►
From YouTube: DXgov Weekly Gathering [2021-05-12]
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Welcome
to
geek
style
governance,
discussion,
wednesday
may
12
1500
utc,
starting
first
with
the
proposal,
roundup,
five
proposals,
boosted
or
pending,
boosting
on
mainnet
and
three
actually
a
little
bit
more
than
an
exercise,
so
starting
with
mainnet,
there's
the
deep
style
treasury
diversification
number
15..
This
is
a
205th
50,
eth
conversion
to
die.
This
is
actually
the
first
one
under
the
second
or
the
first
new
proposal
under
the
second
charger
authorization
proposal.
I
think
that's
supposed
to
pass
in
the
next
day
or
so.
B
Second,
is
the
dxd
buyback
program
signal
proposal
this
passed
on
xdi
last
night
yesterday
with
I
think
it
was
like
20
of
rep
and
then
this
one
is
slated
to
pass
in
the
next
I
think
tomorrow
evening.
So
I
wanted
to
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
later
and
then
next
is
fun
gas
governance
refund.
So
this
is
the
governance
refunds
actually
for
the
whole
of
q1.
I
think
it's
24
eth
that
is
being
refunded
for
all
of
those.
B
So
hopefully,
when
that
passes,
you
can
go
claim
your
your
refunds
on
gas.
I
think
it
should
be
the
same
process
that
we've
done
before,
but
this
time
it's
being
led
by
dave,
fluid
drop
and
so
that
hopefully,
we'll
go
through
the
next
couple
days
here
and
then
next
is
treasury.
Diversification
number
16.,
it's
another
250,
eighth
trade,
this
time
to
usdc
that
one
was
just
boosted,
maybe
yesterday's
been
submitted,
and
then
there
is,
I
think,
there's
another
one.
That's
been
submitted.
B
That
has
not
been
boosted
yet,
but
gas
prices
have
been
kind
of
crazy
and
then
the
last
one
on
mainnet
is
the
safe
multi-call
installation
which
allows
geekdow
to
interact
with
a
cert
a
set
of
smart
contracts,
and
that
is
up
for
voting
for
I
think
another.
Six
and
a
half
days
before
that
proposal
will
conclude
any
thoughts,
comments,
questions
concerns
on
mainnet
proposals
outstanding.
B
Cool
and
then
on
xdi
we
have
some
rep
boost,
so
snufkin
the
rf
nude
or
thirff
noob.
I
think
I
got
like
thirth
nude,
better
lead
parachutes,
and
so
a
couple
of
these
are
out
of
the
discord
rep
boost
program
that
kenyan
launched-
I
guess
was
a
couple
weeks
ago.
The
signal
proposal
passed
so
this
is
rep
awards
based
upon
activity
in
discord
over
q1.
So
it's
anywhere
from
like
0.01
to
I
think
0.09
or
something
like
that,
and
so
that's
something
we'll
be
doing.
B
I
think
every
quarter
and
so
they're
submitting
the
proposals
here
and
then
they
in
the
instructions
they're
supposed
to
go
to
the
discord,
governance,
discussion,
channel
on
the
geek
style,
discord
and
then
paste
the
proposal
and
say
this
is
this
is
me
so
I
think
it's
a
great
way
to
expand
governance,
get
people
voting
on
things.
It's
nice
to
see
some
of
the
the
community
members
that
discord
like
pretty
active
and
voting
on
xdi.
B
They
have
their
the
same
handles
attached
to
both
so
that
that's
been
good
to
see.
There
are
fluid,
I'm
sorry,
worker
proposals
for
fluid
drop
level,
k
and
corcus,
and
then
there
is
the
proposal
for
grant
investment
from
geek
style
to
opolis
inc,
and
I
want
to
open
up
the
floor
just
because
we
talked
a
little
about
that
last
week
before
we
do
that.
B
That
is
a
hundred
thousand
die
grant,
and
if
you
do
the
math
right
now,
we
actually
only
have
we
have
101
000
dot
x
die
in
dx
dial
base
an
nxt
excel
base.
Luckily
we
just
had
a
proposal
passed,
I
think
monday
to
transfer
100
beef
to
xi
base,
but
it
would
be
great
to
do
that
today
to
make
sure
that
the
funds
are
there
before.
That
proposal
is
slated
to
pass
in
five
days,
but
that's
a
pretty
big
proposal.
C
Well,
mainly,
just
let's
please
boost
it.
If
you
support
it
because.
D
No,
it's
interesting,
so
it's
it's
really
interesting.
We
only
found
out
okay.
So
just
the
background
is
originally
we
were
gonna.
We
thought
that
dx
ventures
opportunities
would
mainly
be
coming
from
like
main
net
funds.
We
like
in
general.
That's
where,
like
the
like,
the
creation
and
signal
proposal
to
like
create
the
the
initiative
and
stuff
was
all
on
maintenance.
What
was
what's
really
interesting?
We
only
found
out
in
the
last
like
one
week.
D
Basically,
since
you
know
worked
work
token
had
launched
to
the
public
community,
there's
like
a
few
thousand
people
that
already
hold
it
that
it's
actually
like
most
of
the
activity
is
taking
place
on
xdi.
So
there
is
a
mainnet
token
called
proto
work,
which
is
the
actual
real
token,
which
is
bridged
across
to
xdi
and
that's
where
all
of
their
governance
is
going
to
take
place
and
where
all
the
holders
are.
So
it's
actually
a
pretty
good
opportunity
for
dxdown
in
general,
especially
with
swapper.
D
Obviously-
and
so
it's
quite
interesting
that
as
we
learned
that
out,
it
made
sense
for
the
proposal
which
the
proposal
came
from
opolis
to
dx
tao
as
an
entity
to
to,
and
and
that's
we're
thinking
of
this
proposal
as
like
the
contract
between
a
third-party
entity
and
the
dao
itself,
and
so
we
thought
that
made
more
sense
on
maintenance.
But
in
this
case
it
it
works
really
well
on
xdi,
it's
a
quicker
proposal,
we're
like
a
little
late
to
be
in
their
public
announcement.
D
I
think
which
there
I
think
tammy
mentioned
is
like
today,
so
we're
hopefully
going
to
do
a
second
announcement
where,
like
it
might
actually
be
better
where
like
dx
dao,
joins
the
round
as
a
as
a
dow
participant,
and
there
could
be
like
a
second
announcement
with
like
fewer
entities
named,
which
could
then
we
could
promote
and
that
like
may
get
more
attention
than
just
being
like
one
of
the
mixed
in
20
when
the
first
announcement.
D
So
overall
it's
pretty
good,
it
will
be
the
first
dx
ventures,
invest
participation
and
opportunity,
and
it's
actually
like
an
investment
grant.
Actually
it's
just
it's
like
really
a
grant.
Today,
that
becomes
an
investment,
maybe
in
the
future
and
yeah
overall,
I
think,
there's
an
idea
to
maybe
write
an
article
like
a
maybe
create
a
dx
ventures
medium
like
so.
We
can
have
an
article
specifically
about
this
first
opportunity
and
the
process
and
what
was
learned
and
things,
and
that
could
be
helpful
for
moving
this
type
of
initiative
forward.
C
Right
and
actually
one
thing
just
for
future
governance
questions
that
came
up
for
me
when
I
was
doing
the
pseudo,
like
our
quote,
unquote
agreement
that
we're
doing
on
xdi
is
the
idea
of
okay.
When
we
create
all
these
bases
where
in
the
future,
are
we
going
to
live
right?
So
we
have
an
xdi
address
for
our
contract,
where,
if
you
know
we
receive
future
tokens
from
opolis
for
a
sale?
Where
are
those
tokens
going
to
go?
You
know
like?
Are
we
still
going
to
be
using
the
xdi
contract?
C
How
do
we
all
agree
upon
where
these
tokens
are
going
to
go?
Hopefully
someone
doesn't
say:
hey.
These
tokens
are
going
to
go
into
my
personal
address
right,
so
we
have
to
actually
this
is
kind
of
on
the
tech
side
and
maybe
something
that
we
could
even
ratify
on
the
forum
or
through
a
signal
proposal
on
mainnet.
I
think
we
need
to
say,
like
these
are
approved,
dxdow
approved
treasury
basis.
A
That's
actually
an
interesting
question.
I
I
would
say
mainnet
is
like
the
the
headquarter
right.
I
don't
expect
it
will
be
gone
in
four
years.
Five
years,
hopefully
yeah
no.
B
Yeah,
but
I
do
agree
that
it's
like,
and
this
is
authorization
really,
and
so
it's
not
just
like
another
new
dx
style
base
is,
is
set
up
but
like
there
needs
to
be
authorization
from
main
dx
style
base,
and
we
did
that
with
dxtal
with
xdxdow
like
when
we
first
did
like
started,
doing
work,
performance
and
worker
payments
in
there.
That
original
proposal
was
like.
We
are,
I
think
I
said
anoint
in
the
proposal
itself.
It
was
it
was
like
anoint.
B
This,
I
guess
address
as
like
the
official
dx,
dow
bass
and
so
with
arbitrary.
Just
think
about,
like
duke's
vote,
like
augusto,
is
working
on
deke's
vote,
which
is
awesome
and
he's
going
to
deploy
like
a
base
to
arbitrom.
That's
probably
going
to
have
like
the
same
rep
of
mainnet
or
vex
die,
but
like
that's,
not
a
dxdoubt
base.
Right
agusto
is
great,
like
he's,
gonna
launch
it,
but
like
it's
only
deep
stout
base
when,
like
the
main
base,
provides
some
like
authorization
and
being
like
this
is
the
official
one.
B
Are
other
concerns
on
like
yeah,
like
long
term,
if
we're
doing
a
deal
or
with
the
opposite
one
like
if
that's
coming
back
to
the
x
die
base,
then
like?
How
long
will
we
kind
of
be
there,
but
it
seems
like
most
of
the
things
on
x.
Die
are
part
of
the
xdi
community,
and
so
I
imagine
they'll
stick
around
yeah.
D
You
know
john,
the
opolis
team
asked
like
who
should
we
make
the
proposal
to
right
and,
and
we
and
a
small
group
of
people
said
you
should
make
the
proposal
to
this
dow
right,
there's
a
bunch
of
xdx
dials
on
xdi
right.
We
that
there's
a
small
group
that
said
you
should
make
the
proposal
of
this
dow
that
kind
of
like
so
if
he
made
it
to
like
the
wrong
dow,
it
would
not
have
been
it
wouldn't
be
voted
on
it
wouldn't
pass.
No
money
would
flow
to
opolis.
D
D
Ideally,
it
comes
to
this
same
address,
but
if,
if
for
some
reason
it
didn't
exist
or
didn't
work,
there
would
need
to
be
someone
informing
opolis
via
some
proof,
hopefully
before
they
like
send
out
tokens
to
a
new
address,
and
that
would
require
this
new
kind
of
verification.
Because
yeah
we
could
switch
dows.
I
guess
in
the
future,
but
it's
going
to
take
some
active
monitoring
and
if
it's
changes
from
this
actual
address.
F
Yeah
just
wanted
to
say
that
what
I
think
is
that
a
dao
is
is
not
just
an
address.
You
know
what
the
entire
dao
is
is
us
is
the
recorders
who
have
on
their
accounts.
F
F
Even
the
exile
ring
cavita,
the
the
one
that
we
are
testing
with
our
rep
accounts
here.
Everything
that
covers
the
dow
is
the
balance
that
it's
under
our
ownership
in
exile,
mainnet
in
our
other
network.
So
it's
not
that
we
are
just
one
network,
one
smart
contract,
one
address:
we
are
multiple
and
yeah.
We
have
to
look
ourselves
as
an
organization
that
have
that
connect
in
different
scenarios
like
in
different
in
different
networks,
and
that
you
can
change.
Actually
what
gives
value
to
the
dao.
Our
I
mean.
F
That
is
what
we
were
talking
for
example
yesterday,
when
we
are
talking
about
security
concerns
of
our
smart
contracts,
this
social
security
that
we
can
own
a
ton
of
money
and
we
don't
have
to
and
our
security
gains
from
our
accounts
from
our
voters,
and
that
is
that
happens
on
our
networks
and
if
we
are
not
just
one
address,
but
we
are
just
a
big
organization
that
can
change
I
can
I
can
mutate
to
other
addresses
to
other
networks,
so
we
should
look
at.
We
should
look
ourselves
as
that.
F
You
know
I
said
huge
organization
with
not
just
one
address,
not
just
one
the
exact
base
to
govern
the
more
actually.
Now
we
can
execute
multiple
decisions
in
different
bases.
B
Yeah
I
like
the
thinking
of
dx
dow,
as
would
you
say
like
like
gigantic
organization
right,
it's
all
about
like
what
are
the
connections
that
bind
those
things
together
and
such
a
powerful
connection
is
what
you
said
is
just
the
rep
distribution
being
able
to
be
like
transported
to
different
chains,
because
that's
that's
a
really
powerful
way
of
connecting
them.
So.
F
I
mean
that's,
that's
our
security.
We
are,
we
can
lose.
We
are
one
proposal
away
to
take
all
the
money.
You
know
to
take
everything
from
there.
It's
just
one
proposal
away
right.
You
can
execute.
You
can
create
one
proposal
in
the
contribution
required
to
send
all
the
leaders
to
one
address,
but
that
doesn't
happen
and
it
won't
get
executed,
because
our
security
lies
in
our
social
body
right
in
our
reputation,
distribution
that
is
enforced
on
the
on
on
the
code
level.
F
So
that
is
what
that
is
why
the
dao?
Well,
what
the
dao
is.
B
Yeah,
quite
let's
keep
going.
We
want
to
get
back
to
something
similar
to
that
later,
but
I
think
that's
it
for
xdi
bass
and
mainnet.
There
were
a
couple
recently
passed
proposals
that
I
just
wanted
to
highlight.
So
there
were
a
couple
different
rep
booths
for
limo
ferdinand
and
then
a
zac
contributor
payout
and
then,
as
I
said
before,
the
dxd
buyback
proposal
on
a
single
proposal
on
xdi
just
passed
and
then
importantly,
we
had
two.
B
I
guess:
10
really
huge
majority
votes
over
the
weekend
to
get
like
1.4
1.5
million
dollars
of
liquidity
into
swapper.
So
that's
cool
that
we
did
a
majority
vote,
but
the
other
important
thing
is,
if
you
did
vote
on
that
majority
vote,
make
sure
you
go
back
to
that
proposal
and
redeem
your
rep,
because
it
is
locked
in
that
proposal.
B
So
I
put
links
to
all
of
the
the
payer
proposals
in
the
governance
agenda,
but
you'll
have
to
do
it
on
basically
10
proposals,
because
it's
all
of
the
funding
proposals
of
which
there
are
five
and
then
all
of
the
the
pair
pair
proposals.
Actually
so
there's
eight
four
of
each.
B
I
guess
just
on
that.
The
one
thing
stake
is
in
was
part
of
this
proposal
and
that's
in
the
treasury,
but
not
in
swapper,
because
it's
not
part
of
the
ui.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
work
with
dow
stack
on
that.
If
we
want
to
have
a
proposal
that
someone
can
can
submit,
not
through
the
ui
that
provisions,
swapper
provisions,
liquidity
and
swapper
for
the
stakehair,
but
that
part
of
the
proposal
has
not
been
has
not
been
done
yet.
B
On
the
list
cool
and
then
just
a
couple
kind
of
it
for
the
proposal
round
up
just
a
couple
different
things
in
terms
of
discussion,
the
opposite,
picking
up
on
some
office
discussion,
I
wanted
to
just
get
some
feedback
on
some
ideas
on
like
how
we
standardize
some
of
these
governance
discussions.
So
I
think
there
was
a
lot
of
really
good
feedback
from
opolis,
but
there
was
also
this
like.
Well.
B
How
long
does
the
feedback
stage
take
before
we
go
to
proposal,
and
so
we've
been
pretty
flexible
in
terms
of
like
our
standards,
for
this,
like,
I
think,
there's
kind
of
an
ad
hoc
approach,
but
in
general
it's
proposals
need
to
first
exist
in
the
forum
at
some
point
and
be
discussed
within
the
geeksdout
community
before
being
submitted
to
a
formal
proposal.
That's
just
kind
of
the
culture.
B
I
think
that
rep
holders
have
developed
in
terms
of
acceptable
proposals
and
acceptable
levels
of
transparency
and
disclosure,
but
we
don't
really
have
like
hard
and
fast
numbers
on
that.
It's
not
like
working
proposals
need
to
be
up
for
this
amount
or
treasury
diversification.
You
know
different
different
ways
with
that
and
and
with
the
adventures
here
was
kind
of
the
same
thing.
Do
we
just
have
this
like
endless
debate
or
so
yeah,
just
kind
of
curious?
What
people
thought
about
like?
B
Maybe
should
we
be
trying
to
put
more
structure
and
standards
on
like
the
proposal
process,
particularly
as
it
comes
to
discussion
to
try
to
standardize
this
a
bit
which
would
maybe
expedite
things,
but
I
think
also
just
provide
some
clarity
for
certain
proposals.
So
any
thoughts
or
comments
on
this.
D
Yeah,
I
think
it's
very
important
to
not
do
what
ex-die
governance
did,
which
is
brand
new
spankin
non-governance,
and
do
the
forum
post
and
the
snapshot
proposal
they
use
snapshot
but
like
at
the
same
immediate
time
and
the
biggest
problem
that
it
caused
was
like
community
members
of
the
x-die
community
didn't
have
a
chance
to
discuss
anything
or
give
any
feedback
right.
So
gx
dao
has
a
pretty
good
governance
process
for
us
doing
for
a
long
time
and
there
is
a
general
practice
to
do
your.
D
You
know
post
about
or
share
in
channels
post
about
it
mention
on
a
call
post,
a
forum
post,
and
I
actually
think
that
asynchronous
and
we've
seen
this
with
the
opolis
discussion.
We've
seen
it
with.
D
You
know
the
omen.
Competition
coming
up
like
doing
asynchronous
discussions
in
the
forum
is
very
powerful,
because
people
have
said
that
they
can't
watch
videos
so
like.
If
you
don't
come
to
a
call,
like
you,
don't
know
anything
about
some
new
proposal
you
it
has
to
be
that
there
has
to
be
discussion
in
the
forum
that
people
have
the
ability
to
link
to
and
read
about
and
and
voice
their
opinions.
D
And
I
think
there
was
a
general
thing
about,
like
maybe
doing
more
dxd
snapshots
around
different
discussions,
and
that
can
actually
be
done
pretty
early
on
in
like
because
it's
just
a
signal
proposal.
It
can
be
implemented
pretty
early
on
in
like
big
important
discussion
topics,
so
that
dx,
dow
in
general,
is
aware
of
what
dxd
holders
think
about
a
certain
thing,
and
so
the
the
more
you
do
that
early
in
the
forum
and
even
the
snapshot
and
include
a
link
to
it
in
the
forum
and
have
discussions
in
the
forum.
D
D
There
was
one
dxd
holder
who
had
voiced
opposition
or
questions
about
like
a
single
proposal
and
like
that
extended
the
whole
thing
two
or
three
weeks
and
what,
if,
like
a
week
later,
another
another
person
community
member
comes
in
and
voices
a
new
question
like
you
could
literally
attack
the
dow
by
just
extending
discussion
week
after
week
after
week,
so
some
general
rules
of
like
when
it's
okay
to
make
a
formal
proposal,
because
our
next
time
proposals
are
cheap.
So,
like
you
can
actually
do
a
proposal.
D
And
if
discussion
changes
you
could
you
know,
vote
that
one
down
and
do
anoth
another
proposal.
You
don't
want
to
do
that,
but
you
have
the
ability
to
and
a
lot
of
times,
discussions
don't
actually
really
start
and
people
don't
pay
a
lot
of
attention
until
there's.
An
actual
proposal
on
the
alchemy,
sometimes
like
the
forum
post,
doesn't
actually
ignite
the
discussion
until
the
until
they're
forced
to
buy
a
forum
proposal,
alchemy
proposal.
B
I
think
it
literally-
this
is
literally
the
definition
of
filibuster
right.
It's
like
prolonged
debate,
to
delay
execution
of
this.
I
yeah
I
mean
I
think
there
are.
You
know
there
are
a
couple
things
I
think
with
this,
like
with
holographic
consensus
and
voting
on
geeks
dow
voting
is
final.
Like
once
you
vote,
you
can't
change
your
vote
on
that
same
proposal.
B
So
there
is
something
about
people
that
are
like
there's
a
certain
amount
of
time
when
the
proposal
is
boosted
when,
like
I
need
to
make
a
decision
for
that,
and
so
and
I
can't
go
back
and
change
that
decision,
so
I
think
we
want
to
have
some
some
of
that
in
there
and
then
I
also
think
like
geek
style.
Governance
is
not
meant
to
be
require.
B
Like
unanimous
votes
like
we
can
have
dissent,
we
can
have
people
disagree
and
they
should
voice
those
disagreements,
but
like
that,
just
disagreeing
with
the
proposal
is
not
enough
to
to
stop
it
like.
We
can
have
proposals
that
are
passed
with.
You
know
5149
right
and
we
have
the
government.
We
should
have
the
governance
system
to
do
that.
B
We
have
that
on
change,
but
we
do
have
like
the
culture
to
make
sure
we
have
enough
discussion
time,
but
then,
once
that
discussion
time
is
over,
like
we
move
to
move
to
a
vote
so
yeah,
I
don't
know
if
we're
ready
for
hard
and
fast
rules
yet.
But
I
just
think
that
clarifying
some
of
this
would
help,
I
think,
formulate
these
discussions
as
they
go
through.
C
C
I
think
that
I
think
something
like
you
said
could
be
used
like
something
just
like
even
just
saying
you
know
this
much
time
in
the
forum
and
then,
if
some,
if
there's
a
real,
if
there's
some,
you
know
a
reasonable
issue
that
we
think
comes
to
light.
We
should
at
least
address
it
on
a
call
right
and
then
from
there
it
can
go
to
vote.
I
think
that
could
be
enough
as
well.
I
mean
the
dxd
holder.
Snapshot
was
good,
but
skye
did
mention
how
the
participation
rate
is
pretty
low.
C
B
Just
a
couple
ones
that
we
have,
I
think,
like
my
general
rule
of
thumb,
is
like.
I
think
it's
something
sitting
in
the
forum
for
a
week
and
it's
been
brought
up
on
at
least
one
call
that
it's
generally
acceptable
ready
to
go
to
proposal
submission.
But
that's
just
like
a
heuristic,
and
it
would
depend
a
lot
on
what
the
actual
proposal
is
and
what
the
disputes
or
disagreements
are.
B
Okay,
next
is
syncing
rep
to
mainnet,
so
there's
been
a
discussion
kind
of
the
last
week
or
so
about
figuring
out
how
we
start
issuing
some
of
these
mainnet
rep
awards
that
have
been
that
contributors
have
earned.
How
do
we
start
issuing
those
on
mainnet,
given
that
we've
been
doing
x
die
for
all
of
the
actual
compensation
payouts?
So
the
two
ways
we
think
about
doing
this
or
like
the
long-term
way
is
we'll
probably
have
another
scheme
installed
that
can
distribute
multiple
rep
awards
in
a
single
proposal.
B
That
will
take
some
time
and
I
think
we
want
to
be
able
to
figure
out
how
we
can
get
contributors,
the
rep
that
they've
earned
like
over
the
last
couple
of
months
in
the
short
term.
So
I
think
it
probably
makes
sense
for
us
to.
B
B
This
would
still
be-
probably
you
know,
maybe
a
thousand
dollars
proposal
given
like
where
eth
is
at
now
in
terms
of
like
the
submitting
boosting
voting
and
proposal,
and
I
think
we
probably
have
around
15
16
17
addresses
that
need
rep
syncs,
we're
still
crunching
these
numbers,
the
contributor
ux
team,
but
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
this
to
be
an
expense
that
geeksdale
has
in
terms
of
distributing
rep
to
the
contributors
that
have
earned
it
as
long
as
we're
batching
it
up
in
three
month
increments.
B
So
we
need
to
get
a
forum
post
up
about
the
the
rep
earned
over
the
last
couple
months.
That's
been
all
the
proposals
that
everyone's
been
doing
and
we'll
work
on
that,
but
I
just
wanted
to
check
with
everyone
here
on
what
they
think
about.
You
know
having
individuals
submit
proposals,
contributors
submit
proposals
to
to
claim
their
main
rep
awards
over
the
next
month
or
two.
D
So
one
one
really
good
thing
is:
by
making
the
conscious
decision
to
move
a
lot
of
the
activity
to
x
die
that
that
has
caused
a
problem
where
you
don't
have
rep
on
mainnet
right
so,
but
that
basically
saved
probably
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
right,
and
so
this
is
now
a
twenty
thousand
dollar
cost
to
sync
that
rep
back
to
mainnet
for
three
months
or
now,
it's
four
months
or
five
months
of
time,
so
you
basically
saved
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
then
spend
twenty
thousand
dollars.
That's
a
pretty
good
deal.
F
Yeah,
I
wanted
to
point
out
that
what
the
work
we
are
doing
in
exile
issuing
more
right
across
a
different
account.
It's
awesome.
That
is
what
we
should
be
aiming
for
to
better
rep
distribution
and
more
decentralized
red
bull
ring
right
is
very,
very,
very
important
that
this
is
reflected
on
mainnet,
because
this
is
where
our
security
games
are
right.
The
more
rep
there
is
three
video
maintenance,
the
better,
so
we
are
doing
great
work
on
xi,
but
more
most
of
our
fans
like,
like
100
of
our
fans,
are
remaining.
F
So
what
I
think
we
should
start
exploring
is
to
yeah
sync
rep
from
from
mainnet
I
mean
from
xi
to
mainet.
We
are
now
one
is
going
to
be
requesting
rep
all
minute.
Now,
due
to
gas
cost
right
so
yeah
we
should
find
out.
Oh
man
stop
more
yeah
yeah.
We
should
find
out.
We
should
design
a
way
to
update
mainnet,
to
match
xz
repetition,
because
yeah.
D
D
F
E
G
We've
done,
we've
made
a
pretty
solid
effort
to
minimize
the
costs
like,
and
we
just
got
to
kind
of
do
a
trade-off
on
like
what
is
the
cost
to
do
it
individually
versus
in
a
batch
and
like
what
is
security
concern
there
I
mean
if
and
there's
just
going.
G
F
Yeah,
no,
no,
no.
We
should
be
able
to
write
a
simple
scheme
added
to
our
governance
system
and
he
should
have
there
the
problem.
There
is
yeah,
it's
going
to
be
how
to
work
with
thousand
argument.
That
is
that
is
eventually
going
to.
I
know
I
don't
know
if
it
disappeared
or
something
it
would
be
awesome
to
get
someone
from
dallas.
You
know
telling
us
what
is
what
is
going
to
happen
with
without
giving
in
the
in
the
long
run.
F
G
I
can
speak
to
this.
I
don't
think
we
have
much
shirt
like
so.
I
think
that
the
plan
from
dow
stack-
you
know
I've
talked
to
matan
and
we
do
have
you
know
channels
open.
There
are
people
that
does
like
still
working
on
alchemy.
So
it's
not
like
an
immediate
like
problem
right,
but
they
are
planning
like
they're
only
in
maintenance
mode
with
alchemy,
right
now
and
they're,
like
basically
planning
to
sunset,
like
they
want
out
essentially
right.
G
So
over
the
longer
run,
we
need
to
think
of
like
what
we're
doing
to
maintain,
alchemy
ourselves
or
like
provide
an
alternative.
G
You
know,
I
don't
think
they're
going
to
leave
us
like
high
and
dry,
but
like
they
have
already
expressed
the
desire
to
basically
like
sun,
set
their
involvement
with
alchemy.
I
don't
know
what
that
means
for
jen
the
token
but
yeah
in
terms
of
alchemy.
I
think
we
we
need
to
come
up
with
a
plan
to
replace
it.
F
Yeah
yeah
here
I'm
here
now
talking
about
the
minting
the
multiple
means
of
rep,
which
is
something
that
we
are
going
to
need.
Eventually,
there
are
two
ways
that
I
seem
to
fix
it.
One
is
that
we
are
the
new
schemer
that
feature
on
on
alchemy,
which
is
not
our
under
control
right.
The
we
are
depending
on
double
stack
on
that
or
we
wait
for
the
expo
to
became
the
main
net.
We
use
that
so
we
have,
I
think
both
of
them
are
going
to
take.
Maybe
the
same
time.
B
Yeah-
just
I
mean
just
to
I
think
the
alchemy
stuff
is,
is
a
big
discussion
and
separate,
and
we
will
get
a
dick's
vote
update
from
augusto
at
the
end
of
this,
but
I
think
for
this
specific
I
I
think
our
short-term
goal
should
be
having
individual
contributors
submit
proposals
to
claim
three
months
of
rep
rewards
on
mainnet
in
like
doing
that
over
the
next
month
and
we'll
need
to
document
that
and
then
the
medium
long-term
solution
is
getting
like
a
real
new
scheme
installed,
and
for
that
like,
we
should
make
sure
that
we're
gotten
everything
buttoned
up
and
that
also
may
align
with
some
of
the
dx
vote
efforts.
B
G
Have
an
idea
there's
a
way
we
can
kind
of
hack
this
to
reduce
overhead
if
we
wanted
right
like
so
we're
already
running
a
lot
of
treasury
diversification
proposals
through
so
each
one
of
those
proposals
could
also
be
doing
a
rep
assignment
right.
So
if
we
are
clever
about
this,
we
can
simply
like
do
it
like
one
at
a
time
you
know
to
start
syncing
people's
reps
on
these
different
and
it
just
saves
the
cost
right
like
we're
just
gonna,
which
is
significant.
G
Now
right
I
mean
that
we're
talking
about
thousands
of
dollars
to
pass
that
proposal.
Like
I
mean
if,
if
it
costs
20
grand
to
sink
the
rep,
I
think
that's
a
justifiable
overhead
cost,
but
if
we
can
reduce
it
like
we
should
take
those
opportunities
you
send
rep
to
a
different
address
in
the
same
proposal.
D
Oh
sorry,
chris
real
quick
on
timing,
since
we
do
two-month
worker
proposals
on
x-time,
we've
been
doing
that.
Theoretically,
you
should
really
do
this
think
after
four
months
you
want
to
have
like
make
sure
you
have
two
two-month
proposals
and
then
do
it.
Three
months
doesn't
really
work,
so
it's
either
two
or
four
months.
B
Yeah,
I
see
what
you're
saying
you
do
in
the
middle
right
yeah,
let's
think
about
we'll
figure
out
the
logistics
of
that,
because
that
makes
sense.
I
think
we
had
first
started
doing.
Proposals
on
in
mid
february
on
x
die.
So
that's
been
three
months
since
then.
So
that
was
my
the
reason.
But
if
we're
planning
for
this,
we
could
just
cut
it
off
at
four
months,
but
we'll
we'll
figure
this
out.
B
I
Yeah,
hey
guys,
I
mean
hey
everyone,
just
an
update
on
the
contributor
experience
squad.
We
had
our
first
meeting
with
position
last
week
to
help
us
find
our
next
marketing
lead
after
meeting
with
trey
and
chase.
I
One
thing
I
want
to
follow
up
on
as
well
is
that
the
tracking
sheet
on
dow
talk
with
all
the
contributors
dxd
vesting
payments
that
was
posted
last
week.
If
you
haven't
yet,
please
take
a
chance
to
review
the
sheet,
and
let
us
know
if
you
have
any
questions
or
if
there
are
any
discrepancies,
we'd
be
happy
to
go
over
it
and
review
it
with
you.
I'm
really
pleased
and
think
everybody's
doing
a
great
job
of
submitting
their
worker
proposals.
I
I
B
Awesome
and
just
on
that,
if
anyone's
interested
they
did
send
over
position,
did
send
over
a
first
batch
of
like
crypto
first
candidates
and
we're
gonna
look
at
those
a
little
bit
on
the
contributor
ux
call
after
after
this.
If
anyone
is
interested,
they
can
reach
out.
B
Cool
and
then
next
almost
at
the
end
of
the
agenda,
is
dxd
buyback
execution.
B
So
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
like
touch
on
this
now,
considering
that
the
signal
proposal
for
x
die
has
passed
and
the
the
signal
pros
on
mainnet
presumably
will
pass
tomorrow
evening,
and
so
after
that,
you
know
that
will
be
clear
signal
from
the
ext
from
deke
style
that
it
hopes
to
move
forward
with
the
the
buyback
program.
But
of
course,
then
we
need
to
actually
have
proposals
that
execute
that
buyback.
B
So
I
think,
starting
thursday
night
starting
friday,
we
can
start
to
submit
those
proposals,
and
I
think
most
people
think
that
those
that
we
should
start
with
this
on
xdi,
so
xdi
would
be
ready
to
submit
those
proposals
on
friday
because
the
multi-call
scheme
there
does
not
have
a
white
list
for
mainnet.
It
will
take,
I
think,
another
four
or
five
days
for
for
the
multi-call
scheme
to
be
installed
before
those
those
proposals
can
be
executed
and
for
both
on
xda
and
mainnet.
B
It
takes
two
proposals,
a
funding
proposal
and
a
multi-call
proposal
that
actually
submits
the
trade
itself.
Those
can
run
concurrently,
but
so
yeah,
so
just
talking
about
like
with
xdi.
I
don't
know
how
we
want
to
do
this,
but
I
guess
there's
some
maybe
be
on
the
lookout
for
a
proposal
over
the
next
five
days,
and
I
mean
starting
on
friday
and
I
think
it'd
be
really
cool
to
potentially
get
a
majority
vote
for
this
into
kind
of
executing
the
buyback
there.
A
I
think
they
worked
out
last
time
on
the
weekend
right,
but
I
definitely
had
the
sentiment
that
people
had
weekends
and
we
might
yeah
weekends
could
be
difficult,
but
now
that
we
know
ahead
of
time
that,
like
weekend
is
majority
of
our
time,
maybe
all
right
holders
are
could
yeah
could
do
us.
The
favor
of
voting
on
on
the
weekend.
B
B
We
want
these
proposals
to
pass
and
like
as
a
rep
holder,
I
wanted
to
pass
immediately
as
it
you
know,
because
I
think
that's
important
but
like
even
if
it
passed
through
a
holographic
consensus
like
that's
still
like
okay,
so
I
think
we
can
get
in
the
habit
of
like
this
is
an
important
proposal,
we're
pushing
for
majority
vote
but
like
and
we'd
like
to
get
there,
but
that's
not
like
dependent
on
the
you
know,
proposal
passing,
but
I
also
don't
know
if,
like
we
like
weekends,
might
just
be
the
time,
because
that's
when
we've
done
this,
because
I
think
it
tends
to
be
like
at
the
end
of
the
work
week
when
we're
like
ready
to
submit
these
things.
B
A
Who
who's
going
to
lead
the
or
like?
Is
there
someone
who
knows
how
to
create
those
limit
orders
on
gpv,
one
or
next
time.
B
Well,
there's
a
great
technical
explainer
attached
to
the
the
buy
back
program
signal
which
I
think
outlines
what
inputs
should
be,
but
it
is
like
a
little
tricky
and
so
yeah
I
don't
I
don't
know
we
obviously
need
to
go.
It's
kind
of
like
liquidity.
Provisioning
where,
like
there
is
some
risk
that
the
proposal
will
fail.
If
all
not
all
the
parameters
are
set
correctly,
got
it
got
it
yeah.
A
And
also
like,
I
think,
for
everyone,
it
is
clear
that
dxd
is
still
extremely
undervalued
and
rep
holders
need,
like
have
a
huge
responsibility
now
to
make
sure
that
we,
like
the
d
style,
is
making
sure
that
to
do
like
the
buyback
as
soon
as
possible.
A
There
was
a
lot
of
delay
like
we
had
several
weeks
of
delays
because
of
external
project
teams
dependencies,
and
I
think
now
we
actually
need
to
move
quickly
and
execute
fast
to
buy
back
as
much
as
dxd
as
we
can,
based
on
the
approved
buyback
proposal.
B
B
Cool
all
right-
and
I
think
that
was
it-
we
could
roll
into
the
dx
vote,
update
augusto.
F
Yeah
yeah,
sorry,
I
wasn't
gonna.
I
wasn't
gonna
dx
vote.
What
happened
on
the
episode
yeah?
We
finished
the
fixes
on
the
wallet
scheme
issue
that
we
found
on
the
smart
contracts
and
we
had
a
very
good
call
yesterday,
organized
by
john,
where
we
talked
with
other
workers
about
the
funds
that
the
issue
that
we
found
and
the
and
you
know
the
like.
The
security
risk
involves
in
using
this
new
scheme
that
is
going
to
this
game
and
the
permission
registry.
F
F
And
then
I
was
working
on
the
deployment
on
arbitron
lot
of
issues
there,
a
lot
of
roadblocks,
because
arabic
was
up
and
down
and
enabled
uncommon
happened
and
they
weren't
ready.
So
it
went
down.
Then
it
went
down
again
and
then,
when
I
deployed
the
faucet
wasn't
working
so
sure
story
is
that
the
deployment
on
arbitrary
can
happen.
F
I
tested
it
and
we
are
able
to
use
arbitrary
on
the
export,
but
I'm
going
to
put
it
on
hold
till
we
need
it
did
we
have
the
smart
contracts
deployed
on
arbitrary
arbitrage,
we
need
and
we
need
to
be
deployed
there.
There
is.
There
is
no
rush
right
now
to
having
deployed
there,
because
also
it's
just
an
entire
testnet
that
doesn't
seem
to
be
completely
working.
So
I
have
several
doubts
about
arbitrary,
but
let's
say
maybe
we
are
surprised
and
finally
works.
F
The
the
goal,
I
think,
is
it's
a
realistic
goal
to
put
that
we
are
going
to
have
dx
vote
on
xi
by
the
end
of
this
month,
where
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
send
some
funds
and
start
testing
and
play
and
playing
with
them
requirement
thing
that
I
need
is
to
yeah
later
we
will
need
to
figure
out
where,
where
do
we
want?
Where
do
we
want
to
take
the
rep
from
I
guess,
from
fsi
network?
So
we
are
going
to
be
deploying
to
net
website
but
yeah?
That's
it.
B
Cool,
I
hope,
the
the
things
you
said
about
arbitrary,
more
of
just
problems
yesterday,
maybe
just
with
the
the
test
net,
but
it
sounds
like
like
when
arbor
trims
ready
to
go
like
we're,
ready
to
go
or
you're
ready
to
go
to
deploy,
and
then
I
think
like
that
is
we
want
to
do
that
so
that
we
can
launch
swapper
on
arbitron,
because
swapper
and
arbor
trim
can't
come
until
we
have
a
dx
style
base
on
arbor
trump.
B
B
So
it
would
be
good
for
us
to
like
get
these
things
lined
up
like
you've
done
with
gig's
vote
for
when
arbor
stream
is
ready,
that
we
can
move
quickly
and
I
think,
there's
yeah
and
maybe
another
corresponding
track-
that
we
need
to
think
of
about
getting
liquidity
and
funds
into
arbor
trump
there.
So.
F
Yeah
about
that,
are
we
already
saying
how
much
how
much
funds
are
we
going
to
put
there
because
really
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
bring
me
any
any.
How
do
you
say
any
confidence?
What
when
it
was
using
a
video,
even
the
vlog
explorer,
you
are
not
able
you
are
not
even
able
to,
for
example,
verify
smart
contracts.
You
know
to
debug
all
the
transaction.
Everything
that's
happening
so,
on
my
eyes,
arbitrary
usability
on
the
user
level
is
a
long
way.
F
B
Yeah,
I
don't
know
if
other
people
have
thoughts
but
yeah,
but
I
think
there's
a
big
benefit
to
swapper,
having
like
some
liquidity,
that
is
deek
style,
provided,
which
is
in
like
what
I'm
thinking
like
even
the
one
to
two
million
range,
because
that
means
people
have
something
instantly
trade,
and
it
also
means
people
can
add
liquidity
and
other
tokens,
and
you
know
very
easily
do
that.
So
I
think
that
is
really
the
only
goal
of
putting
funds
into
arbor
drum
is
like
specifically
for
swapper.
B
I
don't
think
we
should
be
putting
like
you
know,
doing
worker
payments
out
of
there,
because
we're
pretty
set
well
set
up
on
on
on
xdi.
But
I
think
the
the
real
opportunity
on
swapper
I
mean
on
arbitrary
for
swapper
is
not
actually
about
textile
liquidity
or
just
about
deep
style
liquidity,
but
also
about
the
potential
launch
of
swapper
token,
which
will
you
know
would
hopefully
draw
in
liquidity
from
other
sources
to
swapper
on
arbitrom.
B
So
yeah
I
mean
I
don't
expect
like
a
huge
amount
in
the
initial
stages,
just
because
it's
about
getting
that
initial
batch
of
liquidity
for
swapper.
But
it's
very
much
about
like
supporting
swapper
than
it
is
about
like
moving
funds
there
for
operational
purposes
and
so
for
the
supporting
swapper.
It's
going
to
be
like
highly
dependent
upon
like
the
competitive
opportunity.
That's
on
arbor
trim
there
and
whether
that's
worth
the
risk
of
moving
moving
more
funds
but
you're
the
first
I've
heard
mostly
good
things
about
arbitrary.
B
Like
more
that,
they
are
like
that.
I
guess
that
they
are
I've,
heard
more
dev
friendly
than
other
chains.
I
guess
maybe
that's
in
comparison
to
the
layer
twos
that
are
not
like
the
other
layer.
Two
is
like
optimism
that
are
not.
I
mean
zk,
sync
and
the
other
ones
that
are
not
perfectly
evm
compatible,
but
I
don't
expect
anyone
any
other
chains
to
have
like
etherscan
immediately
but
block
explorers
are
incredibly
important
for
users
being
able
to
find
that.
B
B
All
of
these
things
that
they,
you
know,
are
engaging
and
hopefully
are
kind
of
executing
on
that
if
they
could
do
that,
could
do
that
because
I
mean
just
think
about
polygon
and
how
polygon
has
kind
of
blown
up
over
the
last
couple
months,
and
so
I
think,
there's
some
opportunity
for
that
to
happen
on
arbitrary.
F
Yeah
my
one
of
my
concerns
that
it
seems
fragile
right
now
on
testnet
like
they
have
all
the
notes.
I
don't
know
how
many
applications
or
how
many
protocols
are
going
to
be
running
their
notes.
So
I'm
just
going
to
be
waiting
there
to
see
how
to
see
how
healthy
the
network
is
going
to
be,
but
that
is
what
that
is.
That
was
my
take
out
there.
It
looked
fragile.
B
I
just
love
the
image
of
like
arbitrary,
I'm
just
I
mean
augusta,
just
camping
out
on
arbor
trim
like
waiting
waiting
for
others
to
come,
but
I
appreciate
the
skeptic
skeptical
eye
and
so
we'll
have
to
keep
keep
those
in
mind.
G
Yeah
I
mean,
I
think,
it's
a
good
observation,
like
the.
I
think
it's
likely
that
there
will
be
a
rocky
start.
You
know
it's
kind
of
a
double-edged
sword
right,
it's
a
highly
anticipated
launch.
So
that's
one
reason
is
div-wise.
We
need
to
keep
our
eyes
on
it,
but
that
also
puts
a
lot
of
pressure
on
these
teams,
and
you
know
I
think
it's
likely
to
have
some
kind
of
a
rockiness
to
the
beginning,
and
so
we
should
be.
G
B
F
Yeah
eager
eager
to
have
it
on
x-I
right
now,
I'm
re-deploying
everything
on
rinkeby,
I'm
making
sure
that
we
are
going
to
be
able
to
test
to
test
it
there,
because
now
we
did
the
first
audit
the
we
got
the
first
review.
We
did
the
the
first
smart
contact
for
the
changes
on
smart
contracts.
Now
we
decided
to
do
another
audit
of
the
permission
registry
or
quality
scheme
again
and
after
that,
after
that
finish,
we
are
going
to
be
good
to
go
to
debate
to
excite.
F
So
between
that
between
that
time,
my
focus
is
going
to
be
to
bring
to
fix
all
the
issues
that
we
have
on
the
on
on
the
application
on.
There
is
a
lot
of
things
that
that
can
be
fixed.
It's
barely
working,
so
yeah
eager
to
have
it
on
next
side
and
to
start
using
it.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
great
a
great
experience
for
for
our
users.
B
Other
anything
else
comments
things.
People
on
the
mind
want
to
say
before
we
conclude.