and
reputation
to
a
guild,
but
anyway,
this
reputation
can
be
used.
Let's
say
like:
if
you
send,
you
have
five
contributors
on
The
Continuous
index
cup,
DX
copy.
C
You
have
five
contributors
and
these
contributors
are
going
to
receive
in
total,
2.5
repetition
on
one
after
the
six
months.
So
you
can
send
that
reputation
2.5
to
the
guild
and
it
can
be
used
to
the
guild
for
during
those
six
months
and
when
the
six
month
passes,
you
burn
those
2.5
and
you
burn
and
you
mean
0.5
to
each
address.
So
that's
something
a
gambian
that
will
be
essentially
like
a
transfer
right,
but
we
cannot
do
transfer
you.
C
That
that
is
in.
That
is
something
else,
because
what
happens
if
what
what
happened,
if
you
have
an
internal
issues
on
our
internet
discussions
on
the
gear,
we
are
the
the
members,
don't
agree
on
what
should
be
sent
to
it
out
so
or
they
can
take
an
entire
ownership
of
that.
So
we
need
to
design
The
Guild
in
a
way
where
each
gear
can
be
where
you
can
have
it
a.
B
C
C
It
can
intervene,
so
that's
something
that
can
be
done
and
yet
the
thing
every
proposal
that
we
want
to
make
from
The
Guild
to
the
Dow
level
money
to
decide.
Now,
if
we
want
all
the
guild
members
who
agree
on
that
or
the
let's
say,
the
git
leader
or
the
swapley
or
the
or
the
squad
leader
is
going
to
propose
the
sixth
month
the
six
month
budgetary
process,
I
think
it
will
make
sense
for
them.
Squad
leads
to
be
in
charge
of
that,
but
I
know
any.
It
can
work
differently.
A
C
F
C
Which
actually
makes
sense
for
let's
say
you
have
five
members
of
a
guild
and
you
receive
2.5
reputation
that
will
be
distributed
later.
You
still
have
a
your
part
of
the
guild,
and
that
gives
us
reputation.
So
you
are
actually
like,
like
closer
to
have
a
reputation
you
guys,
you
have
a
fifth
of
the
Gill
power
and
the
reputation
of
2.5.
That
key
has
2.5
reputation.
You
can
you
kinda
already
own
the
reputation,
but
it
haven't
been
sent
to
you
individually,
yet
reputation.
C
C
C
A
C
B
Okay,
so
from
from
a
squad
perspective,
we
we
create
what
our
roadmap
looks
like,
and
then
we
send
out
asking
for
a
budget
that
okay.
This
is
what
we
are
trying
to
achieve
and
make
a
write-up
of
how
this
will
be
in
line
with
the
mission
and
mission
statement
and
then
yeah
ask
for
a
budget
and
then,
if
what
what
else?
A
factor
of
that.
Because
for
that
I
know
that
you're
kind
of
you
kind
of
understand
what
needs
to
be
done.
What
has.
F
A
Kind
of
already
have
this
stuff
in
our
head,
but
we
haven't
really
just
put
it
out
there
and
actually
decided
on
these
things
and
so
I
think
that's
like
that's
the
process.
We
need
to
do
and
that's
why
I
think
it's
like
it's
both
like
a
little
tricky
because
it's
new,
but
it's
we
already
kind
of
have
the
things
that
we're
thinking
about
here.
We
just
need
to
go
through
the
motion.
I.
B
Think
yeah
I
mean
I,
agree
now,
I'm
reading
Ross's
comment
here:
it's
it's
not
about
writing
it
on
a
notepad,
I'm
I'm
asking
what
what
else
needs
to
be
done?
Okay,
we
present
we
present
to
we
present
it
on
product
strategy.
But
what
what
do
we
present,
apart
from
the
spreadsheet
I
mean?
Do
we
also
ask
for
okay?
This
is
the
amount
of
contributors
that
we
are
looking
for
and
what
is
the
reputation
it
would
have.
What
is
the
amount
of
Western
dxt
all
of
those
split
in
split
across
levels?
A
B
C
A
A
B
F
A
A
Think
the
DHD
and
rep
conversations
are
are
hard
and
a
little
tricky
because
we
want
to
solve
something
in
like
the
medium
term
and
then
also
like.
This
sets
a
precedent,
long
term,
but
I
think
they
are
less
of.
The
pressing
thing
is
in
like
let's
get
this
through
in
the
next
like
month
or
so
here,
but
important
things
to
like
so
consider.
But.
B
A
Shouldn't
be
like
a
blocker
I
think
to
a
budget
getting
approved,
but
I
mean
I
think
it
is
an
interesting
discussion,
I
think
of
a
swapper.
It's
itself
is
like
you
know:
I
I
should
be
okay,
if,
like
swapper
token
or
I
hope
swapper
token
is
actually
part
of
this
budget
itself
and
maybe
there's
some
distribution
of
swapper
token
to
the
swapper
guild
or
something
like
that,
and
maybe
that's
in
lieu
of
DxD
or
something
there.
A
E
C
B
C
A
Yeah
I
mean
in
a
lot
of
ways,
like
I
kind
of
think,
this
whole
process.
We
should
like
rethink
of
a
lot
of
the
maybe
like
bonus
incentive
structure
here.
I
think
what
we're
talking
about
here
is
like
the
distribution
of
like
paying
like
funding
development
in
certain
areas,
which
is
important,
which
is
really
important,
but
I
think
we
could
get
more
creative
with
the
incentive
mechanisms
for
delivering
on
things.
A
A
We're
basically
talking
about
this
process
here
and
so
I
would
hope
that
we
would
have
certainty
on
like
this
is
the
process
we
want
to
do.
These
are
like
the
guilds
that
we
expect
to
do
in
like
the
next
two
weeks
right
so
starting
kind
of
with
this
week
here
and
so
yeah.
We
talk
about
this
on
next
next
Wednesday's
year,
but
hopefully
it'll
be
like
the
next
week
or
two
we're
figuring
that
out.
C
Even
if
we
help
give
the
Dallas
very
small-
or
let's
say
you
have
two
people
there
working,
it
doesn't
mean
that
they
give
on
their
reputation.
Never
like
oh
The,
Guild
token
right
that
you
used
to
go
from
that.
It
needs
to
be
distributed
of
two
people
right.
You
can't
have
like
maybe
two-thirds
of
it.
C
It
can
be
on
on
these
two
individuals
that
work
on
the
grill,
but
the
rest
can
be
distributed
on
on
other
members
of
the
doubt
that
wants
to
be
involved
on
Khan
help
on
the
key
development
or
at
least
contribute
when
I
minimize
task
to
the
guild.
So
we
should
try
to
get
at
least
yeah.
Let's
say
like
four
members
per
Gil.
A
Yeah
and
I
also,
this
is
why
I
like
the
distinction
between
squads
and
guilds
like
not
because,
like
we
still
have
squads
or
just
old
squads
that
are
working
at
different
things
and
those
are
groups
in
that,
but
they
maybe
don't
have
a
formal
governance
structure
and
then
the
like.
But
the
guild
distinction
is
when
you
have
like
a
formal
governance
to
structure
and
like
yeah,
the
Dave,
the
one-on-one
Guild.
For
me,
it's
like
yeah,
my
formal
governance
structure
is
myself
I
vote
on
all
of
my
decisions.
C
F
A
This
case
those
contributors
should
get
funding
from
different
guilds
and
so
I'm
like
thinking
about
this,
for
myself
like
so
we
have
kind
of
like
the
governance
or
operations
or
kind
of
like
that.
One.
That's
a
portion
but
I
also
do
a
lot
of
work
with
DX
voice,
and
so
like
I
would
talk
with
Keenan
and
Deek's
Voice
team
about
or
do
you
want
to
have
my
services?
A
Or
can
you
Fork
services
for
the
six
months
here
and
like
kind
of
paying
out
from
from
that
I
think
for
the
most
part
most
like
we
do
have
less
cross-skilled
people
than
we
did
before
so
I,
don't
think
it
will
be
as
complicated,
but
I
definitely
think
contributors
will
be
able
to
get
funded
from
different
guilds
and
I
guess
just
like
the
one
other
thing.
I'm
gonna
have
this
like
security
and
ecosystem
Development
Group,
which
I
think
we
need
to
basically
have
like
a
guild.
A
That
is
almost
like
a
catch-all
for
a
lot
of
the
development
work
that
we
do
that
may
not
fit
under
one
squad
or
one
one
kind
of
Guild.
Yet
so
you
can
think
about
DX,
gov
and
swapper.
Are
these
like
now
established
like
both
products,
but
also
they
have
like
a
governance
structure
around
them,
but
we're
still
working
with
like
Mimi's
working
with
carrot
and
then
working
with
like
kind
of.
F
A
C
C
There
are
time
working
on
percentages,
and
you
have
50
here
10
here,
20
here
so
now
we
are
I
mean
with
this.
We
are
going
to
be
able
to
see
like
you
really
have
to
contribute
what
you
are
saying
in
this
squad
in
order
to
get
paid
right,
so
you
it
will,
it
will
make
us
it
will
make
a
thing
twice
about
one
hour:
where
are
we
going
to
submit
or
on
whatever
we
want
to
work
on?
What
are
we
going
to
contribute
on
this
squad?
C
I
need
to
make
sure
that
I'm
going
to
bring
not
just
proposal.
Yeah
I
will
try
to
do
this.
No,
no!
No!
You
will
have
to
propose
something
that
you
really
have
to
try
to
achieve
it.
If
not,
you
won't
get
paid
from
this
year
right
or
you
I
mean
I,
don't
know
if
you
won't
get
paid,
I
mean
you
won't
get
paid,
but
it
will
be
reflected
more
throwfully
on
the
on
the
analysis
of
where
the.
B
I,
don't
know
how
to
explain
it
at
this
point
of
time,
but
for,
for
instance,
yeah.
Let's
say
that
you
know
we
have
swapper
right
now
and
then
one
of
the
routes
that
we
wanted
to
take
was
like
spinning,
swapper
out
into
multiple
different,
multiple
different
products
right.
So
if
that
goes
through
and
and
if
all
of
those
different
products
might
want
to
have
their
own
guilds,
I
don't
know
I
like.
A
A
I
was
making
for
with
the
distinction
between
squads
and
guilds,
so
I
think
squads
are
like
teams
that
can
be
a
part
of
a
guild,
and
you
can't
have
a
squad
that
I
think
graduates
to
a
guild,
the
difference
being
when
there
is
a
formal
governance
structure.
So
not
just
a
team
about
it,
I
would
say
not
just
a
multi-sig,
but
actually
like
a
formal
governance
structure
would
be
the
distinction.