►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2022-02-02]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion
for
wednesday
february,
2nd
1600
utc,
I
believe,
happy
groundhog
day,
but
I'm
not
and
then
a
belated
happy
new
year,
shinyankuala
for
the
spring
festival,
starting
with
the
proposal,
roundup,
actually
no
mainnet
proposals
or
on
arbitrary
right
now.
Just
a
couple
notes
on
that,
because
we
just
had
a
couple
pro
proposals
passed
in
the
last
day
in
the
last
couple
hours.
So
within
the
last
couple
hours
there
was
the
reimbursement
of
the
usdc
incorrectly
sent
to
the
bonding
curve
contract.
A
A
So
this
was
two
separate
proposals
that
sent
1.15
million
eth
and
1.15
million
die,
and
we
just
bridged
those
over
and
now
they're
in
x,
dx
down
now,
and
so
then
we'll
need
to
do
separate
proposals
to
actually
provision
that
liquidity,
and
I
think,
like
the
next
step
on
that
is
we
probably
need
to
set
up
a
meeting
regarding
the
relayer
to
double
check
on
how
we're
we're
doing
that.
A
Considering
it's
such
a
large
deposit
there,
but
that
will
all
be
now
on
nurse's
chain,
the
rest
of
that,
because
the
funds
are
funds
are
all
there
yeah
and
that's
kind
of
it
for
for
maine.
C
Yeah,
the
liquidity
deposit
we
were
talking
venky-
maybe
we
should
include
you
and
to
violet
and
oscar
probably
to
to
do
a
meeting
about
this,
so
that
you
guys
can
kind
of
see
the
action
with
the
liquidity
deposit,
relayer
and
how
that
goes
and
yeah.
I
think
a
refresher
meeting
makes
sense
just
because
it's
been
some
number
of
months
since
we've
done
one
of
these
but
yeah
there's
already,
I
think,
like
2.7
million
dollars
worth
in
the
liquidity
relay
around
next
time.
I
mean.
A
Something
is
there
any
like.
Is
there
any
reason
to
have
those
tokens,
because
there's
now
lp
tokens
right,
but
those
lp
tokens
actually
technically
in
the
relay,
and
I
guess
they
could
be
in
the
treasury
itself,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
any
reason
to
do
that,
especially
because
I
get
we'd
have
to
probably
send
them
to
the
relay
or
if
we
wanted
to
remove
that
liquidity.
C
A
C
Yeah,
the
funds
are
kind
of
getting
spread
out
a
bit
right
between
the
different
chains,
different
activities.
I
was
wondering
earlier
today
like
how
does
like
sushi
even
manage.
Like
the
I
don't
know,
if
people
really
appreciate
the
logistical
overhead
of
having
things
deployed
on
multiple
chains
with
you
know,
real
funds
in
them
now
obviously
like
sushi,
doesn't
have
governance
on
every
chain.
So
that's
a
little
less
overhead,
but
still.
A
A
A
Anyway,
so,
hopefully
more
liquidity
provisioning.
That
proposal
and
then
also
maybe
some
some
other
things
over
the
coming
months
on
on
the
liquidity,
provisioning
side
and
then
moving
to
gnosis
chain
there
are
currently,
I
think
there
are
five
buyback
proposals,
one
twenty
one,
twenty
one,
two
three
and
four
and
just
a
note,
dave's
doing
a
great
job
of
cranking.
These
out
there's
been
a
lot
over
the
last
since
we
we've
restarted
it
and
have
been,
I
think,
you've
noticed
it
on
the
the
dxd
west
price.
A
I
think
it's
at
0.193
on
xdi
now
we'll
talk.
A
About
maybe
some
looking
forward
at
the
next
extension
and
maybe
making
some
small
adjustments
on
the
the
weekly
volume
but
yeah
there's
five
proposals
now
on
next
I
for
that
rest
of
proposals.
There
are
a
couple
contributor
proposals.
There
is
atoms
for
november
and
december,
and
then
there
is
sky
and
sky,
we'll
kind
of
talk
about
this.
So
there
are
two.
A
Proposals
for
you
here,
one
is
through
this.
One
here
is
through
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
This
is
an
old,
quick
wallet
scheme
that
should
not
be
used
and,
to
be
honest,
we
shouldn't
have.
It
may
be
accessible
from
the
ui,
but
this
proposal
is
through
the
quick
wallet
scheme
and
then
separately
from
that,
but
there's
no
funds
in.
A
Wallet
seam,
so
you're
not
actually
gonna
get
paid
or
get
anything
from
that
and
then
separately
from
that.
I
believe
you
have
resubmitted
that
proposal
through
the
typical
contribution
reward
one
there,
and
I
think
the
latest
is
that
this
proposal
should
pass
in
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
because
that
will
allow
you
to
get
your
dxd
back
that
you've
staked
on
there.
But
it
won't.
A
You
won't
get
any
payment
from
there
because
there's
actually
no
funds
in
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
and
so
is
that
is
that
correct
sky
and
I
see
you
have
voted
for
it.
Yeah.
E
And
then,
once
I
realized
well,
once
yeah
ross
told
me,
there
was
no
money
in
here
that
it
didn't
make
sense,
not
that
this
was
a
broken,
quick
wallet
scheme.
I
guess
both
are
problems.
E
E
If
you
choose
contributor,
I
was
thinking
it
was
using
a
contributor
scheme
and
not
a
quick
wallet
scheme,
but
I
probably
should
have
checked
ahead
of
time
and
then
I
I
did
that
using
develop,
and
then
I
actually
did
it
again.
So
there's
actually
three
proposals.
I
did
it
again
using
dx
vote,
which
is
like
the
public
facing
ui
thinking
that
maybe
that
was
going
to
give
me
the
right
contributor
scheme,
and
that
was
wrong
again.
So
don't
don't
vote
on
that.
E
Third,
that
third
one
and
then
I
just
redid
it
using
the
old
traditional
method
of
contributor
yeah.
E
We
were
using
computer
in
a
bunch
of
places
and
so
yeah
just
did
using
the
normal
scheme,
which
comes
from
directly
from
the
taos
avatar
treasury
and
that's
using
gen
so
yeah
it
got
a
little
messed
up,
but
I
was
trying
to
use
something
that
probably
didn't
exist
yet
but
yeah,
it
should
probably
shouldn't
be
in
there
as
a
as
an
option
and
but
in
the
meantime
we
we
also
found,
I
think,
a
bug,
because
I
we
tried
to
get
john
to
down
stake.
E
A
Because
this
is
the
first
time
that
dc
is
staking
for
the
these
new
schemes,
and
so
there
are
some,
maybe
some
complications
with
that.
E
A
A
A
Cool
and
just
in
terms
of
there
is
a
new
quick
wallet
scheme,
so
I
just
the
the
for
all
contributors,
really
anyone
submitting
a
proposal
on
using
dx
vote
right
now.
You
should
go
through
the
custom
one
every
time
the
contributor
one
right
now
is
not
really
working
and
that's
connected
to
another
thing.
Hopefully
we
will
have
that
set
up,
but
right
now,
there's
no
funds
into
any
of
this
and
then,
like
the
proposals
are
separate.
So
really
it
should
all
be
the
custom
one
there.
A
There
is
a
new
scheme
that
has
been
installed
with
some
additional
changes,
and
so
that
was
installed
I
believe,
last
friday
and
so
we're
in
the
process
of
testing
that
and
then
the
first
thing
we
need
to
do
to
test.
That
is
to
add
permissions
for
this
quick
quality
scheme.
A
So
this
is
a
proposal
that
augusto
submitted
a
couple
days
ago
and
then
I
boosted
this
morning
and
so
it
gives
the
quick
wallet
scheme
the
permission
to
send
txd
and
wx
die
there,
and
so,
when
this
is
implemented,
then
we
can
actually
start
testing
the
quick
wallet
scheme,
but
even
before
then
there's
not
really
anything.
I
think
for
for
contributors
to
be
doing
now
that
they
should
be
staying
with
the
custom
proposal.
Type.
A
Okay,
moving
along,
we
have
the
atlantis
world
carrot
portion,
so
this
is
a
pretty
cool.
I
think
proposal.
A
E
Yeah,
just
at
least
for
carrot
campaigns
now
where
we
gathered
all
the
necessary
details
and
provided
those
to
federico.
He
then
creates
this
yarn
script.
I
guess,
which
is
literally
just
a
copy
of
the
information
that
we
are
giving
him
in
requesting.
E
So
maybe
there
can
be
a
document
in
our
docs
that
shows
exactly
how
to
take
the
inputs
and
put
it
into
this
yarn
script.
I
don't.
I
don't
actually
know
what
a
yarn
script
is,
but
wherever
you
put
that
yarn
script
using
multi-call
one,
which
is
what
federico
used
theoretically
yeah
any
of
us
should
be
able
to
do
that
and
then
there's
a
few
pieces.
E
Yeah,
obviously
you
can't
see
it
there.
I
can
share
later
yeah,
like
what
the
yarn
script
looks
like
maybe
I'll
make
this
dock
where
I
just
have
like
the
inputs,
I
need
and
then
and
then
the
yarn
script
that
federico
made
from
that
and
then
you
have.
Basically,
we
have
to
like
choose
token
name
and
token
symbol
and
we've
we've
created
some
standards
for
that
type
of
stuff,
and
we
chose
to
because
this
this
carrot
is
not
created.
E
I
guess
with
tenderly
you
could
you
can
you
can
mirror
it
and
then
you
would
know
the
address
of
the
token
that
is
going
to
be
created
and
so
in
the
same
proposal
multicall.
You
could
also
send
that
future
made
token
to
an
address.
But
in
this
case
we
decided
to
just
keep
things
simple,
create
the
actual
carat
token
in
this
proposal
and
then
once
it's
created,
it
will
be
sitting
in
dxdao
avatar
and
then
we'll
send
that
carat
token
to
the
atlantis
team.
E
A
Yeah,
it's
almost
like
the
opposite
of
when
we
have
the
two
proposals
to
deposit
liquidity.
You
could
do
that
through,
but
here
it's
like
create
the
token
and
then
send
the
token
to.
E
A
A
And
yeah,
just
moving
on
through
a
couple
of
the
other
proposals,
I
mentioned
the
adding
permissions
for
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
So
this
is
the
the
dxd
wx
die.
We've
already
gone
through
the
sky,
we'll
get
to
the
coordinate
in
a
second
melanie's
contributor
proposal
there
and
then
there's
also
a
proposal
to
facilitate
the
payment
for
tenderly.
A
So
this
is
something
that
just
kind
of
I
was
in
contact
with
them
to
switch
over
the
ownership
there,
and
so
we
will
be
able
to
do
this
on
chain,
but
it's
a
little
bit
better
to
do
it
in
a
six
month
increment,
considering
that
the
transaction
costs
there,
but
this
will
be
facilitated
through
candy
fork.
They
need
a
legal
entity
for
an
invoicing
component,
but
hopefully
this
will
get
up
and
we'll
have
the
10
release
subscription
for
the
next
six
months
there
and
then
the
last
thing.
A
I
guess
I
know
this
chain.
This
is
actually
not
a
boosted
proposal,
but
we
do
have.
I
did
submit
a
proposal
to
unregister
the
quick
wallet
scheme.
I
think
the
one
this
guy
that
you
had
used
just
so
that
we
don't
have
that
on
there,
but
I'm
going
to
check
with
augusto
before
kind
of
boosting
that
to
see
if
there's
anything,
to
be
doing
there.
But
this
is
just
a
I
don't
know
if
we've
actually
tested
out
the
d
register
function
there,
but
this
would.
E
Regarding
all
the
schemes
once
they
are
like
up
and
working,
we
have
them
there's
going
to
be
a
whole
bunch
of
schemes.
The
second
question
of
like
is
there
funding
in
those
schemes.
E
I
think
it's
going
to
be
really
important
to
for
the
ui
to
to
show
that
information,
because,
if
you're
giving
people
the
option
to
choose
different
schemes
and
stuff
yeah,
it's
the
ui
is
gonna
have
to
like
either
say
it's
okay
to
use
this
scheme,
or
this
scheme
has
money
in
it
and
right
now,
like
you,
just
look
at
like
some
random
number
like
the
beginning
of
addresses
of
schemes,
but
you
don't,
you
can't
see
what
any
of
them
are
or
if
they're
funded
or
anything
like
that
or
even
the
full
address.
E
A
Took
me
a
while
to
figure
out
the
right
one
that
I
wanted
to
deregister,
even
though
I
think
they
were
probably
a
bunch,
but
the
one
that
I
did
so.
This
is
the
one
that
was
just
installed
this
last
one
and
then
the
this
is
the
one
idea
install
here
and
I
think,
there's
another
one
here-
that
we
can
also
de-install
here.
C
Yeah
another
cross-reference
is
to
look
into
alchemy
because
it
alchemy
shows
like
unsupported
plug-ins
and,
and
we
can
check-
I
don't
some
of
those
one
of
those
may
be
like
the
actual
quick
wallet
scheme
or
whatever,
but
we
should
probably
double
check.
I
can
help
you
with
that
too.
It
would
be
good
to
kind
of
do
some
clean
up
there
and
yeah
clean.
A
C
A
Okay
and
then
the
last-
I
guess
I
suppose
we
haven't
gotten
to
for
on
nose's
chain-
is
the
end
of
your
appreciation,
dow
using
coordinate
and
there's
an
ongoing
coordinate
program
going
on
now
that
started
on
sunday
and
will
be
going
for.
I
think
another
three
days
melanie.
Do
you
want
to
kind
of
inspire
or
say
any
other
words
about
this
cool
experiment?
We're
doing
here.
D
Yeah
definitely
so,
as
chris
mentioned
this
week,
we
started
epoch
1
of
appreciation,
dao
using
coordinate
a
big
thank
you,
of
course,
to
sky
for
helping
bring
this
to
life,
and
I
just
just
want
to
give
everyone
some
background
quickly
of
what
coordinate
is
it's
a
tool
created
by
yearn
to
help
organizations
reward
contributors,
incentivize
participation
within
communities
in
this
very
fair
ground-up,
decentralized
manner?
We've
been
discussing
using
coordinate,
dx
style
for
a
while,
and
this
end-of-year
appreciation
dial
is
really
a
great
way
to
utilize
it.
D
D
Each
contributor
receives
a
fixed
amount
of
give
tokens
and
it's
up
to
each
individual
to
choose
who
to
give
them
to
within
their
circle,
and
in
our
case
it's
the
dx
style
core
contributors.
D
It's
an
opportunity
to
give
appreciation
to
fellow
contributors
who
you
feel
have
provided
value
to
the
extau,
helped
you
out
or
others
or
just
have
done
something
specific
that
you'd
like
to
reward
them
for
for
the
last
six
months
of
2021
at
the
end
of
each
epoch,
which
specifically
is
at
the
end
of
this
week.
On
saturday,
the
5th
the
give
tokens
are
converted
to
get
tokens
which
is
redeemable
for
wrapped
x
die
and
then
the
rewards
will
be
distributed
via
a
dispersed
mechanism.
I
think
sky.
E
Yeah
the
dispersed
like
using
the
safe
this,
these
funds
are
going
to
the
safe
and
they
will
just
be
dispersed
according
to
the
to
the
percentage
allocations.
Basically,.
E
Well,
you
just
described
it
turning
into
get
tokens
and
get
toking
being
like
able
to
like
withdraw
collateral
that
if
you
saw
that
somewhere,
that
could
be
like
future
iteration
of
of
a
coordinate,
which
then
sounds
kind
of
like
carrot,
which
is
actually
really
interesting
like
putting
carrots
into
coordinate
or
something
but
coordinate
currently
doesn't
like
handle
money
itself.
It's
just
this,
this
measurement
mechanism
that
then
you
take
those
results
and
apply
those
to
actual
real
money
or
capital
or
collateral
yeah.
D
Yeah,
okay,
I
wasn't
sure
about
that,
but
thanks
for
clarifying-
and
I
just
want
to
encourage
every
core
contributor
to
fully
participate
in
this
initiative.
So
that
means
not
only
distributing
your
give
tokens
but
also
writing
a
thoughtful
note
to
other
contributors.
D
I
know
personally,
I've
been
working
through
mine
this
week
and
I've
been
having
a
really
good
time.
Just
distributing
my
give
tokens
and
writing
my
notes,
because
I've
been
able
to
reflect
and
think
about
all
of
these
really
great
moments
where
I
feel
like
other
contributors
have
helped
me
personally
or
provided
value
to
my
squad
and
I've
been
able
to
write
a
note
and
just
give
appreciation
and
anyways.
I
just
hope
that
this
small
trial
of
using
coordinate
will
prove
to
be
very
successful.
D
E
C
Yeah,
the
deadline
is
three
days
right,
like
it
has
to
be
by
the
fifth
right
so,
and
these
give
tokens
are
not
the
same
thing
as
giveth.
Give
tokens
right.
E
No,
nothing
like
this
give
tokens
are
just
a
on-chain
signed,
like
a
snapshot
method
signed
measurement
of
like
unit,
almost
it's
more
like
rep
in
dx
dow.
It's
a
on
chain
unit
of
measurement;
sorry
not
on
chain.
It's
a
unit
of
measurement
that
you
sign
using
your
mainnet
address
and
it
signs
messages
in
into
coordinate
like
snapshot
but
they're,
just
units
of
measurement.
F
I
have
a
quick
question:
this
is
thriller,
is
it
does
coordinate,
make
it
public
everyone,
you
voted
for
and
coordinate,
and
how
much
you
or
how
much
you
decided
to
give
them,
or
is
it
anonymous
in
any
way.
E
Yeah,
that's
a
good
question,
so
one
of
the
cool
things
that
comes
out
of
coordinate
is
like
a
graphical
map
of
like
with
not
exact
numbers
but
like
movements
using
like
a
linear
floating
map.
E
So
you
get
to
see
a
map
of
of
like
who's,
interacting
and
giving
to
who
and
receiving
from
who
within
the
community,
but
only
the
circle
and
so
the
we.
We
decided
for
this
test
just
to
use
core
contributors,
but
eventually
I
think
it'd
be
cool
to
do
this
with,
like
the
wider
dx
style
community,
which
is
a
much
bigger
like
anyone.
Who's
contributed
anything
to
dx
dial
like
a
bigger
community,
but
in
in
this
example.
E
Only
if
you
are
part
of
this
circle
can
you
see
the
map
of
who's
giving
to
who
like
graphically,
and
then
you
also
can
only
see
like
only
you
can
see
the
notes
that
were
written
to
you.
So
that's
not
public,
and
then
you
can't
see,
like
the
exact
amounts
that
a
person
gave
to
each
other.
E
The
one
thing
is,
the
admins
can
see
who's
participated
and
who's
not
participated,
and
if
you've,
given
all
your
give
tokens
or
if
you've,
only
given
half
of
your
gift
tokens
but
yeah,
you
can't
see
like
the
exact
numbers
you
just
kind
of
see
that,
through
like
a
higher
level
graphical
interface
like
it's
yeah,
we
can
show
it
later
or
yeah.
It's
I
mean
it's,
it's
really
for
the
circ,
the
people
that
are
members
of
the
circle
to
see
but
yeah.
E
So
there
is,
there
is
like
decent
privacy
embedded
in
it,
like
obviously
the
coordinate
team.
This
is
a
centralized
website,
so
the
like
the
developers
of
coordinate,
could
probably
see
the
details
because
it's
like
held
in
some
off
chain
signed,
signed
wallet
database
somewhere,
but
in
general
it's
not.
It's
not
super
public
to
people
outside
the
circle.
E
A
E
So
yeah,
that's
that's
the
notes
like
yeah.
The
notes
are
like
I
agree
with
melanie
like
one
of
the
coolest
parts
of
it,
it's
almost
more
important
than
the
actual
giving
of
tokens.
The
one
risk
I
just
would
reiterate
is
like
don't
yeah
everyone.
Please
don't
wait
till
the
last
day
and
then
forget,
because
that
does
happen
and
we
don't
plan
to
redo
it.
So,
and
this
is
the
blockchain.
So
it's
like.
E
Yeah
well,
the
thing
it
is
not
is
it
the
the
end
date
is.
The
epoch
is
not
actually
written
on
blockchain,
it's
still
in
a
bit
of
a
centralized
like
coordinate
database,
probably
but
the
the
the
data
is
set
and
can't
be
changed,
but
I
wouldn't
say
it's
on
a
blockchain.
Yet
I
there
is
a
plan
to
make
this
more
open
and
promotion,
permissionless
and
leverage
on
chain.
E
I
imagine
and
like
actually
have
the
collateral
embedded
in
the
system
and
stuff,
but
just
like
snapshot
it's
taking
some
time
and
probably
will
require
a
layer
two
or
something
like
you
wouldn't
want
to
do
that
on
mainnet.
It
would
be
a
terrible
experience.
E
Correct
and
this
in
this
case,
everyone
has
100,
give
tokens
to
give,
and
you
can
give
those.
However,
you
want
there
is
the
ability
to,
and
this
would
take
some
additional
like
alter
of
input
like
if
someone
you
could
say
like
people
that
are
only
50
time
or
something
they
only
get
50
give
tokens
and
full-time
contributors
get
100
gift
tokens.
So
you
have
the
ability
to
give
everyone
different
amounts.
E
E
But
there
is
that
feature
if
there
was
some
additional
thing
you
wanted
to
apply
like
if
you
wanted
to
do
it
based
on
like
rep
the
amount
of
rep
you
have
in
dx
dow
determines
you
know
you
get
more
give
say
or
something
like
that.
That
is
possible.
E
H
E
For
setting
up
wallets
and
stuff,
that's
all
part
of
the
set,
the
setup
and
obviously
the
setup
is
chris,
had
shared
an
article
about
a
community
that
used
it
and
they
determined
like
yeah.
The
setup
of
this
matter
is
like
determining
who
gets
to
participate.
E
How
many
give
tokens
you
get
to
start
with
what
wallet
you're
using
and
can
sign
in
with
those
are
all
things
that
take
set
up
by
the
initiators
of
it,
and
so
that
that
can
obviously
alter
the
way
it's
effective
and
one
other
thing
was
this
community
that
tried
it.
I
believe,
like
one
month,
they
just
used
coordinate
instead
of
their
normal
process
for
for
paying
contributors
to
dx,
dow
or
sorry
to
their
community,
and
I
think
that
that
can
definitely
cause
some
problems.
A
Yeah
and
nothing
new,
but
you
know
deep
style,
I
don't
think,
is
getting
credit
for
the
innovation
that
we're
at
least
trying
in
terms
of
the
compensation
structures
right,
like
obviously,
we
have
the
stable
coins,
the
the
dxd
vested
component,
even
distributing
reputation,
right
governance
power
as
a
form
of
compensation.
We've
got
the
retroactive
bonuses
and
then
obviously
like
this
coordinates.
I
think
it's
just
cool
to
be
experimenting
with
these
different
types
of
incentive,
like
mechanisms,
because
I
think,
like
long-term,
it
probably
won't
be
a
single
one
that
is
used.
F
Structured
and
less
rigid
in
a
way
that's
kind
of
risky
right,
because
it's
like
purely
social,
I
mean,
I
guess
everyone's
going
to
see
what
you
do
in
some
cases,
everyone
would
see
what
you
do,
but
like
two
people
could
just
very
easily
collude
to
get
the
most
out
of
the
coordinate.
I
feel
like
right.
They
could
just
give
each
other
all
of
their
tokens
and
then
also
get
some
from
other
people
and
get
the
most
or
just
whoever's
nicest
to
everybody.
A
E
I
think
by
testing
it
you'll
start
to
learn
more
about
it,
but
like
saying
it's
very
public,
which
is
like
kind
of
an
odd
thing,
like
dx,
dow
proposals
every
month
where
you
list
your
contributions
to
the
dow
when
people
vote
yes
and
no,
that
is
far
more
public
than
coordinate
like
and
and
all
of
the
same
factors
that
you
can
factor
into
and
say
are
things
that
could
happen
in
coordinate
those
can
all
happen
in
on-chain
governance
as
well.
So
two
people
colluding
when
there's
25
contributors
like
yeah.
They
could
do
that.
H
E
Yeah,
so
what
you
can
so
there
is
a
feature
and
we've
just
we've
asked
you
know,
recommended
people
don't
do
this
this
this
epoch
and
you
can
see
it,
but
you
can
see
it
in
the
forum
post
as
as
receivers
of
if
in
a
community
as
a
receiver
of
give
token
anyone
has
the
option
and
the
ability
to
opt
out
and
not
receive
their
give
tokens,
and
so,
if
you
chose
to
not
receive
your
give
tokens,
your
those
give
tokens
are
effectively
distributed
to
the
entire
other
set
of
receivers.
E
A
25
and
it's
25
000
die
and
that
will
be
distributed
based
on
the
proportion
of
give
tokens.
Yep.
Yes,
and
the
last
I
think,
is
you
said
you
have
to
give
in
order
to
receive.
A
A
D
No,
I
think
that
I
think
that's
it
over
the
next
few
days.
Oh
one
more
thing.
Actually,
in
the
next
few
days,
I'm
going
to
be
posting
a
proposal
in
the
forum
about
a
dx
style
entity,
formation
and
maintenance
contributor
stipend.
D
A
Awesome
then,
just
next
up,
I
just
wanted
to
follow
up
on
the
participate
in
the
codeless
condom.
Hackathon
I
saw
christopher
replied
in
the
thread
here.
I
think
I
think
it
would
be
good
for
him
probably
to
do
the
proposal
himself
on
gnosis
chain,
and
I
guess
we
would.
Oh
it's
3k,
not
three-point,
so
I
guess
we
could
probably
start
drafting
up
or
get
him
to
start
drafting
a
proposal
there.
I
wasn't
sure
if
there's
any
other
discussion
here
about
that.
A
Crickets
but
okay
well
be
on
the
lookout
for
proposal
through
there
I'll
follow
up
with
christopher
on
next
steps
there
and
then.
A
Thinking
of
ideas
on
some
like
no
code,
things
when
I
was
actually
talking
with
dave
on,
like
maybe
there's
some
treasury
ideas
that
we
could
maybe
have
even
like
a
dune
dashboard
that
people
do,
or
maybe
even
people
pitching
us
different
investment
ideas,
looking
at
risk
analysis
or
anything,
but
just
some
ideas
on
different
types
of
no
code,
ideas
that
we
can
have
for
the
hackathon
and
there
is
a
a
nice
beautiful,
d-work
board
that
is
tracking
that
there
that
you
can
submit
and
track
them.
A
And
then
just
the
last
two
items
that
I
had
on
the
the
agenda
here
are
related.
I
guess
first,
I
wanted
to
maybe
continue
the
discussion
on
the
dhd
west
swap
fee,
which
was
related
to
the
increase
in
dhd
liquidity.
I
was
looking
to
kind
of
craft
a
proposal
on
potentially
increasing
the
deep
sea
with
swap
fee
first
on
eq
on
gnosis
chain
2.5
and
just
wanted
to
see
if
there
was
any
thoughts
on
that
before
proceeding.
A
I'm
thinking
it
also
push
forward
that
on
mainnet,
because
I
think
that
dxd
liquidity
will
maintain
in
deep
styles
into
swapper
and
I
think
making
it
a
little
bit
more
appealing
to
lps
by
raising
the
swap
fee,
I
think
is,
is
important
and
I
don't
think
it
will
have
a
material
effect
on
volume,
because
the
txt
is
already
in
swapper
there.
A
C
I
think
it's
a
interesting
idea,
although
I
don't
think
it's
a
given
that
you
know
moving
the
fee
in
one
direction
will
increase
the
fees
taken
for
the
liquidity
providers
right.
It
sort.
C
Because
it
depends
on
the
volume
right,
so
I
guess
the
question
is
like:
if
you,
if
it
does
maintain
the
same
amount
of
volume,
then
it
increases
the
fee.
But
I
guess
it's
also
possible
that
increased
fees
could
deter
volume,
but
I
mean
I
think
your
observation
is
good,
that
like
because
there's
not
really
liquidity
in
other
places,
that
that
that's
sort
of
unlikely
right
that
it
would
decrease
volume
on
swapper.
A
Yeah
and
skye-
I
don't
know
if
you
have
any
thoughts
on
this
from
the
house
experience,
because
that
one
is
point
five
percent
there,
but
I
don't.
I
mean
it
basically
would
deter
people
from
trading
frequently
but
like
if
you
look
at
notice
changes
actually
not
that
much
frequent
trading
of
dxd,
it's
more
like
people
come
in
typically
after
buybacks
are
kind
of
using
that
there
so.
E
Yeah
there's
some
examples
of
balancer
pools
where
that
pool
is
the
is
the
pretty
much
was
the
only
pool
to
like
buy
a
certain
token
became
was
pretty
sizable,
had
4.2
percent
fees
and
70
30.,
so
it
was
like
custom
made
so
that
it
was
like
good
for
lps
and
yes,
people
still
trade
on
it,
because
that
was
the
only
place
to
get
that
token
and
there's
probably
in
yeah
some
optimization,
but
it
what
it
does
is
it
detracts
like
arb.
E
So
if
our
bots
are
doing
stuff
across
chain
and
they
have
to
deal
with
a
large
fee,
then
that
traffic
tends
to
go
away
from
those
pools,
and
so
even
if,
even
if
you
have
your
main
pool
like
on
gnosis
chain
for
dxd,
if
there's
any
other
pools
that
exist,
that
have
dxd
there's
going
to
be
r
between
them.
But
if
there's
a
big
fee,
then
the
arb
can
only
happen.
E
So
often
it
can
happen
less
often
right,
and
so
that's
just
like
another
factor,
but
they
like
point
three
percent
or
point
five
percent.
Like
I
don't
know,
if
it,
I
don't
think
that
makes
too
much
of
a
difference.
I
I
like
there
was
some
guessing
on
why,
when
you
swapped
the
reason
he
chose
the
point
three
percent,
but
there
was
a
study
I
think
they
did
afterwards
and
like
no.
There.
A
A
Well,
I
think
it's
highly
dependent
on
the
asset
right-
and
I
think
in
venky's
point
in
the
chat
here
is
very
important.
A
Like
he's
saying
it
could
be
on
swapper
xdi
and
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
have
higher
fees
on
things
that
are
more
susceptible
to
impermanent
loss,
and
I
think
that
makes
sense
in
general
when
you
think
about
like
less
liquid
tokens,
if
you're
market
making
in
those
tokens
that
are
less
liquid,
like
you,
should
be
taking
a
higher
fee,
because
it's
like
that,
the
price
is
not
as
reliable
because
it
doesn't
have
that
like
foundation
of
liquidity,
and
so
that's
why
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
house
and
that's
why,
like
also
if
you
look
on
main
net
right,
remember,
the
balancer,
80
20,
dxd
pool
actually
has
a
0.6
percent
fee
and,
unlike
mainnet,
the
actual
real.
A
I
think
I
think
this
actually
has
more
of
a
chance
on
maintenance
on
mainnet
the
real
deterrent
to
buying
dxd
is
the
gas
costs
right?
That's
what's
really
taking
up
all
of
the
cost
on
whether
or
not
you
want
to
arb
to
maintenance
or
not
is
like
whether
you
want
to
spend
40
or
50
on
the
gas
cost.
So
I
don't
think
it's
as
much
on
the
lp
fee,
but
I
think,
like
lps
on
mainnet
would
benefit
from
a
higher
higher
fee.
There.
C
A
This
is
specifically
about
dpt,
because
I
think,
like
volume
for
deep,
steep
weather
is
not
dependent
on
really
fees.
The
thing
that's
driving
like
volume
and
dxd
weth
is
like
buyback
and
then
like
arbitrage
from
from
that
and
like
some
people
coming
in,
and
so
I
think
that
will
stay
regardless
of
fees.
A
C
Yeah,
it
might
be
interesting
to
like
collect
data
over
periods
of
time.
You
know
actually
playing
with
different
fees,
although
I
mean
it's
hard
to
do
a
perfect
experiment
right,
but
I
mean
it's
a
pricing
problem
right,
just
like
any
yeah.
Any
kind
of
pricing.
A
Of
anything
right
I
mean,
I
do
think
it's
very
dependent
on
the
asset
itself,
so
it's
like
there's
not
going
to
be
like
a
curve
that
is-
and
this
is
like
going
back
to
like
swapper
like
design
in
general.
This
is
what
I
thought
the
marker
is
going
to
go
towards
is
like
each
asset
votes
in
their
own
curve
for
how
it
should
be
like
market
making
on
fees,
and
you
know
the
balancing
permanent
loss.
A
G
Debunked,
but
even
even
a
line
is
a
curve,
so
it's
definitely
a
curve.
That's
what
I
wanted
to
say.
A
It
is
a
lot
yeah
a
curve,
fun
curve
and
then,
like
next
item,
related
just
to
kind
of
continue
the
discussion
we
had
in
the
discord
a
couple
weeks
ago
or
a
week
or
two
ago
about
maybe
figuring
out
how
we
calculate
txd
volume
and
so
dave-
and
I
were
chatting
about
maybe
a
way
to
do
this,
so
that
if
there
is
something
that
volume
dips
below
like
the
weekly
average,
that
could
be
made
up
in
additional
proposals.
A
So
we
will
try
to
get
we'll
include
that
in
like
the
next
buyback
extension
proposal
and
try
to
get
that
up
a
little
bit
sooner
than
before,
because
there
will
be
some
adjustments
to
how
it's
how
it's
calculated,
but
this
will
yeah
hopefully
make
sure
that
their
the
volume
is
not
or
that
the
purchases
are
not
affected.
If
there's
some,
like
complication
on
the
solver
or
some
some
problem,
we
have,
on
our
end.